Marketing “evidence” to healthcare consumers: Applying social marketing to evidence about the

harms and benefits of pharmaceuticals

Presented byW. Douglas Evans, Ph.D.

Lauren McCormack, Ph.D., M.S.P.HPresented at

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Conference:Communicating Harms and Benefits of

Prescription Drugs to Healthcare Consumers Rockville, MD, September 13, 2006

RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute

RTI International ■ 701 13th Street, NW ■ Suite 750 ■ Washington, DC 20005Phone 202-728-2058 E-mail: devans@rti.orgFax 202-728-2095

2

What is Social Marketing?

Andreasen (1995) defines social marketing as “the application of proven concepts and techniques drawn from the commercial sector to promote changes in diverse socially important behaviors such as drug use, smoking, sexual behavior...This marketing approach has an immense potential to affect major social problems if we can only learn how to harness its power…”

3

Theoretical Foundations

Behavior change theorySCT (Bandura), TPB (Ajzen), Transtheoretical

Model (Prochaska) Message theory

Elaboration Likelihood (Petty, Cacioppo) Exposure theory

(Hornik) Marketing theory

(Kotler, Zaltman, and many others)

4

3 Basic Approaches

How to maximize audience exposure to messages?ChannelsLeverage

“Beg” for it – PSAs

“Buy” it – paid promotion (e.g., advertising)

“Borrow” it – earned media coverage

Most campaigns represent some combination

5

Social Marketing Strategies

Audience Segmentation

Targeting

Tailoring

Marketing Strategy 4 Ps – Place, Price, Product, Promotion Aspiration or social modeling Branding

Create a social movement

6

Social Marketing Wheel

Source: NCI 2002

7

Evidence of Effectiveness

Bottom line: Small effect sizes for social marketing, but potentially large population impacts

From 1999-2002, prevalence of smoking in young people in the US decreased from 25.3% to 18%, and

American Legacy Truth campaign was responsible for about 22% of that decrease

Small effect by clinical standards, but approximately 300,000 fewer youth smokers in the US

8

Evidence of Effectiveness (2)

Snyder & Hamilton (2002) reviewed recent US mass media campaigns: Average campaign accounted for 9% of favorable changes in health risk behavior, with highly variable results

“Non-coercive” campaigns (simply delivering health information) accounted for about 5% of the observed variation in behavior

Grilli et al. (2000) studied 17 recent European campaigns on several topics (HIV, nutrition, etc.) and found behaviors requiring one-time (or few) change are easier to promote than those that must be repeated and maintained.

Hornik (1997) and Snyder et al. (2003): Some examples (breastfeeding, vitamin A supplements, switching to 1% milk) have shown greater effect sizes and long-term maintenance.

9

Portion of Decline in Youth Smoking Attributable to truth®

Approximately 22% of total decline in youth smoking attributable to the “truth” campaign

Represents roughly 300,000 fewer youth smokers as a result of “truth”

28.0%26.8%

25.3%

22.6%

20.3%

18.0%

23.7%22.0%

19.6%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002

Trend in actual smoking

Predicted trend if truth did not exist

10

Social Marketing in Health Care

Some efforts to change consumer behavior, primarily through risk communicationGood examples from prostate & breast cancer

screening (McCormack et al., in press)

Very little published research on social marketing to change health care provider behavior

Recent work on understanding marketing by pharmaceutical firms to psychiatrists & physicians (Steinman, Bero et al., 2006)

11

Many Opportunities for Social Marketing in Health Care…

AHRQ purposes: Synthesize knowledge: Evidence-based Practice Centers

systematically review published & unpublished scientific evidence Generate knowledge: DEcIDE Research Network studies new

scientific evidence and analytic tools in an accelerated and practical format.

Translate knowledge: The John M. Eisenberg Clinical Decisions and Communications Science Center compiles the research results into a variety of useful formats for stakeholders.

Target Populations: Elderly – Medicare/Medicaid (SCHIP) Pregnant women and young children People with disabilities

12

Social Marketing Opportunities

All of these purposes and populations are currently targets of social marketing efforts by major funders (e.g., CDC, NIH, foundations)

Significant opportunities to apply social marketing

Goal is to identify social marketing strategies that can be translated to health care settingsReinforcement of messages/campaigns

Which ones seem most readily translatable?

13

What Strategies & Tactics Work in Social Marketing?

Countermarketing

Argument credibility and likeability

Theory-based change models

Social modeling & behavioral alternatives

Risk communication (with certain populations)

14

What Does NOT Work in Social Marketing

Negative messaging can be ineffective with specific audiences (young people)

High cost tradeoffs (loss of immediate, desirable lifestyle options in return for long-term health gains)

Ambiguous messages (do this, except when…)Evidence-based messages need to have clear

associated behaviors

Low exposure

15

Global Social Marketing Challenges

Increase in health issues competing for public attention (tobacco, obesity, drug abuse, HIV/AIDS)

Busy lifestyles, people’s time limitations, technology

Cluttered media environment for health information

Increase in the number and type of communication channels, including the Internet

Consumers & practitioners: Demands on time, multiple education/information sources, changing practice guidelines, fads in health promotion

16

Specific Challenges with Health Care Consumers

Informed decision making (or shared decision making) to address scientific uncertainty

Patient behavior change can be talking to your provider about pros and cons of different decisions

How to give providers discussion points to raise with patients?

How to give providers easy access to evidence & discussion points at point of patient contact (e.g., PDAs, pocket info)

After the discussion, the decision may be to do nothing (e.g., not get tested, at least not now)

Encourage additional learning about the clinical area

17

Case Studies

Following slides offer 4 brief examples from successful social marketing efforts that illustrate key principles of what works

Each example focuses on possible applications in health care

18

Case Study 1: Countermarketing

Counter-marketing is a strategy to deliver information to counter the effects of marketing by companies with competing interests (e.g., tobacco, pharmaceuticals)

Has been widely used in public health to promote population-level health behavior change and prevention (e.g., smoking)

Competition between messages: Countermarketers take away “market share” by providing more compelling facts, information, imagery (rational and affective appeals)

Recently, counter-marketing has been used to reach practitioners such as psychiatrists to counter pharmaceutical industry misinformation

19

Countermarketing - Competition

In tobacco control, countermarketing “brands” encourage non-smoking lifestyle (Evans et al., 2005)

Use persuasive imagery to sell non-smoking, counter to imagery used by industry to sell smoking as socially desirable

Countermarketers compete with tobacco industry marketing to take away “market share”

Encourage adoption of alternative behaviors to take away “market share” from the smoking behavior

20

Rebellion against industry

21

Potential Lessons for Health Care

Countermarketing offers strategies for dissemination of best practices (e.g., patient-provider communication)

Evidence of success in delivering rational arguments (tobacco use risks) with credible messages

Countermarketing could deliver credible science-based information to consumers to counter inaccurate messages or promote informed decisions (e.g., Medicare Part D)

Countermarketing could counter misleading pharmaceutical marketing to practitioners and reinforce other information such as CME, conferences, publications

22

Case Study 2: Credibility & Likeability

Message theory suggests people must engage in “elaboration” (agree with a message’s arguments) for persuasion to occur (Petty & Cacioppo 1986)

Elaboration has both cognitive (rational) and affective (emotional) aspects – credibility & likeability

Effective social marketing campaigns use targeted and/or tailored messages to affect behavioral factors

23

Effectiveness of Targeted Messages

Evidence that targeted message strategies used in countermarketing influence specific attitudes and beliefs.

Sly et al. (2002) found teens with high levels of anti-tobacco industry attitudes promoted by the Florida TRUTH campaign were 4 times less likely to initiate smoking and more than 13 times less likely to become established smokers.

Ohio stand campaign (Hersey, et al., 2006) followed youth over an 18 month period and found reduced likelihood of initiation among 15-17 year olds that self-reported campaign awareness.

Consortium to Lower Obesity in Chicago Children (CLOCC) has developed a clinic- and community-based intervention – 5-4-3-2-1 Go! – that targets specific nutrition and physical activity behaviors for multicultural audiences (Evans et al., in press)

24

The stand Campaign

25

stand Awareness and Smoking Uptake

Y1 Never Smokers who Tried Smoking at Y3

9.5%

6.5%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

Aware ofstand

Not Aware

Longitudinal Survey: Time 1 (Y1) - Time 3 (Y3)

Never Smokers at Y1

Aware of stand at Y1 - Less likely to try smoking at Time 3 6.5% vs. 9.5% or 44% less uptake

26

Potential Lessons for Health Care

Social marketing messages for health care (e.g., immunization, screening) should be delivered to consumers by trusted sources that enhance credibility

Consumers are more likely to change behavioral precursors and health care behaviors if messages are credible, likeable, and have source credibility.

Providers have a unique opportunity to serve as trusted sources for some target audiences (provider-to-patient population relationship may be important in multicultural, low income, etc., settings)

27

Case Study 3: Theory-based Behavior Change Models

Social marketers use theory to identify behavioral determinants that can be modified.

For example, social marketing aimed at obesity might use theory to identify connections between behavioral determinants of poor nutrition, such as: Eating habits within the family, Availability of food with high calorie and low nutrient density

(junk food) in the community Glamorization of fast food in advertising

Social marketers use such factors to construct conceptual frameworks that model complex pathways from messages to changes in behavior

28

Example Behavior Change Model

1. Social MarketingInitiatives

National 5-A-Daycampaign

Messages forAfrican Americans& Hispanics

Health promotionvalue of fruits andvegetables

2. Exposure to 5-A-Day Message

Audienceawareness

Messagereceptivity

3. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs

• Belief in health promotionvalue of fruits andvegetables

• Attitude that consumingmore fruits andvegetables is good

• Intention to consumemore

4. Behavior

Consuming5 servingsof fruits andvegetablesevery day

29

Promotion of Evidence-based Nutrition & PA Using Theoretical Framework

30

Example Theoretical Frameworks

Social cognitive theory (Bandura 1986): Modeling a positive, nonsmoking lifestyle encourages emulation

Countermarketing campaigns can effectively project images of socially desirable behavioral choices (lifestyle)

Social images projected by Legacy Truth campaign are of coolness & popularity of non-smoking (Evans, et al. 2005)

Science-based messages presented in appealing, culturally appropriate way are better received (Evans et al., in press)

Additional evidence from public health: Hornik et al. (2003): ONDCP anti-drug campaign Huhman et al. (2004): VERB: It’s What You Do campaign

31

Potential Lessons for Health Care

Health care consumer behavior can be changed through underlying behavior change principles

For example, health care choices can be portrayed as socially desirable while also providing accurate, science-based facts and information

Science-based information can be made appealing

Opportunity to merge behavior change theory and health science dissemination & translation fields

32

Case Study 4: Risk Communication About Pharmaceuticals

Recent research on marketing/promotion of gabapentin (anti-epileptic drug (AED)) to prescribers (psychiatrists) & consumers (mood disorder patients)

Settlement between Pfizer (former Warner-Lambert) and NAAG provides insight into industry marketing (document discovery)

Promotion generally ignored evidence base for appropriate prescription, put consumers at undue risk

How can social marketing - dissemination of evidence to prescribers and consumers - counteract this?

33

Gabapentin Marketing

Continuing Medical EducationWarner-Lambert used CME events at which

speakers could communicate directly to physicians

Advisory Boards & Consultant Meetings Informal exploratory & concept testing “research”

Research Strategy & Publications Disseminate through publication as promotion tool

34

Evidence-based AED Dissemination Model

35

Potential Lessons for Health Care

Pharmaceuticals using many of same marketing strategies proven effective in social marketing

Countermarketing could target both physicians and consumers

Physicians reached through dissemination of evidence-based drug information: CMEs, conferences, Web-based dissemination, pocket cards, PDA applications

Publication of evidence base on gabapentin & drug class

Consumers reached through mass media (Web), physician-patient interaction (mediated communication)

36

Some Principles of Effective Communication

Personalize risk data -- use stories, narratives, and anecdotes

Use graphics and other pictorial materials to clarify messages

Be sensitive to local norms, such as culture, speech, and dress

Use a variety of approaches such as written, oral, and electronic

Use clear, non-technical “plain” language appropriate to the target audience (www.plainlanguage.gov)

37

Conclusion: Implications of Social Marketing for Health Care Practice

Social marketing can be useful in health care practice

Evidence on social marketing suggests underlying principles can influence health care consumer decision making through multiple strategies

Health care setting provides a unique opportunity to reinforce messages aimed to consumers through brief counseling

As a trusted source, practitioners’ reinforcement of social marketing messages adds value beyond the effects of mass communication

38

Questions/comments?

W. Douglas Evans, Research Triangle Institute, devans@rti.org, 202-728-2058