level1 - usaid assist project · quality standards for community health services level1 2015 ......
TRANSCRIPT
Kenya Quality Model for Health
Quality Standards for Community Health Services
LEVEL12015
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
MINISTRY OF HEALTH
Kenya Quality Model for Health
Quality Standards for Community Health Services
2015
LEVEL 1
MINISTRY OF HEALTH Afya House, P. O. Box 30016 - 00100, Nairobi
www.chs.health.go.ke
04
i
FOREWORD......................................................................................................................iiACKNOWLEDGEMENT .................................................................................................iiiABBREVIATIONS.............................................................................................................ivPREFACE ............................................................................................................................vINTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................viDOMAIN 1: LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE .................................................... 1DOMAIN 2: COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT .............. 3DOMAIN 3: COMMUNITY HEALTH POLICY, GUIDELINES AND STRATEGIES ............................................................................................ 5DOMAIN 4: COMMUNITY HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE AND EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................... .....6DOMAIN 5: MASTER COMMUNITY HEALTH UNIT LISTING .......................... 7DOMAIN 6: COMMODITIES AND SUPPLIES ....................................................... 8DOMAIN 7: TRANSPORT ........................................................................................... 9DOMAIN 8: REFERRAL SYSTEM ..............................................................................10DOMAIN 9: COMMUNITY HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM ....................... 11DOMAIN 10: COMMUNITY HEALTH FINANCING .............................................12DOMAIN 11: LINKAGES AND PARTNERSHIPS......................................................13DOMAIN 12: SERVICE DELIVERY ............................................................................. 14DOMAIN 13: MONITORING AND EVALUATION .................................................15MONITORING AND EVALUATION SHEET FOR TIER ONE KQMH ................16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ii
Kenya’s second National Health Sector Strategic Plan (NHSSP II 2005 -2010) defined a new approach to the way the sector will deliver health care services to Kenyans – the Kenya Essential Package for Health (KEPH). One of the key innovations of KEPH is the recognition and introduction of Level 1 services which are aimed at empowering Kenyan households and communities to take charge of improving their own health. Implementing community health services is one of the top priorities of the Ministry of Health and its partners in the sector.
The promulgation of the constitution of Kenya on 27th August, 2010, was a major milestone towards the improvement of health standards. The need to address the citizens’ expectations of the right to the highest attainable standard of health cannot be over emphasized because the constitution prioritizes quality management as an integral component of the health care services.
The social pillar for Vision 2030 stipulates that to improve the overall livelihoods of Kenyans, the country has to aim at providing efficient and high quality health care with the best standards. This concept of quality and the benefits it would confer to the health providers’ work and the outcomes for their clients however have not completely been understood by clients, health managers and providers.
The Ministry of Health embarked on the review of the Kenya Quality Model and its expansion into a National policy on Quality Assurance including clinical care, management support and leadership and to make it adaptable for the Kenya Essential Package for Health (KEPH). The new model, the Kenya Quality Model for Health, has attempted to address the inadequacies identified in the Kenya Quality Model and has developed standards and checklists for KEPH level 2,3,4,5 and 6. This document outlines the standards for level 1 which have been organized into 13 domains for ease of reference. It is hoped that all stakeholders will play an active role in the implementation of the standards as an integral part of their performance assessment in order to continuously improve the quality of tier 1 health services.
FOREWORD
iii
The development of the Kenya Quality Model for Health - Standards for Community Health Services (Level 1) have been accomplished through the collaborative efforts of the Ministry of Health, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA – CHS project), USAID ASSIST Project and Goal Ireland.
These standards have been developed through a long process of consultations, team work and information gathering through the wise guidance of Dr. James Mwitari former head, Division of Community Health Services, Dr. Lucy Musyoka former head Department of Standards, Quality Assurance and Regulations, Dr. Salim Hussein, head Community Health Services Unit and Dr. Charles Kandie head, Division of Health Standards and Quality Assurance in the Ministry of Health. We also appreciate technical support from the World Health Organisation.
We are sincerely indebted to the following technical officers who worked tirelessly to ensure the realization of these standards – Jane Koech, Francis Muma, Ruth Ngechu, Isaac Mwangangi, John Towett, Samuel Okuche, Samuel Njoroge, Diana Kamar, Daniel Kavoo, Dr. Pauline Duya and Ruth Ngechu all of the Ministry of Health, Elijah Kinyangi of JICA-KCO, Makiko Kinoshita and Akiko Hirano of JICA-CHS, Crispin Ndedda of Micronutrient Initiative, Roselyn Were, Doreen Bwisa, and Jacqueline Kimani all of URC, LLC.
The development of these standards would not have been possible without the financial support from USAID through the USAID ASSIST Project, JICA – CHS Project, Micronutrient Initiative and Goal Kenya who co–funded different activities in the development process and we are grateful for this support.
Finally we wish to thank the representatives from the 47 counties and everyone who contributed in one way or the other to the successful development of these standards.
Dr. Nicholas MuraguriDIRECTOR OF MEDICAL SERVICES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
iv
ABBREVIATIONS
AWP Annual Work PlanCDF Constituency Development FundCHA Community Health AssistantCHC Community Health CommitteeCHEW Community Health Extension WorkerCHIS Community Health Information ServiceCHIS Community Health Information ServiceCHS Community Health ServicesCHS Community Health StrategyCHSU Community Health Services UnitCHU Community Health UnitCHV Community Health VolunteerDHIS District Health Information ServiceDHSQAR Division of Health Standards, Quality Assurance and Regulations EBM Evidence Based MedicineFEFO First Expiry First OutFIFO First In First OutFP Family PlanningGOK Government of KenyaHSSF Health Sector Services FundICT Information and Communication TechnologiesIEC Information Education and CommunicationJICA Japan International Cooperative AgencyKCO Kenya Country OfficeKHSSIP Kenya Health Sector Strategic and Investment Plan 2013-2017KQMH Kenya Quality Model for HealthM&E Monitoring and EvaluationMCHUL Master Community Health Unit ListingMI Micronutrient InitiativeMOH Ministry of HealthPP Patient PartnershipQIT Quality Improvement TeamQM Quality ManagementTOT Trainer of TrainerURC University Research CompanyUSAID United States Agency for International DevelopmentWIT Work Improvement Team
v
The Ministry of Health, in the Kenya Health Sector Strategic and Investment Plan 2013-2017 (KHSSIP), shifted emphasis from curative to prevention and promotion of individual and community health. This aggregates service delivery into Tiers. The tiers are organized from 1 to 4; where Tier 1 is the community health services ; Tier 2- Dispensaries and Health Centres (primary care services); Tier 3 - Sub County and County hospitals; and Tier 4 - referral hospitals including former provincial, national/tertiary health facilities.
To provide Quality Improvement at Tier 1 health services, the Ministry of Health has taken steps to develop standards to cater for service delivery at the community level. These Standards have taken into account leadership, staff motivation, staff competence, adequate resources, content and process of care, referral systems, and the active participation of the community.
It is foreseen that with the introduction of these Standards - adherence, regular assessments and audits will be carried out and a culture of Quality Management will progressively take root at community level and gradually seek to meet the highest standards of Quality.
The quality standards outlined in this document apply to tier 1. During the development of this document it was noted that the services provided at tier 1 were varied and therefore the standards have been expanded to capture the majority of these services.
PREFACE
vi
Quality Improvement is a process to improve adherence to standards and guidelines, to improve structure-process-outcome of health services by applying quality management principles and tools, and to satisfy patients’/clients’ needs in a culturally appropriate way. The Kenya Quality Model for Health (KQMH) integrates Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) through wide dissemination of public health and clinical standards and guidelines with total quality management (TQM) and patient partnership (PP). The issue of quality and quality improvement should not be addressed as a separate programme rather Quality should be “built-in” and integrated in the health delivery system. The KQMH is based on the Kenya Health Standards which are designed to simultaneously address two major issues; • A standards approach that
will ensure delivery of safe and effective health services
• The gradual introduction of quality management to health managers and service providers.
The Standards Approach:The Division of Health Standards, Quality Assurance and Regulations (DHSQAR) shall provide leadership in standards development, revision and regulation. Standards, clinical and public health guidelines shall be evidence-based (EBM approach), consider the perspective of communities, and respect clients’ right.
This model is designed for self-assessment by the Work Improvement Teams (WITs) in the respective Community Health Units (CHUs), Peer Assessments by Quality Improvement Teams (QITs) of different CHUs and external assessment by trained Quality Improvement Coaches and Mentors who shall provide support to ensure compliance with basic standards.
The Quality Management Approach:Parallel to the standards approach, the DSQAR in liaison with key players shall provide leadership in capacity building for quality improvement. The introduction of quality management (QM),
INTRODUCTION
vii
including QM principles and tools, shall be the first step to build capacity at community level to manage quality in a systematic and comprehensive manner. The aim is to provide motivation to surpass basic standards and to guide the way to excellence in health care.
Leadership at all levels will to use the KQMH for self-assessment. Health care managers and providers at tier one should engage in a continuous quality improvement process. The checklist is designed for integration in routine work and is linked to the Annual WorkPlans. Quality Management mentors and coaches will verify community self-assessments through an assessment (using the same checklist) and provide support to quality improvement. The checklist also forms the basis for the Health Services Monitoring & Evaluation (M&E) system. Summary reports will be entered into the county database. The information shall provide additional guidance on priority setting and resource allocation.
Quality Improvement Documentation System:To enable the Assessors to capture all the aspects of Quality in full detail, a combined effort of everyone in the community health unit (CHU) is needed to achieve change and significant improvement in quality of health care. Leadership in health care at all levels including Community, Sub-County, County, National and stakeholders need to be involved in supporting Quality Improvement Documentation System. This system comprises of regular quality reports from various leaders of the community health service delivery system.
Scoring systemThe scoring system of the checklist is based on a 5 point scoring structure. A score of 1 or 0% is the lowest score while a score of 5 or 100% is the highest possible score
1 or 0-24%: A Minimum standard has not been met. There are no visible signs of any efforts to address compliance with the standard, only excuses.
2or 25-49%: A minimum standard has not been met, however there
viii
is evidence for commitment to change for the better, particularly by the top management. There are some demonstrated efforts to improve the situation. Health managers are able to produce some evidence that the issue of non-compliance has been assessed and an improvement plan to reach a stage of compliance is currently being implemented.
3 or 50-74%: A minimum standard has been met .This score refers to meeting the standard as outlined.
4 or 75-99%: A minimum standard has been met. Moreover there is
some demonstrated additional effort to surpass the standard under score 3. There is visible commitment to continuous improvement, and evidence can be produced to demonstrate quality improvement.
5or 100 and above % : Evidence to demonstrate positive results and trend over a period of one year can be produced. An excellence distinction has been achieved and the Community Health Unit is recognized as a Centre of Excellence.
Leadership has been identified as one of the most important principles in quality management and improvement at all levels. In general, leadership can be defined as the process of providing guidance and motivation for continuous quality improvement. Leadership cascades from the Ministry of Health at national level through the county and sub county health management team to the community health committees (CHCs).
In the context of community health services in Kenya, good leadership promotes the vision and mission articulated in the community health strategy.
DOMAIN 1: LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
1
2
Stewardship1.1 Community health services leadership shall be aware of the Kenya Quality Model for Health (KQMH) and recognize their own role in leadership as an essential part of improving quality of community health services.
1.2 Community health services leadership shall promote collaborative and participatory decision-making.
1.3 Community health services leadership shall provide opportunity for development of community health workforce for sustainable community health services delivery.
1.4 Community health services leadership shall sensitize all the stakeholders on their role and responsibilities in delivering community health services.
1.5 Community health services leadership shall follow the guidelines on the establishment of CHU.
1.6 Community health services leadership shall ensure the
full functionality of the CHU (monthly dialogue days, quarterly action days, and Community Health Information System [CHIS] reporting).
1.7 Community health services leadership shall ensure that standard tools for supportive supervision are available and used during quarterly supportive supervision.
Governance
1.8 Community health services leadership shall hold regular stakeholder forum at least semi-annually for the coordination among the stakeholders.
1.9 Community health services leadership shall ensure that CHCs hold meetings monthly and evidenced by the minutes.
1.10 Community health services leadership shall document the identified areas for improvement and demonstrate efforts for remedial action.
STANDARDS
3
DOMAIN 2: COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKFORCE MANAGEMENT
Community health workforce is a critical resource in the delivery of level one health services. The workforce must have the required qualities and the competencies, skills, and knowledge; categories and number of personnel; and training needed to achieve community health goals.
Community Health Volunteers (CHVs)
2.1 All positions for CHVs shall be filled in accordance with the Community strategy guidelines.
2.2 There shall be an inventory of ALL CHVs maintained by the Community Health Extension Workers (CHEWs) and updated annually.
2.3 There shall be five (5) CHEWs deployed in each community Health Unit as stipulated in the community health strategy
Community Health Extension Workers
2.4 There shall be an inventory of ALL CHEWs maintained by the Sub-County Health management team and updated annually.
2.5 Vacancies provided in the Scheme of Service for
Community Health Personnel shall be filled with qualified staff.
2.6 Available community health vacancies shall be communicated through a fair, transparent and accessible system.
2.7 A written job description of Community health workforce shall be communicated to respective employees.
2.8 There shall be an appraisal for all CHEWs on an annual basis using a standardized format, by the Sub-County Health management Team.
2.9 There shall be a continuing professional development programme for all CHEWs and CHVs coordinated by the sub-county Health management team.
2.10 There shall be measures to
STANDARDS
4
ensure staff safety in accordance with the Occupational Safety. and Health (OSH) guidelines implemented by the Sub-county and County health management team.
2.11 There shall be a motivation mechanism for community health personnel implemented by the Sub-county and County health management teams.
5
DOMAIN 3: COMMUNITY HEALTH POLICY, GUIDELINES AND STRATEGIES
Policies, guidelines and strategy standards provide mechanisms, procedures and incentives that encourage stakeholders - including public, non-governmental organizations and communities - to work together to improve health service delivery and eliminate exclusion of populations from access to services. The standards also support efforts that promote effective accountability mechanisms that assure implementation of agreed priorities with available resources. They provide an enabling environment for the implementation of community health services.
3.1 All health stakeholders shall be familiar with all the relevant policies and guidelines including: the Kenya Health Policy ; Health Sector Strategic and Investment Plan; Community Health Policy; Community Health Strategy and guidelines through the efforts of the County Health Management Team.
3.2 There shall be a system in place to monitor the use and adherence of policies and guidelines spearheaded by the Sub-County and County Health
management teams.
3.3 The Community health workforce shall be updated annually on the existing community health services policies and guidelines by the county community strategy focal person.
3.4 There shall be community involvement and participation in the implementation of community health policies and guidelines led by the CHEW.
STANDARDS
6
The community health units need appropriate physical infrastructure including office, storage, information and communication technologies (ICT), education and communication facilities, and energy supply equipment, among others to function efficiently and effectively in delivering quality services
DOMAIN 4: COMMUNITY HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE AND EQUIPMENT
4.1 Every link facility shall provide office space for the community health unit/s attached to it, to serve as a resource centre.
4.2 Each CHU shall be provided with at least 1 computer by the sub-county health director.
4.3 Every link facility-in-charge shall host at least one computer for the CHU/s.
4.4 CHEW shall maintain and update the inventory for all infrastructure and equipment
for community health service delivery.
4.5 CHEW shall maintain and make available the maintenance record and update it regularly.
4.6 CHEWs shall identify and utilize appropriate means of public communication/messaging at community level.
STANDARDS
7
DOMAIN 5: MASTER COMMUNITY HEALTH UNIT LISTING
Health services provision at level 1 is through the extended structure of the health facility called community health units. Master Community Health Unit Listing (MCHUL) is the system extension to facilitate the navigation of general information and other details about the community health units and link facility.
5.1 The MCHUL shall be regularly updated by sub-county health management team as per the MCHUL guidelines.
STANDARD
8
DOMAIN 6: COMMODITIES AND SUPPLIES
Commodities and supplies are consumable and non-consumable items that are used to facilitate delivery of services. Their procurement needs to conform to the processes of supply chain management and distribution.. The CHS kits content will be determined at the National level, customised at the County level and the link facility will supply the same to the CHEWs and CHVs at the community.
6.1 The procurement processes shall conform to the supply chain and commodities management policies, guidelines and procedures.
6.2 The CHV and CHEW shall be supplied with a CHS kit as per CHS guidelines by the link facility.
6.3 Supply of commodities shall be demand driven.
6.4 The CHEW shall participate in development of procurement plans for level 1.
6.5 Procurement shall conform with commodity specifications.
6.6 Skills in forecasting and quantification of health commodities shall be imparted to tier one staff by County Trainers of Trainers (TOTs).
6.7 Management of common conditions shall conform with specific disease treatment guidelines.
6.8 The principle of First-Expiry-First-Out (FEFO) and First-In-First-Out (FIFO) shall be adhered to by the link facility and the community health personnel.
6.9 There shall be job aids to guide commodity management.
6.10 Storage of the. commodities shall be as per the recommendations of the manufacturer.
6.11 Reconstitution of commodities shall be as per the recommendations of the manufacturer.
STANDARDS
9
DOMAIN 7: TRANSPORT
The availability of adequate and efficient transport service is essential for the delivery of community health services including provision of outreach services, essential support supervision and rapid response to public health emergencies at various levels of the community health system. The availability and safety of transport equipment is assured through proper maintenance, licensing and monitoring of utilization.
STANDARDS
7.1 There shall be an appropriate means of transport at each CHU.
7.2 The means of transport shall be aligned and comply with Government transport policies and guidelines.
7.3 Community health personnel who operate a motorcycle shall be required to be in possession
of a valid motorcycle riding license.
7.4 Community health personnel shall be trained on how to maintain the transport equipment.
7.5 There shall be an updated inventory and maintenance plan of transport.
10
DOMAIN 8: REFERRAL SYSTEM
The referral system provides linkage between the community and other tiers of care The availability of adequate and efficient referral service is essential for the delivery of community health services. This will include cases that can effectively be handled at tier two and beyond. Community health personnel should be able to communicate with other levels of care in cases requiring further management.
STANDARDS
8.1 Cases requiring further management shall be referred to higher levels of care according to the referral guidelines.
8.2 There shall be healthcare expert movement to the community where appropriate, to be coordinated by the County and sub-county health management team.
8.3. There shall be a provision for adequate communication systems between the community and higher levels of care.
11
DOMAIN 9: COMMUNITY HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM
The community health information system ensures shared responsibility for collection and interpretation of community health related information, routine data, statistics or experiential studies and vital statistics to inform planning, decision making and reporting.
A proper health information management system involves investment in time, financial resources and effort in maintaining an open and good information system that enhances relationship with all stakeholders and the general public.
STANDARDS
9.1 There shall be completed household records updated every six months in each CHU.
9.2 There shall be Monthly reports compiled for planning and monitoring of community health service.
9.3 The CHEW shall submit the monthly reports to the link health facility by 5th of every month.
9.4 Health information generated from the community shall be uploaded into the District Health Information System (DHIS) by 15th of every month by the Sub-County Health Records Information Officer (HRIO).
9.5 Every Community Health Unit shall have and use all reporting tools as per Community Health Service guidelines.
12
DOMAIN 10: COMMUNITY HEALTH FINANCING
Community health financing includes mobilization of resources from public, private, external aid and community based sources to support implementation of community health strategies, action plans and services at various levels. The key sources include public funds, external donations, community based health financing, social health insurance and public-private partnerships through corporate social responsibility.
STANDARDS
10.1 CHEWs and CHVs shall prepare the annual work plan (AWP) and budget for community health unit to be approved by the CHC.
10.2 The link facility management shall prepare a consolidated AWP comprising of the facility and affiliated CHU work plan.
10.3 The Sub-county health management team shall integrate the CHU budget and AWP into the county budget.
10.4 The County government shall provide vote heads and resource envelop for CHUs in the facility allocation.
10.5 The CHC shall account for the utilized financial resources
according to the availed funds.
10.6 County health management team/Sub-county health management team or CHC shall mobilize resources for CHUs.
10.7 The Sub-county health management teams shall call for audits for CHUs to determine the utilization of funds at the Community as per Public Financial Management Act.
13
DOMAIN 11: LINKAGES AND PARTNERSHIPS
Linkage is defined as a clear organizational structure with well-defined roles and responsibilities for all actors at all levels. There exists linkages between the CHC, the facility health committee, and other governance committees in the health systems Partnership is a collaborative effort requiring systems and structures that harness and link diverse community resources towards quality improvement of services at level 1. Community partnership is a process of building voluntary strategic alliances among community, government, private, and non-profit making organizations. Alliances and partnership building involves sharing of risks, responsibilities, resources, rewards as well as exchange of information for mutual benefit and to achieve a common community health purpose.
STANDARDS
11.1 There shall be a mechanisms for partner and public coordination and accountability at the community by the County health management team.
11.2 There shall be a social accountability mechanism by the Sub-county health management team/CHC.
11.3 There shall be at least one all-inclusive stakeholder forum convened quarterly by the County or sub-County health
management team to improve health in the community.
11.4 There shall be inter-sectoral collaboration involving all non -health stakeholders convened by the County or Sub-county health management team to promote community health services.
14
DOMAIN 12: SERVICE DELIVERY
Health service delivery is viewed as a process where CHVs and CHEWs are involved in the sequence of activities and services to achieve improved health status. They work as a team to ensure safe and efficient promotive, preventive and basic curative services at the household in line with the set standards.
STANDARDS
12.1 There shall be biannual registration of all household members by the community health volunteer.
12.2 There shall be a monthly visit to every household by the community health volunteer to offer services on various health aspects.
12.3 CHVs shall use job aids to guide their work at the household level.
12.4 There shall be at least quarterly community action days for every CHU.
12.5 There shall be a monthly updated chalkboard for recording community health information in each CHU.
12.6 There shall be a defined
minimum package for each cohort in the community.
12.7 There shall be reporting of early signs to monitor imminent disasters and emergencies by CHVs.
15
DOMAIN 13: MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Monitoring and evaluation provides regular feedback and oversight of implementation of activities in relation to plans, resources, infrastructure and use of services by the community served. It also guides collection, analysis, use, and dissemination of information; enables tracking of progress; ensures timely reporting at community level of the health information system; and enables informed decision making.
13.1 There shall be monthly community dialogue fora convened by the CHEWs in charge as per the CHS guidelines.
13.2 There shall be adequate standard data capture tools made available by the sub-County Health Management Team.
13.3 There shall be adequate standard reporting tools made available by the sub-County Health Management Team
13.4 There shall be quarterly analysis, interpretation and dissemination of community health data led by the CHEW.
13.5 There shall be health action days informed by the dialogue fora convened by the CHEW.
13.6 There shall be monthly
CHEW/CHV meetings to receive activity reports and discuss service statistics data, experiences, challenges, lessons learnt and give feedback. Such meetings shall be convened by the CHEW in charge
13.7 There shall be biannual data quality audits of community health units led by the sub-County Health Information Officer.
13.8 There shall be joint review and learning sessions for CHEWs to share experiences convened by the sub-County Health Management Team.
13.9 There shall be quarterly functionality assessment of community health units led by the Sub County community health strategy focal person.
STANDARDS
16
MO
NIT
ORI
NG
AN
D E
VALU
ATIO
N S
HEE
T FO
R T
IER
ON
E KQ
MH
HEA
LTH
FA
CILI
TY:
DEP
ART
MEN
T:
COU
NTY
:D
ATE:
1D
OM
AIN
1: L
EAD
ERSH
IP A
ND
GO
VERN
AN
CE.
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
1.1Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip
shal
l be
awar
e of
th
e Ke
nya
Qua
lity
Mod
el fo
r Hea
lth
(KQ
MH
) and
re
cogn
ize
thei
r le
ader
ship
role
as
an e
ssen
tial p
art
of im
prov
ing
the
qual
ity c
omm
unity
he
alth
ser
vice
s.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip a
re
not a
war
e of
the
KQM
H a
nd th
ey
do n
ot re
cogn
ize
thei
r rol
es in
le
ader
ship
.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip a
re
awar
e of
the
KQM
H a
nd th
ey
do n
ot re
cogn
ize
thei
r rol
es in
le
ader
ship
.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip a
re
awar
e of
the
KQM
H a
nd
they
reco
gniz
e th
eir r
oles
but
th
ey h
ave
not
actu
aliz
ed r
oles
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es le
ader
ship
is
aw
are
of th
e KQ
MH
, rec
ogni
ze
thei
r rol
es in
le
ader
ship
and
ha
ve a
ctua
lized
th
e ro
les
but
ther
e is
no
docu
men
tatio
n.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es le
ader
ship
is
aw
are
of th
e KQ
MH
, rec
ogni
zes
thei
r rol
es in
le
ader
ship
, hav
e ac
tual
ized
the
ro
les
and
ther
e is
do
cum
enta
tion.
1.2Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip
shal
l pro
mot
e co
llabo
rativ
e an
d pa
rtic
ipat
ory
de
cisi
on m
akin
g.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip d
o no
t pro
mot
e co
llabo
rativ
e an
d pa
rtic
ipat
ory
de
cisi
on m
akin
g.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es le
ader
-sh
ip p
rom
ote
col-
labo
ratio
n bu
t do
not p
artic
ipat
e in
de
cisi
on m
akin
g.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip
prom
ote
colla
bora
tion
and
part
icip
atio
n in
dec
isio
n m
akin
g , b
ut
ther
e is
no
evid
ence
of
docu
men
tatio
n an
d no
follo
w-
up.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip p
rom
ote
colla
bora
tion
and
part
icip
atio
n in
de
cisi
on m
akin
g an
d th
ere
is
docu
men
tatio
n bu
t no
follo
w-u
p.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es le
ader
ship
pr
omot
e co
llabo
rativ
e an
d pa
rtic
ipat
ory
de
cisi
on
mak
ing,
ther
e is
do
cum
enta
tion
and
follo
w-u
p.
17
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
1.3Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip s
hall
prov
ide
oppo
rtun
ity fo
r de
velo
pmen
t of
com
mun
ity h
ealth
w
orkf
orce
for
sust
aina
ble
com
mun
ity h
ealth
serv
ices
del
iver
y.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
do
not
prov
ide
oppo
rtun
ity fo
r de
velo
pmen
t of
com
mun
ity h
ealth
w
orkf
orce
for
sust
aina
ble
com
mun
ity h
ealth
serv
ices
del
iver
y.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
e co
nduc
ted
a tr
aini
ng n
eeds
as
sess
men
t for
co
mm
unity
hea
lth
wor
kfor
ce.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip
prov
ide
oppo
rtun
ities
for
deve
lopm
ent o
fco
mm
unity
he
alth
wor
k-fo
rce.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
pro
vide
oppo
rtun
ities
for
deve
lopm
ent o
fco
mm
unity
he
alth
wor
kfor
ce
and
ther
e ar
e co
ntin
uous
trai
ning
pr
ojec
tions
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
pro
vide
oppo
rtun
ities
for
deve
lopm
ent o
fco
mm
unity
hea
lth
wor
kfor
ce, t
here
is
adhe
renc
e to
con
-tin
uous
trai
ning
pr
ojec
tions
and
do
cum
enta
tion.
1.4Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip s
hall
sens
itize
all
the
stak
ehol
ders
on
thei
r rol
e an
dre
spon
sibi
litie
s in
de
liver
ing
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
has
not
se
nsiti
zed
all t
hest
akeh
olde
rs o
n th
eir r
oles
and
re
spon
sibi
litie
s in
de
liver
ing
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
e a
stra
tegy
for
sens
itiza
tion
of
all t
hest
akeh
olde
rs o
n th
eir r
oles
and
re
spon
sibi
litie
s in
de
liver
ing
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip h
ave
sens
itize
d al
l the
stak
ehol
ders
on
thei
r rol
es a
nd
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
in d
eliv
erin
gco
mm
unity
he
alth
ser
vice
s.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
e se
nsiti
zed
all t
hest
akeh
olde
rs o
n th
eir r
oles
and
re
spon
sibi
litie
s,
and
they
hav
e ta
ken-
up th
eir r
oles
an
d re
spon
sibi
litie
s in
del
iver
ing
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
e se
nsiti
zed
all t
hest
akeh
olde
rs o
n th
eir r
oles
and
re
spon
sibi
litie
s in
de
liver
ing
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
es, t
hey
have
ta
ken-
up th
eir
role
s an
d th
ere
is e
vide
nce
of
docu
men
tatio
n.
18
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
1.5Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip s
hall
follo
w th
egu
idel
ines
on
the
esta
blis
hmen
tof
CH
U.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
do
not
follo
wgu
idel
ines
on
the
esta
blis
hmen
tof
CH
U.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
e m
ade
plan
s to
es
tabl
ish
a CH
U
acco
rdin
g to
the
gu
idel
ines
.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip h
ave
follo
wed
gu
idel
ines
on
the
esta
blis
hmen
tof
CH
U.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
efo
llow
ed
guid
elin
es o
n th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent
of C
HU
and
ther
e is
doc
umen
ted
evid
ence
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
efo
llow
ed
guid
elin
es o
n th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent
of a
CH
U, t
here
is
an
indu
ctio
n pl
an fo
r new
le
ader
s on
the
guid
elin
es fo
r CH
U
esta
blis
hmen
t an
d th
ere
is
docu
men
ted
evid
ence
19
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
1.5Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip s
hall
follo
w th
egu
idel
ines
on
the
esta
blis
hmen
tof
CH
U.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
do
not
follo
wgu
idel
ines
on
the
esta
blis
hmen
tof
CH
U.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
e m
ade
plan
s to
es
tabl
ish
a CH
U
acco
rdin
g to
the
gu
idel
ines
.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip h
ave
follo
wed
gu
idel
ines
on
the
esta
blis
hmen
tof
CH
U.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
efo
llow
ed
guid
elin
es o
n th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent
of C
HU
and
ther
e is
doc
umen
ted
evid
ence
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
efo
llow
ed
guid
elin
es o
n th
e es
tabl
ishm
ent
of a
CH
U, t
here
is
an
indu
ctio
n pl
an fo
r new
le
ader
s on
the
guid
elin
es fo
r CH
U
esta
blis
hmen
t an
d th
ere
is
docu
men
ted
evid
ence
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
1.6Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip s
hall
ensu
re th
efu
ll fu
nctio
nalit
y of
th
e CH
U (m
onth
ly
dial
ogue
day
s,qu
arte
rly a
ctio
n da
ys, a
ndCo
mm
unity
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Syst
em [C
HIS
] re
port
ing)
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
has
not
en
sure
dfu
ll fu
nctio
nalit
y th
e CH
Us.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
has
en
sure
dfu
nctio
nalit
y of
the
CHU
s by
con
duct
ing
mon
thly
dia
logu
e da
ys,
quar
terly
act
ion
days
but
do
not
have
repo
rts
on C
omm
unity
H
ealth
In
form
atio
nSy
stem
[CH
IS].
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip
ensu
re fu
ll fu
nctio
nalit
y
of th
e CH
U b
y co
nduc
ting
mon
thly
di
alog
ue d
ays,
quar
terly
act
ion
days
, and
hav
e re
port
s in
the
Com
mun
ity
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Syst
em [C
HIS
] th
at m
easu
re th
e fu
nctio
nalit
y of
th
e CH
U.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
ens
ure
full
func
tiona
lity
of
the
CHU
by
cond
uctin
g m
onth
ly d
ialo
gue
days
, qua
rter
ly
actio
n da
ys, h
ave
aCo
mm
unity
Hea
lth
Info
rmat
ion
Syst
em [C
HIS
] with
re
gula
r rep
orts
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
ens
ure
full
func
tiona
lity
of
the
CHU
by
con-
duct
ing
mon
thly
di
alog
ue d
ays,
quar
terly
act
ion
days
, hav
e a
Com
mun
ity H
ealth
In
form
atio
nSy
stem
[CH
IS]
with
regu
lar
repo
rts
and
feed
-ba
ck.
1.7Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip s
hall
ensu
re th
atst
anda
rd to
ols
for
supp
ortiv
esu
perv
isio
n ar
e av
aila
ble
and
used
dur
ing
quar
-te
rly s
uppo
rtiv
esu
perv
isio
n.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
e no st
anda
rd to
ols
for
supp
ortiv
esu
perv
isio
n.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
est
anda
rd to
ols
for
supp
ortiv
esu
perv
isio
n bu
t su
perv
isio
n is
ad
hoc.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip h
ave
stan
dard
tool
s fo
r sup
port
ive
supe
rvis
ion
have
a p
lan
and
regu
lar v
isits
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
est
anda
rd to
ols
for
supp
ortiv
esu
perv
isio
n ha
ve a
pl
an, r
egul
ar v
isits
an
d re
port
s.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hav
est
anda
rd to
ols
for
supp
ortiv
esu
perv
isio
n ha
ve
a pl
an, r
egul
ar
visi
ts, r
epor
ts a
nd
feed
back
.
20
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
1.8Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip s
hall
hold
regu
lar
stak
ehol
der
foru
ms
at le
ast
sem
i-ann
ually
for c
oord
inat
ion
amon
g st
akeh
olde
rs.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
do
not
hold
st
akeh
olde
r mee
t-in
gs.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hol
d irr
egul
arst
akeh
olde
r mee
t-in
gs.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ces
lead
ersh
ip h
old
stak
ehol
der
foru
ms
at le
ast
sem
iann
ually
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hol
d re
gula
rst
akeh
olde
r mee
t-in
gs w
ith d
etai
led
actio
n pl
ans.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
hol
d re
gula
rst
akeh
olde
r m
eetin
gs, h
ave
deta
iled
actio
n pl
ans
and
feed
back
.
1.9Co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
lead
ersh
ip s
hall
ensu
re th
atCH
Cs h
old
mee
t-in
gs m
onth
ly a
ndev
iden
ced
by th
e m
inut
es.
CHC
mon
thly
m
eetin
gs n
ot h
eld
at a
ll.
CHC
hold
irre
gula
r m
eetin
gs w
ith n
o m
inut
es.
CHC
hold
regu
lar
mee
tings
with
m
inut
es.
CHC
hold
regu
lar
mee
tings
with
m
inut
es a
nd a
de
taile
d ac
tion
plan
.
CHC
hold
regu
lar
mee
tings
with
co
nsis
tent
m
inut
es, a
det
aile
d ac
tion
plan
and
fe
edba
ck.
1.10
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
esle
ader
ship
sha
ll do
cum
ent t
heid
entifi
ed a
reas
for
impr
ovem
ent
and
dem
onst
rate
eff
orts
for
rem
edia
l act
ion.
Ther
e ar
e no
do
cum
enta
tion
of a
reas
of
impr
ovem
ent
and
no e
ffor
ts fo
r re
med
ial a
ctio
n.
Lead
ersh
ip h
ave
iden
tified
are
as
for i
mpr
ovem
ent
and
no e
ffor
ts
dem
onst
rate
d fo
r re
med
ial a
ctio
n
Lead
ersh
ip h
ave
docu
men
ted
the
id
entifi
ed a
reas
fo
r im
prov
emen
t an
d re
med
ial
actio
n.
Lead
ersh
ip h
ave
stan
dard
ized
id
entifi
catio
n of
are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
t,
rem
edia
l act
ion
and
follo
w-u
p.
Lead
ersh
ip h
ave
stan
dard
ized
id
entifi
catio
n of
are
as fo
r im
prov
emen
t, re
med
ial a
ctio
n,
follo
w-u
p, a
nd a
ll th
is is
sus
tain
ed.
21
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
2D
OM
AIN
2: C
OM
MU
NIT
Y H
EALT
H W
ORK
FORC
E M
AN
AG
EMEN
T
2.1
All p
ositi
ons
for
CHVs
sha
llbe
fille
d in
acc
or-
danc
e w
ith th
eCo
mm
unity
str
ate-
gy g
uide
lines
.
All p
ositi
ons
for
CHVs
hav
e no
t be
en fi
lled
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
the
Com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
gu
idel
ines
Som
e po
sitio
ns
for C
HVs
hav
e be
en fi
lled
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
the
com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
gu
idel
ines
.
All p
ositi
ons
for C
HVs
hav
e be
en fi
lled
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
the
com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
gu
idel
ines
.
All p
ositi
ons
for C
HVs
hav
e be
en fi
lled
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
the
com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
gui
delin
es
and
pers
onne
l dat
a do
cum
ente
d.
All p
ositi
ons
for C
HVs
hav
e be
en fi
lled
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
the
com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
gui
de-
lines
, per
sonn
el
data
doc
umen
ted
and
it is
regu
larly
up
date
d.
2.2
Ther
e sh
all b
e an
in
vent
ory
of A
LL C
HVs
mai
n-ta
ined
by
the
Com
mun
ity H
ealth
Ex
tens
ion
Wor
kers
(CH
EWs)
an
d up
date
dan
nual
ly.
Ther
e is
NO
in
vent
ory
for
CHVs
mai
ntai
ned
by th
eCo
mm
unity
Hea
lth
Exte
nsio
nW
orke
rs (C
HEW
s).
Ther
e is
an
inve
ntor
y fo
r CH
Vs m
aint
aine
d by
the
CHEW
bu
t not
upd
ated
an
nual
ly.
Ther
e is
an
inve
ntor
y fo
r CH
Vs m
aint
aine
d by
the
CHEW
an
d up
date
d an
nual
ly.
Ther
e is
an
inve
ntor
y fo
r ALL
CH
Vs m
aint
aine
d by
the
CHEW
up
date
d an
nual
ly
and
utili
zed.
Ther
e is
an
inve
ntor
y fo
r ALL
CH
Vs m
aint
aine
d by
the
CHEW
, up
date
d an
nual
ly,
utili
zed
and
best
pr
actic
es s
hare
d.
2.3
Ther
e sh
all b
e fiv
e (5
) CH
EWs
depl
oyed
in e
ach
CHU
as
stip
ulat
ed
in th
e co
mm
unity
he
alth
str
ateg
y
No
CHEW
de
ploy
ed in
the
CHU
Less
than
five
CH
EWs
depl
oyed
in
eac
h CH
U
Five
CH
EWs
depl
oyed
in
each
CH
U a
s st
ipul
ated
in
the
com
mun
ity
heal
th s
trat
egy
Five
CH
EWs
depl
oyed
in e
ach
CHU
as
stip
ulat
ed
in th
e co
mm
unity
he
alth
str
ateg
y,
and
docu
men
tatio
n is
ava
ilabl
e bu
t not
up
-to-d
ate.
Five
CH
EWs
depl
oyed
in e
ach
CHU
as
stip
ulat
ed
in th
e co
mm
unity
he
alth
str
ateg
y an
d up
date
d do
cum
enta
tion
is
avai
labl
e.
22
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
2.4
Ther
e sh
all b
e an
in
vent
ory
of A
LL C
HEW
s m
aint
aine
d by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty H
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am a
nd u
pdat
ed
annu
ally
.
Ther
e is
NO
in
vent
ory
for
ALL
CHEW
s m
aint
aine
d by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty H
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am.
Ther
e is
an
inve
ntor
y fo
r AL
L CH
EWs
mai
n-ta
ined
by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty
Hea
lth m
anag
e-m
ent
team
but
not
up-
date
d an
nual
ly.
Ther
e is
an
inve
ntor
y fo
r AL
L CH
EWs
mai
ntai
ned
by th
e Su
b-Co
unty
Hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
that
is
upd
ated
an
nual
ly.
Ther
e is
an
inve
nto-
ry fo
r ALL
CH
EWs
mai
ntai
ned
by th
e Su
b-Co
unty
Hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
that
is u
pdat
-ed
ann
ually
and
ut
ilize
d
Ther
e is
an
inve
ntor
y fo
r ALL
CH
EWs
mai
ntai
ned
by th
e Su
b-Co
unty
Hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
, upd
ated
an
nual
ly, u
tiliz
ed
and
best
pra
ctic
es
shar
ed.
2.5
Vaca
ncie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
Sche
me
of S
ervi
ce
for
Com
mun
ity H
ealth
Pe
rson
nel
shal
l be
fille
d w
ith
qual
ified
sta
ff.
Vaca
ncie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
sche
me
of S
ervi
ce
for C
omm
unity
H
ealth
Per
sonn
el
not fi
lled.
Vaca
ncie
s pr
ovid
-ed
in th
e Sc
hem
e of
Ser
vice
for
Com
mun
ity
Hea
lth P
erso
nnel
have
bee
n fil
led
with
unq
ualifi
ed
staff
.
Vaca
ncie
s pr
ovid
ed in
the
Sche
me
of
Serv
ice
for
Com
mun
ity
Hea
lth P
erso
nnel
have
bee
n fil
led
with
qua
lified
st
aff.
Vaca
ncie
s pr
ovid
ed
in th
e Sc
hem
e of
Se
rvic
e fo
rCo
mm
unity
Hea
lth
Pers
onne
lha
ve b
een
fille
d w
ith q
ualifi
ed
staff
and
ther
e is
a
data
base
.
Vaca
ncie
s pr
ovid
-ed
in th
e Sc
hem
e of
Ser
vice
for
Com
mun
ity H
ealth
Pe
rson
nel
have
bee
n fil
led
with
qua
lified
st
aff a
nd th
ere
is a
re
gula
rly u
pdat
ed
data
base
.
23
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
2.6
Avai
labl
e co
mm
unity
hea
lthva
canc
ies
shal
l be
com
mun
icat
edth
roug
h a
fair,
tr
ansp
aren
t and
acce
ssib
le s
yste
m.
Avai
labl
e co
mm
unity
hea
lthva
canc
ies
have
not
bee
n co
mm
unic
ated
.
Avai
labl
e co
mm
unity
hea
lthva
canc
ies
have
bee
n co
mm
unic
ated
bu
t not
thro
ugh
a fa
ir, tr
ansp
aren
t an
dac
cess
ible
sys
tem
.
Avai
labl
e co
mm
unity
he
alth
vaca
ncie
s ha
ve b
een
com
mun
icat
edth
roug
h a
fair,
tr
ansp
aren
t and
acce
ssib
le
syst
em.
Avai
labl
e co
mm
unity
hea
lthva
canc
ies
have
bee
n co
mm
unic
ated
thro
ugh
a fa
ir,
tran
spar
ent a
ndac
cess
ible
sys
tem
, an
d in
a ti
mel
y m
anne
r.
Avai
labl
e co
mm
unity
hea
lthva
canc
ies
have
bee
n co
mm
unic
ated
thro
ugh
a fa
ir,
tran
spar
ent a
ndac
cess
ible
sys
tem
, in
a ti
mel
y m
anne
r an
d do
cum
enta
-tio
n is
ava
ilabl
e.
2.7
A w
ritte
n jo
b de
scrip
tion
ofco
mm
unity
hea
lth
wor
kfor
cesh
all b
e co
mm
unic
ated
tore
spec
tive
empl
oyee
s.
A w
ritte
n jo
b de
scrip
tion
ofco
mm
unity
hea
lth
wor
kfor
ceha
s no
t bee
n co
mm
unic
ated
tore
spec
tive
empl
oyee
s.
A w
ritte
n jo
b de
scrip
tion
ofco
mm
unity
hea
lth
wor
kfor
ceha
s be
en
com
mun
icat
ed to
so
me
empl
oyee
s.
A w
ritte
n jo
b de
scrip
tion
ofco
mm
unity
he
alth
wor
kfor
ce
has
been
co
mm
unic
ated
to
the
resp
ectiv
e em
ploy
ees.
A w
ritte
n jo
b de
-sc
riptio
n of
com
mun
ity
heal
th w
orkf
orce
ha
s be
en
com
mun
icat
ed
to th
e re
spec
tive
empl
oyee
s an
d ac
know
ledg
ed.
A w
ritte
n jo
b de
scrip
tion
ofco
mm
unity
hea
lth
wor
kfor
ceha
s be
en
com
mun
icat
ed
to th
ere
spec
tive
empl
oyee
s,
ackn
owle
dged
and
ad
opte
d.
24
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
2.8
Ther
e sh
all b
e an
ap
prai
sal
for a
ll CH
EWs
on
an a
nnua
l bas
isus
ing
a st
anda
rdiz
ed
form
at,
by th
e Su
b-Co
unty
he
alth
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e is
no
appr
aisa
l for
all
CHEW
s on
an
annu
al b
asis
usin
g a
stan
dard
ized
fo
rmat
, by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty
heal
thm
anag
emen
t te
am.
Ther
e is
an
ap-
prai
sal
for a
ll CH
EWs
usin
g a
stan
dard
-iz
ed fo
rmat
,by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty
heal
thm
anag
emen
t te
am b
ut n
ot o
n an
ann
ual b
asis
.
Ther
e is
an
appr
aisa
lfo
r all
CHEW
s on
an
ann
ual b
asis
usin
g a
stan
dard
ized
fo
rmat
, by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e is
an
appr
aisa
lfo
r all
CHEW
s on
an
annu
al b
asis
usin
g a
stan
dard
ized
fo
rmat
, by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty
heal
thm
anag
emen
t tea
m
and
feed
back
gi
ven.
Ther
e is
an
ap-
prai
sal
for a
ll CH
EWs
on
an a
nnua
l bas
isus
ing
a st
anda
rdiz
ed
form
at, b
y th
e Su
b-Co
unty
Hea
lthm
anag
emen
t Te
am, f
eedb
ack
give
n an
d ac
tion
take
n.
2.9
Ther
e sh
all b
e a
cont
inui
ngpr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
prog
ram
me
for a
ll CH
EWs
and
CHVs
. co
ordi
nate
d by
th
e su
b-co
unty
he
alth
man
age-
men
t tea
m.
Ther
e is
no
con-
tinui
ngpr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
prog
ram
me
for
all C
HEW
s an
d CH
Vs, c
oord
inat
ed
by th
e su
b-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e is
a p
lan
for
cont
inui
ng
prof
essi
onal
de
velo
pmen
t pr
ogra
mm
e fo
r al
l CH
EWs
and
CHVs
, coo
rdin
ated
by
the
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
am b
ut it
ha
s no
t bee
n im
plem
ente
d.
Ther
e is
a
cont
inui
ngpr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
prog
ram
me
for a
ll CH
EWs
and
CHVs
co
ordi
nate
d by
the
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
am.
Ther
e is
a
cont
inui
ngpr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
prog
ram
me
for a
ll CH
EWs
and
CHVs
co
ordi
nate
d by
the
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
am a
nd e
vide
nce
of im
prov
ed
perf
orm
ance
Ther
e is
a
cont
inui
ngpr
ofes
sion
al
deve
lopm
ent
prog
ram
me
for a
ll CH
EWs
and
CHVs
co
ordi
nate
d by
the
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
am, w
ith
evid
ence
of
perf
orm
ance
an
d su
stai
ned
impr
ovem
ent.
25
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
2.10
Ther
e sh
all b
e m
easu
res
toen
sure
sta
ff s
afet
y in
acc
orda
nce
with
th
e O
ccup
atio
nal
Safe
ty a
nd H
ealth
(O
SH) g
uide
lines
im
plem
ente
d by
th
e Su
b-co
unty
and
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
ams.
Ther
e ar
e N
o m
easu
res
toen
sure
sta
ff s
afet
y in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
OSH
gu
idel
ines
im
plem
ente
d by
th
e Su
b-co
unty
and
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
ams.
Ther
e ar
e m
easu
res
toen
sure
sta
ff s
afet
y bu
t not
acc
ordi
ng
to O
SH g
uide
lines
im
plem
ente
d by
th
e Su
b-co
unty
and
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
ams.
Ther
e ar
e m
easu
res
toen
sure
sta
ff
safe
ty in
ac
cord
ance
w
ith th
e O
SH
guid
elin
es
impl
emen
ted
by
the
Sub-
coun
tyan
d Co
unty
he
alth
m
anag
emen
tte
ams.
Ther
e ar
e m
ea-
sure
s to
ens
ure
staff
saf
ety
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith
the
OSH
gui
delin
es
impl
emen
ted
by
the
Sub-
coun
tyan
d Co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
s an
d fo
llow
-up
on
impl
emen
tatio
n.
Ther
e ar
e m
easu
res
to
ensu
re s
taff
saf
ety
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
the
OSH
guid
elin
es
impl
emen
ted
by
the
Sub-
coun
tyan
d Co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
s, fo
llow
-up
on im
plem
enta
tion
and
cont
inuo
us
adhe
renc
e.
2.11
Ther
e sh
all b
e a
mot
ivat
ion
mec
hani
sm fo
r co
mm
unity
heal
th p
erso
nnel
im
plem
ente
dby
the
Sub-
coun
ty
and
Coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams.
Ther
e is
no
mot
ivat
ion
mec
hani
sm fo
r co
mm
unity
heal
th p
erso
nnel
im
plem
ente
dby
the
Sub-
coun
ty
and
Coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams.
Ther
e is
a
mot
ivat
ion
mec
hani
sm
for t
he fo
r co
mm
unity
heal
th p
erso
nnel
bu
t not
im
plem
ente
dby
the
Sub-
coun
ty
and
Coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams.
Ther
e is
a
mot
ivat
ion
mec
hani
sm fo
r co
mm
unity
heal
th p
erso
nnel
im
plem
ente
dby
the
Sub-
coun
ty a
nd
Coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams.
Ther
e is
a
mot
ivat
ion
mec
hani
sm fo
r co
mm
unity
heal
th p
erso
nnel
im
plem
ente
dby
the
Sub-
coun
ty
and
Coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams,
CH
C an
d pa
rtne
rs.
Ther
e is
a
sust
aine
d m
otiv
atio
nm
echa
nism
for
com
mun
ityhe
alth
per
sonn
el
impl
emen
ted
by th
e Su
b-co
unty
an
d Co
unty
heal
th
man
agem
ent
team
s, C
HC
and
part
ners
.
26
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
3D
OM
AIN
3: C
OM
MU
NIT
Y H
EALT
H P
OLI
CY, G
UID
ELIN
ES A
ND
STR
ATEG
IES
3.1
All h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs s
hall
be fa
mili
ar w
ith a
ll th
e re
leva
ntpo
licie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
thro
ugh
the
effor
ts o
fth
e co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
.
All h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs a
re
not f
amili
ar w
ith
all t
he re
leva
ntpo
licie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
th
roug
h th
e eff
orts
of
the
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am
All h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs h
ave
acce
ss to
the
rele
vant
polic
ies
and
guid
elin
es
thro
ugh
the
effor
ts o
fth
e co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
but
are
no
t fam
iliar
with
th
em.
All h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs a
re
fam
iliar
with
all
the
rele
vant
polic
ies
and
guid
elin
es
thro
ugh
the
effor
ts o
fth
e co
unty
he
alth
m
anag
emen
tte
am.
All h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs h
ave
acce
ss to
, and
are
fa
mili
ar w
ith th
e re
leva
ntpo
licie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
thro
ugh
the
effor
ts o
fth
e co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
, and
are
ut
ilizi
ng th
em.
All h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs h
ave
acce
ss a
nd a
re
fam
iliar
with
the
rele
vant
polic
ies
and
guid
elin
es th
roug
h th
e eff
orts
of
the
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am, a
re u
tiliz
ing
them
and
ther
e is
do
cum
enta
tion
of
utili
zatio
n.
3.2
Ther
e sh
all b
e a
syst
em in
pla
ce to
m
onito
r the
use
and
adhe
renc
e of
po
licie
s an
dgu
idel
ines
sp
earh
eade
d by
th
e Su
b-Co
unty
an
d Co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
ams.
Ther
e is
no
syst
emin
pla
ce to
m
onito
r the
use
an
d ad
here
nce
of
polic
ies
and
guid
elin
es
spea
rhea
ded
by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty
and
Coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
s.
Ther
e ar
e pl
ans
to
esta
blis
h a
syst
em
to m
onito
r the
us
ean
d ad
here
nce
to
polic
ies
and
guid
elin
es
spea
rhea
ded
by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty a
nd
Coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
s.
Ther
e is
a s
yste
m
in p
lace
to
mon
itor t
he u
sean
d ad
here
nce
to p
olic
ies
and
guid
elin
es,
spea
rhea
ded
by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty
and
Coun
ty
heal
thm
anag
emen
t te
ams.
Ther
e is
a s
yste
m in
pl
ace
to in
form
the
use
and
adhe
renc
e to
pol
icie
s an
dgu
idel
ines
sp
earh
eade
d by
th
e Su
b-Co
unty
and
Co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
ams,
it is
im
plem
ente
d re
gula
rly b
ut
ther
e is
no
docu
men
tatio
n.
Ther
e is
a s
yste
m
in p
lace
to in
form
th
e us
e an
d ad
here
nce
to
polic
ies
and
guid
elin
es,
spea
rhea
ded
by
the
Sub-
Coun
ty
and
Coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
s, it
is
impl
emen
ted
regu
larly
and
ther
e is
doc
umen
tatio
n.
27
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
3.3
The
com
mun
ity
heal
thw
orkf
orce
sha
ll be
up
date
dan
nual
ly o
n th
e ex
istin
gco
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
polic
ies
and
guid
elin
es b
y th
eco
unty
com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
foca
lpe
rson
.
The
com
mun
ity
heal
thw
orkf
orce
not
up
date
dan
nual
ly o
n th
e ex
istin
gco
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ices
polic
ies
and
guid
elin
es b
y th
eco
unty
com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
foca
lpe
rson
.
The
com
mun
ity
heal
thw
orkf
orce
is
upda
ted
on
the
exis
ting
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
espo
licie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
by
the
coun
ty
com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
foca
lpe
rson
but
not
an
nual
ly.
The
com
mun
ity
heal
thw
orkf
orce
is
upda
ted
annu
ally
on th
e ex
istin
gco
mm
unity
he
alth
ser
vice
spo
licie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
by
the
coun
ty
com
mun
ity
stra
tegy
foca
lpe
rson
.
The
com
mun
ity
heal
thw
orkf
orce
is
upda
ted
annu
ally
on
the
exis
ting
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
espo
licie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
by
the
coun
ty c
omm
unity
st
rate
gy fo
cal
pers
on a
nd th
ere
is a
n ac
tion
plan
de
velo
ped.
The
com
mun
ity
heal
thw
orkf
orce
is
upda
ted
annu
ally
on
the
exis
ting
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
espo
licie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
by
the
coun
ty c
omm
unity
st
rate
gy fo
cal
pers
on, a
n ac
tion
plan
has
be
en d
evel
oped
an
d th
ere
is
evid
ence
of
impl
emen
tatio
n.
3.4
Ther
e sh
all b
e co
mm
unity
invo
lvem
ent a
nd
part
icip
atio
nin
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
com
mun
ity h
ealth
po
licie
s an
dgu
idel
ines
led
by
the
CHEW
.
Ther
e is
no
com
mun
ityin
volv
emen
t and
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of c
omm
unity
he
alth
pol
icie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
led
by
the
CHEW
.
Ther
e is
sel
ectiv
e co
mm
unity
in
volv
emen
t and
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of c
omm
unity
he
alth
pol
icie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
led
by th
e CH
EW.
Ther
e is
co
mm
unity
in
volv
emen
t and
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of c
omm
unity
he
alth
pol
icie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
le
d by
the
CHEW
.
Ther
e is
com
mun
ity
invo
lvem
ent a
nd
part
icip
atio
n in
the
impl
emen
tatio
n of
com
mun
ity
heal
th p
olic
ies
and
guid
elin
es
led
by th
e CH
EW
and
ther
e is
do
cum
enta
tion
Ther
e is
co
mm
unity
in
volv
emen
t and
pa
rtic
ipat
ion
in th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of c
omm
unity
he
alth
pol
icie
s an
d gu
idel
ines
le
d by
the
CHEW
, an
d th
ere
is
docu
men
tatio
n an
d fe
edba
ck.
28
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
4D
OM
AIN
4: C
OM
MU
NIT
Y H
EALT
H IN
FRA
STRU
CTU
RE A
ND
EQ
UIP
MEN
T
4.1
Ever
y lin
k fa
cilit
y sh
all p
rovi
deoffi
ce s
pace
for
the
com
mun
ityhe
alth
uni
t/s
atta
ched
to it
, to
serv
e as
a
reso
urce
cen
tre.
Ther
e is
no
spac
e fo
r the
com
mun
ity
heal
th u
nit,
that
ser
ves
as a
re
sour
ce c
entr
e at
th
e lin
k fa
cilit
y.
Ther
e is
offi
ce
spac
e fo
r co
mm
unity
hea
lth
unit
in th
e lin
k fa
cilit
y bu
t it i
s no
t fu
nctio
nal.
Ever
y lin
k fa
cilit
y ha
s pr
ovid
edoffi
ce s
pace
for
the
com
mun
ityhe
alth
uni
t/s
atta
ched
to it
, to
serv
e as
a
reso
urce
cen
tre.
Ever
y lin
k fa
cilit
y ha
s pr
ovid
edoffi
ce s
pace
for t
he
com
mun
ityhe
alth
uni
t/s
atta
ched
to it
, to
serv
e as
a re
sour
ce
cent
re a
nd it
is
func
tiona
l.
Ther
e is
offi
ce
spac
e fo
r co
mm
unity
hea
lth
unit
in th
e lin
k fa
cilit
y an
d a
reso
urce
cen
tre
whi
ch is
func
tiona
l an
d is
a c
entr
e of
ex
celle
nce.
4.2
Each
CH
U s
hall
be
prov
ided
with
at l
east
1 co
mpu
ter b
y th
eco
unty
hea
lth
dire
ctor
.
The
coun
ty h
ealth
di
rect
or h
as n
ot
prov
ided
at l
east
1 co
mpu
ter t
o ea
ch
CHU
.
The
coun
ty h
ealth
di
rect
or h
as
plan
s of
pro
vidi
ng
a co
mpu
ter b
ut
has
not p
rovi
ded
The
Coun
ty h
ealth
di
rect
or h
as
plan
s of
pro
vidi
ng
a co
mpu
ter b
ut
has
not p
rovi
ded.
The
coun
ty
heal
th d
irect
or
has
pro
vide
d at
le
ast 1
com
pute
r to
eac
h C
HU
.
The
coun
ty h
ealth
di
rect
or h
as
prov
ided
at l
east
1 co
mpu
ter t
o ea
ch
CHU
and
ther
e is
a
mai
nten
ance
pla
n.
The
coun
ty h
ealth
di
rect
or h
as
prov
ided
at l
east
1 c
ompu
ter t
o ea
ch C
HU
and
has
a
mai
nten
ance
pl
an a
nd s
ervi
ce
cont
ract
.
29
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
4.3
CHEW
sha
ll m
aint
ain
and
upda
te th
e in
vent
ory
for a
llin
fras
truc
ture
and
eq
uipm
ent f
or
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
e de
liver
y.
CHEW
doe
s no
t m
aint
ain
and
upda
te th
e in
vent
ory
for a
ll in
fras
truc
ture
and
eq
uipm
ent
for c
omm
unity
he
alth
ser
vice
deliv
ery.
CHEW
has
an
inve
ntor
y fo
r all
infr
astr
uctu
re a
nd
equi
pmen
t but
it
is n
ot u
pdat
ed.
CHEW
mai
ntai
ns
and
upda
tes
the
inve
ntor
y fo
r all
infr
astr
uctu
re
and
equi
pmen
tfo
r com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
cede
liver
y.
CHEW
mai
ntai
ns
and
upda
tes
the
inve
ntor
y fo
r all
infr
astr
uctu
re a
nd
equi
pmen
tfo
r com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
cede
liver
y an
d pr
ovid
es
reco
mm
enda
tions
fo
r its
im
prov
emen
t.
CHEW
mai
ntai
ns
and
upda
tes
the
inve
ntor
y fo
r all
infr
astr
uctu
re a
nd
equi
pmen
tfo
r com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ce
deliv
ery,
pro
vide
s re
com
men
datio
ns
of it
s im
prov
emen
t and
re
com
men
datio
ns
are
effec
ted.
4.4
CHEW
sha
ll ke
ep a
nd m
ake
avai
labl
e th
e m
aint
enan
cere
cord
and
upd
ate
it re
gula
rly.
CHEW
has
no
t kep
t the
m
aint
enan
cere
cord
CHEW
has
kep
t an
d m
ade
avai
labl
e
mai
nten
ance
reco
rd b
ut it
is n
ot
upda
ted.
CHEW
has
ke
pt a
nd m
ade
avai
labl
e th
e m
aint
enan
cere
cord
and
up
date
s it
regu
larly
.
CHEW
has
kep
t an
d m
ade
avai
labl
e th
e m
aint
enan
cere
cord
that
is
upda
ted
regu
larly
an
d pr
ovid
es
reco
mm
enda
tions
.
CHEW
has
ke
pt a
nd m
ade
avai
labl
e th
e m
aint
enan
ce
reco
rd th
at
is u
pdat
ed
regu
larly
, pro
vide
s re
com
men
datio
ns
and
appr
opria
te
actio
n ta
ken.
30
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
4.5
CHEW
s sh
all
iden
tify
and
utili
ze
appr
opria
te
mea
ns o
f pub
lic
com
mun
icat
ion
orm
essa
ging
at
com
mun
ity le
vel.
CHEW
s ha
ve n
ot
iden
tified
any
m
eans
of p
ublic
co
mm
unic
atio
n or
mes
sagi
ng a
t co
mm
unity
leve
l.
CHEW
s h
ave
an a
ppro
pria
te
stra
tegy
for p
ublic
co
mm
unic
atio
n or
m
essa
ging
.
CHEW
s ha
ve
iden
tified
and
utili
zed
appr
opria
te
mea
nsof
pub
lic
com
mun
icat
ion
or m
essa
ging
at
com
mun
ity le
vel.
CHEW
s ha
ve
iden
tified
and
ut
ilize
d ap
prop
riate
m
eans
of p
ublic
co
mm
unic
atio
n or
mes
sagi
ng
at c
omm
unity
le
vel a
nd h
ave
an
impr
ovem
ent p
lan.
CHEW
s ha
ve
iden
tified
an
d ut
ilize
d ap
prop
riate
m
eans
of p
ublic
co
mm
unic
atio
n/m
essa
ging
at
com
mun
ity
leve
l and
hav
e an
exe
cute
d im
prov
emen
t pla
n.
5D
OM
AIN
5: M
AST
ER C
OM
MU
NIT
Y H
EALT
H U
NIT
LIS
TIN
G
5.1
The
MCH
UL
shal
l be
regu
larly
up
date
d by
sub
-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
as
per t
he
MCH
UL
guid
elin
es.
The
MCH
UL
has
not b
een
upda
ted
by s
ub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
am a
s pe
r th
e M
CHU
L gu
idel
ines
.
The
MCH
UL
has
been
upd
ated
by
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
irre
gula
rly.
The
MCH
UL
has
been
regu
larly
up
date
d by
sub
-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
as
per
the
MCH
UL
guid
elin
es.
The
MCH
UL
has
been
regu
larly
up
date
d by
sub
-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent t
eam
as
per
the
MCH
UL
guid
elin
es a
nd
repo
rts
gene
rate
d.
The
MCH
UL
has
been
fully
and
re
gula
rly u
pdat
ed
by s
ub-c
ount
y he
alth
man
agem
ent t
eam
as
per
the
MCH
UL
guid
elin
es a
nd
repo
rts
gene
rate
d us
ed fo
r dec
isio
n m
akin
g.
31
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
6D
OM
AIN
6: C
OM
MO
DIT
IES
AN
D S
UPP
LY
6.1
The
proc
urem
ent
proc
esse
s sh
all
conf
orm
to th
e su
pply
cha
in
com
mod
ities
m
anag
emen
t po
licie
s, g
uide
lines
an
d pr
oced
ures
.
The
proc
urem
ent
proc
esse
s ha
ve
not c
onfo
rmed
to
the
supp
ly c
hain
co
mm
oditi
es
man
agem
ent
polic
ies,
gu
idel
ines
and
pr
oced
ures
, an
d th
ere
is n
o pr
ocur
emen
t pla
n.
The
proc
urem
ent
proc
esse
s ha
ve
not c
onfo
rmed
to
the
supp
ly c
hain
co
mm
oditi
es
man
agem
ent
polic
ies
guid
elin
es
and
proc
edur
es
but t
here
is a
pr
ocur
emen
t pl
an.
The
proc
urem
ent
proc
esse
s ha
ve
conf
orm
ed to
th
e su
pply
cha
in
com
mod
ities
m
anag
emen
t po
licie
s,
guid
elin
es a
nd
proc
edur
es.
The
proc
urem
ent
proc
esse
s ha
ve
conf
orm
ed to
th
e su
pply
cha
in
com
mod
ities
m
anag
emen
t po
licie
s, g
uide
lines
an
d pr
oced
ures
, an
d th
e pr
ocur
emen
t pla
n is
use
d re
gula
rly.
The
proc
urem
ent
proc
esse
s ha
ve
conf
orm
ed to
th
e su
pply
cha
in
com
mod
ities
m
anag
emen
t po
licie
s, g
uide
lines
an
d pr
oced
ures
an
d m
onito
ring
and
eval
uatio
n be
side
s re
port
ing
done
.
6.2
The
CHV
and
CHEW
sha
ll be
su
pplie
d w
ith a
CH
S ki
t as
per C
HS
guid
elin
es b
y th
e lin
k fa
cilit
y.
The
CHV
and
CHEW
are
not
su
pplie
d w
ith a
co
mpl
ete
CHS
kit a
s pe
r CH
S gu
idel
ines
, by
the
link
faci
lity.
Not
all
CHVs
an
d CH
EWs
are
supp
lied
with
a
com
plet
e CH
S ki
t as
per C
HS
guid
elin
es, b
y th
e lin
k fa
cilit
y.
All C
HVs
and
CH
EWs
are
supp
lied
with
a
CHS
kit a
s pe
r CH
S gu
idel
ines
, by
the
link
faci
lity.
All C
HVs
and
CH
EWs
are
supp
lied
with
a
CHS
kit a
s pe
r CH
S gu
idel
ines
by
the
link
faci
lity,
the
kit
is a
lso
com
plet
e.
All C
HVs
and
CH
EWs
are
supp
lied
with
a
CHS
kit a
s pe
r CH
S gu
idel
ines
by
the
link
faci
lity,
the
kit i
s co
mpl
ete
and
ther
e is
a
com
mod
ity
regi
ster
.
32
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
6.3
Supp
ly o
f co
mm
oditi
es s
hall
be d
eman
d dr
iven
.
Supp
ly o
f co
mm
oditi
es
is n
ot d
eman
d dr
iven
.
Supp
ly o
f co
mm
oditi
es is
a
mix
ture
of p
ush-
an
d-pu
ll sy
stem
.
Supp
ly o
f co
mm
oditi
es is
de
man
d dr
iven
.
Supp
ly o
f co
mm
oditi
es is
de
man
d dr
iven
su
ppor
ted
by a
pr
ocur
emen
t pla
n.
Supp
ly o
f co
mm
oditi
es is
de
man
d dr
iven
su
ppor
ted
by a
pr
ocur
emen
t pla
n an
d th
ere
are
upda
ted
reco
rds.
6.4
The
CHEW
sha
ll pa
rtic
ipat
ein
dev
elop
men
t of
proc
urem
ent
plan
s fo
r lev
el 1.
The
CHEW
doe
s no
t par
ticip
ate
in
the
deve
lopm
ent
of p
rocu
rem
ent
plan
s fo
r lev
el 1.
The
CHEW
pa
rtic
ipat
es in
th
e qu
antifi
catio
n pr
oces
s of
the
proc
urem
ent
plan
s fo
r lev
el 1.
The
CHEW
pa
rtic
ipat
esin
dev
elop
men
t of
pro
cure
men
tpl
ans
for l
evel
1.
The
CHEW
pa
rtic
ipat
esin
dev
elop
men
t of
proc
urem
ent
plan
s fo
r lev
el 1
and
this
is s
uppo
rted
by
docu
men
tatio
n.
The
CHEW
pa
rtic
ipat
esin
dev
elop
men
t of
proc
urem
ent
plan
s fo
r lev
el
1, su
ppor
ted
by
docu
men
tatio
n an
d th
er is
regu
lar
revi
ew o
f the
pl
ans.
6.5
Com
mod
ities
pr
ocur
ed s
hall
conf
orm
to
spec
ifica
tions
.
Com
mod
ities
pr
ocur
ed d
o no
t con
form
to
spec
ifica
tions
.
Not
all
com
mod
ities
pr
ocur
ed c
onfo
rm
to s
peci
ficat
ions
.
All c
omm
oditi
es
proc
ured
co
nfor
m to
sp
ecifi
catio
ns.
All c
omm
oditi
es
proc
ured
con
form
to
spe
cific
atio
ns
and
ther
e is
do
cum
enta
tion.
Com
mod
ities
pr
ocur
ed c
onfo
rm
to s
peci
ficat
ions
, an
d th
ere
is
docu
men
tatio
n an
d fe
edba
ck.
33
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
6.6
Skill
s in
fo
reca
stin
g an
dqu
antifi
catio
n of
he
alth
com
mod
ities
sha
ll be
impa
rted
to ti
er o
ne s
taff
by
coun
ty T
rain
ers
of
Trai
ners
(TO
Ts).
Skill
s in
fo
reca
stin
g an
d qu
antifi
catio
n of
hea
lth
com
mod
ities
no
t im
part
ed to
tie
r one
sta
ff b
y co
unty
TO
Ts.
Skill
s in
fo
reca
stin
g an
d qu
antifi
catio
n of
hea
lth
com
mod
ities
not
ye
t im
part
ed to
tie
r one
sta
ff b
y co
unty
TO
Ts b
ut
plan
s to
do
so a
re
in p
lace
.
Skill
s in
fo
reca
stin
g an
d qu
antifi
catio
n of
hea
lth
com
mod
ities
im
part
ed to
tie
r one
sta
ff b
y co
unty
TO
Ts
Skill
s in
fore
cast
ing
and
quan
tifica
tion
of h
ealth
co
mm
oditi
es
impa
rted
to ti
er
one
staff
by
coun
ty
TOTs
are
app
lied.
Skill
s in
fore
cast
ing
and
quan
tifica
tion
of h
ealth
co
mm
oditi
es
impa
rted
to
tier o
ne s
taff
by
cou
nty
TOTs
ar
e ap
plie
d an
d th
ere
are
trai
ning
re
port
s.
6.8
The
prin
cipl
e of
Fi
rst-E
xpiry
-Fi
rst-O
ut (F
EFO
) an
d Fi
rst-I
n-Fi
rst-O
ut (F
IFO
) sh
all b
e ad
here
dto
by
the
link
faci
lity
and
the
com
mun
ity h
ealth
pe
rson
nel l
inke
d to
the
faci
lity.
The
prin
cipl
es o
f FE
FO a
nd F
IFO
ha
ve n
ot b
een
adhe
red
to b
y th
e lin
k fa
cilit
y an
d th
eco
mm
unity
hea
lth
pers
onne
l lin
ked
to th
e fa
cilit
y.
Ther
e ha
s be
en
som
e ad
here
nce
to th
e pr
inci
ples
of
FEF
O a
nd F
IFO
by
the
link
faci
lity
and
the
com
mun
ity h
ealth
pe
rson
nel l
inke
d to
the
faci
lity.
The
prin
cipl
es
of F
EFO
and
FI
FO h
ave
been
ad
here
d to
by
the
link
faci
lity
and
the
com
mun
ity
heal
th p
erso
nnel
lin
ked
to th
e fa
cilit
y.
The
prin
cipl
es o
f FE
FO a
nd F
IFO
ha
ve b
een
adhe
red
to b
y th
e lin
k fa
cilit
y an
d th
eco
mm
unity
hea
lth
pers
onne
l lin
ked
to th
e fa
cilit
y an
d th
ere
are
reco
rds.
The
prin
cipl
es
of F
EFO
and
FI
FO h
ave
been
ad
here
d to
by
the
link
faci
lity
and
the
com
mun
ity h
ealth
pe
rson
nel l
inke
d to
the
faci
lity,
and
th
e re
cord
s ar
e m
aint
aine
d an
d up
date
d re
gula
rly.
6.9
Ther
e sh
all b
e jo
b ai
ds to
gui
de
com
mod
ity
man
agem
ent.
Ther
e ar
e no
job
aids
to g
uide
co
mm
odity
m
anag
emen
t.
Job
aids
togu
ide
all
com
mod
ity
man
agem
ent a
re
avai
labl
e, b
ut n
ot
acce
ssib
le
Job
aids
togu
ide
com
mod
ity
man
agem
ent
are
avai
labl
e an
d ac
cess
ible
.
Job
aids
to g
uide
co
mm
odity
m
anag
emen
t are
ac
cess
ible
and
irr
egul
arly
util
ized
.
Job
aids
to g
uide
co
mm
odity
m
anag
emen
t are
ac
cess
ible
and
re
gula
rly u
tiliz
ed.
34
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
6.10
Stor
age
of th
e co
mm
oditi
es
shal
l be
as p
er th
e re
com
men
datio
ns
of th
e m
anuf
actu
rer.
Stor
age
of
com
mod
ities
is
not a
s pe
r the
re
com
men
datio
ns
of th
em
anuf
actu
rer.
Stor
age
of th
e co
mm
oditi
es is
no
t as
per t
he
reco
mm
enda
tions
of
the
man
ufac
ture
r, bu
t th
ere
are
reco
rds.
Stor
age
of th
e co
mm
oditi
es is
as
per
the
rec-
omm
enda
tions
of
the
man
ufac
ture
r.
Stor
age
of th
e co
mm
oditi
es
is a
s pe
r the
re
com
men
datio
ns
of th
em
anuf
actu
rer,
docu
men
tatio
n do
ne.
Stor
age
of th
e co
mm
oditi
es
is a
s pe
r the
re
com
men
datio
ns
of th
em
anuf
actu
rer,
docu
men
tatio
n do
ne a
nd p
rope
r st
ock
rota
tion
done
.
7D
OM
AIN
7: T
RAN
SPO
RT
7.1
Ther
e sh
all b
e an
ap
prop
riate
mea
ns o
f tr
ansp
ort a
t eac
h CH
U.
Ther
e is
no
mea
ns
of tr
ansp
ort a
t the
CH
U
Ther
e is
no
appr
opria
tem
eans
of
tran
spor
t at e
ach
CHU
.
Ther
e is
an
appr
opria
tem
eans
of
tran
spor
t at e
ach
CHU
.
Ther
e is
an
appr
opria
tem
eans
of t
rans
port
at
eac
h CH
U w
hich
is
in u
se.
Ther
e is
an
appr
opria
tem
eans
of
tran
spor
t at e
ach
CHU
whi
ch is
in
use
and
prop
erly
m
aint
aine
d.
35
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
7.2
The
mea
ns o
f tr
ansp
ort s
hall
be a
ligne
d an
d co
mpl
y w
ithgo
vern
men
t tr
ansp
ort p
olic
ies
and
guid
elin
es.
The
mea
ns o
f tr
ansp
ort i
s ne
ither
alig
ned
nor d
oes
it co
mpl
y w
ithgo
vern
men
t tr
ansp
ort p
olic
ies
and
guid
elin
es.
Som
e m
eans
of
tran
spor
t is
alig
ned
to a
nd
com
plie
s w
ithgo
vern
men
t tr
ansp
ort p
olic
ies
and
guid
elin
es.
The
mea
ns o
f tr
ansp
ort i
s al
igne
d to
and
co
mpl
ies
with
gove
rnm
ent
tran
spor
t po
licie
san
d gu
idel
ines
.
The
mea
ns o
f tr
ansp
ort i
s al
igne
d to
and
com
plie
s w
ithgo
vern
men
t tr
ansp
ort p
olic
ies,
gu
idel
ines
and
co
mpl
ianc
e re
cord
s.
The
mea
ns o
f tr
ansp
ort i
s al
igne
d to
and
co
mpl
ies
with
gove
rnm
ent
tran
spor
t pol
icie
san
d gu
idel
ines
, co
mpl
ianc
e re
cord
s an
d m
aint
enan
ce p
lan
is a
vaila
ble.
7.3
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
pe
rson
nel
who
ope
rate
a
mot
orcy
cle
shal
lbe
requ
ired
to b
e in
pos
sess
ion
of a
val
id
mot
orcy
cle
ridin
glic
ense
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
pe
rson
nel
who
ope
rate
a
mot
orcy
cle
are
not i
n po
sses
sion
of a
val
id
mot
orcy
cle
ridin
g lic
ense
.
Som
e co
mm
unity
he
alth
per
sonn
elw
ho o
pera
te a
m
otor
cycl
e ar
e in
po
sses
sion
of a
val
id
mot
orcy
cle
ridin
g lic
ense
.
Com
mun
ity
heal
th p
erso
nnel
who
ope
rate
a
mot
orcy
cle
are
in p
osse
ssio
nof
a v
alid
m
otor
cycl
e rid
ing
licen
se.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
pe
rson
nel
who
ope
rate
a
mot
orcy
cle
are
in
poss
essi
onof
a v
alid
m
otor
cycl
e rid
ing
licen
se a
nd o
bser
ve
ridin
g re
gula
tions
.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
pe
rson
nel
who
ope
rate
a
mot
orcy
cle
are
in
poss
essi
onof
a v
alid
m
otor
cycl
e rid
ing
licen
se, o
bser
ve
ridin
g re
gula
tions
an
d rid
ers’
reco
rds
are
avai
labl
e.
36
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
7.4
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
pers
onne
l sha
ll be
tr
aine
d on
how
to m
aint
ain
the
tran
spor
teq
uipm
ent.
Com
mun
ity h
ealth
pers
onne
l ha
ve n
ot b
een
trai
ned
on h
ow
to m
aint
ain
the
tran
spor
teq
uipm
ent.
Som
e co
mm
unity
he
alth
per
sonn
el
have
bee
n tr
aine
d on
how
to
mai
ntai
n th
e tr
ansp
ort
equi
pmen
t.
Rele
vant
co
mm
unity
he
alth
pers
onne
l hav
e be
en tr
aine
d on
how
to m
aint
ain
the
tran
spor
teq
uipm
ent.
Rele
vant
co
mm
unity
hea
lthpe
rson
nel h
ave
been
trai
ned
onho
w to
mai
ntai
n th
e tr
ansp
ort
equi
pmen
t and
re
cord
s ar
e av
aila
ble.
Rele
vant
co
mm
unity
hea
lthpe
rson
nel h
ave
been
trai
ned
on
how
to m
aint
ain
the
tran
spor
teq
uipm
ent,
are
pra
ctic
ing
and
reco
rds
are
avai
labl
e.
7.5
Ther
e sh
all b
e an
up
date
din
vent
ory
and
mai
nten
ance
pla
nof
tran
spor
t.
Ther
e is
no
inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce p
lan
of tr
ansp
ort.
Ther
e is
an
inve
ntor
y w
hich
is
not
upd
ated
an
d th
ere
is n
o m
aint
enan
ce p
lan.
Ther
e is
an
upda
ted
inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce
plan
of
tran
spor
t.
Ther
e is
an
upda
ted
inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce p
lan
of tr
ansp
ort a
nd
reco
rds.
Ther
e is
an
upda
ted
inve
ntor
y an
d m
aint
enan
ce p
lan
of tr
ansp
ort,
reco
rds
and
evid
ence
of b
est
prac
tice.
37
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
8D
OM
AIN
8: R
EFER
RAL
SYST
EM
8.1
Case
s re
quiri
ng
furt
her
man
agem
ent s
hall
be re
ferr
ed to
high
er le
vels
of
care
acc
ordi
ng to
the
refe
rral
gu
idel
ines
.
No
case
s re
quiri
ng
furt
her
man
agem
ent
refe
rred
tohi
gher
leve
ls o
f ca
re a
ccor
ding
toth
e re
ferr
al
guid
elin
es.
Case
s re
quiri
ng
furt
her
man
agem
ent
iden
tified
but
not
re
ferr
ed to
high
er le
vels
of
care
acc
ordi
ng to
the
refe
rral
gu
idel
ines
.
Case
s re
quiri
ng
furt
her
man
agem
ent
iden
tified
and
re
ferr
ed to
high
er le
vels
of
care
acc
ordi
ng
to th
e re
ferr
al
guid
elin
es.
Case
s re
quiri
ng
furt
her
man
agem
ent
iden
tified
, ref
erre
d to
hig
her l
evel
s of
ca
re a
ccor
ding
toth
e re
ferr
al
guid
elin
es a
nd
ther
e ar
e re
cord
s
All c
ases
re
quiri
ng fu
rthe
r m
anag
emen
t re
ferr
ed to
hig
her
leve
ls o
f car
e ac
cord
ing
to th
e re
ferr
al g
uide
lines
, fo
llow
-up
done
an
d re
cord
s av
aila
ble.
8.2
Ther
e sh
all b
e he
alth
care
expe
rt
mov
emen
t to
the
com
mun
ity w
here
ap
prop
riate
, to
be
coor
dina
ted
by th
e co
unty
and
su
b-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
am
Ther
e is
no
heal
thca
reex
pert
mov
emen
t to
the
com
mun
ity,
whe
re
appr
opria
te,
coor
dina
ted
by
the
coun
ty a
nd
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e is
un
coor
dina
ted
heal
thca
reex
pert
mov
emen
t to
the
com
mun
ity,
by th
eco
unty
and
sub
-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
am.
Ther
e is
he
alth
care
expe
rt
mov
emen
t to
the
com
mun
ity
whe
re
appr
opria
te,
coor
dina
ted
by th
e co
unty
an
d su
b-co
unty
he
alth
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e is
hea
lthca
reex
pert
mov
emen
t to
the
com
mun
ity a
nd
follo
w-u
p w
here
ap
prop
riate
, co
ordi
nate
d by
the
coun
ty a
nd s
ub-
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent t
eam
.
Ther
e is
hea
lthca
reex
pert
mov
emen
t to
the
com
mun
ity a
nd
follo
w-u
p w
here
ap
prop
riate
, co
ordi
nate
d by
the
coun
ty a
nd
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
and
is
docu
men
ted.
38
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
8.3
Ther
e sh
all b
e a
prov
isio
nfo
r ade
quat
e co
m-
mun
icat
ion
syst
ems
betw
een
the
com
mun
ityan
d hi
gher
leve
ls
of c
are.
Ther
e is
no
prov
isio
nfo
r co
mm
unic
atio
nsy
stem
s be
twee
n th
e co
mm
unity
and
high
er le
vels
of
car
e.
Ther
e is
in
adeq
uate
pr
ovis
ion
ofco
mm
unic
atio
nsy
stem
s be
twee
n th
e co
mm
unity
and
high
er le
vels
of
car
e.
Ther
e is
ad
equa
te
prov
isio
n of
com
mun
icat
ion
syst
ems
betw
een
the
com
mun
ityan
d hi
gher
leve
ls
of c
are.
Ther
e is
ade
quat
e pr
ovis
ion
ofco
mm
unic
atio
nsy
stem
s be
twee
n th
e co
mm
unity
and
high
er le
vels
of
care
and
feed
back
.
Ther
e is
ade
quat
e pr
ovis
ion
ofco
mm
unic
atio
nsy
stem
s be
twee
n th
e co
mm
unity
and
high
er
leve
ls o
f car
e,
feed
back
and
do
cum
enta
tion.
9D
OM
AIN
9: C
OM
MU
NIT
Y H
EALT
H IN
FORM
ATIO
N S
YSTE
M
9.1
Ther
e sh
all
be c
ompl
eted
ho
useh
old
reco
rds
upda
ted
ever
y si
x m
onth
s in
eac
hCH
U.
Ther
e ar
e no
ho
useh
old
reco
rds
in e
ach
CHU
Ther
e ar
e in
com
-pl
ete
hous
ehol
dre
cord
s in
eac
hCH
U.
Ther
e ar
e co
mpl
eted
ho
useh
old
reco
rds
upda
ted
ever
y si
x m
onth
s in
eac
hCH
U.
Ther
e ar
e co
mpl
et-
ed h
ouse
hold
reco
rds
upda
ted
ever
y si
x m
onth
s an
d us
ed fo
r act
ion
in e
ach
CHU
.
Ther
e ar
e co
mpl
et-
ed h
ouse
hold
reco
rds
upda
ted
ever
y si
x m
onth
s,
used
for a
ctio
n an
d th
ere’
s fe
ed-
back
in e
ach
CHU
.
9.2
Ther
e sh
all b
e m
onth
ly re
port
sco
mpi
led
for
plan
ning
and
m
onito
ring
of
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
e.
Ther
e ar
e no
m
onth
ly re
port
sTh
ere
are
inco
mpl
ete
mon
thly
repo
rts
com
pile
d fo
r pl
anni
ng a
nd
mon
itorin
g of
co
mm
unity
hea
lth
serv
ice.
Ther
e ar
e co
mpl
ete
mon
thly
repo
rts
com
pile
d fo
r pl
anni
ng a
nd
mon
itorin
g of
com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ce.
Ther
e ar
e co
mpl
ete
mon
thly
repo
rts
com
pile
d fo
r pl
anni
ng a
nd
mon
itorin
g of
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
e, u
sed
for
deci
sion
mak
ing.
Ther
e ar
e m
onth
ly
repo
rts
com
pile
d fo
r pl
anni
ng a
nd
mon
itorin
g of
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
e, u
sed
for
deci
sion
mak
ing
and
ther
e is
fe
edba
ck.
39
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
9.3
The
CHEW
sha
ll su
bmit
the
mon
thly
repo
rts
to th
e lin
k he
alth
faci
lity
by
5th o
f eve
ry m
onth
.
The
CHEW
has
no
t sub
mitt
ed th
e m
onth
lyre
port
s to
the
link
heal
th fa
cilit
y by
5th
of
ever
y m
onth
.
The
CHEW
su
bmits
mon
thly
repo
rts
to th
e lin
k he
alth
faci
lity
afte
r the
5th
of
ever
y m
onth
.
The
CHEW
su
bmits
mon
thly
repo
rts
to th
e lin
k he
alth
fa
cilit
y by
5th
of
ever
y m
onth
.
The
CHEW
sub
mits
m
onth
lyre
port
s to
the
link
heal
th fa
cilit
y by
5th
of
ever
y m
onth
an
d re
port
s ar
e an
alyz
ed.
The
CHEW
sub
mits
m
onth
lyre
port
s to
the
link
heal
th fa
cilit
y by
5th
of
ever
y m
onth
, re
port
s ar
e an
alyz
ed a
nd
used
for d
ecis
ion
mak
ing.
9.4
Hea
lth in
form
atio
n ge
nera
ted
from
the
com
mun
ity
shal
l be
uplo
aded
in
to th
eD
istr
ict H
ealth
In
form
atio
n Sy
stem
(DH
IS)
by 15
th o
f eve
ry
mon
th, b
y th
e Su
b-Co
unty
Hea
lth R
ecor
ds
Info
rmat
ion
Offi
cer (
HRI
O).
Hea
lth
info
rmat
ion
gene
rate
d fr
omth
e co
mm
unity
ha
s no
t bee
n up
load
ed in
to th
eD
HIS
by 15
th of
eve
ry
mon
th, b
y th
e su
b-co
unty
HRI
O.
Hea
lth
info
rmat
ion
gene
rate
d fr
omth
e co
mm
unity
ha
s be
en
uplo
aded
into
the
DH
IS a
fter
15th
of
ever
y m
onth
, by
the
sub-
coun
tyH
RIO
.
Hea
lth
info
rmat
ion
gene
rate
d fr
omth
e co
mm
unity
ha
s be
en
uplo
aded
into
th
e D
HIS
by
15th
of e
very
mon
th
by, t
he s
ub-
coun
ty H
RIO
.
Hea
lth in
form
atio
n ge
nera
ted
from
the
com
mun
ity h
as
been
upl
oade
d in
to
the
DH
IS b
y 15
th
of e
very
mon
th,
by th
e su
b-co
unty
H
RIO
and
ana
lyze
d.
Hea
lth in
form
atio
n ge
nera
ted
from
the
com
mun
ity
has
been
upl
oade
d in
to th
e D
HIS
by
15th
of e
very
m
onth
, by
the
sub-
coun
ty H
RIO
an
alyz
ed, s
hare
d an
d us
ed fo
r pl
anni
ng.
40
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
9.5
Ever
y CH
U s
hall
have
and
use
all
repo
rtin
g to
ols
as
per c
omm
unity
he
alth
ser
vice
gu
idel
ines
.
CHU
s do
not
hav
e re
port
ing
tool
s as
pe
r com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ce
guid
elin
es.
Ever
y CH
Uha
s an
d us
es
som
e re
port
ing
tool
s as
per
com
mun
ity h
ealth
se
rvic
e gu
idel
ines
.
Ever
y CH
U
has
and
uses
al
l rep
ortin
g to
ols
as p
er
com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ce
guid
elin
es.
Ever
y CH
Uha
s an
d us
es a
ll re
port
ing
tool
s as
pe
r com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ce
guid
elin
es a
nd
repo
rts
shar
ed.
Ever
y CH
Uha
s an
d us
es a
ll re
port
ing
tool
s as
pe
r com
mun
ity
heal
th s
ervi
ce
guid
elin
es, r
epor
ts
are
shar
ed a
nd
feed
back
giv
en.
10D
OM
AIN
10: C
OM
MU
NIT
Y H
EALT
H F
INA
NCI
NG
10.1
CHEW
s an
d CH
Vs
shal
lpr
epar
e th
e an
nual
wor
kpl
an (A
WP)
and
bu
dget
for t
he
CHU
to b
eap
prov
ed b
y th
e CH
C.
CHEW
s an
d CH
Vs
have
not
pr
epar
ed th
e AW
P an
d bu
dget
.
CHEW
s an
d CH
Vs
have
pre
pare
d th
e AW
P an
d bu
dget
for t
he
CHU
but
hav
e no
t fo
rwar
ded
it to
th
e CH
C fo
rap
prov
al.
CHEW
s an
d CH
Vs
have
pre
pare
d th
e AW
P an
d bu
dget
for
the
CHU
to b
eap
prov
ed b
y th
e CH
C.
CHEW
s an
d CH
Vs
have
pre
pare
d th
e AW
P an
d bu
dget
fo
r the
CH
U a
nd
both
hav
e be
en
appr
oved
by
the
CHC.
CHEW
s an
d CH
Vs
have
prep
ared
the
AWP
and
budg
et fo
rth
e CH
U a
nd
thes
e ha
ve b
een
appr
oved
by
the
CHC
and
are
bein
g im
plem
ente
d.
41
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
10.2
The
link
faci
lity
man
agem
ent
team
shal
l pre
pare
a
cons
olid
ated
AWP
com
pris
ing
of th
e fa
cilit
yan
d affi
liate
d CH
U
wor
k pl
an.
The
link
faci
lity
man
agem
ent
team
ha
s no
t pre
pare
d a
cons
olid
ated
AWP
com
pris
ing
of th
e fa
cilit
yan
d affi
liate
d CH
U
wor
k pl
an.
The
link
faci
lity
man
agem
ent
team
ha
s pr
epar
ed a
fa
cilit
yAW
P.
The
link
faci
lity
man
agem
ent
team
has
prep
ared
a
cons
olid
ated
AWP
com
pris
ing
of th
e fa
cilit
yan
d affi
liate
d CH
U w
ork
plan
.
The
link
faci
lity
man
agem
ent t
eam
has
prep
ared
a
cons
olid
ated
AWP
com
pris
ing
of
the
faci
lity
and
affilia
ted
CHU
wor
k pl
an
and
shar
ed w
ith
stak
ehol
ders
The
link
faci
lity
man
agem
ent t
eam
has
prep
ared
a
cons
olid
ated
AWP
com
pris
ing
of th
e fa
cilit
yan
d affi
liate
d CH
U
wor
k pl
an, s
hare
d w
ith s
take
hold
ers
and
impl
emen
ted.
10.3
The
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
sha
llin
tegr
ate
the
CHU
bu
dget
and
AWP
into
the
coun
ty b
udge
t.
The
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
has
not
in
tegr
ated
the
CHU
bud
get a
ndAW
P in
to th
e co
unty
bud
get.
The
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
has
rece
ived
th
e CH
U b
udge
t an
d AW
P an
d is
ye
t to
inte
grat
e in
to th
e co
unty
bu
dget
.
The
coun
ty
heal
thm
anag
emen
t te
am h
asin
tegr
ated
the
CHU
bud
get a
ndAW
P in
to th
e co
unty
bud
get.
The
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent t
eam
ha
s in
tegr
ated
the
CHU
bud
get a
ndAW
P in
to th
e co
unty
bud
get a
nd
has
been
app
rove
d.
The
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent t
eam
ha
s in
tegr
ated
the
CHU
bud
get a
ndAW
P in
to th
e co
unty
bud
get,
has b
een
appr
oved
an
d al
loca
ted
fund
s.
42
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
10.4
The
coun
ty
gove
rnm
ent
shal
l pro
vide
vot
e he
ads
and
reso
urce
env
elop
fo
r CH
Us
inth
e fa
cilit
y al
loca
tion.
The
coun
ty
gove
rnm
ent
has
not p
rovi
ded
vote
hea
ds a
ndre
sour
ce e
nvel
op
for C
HU
s in
the
faci
lity
allo
catio
n.
The
coun
ty
gove
rnm
ent
has
prov
ided
re
sour
ce e
nvel
op
with
out v
ote
head
s fo
r CH
Us,
inth
e fa
cilit
y al
loca
tion.
The
coun
ty
gove
rnm
ent
has
prov
ided
vo
te h
eads
and
reso
urce
env
elop
fo
r CH
Us
inth
e fa
cilit
y al
loca
tion.
The
coun
ty
gove
rnm
ent
has
prov
ided
vot
e he
ads
and
reso
urce
env
elop
fo
r CH
Us
inth
e fa
cilit
y al
loca
tion
with
ac
com
pany
ing
item
izat
ion.
The
coun
ty
gove
rnm
ent
has
prov
ided
vot
e he
ads
and
reso
urce
env
elop
fo
r CH
Us
inth
e fa
cilit
y al
loca
tion
with
ac
com
pany
ing
item
izat
ion
and
auth
ority
to in
cur
expe
nditu
re (A
IE).
10.5
The
CHC
shal
l ac
coun
t for
the
utili
zed
finan
cial
reso
urce
sac
cord
ing
to th
e av
aile
d fu
nds.
The
CHC
has
not
acco
unte
d fo
r the
ut
ilize
d fin
anci
al
reso
urce
sac
cord
ing
to th
e av
aile
d fu
nds.
The
CHC
has
not
fully
acc
ount
ed
for t
he u
tiliz
ed
finan
cial
re
sour
ces
acco
rdin
g to
the
avai
led
fund
s.
The
CHC
has
acco
unte
d fo
rth
e ut
ilize
d fin
anci
al
reso
urce
sac
cord
ing
to th
e av
aile
d fu
nds.
The
CHC
has
acco
unte
d fo
rth
e ut
ilize
d fin
anci
al re
sour
ces
acco
rdin
g to
the
avai
led
fund
s in
a
timel
y m
anne
r.
The
CHC
has
acco
unte
d fo
rth
e ut
ilize
d fin
anci
al re
sour
ces
acco
rdin
g to
the
avai
led
fund
s in
a
timel
y m
anne
r and
pr
epar
ed te
chni
cal
repo
rts.
43
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
10.6
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am o
r sub
-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
am o
r CH
C sh
all
mob
ilize
reso
urce
s fo
r CH
Us.
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am o
r sub
-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
am o
r CH
C ha
s no
tm
obili
zed
reso
urce
s fo
r CH
Us.
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am o
r sub
-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
am o
r CH
C ha
ve s
trat
egie
s to
mob
ilize
re
sour
ces
for C
HU
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am/S
ub-c
ount
y he
alth
man
agem
ent
team
or C
HC
has
mob
ilize
d re
sour
ces
for
CHU
s.
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am o
r sub
-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent t
eam
or
CH
C ha
sm
obili
zed
and
rece
ived
reso
urce
s fo
r CH
Us.
Coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
tte
am o
r sub
-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t tea
m
or C
HC
has
mob
ilize
d an
d re
ceiv
ed re
sour
ces
for C
HU
s an
d al
loca
ted
to C
HU
s fo
r util
izat
ion.
10.7
The
sub-
coun
ty
heal
thm
anag
emen
t te
ams
shal
l cal
l for
au
dits
for C
HU
s to
det
erm
ine
the
utili
zatio
n of
fund
s at
the
com
mun
ity a
s pe
r Pu
blic
Fin
anci
al
Man
agem
ent A
ct
The
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams
have
not
ca
lled
for
audi
ts fo
r CH
Us
to
dete
rmin
eth
e ut
iliza
tion
of fu
nds
at th
e co
mm
unity
as
per
Publ
ic F
inan
cial
M
anag
emen
t Act
The
sub-
coun
ty
heal
thm
anag
emen
t te
ams
have
ca
lled
for a
udits
fo
r CH
Us
to
dete
rmin
eth
e ut
iliza
tion
of fu
nds
at th
e co
mm
unity
but
no
t as
per t
he
Publ
ic F
inan
cial
M
anag
emen
t Act
The
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams
have
ca
lled
for
audi
ts fo
r CH
Us
to d
eter
min
eth
e ut
iliza
tion
of fu
nds
at th
e co
mm
unity
as
per P
ublic
Fina
ncia
l M
anag
emen
t Ac
t.
The
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams
have
cal
led
for a
udits
for C
HU
s to
det
erm
ine
the
utili
zatio
n of
fund
s at
the
com
mun
ity a
s pe
r Pu
blic
Fin
anci
al
Man
agem
ent A
ct
and
have
pro
duce
d au
dit r
epor
ts.
The
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
ams
have
cal
led
for a
udits
for C
HU
s to
det
erm
ine
the
utili
zatio
n of
fund
s at
the
com
mun
ity a
s pe
r Pu
blic
Fin
anci
al
Man
agem
ent A
ct,
have
pro
duce
d au
dit r
epor
ts a
nd
acte
d on
them
.
44
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
11D
OM
AIN
11: L
INKA
GES
AN
D P
ART
NER
SHIP
11.1
Ther
e sh
all b
e a
mec
hani
smfo
r par
tner
an
d pu
blic
co
ordi
natio
n an
d ac
coun
tabi
lity
at th
e co
mm
unity
by
the
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am.
The
Coun
ty H
ealth
M
anag
emen
t Te
am d
oes
not
have
a m
echa
nism
fo
r par
tner
co
ordi
natio
n an
d ac
coun
tabi
lity
at
the
com
mun
ity.
Ther
e is
an
ad h
oc
mec
hani
smfo
r par
tner
and
pu
blic
coor
dina
tion
and
acco
unta
bilit
yat
the
com
mun
ity
by th
e co
unty
heal
th
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e is
a
mec
hani
smfo
r par
tner
and
pu
blic
coor
dina
tion
and
acco
unta
bilit
yat
the
com
mun
ity b
y th
e co
unty
heal
th
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e is
an
oper
atio
nal
mec
hani
smfo
r par
tner
and
pu
blic
coor
dina
tion
and
acco
unta
bilit
yat
the
com
mun
ity
by th
e Co
unty
heal
th
man
agem
ent
team
with
st
anda
rd o
pera
ting
proc
edur
es
Ther
e is
an
oper
atio
nal
mec
hani
smfo
r par
tner
and
pu
blic
coor
dina
tion
and
acco
unta
bilit
yat
the
com
mun
ity
by th
e co
unty
heal
th
man
agem
ent t
eam
w
ith s
tand
ard
oper
atin
g pr
oced
ures
an
d co
ntin
ued
cons
ulta
tions
.
11.2
Ther
e sh
all b
e a
soci
alac
coun
tabi
lity
mec
hani
sm b
y th
esu
b-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
/CH
C.
Ther
e is
no
soci
al
acco
unta
bilit
y m
echa
nism
by
the
sub
coun
ty h
ealth
m
anag
emen
t te
am/C
HC
The
sub
coun
ty/
CHC
has
a so
cial
ac
coun
tabi
lity
mec
hani
sm p
lan
Ther
e is
a s
ocia
lac
coun
tabi
lity
mec
hani
sm
by th
e su
b-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
/CH
C
Ther
e is
a s
ocia
lac
coun
tabi
lity
mec
hani
sm b
y th
esu
b-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
/CH
C w
ith
regu
lar c
omm
unity
fo
rum
s.
Ther
e is
a s
ocia
lac
coun
tabi
lity
mec
hani
sm b
y th
esu
b-co
unty
hea
lth
man
agem
ent
team
/CH
C w
ith
regu
lar c
omm
unity
fo
rum
s, m
eetin
g m
inut
es a
nd
feed
back
.
45
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
11.3
Ther
e sh
all b
e at
leas
t one
al
l-inc
lusi
ve
stak
ehol
der
foru
m c
onve
ned
quar
terly
by
the
coun
ty o
r sub
-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
am to
impr
ove
heal
th in
the
com
mun
ity.
Ther
e is
no
stak
ehol
der f
orum
conv
ened
qu
arte
rly b
y th
eco
unty
or s
ub-
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
to im
prov
ehe
alth
in th
e co
mm
unity
.
Ther
e is
at l
east
on
e st
akeh
olde
r fo
rum
conv
ened
qu
arte
rly b
y th
eco
unty
or s
ub-
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
to im
prov
ehe
alth
in th
e co
mm
unity
, whi
ch
is n
ot in
clus
ive.
Ther
e is
at l
east
on
e al
l-inc
lusi
ve
stak
ehol
der
foru
mco
nven
ed
quar
terly
by
the
coun
ty o
r sub
-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
am to
impr
ove
heal
th in
the
com
mun
ity.
Ther
e is
at l
east
on
e al
l-inc
lusi
ve
stak
ehol
der f
orum
conv
ened
qua
rter
ly
by th
e co
unty
or
sub-
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent
team
to im
prov
e he
alth
in th
e co
mm
unity
with
ac
tion
poin
ts a
nd
reco
mm
enda
tions
.
Ther
e is
at l
east
on
e al
l-inc
lusi
ve
stak
ehol
der f
orum
conv
ened
qu
arte
rly b
y th
eco
unty
or s
ub-
coun
ty h
ealth
man
agem
ent t
eam
to
impr
ove
heal
th in
the
com
mun
ity w
ith
actio
n po
ints
, re
com
men
datio
ns
and
im
plem
enta
tion
repo
rts.
46
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
11.4
Ther
e sh
all b
e in
ter-s
ecto
ral
colla
bora
tion
invo
lvin
g al
l non
-hea
lth
stak
ehol
ders
co
nven
edby
the
coun
ty o
r su
b-co
unty
heal
th
man
agem
ent
team
topr
omot
e co
mm
unity
hea
lthse
rvic
es.
Ther
e is
no
inte
r-se
ctor
alco
llabo
ratio
n in
volv
ing
all n
on-h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs
conv
ened
by th
e co
unty
or
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am to
prom
ote
com
mun
ity h
ealth
serv
ices
.
Ther
e is
inte
r-se
ctor
alco
llabo
ratio
n in
volv
ing
som
e no
n-h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs
conv
ened
by th
e co
unty
or
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am to
prom
ote
com
mun
ity h
ealth
serv
ices
.
Ther
e is
inte
r-se
ctor
alco
llabo
ratio
n in
volv
ing
all n
on-h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs
conv
ened
by th
e co
unty
or
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am to
prom
ote
com
mun
ity
heal
thse
rvic
es.
Ther
e is
inte
r-se
ctor
alco
llabo
ratio
n in
volv
ing
all n
on-h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs
conv
ened
by th
e co
unty
or
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am to
pro
mot
e co
mm
unity
hea
lthse
rvic
es, a
ctio
n po
ints
and
repo
rts.
Ther
e is
inte
r-se
ctor
alco
llabo
ratio
n in
volv
ing
all n
on-h
ealth
st
akeh
olde
rs
conv
ened
by th
e co
unty
or
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am to
pro
mot
e co
mm
unity
hea
lthse
rvic
es, a
ctio
n po
ints
, rep
orts
, fe
edba
ck a
nd
follo
w-u
p.
12D
OM
AIN
12 :
SERV
ICE
DEL
IVER
Y
12.1
Ther
e sh
all b
e bi
annu
alre
gist
ratio
n of
all
hous
ehol
dm
embe
rs b
y th
e co
mm
unity
heal
th v
olun
teer
Ther
e is
no
bian
nual
regi
stra
tion
of
hous
ehol
dm
embe
rs b
y th
e co
mm
unity
heal
th v
olun
teer
.
Ther
e is
irre
gula
rre
gist
ratio
n of
ho
useh
old
mem
bers
by
the
com
mun
ityhe
alth
vol
unte
er.
Ther
e is
bia
nnua
lre
gist
ratio
n of
all
hous
ehol
dm
embe
rs b
y th
e co
mm
unity
heal
th v
olun
teer
.
Ther
e is
bia
nnua
lre
gist
ratio
n of
all
hous
ehol
dm
embe
rs b
y th
e co
mm
unity
heal
th v
olun
teer
an
d th
e CH
EW
is u
pdat
ed
acco
rdin
gly
and
data
ana
lyze
d.
Ther
e is
bia
nnua
lre
gist
ratio
n of
all
hous
ehol
dm
embe
rs b
y th
e co
mm
unity
heal
th v
olun
teer
, th
e CH
EW
is u
pdat
ed
acco
rdin
gly,
dat
a an
alyz
ed a
nd d
ata
is u
tiliz
ed.
47
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
12.2
Ther
e sh
all b
e a
mon
thly
visi
t to
ever
y ho
useh
old
by th
eCH
V to
offer
ser
vice
s on
va
rious
hea
lthas
pect
s.
Ther
e is
no
mon
thly
visi
t to
hous
ehol
ds b
y th
eCH
V to
offer
ser
vice
s on
va
rious
hea
lthas
pect
s.
Ther
e is
irre
gula
r vi
sit t
o ho
useh
olds
by
the
CHV
tooff
er s
ervi
ces
on
vario
us h
ealth
aspe
cts.
Ther
e is
a
mon
thly
visi
t to
ever
y ho
useh
old
by
the
CHV
to o
ffer
se
rvic
es o
n va
rious
hea
lthas
pect
s.
Ther
e is
a m
onth
lyvi
sit t
o ev
ery
hous
ehol
d by
the
CHV
tooff
er s
ervi
ces
on
vario
us h
ealth
aspe
cts
with
pro
per
docu
men
tatio
n.
Ther
e is
a m
onth
lyvi
sit t
o ev
ery
hous
ehol
d by
the
CHV
tooff
er s
ervi
ces
on
vario
us h
ealth
aspe
cts
with
pro
per
docu
men
tatio
n an
d fo
llow
-up.
12.3
CHVs
sha
ll us
e jo
b ai
ds to
gui
de
thei
r wor
k at
the
hous
ehol
d le
vel.
CHVs
do
not u
se
job
aids
to g
uide
thei
r w
ork
at th
eho
useh
old
leve
l.
CHVs
irre
gula
rly
use
job
aids
to g
uide
thei
r w
ork
at th
eho
useh
old
leve
l.
CHVs
use
job
aids
to g
uide
thei
r w
ork
at th
eho
useh
old
leve
l.
CHVs
use
job
aids
to g
uide
thei
r wor
k at
the
hous
ehol
d le
vel a
nd d
ocum
ent
the
qual
ity o
f the
jo
b ai
d.
CHVs
use
job
aids
to g
uide
thei
r w
ork
at th
eho
useh
old
leve
l, do
cum
ent t
he
qual
ity o
f the
job
aid,
repo
rt a
nd
give
feed
back
to
the
stak
ehol
ders
.
12.4
Ther
e sh
all b
e at
le
ast q
uart
erly
co
mm
unity
act
ion
days
for e
very
CH
U.
Ther
e ar
e no
qua
rter
ly
com
mun
ity a
ctio
n da
ys fo
r CH
Us.
Ther
e ar
e irr
egul
ar
com
mun
ity a
ctio
n da
ys in
eve
ry C
HU
Ther
e ar
e at
le
ast
quar
terly
co
mm
unity
ac
tion
days
for e
very
CH
U.
Ther
e ar
e at
leas
tqu
arte
rly
com
mun
ity a
ctio
n da
ys fo
r eve
ry
CHU
and
ther
e is
do
cum
enta
tion.
Ther
e ar
e at
leas
tqu
arte
rly
com
mun
ity a
ctio
n da
ys fo
r eve
ry
CHU
, the
re is
do
cum
enta
tion
and
follo
w-u
p.
48
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
12.5
Ther
e sh
all b
e a
chal
kboa
rd,
upda
ted
mon
thly
, fo
r rec
ordi
ng
com
mun
ity h
ealth
info
rmat
ion
in
each
CH
U.
Ther
e is
a
chal
kboa
rd fo
rre
cord
ing
com
mun
ity h
ealth
info
rmat
ion
in
each
CH
U w
hich
is
not u
pdat
ed.
Ther
e is
an
irreg
ular
lyup
date
d ch
alkb
oard
for
reco
rdin
g co
mm
unity
hea
lthin
form
atio
n in
ea
ch C
HU
.
Ther
e is
a
chal
kboa
rd,
upda
ted
mon
thly
fo
r rec
ordi
ng
com
mun
ity
heal
thin
form
atio
n in
ea
ch C
HU
.
Ther
e is
a
chal
kboa
rd
upda
ted
mon
thly
for r
ecor
ding
co
mm
unity
hea
lthin
form
atio
n in
eac
h CH
U w
ith a
naly
zed
data
.
Ther
e is
a
chal
kboa
rd,
upda
ted
mon
thly
, fo
r rec
ordi
ng
com
mun
ity h
ealth
info
rmat
ion
in e
ach
CHU
w
ith a
naly
zed
data
use
d fo
r im
prov
emen
t
12.7
Ther
e sh
all b
e re
port
ing
ofea
rly s
igns
to
mon
itor i
mm
inen
tdi
sast
ers
and
emer
genc
ies
byCH
Vs.
Ther
e is
no
repo
rtin
g of
early
sig
ns to
m
onito
r im
min
ent
disa
ster
s an
d em
erge
ncie
s by
CHVs
.
Ther
e is
id
entifi
catio
n
of e
arly
sig
ns
to m
onito
r im
min
ent
disa
ster
s an
d em
erge
ncie
s by
CHVs
.
Ther
e is
re
port
ing
ofea
rly s
igns
to
mon
itor
imm
inen
tdi
sast
ers
and
emer
genc
ies
byCH
Vs.
Ther
e is
repo
rtin
g of
ear
ly s
igns
to
mon
itor i
mm
inen
tdi
sast
ers
and
emer
genc
ies
byCH
Vs w
ith a
naly
sis
cond
ucte
d.
Ther
e is
repo
rtin
g of
ear
ly s
igns
to
mon
itor i
mm
inen
tdi
sast
ers
and
emer
genc
ies
byCH
Vs, a
naly
sis
has
been
con
duct
ed
and
actio
n ta
ken.
12.8
Man
agem
ent o
f co
mm
onco
nditi
ons
shal
l co
nfor
m w
ithsp
ecifi
c di
seas
e tr
eatm
ent
guid
elin
es.
Man
agem
ent o
f co
mm
onco
nditi
ons
does
no
t con
form
tosp
ecifi
c di
seas
e tr
eatm
ent
guid
elin
es.
Man
agem
ent o
f so
me
com
mon
cond
ition
s co
nfor
ms
tosp
ecifi
c di
seas
e tr
eatm
ent
guid
elin
es.
Man
agem
ent o
f co
mm
onco
nditi
ons
conf
orm
s to
spec
ific
dise
ase
trea
tmen
tgu
idel
ines
.
Man
agem
ent o
f co
mm
onco
nditi
ons
conf
orm
s to
spec
ific
dise
ase
trea
tmen
tgu
idel
ines
with
da
ta g
ener
ated
.
Man
agem
ent o
f co
mm
onco
nditi
ons
conf
orm
s to
spec
ific
dise
ase
trea
tmen
tgu
idel
ines
, dat
a ge
nera
ted
and
ther
e is
follo
w-u
p
49
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
13D
OM
AIN
13: M
ON
ITO
RIN
G A
ND
EVA
LUAT
ION
13.1
Ther
e sh
all b
e m
onth
lyco
mm
unity
di
alog
ue fo
raco
nven
ed b
y th
e CH
EWs
in c
harg
e,as
per
the
CHS
guid
elin
es.
Ther
e ar
e no
m
onth
lyco
mm
unity
di
alog
ue fo
raco
nven
ed b
y th
e CH
EWs
in c
harg
e,as
per
the
CHS
guid
elin
es.
Ther
e ar
e irr
egul
ar
com
mun
ity
dial
ogue
fora
conv
ened
by
the
CHEW
s in
cha
rge,
as p
er th
e CH
S gu
idel
ines
.
Ther
e ar
e m
onth
lyco
mm
unity
di
alog
ue fo
raco
nven
ed b
y th
e CH
EWs
in c
harg
eas
per
the
CHS
guid
elin
es.
Ther
e ar
e m
onth
lyco
mm
unity
di
alog
ue fo
raco
nven
ed b
y th
e CH
EWs
in c
harg
eas
per
the
CHS
guid
elin
es a
nd
issu
es id
entifi
ed.
Ther
e ar
e m
onth
lyco
mm
unity
di
alog
ue fo
ra
conv
ened
by
the
CHEW
s in
cha
rge
as p
er th
e CH
S gu
idel
ines
, iss
ues
iden
tified
and
ac
tion
take
n.
13.2
Ther
e sh
all b
e ad
equa
test
anda
rd d
ata
capt
ure
and
repo
rtin
g to
ols
mad
e av
aila
ble
by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am.
Ther
e ar
e no
st
anda
rd d
ata
capt
ure
and
repo
rtin
g to
ols
mad
e av
aila
ble
by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am.
Ther
e ar
e in
adeq
uate
st
anda
rd d
ata
capt
ure
and
repo
rtin
g to
ols
mad
e av
aila
ble
by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am.
Ther
e ar
e ad
equa
test
anda
rd d
ata
capt
ure
and
repo
rtin
g to
ols
mad
e av
aila
ble
by th
e su
b-co
unty
heal
th
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e ar
e ad
equa
test
anda
rd d
ata
capt
ure
and
repo
rtin
g to
ols
mad
e av
aila
ble
by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t tea
m.
whi
ch a
re in
use
.
Ther
e ar
e ad
equa
test
anda
rd d
ata
capt
ure
and
repo
rtin
g to
ols
mad
e av
aila
ble
by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
m
anag
emen
t te
am, w
hich
are
in
use
and
dat
a co
llect
ed u
sed
for
plan
ning
.
50
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
13.4
Ther
e sh
all b
e qu
arte
rlyan
alys
is,
inte
rpre
tatio
n an
ddi
ssem
inat
ion
of
com
mun
ityhe
alth
dat
a le
d by
th
e CH
EW.
Ther
e is
no
anal
ysis
, in
terp
reta
tion
and
diss
emin
atio
n of
co
mm
unity
heal
th d
ata
led
by
the
CHEW
.
Ther
e is
an
alys
is,
inte
rpre
tatio
n an
d no
dis
sem
inat
ion
of c
omm
unity
heal
th d
ata
led
by
the
CHEW
.
Ther
e is
qu
arte
rly
anal
ysis
, in
terp
reta
tion
and
diss
emin
atio
n of
co
mm
unity
heal
th d
ata
led
by th
e CH
EW.
Ther
e is
qua
rter
lyan
alys
is,
inte
rpre
tatio
n an
ddi
ssem
inat
ion
of
com
mun
ityhe
alth
dat
a le
d by
the
CHEW
and
ac
tion
poin
ts
iden
tified
.
Ther
e is
qua
rter
lyan
alys
is,
inte
rpre
tatio
n an
ddi
ssem
inat
ion
of
com
mun
ityhe
alth
dat
a le
d by
th
e CH
EW, a
ctio
n po
ints
iden
tified
an
d im
plem
ente
d.
13.5
Ther
e sh
all b
e he
alth
act
ion
days
info
rmed
by
the
dial
ogue
fora
con
vene
d by
th
e CH
EW.
Ther
e ar
e no
he
alth
act
ion
days
info
rmed
by
the
dial
ogue
fora
con
vene
d by
th
e CH
EW.
Ther
e ar
e he
alth
ac
tion
days
but
no
t inf
orm
ed b
y th
e di
alog
uefo
ra c
onve
ned
by
the
CHEW
.
Ther
e ar
e he
alth
ac
tion
days
in
form
ed b
y th
e di
alog
uefo
ra c
onve
ned
by th
e CH
EW.
Ther
e ar
e he
alth
ac
tion
days
info
rmed
by
the
dial
ogue
fora
con
vene
d by
the
CHEW
w
ith fe
edba
ck
to th
e re
leva
nt
stak
ehol
ders
.
Ther
e ar
e he
alth
ac
tion
days
in
form
ed b
y th
e di
alog
uefo
ra c
onve
ned
by th
e CH
EW
with
feed
back
to
the
rele
vant
st
akeh
olde
rs a
nd
follo
w-u
p.
51
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
13.6
Ther
e sh
all b
e m
onth
ly C
HEW
or
CH
V m
eetin
gs
to re
ceiv
e ac
tivity
re
port
s an
ddi
scus
s se
rvic
e st
atis
tics
data
, ex
perie
nces
, ch
alle
nges
, le
sson
sle
arnt
and
giv
e fe
edba
ck. S
uch
mee
tings
sha
ll be
co
nven
ed b
yth
e CH
EW in
ch
arge
.
Ther
e ar
e no
m
onth
ly C
HEW
or
CH
V m
eetin
gs
to re
ceiv
e ac
tivity
re
port
s an
ddi
scus
s se
rvic
e st
atis
tics
data
, ex
perie
nces
, ch
alle
nges
, le
sson
sle
arnt
and
gi
ve fe
edba
ck
conv
ened
by
the
CHEW
in
char
ge.
Ther
e ar
e irr
egul
ar C
HEW
or
CH
V m
eetin
gs
to re
ceiv
e ac
tivity
re
port
s an
d di
scus
s se
rvic
e st
atis
tics
data
, ex
perie
nces
, ch
alle
nges
, le
sson
sle
arnt
and
gi
ve fe
edba
ck
conv
ened
by
the
CHEW
in
char
ge.
Ther
e ar
e m
onth
ly
CHEW
or C
HV
mee
tings
to
rece
ive
activ
ity
repo
rts
and
disc
uss
serv
ice
stat
istic
s da
ta,
expe
rienc
es,
chal
leng
es,
less
ons
lear
nt a
nd
give
feed
back
co
nven
ed b
yth
e CH
EW in
ch
arge
.
Ther
e ar
e m
onth
ly
CHEW
or C
HV
mee
tings
to re
ceiv
e ac
tivity
repo
rts
and
disc
uss
serv
ice
stat
istic
s da
ta,
expe
rienc
es,
chal
leng
es, l
esso
nsle
arnt
and
giv
e fe
edba
ck c
onve
ned
by th
e CH
EW in
ch
arge
and
ther
e ar
e m
inut
es a
nd
actio
n po
ints
.
Ther
e ar
e m
onth
ly
CHEW
or C
HV
mee
tings
to
rece
ive
activ
ity
repo
rts
and
disc
uss
serv
ice
stat
istic
s da
ta,
expe
rienc
es,
chal
leng
es, l
esso
nsle
arnt
and
gi
ve fe
edba
ck
conv
ened
by
the
CHEW
in c
harg
e,
ther
e ar
e m
inut
es,
actio
n po
ints
and
re
view
of p
revi
ous
actio
n po
ints
.
13.7
Ther
e sh
all b
e bi
-ann
ual d
ata
qual
ity a
udits
of
CHU
s le
d by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
info
rmat
ion
office
r.
Ther
e ar
e no
dat
a qu
ality
aud
its o
f CH
Us
led
by th
e su
b-co
unty
heal
th in
form
atio
n offi
cer.
Ther
e ar
e irr
egul
ar
data
qua
lity
audi
ts
of C
HU
s le
d by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
in
form
atio
n offi
cer.
Ther
e ar
e bi
-an
nual
dat
aqu
ality
aud
its o
f CH
Us
led
by th
e su
b-co
unty
heal
th
info
rmat
ion
office
r.
Ther
e ar
e bi
-ann
ual
data
qua
lity
audi
ts
of C
HU
s le
d by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
info
rmat
ion
office
r with
do
cum
enta
tion.
Ther
e ar
e bi
-an
nual
dat
a qu
ality
aud
its o
f co
mm
unity
heal
th u
nits
led
by
the
sub-
coun
tyhe
alth
info
rmat
ion
office
r, w
ith
docu
men
tatio
n an
d fe
edba
ck.
52
Scor
e1
Very
Poo
r2
Poor
3A
vera
ge4
Goo
d5
Very
Goo
dW
eigh
ted
Scor
e
13.8
Ther
e sh
all b
e jo
int
revi
ewan
d le
arni
ng
sess
ions
for
CHEW
sto
sha
re
expe
rienc
es
conv
ened
by th
e su
b-co
unty
he
alth
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e ar
e no
join
t re
view
and
lear
ning
se
ssio
ns fo
r CH
EWs
to s
hare
ex
perie
nces
co
nven
edby
the
sub-
coun
ty
heal
thm
anag
emen
t te
am.
Ther
e ar
e pl
ans
for j
oint
revi
ewan
d le
arni
ng
sess
ions
for
CHEW
sto
sha
re
expe
rienc
es
conv
ened
by th
e su
b-co
unty
he
alth
man
agem
ent
team
.
Ther
e ar
e jo
int
revi
ewan
d le
arni
ng
sess
ions
for
CHEW
sto
sha
re
expe
rienc
es
conv
ened
by th
e su
b-co
unty
hea
lthm
anag
emen
t te
am.
Ther
e ar
e jo
int
revi
ewan
d le
arni
ng
sess
ions
for C
HEW
sto
sha
re
expe
rienc
es
conv
ened
by th
e su
b-co
unty
he
alth
man
agem
ent t
eam
.an
d be
st p
ract
ices
st
anda
rdiz
ed.
Ther
e ar
e jo
int
revi
ewan
d le
arni
ng
sess
ions
for
CHEW
sto
sha
re
expe
rienc
es
conv
ened
by th
e su
b-co
unty
he
alth
man
agem
ent
team
, and
bes
t pr
actic
es h
ave
been
sta
ndar
dize
d an
d di
ssem
inat
ed.
13.9
Ther
e sh
all b
e qu
arte
rlyfu
nctio
nalit
y as
sess
men
t of
CHU
s le
d by
the
sub-
coun
ty
com
mun
ity h
ealth
stra
tegy
foca
l pe
rson
.
Ther
e is
no
func
tiona
lity
asse
ssm
ent o
fCH
Us
led
byth
e su
b-co
unty
co
mm
unity
hea
lthst
rate
gy fo
cal
pers
on.
Ther
e is
irre
gula
rfu
nctio
nalit
y as
sess
men
t of
CHU
s le
d by
the
sub-
coun
ty
com
mun
ity h
ealth
stra
tegy
foca
l pe
rson
.
Ther
e is
qu
arte
rlyfu
nctio
nalit
y as
sess
men
t of
CHU
s le
d by
th
e su
b-co
unty
co
mm
unity
he
alth
stra
tegy
foca
l pe
rson
.
Ther
e is
qua
rter
lyfu
nctio
nalit
y as
sess
men
t of
CHU
s le
d by
the
sub-
coun
ty
com
mun
ity h
ealth
stra
tegy
foca
l pe
rson
with
do
cum
enta
tion
and
actio
n pl
an.
Ther
e is
qua
rter
lyfu
nctio
nalit
y as
sess
men
t of
CHU
s le
d by
the
sub-
coun
ty
com
mun
ity h
ealth
stra
tegy
foca
l pe
rson
with
do
cum
enta
tion,
ac
tion
plan
and
fo
llow
-up.
5353
54
CONTRIBUTORSMinistry of Health - Division of Standards, Quality Assurance and Regulations
1. Dr. Charles Kandie2. Manaseh Bocha3. Francis Muma4. Samuel Okuche5. Dr. Pauline Duya6. Isaac Mwangangi
Ministry of Health - Community Health Services Unit
7. Dr. Salim Ali Hussein8. Samuel Njoroge9. Jane Koech10. Ruth Ngechu11. Caroline Sang12. Daniel Kavoo13. Charity Tauta14. Hilary Chebon15. Diana Kamar16. Ambrose Juma17. Samuel Kiogora18. Stella Kimani19. Mercy Tsimibiko
Ministry of Health - Neonatal, Child and Adolescent Unit
19. Stanely Mbuva
Ministry of Health - Division of Environmental Health
20. Benjamin Murkomen
Ministry of Health - Division of Family Health
21. Clarice Okumu
Ministry of Health - Health Promotion Unit
22. Isabella N. Ndwiga
Japan International Cooperation Agency - Community Health Services
23. Makiko Kinoshita 24. Kenneth Ogendo25. Akiko Hirano26. Salmon Owii
Japan International Cooperation Agency - Kenya Country Office
27. Elijah Kinyangi
USAID - Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems
28. Roselyn Were29. Jacqueline Kimani30. Charles Kimani31. Eunice Musembi32. Dr. Subiri Obwogo 33. Doreen Bwisa 34. Bornface Onyango
55
International Development Institute - Africa
35. Dr. Charles Oyaya36. Lawrence Oguk37. Paul Mbanga38. Emily Wanja
Great Lakes University of Kisumu
39. Dr. Margaret Kaseje40. Elizabeth Ochieng
Africa Medical Research Foundation
41. George Oele
APHIA Plus - Nairobi Coast42. Jefferson Mwaisaka
Goal Kenya 43. David Siso 44. Lawrence Kegoli
MINISTRY OF HEALTH Afya House, P. O. Box 30016 - 00100, Nairobi
www.health.go.ke | www.chs.health.go.ke
MINISTRY OF HEALTH
© FEBRUARY 2015