logistics solutions based on the case of...
TRANSCRIPT
Logistics solutions based on the case of Hamburg
Gunnar Prause, Professor
TalTech & Wismar University
Paldiski, 28.08.2019
Some charateristics
• Founded: 7. May 1189
• Operators • Hamburg Port Authority
• Hamburg Hafen und Logistik AG (HHLA)
• Infrastructure• port area: 73.99 km² (64.80 km²
usable)
• Where 43.31 km² (34.12 km²) are land areas.
• Historically there existed an extensive free port • Enabling duty-free storing of imported goods and
also importing of materials which were processed, re-packaged, used in manufacturing and then re-exported without incurring customs duties.
• The free port was abandoned in 2013.
• Member of North Range Ports (NRP)• 50% of European container traffic
• #3 in Europe
Case study: Hamburg port
Some logistics figures
• Passengers: • 900.562 (2018)• 810.000 (2017)• 722.000 (2016)• 525.000 (2015)
• Total cargo handling (sea side)• 135,1 Mio. t (2018)• 136,5 Mio. t (2017)• 138,2 Mio. t (2016)• 137,8 Mio. t (2015)
• Containers (TEU) • 8,73 Mio. TEU (2018)• 8,82 Mio. TEU (2017)• 8,91 Mio. TEU (2016)• 8,82 Mio. TEU (2015
21%
11%66%
2%cargo type
dry bulk
liquid bulk
container
others
Hamburg Port Business Model
Hinterland connections
• All successful ports enjoy good transshipment infrastructure and have their own business model
• Rotterdam, Antwerp
• Blue Banana
• Rhine river, trains, feeder
• Inland hub: Duisburg port
• Hamburg• Scandinavia, CEE,
Russia
• Shuttle trains, feeder
• Inland hub: Prague
• Singapur
• Maritime transshipment
Port, Gateways & Hinterland
GatewayInland
TerminalDistribution
Center
Capacity
Frequency
CorridorCustomer
“Last Mile”
Segment
GLOBAL HINTERLAND REGIONAL LOCAL
Shipping Network
Massification Atomization
Source: Rodriguez
Modal split & transhipment
Modal Split in Container Traffic 2017 / 2018 In the Port of Hamburg’s modal split, rail further increased its share of containers transported from 41,5 percent to 45,2 percent. Linking Hamburg with all hinterland economic centres, more than 200 freight trains reach or leave Europe’s largest rail port every day.
Cargo train hub: South Hamburg
Hinterland – Shuttle Train
Maschen Marshalling Yard
HHLA Sustainability Report 2018according Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) http://report.hhla.de/annual-report-2018/sustainability/gri-content-index.htm
Dangerous goods at HHLA
Dangerous goods corridor
• Positive Network (greenareas) allowed corridor https://www.gegis.net/gefahr
gutstrassenkarte_hh.html
• Restricted Network (redareas) Driving bans
Risk management approach for GTC- State of the art -
Management variables Operative management Strategical management
ObjectivesMeasures of risk control(Romeike/Hager)
Evaluation activities based ontri-partite modelling set-up
Actuating variable risk elements accordingISO 31000
PESTLE analysis
Control variable Risk evaluation according Huth/Düerkop/Romeike
Risk analysis value
(1= low risk, 5 = high risk)
present
situation
variant A
(north)
Variant B
(south)
P - political 2 2 1
E - economical 4 3 2
S - social 2 1 1
T - technological 4 2 2
L - legal 3 2 1
E - ecological 3 2 1
total 18 12 8
main transport corridorsSource: transpordi arengukava 2014 -2020
Proposed ring railway bypassing of Tallinn. Source: Harju County Plan 2030+
PESTLE analysis of Corridor variantsSource: Kitzmann, Falko, Prause (2020). RISK ASSESSMENT OF LOGISTICS HUB DEVELOPMENT ALONG GREEN TRANSPORT CORRIDORS: THE CASE OF PALDISKI PORT, forthcoming.
W-O Railroad transit Corridor in Estonia
Contact
Gunnar Prause, Prof. Dr.Tallinn University of Technology
School of Business and Governance
Akadeemia tee 3
12618 Tallinn, Estonia
Mobile: +372 5305 9488
Wismar University
Wismar Business School
Philipp-Müller-Str. 14
23966 Wismar, Germany
Mobile: +49 178 280 4882