layer of protection
TRANSCRIPT
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 1/48
Layer of Protection
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 2/48
2
ALARMS
SIS
RELIEF
CONTAINMENT
EMERGENCY RESPONSE
BPCS
Strength in Reserve
• BPCS - Basic processcontrol
• Alarms - draw attention
• SIS - Safety interlock
system to stop/start
equipment
• Relief - Prevent
excessive pressure
• Containment - Prevent
materials from reaching,
workers, community or
environment
• Emergency Response -
evacuation, fire fighting,
health care, etc.
A
U
T
O
M
AT
I
O
N
Layers of Protection for High Reliability
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 3/48
3
• Four Layers in the Safety Hierarchy
• Methods and equipment required at all
four layers
• Process examples for every layer
• Workshop
Safety Through Automation
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 4/48
4
All Processes must have Safety Through
Automation
• Safety must account for failures of equipment
(including controller) and personnel
• Multiple failure must be covered
• Responses should be limited, try to maintain
production if possible
• Automation systems contribute to safe
operation
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 5/48
5
SAFETY STRENGTH IN DEPTH !
PROCESS
RELIEF SYSTEM
SAFETY INTERLOCK SYSTEM
ALARM SYSTEM
BASIC PROCESSCONTROL SYSTEM
Closed-loop control to maintain processwithin acceptable operating region
Bring unusual situation to attentionof a person in the plant
Stop the operation of part of process
Divert material safely
Seriousness
of event
Four
independent
protection
layers (IPL)
Redundancy – Key Concept in Process Safety
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 6/48
6
1. Safety
2. Environmental Protection
3. Equipment Protection
4. Smooth Operation &
Production Rate
5. Product Quality6. Profit
7. Monitoring & Diagnosis
We are now emphasizing
these topics
Control systems are designed to achieve well-
defined objectives, grouped into seven categories.
Objective of process Control
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 7/48
7
• Technology - Multiple PIDs, cascade, feedforward, etc.
• Always control unstable variables (Examples in flash?)
• Always control “quick” safety related variables
- Stable variables that tend to change quickly (Examples?)
• Monitor variables that change very slowly
- Corrosion, erosion, build up of materials
• Provide safe response to critical instrumentation failures
- But, we use instrumentation in the BPCS?
1. Basic process Control System (BPCS)
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 8/48
Control Strategy
•
Feedback Control – Single-loop feedback
• Overcoming disturbances
– Cascade
– Feed forward
– Ratio
• Constraints
– Split-range, override/select control• Multivariable
– multi-loop
– Decoupling
– Multivariable control
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 9/48
Level Control on a Tank
Fin
LT
Fout
Lsp
LC
Without a cascade levelcontroller, changes in
downstream pressure disturb
the tank level.
Ordinary Feedback Control
Fin
FC
LT
RSP
FT
Fout
Lsp
LC
With cascade level controller, changes
in downstream pressure will be
absorbed by the flow controller before
they can significantly affect tank level
because the flow controller responds
faster to this disturbance than the tank
level process.
Cascade Control
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 10/48
Reactor Temperature Control
Feed
Product
TT
Cooling
water
TCTT
TC
RSP
With cascade, changes in the cooling water temperature will be
absorbed by the slave loop before they can significantly affect the
reactor temperature.
Cascade Control
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 11/48
Multiple Cascade Example
FT
AC
AT
TCTT
FC
RSP
RSP
This approach works because the flow control loop is much
faster than the temperature control loop which is much faster
than the composition control loop.
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 12/48
Level Control: Feedback vs feedforward
Make-upWater
To SteamUsers
LT
LC
Feedback-only mustabsorb the variations in
steam usage by feedback
action only.
Make-upWater
To Steam Users
LT
FT
FF
Feedforward-only handlevariation in steam usage but
small errors in metering will
eventually empty or fill the
tank.
Feedforward Feedback
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 13/48
Level Control: Feedforward-Feedback
To SteamUsers
LT
FT FF
LC +
Make-up Water
Combined feedforward and feedback has
best features of both controllers.
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 14/48
Split Range Control: Another Example
FT
FT
FC
FC
Sometimes a single flow control loop cannot provide accurate flow
metering over the full range of operation.
Split range flow control uses two flow controllers
One with a small control valve and one with a large control valve
At low flow rates, the large valve is closed and the small valve provides
accurate flow control.
At large flow rates, both valve are open.
Larger Valve
S i g n a l t o C o n t r o l V a l v
e ( % )
Smaller Valve
Total Flowrate
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 15/48
Application of Split Range Control:
pH Control
Acid
Wastewater
NaOHSolution
Effluent
FTFT
FC
pHTpHC
RSP
• Strategy: control of pH using ratio of NaOH to acid waste water
• Due to dynamic behaviour, Split range is also required
Split range for this valve
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 16/48
Titration Curve for a Strong Acid-Strong Base
System
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01
Base to Acid Ratio
p H
Therefore, for accurate pH control for a wide range of flow
rates for acid wastewater, a split range flow controller for
the NaOH is required.
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 17/48
Override/Select Control
• Override/Select control uses LS and HS action tochange which controller is applied to the
manipulated variable.
• Override/Select control uses select action to switch
between manipulated variables using the samecontrol objective.
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 18/48
Furnace Tube Temperature Constraint Control
FT
FC
TT TT
LS TCTC
RSP
FlueGas
ProcessFluidFuel
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 19/48
Column Flooding Constraint Control
FT
AC
AT
LSDPC
FC
RSP
Lower value of flowrate is selected to avoid
column flooding
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 20/48
20
How would we protect against an error in the
temperature sensor (reading too low) causing a
dangerously high reactor temperature?
TC
Cold
feed
Highly exothermic reaction.
We better be sure thattemperature stays within
allowed range!
BPCS- measurement redundancy
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 21/48
21
How would we protect against an error in the temperature sensor
(reading too low) causing a dangerously high reactor temperature?
T1
Cold
feed
T2
TYTC
Measured value
to PID controller
Controller
output
>
TY
>
Selects the
largest of all
inputs
Use multiple sensors and select most
conservative!
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 22/48
Summary of Control Strategies
• Feedback Control
• Enhancement of single-loop Feedback control
– Cascade, split-range, override control
• Feedforward and Ratio Control
•
Computed Control (e.g. reboiler duty, internal refluxetc)
• Advanced Control
– Inferential control
– Predictive control
– Adaptive control
– Multivariable control
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 23/48
23
• Alarm has an anunciator and visualindication
- No action is automated!
- A plant operator must decide.
• Digital computer stores a record of recent
alarms
• Alarms should catch sensor failures
- But, sensors are used to measure variables
for alarm checking?
2. Alarms that require actions by a Person
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 24/48
24
•
Common error is to design too many alarms - Easy to include; simple (perhaps, incorrect) fix to prevent repeat
of safety incident
- example: One plant had 17 alarms/h - operator acted on only 8%
• Establish and observe clear priority ranking
2. Alarms that require actions by a Person
- HIGH = Hazard to people or equip., action required
- MEDIUM = Loss of RM, close monitoring required
- LOW = investigate when time available
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 25/48
25
• Automatic action usually stops part of plantoperation to achieve safe conditions
- Can divert flow to containment or disposal
- Can stop potentially hazardous process, e.g., combustion
• Capacity of the alternative process must be for “worst case”
• SIS prevents “unusual” situations
- We must be able to start up and shut down- Very fast “blips” might not be significant
3. Safety Interlock System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 26/48
26
• Also called emergency shutdown system (ESS)
• SIS should respond properly to instrumentation
failures
- But, instrumentation is required for SIS?
• Extreme corrective action is required and
automated
- More aggressive than process control (BPCS)
• Alarm to operator when an SIS takes action
3. Safety Interlock System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 27/48
27
The automation strategy is usually simple,for example,
If L123 < L123min; then, reduce fuel to zero
steam
water
LC
PC
fuel
How do weautomate this SIS
when PC is adjusting
the valve?
Example
3 S f t I t l k S t
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 28/48
28
If L123 < L123min; then, reduce fuel to zero
steam
water
LC
PC
fuel
LS s s
fc fc
15 psig
LS = level switch, note that separate sensor is used
s = solenoid valve (open/closed) fc = fail closed
Extra valve with tight shutoff
3. Safety Interlock System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 29/48
29
• The automation strategy may involve several variables, anyone of which could activate the SIS
If L123 < L123min
; or
If T105 > T105max
…….
then, reduce fuel to zero
SIS
100
L123
T105
…..
s
Shown as “box”
in drawing withdetails elsewhere
SIS: Another Example
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 30/48
30
• The SIS saves us from hazards, but can shutdown the plantfor false reasons, e.g., instrument failure.
1 out of 1
must indicate
failure
T100s
2 out of 3
must indicate
failure
T100
T101
T102
Same variable,
multiple sensors!
s
False
shutdown
Failure
on
demand
5 x 10-3 5 x 10-3
2.5 x 10-6 2.5 x 10-6
Better
performance,
more expensive
SIS: measurement redundancy
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 31/48
31
• We desire independent protection layers, withoutcommon-cause failures - Separate systems
sensors
SIS system
i/o i/o………….
sensors
Digital control system
i/o i/o………….
BPCS and Alarms SIS and Alarms
associated with SIS
SIS & DCS
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 32/48
32
4. Safety Relief System
• Overpressure – Increase in pressure can lead to rupture of vessel
or pipe and release of toxic or flammable material
• Underpressure – Also, we must protect against unexpected vacuum!
•
Relief systems provide an exit path for fluid – Benefits: safety, environmental protection,
equipment protection, reduced insurance,
compliance with governmental code
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 33/48
33
• Entirely self-contained, no external power required
• The action is automatic - does not require a person
• Usually, goal is to achieve reasonable pressure
- Prevent high (over-) pressure
- Prevent low (under-) pressure
• The capacity should be for the “worst case” scenario
4. Safety Relief System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 34/48
34
• No external power required -
• self actuating - pressure of
process provides needed
force!
• Valve close when pressure
returns to acceptable value
• Relief Valve - liquid systems
• Safety Valve - gas and vapor
systems including steam
• Safety Relief Valve - liquidand/or vapor systems
• Pressure of protected
system can exceed the set
pressure.
4. Safety Relief System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 35/48
35
Rupture Disk
• No external power
required
• self acting• Rupture disk / burst
diaphragm must be
replaced after opening.
4. Safety Relief System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 36/48
36
RELIEF SYSTEMS ON PIPING &
INSTRUMENTATION (P&I) DIAGRAMS • Spring-loaded safety relief valve
Process
To effluent handling
• Rupture disc
Process To effluent handling
4. Safety Relief System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 37/48
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 38/48
38
IN SOME CASES, RELIEF VALVE AND DIAPHRAGM ARE USED IN
SERIES - WHY?
Why is the pressure
indicator provided?
If the pressure
increases, the disk
has a leak and shouldbe replaced.
Is it local or remotely
displayed? Why?
The display is local to
reduce cost, because
we do not have torespond immediately
to a failed disk - the
situation is not
hazardous.
• What is the
advantage of two in
series?
The disc protects the
valve from corrosive
or sticky material.
The valve closes
when the pressure
returns below theset value.
4. Safety Relief System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 39/48
39
WE SHOULD ALSO PROTECT AGAINST EXCESSIVE VACUUM
• The following example uses buckling pins
overpressure
underpressure
4. Safety Relief System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 40/48
40
Location of Relief System
• Identify potential for damage due to high (or low)
pressure (HAZOP Study)
• In general, closed volume with ANY potential for
pressure increase
– may have exit path that should not be closed but could be
– hand valve, control valve (even fail open), blockage of line
• Remember, this is the last resort, when all other
safety systems have not been adequate and a fast
response is required!
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 41/48
Flash Drum Example
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 42/48
42
LET’S CONSIDER A FLASH DRUM
Is this process safe and ready to operate?
Is the design completed?
F1
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 43/48
43
Where could we use BPCS in the flash process?
F1
Basic Process Control System
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 44/48
44
The level is
unstable; it must
be controlled.
The pressure will
change quickly and
affect safety; it must
be controlled.
F1
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 45/48
45
F1
Where could
we use alarms
in the flash process?
. Alarms that require actions by a Person
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 46/48
46
A low level could
damage the pump;
a high level could
allow liquid in the
vapor line.
The pressure affects
safety, add a high alarm
F1
PAH
LAHLAL
Too much light key
could result in a large
economic lossAAH
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 47/48
47
F1
Safety Relief System
Add relief to the following system
The drum can be isolated
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 48/48
F1
with the control valves;
pressure relief is
required.
We would like to recover without shutdown; we
select a relief valve.