layer of protection

48
7/29/2019 Layer of Protection http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 1/48 Layer of Protection

Upload: 82540

Post on 03-Apr-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 1/48

Layer of Protection

Page 2: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 2/48

2

ALARMS

SIS

RELIEF

CONTAINMENT

EMERGENCY RESPONSE

BPCS

Strength in Reserve

• BPCS - Basic processcontrol

• Alarms - draw attention

• SIS - Safety interlock

system to stop/start

equipment

• Relief  - Prevent

excessive pressure

• Containment - Prevent

materials from reaching,

workers, community or 

environment

• Emergency Response -

evacuation, fire fighting,

health care, etc. 

A

U

T

O

M

AT

I

O

N

Layers of Protection for High Reliability

Page 3: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 3/48

3

• Four Layers in the Safety Hierarchy

• Methods and equipment required at all

four layers

• Process examples for every layer 

• Workshop

Safety Through Automation

Page 4: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 4/48

4

All Processes must have Safety Through

Automation

• Safety must account for failures of equipment

(including controller) and personnel

• Multiple failure must be covered

• Responses should be limited, try to maintain

production if possible

• Automation systems contribute to safe

operation

Page 5: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 5/48

5

SAFETY STRENGTH IN DEPTH !

PROCESS

RELIEF SYSTEM

SAFETY INTERLOCK SYSTEM

ALARM SYSTEM

BASIC PROCESSCONTROL SYSTEM

Closed-loop control to maintain processwithin acceptable operating region

Bring unusual situation to attentionof a person in the plant

Stop the operation of part of process

Divert material safely

Seriousness

of event

Four 

independent

protection

layers (IPL)

Redundancy – Key Concept in Process Safety

Page 6: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 6/48

6

1. Safety

2. Environmental Protection

3. Equipment Protection 

4. Smooth Operation &

Production Rate

5. Product Quality6. Profit

7. Monitoring & Diagnosis

We are now emphasizing

these topics 

Control systems are designed to achieve well-

defined objectives, grouped into seven categories.

Objective of process Control

Page 7: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 7/48

7

• Technology - Multiple PIDs, cascade, feedforward, etc.

• Always control unstable variables (Examples in flash?)

• Always control “quick” safety related variables

- Stable variables that tend to change quickly (Examples?)

• Monitor variables that change very slowly

- Corrosion, erosion, build up of materials

• Provide safe response to critical instrumentation failures 

- But, we use instrumentation in the BPCS?

1. Basic process Control System (BPCS)

Page 8: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 8/48

Control Strategy

Feedback Control – Single-loop feedback

• Overcoming disturbances

 – Cascade

 – Feed forward

 – Ratio

• Constraints

 – Split-range, override/select control• Multivariable

 – multi-loop

 – Decoupling

 – Multivariable control

Page 9: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 9/48

Level Control on a Tank

Fin

LT

Fout

Lsp

LC

Without a cascade levelcontroller, changes in

downstream pressure disturb

the tank level.

Ordinary Feedback Control

Fin

FC

LT 

RSP

FT 

Fout

Lsp

LC

With cascade level controller, changes

in downstream pressure will be

absorbed by the flow controller before

they can significantly affect tank level

because the flow controller responds

faster to this disturbance than the tank

level process.

Cascade Control

Page 10: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 10/48

Reactor Temperature Control

Feed

Product

TT

Cooling

water

TCTT

TC

RSP

With cascade, changes in the cooling water temperature will be

absorbed by the slave loop before they can significantly affect the

reactor temperature.

Cascade Control

Page 11: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 11/48

Multiple Cascade Example

FT 

AC

AT 

TCTT 

FC

RSP

RSP

This approach works because the flow control loop is much

faster than the temperature control loop which is much faster 

than the composition control loop.

Page 12: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 12/48

Level Control: Feedback vs feedforward

Make-upWater

To SteamUsers

LT 

LC

Feedback-only mustabsorb the variations in

steam usage by feedback

action only.

Make-upWater

To Steam Users

LT 

FT 

FF

Feedforward-only handlevariation in steam usage but

small errors in metering will

eventually empty or fill the

tank.

Feedforward Feedback 

Page 13: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 13/48

Level Control: Feedforward-Feedback

To SteamUsers

LT 

FT FF

LC +

Make-up Water

Combined feedforward and feedback has

best features of both controllers.

Page 14: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 14/48

Split Range Control: Another Example

FT

FT

FC

FC

Sometimes a single flow control loop cannot provide accurate flow

metering over the full range of operation.

Split range flow control uses two flow controllers

One with a small control valve and one with a large control valve

At low flow rates, the large valve is closed and the small valve provides

accurate flow control.

At large flow rates, both valve are open.

Larger Valve

   S   i  g  n  a   l   t  o   C  o  n   t  r  o   l   V  a   l  v

  e   (   %   )

Smaller Valve

Total Flowrate

Page 15: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 15/48

Application of Split Range Control:

pH Control

Acid

Wastewater

NaOHSolution

Effluent

FTFT

FC

pHTpHC

RSP

• Strategy: control of pH using ratio of NaOH to acid waste water 

• Due to dynamic behaviour, Split range is also required

Split range for this valve

Page 16: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 16/48

Titration Curve for a Strong Acid-Strong Base

System

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 0.01

Base to Acid Ratio

   p     H

Therefore, for accurate pH control for a wide range of flow

rates for acid wastewater, a split range flow controller for 

the NaOH is required.

Page 17: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 17/48

Override/Select Control

• Override/Select control uses LS and HS action tochange which controller is applied to the

manipulated variable.

• Override/Select control uses select action to switch

between manipulated variables using the samecontrol objective.

Page 18: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 18/48

Furnace Tube Temperature Constraint Control

FT 

FC

TT  TT 

LS TCTC

RSP

FlueGas

ProcessFluidFuel

Page 19: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 19/48

Column Flooding Constraint Control

FT 

AC

AT 

LSDPC

FC

RSP

Lower value of flowrate is selected to avoid

column flooding

Page 20: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 20/48

20

How would we protect against an error in the

temperature sensor (reading too low) causing a

dangerously high reactor temperature?

TC

Cold

feed 

Highly exothermic reaction.

We better be sure thattemperature stays within

allowed range!

BPCS- measurement redundancy

Page 21: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 21/48

21

How would we protect against an error in the temperature sensor 

(reading too low) causing a dangerously high reactor temperature?

T1

Cold

feed 

T2

TYTC

Measured value

to PID controller 

Controller 

output

TY

Selects the

largest of all

inputs

Use multiple sensors and select most

conservative! 

Page 22: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 22/48

Summary of Control Strategies

• Feedback Control

• Enhancement of single-loop Feedback control

 – Cascade, split-range, override control

• Feedforward and Ratio Control

Computed Control (e.g. reboiler duty, internal refluxetc)

• Advanced Control

 – Inferential control

 – Predictive control

 – Adaptive control

 – Multivariable control

Page 23: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 23/48

23

• Alarm has an anunciator and visualindication

- No action is automated!

- A plant operator must decide.

• Digital computer stores a record of recent

alarms

• Alarms should catch sensor failures

- But, sensors are used to measure variables

for alarm checking?

2. Alarms that require actions by a Person

Page 24: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 24/48

24

Common error is to design too many alarms - Easy to include; simple (perhaps, incorrect) fix to prevent repeat

of safety incident

- example: One plant had 17 alarms/h - operator acted on only 8%

• Establish and observe clear priority ranking

2. Alarms that require actions by a Person

- HIGH = Hazard to people or equip., action required

- MEDIUM = Loss of RM, close monitoring required

- LOW = investigate when time available

Page 25: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 25/48

25

• Automatic action usually stops part of plantoperation to achieve safe conditions

- Can divert flow to containment or disposal

- Can stop potentially hazardous process, e.g., combustion

• Capacity of the alternative process must be for “worst case” 

• SIS prevents “unusual” situations 

- We must be able to start up and shut down- Very fast “blips” might not be significant 

3. Safety Interlock System

Page 26: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 26/48

26

• Also called emergency shutdown system (ESS)

• SIS should respond properly to instrumentation

failures

- But, instrumentation is required for SIS?

• Extreme corrective action is required and

automated

- More aggressive than process control (BPCS)

• Alarm to operator when an SIS takes action

3. Safety Interlock System

Page 27: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 27/48

27

The automation strategy is usually simple,for example,

If L123 < L123min; then, reduce fuel to zero

steam 

water  

LC 

PC 

fuel 

How do weautomate this SIS

when PC is adjusting

the valve? 

Example

3 S f t I t l k S t

Page 28: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 28/48

28

If L123 < L123min; then, reduce fuel to zero

steam 

water  

LC 

PC 

fuel 

LS  s  s 

fc  fc 

15 psig 

LS = level switch, note that separate sensor is used 

s  = solenoid valve (open/closed)  fc = fail closed 

Extra valve with tight shutoff  

3. Safety Interlock System

Page 29: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 29/48

29

• The automation strategy may involve several variables, anyone of which could activate the SIS

If L123 < L123min

; or 

If T105 > T105max 

……. 

then, reduce fuel to zero

SIS

100 

L123

T105

….. 

Shown as “box” 

in drawing withdetails elsewhere 

SIS: Another Example

Page 30: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 30/48

30

• The SIS saves us from hazards, but can shutdown the plantfor false reasons, e.g., instrument failure.

1 out of 1

must indicate

failure 

T100s 

2 out of 3

must indicate

failure 

T100

T101

T102

Same variable,

multiple sensors!

False

shutdown 

Failure

on

demand 

5 x 10-3 5 x 10-3 

2.5 x 10-6  2.5 x 10-6 

Better 

performance,

more expensive

SIS: measurement redundancy

Page 31: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 31/48

31

• We desire independent protection layers, withoutcommon-cause failures - Separate systems

sensors

SIS system

i/o i/o…………. 

sensors

Digital control system

i/o i/o…………. 

BPCS and Alarms  SIS and Alarms

associated with SIS 

SIS & DCS

Page 32: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 32/48

32

4. Safety Relief System

• Overpressure – Increase in pressure can lead to rupture of vessel

or pipe and release of toxic or flammable material

• Underpressure – Also, we must protect against unexpected vacuum!

Relief systems provide an exit path for fluid – Benefits: safety, environmental protection,

equipment protection, reduced insurance,

compliance with governmental code

Page 33: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 33/48

33

• Entirely self-contained, no external power required 

• The action is automatic - does not require a person 

• Usually, goal is to achieve reasonable pressure

- Prevent high (over-) pressure

- Prevent low (under-) pressure

• The capacity should be for the “worst case” scenario 

4. Safety Relief System

Page 34: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 34/48

34

• No external power required -

• self actuating - pressure of 

process provides needed

force!

• Valve close when pressure

returns to acceptable value

• Relief Valve - liquid systems

• Safety Valve - gas and vapor 

systems including steam

• Safety Relief Valve - liquidand/or vapor systems

• Pressure of protected

system can exceed the set

pressure.

4. Safety Relief System

Page 35: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 35/48

35

Rupture Disk 

• No external power 

required

• self acting• Rupture disk / burst

diaphragm must be

replaced after opening.

4. Safety Relief System

Page 36: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 36/48

36

RELIEF SYSTEMS ON PIPING &

INSTRUMENTATION (P&I) DIAGRAMS • Spring-loaded safety relief valve

Process

To effluent handling 

• Rupture disc

Process To effluent handling 

4. Safety Relief System

Page 37: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 37/48

Page 38: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 38/48

38

IN SOME CASES, RELIEF VALVE AND DIAPHRAGM ARE USED IN

SERIES -  WHY? 

Why is the pressure

indicator provided?

If the pressure

increases, the disk

has a leak and shouldbe replaced.

Is it local or remotely

displayed? Why?

The display is local to

reduce cost, because

we do not have torespond immediately

to a failed disk - the

situation is not

hazardous.

• What is the

advantage of two in

series?

The disc protects the

valve from corrosive

or sticky material.

The valve closes

when the pressure

returns below theset value.

4. Safety Relief System

Page 39: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 39/48

39

WE SHOULD ALSO PROTECT AGAINST EXCESSIVE VACUUM

• The following example uses buckling pins 

overpressure 

underpressure 

4. Safety Relief System

Page 40: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 40/48

40

Location of Relief System

• Identify potential for damage due to high (or low)

pressure (HAZOP Study)

• In general, closed volume with ANY potential for 

pressure increase

 – may have exit path that should not be closed but could be

 – hand valve, control valve (even fail open), blockage of line

• Remember, this is the last resort, when all other 

safety systems have not been adequate and a fast

response is required!

Page 41: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 41/48

Flash Drum Example

Page 42: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 42/48

42

LET’S CONSIDER A FLASH DRUM 

Is this process safe and ready to operate?

Is the design completed?

F1 

Page 43: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 43/48

43

Where could we use BPCS in the flash process? 

F1 

Basic Process Control System

Page 44: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 44/48

44

The level is

unstable; it must

be controlled.

The pressure will

change quickly and

affect safety; it must

be controlled.

F1 

Page 45: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 45/48

45

F1 

Where could

we use alarms

in the flash process?

. Alarms that require actions by a Person

Page 46: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 46/48

46

A low level could

damage the pump;

a high level could

allow liquid in the

vapor line.

The pressure affects

safety, add a high alarm

F1 

PAH

LAHLAL

Too much light key

could result in a large

economic lossAAH

Page 47: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 47/48

47

F1 

Safety Relief System

 Add relief to the following system

The drum can be isolated

Page 48: Layer of Protection

7/29/2019 Layer of Protection

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/layer-of-protection 48/48

F1 

with the control valves;

pressure relief is

required.

We would like to recover without shutdown; we

select a relief valve.