m-119 tunnel of rees · 2014. 4. 15. · the m-119 tunnel of trees scenic heritage route plan does...

www.m119tunneloftrees.org

M-119 TUNNEL OF TREES SCENIC HERITAGE ROUTE

MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE 2013

3

M-119 TUNNEL OF TREES SCENIC HERITAGE ROUTE Management Plan Update 2013

Presented by:

M-119 TUNNEL OF TREES SCENIC HERITAGE ROUTE COMMITTEE

Emmet County, Michigan

Cross Village Township

Henry Singer

Naomi Singer

Frederick (Rob) Deane

Readmond Township

Dell Weitzel

Joe Engelhard

Larry Wallen

Friendship Township

Bill Prall

Gary Thurston

West Traverse Township Carolyn Sandford

Joey Arbaugh

Bob Sandford

Emmet County Lakeshore Association

Fred Hoffman

Catherine Reindel

George Reindel

Partners Michigan Department of Transportation

Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians

Emmet County

Little Traverse Conservancy

This Program would not exist without the dedication and commitment over the years of the M-119 Tunnel of Trees

Scenic Heritage Route Committee and the expertise and input provided by state and local agencies, non-profit groups,

individual citizens, and landowners.

WWW.m119tunneloftrees.ORG

Prepared by:

NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS. PO BOX 506, TRAVERSE CITY, MICHIGAN 49685-0506. WWW.NWM.ORG

The Northwest Michigan Council of Governments provides regional planning, economic development, and workforce development services to its ten

member counties of Antrim, Benzie, Charlevoix, Emmet, Grand Traverse, Kalkaska, Leelanau, Manistee, Missaukee, and Wexford.

http://www.nwm.org/

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

I. Executive Summary 6

II. Corridor Inventory Update 8

A. Population Characteristics 8

B. Highway Characteristics 10

C. Updated Land Uses 12

D. Photographic Inventory Update 14

Roadside 14

Aerial 73

E. Tree Health Assessment 74

III. Management Plan Update 76

A. Goals, Objectives, and Actions 76

B. Project List 82

IV. Appendices 87

A. M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Summary 88

B. Resources and Contacts 93

6

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The purpose of the M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Management Plan Update is to provide a

review and revision of the M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Committee’s goals, objectives, and

actions provided in the management plan update of 2008 with an updated photographic inventory of the

scenic corridor.

Official discussion regarding M-119’s preservation was initiated in 1990, when a roadside survey was

conducted by the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) to determine the origins and

destinations of the travelers using M-119. In 1990, MDOT contracted with the Little Traverse Conservancy,

a local land protection agency, to conduct a scenic inventory of the roadway. This information was utilized

by local citizens in the early discussions of the roadway’s preservation and management as a heritage

route. The goal of the M-119 Heritage Route Committee in 2000 was to develop a management plan that

best reflected the interests of the community. The M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route was

designated in 2003 after formally adopting the first Management Plan in 2002. Please see Appendix A: M-

119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Summary for a more detailed history.

The update includes the following:

Revised map identifying the corridor boundaries

Maps of road use and crash data

Map displaying future land use along the corridor and county

An updated photographic inventory displaying the location of intrinsic qualities

Aerial inventory

Updated goals, objectives and actions that offer insight into new or continued issues with

recommendations

Recommendations and strategies for making future management decisions

Five year Project List

Because of the “Tunnel of Trees” and other scenic attributes and the inherent beauty displayed along the

designated highway of M-119, the Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Committee continues to work to

ensure the residents of Emmet County that this Heritage Route will maintain the pastoral character of this

region of the County and will be managed in a manner that protects the “Tunnel of Trees”. M-119 is the

only state highway in Emmet County and the only state road in Michigan without a center line.

The Mission Statement of the M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Committee is:

Recognizing the unique value of M-119 and the area surrounding the roadway, the M-119 Heritage Route

Management Plan will strive to protect, preserve, and enhance the natural, scenic, and cultural character of

the M-119 Heritage Route.

7

The M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Plan does not attempt to address every issue and problem

along the corridor. Ideally, this plan update should continue to be used as a guide to achieve community

visions, while clarifying the issues and actions required for protecting its distinctiveness. The plan update

is also a guide for future corridor protection, and continues to enable local communities to maintain more

local control over the corridor without having ownership of the roadway.

The M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Committee is made up of representatives from the

following:

Four (4) townships:

West Traverse

Friendship

Readmond

Cross Village

One (1) association:

Emmet County Lakeshore Association

Partners:

Michigan Department of Transportation

Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians

Emmet County


The Northwest Michigan Council of Governments facilitates and coordinates the Committee and the

process of the plan’s update development by compiling the input, insights, resources, and comments

provided by the Committee.

M-119 TUNNEL OF TREES SCENIC HERITAGE ROUTE Corridor Management Plan Goals

To promote protection and preservation of the current state of the corridor.

To assess existing community plans and regulations to ensure effective

implementation of the goals and projects listed in the management plan.

To promote enhancement projects restoring character and showing the history

of the route.

To unite the linear community through Heritage Route management.

8

II. CORRIDOR INVENTORY

The Corridor Inventory update assists the Michigan Department of Transportation and local planning

bodies in their future deliberations on continued management strategies for the Heritage Route. This

updated information continues to serve as a source of knowledge for data and ideas, which the local

governments along the Route can use when considering development projects or community actions along

the Heritage Route. The inventory does not recommend specific courses of action, but is designed to be

used as a tool to help the community protect the corridor’s “Tunnel of Trees” and the scenic, natural,

historical, and cultural beauty while providing for change and future growth.

A. Population

As the populations of the State of Michigan and many regions within it have declined, northwest Lower

Michigan's population continues to grow. The primary source of recent growth in northwest Lower

Michigan is from in-migration of new residents.

Population data shows that Emmet County had a population of 32,694 in 2010 and the estimated number

for 2011 was 32,794 showing an increase of 100 people. Between 2000 and 2010, Emmet County grew 4%.

9

2010 Population: US Census

10

B. Highway Characteristics

The M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route begins at the Harbor Springs/West Traverse Township

border and traverses up the western side of northern Emmet County. This byway winds along some of the

most scenic areas of Emmet County.

Traffic Counts

Traffic counts are extremely useful in determining how a roadway is being used and in determining

roadway safety and traffic flow patterns. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume data below shows the

following growth for M-119 from Harbor Springs north. Traffic counts are taken at State Road in Cross

Village, which are provided by the Michigan Department of Transportation.

2002 – 1,476

2003 – 1,451

2004 – 2,023

2005 – 1,946

2006 – 2,062

2007 – 2,006

2008 – 1,465

2009 – 1,528

2010 – 2,036

2011 – 1,965

2012 – 1,993

A Traffic Volume Map is shown below for data from 2012 (MDOT Annual ADT Report; mapped by

NWMCOG staff).

2000

14700

7500

12

50

0

12

20

0

14

06

0

6700

5800

5300

4300

4800

11

Accident Locations

Crash information is another data source that can be utilized to study roadway safety. The crash accident

locations’ data for the year 2012 shows that most accidents have occurred in West Traverse Township

between West Lake Road and Five Mile Creek Road. Additional accidents that have occurred are spread out

along the remaining portions of M-119.

12

C. Updated Land Uses

Land use and land cover information provides a base from which to understand the character of the

landscape along the corridor. Please see the Emmet County Future Land Use map from 2009 on the

following page. The Emmet County Master Plan offers the following descriptions for the represented land

uses:

Rural Residential includes lots five acres or larger, neither served nor intended to be served by public

sewer and water. Appropriate uses include one- and two-family dwellings.

Low Density Residential includes one- to five-acre lots neither served nor intended to be served by public

sewer and water. Appropriate uses include one- and two-family dwellings.

Medium Density Residential ranges from ½ to 1 acre in size, and may or may not be connected to public

sewer and water. Appropriate uses include one- and two- family dwellings.

High Density Residential calls for a residential density of ½ acre or less per dwelling unit, and

connections to the public sewer and water utilities. Appropriate uses include one- and two-family

dwellings, and multi-family attached housing.

Mixed Use is the compact development of land that offers a variety of complementary and integrated uses,

including but not limited to: residential, office, retail, restaurant, or entertainment use.

Light Commercial offers professional and business services and is accessed by major roadways, arterials,

and service drives. Appropriate uses include professional offices, financial institutions, medical clinics,

laboratories, and other commercial facilities.

General Commercial offers larger retail, service, and commercial centers for convenient shopping along

major travel corridors, where most patrons will use automobile access. Within the development,

walkability will be encouraged. Appropriate uses include shopping centers, general retailers, grocery

stores, pharmacies, banks, restaurants, theatres, service stations, hotels, and entertainment facilities.

Industrial areas include all uses identified as industrial, as well as the activities accompanying those uses.

They permit a wide range of industrial activities, including manufacturing, warehousing and storage,

processing, wholesale, distribution, mechanical repair, assembly, limited retail, and accessory office and

services.

Park and Recreation areas include all lands and facilities owned and operated by the state and/or local

units of government for park uses that are open to the public,

The Reservation Boundary for the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, as originally described in

the 1855 Treaty of Detroit and repeated in P.L. 103-324, is the area within which the Tribe has jurisdiction

over its membership and includes those lands owned by the Tribe, or are held in trust by the United States

for the benefit of the Tribe.

This Future Land Use map demonstrates that low density residential development dominates the corridor.

Since the Corridor Management Plan in 2008, the most visible development that has occurred is new or

renovated residential.

13

The Emmet County Zoning Ordinance includes zoning for Scenic Resource Districts. These districts are

established to protect scenic resources along rivers, highways and streets, lake shores and impounding

waters. The scenic resources should be protected for their scenic values, environmental stability and

character. This zoning district extends to a depth of 400 feet from the nearest right-of-way line of the scenic

highway.

14

2009 EMMET COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE MAP

15

D. Photographic Inventory Update: Roadside

The following photos are taken heading north from West Traverse Township. Photo sets are labeled in the top right side of the page. If there are several photos in a set, the number is indicated in the upper left box in the description. Management Plan Update Inventory 2013 A1

Starting Location Township

South Boundary on M-119 going north

West Traverse

Owner Type Name Public Y/N

Golf Course

Harbor Point

No and Yes

Description/Use/Facilities South boundary line of West Traverse Township and City of Harbor Springs

Inventory Volunteer(s): Carolyn Sandford, Naomi Singer Date: August 29, 2013

16

Management Plan Update Inventory 2013 A2

View Township

Looking north

West Traverse


Association

Pine Trail

No

Description/Use/Facilities View looking north at Pine Trail


17


View Township

Looking east of M-119

West Traverse


Open Space

No

Description/Use/Facilities View of open space/meadow


18


View Township

Looking north

West Traverse


Commercial

Birchwood Inn

No/Business

Description/Use/Facilities Birchwood Inn and paddock for Birchwood Farms


19


View Township

Looking north

West Traverse


Residential

N

Description/Use/Facilities Sign for the Little Traverse Conservancy’s Thorne Swift Preserve on Lower Shore Drive off of M-119.


20


View Township

Looking north

West Traverse


Residential Birchwood Farms

N

Description/Use/Facilities Entrance to Birchwood Farms


21


View Township

Looking north

West Traverse


Residential

N

Description/Use/Facilities M-119 at Middle Road intersection


22


View Township

Looking east off of M-119

West Traverse


Commercial/Residential

Pond Hill Farm

No/Business

Description/Use/Facilities Pond Hill Farm and Market


23


View Township

Looking north

West Traverse


Organization

Five Mile Creek Schoolhouse

Description/Use/Facilities Old schoolhouse next to old mill off of M-119


24


View Township

(1 of 2) South Boundary of Friendship Township, looking north

Friendship


Private Farmland

Angel Farm

No

Description/Use/Facilities Angel Farm, south of Terpening Road

25

View Township

(2 of 2) South Boundary of Friendship Township, looking west

Friendship


Private Farmland

Angel Farm

No

Description/Use/Facilities Angel Farm with view of Lake Michigan


26


View Township

(1 of 2) Looking north

Friendship


MDOT

M-119 Tunnel of Trees

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Wasson’s Grade, north of Angel Farm

Date: July 28, 2008 no change August 29, 2013

27

View Township

(2 of 2) Looking north

Friendship


MDOT

M-119 Tunnel of Trees

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Lower part of Wasson’s Grade, toward north intersection with N. Lower Shore Dr.

August 29, 2013

Inventory Volunteer(s): Carolyn Sandford, Naomi Singer

28


View Township

(1 of 2) Looking west

Friendship


Private

4009 M-119

No

Description/Use/Facilities View of Lake Michigan just past Lower Shore Drive

29

View Township

(2 of 2) looking northwest

Friendship


Private

4009 M-119

No

Description/Use/Facilities View of Lake Michigan just past Lower Shore Drive

Inventory Volunteer(s): Carolyn Sandford, Naomi Singer Date: July 28, 2008 no change August 29, 2013

30

Management Plan Inventory 2013 A13

View Township

(1 of 2) Looking northwest

Friendship


Private

No

Description/Use/Facilities Intersection of M-119 and Stutsmanville Road

31

View Township

(2 of 2) Looking south

Friendship


Private

No

Description/Use/Facilities Intersection of M-119 and Stutsmanville Road


32


View Township

(3) East side of M-119 and looking north

Friendship


Private

Horseshoe Bend Farm

No

Description/Use/Facilities Horseshoe Bend Farm


33

View Township

(2 of 3) East side of M-119 and looking north

Friendship


Private

Horseshoe Bend Farm

No

Description/Use/Facilities

34

View Township

(3 of 3) East side of M-119 and looking north

Friendship


Private

Horseshoe Bend Farm

No

Description/Use/Facilities Horseshoe Bend Farm

35


View Township

Looking north

Friendship


Tunnel of Trees

John Nature Preserve

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities About one mile north of Horseshoe Bend


36


View Township

(1 of 2) Eastside of M-119

Friendship


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Devil’s Elbow and Sign


37

View Township

(2 of 2) looking north

Friendship


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Devil’s Elbow and Sign

38


View Township

(1 of 4) Looking west; northwest and north Friendship


No

Description/Use/Facilities Just north of Devil’s Elbow; special heritage route powder coated guardrails in brown


39

View Township



No

Description/Use/Facilities Point of interest: At guardrail north of Devil’s Elbow (previous photo)

40


No

Description/Use/Facilities Point of interest: At guardrail north of Devil’s Elbow

View Township


41

View Township



No

Description/Use/Facilities

42


View Township

(1 of 2) South boundary of Readmond Township, looking north

Readmond


Road

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Beginning of Readmond Township near Middle Village Road


43

View Township

(2 of 2) South boundary of Readmond Township, sign on west side of road

Readmond


Road

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Beginning of Readmond Township near Middle Village Road

44


View Township

Local Village Area

Readmond


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Robinson Road and M-119; Good Hart business area


45


View Township

Looking north

Readmond


Farmland

No

Description/Use/Facilities Just north of Good Hart


46


View Township

(1 of 4) On the west side of the road; looking north

Readmond


Private

Old Trail Inn

No

Description/Use/Facilities Old Trail Inn north of Good Hart

47


Private

Old Trail Inn

No

Description/Use/Facilities Old Trail Inn north of Good Hart

View Township


Readmond

48

View Township


Readmond


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Looking north from Island View Rd.

49

View Township


Readmond


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Area of the Old Council Tree; view north


50


View Township

(1 of 2) Looking west

Readmond


Right of Way

MDOT

No

Description/Use/Facilities At the 1920 historic wash out area; looking north on M-119


51

View Township


Readmond


Right of Way

MDOT

No

Description/Use/Facilities At the 1920 historic wash out area; looking north on M-119

52


View Township

(1 of 2) Adjacent to the road; looking north

Cross Village


Nature Preserve


Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Division Road; beginning of Cross Village Township; Ryan Nature Preserve Sign; M-119 going north


53

View Township


Cross Village


Nature Preserve


Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Division Road; beginning of Cross Village Township; Ryan Nature Preserve Sign; M-119 going north

54


View Township


Cross Village


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities L’Arbre Croche Sign


55

View Township


Cross Village


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Start of Cross Village Township

56

View Township


Cross Village


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Hemlock Forest

57


View Township

(1 of 3) Looking north; adjacent to roadway

Cross Village


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Cross Village – junction of M-119 and State Road


58

View Township


Cross Village


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Cross Village – junction of M-119 and State Road

59

View Township


Cross Village


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Cross Village – junction of M-119 and State Road; post office

60

The following photos are taken heading south from Cross Village Township. Photo sets are labeled in the top right side of the page. If there are several photos in a set, the number is indicated in the upper left box in the description. Management Plan Update Inventory 2013 A26

View Township

(1 of 4) Looking west from State Road; looking south

Cross Village


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities South of Cross Village; Corner of State Road and M-119 in Cross Village


61

View Township

(2 of 4) looking south Cross Village


Right of Way

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities South of Cross Village

62

View Township



Right of Way

MDOT

Yes


63

View Township



Right of Way

MDOT

Yes


64


View Township

(1 of 2) Beginning of hemlock forest, looking south

Cross Village


Tunnel of Trees Road

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Going south on M-119


65

View Township

(2 of 2) Beginning of hemlock forest, looking south

Cross Village


Tunnel of Trees Road

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Going south on M-119

66


View Township

Looking west from Robinson Road, Foot of

Clancy Hill

Readmond


Roadway

MDOT

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities View of M-119


67


View Township

Looking south

West Traverse


Private ownership

No

Description/Use/Facilities At the north boundary line of Friendship Township going south

Inventory Volunteer(s): Carolyn Sandford, Joretta Bethke, Patty O’Donnell Date: June 13, 2007 no change August 29, 2013

68


View Township

Looking west

West Traverse


Residential Area

No

Description/Use/Facilities Old Terpening Farm House just north of Cummings Lane


69


View Township

Looking south

West Traverse


Private Parcels

No

Description/Use/Facilities Hill just before Five Mile Creek Road


70


View Township

Looking west

West Traverse


Nature Preserve


Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Five Mile Creek Swamp Nature Preserve


71


View Township

Looking southwest

West Traverse


Nature Preserve


Yes

Description/Use/Facilities Robert Horner Nature Preserve


72


View Township

Looking south

West Traverse


Private ownership area

No

Description/Use/Facilities View of lake from hill north of Birchwood Farm


73


View Township

(1 of 2) Looking southwest

West Traverse


Private

Pull off/Old Brick Yard

No

Description/Use/Facilities Old Brick Yard down below bluff on Lower Shore Drive; view of Lake Michigan


74

View Township

(2 of 2) looking west

West Traverse


Private

Pull off/Old Brick Yard

No

Description/Use/Facilities Old Brick Yard down below bluff on Lower Shore Drive; view of Lake Michigan

75


View Township

Looking south

West Traverse


Residential/Commercial

No

Description/Use/Facilities Hill view with Birchwood Farm


76


View Township

Looking southeast

West Traverse


Residential

No

Description/Use/Facilities Private farm


77


View Township

Looking south

West Traverse


Private/Government

West Traverse Township

Hall

Yes

Description/Use/Facilities West Traverse Township Hall at Lake Street and M-119 intersection.


78


View Township

Looking southwest

West Traverse


Private Residential

No

Description/Use/Facilities Lake view near Pine Trail Association and Forest Beach Association, before golf course.


79

AERIAL INVENTORY

An aerial inventory of the M-119 Tunnel of Trees is available online at www.m119tunneloftrees.org as

updated most recently in 2011.

http://www.m119tunneloftrees.org/

80

E. Tree Health Assessment

TREE HEALTH OF THE M-119 TUNNEL OF TREES The M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Committee requested an inventory of the tree species in

the road right of way along M-119 north of Harbor Springs, Michigan. The inventory took place in July

2007 by Chris Anderson, Forester/Groundwater Technician from the Charlevoix Conservation District. The

information that was noted was the forest type, tree species, average diameter, and overall health. This

information has been archived and is provided on our website.

In 2010, an organic gardener-forester, Ivan Witt, provided the committee with a tree health inspection and

analysis of the Tunnel of Trees canopy. The following is the report from Ivan Witt, dated July 29, 2010.

Tree Health along M-119 Tunnel of Trees

On August 28, 2010 an inspection was made of the general health of the trees and forest within the right-of-

way of M-119 between Harbor Springs and Cross Village. Individual trees and stands as well as the overall

forests along the route were observed and visually inspected for overall age, general condition and possible

problems, either currently or potentially in the next few years. Presence of invasive exotic vegetation was

also observed and noted.

FINDINGS: The age of the forests along the Tunnel of Trees route would be generalized as middle-aged, 60-

90 years old, and therefore of good vigor. The exceptions, however are the aspen and birch trees, which

mature quicker and live shorter lives than many of the other species present. Their life spans are around

80-100 years. Examples of mature to over-mature aspen are seen just south of Middle Road in West

Traverse Township and south of Middle Village Road in Readmond Township, though examples of mature

specimens of both species can be observed throughout the length of the route and are trees of concern.

As trees mature they will naturally have lower limbs die back and should be removed on a bi-annual basis.

The older the trees the larger those branches will be and the more costly their removal. Also, it should be

expected that the occasional tree will die and present a hazard; this will increase in frequency as the overall

forest matures (there is currently no cause for concern). Therefore, budgets should be calculated

accordingly.

One major cause for concern, however, is the widespread presence of beech bark disease. This was

observed in most stands of hardwood along the route and will lead to widespread mortality of the species.

(http://forestry.msu.edu/testmsaf/main%20page/BBdisease.htm) The disease has a couple of stages and

can be most readily observed by the white, waxy scale in heavily infested trees. Blue flagging was tied to

notable examples northwest of Terpening Road and at 6228 M-119 (near Cross Village), where there is a

particularly hazardous heavily infested tree leaning over the road and a power line. As infestation and

death advance, the beech trees become susceptible to a condition termed beech snap. Beech snap occurs

when wind breaks of trees where wood borers and decay fungi weaken the wood beneath fungus (beech

81

bark disease) –killed bark. The disease in forest stands cannot be controlled at a reasonable cost, and a

program of timely salvage cuttings is the only way presently known to reduce its impact.

Removal of infested trees within the right-of-way is recommended at the earliest opportunity. It would be

best to work with adjacent landowners to get them to remove the diseased trees on their lands (though

there are obvious inherent difficulties in doing this). Preemptive removal of healthy appearing trees is not

recommended, as some trees seem naturally tolerant, or at least not as susceptible as others and may very

well survive. A second round of tree removal should be expected in a year or two as the disease takes its

course.

Another forest/tree health issue to monitor is emerald ash borer (EAB) infestation. Ash trees with crown

die-back were observed along the route, but the exact cause was not determined, though it may be assumed

to be EAB. These trees should be included in the general dying tree removal regime and, as there is not the

concentration of the species, no special budgetary consideration need be made.

A couple of invasive exotic plant species were observed in the right-of-way which are of special note.

Autumn olive, a highly invasive shrub, was observed south of Terpening Road on the east side of M-119.

Also, Scotch pine trees are well established in the right-of-way in the vicinity of 3487 M-119. These species

are aggressive in becoming established in open sites and crowd out native vegetation, thereby disrupting

the natural state of the environment. Though there is no other hazard or safety concern, it is considered

good stewardship to control the establishment and spread of these species by their physical removal,

including the roots on the autumn olive. Again, this program would be most effective if adjacent

landowners were involved.

82

IV. Management Plan Update

A. Goals, Objectives, and Actions

Goals


To assess existing community plans and regulations to ensure effective implementation of

the goals and projects listed in the management plan.

To promote enhancement projects restoring character and showing the history of the route.

To unite the linear community through Heritage Route management.

Objectives and Action Steps

This section outlines broad objectives that address the potential threats facing the corridor. In addition to

objectives, action steps are offered as guidance for community response.

Objective 1: Promote Preservation and Conservation of the Tunnel of Trees for Balanced Growth

and Development

Future land use along the corridor continues to be influenced by a variety of factors: individual land

owners’ decisions, regulations administered by the County and the local units of government, state

legislation, the state of the economy, land costs, and pressures resulting from changing demographics and

recreational and travel patterns. Likewise, land use as an issue encompasses a variety of subjects ranging

from site-specific issues such as signage or tree clearing to general concerns about density or open space

preservation.

Action Steps

►Voluntarily monitor and provide guidelines for future development

Communities along the corridor need to continue planning for future development and/or redevelopment

that complements the existing character of the Heritage Route Corridor. Communities along the corridor

should require development that is consistent with township master plans and the updated Emmet County

Master Plan. Commercial development should only occur in established and zoned commercial areas and

support must be given to the enforcement of current zoning laws. Development could also adhere to

design guidelines to ensure that community character and environmental quality would be maintained.

There are many ways to reach these goals including educational activities; voluntary measures such as

conservation easements, land acquisition or donation for nature preserves or parks, and the promotion of

green belts along the corridor; regulatory measures such as zoning, “overlays” that protect certain features

or characteristics of an area, and site plan reviews of proposed developments.

►Support promotion and enforcement of existing regulations

Enforcement of existing regulations is critical to maintain the essential character of the corridor. For

example, the Scenic Resources (SR-2) zoning district in the Emmet County Zoning Ordinance sets forth

83

requirements that are intended to minimize harmful impacts to natural features. It should also be

recognized that current regulations might not sufficiently protect natural features or characteristics and

citizens are therefore encouraged to take a pro-active role in the preservation and protection of the

roadway.

►Maintain the Tunnel of Trees by providing guidelines for land use activities

Preserving the tunnel of trees is one of the most often mentioned priorities among citizens along M-119

and in the townships. Irresponsible tree cutting poses a major threat to tree resources. There are both

regulatory and non-regulatory methods for minimizing tree clearing along the corridor. The SR-2 zoning

district establishes a 40-foot setback or greenbelt requirement from the edge of the right-of-way for the

roadway. The ordinance does allow for selective trimming to create or maintain a view. A non-regulatory

alternative would be to talk directly to landowners about the negative environmental effects and aesthetic

impacts of tree clearing.

►Stay informed and educated

Elected and appointed officials and residents in northern Michigan are faced with difficult planning

decisions, often without the benefit of having professional planning staff at the local level. There are many

educational resources available for the Heritage Route Committee to share with the townships, Emmet

County, Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, the residents, and the Michigan Department of

Transportation (MDOT) for the protection of the Tunnel of Trees.

►Develop or expand partnerships

Coordinating with Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, Emmet County Governmental units, the

Little Traverse Conservancy, the Harbor Springs Area Historical Society, the Tip of the Mitt Watershed

Council, local businesses, and landowners along the corridor is essential to ensure that the land is properly

used, protected and preserved.

►Promote a variety of methods for conservation and preservation of land along the corridor

In order to preserve the unique character of the M-119 corridor it will be necessary to develop projects

that preserve and protect land along the roadway. Potential projects may include working with the Little

Traverse Conservancy, Emmet County, the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, the Michigan

Department of Transportation, America’s Byway Program, Scenic Michigan program, etc.

►Identify and utilize sources of funding for preservation and conservation of the Tunnel of Trees

►Encourage community involvement in promoting responsible road maintenance and development along the

M-119 Heritage Route Corridor. Support routine road maintenance for public safety.

►Implement educational activities

►Focus on communication

Produce and make available educational resources – written, audio, and visual – for committee and

advisory member locations and events. Maintain website for educational outreach.

84

Objective 2: Balancing Roadside Safety with Aesthetics

Safety is of primary importance along the roadway. Preserving and protecting the natural, cultural, and

scenic character of the corridor is an equally important goal. Speed and road design both influence safety.

This plan does not suggest widening, straightening, adding shoulders, changing the speed limit, or changing

the physical appearance of the road in any way.

Action Steps

► Communicate regularly with MDOT and other government agencies

Michigan Department of Transportation projects should be implemented that balance safety, aesthetics,

and cost effectiveness. Local communities should partner with MDOT to determine creative ways to solve

safety challenges. This partnership will only occur if the interests of the community are effectively

communicated to decision-makers. As a designated Heritage Route, M-119 qualifies for a number of special

considerations. Businesses, townships, and citizens – through the Heritage Route Committee – should

communicate with MDOT, the Emmet County Road Commission, and the local enforcement agencies

regarding any interests in having a planned event or project along this corridor.

►Educate the public

Provide information relative to safety issues regarding the use of the corridor. This information may

include accident data, sharpness of some curves, condition of some areas of roadway where sand pile up

can be an issue, as well as overall width of road.

►Promote the enforcement of existing regulations

Encourage education regarding enforcement of existing regulations such as the speed of traffic, excessive

vehicular noise, sharing the road with cyclists and walkers, and litter laws. This will assist in the protection

of community safety, character and aesthetics.

►Review and coordinate M-119 corridor land use and roadway plans with MDOT

Townships should compare the goals of this management plan with existing plans, such as Master Plans,

Future Land Use Plans, or Parks and Recreation Plans. Many of these documents express similar intentions

to protect or preserve a particular scenic quality, natural feature, or landscape aesthetic. Townships should

also review the county zoning ordinance to ensure that the intention of their master plan will be fulfilled by

the existing regulations.

►Provide access to technical plans

Make accessible through archive system the engineering plans already completed relative to the “Wooden

Bridge Project” at the washout area of M-119 in Readmond Township, should such an event occur.

85

Objective 3: Promote Wise Land Use Development

Residents along the M-119 corridor have continued to express concern regarding development on steep

slopes along the Lake Michigan coastline.

Action Steps

►Continue to support the steep slope ordinance and efforts to make the Emmet County Steep Slope Ordinance

more effective through public education and interagency communication

Townships should continue supporting the steep slope ordinance that works to protect the unique geology,

the lakeside bluff, buildings, and the roadway.

►Educate landowners, realtors, developers, and those conducting land transactions about Best Management

Practices (BMPs)

Best Management Practices are land use management actions that reduce the impact on the environment.

BMPs are voluntary actions that include techniques which help minimize erosion and movement of

sediment, protect properties and water sources, minimize transport of sediment onto paved surfaces,

stabilize exposed areas, maintain temporary erosion and sedimentation control measures, and route storm

water runoff to remove sediment.

►Continue to share observations regarding erosion issues with Emmet County Planning and Zoning

Department

Objective 4: Prevent Intrusions to Scenic Character

Intrusions to scenic character include any built structure or landscape element that contrast with the

scenic and natural character of the corridor. Signage, both temporary and permanent, along the M-DOT

right of way (33 feet from the centerline) has become a threat to the character of the corridor and actions

should be considered that result in fewer signs in the right of way and signage which blends in with the

natural environment. Other intrusions include lighting, fencing, and utilities.

Action Steps

►Develop scenic, cultural, and historical signage initiatives that preserve the Tunnel of Trees character and

promote the use of natural or natural looking materials

There are both regulatory and non-regulatory ways to deal with signage. The Emmet County Zoning

Ordinance regulates signage throughout Emmet County. Although the language in the ordinance infers

intention to promote natural materials, it does not require that they be used. The Heritage Route

Management Committee should promote signage that does not conflict with the existing character of the

roadway. The Committee can also work with the other Michigan Heritage Routes to promote changing the

Michigan Department of Transportation’s sign standards (i.e. size, purpose, language, etc.) to appropriate

signage for scenic, historic, cultural, and recreational heritage routes that are not expressways or freeways.

►Encourage the use of natural or natural looking fencing and other structural materials

The use of functional, natural materials should be encouraged to maintain the character of the roadway.

86

►Encourage Dark Skies/light pollution management policies for outdoor lighting

Good outdoor lighting improves visibility, safety, security, and saves money. These recommendations

could be brought to the attention of local residents through educational brochures as well as through web

sites.

►Promote underground utilities

Although these projects would be expensive, the value of enhancing a significant natural feature or a scenic

view is priceless. Educate landowners about the value of having underground utilities.


Utilize all available methods for enhancing communication on issues of importance to the roadway.

Objective 5: Promote Appropriate Use of the Corridor and Alternative Routes

The curves, narrow roadbed, and the Tunnel of Trees render M-119 as a road less traveled, a characteristic

that local communities would like to continue. Therefore, any strategy for M-119 should focus on

promoting appropriate use for the road.

Action Steps

A strategy could consist of the following key components:

1. Encourage the use of State Road/C-77 for vehicles that exceed the road’s safety standards such as

large vehicles, motor homes, and tractor-trailers, while enhancing the driving experience for other

travelers. Redirecting large vehicle traffic will promote a more positive experience for residents

and tourists along M-119.

2. Create and post directional signage at the beginning and end, and at points along M-119 that

informs travelers of their route options.

3. Develop M-119 Heritage Route brochures that include information pertaining to the scenic, historic,

and natural character of the roadway, as well as its unsuitability for vehicles over a specified length.

Brochures could be made available at local businesses, museums, and area chambers of commerce.

►Support ongoing review of traffic patterns

The Committee will review the most recent traffic counts and crash data for the heritage route.

►Support the creation of directional signage that designates C-77 as an alternative route

Traffic data indicate that many people already utilize State Road/C-77 to reach points north of Harbor

Springs. As population in the area north of Harbor Springs increases, Friendship, Readmond, and Cross

Village townships will face difficult questions about the future of development in the area. Townships

should work with MDOT and the County Road Commission to develop an agreed upon route and signage

strategy to inform travelers of their options. Feeder roads may need to be improved before an alternative

route can be marketed to travelers. Promoting C-77 at both the north and south ends of the heritage route

is likely to decrease the amount of through-traffic along the corridor.

87


Communicate regularly with township planning boards and the Emmet County Planning and Zoning

Commission to keep informed about development plans in the region that may affect the M-119 Heritage

Route corridor. In addition the committee must effectively communicate with the Emmet County Road

Commission, MDOT, and residents to ensure successful implementation of the management plan.

88

B. Priority Project List for M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route

The priority project list below itemizes specific construction, mitigation, preservation, and communication

activities that could be pursued along M-119. The list is not meant to be prescriptive, only suggestive. The

list is not prioritized and may be revised by the Heritage Route Committee.

Proposed Project Objective

Addressed Potential Partners

Estimated Cost

Potential Funding Sources

Work with the townships to coordinate efforts for common projects such as the identification and protection of priority sites

Objective 1-5

Townships, Little Traverse

Conservancy, MDOT

Dependent upon the project

Scenic America, foundations, donations

Continue to educate corridor landowners on tree management; responsible tree trimming on steep slopes; importance of old growth timber for maintaining wildlife habitats; invasive species, and the use of native vegetation; Complete a tree health inventory as needed Maintain and update the “Tree Management in the Corridor” brochure and distribute and upload resources to website

Objectives 1, 2, and 3

Emmet County Conservation

District, MDOT, MI DNR; Little

Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians; realtors, property owners, builders,

contractors, landscapers, Little

Traverse Conservancy,

Emmet County, Tip of the Mitt

Watershed Council

$500 Mailing

costs

Tree health inventory

costs

Heritage Route Planning Program

Continue to review, update, and share the heritage route Guidebook to inform people about buffer areas and how to protect and maintain them; Upload to website; Distribute to realtors, builders, contractors, landscape designers, and current property owners

Objectives 1-5

Little Traverse Conservancy, Tip

of the Mitt Watershed

Council.

Mailing costs


89



Estimated Cost


Continue to review the Emmet County Master Plan regarding the Scenic Heritage Route corridor and work with Emmet County and the Townships to improve the protection of the Scenic Resources-2 zoning district.

Objectives 1, 3 and 4

Emmet County Planning and Zoning, other

townships with SR-2 districts,

Heritage Route Committee

Investment of time at the local

and county level

Work with Little Traverse Conservancy to encourage protection of land in the Heritage Route Corridor - land purchase, conservation easements, Purchase of Development Rights (PDR) program, Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program

Objective 1 Little Traverse Conservancy land owners, American Farmland Trust, Michigan Farm

Bureau

Dependent on project

American Farmland Trust, Little Traverse Conservancy, private

donations, foundations, MI Natural Resources

Trust Fund, Little Traverse Bay Bands of

Odawa Indians

Develop a resource list of historical significant people and locations on the Heritage Route; Continue to create and maintain historic markers; Provide resources, bibliography, websites, etc. for those interested in the history of the roadway

Objective 1 MDOT, Little Traverse Bay Band of Odawa Indians,

Emmet County Road Commission, Historical Society of Michigan, Little

Traverse Historical Society

Possible costs:

informative kiosk; signs,

brochure, document, web page

National Trust for Historic Preservation, Historical Society of

Michigan, Little Traverse Historical Society, MI

History, Arts, and Libraries, private

donations

Encourage enforcement of existing speed, noise, and nuisance regulations

Objective 2 County Sheriff, State Police, Tribal

Police

Continue to review and update the Heritage Route brochure for distribution

Objectives 1 - 5

MDOT, Emmet County Road Commission


90



Estimated Cost


Update the Heritage Route map to show viewsheds and historical points

Objective 1 Townships, Little Traverse

Conservancy, local residents

Mapping costs -

NWMCOG

MDOT Work Program

Promote outdoor lighting standards (dark skies/night sky viewing) for the M-119 corridor

Objective 4 Township and county planning

officials

Continue to review and update the M-119 Tunnel of Trees Guidebook and distribute to realtors, builders, contractors, landscape designers, and current property owners; post on website

Objectives 1 - 5


Federal Highway Administration

Continue to participate in local events with the educational display and brochures

Objectives 1 - 5


MDOT Work Program

Work with the MI Heritage Route Program and other Scenic Heritage Routes regarding signage – type, placement, size, and purpose

Objective 4 MDOT; Heritage Route Committees

MDOT Work Program

Develop and implement annual beautification projects for the Heritage Route

Objective 1 Townships, landowners,

master gardener program,

conservation district

Dependent on project

Donations, clubs, groups

Create and update the Tunnel of Trees Heritage Highway website www.m119tunneloftrees.org

Objectives 1 - 5

NWMCOG MDOT Work Program

91



Estimated Cost


Use varying forms of communication (website, newspapers, radio, etc.) to increase community awareness about the route and as a way to thank those involved with continued efforts to maintain beauty, health, and safety of this route

Objectives 1 - 5

Townships, Emmet County, NWMCOG,

local papers and radio shows, Little Traverse Historical

Society

92

Funding

The M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Committee will continue to organize and prioritize

proposed projects each year to take advantage of funding opportunities. Acquiring funds for vital projects

along the corridor will encourage the community to proactively plan for existing and future projects which

benefit the entire County.

The designation of the M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route continues to enhance the

opportunities of obtaining state and federal funds to help existing and future projects along the Route. The

Heritage Route qualifies for the following:

1. Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund

2. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Coastal Management Program

3. Michigan Department of Transportation Alternative Programs grant

4. Other identified governmental agencies’ programs

5. Independent Foundations

6. Local Utility Foundations

Education

Education is an important aspect of the Management Plan. A creative strategy will be used to inform and

educate residents and visitors and will focus on developing a sustainable program that will be developed

with the local governments, non-profit entities, residents, and business associations. Interpretive materials

will provide residents and visitors information on attractions and destinations along the corridor and off

the corridor. These educational materials will assist in the streamlining of traffic flow and decrease

congestion in certain areas at peak times of the year. The primary goal will be to find a balance that

encourages responsible levels of tourism and prioritizes the maintenance of the integrity of the M-119

Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route in Emmet County. A website has been developed to distribute

information and provide resources on the internet (www.m119tunneloftrees.org).

Additional Considerations

There are several additional considerations regarding action and implementation that are important for

heritage route planning and management. Any projects listed in this plan are subject to safety and

maintenance guidelines set forth by the Michigan Department of Transportation such as tree-trimming or

removal to protect utility operations or to correct drainage problems. Projects are also subject to local

government action or review. Funding will need to be acquired prior to implementing the majority of

projects listed.

Heritage Route Management Plans have a five-year shelf life. The M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage

Route Committee will meet regularly to review the projects listed and to ensure that projects are being

implemented that are in accordance with the Management Plan.

93

VII. Appendices

A. M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Summary

B. Resources

94

Appendix A: M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Summary

M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Summary

The Michigan Heritage Route Program was created by Public Act 69 of 1993. The Heritage Route Program

is designed to identify, inventory, protect, enhance, and in some cases, promote state trunk lines and

adjacent land with distinctive or unique scenic, cultural, or historic qualities. The normal process for

Heritage Route nomination within the Michigan Heritage Route Program follows a standard process for

procedure: formation of a nominating team, identification of the potential route, evaluation of the highway

using a roadside inventory, selection of the route to be nominated, preparation of a management plan,

evidence of location support, preparation of nomination/application and submission of application.

Created by legislation in 1993, the program emphasizes cooperation among local residents, their

government officials, landowners and interested groups to preserve unique scenic, historic or recreational

highways. The Heritage Route Program is a grass roots program, requiring involvement by local residents

to ensure that their highway and its roadsides remain in their natural and unspoiled conditions. Michigan's

residents have an opportunity as individuals, groups, or entire communities to become involved in this

important effort to preserve Michigan's roadsides with scenic, historic and/or recreational qualities.

There are three categories of heritage routes: scenic - a state highway having outstanding natural beauty;

historic - a state highway having outstanding historic buildings, and resources along its length.; and

recreational - maintained not only to serve the recreational driver, but also to capture that recreational

setting of the facility or area itself, and set the mood for the recreational experience.

The Benefits of Heritage Routes

Preservation Benefits

Identify, preserve, and enhance Michigan's Scenic, Historic and Recreational resources.

Promote a greater awareness of and appreciation for those resources.

Provide an opportunity for growth management within a corridor by encouraging

appropriate development.

Provide an opportunity to manage the traveler/tourist impact on resources.

Community Benefits

Provide a vision for the future. Uniting those who share that vision.

Enhance the local, regional and state image on a national level.

Identify, promote and preserve community uniqueness enhancing community appeal.

Enhance the quality of life in the community.

95

Education Benefits

Provide an education for future generations, by example.

Opportunity to share ideas, information, research, and lessons.

Provide an effective hands-on teaching tool.

Establish an education network.

Economic Benefits

Attract visitors, who bring additional revenues, enhancing economic activity in the region.

Attract new businesses.

Enhance existing jobs and create new jobs.

Vision Statement:

Recognizing the unique value of M-119 and the area surrounding the roadway, the

M-119 Heritage Route Management Plan will strive to protect, preserve, and enhance

the natural, scenic, and cultural character of the M-119 Heritage Route.

The goal of the M-119 Heritage Route Committee was to develop a plan that best reflected the interests of

the community. To ensure this effort, the process of developing the M-119 Heritage Route Management

Plan included the following principles:


To assess existing community plans and regulations to ensure effective implementation of

the goals and projects listed in the management plan

To promote enhancement projects restoring character and encouraging the use of

alternative routes.

To unite the linear community through the planning process.

History:

The initiative to protect and preserve the M-119 corridor originated in 1936. Mrs. C. F. (Alice) Irwin, an

early preservationist and naturalist living in Harbor Springs was able, via her state-wide newspaper

column, to initiate a grass roots effort to protect and preserve the corridor. At that time several hundred

people met to consider protecting the corridor as opposed to other plans being entertained that would

have significantly modified the route to accommodate growing usage. Mrs. Irwin successfully petitioned

the State legislature to protect and preserve the road in its natural state. Based on a desire to control soil

erosion and preserve the natural beauty the preservationists carried the day. That movement continues to

the present day.

96

The following is a timeline of more recent events that continue to accomplish that original goal:

December 1964 Emmet County Road Commission Scenic Route Study

Summer 1972 Emmet County Lakeshore Association (ECLA) formed by like-minded property owners to

protect and preserve the corridor

July 1990 MI Department of Transportation (MDOT) completes an Origin and Destination Study

Summer 1990 Preservation discussions begin

December 1990 MDOT contracts with the Little Traverse Conservancy (LTC) to conduct a scenic inventory

of the route

February 1993 MDOT Traffic Accident History Study is conveyed to the LTC

March 1993 First informal public meeting held

April 1993 MDOT Base Plots conveyed to LTC

May 1993 Property acquisition information request from LTC

September 1993 Review of Scenic Corridor Study Draft begins

November 1993 ECLA passes unanimous resolution supporting the Heritage Route Designation

November 1993 County Commissioner and long time ‘activist’ ECLA president Paul Lenahan requests

State Attorney General’s opinion on liability issue to the Townships

November 1993 Public comments on Scenic Corridor Study Draft

January 1994 Public hearing on Heritage Route guidelines

February 1994 LTC M-119 Scenic Corridor Study is submitted to MDOT

February 1994 Final M-119 Scenic Corridor Study is sent to interested parties

December 1994 ECLA survey indicates 95% of membership supports Heritage Route Designation

February 1996 Public meeting at Little Traverse Township Hall to discuss Heritage Route Designation

May 1996 Discussion and debate on the Designation of M-119 continues through September 1996

September 1996 Meeting at West Traverse Township Hall; MDOT publicly proposes the Designation of

M-119 as a Scenic Heritage Route

September 1997 Pete Hanses becomes MDOT Heritage Route program director

June 1998 MDOT applies for National Scenic Byways Grant to develop M-119 Management Plan

January 1999 National Scenic Byways Grant awarded to MDOT

97

February 1999 M-119 discussions resume

March 1999 MDOT requests NW MI Council of Governments (NWMCOG)* to develop Corridor

Management Plan

Summer 1999 Discussions with Emmet County Planning Department and Emmet County Board of

Commissioners to proceed with developing the Management Plan for M-119

October 1999 MDOT contracts with NWMCOG to develop a Management Plan

Fall/Winter 1999 NWMCOG begins preliminary discussions with the Townships

March 2000 Draft Outline for Management Plan Contents

Spring 2000 Meetings with Townships and Harbor Springs to solicit input on Management Plan Outline

Spring 2000 Formation of M-119 Scenic Heritage Route Corridor Management Plan Committee, an

advisory committee comprised of three delegates from each Township: Friendship,

Readmond, Cross Village; three delegates from ECLA; in partnership with the Little

Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians, MDOT, County Planning/ Commissioners

Summer 2000 Scheduled monthly meetings drafting the Management Plan through Winter 2001

January 2002 Formal Adoption of M-119 Heritage Route Management Plan

June 28 2003 *Dedication of the M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route at Cross Village

Township Hall*

Summer 2003 Rollover of Management Plan Committee to Implementation Committee

Summer 2004 Historical Signs Unveiling Ceremony at Devils Elbow

Summer 2006 Community Preference Survey

Summer 2007 Township Resolutions in support of Survey Results and Committee Actions

July 2007 Inventory of Tree Species

Fall 2007 Inclusion of West Traverse Township

September 2008 Statewide Heritage Highway Conference Traverse City

Spring 2009 M-119 Tunnel of Trees Scenic Heritage Route Management Plan first 5 year Update 2008

Ongoing 2009 Monthly committee meetings; Implementation projects

Summer 2013 Second Management Plan 5 year Update

Ongoing 2013 Monthly committee meetings open to the public and implementation projects continue

Fall 2013 Development and Launching of website

98

In essence: Many years of citizen-volunteer efforts and persistence.

Summary:

Authority derives from MDOT and the MDOT Scenic Heritage Highway Public Act 69 of1993

Funding initially from a National Scenic Byways Grant

Facilitated by NWMCOG* via a contract with MDOT

Initial drive began 1936

More recent efforts beginning 1964

ECLA was created in 1972 for the purpose of corridor protection and preservation

Championed by ECLA with the full support of Emmet County Planning, Emmet County

Commissioners, LTC, LTBB and the community at large.

Management Plan Committee 2000

Management Plan Adoption 2002

Implementation Committee 2002

Dedication of the M-119 Tunnel Of Trees Scenic Heritage Route June 28, 2003

Unveiling of Historical Signs 2004

Management Plan 5 year Update 2008

Management Plan 5 year Update 2013

Monthly Committee Meetings and Implementation Projects Ongoing

Establish Website

Launched Website

*THE NORTHWEST MICHIGAN COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (NWMCOG): PROVIDES REGIONAL PLANNING SERVICES, ECONOMIC

DEVELOPMENT, AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT TO THE TEN MEMBER COUNTIES OF EMMET, CHARLEVOIX, ANTRIM, KALKASKA, GRAND

TRAVERSE, LEELANAU, BENZIE, MANISTEE, WEXFORD AND MISSAUKEE.

Revised December 2013

99

Appendix B: Resources and Contacts

Northwest Michigan Council of Governments Website Data, www.nwm.org, 231-929-5000

State of Michigan, Department of Transportation Data, www.michigan.gov/mdot, 989-731-5090

Emmet County Planning, Zoning, and Construction Resources, www.emmetcounty.org, 231-439-8983

Little Traverse bay Bands of Odawa Indians, www.ltbbodawa-nsn.gov, 231-242-1400

Little Traverse Conservancy, www.landtrust.org, 231-347-0991

For more information: www.m119tunneloftrees.org

http://www.nwm.org/

http://www.michigan.gov/mdot

http://www.emmetcounty.org/

http://www.ltbbodawa-nsn.gov/

http://www.landtrust.org/

http://www.m119tunneloftrees.org/

m-119 tunnel of rees · 2014. 4. 15. · the m-119 tunnel of trees scenic heritage route plan does...

Documents