likeness task palermo 2009
TRANSCRIPT
Walter Colesso
University of Padova
Model of Likeness Differentiation Continuum in Intimate Relationships
1
The Continuum of Likeness-Differentiation in Intimate Relationships
(a)Theoretical and research studies on the
similarity construct in intimate relationships don’t have a long history. They have flourished within the myriad of analogous terms, like similarity, identification, attraction, imitation, and so on.
(b) It has been usually studied according to a dichotomous model, especially in developmental psychology.
2
(c) Nevertheless, several authors have proposed analogous concepts or terms with three or four degrees, as L’Abate summarized in 1997 (see Figure 1).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 2 3 4 5 6
Berne (1964) Parent Adult Child
Harvey (1961) System 1 (conforming) Systems 3 & 4 (independent) System 2 (rebelling)
Johnson (1972) Conservatives Independents Liberals
Kelly (1955) Similar Dissimilar Contrasting
Kohlberg (1963) Approval-oriented Authority-rules Social & Moral Principles Instrumental Egoism
Lövinger (1966) Symbiosis Coscientious-integrative Autonomous
Impulsive-ridden Self-protective
Lynn (1969) Parental Distance “close” Higher Cognitive Functioning Parental Distance “distant”
Mahler (1965) Symbiotic Differentiated Autistic
Peak (1960) Assimilation Similarity Oppositeness/Isolation
Rotter (1966) Locus of Control: External Internal External
Willis (1965) Yes-man Independent Thinker No-man
Witkin (1962) Cognitive Sty le: Global Articulated Global
Figure 1. The Continuum of Likeness and Compatible Theoretical Formulations
Adapted from: L’Abate, 1997.
3
The Continuum of Likeness-Differentiation in Intimate Relationships
(d) L’Abate (1999) proposes a continuum of likeness-differentiation with six degrees that works in a dichotomous fashion but at three different levels: The formal model proposes that individuals make choices (consciously and/or unconsciously) moving from one pole to the other but at different levels according to:– their stage of life,– their functional level of relational competence,– their individual history, their gender, socio-cultural status, etc.
(e) This formal model may be outlined as a bell-distribution, where functionality may be placed toward the center and disfunctionality toward the extremes. A functional profile will be bell-distributed with few values at the two extreme degrees and many more items in the central degrees.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 2 3 4 5 6
4
The Continuum of Likeness-Differentiation in Intimate Relationships
From a model to an empirical checkLikeness Continuum Task – LT
(Cusinato & Colesso, 2008) supports the existence and influence of an underlying continuum of likeness in intimate relationships. It’s a laboratory experiment of clinical psychology where the subject is asked to make “forced choices” and give reasons for such choices.
The task develops in four steps:
(a) “intimate identification”
(b) “test training”
(c) “coins placement”
(d) “inquiry”
— nine items of the taxonomy “people of your life”; — introducing the six ranges;— the subject is provided with ten 5-cent coins and invited to place them on six cells corresponding to the ranges of the continuum; — the subject is asked to explain his/her coin distribution and produce some real examples to check the right use of the continuum.
5
From a formal model to an empirical checkThe results of two studies are presented:
First study: it concerns a large application of LT to non-clinical subjects to verify if the continuum of a large group, comparable to a non-clinical population sample, has a bell-shaped.
Second study: it concerns some applications to two clinical groups compared with non-clinical control group to investigate which relationships with significant others in their life contexts induce subjects to activate different modalities along the likeness continuum.
Data analyses were performed with log-linear models. Significant Zs were identified for p = .05*, .01**, .001***, in marginal and/or cell analyses.
6
STUDY 1: The likeness continuum in LT with non-clinical individuals7
- LT was applied to a large group of non-clinical individuals. -The overall analysis specifically verified the continuum distribution by comparing the data of 172 subjects with the formal model (Figure 5).
Two aspects emerged:1. The bell distribution appeared rather precise: “differentiation” degrees shift toward the center, while “identity” degrees are a little bit lower: why?2. The Analyses of “degrees x intimate items” offer an orientation for personal relationships, but this picture is rather inaccurate for different interpretation of the same items.
STUDY 1 (continuation)
analyses: males vs. females The analyses compared Male vs. female sub-groups
Results: - Males are distributed on “opposition” and “alienation”, while females on “similarity” and “differentiation” .
- Table “degrees x intimates” does not produce significant Zs.
8
STUDY 2: The likeness continuum in LT with clinical people
First analyses: anorexics and non clinical females-Two different types of clinical subjects were considered: anorexic females vs non clinical females and psychotic males and females vs a non-clinical control group.
Non-clinical subjects show:
- a bell-shape distribution,
- a higher identity score then anorexics.
9
STUDY 2 (continuation)
Second analyses: psychotics and non clinical subject
Histograms show the bell distribution of non-clinicals and a flat one of psychotics; central degrees for the firsts, extreme ones for the seconds.
10
Conclusions
Our research on Likeness Continuum seems to offer positive perspectives:1. All analyses of non-clinical individuals corroborate the bell-shaped
distribution according to the formal model. 2. The distributions of clinical groups differ from non-clinical individuals.
Likeness Continuum (LT) supports Likeness-Continuum model in relationships.
Cusinato, M., & Colesso, W. (2008). Validation of the Continuum of Likeness in Intimate Relationships. In L. L’Abate (Eds.), Toward a Science of Clinical Psychology. Laboratory Evaluations and interventions (pp. 337-352). New York: Nova Publisher
We, Cusinato and I, have created paper-and pencil self-report Likeness Scales for each degree. Its validation is in progress.
11
Thank You
glad to be collaborating to Relational Competence studies
in Family Psychology
12