@let@token coherent emission · i ecme in x mode can escape provided doppler shifted to above cuto...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Coherent emission
Don Melrose
School of PhysicsUniversity of Sydney
June 8, 2010
![Page 2: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outline of talk:
1. Nature of coherent emission
2. Plasma emission
3. Electron cyclotron emission
4. Triggering & fine structure
5. Helliwell’s model
6. Crab giant bursts
7. Summary
![Page 3: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Nature of coherent emissionThree generic types
I Plasma emission (solar radio bursts, planetary bow shocks)
I Electron cyclotron maser emission (planes, Sun, flare stars)
I Pulsar radio emission (not understood)
Three “coherent” mechanisms Ginzburg & Zheleznyakov (1975)
I Emission by bunches (localization in x & p)
I Reactive instability (localization in p)
I Maser growth = negative absorption
Back reaction (BR) to coherent emission
I Bunches: BR disperses the bunch in x-space FASTEST
I Reactive: BR broadens beam in p-space NEXT FASTEST
I Maser: BR = quasilinear relaxation STILL FAST
I BR => suppression of instability
I Astrophysics: relaxation to marginal stability DEFAULT
![Page 4: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Plasma emission
Electron stream
Langmuir turbulence
scattering byion sound waves
transverse wavesfundamental
scatteredLangmuir waves
scattering byion sound waves
coalescence oftwo Langmuir waves
transverse wavessecond harmonic
streaming instability
Figure: Schematic of processes leading to F & H plasma emission
![Page 5: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Quasilinear relaxationBeam instability
I Resonance ω − k · v = 0 => v > ω/k = vφI Instability for dF (v)/dv > 0 at v = vφI Driver (“pump”): faster electrons outpacing slower electrons
I Quasilinear relaxation decreases dF (v)/dv > 0
108
10
20
50
100
200
0 10v v
( v)F ( v)F
(a) (b)
Figure: Evolutions of beam distribution: (a) initial distribution; (b)distribution after number of growth times indicated.
![Page 6: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Plasma instabilities: marginal stabilityDilemma
I Plasma instabilities grow rapidly
I Exhaust free energy in few hundred growth times
Marginal stability
I System must relax to marginally stable state
I Balance: very slow driver (“pump”)
I & large number of localized, transient bursts of growth
Observational evidence
I Langmuir waves in IPM in highly localized “clumps”
I Log-normal statistics for E in clumpsI Consistent with “stochastic growth theory” (SGT):
I random localized bursts of growth, E = eGE0
I growth factor G random variableI => E log-normal in bursts Robinson 1992; Cairns & Robinson 1997
![Page 7: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Electron cyclotron maser emission (ECME)
Jupiter’s DAM
I Bursts at < 40 MHz
I Emitted at Ωe
I Bizarre radiation pattern
I Confirmed by spacecraftDulk 1967
Io effect
I Correlation with moon Io discovered in 1962
I Io drags flux tube through corotating magnetosphere
I => EMF ≈ 2 MV; explains ≈ 2 MeV electrons
![Page 8: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Io-related arcs
Arc pattern confirmed bizarre angular distribution
![Page 9: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Requirements for ECME
Resonance condition
I Cyclotron resonance condition ω − Ωe/γ − kzvz = 0
I Instability driven by ∂f /∂p⊥ > 0
I Escape of radiation requires Ωe ωp
Loss-cone driven ECME
I ∂f /∂p⊥ > 0 in loss-cone
I Driver: forced precipitationp2⊥/B = const.
I Loss cone after mirroring
αβ sin
cosαβ
Explains bizarre radiation pattern for DAM
![Page 10: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Escape of ECME
1 2
-10
10
20
0
w
z
x
o
n 2
p/
n
o
z
x
e0
p
n
o
z
x
e0
p
c(a) (b)
I Curves on the left for ωp Ωe
I Cyclotron maser in whistler mode (cannot escape)
I Curves on right for ωp Ωe
I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted toabove cutoff frequency
![Page 11: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Earth’s AKR
I Analogous radiation from the Earth at < 0.5 MHz
I Correlates with inverted-V precipitating electrons
I Emitted in low density cavity Benson & Calvert 1979
![Page 12: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Recent developments
Faster growth for shell distributionBUT: ECME cannot escape in presence of cold plasma
Astrophysical applications
I ECME favored for solar spike bursts
I ECME accepted for flare stars
I Also applied to blazars Begelman, M.E., Ergun, R.E., Rees, M.J. 2005, ApJ 625, 51
![Page 13: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Triggering and fine structure
Triggers
I What triggers the localized bursts of growth?I Enhance local growth rateI Reduce local loss rateI Enhance local background
I SGT suggests random triggers
I Exceptional (non log-normal) events?
Fine structures: extreme events
I Exceptional events common but not randomI Triggered VLF emissionsI Triggering of ECME by type III bursts
I Extremely narrow bandwidth eventsI Fine structures in DAMI Giant bursts in pulsars
I Maser theory requires RPA: bandwidth > growth rate
![Page 14: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
VLF emissions
Triggered VLF
I Whistlers triggered by Morse code dashes
I Emissions drift in frequency
![Page 15: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Driver for VLF emissions
Free energy for VLF emissions
I Electrons in radiation belts in steady state
I Drift in from solar wind
I Sets up ∂f (v⊥)/∂v⊥ > 0
Loss of electrons
I Scattering into loss cone by whistlers
I => steady average auroral electron precipitation
I Actual precipitation very bursty
I Fine structures in bursts and whistlers correlate
![Page 16: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Helliwell’s model
Phenomenological model
I Resonance satisfiedω − Ωe − kzvz = 0
I Waves grow in interactionregion (IR)
I Resonance also satisfiesd [ω − Ωe − kzvz ]/dt = 0
I Frequency drift due tomotion of IR
Helliwell, R.A. 1967 JGR 72, 4773
![Page 17: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Fine structures in Jovian S bursts
Phase coherence Carr, T.D. 2001
I Phase-coherent burstsI Background Galactic noise level changesI Amplification before S-burst suppressed after S-burst
![Page 18: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
ECME form of Helliwell’s model
Coherent fine structures
I Resonance satisfied: ω − Ωe/γ − kzvz = 0
I Helliwell’s condition satisfied: d [ω − Ωe/γ − kzvz ]/dt = 0
I Applied to x mode for Ωe ωp
I Can explain observed drifts Willes, A. 2002
![Page 19: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Crab giant bursts
Giant bursts in Main Pulse
I several microbursts
Giant bursts in Main Pulse
I nanoshots
Giant bursts in Interpulse
I Bands
![Page 20: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Summary
I Plasma emission & ECME relatively well understood
I Masers operate near marginal stability
I Actual source the envelope of statistically large number oflocalized, transient bursts of wave growth
I Triggering & fine structure outside the scope of simple theory
I Helliwell’s (1967) phenomenological model plausible basis
I Pulsar radio emission & giant bursts poorly understood
![Page 21: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Why don’t we understand pulsar radio emission?Pulsar electrodynamics
I Pulsar electrodynamics inadequately understoodI Ideas developed for aligned modelI Ignores central role of displacement currentI Precludes predicting emission from first principles
Location of apparent source
I Emission from polar-cap regionsI Aberration & geometry plausibly => source heightI Seemingly unrelated to acceleration site
PolarizationI Observed polarization imposed as propagation effectI Suggests apparent source is not actual sourceI => further uncertainty on source location
‘Rosetta-stone’ approach
I Look for definitive signature of emission mechanismI Many suggestions but no consensus
![Page 22: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Pulsar radio emission mechanismsPlasma-like-emission
I Ouflowing relativistic particles => beam instabilityI n2O > 1 in small rangeI Dispersion curve allow escapeI Interesting variant in oscillating model
Curvature emission
I Synchrotron-like emissionI Maser possible for df (γ)/dγ > 0I Maser emission only for one polarization
Linear acceleration emissionI Due to acceleration by E‖I Maser possible for df (γ)/dγ > 0
Anomalous cyclotron emissionI ω − sΩ − k‖v‖ = 0, s = −1I Requires mode with n2 > 1I Applies only in weak-B region
![Page 23: @let@token Coherent emission · I ECME in x mode can escape provided Doppler shifted to above cuto frequency. Earth’s AKR I Analogous radiation from the Earth at](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022090607/605d2e6feed5ba24ee12cb2c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Pulsar wave modes
k
kc
L
A
X
O
c
max
=