march 4, 2014 • seafood processors association, seattle wa · - social, environmental, oh&s...

15
Ethical Sourcing March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA 1

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA

1

Page 2: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

Scheme Organization

• Ethical Sourcing Code, 2nd edition

- Social, Environmental, OH&S

• Appendices:

1. Certification Assessment Requirements

2. Implementation and Auditing Guide

Glossary of Terms and Definitions

3. Audit Methodology

4. Auditor Competency

Page 3: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

Major Changes, 2nd ed.

• Better alignment of requirements / guidance with

internationally recognized standards (e.g., ISO

14001, OHSAS 18001)

- Supports certification if desired

• Emphasis on compliance with national, state/

provincial/ local laws vs. int’l. conventions - Expanded / strengthened OH&S requirements

• Three certification levels reflecting sensitivity to

resource constraints of small locations

• Greater emphasis on continual improvement

Page 4: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

Major Changes continued

• Audit methodology patterned after SQF Code

- Scoring – major, minor, critical nonconformities

- Minimum score for certification

- Requirements for root cause analysis and

corrective / preventive actions

- Annual recertification

- Movement between levels

• Drafted auditor qualifications and developed an

auditor training program

• Added business management principles for

senior management.

Page 5: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

Assessment Requirements Example – Appendix I

12.0 Checking to Support Continual ES Performance Improvement (Continued) [Reference: ES Code §4.5]

Requirements Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

12.4 Does the

organization

have a

procedure for

identifying and

documenting

corrective and

preventive

actions?

The organization has developed and

implemented a procedure(s) to guide root

cause identification and the development of

corrective and preventive actions with regard

to deviations from policies/ procedures,

accidents, incidents, employee concerns,

internal audits findings, etc.

The procedure(s) indicates which appropriate

personnel have been assigned responsibility

by top management to assist in the

investigation and resolution of deviations and

consequences, especially in the areas of:

- supplier/ subcontractor issues,

- human resource/ social issues,

- employee concerns,

- environmental incidents, and

- occupational health and safety incidents.

The procedure(s) addresses how complaints

are to be recorded, tracked and closed out,

and provides guidance on evaluating the

effectiveness of corrective and preventive

actions.

All proposed corrective and

preventive actions are reviewed

through the risk assessment

process prior to implementation.

Post-incident investigations also

include a review of whether the

aspects/ impacts/ hazards/ risks

and controls were properly

evaluated (i.e., why they did not

prevent the incident from

occurring/ recurring).

Communication and training focusing on gaps identified are delivered at all site levels.

Scheduling of internal audits gives

consideration to whether ES-

related incidents are recurring.

(See §12.1.)

An incentive system is in place for management based on performance in relation to proactive and preventative remediation actions.

The types of incidents occurring

at the facility, as well as corrective

and preventive actions to prevent

recurrence, are shared with

relevant stakeholders during

periodic communications

meetings.

A process is in place to ensure

that results of supplier/

contractor audits and associated

corrective action plans are

factored into decisions for

selection and contract extension/

renewal. (See §5.0.)

Page 6: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

6

• Hazardous chemical inventory

• Noise prevention (community impact)

• Groundwater

• Land and soil

Auditing Guidance Appendix II

4.4 Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (EHS) Management Programs

4.4.1 Environmental Management Plan

The company shall evaluate and prioritize its environmental impacts and develop an Environmental

Management Plan (EMP) for priority Impacts identified through this process. The EMP must specify:

management objectives, targets and program activities intended to eliminate,

control and/or reduce priority impacts and to identify/ comply with applicable regulatory and other

requirements (e.g., trade association or community commitments). The tasks, time frames, resources

and responsibilities required to meet the nominated objectives and targets shall be identified. At a minimum,

the EMP shall include specific details on the following topics, if applicable to the scope of the organization’s ES Program:

4.4.1.1 Energy use and air emissions;

•Inventory energy usage and air emissions, including greenhouse gases (GHG) and ozone-depleting

substances (ODS).

4.4.1.2 Water consumption

4.4.1.3 Wastewater treatment and effluent

management

4.4.1.4 Waste management

•Proper identification and handling of waste containers

•Compliance with regulations/ ordinances governing on-site burning/ landfilling

•Implementation of recycling/ waste reduction programs

4.4.1.5 Pollution prevention

4.4.1.6 Land use and biodiversity - Impacts on the local environment and communities

Page 7: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

7

Implementation Guidance 4.4.1

What does it mean?

Environmental Management Plans (EMPs) relate to the significant or priority environmental impacts you have

identified through the initial Environmental Review and/or subsequent Management Reviews. Generally, they include

specific objectives and targets to be met within stated timeframes for the priority areas backed up by procedures to

eliminate, reduce and control the risks identified along with procedures for internal auditing and review. They also

will define the necessary records and documentation needed to demonstrate that the EMP is operating effectively.

What do I have to do?

Your Environmental Management Plan is the core of the systems management approach. It is the strategic plan for

key areas of environmental impacts caused by your business. Some EMPs are applicable to all businesses in the

agrifood chain, while others are specific to key stages, types of business or even geographical location.

In developing your EMP, you should focus on the following:

Where local regulations describe objective or targets, the supplier must ensure that these are utilized and met. Where

no regulatory requirement exists for the area of concentration, the supplier should utilize best industry practice.

Many countries have developed guidance on good agricultural practices. These can be used to help develop your

Environmental Management Plan. Food sectors in some countries also have developed environmental guidance.

See Annexes 3 and 4 for guidance on performing an environmental aspects and impacts analysis.

Auditing Guidance Appendix II

Page 8: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

8

Auditing Guidance Appendix II

Auditing Guidance 4.4.1

The auditor may look for evidence of:

1. A documented environmental management plan that includes objectives and targets for

achieving each area of concentration.

2. Objectives and targets which are relevant to the priority areas and capable of being

realized through the application of the documented procedures and management.

3. Procedures which are capable of eliminating or reducing the identified environmental

impacts to an acceptable level.

4. Operators following these procedures including those for normal, abnormal, accident and

emergency situations. This may mean that auditors will interview operators to evaluate

their understanding of procedures.

5. The documented plan must include energy use and air emissions, water consumption,

waste water treatment, waste management, pollution prevention and land use.

See Appendix 1, §7.0 for specific requirements related to Environmental Aspects/ Impacts

and EMPs.

See Appendix 1, §7.3 for details on graduated requirements (i.e., Levels 1, 2 and 3) for each

EMP aspect.

Page 9: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

Audit Methodology

Certification Levels* Appendix III

1. Awareness and Compliance

- Understanding of and compliance with applicable

laws and regulations

- Understanding of Environmental impacts and Social/

OH&S risks

2. Proactive Management/ Performance Improvement

- Management system-like approach

3. Leading Practices

- Best management practices

- Alignment with int’l. conventions where appropriate

* Sourcing organization or supplier selects desired level of certification.

Page 10: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

• Starting point is 100

Minor nonconformity = 1 point reduction

Major nonconformity = 10 point reduction

Critical nonconformity = 50 point reduction

• Minimum score for certification = 70*

Minor nonconformity - Omission or deficiency that produces unsatisfactory conditions that if

not addressed may lead to an ES-related risk but is not likely to cause

a system element breakdown

Major nonconformity - Omission or deficiency producing unsatisfactory conditions that carry

an ES-related risk and is likely to result in a system element

breakdown

Critical nonconformity - Breakdown of a critical control, regulatory requirement or process step

that is judged to cause a significant ES-related risk

* Certification to the ES Code is voluntary and is not required for SQF Code certification.

Audit Methodology Scoring – Appendix III

Page 11: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

• Pre-Assessment Audit: Gap analysis to determine

readiness. (Could be 1st, 2nd or 3rd party assessor.)

• Desk Audit: Performed by a registered SQF ES auditor

to determine if the ES plan and documentation are

appropriate for the selected level of certification, and

that the organization is ready for a certification audit.

• Facility Audit: On-site audit by a registered SQF ES

auditor to determine implementation/ effectiveness of

the requirements of the selected ES certification level.

Audit Methodology Audits – Appendix III

Page 12: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

Audit Methodology Duration – Appendix III

• Audit duration will be patterned after the SQF Code,

Edition 7. Factors that can impact on the audit

duration include:

- Scope of the audit (certification level)

- Size and complexity of the site/ operations

- Complexity of the ES system design/ documentation

- Whether the ES-related risks are considered to be

high or low

- Ease of communication with company personnel

(e.g., languages, distance, etc.)

- Cooperation of the organization’s personnel

Page 13: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

Auditor Competency - Appendix IV

• Qualifications for auditors based on the following

criteria:

- Education

- Professional Experience

- Audit Experience

- Knowledge, Skills and Abilities

- Competencies and Behaviors

• Requirements will be further defined by SQFI.

• Auditor certification is desirable (RABQSA/ IRCA).

Page 14: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

Ethical Sourcing

GSCP Code Alignment

Page 15: March 4, 2014 • Seafood Processors Association, Seattle WA · - Social, Environmental, OH&S • Appendices: 1. Certification Assessment Requirements 2. Implementation and Auditing

15

Robert Garfield Senior Vice President

Food Marketing Institute

[email protected]