lit 127.1 paper stone
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/13/2019 Lit 127.1 Paper Stone
1/4
Luarca 1
Miguel Antonio Alfredo V. Luarca
Dr. Max Pulan
Lit 127.1 A
September 6, 2013
Grandmother Jias Kindness: Aristocratic Ideology in Chapter 29 of The Story of the Stone
In order to facilitate a discussion of the upper-class, aristocratic ideologies present in the
Chinese novel The Story of the Stoneby Cao Xueqin, I here choose to read and focus on the
rather mundanePro Viventibustrip of the Rongguo household and their visit to the Taoist temple
featured in Chapter 29, Volume 2 of the novel. Though not as dramatically eventful as the other
chapters, Chapter 29 affords us a detailed view of the different social strata involved in the status
quo that operates within the household, the relationships implied by the different characters
behavior, and perhaps an opportunity for one to discern how the intimate point-of-view which
the Narrator enjoys allows us, the Readers, to be aware of, and perhaps complicit to, the
aristocratic ideology that permits or forbids each maneuvering within this microcosm of Chinese
society (in so far as we grant that the Rongguo household is a representative example of Chinese
society as a whole, at least based on the reality represented in Cao Xueqins masterpiece). The
aim here is to try to expose this aristocratic ideology through an inductive reading of the
quotidian practices featured in this chapterrealizations which may lend perspective to the later
actions of the characters.
When the long procession comprised of Grandmother Jias palanquin, and the retinue of
relatives, maids, and duennas finally arrive at the Taoist temple, Xi-feng, one of Grandmother
Jias more important granddaughters,is accidentally hit by a young Taoist acolyte who wanted to
-
8/13/2019 Lit 127.1 Paper Stone
2/4
Luarca 2
hurriedly exit the premises, in concordance to the aristocratic belief that Taoist monks were
deemed socially inferior by the upper classes. The boy is hit on the face by Xi-feng and the other
women of the Rongguo retinue, but Grandmother Jia reproaches them, and orders for the poor
acolyte to be shown charity instead. In this instance, our modern sensibilities will have to
sympathize with the poor acolyte, equally admire the generosity and mercy he was dealt with by
Grandmother Jia, who is no less than the matriarch of the entire royal household, and admonish
the social backwardness exhibited by Xi-feng and the other ladies of the court.
Another scene that displays Grandmother Jias kindness and equanimity can be seen
when the Taoist abbot, Zhang, informs her of a most attractive young lady (1827) whom he
proposes as a viable wife for Bao-yu. Though the young lady cannot match Bao-yu in terms of
family wealth, Grandmother Jia welcomes the suggestion, stating that Money is no problem. Its
looks and character that count. (1828) Furthermore, the very fact that Abbot Zhang is welcome
to deal freely with the royal family, despite being a Taoist monk, especially because of his
familiarity with the matriarch, speaks of how the character of Grandmother Jia, despite being at
the top of this social structure (therefore is most expected to abide by, and protect the rules of the
social game, so to speak) exhibits the most frequent predilection towards softening the rigors of
this very hierarchy. Being at the crown of the social order, she is enabled by her stature to
implement social short-cuts (as when shed rather Bao-yu present himself to the Taoist monks to
show off the jade relic, instead of lending it to Abbot Zhang so that Bao-yu would need not be
bothered nor endure the heat and effluvia of the poor monks) and even blatant defiance of
unwritten laws between upper and lower class (very obvious when she orders her duennas to
treat the Taoist acolyte kindly, instead of punishing him for being in their presence).
-
8/13/2019 Lit 127.1 Paper Stone
3/4
Luarca 3
These shows of kindness are narrated in very intimate and detailed terms by the Narrator
of the novel. Grandmother Jias behavior lies in stark contrast to other aristocratic figures just
slightly below her, such as the cantankerous Cousin Zhen who is willing to humiliate his very
son in front of everyone just for presuming to be cool while [he, i.e. Cousin Zhen]
wassweating outside in the sun. (1825) Another is Bao-yu, who becomes angered at being put
on the spot by Abbot Zhengs marriage proposal, to a young lady of a poorer ilk. We can see
here that despite the middle echelon of the household being run by men and women of starker,
clearer aristocratic dispositionsexemplified by Xi-fengs admonishment of the acolyte, Cousin
Zhengs public humiliation of his son, the many political maneuverings done by the myriad
maids in search of higher positions within the household government at the top of it all is the
charitable spirit of Grandmother Jia, a sense of detachment from the stringency of social
hierarchies, a fine attunement to the needs and desires of individuals with little to no
consideration of their social background.
But there is something quite curious about how this very positive portrayal of
Grandmother Jia by the narrator is subtly compromised by what the narrator leaves out in the
novel.
One of the prime reasons for the suddentPro Viventibustrip to the Taoist temple is for
the viewing of the performance of religious plays. One of the plays selected for performance was
The South Branch by Tang Hsien-tsu. It is very interesting to note how Grandmother Jia
reacts to this bit of theatrical selection:
Grandmother Jia was silent. She knew that The South Branchlikens the world to
an ant-heap and tells a tale of power and glory which turns out in the end to havebeen a dream
Our record omits any description of that ceremony (1830)
-
8/13/2019 Lit 127.1 Paper Stone
4/4
Luarca 4
Now, this omission may very well be an innocent lapse in the narrators part, only in
order to further the plot without needlessly encumbering the story with quotidian details.
Besides, the mentioning of this play, to the original Chinese readers, would have served allusive
and evocative enough to complete its signification. But this silence on Grandmother Jias part is
very intriguing, especially when juxtaposed against the narrators surprising elaboration with
regard to the meaning of this specific play: power and glory which turns out in the end to have
been a dream.
It would be an endless discussion should one attempt to guess the contents of
Grandmother Jias pregnant pause. But perhaps this silence is a means for the narrator to lend
perspective to our understanding of Grandmother Jias character, and by extension, to our
apprehension of the latent social ideology to which she, as matriarch, serves as its metonymy.
Her very authority to create these social short-cuts, to dispel the rigors of the social hierarchy, are
by themselves parts of the very ideology that allows the likes of Cousin Zheng, Xhi-feng and
others to negotiate with the lower class in such a manner within the perimeters of the power-play
in the Rongguo household. Though the Taoist belief in the ephemerality of power and glory lies
at the heart of aristocratic philosophy (thus, in the aristocratic ideology), social status and
birthright must perforce hold sway if only because of societal exigencies such as social
positioning and privilege. It is thus very useful to remember that the narrative of the Jia
household is structured as to anticipate its eventual downfall. Grandmother Jias silence, then, is
a tense moment of self-reflection, self-awareness and perhaps of self-critiquingthe aristocratic
class is dumbfounded at its own transitory, ephemeral state. It preserves itself through power and
glory, while being very much aware of the implications of the adage,sic transit gloria mundi, all
the glories in the world must pass.