lutsel k’e dene school
DESCRIPTION
Lutsel K’e Dene School. Where we are: The Successes – our student achievement data The Challenges – attendance & participation 3. Enrollment and the School Retrofit. Leadership for Literacy Initiative. Started 2006 2009 Excellence in Education Award for our Results - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Lutsel K’e Dene School
Where we are:1. The Successes – our student achievement data2. The Challenges –
attendance & participation3. Enrollment and the
School Retrofit
Leadership for Literacy Initiative
• Started 2006• 2009 Excellence in Education Award for our
Results• 2012 Governor-General of Canada mentions
Lutsel K’e and the excellent growth in literacy skills
• 2012: Aboriginal Success Initiative – GNWT sees the potential of the SSDEC L4L, the importance of pre-school and daycare in improving education
AAT Gr. 3
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Lutsel K'e - Grade 3 – 100% participation rate
Language Arts Math
Goal
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s at
Acc
epta
ble
Stan
dard
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 5 Year AverageWriting 62.5% 33.3% 100.0% 33.3% 50.0% 20.0% 40.0% 53.8% 100.0% 100.0% 62.8%Reading 0.0% 50.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 53.8% 100.0% 66.7% 52.1%Math 25.0% 33.3% 20.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0 20.0% 50.0% 0.0% 66.7% 27.3%
AAT Gr. 6
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Lutsel K'e - Grade 6 – 82% participation rate
Language Arts
Math
Goal
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s at
Acc
epta
ble
Stan
dard
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 5 year AverageLanguage Arts 0.0 0.0 33.3 14.3 33.3 0.0 20.0 25.0 25.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 34.0Math 0.0 0.0 20.0 50.0 50.0 0.0 20.0 25.0 0.0 50.0 66.7 60.0 40.3Goal 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0
LKDS Gr. 9
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
20
40
60
80
100
Lutsel K'e - Grade 9 60% participation rate
Language Arts
Math
Goal
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s at
Acc
epta
ble
Stan
dard
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 5 year AverageLanguage Arts 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 0.0 50.0 NA 0.0% 20.8Math 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0% 66.7 13.3Goal 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0
LK AAT - (in comparison to 5 year average)
Grade 3 Math is 66.7% - up 39.4%Grade 3 ELA is 66.7% - up 20.1%
Writing is at 100% - up 37.2%Reading is at 66.7% - up 14.6%
3/3 grade 3 students wrote – 100% (up 8%)
Grade 6 Math is 60% - up 19.7%Grade 6 ELA is 20% - down 14%Reading is 40% - down 20.5%
Writing is 20% - up 1% 5/6 grade 6 students wrote – 83.3% (same)
Grade 9 Math is 66.7% - up 53.4%
Grade 9 ELA is 0% - down 20.8%Reading is 0% - down 20.8%Writing is 33.3% - up 4.2%
3/5 grade 9 students wrote - 60% (down 14%)
very
poor
- 1
poor
- 2
cons
iderab
ly be
low av
erage
- 3
low av
erage
- 4
avera
ge - 5
high a
verag
e - 6
cons
iderab
ly ab
ove a
verag
e - 7
supe
rior -
8
very
supe
rior -
90%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
GRADE Summary 2012
LK
CanadaDescriptor – Stanine Participation Rate 100% to Gr. 7; Gr. 8 83%. Gr. 9 80% Gr. 10 25%
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Can ada
20 07
20 08
20 09
20 10
20 11
20 12
20 13
0% 10 % 20 % 30% 40% 50% 60 % 70 % 80 % 90% 10 0%
77 %
19 %
18 %
30 %
40 %
57 %
69 %
0%
% of Lu tse l K'e Students Achie ving a Rea ding Sc ore of Aver age or Be tterSt udent s Who Wr ote in M ultip le Year s
GR A DE S umma ryGR ADE Summary GR ADE 2012 Sum mary
Can ad a
20 07
20 08
20 09
20 10
20 11
20 12
20 13
0.0% 10 .0 % 20 .0 % 30.0% 40 .0 % 50 .0 % 60 .0 % 70 .0 % 80 .0 % 90 .0 % 10 0.0%
23 %
0%
0%
9%
5%
30 %
17 %
0%
% of L uts el K'e Stude nts Ac hiev in g a Re a ding Sc ore Co nside rab ly Abo ve Ave ra ge or Supe riorStude nts Who Wr ote in Multiple Ye ars
GR ADE SummaryGRA DE S umm ary GR ADE Summary
very
poor
- 1
poor
- 2
cons
iderab
ly be
low av
erage
- 3
low av
erage
- 4
avera
ge - 5
high a
verag
e - 6
cons
iderab
ly ab
ove a
verag
e - 7
supe
rior -
8
very
supe
rior -
90%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
LK CAT4 Math Summary
LKCanada
Descriptor - Stanine
Perc
enta
ge o
f Stu
dent
s
Ca na da
20 12
20 13
20 14
20 15
20 16
20 17
20 18
0% 10% 20% 30 % 40 % 50% 60% 70 % 80 % 90% 10 0%
77 %
59 %
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
% of L uts el K'e S tude nts Ac hiev ing a Math Sc ore of Ave rage o r Be tter(Pa rticipa tio n ra te jus t unde r 50 %)
GR A DE S umma ryGR ADE Summ ary LK CAT4 Math Summary
Ca na da
20 12
20 13
20 14
20 15
20 16
20 17
20 18
0% 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 % 60% 70% 80% 90 % 10 0%
23 %
22 %
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
% of Lutsel K'e Student s Achieving a Mat h Score Considerably Above Av-erage or Super ior – Part icipation rate 49% approx
GRA DE SummaryGRADE Summary LK CAT4 Math Sum-mary
GRADE 2007
GRADE 2012
Attendance and Reading Levels
• Attendance = school success • Home reading and parent support is as
important as what students do in school• About 16 of our students have attended less than
¼ of their morning classes this year (80% recommended)
• We have some students who have missed two and three years of school and are working two and three grade levels below where they should be… it becomes very hard for these students in Grade 9 & 10
How can we keep this going?
• It does not matter how good the program is, how many after school events we have, ….if the students are not there every day they fall behind, they never learn what school behaviour looks like, have trouble focusing and taking care and pride in their work
• Look at how attendance affects reading levels:• Staff Literacy coach position
Sept
Oct Nov
Jan Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Grade 2 student good attendanceRe
adin
g Co
mpr
ehen
sion
Lev
el
Sept
Oct Nov
Jan Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Grade 2 student poor attendance
Read
ing
Com
preh
ensi
on L
evel
Sept
Oct Nov
Jan Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Grade 7 student – good attendance and home support
Read
ing
Com
preh
ensi
on L
evel
Sept
Oct Nov
Jan Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
ABCDEFGHIJ
KLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
Grade 7 student who has likely missed three years of school or more
Read
ing
Com
preh
ensi
on L
evel
Enrollment, Attendance & the Retrofit
• This is an issue – our enrollment has dropped – especially last year – losing staff, ability to deliver quality programming, resources
• Other schools are having same issues of lower enrollment. But - Chief Sunrise has the same number of students that we do and had a major renovation years ago.
• What can we do? IDEAS?