law and economics-charles w. upton takings. when the government takes property, the constitution...

21
Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings

Post on 19-Dec-2015

212 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton

Takings

Page 2: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Takings

• When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. – The government exercises its power of eminent

domain, condemns the property and then pays the fair market value.

Page 3: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

An Example

• A city wants to build a fire station on Sam’s property. – It sees benefits (use value) of $70,000.– While the market value of the property is

$50,000, Sam would would want $80,000 to compensate him for his use value.

Page 4: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

An Example

• A city wants to build a fire station on Sam’s property. – It sees benefits (use value) of $70,000.

– While the market value of the property is $50,000, Sam would would want $80,000 to compensate him for his use value.

• In general, however, the city can take the property for $50,000, the fair market value, reducing the use value form $80,000, to $70,000.

Page 5: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

An Example

• A city wants to build a fire station on Sam’s property. – It sees benefits (use value) of $70,000.

– While the market value of the property is $50,000, Sam would would want $80,000 to compensate him for his use value.

• In general, however, the city can take the property for $50,000, the fair market value, reducing the use value form $80,000, to $70,000.

This is not Hicks-Kaldor efficient.

Sam loses $30,000; the city gains $20,000.

Page 6: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

An Example

• A city wants to build a fire station on Sam’s property. – It sees benefits (use value) of $70,000.

– While the market value of the property is $50,000, Sam would would want $80,000 to compensate him for his use value.

• In general, however, the city can take the property for $50,000, the fair market value, reducing the use value form $80,000, to $70,000.

This is not Hicks-Kaldor efficient.

Sam loses $30,000; the city gains $20,000.

The alternative would be to require the city to pay Sam its true value, but only Sam knows its

true value. He has every incentive to

overstate its value in any litigation.

Page 7: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Owner Fair Market Value

Use Value to the Owner

Use Value as a fire Station

Sam Jones

$50,000 $80,000 $70,000

Mildred Brown

$55,000 $60,000 $68,000

Page 8: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Owner Fair Market Value

Use Value to the Owner

Use Value as a fire Station

Sam Jones

$50,000 $80,000 $70,000

Mildred Brown

$55,000 $60,000 $68,000

The Right Choice

Page 9: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Owner Fair Market Value

Use Value to the Owner

Use Value as a fire Station

Sam Jones

$50,000 $80,000 $70,000

Mildred Brown

$55,000 $60,000 $68,000

The Right Choice

The City’s Choice

Page 10: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

The Case for Eminent Domain

• Indispensable property.

Page 11: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

The Case for Eminent Domain

• Indispensable property.– There is only one property that would do the

job. A mountain pass where a fort must be built to protect against invasion.

Page 12: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

The Case for Eminent Domain

• Indispensable property.– There is only one property that would do the

job. A mountain pass where a fort must be built to protect against invasion.

• When multiple properties must be purchased.

Page 13: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

The Case for Eminent Domain

• Indispensable property.– There is only one property that would do the

job. A mountain pass where a fort must be built to protect against invasion.

• When multiple properties must be purchased. – There may be a transactions cost argument

Page 14: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Eminent Domain for Private Use

• The taking power is used sometimes to take property from one person to another.

Page 15: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Eminent Domain for Private Use

• The taking power is used sometimes to take property from one person to another. – Urban renewal.– Condemnation of land for a baseball field.

Page 16: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Eminent Domain for Private Use

• Sam Jones owns property that the market values at $40,000.

Page 17: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Eminent Domain for Private Use

• Sam Jones owns property that the market values at $40,000. – The use value to him is $80,000.

Page 18: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Eminent Domain for Private Use

• Sam Jones owns property that the market values at $40,000. – The use value to him is $80,000. – Sally Smith wants the house and the use value

to her is $90,000. .

Page 19: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Eminent Domain for Private Use

• Sam Jones owns property that the market values at $40,000. – The use value to him is $80,000. – Sally Smith wants the house and the use value

to her is $90,000. – A deal can clearly be struck for (say) $85,000.

Page 20: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

Eminent Domain for Private Use

• Sam Jones owns property that the market values at $40,000. – The use value to him is $80,000. – Sally Smith wants the house and the use value

to her is $90,000. – A deal can clearly be struck for (say) $85,000. – But suppose Sally Smith gets the state to

condemn the property for $50,000 and then sell it to her.

Page 21: Law and Economics-Charles W. Upton Takings. When the government takes property, the Constitution requires that “just compensation”. –The government exercises

Takings

End

©2004 Charles W. Upton