machine-detector interface (mdi) report
DESCRIPTION
Machine-Detector Interface (MDI) report. Presented by M. Weaver, SLAC. Operational issues radiation aborts background monitoring Background extrapolations model comparisons to performance simulations vulnerabilities IP characterization measurements. Jan 2007. Mar 2007. May 2007. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Operational issuesOperational issues radiation aborts
background monitoring
Background extrapolationsBackground extrapolations model comparisons to performance
simulations
vulnerabilities
IP characterization measurementsIP characterization measurements
Machine-Detector Interface (MDI) reportMachine-Detector Interface (MDI) report
Presented by M. Weaver, SLAC
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Run-6 radiation-abort historyRun-6 radiation-abort historyB. Petersen
S. Curry
<stable-beam trips> ~ 2.8/day
Jan2007
May2007
Sep2007
Jul2007
Mar2007
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
ForwardWest
ForwardEast
BackwardWest
BackwardEast
Abort-by-dose locationAbort-by-dose location
HER vacuum events
Jan2007
May2007
Sep2007
Jul2007
Mar2007
Jan2007
May2007
Sep2007
Jul2007
Mar2007
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Background Monitoring SummaryBackground Monitoring Summary
SVTRAD diodes + diamondsSVTRAD diodes + diamonds dose rates, dose / injectiondose rates, dose / injection
DCH high voltageDCH high voltage currentcurrent
DRC PMTsDRC PMTs scaler ratesscaler rates
IFR high voltageIFR high voltage currentcurrent
Fast Control & TimingFast Control & Timing deadtime, L1 rates, deadtime, L1 rates, time wrt injectiontime wrt injection
Level 3 TriggerLevel 3 Trigger subdetector occupanciessubdetector occupancies
Neutron counters Neutron counters scaler ratesscaler rates
CsI IP detectorsCsI IP detectors (logarithmic response)(logarithmic response)
All update in small intervals (1-5 seconds)All update in small intervals (1-5 seconds)
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Run-6 radiation-dose ratesRun-6 radiation-dose ratesD
ose
rate
(m
rad
/s)
Pre
ssu
re (
nT
)
Incoming HERVacuum
BW DiamondBE Diamond
Incoming LERVacuum
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Injection- & trickle- background historyInjection- & trickle- background history
Monitor by integrating SVTRAD diode signals over 12 ms after each injection
SVT electronics are sometimes “upset” by exposures greater than 50 mrad / injection.
HER injection-quality monitor
LERLER injection-quality monitor
Ave
rage
Dos
e/In
ject
ion
(m
rad
)
Ave
rage
Dos
e/In
ject
ion
(m
rad
)
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
DIRC PMT Scaler RateDIRC PMT Scaler Rate
DIRC reconstruction has been shown to be robust up to 1MHz
hit rate.
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Detector Occupancies (%)Detector Occupancies (%)S
VT
Lay
er 1
Eas
t
SV
T L
ayer
1 W
est
DC
H T
otal
EM
C T
otal
Tuned noise thresholds and tightened time
windows
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Background sources in PBackground sources in PEEP-IIP-II
Beam-gas (bremsstrahlung + Coulomb)Beam-gas (bremsstrahlung + Coulomb)
HEB only: BHbg ~ IH * (pH0 + PH
Dyn * IH) Note: p0 = f(T) !
LEB only: BLbg ~ IL * (pL0 + PL
Dyn * IL) Note: p0 = f(T) !
beam-gas x- term: BLHbg ~ cLH * IL * IH (LEB+HEB, out of collision) (?)
Luminosity (radiative-Bhabha debris) – Luminosity (radiative-Bhabha debris) – major concern as L major concern as L BP ~ dP * L (strictly linear with L)
Beam-beam tailsBeam-beam tails
from LER tails: BL, bb ~ IL * fL(L,H +/-)
from HER tails: BH, bb ~ IH * fH(L,H +/-)
Trickle background: BTrickle background: BLi Li ,, BBHiHi (injected-beam quality/orbit + beam-beam)
Touschek: BTouschek: BLTLT (signature somewhat similar to bremstrahlung; so far small)Still using characterization of Jan’04
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Projected DAQ Requirements/PerformanceProjected DAQ Requirements/PerformanceP
roce
ssin
g T
ime
Fiber TransferFeature Extraction
Pro
cess
ing
Tim
eThreshold tuning
and window tightening
upgraded
upgraded
L1
Rat
e (H
z)
Time
7.0kHz “ceiling”
5.8kHz average
upgraded
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
SVTSVT Integrated dose will be more than 1 Mrad/year
Backward:
Forward:
TopEast West Bottom
TopEast West Bottom
NO
W20
0420
0520
0620
07
Background will be 50% HER, 50% L
Background strongly - dependent
Predict 80% chip occupancy right in
MID-plane
In layer 1, 10% will be above 20% occupancy
Projected Detector OccupanciesProjected Detector Occupancies
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Background model comparisonsBackground model comparisons(measured/model)(measured/model)
Bwd East Dose Rate Bwd West Dose Rate
Lots of vacuum work during pre-Run6 downtime resulted in a long
time to scrub.
HER vacuum performance still better than
predictions from Jan’04 characterization.
Rat
io
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
DCH Background L1 Trigger Rate
Background model comparisonsBackground model comparisons(measured/model)(measured/model)
Trigger rate somewhat larger than characterization. Results in higher
deadtime.
Run6 backgrounds still consistent with characterization.
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
DRC Background
Background model comparisonsBackground model comparisons(measured/model)(measured/model)
Large fluctuations but tolerable
in this subdetector.
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Machine Background SimulationsMachine Background Simulations
Long effort to simulate sources of machine backgrounds to Long effort to simulate sources of machine backgrounds to improve understandingimprove understanding
Added interest from future B-factory designersAdded interest from future B-factory designers
Difficulty integrating toolsDifficulty integrating tools
LER model was completed long ago and simulated with not-LER model was completed long ago and simulated with not-so-satisfactory results. Problems uncovered generating so-satisfactory results. Problems uncovered generating HER model. At long last, HER model is consistent among HER model. At long last, HER model is consistent among the tools. Ready to simulate and analyse.the tools. Ready to simulate and analyse.
Analysis may learn something in time to compare against Analysis may learn something in time to compare against machine operation but benefit is unknown.machine operation but benefit is unknown.
AcceleratorDesign(MAD)
PrimaryInteractions
(Turtle)
Secondary Interactions+ Detector Response
(GEANT)
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Detector VulnerabilitiesDetector Vulnerabilities
Readout DeadtimeReadout Deadtime
Inefficiencies, backgrounds (combinatorics)Inefficiencies, backgrounds (combinatorics)
DamageDamage
SVT
Total
DCH
EMT
Extrapolation (5.8kHz)
x2 Background (7kHz)
BaBar experts are estimating worst tolerable conditions
A tightened “emergency” A tightened “emergency” trigger configuration is trigger configuration is ready, just in case…ready, just in case…
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
IP CharacterizationIP Characterization
Use BaBar’s tracking resolution and prime venue for Use BaBar’s tracking resolution and prime venue for measuring important parameters at the IPmeasuring important parameters at the IP
Three analyses each measuring y, *y
dLumi / dz vertexing e+e- and +- events
yLumi(z) +- events
y’Lumi(z) +- events
(resolution)Production vertices (x,y,z ~ 30m)
Boost trajectories ( ~ 0.6 mrad)
e- beam
e+ beam
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
BaBar IP measurements reported onlineBaBar IP measurements reported online
Luminous RegionLuminous Region centroids { x, y, z}
sizes { x, z } every 10 minutes
tilts { dx/dz, dy/dz }
dL/dz fit { z, *y, zw, zc} every ~hour
Boost TrajectoryBoost Trajectory mean { x’, y’ } every 10 minutes
spread { x’HER, y’HER } every 30 minutes
}
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
VRF
z (
mm
)
Bunch Length Extraction from dBunch Length Extraction from dLL/dz Fits/dz Fits
BaBar Run
z2 = 10.3 mm2 ± 0.4 mm2
z H ,10.9 mm10.4 mm
10.8 mm ± 0.2 mmz L ,
± 0.2 mm
y* = 13mm
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
dL /dz
IP Beta Function Measurements
yL
y’B
PEPphase
advance2
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Summary (I)Summary (I)
Expect a painful scrubbing process at the beginning of Run7.Expect a painful scrubbing process at the beginning of Run7.Lots of HER arc vacuum work done to remedy source ofLots of HER arc vacuum work done to remedy source ofabort-inducing vacuum events.abort-inducing vacuum events.
Injection backgrounds sometimes problematic but generally Injection backgrounds sometimes problematic but generally under-control under-control
Stored-beam bgds (dose rate, data quality, dead time) Stored-beam bgds (dose rate, data quality, dead time) Some differences from run5 but similar magnitude. No new thermal outgassing/vacuum activity near the detector.
Background characterizationBackground characterization No new experiments. Too late in the game to repeat, no time
for hardware interventions. Latest measures of the projected backgrounds still look good. Uncertain about beam-beam backgrounds – Run5 experiment
suggested not so large, Run6 experience somewhat different.
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Summary (II)Summary (II)
SimulationSimulation After a long struggle, ready to analyze HER backgrounds.
BaBar-based IP characterizationBaBar-based IP characterization Incorporating effects of coupling
Working on including X-ray and SL beam profile monitors
M. Weaver PEP-II MAC Review,15-17 Nov’07
Spare SlidesSpare Slides