making a sound economic case for investment in …
TRANSCRIPT
B U I L D I N G P R O S P E R O U S C I T I E ST H E R O L E O F ‘ N A T U R A L C A P I T A L ’ A N D ‘ G R E E N I N F R A S T R U C T U R E ’2 7 T H S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 6
M A K I N G A S O U N D E C O N O M I C C A S E F O R I N V E S T M E N T I N G R E E N I N F R A S T R U C T U R E
D R J I M C O L E M A N , H E A D O F E C O N O M I C S – B U R O H A P P O L D E N G I N E E R I N G
MAKING A SOUND ECONOMIC CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
I N T R O D U C T I O N
2
Infrastructure is complex and often controversial
Successful, growing cities need a fully functioning infrastructure platform
Infrastructure spending = 3.8% of global GDP: 3.4trillion USD p.a. by 2030
Green Infrastructure is one component of this platform
MAKING A SOUND ECONOMIC CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
I N F R A S T R U C T U R E S E C TO R S & E L E M E N T S
3
Transport & Mobility− Roads & Bridges− Transit – road, rail, air, water
Technology & Comms− Wired & wireless
Energy− Electricity generation− Gas− Renewables
Water− Water supply− Wastewater− Flood control
Waste− Solid waste− Hazardous waste
Green Infrastructure− Parks and gardens − Amenity Greenspace − Natural and semi-natural urban greenspaces
Social infrastructure− Healthcare− Education − Community
MAKING A SOUND ECONOMIC CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
D E L I V E R I N G I N F R A S T R U C T U R E I N A S T R AT E G I C WAY
4
5
P R I O R I T Y I N F R A S T R U C T U R E F O R U R B A N D E V E LO P M E N TF R A M E W O R K
Alignment/ synergy with regional/ government
infrastructure Project(s)…
Backbone/ Must-have infrastructure to enable
development of any form…
Infrastructure needed to leverage ‘quick wins’/
tactical opportunities…
Infrastructure needed to accelerate Parcel B
development…
2
Energy Water Waste Telecom Landfill …
District utilities Land clearing Landscape/ Open space
Regional Transit Regional roads Regional utilities
Streets/ Hardscape
Temporary facilities
Site strip Bulk earthworks Haul road Site compound …
Central Park River restoration …
HSR alignment Regional LRT line &
spur …
Regional highways connecting to existing
Bridges Grade separated
junctions …
Regional utilities upgrade
Gas Power Telecoms Potable water …
Primary street network
Secondary street network
…
Central park car park Tree and planting
nursery …
1
LON
G L
IST
LON
G L
IST
LON
G L
IST
LON
G L
IST
LON
G L
IST
LON
G L
IST
LON
G L
IST
LON
G L
IST
District utilities Land clearing Landscape/ Open space Regional transit Regional roads Regional
utilitiesStreets/
HardscapeTemporary
facilities
3
SHORT-LIST… SHORT-LIST… SHORT-LIST… SHORT-LIST… SHORT-LIST… SHORT-LIST… SHORT-LIST… SHORT-LIST…
Refined Development area phasing…Updated infrastructure shortlist…
6COST
Potential to unlock development yielding higher commercial
return…
Potential to unlock development yielding higher
economic impact…
Phasing Considerations
District utilities Land clearing Landscape/ Open space Regional Transit Regional roads Regional
utilitiesStreets/
HardscapeTemporary
facilities
5
4
INFRASTRUCTURE TYPOLOGIES AND LONG LIST
KEY STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS
PROVISIONAL SHORT LIST
PHASED PRIORITY INFRASTRUCTURE SHORTLIST
PRIORITY INFASTRUCTURE TYPOLOGIES FOR 2016 & 2017
KEY:BENEFIT
ENABLING INFRASTRUCTURE
MAKING A SOUND ECONOMIC CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
E C O N O M I C C A S EPA RT O F A F U L L B U S I N E S S C A S E
6
Basic principles:
Who is making the case?
To whom?
For what?
Assessment?
Public to public
Private to public
Public to private
Private to private
MAKING A SOUND ECONOMIC CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
A P P R OA C H E S & G U I D A N C E
• Standard guidance– E.g. HM Treasury Green Book– HCA Additionality Guide
• Standard indicators– Employment, incomes, GDP, GNP, GVA
• Non-standard socio-economic measures– Environment/green space– Health related impacts– Education related impacts– Wellbeing/welfare related impacts
MAKING A SOUND ECONOMIC CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
B U S I N E S S C A S EO V E R V I E W A N D A P P R O A C H
8
Strategic Case
•The case for intervention that provides a holistic fit with the strategic and policy priorities
•National/ local policy and strategic fit
Economic Case
•Public value/ benefit of the intervention and government investment
•Public costs and benefits analysis•Demonstration of public benefit through qualitative and quantitative analysis•Key metrics1: CBA/ CBR; VfM; Employment impact; GDP impact; GNI impact etc.• Indirect and induced impacts
Commercial Case
•Demonstrating that the intervention will result in a viable procurement and attractive deal for the market
• Implementation efficiency•Procurement strategy and delivery schedule
Financial Case
•The intervention is affordable for the public sector and can be funded through a viable financial arrangement
•Financial model•Funding sources
Management Case
•The project can be implemented using best practices in programme and project management.
•Delivery Plan•Project management team and qualifications•Benefit realisation and contract management plan•Ex-ante evaluation strategy
1 2 3 4 5
Source: HMG Treasury Green Book Five Cases Model Guidance1 For abbreviations, refer to glossary of terms
MAKING A SOUND ECONOMIC CASE FOR INVESTMENT IN GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
OPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
T H E T E C H N I C A L E C O N O M I C C A S EA C R I T I C A L C O M P O N E N T O F T H E F U L L B U S I N E S S C A S E
9
Benefits valuation:
Range of attributable benefits? Monetisation – very challenging
for GI Stated preference (CV, WTP) Revealed preference (Hedonic
Pricing) Value Transfer Natural capital accounting
Discounted benefits Adjustments Net present value (NPV) Cost-Benefit Ratio (CBR)
CBR>2 Ideally?
Prosperous cities are resilient cities
Green infrastructure supports urban resilience• Climate adaptation• Reduced disaster risk• Carbon storage• Demographic change – inclusive
population growth• Health and wellbeing improvements• Productivity gains• Co-benefits (+ multiple benefits)
10
G R E E N I N F R A S T R U C T U R E & U R B A N R E S I L I E N C E
Prosperous cities are resilient cities
What does the counterfactual or ‘do nothing’ scenario look like• Net additional impact• Alleviating or avoiding risks by
investing in green infrastructure• Risk mitigation planning• Reduced CAPEX from green
infrastructure – higher long term return and more cost effective
• Improved CBR?
11
G R E E N I N F R A S T R U C T U R E & U R B A N R E S I L I E N C E
12
F I N A N C I N G G R E E N I N F R A S T R U C T U R EF I N A N C I A L & C O M M E RC I A L C A S E S
Value capture through real estate development
Exploiting the relationship between GI and other elements of the urban infrastructure platform
Improves financial return & CBR Transport and mobility
• Enabling access to green infrastructure
• Increasing economic returns from transport investment
• Enhancing financing opportunities and cross-subsidy
Housing Energy and water supply/management
13
M A X I M I S I N G T H E E C O N O M I C C A S E F O R G R E E N I N F R A S T R U C T U R E
BUSINESS CASEMALAYSIA VISION VALLEY- PARCEL B JUNE 2016COPYRIGHT © 1976-2016 BUROHAPPOLD ENGINEERING. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
B U I L D I N G P R O S P E R O U S C I T I E ST H E R O L E O F ‘ N A T U R A L C A P I T A L ’ A N D ‘ G R E E N I N F R A S T R U C T U R E ’2 7 T H S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 6
M A K I N G A S O U N D E C O N O M I C C A S E F O R I N V E S T M E N T I N G R E E N I N F R A S T R U C T U R E
D R J I M C O L E M A N , H E A D O F E C O N O M I C S – B U R O H A P P O L D E N G I N E E R I N G