marginalizing access to the sustainable food system

17
Marginalizing Access to the Sustainable Food System: Examining Oakland’s Minority Districts Camille Tuason Mata Quadrant Fellowship Presentation October 13, 2010 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Upload: the-ecoplanning-institute

Post on 05-Dec-2014

691 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Quadrant Fellowship Presentation, October 13, 2010.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Marginalizing Access to the Sustainable Food System: Examining Oakland’s Minority Districts

Camille Tuason MataQuadrant Fellowship PresentationOctober 13, 2010University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

Page 2: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Existing Literature• Unequal access to food (marginalization)• Low intake of fresh foods: poor health conditions • Spatial access• Grocery store density• Weak transportation infrastructure• Low intake of fresh foods::high production levels

Page 3: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Research Question• How marginalized are minority residents in the West Oakland,

Fruitvale, and Chinatown districts from the sustainable food system?

Page 4: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Research Framework• What constitutes marginalization? How to measure

marginalization?• Spatial access

• Transportation network• Food venues• Grocery store density• Farmer’s markets• Urban and school yard gardens

• CSA drop-offs

• History • Minorities in American (organic) farming• CSAs drop-offs

• Participation• (organic) farming • Knowledge community

Page 5: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Study Site 1• 94607 (West Oakland): 50.8% African American (2000 U.S.

Census)

Page 6: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Study Site 2• 94607 (Chinatown): 26.7% Asian American (2000 U.S. Census)

Page 7: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Study Site 3• 94601 (Fruitvale): 49.6% Hispanic American (2000 U.S. Census)

Page 8: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Methodologies• Census data• Existing publications• Field observation• Farmer’s markets• Urban gardens• Grocery stores

• Surveys• Grocery store merchants

• Door to Door Surveys• Lower bottom residents

• Interviews• CSA farmers (phone)• WOFC (phone)

• OBUGs• Mo’ Better Foods• City Slickers Gardens• People’s Market

Page 9: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Research Findings• Unequal access to food differed across the three minority

districts:• West Oakland less food secure• Fruitvale and Chinatown sold foods from Asia and South America

• All grocery stores offered low volumes of organic foods.• Minority farmer participation is low.• Might affect their servicing minority neighborhoods

• CSA farms continue to service predominantly white neighborhoods.• Distribution scale to minority district neighborhoods constrained

by costs of delivery

Page 10: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System
Page 11: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System
Page 12: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System
Page 13: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System
Page 14: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System
Page 15: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System
Page 16: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Exceptions to marginalization• Social and environmental activists very involved in improving

access to organic foods:• School yard gardens• Urban food gardens• Organic farmer’s markets

• Extensive transportation network

Page 17: Marginalizing Access To The Sustainable Food System

Research gaps• Little data on minority participation in organic farming• Little effort to comprehensively map out the sustainable food

system• Exploring different ways to participate in CSA programs• How to retain interest in farmer’s markets