lmp1 race engineering
TRANSCRIPT
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
INTRODUCTION
The aim for this project is to use vehicle simulation software to compare three different
setups for a LMP1 car. The simulation software was AVL VSM, the engineering software was
MoTeC i2 Pro.
Table 1 - LMP1 Energy/Power regulations (FIA, 2015, p. 55).
Three VSM files were assigned to us representing three different setup variations:
Setup 1 Setup 2 Setup 3
LMP1h Class 6 MJ 8 MJ 8 MJ
Aerodynamic Forces % DF and Drag 100% 90% 100%
Weight Distribution % Front 53% 52% 53%
ICE Power kW 420.5 416.1 416.1
e-power kW 164 175 175
KERS kW 240 240 240
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
The race simulated was a 6-hour event at Silverstone:
Figure 1 - 2011 Silverstone Grand Prix circuit (AlexJ).
In each section we include a speed/distance trace to pinpoint where we are on the circuit:
Trace 1 - Speed/distance trace with position markers.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
AERODYNAMIC DRAG VS. FUEL CONSUMPTION
GENERAL
Trace 2 – Drag/Total Consumption/Fuel Flow (Red = 6MJ 100%; Green = 8MJ 90%; Blue = 8MJ 100%).
𝐹𝑑𝑟𝑎𝑔 =1
2∗ 𝜌 ∗ 𝐶𝑑 ∗ 𝐴 ∗ 𝑉2, so drag rises with speed. Fuel consumed per lap fluctuates
through slower corners, constant at speed. All cars hit the maximum fuel flow after leaving a
corner, indicating strong traction.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
6MJ 100%
Trace 3 - Drag/Total Consumption/Fuel Flow (6MJ 100%).
We see a flattening of drag at high speed due to lower Vmax. The 6MJ car consumes the most
fuel; the lowest e-power:ICE-power ratio forces the engine to work harder. Lower Vmax
means the car spends more time at full throttle before braking (blue circles).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
8MJ 90%
Trace 4 - Drag/Total Consumption/Fuel Flow (8MJ 90%).
The 8MJ 90% car generates less drag at high speeds (green circles). This gives the lowest fuel
consumption. Less drag means higher speed, so this setup needs to brake earliest (blue
circles). We also see a big lift through Chapel, suggesting a lack of high-speed aero grip
(yellow circle).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
8MJ 100%
Trace 5 - Drag/Total Consumption/Fuel Flow (8MJ 100%).
The drag is similar to the 6MJ car; the values do not trail off as rapidly at high speed. The
fuel consumed middles the other setups. This setup also displays similar fuel-flow
characteristics to the 6MJ (with the exception of braking), lifting at the same points.
COMPARISON
Setup Fuel Consumed (kg) Δ Fuel consumed (kg)
6 MJ, 100% 1.514 +0.064
8 MJ, 90% 1.450 0.000
8 MJ, 100% 1.486 +0.036
We see that the fuel consumption difference due to drag reduction is greater than the
difference due to e-power:ICE-power ratio.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
TYRE SATURATION VS. ACCELERATION VS. THROTTLE
GENERAL
Trace 6 - Tyre Saturation /Acceleration/Throttle Position – Black line = 100% Saturation.
We see that throttle > 0 represents positive acceleration and throttle = 0 represents
negative acceleration. We see the highest saturation values when cornering at speed; the
driver is using all available grip when cornering. G force under braking is higher than
acceleration; most LMP1 cars have some form of traction control fitted (FIA, 2015, p. 6). This
is reflected in tyre saturation.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
6MJ 100%
Trace 7 - Tyre Saturation /Acceleration/Throttle Position (6MJ 100%).
The 6MJ car has less KERS power at the front axle. We can see this when accelerating out of
corners (blue circle). We see high saturation (> 100%) at the slowest sections of the track
(Arena, Brooklands, Vale), suggesting a mechanically balanced car that gives confidence.
Peak G-forces are 3.2 G laterally (Maggots) and +0.9/-1.0 G longitudinally (Arena).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
8MJ 90%
Trace 8 - Tyre Saturation/Acceleration/Throttle Position (8MJ 90%).
The throttle application at higher speeds is less aggressive (green circles). At elevated
speeds, traction is dependent on aerodynamic load. At these points on the track, we see
higher tyre saturation than on the 100% aero cars; the tyres are being worked harder. We
reach a high peak lateral acceleration (3.5 G, Maggots) and longitudinal acceleration (+0.9/-
1.0 G, Arena). We see that peak saturation events due to braking occur earlier.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
8MJ 100%
Trace 9 - Tyre Saturation/Acceleration/Throttle Position (8MJ 100%).
Throttle behaviour is almost identical to the 6MJ car. The peak G-forces are 3.3 G laterally
and +0.9/-1.0 G longitudinally; all our cars have similar acceleration/braking characteristics.
We see that losing KERS leads to a drop in force and front tyre saturation (yellow circles).
Trace 10 - Front Saturation/Acceleration (Red/Orange = 8MJ 100%, Green = 6MJ 100%).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
FUEL CONSUMPTION VS. STINTS VS. TOTAL RACE TIME
MATHEMATICS
A script was written in MATLAB to calculate the number of pit-stops and total distance. It
assumed constant lap time throughout the race distance (no tyre/fuel degradation). This is
covered in Appendix 2.
COMPARISON
The two variable inputs are Fuel consumption and Lap time. Running the solver with these
values gives us the following outputs:
Setup 6 MJ, 100% 8 MJ, 90% 8 MJ, 100%
Fuel consumption (kg) 1.514 1.450 1.486
Lap time (s) 103.610 103.940 103.380
Stint length (laps) 34 35 34
Number of stops 6 5 6
Laps completed (@ 6 hours) 204.71 204.68 205.17
Total laps completed (@ flag) 205 205 206
Fuel remaining (kg) 50.53 8.56 49.87
Fuel remaining (laps) 33 5 33
Comparative position 2 3 1
Chart 1 - Lap chart over the 6 hours (Blue = 6MJ 100%; Orange = 8MJ 90%; Yellow = 8MJ 100%).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
Chart 2 - Lap chart over the final hour (Blue = 6MJ 100%; Orange = 8MJ 90%; Yellow = 8MJ 100%).
Setup 6 MJ, 100% 8 MJ, 90% 8 MJ, 100%
Δ Lap 0.03 0.00 0.49
Δ distance (m) -2714 -2891 0
Estimated Δ time (s) +48.00 +51.00 0.00
This represents a time difference of 0.2-0.3%.
STRATEGY OPTIMISATION
The 8MJ 90% car is optimal – finishing the race with a buffer of 5 laps in the tank. Both of
the other cars are actually required to pit on the penultimate lap. In a real-world race, a
decent engineer would call for a few laps at reduced speed to save fuel and avoid an extra
pit stop.
Our results are similar to some real-world strategies (Porsche #18).
Figure 2 - 2015 6 Hours of Silverstone results (FIA WEC, 2015).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
AERODYNAMIC BALANCE
GENERAL
Trace 11 - Aerodynamic Balance (Red = 6MJ 100%; Green = 8MJ 90%; Blue = 8MJ 100%) – Black line = 50%.
As speed rises so does the proportion of downforce generated at the front. 50% balance
marks the car moving from stable/understeer to unstable/oversteer. Through slower
corners (circa 150kph) the cars have rear-lead tendencies. Above this, the cars are
cornering at exactly 50% balance; the stability limit.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
6MJ 100%
Trace 12 - Balance (6MJ 100%).
We see a sudden rise, followed by a flattening off of the balance at Vmax (blue circles).
Through the most challenging section – Maggots-Becketts-Chapel – we see how finely
balanced the car is; flitting between front-lead and rear-lead balance (green circle).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
8MJ 90%
Trace 13 - Balance (8MJ 90%).
We see a big difference through the Becketts complex (green circle) – we don’t see the third
pronounced spike that the 100% cars have indicating a large braking event. This suggests
that the overall speed through the corner is reduced. In general, the aero balance at
medium speed is further rearwards than on the 6MJ, increasing towards Vmax and under
braking (blue circles).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
8MJ 100%
Trace 14 - Balance (8MJ 100%).
The behaviour of the 8MJ 100% car is very similar to the 6MJ car, with the biggest difference
being a continued rise in forward aero balance at high speed (yellow circles).
Trace 15 - Balance comparison (Red = 8MJ 100%, Green = 6MJ 100%).
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
AERODYNAMIC LOAD VS. CORNERING SPEED
We created an Excel sheet comparing velocity, drag and downforce across the circuit:
Graph 1 - Cornering speed per setup per corner.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Vel
oci
ty (
kmh
)
6MJ 100%
8MJ 90%
8MJ 100%
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
As we expected, the 90% aero car is slower through the corners – max Δ velocity = 6 kmh –
with the difference increasing as speed and dependency on aerodynamic grip increase. At
low velocity the cars corner at similar speed. The same is true in curved acceleration zones
such as Woodcote or Club suggesting that these corners are traction limited. Overall, the
two 100% aero cars corner at roughly the same speed.
Graph 2 - Drag per setup per corner.
Graph 3 - Downforce per setup per corner.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Dra
g (N
)
6MJ 100%
8MJ 90%
8MJ 100%
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Do
wn
forc
e (N
)
6MJ 100%
8MJ 90%
8MJ 100%
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
Downforce and drag are proportional to velocity; it is logical that through the slower corners
our Δ drag/downforce is lower than through higher speed corners. We can confirm that the
90% aero car loses most of its grip and time through high-speed corners. We can also say
that Luffield and Club are not downforce-limited corners as the 90% car has the same
cornering speed at reduced load. The two 100% aero cars have incredibly similar behaviour,
confirming that the 8MJ 100% car gains its time through the straights compared to the 6MJ
100% car.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
DRAG VS. STRAIGHT LINE SPEED/TIME VS. ACCELERATION
GENERAL
Trace 16 – Drag/Longitudinal Acceleration/Velocity (Red = 6MJ 100%; Green = 8MJ 90%; Blue = 8MJ 100%).
Longitudinal acceleration is proportional to the gradient of velocity/drag. During slow
sections (blue circles), the similar acceleration of all three cars suggests similar low-speed
traction. The major difference under acceleration is KERS application (black lines).
Setup 6MJ 100% 8MJ 90% 8MJ 100% Location
Vmax (kmh) 302.7 320.0 314.0 Hangar
Drag @ Vmax (N) 3851.6 3882.4 4133.0 Hangar
G Long @ Vmax 0.05 0.01 -0.01 Hangar
Max G Long 0.96 0.96 0.96 Arena
Min G Long -2.33 -2.27 -2.38 Brooklands
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
6MJ 100%
Trace 17 – Drag/Longitudinal Acceleration/Velocity (6MJ 100%).
A big difference between the 6MJ and the 8MJ cars is high-speed acceleration (black lines).
The 6MJ car has the lowest Vmax and drag of the trio. Acceleration at Vmax (yellow circle) is
higher than the other cars, suggesting that it has not reached terminal velocity.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
8MJ 90%
Trace 18 – Drag/Longitudinal Acceleration/Velocity (8MJ 90%).
The 8MJ 90% car brakes earlier from Vmax. It also brakes harder to balance through Abbey
and Luffield (green circles). The low acceleration at Vmax shows that the car is appropriately
geared. It has the highest Vmax and middling drag force of the three; representative of the
‘low drag’ setup. It has the lowest braking capability of the three cars.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
8MJ 100%
Trace 19 – Drag/Longitudinal Acceleration/Velocity (8MJ 100%).
The 8MJ 100% car has the highest drag and second highest Vmax. The acceleration follows
the 8MJ 90% car up to around 250 kmh where drag takes effect. This high drag gives the car
the strongest braking. It loses speed as KERS is removed (negative acceleration). The
power/drag ratio has been improved by the KERS application and temporarily ‘boosted’ the
car over theoretical Vmax.
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
AlexJ. (n.d.). Silverstone Grand Prix Circuit - Wikipedia. Retrieved from Wikipedia.org:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silverstone_Circuit
FIA. (2015). 2016 Technical Regulations for LMP1 Prototype.
FIA WEC. (2015). Retrieved from www.fiawec.com
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
APENDICIES:
APPENDIX 1
LMP1 RACE ENGINEERING
JOSEPH DOUGLAS PEARCE
APPENDIX 2