ma lecture week 21 - quality

24
www.bradford.ac.uk/management Accounting for Quality Lecture 21

Upload: happy-adela

Post on 21-Jul-2016

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

n

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

www.bradford.ac.uk/management

Accounting for Quality

Lecture 21

Page 2: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Learning outcomes

At the end of the session, you should be able:

To define qualityTo distinguish between the two types of quality

conformanceTo identify the four categories of quality costs and

understand their relationship To outline the implications of quality management to

management accounting

Page 3: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Accounting for Quality: Overview

Recall that to survive and be successful in today’s global competitive environment, companies need to provide quality products or services. to satisfy customer needs and to meet or exceed customer expectations

Whether a company competes through a strategy of cost leadership or product differentiation, quality issues permeate every aspect of its operations A firm choosing to complete on a cost leadership strategy, is not choosing low-

quality products Similarly a differentiation strategy will fail if the firm fails to build quality into its

products

Focusing on quality of a product can be beneficial Creates customer satisfaction Reduces the cost of quality, which can be substantial Generating higher sales, leading to increased shareholder value

Therefore accounting for quality is an important role of the management accountant Makes management aware of the magnitude of quality costs Provides a benchmark against which the impact of quality improvement activities

could be measured.

Page 4: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Quality as a Competitive Tool

Quality is defined as:

The total features and characteristics of a product or a service made or performed according to specifications to satisfy customers at the time of purchase and during use.

Ensuring that the technical aspects of the product’s design and performance conform to the manufacturer’s standards.

Page 5: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Basic Aspects of Quality

Quality may be viewed as hinging on two major factors: Design Quality- refers to how closely the characteristics of a product

or service meet the needs and wants of customers. Conformance Quality- refers to the performance of a product or

service relative to its design and product specifications.

Quality of design failureQuality of design failureConformance quality failureConformance quality failure

Design SpecificationsDesign SpecificationsActual PerformanceActual Performance Customer SatisfactionCustomer Satisfaction

Page 6: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Types of conformance

Quality involves conformance with specifications for products or services that meet or exceed customer requirements and expectations

Two types of conformance Goalpost conformance - Conformance to a quality

specification expressed as a specified range around the target- the target is the ideal or desirable outcome of the operation

Absolute conformance - Requires all products or services to meet the target value exactly with no variations

Page 7: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Managing quality to create value

• Two major perspectives:– Financial perspective: costs of quality

– Non-financial perspective• Customers• Internal processes• Learning and growth

7

Page 8: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Financial Perspective: Costs of Quality

The costs of quality (COQ)- refers to costs of activities associated with prevention, identification, repair, and rectification of poor quality and opportunity costs from lost of production time and sales as a result of poor quality.

These costs focus on conformance quality and are incurred in all business functions of the value chain.

Companies have discovered that they can spend as much as 20% to 30% of total manufacturing costs on quality-related processes

Yet, traditionally, quality costs only included costs of inspection and costs of testing the finished products

Page 9: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Cost of Quality Framework

Divides costs into two components:Conformance costs- prevention and appraisal

costsNon-conformance costs- internal and external

failure costs.

Assumes a relation between conformance costs and non-conformance costsAs companies invest more into prevention and

appraisal costs, they will be able to reduce their failure costs

Prevention is better than cure

Page 10: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Cost of Quality Framework

Conformance costs – costs to achieve high qualityPrevention costs

Costs incurred to ensure that the products conform to quality standards.

E.g., product design and product reviews, employee training, training and certifying suppliers, quality engineering, equipment maintenance.

Appraisal costsCosts incurred in individual product inspection to

make sure they meet both internal and external customer requirements,

E.g., cost of inspecting incoming materials and parts, process control monitoring, maintenance of test equipment.

Page 11: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Cost of Quality Framework

Non-conformance costs: consequences of poor quality Internal failure costs

Costs incurred when the manufacturing process detects a defective component or product before it is shipped to external customers,

E.g., scrap cost, rework cost, re-inspection costs, cost of downtime due to defective parts

External failure costsCosts incurred by a non-conforming product detected after

it is shipped to customers, E.g., cost of repairs, warranty costs, service calls, customer

complaints

Page 12: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Famous external failures• Toyota well known for quality however;

– In 2009 in the US– Family died when accelerator pedal got stuck– Enormous media coverage – US government got

involved– 6 million cars recalled– Production and sales of model suspended– £2billion loss in North America alone– Worldwide reputation losses beyond calculation

Page 13: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Non-financial quality indicators

• A “balanced” approach to quality should include (cf. BSC framework): – Financial indicators (Costs of Quality, above)– Non-financial indicators (see next):

• External, customer focused quality indicators• Internal business processes quality indicators• Learning and growth quality indicators

13

Page 14: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Non-financial quality indicators• External, customer focused quality indicators

– Focused on the two dimensions of quality: design quality and conformance quality

– Indicators include:• Market share; repeat business• Customer complaints• Products with early or repeated failures• Percentage of defective units shipped• Delivery performance

– Both lead and lag indicators14

Page 15: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Non-financial quality indicators• Internal business processes quality indicators

– Internal dimensions of quality to achieve customer-relevant quality and avoid failures

– Indicators include:• Defective units produced or reworked• Number of quality-driven changes to products and

processes• Development time of new products or services• Order-to-delivery time• On-time performance• Productivity and efficiency measures

15

Page 16: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Non-financial quality indicators

• Learning and growth quality indicators– Focus on intangible aspects related to

organizational learning and growth– Indicators include:

• Training on quality, of company employees and from external parties

• Employee satisfaction and turnover• Employee empowerment

16

Page 17: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Setting quality targets

• External quality targets– Based on other companies in the same industry or

on the industry average– Benchmarks by consultancy firms / associations– The case of ISO benchmarks:

• the ISO 900 family of standards• benefits of ISO certification: controversial

insights

17

Page 18: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Setting quality targets

• Internal quality targets– Based on past performance or internal

benchmarking– The six sigma approach:

• improve processes to achieve an extraordinarily high-conformance quality level, near perfection

• aim to reduce process variability that causes defects and undermines customer satisfaction

• five ‘DMAIC’ steps18

Page 19: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

The five ‘DMAIC’ steps

19

Define project with strong business case – problem and

objectives

Measure current performance using reliable

data

Analyse root problem – and any cause and effect

relationships

Improve the process through generating and implementing

solutions targeted at critical process

Control the process to ensure

sustainable performance

Page 20: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

TQM• TQM: permanent and integrated effort across the

entire organization to excel in all customer-relevant quality dimensions of products and services

• Customer satisfaction: TQM’s focus and ‘obsession’• Design quality:

– Meeting customers’ expectations + designing quality into the product and processes to prevent waste; prevent, rather than detect, defects

• Conformance quality

20

Page 21: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

TQM• Important tool: plan-do-check-act (PDCA) cycle, a systematic,

interactive approach to continuous improvement and problem solving

21

Examine what is causing

problem and suggest solution

Experiment with a solution

Examine results of different solutions

Implement solution if it works – or

return to plan stage

Page 22: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

TQM• Belief: costs of improving quality are more than

compensated by cost reductions from efficiency improvements and by revenue increases– But still needs to be confirmed!

• “Return on Quality” (ROQ) approach:– Concern that costs of some quality improvement

initiatives, or improving quality beyond a certain level, may exceed expected benefits

22

Page 23: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Quality and management accounting

Potential for significant involvement by management accounting

Helping to establish the present position of the organisation in relation to each area of quality chosen

Costing the present performance in order to reveal the potential for improvementThrough cost reductionProfit improvement

Carrying out a post audit to demonstrate that savings are achieved

Regular reporting for management control

Page 24: MA Lecture Week 21 - Quality

Quality and management accounting

Monitoring measures selected in order to check that improvement is taking place.

Financial measuresFocus managers’ attention on the costs of poor qualityAssist in problem solving by comparing costs and

benefits of different quality improvement programs and setting priorities for cost reduction

Non-Financial measuresDirect attention to physical processes and to areas that

need improvementProvide immediate short-term feedback on whether

quality improvement efforts are succeedingProvide useful indicators of future long-term

performance