louise o'connor lsbu jan. 20081 learning to learn: the collaborative challenge. louise...

Louise O'Connor LSBU Jan. 2008

1

Learning to Learn: the Collaborative Challenge.

Louise O’ConnorLondon South Bank University

January 2008


2

“It’s all good in the end. This Unit drags you out of your comfort zone by the throat and batters you with learning.” Student quote


3

Focus of Study & Presentation Plan

First stage of two-part study

Undergraduate BA Social Work & BSc Nursing and Social Work (learning disabilities)

Focus on teaching & learning of ‘Partnership & Participation’

Background to innovations in collaborative learning / teaching and assessment

Structure of course Research project Initial findings Questions / Themes


4

Spirit of Partnership? Reform of social work education in UK Emphasis on multi-disciplinary

approaches to education & practice Social Work located within diverse

faculties (health, education, psychology, law, social policy or social sciences…)

‘Partnership working’ a prescribed curriculum area in England (DoH 2002)


5

Partnership - a dangerous liaison? (Preston-Shoot 2007:670)

Original Module & assignment

SCIE Knowledge Review (2006)

Missed opportunities for challenges / experiential learning?

06/07 Piloted group learning activity

Students + lecturer reflection & feedback on pilot and assignment

What does it mean? How can we teach this?


6

Revised Module aims: Maximise collaborative inter / intra-

professional learning Explicit emphasis on: - group work theory and skills - personal and experiential

learning Effective collaboration necessary to

achieve outcome Group & individual elements ‘Intrinsic motivation’ (Mc Dowell, 2001)


7

Learning Process & Assessment Tasks

Group task (40%) Random groups Identified self-directed

study periods Exploration of key themes

related to partnership Application to case

scenario Group presentation and

group mark

Individual Task (60%)Produce posterCriteria included : understanding of

partnership and participation analysis of anti-oppressive

aspects reflection on learning

process & group experience identification of personal

skills


8

Study – Stage 1: Key Questions

Impact of an innovative learning and assessment process?

Contribution to students’ collaborative and individual learning?

Skill and knowledge development (within and across professional boundaries).


9

Study – Stage 1: Data Two cohorts of employment based (EBR) undergraduate

social work students (social care posts, attend part-time) Mature, experienced & ethnically diverse:

EBR 06 – 17 students EBR 05 – 20 students Taught jointly – 12 week module

Stage 2 – 50 Social Work & 25 Nursing / Social Work students

(May 08)

37


10

Study – Stage 1 Questionnaires using Likert scales Focus on:

- views on personal learning

- skill development

- understanding of theory / literature

- motivation Focus Group


11

Respondents: 14 White / White British 10 Minority Ethnic 4 Ethnicity not indicated Age 25-57. (Mean 42) 18 female 8 male 1 disabled 14 indicated student group (6 – EBR 05 & 8 – EBR 06)

28 questionnaires completed

1 focus group


12

Preliminary Findings The following slides provide examples of

some of the preliminary findings. The themes & correlations identified are

tentative and will be the subject of further analysis.

Stage 2 of the project will be evaluated following delivery of the current module to both nursing and social work students. (post June 2008)


13

Views on Personal Learning‘I learn more when…’

I experience challenge or tension

I am involved in small group discussions


14

Skill development: Time management Team work Communication Negotiation Personal awareness Reflection Presentation Assertiveness Use of IT Researching literature

Group task improved skills in all areas

Range – 70-92%


15

Skill development ? Resolving conflict 31% disagreed / didn’t know

Interprofessional practice 23% disagreed; 23% didn’t know;

Working with difference 18% didn’t know


16

Interprofessional Practice?Interprofessional Practice

6 21.4 23.1 23.1

6 21.4 23.1 46.2

9 32.1 34.6 80.8

5 17.9 19.2 100.0

26 92.9 100.0

2 7.1

28 100.0

Disagree

Don't know

Agree

Strongly agree

Total

Valid

SystemMissing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent


17

Interprofessional Practice?


18

Understanding of Theory / Literature:

Group dynamics* Groupwork models Partnership Participation Anti-oppressive practice* Applying theory to practice*

Group task improved skills in all areas

Range – 64 –77%

* Increase in ‘Disagree’ / ‘Don’t know’


19

Increased motivation & involvement & learning process?

Motivation to: Learn more about

topics* Participate in

collaborative learning*

Undertake individual study / tasks

Explore different perspectives

Improved motivation 70-78%

Disagreed / don’t know 14-21%


20

Motivation to participate in collaborative learning:


21

Motivation to participate in collaborative learning

participate in collaborative learning

1 3.6 3.7 3.7

4 14.3 14.8 18.5

3 10.7 11.1 29.6

15 53.6 55.6 85.2

4 14.3 14.8 100.0

27 96.4 100.0

1 3.6

28 100.0

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Don't know

Agree

Strongly agree

Total

Valid

SystemMissing

Total

Frequency Percent Valid PercentCumulative

Percent


22

Significant correlations Age is significantly correlated to score for

anti-oppressive practice (5%)

Score for ‘Participate in collaborative learning’ is highly significantly correlated to score for anti-oppressive practice (0.5%)

Ethnic group is significantly correlated to assertiveness (5%)


23

Qualitative Data Main benefits? Student quotes:

: ‘putting partnership skills into practice –

clarifying roles, challenging each other, developing shared responsibility..’

‘working with difference i.e. colleagues’ perspectives, attitudes & ways of working .. helped me to accept these and share my ideas..’

‘Learning to manage group dynamics and the complexities involved’..

‘good practice to work as a team with people you don’t know well..’


24

Qualitative data Main drawbacks? Student quotes:

‘personalities & levels of participation … although this exists in the workplace managers and supervisors are there to support the group’..’

‘not being able to complete tasks to my own agenda, timeframe..’

‘it does not always show the difficulties that occurred and the learning that took place’

Group conflict …. it got nasty and personal..


25

Focus Group Analysis in progressInitial themes: Strong emotions and behaviours

experienced in groups

Complexity of process

Learning achieved


26

Focus Group Themes:Tension, safety, control …

‘It was very difficult .. Lots of tensions, lots of ‘storming’ all the way through..

‘Two cohorts .. power dynamics going on..’

‘There was a feeling … “them and us”…’

Maybe they felt it was a safe environment .. the university .. a lot of stuff came out.. they would not have been said in workplace ..’


27

Focus Group Themes: professional boundaries / identities

'they would be disciplined for some of the things that were said…

‘work is safe because you know there is some sort of redress…’

‘in work … always difficult professionals .. [but] always someone higher managing that…’


28

Possible themes to explore, subject to further analysis:

Facilitation of groups to enhance learning and conflict resolution? – or will this prevent learning?

Greater linking of taught topics with collaborative experience of partnership in action

Relevance of identities within and across professional boundaries?

Impact of physical location on behaviour / identities?

Similarities or differences with Stage 2 data cohort ?


29

‘It’s all good in the end. This unit dragsyou out of your comfort zone by the throat and batters you with learning.’ student quote

**************Correspondence to Louise O’Connor [email protected]

Senior Lecturer in Social WorkFaculty of Health & Social Care, London South Bank

University

Learning to learn – the collaborative challenge


30

ReferencesBarr, H. Interprofessional education, Today, yesterday and tomorrow. A Review. Learning &

Teaching Support Network for Health Sciences & Practice, CAIPE.

Jackson, c. (2007) Motivating learning through innovative assessment http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/eds/presentations/conference_2007/caroline_jackson.ppt Accessed

online 20 Jan 2008

McDowell, L. (2001) Students and innovative assessment. York: LTSN Generic Centre [available online] www.heacademy.ac.uk

Preston-Shoot, M. (2004) Responding by Degrees: Surveying the Education and Practice Landscape. Social Work Education Vol. 23, No. 6, December 2004, pp. 667–692

Race,P, Brown, S, Smith, S. (2005) 2nd Ed. 500 Tips on assessment. London: Routledge.

Taylor, I, Sharland, E, Sebba, J, Leriche, P, with Keep, A & Orr, D. (2006) The learning , teaching and assessment of partnership work in social work education. Knowledge Review 10. Social Care Institute for Excellence

louise o'connor lsbu jan. 20081 learning to learn: the collaborative challenge. louise...

Documents

individual learning

innovative learning

social sciencespartnership

group work theory

social policy

study stage

education practicesocial

students ebr