margaret c. kenski, ph.d arizona opinion kate kenski, ph.d university of arizona

25
THE AFTER ELECTION POLITICAL LANDSCAPE Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Upload: beverly-russell

Post on 24-Dec-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

THE AFTER ELECTION POLITICAL

LANDSCAPE

Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.DArizona Opinion

Kate Kenski, Ph.DUniversity of Arizona

Page 2: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Overview

Introduction: The 49% nation

The 2012 election: What happened

The 2012 election: Why did it happen

The 2012 election: What does it mean for the future

Page 3: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

The 49% Nation

In 2000, the nation was divided.

In 2012, the national divisions continue.

The voting public is increasingly disenchanted with both parties.

The divisions are political and cultural.

Page 4: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Values Gap 10% values gap in 1987 between major party

identifiers has increased to 18% in 2012

2012 48% approve of gay marriage 53% agree that abortion should be legal 46% agree that immigrants threaten

American values 40% Independents, 31% Democrats, 27%

Republicans

Page 5: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Divisions within Parties

RepublicansRINOs versus Tea Party

DemocratsBlue Dog Democrats who are fiscally

conservative versus Progressives who support big government

Page 6: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Popular Vote by County

Page 7: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Historical StandardsObama Shouldn’t Have Won 52% say things are off on the wrong track 55% say economic conditions are poor, staying

the same, or getting worse 76% say the condition of the nation’s economy is

not-so-good or poor 43,000,000 Americans are on food stamps 7.9% are unemployed Avg household income has declined $4,000

since 2009 35% decline in the value of the avg middle class

family’s assets

Page 8: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

The 2012: What Happened Electoral College

2012: 332 Obama 206 Romney

2008: 365 Obama 173 McCain

House2012: 195 Democrats 234 Republicans 6 Undecided

2010: 193 Democrats 242 Republicans 0 Other

Senate2012: 53 Democrats 45 Republicans 2 Independents

2010: 51 Democrats 47 Republicans 2 Independents

Turnout (% of those eligible to vote who actually voted)2012: 57.5%

2008: 62.3%

2004: 60.4%

2000: 54.2%

Page 9: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

Total Obama Romney

Democrat 38% 92% 7%

Republican 32% 6% 93%

Independent or something else

29% 45% 50%

Page 10: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

Total Obama Romney

Male 47% 45% 52%

Female 53% 55% 44%

Total Obama Romney

White 72% 39% 59%

Black 13% 93% 6%

Hispanic/Latino 10% 71% 27%

Asian 3% 73% 26%

Other 2% 58% 38%

Page 11: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

Total Obama Romney

18-24 11% 60% 36%

25-29 8% 60% 38%

30-39 17% 55% 42%

40-49 20% 48% 50%

50-64 28% 47% 52%

65 and over 16% 44% 56%

Page 12: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

Total Obama Romney

No high school diploma

3% 64% 35%

High school graduate

21% 51% 48%

Some college/AA degree

29% 49% 48%

College grad 29% 47% 51%

Postgraduate study

18% 55% 42%

Page 13: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

2011 total family income

Total Obama Romney

Under $30K 20% 63% 35%

$30K-$49,999 21% 57% 42%

$50K-$99,999 31% 46% 52%

$100K-$199,999

21% 44% 54%

$200K-$249,999

3% 47% 52%

$250K or more 4% 42% 55%

Page 14: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

The 2012 Election: Why It Happened

Religious service attendance

Total Obama Romney

Weekly 42% 39% 59%

Occasionally 40% 55% 43%

Never 17% 62% 34%

Page 15: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Issues

Economy

Jobs

Immigration

GOP War on Women

Page 16: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Obama Gaffe: You didn’t build that

Page 17: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Romney Gaffe: 47%

Page 18: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Romney Killed My Wife Ad

Page 19: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

GOP War on Women

Page 20: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Campaign Factors

Obama defined Romney

Obama had a better ground game

Romney missed opportunities

Hurricane Sandy

Page 21: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Future Political Landscape Ultimately, voters opted for security over

economic freedom and less regulation.

56% of voters in OH and MI approved of the auto bailout.

Tax increase measures that affect large number of voters are opposed by the majority.

Page 22: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Future Political Landscape

Neither candidates nor voters endorse serious solutions

Only taxing those making over $250K enjoyed a majority of support.That would raise $80 billion with a $1.4 trillion

deficit.

National debt likely to rise to $20 trillion by 2016.

Page 23: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Future Political Landscape

Demographics have changed less than pundits proclaim.

Turnout raises the impact of some groups more than others.Low Evangelical turnout in 2008Low White turnout in 2012Gender gap probably less when other

factors like income and marital status are considered

Page 24: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Future Political Landscape

Young voters have somewhat different social values than their parents

Campaigns will continue to be negative because it works

Gridlock in Congress will lead to more government by regulations than by legislation

Page 25: Margaret C. Kenski, Ph.D Arizona Opinion Kate Kenski, Ph.D University of Arizona

Future Political Landscape

Trust in government is likely to remain low76% trusted federal government to do the right

thing in 1964

8% trust the government today

Social media will continue to increase in importance as campaign media