lbt progress report, feb 21-24 2005marco xompero 1/14 p45 test results and beyond… marco xompero...
TRANSCRIPT
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 1/14
P45 Test Resultsand beyond…
Marco XomperoDaniela Zanotti
Armando Riccardi
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 2/14
Overview
• Flattening P45 thin shell with bias magnets.
• Position noise characterization with new electronics.
• Thin shell step response.• Chopping? Chopping!• Test tower optical bench.
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 3/14
Flattening P45
Actuator locations
finite element analysis: LBT672 shelldeformation due to local torque39 nm PtV / N mm => max: 2.3nm PtV
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 4/14
Position Noise (1)
Typical RMS value reduced ~1.3 [nm]
INCREASE WORK DISTANCE!
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 5/14
Position noise (2)
• Work gap: 68m• What do we expect? Noise increase prop. d2…• Different gain on different rings
– Proportional: Inner/Mid 0.1N/m Outer 0.1N/m
– Derivative: Inner 45 Ns/mMid 43 Ns/mOuter 90 Ns/m
• Double derivative guard pole at 15kHz
2dn
Typical RMS ~3.5 [nm]
High derivative means air damping substitution
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 6/14
Step Response (1)
New settling time: ~0.57[ms] to ~0.67[ms]
Old settling time: 0.7[ms]
Other Modes Cross Talk
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 7/14
Step Response (2)
Mid stiffness mode High stiffness mode
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 8/14
Chopping • 128 m gap• Proportional: In, Mid, Ext 0.04
N/m• Derivative: In, Mid 10 Ns/m,
Ext 20 Ns/m• Edge PtV tilt ~140m i.e.
~14 arcsec on the sky• Chopping frequency ~5Hz
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 9/14
Chopping (2)
Settling Time ~10ms
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 10/14
Chopping (2)
K Band d.l. size: ~53[mas]
Rms ~3.2 [mas]
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 11/14
Optical test tower (1)GOALS:• Avoid air convection• Minimum hexapod movement to correct defocus term in the optical path
SOLUTION:Local thermal stability in all tower length within 0.1 ◦C(ex: INVAR support add only 30 nm defocus term)
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 12/14
N S
Optical test tower (2)
H20 + Glycole
Out
In
TemperatureSensors(PT1000)
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 13/14
Summary
• Bias magnets increase the safety and induce acceptable mirror figuring errors.
• P45 new control devices and sensors are ok!
• We can work easily from 68m to 130 m.• New electronics improved settling time.• Chopping require optimization but we are
not so far!• The temperature control of optical test
tower has been tested to be in spec.
LBT Progress Report, Feb 21-24 2005 Marco Xompero 14/14
The End?
The End!