lúcio melre da silva 1 - stf · lúcio melre da silva presentation constitutional amendment number...

Lúcio Melre da Silva

1

ELETRONIC ELETRONIC PLENARYPLENARY


• Presentation

• Legal Base

• General Repercussion Institute (“Instituto da Repercussão Geral”)

• How does it work?

• Virtual Plenary

SCHEDULE

• Purpose

• Consultation

• Conclusion

• Doubts / Questions


Presentation

Constitutional Amendment number 45/2004 includedamong the conditions of admissibility of the extraordinaryappeal, the requirement of general repercussion of theconstitutional question raised,regulated by changes in the Code of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Procedureof the Supreme Court.


Legal Base

• CF/88, article 102, § 3º, added by constitutional amendment number45/04• CPC, articles 543-A and 543-B, added by Federal law n. 11.418/06• Rules of Procedure of STF

- articles 322-A and 328, with the changes of the regimental amendment n. 21/2007̵ article n. 328-A, with the changes of the regimental amendment n. 23/08 and 27/2008̵ article n. 13, with the changes of the Regimental Amendment n. 24/2008 and n. 29/2009̵ article n. 324, with the changes of the Regimental Amendment n. 31/2009

• Official Letter (Portaria) 138/2009 of the Presidency of STF.


The General Repercussion Institute

The Court will refuse the matter, wich the constitutionalquestion does not offer general repercussion,in otherwords, exceed the subjective interests of the parties in terms of economic, political, social or legal matters.

The refusal means that the process will not conductwithin the STF, as traditionally occurred before theimplementation of this mechanism.


Purposes of the General Repercussion

••LimitLimit thethe jurisdictionjurisdiction ofof thethe SupremeSupreme CourtCourt, , thethe trialtrial ofofextraordinaryextraordinary appealsappeals, , constitutionalconstitutional issuesissues withwith relevantrelevantsocial, social, politicalpolitical, , economiceconomic oror legal, legal, thatthat transcendtranscend thethesubjectivesubjective interestsinterests ofof thethe causecause

•Standardize the constitutional interpretation withoutrequiring the Supreme Court decides many identical cases, with the same constitutional issue.

••..Minimize the burden of cases under jurisdiction of thisCourt trial, causing the celerity of the decisions of otherprocesses that also processes in court.


The numbers of the General Repercussion


Processual Statistics


How does the General Repercussion work?

The analysis of the general repercussion is based in the manifestation or in the absence of the CourtJustices.As defined by RISTF, in article 323, the Relater ofthe process must submit, to the other Justices andelectronically, a copy of his manifestation of theexistence or not of the general repercussion.Received the manifestation of the Relater, the otherJustices will send, also by electronic way, within thecommon 20 (twenty) days term, demonstrations onthe issue of RG.


Plenary Virtual

TheThe PlenaryPlenary Virtual is Virtual is nothingnothing more more thanthan anan electronicelectronicsessionsession, , wherewhere therethere is is notnot thethe physicalphysical presencepresence ofofthethe Justices.Justices.

It is It is thethe mainmain featurefeature thatthat allowsallows thethe openingopening ofof thethesessionsession, , statementstatement ofof votes votes andand monitoringmonitoring thethe trialtrial ofofthethe mattermatter regardingregarding to to thethe general general repercussionrepercussion andandconstitutionalityconstitutionality..

OnlyOnly thethe ministersministers havehave accessaccess to to thisthis functionalityfunctionality..


Plenary Virtual


�� -- ProceedingsProceedings in in thethe trialtrial, , eveneven beforebefore Justices Justices manifestationmanifestation

�� --ProceedingsProceedings ofof thethe RelaterRelater thatthat havehave notnot beenbeen to to trialtrialandand havehave passedpassed thethe general general repercussionrepercussion

�� -- Processes Processes thatthat havehave notnot finishedfinished thethe trialtrial

�� -- Cases Cases scheduledscheduled for for nextnext FridayFriday, , whichwhich willwill beginbeginthethe analysisanalysis ofof thethe general general repercussionrepercussion

--. Mouse . Mouse sensitivesensitive: to : to overrideoverridethethe processprocess ID, are ID, are presentedpresentedthethe votes votes alreadyalready pronouncedpronounced

��

Plenary Virtual


Plenary Virtual

. Processes . Processes withwith shortershorter deadlines are deadlines are onon thethe top top ofof thethe listlist. . WeWe use use differentdifferent colorscolors for for differentdifferent deadlinesdeadlines


Plenary Virtual

. . Some Some partsparts cancan bebe scannedscanned for for informationinformation ofof allall JusticesJustices


ThereThere are are thethe followingfollowing optionsoptions: : preventionprevention, , oror ifif therethere is is notnot constitutionalconstitutionalissueissue involvedinvolved oror whetherwhether oror notnot a case a case ofof general general repercussionrepercussion

Plenary Virtual


Plenary Virtual


Research

. . It It allowsallows detailsdetails ofof thethe researchresearch to to bebe performedperformed


Internet Research

In In thethe STF STF websitewebsite STF are STF are providedprovided informationinformation aboutabout thethe processes processes

thatthat are are beingbeing examinedexamined in in STFSTF--GeneralGeneral repercussionrepercussion


Researches in the Internet


Conclusion

TThehe General General repercussionrepercussion, as a , as a requirementrequirement for for thethe extraordinaryextraordinary appealappeal, ,

waswas establishedestablished to to streamlinestreamline thethe work work ofof thethe SupremeSupreme CourtCourt, , avoidingavoiding thethe

needneed for for pronouncepronounce a big a big numbernumber ofof decisionsdecisions onon a a certaincertain themetheme andand

establishingestablishing thethe role role ofof thethe SupremeSupreme CourtCourt as as thethe ConstitutionalConstitutional CourtCourt. . WithWith

thethe creationcreation ofof thisthis instituteinstitute, , thethe SupremeSupreme CourtCourt decides decides onlyonly onceonce aboutabout

everyevery constitutionalconstitutional questionquestion, , andand hishis decisiondecision serves as serves as thethe foundationfoundation for for

thethe prosecutionprosecution ofof otherother cases cases onon thethe samesame subjectsubject in in discussiondiscussion in in manymany

instancesinstances, , andand thusthus avoidsavoids thethe proliferationproliferation ofof appealsappeals..


Questions

Federal Suprem Federal Suprem Federal Suprem CourtCourtCourtTechnologyTechnologyTechnology andandand InformationInformationInformation SecretarySecretarySecretary

Lúcio Melre da Silva Secretário de Tecnologia da Informação

[email protected] 61 3217-3459

lúcio melre da silva 1 - stf · lúcio melre da silva presentation constitutional amendment number...

Documents