lhc ip2 inside injection

27
LHC IP2 inside injection W. Bartmann, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi FHI-Meeting, 15 th April 2014

Upload: oakes

Post on 22-Feb-2016

59 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

LHC IP2 inside injection. W. Bartmann, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi FHI-Meeting, 15 th April 2014. Inside injection in P2. Injection. Injection. P2 injection layout. 0.84 mrad V. 0.35 mrad V. 12 mrad H. Vacuum chamber at MSI entrance. Option 1 Move existing MSI. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LHC IP2 inside injection

LHC IP2 inside injection

W. Bartmann, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi

FHI-Meeting, 15th April 2014

Page 2: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 2

Inside injection in P2

Injection Injection

15-April-2014

Page 3: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 3

P2 injection layout

15-April-2014

12 mrad H

0.84 mrad V0.35 mrad V

Page 4: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 4

Vacuum chamber at MSI entrance

15-April-2014

Page 5: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 5

Option 1Move existing MSI

15-April-2014

Page 6: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 6

Vacuum chamber at MSI entrance

15-April-2014

Page 7: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 7

Vacuum chamber at MSI entrance

15-April-2014

Page 8: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 8

Move MSI

15-April-2014

Move MSI horizontally from B1 to B2 and shift longitudinally to get clearance of Q6

Page 9: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 9

Move existing MSI magnets• Move existing MSI horizontally from B1 to B2 – OK

• For clearance of Q6 need to move downstream by 194 mm/12 mrad = 16.2 m - OK– 20.1 m available between MSIA1 and Q5– Still 3.9 m drift between MSI and Q5 for eg. vacuum equipment and maybe shielding (limited aperture

at MSI losses at injection)

• Can TI 2 deliver the beam?– Existing MSI magnets impose a change in vertical trajectory through Q5– Problem is aperture in Q5, presently inj beam is 21 mm displaced wrt orbiting beam; 11.1

mm vertical beam stay clear NEW Q5 needed if MSI kept– MKI might need to be moved to recover vertical angle together with Q5– Trajectory matching in horizontal plane aggravated by wrong Q5 kick

• Very likely not feasible even with newly designed Q5

15-April-2014

Page 10: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 10

Option 2Move redesigned MSI

15-April-2014

Page 11: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 11

TI2 geometry

15-April-2014

Green: LHC ringBlue: present TI 2Magenta: proposed TI 2

MBIB

Page 12: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 12

Q6

15-April-2014

Page 13: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 13

MKI and MSI

15-April-2014

Page 14: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 14

New MSI design, moved

15-April-2014

Matched at Q5 and MKI

Page 15: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 15

New MSI design, moved

15-April-2014

Vertically same trajectory as now

Page 16: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 16

Thinner ‘blade’

15-April-2014

40 mm beam separation

20 mm beam separation

Page 17: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 17

Move redesigned MSI• New MSI design:

– requires smaller ‘blade’ due to smaller vertical displacement between beams from long. Shift

– From 40 mm to 20 mm beam separation

• No change for Q5 trajectory

• No change for TI 2 trajectory

15-April-2014

Page 18: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 1815-April-2014

Option 2Mirror injection

Page 19: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 19

Mirror injection

15-April-2014

Keep same longitudinal position no changes downstream of MSI

Page 20: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 20

Use existing MSI magnets

15-April-2014

Roll existing MSI by 180 deg Tilt existing MSI by 180 deg and redesign vacuum chamber of injected beam

Chamber should be here!

Page 21: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 21

S-shape in MSI straight

15-April-2014

Q6 – TI 2 collision even with extremely strong bends

Page 22: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 22

Use UJ22 and cross before Q8

15-April-2014

Page 23: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 23

Use UJ22 and cross before Q8

15-April-2014

MBIBs 3 x stronger than present ones

Page 24: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 24

Use UJ22 and cross before Q8

15-April-2014

Still no sufficient vertical separation at H-crossing

Page 25: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 25

Conclusions• Option 1 – Move existing MSI

– Move MSI transversely onto the other beam and long. closer to Q5 – With existing MSI magnets seems not feasible

• Option 2 – Move redesigned MSI– Smaller beam separation requires thinner blade (40 20 mm)– If septum design possible least impact on overall injection region

• Option 3 – Mirror injection– Tilt MSI by 180 deg and mirror the injection to the inside of the ring– Existing MSI can only be used if vacuum chamber can be modified (invert horizontal angle) – TI 2 needs to pass below the ring and bend the beam back into the MSI aperture (S-shape)– Crossing inside MSI straight impossible with reasonable bending radii– UJ22 and Q8 crossing: requires tremendously strong bends or change of tunnel geometry; to be further

studied

• For all options MKI modifications to be checked

15-April-2014

Page 26: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 2615-April-2014

Page 27: LHC IP2 inside injection

FHI, LHC IP2 inside injection 27

MBIB data sheet

15-April-2014