loading effects of heavy trucks and autonomous vehicles · outline of the presentation •...
TRANSCRIPT
Loading effects of heavy trucks and autonomous vehicles
Prof. Pauli KolisojaTampere University of Technology
Finland
Outline of the presentation
• Background– New legislation on (super) heavy trucks– Forthcoming introduction of autonomous vehicles
• Concerns with regard to the loading effect of (autonomous) heavy trucks and respective investigations carried out– Single tires vs. dual tires– Speeding up of road deterioration due to less wheel path wander– Pumping effect on soft subgrade soil areas
• Some key results so far
31.5.2018 2
New legislation on super heavy trucks
31.5.2018 3
• New legislation concerning allowable truck masses came into effect in Finland October 1st, 2013:– Maximum truck & trailer mass: 600 760 kN– Maximum double boogie mass: 190 210 kN– Maximum triple boogie mass: 240 270 kN– 65% of the trailer mass must be resting on dual tires
• With special permission truck weights even exceeding 1 MN can be allowed on specified transportation routes
• Allowable axle loads were not increased (except for existing trucks for a transition period of four years) more axles in a single truck than before higher load concentration under a group of axles
Development of maximum allowed vehicle weight in Finland
31.5.2018 4Kaakkurivaara, T. (2018)https://dissertationesforestales.fi/article/9989
A normal heavy truck allowed to operate on the whole Finnish road network
31.5.2018 5
9 axles – 76 tons
Examples of newly introduced super heavy trucks in Finland
31.5.2018 6
11 axles – 92 tons
Examples of newly introduced super heavy trucks in Finland
31.5.2018 7
13 axles – 104 tons
Introduction of autonomous vehicles can…
31.5.2018 8
• Markedly decrease the amount of wheel path wander i.e. accumulate the loading effect in road cross section
• Drastically increase the amount of consecutive axles following each other if ‘platoon driving’ is applied
‘65% rule’ - test site for the loading effect of different tire types
31.5.2018 9
FTA wanted to have independent response measurements:– In the local climatic and road conditions– With all different currently available truck tire types
Vertical stresses at three depths –single wheel (left) vs dual wheels (right)
31.5.2018 10
384 kPa
324 kPa
See more details at DOI: 10.3141/2474-20 and 10.3141/2474-21
Effect of tire type and axle load on the load equivalency factor
31.5.2018 11
One of the loading test sites for heavy trucks – main road 77 in Karstula
31.5.2018 12
• Thickness of AC layers about 200 mm
• Overall thickness of the road structureabout 1,5 m
• Road located on peat subgrade
Truck loading tests on road 77 in Karstula
31.5.2018 13
AC 200 mm
Road structure
Anchoring tostiff subgradelayer
Peat subgrade
Displ. transducer
Road surface deflection while two 9-axle (76 ton) trucks are passing over the site
31.5.2018 14
Posi
tion
of ro
ad s
urfa
ce, m
m
8,1
9,0
8,7
8,4
Time
Permanentdisplacementof road surface
Permanent displacements of road surface in relation to the position of wheel path
31.5.2018 15
Perm
anen
t dis
plac
emen
t of r
oad
surfa
ce, m
m
Distance of wheel path form the measurement point, mm
Own vehicles 25.4.17
Other vehicles 25.4.17
Own vehicles 16.5.17
Other vehicles 16.5.17
Own vehicles 17.5.17
Other vehicles 17.5.17
Measurement pointis located here
Plastic rebound of the road surface due to a vehicle passing nearby
31.5.2018 16
Posi
tion
of ro
ad s
urfa
ce, m
m
Time
Principal mechanism of water pumping into the road structure
• A passing over axle load is inducing excess pore water pressure in soft water-saturated subgrade soil
• Water is pushed upwards into the road structure• Successive axles are accumulating the phenomenon
31.5.2018 17
Pumping effect test site in Inari in the autumn 2015 (www.google.fi/maps)
31.5.2018 18
Rut development after 5 partially loaded and 2 fully loaded truck overpasses
• Thickness of AC layer at the Inari test site was about 80 mm and the total thickness of road structure about 0.6 m
• Ground water level near to ground surface • Rut development rate of the order of 1 mm/overpass was
observed on a road section resting on top of peat subgrade
31.5.2018 19
~ 4 mm
Ground Penetrating Radar signal attenuation analysis of the test site
31.5.2018 20
GRP analysis performed by Roadscanners Ltd indicate theamount of water in the road structure by red color
Num
ber o
f ove
rpas
ses
Before the test
Run 1: half loaded truck
Run 2: half loaded truck + trailer
Run 3: fully loaded truck
Run 4: fully loaded truck + trailer
Thermal images of the road surface before and at the end of loading tests
31.5.2018 21
Before After
Conclusions
• Damaging effect of (old generation) single wheels is several times higher than that of dual wheels ‘65% rule’ is definitely appropriate
• Variation of vehicle wheel paths is critical for limiting the rut development rate even on high quality main roads Introduction of autonomous heavy vehicles is potentially risking the condition of our road infrastructure Technically is should be possible to avoid this risk by enforcing the use of controlled wheel path variation
• Increasing the number of consecutive axles due to heavier trucks or introduction of platoon driving increases the risk for pumping effect and consequent rapid road deterioration on wet/soft subgrade soil areas
31.5.2018 22
Hard working people behind the results
31.5.2018 23
Nuutti Vuorimies, project manager([email protected])• Laboratory testing and analysis• Conduction of in-situ loading tests
Antti Kalliainen (PhD student)([email protected])• Mechanical modelling of
pavement structures
A number of other people have been assisting in different project phases: Ville Liiv, Jonna Rossi, Antti Akkanen, Altti Kurki, Marko Happo, Tero Porkka…
Close collaboration with Roadscanners Ltd during the whole project.
Questions, comments?
31.5.2018 24