low carbon london - ofgem...wholesale price (£/mwh) • supplier needs and dno needs are unlikely...
TRANSCRIPT
Low Carbon London Influencing Customer Profiles and New Interactions
Adriana Laguna
1
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• Introduction of Low Carbon London
• Time of Use tariffs
• Results from the trials
• Deployment of Time of Use tariffs
• Customer reaction to dToU tariffs
• What did we learn?
Low Carbon London Influencing Customer Profiles and New Interactions
2
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Low Carbon London Overview
3
Demand Side Response &
Distributed Generation
Network planning &
operation
Electrification
of heat &
transport
Present a holistic view of the smart distribution network - grounded in
extensive real world data and experience, and justified through cost-
benefit analysis and implementation strategies
Smart meters Instrumenting
a smart grid
Electrification of
heat & transport
Demand side
response
Dynamic Time
of Use Tariffs
Active Network
Management
Thre
e
them
es
Six
tria
l are
as
One
obje
ctive
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Low Carbon London Smart meters and dynamic tariffs
• Unique smart meter trial in Great Britain
• Statistically robust results: control group of c. 4,500 households
• First appliance survey of this magnitude: survey data from 2,500
households
• Insight to customer perception: 37 semi-structured in-depth interviews
4
5,600 customers
with a SMART METER
1,100 under dToU
4,500 Control Group
2,500 Appliance
Survey
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• Introduction of Low Carbon London
• Time of Use tariffs
• Results from the trials
• Deployment of Time of Use tariffs
• Customer reaction to dToU tariffs
• What did we learn?
Low Carbon London
5
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Time of Use Tariffs
• Static time of use tariffs can present network benefits
6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
00
:00
06
:00
12
:00
18
:00
00
:00
06
:00
12
:00
18
:00
00
:00
Sub
stat
ion
load
(M
W)
Duke Street Clapham Park Road
8am - 8pm Time Slot 8am - 8pm Time Slot
Substation Peak - Top 5% load Substation Peak - Top 5% load
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
00:0
0
06:0
0
12:0
0
18:0
0
00:0
0
06:0
0
12:0
0
18:0
0
00:0
0
Sub
stat
ion
load
(M
W)
Duke Street
Wh
ole
sale
pri
ce (
£/M
Wh
)
Wholesale price (£/MWh)
• Supplier needs and DNO needs are unlikely to be sufficiently
aligned for network benefits to be realised as a result of a wholesale
price-driven ToU tariff.
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs Wholesale price-driven tariffs
7
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs The Low Carbon London approach
• ToU initiatives in GB have been focused on static tariffs; this is the
first time a large scale dynamic ToU domestic tariff has been
tested in GB
• Three price bands:
• Two applications tested: Constraint Management and Supply
Following
8
1,100 on
dToU
4,500 Control
Group
—High: 67.20 p/kWh
Default: 11.76 p/kWh
Low: 3.99 p/kWh
Fixed rate: 14.23 p/kWh
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• Introduction of Low Carbon London
• Time of Use tariffs
• Results from the trials
• Deployment of Time of Use tariffs
• Customer reaction to dToU tariffs
• What did we learn?
Low Carbon London
9
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• The results demonstrate a robust reduction in average load of
approximately 0.05 kW/household
10
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs Low Carbon London Results
Household performance rank against measured DSR, by price band
Rank of households
High price Default price Low price
Me
an
DS
R (
kW
)
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• Introduction of Low Carbon London
• Time of Use tariffs
• Results from the trials
• Deployment of Time of Use tariffs
• Customer reaction to dToU tariffs
• What did we learn?
Low Carbon London
11
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs How can DNOs deploy such a tariff?
We have looked at two scenarios:
• Voluntary
– Based on LCL uptake from LCL trial:
• Assumes 24% uptake
• Costs of £207/customer
• Mandatory
– Where the tariff is imposed (i.e. assuming 100% response)
– mandating suppliers to pass through a dToU price signal through DUoS
charges
12
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20
13
/14
20
14
/15
20
15
/16
20
16
/17
20
17
/18
20
18
/19
20
19
/20
20
20
/21
20
21
/22
20
22
/23
20
23
/24
20
24
/25
20
25
/26
20
26
/27
20
27
/28
20
28
/29
20
29
/30
20
30
/31
20
31
/32
20
32
/33
20
33
/34
20
34
/35
Dem
and
/Cap
acit
y (M
W) Forecast Load - Winter
Capacity withreinforcement - Winter
Post-interventioncapacity - Winter
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs Whiston Road Case Study
• Whiston Road case study: 19,500 domestic customers
13
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs Whiston Road Case Study
• Whiston Road case study: 19,500 domestic customers
• Up to £25 contribution to costs could be funded by network benefits
14
Voluntary Mandatory
Uptake 24% 100%
Deferral No deferral 1 year
Cost per household £207 based on trial costs Viable only if <£25
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• A dToU price signal could be used to defer reinforcement spend at
some substations
• The value of dToU may triple if the average response improved
• High costs and low benefits mean that voluntary uptake of dToU
tariffs is unlikely to be of value to the DNO
• The benefits of applying dToU to manage outages are outweighed
by the costs
15
£k (real 2012/13) NPV Totex impact
ED1
Totex impact
ED2
Reinforcement deferral
Whiston Road case study 333 1,059 (1,074)
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs Cost Benefit Analysis
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
£0
£100,000
£200,000
£300,000
£400,000
£500,000
0% 1% 2% 3% 4%
NP
V
Unconstrained ToU as proportion of site capacity
0 year deferral
1 year deferral
2 year deferral
3 year deferral
• The benefit available from a dToU price response will be higher
where there is a higher domestic consumer population signed up
• Before considering implementation costs, £2.13m of benefits could
be available to the DNO through deferring reinforcement
16
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs Extrapolative Analysis
Increasing ToU
response
availability as
domestic load
increases allows
for greater
deferral and value
for the DNO
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• Introduction of Low Carbon London
• Time of Use tariffs
• Results from the trials
• Deployment of Time of Use tariffs
• Customer reaction to dToU tariffs
• What did we learn?
Low Carbon London
17
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• Highly engaged households (low rank index) tend to decrease their
consumption in response to high price signals and increase in response to low
price signals
• Customers appear to be keen to participate in Time of Use tariffs
18
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs Low Carbon London Results
Appliances for which households reported flexibility in
avoiding high prices on the tariff
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
• Introduction of Low Carbon London
• Time of Use tariffs
• Results from the trials
• Deployment of Time of Use tariffs
• Customer reaction to dToU tariffs
• What did we learn?
Low Carbon London
19
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Time of Use tariffs Lessons Learned
• The trial results suggest that on average dToU customers provided a
response of c. 50 W, and that the best responders provided a
response of three times this size
• Customers understand and engage with Time of use tariffs
• However, for DNOs, the use of dToU tariffs to realise network
benefits is also likely to be less cost-effective than using I&C
Demand Side Response
20
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Network benefits of supplier led tariffs
• There is potential for peak load to be reduced by static ToU tariffs at
many substations in the sample
21
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
GSPSuper-urban Urban Sub-urban
Sampled substations 0800-2000h 1600-2200h
Substation peak reduction (%) if peak is shifted outside of targeted time slice
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Dynamic Time of Use Tariffs When would a dToU tariff work for a DNO?
In future, the business case for DNO applications of dynamic ToU tariffs
might be revisited, if at least some of the following criteria were met:
• Uptake of dToU tariffs is close to 100%
• Regulation allows for cross-supplier coordination of DNO ToU price events
• In-home automation leads to higher levels of response
• Other stakeholders (e.g. the SO) are also able to apply ToU price signals
through the tariff
• Suppliers already have dToU-ready billing systems in place
22
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved
Trial outcomes of Low Carbon London
We have analysed driving
and charging behaviour
for 72 residential and 54
commercial charging
points
We have end to end
network monitoring of 3
Engineering
Instrumentation Zones
by monitoring 106 LV pot
end locations
Winter I&C DSR trial
completed: 130 MWh
contracted - 120 unique
events (119 MWh from
generation / 11MWh from
demand turn-down.
Residential dynamic
time of use trial
completed in February:
Over 1,100 people on the
‘dToU’ trial with a further
4,900 control group.
We secured £420,000 of
external revenue by
licensing the programme’s
central trial database and
ANM systems for use on
another project
We created the biggest
smart meter dataset in
the UK: 5,510 EDFE +
10,000 British Gas smart
meters across London
23
2011. UK Power Networks. All rights reserved 24
ukpowernetworks.co.uk/innovation
Thank you