list of figures · 2.3 history and previous work 3.o geology 4.0 geophysical surveys 4.1...

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l

52P09SE0821 2.12598 RICH LAKE 010

EXPLORATION PROGRAM REPORT

ON THE

JAMES REID PROPERTY

FORT HOPE AREA/ ONTARIO

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

NTS 52P/9

Latitude: 5lo 37' N Longitude: 88O 02' W

For

OHIO RESOURCES CORP.806 - 850 West Hastings Street

Vancouver, B.C.V6C 1E1

By

RECEIVED

Jill - 7 1989

MINING LANDS SECTION

J. Campbell Graham/ M.Eng./ P.Eng,Hi-Tec Resource Management Ltd.

1500 - 609 Granville StreetVancouver, B.C.

V7Y 1G5

May 30, 1989


52P09SEe*21 2.12598 RICH LAKE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

l.O SUMMARY

2.0 INTRODUCTION2.1 Location and Access2.2 Property and Ownership2.3 History and Previous Work

3.O GEOLOGY

4.0 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS4.1 Description of IP Survey4.2 Description of VLF-EM

and Magnetometer Surveys4.3 Discussion of Results

4.3.1 North Grid4.3.2 South Grid

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

6.O REFERENCES

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX I Estimated Cost of Proposed Program

APPENDIX II Statement of Costs

APPENDIX III Statement of Qualifications

010C

Page No.

i

l123

66

788

10

11

13

111111111111111111

.Figure 1 .

Figure 2.

Figure 3a.

Figure 3b.

Figure 3c.

Figure 3d.

Figure 3e.

Figure 3f.

Figure 4a.

Figure 4b.

Figure 5a.

Figure 5b.

Figure 5c.

Figure 6a.

Figure 6b.

Figure 7a.

Figure 7b.

LIST OF FIGURES

Location Map

Claim Map

IP Pseudosections - North Grid LO, 50E

IP Pseudosections - North Grid L100E, 150E




IP Pseudosections - North Grid L500E, 550E, 600E

After Page

1

2

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

Chargeability Plan Map - North Grid in pocket

Resistivity Plan Map - North Grid in pocket

VLF-EM Survey (Cutler) - North GridInphase and Quadrature Postings in pocket

VLF-EM Survey (Cutler) - North GridInphase and Quadrature Profiles in pocket

VLF-EM Survey (Cutler) - North Grid Field Strength Postings and Profiles

Magnetometer Survey - North Grid Postings

Magnetometer Survey - North Grid Profiles

IP Pseudosections - South Grid L100E, 200E


in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

Figure 7c.

Figure 7d.

Figure 7e.

Figure 7f.

Figure 7g.

Figure 8a.

Figure 8b.

Figure 9.






Chargeability Plan Map - South Grid

Resistivity Plan Map - South Grid

Magnetometer Survey (1988) South Grid

Figure 10. Compilation Map

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket

in pocket


l.O SUMMARY

From March 26 to April 10, 1989, Hi-Tec Resource

Management Ltd. conducted an exploration program on the

James Reid property, near Fort Hope in northwestern

Ontario. The program was conducted on behalf of Ohio

Resources Corp., and consisted of induced polarization,

magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys.

The property hosts gold-bearing quartz veins explored

by trenching and some underground work in the late

1920's and 1930's. Historical values of up to 1.0 oz

gold/ton are reported. Later exploration included

drilling, magnetometer and VLF-EM surveys, and a soil

geochemical survey.

Since 1987, drilling by Noramco Exploration Inc.

immediately north of the subject property has defined

gold-bearing zones (sulfide mineralized shears with

coincident magnetic highs), one of which appeared to

trend onto the subject property. The objective of the

present exploration program was to locate the possible

extension of the gold-bearing zone and explore for similar mineralized zones.

The results of the program are very encouraging,

including the discovery of the hoped-for extension of

the gold-bearing zone, and three additional zones.

Further exploration work is definitely warranted and highly recommended.

The anomalies should be tested with diamond drilling.

As well, the remainder of the property should be

surveyed with the IP method to identify additional


11

targets. Of particular interest is the relationship of

the gold mineralization in the shaft area to the zones

defined by the present survey. The cost of the recommended program is estimated to be S393,000.

B

l

2.O INTRODUCTION

ll l

At the request of Mr. Grant Lang, president of Ohio

B Resources Corp. , Hi-Tec Resource Management Ltd.

B conducted an exploration program on the James Reid

property to evaluate its precious metal potential .

lThe author and a three-man crew conducted an IP survey

on the property from March 26 to April 10, 1989. In

M preparation, control grids were cut and a VLF-EM and

" magnetometer survey conducted by a subcontractor

l (Lashex Ltd., of North Bay, Ontario) from March 18 to

March 26, 1989.

l This report is based on the results of the present

* program and on the available literature pertaining to

the area.

2.1 Location and Access

The James Reid property is located in northwesternm

Ontario, about 8 km northwest of Fort Hope and 150 km

l east of Pickle Lake (Fig. 1) . The claims are centered

at north latitude 51 O 25" and west longitude 88 0 02',

l and are covered by NTS mapsheets 52P/9 and 16.

l

l


p

PROPERTY LOCATION

ir-f 56"

4-48"

ir

100i 200 300 400 500 km

OHIO RESOURCES CORP.

JAMES REID PROPERTY

LOCATION MAP

HineMSOUfiCC MANWfMENHTD

ICtlEiAt thown

CHKDH

C Graham

N.I.I.;

62P/9DAT f i

Apf i! 1989PROJECT No:

89ONT001

l l

The property is most easily accessed from Pickle Lake

by helicopter or float plane. Pickle Lake is served by

scheduled air service from Thunder Bay.

l For the present exploration program the crew stayed at

a camp on Rond Lake, about 1.5 km northeast of the

l property, and commuted by snowmobile along a winter

road which accesses the central portion of the

l property.

l2.2 Property and Ownership

B The property consists of twenty contiguous mineral

claims of one unit each located in the Thunder Bay

l Mining Division (Fig. 2) . The nominal area of the

property is 800 acres. (The Ontario government claim

l map indicates a notch out of the property's northeast

m corner, but the shape as observed in the field is

roughly rectangular.)

lThe claims are owned by Robert James Reid and are under

option to Ohio Resources Corp. The pertinent claim

•m information is as follows:

l

l

l

11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

issPoo'

03 0 2 0!' J

\3fSilO\ S&to* 7^^^-^^ ̂ "^ TB TB ***"* f5*"* f-ZT'**' Jjyv*z.^X IOMS '" 100J^'00"^

j - ——— -~——-77w24 liBV^Ja/ y-^ro fctf//^ f ft w f&fa ffifa *2 MM IOOBS/^"^ W"'

#537// #5;5.'cs7 /— ^ ~S- -4--^,r^~^ ViioossîX--^^^ ---^vif^saidr^'*"! TX i7^^' 13 7•- " '^1 I 1'B TB îft^ ' m di * KM (T) l V I 1008546 1UU0^ s^ Fw^ÛTi — fet^tfWliJMs^ 10M5^C^ s

^HwJ^.T^-O^^J^^^WM '^JsSwvtlr t- * ' T/t A/ j fit G j ' ' rr^woOc 1 t. Q ^, flUW9 ———— r fB-/--^- - - 7 TV - -|^] g, J 7f/^ j f\ .. |^4^-e^*| 65 , 376 ^65,377 1^^^^! ^j f- )flt)Jfof 7?W/ !0085-!8

' Â39 Wlm n W'~":i t\\ "i ^ . 7 TP /0/J.OLC 3fD Ygf\g,yo7Sg* PA 0 |^ A " 6 J t| ? i WlôB /l

1 1 . ! TB J TB I TB JljS^f/^' ' flM'? moew

1/0/20^1 "Me--WW^ ''65l3726 -fl^*^9 j^ T? TB 7B n0 l (TTB

J7^^^jTB ~^TB";'J"'TB" "loosss^. | l008^-^s5s: 'u X~^î-^...- | ;^Tîi*o*^-^^^Syo7f?x ' r8 T"^— i ja~) TB i7ayyo/X^ ^yp/Jiv ifffow ™x)ot|t^ M oeti^l loossse ^0^5/57 ' looesss looasss

\

^ /.^/ff

^-^L 'f \- ̂,

1 ———J ^

-p5l*37'30''

J 37'

r


Scale 1" , 1 mile. ÂMES RED PROPERTY

0 500 1000 metres

^ —— i ,i^n, CLAIM MAP(Approx. 1:31680)

(OLii NA At chown

yflj OWN. l*i 0

tfffiim IMW --ri —— vjMti^MHI KSOUnCt MANAfifMtNI LID CHKD.ir. f

C Gcsham

T.|i FtOUMf Moi

^- 2ft.pfi/1989

J90NT001


Claim No. Units

TB 651376 r lTB 651377 7 lTB 651378 lTB 651379 lTB 740028 lTB 740029 lTB 840781'' lTB 840782'' lTB 840783 7 lTB 840784 y lTB 840785 lTB 840786 lTB 840787 lTB 840788 lTB 840789 lTB 840790 lTB 840791 lTB 840792/ lTB 840793 lTB 840794 x l

Record Date

Jul. 9, 1982 it

Oct. 30, 1984 11

NOV. 8, 1985 itit n n n n H n H n H n n

2.3 History and Previous Work

A good history of the property is presented in

Cruikshank's 1988 report (quoting from Londry's 1987

report), and is presented below. -

"The property on which the mine shaft is located was first staked during 1927 by Lorne Howey (a well known Canadian prospector) and associates. The claims were staked as a result of locating gold-bearing quartz veins in the local volcanic rocks.

"Shaft sinking was started in February 1928, and by September had been put down to a depth of 100 feet where a level was established and some drifting and cross-cutting was completed. During the summer of 1928 extensive prospecting was also done on the surface. One vein, striking east-west was uncovered and trenched in various places for a distance of about 575 feet east of the shaft.


"At that time E.M. Burwash, a geologist working for the Ontario Department of Mines, reported in the Department's annual report (Volume XXXVII, Part 2, 1929) assays from this vein averaging about 1.0 oz. gold per ton across an average width of 34.5 inches.

"No further exploration was carried out until 1935, when the property was taken over by Fort Hope Consolidated Gold Mines. This company pumped the water from the mine workings and continued the exploration and development of the 100 foot, level. A total of about 250 feet of drifting and cross-cutting was completed during this phase of the work. At this time a new ore shoot was opened up on the 100 foot level. It consists of a quartz vein that was followed for a distance of 25 feet, striking diagonally to an east- west porphyry dike with which the main ore zone is associated. The average grade in this vein is reported to be $21.32 per ton with the price of gold at $35.00 per oz. [0.61 oz/ton], but the width of the vein is not known.

"About 5000 feet of diamond drilling was done from surface at this time, but no assay results from this drilling are available.

"In 1946 Golden Hope Mines Limited was incorporated to acquire the property, and in the autumn of that year, a magnetic survey was made by the firm of Koulomzine, Geoffrey and Brossard of Val D'Or, Quebec. A major northwest-southeast striking fault was implied by that survey, but no further work was done at that time.

"Another exploration program was done during 1958 and 1959. At this time, surface sampling was carried out and some bulk samples were sent for testing, but in 1959 the work was suspended because of lack of funds.

"The claims expired on June 24, 1982 and four claims were re-staked around the shaft area on June 25, 1982 by Mike Labchuk and John Londry. Two more claims were staked during the month of October, 1984, to make a group of six. During this time, a magnetometer and VLF-EM survey had been carried out over the six claims, the numbers of which are TB-651376 to TB-651379 inclusive and TB-740028 and TB-740029. A strong magnetometer anomaly was located striking north of west and extending to the northwest boundary of the six claim group.

"During the last of October, 1985, fourteen more claims were staked to increase the property to its present size of twenty contiguous mining claims.

l l l l l l l l l

l

l l l l l l l

"In November, 1985, the titles of the original six claims were transferred to Robert James Reid. The titles of the remaining fourteen claims were also transferred to Robert James Reid in August, 1986."

Ohio Resources Corp. currently holds an option on the

property.

The property immediately to the north is being explored

by Noramco Explorations Inc., and drilling results

since 1987 have been very encouraging. Results include

0.22 oz gold/ton over 20' in the OL-12 zone, which is

related to a sulfide mineralized shear zone with strong

magnetic response. An airborne geophysical survey over

the Noramco property indicates the magnetic zone trends

onto the subject property.

3.O GEOLOGY

lThe property overlies mafic and intermediate volcanics

of Archean age, with exposures of banded metasediments

in the south. Abundant foliation suggests regional

scale shearing.

Feldspar porphyry dikes are noted in the vicinity of

the shaft, and gold-bearing quartz veins. Felsic

intrusives and regional scale shear zones are important

features in Archean gold deposits, and their presence

is favourable.

l ll Noramco's drilling immediately to the north of the

subject property indicates that gold occurs with

l

l

sulfides in quartz veins contained within shear zones

in mafic volcanics.

4.0 GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS

l ll 4.1 Description of IP Survey

A total of 10.4 km was surveyed on two grids (grid

l locations and anomalies are shown in Fig. 10) by the

induced polarization (IP) method. A dipole-dipole

g array with a 25 m dipole spacing was used, with

readings taken for four dipole separations.

(Occasionally only three separations were possible due

H to telluric noise.)

l Instrumentation used was a BRGM IP-2 time domain

receiver and a Phoenix IPT-1 transmitter set for a two

B second pulse width.

lThe north survey grid was placed to cover the

l southwesterly extension of the magnetic feature

trending from Noramco's property to the north. An 800 m

baseline was established at an azimuth of 700 and

seventeen crosslines (LO to L8E) were cut at 50 m

l l

spacing. Readings were made every 25 m. Due to time

l constraints imposed by deteriorating weather con

ditions, only thirteen of the crosslines were surveyed

l before proceeding to the south grid.

The south survey grid was placed to cover a magnetic

l feature which trends east-west across the southern part

of the property. A 1.6 km baseline was established at

l an azimuth of 90O and nineteen 400 m crosslines (LO to

m L16E) were cut at 100 m spacing with in-fill lines at

50 m in the center of the grid (to cover a magnetically

l disturbed zone in greater detail) . Readings were made

every 25 m. Fourteen of the crosslines were surveyed.

l For the north grid, the IP survey results are presented

in Figs. 3a-f (pseudosections) and in Figs. 4a, b (plan

l view) .

l For the south grid, the IP survey results are presented

in Figs. 7a-g (pseudosections) and in Figs. 8a, b (plan

l view) .

4.2 Description of VLF-EM and Magnetometer Surveys

l

g

l

The north grid was surveyed using a Scintrex IGS

system, which measures both VLF-EM and total magnetic

field strength. A total of 7.0 km was surveyed, with

l

l

l

8l l

station spacings of 12.5 m for the magnetic survey and

l 25 m for the VLF-EM. Both the Annapolis and Cutler

stations were used, but the results for Annapolis are

not presented since observed conductor response was

minimal.

l Diurnal corrections for the magnetic readings were made

by means of an automated base station.

lM The VLF-EM survey results are presented in Figs. 5a-c,

* and the magnetometer survey results are presented in

Figs. 6a-b.

Figure 9 presents the 1988 magnetometer survey results

for the south grid area. The 1988 data was projected

B onto the south grid lines and is presented in profile

form to allow direct correlation with the IP survey

results.

l4.3 Discussion of Results

m 4.3.1 North Grid

B Two significant anomalous zones were defined on the

north grid (all anomalies discussed are shown on the

l

l

l

l l

Compilation Map, Fig. 10). The northernmost anomaly is

l directly on trend with one of Noramco's gold-bearing

zones and is characterized by:

m 1) high chargeability (up to 48 msec) , likely

indicating sulfide mineralization;

l 2) very low resistivity (occasionally less than

100 ohm-m), likely indicating a shear zone;

l 3) directly coincident very high magnetic field

M strength (occasionally some 1000's of gammas

above background), likely due to pyrrhotite

l (a common magnetic sulfide mineral) and

magnetite (which is found in mafic

g volcanics).

" The anomaly has an apparent strike length of 300 m

B (250N/00 to 350N/300E) and is open for extension to the

southwest although it is weaker there. The 1988

l magnetic survey results show the high magnetic zone

continuing (although weakening and broadening,

l indicating the source of the anomaly to be at greater

m depth or less concentrated) at least 500 m southwest

from the north grid, allowing a potential strike length

l of up to 800 m.

l

l

l

lA second anomaly parallel to the one described above is

l also defined on the north grid. This second anomaly

includes a zone of very high chargeability about 50 m

B across, low resistivity (although not as low as noted

fl in the first anomaly) , a zone of moderate chargeability

trending southwest off the grid, and a zone of weak

l chargeability and moderately high magnetic field

strength trending northeast about 350 m. The overall

strike length of the second anomaly is 550 m (50N/00 to

g 250N/550E) and is open for extension to the southwest

and east. It is interesting to note that the most

l intense part of the second anomaly has no magnetic

response, indicating that no pyrrhotite or magnetite is

J present.

' Both anomalies appear to be steeply dipping and extend

B from near surface to greater than 100 m depth.

J 4.3.2 South Grid

B

m

Two parallel IP anomalies were discovered on the south

grid, both with directly coincident zones of high

magnetic field strength over much of their length and

l moderately low resistivity. The northernmost anomaly

has a strike length of 900 m (100S/500E to 225S/1400E) ;

the southernmost has 1500 m (175S/100E to 350S/1600E) .

l

l


11

They probably represent steeply dipping sulfide

mineralized shear zones which extend from near surface

to greater than 100 m depth.

The 1988 soil geochemical survey results show elevated

gold values (up to 70 ppb) in the area of these

anomalies, possibly indicating the inferred mineralized

zones are gold-bearing.

5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The property hosts gold-bearing quartz veins explored

by trenching and some underground work in the late

1920's and 1930's. Historical values of up to 1.0 oz

gold/ton are reported. Recent drilling by Noramco

Exploration Inc. immediately north of the subject

property defined gold-bearing zones, one of which

appeared to trend onto the subject property. The

objective of the present exploration program was to

locate the possible extension of the gold-bearing zone

and explore for similar mineralized zones.

The results of the program are very encouraging,

including the discovery of the hoped-for extension of

the gold-bearing zone and three additional zones. All four zones are characterized by geophysical responses

which indicate they are steeply dipping sulfide

mineralized shear zones.

Further exploration work is definitely warranted and

highly recommended. The anomalies should be tested

with diamond drilling. As well, the remainder of the

property should be surveyed with the IP method to

12

l l

identify additional targets. Of particular interest is

l the relationship of the gold mineralization in the

shaft area to the zones defined by the present survey.

The cost of the recommended program is estimated at

| $393,000. A first phase of IP surveying is estimated

at $93 / 000 / followed by about 6,000' of diamond

drilling at $300,000 (all inclusive). A breakdown for

l the first phase is given as Appendix I.

l Respectfully submitted,

l

J/ Campbell Graham, M. Eng., P. Ehgi/i'i.;/ -,, v v'' J'

l Geophysical Engineer

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l


13

7.O REFERENCES

Cruikshank, P., 1988. Geophysical report on a magnetometer survey over the James Reid property. Private report by Geotronics Surveys Ltd. for Ohio Resources Corp.

Goldsmith, L.B., 1988. Geology and soil geochemistry, James Reid property. Private report by Arctex Engineering Services for Ohio Resources Corp.

Podolsky, G., 1986. Report on combined helicopter-borne magnetic, electromagnetic, and VLF survey, Opikeigen Lake property. Private report by Aerodat Ltd. for Pure Gold Resources Inc., o.G.S. assessment files, Thunder Bay.


APPENDIX I

ESTIMATED COST OF PROPOSED PROGRAM

l l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

l

APPENDIX I

ESTIMATED COST OF PROPOSED PROGRAM

Phase I, IP Survey

Project Preparation $2,000

Permitting 500

Mob/DemobLinecutters 2,500 IP crew 7,000 Fixed wing support 3,000

Linecuttingsay 30 km crosslines @ $250/km 7,500 say 4 km base and tielines @ $350/km 1,400

IP Survey, say 25 days @ $1500/day 37,500

Domicile 4,000

Accounting, communication, freight 3,000

Report 5,000

Contingencies, approx. 10% 7,500

Project Management Fee, 15% 12,135

$93,035

Phase. .IIf Drilling

The cost of the drilling program is difficult to estimate, as it depends on the number of targets defined during the first phase. A reasonable estimate is $300,000 for about 6,000' of diamond drilling, all inclusive.


APPENDIX II

STATEMENT OF COSTS

l l l l l l

Mobilization/Demobilization 8,387.20

I Crew $ 1,800.00Geophysicist 2,300.00IP Equipment Rental 700.00Fixed Wing Support 3,587.20

* 8,387.20

STATEMENT OF COSTS

OHIO RESOURCES CORPORATION JAMES REID PROPERTY PROJECT 890NT001

Project Preparation $ 2,700.00

B Linecutting 4,995.25

l

Crosslines 13.226 km @ 250 = 3,306.50 Baselines S Tielines 4.825 km @ 350 = 1,688.75

4,995.25

Detailed VLF-Mag . . 1,400.007.0 kilometers @ $200/km

IP Survey12 Days @ 1,500.00 18,000.00

l Camp Rental including fuel 12 days @ $100/day 1,200.00

m Snowmobile Rental 800.00

Accounting/Communications/Freight 3,767.13

l Report Compilation and Drafting 5,000.00

Contingencies(Helicopter Support) 2,778.60

l 49,028.18 Project Management Fee 6 15* 7,201.53

$ 56,229.71

l '

l

l


APPENDIX III

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l 1

STATEMENT OP QUALIFICATIONS

I, JAMES CAMPBELL GRAHAM of the City of Vancouver, in the Province of British Columbia, hereby certify:

1. I am a Geophysical Engineer employed by Hi-Tec Resource Management Ltd. during the writing of this report. Their office is at 1500 - 609 Granville Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7Y 1G5.

2. I am a registered Professional Engineer in the Province of British Columbia.

3. I graduated in 1982 with a B.Se. degree and in 1985 with a M.Eng. degree, . both in Geophysical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines in Golden, Colorado.

4. I have been involved in numerous mineral exploration programs since 1975.

5. This report is based upon field work carried out by this author and a Hi-Tec Resource Management Ltd. crew during March and April, 1989 and a review of published and privately held literature pertaining to the claim area.

6. I hold no direct or indirect interest in the property described herein, or in any securities of Ohio Resources Corp. or in any associated companies, nor do I expect to receive any.

7. This report may be utilized by Ohio Resources Corp. for inclusion in a Prospectus or Statement of Material Facts.

Dated in Vancouver, B.C. this

/X- A

day of.(.'^t- -o e :*r^'' (-'if ' - ••'•S.', *;.

J (A ML 1987.

'i.t

J l c . Graham, M. Eng., i?. Eng. ' - '' V: \ ~ ' -

\^.V'."rirV ^:pl;^H;;:.''

" -"-t.i ..*'J ''

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Report of Work j(Geophysical, Geological, l Geochemical and ExpendJ

fr /#"IOS2.12598 RICH LAKE 900

Type of Survcvls)

GEOPHYSICAL - IP, EM, MAGClaim ~Hbldcr(s)~

ROBERT JAMES REID

Fownship or Area

FORT HOPE, THUNDER BAX MDProspector's Licence No,rosncctor s LiA48161

Addressc/o OHIO RESOURCES CORP. 806-850 WEST HASTINGS, VANCOUVER, B.C. V6C 1E1

Date of Survey (from fr to) l ota' Miles of line Cut28 03 89 i 9 04 89 11.3SU' VCHI0-TEC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.Day j Mo. | Yr. | Day j Mo. | Vi.

Name ami Address of Author (oi Gco-Tethnica! report!

J, CAMPBELL GRAHAM c/o PII-TEC 1500-609 Granviiie, P.O. BDXC10362^

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at right Mining Claims Traversefi {List in numerical sequence)Special Provisions

For (us! survey:

Lnier 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

J Geophysical

E lccirornagnclic

- Magneiomcter

- Radiomclric

- Other

; Geological

j Geochemica!

ars Days

Complete reverse side and enter toTal(s) here

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic ; * l O l

Magnetometer j TO \ * Y O

- Radion*etric

- Other I . P .

Geological

Geochemical

Airborne Credits

Note: Sp' - c Mf pt o vis ions E l ecu o ma go e t K, i-ff'dits do not apply lo Airborn*' Survt-ys. Magnetometer

fladiometric

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Calculation ci Fxpcnch'ure Days Credits

Total Expenditures

15 ^

InstructionsTotal Days deans may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice, EntC' number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

June 20,198 RecorcletfHolder or Agent (Signature)]

9 Y/ ^l/ l\.*SL*r^-,^' /t ij^.-f*——V- l

Certification Verifying Report of'Vflork

For Office Use Only

heit'by teitify thai t have a personal and intimate knowledge of the IHUS sot io.'th m the^^jqf-t'jfftSjVoik annexed hereto, having performed the work i witnessed same during and'or after its completion and the annexed ii-jmit is true j y *) ,

Name and Postal Address of Person CertifyingVIRGINIA KURAN c/o HI-TEC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD. 1500-609 Granviiie, P.O. Box 10362, Vancouver, B.C. V7Y 1G5 Date Certified Certified by (Signature)

'36? i85 l

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Geophysical-Geological-Geochemical Technical Data Statement

File

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

wt/5

Type of Survey(s) Township or Are.

Claim

GEOPHYSICAL

FORT HOPETHUNDER BAY MINING DIV.

Survey Company_HI-TEC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

Author of Report J. CAMPBELL GRAHAM, I1T m^^ 1500-609 Granville,

Address of Amhnr c/o HI-TEC p.p. Box 103627 Vancouv. T ^ ro B - c - V7Y 1G5 /March 28-April 9/89 Covering Dates ol Survey_____________________l———————

(linecutting to office)

Total Miles of Line Cut____l—^—^—-——-——————^——.—.—————^——

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical- Electromagnetic.

DAYS per claim

- Radiometric- Other ———Geological.Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurvcyi)

Magnetometer. -Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATE: June 20/ 89 SIGNATURE:

Res. Geol.^.^.Previous Surveys

File No. Type

. Qualifications.

J

Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

TB(prefix)

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

TB

.T.B..

TB

840792(number)

840793

840794

651376

651377

.8 4 0.1?.3.

M9.18.2..

840781

K

J

TOTAL CLAIMS-

837 (85/1?)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey72.2 stations established

Number of Stations I P- 420, MAG- 56 O, VT.F-2RO Nnmhrr of Readings IP-420, MAG-56n f VT,F-2Ptf Station interval J P- 2 5m, MAG- 1 2. 5m, VLF-25m Line sparing IP b Maq-50m, 100m; EM-50m Profile srale VLF-2cm^50O MAG 2 CMÎOOO nT ________________________ _________Contour interval ^âtajio^con toured

Scintrex IGS

OCoil configuration .

XsssH D

O

Ci w

Instrumentq

Accuracy — Scale constant —. oDiurnal correction method __automated

~ . , , . . ./i * 10 seconds Base Station check-in interval (hours)___________ —Base Station location and value . N/A————.^^—.——

Instrument Scintrex IGS

Coil separation n/a.f 3%

Accuracy ___~————Method: n/a O Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back D In line O Parallel line

s, Cutler(specify V.L.F. station)

p^m^rs rn^nred i" phase, out of phase, quadature

Instrument.

Scale constant ^

Corrections made —

Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument IP-2 Receiver ——-——.—....—-.....—————..........—.X Method IXJ Time Domain D Frequency Domain

p Parameters - On time __Â^LÂ8_________________ Frequency ^—-.— S JH - Off time—1.jeco?^_________________ Range..K^

^ ^ K.) O

Delay time—16 O ms.gggMs

fL-i w-J A T r2Kw— Integration time.

window widths 120ms, 220ms, 420ms, b20ms

Power.W" Electrode array-dipdejrdipolfi-Q ^, , . 25m X, Electrode spacing ,

Type of electrode ^^î^^teel

HI-TECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

July 6, 1989

Ministry of Northern Development and Mines Mining Lands Section 880 Bay Street 3rd Floor Toronto, Ontario MSS 1Z8

Attention: Authur Bar

Dear Sir:

E'lease find enclosed with this letter two copies of a technical report on claims located in the Thunder Bay Mining District owned by Robert James Reid. The report of work was sent to the Thunder Bay Mining District office.

Would you please acknowledge receipt of the technical reports .

Yours truly,

HI -TEC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

Virginia Kuran, B. Se., F. G. A. C. Exploration Manager

RECEIVEDj y l - 7 1989

MINING LANDS SECTION

Stock Exchange lower 1500 609 Granule Street P.O. Box 1036? Vancouver, British Columbia V7Y 165 lei. (604) 669 5559 Fax. (604) 685-6800

Q

,- "

' .' *

- '

-. •"•'

.. -1'

, Y

- " ;

' "'

' ' -

- Y.

.:-

-;?;-

-' '

v .

' ' -

( "f-

- 'Y

' j

- -

;-. -\

, Y

":'.

' -

- -.

-, -.

01/

' '

'' \

' '

' '

* '

' '

' ''

' '

' '

i '

- "

"' J'

\'

*'

' 1

' '

! fr

"i

7 ''

1 -

' v . '

i; -^ '

h V

;.r

'' Y

YA,

(' ]

Y ;

i .'.Y

,

"^ '.-

Y''

-- -

J ; "

- i

.' -?

|? .0

'J

' /*

, '

-

1 ,

.'. '

f ,

. -

' i

\ *

^ "**

31

B

i-" ,

"'

' - -

' '"

-Y. "

-

' "

" '

' ,

1 j

\ '

'. '

' ( -'

r '

- '

di|

f•*

'' -v

' '

' j

' -'

' .

y

|g "

S

/"

' .

" '

' '

' '

' '.

' -

" .,

' '

" y

(' ^

' '

-

ift

*T

l'''-,

'-

' - ^

i

11

\ W

' - .

' -

Y

-:--

' ' ;-

.';".-

- -;

r '

' : '

' '-

/' - '

: S '

' *

- '

llH'

f '

** .

' ,h

-- ;

.' sj^

j ?

* - \

* ,

x ,'

' SE

**'

v '

' '

f'

' "

S

' '

'-

"' -

, .

f

"

/'

'

. "

' '

'." -

-^

.

' -

•-

' l

' ]

' ^

! *

R*

'•^

•••"

-::;,

. ...-

. ...

- '

. '

' ,

; -,-

, ./'

. gS

?(

. -

^ 1

\ ,

^

. .

sff

(f

. '

\ .••

'' -

9 O

' \-

"

- ;

' '

-V

'

. -

- -

* ' "

' '

- S

S f

' '

- y'

S

' ?

w 1

' -

'. ;

,- -

x"

f -

- s

i'1

! .

' -''

r '

' '

9,

" -

' ,

' -

-l .

*- ,

, '

- '

' .--

. -

. x.

T,

^ -t.

"

f '

' ''S

*"

' '

/'

' '

*

7 4- (rt 1 S

z ING

AND

SURFA

o m 5 or w

eo-

73 O 1 W

C 3) FACE

RIGHTS

O Z f 1

' V

-

S 3D O 1 I •y IING

RIGHTS

ON r~

i f

> 33 m w ^̂ — •H X

O 33

> Z •n 30 O s *

D 58 O w ri O Z'\

, , '

>'; V

T

t

•^ 1

'"f

mv

m

2

O m Ul

i•-

' 2 :"! i

FR

ON

D;L

AK

E G

-25

2

RE

SE

RV

ED

L

AK

E G

-38

6

i

- 1 t •f

-Q c!) 00 (X

)"•4

,''. '

w'

M c r. (0

r

W

'•4

.

! - '

•V

,

1

;v

*"k

- "*.

":'Y

.\

,'~ '*.

'

.•i

© "Ministry of

Naturai

.^ Resource

s*

'Ontario

flu

GUST/.

Ca

lX

w

S r

^

5 w

,3

^..

T,.

.tO

^

v-

Y;

"i.V

^'-

..':

'

'. : -

' i' '

"'-'

.'.

- --

.

yj* '

.5

v. .'

- '' Y

-;"- "'

M

', J

Z

.- Z

' '.', Z

-

" -m

^j

- —

i i

m ^

~ x

** T

l r

•'2-5

^5 5

'o-l.

-. —

'^

^^

^ d~M

*—

m "

^ ^^

"^

*u 3

2

;

o m

r*

\*

' * ^

î

^^^

. -

y \

- . *

*^^

*^-

} *

. ~

*

CO

,

*l^*t

e

' ''H

"^

DO i

.2-Y

''Ô

"2;:-

''.S'2

Y(j

.^ ^ .

v ^ '

rn "

u''s '

- '-r^1'".'"

1"-1-?". .

-v - .;:'"

': v/.

'' V •i'

-'-'Y"^--

' Y^v'\'

v;:?-v:-

i. '

' "'

V v

1. '

"--.

. "

"; •i

-'.'"

i ' '

''- ,'"i-

i "••

•'

'•B

m o

U) fi

-

•' V 'v ri

i,V".

i

SCALE:

1

INCH^.AO.CHAI

FttT-' --' -î^

;!

0 i DOG

7OOO

. - *t Si

. Z

' ^ -

6 ;

wf

. v (- Y,

|^;;'V

)••V

jv. :'

-''

lYY

;;V

:, ';' -

- .'^

RESERVATION

r.-,—-... ----

CANCELLED " ^.

.....SAND

ft

GRAVEL

. __ ,....-—tNOT

E' MiNING

BIGHT

S IN f

**Ci

'913. VESTED

IN ORIG'N

J.AND

S ACT..F.

SO 1970.

, O

*J II

J

|

- . k

v '

' "-t

* '

' '

Tl s

^

i '

- i

'^S

Cz

'! . !

.i

O

. ^

' ! ,

v .

.L l

** 2

*

I 1

'

"(- m

X

'

P-

. '

Y-^'J

r^'t'

-' v

8 jS

:'"i -

'•Rr*

)fcc^

o, :!

;-.l''|

j.;

•Y.-S

* C

Te©

" -.

MININGRIGHTSONL^

LICENCE

OF

OCCUPATION ...

ORDER-IN-COUNCIL"-.-...

i ! i

•. '

.; i *

' i*

.' *

1'- :

r-V 8

"-4 t

. LEASE. SURFAC

E 4

MINING

P

" '.SURFA

CE RtGHTSONI

1 *

01

,1

W)

'

-.j. 1

". i

'fi

'v

'. :''

1 .

''

in H

PATENT. SURFACE

4

MINING

" '.SURFA

CE RIGHTS

Ol

4-MtMiwr, Rinur^ nwi <

.? 5

*r^

î (/i*

i i

f: i

'; ' 3

* 'V

t 1 "-

O 3

O

H

<

-o

m O Tl u

,O n c z m Z

H

i

:- ^v

w S 00 o 1-

CD

00 •u O

CO ZJ

O z: o m O 3O .

*r*f

*

O 5S **^

s ^ '0..

w

UTILITY

LINES

NON-PERENNIAL STREAM

FLOODlRGTJR

FLOODING

RIG

SUBDIVISION

OR

COMPOSITE

RESERVATIONS

ORIGINAL

SHORELINE ~" '

-MARSH

OR

MUSKEG

MINES

, . " "

. TRAVER

SE MONUME

NT

f

r5

5 ,

J*

t/)

' t

f'.-

t

1 Y

fill

Y:

; -

.K '1

l

1 ::'

l i

'•- ;i

M' M

f

Sj^

^ ii

in-

HIGHWAY

AND

ROUTE No

OTHER

ROADS'.

' TRAIL

S ' ~; "- ~ '~

SURVESfED LINES "" - - ~

~

TOWNSHIPS. &ASE LINES

. E'

LOTS.

MININ&

CLAIM

S. PAR

UNSURVEYEDjiilN

ES CO

T LINES

' J?

"

PARCEL

BOUNDARY

. - MfMN

G CLAIMS

ETC

Rfilt WAY ANH RIT,HT

DF

WA^

' "

n ^

-\

' m

f *

^r

' '.- "

*! ••y

,.---"

, '.'"

t : '

.n" ''

'i;i y i

p -.vi.

6v

-: '

' i v

^.Y.

" '

;^!/-

'.

-. ,'(-

|;

-j r—

rn

en

m Z O

1

, '

^ .'

' **

'^••;

' '

'1

' T

"

' .

i f

' '

",

•'•-s

/.-.

: ,

! x

- -'-'

, ;,

. y

,, i

* --

"'

\'-

' '-'

, i-

-- ,"

: '

- ^

. -

' ••1

, -' .-

..J ;

' *-

- ^

-- -

' - '

- "

,l '

, '

' -'"

" - ' V

,, ^

' - '

, •1;~

V;in

,iJcr

ii an

use/

( "

. -1

' ^

' '

i ' r l ^

i t A

Y

. " i

iM li

* - "

-.*

— ••* -

*"*

*; A^

™!i

. -j^

--^""

rn x m tn

LINE 300E (NORTH GRID)

CHARGEABILITY (Mt msec)ON SON 100N ISDN 200N 250N 300N 350N

N = lN s 2N - 3N = 4

232222331012214 3 ^-5-^4 322

rT7sl ^v.19'6 7\3 4 l~~2 4 b 8 9 8 5 6s

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-m)ON 50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N 350N

NN N N

0.4.1-0.5 0,5 0.7 0,5 0.6 0.5 0-7 Og^4rO 0.8 0.9 09

1,0 1.3 ^1.5 1.2 1.3 1.3

0.5

LINE 350E ^NDRTH GRID)

CHARGEABILITY (Mt r,sec,ON SON 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N 350N

N N N N

1234

33241 2 3 l (7)

l l 2 3 \r-:l 2 4 5V -t

34212 Jt/^) 2 - 0

D 0(0 l

8 8 6^ 4

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KOhn-n)ON SON 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N 350N

CURRENT DIPOLE TO S.

52Pe9SE302l 2.12598 RICH LAKE

DIPOLE - DIPOLE ARRAY

D ND

D i EIPDLE WIDTH N t 1,2,3,4

PLDT POINT;

2.125

CDNTDUR INTERVALS" ' -. . , '

CHARGEABILITYi 5 msec

r-* APPARENT RESISTIVITY' 0.5 KDhm-tn

50

SCALE Ii2500O 50 100

m

METERS

150

DHID RESOURCES CORP.

JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDIPOLE - DIPOLE ARRAYDIPOLE SPACING 85m

LINES 300E AND 350E (NORTH GRID)

mmRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCALD

DVNJYi RPM

CHKDJYi JCG

N.T.SJ5S P/9

DATEi APR. 1969

89DNT001

HGURE New

3dFILE New

210


CHARGEABILITY (Mi msec)ON

N = 1 N s 2 N * 3N s 4

SON 100N 150N 200N 250N

i t v —i PI "34 — *3 n 1 P n— i ^x Jtsfjif ***~ ̂ ^ "^^^ W^t^s^x *^*^. r ff^ ^^///y{si^ o^S^1 ^ wQTSwi^vV^&L 1*~~~^n o 1 r3 U "y"^^-D CO^ZK^^J^-S:-! - ^B cL^ B

"^^f^t^^^l^!^

SOON 350N 400N

sJ&w^^. \ \. Q. ^ 1 1

^38^- -^^6

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHO KDhn-n)ON

N ^ 1 N ^ 2N s 3 N ^ 4

50N 100N 150N 200N 250N

0,3 /OA 1,0 0,6 0,7 0,9 4^ 0,7 0.6 0,6

0.8 0,8 ' 0,7 ' n lV 2^~^âf^

300N 350N 400N

0.5 0,1 0.4, 0,6 0.5 f^0,3 0,1 5*5 liO ftlO 0,05 0,1 ttS 3 0.07 0.05 0.1


CHARGEABILITY (Mt msec)ONL

N s 1 N - 2 N ^ 3N s 4

SON 100N 150N 200N 250N

1213,5 ^3, 2300 OT, 2 3/8 8^6^ 3233

3^9-^12 13 10 5 1 3 yfi

300N 350N 400N

2^^-SA.* 2 c^^^7

- ^/JfJr\Un r~—

^^^^f^GD

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KQhm-m)ON

N s 1 N s 2 N = 3 N s 4

SON 100N 150N 200N 250N

0,4 JDj^ 0,5 0.4 0,7 0,6 0.7 0.6 0.8^05-

l,CLÔtf L4 1,1 1,3 \'^^l3^^îl 1,1 1.-5 D5 1,2 xlT~l,9x'aS?^"0?

300N 350N 400N 1

ri.a 0,10 0,1 0.7iÔ.l 0.05 0.1 42 0,04 0.04 S 0,06 0,05 III II III II

DIPDLE - DIPDLE ARRAY

D i DIPOLE WIDTH

2.125

CDNTDUR INTER VALSi-* -* 30

CHARGEABILITY" 5 msec2ri APPARENT RESISTIVITY! 0.5 KDhm-n

50

SCALE 1:2500O 50 100

^^ZEE?

METERS

150

A DASH REPLACING A CHARGEABILITY VALUE SIGNIFIES AN INVALID READING

DHID RESOURCES CDRP.

JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDIPDLE - DIPOLE ARRAY

DIPOLE SPACING 25mLINES 200E AND 250E (NORTH GRID)

HHECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCALDi-escc

RPH

CHKD.BY. JCG

58 P/9DATE-APR. L9S9

PROJECT MoJ 89CKT001

FIGURE New

3C

FILE Nw

58P09SE0a21 2.12598 RICH LAKE 220


CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)ON 50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N

N NN N

1234

6 ^3 2 9 9 X4

3322022 331 132

2 l O 2 l 3/ 9^ 9 8 1132-

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-rOON 50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N

N N N N

1234

0.4- 0,5 Q,7^JSLa^tSJ Q& l.CL 0.6 O 0.7 0,8^3-^I^Tf^l,4 W ' "'

0,^1.^ M0g4Jt~fcS 1.^1.4 A?' 2,3ia^ 1.3

0,7 0,80.8

l'

LINE 450E (NDRTH GRID) CHARGEABILITY (Mt msec)

ON 50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N

N = lN ^ 2N ^ 3N = 4

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhm-n)ON 50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N

NN N N

1234

0.

l.t

0,7 a^-o.9 0.9 cua^p.g ,o.y 0,6 o.s-*e—KfU-t^^tS-^bS 1.2 1,2S'0 ITK 0.8

,9 1,9



D ND

D t DIPOLE: WIDTH

PLDT POINT \,

CONTOUR INTERVALSi - .v,',',;

CHARGEABILITY. 5 nsec

APPARENT RESISTIVITYi 0.5 KOhn-n

2. 125950

SCALE 1:2500O 50 100

35

METERS

150

DHID RESOURCES CDRP,

JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDIPOLE - DIPOLE ARRAYDIPOLE SPACING 25m

LINES 400E AND 450E (NORTH GRID)


SCALD HS900

DVKJYi

RP*

CHKDJm JOG

SE P/9

DATE.APR, 1969

PROJECT NOJ 890MT001

FIGURE

3eFILE Mew

2.12S98 RICH LAKE230


CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)ON 50N IOON 150N 200N 250N

N s lN = 2N = 3N s 4

100012033 11

N N N N

1234

0,4 0.7 0,9

1

1,2 aau4JkjO,6, 0,7 - -^^"ife

300N

221000.2 3. 92 3 3 l 2 cT-ri g AT)

1, Q ^ —^O

APPARENT RESISTIVITY CRHD KOhn-n)ON 50N iOON 150N 200N 250N 300N

DIPOLE - DIPDLE ARRAYLINE 600E CNDRTH GRID)

CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)ON 50N IOON 150N 200N

N N NN

1234

7 109

9

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-m)ON SON IOON 150N 200N

N N N N

ND

PLOT PDINT \ t

D

D t DIPOLE WIDTH

\

CDNTDUR INTERVALSi "- . ' ' . -,

CHARGEABILITYi 5 nsec

APPARENT RESISTIVITY) 0.5 KDhm-n

0


CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)ON SON IOON 150N 200N 250N

N N N N

1234

O .7 8

APPARENT RESISTIVITY CRHD KDhm-n)ON 50N IOON 150N 200N 250N

N N N N

1234 1.6

2



S2P89S68021 2.12598 RICH LAKE 340

SCALE 1:2500 O 50 100 150

METERS


JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDIPDLE - DIPOLE ARRAY

DIPDLE SPACING 25nLINES 500E, 550E, 600E (NORTH GRID)

•meFt SOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCALD

DVtUY"

RPH

CHOLBYi

JCG

52 P/9DATE.APR. 1969

PROJECT Nw 890KT001

Hw

3fFILE MM

LINE OE (NORTH GRID)CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)

ON

N - l N s 2 N ^ 3 N ^ 4

50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 30

1 2 ^ 51 1 111 2, 9 ^6 N8 6 8\r 2 U^0! 1 '-Hjl^^V^X^

- - 7\ 1^-1 -2 M7jhj*\l }^— — Q\ FI —O — P* /l M *^ 1 Q 17 1j U C c Id lo l/ 1

ON

*4

^fr

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KOhm-n)ON

N ^ 1N ^ 2N - 3N ^ 4

50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 30

0.3 0.3 0,3 0.2 0,2 0.2 0,3^,3 0.3 0.2 0.20.3 0.5 ijO^g-JM O.^Qt^Crfe^S 0,1 0.1 0,

0,4^^3750,7^^^6 0,7 0,8^0.2 0.1 0.20.5 0,7 0,8 0.8 l.e-1,0 U2 0,1 0.1 0.

ON

03-

02


CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)ON

N - 1 N ^ 2N ^ 3N ^ 4

SON 100N 150N 200N 250N 30

sas^qo-iyO i 3 e.s^ , nr -^ \ \— f f^ ^. __ ̂4-^ DlNKL\3 ^-1 0 L Q 2 ?Vl2 ^

12 11 l^f x?\,-2 -1 -TT3 y fK|~^-U^12 11 12 X ? -3-1 (T X 9 T5 2

ON

}̂

ir

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-n)ON

N = 1 N ^ 2 N = 3 N ^ 4

50N ICON 150N 200N 250N 30

0.5 0.6 Q.4 0.2 0,3 0.2 O^jJJu^.4 0,3 0,20,5 0.7^*5s.flQi4^fi}5J--6A*'^.7 0^6YO,4 0,2 0

0.5 0.7 0.7(16 O9--OaiVt7p (p 0,2 0,2 0^ 0,9 1,0 1,0 hfr- 1.3 '0,7^0.2 0,2 0.

ON

30

2

350N 400N 450N

2 l -le -4 233

O 3

350N 400N 450N

070,20.10 '^0

0.9X^.01^0.9 0.8 -.5 '"W"*0:4 12

350N 400N 450N

350N 400N 450N

^ DASH REPLACING A CHARGEABILITY VALUE SIGNIFIES AN INVALID READING



D i DIPOLE WIDTH N i 13,3,4

PLDT POINT -

2. 125

CONTOUR INTERVALS' ,

CHARGEABILITYi 3

"ft APPARENT RESISTIVITYi 0.5 KGhn-n

50

SCALE 1:2500O 50 100

m

METERS

150

OHIO RESOURCES CORP,

JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY DIPOLE - DIPOLE ARRAY

DIPOLE SPACING 25m LINES OE AND 50E (NORTH GRID)


SCALE-

RPH

CHKILBY' JCG

N-T-S."

52 P/9

MT& APR. 1989

PROJECT Nw 890NT001

FIGURE NOJ

3aFILE New

52P09SE0C21 2.12598 RICH LAKE 250

LINE 10QE (NORTH GRID)

CHARGEABILITY (M-fc msec)ON 50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N 350N 400N

N - lN s 2N ^ 3N ^ 4

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-n)ON 50N 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N

1 w5^4? /14_14

/ r——"* ~ \"* jt " *^~ "-^-f t n.~ ~J l i~ ~i * ~ ~ i

l6 /17\13 l\^^?e>>e<^ l̂ .3^^*11^ 9 16 18N 13 Y^V-2 -l Y^^fj6^

Vr

350N 400N

N N N N

0.7 0.8 0,8 0,4, .0,4 , 0,3 0. 0.9 0,9 0.7

0.7 0.6 0.9 0.7 A ,__^ 0,5 0.7 1.0 l!0^-e3^1.8F'T1.4

-4 0.5 0.6 0.2 0,3 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.7/0.2 0.1 OJB 0^0^" "0.6

0,1 0.2 J^.6\ 1.4N),7 0.08 0.1 0.2 X 0.8 -T7

.3

THE 150E (NORTH GRID)

CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)ON SON 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N 350N 400N

N NN N

1234

\il c 2 2

— O

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KOhn-n)ON SON 100N 150N 200N 250N 300N

450N

450N

350N52P09SE0021 2.12596 RICH LAKE

4UUN

2B3


D

D i DIPOLE VIDTH N i ta.3,4

PLOT POINT -

2598

CDNTDUR INTERVAL'S^

CHARGEABILITY- 5 msec

APPARENT RESISTIVITY' 0.5 KDhn-rn

50

SCALE 1:2500O 50 100

^S^^5!

METERS

150

NN N N

0.6 0,08,0.80.5 41.4

06 0,070,1 0,07 0.09



JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDIPOLE - DIPOLE ARRAY

DIPOLE SPACING 25nLINES 100E AND 150E (NORTH GRID)

HKECRESOURCE MANAGE Mf NI LTD.

SCALE'

DVKBYi RPM

CttCDJY.

JCG

N.T.SJ 53 P/9

WTEi APR. 1989

PROJECT New B9DNT001

FIGURE Ho*

3bFILE Nw

^ ^ iCi)c'^

w^\ ^ 3 loA

O)c,'^\

w c-'^Ci)t:'^

\

\zo) c,'^ico

CDc'J\

1̂ \ lCi)c:V* Ci)c

^

Ci)c^'^

\

lCi) ^

\

O)c^ '^\

^ K\Ci)

\̂k5^ w

50

2.12598

SCALE 1:2500 O 50 100

SSE^

METERS

150

a.iasse RICH LAKE

CHARGEABILITYCDNTDUR INTERVAL: 5 msec

NOTE' Dipole - Dipole Array Dipole Spacing 25.0n Current Dipole to S


JAMES REID PROPERTY

PLAN MAP DF CHARGEABILITY FOR N s 3 SEPARATION

NORTH GRID

NKECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD

SCALD

DVIUYiWM

CHOUYi JOG

52 P/9MTO

APR. I9t*

PKDJECT Hw OTOKTOW

FIGURE MO.

4aFILE MM

N

50

2. 125

SCALE 1)2500O 50 100

METERS

150

52P09SEe021 2.13596 RICH LAKE 280

APPARENT RESISTIVITY CONTOUR INTERVAL' 0,5

NDTE.I Dipole - Dipole Array Dipole Spacing 25.0m Current Dipole to S


JAMES REID PROPERTY

PLAN MAP DF APPARENT RESISTIVITY FDR N = 3 SEPARATION

NORTH GRID

RESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SOLD

1*300

flVNJY.

RPM

MournJCG

DATD APft.

PROJECT M MDHTOOL

FKUK Mw

4bFILE Nai

QJ

Q)

d)

\l

\\

\ \

2.1259

INPHASE VALUES TQ LEFT DF LINE (Degrees)

QUADRATURE VALUES TD RIGHT DF LINE W


JAMES REID PROPERTY

VLF - EM (CUTLER)READING VALUES DF

INPHASE AND QUADRATURENORTH GRID

•HECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCALE.1*500

RPH

JCG

sa p/9LATEi

APR. 1969

PROJECT Mtw •9QKT001

FIGURE Nw

5aFILE NOJ

52P09SE002I 2.12598 RICH LAKE 290

\(P

\\

Q)

•30

TB 840793 TB 840794

50SCALE Ii2500O 50 100 150

2.1259 METERS

TOTAL FIELD STRENGTH: BASE ^ 50,000 nT DN LEFT SIDE DF LINE (UNITS-,

VERTICAL GRADIENT DN RIGHT SIDE DF LINE(UNITS: riT/m)

DHID RESDURCES CORP.

JAMES REID PROPERTY

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYTOTAL FIELD STRENGTH ANDVERTICAL GRADIENT VALUES

NORTH GRID

HKTCCRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCAUJuesoo

RPH

CHOLIYi JCO

sa p/9DATE. APR. 1969

PROJECT N(W WGKTOOl

FIGURE Hw

6aFILE

52P09SE0021 2.12598 RICH LAKE 310

\

ir-

\\

\\

\\

PROFILE AMPLITUDETL1TAL FIELD STRENGTH VERTICAL GRADIENT

- 61,000 nT

60,000 nT

50 nT/m

- — — — — - O nT/m

Q)l

\ \

\\\

59,000 nT

s*0-'

S^01"

f f f*

2. 125

50

SCALE Ii2500O 50 100 150

52PC9SEM21 2.12598 RICH LAKE 330

TOTAL FIELD STRENGTH! PROFILE BASE ^ 60,000 nT

VERTICAL GRADIENT!

METERS

DHID RESOURCES CORP,

JAMES REID PROPERTY

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYTOTAL FIELD STRENGTH ANDVERTICAL GRADIENT PROFILES

NORTH GRID


SCALE. 1.2300

RPH

JOG

52 f/9MTO

APR.

PROJECT Htw 89OHT001

FIGURE

6bFILE

LINE 100E (SOUTH GRID)

CHARGEABILITY (Mt msec)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

NN N N

i234

^ -a -a -iVI -1 -3

-5

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KOhn-m)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S SOS

NN N N

0.9^0.6 0.7 0.5.0.7 0,5 0,7 (U4,p.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0,21.8 0.6 V&^tt&sfiA 0.4 0.4 0.3

0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6XB.4 frS^.S 1.8 0.6 0,9 0.8 0.7V0,3 0,6



N N NN

1234

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-n)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

N N N N

1234

0,3 0,3 0,4, 0.6 0,5 0,3 0,2 0.1 0,3 0,4^.5 0.7 5^04*4 0.3-J.4 ^5 O^o^S 0.7 IT.?

,9 0,7^0.5s O.S^O.-T 0.7 0,7

ON

ON

ON

CURRENT DIPOLE TO N.

ON



ND D

1

Vlyl .

\V)

D i DIPOLE: VIDTHN i 13,3,4

PLDT POINT

2.125

CDNTDUR INTERVALS. . r ''

CHARGEABILITY' 5 nsec~""

s~* APPARENT RESISTIVITY. 0.5 KOhn-n

50SCALE 1:2500 O 50 100

^^na^

METERS

150


JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDIPOLE ~ DIPOLE ARRAYDIPOLE SPACING 25n

LINES 100E AND 200E (SOUTH GRID)


SCALE* 1C9DO

DVN.BYi

RPH

JCG

N.TA- 52 P/9

DATE* APR. 1989

PROJECT No* 89DNT001

FIGURE NOJ

7aFILE Nw

52P*9SE802I 2.12S9B RICH LAKE 340

LINE 300E (SDUTH GRID)

CHARGEABILITY CMt msec)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

N = lN = 2N = 3N * 4

4 ri C3l, 10, 17 S x"! O l ls^V1 ^ i o.3 224

l 1 2 -fr- 4

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHO KDhm-n)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

N N N N

1234

0,6 p.4 0,3 0,3 0.9 0.9"" 0.3 0.4

0.7s?0.3 0,30.4 O.'P 0,6

0,3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0,3[,4 0.4 0.3

ON

ON


D ND

D i DIPOLE VIDTH

PLOT POINT g

2.1259CONTOUR INTERVALS' "*

JcHARGEABILITYi 5 msec

APPARENT RESISTIVITYi 0.5 KDhn-ii

LINE 400E (SOUTH GRID) CHARGEABILITY (Mt msec)

400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

N N N N

1234

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-m)400S 350S 300S 2502 200S 150S 100S 50S

N N N

123

0.7 0.7

XI — A

.4 0,4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.2 0,2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0,2 D.8%4 0,3 0,4 kScjX^O.4 0.3 0,3 0.2 0.2

.3 0.3 0,3 0.6 0,6^4 0,3 0.3 0.3 "3 0.4 D.6 0.8 O.sHfcS 0,4 0.4

ON

ONCURRENT OPOLE TO N.

2.12598 RICH LAKE 350

50

SCALE 1:2500O 50 100

SE

METERS

150


JAMES REID PROPERTY


DIPOLE SPACING 25nLINES 300E AND 400E (SOUTH GRID)


SCAL&

DVN.BY.nw

CHKD-BYi JCG

se p/9DATE' APR. 1989

PROJECT New 89DNT001

FIGURE Ho*

7bFUE NOJ

LINE 500E (SOUTH GRID)CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)

4005 3505 3005 2505 2005 1505 1 1 1

100S 5 1

N = 1 -Z f la U2- 19 ^7X.J V -2 A 2 2 0 3 2N ^ 2 s^p ga^Se^jgr^V^-lx* 4 3ê~6~ r^N = 3 67^19 J 38 ("30 (Efc fek^N3 *4l 4^xWv 6 9 N ^ 4 15 ' 26 'BO l 27 20 2^ M ^ 1 ' 13 IrO 9

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHO KOhn-m)4005 3505 3005 2505 2005 1505

i

N - 1 0.8 0,6 0.5 0.7 0.5 Q.5 0,5 Qi4^ 0,3 0,3 N s 2 r,KJ).8 0.8 0.6^,4^0,6 0.7 0^/0,4 0 N s 3 1.3Û9 0,7 A.5 ^(5 0,9 0.8 O.^'0^5 N s 4 1.5^0.7 Oi3 0,3 0.7 0,9 0.9 0.8 Y0

LINE 600E (SOUTH GRID)CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)

4005 350S 3005 250S 200S 1505

N — T 1 [ ^ (l re?fcr^S^ e?^d o f n i -^v f. 7 i 1 A— xMX^ — ̂ ^/"T *V^t*-----*i?^x f /"^

M ^ 4 ^^s?3î -^jih^ pV^PHT-^ A 11'^li — " iJO/C./C.OL-UlO D 1J.C.

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-n)4005 3505 3005 2505 2005 1505

1 1 1

N s 1 0,9 0.6 0.7 0,6 0.5 0,7 03 47 Q^4 0,4x

n = 3 l.&^XLS 0.7 0.7 0.6 JU 1,3^48 0,5 N s 4 lVÔ.8 0,8 0.6 0.8 HDJ9 1.3X0,9 0

1005 5

0.3 0.2 0,3 4 0,3 0,3 C 0,4 0.4 0,4

.4 0,4 e;5

1005 5

fW9 \3

^16-^^715•J l—x-J X ^

1005 5

.0.4 0.3 O.a ,^05 0.3/C

505

SOS

505


ND

ON

D i EIPaLE WIDTH N i 1,8,3,4, s- s-s**r#-f' ̂

PLOT PDINT

ON

2. 12 CONTOUR INTERVALSt

CHARGEABILJTYi 5

APPARENT RESISTIVITY. 0.5 KDhm-n

50

ON

SCALE Ii2500 O 50 100

^•s-s

METERS

150

ON

CURRENT DPOLE TO N.


JAMES REID PROPERTY


DIPOLE SPACING 25mLINES 500E AND 600E (SOUTH GRID)

•TORESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCALE. 1*300

CHKDJYi JCG

UT* SE P/9

DATE* fftL 1999

PROJECT New 89DKTM1

FIGURE

7CFILE NOJ

2.12593 RICH LAKE 360


CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)400S

N = 1 N ^ 2N i: T

N = 4

350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S

lo v ^t-s f 1 y 1^- i/ v v \1 \^f 2 i O — O D -~J^ f^ O v,i T* oi -fps \ (i ̂ r^^jpf^ ^3flV\ T /o /i p^^-wi- r Q ^ p ^~TT\l^"~^ltl3o2oX 21 îrfl^^Mf'1' lw-^ 11 13.cj\"tfr-- 1

4r ::^25 21 20^"?^^ 7 8^ 13 "2?~î1

11

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-n)400S

N = 1N ^ 2N = 3N ^ 4

350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 1

0.7^4-8 0,6 0.5^J-4 0,9 1.0 -Q-8 0,6 CU 0.4 0.1.55X9 0,7 0,6 0,7 f 1.3 1.4 \0.8 0,7 ^6.4 ^6x

1,3^0,8 0,7 0,9 0.9\ 1.4 1,2^0.9 0.6^0.3\ 0.1.4X 0.9 0,9 -O^ h 1.1 1.3 X 0.7 0.0 0^5

3 CvJi t

6 C3T.1


CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)400S

N = 1N = 2N ^ 3 N ^ 4

350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S

10 j. ̂ J^-î? \ 7 v "1 /6 x 10 x7 ^-^ 6 i 1r/^T^*^ J^lV V/ff ̂ x u2 15\7. o\tt — 4i

30 25 2^-20]^ 8 11 '^3^0 1^

Ks14N

1 ]

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHO KDhn-n)400S

N ^ 1N ^ 2N = 3N ^ 4

350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S

0.8 0,8 0.^ 0.4,,0.5^JJ,9 0.7, 0^9 0,5 0,6 A3 0.J^0.8,#b.'j;^^tTxYO,^l,350.7 0.7 O.T^bJSzli fr4j#*O.Z/^ 1.1 1.2yti.8 0.9 0,6 0,7 0,

0.5 0,7 X1,TM.2 -t^ as 0.9 0.7 0.6 1,0

3 C0,4'

7 C1.0

SOS

11

50S

50S

l12

SOS

0.3^.0.5

0,7


ON

ND D

D i DIPOLE WIDTH N r

ON

2. 125CONTOUR INTERVALSr-U'c/-. - -:\*- -'l

" .^^.!f t'-^ ? "

CHARGEABILITYi 5 nStfC^'-'^

APPARENT RESISTIVITY. 0.5 KDhn-n

50

ON

SCALE Ii2500O 50 100-—^^

METERS

150

ONCURRENT DPOLE TO N.


JAMES REID PROPERTY




SCALD IC900

OVKBYi RPH

CHKBJYiJCG

H.TA" 52 P/9

DATD APR.

PROJECT New 990KTOOI

FIGURE

7dFILE Nw

5aP09SE002t 2.12598 RICH LAKE


CHARGEABILITY (Mi; msec)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S SOS

10^403N ^ lN ^ 2N = 3N ^ 4

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHO KDhm-m)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S

l___^100S SOS

NN N N

. ^, ^-L - ^

~ 3s 4

OX 1,1. 0.5 0.8 0.5, .0,4. 0.3 0.-r^ Oy,jr-*—TTV^6 076 076

1.1 ^0.7 0.9 CL^ 0.l.SyO.S 0.6 0,7/^6, ^^1.2 V̂ ,9 0.5 0.9

0.9 0^ 0,^-^ 1.4M.41.3 A8 0.9 QS 0.8 0.6 0,7y rTM.3'i.8N 0/9 0.7 0.7^0^4 H

4

l. 3

ON

ON


D

2.1259

ND

PLOT PDINT

D . DIPOLE WIDTH

CDNTGUR INTERVALS. ' -^ ; ' ,

CHARGEABILITY. 5 msec

APPARENT RESISTIVITY" 0.5 KOhn-n



N ^N sN =N s

O

34 26 25X 18

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHO KOhm-m)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

N N N N

L-. 4

- 2— - ^^

^ 4

1.0 L3, 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0,7 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.5 JLjti03 0.4TT\0.8 (L^^.3 A0.6 0,7 0.8TI.5

0^ 1,1 1.X131.2 I.^NS. 9/^1.3 0.3^0.6^2^1,1 0.7^ 1,2 1,4 1.2 1,2 1.4* OP 0.3 0.3^ fi *T,6

ON

ON


52Pa9SE002) 2.12598 RICH LAKE 380

50SCALE Ii2500O 50 100

m

METERS

150


JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEYDIPOLE - DIPOLE ARRAYDIPOLE SPACING 25n

LINES 750E AND 800E (SOUTH GRID)

MHECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCALE' 1*500

DVNJYi

RPH

CHKRBY. JCG

52 P/9DATEi APR. 1989

PROJECT 89DNT001

FIGURE

76FILE


CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)4QOS 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

N = lN ^ 2N * 3N = 4

5 ^-15

.^19 B^V la 14 ~ 18 19 18 ' 11

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KOhn-m)400S 350S 300S P50S 200S 150S 100S SOS

N N N N

1234

0.5 OA 0,6^ 1.0 0,4/0,9^1,2)

0.6


CHARGEABILITY (Mt nsec)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

N N N N

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHO KOhn-n)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S

ON

ON

ON

52P89SE002I 2-12S9B RICH LAKE

UIN

330


D ND D

D i DIPDLE WIDTH

2.12598CONTOUR INTERVALS"

CHARGEABILITYi 5 msec

APPARENT RESISTIVITYi 0.5 KDhn-m

50SCALE 1=2500O 50 100

^SZ^!H!

METERS

150

N N N N

1234

0.2 0.3 0.3

0.

1,2 .0.8.5 1.} O

0,8 0.7




JAMES REID PROPERTY



Ht-IECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCALD 1*500

DVNJYi RPM

CHKOBYi JCG

N.T*sa p/9

DAT& APR. 1999

PROJECT NOJ 89QMT001

FIGURE

7f


CHARGEABILITY (Mt msec)400S 350S 300S 250S POOS 150S 100S SOS

N - lN = 2N ^ 3N ^ 4 l*APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KDhn-m)

400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S 100S 50S

N NN N

1234

0,6 0.6 0.6 0.9-4.0 ' 1.3

LINE 1600E (SDUTH GRID)


N ^N :*N sN *

234

APPARENT RESISTIVITY (RHD KOhn-n)400S 350S 300S 250S 200S 150S

ON

ON

ON

52P89SE002I 2.13598 RICH LAKE

100S 50S ON—l_______l_______i CURRENT OPOLE TO N.

400

N N N N

1234



D i DIPOLE WIDTH

2. 1259

CONTOUR INTERVALS! ,

CHARGEABILITY! 5 nsec

—. APPARENT RESISTIVITY" 0.5 KOhn-n

50SCALE 1:2500 O 50 100

jza^^^

METERS

150

DHID RESOURCES CORP,

JAMES REID PROPERTY

INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY DIPOLE - DIPOLE ARRAY

DIPOLE SPACING 25n LINES 1400E AND 1600E (SDUTH GRID)

WECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD

SCALDvesoo

RPH

CHKDJYi JOG

52 P/9

DATD APR.

PROJECT No* &9QNTW1

FIGURE NOJ

FILE NQ.I

uoCD

01 C

U OoOJ

cuc

UCD CD00

Qj C

LJCD CD

QJ C

LJCD CD in

Qj c

uCD CD

CU c

uCDLO

QJ C

UCD CD

QJc

LJCD[D

QjcLi

LJCD CDCD

QjC

LJCD CD CD

QJ C

L\ \

LJCD CDOJ

QJ C

UCD CD

Qj C

LJCD CD

Qj C

Station 5QS -

Station 100S

Station 150S ——

Station 200S ——

Station 250S ——

Station 300S ——

Station 350S ——

CHARGEABILITY CONTOUR INTERVAL! 5 nsec

NOTE', Dipole - Dipole Array Dipole Spacing 25.0m Current Dipole to N

50

SCALE 1:2500O 50 100

^^E^

METERS

150

21


JAMES REID PROPERTY

PLAN MAP DF CHARGEABILITY PDR N = 3 SEPARATION

SOUTH GRID

HHECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD

SCALEJ 1*500

DVNJYi

RPM

JCti

SE P/9DATD WR.

690NT001

FIGURE New

8aHLE Ntw

5aP09SE0(!21 2.13598 RICH LAKE •410

LJ o o

CDc

LJo o OJ

QJ c

LJ O O

O) c

U o c-

0"c

U oCD

c

UCD O

QJC

LJCDLO

QJ C

LJ oCD

LJ o LO

CU C

LJ o oCO

QJ C

LJCD CD CD

QJ C

li

LJCD CDOJ

QJc

LJCD O

QJ C

LJCD CD MD

QJ C

Station 5QS ——

Station 100S ——

Station 150S ——

Station 200S ~

Station 250S ——

Station 300S -

Station 350S -

APPARENT RESISTIVITY CONTOUR INTERVAL BELDV 5,0 KDh——.1 0,5 KDhn-m ABOVE 5,0 Dh——i 2,5 KDh.——i

NOTE' Dipole - Dipole Array Dipole Spacing 25,On Current Dipole to N

50

SCALE 1:2500O 50 100

asE^

METERS

150

2. 12598


JAMES REID PROPERTY

PLAN MAP DF APPARENT RESISTIVITY PDR N = 3 SEPARATION

SOUTH GRID

W-TECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD

SCALE' 1-2500

DWN.BY, RPH

CHKDJY' JCG

N-T-S."

58 P/9DATE' APR. 1989

PROJECT No.. 89DNT001

FIGURE Hot

8bFILE Noj

2.12596 RICH LAKE 420

LJ O

QJ C

Station OS

Station 50S -

Station 100S ~

Station 150S

Station 200S ——

Station 250S ——

Station 300S ——

Station 350S -

Station 400S ——

10135

9985

9900

96+4

9794

9768

9749

9728

9729

9711

9541

9641

9770

9737

9752

9764

9792

9778

9772

9734

9725

uCD CD

CU C

LJCD CDOJ

QJ C

U CD CD

QJc

LJ CD CD

Qjc:

10143

LOQ39

9894

9834

9759

9765

9813

10781

10331

9B19

9743

9788

9623

9702

9711

9754

9774

9755

9785

9806

9734

9890

9894

9920

9907

9830

9786

9737

9714

9721

9761

9756

9741

9739

9740

971B

9762

9716

9697

9677

9689

9748

9863

9870

9868

9869

9865

9860

9817

9782

976E

9747

9733

9988

102fl9

9960

9653

9604

9778

97S4

9723

9710

9704

9885

9917

9905

9829

9624

9696

9935

9838

9962

9783

9704

9710

9859

10761

10367

9923

9960

9748

9717

9712

9834

LJCD CDLO

QJc

9668

9791

9604

9829

9862

10061

10287

10103

9901

9747

9679

9623

9636

10056

12641

11225

10265

9969

9828

9761

9708

UCD CD

QJc

9613

9924

9877

9844

9B16

9965

10109

9916

9747

9753

9702

9662

9779

9906

10273

11287

11871

10S52

10379

10113

9953

NOTE: Magnetic Data from 1988 Survey.

LJCD CD

QJc

9965

9917

9896

9793

9726

9776

11214

10305

9868

9772

9710

9685

9754

9974

10011

10180

10547

10502

10272

10147

9966

LJ CD o CO

QJC

LJ

LJ CD O

QJ C

9860

9973

9938

9835

9762

9784

10192

12227

10068

9840

9618

9804

9858

9869

9873

9971

9992

10011

9946

9883

9881

9865

9921

9950

10027

9965

9879

9908

10493

10113

9977

9913

9856

9867

9963

9915

9863

9899

9938

9878

9866

9832

TDTAL MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH BASE VALUE ^ 50,000 nT

LJCD CD CD

QJC

LJ o o

QJC

LJCD CDOJ

QJC

9661

9701

9711

9721

9832

10107

10046

9883

9847

9877

10113

10910

10060

9884

9632

9840

9813

9758

9748

9897

9853

9705

9698

9662

9919

9723

9736

10149

mm

9943

9851

L0234

10024

10262

9918

9861

9609

9792

9606

9884

9835

9803

9694

9690

9645

9687

9732

9721

10280

10146

10032

9910

9991

10028

10131

9845

9837

9840

9789

9820

9822

9818

9786

LJCD OCO

QJc

9670

9624

9679

9602

9667

9569

9881

9862

10146

9997

9740

9891

9912

9926

9876

9821

9779

9780

9762

9793

9788

LJCD CD'SI-

C

9666

9690

9684

9830

9687

9689

9754

10525

10177

10110

9926

9974

10049

9971

9891

9846

9602

9782

9769

9784

9797

50SCALE 1'2500O 50 100I^^E——

METERS

150

LJCD CDLO

QJc

9723

9734

9742

9744

9707

9694

9740

10271

10213

9995

9893

9667

10000

9986

9883

9637

9804

9801

9792

9681

9823

UJCDCD

QJc

9763

10069

9699

9737

9737

9733

9766

9860

9992

9914

9839

9824

9991

9891

9803

9798

9788

9784

9700

9780

9790

2.1259


JAMES REID PRDPERTY

MAGNETOMETER SURVEYTOTAL FIELD STRENGTH

READING VALUESSOUTH GRID

HI-TECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD

SCALEr 1*300

N.T.SJ32 P/9

RPH

CHKIXBY.

JCG

DATEi APR. 1989

PROJECT NEW 89QNTD01

FIGURE No..

9aTILE Nw

52PC9SE0821 2.12598 RICH LAKE 430

C C C C

UCD 0 LO

O) c

LJCDCD

OiC

Station OS ——

Station 50S

Station 100S ——

Station 150S ——

Station 200S ——

Station 250S

Station 300S

Station 350S

Station 400S

Increasing lo Right

NOTE: Magnetic Datafrom 1988 Survey. TDTAL MAGNETIC FIELD STRENGTH

PROFILE BASE VALUE ^ 60,000 nT

PRDFILE AMPLITUDE

TDTAL FIELD STRENGTH

-- 61,000 nT

60,000

- 59,000 nT

50

SCALE 1=2500O 50 100

5

METERS

150

2. 98


JAMES REID PROPERTY

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY TDTAL FIELD STRENGTH

PROFILES SOUTH GRID


US500DVN3Y'

RPM

CHKD3Y' JCG

53 P/9DATE'

APR. 1989

PROJECT Nw 89QNT001

FIGURE NOJ

FILE NOJ

52P09SE0a21 2.12598 RICH LAKE 440

\CP

\ \ \01 PROFILE AMPLITUDE

\ INPHASE QUADRATURE

50'

\ W C

502

oy.01C;

Q}

Q) - 50*

1259

50SCALE O 50 10(f" 150

METERS

Positive to Right

Strong Corxluclor

••••i Weak Conductor

Direction of Survey is South

RESOURCES CORP.

JAMES REID PROPERTY

VLF - EM (CUTLER)PROFILES OF

INPHASE AND QUADRATURE NORTH GRID


1*500DVKBYi

RPH

JCG

p/9DATD APR. 1989

PROJECT Hew 89WT001

FIGURE:

5bFILE Nw

52P09SE0021 2.12598 RICH LAKE 300

\O)r-

\ \Q) PRDFILE AMPLITUDE

MEAN ZERDED FIELD STRENGTH

oy.Q) O

CJ - 257.

2. 1259

50SCALE 1:2500O 50 100

m

METERS

150


JAMES REID PROPERTY

VLF - EM (CUTLER)PROFILES AND VALUES

MEAN ZERDED FIELD STRENGTHNORTH GRID

•HECRESOURCE MANAGEMENT LTD.

SCALE*lesoo

RPM

CHKBJYi JCG

N.TAJ 52 P/9

DATD APR. 1989

PROJECT N 89QNTOOt

FIGURE NOJ

5CFILE NOJ

52P09SE0e21 2.12598 RICH LAKE 320

DRIL

L H

OLE

S TE

STIN

G

NO

RA

MC

O'S

H-2

9 ZO

NE

O O

L-3

7

O O

L-29

G O

L-31

O O

L-35

O O

L-30

O O

L-36

Q O cr R

TB 8

5510

5

D

o

o + CO y d o (T O

w

87-1

2 O

(D

ISC

OVE

RY

HO

LE)

DTB

791

415

TB 8

4079

0

D

TB 8

4078

9

TB 8

4078

7

TB 8

4078

5D

BL 0

0BL

00

100

S-

200

S-

300

S-

TL 4

S4

S

LEG

END

o Dr

ill ho

le (

Nor

amco

)

U

Clai

m p

ost,

obse

rved

D

Claim

pos

t, as

sum

ed

Road

Not s

urve

yed

with

IP m

etho

d

IP an

omal

y, s

trong

IP an

omal

y, w

eak

Axis

of

stro

ng m

agne

tic a

nom

aly

Axis

of

wea

k m

agne

tic a

nom

aly

OH

IO R

ESO

UR

CES

CO

RP.

JAM

ES R

EID

PRO

PER

TY

COM

PILA

TIO

N M

APo

j

g 5

9 8

HI-TE

CRE

SOUR

CE M

ANAG

EMEN

T LT

D

SC

ALE

:

1 : 2

500

OW

N.

BY

:

H.V

.

CH

KD

. B

Y:

C. G

raha

m

N.T

.S-: 52

P/9

DA

TE

:

Apr

./198

9PR

OJE

CT

No:

8

9O

NT

0

01

FIG

UR

E

No:

10

FIL

E

No:

52P09SE0021 2.12

598

RICH LAKE

4B

0

list of figures · 2.3 history and previous work 3.o geology 4.0 geophysical surveys 4.1...

Documents