levitation: engineering + science at 11 id-c · aerodynamic levitation antonov-225, payload 550,000...
TRANSCRIPT
2
Means of Support
nChris Benmore, Kevin Beyer, XSD 11 ID-CnJoerg Neuefeind, SNSnMartin Wilding, U. Aberystwyth, John Parise, Stony
Brook.nInternal funding: IPNS, Art Shultz, XSD, Brian Toby
and Pete ChupasnExternal funding: ORNL
Joan Siewenie,2001 GLAD tests
3
Outline
nWhy levitate things?nIssues specific to levitation experimentsnMethodsnSome applicationsnSummary
4
Containerless processing/levitation
F = -mg
Using containerless methods accesses:• high purity• non-equilibrium liquids• pristine liquid surfaces • eliminates sample “holder”
Material
Atmosphereevaporation
equilibration
Container
contamination reactions
nucleation
Tendency for chemical reactions increases exponentially with T
5
Issues
n You can’t touch the sample with anythingn Non-contact measurements
• Beams• Optical probes• Spectroscopy
– Non-contact temperature control• Lasers/beams – surface heating• EM – bulk heating• Microwave – bulk heating
n Sample sizes are limited
n Compositions and materials may be specific to the method
6
Scientific applications of levitation (containerless techniques)
n Avoid contamination of materials at extreme temperaturesn Control melt chemistry under extreme conditionsn Investigate surface reactions with reactive environmentsn Avoid nucleation to access deeply supercooled and non-equilibrium liquids
and glassesn Expose pristine liquid surfacesn Scientific and technological interest derives from:
– Geo-materials community: planetary evolution, carbon sequestration, waste storage
– Fundamental condensed matter physics: glass transition, fragile liquids, nucleation and ordering in supercooled liquids
– Bio-materials community: supersaturated solutions, bio-active phases– Energy materials: materials at extreme temperatures in chemically
active gases– Measurement of thermophysical properties of hot liquids: surface
tension, viscosity, heat capacity
7
“Transient” methods: Shot tower, William Watts, England, 1782
A shot tower in Dubuque, IA
Free fall time:gh
t2
=
0
10
20
30
40
50
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10000
Free fall distance (m)
Fre
e fa
ll ti
me
(s)
vt 4.4 44 440 ms-1
h
KC-135
8
Aero-acoustic Levitation
UHV Electrostatic levitation
Electromagnetic LevitationHigh pressure electrostatic levitation
Aerodynamic levitation
Acoustic levitation
Magnetic levitation
Some methods for “steady-state” containerless or levitation
10
Aerodynamic levitation
Antonov-225, payload 550,000 lbsTakeoff wt. ~4 x 108 grams
Plenty of force availableSize limit results from fragmentation of liquids
γρ 2gL
Bo =0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.05 0.075 0.1 0.125 0.15
Radius (cm)
Bo
nd
Nu
mb
er
STABLE LEVITATION OF LIQUIDS
11
Operated as a Class I laser system with embedded 250 Watt (Class IV) CO2 laser in the lab and at 11 ID-C
13
Desirable features of an APS research levitation system
n Beamline and lab. based systems to enable sample synthesis and testingn Non-contact temperature measurement
– Optical diagnostics and beam probesn Class I laser operation
– Enhanced safety– More accessible to users
n Ability to change process atmospheres– Oxidizing, neutral, reducing, reactive
n Basic lab support:– semi-micro balance, density meas., mixing and grinding equipment,
technical support
14
Some examples of reluctant glass formers made using levitation melt processing
n Al2O3-CaO 50-75 % CaOn Al2O3-RE oxide 20-50 % RE oxide (includes RE garnets and perovskites)n Al2O3-SiO2 up to 67 % Al2O3 (includes 60/40 mullite)n CaO-SiO2 up to 50% CaOn MgO-SiO2 up to 67 % MgO (includes enstatite and forsterite)n Calcium phosphatesn Zr-Cu-Ni-Al-Ti alloys Cooling rate limited by surface area:volume
A67S33 Mg2SiO4 ErAG YAG LAG
1000 300 100 30 K/s @ 1300K
3 mm
15
Temperature dependent structure of liquids
Liquid 1600oC
Mei, et al, PRL, 98, 057802 (2007).
SiO2
16
Acoustic Levitation D BE
CA
G
F
H
X-ray beam
I
B
D BE
CA
G
F
H
X-ray beam
I
B
RSI, 80, 083904 (2009).
VIDEO
17
Acoustic Levitation
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
100 110 120 130 140 150 160
Time (s)
Tem
per
ature
(oC
)
heater off heater on
0
10
20
30
40
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Heater Power (W)
Tem
per
ature
Incr
ease
(oC
)
18
What the image plate “sees”
-15°C-15°C +16°C+16°C
Small (sub-millimeter) sample motion does not measurably affect the data quality
19
Electromagnetic levitationn Need skin depth, d, < sample x-sectionn Force is proportional to (field gradient)2
n Heating is proportional to (induced (current) field)2
n Typically 450 kHz generator (Lepel, Inductotherm, Ameritherm)
n Need to match impedance of loadn Need to avoid FCC frequenciesn Heating and levitation are coupledn Cooling gas or beam heating can extend T rangen Used in a demo expt. at GLAD ~1993
νρ
δ C∝ 2BHeat ∝dz
dBForce
2
∝
20
Non-contact temperature measurement
5,6 carboxyfluorescein rhodamine B
Inframetrics 760, 8-12 µm thermal imaging camera
FL emission ratio measurements Ross et al, Analyt. Chem., 4117-23, 73 (2001).
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 20 40 60 80 100
Inte
nsity
(A
.U.)
Temperature (ºC)
Peak in thermal emission spectrum at 300 K is ~10 µm
Low T High T
Optical pyrometry at a wavelength where emissionis strong. Peak ~3000/T (in K)
Emissivity correctionsmay be needed.
2.
)ln(11CTT appabs
λελ=−
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30
Thermocouple (oC)
IR Im
ager
(oC
)
21
Summary
• Good coverage of “sample environment space”
• Ability to investigate liquids under non-equilibrium conditions and at high purity
• Class I laser system maximizes safety, minimizes user training requirements
• Complementary bench top facility enables characterization and synthesis
• Neutron + X-ray needed to deconvolute structure and constrain models
• Work needed on low T measurement• Work needed on fast measurements
in transient conditions – high flux is essential
Acoustic Aerodynamic
0
1
2
3
4
-50 450 950 1450 1950 2450 2950
Temperature (C)
Sam
ple
siz
e (m
m)
sample environment space