lms and the open web
DESCRIPTION
Comparing Moodle, MyWebCT and other LMS to Flicker, Facebook and other Open Web ResourcesTRANSCRIPT
AIMBy the end of the session you will be able to
critically assess the pros and cons of a VLE or independent Web2.0 tools in relation to a higher education context.
EXAMPLESLMS Open Access Social
MediaBlackboard
www.blackboard.com- Moodle
www.moodle.com
Facebook www.facebook.com
- Twitter www.twitter.com- Wikispaces
www.wikispaces.com- Flickr www.flickr.com- Wordpress
www.wordpress.com
DISCUSSIONSWhat’s your experience with LMS?
What advantages do you think they offer?
What issues have you identified, if any?
CASE STUDYWatch the video and compile a list of benefits
and issues mentioned.Compare your list to the one on the board.
BenefitsLMS
Open Access Social Media
CentralisedAuthenticationTracking and CollatingTechnical support and
trainingCopyright
FamiliarityEasy to useConstant upgradesFreeInclusion of external
guestsCollaborationPrivacy settingsTechnical support
IssuesLMS
Open Access Social Media
- Training- Exclusion of external
guests- Choice- Cost
Not integratedNo formal recordPotential hidden costsNo on-site technical
supportUnprotected wallsCopyright
Let’s think of the implications!
How would b-learning work in your institution (LMS, Open Access Social Media, Integrated Approach?
Why?
ReferencesCOFAOnlineUNSW. (2010, October 26). Learning management system or the open web? Retrieved from http://online.cofa.unsw.edu.au/learning-to-teach-online/ltto-episodes?view=video&video=159
CONCLUSIONSEach university needs to
consider what fits their context best.
Every model has some advantages and disadvantages, so it is somehow better to go for an integrated approach.
References•Blackboard logo Retrieved from http://new.ipfw.edu/elearning/•Moodle Logo Retrieved from: http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/lms/moodle/course/view.php?id=540&topic=8•Facebook and twitter logos. Retrieved from: http://newlogos2012.blogspot.com/2012/07/facebook-logo-size.html