gambling-related harms evidence review

202
1 Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

Upload: others

Post on 17-Nov-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Gambling-related harms evidence review

1

Gambling-related harms evidence review

Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

1

Contents

Executive summary 3

Background 3

Methods 3

Results 3

Discussion and implications 6

1 Introduction 7

11 Background and aims 7

12 Methods 7

13 COVID-19 9

2 Overall gambling participation 10

21 Introduction 10

22 Overall gambling participation by type of activity 10

23 Overall gambling participation by age and sex 13

24 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification 19

25 Overall gambling participation by economic activity 21

27 Overall gambling participation by Index of Multiple Deprivation 25

28 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity 28

29 Overall gambling participation by region 29

210 Overall gambling participation by local authority 31

211 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health 32

212 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction 34

213 Overall gambling participation by wellbeing 35

214 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12 39

215 Overall gambling participation by BMI group 41

216 Overall gambling participation by alcohol consumption 42

217 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking 44

3 At-risk and problem gambling 46

31 Introduction 46

32 Problem and at-risk gambling according to PGSI by age and sex 47

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

2

33 At-risk gambling 49

34 Problem gambling 61

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling 74

4 Gambling frequency 79

41 Introduction 79

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months 79

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers 81

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume 82

5 Hospital admissions 85

51 Introduction 85

52 HES admissions due to gambling 85

6 Previously published sources of gambling data 86

61 Affected others 86

62 Treatment 90

63 Attitudes and influences 95

64 Children and young people 99

7 Discussion 107

71 Strengths and limitations 108

8 References 109

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority 110

Introduction 110

Results 110

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling 116

Introduction 116

Data source 116

Appendix C Confidence limits 131

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

3

Executive summary

Background

In the UK there has been increasing concern about the harms associated with

gambling

Public Health England (PHE) was commissioned to review the evidence for the

prevalence determinants and harms associated with gambling and to estimate the

social and economic burden of gambling-related harms in England

To support the objectives of the PHE evidence review this report brings together a

range of quantitative data sources that seek to estimate gambling involvement and

gambling-related harms among the general population

Methods

The first part of the review focuses on a 4 year combined and weighted dataset from the

Health Survey for England (HSE) which presents new analysis undertaken for this

review The second part focuses on previously published sources of gambling data

bringing these together for the first time to address questions not met by the HSE

survey

Results

Gambling participation

In England 245 million people (half of the adult population) gamble each year

Participation in the National Lottery is the most common type of gambling except among

younger people where scratchcards are more common Football pools and playing

electronic gaming machines are much more prevalent gambling activities among people

under 35 years of age compared to older age groups

Overall men are more likely to participate in gambling and this sex difference is marked

for online gambling where 15 of men participate compared to 4 of women Since

2012 overall gambling prevalence has fluctuated Participation in the National Lottery

declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However participation in other gambling

activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015 before falling back to 40 in the

most recent HSE survey Online gambling (excluding the National Lottery) has increased

from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

4

Harmful gambling

The most commonly used screening tools categorise gambling-related harm as either

low-risk moderate-risk or problem gambling The levels of gambling are defined as

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

More specifically problem gambling is typically defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits In 2018 the

HSE estimated that 05 of the population were problem gamblers This is a reduction

from 09 in 2015 (although since the numbers are very small this does not represent a

real decline) However the proportion of gamblers who experience low levels of

gambling-related problems is increasing

It is important to note that a recent YouGov study found a significantly different

prevalence of 13 of the population experiencing some level of gambling harm

compared to 4 from a combined version of the HSE1 An assessment of both sources

concluded that HSE likely underestimated the true prevalence in the population

Profile of gamblers

Overall the highest rates of gambling participation are reported among people who have

higher academic qualifications are employed and among relatively less deprived

groups There are disproportionately more people classified as lsquoat-riskrsquo or lsquolow-riskrsquo

lsquomoderate-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo among men in younger age groups However

the socio-demographic profile of gamblers appears to change as the level of gambling

risk increases from low-risk to problem gambling Harmful gambling is associated with

people who are unemployed and among people living in more deprived areas

Gambling and the risk of gambling-related harm also appear to be associated with

psychological and physical health Overall the highest levels of gambling participation

are reported by people who report better general psychological health (on the short

general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)) and higher life satisfaction In contrast people

1 This version of the HSE combined the health surveys for England Scotland and Wales

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

5

describing poorer psychological health are less likely to report gambling participation

Again this reverses for problem gambling with higher prevalence among people with

poor health low life satisfaction and wellbeing and especially for people where there is

an indication of probable psychological health problems

The health behaviour profile for gambling was inconclusive for BMI (Body Mass Index)

status and cigarette smoking But there is a clear and strong association between

gambling at all levels of harm and increasing alcohol consumption This gradient is

evident for overall gambling participation and becomes steeper for at-risk and problem

gambling There is a particularly high level of gambling risk for people consuming 50

units of alcohol or more per week

Finally harmful gambling has a very different activity profile to general gambling It

includes low National Lottery participation and high participation in online gambling

including

bull slots

bull casino and bingo games

bull electronic gambling machines in bookmakers

bull sports and other event betting

bull betting exchanges

bull dog racing

At-risk gamblers are significantly more likely than general gamblers to participate in

online gambling

Overall demographic factors particularly sex appear to predict at-risk gambling

behaviour more than economic factors such as income employment and relative

deprivation Poor mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling than both poor

physical health and negative health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

Affected others treatment attitudes and influences and children and young people

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were found to be negatively

affected by someone elsersquos gambling Affected others are more likely to be women

reflecting the association between problem gambling and men Among affected others

immediate family members felt the most severe impacts of problem gambling

Just over 9000 people received treatment from the National Gambling Treatment

Service (NGTS) in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This represents only a small

fraction of problem gamblers in England This was the highest number of people treated

since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

6

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged The proportion of children and young people who participate in any

gambling has been reducing Boys are more likely to gamble than girls and the rate

increases with age Fruit and slot (electronic gaming) machines were often identified as

the first experiences of gambling among children and young people Playing the National

Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most common forms

of gambling reported But as the young people got older there was a significant increase

in online gambling among men

The rates of gambling among children and young people are lower than drinking alcohol

but higher than using e-cigarettes smoking tobacco cigarettes or taking illegal drugs

There is a potential relationship between these other harmful activities and gambling

Compared with children who have not gambled those who have spent their own money

on gambling are more likely to have also consumed alcohol taken drugs or smoked

either a tobacco cigarette or an e-cigarette

Discussion and implications

The main findings of this report are that

bull half the population currently gamble with 05 of the population experiencing the

highest level of harm

bull people who are classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo are disproportionately

younger men

bull socioeconomic and health inequalities persist among people classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and

lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo

bull alcohol is very strongly associated with gambling

bull a significant proportion of the population (7) are negatively affected by someone

elsersquos gambling

The previously published sources discussed in the second part of the report vary in the

type and quality of gambling data available Gambling is a relatively new field of

research and inconsistencies in the robustness and standardisation of the publications

and data available are to be expected However all sources included are encouraging

additions to the existing body of work This inconsistency in data quality and the

absence of longitudinal data are a major gap in the evidence base to be addressed in

future research and data collection

No data here takes into account the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on

gambling behaviour Public Health England (PHE) has published a rapid evidence

review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

7

1 Introduction

11 Background and aims

Concern about the harms associated with gambling has been increasing in the UK In

response in March 2018 the PHE remit letter from Health Minister Steve Brine

confirmed PHErsquos priorities for 2018 to 2019 This included the request for PHE to ldquoinform

and support action on gambling-related harm as part of the follow up to the Department

for Digital Culture Media amp Sport-led (DCMS) review of gaming machines and social

responsibilityrdquo (1)

In May 2018 DCMS published their response to the consultation on proposals for

changes to gaming machines and social responsibility measures In it they announced

that ldquoPHE will conduct an evidence review of the health aspects of gambling-related

harm to inform action on prevention and treatmentrdquo (2)

To fulfil this commitment 2 complementary evidence reviews were undertaken

1 The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) carried out a mapping review of

the literature on the effectiveness of national and international polices and

interventions to reduce gambling-related harms (3)

2 PHE has undertaken a broader evidence review on the prevalence of gambling and

associated health harms and social and economic burden

This report presents the findings of the quantitative analysis aspect of the work

conducted by PHE only It is one of 7 technical reports that inform the broader evidence

review The aim is to describe the prevalence characteristics associations and harms

associated with gambling as described in the scope (4) of the high-level protocol

Specifically this report aims to

bull describe the prevalence of gambling and gambling-related harms in England by

socio-demographic characteristics geographical distribution and year

bull identify the determinants of gambling and harmful gambling

12 Methods

To begin the project we undertook a search of common databases websites and other

online resources (for example Office for National Statistics NHS Digital and the

Gambling Commission websites) to see if published reports or datasets for England

were available to fulfil the above objectives We determined that this was not to be the

case So we identified datasets and official statistics that include information on

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

8

gambling by adults or children We used the HSE (for years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018)

as the primary dataset

We ran outputs from HSE to meet the objectives both on the most recent year (2018)

and the whole combined dataset where necessary All outputs have been non-response

weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE analysis since 2003 We commissioned

the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) who manage the HSE on behalf of

NHS Digital to combine the datasets NatCen calculated and appended new combined

weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc18 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb18 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication (5) we used the problem gambling

weight for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening

tools We used the self-completion weight for the rest

You can find all important information related to the data source in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the Health Survey for England series (6) Registered users can access

the separate datasets via the UK Data Archive (7)

We conducted all statistical analysis in SPSS version 25

We supplemented the outputs from HSE with findings from statistical publications and

reports available from other sources to better meet the objectives Sources include

several outputs by

bull the Gambling Commission

bull the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010

bull YouGov

bull the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH)

bull the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

bull hospital episode statistics (NHS Digital)

The HSE asks children certain questions including about smoking and alcohol but this

is not the case for gambling However we found published data to fulfil the aim to

include children in the analytic aspect of the work at least to an extent

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

9

The Gambling Commission publish an analytical report lsquoYoung people and gamblingrsquo

that explores the gambling behaviours of young people aged 11 to 16 years old in

England Scotland and Wales The survey was conducted by Ipsos MORI and includes

adolescent-appropriate application of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders 4th version) to measure at-risk and problem gambling This source

only allows limited analysis of associations linked to gambling in children as it is only

gambling behaviour focused and does not include any health topics

This report has found the lack of health and gambling data for children to be a gap in the

data currently available However gambling behaviours in the cohort is very detailed

and includes aspects such as in-game gambling parental gambling and those following

gambling companies on social media Furthermore trend data is available We have

supplemented the results from this source with recent findings from ALSPAC

13 COVID-19

The Health Survey for England 2018 is the primary data source and the gambling

supplementary questions refer to gambling behaviour in the last 12 months The data

was published in November 2019 and the 12 month period covered by the survey

questions is 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 This was before COVID-19 and so

no data here takes into account the impact of the pandemic on gambling behaviour So

the term lsquothe last 12 monthsrsquo does not refer to the 12 months of 2020 when the

pandemic occurred We have published a rapid evidence review to explore the impact of

COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

10

2 Overall gambling participation

21 Introduction

This section focuses on prevalence and associations with any gambling activity in the

last 12 months (at the time of the survey year referenced most recent refers to 2018)

The HSE involves a set of questions and interviews conducted face to face in the homes

of respondents The gambling questions are completed using a self-completion

questionnaire alongside the core health questionnaire As part of this respondents were

asked whether they have participated in any gambling activity in the last 12 months and

if so what type of activity

22 Overall gambling participation by type of activity

Over half (540) of the England population aged 16 and over have taken part in some

form of gambling in the last 12 months (based on HSE 2018 (5)) This equates to almost

245 million people Gambling activity questions were first included in the HSE in 2012

and again in 2015 2016 and most recently in 2018 Since 2012 participation in any

gambling activity has reduced significantly in the England population by over 10 percent

(from 645 to 540) However the reduction between 2016 and 2018 is not

statistically significant meaning there is unlikely to have been a real change between

the 2 most recent years for which data is available

The National Lottery was the gambling activity with the highest level of participation in

England with 36 of the population taking part in the last 12 months The recent

Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that in the

individual National Lottery draws the most common games of 2019 were

bull Lotto (played by 21 of all survey respondents in the past 4 weeks)

bull EuroMillions (20)

bull Thunderball (3)

bull Hotpicks (1)

However participation in the National Lottery has declined from 525 in 2012 to 457

in 2015 405 in 2016 to 360 in 2018 This is a statistically significant decline and

suggests that the reduction seen in overall gambling participation is largely due to the

reduction in National Lottery participation Figure 1 shows the percentage of overall

gambling participation in England between 2012 and 2018 Once the National Lottery is

excluded gambling participation has stayed at the same level with 402 of the

population having gambled on some other activity in the last 12 months As shown in

Figure 1 by excluding respondents who only play the National Lottery we see a different

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

11

pattern in gambling participation This shows a pattern more resistant to change with the

rate increasing to 451 between 2012 and 2015 before reducing to 402 in 2018

Figure 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Base2 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 Unless otherwise stated the base given in tables is the number of respondents who answered the

relevant question

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity Any gambling activity exc National Lottery

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

12

After lotteries the most common types of gambling activity according to HSE 2018 were

bull horse racing (not online3) (81)

bull online betting with a bookmaker (78)

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines (57)

bull bingo (not online) (45)

These were also the most common activities in 2012 the only difference being that

online betting with a bookmaker was less common in 2012

Table 2 Overall gambling participation by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 525 457 405 360

Scratchcards 187 222 203 179

Other lotteries 150 148 139 144

Machines and games

Football pools 21 26 26 29

Bingo (not online) 58 59 49 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 71 62 57

Machines in a bookmakers 24 33 29 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 35 32 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 11 08 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 28 37 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 43 72 74 78

Betting exchange 08 10 12 11

Horse races (not online) 104 111 92 81

Dog races (not online) 27 28 21 17

Sports events (not online) 38 52 51 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 14 13 15

3 lsquoNot onlinersquo throughout this report means gambling in a bookmakers by telephone or at the venue

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

13

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Spread-betting 05 06 06 05

Private betting 46 51 41 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 18 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 66 94 94 94

Base 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

23 Overall gambling participation by age and sex

Participation in any gambling activity was most common in respondents aged 45 to 64

(604) and least common in those aged 16 to 24 (390) The National Lottery draws

were the activity with greatest participation across all age groups except for those aged

16 to 24 years for whom scratchcards are more common If we exclude National Lottery

gambling was more common in younger age groups for many activities4

Also 94 of people surveyed participated in some form of online gambling (excluding

National Lottery) and this type of gambling is more common with younger people Online

gambling has increased in popularity from 66 in 2012 and since 2015 has remained

consistent at 94

Slot (electronic gaming) machines were the most common type of machine or game

betting Except for bingo most machine or games betting activity types were more

common among younger people particularly

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines

bull football pools

4 Itrsquos worth noting that the HSE gambling measures are derived from a self-completion questionnaire for

people aged 16 years and over However while the legal age limit for playing the National Lottery and

scratchcards is currently 16 years (as well as for some (category D) slot machines) it is 18 years for most

other forms of gambling HSE does not take this legal age discrepancy into account

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

14

bull electronic gaming machines in bookmakers (including fixed odds betting terminals

(FOBT)

bull casino table games

Online betting with a bookmaker sports betting and private betting were also more

common with younger age groups particularly the under 35s

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

15

Table 3 Overall gambling participation by age group England 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 124 324 428 471 444 368 286 360

Scratchcards 197 268 236 196 140 91 49 179

Other lotteries 49 101 144 171 189 189 176 144

Machines and games

Football pools 64 63 19 08 15 10 21 29

Bingo (not online) 49 55 53 30 41 37 51 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 97 71 53 41 13 10 57

Machines in a bookmakers 44 51 20 16 09 - - 22

Casino table games (not online) 41 63 30 17 13 - - 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 13 08 - - - - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

33 66 47 21 14 - - 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 92 159 105 77 40 18 11 78

Betting exchange 27 17 11 04 08 - - 11

Horse races (not online) 99 87 80 89 86 78 33 81

Dog races (not online) 31 26 12 16 11 12 - 17

Sports events (not online) 68 75 36 38 29 14 - 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

16

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Other events or sports (not online) 38 27 10 11 12 - - 15

Spread-betting 17 09 - - - - - 05

Private betting 85 64 39 23 19 11 14 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 19 16 15 08 09 11 06 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 390 569 573 604 596 530 444 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

371 489 443 407 405 337 282 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

112 185 129 91 51 24 15 94

Base 931 1196 1140 1242 1058 875 661 7104

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

17

The Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that on

average online gamblers have 3 accounts with gambling websites and that 21 have

bet lsquoin-playrsquo (while the event is taking place) in the last 4 weeks Furthermore 20 of

online gamblers aged 18 to 24 had more than 5 online accounts Table 4 is taken from

the Gambling Commission report and shows online and in-person participation in the

last 4 weeks for those activities that can be accessed through multiple methods The

table shows that people playing bingo (81) and the National Lottery (73) were most

likely to participate in-person while those participating in football betting (83) sports

betting (81) and casino games (74) were most likely to do so online

Smartphones are now the most popular method of accessing online gambling with 50

of all online gamblers using their device for this purpose This continues the trend seen

in the Gambling Commission annual reports of increasing smartphone use for gambling

in recent years Younger age groups were most likely to gamble with multiple devices

while the likelihood of using more than one device to gamble reduces with age

Table 4 Online and in-person participation in the last 4 weeks (2019)

National Lottery

()

Bingo ()

Football pools

()

Horse racing

()

Sports betting

()

Football betting

()

Betting on other

events ()

Casino games

()

Online 36 24 55 61 81 83 58 74

In-person 73 81 50 49 27 26 53 47

Source The Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Figure 2 shows overall gambling participation for adults by sex in England between 2012

and 2018 Men (574) were more likely than women (507) to have participated in

any gambling activity in the last 12 months It also shows participation reducing at a

similar rate for both men and women since 2012

The difference is marked for online gambling with only 43 of women participating in

online activities compared to 147 of men Participation in online gambling reaches

284 for men aged 25 to 34 This means that of the 565 of 25 to 34 year old men

that gamble (excluding the National Lottery) half do so online

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

18

Figure 2 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 5 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018 2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity men 680 655 612 574

Any gambling activity women 610 589 513 507

Base men 3042 2996 2965 3506

Base women 3749 3759 3726 3599

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Women (178) were as likely to buy scratchcards as men (181) and more likely to

take part in bingo (59 compared to 30 of men) but men had higher participation

rates in all other gambling activities The differences between men and women were

greatest for

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity men Any gambling activity women

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

19

bull online betting with a bookmaker

bull machines in bookmakers (including FOBT)

bull betting on sports events

bull private betting5

24 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification

By highest educational qualifications participation in any gambling activity was most

common in the below degree category (588) followed by respondents with an NVQ4

NVQ5 and degree or equivalent (504) level of qualification Those with no qualification

were least likely to participate in any gambling activity (465)

There were differences by type of activity where those with an NVQ4 NVQ5 and degree

or equivalent were less likely to participate in bingo (24) Also along with people in

the below degree category they were more likely to participate in betting on horse

racing and sports events (not online) Respondents with no qualification were notably

less likely than the rest of the population to participate in online betting with a bookmaker

(23)

Table 6 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification England 2018

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 345 389 307 360

Scratchcards 131 218 147 179

Other lotteries 131 161 119 144

Machines and games

Football pools 14 39 23 29

Bingo (not online) 24 53 55 45

5 This excludes poker played in clubs betting exchanges and spread-betting which are all relatively low

participation activities but are dominated by men

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

20

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 33 76 38 57

Machines in a bookmakers 13 31 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 34 30 05 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 03 10 04 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 38 14 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 88 23 78

Betting exchange 14 10 08 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 41 81

Dog races (not online) 11 21 12 17

Sports events (not online) 33 52 19 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 21 10 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 33 46 23 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 10 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 504 588 465 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

360 456 313 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

107 109 34 94

Base 2024 3553 1313 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

21

25 Overall gambling participation by economic activity

Looking at economic activity participation by group in any gambling activity was most

common in the

bull employed self-employed or training category (647)

bull retired (523)

bull unemployed (504)

However confounding is important here as economic groups like students and those in

retirement comprise people of very different ages and previous tables have shown a

strong association between gambling and age You can find more information about the

issues of confounding later in this report in the section on at-risk and problem gambling

and in more detail in Appendix B

We based Table 7 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller employment groups

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

22

Table 7 Overall gambling participation by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 509 136 398 341 334 432

Scratchcards 246 166 84 205 205 199

Other lotteries 150 42 184 108 99 142

Machines and games

Football pools 32 43 14 21 10 27

Bingo (not online) 52 37 59 52 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 76 18 74 50 65

Machines in a bookmakers 37 36 04 47 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 43 43 08 22 12 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 13 19 02 11 - 1

66 The economically inactive population comprises all persons who were neither employed nor unemployed during the short reference period used to

measure current activity This population is split into 4 groups attendant at educational institutions retired engaged in family duties other

economically inactive

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

23

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

43 26 06 44 30 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 99 56 14 49 31 69

Betting exchange 13 25 03 11 - 11

Horse races (not online) 123 57 70 80 54 98

Dog races (not online) 32 16 11 22 11 24

Sports events (not online) 64 54 14 47 18 48

Other events or sports (not online) 18 14 04 16 - 13

Spread-betting 07 06 - 09 - 05

Private betting 56 92 17 36 22 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 17 22 09 14 07 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 647 360 523 504 469 576

Base 15321 2029 5906 1796 2111 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

24

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

25

27 Overall gambling participation by Index of Multiple Deprivation

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is the official measure of relative deprivation for

small areas in England Quintiles are calculated by ranking the neighbourhoods in

England from most deprived to least deprived and dividing them into 5 equal groups

These range from the most deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally to the least

deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile but there were differences by activity type Several activities were statistically

significantly higher in the most deprived quintile compared to lesser deprived quintiles

We saw the strongest inequality gradients were for bingo and scratchcards

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

26

Table 8 Overall gambling participation by IMD England 2018

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 325 355 382 376 358 360

Scratchcards 213 180 191 166 147 179

Other lotteries 108 131 163 162 154 144

Machines and games

Football pools 26 40 30 24 24 29

Bingo (not online) 64 50 43 37 31 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 54 57 52 52 57

Machines in a bookmakers 30 26 19 25 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 22 32 29 27 20 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 09 07 05 - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

41 27 29 29 24 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 64 69 83 91 83 78

Betting exchange 13 07 08 15 13 11

Horse races (not online) 59 65 98 96 87 81

Dog races (not online) 16 15 16 27 09 17

Sports events (not online) 35 40 41 48 38 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

27

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online) 12 16 17 15 17 15

Spread-betting 05 06 04 05 05 05

Private betting 33 46 40 37 32 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 14 16 13 06 12 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 514 527 567 553 534 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

395 393 429 400 388 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

83 86 98 105 99 94

Base 1278 1528 1515 1474 1310 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

28

28 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity

By broad ethnicity overall participation in any gambling activity was most common in

the White and White British ethnic group (608) and least common in the Asian and

Asian British ethnic group (312)

We base Table 9 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller ethnic groups

Table 9 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 457 228 311 345 432

Scratchcards 211 91 146 182 199

Other lotteries 152 71 83 93 142

Machines and games

Football pools 26 23 32 43 27

Bingo (not online) 58 20 27 25 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

68 47 51 55 65

Machines in a bookmakers

29 23 33 33 29

Casino table games (not online)

32 27 37 33 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs

10 10 - - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

36 12 15 31 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

75 21 37 57 69

Betting exchange 11 07 - - 11

Horse races (not online)

109 17 30 46 98

Dog races (not online) 27 - - - 24

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

29

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Sports events (not online)

51 20 21 50 48

Other events or sports (not online)

14 09 - 22 13

Spread-betting 05 07 - - 05

Private betting 49 28 17 56 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 - 17 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 608 312 417 440 576

Base 23586 2043 821 688 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

29 Overall gambling participation by region

The North East (647) had the highest overall participation in gambling while London

(480) was lower than average

We based Table 10 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for each region

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

30

Table 10 Overall gambling participation by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

647 587 608 611 578 611 480 568 578 576

Base 1329 3592 2699 2332 2838 3013 4115 4442 2803 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 201

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

31

210 Overall gambling participation by local authority

Variation in gambling participation was evident by upper tier local authority (UTLA)

Discounting Rutland which has wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a

rate of gambling participation that was statistically significantly higher than average for

England The top 5 UTLAs in England with the highest levels of gambling participation

were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

For the full list of authorities included in Figure 3 see Appendix A You should note that

due to small sample sizes we have grouped together the authorities of inner and outer

London

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

32

Figure 3 Overall gambling participation by UTLA England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

211 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health

In HSE general health is self-assessed with the question lsquoHow is your health in general

Would you say it was very good good fair bad or very badrsquo There has been very little

change in the general health status of the population over the course of the surveys

with 76 of respondents reporting very good or good health in 1993 compared to 75

in 2018 (in no survey year has this been below 74 or above 76) This is the same for

respondents who gamble with 752 reporting very good or good health in HSE 2018

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health tend to gamble less (501) than

the general population and those reporting good or very good general health (580)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

33

We based Table 11 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for the smaller categories

Table 11 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 435 444 381 432

Scratchcards 205 195 151 199

Other lotteries 142 153 120 142

Machines and games

Football pools 30 20 11 27

Bingo (not online) 48 69 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 59 42 65

Machines in a bookmakers 31 24 20 29

Casino table games (not online) 36 18 13 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 11 07 - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

34 30 29 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 79 44 29 69

Betting exchange 12 07 - 11

Horse races (not online) 105 83 63 98

Dog races (not online) 26 20 14 24

Sports events (not online) 52 36 27 48

Other events or sports (not online) 14 10 12 13

Spread-betting 06 04 - 05

Private betting 52 34 16 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 16 10 15

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

34

Summary

Any gambling activity 580 588 501 576

Base 20488 4684 1987 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

212 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction

In HSE life satisfaction is derived from the question lsquoOverall how satisfied are you with

life nowadaysrsquo This is scored and grouped low (score 0 to 4) medium (score 5 to 6)

high (score 7 to 8) and very high (score 9 to 10)

Gambling participation across life satisfaction groups was inconclusive As with self-

assessed general health the lowest group were again least likely to participate in

gambling (492) This was also true for respondents participating in the National

Lottery where 315 in the lowest satisfaction group take part compared to 363 in the

very high satisfaction group The low satisfaction group were most likely to participate in

online gambling including slots casino and bingo games (50 compared to 28 in the

very high group) but this reverses for online gambling with a bookmaker (44 of the low

group compared to 70 of the very high group)

Table 12 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction England 2018

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 315 353 373 363 360

Scratchcards 188 204 181 166 179

Other lotteries 121 155 142 150 144

Machines and games

Football pools 18 38 31 26 29

Bingo (not online) 46 57 41 45 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 58 55 61 51 57

Machines in a bookmakers 31 2 23 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 16 31 31 22 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - 07

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

35

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

50 33 25 28 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 44 82 92 70 78

Betting exchange - - - - 11

Horse races (not online) 63 66 87 86 81

Dog races (not online) 18 09 16 20 17

Sports events (not online) 31 43 46 36 40

Other events or sports (not online) 18 17 14 17 15

Spread-betting - - - - 05

Private betting 44 34 42 31 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 13 09 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 492 523 559 535 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

359 422 418 384 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

78 99 106 82 94

Base 604 937 3038 2408 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

213 Overall gambling participation by wellbeing

The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a widely used measure

of subjective and psychological functioning It was developed to capture a broad concept

of positive mental wellbeing and incorporates 2 perspectives on wellbeing (9)

1 Eudaimonic wellbeing comes from a sense of purpose personal growth and

involvement in activities

2 Hedonic wellbeing comes from feelings of joy satisfaction and enjoyment

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

36

WEMWBS includes 14 statements that cover psychological functioning cognitive-

evaluative dimensions and affective-emotional aspects of wellbeing For each statement

respondents can answer

bull none of the time

bull rarely

bull some of the time

bull often

bull all of the time

The statements are all expressed positively The responses from 1 to 5 are aggregated

to form an index which can range from 14 (those who answer lsquonone of the timersquo for

every statement) to 70 (those who answer lsquoall of the timersquo to all statements) (10)

As above for life satisfaction findings were inconclusive across WEMWBS quintiles with

the highest participation rates seen in quintiles 2 to 4 and the lowest rate seen in quintile

5 (521)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

37

Table 13 Overall gambling participation by WEMWBS quintile England 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 396 417 399 429 392 405

Scratchcards 232 224 225 178 161 203

Other lotteries 129 132 144 142 148 139

Machines and games

Football pools 28 19 29 28 30 26

Bingo (not online) 46 53 58 46 41 49

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 64 88 57 41 62

Machines in a bookmakers 43 28 36 23 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 26 29 44 32 31 32

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - - 08

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

44 26 35 28 24 31

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 81 71 75 77 72 74

Betting exchange 11 16 08 10 17 12

Horse races (not online) 90 101 109 89 78 92

Dog races (not online) 17 25 26 20 17 21

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

38

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Sports events (not online) 56 44 74 50 38 51

Other events or sports (not online) 13 11 18 14 08 13

Spread-betting - - - - - 06

Private betting 37 47 56 37 32 41

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 09 16 09 13 13

Summary

Any gambling activity 555 585 570 589 521 562

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 417

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 94

Base 1281 1426 1189 1272 1375 6691

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

39

214 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used and validated

measure of psychological health It addresses broader components of psychological

morbidity with 12 items measuring

bull happiness

bull depression

bull anxiety

bull sleep disturbance

bull self-confidence

Each item is rated on a 4-point response scale to show whether symptoms of mental ill

health are lsquonot at all presentrsquo or if present lsquono more than usualrsquo lsquorather more than

usualrsquo or lsquomuch more than usualrsquo For the purpose of the HSE we adopted the standard

GHQ coding method for each of the 4 possible responses to each item as advocated by

the test author Each symptom was scored either 0 if rsquonot at all presentrsquo or present lsquono

more than usualrsquo or 1 for symptoms that were present lsquorather more than usualrsquo or lsquomuch

more than usualrsquo (11) So using this method the maximum score for any individual

study participant is 12 No formal threshold exists for identifying probable mental ill

health with optimal values likely to be specific to the population under study However

in keeping with previous HSE surveys participantsrsquo scores are grouped according to 3

categories which are

bull 0 (indicating no evidence of probable mental ill health)

bull 1 to 3 (indicating less than optimal mental health)

bull 4 or more (indicating probable psychological disturbance or mental ill health) (10)

Continuing the trend seen before for general health life satisfaction and wellbeing

respondents scoring highest on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological disturbance

or mental ill health) were less likely (506) to participate in gambling than those who

score 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) (555)

Table 14 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12 England 2018

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 376 349 327 360

Scratchcards 175 189 187 179

Other lotteries 148 153 119 144

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

40

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Machines and games

Football pools 32 26 24 29

Bingo (not online) 44 53 37 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 57 56 57 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 24 28 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 28 34 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 07 08 05 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 27 32 37 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 88 72 58 78

Betting exchange 12 11 11 11

Horse races (not online) 86 83 67 81

Dog races (not online) 18 19 09 17

Sports events (not online) 43 43 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 17 10 18 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 39 36 38 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 553 535 502 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 404 411 381 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 100 93 83 94

Base 4193 1630 1146 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

41

215 Overall gambling participation by BMI group

BMI (body mass index) is a widely used measure of weight that takes into account the

individualrsquos height and is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the height in metres

squared (kgm2) Adults can be classified as

bull underweight (BMI less than 185)

bull normal (BMI between 185 and 25)

bull overweight (BMI between 25 and 30)

bull obese (BMI 30 or above)

According to HSE 2018 63 of adults in England were overweight or obese and

between 1993 and 2018 there has been a marked increase in the proportion of adults

who are overweight or obese

A greater proportion of respondents classified as obese (594) and overweight (569)

participated in gambling compared to those classified not overweight or obese (486)

This difference was particularly notable for participation in the National Lottery as 429

of the obese group participated compared to 284 of the not overweight or obese

group

Table 15 Overall gambling participation by BMI group England 2018

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 284 393 429 360

Scratchcards 161 182 212 179

Other lotteries 108 159 185 144

Machines and games

Football pools 32 33 23 29

Bingo (not online) 37 44 55 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 52 54 66 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 27 20 22

Casino table games (not online) 21 36 24 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 04 10 07 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 30 35 30

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

42

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 78 92 74 78

Betting exchange 10 11 15 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 77 81

Dog races (not online) 14 19 19 17

Sports events (not online) 34 60 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 13 25 08 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 38 44 35 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 13 11 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 483 569 594 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

372 416 446 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

94 103 97 94

Base 2113 2234 1815 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

216 Overall gambling participation by alcohol consumption

HSE has asked about drinking alcohol since it began in 1993 The proportion of adults

who have drunk alcohol in the last week has steadily reduced over the previous decades

from 67 in 1998 to 57 in 2018 Across all age groups men were more likely than

women to drink at increasing and higher risk levels (12)

Alcohol consumption is reported in units of alcohol One unit of alcohol is 10ml by

volume of pure alcohol In 2016 the UK Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) published new

guidelines on low risk drinking (13) It is now recommended that men and women should

not regularly (defined as most weeks) drink more than 14 units a week Drinking at this

level is considered to be lsquolow riskrsquo and adults who regularly drink up to this amount are

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

43

advised to spread their drinking over 3 or more days Above this level is considered to

be lsquoincreased riskrsquo For men this is now over 14 units and up to 50 units and for women

over 14 units and up to 35 units per week Men who regularly drink more than 50 units a

week and women more than 35 units are described as lsquohigher risk drinkersrsquo and are

considered to be at particular risk of alcohol-related health problems (12)

There was a clear pattern of increased participation in gambling as the number of

alcohol units consumed per week increased being most noticeable at the extremes A

total of 354 of non-drinkers participated in gambling compared to 744 of those

consuming over 50 units This trend persisted for every type of gambling activity

Table 16 Overall gambling participation by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 261 445 542 525 570 432

Scratchcards 120 207 228 234 295 199

Other lotteries 86 146 172 181 205 142

Machines and games

Football pools 14 23 39 46 66 27

Bingo (not online) 36 58 50 49 72 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 32 61 91 105 127 65

Machines in a bookmakers 15 23 45 62 75 29

Casino table games (not online) 09 25 61 61 80 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 05 07 14 25 36 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

14 31 48 54 68 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 15 61 123 135 150 69

Betting exchange 04 08 16 26 35 11

Horse races (not online) 28 89 162 198 207 98

Dog races (not online) 06 23 35 45 61 24

Sports events (not online) 13 38 87 113 137 48

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

44

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online)

04 09 24 45 46 13

Spread-betting 03 04 07 14 29 05

Private betting 13 41 82 69 95 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 06 13 23 32 26 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 354 595 695 686 744 576

Base 4572 15591 4666 858 903 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

217 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking

Since it began HSE has asked questions about cigarette smoking in adults From the

series current cigarette smoking has steadily declined from 27 in 1993 to 17 in

2018 The proportion of respondents that have never regularly smoked cigarettes

increased from 46 to 58 over the same period HSE collects information about the

use of various tobacco products including cigarettes cigars and pipes The focus of this

analysis is on cigarette use meaning we do not consider cigar and pipe use in the below

definition of a current smoker

There was little difference in overall gambling participation between smokers (605)

and non-smokers (588) However current smokers generally have a higher likelihood

of participation for most gambling activity types Most notable were

bull scratchcards (306 compared to 184 of non-smokers)

bull football pools (52 compared to 26 of non-smokers)

bull machines in a bookmakers (46 compared to 18 of non-smokers)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

45

Table 17 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking England 2018

Current smoker ()

Non-smoker ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 377 406 360

Scratchcards 306 184 179

Other lotteries 121 172 144

Machines and games

Football pools 52 26 29

Bingo (not online) 69 52 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 97 54 57

Machines in a bookmakers 46 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 40 27 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 06 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 58 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 82 78

Betting exchange 07 14 11

Horse races (not online) 89 98 81

Dog races (not online) 24 14 17

Sports events (not online) 56 41 40

Other events or sports (not online) 24 15 15

Spread-betting 08 04 05

Private betting 70 36 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 14 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 605 588 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 485 437 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 123 99 94

Base 1151 2840 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

46

3 At-risk and problem gambling

31 Introduction

The most commonly used screening tools for gambling are the Diagnostic and Statistical

Manual of Mental Disorders 4th version (DSM-IV) and the Problem Gambling Severity

Index (PGSI) They define levels of gambling as (14)

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

Anyone scoring low risk or above are showing some signs of problematic behaviour

More specifically problem gambling is defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits There are

several screening tools available to identify problem gambling The HSE uses both the

DSM-IV and the PGSI

The DSM-IV was created as a clinical diagnostic tool and was not intended for use as a

screening instrument among the general population However an adapted version of the

DSM-IV for use in a survey setting was developed for the British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) series and was subject to a rigorous development and testing process

including cognitive testing and piloting The PGSI was designed for use among the

general population rather than within a clinical context It was developed tested and

validated within a general population survey of over 3000 people and the questionnaire

itself has been subject to critical evaluation and was revised in 2003 (12)

We base most tables in this section on the combined HSE dataset to increase sample

sizes wherever possible

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

47

32 Problem and at-risk gambling according to PGSI by age and sex

The PGSI consists of 9 items ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquogambling causing health

problemsrsquo to lsquofeeling guilty about gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale

These are

bull never

bull sometimes

bull most of the time

bull almost always

A score of 1 or more for PGSI indicates at-risk gambling A score of 1 to 2 is considered

low risk a score of 3 to 7 is considered moderate risk and a score of 8 or more

indicates problem gambling (12)

We have combined the low and moderate groups into an lsquoat-riskrsquo group (score 1 to 7) to

give a picture of the total risk of being a problem gambler (score 8 or more) in the

population Non-problem gambling group includes people who have not participated in

any gambling activity

According to the PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of 04 in the general

population (Table 18) The prevalence of people considered lsquoat-riskrsquo was 38 Men in

the younger age groups were most likely to experience both problem and at-risk

gambling For example 117 of men aged 16 to 24 and 101 of men aged 25 to 34

were participating in at-risk levels of gambling compared to 31 and 27 of women

respectively (these differences are statistically significant)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

48

Table 18 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

917 929 958 965 974 986 991 957

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 75 63 38 30 22 13 09 38

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

08 08 04 05 03 - - 04

Mean PGSI score 026 023 015 012 009 005 002 014

Base 3727 4547 4459 4726 3913 3186 2520 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 19 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (inc those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

868 885 936 949 962 978 983 933

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 117 101 59 43 33 19 17 60

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

15 14 05 08 - - - 08

Mean PGSI score 043 039 024 020 014 008 004 024

Base 1889 2249 2219 2336 1928 1534 1092 13246

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

49

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

967 972 980 981 986 993 997 981

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 31 27 18 18 12 07 - 17

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

- - - - - - - 01

Mean PGSI score 009 007 006 005 004 001 000 005

Base 1838 2298 2239 2390 1985 1653 1428 13831

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

According to the PGSI in 2018 there were an estimated 168149 people experiencing

problem gambling in England This is a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 208700

Also the PGSI estimates there to have been 377242 moderate risk gamblers and

1213830 low risk gamblers in England While estimates of problem gamblers and those

at moderate risk have reduced since 2016 those estimated at low risk have increased

since 2016 (from 1094066)

33 At-risk gambling

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by activity

This section shows at-risk gamblers among all respondents who participated in different

gambling activities The base is all respondents who participated in at least one activity

(individual survey participants may be included in multiple rows)

It is worth nothing that in contrast to other gambling activities participation in the

National Lottery was very low among at-risk gamblers compared to the general

population While at-risk gamblers accounted for 74 of all gambling activity they were

significantly overrepresented for

bull spread betting (520)

bull machines in bookmakers (464)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (456)

bull online gambling on slots casino or bingo games (442)

bull betting exchanges (440)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

50

Also in 20187 overall participation in online gambling was more than double (234)

that of the general population (94)

Table 20 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 68

Scratchcards 119

Other lotteries 80

Machines and games

Football pools 291

Bingo (not online) 129

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 257

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 315

Poker played in pubs or clubs 456

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 442

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 263

Betting exchange 440

Horse races (not online) 156

Dog races (not online) 266

Sports events (not online) 305

Other events or sports (not online) 436

Spread-betting 520

Private betting 250

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 338

7 We have used the latest year rather than the combined dataset due to how much online gambling has

increased between 2012 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

51

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Summary

Any gambling activity 74

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base8 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

While at-risk gamblers account for 74 of all gambling activity they account for 527

of those participating in 7 or more different gambling activities over the last 12 months

Table 21 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by number of activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities At-risk gamblers among those who participate ()

1 activity 18

2 to 3 activities 52

4 to 6 activities 197

7 or more activities 527

Total (any gambling activity) 74

Base9 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by highest educational qualification

As we have seen before for overall gambling participation at-risk gambling was most

common in the population for respondents in the below degree category (45) This

category was statistically significantly higher than both the NVQ4 NVQ5 or degree or

equivalent and the no qualification categories

8 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 9 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

52

Table 22 PGSI risk category by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category NVQ4NVQ5 Degree or

equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

969 949 962 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

22 33 22 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 12 09 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 05 06 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

29 45 31 38

Base 7582 14415 5033 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity at-risk gambling was most common in the unemployed category

(61) This was statistically significantly higher than all groups other than those in full-

time education For overall participation in gambling prevalence was the highest for the

employed self-employed or training category This was statistically significant

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

53

Table 23 PGSI risk category by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Employed self-

employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other Inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

950 925 941 987 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 43 45 09 20 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

12 18 10 03 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 14 - - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

44 61 56 12 27 38

Base 15281 1791 2023 5875 2107 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by IMD

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile However for at-risk gambling there was a statistically significant gradient with

prevalence increasing across quintiles from least deprived (30) to most deprived

(53) This aligns with the higher prevalence seen before in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

54

Table 24 PGSI risk category by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

939 954 960 963 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

34 31 24 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

18 10 10 07 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

08 05 05 04 01 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

53 41 34 33 30 38

Base 5165 5362 5667 5516 5369 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by ethnicity

By ethnicity the Asian and Asian British ethnic group had the lowest prevalence of at-

risk gambling (20) This was statistically significantly lower than the White and White

British group (39)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

55

Table 25 PGSI risk category by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category White White

British ()

Asian Asian

British ()

Black Black

British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

957 970 957 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

28 15 28 41 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

11 - - - 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 10 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

39 20 34 49 38

Base 23513 2037 816 687 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

56

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by region

The North East (49) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling while the South West (30) had the lowest

Table 26 PGSI risk category by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the Humber

()

East Midland

s ()

West Midland

s ()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

944 952 958 961 960 955 956 958 968 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

36 32 25 26 24 30 26 30 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

13 11 11 09 10 12 10 10 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 +)

- 04 07 - 05 - 08 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

49 44 36 35 35 42 36 40 30 38

Base 1325 3584 2685 2321 2824 3008 4107 4429 2794 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

57

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by self-assessed general health

There was no significant difference in at-risk gambling by respondents reporting bad and

very bad general health and those reporting very good and good general health

Table 27 PGSI risk category by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Very goodgood

()

Fair ()

Bad very bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

958 955 958 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 29 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 10 11 12 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 03 08 08 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 38 38 35 38

Base 20439 4657 1978 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by life satisfaction

Results for overall gambling participation across life satisfaction groups were

inconclusive This was not the case for at-risk gambling where respondents with low life

satisfaction (62) had a higher prevalence and those with very high life satisfaction had

a notably lower prevalence (22) This difference was statistically significant

Table 28 PGSI risk category by life satisfaction England 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

927 956 957 977 960

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

41 31 28 15 26

10 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

58

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

21 08 11 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 04 04 - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

62 39 39 22 36

Base 1231 2064 6016 3926 13601

Source HSE 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by wellbeing

As above for life satisfaction there was a gradient for at-risk gambling with respondents

in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) having the highest prevalence (64) and those in

quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) having the lowest prevalence (23) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 29 PGSI risk category by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

925 950 960 976 976 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

45 30 28 17 18 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 13 09 06 05 11

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 06 03 - 02 05

11 Totals differ from majority of tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

59

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

64 44 38 23 23 38

Base 3351 3772 3386 3238 3432 20193

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

problems) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling (51) while those scoring 0

(no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (30) This is a reversal of

the pattern seen before for overall gambling participation

Table 30 PGSI risk category by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 968 948 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 23 34 37 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 14 14 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 04 10 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 30 49 51 38

Base 11463 5025 3357 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by BMI group

There were no statistically significant differences for at-risk gambling between

respondents by BMI group

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

60

Table 31 PGSI risk category by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese () Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 954 957 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 27 25 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

10 11 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 05 05 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

42 38 37 38

Base 8910 8471 6378 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by alcohol consumption

As seen for overall gambling participation there was a clear pattern of increased at-risk

gambling as the number of alcohol units consumed per week increased This gradient

was statistically significant with 16 of non-drinkers gambling at-risk compared to

100 of people who consume over 50 units per week

Table 32 PGSI risk category by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Nevernot in last 12

months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to

35 ()

Over 35 to

50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 980 965 936 921 889 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

11 23 43 47 76 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

06 08 16 20 24 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 03 05 13 11 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

16 32 59 66 100 38

Base 4558 13678 4645 894 899 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

61

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by cigarette smoking

We saw a similar pattern for at-risk gambling as we saw for overall gambling

participation when looking at cigarette smoking Current smokers (72) had a higher

prevalence of at-risk gambling compared to non-smokers (37) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 33 PGSI risk category by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Current smoker

() Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 918 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 53 26 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+) 09 04 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 72 37 38

Base 4839 9660 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

34 Problem gambling

Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex

The DSM-IV contains 10 diagnostic criteria ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquocommitting

a crime to fund gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from

lsquoneverrsquo to lsquovery oftenrsquo A score of 3 or more indicates problem gambling

According to the DSM-IV and similar to PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of

05 in the general population Though numbers are small the younger age groups

tend to have a higher prevalence As we would expect given the higher rates of

gambling participation problem gambling according to the DSM-IV was higher in men

(09) than women (02) with the highest prevalence again seen in men in the 25 to

34 age group (15)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

62

Table 34 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

992 991 995 994 996 997 999 994

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

08 09 05 06 04 - - 06

Mean DSM-IV score 009 008 006 005 005 003 002 01

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 35 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

986 985 993 989 993 994 999 991

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

14 15 07 11 07 - - 09

Mean DSM-IV score 015 013 007 008 007 005 003 009

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

998 997 996 998 999 1000 999 998

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

63

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

- - - - - - - 02

Mean DSM-IV score 003 003 004 002 003 002 001 003

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

In 2018 DSM-IV estimated there to be 223975 problem gamblers in England This was

a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 257930

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex

The proportion of problem gamblers in the population according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI included in the HSE was 05 in 2018 (this increases to 07 when we combine

HSE years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018) Prevalence was higher for men (08) than

women (03) Using the combined HSE dataset (see Table 36) prevalence is highest

in the younger age groups

As reported by HSE the proportion of problem gamblers in the population has been

reducing from 09 in 2015 to 07 in 2016 to 05 in 2018 However as numbers

are very small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with

previous years and do not represent a real decline In 2018 there were estimated to be

245634 problem gamblers in England according to either DSM-IV or PGSI This is a

reduction from the 2016 estimate of 303328

Table 36 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 990 990 994 993 995 996 999 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 10 06 07 05 04 - 07

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

64

Table 37 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 982 983 992 987 992 993 999 989

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

18 17 08 13 08 07 - 11

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 998 996 995 998 998 1000 999 998

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

- - 05 - - - - 02

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity

While accounting for just 12 of all gambling activity problem gamblers (according to

either DSM-IV or PGSI) account for a significantly disproportionate level of participation

in

bull machines in a bookmakers (464)

bull spread betting (159)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (147)

bull other events or sports (not online) (135)

The problem gambler group were less likely to participate in activities such as the

National Lottery and scratchcards than the general gambling population

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

65

The problem gambler group were more likely than the general gambling population to

have participated in 7 or more gambling activities in the last 12 months

Table 38 Problem gambling prevalence according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 10

Scratchcards 18

Other lotteries 16

Machines and games

Football pools 50

Bingo (not online) 33

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 49

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 64

Poker played in pubs or clubs 147

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 87

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 37

Betting exchange 107

Horse races (not online) 30

Dog races (not online) 71

Sports events (not online) 56

Other events or sports (not online) 135

Spread betting 159

Private betting 43

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 99

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

66

Summary

Any gambling activity 12

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base12 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 39 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by number of activities participated in over the last 12 months England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

1 activity 03

2 to 3 activities 06

4 to 6 activities 28

7 or more activities 118

Total (any gambling activity) 12

Base13 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification

Based on the data from HSE there is no observable difference for problem gambling by

highest educational qualification

12 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 13 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

67

Table 40 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 990 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 10 07

Base 7599 14457 5061 27164

Source HSE 2012 2105 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity problem gambling was most common in respondents who were

currently unemployed (21)

Table 41 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity England 2012 2105 2016 2018

Employed self-employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler

993 979 995 998 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

07 21 05 02 06 07

Base 15321 1796 2029 5906 2111 2716

4

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD

Unlike overall gambling participation there was an inequality gradient across IMD

quintiles for problem gambling Prevalence was greatest in the most deprived group

(12) and declined for each quintile The difference between the most and least

deprived quintiles was statistically significant We saw a similar pattern before for at-risk

gambling

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

68

Table 42 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 988 993 995 996 998 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

12 07 05 04 02 07

Base 5183 5379 5684 5532 5386 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity

Problem gambling was greater in the Asian and Asian British (11) ethnic group

compared to the White and White British group (05) The difference between the 2

groups is statistically significant Though numbers are small for the remaining groups

(with confidence intervals too wide to draw any meaningful conclusions) the data

suggests a paradox of harm regarding the Asian and Asian British group This ethnic

group is less likely to take part in gambling than the White and White British group (both

overall participation and at-risk gambling) but more likely to experience problematic

gambling than the White and White British group

Table 43 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

Mixed Other

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 986 985 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 14 15 07

Base 23586 2043 821 455 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

69

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region

Even when we combined multiple HSE years numbers were small and confidence intervals overlapped when looking at

problem gambling by region

Table 44 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler (including people not participating in any gambling activity)

990 994 990 995 993 995 988 996 997 93

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 06 10 05 07 05 12 04 03 07

Base 1329 3598 2655 2341 2843 3067 4022 4451 2820 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

70

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed general health

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health had a higher prevalence of

problem gambling (13) than those reporting very good or good general health (05)

As we saw for at-risk gambling the difference between the groups was not statistically

significant but the gradient represents a different pattern to overall gambling

participation

Table 45 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed

general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 987 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 13 07

Base 20586 4581 1954 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life satisfaction

Problem gambling continues the pattern we saw before for at-risk gambling with the

highest prevalence in the low life satisfaction group (17) This was statistically

significant Again it is important to note that this was not the case for overall gambling

participation where there was no clear pattern

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

71

Table 46 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life

satisfaction England 2016 2018

Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()14

Non-problem gambler

983 995 994 998 994

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

17 05 06 02 06

Base 1223 2049 5996 3909 13629

Source HSE 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by wellbeing

As with at-risk gambling there was a clear gradient across WEMWBS quintiles with the

highest prevalence of problem gambling in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) (16) and

lowest in quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) (03) This difference was statistically

significant

Table 47 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()15

Non-problem gambler

984 990 996 998 997 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

16 10 04 02 03 07

Base 3338 3761 3393 3245 3431 20272

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

14 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018 15 Totals differ from most tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

72

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

disturbance or mental ill health) had the highest prevalence of problem gambling (14)

while those scoring 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (03)

This difference was statistically significant This is a similar pattern to at-risk gambling

and differs from overall gambling participation

Table 48 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 14 07

Base 11507 5037 3357 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group

There was little difference for problem gambling across BMI groups There was a similar

picture showing a lack of association between BMI groups for at-risk gambling

Table 49 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not overweight

or obese () Overweight

() Obese () Total ()

Non-problem gambler 994 993 993 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

06 07 07 07

Base 8964 8497 6364 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

73

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by alcohol consumption

There was a clear pattern of increased problem gambling as the number of alcohol units

consumed per week increased

Table 50 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Never or not in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

15 to 35 ()

36 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 994 993 985 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 06 07 15 14 07

Base 4503 15575 4693 863 911 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking

There was little difference by cigarette smoking status for overall gambling participation

This changed for problem gambling with current smokers (13) having higher

prevalence of problem gambling compared to non-smokers (06) This difference is

statistically significant

Table 51 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Current

smoker () Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 987 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

13 06 07

Base 4879 9663 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

74

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling

The previous sections have examined the relationships between gambling and various

other factors separately We carried out binary logistic regression models to further

investigate the different factors associated with gambling The following is a summary of

the pre-registered analysis We present the full outputs in Appendix B

To begin we conducted a series of bivariate analyses to compare a range of variables

to 3 increasing levels of gambling

1 Overall gambling participation

2 Harmful gambling (including low risk moderate risk and problem gambling)

3 Problem gambling taken in isolation

The variables included were

bull age

bull sex

bull ethnicity

bull income

bull educational attainment

bull employment

bull IMD

bull region

bull general health

bull wellbeing

bull life satisfaction

bull GHQ12

bull BMI

bull alcohol

bull smoking

Of these income region self-reported general health and BMI were shown not to be

statistically significantly associated with harmful gambling Income and BMI were shown

not to be statistically significantly associated with problem gambling

After reviewing the bivariate output we applied a multiple logistic regression to estimate

associations of socio-demographic and health factors on the likelihood that respondents

are participating in harmful gambling We excluded factors not significant at the bivariate

level from the model lsquoHarmful gamblingrsquo as discussed here includes problem gambling

and so the model takes account of the full continuum of gambling risk It is important to

note that the terms lsquolow riskrsquo and lsquomoderate riskrsquo (as used in the interpretation of the

PGSI) do not mean that risk is negligible for these respondents but rather that these

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

75

respondents are on a continuum of risk with people who have a definite problem with

their gambling This means the model includes all respondents with problem gambling

behaviours and those at risk of developing problem gambling behaviours

The logistic regression model for harmful gambling was statistically significant (p less-

than 005) The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling (see Appendix

B for more detail) and correctly classified 94 of cases but this was skewed towards

classifying respondents at no risk

Table 52 details the regression function itself and so summarises the effect of each

variable See the key below the table for the meaning of each column However the

main values of concern are the p-value and the adjusted odds ratio The p-value

determines which variables are significant (by convention this is less-than 005) and

these are highlighted in the table The adjusted odds ratio is a measurement of

likelihood that an outcome (harmful gambling) will occur given a particular exposure

compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of that exposure (see

Appendix B for more detail)

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be harmful gamblers Respondents

with below degree attainment were 18 times the odds and those with no qualifications

were 21 times the odds to be harmful gamblers compared to those with a NVQ4 NVQ5

or degree or equivalent level of attainment

Wellbeing contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on

GHQ12 Comparing those scoring 0 the odds of respondents scoring 1 to 3 were 20

times more likely and those scoring 4 or more were 24 times more likely to participate in

harmful gambling

On physical health and health behaviours smoking did not contribute significantly to the

model but alcohol did

Compared to abstainers or those not drinking in the last 12 months the odds of

respondents who drank above the CMOsrsquo low-risk drinking guidelines (14 to 35 units)

were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This increases markedly to

78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) It should be noted that the group

from HSE consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

76

Table 52 Binary multiple logistic regression model of harmful gambling variables

in the equation England 2016

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent)

- - 8609 2 0014 - - -

Educational qualification 3 groups (below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational qualification 3 groups (no qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (Least deprived)

- - 11143 4 0025 - - -

Quintile of IMD score (2)

-0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3)

0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4)

0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (Most deprived)

0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1)

- - 15525 4 0004 - - -

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2)

0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3)

0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4)

0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

77

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5)

-0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Life satisfaction (low (0 to 4))

- - 4262 3 0235 - - -

Life satisfaction (medium (5 to 6))

-0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (high (7 to 8))

-0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (very high (9 to 10))

0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ score ndash grouped (score 0)

- - 15279 2 0000 - - -

GHQ score - grouped (score 1-3)

0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ score - grouped (score 4+)

0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (nevernot in last 12 months)

- - 36554 4 0000 - - -

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14)

0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (over 14 to 35)

1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (over 35 to 50)

0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (over 50)

2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020 - -

Notes Missing data was not available due to small counts Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age 16-75+ in 10 year age bands Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc) Key B the unstandardized coefficients for the model SE the standard errors for the B-coefficients

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

78

Wald the test statistic for the individual predictor variables Linear regression will have a t-test while logistic regression has a chi-square test It is used to determine the p-value df the degrees of freedom for the Wald statistic p-value determines which variables are significant By convention any variable with a p-value below 005 is significant AOR (adjusted odds ratio) the odds ratios associated with changes in predictor scores 95 CI the 95 confidence interval of the odds ratio Source HSE 2016

The broad conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly sex

appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic factors

such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a

stronger predictor of harmful gambling than both poor physical health and negative

health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model being selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and

the method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

79

4 Gambling frequency

41 Introduction

This section considers how often people who do gamble participate in gambling

activities and to what extent Frequency is compared for respondents participating in any

gambling activity at-risk gamblers and problem gamblers This is followed by findings

from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey which combines gambling frequency with

gambling volume in terms of money and time spent

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months

For all gamblers the most common frequency of participation was once a week (262)

followed by once or twice a year (253) This was true for lotteries with 311

participating in the National Lottery once a week 232 buying scratchcards once a

week and 276 participating in other lotteries once a week A similar picture was seen

for machines and games except for machines in a bookmakers poker played in pubs or

clubs and online gambling All these activities were slightly more likely to be played 2 or

more times a week

Most betting activities were also most frequently participated in 2 or more times a week

or once a week except for horse racing and private betting Dog racing was most

frequently participated in either 2 or more times a week (236) or once a week (222)

followed by once or twice a year (218) This differs from horse racing where 349

participated only once or twice a year This reinforces the difference between horse

racing and dog racing seen before for at-risk and problem gambling

Table 53 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 145 311 111 116 139 179

Scratchcards 126 232 133 131 175 203

Other lotteries 144 276 105 161 113 202

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

80

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Machines and games

Football pools 219 301 121 152 104 104

Bingo (not online) 180 257 110 102 141 210

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

171 218 155 102 143 212

Machines in a bookmakers

246 232 158 136 101 127

Casino table games (not online)

152 191 146 127 152 231

Poker played in pubs or clubs

297 285 128 134 81 76

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

252 248 173 126 117 84

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

174 239 150 116 131 190

Betting exchange 272 258 161 69 115 124

Horse races (not online)

152 210 101 80 108 349

Dog races (not online)

236 222 100 102 122 218

Sports events (not online)

215 277 146 110 118 135

Other events or sports (not online)

345 320 175 69 44 47

Spread-betting 367 239 101 138 73 83

Private betting 155 204 140 130 127 245

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling

213 248 99 138 106 195

Summary

Any gambling activity

119 262 102 124 140 253

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

81

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Base16 1342 2961 1147 1403 1581 2853

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers

As we would expect gambling frequency increases as the level of gambling risk

increases Almost a quarter of low risk gamblers gamble 2 or more times a week and

this increases to 451 of moderate risk gamblers and 541 of problem gamblers

Respondents who are considered problem gamblers according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI 507 gamble 2 or more times a week compared to 114 of non-problem

gamblers

Table 54 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for at-risk gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 246 451 541

Once a week 266 294 194

Less than once a week more than once a month

198 88 71

Once a month 133 54 173

16 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities minus those who did

not answer the frequency question

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

82

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

Every 2 to 3 months 98 78 -

Once or twice a year 59 - -

Base 541 204 98

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 55 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for problem gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 114 507

Once a week 263 225

Less than once a week more than once a month

102 56

Once a month 124 141

Every 2 to 3 months 142 -

Once or twice a year 255 42

Base17 11146 142

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume

Although it is not as recent as the HSE 2018 the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) (15) includes more detail than the HSE on certain issues relevant to the

aims of this review In particular the BGPS offers additional data on gambling frequency

(lsquoregularrsquo gambling or days per month) and gambling volume (money time spent) While

a summary is useful for the objectives of this report itrsquos worth noting that the gambling

17 The base for problem gamblers in Table 55 is respondents categorised as a problem gambler according to either

DSM-IV or PGSI This is the conventional approach and that taken throughout the section before focusing on problem

gambling This differs from the base for Table 54 which is respondents categorised as problem gamblers according to

PGSI only This difference is necessary as only PGSI allows the further breakdown into low and moderate risk that

Table 54 requires

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

83

landscape has changed considerably since 2010 particularly issues relating to online

gambling

The BGPS included questions to measure gambling volume among regular gamblers18

based on the amount of time spent gambling in an average month and the amount of

money spent on gambling in an average month This detail is not possible from the HSE

When looking at time spent on gambling the BGPS made a cut-off for analysis purposes

to capture the top 10 of regular gamblers This cut-off was around 7 hours per month

gambling (with a mean for the group of 310 hours per month) The other 90 of regular

gamblers either did not spend any time gambling or generally spent less than 7 hours a

month gambling (with a mean of 30 minutes per month) The BGPS labelled these

groups lsquohigh-timersquo and lsquonon high-timersquo gamblers respectively

When looking at money spent on gambling the BGPS cut-off for the top 10 of regular

gamblers was around pound6150 per month on gambling (with a mean of pound20992 per

month) The remaining 90 of regular gamblers spent less than this amount (with a

mean of pound1482 per month) The BGPS labelled these groups lsquohigh-spendrsquo and lsquonon

high-spendrsquo gamblers respectively As a summary of gambling volume that considers

both time and money spent the BGPS provides 4 possible sub-groups of regular

gamblers These are respondents who were

bull non high-time and non high-spend gamblers (85)

bull high-time but non high-spend gamblers (4)

bull high-spend but non high-time gamblers (4)

bull high-time and high-spend gamblers (6)

Most (85) regular gamblers were both non high-time and non high-spend gamblers Of

the remainder the BGPS found 4 were high-time but not high-spend and another 4

were high-spend but not high-time gamblers It also found 6 were both high-time and

high-spend gamblers

Non high-time and non high-spend gamblers took part in 25 gambling activities in the

past year In comparison high-time only gamblers took part in 40 gambling activities in

the past year and high-spend only gamblers took part in 52 activities High-time and

high-spend gamblers had the highest levels of gambling participation taking part in 66

gambling activities

18 Respondents who gambled once a month or more

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

84

Compared to all regular gamblers the high-time and high-spend group were more likely

to

bull be from semi-routine or routine households19

bull live in areas of greatest deprivation

bull have no educational qualifications

bull be slightly more likely to live in the lowest income households

bull be unemployed (they were much more likely to be unemployed)

Along with the high-time only gamblers this group experiences the greatest

socioeconomic deprivation

19 Based on The National Statistics Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

85

5 Hospital admissions

51 Introduction

This section presents the number of hospital admissions due to gambling from NHS

Digitalrsquos hospital episode statistics (HES) These statistics detail all admissions

outpatient appointments and AampE attendances at NHS hospitals in England We use

figures from finished admission episodes (FAEs) with a primary or secondary diagnosis

as classified by the International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) (ICD-10) of

bull ICD-10 F630 Pathological Gambling

bull ICD-10 Z726 Gambling and Betting

52 HES admissions due to gambling

Across England there were 375 admissions to hospital because of gambling in 2018 to

2019 Over the previous 3 years admissions have increased but compared to other

causes numbers20 remain very small

Table 56 Number of FAEs with a primary or secondary diagnosis relating to gambling by age group England between 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019

Age group 2016 to 2017 2017 to 2018 2018 to 2019

lt20 lt10 lt10 lt10

20 to 29 75 90 115

30 to 39 70 105 120

40 to 49 60 50 60

50 to 59 40 50 55

60+ 20 25 20

Total (will not sum due to rounding) 260 325 375

Source Hospital episode statistics (HES) NHS Digital 2020

20 Numbers are too small relative to all hospital admissions to calculate meaningful rates

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

86

6 Previously published sources of gambling data

This section of the report collates information on gambling previously published

elsewhere The purpose is to meet aspects of the objectives not fulfilled by the primary

data source Topics include

bull affected others

bull treatment

bull attitudes and influences

bull children and young people

The published sources discussed in the rest of the report vary in the type and quality of

gambling data available Gambling is relatively new field of research Inconsistencies in

the robustness and standardisation of the publications and data available are to be

expected However all sources included here are encouraging additions to the existing

body of work and one of the recommendations of the review is to encourage further

research and analysis in this area

We discuss the methods and caveats of each source in the introduction to each topic

61 Affected others

Introduction

A recent report published by YouGov (16) on behalf of GambleAware included a detailed

section on lsquoaffected othersrsquo The report defines lsquoaffected othersrsquo as

ldquohellippeople that know someone who has had a problem with gambling (either

currently or in their past) and feel they have personally experienced negative

effects from this person (or peoples) gambling behaviour This could include

family members friends and work colleagues among others with the negative

effects ranging from financial to emotional or practical impactsrdquo

The BGPS included some analysis of affected others in 2010 but the YouGov report

represents the most recent data available on affected others currently available The

source is not as robust as the HSE (which is designed to be representative of the

population by adopting a multi-stage stratified probability sampling design based on

postcode sectors) but does have a very good sample size of around 12000

respondents of which 7 are affected others

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

87

The main difference between the HSE and the YouGov survey is the sampling method

(probability vs non-probability) The difference in mode is also important (face-to-face

vs online) YouGov describe the survey as nationally representative but this is unclear

These differences may account for the fact that the headline prevalences do differ

somewhat from HSE21 in that YouGov finds 13 of the population experience gambling

harm (PGSI score of 1+) compared to a figure of 4 on the combined HSE This is a

significant difference

An independent report by the London School of Economics (LSE) (17) evaluates the

differences between the sources It concludes that HSE may under-estimate gambling

harm by requiring a residential address and YouGov may over-estimate harm by

excluding offline people The conclusion drawn by LSE is that it is credible that the level

of harm is probably somewhere between the 2 reported figures

The LSE report does offer a level of scrutiny and transparency but it is important to note

when reading the following section that the YouGov report itself has not been peer

reviewed and there is a lack of conclusions drawn and references to other published

work on the subject Furthermore the report does not specify the time frame of the PGSI

questions The HSE is clear that the PGSI is based on the respondentsrsquo activities over

the last 12 months We could assume that YouGov also covered the last 12 months but

this is not clear from the publication If YouGov did not specify the last 12 months then

respondents might have assumed the questions could apply to an earlier time which

would increase the prevalence of harm Particularly relevant to this section it is also

unclear how YouGov arrived at the 7 affected others prevalence figure due to the

complexity of how the report combines phases 1 and 2 of the study as it does not

include this information

However the affected others section of the YouGov report is the most detailed

contribution to the subject currently available and taking into account the above

caveats adds value to the present review

Prevalence of affected others

YouGov finds that 7 of the total adult population of Great Britain were affected others

The findings also reveal that the likelihood of being an affected other increases with

PGSI score Among gamblers 20 of problem gamblers (according to PGSI) were

affected others compared to 13 of moderate risk gamblers and 9 of low risk

21 We do not compare this to HSE exactly but rather the health surveys of England Wales and Scotland combined

Here we refer to it as HSE for simplicity and consistency

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

88

gamblers The report suggests that this shows the complex relationship between a

personrsquos own gambling and the issues relating to other peoplersquos gambling

Affected others were more likely to be women (57) than men (43) which reflects the

fact that problem gambling is much more associated with men There is little variation by

age but affected others were slightly more likely to be social class CD2E22 and less

likely to be White British

Type of affected others

Affected others were most likely to be negatively affected by a gambling problem of

someone in their immediate family (61) This is most commonly a spouse or partner

(25) followed by a parent (21) Women (71) were more likely than men (44) to

be negatively affected by the gambling of someone in their immediate family Women

were also much more likely to be affected by their spouse or partner (35 of women

compared to 9 of men)

Due to their age younger (18 to 24) affected others were most likely to have been

affected by the gambling of a parent Older affected others (55 and over) were most

likely to have been affected by the gambling of a child

Importantly people who were both affected others and problem gamblers were more

likely to have been negatively affected by the gambling problem of a child (15)

implying that gambling has profound impacts on the family as a whole Problem

gamblers were also more likely than average to say they have been negatively affected

by a non-immediate family member or work contact suggesting that gamblers were

more likely to socialise with other gamblers

Severity of impact upon affected others

Among affected others the most severe impacts of gambling were felt most by

immediate family members Figure 4 shows the severity of impact by type of affected

other in Great Britain in 2019 It presents the results from the YouGov report on severity

of impact by percentage into either minor moderate or severe The figure shows that

almost half (48) of affected others that were affected by a spouse or partner report a

severe negative impact This is followed in severity by the gambling of a parent (41)

22 Social class definition

AB higher and intermediate managerial administrative and professional workers C1 supervisory clerical and junior

managerial administrative and professional workers C2 skilled manual workers D semi-skilled and unskilled

manual workers E people on long term state benefits casual and lowest grade workers unemployed with state

benefits (including pension) only

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

89

and a child (38) A lower proportion of affected others reporting a severe negative

impact were due to friends The report suggests that the type and closeness of the

relationship plays an important role in determining the severity of the negative impact

experienced by affected others

Figure 4 Severity of impact by type of affected other Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling treatment and support YouGov 2019

The most significant type of impact reported by affected others was an inability to trust

the problem gambler (62) This was followed by

bull feelings of anger towards them (53)

bull anxiety (40)

bull a breakdown of communication (40)

bull reduced income for household running costs such as food rent and bills (38)

Women were more likely to have experienced all the negative impacts of being an

affected other with 81 reporting depression anxiety and anger towards the problem

gambler compared to 64 of men Women were also more likely to have experienced

financial impacts (67 of women compared to 48 of men)

Advice and support

YouGov found that most (64) affected others have not sought advice or support on

behalf of the problem gambler and an even greater proportion (72) have not sought

help for themselves as an affected other When affected others do seek advice and

0 20 40 60 80 100

Other workcolleague

Friend

Sibling

Other familymember

Child

Parent

Spousepartner

Percent reporting severity of impact ()

Severe Moderate Minor

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

90

support either for themselves or for the problem gambler it is most likely from less formal

sources This included seeking help from

bull a friend or family member (19)

bull a spouse or partner (11)

bull gambling support websites (11)

For more formal sources of advice and support 12 report seeking help from mental

health services and 8 from a GP Also 5 report seeking help from another addiction

service (for example a drugs or alcohol service) again highlighting the complexity of

addiction

Concern for the safety or wellbeing of the problem gambler or family members (65) is

the most common reason affected others seek advice and support Over half (57) of

affected others report not knowing how to deal with gambling and its impacts as the

reason for seeking help A similar proportion (54) sought advice due to a relationship

or family being affected by gambling or due to mental health problems (51) Though a

lower significant proportion (34) report being prompted by a severe negative impact

such as risk of losing employment risk of losing their home or criminal proceedings

YouGov concluded that there is an evident demand for advice and support among

affected others with almost half (48) reporting a need for such help whether for

themselves their spouse or partner a family member friend or colleague

The most reported barrier to seeking advice or support was that the person does not

consider their gambling to be a problem (43) The next most common reason is the

belief that gambling treatment would not be helpful or be effective (40) A further 14

reported feeling embarrassed or ashamed to ask for advice or support or that they would

not want others to find out socially or professionally

62 Treatment

Introduction

This section draws on published reports from Gambleaware The National Gambling

Treatment Service (NGTS) is a network of organisations providing treatment and

support for people experiencing gambling-related harms It is free to access across

England Scotland and Wales GambleAware commissions the NGTS and it is funded

through voluntary contributions from the gambling industry

GambleAware publish annual statistics (18) covering the treatment activity of the NGTS

and this is the source of the following summary The annual statistics cover treatment

provided by GamCare and its partner network Gordon Moody Associates and the

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

91

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) This represents most of the treatment provision for gambling in the UK although

there are other providers emerging in the public sector and third sector as a result of

policy changes in England Scotland and Wales23

Treatment provided (19)

GamCare offers

bull online treatment supported by regular contact with a therapist that people can access

at a time and place convenient for them over the course of 8 weeks

bull one-to-one in person online and telephone therapeutic support and treatment for

people with gambling problems as well as affected others

bull group based gambling recovery courses delivered face-to-face or online for between

6 to 8 weeks

bull the National Gambling Helpline which provides immediate telephone and online live

chat support and referral into the treatment service

bull information and advice via their website moderated forums and online group

chatrooms24

Gordon Moody Association offers

bull two specialist residential treatment centres providing an intensive programme for men

with a gambling addiction over a period of 14 weeks

bull specialist relapse prevention housing for people who have completed the treatment

programmes but need additional recovery support

bull retreat and counselling programmes for women or men-only groups that combine

short residential stays with at-home counselling support

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) offers treatment for gambling problems This treatment is especially for people

bull with more severe addictions

bull with co-morbid mental and physical health conditions

bull with impaired social functioning

bull who may come to treatment with more risk such as risk of suicide

23 The NHS Northern Gambling Service provided by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

has not been open for one full reporting year at time of publication So it is not included in the annual

statistics for 2019 to 2020 Further regional NHS led clinics are being established as part of the NHS Long

Term Plan 24 Data from these services are not included in the annual statistics publication

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

92

GambleAware funded treatment providers are required to submit quarterly datasets in a

standardised format The annual statistics publication presents the analysis of these

submissions As of 2020 there is an additional service as part of the NGTS However

this new service the NHS Northern Gambling Service was not operational in 2019 to

2020 so we have concentrated on the 3 service providers for which there is published

data available

Socio-demographic profile of people in treatment

The NGTS treated just over 9000 people in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This is

the most people treated since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016 (5909) For reference

this review has previously estimated there to be around 245600 problem gamblers in

England (according to PGSI or DSM-IV) Almost a quarter (23) of people treated in

2019 to 2020 had been seen before by the service

Most people treated were gamblers (84) while 13 of referrals related to affected

others This is less than the estimate of affected others among the problem gambling

population (20) suggesting a certain level of unmet need for this group As we can

expect from previous sections of this review affected others were more likely to be

women

Most people treated were men (75) and a greater proportion are from the younger age

groups This corresponds to the prevalence of problem gambling in the population

However there has been an overall small increase in the proportion of women being

treated increasing from 19 in 2015 to 2016 to 25 in 2019 to 2020

Table 57 Age and sex of people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Age group lt20 ()

20-24 ()

25-29 ()

30-34 ()

35-39 ()

40-44 ()

45-49 ()

50-54 ()

55-59 ()

60+ ()

Men 12 112 216 217 157 95 75 52 34 30

Women 05 48 136 159 161 120 85 104 90 91

All people in treatment

10 96 196 202 158 101 78 65 48 45

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Most people in treatment were employed (75) with the next most reported category

being unemployed (9) Given the unemployment rate in the UK was around 4 in

2019 we can expect a higher proportion of people in treatment to be unemployed given

previous findings that problem gambling is highest in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

93

On average people in treatment reported problem gambling starting at the age of 24

years although this was highly variable Three-quarters reported problem gambling

starting by the age of 32 years and one-quarter by the age of 19 years At the point of

coming to treatment services people had typically been problem gambling for an

average of 10 years

Gambling profile of people in treatment

A large proportion of people in treatment (58) participated online for their primary

gambling activity followed by bookmakers (27) No other locations were used by more

than 10 of people in treatment For online activities gambling on casino slots was the

most common activity (38) followed by sporting events (37) and casino table games

(27) For bookmakers gaming machines were the most common form of gambling

(53) followed by sporting events (31) and horse racing (24)

The most notable difference in gambling activity for peopl in treatment between 2015 to

2016 and 2019 to 2020 has been the increase in online gambling (from 57 to 69)

This has happened alongside the reduction in the proportion using bookmakers (from

56 to 38)

About 12 of people in treatment had suffered a job loss as a result of their gambling

and 26 had suffered a relationship loss through their gambling Almost a third (29) of

people in treatment had no debt due to gambling at the time of assessment But a

quarter had debts up to pound5000 and 45 had debts over pound5000 or were bankrupt or in

an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA)

Over half of people in treatment (54) spent up to pound100 per day gambling in the 30 days

before assessment The NGST annual statistics also found

bull 16 spent between pound100 and pound200

bull 18 spent between pound200 and pound500

bull 15 spent over pound500

On average (mean) people in treatment reported spending pound2102 on gambling in the

30 days before assessment

Average (mean) money spent on gambling days was highest among people using

casinos (pound544) and online services (pound435) The mean spend can be affected by outliers

(extreme individual values) but even using the median people using casinos still had the

highest average daily spend (pound200) Average monthly spend was again very high for

people using casinos followed by adult entertainment centres and online services

However monthly spend was also high for bookmakers and bingo halls especially

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

94

compared to daily spend The report suggests that using these services often

contributes to a high monthly spend

Table 58 Average money spent on gambling by people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Average spend per gambling

day (pound) Average spend in past

month (pound)

Mean Median Mean Median

Bookmakers 295 100 1785 1000

Bingo hall 210 100 1007 775

Casino 544 200 2973 1000

Live events 170 45 974 600

Adult entertainment centre

241 100 2807 640

Family entertainment centre

136 100 737 600

Pub 212 100 1519 700

Online 435 100 2145 1000

Miscellaneous 324 100 1467 575

Private members club 160 50 1777 700

Other 265 52 2038 600

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Access and outcomes

The overwhelming majority of people (902) self-referred to the NGTS This was

distantly followed by prisons (29) other service or agency (27) and GPs (15)

For people treated during 2019 to 2020 50 were seen within 3 days and 75 within 8

days Waiting times for residential services were higher with 50 of people seen within

3 and a half months

During 2019 to 2020 there was an average of 7 appointments per person and this was

similar for both problem gamblers and affected others Treatment lasted on average 8

weeks with a quarter of people receiving treatment for 3 weeks or less Half of all people

receiving treatment did so for between 3 and 15 weeks and a quarter received treatment

for over 15 weeks Treatment was slightly shorter for affected others and for those in

residential centres was generally longer (an average of 13 weeks)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

95

Between 2015 to 2016 and 2019 to 2020 the proportion of people completing treatment

increased from 59 to 69 while the proportion dropping out of treatment decreased

from 35 to 24 Affected others were more likely to complete treatment than problem

gamblers (80 compared to 66) Overall women were more likely to complete

treatment than men but when limited to just problem gamblers female problem

gamblers were slightly less likely to complete treatment (64 compared to 67 of male

problem gamblers) Also people who were unemployed were considerably more likely

than the average to drop out of treatment (32) and less likely to complete treatment

(61)

As expected almost all (94) people receiving treatment were defined as a problem

gambler according to PGSI The mean PGSI score for people in treatment was 20

markedly higher than the threshold of 8 required for the problem gambler definition

During 2019 to 2020 this proportion had reduced to 40 while PGSI scores had

improved for most people in treatment (75) Those defined as problem gamblers were

most likely to improve by 10 to 18 points (31) with a further 26 improving by 20 to 27

points

63 Attitudes and influences

Introduction

The Gambling Commission has been tracking public perceptions of gambling since

2010 These attitudes and what influences gambling behaviours are the subject of this

section The primary source is the Gambling Commission annual report series

lsquoGambling participation behaviour awareness and attitudesrsquo (20) The Gambling

Commission collects data via a combination of telephone and online surveys This is

supplemented by tables from the HSE

The telephone survey provides the main measure of past 4 week gambling participation

with waves conducted quarterly in March June September and December to reduce

the effect of seasonal variations in gambling behaviour The Gambling Commission

conducts about 1000 interviews each quarter from a survey sample generated through

Random Digit Dialling (RDD)25 of Great Britain phone numbers The sample is subject to

quotas to ensure it is as nationally representative as possible Respondents are

screened to ensure they are 16 or over and fit in remaining unfilled quotas Quotas are

set based on age sex religion and social grade Data is weighted to be representative

25 Random Digit Dialling (RDD) is a method for sampling of telephone surveys which involves the random generation

of telephone numbers

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

96

of the adult population with weights set based on the National Readership Survey (a

face-to-face random probability sample)

The Gambling Commission uses the online survey to monitor online gambling

behaviour The survey was launched after the government introduced regulation of

overseas gambling companies transacting with customers in Great Britain (in-line with

the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014) The online survey sample is

sourced through a panel and the sample is subject to quotas in-line with those used for

the telephone survey Also data is weighted for analysis in-line with the methods used

for the telephone survey

Public perception of gambling

Considering the public perception of gambling back to 2010 gamblersrsquo attitudes are more positive than non-gamblers but the gap has reduced significantly in recent years (Figure 5) The proportion of gamblers and non-gamblers who think that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted has reduced gradually over the past 10 years

Figure 5 Respondents who agree that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted Great Britain 2010 to 2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

All respondents Gambled in past 12 months

Not gambled in past 12 months

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

97

The views of gamblers were also sought on the most important factors when selecting a

company to gamble with The most important factor was having the best odds (26)

followed by the company having

bull a fair and trustworthy reputation (24)

bull bonus offers (15)

bull a recognisable brand name (14)

The Gambling Commission survey asked respondents about a series of attitudinal

statements taken from the Attitudes Towards Gambling Scale (ATGS-8) (a validated

scale to assess gambling attitudes among the general population originally developed

for the 2007 BGPS) From this 82 of respondents in 2019 agreed that there were

currently too many opportunities for gambling (a 3 increase from 2018) while 73

agreed that gambling is dangerous for family life In 2019 we also saw an increase in

the proportion saying that gambling should be discouraged (up to 62 from 58 in

2018) and a significant reduction in respondents agreeing that ldquogambling livens up liferdquo

(down to 26 from 28 in 2018)

Awareness of gambling

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey asks whether gamblers

follow a gambling company on social media Overall 23 of respondents followed a

gambling company on either Facebook Twitter YouTube Snapchat or Instagram in

2019 Facebook (17) was the most popular social media platform in which gamblers

follow gambling companies and despite a decrease over recent years this has been the

case since 2015 This is followed by

bull Twitter (8)

bull YouTube (6)

bull Instagram (5)

bull Snapchat (2)

These figures are consistent with the Adultrsquos Media Use and Attitudes Report (21) which

identifies Facebook as the most popular social media platform with use decreasing since

2017

Overall 86 of respondents have ever seen or heard any gambling advertisements and

82 have ever seen or heard any gambling sponsorship A higher proportion of men

(89) than women (83) have seen or heard gambling advertisements Also compared

to the 2018 survey we saw a decrease in the visibility of gambling sponsorships among

those aged 25 to 34 years (77 in 2019 compared to 82 in 2018)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

98

Gambling management tools

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey also asks about wider issues

of self-exclusion and gambling management tools

If a gambler considers themselves to be spending too much time or money gambling

either online or in person they can request to be self-excluded from a gambling

company or can self-exclude from multiple operators Figure 6 shows the percentage of

gamblers who have self-excluded from gambling activities through a gambling

management tool and whether they were aware of these tools In 2019 5 of gamblers

have ever self-excluded which is a slight reduction from 6 in the previous 4 years The

proportion The proportion of gamblers who had not self-excluded but were aware of

self-exclusion increased steadily from 29 in 2015 to 42 in 2019 The proportion of

gamblers who were not aware of self-exclusion reduced from 65 in 2015 53 in 2019

Figure 6 Gamblersrsquo awareness and use of self-exclusion Great Britain 2015-2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Among gamblers in 2019 more men (6) have self-excluded than women (4) while

those aged 25 to 34 have the highest self-exclusion rates (9) Other management

tools used were

bull setting financial limits (9)

6 6 6 6 5

2937 35

41 42

6557 58

53 53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Self-excluded Not self-excluded but aware Not self-excluded and not aware

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

99

bull time out (3)

bull reality check (3)

bull exclusion by product (2)

Table 59 Use and awareness of gambling management tools Great Britain 2019

Self-exclusion

() Exclusion by product ()

Time out ()

Financial limits ()

Reality check ()

Used 5 2 3 9 3

Aware but not used

42 24 34 49 27

Not aware 53 74 63 42 70

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Compared to the previous year the Gambling Commission reported an increase in the

proportion of respondents seeing information about where to seek help to control

gambling (40) in 2019 They also reported a decrease in respondents seeing

information on whether a machine is random or compensated26 (6)

Overall 20 of gamblers have ever read the terms and conditions provided by a

gambling operator The proportion of respondents who have not read terms and

conditions but were aware they are available was 62 while 18 were not aware terms

and conditions are available Women (22) and those aged 65 or over (30) were

more likely to be unaware of terms and conditions

64 Children and young people

Introduction

This section focuses on gambling prevalence among children and young people The

legal gambling age in the UK is 18 and this includes both gambling in person and

online Historically the exception was the National Lottery but the government plans to

26 All gambling machines have a return to player rate that dictates how frequently they are likely to pay

out For random machines and online slots this is typically based on a random number generator

meaning it is totally random whether the machine hits this number and pays out In contrast the likelihood

of a compensated machine paying out is based on previous plays The most common example is a fruit

machine which is more likely to pay out the more money it has taken (this is necessary as they can only

physically hold a certain number of coins)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

100

raise this from 16 to 18 no later than October 2021 following the announcement of the

Review of the Gambling Act 2005 (22)

The primary source used is the Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and

Gambling Survey A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo (23) We

supplement this with information from the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) report

lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) as well as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) (25)

The Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey A research

study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo is conducted as part of Ipsos MORIrsquos

annual Young People Omnibus (YPO) and examines gambling behaviours such as

where young people gamble and with whom perceptions of gambling and awareness of

gambling advertising The survey also asks a series of questions relating to potential

issues associated with gambling and uses the DSM-IV-MR-J2 problem gambling screen

to classify gamblers as low risk moderate risk or problem gamblers The survey is

conducted in schools with pupils completing online self-completion surveys in class

Data is weighted by sex age and region

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo used a mixed methods approach comprising of a

series of 6 focus groups with a total of 79 young people across England Scotland and

Wales It also included a survey conducted through Survey Monkey and promoted

through social media which 1025 young people responded to The ethnicity and

geographical region of the respondents was fairly representative of the UK population

However most take-up in the survey was by boys (83) which is not representative of

the general population That said the authors quote studies that have found boys to

have significantly higher participation rates in games most heavily associated with loot

boxes and skin betting such as the FIFA series and Fortnite

ALSPAC is a longitudinal study of young peoplesrsquo gambling between 17 and 24 years

using a contemporary UK cohort the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) When the children were aged 6 in 1997 to 1998 their parents completed the

South Oaks Gambling Screen Then when aged 18 the parents completed the PGSI

Between 2008 and 2018 all young people still registered with the ALSPAC (10155)

were invited to take part and complete a gambling frequency survey which included

PGSI The sample sizes completing the gambling surveys were

bull 3757 at age 17

bull 4340 at age 20

bull 4345 at age 24

Depression anxiety and wellbeing scores and drug and alcohol use were also

collected by self-completion questionnaires The main strength of this report is its use of

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

101

the large ALSPAC cohort which has collected detailed data for over 25 years The main

limitation is the missing data with less than half of the whole ALSPAC cohort completing

the gambling surveys Non-responders to the gambling surveys when compared to

ALSPAC responders overall were more likely to be male and from more deprived social

backgrounds with mothers with lower educational levels There was also a significant

gender bias with the final sample comprising 58 females As males were more likely

to engage in gambling activity this gender bias will have resulted in an under-estimate

of gambling prevalence and associated characteristics (26)

A main limitation of all sources used in this section is a lack of general health data We

acknowledged this in the protocol of this review and represents a gap in the data

available for children young people and gambling

Gambling participation

The proportion of 11 to 16-year-old children who have spent their own money on any gambling activity in the last 7 days has been decreasing since 2011 from 23 to 11 in 2019 (Figure 7) This decrease follows the trend of any gambling in the last 12 months which has reduced from 39 in 2018 to 36 in 201927 We should view this reduction in the context of declining rates of drinking smoking and drug-taking in children and young people Though poor diet remains an issue obesity rates are also falling and levels of activity increasing largely through increased activity at school (27)

Nearly double the number of boys (13) reported participating in any gambling activity

in the past 7 days than girls (7) Participation was higher in older children (12 of 14

to 16 year olds compared to 9 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Table 60 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by age and sex Great Britain 2019

11

year olds

12 year olds

13 year olds

14 year olds

15 year olds

16 year olds

Boys aged 11-16

Girls aged 11-16

Total aged 11-16

Has played a National Lottery game in past 7 days

7 3 4 2 3 9 5 2 4

Has played any gambling game in the past 7 days

14 8 9 11 11 16 13 7 11

27 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 37 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19

pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

102

Source Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain 2019

The most common gambling activities for 11 to 16-year-old children in the past 7 days

were placing a private bet for money (5) and playing fruit or slot (electronic gaming)

machines (4) A consistent finding in the report series is that fruit and slot (electronic

gaming) machines (mentioned by 23 of respondents who have gambled) was the first

experience of gambling The main reason for gambling given was ldquobecause itrsquos funrdquo

(55) while among children who do not gamble the main reason given was that it is

illegal and they are too young to take part (56)

National Lottery participation in the past 7 days among 11 to 15 year olds was at its

lowest reported level in 2019 Figure 7 shows that the proportion of 11 to 15 year olds

who have played National Lottery games in the past week has decreased over time

from 10 in 2011 to 4 in 2019

Figure 7 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by activity Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling Commission lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo 2019

Scratchcards remained the most common National Lottery product among children

under 16 who have ever played (mentioned by 10) compared with

bull Lotto the main National Lottery draw (6)

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Any gambling game Any National Lottery game

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

103

bull National Lottery online instant win games (4)

bull other National Lottery games (5)

Most under 16s who bought a National Lottery product were in the company of a parent

or guardian (67) and report that the parent typically pays at the till (73) The report

concludes that although under 16s play the National Lottery for a range of reasons the

influence of parents and family members was as important as having fun

On average 11 to 16 year olds who had gambled in the past 7 days spent pound17 The

overall amount of money this group was given as pocket money birthday money or

money earnt over the same period was pound34

The rates of gambling reported in the past week (11) were lower than drinking alcohol

(16) but higher than using e-cigarettes (7) smoking tobacco cigarettes (6) or

taking illegal drugs (5) Since 2017 the series has seen a potential relationship

between these other harmful activities and gambling such that those who have spent

their own money on gambling in the past 7 days were also more likely to have drank

alcohol (41) taken drugs (21) or smoked either a tobacco cigarette (25) or an e-

cigarette (27) compared with children who had not gambled

Online gambling and gaming

Participation in online gambling among children in the last 7 days compared with in

person gambling was low (3) particularly in the context of the time young people

spend online (the series shows how chatting online with friends and using social media

are 2 of the most popular spare time activities for this age group) Given the low rate of

participation in online gambling it is difficult to draw conclusions across the report series

Any past participation in online gambling was higher at 12 with differences across age

and sex showing the same pattern seen for overall gambling Boys (16) were more

likely than girls (8) to have ever played an online gambling-style game Participation

was higher in older children compared to younger children (14 of 14 to 16 year olds

compared to 10 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Among children who have ever played online gambling-style games fruit and slot

(electronic gaming) machines were most commonly mentioned (30) followed by casino

games such as

bull roulette or blackjack (26)

bull poker games (24)

bull bingo (21)

This was consistent with previous surveys Almost half (47) of children who play online

gambling-style games do so via apps Of these 26 were apps unrelated to social

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

104

networking sites 18 were via Facebook and 17 were free demo games via

gambling apps

Half (52) of 11 to 16 year olds were aware of in-game items (for example weapons

power-ups and tokens) Awareness of in-game items was more common in boys (66)

than girls (37) Of these children 44 had paid money for loot boxes crates or packs

to get in-game items within the game theyrsquore playing In most cases the money used for

loot boxes crates or packs comes from money they had received as a birthday or

Christmas present or from pocket money

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) explored the relationship between gambling

and video games This report was undertaken to explore concerns that these activities

introduce young people to gambling before they have been able to develop strategies to

avoid gambling-related harms

The RSPH report states that around 93 of young people regularly play video games

and that there is a growing concern around loot boxes and skin betting28 The report

found that in the past 7 days twice as many 11 to 14 year olds had bought loot boxes

than 22 to 24 year olds and almost twice as many had taken part in skin betting Also

children under 18 were significantly less likely than older respondents to classify these

activities as gambling and less likely to associate gambling harms with an increased risk

of health issues such as anxiety and alcohol consumption Finally only 25 of children

aged 11 to 14 years strongly support classifying loot boxes as gambling compared to

73 of those aged 22 to 24 years

You should note with reference to the caveats given at the start of this section that

although this source allows us to include information on this new topic the sampling

design it is not as robust as the lsquoGambling Commission Young People and Gambling

Survey 2019rsquo

Problem gambling

In 2019 17 of 11 to 16 year olds were classified as problem gamblers29 and 27 as

at-risk gamblers (as defined by the youth-adapted problem gambling screen DSM-IV-

28 Loot boxes are purchasable rewards that are uncertain at the time of purchase They include cosmetics such as new lsquoskinsrsquo for a character or they can be functional providing an advantage within the game As they cost money to buy and there is an element of chance involved it has led to concerns that they are a form of gambling On sites external to the game itself players can trade sell or bet on their skins for money ndash this is skin betting The Gambling Commissionrsquos view on loot boxes skin betting and related issues is set on in the position paper published March 2017 29 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 19 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

105

MR-J screen) These figures have remained stable compared to the previous year

However it is important to note that problem gambling prevalence in children and young

people from this source is higher than problem gambling prevalence in adults as

reported in the HSE In reality this is perhaps unlikely to be the case suggesting the

DSM-IV as used here may result in an overestimation

There was a higher proportion of boys at risk (38) and problem gamblers (20) than

girls at risk (16) and problem gamblers (07) This gender difference was consistent

with the higher prevalence seen in boys throughout the survey as well as what we see in

adult problem gambling from the HSE and other sources referenced throughout this

report

Another important aspect of gambling for public health not included in the HSE is the

harmful impact on family members The BGPS asks 2 questions about this issue The

first asked whether the respondentrsquos parents or guardians had ever regularly gambled If

so the respondent was asked to report whether they felt that either of their parents or

guardians had ever had a problem with their gambling Problem gambling prevalence

was significantly higher among respondents whose parents gambled regularly (16)

than for those whose parents did not (07) Also 50 of respondents who reported

having a parent with a gambling problem were themselves problem gamblers compared

with 10 of those who reported that although their parents regularly gambled they did

not have a problem with their gambling

Attitudes and influences

Most young people believe gambling to be dangerous (59) and feel well informed

about the issue (60) Also 7 agree that most people their age gamble 11 agree it

is OK for someone their age to gamble to see what itrsquos like and 7 agree it is OK for

someone their age to gamble once a week Consistent with previous surveys it is

interesting to note that despite the higher gambling prevalence in boys compared to

girls both show a similar level of agreement that gambling is dangerous (60 of boys

and 59 of girls)

Exposure to advertising was high among children and young people with 69 reporting

to have seen or heard some form of gambling advertisements or sponsorship most

commonly via television Boys (39) were more likely than girls (28) to report seeing

or hearing a gambling advert about a sports event or a betting company (34 of boys

compared to 21 of girls) Girls (47) were more likely than boys (34) to remember

the last advert they saw about a National Lottery based game or bingo (33 of girls

compared to 20 of boys) Also just over one in 10 (12) follow gambling companies

on social media while 11 had received direct marketing from gambling companies

Half (50) of young people have been spoken to about the potential problems that

gambling can lead to and 74 say they know who to go to for help if they had problems

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

106

related to gambling Children were most likely to have been spoken to about the

potential problems with gambling by their parents or guardians (34) followed by a

teacher (19)

These findings also highlight how parents or guardians were typically present when a

young person gambles (67 of those who have ever spent money on gambling) but are

also recognised as the first contact for help if they were to have problems with gambling

(53) Most young people (57) say their family would discourage them from gambling

if they started or found out but 23 report that their parents or guardians set rules about

gambling

A recent release from ALSPAC (25) measured young peoplersquos gambling at age 17 20

and 24 (3 points of transition from adolescence to adulthood) and revealed that regular

weekly gamblers had developed habits and patterns of play by 20 years of age Playing

the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most

common forms of gambling reported but as the young people got older there was a

significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to 35 at age 20

and 47 at age 24 There was also an increase seen among women but not as steep

(from 08 at age 17 to 4 at age 20 and 11 at age 24) The study shows how young

people who gamble regularly were more likely to

bull have parents who gambled regularly

bull have high social media usage

bull have been regular players of video games when younger

Also regular gamblers had lower wellbeing scores and were at least twice as likely to

smoke cigarettes daily and consume alcohol weekly Finally a small minority (6 to 7)

of men demonstrated problem gambling behaviours associated with poor mental health

and wellbeing involvement in crime and potentially harmful use of drugs and alcohol

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

107

7 Discussion

Over half of the population take part in gambling (245 million people in England)

Participation in the National Lottery declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However

participation in other gambling activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015

before falling back to 40 in the most recent survey Online gambling (excluding the

National Lottery) has increased from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

The trend in problem gambling between 2012 and 2018 has also reduced accounting

for 05 of the population in 2018 (245600 people in England) As numbers are very

small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with previous years

rather than representative of a real decline However low risk gambling is increasing

and a cause for concern

The prevention paradox states that on a health continuum ndash alcohol being the typical

example ndash the larger volume of harm is associated with people lower on the continuum

because there are more of them It is unclear from the data available whether problem

gambling is actually declining but low risk gambling does appear to be increasing So it

is difficult to say whether gambling risk and the associated harms have increased or

decreased overall The HSE gambling questionnaire is not detailed enough about the

harms themselves and so we cannot draw a clear conclusion based on the quantitative

data presented here This is a limitation of this study and in the data currently available

for this topic area

Problem moderate risk and low risk gambling are all associated with men in the younger

age groups Demographic factors particularly sex appear more significant in predicting

at-risk gambling behaviour than economic factors such as income employment and

relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling

than poor physical health and negative health behaviours with the exception of alcohol

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were affected others Among

children playing the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends

were the most common forms of gambling reported But as the young people got older

there was a significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to

35 at age 20 and 47 at age 24

Figures presented do not cover the period of the COVID-19 pandemic with the most

recent published data from the primary data source covering 2018 We have published a

separate evidence review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling It is important

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

108

to note that some findings particularly for problem gambling may be deemed

inconclusive because of the limited sample size

71 Strengths and limitations

The main strength of the findings of this report comes from the HSE The HSE is a

primary resource used to monitor the nationrsquos health and care It is a robust transparent

detailed widely used and well-respected data source Including the gambling

questionnaire allows us to compare gambling with a range of other health behaviours

and conditions However while sample size is adequate for analysing a range of topics

in England we had to combine several survey years at times in this report In particular

we had to combine data when looking at more detailed breakdowns Though it is the

most robust source available for estimating problem gambling in England the combined

dataset only included around 150 problem gamblers (according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI)

The main limitations of this report come from relying on alternative sources of previously

published data to meet aspects of the objectives not fully met by the HSE The HSE

does not ask questions about

bull time spent on gambling

bull money spent on gambling

bull affected others

bull attitudes towards gambling

bull the gambling behaviours of children and young people

The sources used are the best available for quantitative gambling data on these topics

but in general they lack the data quality of the HSE They also vary considerably in

robustness and how representative they are of the national population Finally except

for ALSPAC referenced in this report there is no longitudinal gambling data source

currently available The addition of longitudinal data would have contributed significantly

to the objectives of this report by allowing us to see important changes in the gambling

behaviours of individuals over time As a relatively new field in public health we hope

that more and better-quality quantitative gambling data will become available as more

research is carried out

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

109

8 References

1 Department of Health and Social Care PHE remit letter 2018 to 2019 Online 2018 2 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Government response to the consultation

on proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures Online 2018

3 Blank L Baxter S Buckley Woods H Goyder E Interventions to reduce public health burden of gambling related harms A mapping review of the international evidence Lancet Public Health 2021 Volume 6

4 Public Health England Gambling-related harms evidence review scope Online 2020 5 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling Online 2019 6 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Online 2018 7 UK Data Service Health Survey for England Online 2020 8 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes

annual report 2020 9 The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) development and UK

validation Health Qual Life Outcomes Tennant R Hiller L Fishwick R Platt S and S Joseph and others 2007 pages 1-13

10 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2016 Well-being and mental health Online 2017 11 David P Goldberg and Paul Williams User Guide to the General Health Questionnaire

Windsor NFER-NELSON 1988 12 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Adult health related behaviours Online

2019 13 Department of Health and Social Care UK Chief Medical Officers Low Risk Drinking

Guidelines Online 2016 14 Gambling Commission Problem gambling vs gambling-related harms Online 2020 15 NatCen British Gambling Prevalence Survey Online 2010 16 NatCen Treatment Needs and Gap Analysis in Great Britain Synthesis of findings from a

programme of studies Online 2020 17 London School of Economics An assessment of the accuracy of survey estimates of the

prevalence of problem gambling in the United Kingdom Online 2020 18 BeGambleAware Annual Statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great

Britain) Online 2020 19 BeGambleAware National Gambling Treatment Service Online 2020 20 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and

attitudes Annual Report Online 2020 21 Ofcom Adults Media Use and Attitudes Report Online 2019 22 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Review of the Gambling Act 2005

Online 2020 23 Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study

among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain Online 2019 24 Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) Skins in the game Online 2019 25 University of Bristol Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Online 2019 26 Emond A Griffiths M and L Hollen A longitudinal study of gambling in late adolescence

and early adulthood Follow-up assessment at 24 years Online 2019 27 The Kings Fund Healthy behaviours Future trends Online 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

110

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority

Introduction

Table 61 shows the prevalence of overall gambling participation in the last 12 months by

upper tier local authority (UTLA) as illustrated in Figure 4 of the main report Due to

sample size the authorities of Inner and Outer London have been grouped together

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

Results

Variation in gambling participation is evident by UTLA Discounting Rutland which has

wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a rate of gambling participation that

is statistically significantly higher than average for England The top 5 UTLAs in England

with the highest levels of gambling participation were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

111

Table 61 Gambling participation in the last 12 months by upper tier local authority England 2012 2015 2016 2018

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000001 Hartlepool 707 596 798

E06000002 Middlesbrough 612 492 720

E06000003 Redcar and Cleveland

667 561 758

E06000004 Stockton-on-Tees 726 637 799

E06000005 Darlington 700 575 801

E06000006 Halton 582 450 703

E06000007 Warrington 525 428 621

E06000008 Blackburn with

Darwen 571 441 692

E06000009 Blackpool 690 562 794

E06000010 Kingston upon Hull 654 567 731

E06000011 East Riding of

Yorkshire 547 464 627

E06000012 North East

Lincolnshire 640 527 739

E06000013 North Lincolnshire 683 587 766

E06000014 York 500 409 591

E06000015 Derby 633 539 718

E06000016 Leicester 476 397 557

E06000017 Rutland 833 436 970

E06000018 Nottingham 527 447 605

E06000019 Herefordshire 600 483 707

E06000020 Telford and Wrekin 711 614 792

E06000021 Stoke-on-Trent 615 535 689

E06000022 Bath and North East

Somerset 589 489 683

E06000023 Bristol 547 476 616

E06000024 North Somerset 606 510 694

E06000025 South

Gloucestershire 566 471 656

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

112

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000026 Plymouth 675 587 752

E06000027 Torbay 550 425 669

E06000030 Swindon 583 483 677

E06000031 Peterborough 617 516 709

E06000032 Luton 646 548 734

E06000033 Southend-on-Sea 598 489 697

E06000034 Thurrock 690 585 779

E06000035 Medway 500 424 576

E06000036 Bracknell Forest 681 566 777

E06000037 West Berkshire 575 466 677

E06000038 Reading 549 441 652

E06000039 Slough 349 257 454

E06000040 Windsor and Maidenhead

469 364 577

E06000041 Wokingham 595 485 696

E06000042 Milton Keynes 654 570 730

E06000043 Brighton and Hove 500 399 601

E06000044 Portsmouth 701 598 787

E06000045 Southampton 710 611 792

E06000046 Isle of Wight 675 568 766

E06000047 County Durham 687 630 738

E06000049 Cheshire East 519 452 586

E06000050 Cheshire West and

Chester 627 561 688

E06000051 Shropshire 653 587 713

E06000052 Cornwall 630 583 673

E06000054 Wiltshire 603 544 659

E06000055 Bedford 569 448 682

E06000056 Central Bedfordshire 620 531 701

E06000057 Northumberland 627 552 697

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

113

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000058 Bournemouth

Christchurch and Poole

614 546 677

E06000059 Dorset 588 520 654

E08000001 Bolton 603 533 669

E08000002 Bury 602 512 685

E08000003 Manchester 453 395 512

E08000004 Oldham 624 544 698

E08000005 Rochdale 614 527 694

E08000006 Salford 551 457 642

E08000007 Stockport 549 480 615

E08000008 Tameside 609 516 695

E08000009 Trafford 558 458 654

E08000010 Wigan 622 538 700

E08000011 Knowsley 786 676 866

E08000012 Liverpool 683 612 746

E08000013 St Helens 596 492 691

E08000014 Sefton 650 567 724

E08000015 Wirral 665 591 731

E08000016 Barnsley 734 644 808

E08000017 Doncaster 703 631 766

E08000018 Rotherham 729 633 808

E08000019 Sheffield 595 544 643

E08000021 Newcastle upon Tyne 558 480 634

E08000022 North Tyneside 759 635 850

E08000023 South Tyneside 692 583 784

E08000024 Sunderland 664 584 736

E08000025 Birmingham 437 393 481

E08000026 Coventry 549 479 618

E08000027 Dudley 682 598 755

E08000028 Sandwell 630 536 715

E08000029 Solihull 505 412 597

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

114

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E08000030 Walsall 558 469 644

E08000031 Wolverhampton 613 500 715

E08000032 Bradford 490 421 559

E08000033 Calderdale 707 601 795

E08000034 Kirklees 563 502 621

E08000035 Leeds 635 586 682

E08000036 Wakefield 702 629 766

E08000037 Gateshead 635 536 725

E10000002 Buckinghamshire 533 474 592

E10000003 Cambridgeshire 587 537 634

E10000006 Cumbria 688 626 743

E10000007 Derbyshire 631 585 675

E10000008 Devon 542 496 587

E10000011 East Sussex 532 470 593

E10000012 Essex 620 583 655

E10000013 Gloucestershire 635 579 688

E10000014 Hampshire 602 565 637

E10000015 Hertfordshire 615 576 652

E10000016 Kent 607 573 641

E10000017 Lancashire 619 581 656

E10000018 Leicestershire 604 553 653

E10000019 Lincolnshire 664 617 707

E10000020 Norfolk 638 595 679

E10000021 Northamptonshire 668 617 715

E10000023 North Yorkshire 651 601 698

E10000024 Nottinghamshire 643 597 687

E10000025 Oxfordshire 636 589 680

E10000027 Somerset 589 530 645

E10000028 Staffordshire 695 655 733

E10000029 Suffolk 658 609 704

E10000030 Surrey 565 528 602

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

115

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E10000031 Warwickshire 528 476 579

E10000032 West Sussex 610 559 658

E10000034 Worcestershire 673 619 724

Inner London 502 473 530

Outer London 500 482 518

Total 593 587 598

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

116

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling

Introduction

This analysis forms one part of a larger piece of work described in the pre-registered

lsquoGambling-related harms evidence review Analysis protocolrsquo The aim is to describe the

prevalence and determinants of gambling the harms associated with gambling and the

social and economic burden of gambling This analysis seeks to address the following

research questions

1 What socio-demographic factors are associated with gambling and harmful gambling

in England

2 Is gambling and harmful gambling associated with health status

The hypotheses tested are

1 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

2 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in

England

3 Problem gambling is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

4 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

5 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

6 Problem gambling is associated with health conditions in England

Data source

The data source is a combined dataset of the HSE for years 2012 2015 2016 and

2018

The HSE is a survey of the general population aged 16 and over Participants are

selected using a random probability sample The survey design ensures that every

address in England has an equal chance of being included in the survey each year and

the results are representative of the population living in private households Gambling

specific questions are included in the 2012 2015 2016 and 2018 surveys only

Outputs have been non-response weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE

analysis since 2003 NatCen were commissioned to combine the datasets They

manage the HSE on behalf of NHS Digital NatCen calculated and appended new

combined weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

117

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc16 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb16 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication30 the problem gambling weights were

used for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening tools

The self-completion weights were used for the remaining analyses

All important information related to the data source is available in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the HSE series31 Registered users can access the un-combined

datasets via the UK Data Archive32

We used SPSS version 25 software for all statistical analysis

Variables

We selected the variables below as they were of the most interest to the research aims

of the study within the limitations of the data available The independent variables are

those measuring the main socio-demographic and health concepts reported in the HSE

series Initially only Anyacty and PROBGAM as dependent variables were within scope

However following feedback from the expert reference group associated with the wider

project we agreed that a measure of any level of risk (lsquoharmful gamblingrsquo) should be

included if feasible A common proxy from HSE and Gambling Commission outputs is to

use a PGSI score of 1 or more to describe any level of gambling risk The analysis

follows this precedent

Table 62 Dependent gambling variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

Anyacty Whether spent any money on gambling in last 12 months Categorical

PGSI_atrisk Respondents with a PGSI score of 1 or more Categorical

PROBGAM Whether a problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

Categorical

30 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling 31 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 32 UK Data Service (2020) Health Survey for England

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

118

Table 63 Independent socio-demographic variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

ag16g10 Age 16 to 75 in 10-year age bands Categorical

Sex Gender Categorical

Origin2 Grouped ethnicity (White Black Asian Mixed Other) Categorical

Eqv3 Equivalised income tertiles (lowest middle highest) Ordinal

TopQual4 Highest educational qualification (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent below degree no qualification)

Ordinal

Employment_r Recoded variable of Activb2activity status of previous week (in education paid employmentself-employed unemployed retired looking after homefamily other)

Categorical

Qimd Quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score (2010 IMD for 2012 and 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018)

Ordinal

Gor1 Government Office Region Categorical

Table 64 Independent health-related variables of interest

Variable name

Variable label Measure

Genhelf2 Self-assessed general health grouped (very goodgood fair badvery bad)

Ordinal

WemwbsQ WEMWBS score quintiles Ordinal

LifeSatG LifeSatG Life satisfaction (low medium high very high) Ordinal

GHQg2 GHQ score group (0 1-3 4+) Ordinal

BMIlvg3 BMI group (not overweight or obese overweight obese) Categorical

Totalwug Alcohol units per week grouped Categorical

Cignow Current smoker Categorical

Missing data

Missing data was coded as such in the source dataset and was excluded as appropriate

from statistical analysis

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

119

Results

Step 1 Bivariate analysis

For step 1 of this pre-registered analysis a series of chi-squared tests were conducted

to refute the null hypothesis This was that the variables of interest are independent of

the 3 dependent gambling variables33

All 3 dependent variables are categorical as are most of the independent variables of

interest Chi-square was also used to test the ordinal variables against the categorical

dependents while acknowledging that the test will treat both as categorical The results

of such tests concerning ordinal variables are valid but there is an acceptable loss of

information in the output (for example the order of the categories) This is a common

approach and the ordinal variables are fully accounted for in step 2 of the analysis using

binary multiple logistic regression To trust the conclusions from a chi-square test the 2

standard assumptions are that

bull observations are independent

bull all expected frequencies are more than 534 for a 2x2 table (for example PROBGAM

x Sex)

These assumptions are true for the HSE combined dataset However the SPSS syntax

used tested the latter assumption as part of the output

Step 1 Findings

Tables 68 69 and 70 show the main output from the bivariate analysis

The most important figure for the hypotheses measured is the significance determined

by the chi-square test Where this is less-than 005 the null hypothesis is rejected and

the conclusion can be made that the association between the dependent and

independent is likely not due to chance variation From the outputs below this cannot be

determined for income region self-reported general health and region

The output also includes measures for Cramerrsquos-VPhi35 to quantify the correlation Chi-

square has determined whether there is a significant relationship between the variables

but is not able to quantify how important this is Cramerrsquos-V is a post-test that provides

this additional information Given the relatively large sample size of the dataset it is

33 Technically a chi-square test is a descriptive test not a modelling technique and as such there are no

dependent variables but for simplicity of language and consistency with the following description of Step 2

of this analysis the main gambling measures are here referred to as dependent 34 For larger tables no more than 20 of all cells may have an expected frequency less than 5 and all

expected frequencies more than 1 35 Phi is used where the table is 2x2

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

120

important to note that even small effects can become significant (as chance reduces

with larger sample sizes) Including this post-test suggests that this may be the case for

our study given that all measures of the correlation are low However results here do

not preclude any variables from step 2 The results of the chi-square test are used to

test whether including a variable reduces the badness-of-fit measure This means that if

chi-square is significant then the variable will be considered a significant predictor in the

equation So only income region and self-reported general health were excluded from

step 2 of the analysis and the conclusion made that the sample size may be amplifying

significance at the bivariate level

Table 65 Bivariate output for gambling participation in the last 12 months

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0121

Sex 0000 0075

Ethnicity 0000 0171

Income 0000 0087

Educational qualification 0000 0076

Employment 0000 0180

IMD 0000 0039

Region 0000 0087

Health factors

General health 0000 0042

Wellbeing 0000 0045

Life satisfaction 0000 0045

GHQ 0000 0032

BMI 0000 0096

Alcohol 0000 0227

Smoking 0000 0031

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

121

Table 66 Bivariate output for harmful gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0123

Sex 0000 0121

Ethnicity 0001 0027

Income 0831 0004

Educational qualification 0000 0044

Employment 0000 0088

IMD 0000 0050

Region 0021 0026

Health factors

General health 0577 0006

Wellbeing 0000 0092

Life satisfaction 0000 0070

GHQ 0000 0061

BMI 0330 0010

Alcohol 0000 0106

Smoking 0000 0085

Table 67 Bivariate output for problem gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0036

Sex 0000 0053

Ethnicity 0000 0042

Income 0017 0019

Educational qualification 0000 0029

Employment 0000 0052

IMD 0000 0047

Region 0000 0037

Health factors

General health 0000 0036

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

122

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Wellbeing 0000 0062

Life satisfaction 0000 0052

GHQ 0000 0053

BMI 0849 0004

Alcohol 0002 0031

Smoking 0000 0040

Step 2 Binary logistic regression

Whereas step 1 describes the significance of the relationship between the independent

variables and gambling behaviour step 2 models the determinants of and predicts the

likelihood of gambling behaviour among the study population Unlike the bivariate

analysis the aim here is to explicitly define a dependent gambling variable and make

predictions so a logistic regression is most appropriate

Because most variables and outcomes were categorical it could be argued that a log

linear analysis would be preferred for step 2 While this is an extension of the chi-square

test used in step 1 it has the disadvantage of being unintuitive and problematic to

interpret and explain So we decided to use logistic regression as it is easier to

understand than log linear analysis simple to explain to the audience of the final report

and is still a reasonable tool for the aims of this study

All standard assumptions of binary logistic regression are met by the present analysis

namely

bull dependent is dichotomous

bull one or more independent variables that can be either categorical (nominal or ordinal)

or continuous

bull independent observations

bull dependent variable is mutually exclusive

bull linear relationship between any continuous independent variables and the logit

transformation of the dependent variable

Before the regression some variables were recoded into more practical or meaningful

groups and others were dummy coded to turn certain categories into binary variables to

give them directionality (such as higher category is 1 lower category is 0) This allows

the regression to look at direction of association by comparing 2 sides

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

123

Table 68 Variables entered into the equation

Variable name Entered into

equation Recodes

ag16g10 Yes No recode

Sex Yes Recoded into dummy variable Sex_r (Male (0) Female (1))

Origin2 Yes Recoded into Ethnicity_r (White (0) Non-White (1))

Eqv3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

TopQual4 Yes No recode

Employment_r Yes Recoded into 2 dummy variables Paid_employ_dum (In paid employmentself-employed (1)) and Unemployed_dum (Unemployed (1))

Qimd Yes No recode

Gor1 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Genhelf2 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

WemwbsQ Yes No recode

LifeSatG Yes No recode

GHQg2 Yes No recode

BMIlvg3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Totalwug Yes Recoded into Alcwug_r (Never drink (0) 1-14 units (1) Over 14 to 35 units (2) Over 35 to 50 units (3) 50+ units (4))

Cignow Yes No recode

Not all questions were asked in every HSE year For example life satisfaction is

included in the 2016 and 2018 surveys while WEMWBS is included in 2012 2015 and

2016 surveys only Given the results of step 1 life satisfaction and WEMWBS are to be

included in the logistic regression This means that the analysis will be run on 2016 as

this is the most recent year that includes all variables of interest This is suitable from a

sample size perspective for Anyacty and PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling)

While there is no consensus regarding sample size for logistic regression a

conventional guideline suggests that maximum likelihood estimation with less than 100

cases is ldquoriskyrdquo 500 cases is ldquoadequaterdquo and there should be at least 10 cases per

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

124

predictor36 Others have refined this saying that 10 times the number of predictors (k)

should consider the proportion (p) of successes (n = 10kp)37 Given the results of step 1

this means we need a sample of 253 for Anyacty and 2933 for PGSI_atrisk (harmful

gambling) We used 3395 in the analysis for Anyacty and 3315 for PGSI_atrisk The

sample requirement for PROBGAM to be meaningful cannot be achieved within the

limits of the dataset used no matter the number of HSE years included

One final consideration about the sample size for the logistic regression is specific to the

calculation of logs ratios which is the output of step 2 A bias38 of up to 15 is

acknowledged for the log odds ratio when the sample size is around 100 but this

reduces close to zero when around 1000 cases are included So the current analysis

should not be unduly affected by such bias

Table 69 Sample size calculation

Model Proportion of successes (p) Number of predictors (k) Sample size (n)

Anyacty 0473743 12 253

Atrisk 0040908 12 2933

Probgam 0006601 12 18180

Step 2 Findings

The Anyacty model is poor and is not described in detail here

The first output below (Table 73) allows us to reject the null hypothesis Here this is that

the model based on the variables inputted fits equally well as the null model (Block 0 in

full output)

36 Long J (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables SAGE Publications London 37 Peduzzi P Concato J Kemper E Holford T R and A R Feinstein (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis Journal of clinical epidemiology 49(12) 1373-1379 38 Nemes S Jonasson J M Genell A and G Steineck (2009) Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size BMC medical research methodology 9 56-60

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

125

Table 70 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig

Step 32938 25 0000

Block 32938 25 0000

Model 32938 25 000

The second main output is the pseudo-Rsup2 values Itrsquos worth noting that these will be

lower than the Rsup2 of multiple regression lsquoPseudorsquo as Rsup2 in this analysis is not technically

the proportion of variation accounted for by variation in the independents rather it is

only an analogue of correlation The Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be quoted as the preferred

measure over Cox and Snell Rsup2 because the latter has the limitation that it cannot reach

1 as Rsup2 in linear regression can Nagelkerke Rsup2 overcomes this limitation by adjusting

the scale of the statistic So as this analysis aims to be as analogous as possible to the

Rsup2 of least squares regression Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be used

The present model has an Rsup2 of 27 which is good but not great However it is typical

of Nagelkerke and Cox amp Snell to vary and so it is best practice not to over-emphasize

the pseudo-Rsup2 in logistic regression The Hosmer amp Lemeshow uses non-significance as

a measure of goodness of fit of the model Greater than 005 indicates it is a good fitting

model which the PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling) model achieves

Table 71 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Model Summary

-2 Log likelihood Cox amp Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square

1128789a 0097 0267

Note a Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than 0001

Table 72 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Hosmer and Lemeshow Test (step 1)

Chi-square df Sig

9080 8 0336

A drawback of the model is the low classification rate particularly regarding true

classifications A model with a good accuracy rate would demonstrate high proportions

for both those with no PGSI risk and those with any PGSI risk The current model is

good at predicting cases that have no risk (997) but not very good at predicting cases

that do have risk (104)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

126

Table 73 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Classification Tablea

Predicted

(PGSI_atrisk) Percentage Correct

No risk At risk

Observed (PGSI At risk (1plus))

No risk 3023 8 997

At risk 172 20 104

Overall Percentage 944

Note a The cut value is 0500

The most important output for the aim of this study is the variables in the equation table

which details the regression function itself This analysis is not concerned with the raw

scores because natural scales do not make sense when dealing with a dichotomous

dependent variable As the analysis here aims to predict the likelihood of falling into one

of 2 groups (at risk gambling yes or no) meaning the relationship in non-linear then we

quote the log odds (essentially the analysis has made the relationship linear by

converting the raw probability scores into log odds) By taking the natural log of the odds

ratios we get an indirect measure of probability of being in the target group that will then

be linearly related So the final output of the analysis is the predicted change in log odds

for every one unit change in the independents Those that were significant were

tabulated and summarised in the body of the main report These are

bull age

bull sex

bull GHQ-12 (all levels)

bull alcohol consumption (over 14 to 35 units and 50 units or more)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

127

Table 74 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Variables in the Equationa

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational Qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equiv)

8609 2 0014

Educational Qualification 3 groups (Below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational Qualification 3 groups (No qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (least deprived) 11143 4 0025

Quintile of IMD score (2) -0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3) 0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4) 0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (most deprived) 0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1) 15525 4 0004

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2) 0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3) 0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4) 0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5) -0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

128

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Life satisfaction (Low (0-4)) 4262 3 0235

Life satisfaction (Medium (5-6)) -0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (High (7-8)) -0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (Very high (9-10)) 0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ Score ndash grouped (Score 0) 15279 2 0000

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 1-3) 0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 4+) 0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (Nevernot in last 12 months)

36554 4 0000

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14) 0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (Over 14 to 35) 1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (Over 35 to 50) 0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (Over 50) 2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020

Note Empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts a Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

129

Limitations

The main limitations to the analysis are the low classification rate for positive cases and

that while the Rsup2 is less important in binary logistic regression than linear regression and

automatically lower the model overall seems to be good but not great The other main

limitation is that the variables included and so the concepts measured are restricted by

what is included in HSE

Finally it is important to note that while the model goes some way to explaining the

relationship between harmful gambling and the available range of variables and

concepts all conclusions relate to association only not causation

Conclusions

A series of bivariate analyses were conducted to compare a range of variables to 3

increasing levels of gambling participation and harm Of these income region self-

reported general health and BMI were shown not to be significant for harmful gambling

Income and BMI were shown not to be significant for problem gambling

We performed a logistic regression to look at the effects of important socio-demographic

and health factors on the likelihood that respondents are participating in harmful levels of

gambling The logistic regression model was statistically significant (p less-than 005)

The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling and correctly classified

94 of cases but this was skewed towards classifying those at no risk

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be at-risk gamblers Wellbeing

contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on GHQ12

Compared to respondents scoring 0 the odds of those scoring 1 to 3 were 20 times

more likely to participate in harmful gambling Those scoring 4 or more were 24 times

more likely to participate

Regarding physical health and health behaviours smoking and BMI did not contribute

significantly to the model but alcohol did Compared to abstainers or people not drinking

in last 12 months the odds of respondents who drank above the recommended limits

(14 to 35 units) were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This

increased markedly to 78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) Given the

importance of gender mentioned above it should be noted that the group from HSE

consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

The broader conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly

gender appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic

factors such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

130

is a stronger predictor of harmful gambling than poor physical health and negative health

behaviours with the exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and the

method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

131

Appendix C Confidence limits

This appendix presents the confidence intervals39 that correspond to the tables

produced from the Health Survey for England

Note that empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts

Table 1 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6562960 6334907 5738490 5517114

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4317807 4628907 4288585 4135974

Table 2 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5131122 4451484 3932956 3487769

Scratchcards 1779043 2122489 1935338 1701510

Other lotteries 1414683 1397320 1309177 1359294

Machines and games

Football pools 182619 224660 224504 253018

Bingo (not online) 525364 536277 440814 403652

39 A confidence range has been constructed using the Wilson Score method applied to the unweighted survey data

This range (+x and -y) has then been applied to the weighted estimate to produce 95 confidence intervals based

on weighted prevalence levels

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

132

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

565450 651162 564692 517818

Machines in a bookmakers 203497 289984 252415 188015

Casino table games (not online) 217587 308750 280441 225071

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075259 087758 061298 052915

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

247617 327553 271087 262360

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 384863 660760 679692 719161

Betting exchange 057923 078901 096568 088006

Horse races (not online) 966001 1037288 853068 748048

Dog races (not online) 231290 243261 178292 142126

Sports events (not online) 337418 469553 459815 356345

Other events or sports (not online)

070264 114616 105517 123946

Spread-betting 032504 044184 044120 035913

Private betting 414193 460042 365062 337475

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 106871 150925 105517 096928

Summary

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

603368 872696 872386 873509

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

133

Table 3 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1043636 2980783 3995669 4433740 4143208 3366952 2528593 3489166

Scratchcards 1727215 2436717 2122630 1748760 1203935 736928 349895 1702598

Other lotteries 368931 851805 1248142 1510844 1665525 1644453 1488600 1360281

Machines and games

Football pools 500017 505813 125403 043431 092364 052245 125216 253452

Bingo (not online) 368931 434472 414316 218671 306199 263832 366695 404203

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

669475 814954 574877 418627 306199 073441 047549 518443

Machines in a bookmakers

325948 399073 133402 103672 048250 188385

Casino table games (not online)

300370 505813 215674 111586 077250 225478

Poker played in pubs or clubs

097038 079631 042318 053100

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

233091 532732 361625 143797 084765 262801

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

750752 1393731 885118 634445 297618 110693 054080 719896

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

134

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Betting exchange 183742 110705 063786 017054 041341 088251

Horse races (not online)

814337 723214 656254 744063 705698 620226 218526 748796

Dog races (not online) 216520 183867 071194 103672 062513 066258 142445

Sports events (not online)

535416 613960 266506 287132 204688 080724 356862

Other events or sports (not online)

274971 192195 056493 065233 069829 124242

Spread-betting 104643 050020 036061

Private betting 687487 514776 292227 160184 123468 059188 074454 337978

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120051 102830 093988 043431 048250 059188 023266 097187

Summary

Any gambling activity 3591860 5407593 5440884 5765226 5661399 4968794 4065485 5283918

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

3405626 4607524 4144038 3800076 3758191 3064607 2490272 3906545

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

933176 1640157 1107806 762420 392939 157519 081463 874316

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

135

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1467259 3510485 4569168 4988049 4740843 4004582 3216145 3712348

Scratchcards 2237681 2938136 2615102 2189984 1622106 1118809 682241 1880872

Other lotteries 648125 1193740 1655770 1929442 2136972 2162721 2068854 1523567

Machines and games

Football pools 815807 782166 286905 146905 242719 190570 350156 331639

Bingo (not online) 648125 694019 675709 410309 547004 516624 705209 500715

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1024788 1150848 873938 668934 547004 229112 209095 626345

Machines in a bookmakers

591519 649674 298839 246170 167268 078437 076382 256781

Casino table games (not online)

557344 782166 415895 258195 217978 123019 109263 299645

Poker played in pubs or clubs

262730 211548 150729 079335 070360 078437 093306 092229

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

465280 815055 608802 305738 230391 123019 109263 342279

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1122772 1808101 1241414 931637 535657 291423 222447 844666

Betting exchange 395122 260219 189059 093528 154249 123019 124567 137034

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

136

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Horse races (not online)

1198611 1043228 971956 1061279 1044250 976648 495459 875733

Dog races (not online) 442015 366481 201584 246170 192860 216382 124567 202776

Sports events (not online)

860079 913250 484660 501354 409383 241741 153840 448110

Other events or sports (not online)

522990 378089 176420 184919 205472 078437 124567 181001

Spread-betting 275043 161416 067548 064526 085458 043689 076382 069289

Private betting 1046612 793138 518737 329227 291327 203539 261727 427016

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 299471 248158 238589 146905 167268 203539 153840 148088

Summary

Any gambling activity 4217178 5967990 6014213 6308361 6251656 5628584 4820989 5515650

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4024973 5173180 4719791 4345658 4348681 3689635 3174929 4134514

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1338704 2080011 1497113 1082799 659541 364073 274602 1010073

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

137

Table 5 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6632052 6377894 5943259 5575595

Any gambling activity Females

5942819 5731883 4969458 4906675

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6963408 6718136 6293842 5902785

Any gambling activity Females

6254929 6046300 5290274 5233175

Table 6 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3246002 3730976 2826442

Scratchcards 1169964 2047322 1288765

Other lotteries 1169964 1492822 1025881

Machines and games

Football pools 097245 331162 161764

Bingo (not online) 181793 461044 439165

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 260591 677371 289335

Machines in a bookmakers 089066 257882 058685

Casino table games (not online) 269453 248786 023699

Poker played in pubs or clubs 013817 072168 017435

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

181793 321958 089155

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 829815 791242 161764

Betting exchange 097245 072168 044142

Horse races (not online) 680296 876993 315458

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

138

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Dog races (not online) 072929 167769 073727

Sports events (not online) 260591 451712 128970

Other events or sports (not online) 057156 167769 058685

Spread-betting

Private betting 260591 395884 161764

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 072929 106282 058685

Summary

Any gambling activity 4822296 5717294 4381627

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3393706 4396794 2884939

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

942692 991720 254771

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3659871 4051421 3324819

Scratchcards 1464018 2318770 1671830

Other lotteries 1464018 1734501 1376348

Machines and games

Football pools 201170 458796 326066

Bingo (not online) 316244 608611 686798

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 417105 851788 497620

Machines in a bookmakers 189387 372249 169903

Casino table games (not online) 428205 361367 105181

Poker played in pubs or clubs 065016 138416 091504

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316244 448022 219200

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1085531 977657 326066

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

139

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Betting exchange 201170 138416 144563

Horse races (not online) 915656 1071712 531322

Dog races (not online) 165600 262578 194744

Sports events (not online) 417105 597965 279093

Other events or sports (not online) 141449 262578 169903

Spread-betting 018946 010800 029172

Private betting 417105 533922 326066

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 165600 184216 169903

Summary

Any gambling activity 5257552 6040806 4920415

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3811599 4724157 3385971

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1212199 1196726 452417

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

140

Table 7 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5010828 1217707 3855865 3194364 3141982 4261193

Scratchcards 2392446 1504443 771932 1869685 1883219 1942949

Other lotteries 1444337 341029 1743242 944731 869787 1378997

Machines and games

Football pools 293283 350031 113038 153197 065571 251384

Bingo (not online) 485953 296228 532725 426543 524869 503985

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

787354 652538 149092 627816 414928 621294

Machines in a bookmakers

341252 287313 026812 381417 131420 270701

Casino table games (not online)

399008 350031 060262 161672 081619 290043

Poker played in pubs or clubs

113245 139049 011396 071133 088841

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

399008 199203 043262 354482 235334 309408

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

943709 468090 113038 399434 244162 660465

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

141

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Betting exchange 113245 190517 018918 071133 098270

Horse races (not online)

1178937 477241 637685 683310 451433 945210

Dog races (not online)

293283 113840 086397 161672 073550 222461

Sports events (not online)

602327 449816 113038 381417 131420 455212

Other events or sports (not online)

160124 097291 026812 111449 117202

Spread-betting 057978 034490 055608 042284

Private betting 524694 801832 140032 283272 165567 435724

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 150708 164632 068903 095111 042311 136216

Summary

Any gambling activity

6393967 3393970 5102509 4808928 4477874 5701128

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

142

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5169127 1516050 4105461 3632423 3544049 4378999

Scratchcards 2528827 1828181 913477 2242908 2227498 2037902

Other lotteries 1557418 516281 1940866 1232003 1124781 1462015

Machines and games

Football pools 349063 527241 173280 287250 152230 289954

Bingo (not online) 556293 461270 653008 632580 731043 557279

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

874737 883487 217174 870369 601420 679936

Machines in a bookmakers

401069 450223 059636 577920 246091 310631

Casino table games (not online)

463283 527241 106134 298732 176110 331283

Poker played in pubs or clubs

149196 259130 035079 169741 112545

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

463283 338712 083160 544983 381740 351912

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1038302 668690 173280 599818 392876 720754

Betting exchange 149196 327436 047543 169741 123113

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

143

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Horse races (not online)

1282954 679502 767906 934619 644769 1015927

Dog races (not online)

349063 224453 139960 298732 164214 258885

Sports events (not online)

679859 647040 173280 577920 246091 506066

Other events or sports (not online)

202292 201077 059636 229211 144176

Spread-betting 084494 104180 145351 059116

Private betting 597532 1053588 206247 456535 291798 485560

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 191713 293434 117480 205634 115599 165156

Summary

Any gambling activity

6545296 3811322 5357192 5270901 4903252 5818657

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

144

Table 8 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2998785 3313954 3578576 3516211 3324918

Scratchcards 19143 1615445 1719943 1478757 1288589

Other lotteries 921428 1150021 1452543 1440705 1354701

Machines and games

Football pools 185938 31272 225267 17336 170005

Bingo (not online) 518444 401551 338874 285037 229006

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 563566 437439 464056 417836 412342

Machines in a bookmakers 219643 191307 132429 181788 058654

Casino table games (not online) 152757 242814 216674 19874 137049

Poker played in pubs or clubs 058271 05344 038722 024671

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314336 199825 216674 215808 170005

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 518444 573413 701384 773594 692533

Betting exchange 08089 038818 045942 09936 08136

Horse races (not online) 473551 536962 840279 819922 729218

Dog races (not online) 1043 100084 107956 19874 051313

Sports events (not online) 262367 31272 321201 382119 289254

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

145

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 073249 108136 11606 09936 112815

Spread-betting 02347 031777 018411 024671 023682

Private betting 245207 365855 312388 285037 237546

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 088618 108136 084028 031424 073691

Summary

Any gambling activity 4865969 5019271 5419072 5275098 5069299

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3685513 3688054 4042843 3752781 3619792

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

690953 729585 840279 903618 839822

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3511704 379332 4067395 4010237 3843384

Scratchcards 2362902 2000608 2115692 1858612 1672048

Other lotteries 1262067 148849 1824509 1816872 1745527

Machines and games

Football pools 362472 510357 398515 331394 337824

Bingo (not online) 787689 621024 54425 479041 418413

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 842267 664936 69836 645461 653849

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

146

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 408527 352472 27191 342913 169993

Casino table games (not online) 315893 420664 387158 365857 291013

Poker played in pubs or clubs 171099 151192 126224 10107

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

533175 363904 387158 388685 337824

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 787689 828209 979717 1067675 991846

Betting exchange 2083 125915 138953 225862 207111

Horse races (not online) 732881 784861 1140062 1121087 1034927

Dog races (not online) 244709 224247 236535 365857 157392

Sports events (not online) 465504 510357 522024 601386 497756

Other events or sports (not online) 196001 236144 24838 225862 255422

Spread-betting 106199 113005 086687 10107 105257

Private betting 442784 576921 510888 479041 429815

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 220512 236144 200614 114265 194839

Summary

Any gambling activity 5413192 5519375 5917538 5782146 5608713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

422078 4177314 4540749 4252419 4146756

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

147

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

994041 1011184 1140062 1216923 1163622

Table 9 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4506501 2103280 2802777 3104280

Scratchcards 2058401 792842 1234950 1549603

Other lotteries 1474748 606499 660149 735006

Machines and games

Football pools 240450 173397 219725 302101

Bingo (not online) 550883 147693 179245 157085

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 648570 386423 379327 403041

Machines in a bookmakers 269339 173397 227916 220317

Casino table games (not online) 298290 208101 260953 220317

Poker played in pubs or clubs 088076 065122

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

336971 081107 086615 204294

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 717074 156226 260953 420097

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

148

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Betting exchange 097462 041968

Horse races (not online) 1050863 122333 203434 327088

Dog races (not online) 250072

Sports events (not online) 482648 147693 131947 360673

Other events or sports (not online) 125778 057277 134063

Spread-betting 041769 041968

Private betting 463178 216842 101452 411562

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 135258 081107 096828

Summary

Any gambling activity 6017525 2922783 3837359 4033433

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4633639 2466930 3434827 3812932

Scratchcards 2162540 1042510 1718023 2125711

Other lotteries 1566385 829603 1038692 1170192

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

149

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Machines and games

Football pools 281094 304507 463866 608649

Bingo (not online) 610557 270324 404813 395663

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 712837 570581 682495 746376

Machines in a bookmakers 312195 304507 475582 491544

Casino table games (not online) 343234 349653 522173 491544

Poker played in pubs or clubs 113520 153271

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

384540 177211 258560 467789

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 784311 281753 522173 769098

Betting exchange 124130 116537

Horse races (not online) 1130410 235796 440344 643329

Dog races (not online) 291468

Sports events (not online) 538815 270324 332669 689299

Other events or sports (not online) 155805 141153 359019

Spread-betting 059843 116537

Private betting 518291 360874 283536 757744

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 166321 177211 296809

Summary

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

150

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Any gambling activity 6142123 3324273 4510372 4773230

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Table 10 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6209163 5708136 5894410 5910459 5597362 5934614 4647612 5533803 5596221

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6722364 6030005 6262520 6305890 5960529 6282559 4952761 5825022 5961644

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

151

Table 11 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4282244 4298228 3598961

Scratchcards 1995277 1839055 1359311

Other lotteries 1372875 1429754 1064399

Machines and games

Football pools 277508 163664 072657

Bingo (not online) 451567 620892 522183

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 656096 526067 340283

Machines in a bookmakers 287133 199915 147071

Casino table games (not online) 335349 145687 088760

Poker played in pubs or clubs 096607 049834

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316045 254867 224818

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 753849 384907 224818

Betting exchange 105979 049834

Horse races (not online) 1008762 754369 531374

Dog races (not online) 239082 163664 096923

Sports events (not online) 490429 310339 207346

Other events or sports (not online) 124799 075251 080668

Spread-betting 050312 025545

Private betting 490429 291800 113436

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 134242 127829 064737

Summary

Any gambling activity 5732273 5738381 4790347

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

152

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4418000 4582689 4025631

Scratchcards 2105829 2065944 1674158

Other lotteries 1468467 1635933 1350266

Machines and games

Football pools 324254 244202 166214

Bingo (not online) 510128 766172 734720

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 725520 661161 517392

Machines in a bookmakers 334626 287886 271453

Casino table games (not online) 386391 222213 190034

Poker played in pubs or clubs 125227 098246

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

365702 352835 373358

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 827729 502566 373358

Betting exchange 135851 098246

Horse races (not online) 1092719 912465 745491

Dog races (not online) 282695 244202 201833

Sports events (not online) 551251 417265 350907

Other events or sports (not online) 157023 132780 178164

Spread-betting 071540 062584

Private betting 551251 395838 225242

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 167577 200103 154172

Summary

Any gambling activity 5867427 6020177 5229614

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

153

Table 12 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2792229 3230571 3559739 3440260

Scratchcards 1588487 1794312 1677146 1516730

Other lotteries 973585 1332406 1300397 1362961

Machines and games

Football pools 100467 275244 254047 203593

Bingo (not online) 319703 438844 345092 374197

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 420026 421365 530313 429061

Machines in a bookmakers 198705 128019 182413 134065

Casino table games (not online) 086254 216759 254047 168580

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

352860 233340 200193 221251

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 303246 660924 822312 604791

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 462504 518085 774924 754509

Dog races (not online) 100467 046459 121105 151252

Sports events (not online) 198705 317701 391068 292677

Other events or sports (not online) 100467 104797 103936 125531

Spread-betting

Private betting 303246 241672 354266 247898

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 079275 067552 095429 059327

Summary

Any gambling activity 4523069 4909906 5412810 5150385

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3217452 3907588 4005754 3647737

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

591819 814832 955467 716959

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

154

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3531155 3841433 3903469 3824104

Scratchcards 2210949 2309860 1950911 1813910

Other lotteries 1494319 1795766 1548645 1648188

Machines and games

Football pools 320456 522482 377799 331506

Bingo (not online) 657681 737332 486501 540297

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 795842 714974 700775 605242

Machines in a bookmakers 480575 311178 289634 241289

Casino table games (not online) 294922 441540 377799 286647

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

704018 464795 311804 353785

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 634391 1013210 1027993 808906

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 852731 837355 975507 978679

Dog races (not online) 320456 173636 211119 264039

Sports events (not online) 480575 579618 540398 442104

Other events or sports (not online) 320456 274645 188339 229855

Spread-betting

Private betting 634391 476382 497301 387042

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 282027 212298 176871 136314

Summary

Any gambling activity 5317942 5548216 5765700 5548500

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3980370 4538781 4356317 4035958

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1021521 1197914 1174485 936357

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

155

Table 13 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3695674 3916652 3715339 4020550 3665308

Scratchcards 2097067 2031186 2021718 1579579 1425222

Other lotteries 1117472 1154159 1251896 1238946 1302119

Machines and games

Football pools 202809 130988 208740 202579 222107

Bingo (not online) 358227 425267 460826 357911 317347

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 500585 524312 731955 455425 317347

Machines in a bookmakers 331904 206236 268175 160863 121980

Casino table games (not online) 186011 214760 337373 236494 230656

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

340663 189273 259613 202579 171397

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 672818 587908 613590 635899 594967

Betting exchange 065744 106679 042865 058198 113910

Horse races (not online) 755297 864165 925293 745641 649722

Dog races (not online) 112296 180838 183676 136284 113910

Sports events (not online) 446856 345241 604535 393194 291135

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

156

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 080935 067501 118494 088524 044729

Spread-betting

Private betting 279705 371799 443040 279430 239231

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120300 052494 102695 050895 082259

Summary

Any gambling activity 5276613 5592315 5416787 5617329 4945734

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4230545 4427808 4271166 4563725 4180709

Scratchcards 2558958 2463644 2495995 1999811 1813667

Other lotteries 1484713 1505614 1651034 1622613 1677494

Machines and games

Football pools 385415 274857 401597 385844 404082

Bingo (not online) 588920 658751 727642 589428 528229

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 765606 779116 1054581 711252 528229

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

157

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 555423 379126 481711 327861 264877

Casino table games (not online) 362332 390548 571997 431688 415476

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

566604 356196 470337 385844 335126

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 972237 855143 913784 929573 868881

Betting exchange 183496 239328 148824 171309 253003

Horse races (not online) 1069220 1177274 1279891 1059108 933792

Dog races (not online) 256586 344685 366853 292621 253003

Sports events (not online) 699693 559261 902903 633905 494607

Other events or sports (not online) 208186 178774 272551 220742 142685

Spread-betting

Private betting 487981 592542 705558 488452 426846

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 268522 153889 248479 158672 204877

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

158

Summary

Any gambling activity 5820098 6103118 5978704 6157312 5473096

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

159

Table 14 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3614585 3262398 3004568

Scratchcards 1637980 1707333 1654845

Other lotteries 1375741 1363414 1015146

Machines and games

Football pools 270864 193181 166022

Bingo (not online) 381984 431371 275273

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 503795 458465 449980

Machines in a bookmakers 161810 176141 199119

Casino table games (not online) 206914 210338 249667

Poker played in pubs or clubs 048888 046850 022542

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

225102 244956 275273

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 797979 604322 458858

Betting exchange 091223 069632 063876

Horse races (not online) 778883 705673 539231

Dog races (not online) 143947 134151 049405

Sports events (not online) 372668 341796 215860

Other events or sports (not online) 135062 061918 117588

Spread-betting

Private betting 335497 279923 283850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 082604 093322 078806

Summary

Any gambling activity 5379095 5107325 4730935

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1625845 3873510 3533251

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

453456 798417 683864

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

160

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3907685 3724702 3546992

Scratchcards 1867970 2087292 2106069

Other lotteries 1590703 1712903 1390311

Machines and games

Football pools 377703 349108 345783

Bingo (not online) 506364 649649 495664

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 644314 682414 719620

Machines in a bookmakers 246977 326243 392418

Casino table games (not online) 301782 371857 461470

Poker played in pubs or clubs 100137 136286 110532

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

323557 417051 495664

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 969563 855805 730675

Betting exchange 157711 173363 188798

Horse races (not online) 948696 973936 829701

Dog races (not online) 224876 268468 163402

Sports events (not online) 495698 539693 415544

Other events or sports (not online) 213780 161123 274618

Spread-betting

Private betting 452942 461896 507019

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 146348 209531 213734

Summary

Any gambling activity 5679935 5591029 5308932

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1855188 4350675 4094700

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

587617 1080722 1003999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

161

Table 15 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2651783 3729469 4064039

Scratchcards 1459465 1665503 1938147

Other lotteries 954702 1444234 1678079

Machines and games

Football pools 253038 263571 170451

Bingo (not online) 297553 362493 454205

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 433199 453700 554696

Machines in a bookmakers 148439 210476 145004

Casino table games (not online) 156996 290372 179002

Poker played in pubs or clubs 020646 066338 040707

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

182870 236932 274792

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 673162 807051 628360

Betting exchange 065583 074372 103450

Horse races (not online) 682479 854102 656091

Dog races (not online) 097998 141093 136599

Sports events (not online) 270792 508869 230904

Other events or sports (not online) 089781 192957 048153

Spread-betting

Private betting 306505 362493 274792

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 089781 090690 071294

Summary

Any gambling activity 4617434 5483635 5712319

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3516410 3957222 4232697

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

822832 910695 842232

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

162

Upper confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3036056 4134205 4518960

Scratchcards 1772839 1985414 2314018

Other lotteries 1219525 1747473 2035226

Machines and games

Football pools 403947 412462 309698

Bingo (not online) 459251 533162 664592

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 623061 641612 783637

Machines in a bookmakers 268983 345763 275271

Casino table games (not online) 280389 445558 321105

Poker played in pubs or clubs 077356 150485 120117

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314406 379204 444850

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 902154 1046957 869635

Betting exchange 152201 162416 217037

Horse races (not online) 912801 1099733 901776

Dog races (not online) 199641 255421 263719

Sports events (not online) 426121 706237 388949

Other events or sports (not online) 187894 323351 132630

Spread-betting

Private betting 470263 533162 444850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 187894 186030 169362

Summary

Any gambling activity 5043183 5893996 6163711

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3928235 4365662 4689584

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1071903 1162935 1114791

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

163

Table 16 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2484741 4372137 5276755 4915487 5374800

Scratchcards 1108981 2007129 2161887 2068953 2661741

Other lotteries 782168 1405446 1614427 1566777 1799449

Machines and games

Football pools 109794 207619 338138 338922 515747

Bingo (not online) 309779 544387 441083 364588 568919

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 272783 573503 830806 862187 1068509

Machines in a bookmakers 118618 207619 394168 477341 595632

Casino table games (not online) 066450 226639 544874 468590 640326

Poker played in pubs or clubs 033301 058073 110064 164810 256825

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

109794 283929 422295 407680 533432

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 118618 573503 1138851 1137546 1281953

Betting exchange 025408 067178 127774 172804 248473

Horse races (not online) 235999 846311 1517068 1727076 1818423

Dog races (not online) 041390 207619 300976 330401 471722

Sports events (not online) 101014 351108 792492 935181 1161056

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

164

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Other events or sports (not online) 025408 076338 199845 330401 341538

Spread-betting 017786 031240 049802 080286 198927

Private betting 101014 379989 744672 538911 775547

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 041390 113381 190751 221520 174577

Summary

Any gambling activity 3402663 5872721 6816336 6541742 7145430

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2739271 4528134 5562554 5582284 6019270

Scratchcards 1297399 2134314 2402588 2634760 3255627

Other lotteries 944783 1516298 1830969 2081660 2325544

Machines and games

Football pools 178366 254731 449447 621550 841022

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

165

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Bingo (not online) 418012 617791 566320 655617 907342

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 375075 648660 995923 1273026 1503092

Machines in a bookmakers 189525 254731 513318 801704 940375

Casino table games (not online) 121794 275702 682349 790545 995257

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075010 084356 177932 377534 502486

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

178366 338382 545142 712079 863168

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 189525 648660 1327352 1594993 1747699

Betting exchange 062920 095246 200189 389451 490922

Horse races (not online) 331926 935714 1728493 2259846 2346400

Dog races (not online) 086904 254731 406674 610161 785471

Sports events (not online) 167162 411168 954302 1359318 1609698

Other events or sports (not online) 062920 106081 287986 610161 616925

Spread-betting 050558 051203 098309 243038 420977

Private betting 167162 442273 902205 879511 1158765

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 086904 149018 277097 460200 385581

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

166

Summary

Any gambling activity 3679789 6026811 7080456 7161677 7713898

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

167

Table 17 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3494549 3880776

Scratchcards 2800592 1701792

Other lotteries 1034091 1585660

Machines and games

Football pools 405984 207566

Bingo (not online) 557456 444225

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 812186 462738

Machines in a bookmakers 353341 137215

Casino table games (not online) 301251 216477

Poker played in pubs or clubs 101963 037516

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 459092 252321

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 793825 724651

Betting exchange 035595 102887

Horse races (not online) 738878 876023

Dog races (not online) 166154 102887

Sports events (not online) 441342 343059

Other events or sports (not online) 166154 111399

Spread-betting 042443 022554

Private betting 566454 297514

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 117695 102887

Summary

Any gambling activity 5764541 5697910

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 4562254 4188547

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1052700 885515

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

168

Upper confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4053634 4241764

Scratchcards 3332315 1986745

Other lotteries 1411123 1863201

Machines and games

Football pools 663820 325240

Bingo (not online) 851218 607878

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 1154624 629312

Machines in a bookmakers 596862 235807

Casino table games (not online) 529352 336302

Poker played in pubs or clubs 250237 095830

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 730313 380349

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1133119 926642

Betting exchange 137204 190243

Horse races (not online) 1068465 1094838

Dog races (not online) 345513 190243

Sports events (not online) 708196 489341

Other events or sports (not online) 345513 201704

Spread-betting 150289 070846

Private betting 862153 435022

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 274371 190243

Summary

Any gambling activity 6328473 6059713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 5138744 4553155

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1432381 1105318

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

169

Table 18 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9077077 9211674 9517075 9593713 9685299 9812957 9864932 9545183

At risk (score 1-7) 669745 563003 327741 255052 178513 096121 059878 357875

Problem gambler (score 8+) 056035 057940 025265 033521 017067 033153

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9254336 9361084 9635040 9698734 9785404 9895338 9940122 9593521

At risk (score 1-7) 839007 704375 440212 352582 270863 175609 135068 403436

Problem gambler (score 8+) 114097 110366 063274 074520 052682 048254

Table 19 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8519860 8711536 9250440 9393184 9525060 9693782 9734680 9286154

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1032766 892188 499373 354966 259088 132731 108543 560818

Problem gambler (score 8+) 104206 099068 028010 051089 066191

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

170

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8825203 8975334 9454491 9572073 9696566 9842337 9891457 9371335

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1322780 1141419 695870 520040 419484 271299 265320 641733

Problem gambler (score 8+) 215479 197506 089099 125066 096662

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9578099 9644270 9733259 9747049 9798131 9876829 9925357 9785876

At risk (score 1 to 7) 240027 211211 132617 133917 080652 039690 149759

Problem gambler (score 8+) 005940

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9742421 9779976 9850299 9857514 9903095 9960310 9987975 9831453

At risk (score 1 to 7) 399536 344576 243894 241552 178199 123171 192924

Problem gambler (score 8+) 016832

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

171

Table 20 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower

confidence limit

Upper confidence

limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 641488 720646

Scratchcards 1140046 1241836

Other lotteries 758388 843687

Machines and games

Football pools 2839128 2981904

Bingo (not online) 1238228 1343604

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 2501922 2639279

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 3077452 3223462

Poker played in pubs or clubs 4481833 4638384

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 4342093 4498193

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 2561391 2699780

Betting exchange 4322136 4478161

Horse races (not online) 1503817 1617882

Dog races (not online) 2591132 2730024

Sports events (not online) 2978122 3122841

Other events or sports (not online) 4282224 4438092

Spread-betting 5121433 5278468

Private betting 2432562 2568673

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 3306058 3454743

Summary

Any gambling activity 699899 782206

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

172

Table 21 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower confidence limit Lower confidence limit

1 activity 160262 202119

2 to 3 activities 486195 556018

4 to 6 activities 1908236 2033261

7 or more activities 5191468 5348399

Total 699899 782206

Table 22 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9648551 9452875 9563557

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 189323 302060 182973

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 053570 103480 067396

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 012157 039731 042110

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 254548 417354 265579

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9726699 9524733 9669396

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 255518 360428 264318

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 091424 139120 120093

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032887 062907 085425

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 330222 485071 361575

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

173

Table 23 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9464299 9118712 9298723 9837688 9607037

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293250 345425 367963 068855 148376

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 103921 127950 064986 018895 042291

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 039993 095061

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 408612 508276 467966 095173 208930

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9533439 9363096 9504561 9895948 9755893

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 349103 534137 549284 117562 269095

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 138532 252683 153588 047600 115653

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062495 205743

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 473680 730515 668865 151205 348286

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

174

Table 24 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9321411 9480605 9545787 9576877 9640182

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293936 266863 20326 221189 193183

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 147161 076655 077211 051171 050955

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 059097 034342 034692 026447 004394

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 472157 360129 295883 286013 257623

Upper confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9452064 9592895 9647981 9676678 9733111

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 392991 359853 283189 305409 273638

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 220003 13036 129428 095691 096095

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 108216 072746 072015 060457 022741

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 594487 466443 390431 380487 349097

Table 25 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9543316 9616616 9408087 9174175

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

175

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259672 105609 187044 285473

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 097444

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032703 065081

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 365999 147627 235874 352165

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9595191 9765690 9689087 9537114

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 301870 212649 417188 585573

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 124153

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 048918 153365

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 415508 270443 487796 677991

Table 26 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9302879 9445046 9497357 9523320 9521257 9469934 9492898 9516849 9608043

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

272358 267204 197386 202673 189687 244778 215582 253691 180619

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

176

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

081569 080707 076948 058876 069385 086843 073820 074650 045143

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

023985 044753 029872 056980

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

386243 377595 295904 282584 288287 353966 307224 346162 242915

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9551450 9585275 9649557 9681445 9666246 9618459 9618579 9635214 9739105

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

474469 382818 316187 332992 303245 367211 313277 354455 292479

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

206588 149764 157024 137350 143928 165606 135338 133843 108395

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+)

066636 109334 083576 112215

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

619832 512170 437354 432782 424346 497717 421448 461810 369991

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

177

Table 27 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9551629 9486617 9482365

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 267865 218054 172604

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087250 083816 080596

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 023379 058161 049173

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 354644 328786 277601

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9606650 9605883 9659880

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 313905 309759 305887

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 114591 144244 178322

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 038489 109950 129900

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 407092 438830 440425

Table 28 Confidence limits

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9111018 9462725 9515756 9718238

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

312764 243504 241229 116443

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

143552 049671 086588 048311

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

065081 020491 026909

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

498432 314684 343949 178574

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9402415 9640332 9618411 9812436

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

535794 393921 324795 193039

Moderate risk gambler 306251 128609 139653 101327

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

178

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

(PGSI score 3 to 7)

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

185343 077937 059421

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

768820 482444 441935 270771

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

179

Table 29 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9155873 9425755 9528615 9701374 9703227

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 384868 250161 229556 130857 140608

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 148983 098486 063289 038633 031309

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 079863 039886 016379 009625

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 562021 379057 320660 183742 184927

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9334394 9565089 9660959 9807345 9806130

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 525552 359403 341141 220589 230170

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 242033 171423 127839 093075 079760

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 151335 090166 054885 041510

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 727964 510221 449811 287563 285740

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

180

Table 30 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9646180 9415118 9293309

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 204114 293344 311256

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 056303 111028 105447

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 013323 025937 071499

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 270312 433683 440578

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9710684 9538038 9456678

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259082 393775 439328

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087001 176397 185663

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 030014 061641 139703

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 332837 553207 589687

Table 31 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9494512 9524690 9538509

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 285425 237569 214448

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 081349 089900 087185

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 037336 037060 035420

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 380286 341334 326392

Upper confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9581575 9611167 9635965

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 358609 306719 291270

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 122875 134533 138702

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 066930 067427 070539

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 463662 422854 419182

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

181

Table 32 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9755131 9619945 9285949 9010047 8667875

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 083572 207589 375341 347399 604245

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 041367 067162 127709 125476 158387

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 025390 022545 033406 073004 059660

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 127437 293471 525814 512384 820593

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9836785 9677758 9426846 9372379 9079022

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 144664 254767 492212 633031 951836

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 086953 095269 200289 317363 362119

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062963 039910 074774 230460 201952

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 200714 348841 661474 846350 1213446

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

182

Table 33 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9099340 9548599

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 470349 230101

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 155175 091058

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 067013 029234

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 650515 334161

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9254028 9627752

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 596743 293668

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 232455 132830

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 120777 054710

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 796275 409520

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

183

Table 34 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9885967 9878118 9924628 9913695 9934834 9944198 9968002 9930092

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

056067 066401 033140 041679 024529 051489

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9943933 9933599 9966860 9958321 9975471 9983891 9996880 9948511

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

114033 121882 075372 086305 065166 069908

Table 35 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9796495 9790890 9885826 9839198 9881842 9887272 9947056 9892470

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

096118 107416 042843 075125 041388 075306

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

184

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9903882 9892584 9957157 9924875 9958612 9968144 9998118 9924694

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

203505 209110 114174 160802 118158 107530

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9946745 9937883 9924067 9952449 9963538 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9992505 9985535 9978965 9991601 9997263 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

185

Table 36 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9862701 9866674 9912713 9901984 9922588 9931413 9968002 9919365

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

072759 074941 041208 049951 032263 023300 060759

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9927241 9925059 9958792 9950049 9967737 9976700 9996880 9939241

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

137299 133326 087287 098016 077412 068587 080635

Table 37 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9749746 9767784 9873539 9815674 9869402 9874373 9947056 9870806

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129207 124241 050521 091536 048908 038907 093630

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

186

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9870793 9875759 9949479 9908464 9951092 9961093 9998118 9906370

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

250254 232216 126461 184326 130598 125627 129194

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9946745 9924651 9911158 9952449 9948608 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

028092 013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9992505 9978801 9971908 9991601 9992232 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

088842 028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

187

Table 38 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit

Upper confidence limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 085526 116894

Scratchcards 160262 202119

Other lotteries 141440 180951

Machines and games

Football pools 466841 535382

Bingo (not online) 303055 359252

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 457170 525058

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 602596 679557

Poker played in pubs or clubs 1415214 1526530

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 826715 915325

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 341456 400831

Betting exchange 1022381 1119561

Horse races (not online) 274326 327996

Dog races (not online) 670683 751436

Sports events (not online) 524945 597248

Other events or sports (not online) 1297189 1404615

Spread betting 1533366 1648318

Private betting 399228 463030

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 944042 1037939

Summary

Any gambling activity 104050 138360

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

188

Table 39 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit Upper confidence

limit

1 activity 022545 039910

2 to 3 activities 049022 073418

4 to 6 activities 255212 307119

7 or more activities 1130234 1231654

Total 104050 138360

Table 40 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9954942 9915039 9868631

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

019964 057658 076064

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9980036 9942342 9923936

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045058 084961 131369

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

189

Table 41 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9915506 9712750 9908589 9964921 9896912

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057978 153197 027297 011396 034858

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9942022 9846803 9972703 9988604 9965142

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

084494 287250 091411 035079 103088

Table 42 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9970101 9941246 9923436 9908721 9850406

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

008286 025670 037646 046856 089809

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

190

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9991714 9974330 9962354 9953144 9910191

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

029899 058754 076564 091279 149594

Table 43 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9942933 9827380 9744833 9675853

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

039650 069453 076037 069096

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9960350 9930547 9923963 9930904

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057067 172620 255167 324147

Table 44 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9854415 9910787 9857493 9913822 9892022 9920618 9839632 9937886 9942973

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

191

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

070998 040821 072334 028763 046875 032433 091573 026562 016867

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9945585 9969213 9942507 9986178 9967978 9979382 9920368 9982114 9997027

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129002 079179 127666 071237 093125 067567 148427 053438 043133

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

192

Table 45 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9939398 9855435 9809368

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041245 083629 088478

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9958755 9916371 9911522

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

060602 144565 190632

Table 46 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9740976 9908850 9917042 9960283

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

111223 027376 043368 010061

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9888777 9972624 9956632 9989939

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

259024 091150 082958 039717

Table 47 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9791533 9862827 9932436 9957659 9945326

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

122660 072826 023654 009436 016443

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9877340 9927174 9976346 9990564 9983557

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

193

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

208467 137173 067564 042341 054674

Table 48 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9958214 9902923 9814337

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

021531 050437 105447

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9978469 9949563 9894553

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041786 097077 185663

Table 49 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9921761 9909910 9906334

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045993 054365 052282

Upper confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9954007 9945635 9947718

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

078239 090090 093666

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

194

Table 50 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9924761 9926594 9901786 9744784 9760771

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

033199 049030 049850 087770 081586

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9966801 9950970 9950150 9912230 9918414

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

075239 073406 098214 255216 239229

Table 51 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9834167 9922517

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 101829 046444

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9898171 9953556

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 165833 077483

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

195

Table 53 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1271729 2945796 941041 1002800 1228218 1653678

Scratchcards 1093044 2171483 1145690 1143454 1570657 1886444

Other lotteries 1262295 2601960 885593 1426952 983242 1876728

Machines and games

Football pools 1976900 2847439 1033817 1341628 899014 933261

Bingo (not online) 1603655 2415815 931788 872323 1247152 1954492

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1517999 2034979 1352120 872323 1266097 1973946

Machines in a bookmakers 2237019 2171483 1380390 1190513 871014 1152814

Casino table games (not online) 1337847 1772444 1267479 1105867 1351490 2159024

Poker played in pubs or clubs 2731578 2690263 1099009 1171680 685457 668361

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2294993 2327774 1522123 1096479 1020778 743724

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1546529 2239824 1305066 1002800 1152603 1760254

Betting exchange 2488655 2425602 1408685 568786 1002002 1124095

Horse races (not online) 1337847 1957088 848726 669221 936408 3317233

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

196

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Dog races (not online) 2140529 2073956 839523 872323 1067781 2032342

Sports events (not online) 1938477 2611768 1267479 946779 1030171 1229504

Other events or sports (not online)

3200389 3034395 1541067 568786 349482 398246

Spread-betting 3416236 2239824 848726 1209360 611868 734288

Private betting 1366227 1898725 1211196 1134052 1114871 2295682

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 1919276 2327774 830324 1209360 917703 1808759

Summary

Any gambling activity 1027530 2464764 857936 1077713 1237684 2373874

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1648541 3279102 1304925 1338178 1569279 1934955

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

197

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Scratchcards 1448311 2475462 1538808 1496704 1945096 2181543

Other lotteries 1638032 2923845 1240773 1811568 1295516 2171286

Machines and games

Football pools 2419145 3177718 1411481 1717383 1200180 1157388

Bingo (not online) 2014617 2730483 1294245 1189419 1590249 2253307

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1920787 2332329 1770908 1189419 1611206 2273799

Machines in a bookmakers 2697484 2475462 1802439 1549372 1168326 1397217

Casino table games (not online) 1722023 2055564 1676151 1454510 1705377 2468210

Poker played in pubs or clubs 3220013 3015309 1485823 1528315 954852 863041

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2759168 2638757 1959705 1443953 1337786 947463

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1952085 2546940 1718297 1338178 1485282 2048083

Betting exchange 2964364 2740670 1833943 834759 1316659 1366017

Horse races (not online) 1722023 2250428 1197907 953723 1242592 3666828

Dog races (not online) 2594545 2373249 1187178 1189419 1390541 2335242

Sports events (not online) 2377797 2934012 1676151 1274527 1348344 1480312

Other events or sports (not online)

3708461 3370270 1980627 834759 552620 553936

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

198

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Spread-betting 3931358 2546940 1197907 1570416 868828 936926

Private betting 1753472 2188946 1612834 1486161 1443208 2611176

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 2357111 2638757 1176443 1570416 1221394 2099443

Summary

Any gambling activity 1374225 2781404 1208631 1422827 1579765 2692769

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

199

Table 54 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2115834 3842514 4426600

Once a week 2305108 2357524 1278810

Less than once a week more than once a month

1666011 563551 347431

Once a month 1069570 304294 1108443

Every 2 to 3 months 757091 485165

Once or twice a year 420816

Upper confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2839983 5195599 6362470

Once a week 3047889 3598625 2832036

Less than once a week more than once a month

2336575 1348746 1396207

Once a month 1642181 940571 2598245

Every 2 to 3 months 1259596 1230828

Once or twice a year 821370

Table 55 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1082324 4256754

Once a week 2549093 1640856

Less than once a week more than once a month

965178 285899

Once a month 1180106 931875

Every 2 to 3 months 1356433

Once or twice a year 2469937 193456

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

200

Upper confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1200336 5879558

Once a week 2712540 3004014

Less than once a week more than once a month

1077564 1068000

Once a month 1302485 2077246

Every 2 to 3 months 1486034

Once or twice a year 2631751 887818

201

Published September 2021

PHE gateway number GOV-9697

wwwgovukphe

Twitter PHE_uk

wwwfacebookcomPublicHealthEngland

copy Crown copyright 2021

Page 2: Gambling-related harms evidence review

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

1

Contents

Executive summary 3

Background 3

Methods 3

Results 3

Discussion and implications 6

1 Introduction 7

11 Background and aims 7

12 Methods 7

13 COVID-19 9

2 Overall gambling participation 10

21 Introduction 10

22 Overall gambling participation by type of activity 10

23 Overall gambling participation by age and sex 13

24 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification 19

25 Overall gambling participation by economic activity 21

27 Overall gambling participation by Index of Multiple Deprivation 25

28 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity 28

29 Overall gambling participation by region 29

210 Overall gambling participation by local authority 31

211 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health 32

212 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction 34

213 Overall gambling participation by wellbeing 35

214 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12 39

215 Overall gambling participation by BMI group 41

216 Overall gambling participation by alcohol consumption 42

217 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking 44

3 At-risk and problem gambling 46

31 Introduction 46

32 Problem and at-risk gambling according to PGSI by age and sex 47

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

2

33 At-risk gambling 49

34 Problem gambling 61

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling 74

4 Gambling frequency 79

41 Introduction 79

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months 79

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers 81

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume 82

5 Hospital admissions 85

51 Introduction 85

52 HES admissions due to gambling 85

6 Previously published sources of gambling data 86

61 Affected others 86

62 Treatment 90

63 Attitudes and influences 95

64 Children and young people 99

7 Discussion 107

71 Strengths and limitations 108

8 References 109

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority 110

Introduction 110

Results 110

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling 116

Introduction 116

Data source 116

Appendix C Confidence limits 131

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

3

Executive summary

Background

In the UK there has been increasing concern about the harms associated with

gambling

Public Health England (PHE) was commissioned to review the evidence for the

prevalence determinants and harms associated with gambling and to estimate the

social and economic burden of gambling-related harms in England

To support the objectives of the PHE evidence review this report brings together a

range of quantitative data sources that seek to estimate gambling involvement and

gambling-related harms among the general population

Methods

The first part of the review focuses on a 4 year combined and weighted dataset from the

Health Survey for England (HSE) which presents new analysis undertaken for this

review The second part focuses on previously published sources of gambling data

bringing these together for the first time to address questions not met by the HSE

survey

Results

Gambling participation

In England 245 million people (half of the adult population) gamble each year

Participation in the National Lottery is the most common type of gambling except among

younger people where scratchcards are more common Football pools and playing

electronic gaming machines are much more prevalent gambling activities among people

under 35 years of age compared to older age groups

Overall men are more likely to participate in gambling and this sex difference is marked

for online gambling where 15 of men participate compared to 4 of women Since

2012 overall gambling prevalence has fluctuated Participation in the National Lottery

declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However participation in other gambling

activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015 before falling back to 40 in the

most recent HSE survey Online gambling (excluding the National Lottery) has increased

from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

4

Harmful gambling

The most commonly used screening tools categorise gambling-related harm as either

low-risk moderate-risk or problem gambling The levels of gambling are defined as

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

More specifically problem gambling is typically defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits In 2018 the

HSE estimated that 05 of the population were problem gamblers This is a reduction

from 09 in 2015 (although since the numbers are very small this does not represent a

real decline) However the proportion of gamblers who experience low levels of

gambling-related problems is increasing

It is important to note that a recent YouGov study found a significantly different

prevalence of 13 of the population experiencing some level of gambling harm

compared to 4 from a combined version of the HSE1 An assessment of both sources

concluded that HSE likely underestimated the true prevalence in the population

Profile of gamblers

Overall the highest rates of gambling participation are reported among people who have

higher academic qualifications are employed and among relatively less deprived

groups There are disproportionately more people classified as lsquoat-riskrsquo or lsquolow-riskrsquo

lsquomoderate-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo among men in younger age groups However

the socio-demographic profile of gamblers appears to change as the level of gambling

risk increases from low-risk to problem gambling Harmful gambling is associated with

people who are unemployed and among people living in more deprived areas

Gambling and the risk of gambling-related harm also appear to be associated with

psychological and physical health Overall the highest levels of gambling participation

are reported by people who report better general psychological health (on the short

general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)) and higher life satisfaction In contrast people

1 This version of the HSE combined the health surveys for England Scotland and Wales

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

5

describing poorer psychological health are less likely to report gambling participation

Again this reverses for problem gambling with higher prevalence among people with

poor health low life satisfaction and wellbeing and especially for people where there is

an indication of probable psychological health problems

The health behaviour profile for gambling was inconclusive for BMI (Body Mass Index)

status and cigarette smoking But there is a clear and strong association between

gambling at all levels of harm and increasing alcohol consumption This gradient is

evident for overall gambling participation and becomes steeper for at-risk and problem

gambling There is a particularly high level of gambling risk for people consuming 50

units of alcohol or more per week

Finally harmful gambling has a very different activity profile to general gambling It

includes low National Lottery participation and high participation in online gambling

including

bull slots

bull casino and bingo games

bull electronic gambling machines in bookmakers

bull sports and other event betting

bull betting exchanges

bull dog racing

At-risk gamblers are significantly more likely than general gamblers to participate in

online gambling

Overall demographic factors particularly sex appear to predict at-risk gambling

behaviour more than economic factors such as income employment and relative

deprivation Poor mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling than both poor

physical health and negative health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

Affected others treatment attitudes and influences and children and young people

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were found to be negatively

affected by someone elsersquos gambling Affected others are more likely to be women

reflecting the association between problem gambling and men Among affected others

immediate family members felt the most severe impacts of problem gambling

Just over 9000 people received treatment from the National Gambling Treatment

Service (NGTS) in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This represents only a small

fraction of problem gamblers in England This was the highest number of people treated

since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

6

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged The proportion of children and young people who participate in any

gambling has been reducing Boys are more likely to gamble than girls and the rate

increases with age Fruit and slot (electronic gaming) machines were often identified as

the first experiences of gambling among children and young people Playing the National

Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most common forms

of gambling reported But as the young people got older there was a significant increase

in online gambling among men

The rates of gambling among children and young people are lower than drinking alcohol

but higher than using e-cigarettes smoking tobacco cigarettes or taking illegal drugs

There is a potential relationship between these other harmful activities and gambling

Compared with children who have not gambled those who have spent their own money

on gambling are more likely to have also consumed alcohol taken drugs or smoked

either a tobacco cigarette or an e-cigarette

Discussion and implications

The main findings of this report are that

bull half the population currently gamble with 05 of the population experiencing the

highest level of harm

bull people who are classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo are disproportionately

younger men

bull socioeconomic and health inequalities persist among people classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and

lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo

bull alcohol is very strongly associated with gambling

bull a significant proportion of the population (7) are negatively affected by someone

elsersquos gambling

The previously published sources discussed in the second part of the report vary in the

type and quality of gambling data available Gambling is a relatively new field of

research and inconsistencies in the robustness and standardisation of the publications

and data available are to be expected However all sources included are encouraging

additions to the existing body of work This inconsistency in data quality and the

absence of longitudinal data are a major gap in the evidence base to be addressed in

future research and data collection

No data here takes into account the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on

gambling behaviour Public Health England (PHE) has published a rapid evidence

review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

7

1 Introduction

11 Background and aims

Concern about the harms associated with gambling has been increasing in the UK In

response in March 2018 the PHE remit letter from Health Minister Steve Brine

confirmed PHErsquos priorities for 2018 to 2019 This included the request for PHE to ldquoinform

and support action on gambling-related harm as part of the follow up to the Department

for Digital Culture Media amp Sport-led (DCMS) review of gaming machines and social

responsibilityrdquo (1)

In May 2018 DCMS published their response to the consultation on proposals for

changes to gaming machines and social responsibility measures In it they announced

that ldquoPHE will conduct an evidence review of the health aspects of gambling-related

harm to inform action on prevention and treatmentrdquo (2)

To fulfil this commitment 2 complementary evidence reviews were undertaken

1 The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) carried out a mapping review of

the literature on the effectiveness of national and international polices and

interventions to reduce gambling-related harms (3)

2 PHE has undertaken a broader evidence review on the prevalence of gambling and

associated health harms and social and economic burden

This report presents the findings of the quantitative analysis aspect of the work

conducted by PHE only It is one of 7 technical reports that inform the broader evidence

review The aim is to describe the prevalence characteristics associations and harms

associated with gambling as described in the scope (4) of the high-level protocol

Specifically this report aims to

bull describe the prevalence of gambling and gambling-related harms in England by

socio-demographic characteristics geographical distribution and year

bull identify the determinants of gambling and harmful gambling

12 Methods

To begin the project we undertook a search of common databases websites and other

online resources (for example Office for National Statistics NHS Digital and the

Gambling Commission websites) to see if published reports or datasets for England

were available to fulfil the above objectives We determined that this was not to be the

case So we identified datasets and official statistics that include information on

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

8

gambling by adults or children We used the HSE (for years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018)

as the primary dataset

We ran outputs from HSE to meet the objectives both on the most recent year (2018)

and the whole combined dataset where necessary All outputs have been non-response

weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE analysis since 2003 We commissioned

the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) who manage the HSE on behalf of

NHS Digital to combine the datasets NatCen calculated and appended new combined

weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc18 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb18 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication (5) we used the problem gambling

weight for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening

tools We used the self-completion weight for the rest

You can find all important information related to the data source in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the Health Survey for England series (6) Registered users can access

the separate datasets via the UK Data Archive (7)

We conducted all statistical analysis in SPSS version 25

We supplemented the outputs from HSE with findings from statistical publications and

reports available from other sources to better meet the objectives Sources include

several outputs by

bull the Gambling Commission

bull the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010

bull YouGov

bull the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH)

bull the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

bull hospital episode statistics (NHS Digital)

The HSE asks children certain questions including about smoking and alcohol but this

is not the case for gambling However we found published data to fulfil the aim to

include children in the analytic aspect of the work at least to an extent

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

9

The Gambling Commission publish an analytical report lsquoYoung people and gamblingrsquo

that explores the gambling behaviours of young people aged 11 to 16 years old in

England Scotland and Wales The survey was conducted by Ipsos MORI and includes

adolescent-appropriate application of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders 4th version) to measure at-risk and problem gambling This source

only allows limited analysis of associations linked to gambling in children as it is only

gambling behaviour focused and does not include any health topics

This report has found the lack of health and gambling data for children to be a gap in the

data currently available However gambling behaviours in the cohort is very detailed

and includes aspects such as in-game gambling parental gambling and those following

gambling companies on social media Furthermore trend data is available We have

supplemented the results from this source with recent findings from ALSPAC

13 COVID-19

The Health Survey for England 2018 is the primary data source and the gambling

supplementary questions refer to gambling behaviour in the last 12 months The data

was published in November 2019 and the 12 month period covered by the survey

questions is 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 This was before COVID-19 and so

no data here takes into account the impact of the pandemic on gambling behaviour So

the term lsquothe last 12 monthsrsquo does not refer to the 12 months of 2020 when the

pandemic occurred We have published a rapid evidence review to explore the impact of

COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

10

2 Overall gambling participation

21 Introduction

This section focuses on prevalence and associations with any gambling activity in the

last 12 months (at the time of the survey year referenced most recent refers to 2018)

The HSE involves a set of questions and interviews conducted face to face in the homes

of respondents The gambling questions are completed using a self-completion

questionnaire alongside the core health questionnaire As part of this respondents were

asked whether they have participated in any gambling activity in the last 12 months and

if so what type of activity

22 Overall gambling participation by type of activity

Over half (540) of the England population aged 16 and over have taken part in some

form of gambling in the last 12 months (based on HSE 2018 (5)) This equates to almost

245 million people Gambling activity questions were first included in the HSE in 2012

and again in 2015 2016 and most recently in 2018 Since 2012 participation in any

gambling activity has reduced significantly in the England population by over 10 percent

(from 645 to 540) However the reduction between 2016 and 2018 is not

statistically significant meaning there is unlikely to have been a real change between

the 2 most recent years for which data is available

The National Lottery was the gambling activity with the highest level of participation in

England with 36 of the population taking part in the last 12 months The recent

Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that in the

individual National Lottery draws the most common games of 2019 were

bull Lotto (played by 21 of all survey respondents in the past 4 weeks)

bull EuroMillions (20)

bull Thunderball (3)

bull Hotpicks (1)

However participation in the National Lottery has declined from 525 in 2012 to 457

in 2015 405 in 2016 to 360 in 2018 This is a statistically significant decline and

suggests that the reduction seen in overall gambling participation is largely due to the

reduction in National Lottery participation Figure 1 shows the percentage of overall

gambling participation in England between 2012 and 2018 Once the National Lottery is

excluded gambling participation has stayed at the same level with 402 of the

population having gambled on some other activity in the last 12 months As shown in

Figure 1 by excluding respondents who only play the National Lottery we see a different

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

11

pattern in gambling participation This shows a pattern more resistant to change with the

rate increasing to 451 between 2012 and 2015 before reducing to 402 in 2018

Figure 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Base2 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 Unless otherwise stated the base given in tables is the number of respondents who answered the

relevant question

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity Any gambling activity exc National Lottery

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

12

After lotteries the most common types of gambling activity according to HSE 2018 were

bull horse racing (not online3) (81)

bull online betting with a bookmaker (78)

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines (57)

bull bingo (not online) (45)

These were also the most common activities in 2012 the only difference being that

online betting with a bookmaker was less common in 2012

Table 2 Overall gambling participation by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 525 457 405 360

Scratchcards 187 222 203 179

Other lotteries 150 148 139 144

Machines and games

Football pools 21 26 26 29

Bingo (not online) 58 59 49 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 71 62 57

Machines in a bookmakers 24 33 29 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 35 32 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 11 08 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 28 37 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 43 72 74 78

Betting exchange 08 10 12 11

Horse races (not online) 104 111 92 81

Dog races (not online) 27 28 21 17

Sports events (not online) 38 52 51 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 14 13 15

3 lsquoNot onlinersquo throughout this report means gambling in a bookmakers by telephone or at the venue

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

13

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Spread-betting 05 06 06 05

Private betting 46 51 41 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 18 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 66 94 94 94

Base 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

23 Overall gambling participation by age and sex

Participation in any gambling activity was most common in respondents aged 45 to 64

(604) and least common in those aged 16 to 24 (390) The National Lottery draws

were the activity with greatest participation across all age groups except for those aged

16 to 24 years for whom scratchcards are more common If we exclude National Lottery

gambling was more common in younger age groups for many activities4

Also 94 of people surveyed participated in some form of online gambling (excluding

National Lottery) and this type of gambling is more common with younger people Online

gambling has increased in popularity from 66 in 2012 and since 2015 has remained

consistent at 94

Slot (electronic gaming) machines were the most common type of machine or game

betting Except for bingo most machine or games betting activity types were more

common among younger people particularly

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines

bull football pools

4 Itrsquos worth noting that the HSE gambling measures are derived from a self-completion questionnaire for

people aged 16 years and over However while the legal age limit for playing the National Lottery and

scratchcards is currently 16 years (as well as for some (category D) slot machines) it is 18 years for most

other forms of gambling HSE does not take this legal age discrepancy into account

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

14

bull electronic gaming machines in bookmakers (including fixed odds betting terminals

(FOBT)

bull casino table games

Online betting with a bookmaker sports betting and private betting were also more

common with younger age groups particularly the under 35s

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

15

Table 3 Overall gambling participation by age group England 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 124 324 428 471 444 368 286 360

Scratchcards 197 268 236 196 140 91 49 179

Other lotteries 49 101 144 171 189 189 176 144

Machines and games

Football pools 64 63 19 08 15 10 21 29

Bingo (not online) 49 55 53 30 41 37 51 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 97 71 53 41 13 10 57

Machines in a bookmakers 44 51 20 16 09 - - 22

Casino table games (not online) 41 63 30 17 13 - - 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 13 08 - - - - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

33 66 47 21 14 - - 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 92 159 105 77 40 18 11 78

Betting exchange 27 17 11 04 08 - - 11

Horse races (not online) 99 87 80 89 86 78 33 81

Dog races (not online) 31 26 12 16 11 12 - 17

Sports events (not online) 68 75 36 38 29 14 - 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

16

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Other events or sports (not online) 38 27 10 11 12 - - 15

Spread-betting 17 09 - - - - - 05

Private betting 85 64 39 23 19 11 14 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 19 16 15 08 09 11 06 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 390 569 573 604 596 530 444 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

371 489 443 407 405 337 282 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

112 185 129 91 51 24 15 94

Base 931 1196 1140 1242 1058 875 661 7104

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

17

The Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that on

average online gamblers have 3 accounts with gambling websites and that 21 have

bet lsquoin-playrsquo (while the event is taking place) in the last 4 weeks Furthermore 20 of

online gamblers aged 18 to 24 had more than 5 online accounts Table 4 is taken from

the Gambling Commission report and shows online and in-person participation in the

last 4 weeks for those activities that can be accessed through multiple methods The

table shows that people playing bingo (81) and the National Lottery (73) were most

likely to participate in-person while those participating in football betting (83) sports

betting (81) and casino games (74) were most likely to do so online

Smartphones are now the most popular method of accessing online gambling with 50

of all online gamblers using their device for this purpose This continues the trend seen

in the Gambling Commission annual reports of increasing smartphone use for gambling

in recent years Younger age groups were most likely to gamble with multiple devices

while the likelihood of using more than one device to gamble reduces with age

Table 4 Online and in-person participation in the last 4 weeks (2019)

National Lottery

()

Bingo ()

Football pools

()

Horse racing

()

Sports betting

()

Football betting

()

Betting on other

events ()

Casino games

()

Online 36 24 55 61 81 83 58 74

In-person 73 81 50 49 27 26 53 47

Source The Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Figure 2 shows overall gambling participation for adults by sex in England between 2012

and 2018 Men (574) were more likely than women (507) to have participated in

any gambling activity in the last 12 months It also shows participation reducing at a

similar rate for both men and women since 2012

The difference is marked for online gambling with only 43 of women participating in

online activities compared to 147 of men Participation in online gambling reaches

284 for men aged 25 to 34 This means that of the 565 of 25 to 34 year old men

that gamble (excluding the National Lottery) half do so online

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

18

Figure 2 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 5 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018 2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity men 680 655 612 574

Any gambling activity women 610 589 513 507

Base men 3042 2996 2965 3506

Base women 3749 3759 3726 3599

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Women (178) were as likely to buy scratchcards as men (181) and more likely to

take part in bingo (59 compared to 30 of men) but men had higher participation

rates in all other gambling activities The differences between men and women were

greatest for

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity men Any gambling activity women

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

19

bull online betting with a bookmaker

bull machines in bookmakers (including FOBT)

bull betting on sports events

bull private betting5

24 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification

By highest educational qualifications participation in any gambling activity was most

common in the below degree category (588) followed by respondents with an NVQ4

NVQ5 and degree or equivalent (504) level of qualification Those with no qualification

were least likely to participate in any gambling activity (465)

There were differences by type of activity where those with an NVQ4 NVQ5 and degree

or equivalent were less likely to participate in bingo (24) Also along with people in

the below degree category they were more likely to participate in betting on horse

racing and sports events (not online) Respondents with no qualification were notably

less likely than the rest of the population to participate in online betting with a bookmaker

(23)

Table 6 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification England 2018

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 345 389 307 360

Scratchcards 131 218 147 179

Other lotteries 131 161 119 144

Machines and games

Football pools 14 39 23 29

Bingo (not online) 24 53 55 45

5 This excludes poker played in clubs betting exchanges and spread-betting which are all relatively low

participation activities but are dominated by men

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

20

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 33 76 38 57

Machines in a bookmakers 13 31 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 34 30 05 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 03 10 04 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 38 14 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 88 23 78

Betting exchange 14 10 08 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 41 81

Dog races (not online) 11 21 12 17

Sports events (not online) 33 52 19 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 21 10 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 33 46 23 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 10 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 504 588 465 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

360 456 313 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

107 109 34 94

Base 2024 3553 1313 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

21

25 Overall gambling participation by economic activity

Looking at economic activity participation by group in any gambling activity was most

common in the

bull employed self-employed or training category (647)

bull retired (523)

bull unemployed (504)

However confounding is important here as economic groups like students and those in

retirement comprise people of very different ages and previous tables have shown a

strong association between gambling and age You can find more information about the

issues of confounding later in this report in the section on at-risk and problem gambling

and in more detail in Appendix B

We based Table 7 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller employment groups

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

22

Table 7 Overall gambling participation by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 509 136 398 341 334 432

Scratchcards 246 166 84 205 205 199

Other lotteries 150 42 184 108 99 142

Machines and games

Football pools 32 43 14 21 10 27

Bingo (not online) 52 37 59 52 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 76 18 74 50 65

Machines in a bookmakers 37 36 04 47 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 43 43 08 22 12 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 13 19 02 11 - 1

66 The economically inactive population comprises all persons who were neither employed nor unemployed during the short reference period used to

measure current activity This population is split into 4 groups attendant at educational institutions retired engaged in family duties other

economically inactive

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

23

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

43 26 06 44 30 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 99 56 14 49 31 69

Betting exchange 13 25 03 11 - 11

Horse races (not online) 123 57 70 80 54 98

Dog races (not online) 32 16 11 22 11 24

Sports events (not online) 64 54 14 47 18 48

Other events or sports (not online) 18 14 04 16 - 13

Spread-betting 07 06 - 09 - 05

Private betting 56 92 17 36 22 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 17 22 09 14 07 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 647 360 523 504 469 576

Base 15321 2029 5906 1796 2111 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

24

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

25

27 Overall gambling participation by Index of Multiple Deprivation

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is the official measure of relative deprivation for

small areas in England Quintiles are calculated by ranking the neighbourhoods in

England from most deprived to least deprived and dividing them into 5 equal groups

These range from the most deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally to the least

deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile but there were differences by activity type Several activities were statistically

significantly higher in the most deprived quintile compared to lesser deprived quintiles

We saw the strongest inequality gradients were for bingo and scratchcards

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

26

Table 8 Overall gambling participation by IMD England 2018

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 325 355 382 376 358 360

Scratchcards 213 180 191 166 147 179

Other lotteries 108 131 163 162 154 144

Machines and games

Football pools 26 40 30 24 24 29

Bingo (not online) 64 50 43 37 31 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 54 57 52 52 57

Machines in a bookmakers 30 26 19 25 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 22 32 29 27 20 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 09 07 05 - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

41 27 29 29 24 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 64 69 83 91 83 78

Betting exchange 13 07 08 15 13 11

Horse races (not online) 59 65 98 96 87 81

Dog races (not online) 16 15 16 27 09 17

Sports events (not online) 35 40 41 48 38 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

27

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online) 12 16 17 15 17 15

Spread-betting 05 06 04 05 05 05

Private betting 33 46 40 37 32 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 14 16 13 06 12 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 514 527 567 553 534 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

395 393 429 400 388 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

83 86 98 105 99 94

Base 1278 1528 1515 1474 1310 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

28

28 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity

By broad ethnicity overall participation in any gambling activity was most common in

the White and White British ethnic group (608) and least common in the Asian and

Asian British ethnic group (312)

We base Table 9 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller ethnic groups

Table 9 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 457 228 311 345 432

Scratchcards 211 91 146 182 199

Other lotteries 152 71 83 93 142

Machines and games

Football pools 26 23 32 43 27

Bingo (not online) 58 20 27 25 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

68 47 51 55 65

Machines in a bookmakers

29 23 33 33 29

Casino table games (not online)

32 27 37 33 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs

10 10 - - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

36 12 15 31 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

75 21 37 57 69

Betting exchange 11 07 - - 11

Horse races (not online)

109 17 30 46 98

Dog races (not online) 27 - - - 24

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

29

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Sports events (not online)

51 20 21 50 48

Other events or sports (not online)

14 09 - 22 13

Spread-betting 05 07 - - 05

Private betting 49 28 17 56 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 - 17 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 608 312 417 440 576

Base 23586 2043 821 688 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

29 Overall gambling participation by region

The North East (647) had the highest overall participation in gambling while London

(480) was lower than average

We based Table 10 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for each region

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

30

Table 10 Overall gambling participation by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

647 587 608 611 578 611 480 568 578 576

Base 1329 3592 2699 2332 2838 3013 4115 4442 2803 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 201

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

31

210 Overall gambling participation by local authority

Variation in gambling participation was evident by upper tier local authority (UTLA)

Discounting Rutland which has wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a

rate of gambling participation that was statistically significantly higher than average for

England The top 5 UTLAs in England with the highest levels of gambling participation

were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

For the full list of authorities included in Figure 3 see Appendix A You should note that

due to small sample sizes we have grouped together the authorities of inner and outer

London

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

32

Figure 3 Overall gambling participation by UTLA England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

211 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health

In HSE general health is self-assessed with the question lsquoHow is your health in general

Would you say it was very good good fair bad or very badrsquo There has been very little

change in the general health status of the population over the course of the surveys

with 76 of respondents reporting very good or good health in 1993 compared to 75

in 2018 (in no survey year has this been below 74 or above 76) This is the same for

respondents who gamble with 752 reporting very good or good health in HSE 2018

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health tend to gamble less (501) than

the general population and those reporting good or very good general health (580)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

33

We based Table 11 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for the smaller categories

Table 11 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 435 444 381 432

Scratchcards 205 195 151 199

Other lotteries 142 153 120 142

Machines and games

Football pools 30 20 11 27

Bingo (not online) 48 69 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 59 42 65

Machines in a bookmakers 31 24 20 29

Casino table games (not online) 36 18 13 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 11 07 - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

34 30 29 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 79 44 29 69

Betting exchange 12 07 - 11

Horse races (not online) 105 83 63 98

Dog races (not online) 26 20 14 24

Sports events (not online) 52 36 27 48

Other events or sports (not online) 14 10 12 13

Spread-betting 06 04 - 05

Private betting 52 34 16 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 16 10 15

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

34

Summary

Any gambling activity 580 588 501 576

Base 20488 4684 1987 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

212 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction

In HSE life satisfaction is derived from the question lsquoOverall how satisfied are you with

life nowadaysrsquo This is scored and grouped low (score 0 to 4) medium (score 5 to 6)

high (score 7 to 8) and very high (score 9 to 10)

Gambling participation across life satisfaction groups was inconclusive As with self-

assessed general health the lowest group were again least likely to participate in

gambling (492) This was also true for respondents participating in the National

Lottery where 315 in the lowest satisfaction group take part compared to 363 in the

very high satisfaction group The low satisfaction group were most likely to participate in

online gambling including slots casino and bingo games (50 compared to 28 in the

very high group) but this reverses for online gambling with a bookmaker (44 of the low

group compared to 70 of the very high group)

Table 12 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction England 2018

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 315 353 373 363 360

Scratchcards 188 204 181 166 179

Other lotteries 121 155 142 150 144

Machines and games

Football pools 18 38 31 26 29

Bingo (not online) 46 57 41 45 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 58 55 61 51 57

Machines in a bookmakers 31 2 23 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 16 31 31 22 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - 07

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

35

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

50 33 25 28 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 44 82 92 70 78

Betting exchange - - - - 11

Horse races (not online) 63 66 87 86 81

Dog races (not online) 18 09 16 20 17

Sports events (not online) 31 43 46 36 40

Other events or sports (not online) 18 17 14 17 15

Spread-betting - - - - 05

Private betting 44 34 42 31 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 13 09 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 492 523 559 535 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

359 422 418 384 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

78 99 106 82 94

Base 604 937 3038 2408 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

213 Overall gambling participation by wellbeing

The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a widely used measure

of subjective and psychological functioning It was developed to capture a broad concept

of positive mental wellbeing and incorporates 2 perspectives on wellbeing (9)

1 Eudaimonic wellbeing comes from a sense of purpose personal growth and

involvement in activities

2 Hedonic wellbeing comes from feelings of joy satisfaction and enjoyment

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

36

WEMWBS includes 14 statements that cover psychological functioning cognitive-

evaluative dimensions and affective-emotional aspects of wellbeing For each statement

respondents can answer

bull none of the time

bull rarely

bull some of the time

bull often

bull all of the time

The statements are all expressed positively The responses from 1 to 5 are aggregated

to form an index which can range from 14 (those who answer lsquonone of the timersquo for

every statement) to 70 (those who answer lsquoall of the timersquo to all statements) (10)

As above for life satisfaction findings were inconclusive across WEMWBS quintiles with

the highest participation rates seen in quintiles 2 to 4 and the lowest rate seen in quintile

5 (521)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

37

Table 13 Overall gambling participation by WEMWBS quintile England 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 396 417 399 429 392 405

Scratchcards 232 224 225 178 161 203

Other lotteries 129 132 144 142 148 139

Machines and games

Football pools 28 19 29 28 30 26

Bingo (not online) 46 53 58 46 41 49

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 64 88 57 41 62

Machines in a bookmakers 43 28 36 23 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 26 29 44 32 31 32

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - - 08

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

44 26 35 28 24 31

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 81 71 75 77 72 74

Betting exchange 11 16 08 10 17 12

Horse races (not online) 90 101 109 89 78 92

Dog races (not online) 17 25 26 20 17 21

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

38

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Sports events (not online) 56 44 74 50 38 51

Other events or sports (not online) 13 11 18 14 08 13

Spread-betting - - - - - 06

Private betting 37 47 56 37 32 41

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 09 16 09 13 13

Summary

Any gambling activity 555 585 570 589 521 562

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 417

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 94

Base 1281 1426 1189 1272 1375 6691

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

39

214 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used and validated

measure of psychological health It addresses broader components of psychological

morbidity with 12 items measuring

bull happiness

bull depression

bull anxiety

bull sleep disturbance

bull self-confidence

Each item is rated on a 4-point response scale to show whether symptoms of mental ill

health are lsquonot at all presentrsquo or if present lsquono more than usualrsquo lsquorather more than

usualrsquo or lsquomuch more than usualrsquo For the purpose of the HSE we adopted the standard

GHQ coding method for each of the 4 possible responses to each item as advocated by

the test author Each symptom was scored either 0 if rsquonot at all presentrsquo or present lsquono

more than usualrsquo or 1 for symptoms that were present lsquorather more than usualrsquo or lsquomuch

more than usualrsquo (11) So using this method the maximum score for any individual

study participant is 12 No formal threshold exists for identifying probable mental ill

health with optimal values likely to be specific to the population under study However

in keeping with previous HSE surveys participantsrsquo scores are grouped according to 3

categories which are

bull 0 (indicating no evidence of probable mental ill health)

bull 1 to 3 (indicating less than optimal mental health)

bull 4 or more (indicating probable psychological disturbance or mental ill health) (10)

Continuing the trend seen before for general health life satisfaction and wellbeing

respondents scoring highest on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological disturbance

or mental ill health) were less likely (506) to participate in gambling than those who

score 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) (555)

Table 14 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12 England 2018

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 376 349 327 360

Scratchcards 175 189 187 179

Other lotteries 148 153 119 144

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

40

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Machines and games

Football pools 32 26 24 29

Bingo (not online) 44 53 37 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 57 56 57 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 24 28 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 28 34 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 07 08 05 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 27 32 37 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 88 72 58 78

Betting exchange 12 11 11 11

Horse races (not online) 86 83 67 81

Dog races (not online) 18 19 09 17

Sports events (not online) 43 43 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 17 10 18 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 39 36 38 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 553 535 502 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 404 411 381 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 100 93 83 94

Base 4193 1630 1146 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

41

215 Overall gambling participation by BMI group

BMI (body mass index) is a widely used measure of weight that takes into account the

individualrsquos height and is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the height in metres

squared (kgm2) Adults can be classified as

bull underweight (BMI less than 185)

bull normal (BMI between 185 and 25)

bull overweight (BMI between 25 and 30)

bull obese (BMI 30 or above)

According to HSE 2018 63 of adults in England were overweight or obese and

between 1993 and 2018 there has been a marked increase in the proportion of adults

who are overweight or obese

A greater proportion of respondents classified as obese (594) and overweight (569)

participated in gambling compared to those classified not overweight or obese (486)

This difference was particularly notable for participation in the National Lottery as 429

of the obese group participated compared to 284 of the not overweight or obese

group

Table 15 Overall gambling participation by BMI group England 2018

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 284 393 429 360

Scratchcards 161 182 212 179

Other lotteries 108 159 185 144

Machines and games

Football pools 32 33 23 29

Bingo (not online) 37 44 55 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 52 54 66 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 27 20 22

Casino table games (not online) 21 36 24 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 04 10 07 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 30 35 30

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

42

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 78 92 74 78

Betting exchange 10 11 15 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 77 81

Dog races (not online) 14 19 19 17

Sports events (not online) 34 60 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 13 25 08 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 38 44 35 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 13 11 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 483 569 594 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

372 416 446 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

94 103 97 94

Base 2113 2234 1815 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

216 Overall gambling participation by alcohol consumption

HSE has asked about drinking alcohol since it began in 1993 The proportion of adults

who have drunk alcohol in the last week has steadily reduced over the previous decades

from 67 in 1998 to 57 in 2018 Across all age groups men were more likely than

women to drink at increasing and higher risk levels (12)

Alcohol consumption is reported in units of alcohol One unit of alcohol is 10ml by

volume of pure alcohol In 2016 the UK Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) published new

guidelines on low risk drinking (13) It is now recommended that men and women should

not regularly (defined as most weeks) drink more than 14 units a week Drinking at this

level is considered to be lsquolow riskrsquo and adults who regularly drink up to this amount are

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

43

advised to spread their drinking over 3 or more days Above this level is considered to

be lsquoincreased riskrsquo For men this is now over 14 units and up to 50 units and for women

over 14 units and up to 35 units per week Men who regularly drink more than 50 units a

week and women more than 35 units are described as lsquohigher risk drinkersrsquo and are

considered to be at particular risk of alcohol-related health problems (12)

There was a clear pattern of increased participation in gambling as the number of

alcohol units consumed per week increased being most noticeable at the extremes A

total of 354 of non-drinkers participated in gambling compared to 744 of those

consuming over 50 units This trend persisted for every type of gambling activity

Table 16 Overall gambling participation by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 261 445 542 525 570 432

Scratchcards 120 207 228 234 295 199

Other lotteries 86 146 172 181 205 142

Machines and games

Football pools 14 23 39 46 66 27

Bingo (not online) 36 58 50 49 72 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 32 61 91 105 127 65

Machines in a bookmakers 15 23 45 62 75 29

Casino table games (not online) 09 25 61 61 80 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 05 07 14 25 36 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

14 31 48 54 68 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 15 61 123 135 150 69

Betting exchange 04 08 16 26 35 11

Horse races (not online) 28 89 162 198 207 98

Dog races (not online) 06 23 35 45 61 24

Sports events (not online) 13 38 87 113 137 48

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

44

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online)

04 09 24 45 46 13

Spread-betting 03 04 07 14 29 05

Private betting 13 41 82 69 95 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 06 13 23 32 26 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 354 595 695 686 744 576

Base 4572 15591 4666 858 903 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

217 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking

Since it began HSE has asked questions about cigarette smoking in adults From the

series current cigarette smoking has steadily declined from 27 in 1993 to 17 in

2018 The proportion of respondents that have never regularly smoked cigarettes

increased from 46 to 58 over the same period HSE collects information about the

use of various tobacco products including cigarettes cigars and pipes The focus of this

analysis is on cigarette use meaning we do not consider cigar and pipe use in the below

definition of a current smoker

There was little difference in overall gambling participation between smokers (605)

and non-smokers (588) However current smokers generally have a higher likelihood

of participation for most gambling activity types Most notable were

bull scratchcards (306 compared to 184 of non-smokers)

bull football pools (52 compared to 26 of non-smokers)

bull machines in a bookmakers (46 compared to 18 of non-smokers)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

45

Table 17 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking England 2018

Current smoker ()

Non-smoker ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 377 406 360

Scratchcards 306 184 179

Other lotteries 121 172 144

Machines and games

Football pools 52 26 29

Bingo (not online) 69 52 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 97 54 57

Machines in a bookmakers 46 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 40 27 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 06 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 58 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 82 78

Betting exchange 07 14 11

Horse races (not online) 89 98 81

Dog races (not online) 24 14 17

Sports events (not online) 56 41 40

Other events or sports (not online) 24 15 15

Spread-betting 08 04 05

Private betting 70 36 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 14 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 605 588 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 485 437 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 123 99 94

Base 1151 2840 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

46

3 At-risk and problem gambling

31 Introduction

The most commonly used screening tools for gambling are the Diagnostic and Statistical

Manual of Mental Disorders 4th version (DSM-IV) and the Problem Gambling Severity

Index (PGSI) They define levels of gambling as (14)

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

Anyone scoring low risk or above are showing some signs of problematic behaviour

More specifically problem gambling is defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits There are

several screening tools available to identify problem gambling The HSE uses both the

DSM-IV and the PGSI

The DSM-IV was created as a clinical diagnostic tool and was not intended for use as a

screening instrument among the general population However an adapted version of the

DSM-IV for use in a survey setting was developed for the British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) series and was subject to a rigorous development and testing process

including cognitive testing and piloting The PGSI was designed for use among the

general population rather than within a clinical context It was developed tested and

validated within a general population survey of over 3000 people and the questionnaire

itself has been subject to critical evaluation and was revised in 2003 (12)

We base most tables in this section on the combined HSE dataset to increase sample

sizes wherever possible

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

47

32 Problem and at-risk gambling according to PGSI by age and sex

The PGSI consists of 9 items ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquogambling causing health

problemsrsquo to lsquofeeling guilty about gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale

These are

bull never

bull sometimes

bull most of the time

bull almost always

A score of 1 or more for PGSI indicates at-risk gambling A score of 1 to 2 is considered

low risk a score of 3 to 7 is considered moderate risk and a score of 8 or more

indicates problem gambling (12)

We have combined the low and moderate groups into an lsquoat-riskrsquo group (score 1 to 7) to

give a picture of the total risk of being a problem gambler (score 8 or more) in the

population Non-problem gambling group includes people who have not participated in

any gambling activity

According to the PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of 04 in the general

population (Table 18) The prevalence of people considered lsquoat-riskrsquo was 38 Men in

the younger age groups were most likely to experience both problem and at-risk

gambling For example 117 of men aged 16 to 24 and 101 of men aged 25 to 34

were participating in at-risk levels of gambling compared to 31 and 27 of women

respectively (these differences are statistically significant)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

48

Table 18 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

917 929 958 965 974 986 991 957

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 75 63 38 30 22 13 09 38

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

08 08 04 05 03 - - 04

Mean PGSI score 026 023 015 012 009 005 002 014

Base 3727 4547 4459 4726 3913 3186 2520 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 19 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (inc those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

868 885 936 949 962 978 983 933

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 117 101 59 43 33 19 17 60

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

15 14 05 08 - - - 08

Mean PGSI score 043 039 024 020 014 008 004 024

Base 1889 2249 2219 2336 1928 1534 1092 13246

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

49

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

967 972 980 981 986 993 997 981

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 31 27 18 18 12 07 - 17

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

- - - - - - - 01

Mean PGSI score 009 007 006 005 004 001 000 005

Base 1838 2298 2239 2390 1985 1653 1428 13831

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

According to the PGSI in 2018 there were an estimated 168149 people experiencing

problem gambling in England This is a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 208700

Also the PGSI estimates there to have been 377242 moderate risk gamblers and

1213830 low risk gamblers in England While estimates of problem gamblers and those

at moderate risk have reduced since 2016 those estimated at low risk have increased

since 2016 (from 1094066)

33 At-risk gambling

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by activity

This section shows at-risk gamblers among all respondents who participated in different

gambling activities The base is all respondents who participated in at least one activity

(individual survey participants may be included in multiple rows)

It is worth nothing that in contrast to other gambling activities participation in the

National Lottery was very low among at-risk gamblers compared to the general

population While at-risk gamblers accounted for 74 of all gambling activity they were

significantly overrepresented for

bull spread betting (520)

bull machines in bookmakers (464)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (456)

bull online gambling on slots casino or bingo games (442)

bull betting exchanges (440)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

50

Also in 20187 overall participation in online gambling was more than double (234)

that of the general population (94)

Table 20 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 68

Scratchcards 119

Other lotteries 80

Machines and games

Football pools 291

Bingo (not online) 129

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 257

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 315

Poker played in pubs or clubs 456

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 442

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 263

Betting exchange 440

Horse races (not online) 156

Dog races (not online) 266

Sports events (not online) 305

Other events or sports (not online) 436

Spread-betting 520

Private betting 250

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 338

7 We have used the latest year rather than the combined dataset due to how much online gambling has

increased between 2012 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

51

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Summary

Any gambling activity 74

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base8 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

While at-risk gamblers account for 74 of all gambling activity they account for 527

of those participating in 7 or more different gambling activities over the last 12 months

Table 21 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by number of activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities At-risk gamblers among those who participate ()

1 activity 18

2 to 3 activities 52

4 to 6 activities 197

7 or more activities 527

Total (any gambling activity) 74

Base9 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by highest educational qualification

As we have seen before for overall gambling participation at-risk gambling was most

common in the population for respondents in the below degree category (45) This

category was statistically significantly higher than both the NVQ4 NVQ5 or degree or

equivalent and the no qualification categories

8 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 9 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

52

Table 22 PGSI risk category by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category NVQ4NVQ5 Degree or

equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

969 949 962 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

22 33 22 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 12 09 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 05 06 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

29 45 31 38

Base 7582 14415 5033 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity at-risk gambling was most common in the unemployed category

(61) This was statistically significantly higher than all groups other than those in full-

time education For overall participation in gambling prevalence was the highest for the

employed self-employed or training category This was statistically significant

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

53

Table 23 PGSI risk category by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Employed self-

employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other Inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

950 925 941 987 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 43 45 09 20 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

12 18 10 03 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 14 - - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

44 61 56 12 27 38

Base 15281 1791 2023 5875 2107 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by IMD

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile However for at-risk gambling there was a statistically significant gradient with

prevalence increasing across quintiles from least deprived (30) to most deprived

(53) This aligns with the higher prevalence seen before in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

54

Table 24 PGSI risk category by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

939 954 960 963 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

34 31 24 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

18 10 10 07 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

08 05 05 04 01 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

53 41 34 33 30 38

Base 5165 5362 5667 5516 5369 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by ethnicity

By ethnicity the Asian and Asian British ethnic group had the lowest prevalence of at-

risk gambling (20) This was statistically significantly lower than the White and White

British group (39)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

55

Table 25 PGSI risk category by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category White White

British ()

Asian Asian

British ()

Black Black

British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

957 970 957 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

28 15 28 41 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

11 - - - 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 10 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

39 20 34 49 38

Base 23513 2037 816 687 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

56

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by region

The North East (49) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling while the South West (30) had the lowest

Table 26 PGSI risk category by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the Humber

()

East Midland

s ()

West Midland

s ()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

944 952 958 961 960 955 956 958 968 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

36 32 25 26 24 30 26 30 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

13 11 11 09 10 12 10 10 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 +)

- 04 07 - 05 - 08 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

49 44 36 35 35 42 36 40 30 38

Base 1325 3584 2685 2321 2824 3008 4107 4429 2794 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

57

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by self-assessed general health

There was no significant difference in at-risk gambling by respondents reporting bad and

very bad general health and those reporting very good and good general health

Table 27 PGSI risk category by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Very goodgood

()

Fair ()

Bad very bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

958 955 958 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 29 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 10 11 12 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 03 08 08 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 38 38 35 38

Base 20439 4657 1978 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by life satisfaction

Results for overall gambling participation across life satisfaction groups were

inconclusive This was not the case for at-risk gambling where respondents with low life

satisfaction (62) had a higher prevalence and those with very high life satisfaction had

a notably lower prevalence (22) This difference was statistically significant

Table 28 PGSI risk category by life satisfaction England 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

927 956 957 977 960

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

41 31 28 15 26

10 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

58

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

21 08 11 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 04 04 - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

62 39 39 22 36

Base 1231 2064 6016 3926 13601

Source HSE 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by wellbeing

As above for life satisfaction there was a gradient for at-risk gambling with respondents

in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) having the highest prevalence (64) and those in

quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) having the lowest prevalence (23) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 29 PGSI risk category by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

925 950 960 976 976 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

45 30 28 17 18 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 13 09 06 05 11

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 06 03 - 02 05

11 Totals differ from majority of tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

59

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

64 44 38 23 23 38

Base 3351 3772 3386 3238 3432 20193

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

problems) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling (51) while those scoring 0

(no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (30) This is a reversal of

the pattern seen before for overall gambling participation

Table 30 PGSI risk category by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 968 948 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 23 34 37 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 14 14 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 04 10 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 30 49 51 38

Base 11463 5025 3357 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by BMI group

There were no statistically significant differences for at-risk gambling between

respondents by BMI group

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

60

Table 31 PGSI risk category by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese () Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 954 957 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 27 25 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

10 11 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 05 05 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

42 38 37 38

Base 8910 8471 6378 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by alcohol consumption

As seen for overall gambling participation there was a clear pattern of increased at-risk

gambling as the number of alcohol units consumed per week increased This gradient

was statistically significant with 16 of non-drinkers gambling at-risk compared to

100 of people who consume over 50 units per week

Table 32 PGSI risk category by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Nevernot in last 12

months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to

35 ()

Over 35 to

50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 980 965 936 921 889 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

11 23 43 47 76 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

06 08 16 20 24 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 03 05 13 11 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

16 32 59 66 100 38

Base 4558 13678 4645 894 899 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

61

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by cigarette smoking

We saw a similar pattern for at-risk gambling as we saw for overall gambling

participation when looking at cigarette smoking Current smokers (72) had a higher

prevalence of at-risk gambling compared to non-smokers (37) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 33 PGSI risk category by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Current smoker

() Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 918 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 53 26 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+) 09 04 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 72 37 38

Base 4839 9660 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

34 Problem gambling

Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex

The DSM-IV contains 10 diagnostic criteria ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquocommitting

a crime to fund gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from

lsquoneverrsquo to lsquovery oftenrsquo A score of 3 or more indicates problem gambling

According to the DSM-IV and similar to PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of

05 in the general population Though numbers are small the younger age groups

tend to have a higher prevalence As we would expect given the higher rates of

gambling participation problem gambling according to the DSM-IV was higher in men

(09) than women (02) with the highest prevalence again seen in men in the 25 to

34 age group (15)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

62

Table 34 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

992 991 995 994 996 997 999 994

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

08 09 05 06 04 - - 06

Mean DSM-IV score 009 008 006 005 005 003 002 01

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 35 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

986 985 993 989 993 994 999 991

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

14 15 07 11 07 - - 09

Mean DSM-IV score 015 013 007 008 007 005 003 009

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

998 997 996 998 999 1000 999 998

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

63

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

- - - - - - - 02

Mean DSM-IV score 003 003 004 002 003 002 001 003

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

In 2018 DSM-IV estimated there to be 223975 problem gamblers in England This was

a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 257930

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex

The proportion of problem gamblers in the population according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI included in the HSE was 05 in 2018 (this increases to 07 when we combine

HSE years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018) Prevalence was higher for men (08) than

women (03) Using the combined HSE dataset (see Table 36) prevalence is highest

in the younger age groups

As reported by HSE the proportion of problem gamblers in the population has been

reducing from 09 in 2015 to 07 in 2016 to 05 in 2018 However as numbers

are very small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with

previous years and do not represent a real decline In 2018 there were estimated to be

245634 problem gamblers in England according to either DSM-IV or PGSI This is a

reduction from the 2016 estimate of 303328

Table 36 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 990 990 994 993 995 996 999 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 10 06 07 05 04 - 07

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

64

Table 37 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 982 983 992 987 992 993 999 989

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

18 17 08 13 08 07 - 11

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 998 996 995 998 998 1000 999 998

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

- - 05 - - - - 02

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity

While accounting for just 12 of all gambling activity problem gamblers (according to

either DSM-IV or PGSI) account for a significantly disproportionate level of participation

in

bull machines in a bookmakers (464)

bull spread betting (159)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (147)

bull other events or sports (not online) (135)

The problem gambler group were less likely to participate in activities such as the

National Lottery and scratchcards than the general gambling population

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

65

The problem gambler group were more likely than the general gambling population to

have participated in 7 or more gambling activities in the last 12 months

Table 38 Problem gambling prevalence according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 10

Scratchcards 18

Other lotteries 16

Machines and games

Football pools 50

Bingo (not online) 33

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 49

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 64

Poker played in pubs or clubs 147

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 87

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 37

Betting exchange 107

Horse races (not online) 30

Dog races (not online) 71

Sports events (not online) 56

Other events or sports (not online) 135

Spread betting 159

Private betting 43

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 99

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

66

Summary

Any gambling activity 12

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base12 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 39 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by number of activities participated in over the last 12 months England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

1 activity 03

2 to 3 activities 06

4 to 6 activities 28

7 or more activities 118

Total (any gambling activity) 12

Base13 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification

Based on the data from HSE there is no observable difference for problem gambling by

highest educational qualification

12 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 13 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

67

Table 40 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 990 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 10 07

Base 7599 14457 5061 27164

Source HSE 2012 2105 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity problem gambling was most common in respondents who were

currently unemployed (21)

Table 41 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity England 2012 2105 2016 2018

Employed self-employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler

993 979 995 998 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

07 21 05 02 06 07

Base 15321 1796 2029 5906 2111 2716

4

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD

Unlike overall gambling participation there was an inequality gradient across IMD

quintiles for problem gambling Prevalence was greatest in the most deprived group

(12) and declined for each quintile The difference between the most and least

deprived quintiles was statistically significant We saw a similar pattern before for at-risk

gambling

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

68

Table 42 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 988 993 995 996 998 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

12 07 05 04 02 07

Base 5183 5379 5684 5532 5386 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity

Problem gambling was greater in the Asian and Asian British (11) ethnic group

compared to the White and White British group (05) The difference between the 2

groups is statistically significant Though numbers are small for the remaining groups

(with confidence intervals too wide to draw any meaningful conclusions) the data

suggests a paradox of harm regarding the Asian and Asian British group This ethnic

group is less likely to take part in gambling than the White and White British group (both

overall participation and at-risk gambling) but more likely to experience problematic

gambling than the White and White British group

Table 43 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

Mixed Other

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 986 985 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 14 15 07

Base 23586 2043 821 455 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

69

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region

Even when we combined multiple HSE years numbers were small and confidence intervals overlapped when looking at

problem gambling by region

Table 44 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler (including people not participating in any gambling activity)

990 994 990 995 993 995 988 996 997 93

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 06 10 05 07 05 12 04 03 07

Base 1329 3598 2655 2341 2843 3067 4022 4451 2820 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

70

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed general health

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health had a higher prevalence of

problem gambling (13) than those reporting very good or good general health (05)

As we saw for at-risk gambling the difference between the groups was not statistically

significant but the gradient represents a different pattern to overall gambling

participation

Table 45 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed

general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 987 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 13 07

Base 20586 4581 1954 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life satisfaction

Problem gambling continues the pattern we saw before for at-risk gambling with the

highest prevalence in the low life satisfaction group (17) This was statistically

significant Again it is important to note that this was not the case for overall gambling

participation where there was no clear pattern

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

71

Table 46 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life

satisfaction England 2016 2018

Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()14

Non-problem gambler

983 995 994 998 994

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

17 05 06 02 06

Base 1223 2049 5996 3909 13629

Source HSE 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by wellbeing

As with at-risk gambling there was a clear gradient across WEMWBS quintiles with the

highest prevalence of problem gambling in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) (16) and

lowest in quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) (03) This difference was statistically

significant

Table 47 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()15

Non-problem gambler

984 990 996 998 997 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

16 10 04 02 03 07

Base 3338 3761 3393 3245 3431 20272

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

14 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018 15 Totals differ from most tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

72

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

disturbance or mental ill health) had the highest prevalence of problem gambling (14)

while those scoring 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (03)

This difference was statistically significant This is a similar pattern to at-risk gambling

and differs from overall gambling participation

Table 48 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 14 07

Base 11507 5037 3357 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group

There was little difference for problem gambling across BMI groups There was a similar

picture showing a lack of association between BMI groups for at-risk gambling

Table 49 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not overweight

or obese () Overweight

() Obese () Total ()

Non-problem gambler 994 993 993 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

06 07 07 07

Base 8964 8497 6364 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

73

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by alcohol consumption

There was a clear pattern of increased problem gambling as the number of alcohol units

consumed per week increased

Table 50 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Never or not in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

15 to 35 ()

36 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 994 993 985 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 06 07 15 14 07

Base 4503 15575 4693 863 911 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking

There was little difference by cigarette smoking status for overall gambling participation

This changed for problem gambling with current smokers (13) having higher

prevalence of problem gambling compared to non-smokers (06) This difference is

statistically significant

Table 51 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Current

smoker () Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 987 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

13 06 07

Base 4879 9663 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

74

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling

The previous sections have examined the relationships between gambling and various

other factors separately We carried out binary logistic regression models to further

investigate the different factors associated with gambling The following is a summary of

the pre-registered analysis We present the full outputs in Appendix B

To begin we conducted a series of bivariate analyses to compare a range of variables

to 3 increasing levels of gambling

1 Overall gambling participation

2 Harmful gambling (including low risk moderate risk and problem gambling)

3 Problem gambling taken in isolation

The variables included were

bull age

bull sex

bull ethnicity

bull income

bull educational attainment

bull employment

bull IMD

bull region

bull general health

bull wellbeing

bull life satisfaction

bull GHQ12

bull BMI

bull alcohol

bull smoking

Of these income region self-reported general health and BMI were shown not to be

statistically significantly associated with harmful gambling Income and BMI were shown

not to be statistically significantly associated with problem gambling

After reviewing the bivariate output we applied a multiple logistic regression to estimate

associations of socio-demographic and health factors on the likelihood that respondents

are participating in harmful gambling We excluded factors not significant at the bivariate

level from the model lsquoHarmful gamblingrsquo as discussed here includes problem gambling

and so the model takes account of the full continuum of gambling risk It is important to

note that the terms lsquolow riskrsquo and lsquomoderate riskrsquo (as used in the interpretation of the

PGSI) do not mean that risk is negligible for these respondents but rather that these

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

75

respondents are on a continuum of risk with people who have a definite problem with

their gambling This means the model includes all respondents with problem gambling

behaviours and those at risk of developing problem gambling behaviours

The logistic regression model for harmful gambling was statistically significant (p less-

than 005) The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling (see Appendix

B for more detail) and correctly classified 94 of cases but this was skewed towards

classifying respondents at no risk

Table 52 details the regression function itself and so summarises the effect of each

variable See the key below the table for the meaning of each column However the

main values of concern are the p-value and the adjusted odds ratio The p-value

determines which variables are significant (by convention this is less-than 005) and

these are highlighted in the table The adjusted odds ratio is a measurement of

likelihood that an outcome (harmful gambling) will occur given a particular exposure

compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of that exposure (see

Appendix B for more detail)

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be harmful gamblers Respondents

with below degree attainment were 18 times the odds and those with no qualifications

were 21 times the odds to be harmful gamblers compared to those with a NVQ4 NVQ5

or degree or equivalent level of attainment

Wellbeing contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on

GHQ12 Comparing those scoring 0 the odds of respondents scoring 1 to 3 were 20

times more likely and those scoring 4 or more were 24 times more likely to participate in

harmful gambling

On physical health and health behaviours smoking did not contribute significantly to the

model but alcohol did

Compared to abstainers or those not drinking in the last 12 months the odds of

respondents who drank above the CMOsrsquo low-risk drinking guidelines (14 to 35 units)

were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This increases markedly to

78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) It should be noted that the group

from HSE consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

76

Table 52 Binary multiple logistic regression model of harmful gambling variables

in the equation England 2016

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent)

- - 8609 2 0014 - - -

Educational qualification 3 groups (below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational qualification 3 groups (no qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (Least deprived)

- - 11143 4 0025 - - -

Quintile of IMD score (2)

-0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3)

0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4)

0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (Most deprived)

0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1)

- - 15525 4 0004 - - -

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2)

0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3)

0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4)

0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

77

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5)

-0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Life satisfaction (low (0 to 4))

- - 4262 3 0235 - - -

Life satisfaction (medium (5 to 6))

-0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (high (7 to 8))

-0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (very high (9 to 10))

0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ score ndash grouped (score 0)

- - 15279 2 0000 - - -

GHQ score - grouped (score 1-3)

0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ score - grouped (score 4+)

0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (nevernot in last 12 months)

- - 36554 4 0000 - - -

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14)

0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (over 14 to 35)

1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (over 35 to 50)

0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (over 50)

2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020 - -

Notes Missing data was not available due to small counts Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age 16-75+ in 10 year age bands Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc) Key B the unstandardized coefficients for the model SE the standard errors for the B-coefficients

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

78

Wald the test statistic for the individual predictor variables Linear regression will have a t-test while logistic regression has a chi-square test It is used to determine the p-value df the degrees of freedom for the Wald statistic p-value determines which variables are significant By convention any variable with a p-value below 005 is significant AOR (adjusted odds ratio) the odds ratios associated with changes in predictor scores 95 CI the 95 confidence interval of the odds ratio Source HSE 2016

The broad conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly sex

appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic factors

such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a

stronger predictor of harmful gambling than both poor physical health and negative

health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model being selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and

the method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

79

4 Gambling frequency

41 Introduction

This section considers how often people who do gamble participate in gambling

activities and to what extent Frequency is compared for respondents participating in any

gambling activity at-risk gamblers and problem gamblers This is followed by findings

from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey which combines gambling frequency with

gambling volume in terms of money and time spent

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months

For all gamblers the most common frequency of participation was once a week (262)

followed by once or twice a year (253) This was true for lotteries with 311

participating in the National Lottery once a week 232 buying scratchcards once a

week and 276 participating in other lotteries once a week A similar picture was seen

for machines and games except for machines in a bookmakers poker played in pubs or

clubs and online gambling All these activities were slightly more likely to be played 2 or

more times a week

Most betting activities were also most frequently participated in 2 or more times a week

or once a week except for horse racing and private betting Dog racing was most

frequently participated in either 2 or more times a week (236) or once a week (222)

followed by once or twice a year (218) This differs from horse racing where 349

participated only once or twice a year This reinforces the difference between horse

racing and dog racing seen before for at-risk and problem gambling

Table 53 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 145 311 111 116 139 179

Scratchcards 126 232 133 131 175 203

Other lotteries 144 276 105 161 113 202

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

80

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Machines and games

Football pools 219 301 121 152 104 104

Bingo (not online) 180 257 110 102 141 210

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

171 218 155 102 143 212

Machines in a bookmakers

246 232 158 136 101 127

Casino table games (not online)

152 191 146 127 152 231

Poker played in pubs or clubs

297 285 128 134 81 76

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

252 248 173 126 117 84

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

174 239 150 116 131 190

Betting exchange 272 258 161 69 115 124

Horse races (not online)

152 210 101 80 108 349

Dog races (not online)

236 222 100 102 122 218

Sports events (not online)

215 277 146 110 118 135

Other events or sports (not online)

345 320 175 69 44 47

Spread-betting 367 239 101 138 73 83

Private betting 155 204 140 130 127 245

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling

213 248 99 138 106 195

Summary

Any gambling activity

119 262 102 124 140 253

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

81

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Base16 1342 2961 1147 1403 1581 2853

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers

As we would expect gambling frequency increases as the level of gambling risk

increases Almost a quarter of low risk gamblers gamble 2 or more times a week and

this increases to 451 of moderate risk gamblers and 541 of problem gamblers

Respondents who are considered problem gamblers according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI 507 gamble 2 or more times a week compared to 114 of non-problem

gamblers

Table 54 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for at-risk gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 246 451 541

Once a week 266 294 194

Less than once a week more than once a month

198 88 71

Once a month 133 54 173

16 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities minus those who did

not answer the frequency question

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

82

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

Every 2 to 3 months 98 78 -

Once or twice a year 59 - -

Base 541 204 98

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 55 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for problem gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 114 507

Once a week 263 225

Less than once a week more than once a month

102 56

Once a month 124 141

Every 2 to 3 months 142 -

Once or twice a year 255 42

Base17 11146 142

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume

Although it is not as recent as the HSE 2018 the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) (15) includes more detail than the HSE on certain issues relevant to the

aims of this review In particular the BGPS offers additional data on gambling frequency

(lsquoregularrsquo gambling or days per month) and gambling volume (money time spent) While

a summary is useful for the objectives of this report itrsquos worth noting that the gambling

17 The base for problem gamblers in Table 55 is respondents categorised as a problem gambler according to either

DSM-IV or PGSI This is the conventional approach and that taken throughout the section before focusing on problem

gambling This differs from the base for Table 54 which is respondents categorised as problem gamblers according to

PGSI only This difference is necessary as only PGSI allows the further breakdown into low and moderate risk that

Table 54 requires

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

83

landscape has changed considerably since 2010 particularly issues relating to online

gambling

The BGPS included questions to measure gambling volume among regular gamblers18

based on the amount of time spent gambling in an average month and the amount of

money spent on gambling in an average month This detail is not possible from the HSE

When looking at time spent on gambling the BGPS made a cut-off for analysis purposes

to capture the top 10 of regular gamblers This cut-off was around 7 hours per month

gambling (with a mean for the group of 310 hours per month) The other 90 of regular

gamblers either did not spend any time gambling or generally spent less than 7 hours a

month gambling (with a mean of 30 minutes per month) The BGPS labelled these

groups lsquohigh-timersquo and lsquonon high-timersquo gamblers respectively

When looking at money spent on gambling the BGPS cut-off for the top 10 of regular

gamblers was around pound6150 per month on gambling (with a mean of pound20992 per

month) The remaining 90 of regular gamblers spent less than this amount (with a

mean of pound1482 per month) The BGPS labelled these groups lsquohigh-spendrsquo and lsquonon

high-spendrsquo gamblers respectively As a summary of gambling volume that considers

both time and money spent the BGPS provides 4 possible sub-groups of regular

gamblers These are respondents who were

bull non high-time and non high-spend gamblers (85)

bull high-time but non high-spend gamblers (4)

bull high-spend but non high-time gamblers (4)

bull high-time and high-spend gamblers (6)

Most (85) regular gamblers were both non high-time and non high-spend gamblers Of

the remainder the BGPS found 4 were high-time but not high-spend and another 4

were high-spend but not high-time gamblers It also found 6 were both high-time and

high-spend gamblers

Non high-time and non high-spend gamblers took part in 25 gambling activities in the

past year In comparison high-time only gamblers took part in 40 gambling activities in

the past year and high-spend only gamblers took part in 52 activities High-time and

high-spend gamblers had the highest levels of gambling participation taking part in 66

gambling activities

18 Respondents who gambled once a month or more

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

84

Compared to all regular gamblers the high-time and high-spend group were more likely

to

bull be from semi-routine or routine households19

bull live in areas of greatest deprivation

bull have no educational qualifications

bull be slightly more likely to live in the lowest income households

bull be unemployed (they were much more likely to be unemployed)

Along with the high-time only gamblers this group experiences the greatest

socioeconomic deprivation

19 Based on The National Statistics Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

85

5 Hospital admissions

51 Introduction

This section presents the number of hospital admissions due to gambling from NHS

Digitalrsquos hospital episode statistics (HES) These statistics detail all admissions

outpatient appointments and AampE attendances at NHS hospitals in England We use

figures from finished admission episodes (FAEs) with a primary or secondary diagnosis

as classified by the International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) (ICD-10) of

bull ICD-10 F630 Pathological Gambling

bull ICD-10 Z726 Gambling and Betting

52 HES admissions due to gambling

Across England there were 375 admissions to hospital because of gambling in 2018 to

2019 Over the previous 3 years admissions have increased but compared to other

causes numbers20 remain very small

Table 56 Number of FAEs with a primary or secondary diagnosis relating to gambling by age group England between 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019

Age group 2016 to 2017 2017 to 2018 2018 to 2019

lt20 lt10 lt10 lt10

20 to 29 75 90 115

30 to 39 70 105 120

40 to 49 60 50 60

50 to 59 40 50 55

60+ 20 25 20

Total (will not sum due to rounding) 260 325 375

Source Hospital episode statistics (HES) NHS Digital 2020

20 Numbers are too small relative to all hospital admissions to calculate meaningful rates

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

86

6 Previously published sources of gambling data

This section of the report collates information on gambling previously published

elsewhere The purpose is to meet aspects of the objectives not fulfilled by the primary

data source Topics include

bull affected others

bull treatment

bull attitudes and influences

bull children and young people

The published sources discussed in the rest of the report vary in the type and quality of

gambling data available Gambling is relatively new field of research Inconsistencies in

the robustness and standardisation of the publications and data available are to be

expected However all sources included here are encouraging additions to the existing

body of work and one of the recommendations of the review is to encourage further

research and analysis in this area

We discuss the methods and caveats of each source in the introduction to each topic

61 Affected others

Introduction

A recent report published by YouGov (16) on behalf of GambleAware included a detailed

section on lsquoaffected othersrsquo The report defines lsquoaffected othersrsquo as

ldquohellippeople that know someone who has had a problem with gambling (either

currently or in their past) and feel they have personally experienced negative

effects from this person (or peoples) gambling behaviour This could include

family members friends and work colleagues among others with the negative

effects ranging from financial to emotional or practical impactsrdquo

The BGPS included some analysis of affected others in 2010 but the YouGov report

represents the most recent data available on affected others currently available The

source is not as robust as the HSE (which is designed to be representative of the

population by adopting a multi-stage stratified probability sampling design based on

postcode sectors) but does have a very good sample size of around 12000

respondents of which 7 are affected others

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

87

The main difference between the HSE and the YouGov survey is the sampling method

(probability vs non-probability) The difference in mode is also important (face-to-face

vs online) YouGov describe the survey as nationally representative but this is unclear

These differences may account for the fact that the headline prevalences do differ

somewhat from HSE21 in that YouGov finds 13 of the population experience gambling

harm (PGSI score of 1+) compared to a figure of 4 on the combined HSE This is a

significant difference

An independent report by the London School of Economics (LSE) (17) evaluates the

differences between the sources It concludes that HSE may under-estimate gambling

harm by requiring a residential address and YouGov may over-estimate harm by

excluding offline people The conclusion drawn by LSE is that it is credible that the level

of harm is probably somewhere between the 2 reported figures

The LSE report does offer a level of scrutiny and transparency but it is important to note

when reading the following section that the YouGov report itself has not been peer

reviewed and there is a lack of conclusions drawn and references to other published

work on the subject Furthermore the report does not specify the time frame of the PGSI

questions The HSE is clear that the PGSI is based on the respondentsrsquo activities over

the last 12 months We could assume that YouGov also covered the last 12 months but

this is not clear from the publication If YouGov did not specify the last 12 months then

respondents might have assumed the questions could apply to an earlier time which

would increase the prevalence of harm Particularly relevant to this section it is also

unclear how YouGov arrived at the 7 affected others prevalence figure due to the

complexity of how the report combines phases 1 and 2 of the study as it does not

include this information

However the affected others section of the YouGov report is the most detailed

contribution to the subject currently available and taking into account the above

caveats adds value to the present review

Prevalence of affected others

YouGov finds that 7 of the total adult population of Great Britain were affected others

The findings also reveal that the likelihood of being an affected other increases with

PGSI score Among gamblers 20 of problem gamblers (according to PGSI) were

affected others compared to 13 of moderate risk gamblers and 9 of low risk

21 We do not compare this to HSE exactly but rather the health surveys of England Wales and Scotland combined

Here we refer to it as HSE for simplicity and consistency

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

88

gamblers The report suggests that this shows the complex relationship between a

personrsquos own gambling and the issues relating to other peoplersquos gambling

Affected others were more likely to be women (57) than men (43) which reflects the

fact that problem gambling is much more associated with men There is little variation by

age but affected others were slightly more likely to be social class CD2E22 and less

likely to be White British

Type of affected others

Affected others were most likely to be negatively affected by a gambling problem of

someone in their immediate family (61) This is most commonly a spouse or partner

(25) followed by a parent (21) Women (71) were more likely than men (44) to

be negatively affected by the gambling of someone in their immediate family Women

were also much more likely to be affected by their spouse or partner (35 of women

compared to 9 of men)

Due to their age younger (18 to 24) affected others were most likely to have been

affected by the gambling of a parent Older affected others (55 and over) were most

likely to have been affected by the gambling of a child

Importantly people who were both affected others and problem gamblers were more

likely to have been negatively affected by the gambling problem of a child (15)

implying that gambling has profound impacts on the family as a whole Problem

gamblers were also more likely than average to say they have been negatively affected

by a non-immediate family member or work contact suggesting that gamblers were

more likely to socialise with other gamblers

Severity of impact upon affected others

Among affected others the most severe impacts of gambling were felt most by

immediate family members Figure 4 shows the severity of impact by type of affected

other in Great Britain in 2019 It presents the results from the YouGov report on severity

of impact by percentage into either minor moderate or severe The figure shows that

almost half (48) of affected others that were affected by a spouse or partner report a

severe negative impact This is followed in severity by the gambling of a parent (41)

22 Social class definition

AB higher and intermediate managerial administrative and professional workers C1 supervisory clerical and junior

managerial administrative and professional workers C2 skilled manual workers D semi-skilled and unskilled

manual workers E people on long term state benefits casual and lowest grade workers unemployed with state

benefits (including pension) only

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

89

and a child (38) A lower proportion of affected others reporting a severe negative

impact were due to friends The report suggests that the type and closeness of the

relationship plays an important role in determining the severity of the negative impact

experienced by affected others

Figure 4 Severity of impact by type of affected other Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling treatment and support YouGov 2019

The most significant type of impact reported by affected others was an inability to trust

the problem gambler (62) This was followed by

bull feelings of anger towards them (53)

bull anxiety (40)

bull a breakdown of communication (40)

bull reduced income for household running costs such as food rent and bills (38)

Women were more likely to have experienced all the negative impacts of being an

affected other with 81 reporting depression anxiety and anger towards the problem

gambler compared to 64 of men Women were also more likely to have experienced

financial impacts (67 of women compared to 48 of men)

Advice and support

YouGov found that most (64) affected others have not sought advice or support on

behalf of the problem gambler and an even greater proportion (72) have not sought

help for themselves as an affected other When affected others do seek advice and

0 20 40 60 80 100

Other workcolleague

Friend

Sibling

Other familymember

Child

Parent

Spousepartner

Percent reporting severity of impact ()

Severe Moderate Minor

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

90

support either for themselves or for the problem gambler it is most likely from less formal

sources This included seeking help from

bull a friend or family member (19)

bull a spouse or partner (11)

bull gambling support websites (11)

For more formal sources of advice and support 12 report seeking help from mental

health services and 8 from a GP Also 5 report seeking help from another addiction

service (for example a drugs or alcohol service) again highlighting the complexity of

addiction

Concern for the safety or wellbeing of the problem gambler or family members (65) is

the most common reason affected others seek advice and support Over half (57) of

affected others report not knowing how to deal with gambling and its impacts as the

reason for seeking help A similar proportion (54) sought advice due to a relationship

or family being affected by gambling or due to mental health problems (51) Though a

lower significant proportion (34) report being prompted by a severe negative impact

such as risk of losing employment risk of losing their home or criminal proceedings

YouGov concluded that there is an evident demand for advice and support among

affected others with almost half (48) reporting a need for such help whether for

themselves their spouse or partner a family member friend or colleague

The most reported barrier to seeking advice or support was that the person does not

consider their gambling to be a problem (43) The next most common reason is the

belief that gambling treatment would not be helpful or be effective (40) A further 14

reported feeling embarrassed or ashamed to ask for advice or support or that they would

not want others to find out socially or professionally

62 Treatment

Introduction

This section draws on published reports from Gambleaware The National Gambling

Treatment Service (NGTS) is a network of organisations providing treatment and

support for people experiencing gambling-related harms It is free to access across

England Scotland and Wales GambleAware commissions the NGTS and it is funded

through voluntary contributions from the gambling industry

GambleAware publish annual statistics (18) covering the treatment activity of the NGTS

and this is the source of the following summary The annual statistics cover treatment

provided by GamCare and its partner network Gordon Moody Associates and the

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

91

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) This represents most of the treatment provision for gambling in the UK although

there are other providers emerging in the public sector and third sector as a result of

policy changes in England Scotland and Wales23

Treatment provided (19)

GamCare offers

bull online treatment supported by regular contact with a therapist that people can access

at a time and place convenient for them over the course of 8 weeks

bull one-to-one in person online and telephone therapeutic support and treatment for

people with gambling problems as well as affected others

bull group based gambling recovery courses delivered face-to-face or online for between

6 to 8 weeks

bull the National Gambling Helpline which provides immediate telephone and online live

chat support and referral into the treatment service

bull information and advice via their website moderated forums and online group

chatrooms24

Gordon Moody Association offers

bull two specialist residential treatment centres providing an intensive programme for men

with a gambling addiction over a period of 14 weeks

bull specialist relapse prevention housing for people who have completed the treatment

programmes but need additional recovery support

bull retreat and counselling programmes for women or men-only groups that combine

short residential stays with at-home counselling support

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) offers treatment for gambling problems This treatment is especially for people

bull with more severe addictions

bull with co-morbid mental and physical health conditions

bull with impaired social functioning

bull who may come to treatment with more risk such as risk of suicide

23 The NHS Northern Gambling Service provided by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

has not been open for one full reporting year at time of publication So it is not included in the annual

statistics for 2019 to 2020 Further regional NHS led clinics are being established as part of the NHS Long

Term Plan 24 Data from these services are not included in the annual statistics publication

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

92

GambleAware funded treatment providers are required to submit quarterly datasets in a

standardised format The annual statistics publication presents the analysis of these

submissions As of 2020 there is an additional service as part of the NGTS However

this new service the NHS Northern Gambling Service was not operational in 2019 to

2020 so we have concentrated on the 3 service providers for which there is published

data available

Socio-demographic profile of people in treatment

The NGTS treated just over 9000 people in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This is

the most people treated since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016 (5909) For reference

this review has previously estimated there to be around 245600 problem gamblers in

England (according to PGSI or DSM-IV) Almost a quarter (23) of people treated in

2019 to 2020 had been seen before by the service

Most people treated were gamblers (84) while 13 of referrals related to affected

others This is less than the estimate of affected others among the problem gambling

population (20) suggesting a certain level of unmet need for this group As we can

expect from previous sections of this review affected others were more likely to be

women

Most people treated were men (75) and a greater proportion are from the younger age

groups This corresponds to the prevalence of problem gambling in the population

However there has been an overall small increase in the proportion of women being

treated increasing from 19 in 2015 to 2016 to 25 in 2019 to 2020

Table 57 Age and sex of people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Age group lt20 ()

20-24 ()

25-29 ()

30-34 ()

35-39 ()

40-44 ()

45-49 ()

50-54 ()

55-59 ()

60+ ()

Men 12 112 216 217 157 95 75 52 34 30

Women 05 48 136 159 161 120 85 104 90 91

All people in treatment

10 96 196 202 158 101 78 65 48 45

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Most people in treatment were employed (75) with the next most reported category

being unemployed (9) Given the unemployment rate in the UK was around 4 in

2019 we can expect a higher proportion of people in treatment to be unemployed given

previous findings that problem gambling is highest in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

93

On average people in treatment reported problem gambling starting at the age of 24

years although this was highly variable Three-quarters reported problem gambling

starting by the age of 32 years and one-quarter by the age of 19 years At the point of

coming to treatment services people had typically been problem gambling for an

average of 10 years

Gambling profile of people in treatment

A large proportion of people in treatment (58) participated online for their primary

gambling activity followed by bookmakers (27) No other locations were used by more

than 10 of people in treatment For online activities gambling on casino slots was the

most common activity (38) followed by sporting events (37) and casino table games

(27) For bookmakers gaming machines were the most common form of gambling

(53) followed by sporting events (31) and horse racing (24)

The most notable difference in gambling activity for peopl in treatment between 2015 to

2016 and 2019 to 2020 has been the increase in online gambling (from 57 to 69)

This has happened alongside the reduction in the proportion using bookmakers (from

56 to 38)

About 12 of people in treatment had suffered a job loss as a result of their gambling

and 26 had suffered a relationship loss through their gambling Almost a third (29) of

people in treatment had no debt due to gambling at the time of assessment But a

quarter had debts up to pound5000 and 45 had debts over pound5000 or were bankrupt or in

an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA)

Over half of people in treatment (54) spent up to pound100 per day gambling in the 30 days

before assessment The NGST annual statistics also found

bull 16 spent between pound100 and pound200

bull 18 spent between pound200 and pound500

bull 15 spent over pound500

On average (mean) people in treatment reported spending pound2102 on gambling in the

30 days before assessment

Average (mean) money spent on gambling days was highest among people using

casinos (pound544) and online services (pound435) The mean spend can be affected by outliers

(extreme individual values) but even using the median people using casinos still had the

highest average daily spend (pound200) Average monthly spend was again very high for

people using casinos followed by adult entertainment centres and online services

However monthly spend was also high for bookmakers and bingo halls especially

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

94

compared to daily spend The report suggests that using these services often

contributes to a high monthly spend

Table 58 Average money spent on gambling by people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Average spend per gambling

day (pound) Average spend in past

month (pound)

Mean Median Mean Median

Bookmakers 295 100 1785 1000

Bingo hall 210 100 1007 775

Casino 544 200 2973 1000

Live events 170 45 974 600

Adult entertainment centre

241 100 2807 640

Family entertainment centre

136 100 737 600

Pub 212 100 1519 700

Online 435 100 2145 1000

Miscellaneous 324 100 1467 575

Private members club 160 50 1777 700

Other 265 52 2038 600

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Access and outcomes

The overwhelming majority of people (902) self-referred to the NGTS This was

distantly followed by prisons (29) other service or agency (27) and GPs (15)

For people treated during 2019 to 2020 50 were seen within 3 days and 75 within 8

days Waiting times for residential services were higher with 50 of people seen within

3 and a half months

During 2019 to 2020 there was an average of 7 appointments per person and this was

similar for both problem gamblers and affected others Treatment lasted on average 8

weeks with a quarter of people receiving treatment for 3 weeks or less Half of all people

receiving treatment did so for between 3 and 15 weeks and a quarter received treatment

for over 15 weeks Treatment was slightly shorter for affected others and for those in

residential centres was generally longer (an average of 13 weeks)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

95

Between 2015 to 2016 and 2019 to 2020 the proportion of people completing treatment

increased from 59 to 69 while the proportion dropping out of treatment decreased

from 35 to 24 Affected others were more likely to complete treatment than problem

gamblers (80 compared to 66) Overall women were more likely to complete

treatment than men but when limited to just problem gamblers female problem

gamblers were slightly less likely to complete treatment (64 compared to 67 of male

problem gamblers) Also people who were unemployed were considerably more likely

than the average to drop out of treatment (32) and less likely to complete treatment

(61)

As expected almost all (94) people receiving treatment were defined as a problem

gambler according to PGSI The mean PGSI score for people in treatment was 20

markedly higher than the threshold of 8 required for the problem gambler definition

During 2019 to 2020 this proportion had reduced to 40 while PGSI scores had

improved for most people in treatment (75) Those defined as problem gamblers were

most likely to improve by 10 to 18 points (31) with a further 26 improving by 20 to 27

points

63 Attitudes and influences

Introduction

The Gambling Commission has been tracking public perceptions of gambling since

2010 These attitudes and what influences gambling behaviours are the subject of this

section The primary source is the Gambling Commission annual report series

lsquoGambling participation behaviour awareness and attitudesrsquo (20) The Gambling

Commission collects data via a combination of telephone and online surveys This is

supplemented by tables from the HSE

The telephone survey provides the main measure of past 4 week gambling participation

with waves conducted quarterly in March June September and December to reduce

the effect of seasonal variations in gambling behaviour The Gambling Commission

conducts about 1000 interviews each quarter from a survey sample generated through

Random Digit Dialling (RDD)25 of Great Britain phone numbers The sample is subject to

quotas to ensure it is as nationally representative as possible Respondents are

screened to ensure they are 16 or over and fit in remaining unfilled quotas Quotas are

set based on age sex religion and social grade Data is weighted to be representative

25 Random Digit Dialling (RDD) is a method for sampling of telephone surveys which involves the random generation

of telephone numbers

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

96

of the adult population with weights set based on the National Readership Survey (a

face-to-face random probability sample)

The Gambling Commission uses the online survey to monitor online gambling

behaviour The survey was launched after the government introduced regulation of

overseas gambling companies transacting with customers in Great Britain (in-line with

the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014) The online survey sample is

sourced through a panel and the sample is subject to quotas in-line with those used for

the telephone survey Also data is weighted for analysis in-line with the methods used

for the telephone survey

Public perception of gambling

Considering the public perception of gambling back to 2010 gamblersrsquo attitudes are more positive than non-gamblers but the gap has reduced significantly in recent years (Figure 5) The proportion of gamblers and non-gamblers who think that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted has reduced gradually over the past 10 years

Figure 5 Respondents who agree that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted Great Britain 2010 to 2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

All respondents Gambled in past 12 months

Not gambled in past 12 months

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

97

The views of gamblers were also sought on the most important factors when selecting a

company to gamble with The most important factor was having the best odds (26)

followed by the company having

bull a fair and trustworthy reputation (24)

bull bonus offers (15)

bull a recognisable brand name (14)

The Gambling Commission survey asked respondents about a series of attitudinal

statements taken from the Attitudes Towards Gambling Scale (ATGS-8) (a validated

scale to assess gambling attitudes among the general population originally developed

for the 2007 BGPS) From this 82 of respondents in 2019 agreed that there were

currently too many opportunities for gambling (a 3 increase from 2018) while 73

agreed that gambling is dangerous for family life In 2019 we also saw an increase in

the proportion saying that gambling should be discouraged (up to 62 from 58 in

2018) and a significant reduction in respondents agreeing that ldquogambling livens up liferdquo

(down to 26 from 28 in 2018)

Awareness of gambling

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey asks whether gamblers

follow a gambling company on social media Overall 23 of respondents followed a

gambling company on either Facebook Twitter YouTube Snapchat or Instagram in

2019 Facebook (17) was the most popular social media platform in which gamblers

follow gambling companies and despite a decrease over recent years this has been the

case since 2015 This is followed by

bull Twitter (8)

bull YouTube (6)

bull Instagram (5)

bull Snapchat (2)

These figures are consistent with the Adultrsquos Media Use and Attitudes Report (21) which

identifies Facebook as the most popular social media platform with use decreasing since

2017

Overall 86 of respondents have ever seen or heard any gambling advertisements and

82 have ever seen or heard any gambling sponsorship A higher proportion of men

(89) than women (83) have seen or heard gambling advertisements Also compared

to the 2018 survey we saw a decrease in the visibility of gambling sponsorships among

those aged 25 to 34 years (77 in 2019 compared to 82 in 2018)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

98

Gambling management tools

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey also asks about wider issues

of self-exclusion and gambling management tools

If a gambler considers themselves to be spending too much time or money gambling

either online or in person they can request to be self-excluded from a gambling

company or can self-exclude from multiple operators Figure 6 shows the percentage of

gamblers who have self-excluded from gambling activities through a gambling

management tool and whether they were aware of these tools In 2019 5 of gamblers

have ever self-excluded which is a slight reduction from 6 in the previous 4 years The

proportion The proportion of gamblers who had not self-excluded but were aware of

self-exclusion increased steadily from 29 in 2015 to 42 in 2019 The proportion of

gamblers who were not aware of self-exclusion reduced from 65 in 2015 53 in 2019

Figure 6 Gamblersrsquo awareness and use of self-exclusion Great Britain 2015-2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Among gamblers in 2019 more men (6) have self-excluded than women (4) while

those aged 25 to 34 have the highest self-exclusion rates (9) Other management

tools used were

bull setting financial limits (9)

6 6 6 6 5

2937 35

41 42

6557 58

53 53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Self-excluded Not self-excluded but aware Not self-excluded and not aware

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

99

bull time out (3)

bull reality check (3)

bull exclusion by product (2)

Table 59 Use and awareness of gambling management tools Great Britain 2019

Self-exclusion

() Exclusion by product ()

Time out ()

Financial limits ()

Reality check ()

Used 5 2 3 9 3

Aware but not used

42 24 34 49 27

Not aware 53 74 63 42 70

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Compared to the previous year the Gambling Commission reported an increase in the

proportion of respondents seeing information about where to seek help to control

gambling (40) in 2019 They also reported a decrease in respondents seeing

information on whether a machine is random or compensated26 (6)

Overall 20 of gamblers have ever read the terms and conditions provided by a

gambling operator The proportion of respondents who have not read terms and

conditions but were aware they are available was 62 while 18 were not aware terms

and conditions are available Women (22) and those aged 65 or over (30) were

more likely to be unaware of terms and conditions

64 Children and young people

Introduction

This section focuses on gambling prevalence among children and young people The

legal gambling age in the UK is 18 and this includes both gambling in person and

online Historically the exception was the National Lottery but the government plans to

26 All gambling machines have a return to player rate that dictates how frequently they are likely to pay

out For random machines and online slots this is typically based on a random number generator

meaning it is totally random whether the machine hits this number and pays out In contrast the likelihood

of a compensated machine paying out is based on previous plays The most common example is a fruit

machine which is more likely to pay out the more money it has taken (this is necessary as they can only

physically hold a certain number of coins)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

100

raise this from 16 to 18 no later than October 2021 following the announcement of the

Review of the Gambling Act 2005 (22)

The primary source used is the Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and

Gambling Survey A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo (23) We

supplement this with information from the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) report

lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) as well as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) (25)

The Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey A research

study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo is conducted as part of Ipsos MORIrsquos

annual Young People Omnibus (YPO) and examines gambling behaviours such as

where young people gamble and with whom perceptions of gambling and awareness of

gambling advertising The survey also asks a series of questions relating to potential

issues associated with gambling and uses the DSM-IV-MR-J2 problem gambling screen

to classify gamblers as low risk moderate risk or problem gamblers The survey is

conducted in schools with pupils completing online self-completion surveys in class

Data is weighted by sex age and region

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo used a mixed methods approach comprising of a

series of 6 focus groups with a total of 79 young people across England Scotland and

Wales It also included a survey conducted through Survey Monkey and promoted

through social media which 1025 young people responded to The ethnicity and

geographical region of the respondents was fairly representative of the UK population

However most take-up in the survey was by boys (83) which is not representative of

the general population That said the authors quote studies that have found boys to

have significantly higher participation rates in games most heavily associated with loot

boxes and skin betting such as the FIFA series and Fortnite

ALSPAC is a longitudinal study of young peoplesrsquo gambling between 17 and 24 years

using a contemporary UK cohort the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) When the children were aged 6 in 1997 to 1998 their parents completed the

South Oaks Gambling Screen Then when aged 18 the parents completed the PGSI

Between 2008 and 2018 all young people still registered with the ALSPAC (10155)

were invited to take part and complete a gambling frequency survey which included

PGSI The sample sizes completing the gambling surveys were

bull 3757 at age 17

bull 4340 at age 20

bull 4345 at age 24

Depression anxiety and wellbeing scores and drug and alcohol use were also

collected by self-completion questionnaires The main strength of this report is its use of

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

101

the large ALSPAC cohort which has collected detailed data for over 25 years The main

limitation is the missing data with less than half of the whole ALSPAC cohort completing

the gambling surveys Non-responders to the gambling surveys when compared to

ALSPAC responders overall were more likely to be male and from more deprived social

backgrounds with mothers with lower educational levels There was also a significant

gender bias with the final sample comprising 58 females As males were more likely

to engage in gambling activity this gender bias will have resulted in an under-estimate

of gambling prevalence and associated characteristics (26)

A main limitation of all sources used in this section is a lack of general health data We

acknowledged this in the protocol of this review and represents a gap in the data

available for children young people and gambling

Gambling participation

The proportion of 11 to 16-year-old children who have spent their own money on any gambling activity in the last 7 days has been decreasing since 2011 from 23 to 11 in 2019 (Figure 7) This decrease follows the trend of any gambling in the last 12 months which has reduced from 39 in 2018 to 36 in 201927 We should view this reduction in the context of declining rates of drinking smoking and drug-taking in children and young people Though poor diet remains an issue obesity rates are also falling and levels of activity increasing largely through increased activity at school (27)

Nearly double the number of boys (13) reported participating in any gambling activity

in the past 7 days than girls (7) Participation was higher in older children (12 of 14

to 16 year olds compared to 9 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Table 60 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by age and sex Great Britain 2019

11

year olds

12 year olds

13 year olds

14 year olds

15 year olds

16 year olds

Boys aged 11-16

Girls aged 11-16

Total aged 11-16

Has played a National Lottery game in past 7 days

7 3 4 2 3 9 5 2 4

Has played any gambling game in the past 7 days

14 8 9 11 11 16 13 7 11

27 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 37 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19

pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

102

Source Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain 2019

The most common gambling activities for 11 to 16-year-old children in the past 7 days

were placing a private bet for money (5) and playing fruit or slot (electronic gaming)

machines (4) A consistent finding in the report series is that fruit and slot (electronic

gaming) machines (mentioned by 23 of respondents who have gambled) was the first

experience of gambling The main reason for gambling given was ldquobecause itrsquos funrdquo

(55) while among children who do not gamble the main reason given was that it is

illegal and they are too young to take part (56)

National Lottery participation in the past 7 days among 11 to 15 year olds was at its

lowest reported level in 2019 Figure 7 shows that the proportion of 11 to 15 year olds

who have played National Lottery games in the past week has decreased over time

from 10 in 2011 to 4 in 2019

Figure 7 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by activity Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling Commission lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo 2019

Scratchcards remained the most common National Lottery product among children

under 16 who have ever played (mentioned by 10) compared with

bull Lotto the main National Lottery draw (6)

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Any gambling game Any National Lottery game

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

103

bull National Lottery online instant win games (4)

bull other National Lottery games (5)

Most under 16s who bought a National Lottery product were in the company of a parent

or guardian (67) and report that the parent typically pays at the till (73) The report

concludes that although under 16s play the National Lottery for a range of reasons the

influence of parents and family members was as important as having fun

On average 11 to 16 year olds who had gambled in the past 7 days spent pound17 The

overall amount of money this group was given as pocket money birthday money or

money earnt over the same period was pound34

The rates of gambling reported in the past week (11) were lower than drinking alcohol

(16) but higher than using e-cigarettes (7) smoking tobacco cigarettes (6) or

taking illegal drugs (5) Since 2017 the series has seen a potential relationship

between these other harmful activities and gambling such that those who have spent

their own money on gambling in the past 7 days were also more likely to have drank

alcohol (41) taken drugs (21) or smoked either a tobacco cigarette (25) or an e-

cigarette (27) compared with children who had not gambled

Online gambling and gaming

Participation in online gambling among children in the last 7 days compared with in

person gambling was low (3) particularly in the context of the time young people

spend online (the series shows how chatting online with friends and using social media

are 2 of the most popular spare time activities for this age group) Given the low rate of

participation in online gambling it is difficult to draw conclusions across the report series

Any past participation in online gambling was higher at 12 with differences across age

and sex showing the same pattern seen for overall gambling Boys (16) were more

likely than girls (8) to have ever played an online gambling-style game Participation

was higher in older children compared to younger children (14 of 14 to 16 year olds

compared to 10 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Among children who have ever played online gambling-style games fruit and slot

(electronic gaming) machines were most commonly mentioned (30) followed by casino

games such as

bull roulette or blackjack (26)

bull poker games (24)

bull bingo (21)

This was consistent with previous surveys Almost half (47) of children who play online

gambling-style games do so via apps Of these 26 were apps unrelated to social

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

104

networking sites 18 were via Facebook and 17 were free demo games via

gambling apps

Half (52) of 11 to 16 year olds were aware of in-game items (for example weapons

power-ups and tokens) Awareness of in-game items was more common in boys (66)

than girls (37) Of these children 44 had paid money for loot boxes crates or packs

to get in-game items within the game theyrsquore playing In most cases the money used for

loot boxes crates or packs comes from money they had received as a birthday or

Christmas present or from pocket money

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) explored the relationship between gambling

and video games This report was undertaken to explore concerns that these activities

introduce young people to gambling before they have been able to develop strategies to

avoid gambling-related harms

The RSPH report states that around 93 of young people regularly play video games

and that there is a growing concern around loot boxes and skin betting28 The report

found that in the past 7 days twice as many 11 to 14 year olds had bought loot boxes

than 22 to 24 year olds and almost twice as many had taken part in skin betting Also

children under 18 were significantly less likely than older respondents to classify these

activities as gambling and less likely to associate gambling harms with an increased risk

of health issues such as anxiety and alcohol consumption Finally only 25 of children

aged 11 to 14 years strongly support classifying loot boxes as gambling compared to

73 of those aged 22 to 24 years

You should note with reference to the caveats given at the start of this section that

although this source allows us to include information on this new topic the sampling

design it is not as robust as the lsquoGambling Commission Young People and Gambling

Survey 2019rsquo

Problem gambling

In 2019 17 of 11 to 16 year olds were classified as problem gamblers29 and 27 as

at-risk gamblers (as defined by the youth-adapted problem gambling screen DSM-IV-

28 Loot boxes are purchasable rewards that are uncertain at the time of purchase They include cosmetics such as new lsquoskinsrsquo for a character or they can be functional providing an advantage within the game As they cost money to buy and there is an element of chance involved it has led to concerns that they are a form of gambling On sites external to the game itself players can trade sell or bet on their skins for money ndash this is skin betting The Gambling Commissionrsquos view on loot boxes skin betting and related issues is set on in the position paper published March 2017 29 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 19 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

105

MR-J screen) These figures have remained stable compared to the previous year

However it is important to note that problem gambling prevalence in children and young

people from this source is higher than problem gambling prevalence in adults as

reported in the HSE In reality this is perhaps unlikely to be the case suggesting the

DSM-IV as used here may result in an overestimation

There was a higher proportion of boys at risk (38) and problem gamblers (20) than

girls at risk (16) and problem gamblers (07) This gender difference was consistent

with the higher prevalence seen in boys throughout the survey as well as what we see in

adult problem gambling from the HSE and other sources referenced throughout this

report

Another important aspect of gambling for public health not included in the HSE is the

harmful impact on family members The BGPS asks 2 questions about this issue The

first asked whether the respondentrsquos parents or guardians had ever regularly gambled If

so the respondent was asked to report whether they felt that either of their parents or

guardians had ever had a problem with their gambling Problem gambling prevalence

was significantly higher among respondents whose parents gambled regularly (16)

than for those whose parents did not (07) Also 50 of respondents who reported

having a parent with a gambling problem were themselves problem gamblers compared

with 10 of those who reported that although their parents regularly gambled they did

not have a problem with their gambling

Attitudes and influences

Most young people believe gambling to be dangerous (59) and feel well informed

about the issue (60) Also 7 agree that most people their age gamble 11 agree it

is OK for someone their age to gamble to see what itrsquos like and 7 agree it is OK for

someone their age to gamble once a week Consistent with previous surveys it is

interesting to note that despite the higher gambling prevalence in boys compared to

girls both show a similar level of agreement that gambling is dangerous (60 of boys

and 59 of girls)

Exposure to advertising was high among children and young people with 69 reporting

to have seen or heard some form of gambling advertisements or sponsorship most

commonly via television Boys (39) were more likely than girls (28) to report seeing

or hearing a gambling advert about a sports event or a betting company (34 of boys

compared to 21 of girls) Girls (47) were more likely than boys (34) to remember

the last advert they saw about a National Lottery based game or bingo (33 of girls

compared to 20 of boys) Also just over one in 10 (12) follow gambling companies

on social media while 11 had received direct marketing from gambling companies

Half (50) of young people have been spoken to about the potential problems that

gambling can lead to and 74 say they know who to go to for help if they had problems

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

106

related to gambling Children were most likely to have been spoken to about the

potential problems with gambling by their parents or guardians (34) followed by a

teacher (19)

These findings also highlight how parents or guardians were typically present when a

young person gambles (67 of those who have ever spent money on gambling) but are

also recognised as the first contact for help if they were to have problems with gambling

(53) Most young people (57) say their family would discourage them from gambling

if they started or found out but 23 report that their parents or guardians set rules about

gambling

A recent release from ALSPAC (25) measured young peoplersquos gambling at age 17 20

and 24 (3 points of transition from adolescence to adulthood) and revealed that regular

weekly gamblers had developed habits and patterns of play by 20 years of age Playing

the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most

common forms of gambling reported but as the young people got older there was a

significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to 35 at age 20

and 47 at age 24 There was also an increase seen among women but not as steep

(from 08 at age 17 to 4 at age 20 and 11 at age 24) The study shows how young

people who gamble regularly were more likely to

bull have parents who gambled regularly

bull have high social media usage

bull have been regular players of video games when younger

Also regular gamblers had lower wellbeing scores and were at least twice as likely to

smoke cigarettes daily and consume alcohol weekly Finally a small minority (6 to 7)

of men demonstrated problem gambling behaviours associated with poor mental health

and wellbeing involvement in crime and potentially harmful use of drugs and alcohol

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

107

7 Discussion

Over half of the population take part in gambling (245 million people in England)

Participation in the National Lottery declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However

participation in other gambling activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015

before falling back to 40 in the most recent survey Online gambling (excluding the

National Lottery) has increased from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

The trend in problem gambling between 2012 and 2018 has also reduced accounting

for 05 of the population in 2018 (245600 people in England) As numbers are very

small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with previous years

rather than representative of a real decline However low risk gambling is increasing

and a cause for concern

The prevention paradox states that on a health continuum ndash alcohol being the typical

example ndash the larger volume of harm is associated with people lower on the continuum

because there are more of them It is unclear from the data available whether problem

gambling is actually declining but low risk gambling does appear to be increasing So it

is difficult to say whether gambling risk and the associated harms have increased or

decreased overall The HSE gambling questionnaire is not detailed enough about the

harms themselves and so we cannot draw a clear conclusion based on the quantitative

data presented here This is a limitation of this study and in the data currently available

for this topic area

Problem moderate risk and low risk gambling are all associated with men in the younger

age groups Demographic factors particularly sex appear more significant in predicting

at-risk gambling behaviour than economic factors such as income employment and

relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling

than poor physical health and negative health behaviours with the exception of alcohol

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were affected others Among

children playing the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends

were the most common forms of gambling reported But as the young people got older

there was a significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to

35 at age 20 and 47 at age 24

Figures presented do not cover the period of the COVID-19 pandemic with the most

recent published data from the primary data source covering 2018 We have published a

separate evidence review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling It is important

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

108

to note that some findings particularly for problem gambling may be deemed

inconclusive because of the limited sample size

71 Strengths and limitations

The main strength of the findings of this report comes from the HSE The HSE is a

primary resource used to monitor the nationrsquos health and care It is a robust transparent

detailed widely used and well-respected data source Including the gambling

questionnaire allows us to compare gambling with a range of other health behaviours

and conditions However while sample size is adequate for analysing a range of topics

in England we had to combine several survey years at times in this report In particular

we had to combine data when looking at more detailed breakdowns Though it is the

most robust source available for estimating problem gambling in England the combined

dataset only included around 150 problem gamblers (according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI)

The main limitations of this report come from relying on alternative sources of previously

published data to meet aspects of the objectives not fully met by the HSE The HSE

does not ask questions about

bull time spent on gambling

bull money spent on gambling

bull affected others

bull attitudes towards gambling

bull the gambling behaviours of children and young people

The sources used are the best available for quantitative gambling data on these topics

but in general they lack the data quality of the HSE They also vary considerably in

robustness and how representative they are of the national population Finally except

for ALSPAC referenced in this report there is no longitudinal gambling data source

currently available The addition of longitudinal data would have contributed significantly

to the objectives of this report by allowing us to see important changes in the gambling

behaviours of individuals over time As a relatively new field in public health we hope

that more and better-quality quantitative gambling data will become available as more

research is carried out

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

109

8 References

1 Department of Health and Social Care PHE remit letter 2018 to 2019 Online 2018 2 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Government response to the consultation

on proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures Online 2018

3 Blank L Baxter S Buckley Woods H Goyder E Interventions to reduce public health burden of gambling related harms A mapping review of the international evidence Lancet Public Health 2021 Volume 6

4 Public Health England Gambling-related harms evidence review scope Online 2020 5 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling Online 2019 6 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Online 2018 7 UK Data Service Health Survey for England Online 2020 8 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes

annual report 2020 9 The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) development and UK

validation Health Qual Life Outcomes Tennant R Hiller L Fishwick R Platt S and S Joseph and others 2007 pages 1-13

10 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2016 Well-being and mental health Online 2017 11 David P Goldberg and Paul Williams User Guide to the General Health Questionnaire

Windsor NFER-NELSON 1988 12 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Adult health related behaviours Online

2019 13 Department of Health and Social Care UK Chief Medical Officers Low Risk Drinking

Guidelines Online 2016 14 Gambling Commission Problem gambling vs gambling-related harms Online 2020 15 NatCen British Gambling Prevalence Survey Online 2010 16 NatCen Treatment Needs and Gap Analysis in Great Britain Synthesis of findings from a

programme of studies Online 2020 17 London School of Economics An assessment of the accuracy of survey estimates of the

prevalence of problem gambling in the United Kingdom Online 2020 18 BeGambleAware Annual Statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great

Britain) Online 2020 19 BeGambleAware National Gambling Treatment Service Online 2020 20 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and

attitudes Annual Report Online 2020 21 Ofcom Adults Media Use and Attitudes Report Online 2019 22 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Review of the Gambling Act 2005

Online 2020 23 Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study

among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain Online 2019 24 Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) Skins in the game Online 2019 25 University of Bristol Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Online 2019 26 Emond A Griffiths M and L Hollen A longitudinal study of gambling in late adolescence

and early adulthood Follow-up assessment at 24 years Online 2019 27 The Kings Fund Healthy behaviours Future trends Online 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

110

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority

Introduction

Table 61 shows the prevalence of overall gambling participation in the last 12 months by

upper tier local authority (UTLA) as illustrated in Figure 4 of the main report Due to

sample size the authorities of Inner and Outer London have been grouped together

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

Results

Variation in gambling participation is evident by UTLA Discounting Rutland which has

wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a rate of gambling participation that

is statistically significantly higher than average for England The top 5 UTLAs in England

with the highest levels of gambling participation were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

111

Table 61 Gambling participation in the last 12 months by upper tier local authority England 2012 2015 2016 2018

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000001 Hartlepool 707 596 798

E06000002 Middlesbrough 612 492 720

E06000003 Redcar and Cleveland

667 561 758

E06000004 Stockton-on-Tees 726 637 799

E06000005 Darlington 700 575 801

E06000006 Halton 582 450 703

E06000007 Warrington 525 428 621

E06000008 Blackburn with

Darwen 571 441 692

E06000009 Blackpool 690 562 794

E06000010 Kingston upon Hull 654 567 731

E06000011 East Riding of

Yorkshire 547 464 627

E06000012 North East

Lincolnshire 640 527 739

E06000013 North Lincolnshire 683 587 766

E06000014 York 500 409 591

E06000015 Derby 633 539 718

E06000016 Leicester 476 397 557

E06000017 Rutland 833 436 970

E06000018 Nottingham 527 447 605

E06000019 Herefordshire 600 483 707

E06000020 Telford and Wrekin 711 614 792

E06000021 Stoke-on-Trent 615 535 689

E06000022 Bath and North East

Somerset 589 489 683

E06000023 Bristol 547 476 616

E06000024 North Somerset 606 510 694

E06000025 South

Gloucestershire 566 471 656

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

112

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000026 Plymouth 675 587 752

E06000027 Torbay 550 425 669

E06000030 Swindon 583 483 677

E06000031 Peterborough 617 516 709

E06000032 Luton 646 548 734

E06000033 Southend-on-Sea 598 489 697

E06000034 Thurrock 690 585 779

E06000035 Medway 500 424 576

E06000036 Bracknell Forest 681 566 777

E06000037 West Berkshire 575 466 677

E06000038 Reading 549 441 652

E06000039 Slough 349 257 454

E06000040 Windsor and Maidenhead

469 364 577

E06000041 Wokingham 595 485 696

E06000042 Milton Keynes 654 570 730

E06000043 Brighton and Hove 500 399 601

E06000044 Portsmouth 701 598 787

E06000045 Southampton 710 611 792

E06000046 Isle of Wight 675 568 766

E06000047 County Durham 687 630 738

E06000049 Cheshire East 519 452 586

E06000050 Cheshire West and

Chester 627 561 688

E06000051 Shropshire 653 587 713

E06000052 Cornwall 630 583 673

E06000054 Wiltshire 603 544 659

E06000055 Bedford 569 448 682

E06000056 Central Bedfordshire 620 531 701

E06000057 Northumberland 627 552 697

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

113

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000058 Bournemouth

Christchurch and Poole

614 546 677

E06000059 Dorset 588 520 654

E08000001 Bolton 603 533 669

E08000002 Bury 602 512 685

E08000003 Manchester 453 395 512

E08000004 Oldham 624 544 698

E08000005 Rochdale 614 527 694

E08000006 Salford 551 457 642

E08000007 Stockport 549 480 615

E08000008 Tameside 609 516 695

E08000009 Trafford 558 458 654

E08000010 Wigan 622 538 700

E08000011 Knowsley 786 676 866

E08000012 Liverpool 683 612 746

E08000013 St Helens 596 492 691

E08000014 Sefton 650 567 724

E08000015 Wirral 665 591 731

E08000016 Barnsley 734 644 808

E08000017 Doncaster 703 631 766

E08000018 Rotherham 729 633 808

E08000019 Sheffield 595 544 643

E08000021 Newcastle upon Tyne 558 480 634

E08000022 North Tyneside 759 635 850

E08000023 South Tyneside 692 583 784

E08000024 Sunderland 664 584 736

E08000025 Birmingham 437 393 481

E08000026 Coventry 549 479 618

E08000027 Dudley 682 598 755

E08000028 Sandwell 630 536 715

E08000029 Solihull 505 412 597

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

114

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E08000030 Walsall 558 469 644

E08000031 Wolverhampton 613 500 715

E08000032 Bradford 490 421 559

E08000033 Calderdale 707 601 795

E08000034 Kirklees 563 502 621

E08000035 Leeds 635 586 682

E08000036 Wakefield 702 629 766

E08000037 Gateshead 635 536 725

E10000002 Buckinghamshire 533 474 592

E10000003 Cambridgeshire 587 537 634

E10000006 Cumbria 688 626 743

E10000007 Derbyshire 631 585 675

E10000008 Devon 542 496 587

E10000011 East Sussex 532 470 593

E10000012 Essex 620 583 655

E10000013 Gloucestershire 635 579 688

E10000014 Hampshire 602 565 637

E10000015 Hertfordshire 615 576 652

E10000016 Kent 607 573 641

E10000017 Lancashire 619 581 656

E10000018 Leicestershire 604 553 653

E10000019 Lincolnshire 664 617 707

E10000020 Norfolk 638 595 679

E10000021 Northamptonshire 668 617 715

E10000023 North Yorkshire 651 601 698

E10000024 Nottinghamshire 643 597 687

E10000025 Oxfordshire 636 589 680

E10000027 Somerset 589 530 645

E10000028 Staffordshire 695 655 733

E10000029 Suffolk 658 609 704

E10000030 Surrey 565 528 602

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

115

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E10000031 Warwickshire 528 476 579

E10000032 West Sussex 610 559 658

E10000034 Worcestershire 673 619 724

Inner London 502 473 530

Outer London 500 482 518

Total 593 587 598

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

116

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling

Introduction

This analysis forms one part of a larger piece of work described in the pre-registered

lsquoGambling-related harms evidence review Analysis protocolrsquo The aim is to describe the

prevalence and determinants of gambling the harms associated with gambling and the

social and economic burden of gambling This analysis seeks to address the following

research questions

1 What socio-demographic factors are associated with gambling and harmful gambling

in England

2 Is gambling and harmful gambling associated with health status

The hypotheses tested are

1 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

2 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in

England

3 Problem gambling is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

4 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

5 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

6 Problem gambling is associated with health conditions in England

Data source

The data source is a combined dataset of the HSE for years 2012 2015 2016 and

2018

The HSE is a survey of the general population aged 16 and over Participants are

selected using a random probability sample The survey design ensures that every

address in England has an equal chance of being included in the survey each year and

the results are representative of the population living in private households Gambling

specific questions are included in the 2012 2015 2016 and 2018 surveys only

Outputs have been non-response weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE

analysis since 2003 NatCen were commissioned to combine the datasets They

manage the HSE on behalf of NHS Digital NatCen calculated and appended new

combined weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

117

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc16 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb16 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication30 the problem gambling weights were

used for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening tools

The self-completion weights were used for the remaining analyses

All important information related to the data source is available in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the HSE series31 Registered users can access the un-combined

datasets via the UK Data Archive32

We used SPSS version 25 software for all statistical analysis

Variables

We selected the variables below as they were of the most interest to the research aims

of the study within the limitations of the data available The independent variables are

those measuring the main socio-demographic and health concepts reported in the HSE

series Initially only Anyacty and PROBGAM as dependent variables were within scope

However following feedback from the expert reference group associated with the wider

project we agreed that a measure of any level of risk (lsquoharmful gamblingrsquo) should be

included if feasible A common proxy from HSE and Gambling Commission outputs is to

use a PGSI score of 1 or more to describe any level of gambling risk The analysis

follows this precedent

Table 62 Dependent gambling variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

Anyacty Whether spent any money on gambling in last 12 months Categorical

PGSI_atrisk Respondents with a PGSI score of 1 or more Categorical

PROBGAM Whether a problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

Categorical

30 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling 31 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 32 UK Data Service (2020) Health Survey for England

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

118

Table 63 Independent socio-demographic variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

ag16g10 Age 16 to 75 in 10-year age bands Categorical

Sex Gender Categorical

Origin2 Grouped ethnicity (White Black Asian Mixed Other) Categorical

Eqv3 Equivalised income tertiles (lowest middle highest) Ordinal

TopQual4 Highest educational qualification (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent below degree no qualification)

Ordinal

Employment_r Recoded variable of Activb2activity status of previous week (in education paid employmentself-employed unemployed retired looking after homefamily other)

Categorical

Qimd Quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score (2010 IMD for 2012 and 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018)

Ordinal

Gor1 Government Office Region Categorical

Table 64 Independent health-related variables of interest

Variable name

Variable label Measure

Genhelf2 Self-assessed general health grouped (very goodgood fair badvery bad)

Ordinal

WemwbsQ WEMWBS score quintiles Ordinal

LifeSatG LifeSatG Life satisfaction (low medium high very high) Ordinal

GHQg2 GHQ score group (0 1-3 4+) Ordinal

BMIlvg3 BMI group (not overweight or obese overweight obese) Categorical

Totalwug Alcohol units per week grouped Categorical

Cignow Current smoker Categorical

Missing data

Missing data was coded as such in the source dataset and was excluded as appropriate

from statistical analysis

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

119

Results

Step 1 Bivariate analysis

For step 1 of this pre-registered analysis a series of chi-squared tests were conducted

to refute the null hypothesis This was that the variables of interest are independent of

the 3 dependent gambling variables33

All 3 dependent variables are categorical as are most of the independent variables of

interest Chi-square was also used to test the ordinal variables against the categorical

dependents while acknowledging that the test will treat both as categorical The results

of such tests concerning ordinal variables are valid but there is an acceptable loss of

information in the output (for example the order of the categories) This is a common

approach and the ordinal variables are fully accounted for in step 2 of the analysis using

binary multiple logistic regression To trust the conclusions from a chi-square test the 2

standard assumptions are that

bull observations are independent

bull all expected frequencies are more than 534 for a 2x2 table (for example PROBGAM

x Sex)

These assumptions are true for the HSE combined dataset However the SPSS syntax

used tested the latter assumption as part of the output

Step 1 Findings

Tables 68 69 and 70 show the main output from the bivariate analysis

The most important figure for the hypotheses measured is the significance determined

by the chi-square test Where this is less-than 005 the null hypothesis is rejected and

the conclusion can be made that the association between the dependent and

independent is likely not due to chance variation From the outputs below this cannot be

determined for income region self-reported general health and region

The output also includes measures for Cramerrsquos-VPhi35 to quantify the correlation Chi-

square has determined whether there is a significant relationship between the variables

but is not able to quantify how important this is Cramerrsquos-V is a post-test that provides

this additional information Given the relatively large sample size of the dataset it is

33 Technically a chi-square test is a descriptive test not a modelling technique and as such there are no

dependent variables but for simplicity of language and consistency with the following description of Step 2

of this analysis the main gambling measures are here referred to as dependent 34 For larger tables no more than 20 of all cells may have an expected frequency less than 5 and all

expected frequencies more than 1 35 Phi is used where the table is 2x2

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

120

important to note that even small effects can become significant (as chance reduces

with larger sample sizes) Including this post-test suggests that this may be the case for

our study given that all measures of the correlation are low However results here do

not preclude any variables from step 2 The results of the chi-square test are used to

test whether including a variable reduces the badness-of-fit measure This means that if

chi-square is significant then the variable will be considered a significant predictor in the

equation So only income region and self-reported general health were excluded from

step 2 of the analysis and the conclusion made that the sample size may be amplifying

significance at the bivariate level

Table 65 Bivariate output for gambling participation in the last 12 months

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0121

Sex 0000 0075

Ethnicity 0000 0171

Income 0000 0087

Educational qualification 0000 0076

Employment 0000 0180

IMD 0000 0039

Region 0000 0087

Health factors

General health 0000 0042

Wellbeing 0000 0045

Life satisfaction 0000 0045

GHQ 0000 0032

BMI 0000 0096

Alcohol 0000 0227

Smoking 0000 0031

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

121

Table 66 Bivariate output for harmful gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0123

Sex 0000 0121

Ethnicity 0001 0027

Income 0831 0004

Educational qualification 0000 0044

Employment 0000 0088

IMD 0000 0050

Region 0021 0026

Health factors

General health 0577 0006

Wellbeing 0000 0092

Life satisfaction 0000 0070

GHQ 0000 0061

BMI 0330 0010

Alcohol 0000 0106

Smoking 0000 0085

Table 67 Bivariate output for problem gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0036

Sex 0000 0053

Ethnicity 0000 0042

Income 0017 0019

Educational qualification 0000 0029

Employment 0000 0052

IMD 0000 0047

Region 0000 0037

Health factors

General health 0000 0036

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

122

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Wellbeing 0000 0062

Life satisfaction 0000 0052

GHQ 0000 0053

BMI 0849 0004

Alcohol 0002 0031

Smoking 0000 0040

Step 2 Binary logistic regression

Whereas step 1 describes the significance of the relationship between the independent

variables and gambling behaviour step 2 models the determinants of and predicts the

likelihood of gambling behaviour among the study population Unlike the bivariate

analysis the aim here is to explicitly define a dependent gambling variable and make

predictions so a logistic regression is most appropriate

Because most variables and outcomes were categorical it could be argued that a log

linear analysis would be preferred for step 2 While this is an extension of the chi-square

test used in step 1 it has the disadvantage of being unintuitive and problematic to

interpret and explain So we decided to use logistic regression as it is easier to

understand than log linear analysis simple to explain to the audience of the final report

and is still a reasonable tool for the aims of this study

All standard assumptions of binary logistic regression are met by the present analysis

namely

bull dependent is dichotomous

bull one or more independent variables that can be either categorical (nominal or ordinal)

or continuous

bull independent observations

bull dependent variable is mutually exclusive

bull linear relationship between any continuous independent variables and the logit

transformation of the dependent variable

Before the regression some variables were recoded into more practical or meaningful

groups and others were dummy coded to turn certain categories into binary variables to

give them directionality (such as higher category is 1 lower category is 0) This allows

the regression to look at direction of association by comparing 2 sides

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

123

Table 68 Variables entered into the equation

Variable name Entered into

equation Recodes

ag16g10 Yes No recode

Sex Yes Recoded into dummy variable Sex_r (Male (0) Female (1))

Origin2 Yes Recoded into Ethnicity_r (White (0) Non-White (1))

Eqv3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

TopQual4 Yes No recode

Employment_r Yes Recoded into 2 dummy variables Paid_employ_dum (In paid employmentself-employed (1)) and Unemployed_dum (Unemployed (1))

Qimd Yes No recode

Gor1 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Genhelf2 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

WemwbsQ Yes No recode

LifeSatG Yes No recode

GHQg2 Yes No recode

BMIlvg3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Totalwug Yes Recoded into Alcwug_r (Never drink (0) 1-14 units (1) Over 14 to 35 units (2) Over 35 to 50 units (3) 50+ units (4))

Cignow Yes No recode

Not all questions were asked in every HSE year For example life satisfaction is

included in the 2016 and 2018 surveys while WEMWBS is included in 2012 2015 and

2016 surveys only Given the results of step 1 life satisfaction and WEMWBS are to be

included in the logistic regression This means that the analysis will be run on 2016 as

this is the most recent year that includes all variables of interest This is suitable from a

sample size perspective for Anyacty and PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling)

While there is no consensus regarding sample size for logistic regression a

conventional guideline suggests that maximum likelihood estimation with less than 100

cases is ldquoriskyrdquo 500 cases is ldquoadequaterdquo and there should be at least 10 cases per

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

124

predictor36 Others have refined this saying that 10 times the number of predictors (k)

should consider the proportion (p) of successes (n = 10kp)37 Given the results of step 1

this means we need a sample of 253 for Anyacty and 2933 for PGSI_atrisk (harmful

gambling) We used 3395 in the analysis for Anyacty and 3315 for PGSI_atrisk The

sample requirement for PROBGAM to be meaningful cannot be achieved within the

limits of the dataset used no matter the number of HSE years included

One final consideration about the sample size for the logistic regression is specific to the

calculation of logs ratios which is the output of step 2 A bias38 of up to 15 is

acknowledged for the log odds ratio when the sample size is around 100 but this

reduces close to zero when around 1000 cases are included So the current analysis

should not be unduly affected by such bias

Table 69 Sample size calculation

Model Proportion of successes (p) Number of predictors (k) Sample size (n)

Anyacty 0473743 12 253

Atrisk 0040908 12 2933

Probgam 0006601 12 18180

Step 2 Findings

The Anyacty model is poor and is not described in detail here

The first output below (Table 73) allows us to reject the null hypothesis Here this is that

the model based on the variables inputted fits equally well as the null model (Block 0 in

full output)

36 Long J (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables SAGE Publications London 37 Peduzzi P Concato J Kemper E Holford T R and A R Feinstein (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis Journal of clinical epidemiology 49(12) 1373-1379 38 Nemes S Jonasson J M Genell A and G Steineck (2009) Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size BMC medical research methodology 9 56-60

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

125

Table 70 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig

Step 32938 25 0000

Block 32938 25 0000

Model 32938 25 000

The second main output is the pseudo-Rsup2 values Itrsquos worth noting that these will be

lower than the Rsup2 of multiple regression lsquoPseudorsquo as Rsup2 in this analysis is not technically

the proportion of variation accounted for by variation in the independents rather it is

only an analogue of correlation The Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be quoted as the preferred

measure over Cox and Snell Rsup2 because the latter has the limitation that it cannot reach

1 as Rsup2 in linear regression can Nagelkerke Rsup2 overcomes this limitation by adjusting

the scale of the statistic So as this analysis aims to be as analogous as possible to the

Rsup2 of least squares regression Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be used

The present model has an Rsup2 of 27 which is good but not great However it is typical

of Nagelkerke and Cox amp Snell to vary and so it is best practice not to over-emphasize

the pseudo-Rsup2 in logistic regression The Hosmer amp Lemeshow uses non-significance as

a measure of goodness of fit of the model Greater than 005 indicates it is a good fitting

model which the PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling) model achieves

Table 71 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Model Summary

-2 Log likelihood Cox amp Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square

1128789a 0097 0267

Note a Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than 0001

Table 72 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Hosmer and Lemeshow Test (step 1)

Chi-square df Sig

9080 8 0336

A drawback of the model is the low classification rate particularly regarding true

classifications A model with a good accuracy rate would demonstrate high proportions

for both those with no PGSI risk and those with any PGSI risk The current model is

good at predicting cases that have no risk (997) but not very good at predicting cases

that do have risk (104)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

126

Table 73 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Classification Tablea

Predicted

(PGSI_atrisk) Percentage Correct

No risk At risk

Observed (PGSI At risk (1plus))

No risk 3023 8 997

At risk 172 20 104

Overall Percentage 944

Note a The cut value is 0500

The most important output for the aim of this study is the variables in the equation table

which details the regression function itself This analysis is not concerned with the raw

scores because natural scales do not make sense when dealing with a dichotomous

dependent variable As the analysis here aims to predict the likelihood of falling into one

of 2 groups (at risk gambling yes or no) meaning the relationship in non-linear then we

quote the log odds (essentially the analysis has made the relationship linear by

converting the raw probability scores into log odds) By taking the natural log of the odds

ratios we get an indirect measure of probability of being in the target group that will then

be linearly related So the final output of the analysis is the predicted change in log odds

for every one unit change in the independents Those that were significant were

tabulated and summarised in the body of the main report These are

bull age

bull sex

bull GHQ-12 (all levels)

bull alcohol consumption (over 14 to 35 units and 50 units or more)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

127

Table 74 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Variables in the Equationa

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational Qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equiv)

8609 2 0014

Educational Qualification 3 groups (Below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational Qualification 3 groups (No qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (least deprived) 11143 4 0025

Quintile of IMD score (2) -0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3) 0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4) 0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (most deprived) 0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1) 15525 4 0004

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2) 0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3) 0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4) 0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5) -0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

128

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Life satisfaction (Low (0-4)) 4262 3 0235

Life satisfaction (Medium (5-6)) -0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (High (7-8)) -0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (Very high (9-10)) 0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ Score ndash grouped (Score 0) 15279 2 0000

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 1-3) 0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 4+) 0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (Nevernot in last 12 months)

36554 4 0000

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14) 0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (Over 14 to 35) 1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (Over 35 to 50) 0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (Over 50) 2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020

Note Empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts a Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

129

Limitations

The main limitations to the analysis are the low classification rate for positive cases and

that while the Rsup2 is less important in binary logistic regression than linear regression and

automatically lower the model overall seems to be good but not great The other main

limitation is that the variables included and so the concepts measured are restricted by

what is included in HSE

Finally it is important to note that while the model goes some way to explaining the

relationship between harmful gambling and the available range of variables and

concepts all conclusions relate to association only not causation

Conclusions

A series of bivariate analyses were conducted to compare a range of variables to 3

increasing levels of gambling participation and harm Of these income region self-

reported general health and BMI were shown not to be significant for harmful gambling

Income and BMI were shown not to be significant for problem gambling

We performed a logistic regression to look at the effects of important socio-demographic

and health factors on the likelihood that respondents are participating in harmful levels of

gambling The logistic regression model was statistically significant (p less-than 005)

The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling and correctly classified

94 of cases but this was skewed towards classifying those at no risk

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be at-risk gamblers Wellbeing

contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on GHQ12

Compared to respondents scoring 0 the odds of those scoring 1 to 3 were 20 times

more likely to participate in harmful gambling Those scoring 4 or more were 24 times

more likely to participate

Regarding physical health and health behaviours smoking and BMI did not contribute

significantly to the model but alcohol did Compared to abstainers or people not drinking

in last 12 months the odds of respondents who drank above the recommended limits

(14 to 35 units) were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This

increased markedly to 78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) Given the

importance of gender mentioned above it should be noted that the group from HSE

consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

The broader conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly

gender appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic

factors such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

130

is a stronger predictor of harmful gambling than poor physical health and negative health

behaviours with the exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and the

method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

131

Appendix C Confidence limits

This appendix presents the confidence intervals39 that correspond to the tables

produced from the Health Survey for England

Note that empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts

Table 1 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6562960 6334907 5738490 5517114

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4317807 4628907 4288585 4135974

Table 2 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5131122 4451484 3932956 3487769

Scratchcards 1779043 2122489 1935338 1701510

Other lotteries 1414683 1397320 1309177 1359294

Machines and games

Football pools 182619 224660 224504 253018

Bingo (not online) 525364 536277 440814 403652

39 A confidence range has been constructed using the Wilson Score method applied to the unweighted survey data

This range (+x and -y) has then been applied to the weighted estimate to produce 95 confidence intervals based

on weighted prevalence levels

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

132

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

565450 651162 564692 517818

Machines in a bookmakers 203497 289984 252415 188015

Casino table games (not online) 217587 308750 280441 225071

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075259 087758 061298 052915

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

247617 327553 271087 262360

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 384863 660760 679692 719161

Betting exchange 057923 078901 096568 088006

Horse races (not online) 966001 1037288 853068 748048

Dog races (not online) 231290 243261 178292 142126

Sports events (not online) 337418 469553 459815 356345

Other events or sports (not online)

070264 114616 105517 123946

Spread-betting 032504 044184 044120 035913

Private betting 414193 460042 365062 337475

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 106871 150925 105517 096928

Summary

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

603368 872696 872386 873509

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

133

Table 3 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1043636 2980783 3995669 4433740 4143208 3366952 2528593 3489166

Scratchcards 1727215 2436717 2122630 1748760 1203935 736928 349895 1702598

Other lotteries 368931 851805 1248142 1510844 1665525 1644453 1488600 1360281

Machines and games

Football pools 500017 505813 125403 043431 092364 052245 125216 253452

Bingo (not online) 368931 434472 414316 218671 306199 263832 366695 404203

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

669475 814954 574877 418627 306199 073441 047549 518443

Machines in a bookmakers

325948 399073 133402 103672 048250 188385

Casino table games (not online)

300370 505813 215674 111586 077250 225478

Poker played in pubs or clubs

097038 079631 042318 053100

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

233091 532732 361625 143797 084765 262801

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

750752 1393731 885118 634445 297618 110693 054080 719896

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

134

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Betting exchange 183742 110705 063786 017054 041341 088251

Horse races (not online)

814337 723214 656254 744063 705698 620226 218526 748796

Dog races (not online) 216520 183867 071194 103672 062513 066258 142445

Sports events (not online)

535416 613960 266506 287132 204688 080724 356862

Other events or sports (not online)

274971 192195 056493 065233 069829 124242

Spread-betting 104643 050020 036061

Private betting 687487 514776 292227 160184 123468 059188 074454 337978

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120051 102830 093988 043431 048250 059188 023266 097187

Summary

Any gambling activity 3591860 5407593 5440884 5765226 5661399 4968794 4065485 5283918

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

3405626 4607524 4144038 3800076 3758191 3064607 2490272 3906545

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

933176 1640157 1107806 762420 392939 157519 081463 874316

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

135

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1467259 3510485 4569168 4988049 4740843 4004582 3216145 3712348

Scratchcards 2237681 2938136 2615102 2189984 1622106 1118809 682241 1880872

Other lotteries 648125 1193740 1655770 1929442 2136972 2162721 2068854 1523567

Machines and games

Football pools 815807 782166 286905 146905 242719 190570 350156 331639

Bingo (not online) 648125 694019 675709 410309 547004 516624 705209 500715

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1024788 1150848 873938 668934 547004 229112 209095 626345

Machines in a bookmakers

591519 649674 298839 246170 167268 078437 076382 256781

Casino table games (not online)

557344 782166 415895 258195 217978 123019 109263 299645

Poker played in pubs or clubs

262730 211548 150729 079335 070360 078437 093306 092229

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

465280 815055 608802 305738 230391 123019 109263 342279

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1122772 1808101 1241414 931637 535657 291423 222447 844666

Betting exchange 395122 260219 189059 093528 154249 123019 124567 137034

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

136

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Horse races (not online)

1198611 1043228 971956 1061279 1044250 976648 495459 875733

Dog races (not online) 442015 366481 201584 246170 192860 216382 124567 202776

Sports events (not online)

860079 913250 484660 501354 409383 241741 153840 448110

Other events or sports (not online)

522990 378089 176420 184919 205472 078437 124567 181001

Spread-betting 275043 161416 067548 064526 085458 043689 076382 069289

Private betting 1046612 793138 518737 329227 291327 203539 261727 427016

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 299471 248158 238589 146905 167268 203539 153840 148088

Summary

Any gambling activity 4217178 5967990 6014213 6308361 6251656 5628584 4820989 5515650

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4024973 5173180 4719791 4345658 4348681 3689635 3174929 4134514

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1338704 2080011 1497113 1082799 659541 364073 274602 1010073

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

137

Table 5 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6632052 6377894 5943259 5575595

Any gambling activity Females

5942819 5731883 4969458 4906675

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6963408 6718136 6293842 5902785

Any gambling activity Females

6254929 6046300 5290274 5233175

Table 6 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3246002 3730976 2826442

Scratchcards 1169964 2047322 1288765

Other lotteries 1169964 1492822 1025881

Machines and games

Football pools 097245 331162 161764

Bingo (not online) 181793 461044 439165

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 260591 677371 289335

Machines in a bookmakers 089066 257882 058685

Casino table games (not online) 269453 248786 023699

Poker played in pubs or clubs 013817 072168 017435

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

181793 321958 089155

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 829815 791242 161764

Betting exchange 097245 072168 044142

Horse races (not online) 680296 876993 315458

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

138

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Dog races (not online) 072929 167769 073727

Sports events (not online) 260591 451712 128970

Other events or sports (not online) 057156 167769 058685

Spread-betting

Private betting 260591 395884 161764

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 072929 106282 058685

Summary

Any gambling activity 4822296 5717294 4381627

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3393706 4396794 2884939

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

942692 991720 254771

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3659871 4051421 3324819

Scratchcards 1464018 2318770 1671830

Other lotteries 1464018 1734501 1376348

Machines and games

Football pools 201170 458796 326066

Bingo (not online) 316244 608611 686798

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 417105 851788 497620

Machines in a bookmakers 189387 372249 169903

Casino table games (not online) 428205 361367 105181

Poker played in pubs or clubs 065016 138416 091504

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316244 448022 219200

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1085531 977657 326066

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

139

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Betting exchange 201170 138416 144563

Horse races (not online) 915656 1071712 531322

Dog races (not online) 165600 262578 194744

Sports events (not online) 417105 597965 279093

Other events or sports (not online) 141449 262578 169903

Spread-betting 018946 010800 029172

Private betting 417105 533922 326066

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 165600 184216 169903

Summary

Any gambling activity 5257552 6040806 4920415

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3811599 4724157 3385971

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1212199 1196726 452417

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

140

Table 7 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5010828 1217707 3855865 3194364 3141982 4261193

Scratchcards 2392446 1504443 771932 1869685 1883219 1942949

Other lotteries 1444337 341029 1743242 944731 869787 1378997

Machines and games

Football pools 293283 350031 113038 153197 065571 251384

Bingo (not online) 485953 296228 532725 426543 524869 503985

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

787354 652538 149092 627816 414928 621294

Machines in a bookmakers

341252 287313 026812 381417 131420 270701

Casino table games (not online)

399008 350031 060262 161672 081619 290043

Poker played in pubs or clubs

113245 139049 011396 071133 088841

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

399008 199203 043262 354482 235334 309408

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

943709 468090 113038 399434 244162 660465

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

141

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Betting exchange 113245 190517 018918 071133 098270

Horse races (not online)

1178937 477241 637685 683310 451433 945210

Dog races (not online)

293283 113840 086397 161672 073550 222461

Sports events (not online)

602327 449816 113038 381417 131420 455212

Other events or sports (not online)

160124 097291 026812 111449 117202

Spread-betting 057978 034490 055608 042284

Private betting 524694 801832 140032 283272 165567 435724

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 150708 164632 068903 095111 042311 136216

Summary

Any gambling activity

6393967 3393970 5102509 4808928 4477874 5701128

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

142

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5169127 1516050 4105461 3632423 3544049 4378999

Scratchcards 2528827 1828181 913477 2242908 2227498 2037902

Other lotteries 1557418 516281 1940866 1232003 1124781 1462015

Machines and games

Football pools 349063 527241 173280 287250 152230 289954

Bingo (not online) 556293 461270 653008 632580 731043 557279

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

874737 883487 217174 870369 601420 679936

Machines in a bookmakers

401069 450223 059636 577920 246091 310631

Casino table games (not online)

463283 527241 106134 298732 176110 331283

Poker played in pubs or clubs

149196 259130 035079 169741 112545

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

463283 338712 083160 544983 381740 351912

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1038302 668690 173280 599818 392876 720754

Betting exchange 149196 327436 047543 169741 123113

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

143

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Horse races (not online)

1282954 679502 767906 934619 644769 1015927

Dog races (not online)

349063 224453 139960 298732 164214 258885

Sports events (not online)

679859 647040 173280 577920 246091 506066

Other events or sports (not online)

202292 201077 059636 229211 144176

Spread-betting 084494 104180 145351 059116

Private betting 597532 1053588 206247 456535 291798 485560

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 191713 293434 117480 205634 115599 165156

Summary

Any gambling activity

6545296 3811322 5357192 5270901 4903252 5818657

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

144

Table 8 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2998785 3313954 3578576 3516211 3324918

Scratchcards 19143 1615445 1719943 1478757 1288589

Other lotteries 921428 1150021 1452543 1440705 1354701

Machines and games

Football pools 185938 31272 225267 17336 170005

Bingo (not online) 518444 401551 338874 285037 229006

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 563566 437439 464056 417836 412342

Machines in a bookmakers 219643 191307 132429 181788 058654

Casino table games (not online) 152757 242814 216674 19874 137049

Poker played in pubs or clubs 058271 05344 038722 024671

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314336 199825 216674 215808 170005

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 518444 573413 701384 773594 692533

Betting exchange 08089 038818 045942 09936 08136

Horse races (not online) 473551 536962 840279 819922 729218

Dog races (not online) 1043 100084 107956 19874 051313

Sports events (not online) 262367 31272 321201 382119 289254

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

145

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 073249 108136 11606 09936 112815

Spread-betting 02347 031777 018411 024671 023682

Private betting 245207 365855 312388 285037 237546

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 088618 108136 084028 031424 073691

Summary

Any gambling activity 4865969 5019271 5419072 5275098 5069299

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3685513 3688054 4042843 3752781 3619792

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

690953 729585 840279 903618 839822

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3511704 379332 4067395 4010237 3843384

Scratchcards 2362902 2000608 2115692 1858612 1672048

Other lotteries 1262067 148849 1824509 1816872 1745527

Machines and games

Football pools 362472 510357 398515 331394 337824

Bingo (not online) 787689 621024 54425 479041 418413

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 842267 664936 69836 645461 653849

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

146

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 408527 352472 27191 342913 169993

Casino table games (not online) 315893 420664 387158 365857 291013

Poker played in pubs or clubs 171099 151192 126224 10107

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

533175 363904 387158 388685 337824

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 787689 828209 979717 1067675 991846

Betting exchange 2083 125915 138953 225862 207111

Horse races (not online) 732881 784861 1140062 1121087 1034927

Dog races (not online) 244709 224247 236535 365857 157392

Sports events (not online) 465504 510357 522024 601386 497756

Other events or sports (not online) 196001 236144 24838 225862 255422

Spread-betting 106199 113005 086687 10107 105257

Private betting 442784 576921 510888 479041 429815

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 220512 236144 200614 114265 194839

Summary

Any gambling activity 5413192 5519375 5917538 5782146 5608713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

422078 4177314 4540749 4252419 4146756

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

147

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

994041 1011184 1140062 1216923 1163622

Table 9 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4506501 2103280 2802777 3104280

Scratchcards 2058401 792842 1234950 1549603

Other lotteries 1474748 606499 660149 735006

Machines and games

Football pools 240450 173397 219725 302101

Bingo (not online) 550883 147693 179245 157085

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 648570 386423 379327 403041

Machines in a bookmakers 269339 173397 227916 220317

Casino table games (not online) 298290 208101 260953 220317

Poker played in pubs or clubs 088076 065122

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

336971 081107 086615 204294

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 717074 156226 260953 420097

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

148

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Betting exchange 097462 041968

Horse races (not online) 1050863 122333 203434 327088

Dog races (not online) 250072

Sports events (not online) 482648 147693 131947 360673

Other events or sports (not online) 125778 057277 134063

Spread-betting 041769 041968

Private betting 463178 216842 101452 411562

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 135258 081107 096828

Summary

Any gambling activity 6017525 2922783 3837359 4033433

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4633639 2466930 3434827 3812932

Scratchcards 2162540 1042510 1718023 2125711

Other lotteries 1566385 829603 1038692 1170192

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

149

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Machines and games

Football pools 281094 304507 463866 608649

Bingo (not online) 610557 270324 404813 395663

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 712837 570581 682495 746376

Machines in a bookmakers 312195 304507 475582 491544

Casino table games (not online) 343234 349653 522173 491544

Poker played in pubs or clubs 113520 153271

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

384540 177211 258560 467789

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 784311 281753 522173 769098

Betting exchange 124130 116537

Horse races (not online) 1130410 235796 440344 643329

Dog races (not online) 291468

Sports events (not online) 538815 270324 332669 689299

Other events or sports (not online) 155805 141153 359019

Spread-betting 059843 116537

Private betting 518291 360874 283536 757744

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 166321 177211 296809

Summary

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

150

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Any gambling activity 6142123 3324273 4510372 4773230

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Table 10 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6209163 5708136 5894410 5910459 5597362 5934614 4647612 5533803 5596221

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6722364 6030005 6262520 6305890 5960529 6282559 4952761 5825022 5961644

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

151

Table 11 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4282244 4298228 3598961

Scratchcards 1995277 1839055 1359311

Other lotteries 1372875 1429754 1064399

Machines and games

Football pools 277508 163664 072657

Bingo (not online) 451567 620892 522183

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 656096 526067 340283

Machines in a bookmakers 287133 199915 147071

Casino table games (not online) 335349 145687 088760

Poker played in pubs or clubs 096607 049834

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316045 254867 224818

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 753849 384907 224818

Betting exchange 105979 049834

Horse races (not online) 1008762 754369 531374

Dog races (not online) 239082 163664 096923

Sports events (not online) 490429 310339 207346

Other events or sports (not online) 124799 075251 080668

Spread-betting 050312 025545

Private betting 490429 291800 113436

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 134242 127829 064737

Summary

Any gambling activity 5732273 5738381 4790347

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

152

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4418000 4582689 4025631

Scratchcards 2105829 2065944 1674158

Other lotteries 1468467 1635933 1350266

Machines and games

Football pools 324254 244202 166214

Bingo (not online) 510128 766172 734720

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 725520 661161 517392

Machines in a bookmakers 334626 287886 271453

Casino table games (not online) 386391 222213 190034

Poker played in pubs or clubs 125227 098246

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

365702 352835 373358

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 827729 502566 373358

Betting exchange 135851 098246

Horse races (not online) 1092719 912465 745491

Dog races (not online) 282695 244202 201833

Sports events (not online) 551251 417265 350907

Other events or sports (not online) 157023 132780 178164

Spread-betting 071540 062584

Private betting 551251 395838 225242

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 167577 200103 154172

Summary

Any gambling activity 5867427 6020177 5229614

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

153

Table 12 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2792229 3230571 3559739 3440260

Scratchcards 1588487 1794312 1677146 1516730

Other lotteries 973585 1332406 1300397 1362961

Machines and games

Football pools 100467 275244 254047 203593

Bingo (not online) 319703 438844 345092 374197

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 420026 421365 530313 429061

Machines in a bookmakers 198705 128019 182413 134065

Casino table games (not online) 086254 216759 254047 168580

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

352860 233340 200193 221251

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 303246 660924 822312 604791

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 462504 518085 774924 754509

Dog races (not online) 100467 046459 121105 151252

Sports events (not online) 198705 317701 391068 292677

Other events or sports (not online) 100467 104797 103936 125531

Spread-betting

Private betting 303246 241672 354266 247898

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 079275 067552 095429 059327

Summary

Any gambling activity 4523069 4909906 5412810 5150385

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3217452 3907588 4005754 3647737

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

591819 814832 955467 716959

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

154

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3531155 3841433 3903469 3824104

Scratchcards 2210949 2309860 1950911 1813910

Other lotteries 1494319 1795766 1548645 1648188

Machines and games

Football pools 320456 522482 377799 331506

Bingo (not online) 657681 737332 486501 540297

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 795842 714974 700775 605242

Machines in a bookmakers 480575 311178 289634 241289

Casino table games (not online) 294922 441540 377799 286647

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

704018 464795 311804 353785

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 634391 1013210 1027993 808906

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 852731 837355 975507 978679

Dog races (not online) 320456 173636 211119 264039

Sports events (not online) 480575 579618 540398 442104

Other events or sports (not online) 320456 274645 188339 229855

Spread-betting

Private betting 634391 476382 497301 387042

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 282027 212298 176871 136314

Summary

Any gambling activity 5317942 5548216 5765700 5548500

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3980370 4538781 4356317 4035958

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1021521 1197914 1174485 936357

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

155

Table 13 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3695674 3916652 3715339 4020550 3665308

Scratchcards 2097067 2031186 2021718 1579579 1425222

Other lotteries 1117472 1154159 1251896 1238946 1302119

Machines and games

Football pools 202809 130988 208740 202579 222107

Bingo (not online) 358227 425267 460826 357911 317347

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 500585 524312 731955 455425 317347

Machines in a bookmakers 331904 206236 268175 160863 121980

Casino table games (not online) 186011 214760 337373 236494 230656

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

340663 189273 259613 202579 171397

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 672818 587908 613590 635899 594967

Betting exchange 065744 106679 042865 058198 113910

Horse races (not online) 755297 864165 925293 745641 649722

Dog races (not online) 112296 180838 183676 136284 113910

Sports events (not online) 446856 345241 604535 393194 291135

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

156

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 080935 067501 118494 088524 044729

Spread-betting

Private betting 279705 371799 443040 279430 239231

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120300 052494 102695 050895 082259

Summary

Any gambling activity 5276613 5592315 5416787 5617329 4945734

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4230545 4427808 4271166 4563725 4180709

Scratchcards 2558958 2463644 2495995 1999811 1813667

Other lotteries 1484713 1505614 1651034 1622613 1677494

Machines and games

Football pools 385415 274857 401597 385844 404082

Bingo (not online) 588920 658751 727642 589428 528229

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 765606 779116 1054581 711252 528229

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

157

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 555423 379126 481711 327861 264877

Casino table games (not online) 362332 390548 571997 431688 415476

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

566604 356196 470337 385844 335126

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 972237 855143 913784 929573 868881

Betting exchange 183496 239328 148824 171309 253003

Horse races (not online) 1069220 1177274 1279891 1059108 933792

Dog races (not online) 256586 344685 366853 292621 253003

Sports events (not online) 699693 559261 902903 633905 494607

Other events or sports (not online) 208186 178774 272551 220742 142685

Spread-betting

Private betting 487981 592542 705558 488452 426846

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 268522 153889 248479 158672 204877

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

158

Summary

Any gambling activity 5820098 6103118 5978704 6157312 5473096

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

159

Table 14 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3614585 3262398 3004568

Scratchcards 1637980 1707333 1654845

Other lotteries 1375741 1363414 1015146

Machines and games

Football pools 270864 193181 166022

Bingo (not online) 381984 431371 275273

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 503795 458465 449980

Machines in a bookmakers 161810 176141 199119

Casino table games (not online) 206914 210338 249667

Poker played in pubs or clubs 048888 046850 022542

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

225102 244956 275273

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 797979 604322 458858

Betting exchange 091223 069632 063876

Horse races (not online) 778883 705673 539231

Dog races (not online) 143947 134151 049405

Sports events (not online) 372668 341796 215860

Other events or sports (not online) 135062 061918 117588

Spread-betting

Private betting 335497 279923 283850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 082604 093322 078806

Summary

Any gambling activity 5379095 5107325 4730935

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1625845 3873510 3533251

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

453456 798417 683864

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

160

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3907685 3724702 3546992

Scratchcards 1867970 2087292 2106069

Other lotteries 1590703 1712903 1390311

Machines and games

Football pools 377703 349108 345783

Bingo (not online) 506364 649649 495664

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 644314 682414 719620

Machines in a bookmakers 246977 326243 392418

Casino table games (not online) 301782 371857 461470

Poker played in pubs or clubs 100137 136286 110532

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

323557 417051 495664

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 969563 855805 730675

Betting exchange 157711 173363 188798

Horse races (not online) 948696 973936 829701

Dog races (not online) 224876 268468 163402

Sports events (not online) 495698 539693 415544

Other events or sports (not online) 213780 161123 274618

Spread-betting

Private betting 452942 461896 507019

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 146348 209531 213734

Summary

Any gambling activity 5679935 5591029 5308932

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1855188 4350675 4094700

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

587617 1080722 1003999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

161

Table 15 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2651783 3729469 4064039

Scratchcards 1459465 1665503 1938147

Other lotteries 954702 1444234 1678079

Machines and games

Football pools 253038 263571 170451

Bingo (not online) 297553 362493 454205

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 433199 453700 554696

Machines in a bookmakers 148439 210476 145004

Casino table games (not online) 156996 290372 179002

Poker played in pubs or clubs 020646 066338 040707

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

182870 236932 274792

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 673162 807051 628360

Betting exchange 065583 074372 103450

Horse races (not online) 682479 854102 656091

Dog races (not online) 097998 141093 136599

Sports events (not online) 270792 508869 230904

Other events or sports (not online) 089781 192957 048153

Spread-betting

Private betting 306505 362493 274792

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 089781 090690 071294

Summary

Any gambling activity 4617434 5483635 5712319

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3516410 3957222 4232697

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

822832 910695 842232

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

162

Upper confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3036056 4134205 4518960

Scratchcards 1772839 1985414 2314018

Other lotteries 1219525 1747473 2035226

Machines and games

Football pools 403947 412462 309698

Bingo (not online) 459251 533162 664592

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 623061 641612 783637

Machines in a bookmakers 268983 345763 275271

Casino table games (not online) 280389 445558 321105

Poker played in pubs or clubs 077356 150485 120117

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314406 379204 444850

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 902154 1046957 869635

Betting exchange 152201 162416 217037

Horse races (not online) 912801 1099733 901776

Dog races (not online) 199641 255421 263719

Sports events (not online) 426121 706237 388949

Other events or sports (not online) 187894 323351 132630

Spread-betting

Private betting 470263 533162 444850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 187894 186030 169362

Summary

Any gambling activity 5043183 5893996 6163711

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3928235 4365662 4689584

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1071903 1162935 1114791

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

163

Table 16 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2484741 4372137 5276755 4915487 5374800

Scratchcards 1108981 2007129 2161887 2068953 2661741

Other lotteries 782168 1405446 1614427 1566777 1799449

Machines and games

Football pools 109794 207619 338138 338922 515747

Bingo (not online) 309779 544387 441083 364588 568919

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 272783 573503 830806 862187 1068509

Machines in a bookmakers 118618 207619 394168 477341 595632

Casino table games (not online) 066450 226639 544874 468590 640326

Poker played in pubs or clubs 033301 058073 110064 164810 256825

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

109794 283929 422295 407680 533432

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 118618 573503 1138851 1137546 1281953

Betting exchange 025408 067178 127774 172804 248473

Horse races (not online) 235999 846311 1517068 1727076 1818423

Dog races (not online) 041390 207619 300976 330401 471722

Sports events (not online) 101014 351108 792492 935181 1161056

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

164

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Other events or sports (not online) 025408 076338 199845 330401 341538

Spread-betting 017786 031240 049802 080286 198927

Private betting 101014 379989 744672 538911 775547

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 041390 113381 190751 221520 174577

Summary

Any gambling activity 3402663 5872721 6816336 6541742 7145430

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2739271 4528134 5562554 5582284 6019270

Scratchcards 1297399 2134314 2402588 2634760 3255627

Other lotteries 944783 1516298 1830969 2081660 2325544

Machines and games

Football pools 178366 254731 449447 621550 841022

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

165

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Bingo (not online) 418012 617791 566320 655617 907342

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 375075 648660 995923 1273026 1503092

Machines in a bookmakers 189525 254731 513318 801704 940375

Casino table games (not online) 121794 275702 682349 790545 995257

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075010 084356 177932 377534 502486

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

178366 338382 545142 712079 863168

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 189525 648660 1327352 1594993 1747699

Betting exchange 062920 095246 200189 389451 490922

Horse races (not online) 331926 935714 1728493 2259846 2346400

Dog races (not online) 086904 254731 406674 610161 785471

Sports events (not online) 167162 411168 954302 1359318 1609698

Other events or sports (not online) 062920 106081 287986 610161 616925

Spread-betting 050558 051203 098309 243038 420977

Private betting 167162 442273 902205 879511 1158765

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 086904 149018 277097 460200 385581

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

166

Summary

Any gambling activity 3679789 6026811 7080456 7161677 7713898

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

167

Table 17 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3494549 3880776

Scratchcards 2800592 1701792

Other lotteries 1034091 1585660

Machines and games

Football pools 405984 207566

Bingo (not online) 557456 444225

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 812186 462738

Machines in a bookmakers 353341 137215

Casino table games (not online) 301251 216477

Poker played in pubs or clubs 101963 037516

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 459092 252321

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 793825 724651

Betting exchange 035595 102887

Horse races (not online) 738878 876023

Dog races (not online) 166154 102887

Sports events (not online) 441342 343059

Other events or sports (not online) 166154 111399

Spread-betting 042443 022554

Private betting 566454 297514

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 117695 102887

Summary

Any gambling activity 5764541 5697910

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 4562254 4188547

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1052700 885515

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

168

Upper confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4053634 4241764

Scratchcards 3332315 1986745

Other lotteries 1411123 1863201

Machines and games

Football pools 663820 325240

Bingo (not online) 851218 607878

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 1154624 629312

Machines in a bookmakers 596862 235807

Casino table games (not online) 529352 336302

Poker played in pubs or clubs 250237 095830

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 730313 380349

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1133119 926642

Betting exchange 137204 190243

Horse races (not online) 1068465 1094838

Dog races (not online) 345513 190243

Sports events (not online) 708196 489341

Other events or sports (not online) 345513 201704

Spread-betting 150289 070846

Private betting 862153 435022

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 274371 190243

Summary

Any gambling activity 6328473 6059713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 5138744 4553155

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1432381 1105318

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

169

Table 18 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9077077 9211674 9517075 9593713 9685299 9812957 9864932 9545183

At risk (score 1-7) 669745 563003 327741 255052 178513 096121 059878 357875

Problem gambler (score 8+) 056035 057940 025265 033521 017067 033153

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9254336 9361084 9635040 9698734 9785404 9895338 9940122 9593521

At risk (score 1-7) 839007 704375 440212 352582 270863 175609 135068 403436

Problem gambler (score 8+) 114097 110366 063274 074520 052682 048254

Table 19 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8519860 8711536 9250440 9393184 9525060 9693782 9734680 9286154

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1032766 892188 499373 354966 259088 132731 108543 560818

Problem gambler (score 8+) 104206 099068 028010 051089 066191

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

170

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8825203 8975334 9454491 9572073 9696566 9842337 9891457 9371335

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1322780 1141419 695870 520040 419484 271299 265320 641733

Problem gambler (score 8+) 215479 197506 089099 125066 096662

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9578099 9644270 9733259 9747049 9798131 9876829 9925357 9785876

At risk (score 1 to 7) 240027 211211 132617 133917 080652 039690 149759

Problem gambler (score 8+) 005940

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9742421 9779976 9850299 9857514 9903095 9960310 9987975 9831453

At risk (score 1 to 7) 399536 344576 243894 241552 178199 123171 192924

Problem gambler (score 8+) 016832

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

171

Table 20 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower

confidence limit

Upper confidence

limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 641488 720646

Scratchcards 1140046 1241836

Other lotteries 758388 843687

Machines and games

Football pools 2839128 2981904

Bingo (not online) 1238228 1343604

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 2501922 2639279

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 3077452 3223462

Poker played in pubs or clubs 4481833 4638384

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 4342093 4498193

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 2561391 2699780

Betting exchange 4322136 4478161

Horse races (not online) 1503817 1617882

Dog races (not online) 2591132 2730024

Sports events (not online) 2978122 3122841

Other events or sports (not online) 4282224 4438092

Spread-betting 5121433 5278468

Private betting 2432562 2568673

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 3306058 3454743

Summary

Any gambling activity 699899 782206

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

172

Table 21 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower confidence limit Lower confidence limit

1 activity 160262 202119

2 to 3 activities 486195 556018

4 to 6 activities 1908236 2033261

7 or more activities 5191468 5348399

Total 699899 782206

Table 22 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9648551 9452875 9563557

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 189323 302060 182973

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 053570 103480 067396

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 012157 039731 042110

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 254548 417354 265579

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9726699 9524733 9669396

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 255518 360428 264318

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 091424 139120 120093

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032887 062907 085425

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 330222 485071 361575

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

173

Table 23 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9464299 9118712 9298723 9837688 9607037

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293250 345425 367963 068855 148376

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 103921 127950 064986 018895 042291

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 039993 095061

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 408612 508276 467966 095173 208930

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9533439 9363096 9504561 9895948 9755893

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 349103 534137 549284 117562 269095

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 138532 252683 153588 047600 115653

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062495 205743

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 473680 730515 668865 151205 348286

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

174

Table 24 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9321411 9480605 9545787 9576877 9640182

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293936 266863 20326 221189 193183

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 147161 076655 077211 051171 050955

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 059097 034342 034692 026447 004394

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 472157 360129 295883 286013 257623

Upper confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9452064 9592895 9647981 9676678 9733111

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 392991 359853 283189 305409 273638

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 220003 13036 129428 095691 096095

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 108216 072746 072015 060457 022741

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 594487 466443 390431 380487 349097

Table 25 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9543316 9616616 9408087 9174175

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

175

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259672 105609 187044 285473

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 097444

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032703 065081

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 365999 147627 235874 352165

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9595191 9765690 9689087 9537114

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 301870 212649 417188 585573

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 124153

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 048918 153365

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 415508 270443 487796 677991

Table 26 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9302879 9445046 9497357 9523320 9521257 9469934 9492898 9516849 9608043

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

272358 267204 197386 202673 189687 244778 215582 253691 180619

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

176

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

081569 080707 076948 058876 069385 086843 073820 074650 045143

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

023985 044753 029872 056980

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

386243 377595 295904 282584 288287 353966 307224 346162 242915

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9551450 9585275 9649557 9681445 9666246 9618459 9618579 9635214 9739105

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

474469 382818 316187 332992 303245 367211 313277 354455 292479

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

206588 149764 157024 137350 143928 165606 135338 133843 108395

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+)

066636 109334 083576 112215

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

619832 512170 437354 432782 424346 497717 421448 461810 369991

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

177

Table 27 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9551629 9486617 9482365

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 267865 218054 172604

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087250 083816 080596

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 023379 058161 049173

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 354644 328786 277601

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9606650 9605883 9659880

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 313905 309759 305887

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 114591 144244 178322

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 038489 109950 129900

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 407092 438830 440425

Table 28 Confidence limits

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9111018 9462725 9515756 9718238

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

312764 243504 241229 116443

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

143552 049671 086588 048311

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

065081 020491 026909

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

498432 314684 343949 178574

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9402415 9640332 9618411 9812436

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

535794 393921 324795 193039

Moderate risk gambler 306251 128609 139653 101327

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

178

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

(PGSI score 3 to 7)

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

185343 077937 059421

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

768820 482444 441935 270771

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

179

Table 29 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9155873 9425755 9528615 9701374 9703227

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 384868 250161 229556 130857 140608

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 148983 098486 063289 038633 031309

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 079863 039886 016379 009625

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 562021 379057 320660 183742 184927

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9334394 9565089 9660959 9807345 9806130

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 525552 359403 341141 220589 230170

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 242033 171423 127839 093075 079760

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 151335 090166 054885 041510

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 727964 510221 449811 287563 285740

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

180

Table 30 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9646180 9415118 9293309

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 204114 293344 311256

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 056303 111028 105447

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 013323 025937 071499

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 270312 433683 440578

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9710684 9538038 9456678

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259082 393775 439328

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087001 176397 185663

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 030014 061641 139703

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 332837 553207 589687

Table 31 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9494512 9524690 9538509

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 285425 237569 214448

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 081349 089900 087185

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 037336 037060 035420

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 380286 341334 326392

Upper confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9581575 9611167 9635965

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 358609 306719 291270

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 122875 134533 138702

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 066930 067427 070539

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 463662 422854 419182

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

181

Table 32 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9755131 9619945 9285949 9010047 8667875

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 083572 207589 375341 347399 604245

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 041367 067162 127709 125476 158387

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 025390 022545 033406 073004 059660

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 127437 293471 525814 512384 820593

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9836785 9677758 9426846 9372379 9079022

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 144664 254767 492212 633031 951836

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 086953 095269 200289 317363 362119

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062963 039910 074774 230460 201952

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 200714 348841 661474 846350 1213446

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

182

Table 33 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9099340 9548599

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 470349 230101

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 155175 091058

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 067013 029234

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 650515 334161

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9254028 9627752

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 596743 293668

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 232455 132830

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 120777 054710

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 796275 409520

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

183

Table 34 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9885967 9878118 9924628 9913695 9934834 9944198 9968002 9930092

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

056067 066401 033140 041679 024529 051489

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9943933 9933599 9966860 9958321 9975471 9983891 9996880 9948511

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

114033 121882 075372 086305 065166 069908

Table 35 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9796495 9790890 9885826 9839198 9881842 9887272 9947056 9892470

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

096118 107416 042843 075125 041388 075306

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

184

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9903882 9892584 9957157 9924875 9958612 9968144 9998118 9924694

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

203505 209110 114174 160802 118158 107530

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9946745 9937883 9924067 9952449 9963538 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9992505 9985535 9978965 9991601 9997263 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

185

Table 36 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9862701 9866674 9912713 9901984 9922588 9931413 9968002 9919365

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

072759 074941 041208 049951 032263 023300 060759

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9927241 9925059 9958792 9950049 9967737 9976700 9996880 9939241

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

137299 133326 087287 098016 077412 068587 080635

Table 37 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9749746 9767784 9873539 9815674 9869402 9874373 9947056 9870806

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129207 124241 050521 091536 048908 038907 093630

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

186

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9870793 9875759 9949479 9908464 9951092 9961093 9998118 9906370

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

250254 232216 126461 184326 130598 125627 129194

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9946745 9924651 9911158 9952449 9948608 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

028092 013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9992505 9978801 9971908 9991601 9992232 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

088842 028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

187

Table 38 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit

Upper confidence limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 085526 116894

Scratchcards 160262 202119

Other lotteries 141440 180951

Machines and games

Football pools 466841 535382

Bingo (not online) 303055 359252

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 457170 525058

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 602596 679557

Poker played in pubs or clubs 1415214 1526530

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 826715 915325

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 341456 400831

Betting exchange 1022381 1119561

Horse races (not online) 274326 327996

Dog races (not online) 670683 751436

Sports events (not online) 524945 597248

Other events or sports (not online) 1297189 1404615

Spread betting 1533366 1648318

Private betting 399228 463030

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 944042 1037939

Summary

Any gambling activity 104050 138360

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

188

Table 39 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit Upper confidence

limit

1 activity 022545 039910

2 to 3 activities 049022 073418

4 to 6 activities 255212 307119

7 or more activities 1130234 1231654

Total 104050 138360

Table 40 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9954942 9915039 9868631

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

019964 057658 076064

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9980036 9942342 9923936

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045058 084961 131369

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

189

Table 41 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9915506 9712750 9908589 9964921 9896912

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057978 153197 027297 011396 034858

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9942022 9846803 9972703 9988604 9965142

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

084494 287250 091411 035079 103088

Table 42 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9970101 9941246 9923436 9908721 9850406

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

008286 025670 037646 046856 089809

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

190

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9991714 9974330 9962354 9953144 9910191

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

029899 058754 076564 091279 149594

Table 43 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9942933 9827380 9744833 9675853

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

039650 069453 076037 069096

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9960350 9930547 9923963 9930904

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057067 172620 255167 324147

Table 44 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9854415 9910787 9857493 9913822 9892022 9920618 9839632 9937886 9942973

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

191

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

070998 040821 072334 028763 046875 032433 091573 026562 016867

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9945585 9969213 9942507 9986178 9967978 9979382 9920368 9982114 9997027

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129002 079179 127666 071237 093125 067567 148427 053438 043133

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

192

Table 45 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9939398 9855435 9809368

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041245 083629 088478

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9958755 9916371 9911522

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

060602 144565 190632

Table 46 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9740976 9908850 9917042 9960283

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

111223 027376 043368 010061

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9888777 9972624 9956632 9989939

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

259024 091150 082958 039717

Table 47 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9791533 9862827 9932436 9957659 9945326

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

122660 072826 023654 009436 016443

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9877340 9927174 9976346 9990564 9983557

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

193

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

208467 137173 067564 042341 054674

Table 48 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9958214 9902923 9814337

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

021531 050437 105447

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9978469 9949563 9894553

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041786 097077 185663

Table 49 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9921761 9909910 9906334

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045993 054365 052282

Upper confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9954007 9945635 9947718

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

078239 090090 093666

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

194

Table 50 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9924761 9926594 9901786 9744784 9760771

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

033199 049030 049850 087770 081586

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9966801 9950970 9950150 9912230 9918414

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

075239 073406 098214 255216 239229

Table 51 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9834167 9922517

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 101829 046444

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9898171 9953556

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 165833 077483

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

195

Table 53 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1271729 2945796 941041 1002800 1228218 1653678

Scratchcards 1093044 2171483 1145690 1143454 1570657 1886444

Other lotteries 1262295 2601960 885593 1426952 983242 1876728

Machines and games

Football pools 1976900 2847439 1033817 1341628 899014 933261

Bingo (not online) 1603655 2415815 931788 872323 1247152 1954492

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1517999 2034979 1352120 872323 1266097 1973946

Machines in a bookmakers 2237019 2171483 1380390 1190513 871014 1152814

Casino table games (not online) 1337847 1772444 1267479 1105867 1351490 2159024

Poker played in pubs or clubs 2731578 2690263 1099009 1171680 685457 668361

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2294993 2327774 1522123 1096479 1020778 743724

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1546529 2239824 1305066 1002800 1152603 1760254

Betting exchange 2488655 2425602 1408685 568786 1002002 1124095

Horse races (not online) 1337847 1957088 848726 669221 936408 3317233

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

196

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Dog races (not online) 2140529 2073956 839523 872323 1067781 2032342

Sports events (not online) 1938477 2611768 1267479 946779 1030171 1229504

Other events or sports (not online)

3200389 3034395 1541067 568786 349482 398246

Spread-betting 3416236 2239824 848726 1209360 611868 734288

Private betting 1366227 1898725 1211196 1134052 1114871 2295682

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 1919276 2327774 830324 1209360 917703 1808759

Summary

Any gambling activity 1027530 2464764 857936 1077713 1237684 2373874

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1648541 3279102 1304925 1338178 1569279 1934955

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

197

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Scratchcards 1448311 2475462 1538808 1496704 1945096 2181543

Other lotteries 1638032 2923845 1240773 1811568 1295516 2171286

Machines and games

Football pools 2419145 3177718 1411481 1717383 1200180 1157388

Bingo (not online) 2014617 2730483 1294245 1189419 1590249 2253307

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1920787 2332329 1770908 1189419 1611206 2273799

Machines in a bookmakers 2697484 2475462 1802439 1549372 1168326 1397217

Casino table games (not online) 1722023 2055564 1676151 1454510 1705377 2468210

Poker played in pubs or clubs 3220013 3015309 1485823 1528315 954852 863041

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2759168 2638757 1959705 1443953 1337786 947463

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1952085 2546940 1718297 1338178 1485282 2048083

Betting exchange 2964364 2740670 1833943 834759 1316659 1366017

Horse races (not online) 1722023 2250428 1197907 953723 1242592 3666828

Dog races (not online) 2594545 2373249 1187178 1189419 1390541 2335242

Sports events (not online) 2377797 2934012 1676151 1274527 1348344 1480312

Other events or sports (not online)

3708461 3370270 1980627 834759 552620 553936

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

198

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Spread-betting 3931358 2546940 1197907 1570416 868828 936926

Private betting 1753472 2188946 1612834 1486161 1443208 2611176

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 2357111 2638757 1176443 1570416 1221394 2099443

Summary

Any gambling activity 1374225 2781404 1208631 1422827 1579765 2692769

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

199

Table 54 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2115834 3842514 4426600

Once a week 2305108 2357524 1278810

Less than once a week more than once a month

1666011 563551 347431

Once a month 1069570 304294 1108443

Every 2 to 3 months 757091 485165

Once or twice a year 420816

Upper confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2839983 5195599 6362470

Once a week 3047889 3598625 2832036

Less than once a week more than once a month

2336575 1348746 1396207

Once a month 1642181 940571 2598245

Every 2 to 3 months 1259596 1230828

Once or twice a year 821370

Table 55 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1082324 4256754

Once a week 2549093 1640856

Less than once a week more than once a month

965178 285899

Once a month 1180106 931875

Every 2 to 3 months 1356433

Once or twice a year 2469937 193456

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

200

Upper confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1200336 5879558

Once a week 2712540 3004014

Less than once a week more than once a month

1077564 1068000

Once a month 1302485 2077246

Every 2 to 3 months 1486034

Once or twice a year 2631751 887818

201

Published September 2021

PHE gateway number GOV-9697

wwwgovukphe

Twitter PHE_uk

wwwfacebookcomPublicHealthEngland

copy Crown copyright 2021

Page 3: Gambling-related harms evidence review

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

2

33 At-risk gambling 49

34 Problem gambling 61

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling 74

4 Gambling frequency 79

41 Introduction 79

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months 79

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers 81

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume 82

5 Hospital admissions 85

51 Introduction 85

52 HES admissions due to gambling 85

6 Previously published sources of gambling data 86

61 Affected others 86

62 Treatment 90

63 Attitudes and influences 95

64 Children and young people 99

7 Discussion 107

71 Strengths and limitations 108

8 References 109

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority 110

Introduction 110

Results 110

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling 116

Introduction 116

Data source 116

Appendix C Confidence limits 131

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

3

Executive summary

Background

In the UK there has been increasing concern about the harms associated with

gambling

Public Health England (PHE) was commissioned to review the evidence for the

prevalence determinants and harms associated with gambling and to estimate the

social and economic burden of gambling-related harms in England

To support the objectives of the PHE evidence review this report brings together a

range of quantitative data sources that seek to estimate gambling involvement and

gambling-related harms among the general population

Methods

The first part of the review focuses on a 4 year combined and weighted dataset from the

Health Survey for England (HSE) which presents new analysis undertaken for this

review The second part focuses on previously published sources of gambling data

bringing these together for the first time to address questions not met by the HSE

survey

Results

Gambling participation

In England 245 million people (half of the adult population) gamble each year

Participation in the National Lottery is the most common type of gambling except among

younger people where scratchcards are more common Football pools and playing

electronic gaming machines are much more prevalent gambling activities among people

under 35 years of age compared to older age groups

Overall men are more likely to participate in gambling and this sex difference is marked

for online gambling where 15 of men participate compared to 4 of women Since

2012 overall gambling prevalence has fluctuated Participation in the National Lottery

declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However participation in other gambling

activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015 before falling back to 40 in the

most recent HSE survey Online gambling (excluding the National Lottery) has increased

from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

4

Harmful gambling

The most commonly used screening tools categorise gambling-related harm as either

low-risk moderate-risk or problem gambling The levels of gambling are defined as

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

More specifically problem gambling is typically defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits In 2018 the

HSE estimated that 05 of the population were problem gamblers This is a reduction

from 09 in 2015 (although since the numbers are very small this does not represent a

real decline) However the proportion of gamblers who experience low levels of

gambling-related problems is increasing

It is important to note that a recent YouGov study found a significantly different

prevalence of 13 of the population experiencing some level of gambling harm

compared to 4 from a combined version of the HSE1 An assessment of both sources

concluded that HSE likely underestimated the true prevalence in the population

Profile of gamblers

Overall the highest rates of gambling participation are reported among people who have

higher academic qualifications are employed and among relatively less deprived

groups There are disproportionately more people classified as lsquoat-riskrsquo or lsquolow-riskrsquo

lsquomoderate-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo among men in younger age groups However

the socio-demographic profile of gamblers appears to change as the level of gambling

risk increases from low-risk to problem gambling Harmful gambling is associated with

people who are unemployed and among people living in more deprived areas

Gambling and the risk of gambling-related harm also appear to be associated with

psychological and physical health Overall the highest levels of gambling participation

are reported by people who report better general psychological health (on the short

general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)) and higher life satisfaction In contrast people

1 This version of the HSE combined the health surveys for England Scotland and Wales

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

5

describing poorer psychological health are less likely to report gambling participation

Again this reverses for problem gambling with higher prevalence among people with

poor health low life satisfaction and wellbeing and especially for people where there is

an indication of probable psychological health problems

The health behaviour profile for gambling was inconclusive for BMI (Body Mass Index)

status and cigarette smoking But there is a clear and strong association between

gambling at all levels of harm and increasing alcohol consumption This gradient is

evident for overall gambling participation and becomes steeper for at-risk and problem

gambling There is a particularly high level of gambling risk for people consuming 50

units of alcohol or more per week

Finally harmful gambling has a very different activity profile to general gambling It

includes low National Lottery participation and high participation in online gambling

including

bull slots

bull casino and bingo games

bull electronic gambling machines in bookmakers

bull sports and other event betting

bull betting exchanges

bull dog racing

At-risk gamblers are significantly more likely than general gamblers to participate in

online gambling

Overall demographic factors particularly sex appear to predict at-risk gambling

behaviour more than economic factors such as income employment and relative

deprivation Poor mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling than both poor

physical health and negative health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

Affected others treatment attitudes and influences and children and young people

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were found to be negatively

affected by someone elsersquos gambling Affected others are more likely to be women

reflecting the association between problem gambling and men Among affected others

immediate family members felt the most severe impacts of problem gambling

Just over 9000 people received treatment from the National Gambling Treatment

Service (NGTS) in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This represents only a small

fraction of problem gamblers in England This was the highest number of people treated

since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

6

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged The proportion of children and young people who participate in any

gambling has been reducing Boys are more likely to gamble than girls and the rate

increases with age Fruit and slot (electronic gaming) machines were often identified as

the first experiences of gambling among children and young people Playing the National

Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most common forms

of gambling reported But as the young people got older there was a significant increase

in online gambling among men

The rates of gambling among children and young people are lower than drinking alcohol

but higher than using e-cigarettes smoking tobacco cigarettes or taking illegal drugs

There is a potential relationship between these other harmful activities and gambling

Compared with children who have not gambled those who have spent their own money

on gambling are more likely to have also consumed alcohol taken drugs or smoked

either a tobacco cigarette or an e-cigarette

Discussion and implications

The main findings of this report are that

bull half the population currently gamble with 05 of the population experiencing the

highest level of harm

bull people who are classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo are disproportionately

younger men

bull socioeconomic and health inequalities persist among people classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and

lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo

bull alcohol is very strongly associated with gambling

bull a significant proportion of the population (7) are negatively affected by someone

elsersquos gambling

The previously published sources discussed in the second part of the report vary in the

type and quality of gambling data available Gambling is a relatively new field of

research and inconsistencies in the robustness and standardisation of the publications

and data available are to be expected However all sources included are encouraging

additions to the existing body of work This inconsistency in data quality and the

absence of longitudinal data are a major gap in the evidence base to be addressed in

future research and data collection

No data here takes into account the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on

gambling behaviour Public Health England (PHE) has published a rapid evidence

review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

7

1 Introduction

11 Background and aims

Concern about the harms associated with gambling has been increasing in the UK In

response in March 2018 the PHE remit letter from Health Minister Steve Brine

confirmed PHErsquos priorities for 2018 to 2019 This included the request for PHE to ldquoinform

and support action on gambling-related harm as part of the follow up to the Department

for Digital Culture Media amp Sport-led (DCMS) review of gaming machines and social

responsibilityrdquo (1)

In May 2018 DCMS published their response to the consultation on proposals for

changes to gaming machines and social responsibility measures In it they announced

that ldquoPHE will conduct an evidence review of the health aspects of gambling-related

harm to inform action on prevention and treatmentrdquo (2)

To fulfil this commitment 2 complementary evidence reviews were undertaken

1 The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) carried out a mapping review of

the literature on the effectiveness of national and international polices and

interventions to reduce gambling-related harms (3)

2 PHE has undertaken a broader evidence review on the prevalence of gambling and

associated health harms and social and economic burden

This report presents the findings of the quantitative analysis aspect of the work

conducted by PHE only It is one of 7 technical reports that inform the broader evidence

review The aim is to describe the prevalence characteristics associations and harms

associated with gambling as described in the scope (4) of the high-level protocol

Specifically this report aims to

bull describe the prevalence of gambling and gambling-related harms in England by

socio-demographic characteristics geographical distribution and year

bull identify the determinants of gambling and harmful gambling

12 Methods

To begin the project we undertook a search of common databases websites and other

online resources (for example Office for National Statistics NHS Digital and the

Gambling Commission websites) to see if published reports or datasets for England

were available to fulfil the above objectives We determined that this was not to be the

case So we identified datasets and official statistics that include information on

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

8

gambling by adults or children We used the HSE (for years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018)

as the primary dataset

We ran outputs from HSE to meet the objectives both on the most recent year (2018)

and the whole combined dataset where necessary All outputs have been non-response

weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE analysis since 2003 We commissioned

the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) who manage the HSE on behalf of

NHS Digital to combine the datasets NatCen calculated and appended new combined

weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc18 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb18 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication (5) we used the problem gambling

weight for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening

tools We used the self-completion weight for the rest

You can find all important information related to the data source in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the Health Survey for England series (6) Registered users can access

the separate datasets via the UK Data Archive (7)

We conducted all statistical analysis in SPSS version 25

We supplemented the outputs from HSE with findings from statistical publications and

reports available from other sources to better meet the objectives Sources include

several outputs by

bull the Gambling Commission

bull the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010

bull YouGov

bull the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH)

bull the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

bull hospital episode statistics (NHS Digital)

The HSE asks children certain questions including about smoking and alcohol but this

is not the case for gambling However we found published data to fulfil the aim to

include children in the analytic aspect of the work at least to an extent

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

9

The Gambling Commission publish an analytical report lsquoYoung people and gamblingrsquo

that explores the gambling behaviours of young people aged 11 to 16 years old in

England Scotland and Wales The survey was conducted by Ipsos MORI and includes

adolescent-appropriate application of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders 4th version) to measure at-risk and problem gambling This source

only allows limited analysis of associations linked to gambling in children as it is only

gambling behaviour focused and does not include any health topics

This report has found the lack of health and gambling data for children to be a gap in the

data currently available However gambling behaviours in the cohort is very detailed

and includes aspects such as in-game gambling parental gambling and those following

gambling companies on social media Furthermore trend data is available We have

supplemented the results from this source with recent findings from ALSPAC

13 COVID-19

The Health Survey for England 2018 is the primary data source and the gambling

supplementary questions refer to gambling behaviour in the last 12 months The data

was published in November 2019 and the 12 month period covered by the survey

questions is 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 This was before COVID-19 and so

no data here takes into account the impact of the pandemic on gambling behaviour So

the term lsquothe last 12 monthsrsquo does not refer to the 12 months of 2020 when the

pandemic occurred We have published a rapid evidence review to explore the impact of

COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

10

2 Overall gambling participation

21 Introduction

This section focuses on prevalence and associations with any gambling activity in the

last 12 months (at the time of the survey year referenced most recent refers to 2018)

The HSE involves a set of questions and interviews conducted face to face in the homes

of respondents The gambling questions are completed using a self-completion

questionnaire alongside the core health questionnaire As part of this respondents were

asked whether they have participated in any gambling activity in the last 12 months and

if so what type of activity

22 Overall gambling participation by type of activity

Over half (540) of the England population aged 16 and over have taken part in some

form of gambling in the last 12 months (based on HSE 2018 (5)) This equates to almost

245 million people Gambling activity questions were first included in the HSE in 2012

and again in 2015 2016 and most recently in 2018 Since 2012 participation in any

gambling activity has reduced significantly in the England population by over 10 percent

(from 645 to 540) However the reduction between 2016 and 2018 is not

statistically significant meaning there is unlikely to have been a real change between

the 2 most recent years for which data is available

The National Lottery was the gambling activity with the highest level of participation in

England with 36 of the population taking part in the last 12 months The recent

Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that in the

individual National Lottery draws the most common games of 2019 were

bull Lotto (played by 21 of all survey respondents in the past 4 weeks)

bull EuroMillions (20)

bull Thunderball (3)

bull Hotpicks (1)

However participation in the National Lottery has declined from 525 in 2012 to 457

in 2015 405 in 2016 to 360 in 2018 This is a statistically significant decline and

suggests that the reduction seen in overall gambling participation is largely due to the

reduction in National Lottery participation Figure 1 shows the percentage of overall

gambling participation in England between 2012 and 2018 Once the National Lottery is

excluded gambling participation has stayed at the same level with 402 of the

population having gambled on some other activity in the last 12 months As shown in

Figure 1 by excluding respondents who only play the National Lottery we see a different

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

11

pattern in gambling participation This shows a pattern more resistant to change with the

rate increasing to 451 between 2012 and 2015 before reducing to 402 in 2018

Figure 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Base2 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 Unless otherwise stated the base given in tables is the number of respondents who answered the

relevant question

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity Any gambling activity exc National Lottery

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

12

After lotteries the most common types of gambling activity according to HSE 2018 were

bull horse racing (not online3) (81)

bull online betting with a bookmaker (78)

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines (57)

bull bingo (not online) (45)

These were also the most common activities in 2012 the only difference being that

online betting with a bookmaker was less common in 2012

Table 2 Overall gambling participation by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 525 457 405 360

Scratchcards 187 222 203 179

Other lotteries 150 148 139 144

Machines and games

Football pools 21 26 26 29

Bingo (not online) 58 59 49 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 71 62 57

Machines in a bookmakers 24 33 29 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 35 32 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 11 08 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 28 37 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 43 72 74 78

Betting exchange 08 10 12 11

Horse races (not online) 104 111 92 81

Dog races (not online) 27 28 21 17

Sports events (not online) 38 52 51 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 14 13 15

3 lsquoNot onlinersquo throughout this report means gambling in a bookmakers by telephone or at the venue

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

13

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Spread-betting 05 06 06 05

Private betting 46 51 41 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 18 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 66 94 94 94

Base 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

23 Overall gambling participation by age and sex

Participation in any gambling activity was most common in respondents aged 45 to 64

(604) and least common in those aged 16 to 24 (390) The National Lottery draws

were the activity with greatest participation across all age groups except for those aged

16 to 24 years for whom scratchcards are more common If we exclude National Lottery

gambling was more common in younger age groups for many activities4

Also 94 of people surveyed participated in some form of online gambling (excluding

National Lottery) and this type of gambling is more common with younger people Online

gambling has increased in popularity from 66 in 2012 and since 2015 has remained

consistent at 94

Slot (electronic gaming) machines were the most common type of machine or game

betting Except for bingo most machine or games betting activity types were more

common among younger people particularly

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines

bull football pools

4 Itrsquos worth noting that the HSE gambling measures are derived from a self-completion questionnaire for

people aged 16 years and over However while the legal age limit for playing the National Lottery and

scratchcards is currently 16 years (as well as for some (category D) slot machines) it is 18 years for most

other forms of gambling HSE does not take this legal age discrepancy into account

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

14

bull electronic gaming machines in bookmakers (including fixed odds betting terminals

(FOBT)

bull casino table games

Online betting with a bookmaker sports betting and private betting were also more

common with younger age groups particularly the under 35s

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

15

Table 3 Overall gambling participation by age group England 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 124 324 428 471 444 368 286 360

Scratchcards 197 268 236 196 140 91 49 179

Other lotteries 49 101 144 171 189 189 176 144

Machines and games

Football pools 64 63 19 08 15 10 21 29

Bingo (not online) 49 55 53 30 41 37 51 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 97 71 53 41 13 10 57

Machines in a bookmakers 44 51 20 16 09 - - 22

Casino table games (not online) 41 63 30 17 13 - - 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 13 08 - - - - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

33 66 47 21 14 - - 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 92 159 105 77 40 18 11 78

Betting exchange 27 17 11 04 08 - - 11

Horse races (not online) 99 87 80 89 86 78 33 81

Dog races (not online) 31 26 12 16 11 12 - 17

Sports events (not online) 68 75 36 38 29 14 - 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

16

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Other events or sports (not online) 38 27 10 11 12 - - 15

Spread-betting 17 09 - - - - - 05

Private betting 85 64 39 23 19 11 14 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 19 16 15 08 09 11 06 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 390 569 573 604 596 530 444 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

371 489 443 407 405 337 282 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

112 185 129 91 51 24 15 94

Base 931 1196 1140 1242 1058 875 661 7104

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

17

The Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that on

average online gamblers have 3 accounts with gambling websites and that 21 have

bet lsquoin-playrsquo (while the event is taking place) in the last 4 weeks Furthermore 20 of

online gamblers aged 18 to 24 had more than 5 online accounts Table 4 is taken from

the Gambling Commission report and shows online and in-person participation in the

last 4 weeks for those activities that can be accessed through multiple methods The

table shows that people playing bingo (81) and the National Lottery (73) were most

likely to participate in-person while those participating in football betting (83) sports

betting (81) and casino games (74) were most likely to do so online

Smartphones are now the most popular method of accessing online gambling with 50

of all online gamblers using their device for this purpose This continues the trend seen

in the Gambling Commission annual reports of increasing smartphone use for gambling

in recent years Younger age groups were most likely to gamble with multiple devices

while the likelihood of using more than one device to gamble reduces with age

Table 4 Online and in-person participation in the last 4 weeks (2019)

National Lottery

()

Bingo ()

Football pools

()

Horse racing

()

Sports betting

()

Football betting

()

Betting on other

events ()

Casino games

()

Online 36 24 55 61 81 83 58 74

In-person 73 81 50 49 27 26 53 47

Source The Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Figure 2 shows overall gambling participation for adults by sex in England between 2012

and 2018 Men (574) were more likely than women (507) to have participated in

any gambling activity in the last 12 months It also shows participation reducing at a

similar rate for both men and women since 2012

The difference is marked for online gambling with only 43 of women participating in

online activities compared to 147 of men Participation in online gambling reaches

284 for men aged 25 to 34 This means that of the 565 of 25 to 34 year old men

that gamble (excluding the National Lottery) half do so online

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

18

Figure 2 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 5 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018 2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity men 680 655 612 574

Any gambling activity women 610 589 513 507

Base men 3042 2996 2965 3506

Base women 3749 3759 3726 3599

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Women (178) were as likely to buy scratchcards as men (181) and more likely to

take part in bingo (59 compared to 30 of men) but men had higher participation

rates in all other gambling activities The differences between men and women were

greatest for

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity men Any gambling activity women

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

19

bull online betting with a bookmaker

bull machines in bookmakers (including FOBT)

bull betting on sports events

bull private betting5

24 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification

By highest educational qualifications participation in any gambling activity was most

common in the below degree category (588) followed by respondents with an NVQ4

NVQ5 and degree or equivalent (504) level of qualification Those with no qualification

were least likely to participate in any gambling activity (465)

There were differences by type of activity where those with an NVQ4 NVQ5 and degree

or equivalent were less likely to participate in bingo (24) Also along with people in

the below degree category they were more likely to participate in betting on horse

racing and sports events (not online) Respondents with no qualification were notably

less likely than the rest of the population to participate in online betting with a bookmaker

(23)

Table 6 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification England 2018

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 345 389 307 360

Scratchcards 131 218 147 179

Other lotteries 131 161 119 144

Machines and games

Football pools 14 39 23 29

Bingo (not online) 24 53 55 45

5 This excludes poker played in clubs betting exchanges and spread-betting which are all relatively low

participation activities but are dominated by men

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

20

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 33 76 38 57

Machines in a bookmakers 13 31 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 34 30 05 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 03 10 04 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 38 14 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 88 23 78

Betting exchange 14 10 08 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 41 81

Dog races (not online) 11 21 12 17

Sports events (not online) 33 52 19 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 21 10 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 33 46 23 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 10 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 504 588 465 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

360 456 313 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

107 109 34 94

Base 2024 3553 1313 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

21

25 Overall gambling participation by economic activity

Looking at economic activity participation by group in any gambling activity was most

common in the

bull employed self-employed or training category (647)

bull retired (523)

bull unemployed (504)

However confounding is important here as economic groups like students and those in

retirement comprise people of very different ages and previous tables have shown a

strong association between gambling and age You can find more information about the

issues of confounding later in this report in the section on at-risk and problem gambling

and in more detail in Appendix B

We based Table 7 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller employment groups

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

22

Table 7 Overall gambling participation by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 509 136 398 341 334 432

Scratchcards 246 166 84 205 205 199

Other lotteries 150 42 184 108 99 142

Machines and games

Football pools 32 43 14 21 10 27

Bingo (not online) 52 37 59 52 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 76 18 74 50 65

Machines in a bookmakers 37 36 04 47 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 43 43 08 22 12 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 13 19 02 11 - 1

66 The economically inactive population comprises all persons who were neither employed nor unemployed during the short reference period used to

measure current activity This population is split into 4 groups attendant at educational institutions retired engaged in family duties other

economically inactive

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

23

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

43 26 06 44 30 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 99 56 14 49 31 69

Betting exchange 13 25 03 11 - 11

Horse races (not online) 123 57 70 80 54 98

Dog races (not online) 32 16 11 22 11 24

Sports events (not online) 64 54 14 47 18 48

Other events or sports (not online) 18 14 04 16 - 13

Spread-betting 07 06 - 09 - 05

Private betting 56 92 17 36 22 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 17 22 09 14 07 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 647 360 523 504 469 576

Base 15321 2029 5906 1796 2111 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

24

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

25

27 Overall gambling participation by Index of Multiple Deprivation

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is the official measure of relative deprivation for

small areas in England Quintiles are calculated by ranking the neighbourhoods in

England from most deprived to least deprived and dividing them into 5 equal groups

These range from the most deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally to the least

deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile but there were differences by activity type Several activities were statistically

significantly higher in the most deprived quintile compared to lesser deprived quintiles

We saw the strongest inequality gradients were for bingo and scratchcards

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

26

Table 8 Overall gambling participation by IMD England 2018

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 325 355 382 376 358 360

Scratchcards 213 180 191 166 147 179

Other lotteries 108 131 163 162 154 144

Machines and games

Football pools 26 40 30 24 24 29

Bingo (not online) 64 50 43 37 31 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 54 57 52 52 57

Machines in a bookmakers 30 26 19 25 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 22 32 29 27 20 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 09 07 05 - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

41 27 29 29 24 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 64 69 83 91 83 78

Betting exchange 13 07 08 15 13 11

Horse races (not online) 59 65 98 96 87 81

Dog races (not online) 16 15 16 27 09 17

Sports events (not online) 35 40 41 48 38 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

27

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online) 12 16 17 15 17 15

Spread-betting 05 06 04 05 05 05

Private betting 33 46 40 37 32 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 14 16 13 06 12 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 514 527 567 553 534 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

395 393 429 400 388 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

83 86 98 105 99 94

Base 1278 1528 1515 1474 1310 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

28

28 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity

By broad ethnicity overall participation in any gambling activity was most common in

the White and White British ethnic group (608) and least common in the Asian and

Asian British ethnic group (312)

We base Table 9 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller ethnic groups

Table 9 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 457 228 311 345 432

Scratchcards 211 91 146 182 199

Other lotteries 152 71 83 93 142

Machines and games

Football pools 26 23 32 43 27

Bingo (not online) 58 20 27 25 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

68 47 51 55 65

Machines in a bookmakers

29 23 33 33 29

Casino table games (not online)

32 27 37 33 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs

10 10 - - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

36 12 15 31 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

75 21 37 57 69

Betting exchange 11 07 - - 11

Horse races (not online)

109 17 30 46 98

Dog races (not online) 27 - - - 24

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

29

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Sports events (not online)

51 20 21 50 48

Other events or sports (not online)

14 09 - 22 13

Spread-betting 05 07 - - 05

Private betting 49 28 17 56 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 - 17 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 608 312 417 440 576

Base 23586 2043 821 688 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

29 Overall gambling participation by region

The North East (647) had the highest overall participation in gambling while London

(480) was lower than average

We based Table 10 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for each region

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

30

Table 10 Overall gambling participation by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

647 587 608 611 578 611 480 568 578 576

Base 1329 3592 2699 2332 2838 3013 4115 4442 2803 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 201

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

31

210 Overall gambling participation by local authority

Variation in gambling participation was evident by upper tier local authority (UTLA)

Discounting Rutland which has wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a

rate of gambling participation that was statistically significantly higher than average for

England The top 5 UTLAs in England with the highest levels of gambling participation

were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

For the full list of authorities included in Figure 3 see Appendix A You should note that

due to small sample sizes we have grouped together the authorities of inner and outer

London

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

32

Figure 3 Overall gambling participation by UTLA England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

211 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health

In HSE general health is self-assessed with the question lsquoHow is your health in general

Would you say it was very good good fair bad or very badrsquo There has been very little

change in the general health status of the population over the course of the surveys

with 76 of respondents reporting very good or good health in 1993 compared to 75

in 2018 (in no survey year has this been below 74 or above 76) This is the same for

respondents who gamble with 752 reporting very good or good health in HSE 2018

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health tend to gamble less (501) than

the general population and those reporting good or very good general health (580)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

33

We based Table 11 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for the smaller categories

Table 11 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 435 444 381 432

Scratchcards 205 195 151 199

Other lotteries 142 153 120 142

Machines and games

Football pools 30 20 11 27

Bingo (not online) 48 69 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 59 42 65

Machines in a bookmakers 31 24 20 29

Casino table games (not online) 36 18 13 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 11 07 - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

34 30 29 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 79 44 29 69

Betting exchange 12 07 - 11

Horse races (not online) 105 83 63 98

Dog races (not online) 26 20 14 24

Sports events (not online) 52 36 27 48

Other events or sports (not online) 14 10 12 13

Spread-betting 06 04 - 05

Private betting 52 34 16 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 16 10 15

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

34

Summary

Any gambling activity 580 588 501 576

Base 20488 4684 1987 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

212 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction

In HSE life satisfaction is derived from the question lsquoOverall how satisfied are you with

life nowadaysrsquo This is scored and grouped low (score 0 to 4) medium (score 5 to 6)

high (score 7 to 8) and very high (score 9 to 10)

Gambling participation across life satisfaction groups was inconclusive As with self-

assessed general health the lowest group were again least likely to participate in

gambling (492) This was also true for respondents participating in the National

Lottery where 315 in the lowest satisfaction group take part compared to 363 in the

very high satisfaction group The low satisfaction group were most likely to participate in

online gambling including slots casino and bingo games (50 compared to 28 in the

very high group) but this reverses for online gambling with a bookmaker (44 of the low

group compared to 70 of the very high group)

Table 12 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction England 2018

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 315 353 373 363 360

Scratchcards 188 204 181 166 179

Other lotteries 121 155 142 150 144

Machines and games

Football pools 18 38 31 26 29

Bingo (not online) 46 57 41 45 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 58 55 61 51 57

Machines in a bookmakers 31 2 23 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 16 31 31 22 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - 07

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

35

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

50 33 25 28 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 44 82 92 70 78

Betting exchange - - - - 11

Horse races (not online) 63 66 87 86 81

Dog races (not online) 18 09 16 20 17

Sports events (not online) 31 43 46 36 40

Other events or sports (not online) 18 17 14 17 15

Spread-betting - - - - 05

Private betting 44 34 42 31 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 13 09 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 492 523 559 535 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

359 422 418 384 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

78 99 106 82 94

Base 604 937 3038 2408 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

213 Overall gambling participation by wellbeing

The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a widely used measure

of subjective and psychological functioning It was developed to capture a broad concept

of positive mental wellbeing and incorporates 2 perspectives on wellbeing (9)

1 Eudaimonic wellbeing comes from a sense of purpose personal growth and

involvement in activities

2 Hedonic wellbeing comes from feelings of joy satisfaction and enjoyment

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

36

WEMWBS includes 14 statements that cover psychological functioning cognitive-

evaluative dimensions and affective-emotional aspects of wellbeing For each statement

respondents can answer

bull none of the time

bull rarely

bull some of the time

bull often

bull all of the time

The statements are all expressed positively The responses from 1 to 5 are aggregated

to form an index which can range from 14 (those who answer lsquonone of the timersquo for

every statement) to 70 (those who answer lsquoall of the timersquo to all statements) (10)

As above for life satisfaction findings were inconclusive across WEMWBS quintiles with

the highest participation rates seen in quintiles 2 to 4 and the lowest rate seen in quintile

5 (521)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

37

Table 13 Overall gambling participation by WEMWBS quintile England 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 396 417 399 429 392 405

Scratchcards 232 224 225 178 161 203

Other lotteries 129 132 144 142 148 139

Machines and games

Football pools 28 19 29 28 30 26

Bingo (not online) 46 53 58 46 41 49

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 64 88 57 41 62

Machines in a bookmakers 43 28 36 23 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 26 29 44 32 31 32

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - - 08

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

44 26 35 28 24 31

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 81 71 75 77 72 74

Betting exchange 11 16 08 10 17 12

Horse races (not online) 90 101 109 89 78 92

Dog races (not online) 17 25 26 20 17 21

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

38

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Sports events (not online) 56 44 74 50 38 51

Other events or sports (not online) 13 11 18 14 08 13

Spread-betting - - - - - 06

Private betting 37 47 56 37 32 41

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 09 16 09 13 13

Summary

Any gambling activity 555 585 570 589 521 562

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 417

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 94

Base 1281 1426 1189 1272 1375 6691

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

39

214 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used and validated

measure of psychological health It addresses broader components of psychological

morbidity with 12 items measuring

bull happiness

bull depression

bull anxiety

bull sleep disturbance

bull self-confidence

Each item is rated on a 4-point response scale to show whether symptoms of mental ill

health are lsquonot at all presentrsquo or if present lsquono more than usualrsquo lsquorather more than

usualrsquo or lsquomuch more than usualrsquo For the purpose of the HSE we adopted the standard

GHQ coding method for each of the 4 possible responses to each item as advocated by

the test author Each symptom was scored either 0 if rsquonot at all presentrsquo or present lsquono

more than usualrsquo or 1 for symptoms that were present lsquorather more than usualrsquo or lsquomuch

more than usualrsquo (11) So using this method the maximum score for any individual

study participant is 12 No formal threshold exists for identifying probable mental ill

health with optimal values likely to be specific to the population under study However

in keeping with previous HSE surveys participantsrsquo scores are grouped according to 3

categories which are

bull 0 (indicating no evidence of probable mental ill health)

bull 1 to 3 (indicating less than optimal mental health)

bull 4 or more (indicating probable psychological disturbance or mental ill health) (10)

Continuing the trend seen before for general health life satisfaction and wellbeing

respondents scoring highest on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological disturbance

or mental ill health) were less likely (506) to participate in gambling than those who

score 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) (555)

Table 14 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12 England 2018

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 376 349 327 360

Scratchcards 175 189 187 179

Other lotteries 148 153 119 144

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

40

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Machines and games

Football pools 32 26 24 29

Bingo (not online) 44 53 37 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 57 56 57 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 24 28 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 28 34 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 07 08 05 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 27 32 37 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 88 72 58 78

Betting exchange 12 11 11 11

Horse races (not online) 86 83 67 81

Dog races (not online) 18 19 09 17

Sports events (not online) 43 43 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 17 10 18 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 39 36 38 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 553 535 502 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 404 411 381 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 100 93 83 94

Base 4193 1630 1146 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

41

215 Overall gambling participation by BMI group

BMI (body mass index) is a widely used measure of weight that takes into account the

individualrsquos height and is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the height in metres

squared (kgm2) Adults can be classified as

bull underweight (BMI less than 185)

bull normal (BMI between 185 and 25)

bull overweight (BMI between 25 and 30)

bull obese (BMI 30 or above)

According to HSE 2018 63 of adults in England were overweight or obese and

between 1993 and 2018 there has been a marked increase in the proportion of adults

who are overweight or obese

A greater proportion of respondents classified as obese (594) and overweight (569)

participated in gambling compared to those classified not overweight or obese (486)

This difference was particularly notable for participation in the National Lottery as 429

of the obese group participated compared to 284 of the not overweight or obese

group

Table 15 Overall gambling participation by BMI group England 2018

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 284 393 429 360

Scratchcards 161 182 212 179

Other lotteries 108 159 185 144

Machines and games

Football pools 32 33 23 29

Bingo (not online) 37 44 55 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 52 54 66 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 27 20 22

Casino table games (not online) 21 36 24 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 04 10 07 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 30 35 30

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

42

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 78 92 74 78

Betting exchange 10 11 15 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 77 81

Dog races (not online) 14 19 19 17

Sports events (not online) 34 60 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 13 25 08 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 38 44 35 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 13 11 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 483 569 594 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

372 416 446 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

94 103 97 94

Base 2113 2234 1815 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

216 Overall gambling participation by alcohol consumption

HSE has asked about drinking alcohol since it began in 1993 The proportion of adults

who have drunk alcohol in the last week has steadily reduced over the previous decades

from 67 in 1998 to 57 in 2018 Across all age groups men were more likely than

women to drink at increasing and higher risk levels (12)

Alcohol consumption is reported in units of alcohol One unit of alcohol is 10ml by

volume of pure alcohol In 2016 the UK Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) published new

guidelines on low risk drinking (13) It is now recommended that men and women should

not regularly (defined as most weeks) drink more than 14 units a week Drinking at this

level is considered to be lsquolow riskrsquo and adults who regularly drink up to this amount are

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

43

advised to spread their drinking over 3 or more days Above this level is considered to

be lsquoincreased riskrsquo For men this is now over 14 units and up to 50 units and for women

over 14 units and up to 35 units per week Men who regularly drink more than 50 units a

week and women more than 35 units are described as lsquohigher risk drinkersrsquo and are

considered to be at particular risk of alcohol-related health problems (12)

There was a clear pattern of increased participation in gambling as the number of

alcohol units consumed per week increased being most noticeable at the extremes A

total of 354 of non-drinkers participated in gambling compared to 744 of those

consuming over 50 units This trend persisted for every type of gambling activity

Table 16 Overall gambling participation by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 261 445 542 525 570 432

Scratchcards 120 207 228 234 295 199

Other lotteries 86 146 172 181 205 142

Machines and games

Football pools 14 23 39 46 66 27

Bingo (not online) 36 58 50 49 72 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 32 61 91 105 127 65

Machines in a bookmakers 15 23 45 62 75 29

Casino table games (not online) 09 25 61 61 80 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 05 07 14 25 36 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

14 31 48 54 68 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 15 61 123 135 150 69

Betting exchange 04 08 16 26 35 11

Horse races (not online) 28 89 162 198 207 98

Dog races (not online) 06 23 35 45 61 24

Sports events (not online) 13 38 87 113 137 48

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

44

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online)

04 09 24 45 46 13

Spread-betting 03 04 07 14 29 05

Private betting 13 41 82 69 95 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 06 13 23 32 26 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 354 595 695 686 744 576

Base 4572 15591 4666 858 903 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

217 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking

Since it began HSE has asked questions about cigarette smoking in adults From the

series current cigarette smoking has steadily declined from 27 in 1993 to 17 in

2018 The proportion of respondents that have never regularly smoked cigarettes

increased from 46 to 58 over the same period HSE collects information about the

use of various tobacco products including cigarettes cigars and pipes The focus of this

analysis is on cigarette use meaning we do not consider cigar and pipe use in the below

definition of a current smoker

There was little difference in overall gambling participation between smokers (605)

and non-smokers (588) However current smokers generally have a higher likelihood

of participation for most gambling activity types Most notable were

bull scratchcards (306 compared to 184 of non-smokers)

bull football pools (52 compared to 26 of non-smokers)

bull machines in a bookmakers (46 compared to 18 of non-smokers)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

45

Table 17 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking England 2018

Current smoker ()

Non-smoker ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 377 406 360

Scratchcards 306 184 179

Other lotteries 121 172 144

Machines and games

Football pools 52 26 29

Bingo (not online) 69 52 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 97 54 57

Machines in a bookmakers 46 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 40 27 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 06 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 58 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 82 78

Betting exchange 07 14 11

Horse races (not online) 89 98 81

Dog races (not online) 24 14 17

Sports events (not online) 56 41 40

Other events or sports (not online) 24 15 15

Spread-betting 08 04 05

Private betting 70 36 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 14 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 605 588 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 485 437 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 123 99 94

Base 1151 2840 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

46

3 At-risk and problem gambling

31 Introduction

The most commonly used screening tools for gambling are the Diagnostic and Statistical

Manual of Mental Disorders 4th version (DSM-IV) and the Problem Gambling Severity

Index (PGSI) They define levels of gambling as (14)

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

Anyone scoring low risk or above are showing some signs of problematic behaviour

More specifically problem gambling is defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits There are

several screening tools available to identify problem gambling The HSE uses both the

DSM-IV and the PGSI

The DSM-IV was created as a clinical diagnostic tool and was not intended for use as a

screening instrument among the general population However an adapted version of the

DSM-IV for use in a survey setting was developed for the British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) series and was subject to a rigorous development and testing process

including cognitive testing and piloting The PGSI was designed for use among the

general population rather than within a clinical context It was developed tested and

validated within a general population survey of over 3000 people and the questionnaire

itself has been subject to critical evaluation and was revised in 2003 (12)

We base most tables in this section on the combined HSE dataset to increase sample

sizes wherever possible

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

47

32 Problem and at-risk gambling according to PGSI by age and sex

The PGSI consists of 9 items ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquogambling causing health

problemsrsquo to lsquofeeling guilty about gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale

These are

bull never

bull sometimes

bull most of the time

bull almost always

A score of 1 or more for PGSI indicates at-risk gambling A score of 1 to 2 is considered

low risk a score of 3 to 7 is considered moderate risk and a score of 8 or more

indicates problem gambling (12)

We have combined the low and moderate groups into an lsquoat-riskrsquo group (score 1 to 7) to

give a picture of the total risk of being a problem gambler (score 8 or more) in the

population Non-problem gambling group includes people who have not participated in

any gambling activity

According to the PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of 04 in the general

population (Table 18) The prevalence of people considered lsquoat-riskrsquo was 38 Men in

the younger age groups were most likely to experience both problem and at-risk

gambling For example 117 of men aged 16 to 24 and 101 of men aged 25 to 34

were participating in at-risk levels of gambling compared to 31 and 27 of women

respectively (these differences are statistically significant)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

48

Table 18 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

917 929 958 965 974 986 991 957

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 75 63 38 30 22 13 09 38

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

08 08 04 05 03 - - 04

Mean PGSI score 026 023 015 012 009 005 002 014

Base 3727 4547 4459 4726 3913 3186 2520 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 19 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (inc those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

868 885 936 949 962 978 983 933

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 117 101 59 43 33 19 17 60

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

15 14 05 08 - - - 08

Mean PGSI score 043 039 024 020 014 008 004 024

Base 1889 2249 2219 2336 1928 1534 1092 13246

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

49

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

967 972 980 981 986 993 997 981

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 31 27 18 18 12 07 - 17

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

- - - - - - - 01

Mean PGSI score 009 007 006 005 004 001 000 005

Base 1838 2298 2239 2390 1985 1653 1428 13831

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

According to the PGSI in 2018 there were an estimated 168149 people experiencing

problem gambling in England This is a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 208700

Also the PGSI estimates there to have been 377242 moderate risk gamblers and

1213830 low risk gamblers in England While estimates of problem gamblers and those

at moderate risk have reduced since 2016 those estimated at low risk have increased

since 2016 (from 1094066)

33 At-risk gambling

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by activity

This section shows at-risk gamblers among all respondents who participated in different

gambling activities The base is all respondents who participated in at least one activity

(individual survey participants may be included in multiple rows)

It is worth nothing that in contrast to other gambling activities participation in the

National Lottery was very low among at-risk gamblers compared to the general

population While at-risk gamblers accounted for 74 of all gambling activity they were

significantly overrepresented for

bull spread betting (520)

bull machines in bookmakers (464)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (456)

bull online gambling on slots casino or bingo games (442)

bull betting exchanges (440)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

50

Also in 20187 overall participation in online gambling was more than double (234)

that of the general population (94)

Table 20 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 68

Scratchcards 119

Other lotteries 80

Machines and games

Football pools 291

Bingo (not online) 129

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 257

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 315

Poker played in pubs or clubs 456

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 442

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 263

Betting exchange 440

Horse races (not online) 156

Dog races (not online) 266

Sports events (not online) 305

Other events or sports (not online) 436

Spread-betting 520

Private betting 250

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 338

7 We have used the latest year rather than the combined dataset due to how much online gambling has

increased between 2012 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

51

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Summary

Any gambling activity 74

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base8 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

While at-risk gamblers account for 74 of all gambling activity they account for 527

of those participating in 7 or more different gambling activities over the last 12 months

Table 21 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by number of activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities At-risk gamblers among those who participate ()

1 activity 18

2 to 3 activities 52

4 to 6 activities 197

7 or more activities 527

Total (any gambling activity) 74

Base9 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by highest educational qualification

As we have seen before for overall gambling participation at-risk gambling was most

common in the population for respondents in the below degree category (45) This

category was statistically significantly higher than both the NVQ4 NVQ5 or degree or

equivalent and the no qualification categories

8 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 9 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

52

Table 22 PGSI risk category by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category NVQ4NVQ5 Degree or

equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

969 949 962 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

22 33 22 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 12 09 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 05 06 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

29 45 31 38

Base 7582 14415 5033 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity at-risk gambling was most common in the unemployed category

(61) This was statistically significantly higher than all groups other than those in full-

time education For overall participation in gambling prevalence was the highest for the

employed self-employed or training category This was statistically significant

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

53

Table 23 PGSI risk category by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Employed self-

employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other Inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

950 925 941 987 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 43 45 09 20 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

12 18 10 03 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 14 - - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

44 61 56 12 27 38

Base 15281 1791 2023 5875 2107 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by IMD

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile However for at-risk gambling there was a statistically significant gradient with

prevalence increasing across quintiles from least deprived (30) to most deprived

(53) This aligns with the higher prevalence seen before in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

54

Table 24 PGSI risk category by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

939 954 960 963 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

34 31 24 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

18 10 10 07 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

08 05 05 04 01 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

53 41 34 33 30 38

Base 5165 5362 5667 5516 5369 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by ethnicity

By ethnicity the Asian and Asian British ethnic group had the lowest prevalence of at-

risk gambling (20) This was statistically significantly lower than the White and White

British group (39)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

55

Table 25 PGSI risk category by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category White White

British ()

Asian Asian

British ()

Black Black

British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

957 970 957 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

28 15 28 41 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

11 - - - 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 10 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

39 20 34 49 38

Base 23513 2037 816 687 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

56

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by region

The North East (49) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling while the South West (30) had the lowest

Table 26 PGSI risk category by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the Humber

()

East Midland

s ()

West Midland

s ()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

944 952 958 961 960 955 956 958 968 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

36 32 25 26 24 30 26 30 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

13 11 11 09 10 12 10 10 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 +)

- 04 07 - 05 - 08 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

49 44 36 35 35 42 36 40 30 38

Base 1325 3584 2685 2321 2824 3008 4107 4429 2794 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

57

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by self-assessed general health

There was no significant difference in at-risk gambling by respondents reporting bad and

very bad general health and those reporting very good and good general health

Table 27 PGSI risk category by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Very goodgood

()

Fair ()

Bad very bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

958 955 958 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 29 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 10 11 12 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 03 08 08 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 38 38 35 38

Base 20439 4657 1978 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by life satisfaction

Results for overall gambling participation across life satisfaction groups were

inconclusive This was not the case for at-risk gambling where respondents with low life

satisfaction (62) had a higher prevalence and those with very high life satisfaction had

a notably lower prevalence (22) This difference was statistically significant

Table 28 PGSI risk category by life satisfaction England 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

927 956 957 977 960

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

41 31 28 15 26

10 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

58

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

21 08 11 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 04 04 - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

62 39 39 22 36

Base 1231 2064 6016 3926 13601

Source HSE 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by wellbeing

As above for life satisfaction there was a gradient for at-risk gambling with respondents

in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) having the highest prevalence (64) and those in

quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) having the lowest prevalence (23) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 29 PGSI risk category by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

925 950 960 976 976 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

45 30 28 17 18 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 13 09 06 05 11

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 06 03 - 02 05

11 Totals differ from majority of tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

59

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

64 44 38 23 23 38

Base 3351 3772 3386 3238 3432 20193

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

problems) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling (51) while those scoring 0

(no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (30) This is a reversal of

the pattern seen before for overall gambling participation

Table 30 PGSI risk category by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 968 948 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 23 34 37 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 14 14 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 04 10 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 30 49 51 38

Base 11463 5025 3357 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by BMI group

There were no statistically significant differences for at-risk gambling between

respondents by BMI group

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

60

Table 31 PGSI risk category by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese () Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 954 957 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 27 25 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

10 11 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 05 05 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

42 38 37 38

Base 8910 8471 6378 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by alcohol consumption

As seen for overall gambling participation there was a clear pattern of increased at-risk

gambling as the number of alcohol units consumed per week increased This gradient

was statistically significant with 16 of non-drinkers gambling at-risk compared to

100 of people who consume over 50 units per week

Table 32 PGSI risk category by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Nevernot in last 12

months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to

35 ()

Over 35 to

50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 980 965 936 921 889 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

11 23 43 47 76 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

06 08 16 20 24 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 03 05 13 11 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

16 32 59 66 100 38

Base 4558 13678 4645 894 899 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

61

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by cigarette smoking

We saw a similar pattern for at-risk gambling as we saw for overall gambling

participation when looking at cigarette smoking Current smokers (72) had a higher

prevalence of at-risk gambling compared to non-smokers (37) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 33 PGSI risk category by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Current smoker

() Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 918 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 53 26 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+) 09 04 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 72 37 38

Base 4839 9660 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

34 Problem gambling

Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex

The DSM-IV contains 10 diagnostic criteria ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquocommitting

a crime to fund gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from

lsquoneverrsquo to lsquovery oftenrsquo A score of 3 or more indicates problem gambling

According to the DSM-IV and similar to PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of

05 in the general population Though numbers are small the younger age groups

tend to have a higher prevalence As we would expect given the higher rates of

gambling participation problem gambling according to the DSM-IV was higher in men

(09) than women (02) with the highest prevalence again seen in men in the 25 to

34 age group (15)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

62

Table 34 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

992 991 995 994 996 997 999 994

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

08 09 05 06 04 - - 06

Mean DSM-IV score 009 008 006 005 005 003 002 01

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 35 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

986 985 993 989 993 994 999 991

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

14 15 07 11 07 - - 09

Mean DSM-IV score 015 013 007 008 007 005 003 009

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

998 997 996 998 999 1000 999 998

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

63

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

- - - - - - - 02

Mean DSM-IV score 003 003 004 002 003 002 001 003

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

In 2018 DSM-IV estimated there to be 223975 problem gamblers in England This was

a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 257930

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex

The proportion of problem gamblers in the population according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI included in the HSE was 05 in 2018 (this increases to 07 when we combine

HSE years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018) Prevalence was higher for men (08) than

women (03) Using the combined HSE dataset (see Table 36) prevalence is highest

in the younger age groups

As reported by HSE the proportion of problem gamblers in the population has been

reducing from 09 in 2015 to 07 in 2016 to 05 in 2018 However as numbers

are very small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with

previous years and do not represent a real decline In 2018 there were estimated to be

245634 problem gamblers in England according to either DSM-IV or PGSI This is a

reduction from the 2016 estimate of 303328

Table 36 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 990 990 994 993 995 996 999 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 10 06 07 05 04 - 07

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

64

Table 37 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 982 983 992 987 992 993 999 989

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

18 17 08 13 08 07 - 11

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 998 996 995 998 998 1000 999 998

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

- - 05 - - - - 02

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity

While accounting for just 12 of all gambling activity problem gamblers (according to

either DSM-IV or PGSI) account for a significantly disproportionate level of participation

in

bull machines in a bookmakers (464)

bull spread betting (159)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (147)

bull other events or sports (not online) (135)

The problem gambler group were less likely to participate in activities such as the

National Lottery and scratchcards than the general gambling population

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

65

The problem gambler group were more likely than the general gambling population to

have participated in 7 or more gambling activities in the last 12 months

Table 38 Problem gambling prevalence according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 10

Scratchcards 18

Other lotteries 16

Machines and games

Football pools 50

Bingo (not online) 33

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 49

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 64

Poker played in pubs or clubs 147

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 87

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 37

Betting exchange 107

Horse races (not online) 30

Dog races (not online) 71

Sports events (not online) 56

Other events or sports (not online) 135

Spread betting 159

Private betting 43

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 99

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

66

Summary

Any gambling activity 12

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base12 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 39 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by number of activities participated in over the last 12 months England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

1 activity 03

2 to 3 activities 06

4 to 6 activities 28

7 or more activities 118

Total (any gambling activity) 12

Base13 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification

Based on the data from HSE there is no observable difference for problem gambling by

highest educational qualification

12 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 13 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

67

Table 40 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 990 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 10 07

Base 7599 14457 5061 27164

Source HSE 2012 2105 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity problem gambling was most common in respondents who were

currently unemployed (21)

Table 41 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity England 2012 2105 2016 2018

Employed self-employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler

993 979 995 998 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

07 21 05 02 06 07

Base 15321 1796 2029 5906 2111 2716

4

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD

Unlike overall gambling participation there was an inequality gradient across IMD

quintiles for problem gambling Prevalence was greatest in the most deprived group

(12) and declined for each quintile The difference between the most and least

deprived quintiles was statistically significant We saw a similar pattern before for at-risk

gambling

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

68

Table 42 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 988 993 995 996 998 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

12 07 05 04 02 07

Base 5183 5379 5684 5532 5386 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity

Problem gambling was greater in the Asian and Asian British (11) ethnic group

compared to the White and White British group (05) The difference between the 2

groups is statistically significant Though numbers are small for the remaining groups

(with confidence intervals too wide to draw any meaningful conclusions) the data

suggests a paradox of harm regarding the Asian and Asian British group This ethnic

group is less likely to take part in gambling than the White and White British group (both

overall participation and at-risk gambling) but more likely to experience problematic

gambling than the White and White British group

Table 43 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

Mixed Other

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 986 985 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 14 15 07

Base 23586 2043 821 455 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

69

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region

Even when we combined multiple HSE years numbers were small and confidence intervals overlapped when looking at

problem gambling by region

Table 44 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler (including people not participating in any gambling activity)

990 994 990 995 993 995 988 996 997 93

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 06 10 05 07 05 12 04 03 07

Base 1329 3598 2655 2341 2843 3067 4022 4451 2820 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

70

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed general health

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health had a higher prevalence of

problem gambling (13) than those reporting very good or good general health (05)

As we saw for at-risk gambling the difference between the groups was not statistically

significant but the gradient represents a different pattern to overall gambling

participation

Table 45 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed

general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 987 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 13 07

Base 20586 4581 1954 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life satisfaction

Problem gambling continues the pattern we saw before for at-risk gambling with the

highest prevalence in the low life satisfaction group (17) This was statistically

significant Again it is important to note that this was not the case for overall gambling

participation where there was no clear pattern

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

71

Table 46 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life

satisfaction England 2016 2018

Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()14

Non-problem gambler

983 995 994 998 994

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

17 05 06 02 06

Base 1223 2049 5996 3909 13629

Source HSE 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by wellbeing

As with at-risk gambling there was a clear gradient across WEMWBS quintiles with the

highest prevalence of problem gambling in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) (16) and

lowest in quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) (03) This difference was statistically

significant

Table 47 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()15

Non-problem gambler

984 990 996 998 997 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

16 10 04 02 03 07

Base 3338 3761 3393 3245 3431 20272

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

14 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018 15 Totals differ from most tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

72

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

disturbance or mental ill health) had the highest prevalence of problem gambling (14)

while those scoring 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (03)

This difference was statistically significant This is a similar pattern to at-risk gambling

and differs from overall gambling participation

Table 48 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 14 07

Base 11507 5037 3357 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group

There was little difference for problem gambling across BMI groups There was a similar

picture showing a lack of association between BMI groups for at-risk gambling

Table 49 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not overweight

or obese () Overweight

() Obese () Total ()

Non-problem gambler 994 993 993 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

06 07 07 07

Base 8964 8497 6364 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

73

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by alcohol consumption

There was a clear pattern of increased problem gambling as the number of alcohol units

consumed per week increased

Table 50 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Never or not in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

15 to 35 ()

36 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 994 993 985 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 06 07 15 14 07

Base 4503 15575 4693 863 911 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking

There was little difference by cigarette smoking status for overall gambling participation

This changed for problem gambling with current smokers (13) having higher

prevalence of problem gambling compared to non-smokers (06) This difference is

statistically significant

Table 51 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Current

smoker () Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 987 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

13 06 07

Base 4879 9663 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

74

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling

The previous sections have examined the relationships between gambling and various

other factors separately We carried out binary logistic regression models to further

investigate the different factors associated with gambling The following is a summary of

the pre-registered analysis We present the full outputs in Appendix B

To begin we conducted a series of bivariate analyses to compare a range of variables

to 3 increasing levels of gambling

1 Overall gambling participation

2 Harmful gambling (including low risk moderate risk and problem gambling)

3 Problem gambling taken in isolation

The variables included were

bull age

bull sex

bull ethnicity

bull income

bull educational attainment

bull employment

bull IMD

bull region

bull general health

bull wellbeing

bull life satisfaction

bull GHQ12

bull BMI

bull alcohol

bull smoking

Of these income region self-reported general health and BMI were shown not to be

statistically significantly associated with harmful gambling Income and BMI were shown

not to be statistically significantly associated with problem gambling

After reviewing the bivariate output we applied a multiple logistic regression to estimate

associations of socio-demographic and health factors on the likelihood that respondents

are participating in harmful gambling We excluded factors not significant at the bivariate

level from the model lsquoHarmful gamblingrsquo as discussed here includes problem gambling

and so the model takes account of the full continuum of gambling risk It is important to

note that the terms lsquolow riskrsquo and lsquomoderate riskrsquo (as used in the interpretation of the

PGSI) do not mean that risk is negligible for these respondents but rather that these

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

75

respondents are on a continuum of risk with people who have a definite problem with

their gambling This means the model includes all respondents with problem gambling

behaviours and those at risk of developing problem gambling behaviours

The logistic regression model for harmful gambling was statistically significant (p less-

than 005) The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling (see Appendix

B for more detail) and correctly classified 94 of cases but this was skewed towards

classifying respondents at no risk

Table 52 details the regression function itself and so summarises the effect of each

variable See the key below the table for the meaning of each column However the

main values of concern are the p-value and the adjusted odds ratio The p-value

determines which variables are significant (by convention this is less-than 005) and

these are highlighted in the table The adjusted odds ratio is a measurement of

likelihood that an outcome (harmful gambling) will occur given a particular exposure

compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of that exposure (see

Appendix B for more detail)

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be harmful gamblers Respondents

with below degree attainment were 18 times the odds and those with no qualifications

were 21 times the odds to be harmful gamblers compared to those with a NVQ4 NVQ5

or degree or equivalent level of attainment

Wellbeing contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on

GHQ12 Comparing those scoring 0 the odds of respondents scoring 1 to 3 were 20

times more likely and those scoring 4 or more were 24 times more likely to participate in

harmful gambling

On physical health and health behaviours smoking did not contribute significantly to the

model but alcohol did

Compared to abstainers or those not drinking in the last 12 months the odds of

respondents who drank above the CMOsrsquo low-risk drinking guidelines (14 to 35 units)

were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This increases markedly to

78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) It should be noted that the group

from HSE consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

76

Table 52 Binary multiple logistic regression model of harmful gambling variables

in the equation England 2016

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent)

- - 8609 2 0014 - - -

Educational qualification 3 groups (below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational qualification 3 groups (no qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (Least deprived)

- - 11143 4 0025 - - -

Quintile of IMD score (2)

-0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3)

0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4)

0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (Most deprived)

0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1)

- - 15525 4 0004 - - -

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2)

0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3)

0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4)

0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

77

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5)

-0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Life satisfaction (low (0 to 4))

- - 4262 3 0235 - - -

Life satisfaction (medium (5 to 6))

-0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (high (7 to 8))

-0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (very high (9 to 10))

0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ score ndash grouped (score 0)

- - 15279 2 0000 - - -

GHQ score - grouped (score 1-3)

0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ score - grouped (score 4+)

0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (nevernot in last 12 months)

- - 36554 4 0000 - - -

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14)

0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (over 14 to 35)

1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (over 35 to 50)

0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (over 50)

2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020 - -

Notes Missing data was not available due to small counts Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age 16-75+ in 10 year age bands Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc) Key B the unstandardized coefficients for the model SE the standard errors for the B-coefficients

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

78

Wald the test statistic for the individual predictor variables Linear regression will have a t-test while logistic regression has a chi-square test It is used to determine the p-value df the degrees of freedom for the Wald statistic p-value determines which variables are significant By convention any variable with a p-value below 005 is significant AOR (adjusted odds ratio) the odds ratios associated with changes in predictor scores 95 CI the 95 confidence interval of the odds ratio Source HSE 2016

The broad conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly sex

appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic factors

such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a

stronger predictor of harmful gambling than both poor physical health and negative

health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model being selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and

the method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

79

4 Gambling frequency

41 Introduction

This section considers how often people who do gamble participate in gambling

activities and to what extent Frequency is compared for respondents participating in any

gambling activity at-risk gamblers and problem gamblers This is followed by findings

from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey which combines gambling frequency with

gambling volume in terms of money and time spent

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months

For all gamblers the most common frequency of participation was once a week (262)

followed by once or twice a year (253) This was true for lotteries with 311

participating in the National Lottery once a week 232 buying scratchcards once a

week and 276 participating in other lotteries once a week A similar picture was seen

for machines and games except for machines in a bookmakers poker played in pubs or

clubs and online gambling All these activities were slightly more likely to be played 2 or

more times a week

Most betting activities were also most frequently participated in 2 or more times a week

or once a week except for horse racing and private betting Dog racing was most

frequently participated in either 2 or more times a week (236) or once a week (222)

followed by once or twice a year (218) This differs from horse racing where 349

participated only once or twice a year This reinforces the difference between horse

racing and dog racing seen before for at-risk and problem gambling

Table 53 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 145 311 111 116 139 179

Scratchcards 126 232 133 131 175 203

Other lotteries 144 276 105 161 113 202

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

80

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Machines and games

Football pools 219 301 121 152 104 104

Bingo (not online) 180 257 110 102 141 210

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

171 218 155 102 143 212

Machines in a bookmakers

246 232 158 136 101 127

Casino table games (not online)

152 191 146 127 152 231

Poker played in pubs or clubs

297 285 128 134 81 76

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

252 248 173 126 117 84

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

174 239 150 116 131 190

Betting exchange 272 258 161 69 115 124

Horse races (not online)

152 210 101 80 108 349

Dog races (not online)

236 222 100 102 122 218

Sports events (not online)

215 277 146 110 118 135

Other events or sports (not online)

345 320 175 69 44 47

Spread-betting 367 239 101 138 73 83

Private betting 155 204 140 130 127 245

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling

213 248 99 138 106 195

Summary

Any gambling activity

119 262 102 124 140 253

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

81

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Base16 1342 2961 1147 1403 1581 2853

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers

As we would expect gambling frequency increases as the level of gambling risk

increases Almost a quarter of low risk gamblers gamble 2 or more times a week and

this increases to 451 of moderate risk gamblers and 541 of problem gamblers

Respondents who are considered problem gamblers according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI 507 gamble 2 or more times a week compared to 114 of non-problem

gamblers

Table 54 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for at-risk gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 246 451 541

Once a week 266 294 194

Less than once a week more than once a month

198 88 71

Once a month 133 54 173

16 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities minus those who did

not answer the frequency question

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

82

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

Every 2 to 3 months 98 78 -

Once or twice a year 59 - -

Base 541 204 98

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 55 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for problem gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 114 507

Once a week 263 225

Less than once a week more than once a month

102 56

Once a month 124 141

Every 2 to 3 months 142 -

Once or twice a year 255 42

Base17 11146 142

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume

Although it is not as recent as the HSE 2018 the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) (15) includes more detail than the HSE on certain issues relevant to the

aims of this review In particular the BGPS offers additional data on gambling frequency

(lsquoregularrsquo gambling or days per month) and gambling volume (money time spent) While

a summary is useful for the objectives of this report itrsquos worth noting that the gambling

17 The base for problem gamblers in Table 55 is respondents categorised as a problem gambler according to either

DSM-IV or PGSI This is the conventional approach and that taken throughout the section before focusing on problem

gambling This differs from the base for Table 54 which is respondents categorised as problem gamblers according to

PGSI only This difference is necessary as only PGSI allows the further breakdown into low and moderate risk that

Table 54 requires

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

83

landscape has changed considerably since 2010 particularly issues relating to online

gambling

The BGPS included questions to measure gambling volume among regular gamblers18

based on the amount of time spent gambling in an average month and the amount of

money spent on gambling in an average month This detail is not possible from the HSE

When looking at time spent on gambling the BGPS made a cut-off for analysis purposes

to capture the top 10 of regular gamblers This cut-off was around 7 hours per month

gambling (with a mean for the group of 310 hours per month) The other 90 of regular

gamblers either did not spend any time gambling or generally spent less than 7 hours a

month gambling (with a mean of 30 minutes per month) The BGPS labelled these

groups lsquohigh-timersquo and lsquonon high-timersquo gamblers respectively

When looking at money spent on gambling the BGPS cut-off for the top 10 of regular

gamblers was around pound6150 per month on gambling (with a mean of pound20992 per

month) The remaining 90 of regular gamblers spent less than this amount (with a

mean of pound1482 per month) The BGPS labelled these groups lsquohigh-spendrsquo and lsquonon

high-spendrsquo gamblers respectively As a summary of gambling volume that considers

both time and money spent the BGPS provides 4 possible sub-groups of regular

gamblers These are respondents who were

bull non high-time and non high-spend gamblers (85)

bull high-time but non high-spend gamblers (4)

bull high-spend but non high-time gamblers (4)

bull high-time and high-spend gamblers (6)

Most (85) regular gamblers were both non high-time and non high-spend gamblers Of

the remainder the BGPS found 4 were high-time but not high-spend and another 4

were high-spend but not high-time gamblers It also found 6 were both high-time and

high-spend gamblers

Non high-time and non high-spend gamblers took part in 25 gambling activities in the

past year In comparison high-time only gamblers took part in 40 gambling activities in

the past year and high-spend only gamblers took part in 52 activities High-time and

high-spend gamblers had the highest levels of gambling participation taking part in 66

gambling activities

18 Respondents who gambled once a month or more

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

84

Compared to all regular gamblers the high-time and high-spend group were more likely

to

bull be from semi-routine or routine households19

bull live in areas of greatest deprivation

bull have no educational qualifications

bull be slightly more likely to live in the lowest income households

bull be unemployed (they were much more likely to be unemployed)

Along with the high-time only gamblers this group experiences the greatest

socioeconomic deprivation

19 Based on The National Statistics Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

85

5 Hospital admissions

51 Introduction

This section presents the number of hospital admissions due to gambling from NHS

Digitalrsquos hospital episode statistics (HES) These statistics detail all admissions

outpatient appointments and AampE attendances at NHS hospitals in England We use

figures from finished admission episodes (FAEs) with a primary or secondary diagnosis

as classified by the International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) (ICD-10) of

bull ICD-10 F630 Pathological Gambling

bull ICD-10 Z726 Gambling and Betting

52 HES admissions due to gambling

Across England there were 375 admissions to hospital because of gambling in 2018 to

2019 Over the previous 3 years admissions have increased but compared to other

causes numbers20 remain very small

Table 56 Number of FAEs with a primary or secondary diagnosis relating to gambling by age group England between 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019

Age group 2016 to 2017 2017 to 2018 2018 to 2019

lt20 lt10 lt10 lt10

20 to 29 75 90 115

30 to 39 70 105 120

40 to 49 60 50 60

50 to 59 40 50 55

60+ 20 25 20

Total (will not sum due to rounding) 260 325 375

Source Hospital episode statistics (HES) NHS Digital 2020

20 Numbers are too small relative to all hospital admissions to calculate meaningful rates

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

86

6 Previously published sources of gambling data

This section of the report collates information on gambling previously published

elsewhere The purpose is to meet aspects of the objectives not fulfilled by the primary

data source Topics include

bull affected others

bull treatment

bull attitudes and influences

bull children and young people

The published sources discussed in the rest of the report vary in the type and quality of

gambling data available Gambling is relatively new field of research Inconsistencies in

the robustness and standardisation of the publications and data available are to be

expected However all sources included here are encouraging additions to the existing

body of work and one of the recommendations of the review is to encourage further

research and analysis in this area

We discuss the methods and caveats of each source in the introduction to each topic

61 Affected others

Introduction

A recent report published by YouGov (16) on behalf of GambleAware included a detailed

section on lsquoaffected othersrsquo The report defines lsquoaffected othersrsquo as

ldquohellippeople that know someone who has had a problem with gambling (either

currently or in their past) and feel they have personally experienced negative

effects from this person (or peoples) gambling behaviour This could include

family members friends and work colleagues among others with the negative

effects ranging from financial to emotional or practical impactsrdquo

The BGPS included some analysis of affected others in 2010 but the YouGov report

represents the most recent data available on affected others currently available The

source is not as robust as the HSE (which is designed to be representative of the

population by adopting a multi-stage stratified probability sampling design based on

postcode sectors) but does have a very good sample size of around 12000

respondents of which 7 are affected others

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

87

The main difference between the HSE and the YouGov survey is the sampling method

(probability vs non-probability) The difference in mode is also important (face-to-face

vs online) YouGov describe the survey as nationally representative but this is unclear

These differences may account for the fact that the headline prevalences do differ

somewhat from HSE21 in that YouGov finds 13 of the population experience gambling

harm (PGSI score of 1+) compared to a figure of 4 on the combined HSE This is a

significant difference

An independent report by the London School of Economics (LSE) (17) evaluates the

differences between the sources It concludes that HSE may under-estimate gambling

harm by requiring a residential address and YouGov may over-estimate harm by

excluding offline people The conclusion drawn by LSE is that it is credible that the level

of harm is probably somewhere between the 2 reported figures

The LSE report does offer a level of scrutiny and transparency but it is important to note

when reading the following section that the YouGov report itself has not been peer

reviewed and there is a lack of conclusions drawn and references to other published

work on the subject Furthermore the report does not specify the time frame of the PGSI

questions The HSE is clear that the PGSI is based on the respondentsrsquo activities over

the last 12 months We could assume that YouGov also covered the last 12 months but

this is not clear from the publication If YouGov did not specify the last 12 months then

respondents might have assumed the questions could apply to an earlier time which

would increase the prevalence of harm Particularly relevant to this section it is also

unclear how YouGov arrived at the 7 affected others prevalence figure due to the

complexity of how the report combines phases 1 and 2 of the study as it does not

include this information

However the affected others section of the YouGov report is the most detailed

contribution to the subject currently available and taking into account the above

caveats adds value to the present review

Prevalence of affected others

YouGov finds that 7 of the total adult population of Great Britain were affected others

The findings also reveal that the likelihood of being an affected other increases with

PGSI score Among gamblers 20 of problem gamblers (according to PGSI) were

affected others compared to 13 of moderate risk gamblers and 9 of low risk

21 We do not compare this to HSE exactly but rather the health surveys of England Wales and Scotland combined

Here we refer to it as HSE for simplicity and consistency

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

88

gamblers The report suggests that this shows the complex relationship between a

personrsquos own gambling and the issues relating to other peoplersquos gambling

Affected others were more likely to be women (57) than men (43) which reflects the

fact that problem gambling is much more associated with men There is little variation by

age but affected others were slightly more likely to be social class CD2E22 and less

likely to be White British

Type of affected others

Affected others were most likely to be negatively affected by a gambling problem of

someone in their immediate family (61) This is most commonly a spouse or partner

(25) followed by a parent (21) Women (71) were more likely than men (44) to

be negatively affected by the gambling of someone in their immediate family Women

were also much more likely to be affected by their spouse or partner (35 of women

compared to 9 of men)

Due to their age younger (18 to 24) affected others were most likely to have been

affected by the gambling of a parent Older affected others (55 and over) were most

likely to have been affected by the gambling of a child

Importantly people who were both affected others and problem gamblers were more

likely to have been negatively affected by the gambling problem of a child (15)

implying that gambling has profound impacts on the family as a whole Problem

gamblers were also more likely than average to say they have been negatively affected

by a non-immediate family member or work contact suggesting that gamblers were

more likely to socialise with other gamblers

Severity of impact upon affected others

Among affected others the most severe impacts of gambling were felt most by

immediate family members Figure 4 shows the severity of impact by type of affected

other in Great Britain in 2019 It presents the results from the YouGov report on severity

of impact by percentage into either minor moderate or severe The figure shows that

almost half (48) of affected others that were affected by a spouse or partner report a

severe negative impact This is followed in severity by the gambling of a parent (41)

22 Social class definition

AB higher and intermediate managerial administrative and professional workers C1 supervisory clerical and junior

managerial administrative and professional workers C2 skilled manual workers D semi-skilled and unskilled

manual workers E people on long term state benefits casual and lowest grade workers unemployed with state

benefits (including pension) only

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

89

and a child (38) A lower proportion of affected others reporting a severe negative

impact were due to friends The report suggests that the type and closeness of the

relationship plays an important role in determining the severity of the negative impact

experienced by affected others

Figure 4 Severity of impact by type of affected other Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling treatment and support YouGov 2019

The most significant type of impact reported by affected others was an inability to trust

the problem gambler (62) This was followed by

bull feelings of anger towards them (53)

bull anxiety (40)

bull a breakdown of communication (40)

bull reduced income for household running costs such as food rent and bills (38)

Women were more likely to have experienced all the negative impacts of being an

affected other with 81 reporting depression anxiety and anger towards the problem

gambler compared to 64 of men Women were also more likely to have experienced

financial impacts (67 of women compared to 48 of men)

Advice and support

YouGov found that most (64) affected others have not sought advice or support on

behalf of the problem gambler and an even greater proportion (72) have not sought

help for themselves as an affected other When affected others do seek advice and

0 20 40 60 80 100

Other workcolleague

Friend

Sibling

Other familymember

Child

Parent

Spousepartner

Percent reporting severity of impact ()

Severe Moderate Minor

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

90

support either for themselves or for the problem gambler it is most likely from less formal

sources This included seeking help from

bull a friend or family member (19)

bull a spouse or partner (11)

bull gambling support websites (11)

For more formal sources of advice and support 12 report seeking help from mental

health services and 8 from a GP Also 5 report seeking help from another addiction

service (for example a drugs or alcohol service) again highlighting the complexity of

addiction

Concern for the safety or wellbeing of the problem gambler or family members (65) is

the most common reason affected others seek advice and support Over half (57) of

affected others report not knowing how to deal with gambling and its impacts as the

reason for seeking help A similar proportion (54) sought advice due to a relationship

or family being affected by gambling or due to mental health problems (51) Though a

lower significant proportion (34) report being prompted by a severe negative impact

such as risk of losing employment risk of losing their home or criminal proceedings

YouGov concluded that there is an evident demand for advice and support among

affected others with almost half (48) reporting a need for such help whether for

themselves their spouse or partner a family member friend or colleague

The most reported barrier to seeking advice or support was that the person does not

consider their gambling to be a problem (43) The next most common reason is the

belief that gambling treatment would not be helpful or be effective (40) A further 14

reported feeling embarrassed or ashamed to ask for advice or support or that they would

not want others to find out socially or professionally

62 Treatment

Introduction

This section draws on published reports from Gambleaware The National Gambling

Treatment Service (NGTS) is a network of organisations providing treatment and

support for people experiencing gambling-related harms It is free to access across

England Scotland and Wales GambleAware commissions the NGTS and it is funded

through voluntary contributions from the gambling industry

GambleAware publish annual statistics (18) covering the treatment activity of the NGTS

and this is the source of the following summary The annual statistics cover treatment

provided by GamCare and its partner network Gordon Moody Associates and the

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

91

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) This represents most of the treatment provision for gambling in the UK although

there are other providers emerging in the public sector and third sector as a result of

policy changes in England Scotland and Wales23

Treatment provided (19)

GamCare offers

bull online treatment supported by regular contact with a therapist that people can access

at a time and place convenient for them over the course of 8 weeks

bull one-to-one in person online and telephone therapeutic support and treatment for

people with gambling problems as well as affected others

bull group based gambling recovery courses delivered face-to-face or online for between

6 to 8 weeks

bull the National Gambling Helpline which provides immediate telephone and online live

chat support and referral into the treatment service

bull information and advice via their website moderated forums and online group

chatrooms24

Gordon Moody Association offers

bull two specialist residential treatment centres providing an intensive programme for men

with a gambling addiction over a period of 14 weeks

bull specialist relapse prevention housing for people who have completed the treatment

programmes but need additional recovery support

bull retreat and counselling programmes for women or men-only groups that combine

short residential stays with at-home counselling support

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) offers treatment for gambling problems This treatment is especially for people

bull with more severe addictions

bull with co-morbid mental and physical health conditions

bull with impaired social functioning

bull who may come to treatment with more risk such as risk of suicide

23 The NHS Northern Gambling Service provided by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

has not been open for one full reporting year at time of publication So it is not included in the annual

statistics for 2019 to 2020 Further regional NHS led clinics are being established as part of the NHS Long

Term Plan 24 Data from these services are not included in the annual statistics publication

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

92

GambleAware funded treatment providers are required to submit quarterly datasets in a

standardised format The annual statistics publication presents the analysis of these

submissions As of 2020 there is an additional service as part of the NGTS However

this new service the NHS Northern Gambling Service was not operational in 2019 to

2020 so we have concentrated on the 3 service providers for which there is published

data available

Socio-demographic profile of people in treatment

The NGTS treated just over 9000 people in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This is

the most people treated since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016 (5909) For reference

this review has previously estimated there to be around 245600 problem gamblers in

England (according to PGSI or DSM-IV) Almost a quarter (23) of people treated in

2019 to 2020 had been seen before by the service

Most people treated were gamblers (84) while 13 of referrals related to affected

others This is less than the estimate of affected others among the problem gambling

population (20) suggesting a certain level of unmet need for this group As we can

expect from previous sections of this review affected others were more likely to be

women

Most people treated were men (75) and a greater proportion are from the younger age

groups This corresponds to the prevalence of problem gambling in the population

However there has been an overall small increase in the proportion of women being

treated increasing from 19 in 2015 to 2016 to 25 in 2019 to 2020

Table 57 Age and sex of people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Age group lt20 ()

20-24 ()

25-29 ()

30-34 ()

35-39 ()

40-44 ()

45-49 ()

50-54 ()

55-59 ()

60+ ()

Men 12 112 216 217 157 95 75 52 34 30

Women 05 48 136 159 161 120 85 104 90 91

All people in treatment

10 96 196 202 158 101 78 65 48 45

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Most people in treatment were employed (75) with the next most reported category

being unemployed (9) Given the unemployment rate in the UK was around 4 in

2019 we can expect a higher proportion of people in treatment to be unemployed given

previous findings that problem gambling is highest in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

93

On average people in treatment reported problem gambling starting at the age of 24

years although this was highly variable Three-quarters reported problem gambling

starting by the age of 32 years and one-quarter by the age of 19 years At the point of

coming to treatment services people had typically been problem gambling for an

average of 10 years

Gambling profile of people in treatment

A large proportion of people in treatment (58) participated online for their primary

gambling activity followed by bookmakers (27) No other locations were used by more

than 10 of people in treatment For online activities gambling on casino slots was the

most common activity (38) followed by sporting events (37) and casino table games

(27) For bookmakers gaming machines were the most common form of gambling

(53) followed by sporting events (31) and horse racing (24)

The most notable difference in gambling activity for peopl in treatment between 2015 to

2016 and 2019 to 2020 has been the increase in online gambling (from 57 to 69)

This has happened alongside the reduction in the proportion using bookmakers (from

56 to 38)

About 12 of people in treatment had suffered a job loss as a result of their gambling

and 26 had suffered a relationship loss through their gambling Almost a third (29) of

people in treatment had no debt due to gambling at the time of assessment But a

quarter had debts up to pound5000 and 45 had debts over pound5000 or were bankrupt or in

an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA)

Over half of people in treatment (54) spent up to pound100 per day gambling in the 30 days

before assessment The NGST annual statistics also found

bull 16 spent between pound100 and pound200

bull 18 spent between pound200 and pound500

bull 15 spent over pound500

On average (mean) people in treatment reported spending pound2102 on gambling in the

30 days before assessment

Average (mean) money spent on gambling days was highest among people using

casinos (pound544) and online services (pound435) The mean spend can be affected by outliers

(extreme individual values) but even using the median people using casinos still had the

highest average daily spend (pound200) Average monthly spend was again very high for

people using casinos followed by adult entertainment centres and online services

However monthly spend was also high for bookmakers and bingo halls especially

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

94

compared to daily spend The report suggests that using these services often

contributes to a high monthly spend

Table 58 Average money spent on gambling by people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Average spend per gambling

day (pound) Average spend in past

month (pound)

Mean Median Mean Median

Bookmakers 295 100 1785 1000

Bingo hall 210 100 1007 775

Casino 544 200 2973 1000

Live events 170 45 974 600

Adult entertainment centre

241 100 2807 640

Family entertainment centre

136 100 737 600

Pub 212 100 1519 700

Online 435 100 2145 1000

Miscellaneous 324 100 1467 575

Private members club 160 50 1777 700

Other 265 52 2038 600

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Access and outcomes

The overwhelming majority of people (902) self-referred to the NGTS This was

distantly followed by prisons (29) other service or agency (27) and GPs (15)

For people treated during 2019 to 2020 50 were seen within 3 days and 75 within 8

days Waiting times for residential services were higher with 50 of people seen within

3 and a half months

During 2019 to 2020 there was an average of 7 appointments per person and this was

similar for both problem gamblers and affected others Treatment lasted on average 8

weeks with a quarter of people receiving treatment for 3 weeks or less Half of all people

receiving treatment did so for between 3 and 15 weeks and a quarter received treatment

for over 15 weeks Treatment was slightly shorter for affected others and for those in

residential centres was generally longer (an average of 13 weeks)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

95

Between 2015 to 2016 and 2019 to 2020 the proportion of people completing treatment

increased from 59 to 69 while the proportion dropping out of treatment decreased

from 35 to 24 Affected others were more likely to complete treatment than problem

gamblers (80 compared to 66) Overall women were more likely to complete

treatment than men but when limited to just problem gamblers female problem

gamblers were slightly less likely to complete treatment (64 compared to 67 of male

problem gamblers) Also people who were unemployed were considerably more likely

than the average to drop out of treatment (32) and less likely to complete treatment

(61)

As expected almost all (94) people receiving treatment were defined as a problem

gambler according to PGSI The mean PGSI score for people in treatment was 20

markedly higher than the threshold of 8 required for the problem gambler definition

During 2019 to 2020 this proportion had reduced to 40 while PGSI scores had

improved for most people in treatment (75) Those defined as problem gamblers were

most likely to improve by 10 to 18 points (31) with a further 26 improving by 20 to 27

points

63 Attitudes and influences

Introduction

The Gambling Commission has been tracking public perceptions of gambling since

2010 These attitudes and what influences gambling behaviours are the subject of this

section The primary source is the Gambling Commission annual report series

lsquoGambling participation behaviour awareness and attitudesrsquo (20) The Gambling

Commission collects data via a combination of telephone and online surveys This is

supplemented by tables from the HSE

The telephone survey provides the main measure of past 4 week gambling participation

with waves conducted quarterly in March June September and December to reduce

the effect of seasonal variations in gambling behaviour The Gambling Commission

conducts about 1000 interviews each quarter from a survey sample generated through

Random Digit Dialling (RDD)25 of Great Britain phone numbers The sample is subject to

quotas to ensure it is as nationally representative as possible Respondents are

screened to ensure they are 16 or over and fit in remaining unfilled quotas Quotas are

set based on age sex religion and social grade Data is weighted to be representative

25 Random Digit Dialling (RDD) is a method for sampling of telephone surveys which involves the random generation

of telephone numbers

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

96

of the adult population with weights set based on the National Readership Survey (a

face-to-face random probability sample)

The Gambling Commission uses the online survey to monitor online gambling

behaviour The survey was launched after the government introduced regulation of

overseas gambling companies transacting with customers in Great Britain (in-line with

the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014) The online survey sample is

sourced through a panel and the sample is subject to quotas in-line with those used for

the telephone survey Also data is weighted for analysis in-line with the methods used

for the telephone survey

Public perception of gambling

Considering the public perception of gambling back to 2010 gamblersrsquo attitudes are more positive than non-gamblers but the gap has reduced significantly in recent years (Figure 5) The proportion of gamblers and non-gamblers who think that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted has reduced gradually over the past 10 years

Figure 5 Respondents who agree that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted Great Britain 2010 to 2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

All respondents Gambled in past 12 months

Not gambled in past 12 months

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

97

The views of gamblers were also sought on the most important factors when selecting a

company to gamble with The most important factor was having the best odds (26)

followed by the company having

bull a fair and trustworthy reputation (24)

bull bonus offers (15)

bull a recognisable brand name (14)

The Gambling Commission survey asked respondents about a series of attitudinal

statements taken from the Attitudes Towards Gambling Scale (ATGS-8) (a validated

scale to assess gambling attitudes among the general population originally developed

for the 2007 BGPS) From this 82 of respondents in 2019 agreed that there were

currently too many opportunities for gambling (a 3 increase from 2018) while 73

agreed that gambling is dangerous for family life In 2019 we also saw an increase in

the proportion saying that gambling should be discouraged (up to 62 from 58 in

2018) and a significant reduction in respondents agreeing that ldquogambling livens up liferdquo

(down to 26 from 28 in 2018)

Awareness of gambling

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey asks whether gamblers

follow a gambling company on social media Overall 23 of respondents followed a

gambling company on either Facebook Twitter YouTube Snapchat or Instagram in

2019 Facebook (17) was the most popular social media platform in which gamblers

follow gambling companies and despite a decrease over recent years this has been the

case since 2015 This is followed by

bull Twitter (8)

bull YouTube (6)

bull Instagram (5)

bull Snapchat (2)

These figures are consistent with the Adultrsquos Media Use and Attitudes Report (21) which

identifies Facebook as the most popular social media platform with use decreasing since

2017

Overall 86 of respondents have ever seen or heard any gambling advertisements and

82 have ever seen or heard any gambling sponsorship A higher proportion of men

(89) than women (83) have seen or heard gambling advertisements Also compared

to the 2018 survey we saw a decrease in the visibility of gambling sponsorships among

those aged 25 to 34 years (77 in 2019 compared to 82 in 2018)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

98

Gambling management tools

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey also asks about wider issues

of self-exclusion and gambling management tools

If a gambler considers themselves to be spending too much time or money gambling

either online or in person they can request to be self-excluded from a gambling

company or can self-exclude from multiple operators Figure 6 shows the percentage of

gamblers who have self-excluded from gambling activities through a gambling

management tool and whether they were aware of these tools In 2019 5 of gamblers

have ever self-excluded which is a slight reduction from 6 in the previous 4 years The

proportion The proportion of gamblers who had not self-excluded but were aware of

self-exclusion increased steadily from 29 in 2015 to 42 in 2019 The proportion of

gamblers who were not aware of self-exclusion reduced from 65 in 2015 53 in 2019

Figure 6 Gamblersrsquo awareness and use of self-exclusion Great Britain 2015-2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Among gamblers in 2019 more men (6) have self-excluded than women (4) while

those aged 25 to 34 have the highest self-exclusion rates (9) Other management

tools used were

bull setting financial limits (9)

6 6 6 6 5

2937 35

41 42

6557 58

53 53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Self-excluded Not self-excluded but aware Not self-excluded and not aware

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

99

bull time out (3)

bull reality check (3)

bull exclusion by product (2)

Table 59 Use and awareness of gambling management tools Great Britain 2019

Self-exclusion

() Exclusion by product ()

Time out ()

Financial limits ()

Reality check ()

Used 5 2 3 9 3

Aware but not used

42 24 34 49 27

Not aware 53 74 63 42 70

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Compared to the previous year the Gambling Commission reported an increase in the

proportion of respondents seeing information about where to seek help to control

gambling (40) in 2019 They also reported a decrease in respondents seeing

information on whether a machine is random or compensated26 (6)

Overall 20 of gamblers have ever read the terms and conditions provided by a

gambling operator The proportion of respondents who have not read terms and

conditions but were aware they are available was 62 while 18 were not aware terms

and conditions are available Women (22) and those aged 65 or over (30) were

more likely to be unaware of terms and conditions

64 Children and young people

Introduction

This section focuses on gambling prevalence among children and young people The

legal gambling age in the UK is 18 and this includes both gambling in person and

online Historically the exception was the National Lottery but the government plans to

26 All gambling machines have a return to player rate that dictates how frequently they are likely to pay

out For random machines and online slots this is typically based on a random number generator

meaning it is totally random whether the machine hits this number and pays out In contrast the likelihood

of a compensated machine paying out is based on previous plays The most common example is a fruit

machine which is more likely to pay out the more money it has taken (this is necessary as they can only

physically hold a certain number of coins)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

100

raise this from 16 to 18 no later than October 2021 following the announcement of the

Review of the Gambling Act 2005 (22)

The primary source used is the Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and

Gambling Survey A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo (23) We

supplement this with information from the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) report

lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) as well as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) (25)

The Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey A research

study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo is conducted as part of Ipsos MORIrsquos

annual Young People Omnibus (YPO) and examines gambling behaviours such as

where young people gamble and with whom perceptions of gambling and awareness of

gambling advertising The survey also asks a series of questions relating to potential

issues associated with gambling and uses the DSM-IV-MR-J2 problem gambling screen

to classify gamblers as low risk moderate risk or problem gamblers The survey is

conducted in schools with pupils completing online self-completion surveys in class

Data is weighted by sex age and region

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo used a mixed methods approach comprising of a

series of 6 focus groups with a total of 79 young people across England Scotland and

Wales It also included a survey conducted through Survey Monkey and promoted

through social media which 1025 young people responded to The ethnicity and

geographical region of the respondents was fairly representative of the UK population

However most take-up in the survey was by boys (83) which is not representative of

the general population That said the authors quote studies that have found boys to

have significantly higher participation rates in games most heavily associated with loot

boxes and skin betting such as the FIFA series and Fortnite

ALSPAC is a longitudinal study of young peoplesrsquo gambling between 17 and 24 years

using a contemporary UK cohort the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) When the children were aged 6 in 1997 to 1998 their parents completed the

South Oaks Gambling Screen Then when aged 18 the parents completed the PGSI

Between 2008 and 2018 all young people still registered with the ALSPAC (10155)

were invited to take part and complete a gambling frequency survey which included

PGSI The sample sizes completing the gambling surveys were

bull 3757 at age 17

bull 4340 at age 20

bull 4345 at age 24

Depression anxiety and wellbeing scores and drug and alcohol use were also

collected by self-completion questionnaires The main strength of this report is its use of

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

101

the large ALSPAC cohort which has collected detailed data for over 25 years The main

limitation is the missing data with less than half of the whole ALSPAC cohort completing

the gambling surveys Non-responders to the gambling surveys when compared to

ALSPAC responders overall were more likely to be male and from more deprived social

backgrounds with mothers with lower educational levels There was also a significant

gender bias with the final sample comprising 58 females As males were more likely

to engage in gambling activity this gender bias will have resulted in an under-estimate

of gambling prevalence and associated characteristics (26)

A main limitation of all sources used in this section is a lack of general health data We

acknowledged this in the protocol of this review and represents a gap in the data

available for children young people and gambling

Gambling participation

The proportion of 11 to 16-year-old children who have spent their own money on any gambling activity in the last 7 days has been decreasing since 2011 from 23 to 11 in 2019 (Figure 7) This decrease follows the trend of any gambling in the last 12 months which has reduced from 39 in 2018 to 36 in 201927 We should view this reduction in the context of declining rates of drinking smoking and drug-taking in children and young people Though poor diet remains an issue obesity rates are also falling and levels of activity increasing largely through increased activity at school (27)

Nearly double the number of boys (13) reported participating in any gambling activity

in the past 7 days than girls (7) Participation was higher in older children (12 of 14

to 16 year olds compared to 9 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Table 60 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by age and sex Great Britain 2019

11

year olds

12 year olds

13 year olds

14 year olds

15 year olds

16 year olds

Boys aged 11-16

Girls aged 11-16

Total aged 11-16

Has played a National Lottery game in past 7 days

7 3 4 2 3 9 5 2 4

Has played any gambling game in the past 7 days

14 8 9 11 11 16 13 7 11

27 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 37 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19

pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

102

Source Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain 2019

The most common gambling activities for 11 to 16-year-old children in the past 7 days

were placing a private bet for money (5) and playing fruit or slot (electronic gaming)

machines (4) A consistent finding in the report series is that fruit and slot (electronic

gaming) machines (mentioned by 23 of respondents who have gambled) was the first

experience of gambling The main reason for gambling given was ldquobecause itrsquos funrdquo

(55) while among children who do not gamble the main reason given was that it is

illegal and they are too young to take part (56)

National Lottery participation in the past 7 days among 11 to 15 year olds was at its

lowest reported level in 2019 Figure 7 shows that the proportion of 11 to 15 year olds

who have played National Lottery games in the past week has decreased over time

from 10 in 2011 to 4 in 2019

Figure 7 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by activity Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling Commission lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo 2019

Scratchcards remained the most common National Lottery product among children

under 16 who have ever played (mentioned by 10) compared with

bull Lotto the main National Lottery draw (6)

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Any gambling game Any National Lottery game

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

103

bull National Lottery online instant win games (4)

bull other National Lottery games (5)

Most under 16s who bought a National Lottery product were in the company of a parent

or guardian (67) and report that the parent typically pays at the till (73) The report

concludes that although under 16s play the National Lottery for a range of reasons the

influence of parents and family members was as important as having fun

On average 11 to 16 year olds who had gambled in the past 7 days spent pound17 The

overall amount of money this group was given as pocket money birthday money or

money earnt over the same period was pound34

The rates of gambling reported in the past week (11) were lower than drinking alcohol

(16) but higher than using e-cigarettes (7) smoking tobacco cigarettes (6) or

taking illegal drugs (5) Since 2017 the series has seen a potential relationship

between these other harmful activities and gambling such that those who have spent

their own money on gambling in the past 7 days were also more likely to have drank

alcohol (41) taken drugs (21) or smoked either a tobacco cigarette (25) or an e-

cigarette (27) compared with children who had not gambled

Online gambling and gaming

Participation in online gambling among children in the last 7 days compared with in

person gambling was low (3) particularly in the context of the time young people

spend online (the series shows how chatting online with friends and using social media

are 2 of the most popular spare time activities for this age group) Given the low rate of

participation in online gambling it is difficult to draw conclusions across the report series

Any past participation in online gambling was higher at 12 with differences across age

and sex showing the same pattern seen for overall gambling Boys (16) were more

likely than girls (8) to have ever played an online gambling-style game Participation

was higher in older children compared to younger children (14 of 14 to 16 year olds

compared to 10 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Among children who have ever played online gambling-style games fruit and slot

(electronic gaming) machines were most commonly mentioned (30) followed by casino

games such as

bull roulette or blackjack (26)

bull poker games (24)

bull bingo (21)

This was consistent with previous surveys Almost half (47) of children who play online

gambling-style games do so via apps Of these 26 were apps unrelated to social

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

104

networking sites 18 were via Facebook and 17 were free demo games via

gambling apps

Half (52) of 11 to 16 year olds were aware of in-game items (for example weapons

power-ups and tokens) Awareness of in-game items was more common in boys (66)

than girls (37) Of these children 44 had paid money for loot boxes crates or packs

to get in-game items within the game theyrsquore playing In most cases the money used for

loot boxes crates or packs comes from money they had received as a birthday or

Christmas present or from pocket money

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) explored the relationship between gambling

and video games This report was undertaken to explore concerns that these activities

introduce young people to gambling before they have been able to develop strategies to

avoid gambling-related harms

The RSPH report states that around 93 of young people regularly play video games

and that there is a growing concern around loot boxes and skin betting28 The report

found that in the past 7 days twice as many 11 to 14 year olds had bought loot boxes

than 22 to 24 year olds and almost twice as many had taken part in skin betting Also

children under 18 were significantly less likely than older respondents to classify these

activities as gambling and less likely to associate gambling harms with an increased risk

of health issues such as anxiety and alcohol consumption Finally only 25 of children

aged 11 to 14 years strongly support classifying loot boxes as gambling compared to

73 of those aged 22 to 24 years

You should note with reference to the caveats given at the start of this section that

although this source allows us to include information on this new topic the sampling

design it is not as robust as the lsquoGambling Commission Young People and Gambling

Survey 2019rsquo

Problem gambling

In 2019 17 of 11 to 16 year olds were classified as problem gamblers29 and 27 as

at-risk gamblers (as defined by the youth-adapted problem gambling screen DSM-IV-

28 Loot boxes are purchasable rewards that are uncertain at the time of purchase They include cosmetics such as new lsquoskinsrsquo for a character or they can be functional providing an advantage within the game As they cost money to buy and there is an element of chance involved it has led to concerns that they are a form of gambling On sites external to the game itself players can trade sell or bet on their skins for money ndash this is skin betting The Gambling Commissionrsquos view on loot boxes skin betting and related issues is set on in the position paper published March 2017 29 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 19 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

105

MR-J screen) These figures have remained stable compared to the previous year

However it is important to note that problem gambling prevalence in children and young

people from this source is higher than problem gambling prevalence in adults as

reported in the HSE In reality this is perhaps unlikely to be the case suggesting the

DSM-IV as used here may result in an overestimation

There was a higher proportion of boys at risk (38) and problem gamblers (20) than

girls at risk (16) and problem gamblers (07) This gender difference was consistent

with the higher prevalence seen in boys throughout the survey as well as what we see in

adult problem gambling from the HSE and other sources referenced throughout this

report

Another important aspect of gambling for public health not included in the HSE is the

harmful impact on family members The BGPS asks 2 questions about this issue The

first asked whether the respondentrsquos parents or guardians had ever regularly gambled If

so the respondent was asked to report whether they felt that either of their parents or

guardians had ever had a problem with their gambling Problem gambling prevalence

was significantly higher among respondents whose parents gambled regularly (16)

than for those whose parents did not (07) Also 50 of respondents who reported

having a parent with a gambling problem were themselves problem gamblers compared

with 10 of those who reported that although their parents regularly gambled they did

not have a problem with their gambling

Attitudes and influences

Most young people believe gambling to be dangerous (59) and feel well informed

about the issue (60) Also 7 agree that most people their age gamble 11 agree it

is OK for someone their age to gamble to see what itrsquos like and 7 agree it is OK for

someone their age to gamble once a week Consistent with previous surveys it is

interesting to note that despite the higher gambling prevalence in boys compared to

girls both show a similar level of agreement that gambling is dangerous (60 of boys

and 59 of girls)

Exposure to advertising was high among children and young people with 69 reporting

to have seen or heard some form of gambling advertisements or sponsorship most

commonly via television Boys (39) were more likely than girls (28) to report seeing

or hearing a gambling advert about a sports event or a betting company (34 of boys

compared to 21 of girls) Girls (47) were more likely than boys (34) to remember

the last advert they saw about a National Lottery based game or bingo (33 of girls

compared to 20 of boys) Also just over one in 10 (12) follow gambling companies

on social media while 11 had received direct marketing from gambling companies

Half (50) of young people have been spoken to about the potential problems that

gambling can lead to and 74 say they know who to go to for help if they had problems

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

106

related to gambling Children were most likely to have been spoken to about the

potential problems with gambling by their parents or guardians (34) followed by a

teacher (19)

These findings also highlight how parents or guardians were typically present when a

young person gambles (67 of those who have ever spent money on gambling) but are

also recognised as the first contact for help if they were to have problems with gambling

(53) Most young people (57) say their family would discourage them from gambling

if they started or found out but 23 report that their parents or guardians set rules about

gambling

A recent release from ALSPAC (25) measured young peoplersquos gambling at age 17 20

and 24 (3 points of transition from adolescence to adulthood) and revealed that regular

weekly gamblers had developed habits and patterns of play by 20 years of age Playing

the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most

common forms of gambling reported but as the young people got older there was a

significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to 35 at age 20

and 47 at age 24 There was also an increase seen among women but not as steep

(from 08 at age 17 to 4 at age 20 and 11 at age 24) The study shows how young

people who gamble regularly were more likely to

bull have parents who gambled regularly

bull have high social media usage

bull have been regular players of video games when younger

Also regular gamblers had lower wellbeing scores and were at least twice as likely to

smoke cigarettes daily and consume alcohol weekly Finally a small minority (6 to 7)

of men demonstrated problem gambling behaviours associated with poor mental health

and wellbeing involvement in crime and potentially harmful use of drugs and alcohol

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

107

7 Discussion

Over half of the population take part in gambling (245 million people in England)

Participation in the National Lottery declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However

participation in other gambling activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015

before falling back to 40 in the most recent survey Online gambling (excluding the

National Lottery) has increased from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

The trend in problem gambling between 2012 and 2018 has also reduced accounting

for 05 of the population in 2018 (245600 people in England) As numbers are very

small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with previous years

rather than representative of a real decline However low risk gambling is increasing

and a cause for concern

The prevention paradox states that on a health continuum ndash alcohol being the typical

example ndash the larger volume of harm is associated with people lower on the continuum

because there are more of them It is unclear from the data available whether problem

gambling is actually declining but low risk gambling does appear to be increasing So it

is difficult to say whether gambling risk and the associated harms have increased or

decreased overall The HSE gambling questionnaire is not detailed enough about the

harms themselves and so we cannot draw a clear conclusion based on the quantitative

data presented here This is a limitation of this study and in the data currently available

for this topic area

Problem moderate risk and low risk gambling are all associated with men in the younger

age groups Demographic factors particularly sex appear more significant in predicting

at-risk gambling behaviour than economic factors such as income employment and

relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling

than poor physical health and negative health behaviours with the exception of alcohol

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were affected others Among

children playing the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends

were the most common forms of gambling reported But as the young people got older

there was a significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to

35 at age 20 and 47 at age 24

Figures presented do not cover the period of the COVID-19 pandemic with the most

recent published data from the primary data source covering 2018 We have published a

separate evidence review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling It is important

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

108

to note that some findings particularly for problem gambling may be deemed

inconclusive because of the limited sample size

71 Strengths and limitations

The main strength of the findings of this report comes from the HSE The HSE is a

primary resource used to monitor the nationrsquos health and care It is a robust transparent

detailed widely used and well-respected data source Including the gambling

questionnaire allows us to compare gambling with a range of other health behaviours

and conditions However while sample size is adequate for analysing a range of topics

in England we had to combine several survey years at times in this report In particular

we had to combine data when looking at more detailed breakdowns Though it is the

most robust source available for estimating problem gambling in England the combined

dataset only included around 150 problem gamblers (according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI)

The main limitations of this report come from relying on alternative sources of previously

published data to meet aspects of the objectives not fully met by the HSE The HSE

does not ask questions about

bull time spent on gambling

bull money spent on gambling

bull affected others

bull attitudes towards gambling

bull the gambling behaviours of children and young people

The sources used are the best available for quantitative gambling data on these topics

but in general they lack the data quality of the HSE They also vary considerably in

robustness and how representative they are of the national population Finally except

for ALSPAC referenced in this report there is no longitudinal gambling data source

currently available The addition of longitudinal data would have contributed significantly

to the objectives of this report by allowing us to see important changes in the gambling

behaviours of individuals over time As a relatively new field in public health we hope

that more and better-quality quantitative gambling data will become available as more

research is carried out

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

109

8 References

1 Department of Health and Social Care PHE remit letter 2018 to 2019 Online 2018 2 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Government response to the consultation

on proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures Online 2018

3 Blank L Baxter S Buckley Woods H Goyder E Interventions to reduce public health burden of gambling related harms A mapping review of the international evidence Lancet Public Health 2021 Volume 6

4 Public Health England Gambling-related harms evidence review scope Online 2020 5 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling Online 2019 6 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Online 2018 7 UK Data Service Health Survey for England Online 2020 8 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes

annual report 2020 9 The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) development and UK

validation Health Qual Life Outcomes Tennant R Hiller L Fishwick R Platt S and S Joseph and others 2007 pages 1-13

10 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2016 Well-being and mental health Online 2017 11 David P Goldberg and Paul Williams User Guide to the General Health Questionnaire

Windsor NFER-NELSON 1988 12 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Adult health related behaviours Online

2019 13 Department of Health and Social Care UK Chief Medical Officers Low Risk Drinking

Guidelines Online 2016 14 Gambling Commission Problem gambling vs gambling-related harms Online 2020 15 NatCen British Gambling Prevalence Survey Online 2010 16 NatCen Treatment Needs and Gap Analysis in Great Britain Synthesis of findings from a

programme of studies Online 2020 17 London School of Economics An assessment of the accuracy of survey estimates of the

prevalence of problem gambling in the United Kingdom Online 2020 18 BeGambleAware Annual Statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great

Britain) Online 2020 19 BeGambleAware National Gambling Treatment Service Online 2020 20 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and

attitudes Annual Report Online 2020 21 Ofcom Adults Media Use and Attitudes Report Online 2019 22 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Review of the Gambling Act 2005

Online 2020 23 Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study

among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain Online 2019 24 Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) Skins in the game Online 2019 25 University of Bristol Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Online 2019 26 Emond A Griffiths M and L Hollen A longitudinal study of gambling in late adolescence

and early adulthood Follow-up assessment at 24 years Online 2019 27 The Kings Fund Healthy behaviours Future trends Online 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

110

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority

Introduction

Table 61 shows the prevalence of overall gambling participation in the last 12 months by

upper tier local authority (UTLA) as illustrated in Figure 4 of the main report Due to

sample size the authorities of Inner and Outer London have been grouped together

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

Results

Variation in gambling participation is evident by UTLA Discounting Rutland which has

wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a rate of gambling participation that

is statistically significantly higher than average for England The top 5 UTLAs in England

with the highest levels of gambling participation were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

111

Table 61 Gambling participation in the last 12 months by upper tier local authority England 2012 2015 2016 2018

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000001 Hartlepool 707 596 798

E06000002 Middlesbrough 612 492 720

E06000003 Redcar and Cleveland

667 561 758

E06000004 Stockton-on-Tees 726 637 799

E06000005 Darlington 700 575 801

E06000006 Halton 582 450 703

E06000007 Warrington 525 428 621

E06000008 Blackburn with

Darwen 571 441 692

E06000009 Blackpool 690 562 794

E06000010 Kingston upon Hull 654 567 731

E06000011 East Riding of

Yorkshire 547 464 627

E06000012 North East

Lincolnshire 640 527 739

E06000013 North Lincolnshire 683 587 766

E06000014 York 500 409 591

E06000015 Derby 633 539 718

E06000016 Leicester 476 397 557

E06000017 Rutland 833 436 970

E06000018 Nottingham 527 447 605

E06000019 Herefordshire 600 483 707

E06000020 Telford and Wrekin 711 614 792

E06000021 Stoke-on-Trent 615 535 689

E06000022 Bath and North East

Somerset 589 489 683

E06000023 Bristol 547 476 616

E06000024 North Somerset 606 510 694

E06000025 South

Gloucestershire 566 471 656

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

112

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000026 Plymouth 675 587 752

E06000027 Torbay 550 425 669

E06000030 Swindon 583 483 677

E06000031 Peterborough 617 516 709

E06000032 Luton 646 548 734

E06000033 Southend-on-Sea 598 489 697

E06000034 Thurrock 690 585 779

E06000035 Medway 500 424 576

E06000036 Bracknell Forest 681 566 777

E06000037 West Berkshire 575 466 677

E06000038 Reading 549 441 652

E06000039 Slough 349 257 454

E06000040 Windsor and Maidenhead

469 364 577

E06000041 Wokingham 595 485 696

E06000042 Milton Keynes 654 570 730

E06000043 Brighton and Hove 500 399 601

E06000044 Portsmouth 701 598 787

E06000045 Southampton 710 611 792

E06000046 Isle of Wight 675 568 766

E06000047 County Durham 687 630 738

E06000049 Cheshire East 519 452 586

E06000050 Cheshire West and

Chester 627 561 688

E06000051 Shropshire 653 587 713

E06000052 Cornwall 630 583 673

E06000054 Wiltshire 603 544 659

E06000055 Bedford 569 448 682

E06000056 Central Bedfordshire 620 531 701

E06000057 Northumberland 627 552 697

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

113

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000058 Bournemouth

Christchurch and Poole

614 546 677

E06000059 Dorset 588 520 654

E08000001 Bolton 603 533 669

E08000002 Bury 602 512 685

E08000003 Manchester 453 395 512

E08000004 Oldham 624 544 698

E08000005 Rochdale 614 527 694

E08000006 Salford 551 457 642

E08000007 Stockport 549 480 615

E08000008 Tameside 609 516 695

E08000009 Trafford 558 458 654

E08000010 Wigan 622 538 700

E08000011 Knowsley 786 676 866

E08000012 Liverpool 683 612 746

E08000013 St Helens 596 492 691

E08000014 Sefton 650 567 724

E08000015 Wirral 665 591 731

E08000016 Barnsley 734 644 808

E08000017 Doncaster 703 631 766

E08000018 Rotherham 729 633 808

E08000019 Sheffield 595 544 643

E08000021 Newcastle upon Tyne 558 480 634

E08000022 North Tyneside 759 635 850

E08000023 South Tyneside 692 583 784

E08000024 Sunderland 664 584 736

E08000025 Birmingham 437 393 481

E08000026 Coventry 549 479 618

E08000027 Dudley 682 598 755

E08000028 Sandwell 630 536 715

E08000029 Solihull 505 412 597

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

114

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E08000030 Walsall 558 469 644

E08000031 Wolverhampton 613 500 715

E08000032 Bradford 490 421 559

E08000033 Calderdale 707 601 795

E08000034 Kirklees 563 502 621

E08000035 Leeds 635 586 682

E08000036 Wakefield 702 629 766

E08000037 Gateshead 635 536 725

E10000002 Buckinghamshire 533 474 592

E10000003 Cambridgeshire 587 537 634

E10000006 Cumbria 688 626 743

E10000007 Derbyshire 631 585 675

E10000008 Devon 542 496 587

E10000011 East Sussex 532 470 593

E10000012 Essex 620 583 655

E10000013 Gloucestershire 635 579 688

E10000014 Hampshire 602 565 637

E10000015 Hertfordshire 615 576 652

E10000016 Kent 607 573 641

E10000017 Lancashire 619 581 656

E10000018 Leicestershire 604 553 653

E10000019 Lincolnshire 664 617 707

E10000020 Norfolk 638 595 679

E10000021 Northamptonshire 668 617 715

E10000023 North Yorkshire 651 601 698

E10000024 Nottinghamshire 643 597 687

E10000025 Oxfordshire 636 589 680

E10000027 Somerset 589 530 645

E10000028 Staffordshire 695 655 733

E10000029 Suffolk 658 609 704

E10000030 Surrey 565 528 602

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

115

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E10000031 Warwickshire 528 476 579

E10000032 West Sussex 610 559 658

E10000034 Worcestershire 673 619 724

Inner London 502 473 530

Outer London 500 482 518

Total 593 587 598

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

116

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling

Introduction

This analysis forms one part of a larger piece of work described in the pre-registered

lsquoGambling-related harms evidence review Analysis protocolrsquo The aim is to describe the

prevalence and determinants of gambling the harms associated with gambling and the

social and economic burden of gambling This analysis seeks to address the following

research questions

1 What socio-demographic factors are associated with gambling and harmful gambling

in England

2 Is gambling and harmful gambling associated with health status

The hypotheses tested are

1 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

2 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in

England

3 Problem gambling is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

4 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

5 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

6 Problem gambling is associated with health conditions in England

Data source

The data source is a combined dataset of the HSE for years 2012 2015 2016 and

2018

The HSE is a survey of the general population aged 16 and over Participants are

selected using a random probability sample The survey design ensures that every

address in England has an equal chance of being included in the survey each year and

the results are representative of the population living in private households Gambling

specific questions are included in the 2012 2015 2016 and 2018 surveys only

Outputs have been non-response weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE

analysis since 2003 NatCen were commissioned to combine the datasets They

manage the HSE on behalf of NHS Digital NatCen calculated and appended new

combined weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

117

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc16 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb16 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication30 the problem gambling weights were

used for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening tools

The self-completion weights were used for the remaining analyses

All important information related to the data source is available in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the HSE series31 Registered users can access the un-combined

datasets via the UK Data Archive32

We used SPSS version 25 software for all statistical analysis

Variables

We selected the variables below as they were of the most interest to the research aims

of the study within the limitations of the data available The independent variables are

those measuring the main socio-demographic and health concepts reported in the HSE

series Initially only Anyacty and PROBGAM as dependent variables were within scope

However following feedback from the expert reference group associated with the wider

project we agreed that a measure of any level of risk (lsquoharmful gamblingrsquo) should be

included if feasible A common proxy from HSE and Gambling Commission outputs is to

use a PGSI score of 1 or more to describe any level of gambling risk The analysis

follows this precedent

Table 62 Dependent gambling variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

Anyacty Whether spent any money on gambling in last 12 months Categorical

PGSI_atrisk Respondents with a PGSI score of 1 or more Categorical

PROBGAM Whether a problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

Categorical

30 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling 31 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 32 UK Data Service (2020) Health Survey for England

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

118

Table 63 Independent socio-demographic variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

ag16g10 Age 16 to 75 in 10-year age bands Categorical

Sex Gender Categorical

Origin2 Grouped ethnicity (White Black Asian Mixed Other) Categorical

Eqv3 Equivalised income tertiles (lowest middle highest) Ordinal

TopQual4 Highest educational qualification (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent below degree no qualification)

Ordinal

Employment_r Recoded variable of Activb2activity status of previous week (in education paid employmentself-employed unemployed retired looking after homefamily other)

Categorical

Qimd Quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score (2010 IMD for 2012 and 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018)

Ordinal

Gor1 Government Office Region Categorical

Table 64 Independent health-related variables of interest

Variable name

Variable label Measure

Genhelf2 Self-assessed general health grouped (very goodgood fair badvery bad)

Ordinal

WemwbsQ WEMWBS score quintiles Ordinal

LifeSatG LifeSatG Life satisfaction (low medium high very high) Ordinal

GHQg2 GHQ score group (0 1-3 4+) Ordinal

BMIlvg3 BMI group (not overweight or obese overweight obese) Categorical

Totalwug Alcohol units per week grouped Categorical

Cignow Current smoker Categorical

Missing data

Missing data was coded as such in the source dataset and was excluded as appropriate

from statistical analysis

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

119

Results

Step 1 Bivariate analysis

For step 1 of this pre-registered analysis a series of chi-squared tests were conducted

to refute the null hypothesis This was that the variables of interest are independent of

the 3 dependent gambling variables33

All 3 dependent variables are categorical as are most of the independent variables of

interest Chi-square was also used to test the ordinal variables against the categorical

dependents while acknowledging that the test will treat both as categorical The results

of such tests concerning ordinal variables are valid but there is an acceptable loss of

information in the output (for example the order of the categories) This is a common

approach and the ordinal variables are fully accounted for in step 2 of the analysis using

binary multiple logistic regression To trust the conclusions from a chi-square test the 2

standard assumptions are that

bull observations are independent

bull all expected frequencies are more than 534 for a 2x2 table (for example PROBGAM

x Sex)

These assumptions are true for the HSE combined dataset However the SPSS syntax

used tested the latter assumption as part of the output

Step 1 Findings

Tables 68 69 and 70 show the main output from the bivariate analysis

The most important figure for the hypotheses measured is the significance determined

by the chi-square test Where this is less-than 005 the null hypothesis is rejected and

the conclusion can be made that the association between the dependent and

independent is likely not due to chance variation From the outputs below this cannot be

determined for income region self-reported general health and region

The output also includes measures for Cramerrsquos-VPhi35 to quantify the correlation Chi-

square has determined whether there is a significant relationship between the variables

but is not able to quantify how important this is Cramerrsquos-V is a post-test that provides

this additional information Given the relatively large sample size of the dataset it is

33 Technically a chi-square test is a descriptive test not a modelling technique and as such there are no

dependent variables but for simplicity of language and consistency with the following description of Step 2

of this analysis the main gambling measures are here referred to as dependent 34 For larger tables no more than 20 of all cells may have an expected frequency less than 5 and all

expected frequencies more than 1 35 Phi is used where the table is 2x2

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

120

important to note that even small effects can become significant (as chance reduces

with larger sample sizes) Including this post-test suggests that this may be the case for

our study given that all measures of the correlation are low However results here do

not preclude any variables from step 2 The results of the chi-square test are used to

test whether including a variable reduces the badness-of-fit measure This means that if

chi-square is significant then the variable will be considered a significant predictor in the

equation So only income region and self-reported general health were excluded from

step 2 of the analysis and the conclusion made that the sample size may be amplifying

significance at the bivariate level

Table 65 Bivariate output for gambling participation in the last 12 months

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0121

Sex 0000 0075

Ethnicity 0000 0171

Income 0000 0087

Educational qualification 0000 0076

Employment 0000 0180

IMD 0000 0039

Region 0000 0087

Health factors

General health 0000 0042

Wellbeing 0000 0045

Life satisfaction 0000 0045

GHQ 0000 0032

BMI 0000 0096

Alcohol 0000 0227

Smoking 0000 0031

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

121

Table 66 Bivariate output for harmful gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0123

Sex 0000 0121

Ethnicity 0001 0027

Income 0831 0004

Educational qualification 0000 0044

Employment 0000 0088

IMD 0000 0050

Region 0021 0026

Health factors

General health 0577 0006

Wellbeing 0000 0092

Life satisfaction 0000 0070

GHQ 0000 0061

BMI 0330 0010

Alcohol 0000 0106

Smoking 0000 0085

Table 67 Bivariate output for problem gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0036

Sex 0000 0053

Ethnicity 0000 0042

Income 0017 0019

Educational qualification 0000 0029

Employment 0000 0052

IMD 0000 0047

Region 0000 0037

Health factors

General health 0000 0036

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

122

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Wellbeing 0000 0062

Life satisfaction 0000 0052

GHQ 0000 0053

BMI 0849 0004

Alcohol 0002 0031

Smoking 0000 0040

Step 2 Binary logistic regression

Whereas step 1 describes the significance of the relationship between the independent

variables and gambling behaviour step 2 models the determinants of and predicts the

likelihood of gambling behaviour among the study population Unlike the bivariate

analysis the aim here is to explicitly define a dependent gambling variable and make

predictions so a logistic regression is most appropriate

Because most variables and outcomes were categorical it could be argued that a log

linear analysis would be preferred for step 2 While this is an extension of the chi-square

test used in step 1 it has the disadvantage of being unintuitive and problematic to

interpret and explain So we decided to use logistic regression as it is easier to

understand than log linear analysis simple to explain to the audience of the final report

and is still a reasonable tool for the aims of this study

All standard assumptions of binary logistic regression are met by the present analysis

namely

bull dependent is dichotomous

bull one or more independent variables that can be either categorical (nominal or ordinal)

or continuous

bull independent observations

bull dependent variable is mutually exclusive

bull linear relationship between any continuous independent variables and the logit

transformation of the dependent variable

Before the regression some variables were recoded into more practical or meaningful

groups and others were dummy coded to turn certain categories into binary variables to

give them directionality (such as higher category is 1 lower category is 0) This allows

the regression to look at direction of association by comparing 2 sides

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

123

Table 68 Variables entered into the equation

Variable name Entered into

equation Recodes

ag16g10 Yes No recode

Sex Yes Recoded into dummy variable Sex_r (Male (0) Female (1))

Origin2 Yes Recoded into Ethnicity_r (White (0) Non-White (1))

Eqv3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

TopQual4 Yes No recode

Employment_r Yes Recoded into 2 dummy variables Paid_employ_dum (In paid employmentself-employed (1)) and Unemployed_dum (Unemployed (1))

Qimd Yes No recode

Gor1 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Genhelf2 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

WemwbsQ Yes No recode

LifeSatG Yes No recode

GHQg2 Yes No recode

BMIlvg3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Totalwug Yes Recoded into Alcwug_r (Never drink (0) 1-14 units (1) Over 14 to 35 units (2) Over 35 to 50 units (3) 50+ units (4))

Cignow Yes No recode

Not all questions were asked in every HSE year For example life satisfaction is

included in the 2016 and 2018 surveys while WEMWBS is included in 2012 2015 and

2016 surveys only Given the results of step 1 life satisfaction and WEMWBS are to be

included in the logistic regression This means that the analysis will be run on 2016 as

this is the most recent year that includes all variables of interest This is suitable from a

sample size perspective for Anyacty and PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling)

While there is no consensus regarding sample size for logistic regression a

conventional guideline suggests that maximum likelihood estimation with less than 100

cases is ldquoriskyrdquo 500 cases is ldquoadequaterdquo and there should be at least 10 cases per

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

124

predictor36 Others have refined this saying that 10 times the number of predictors (k)

should consider the proportion (p) of successes (n = 10kp)37 Given the results of step 1

this means we need a sample of 253 for Anyacty and 2933 for PGSI_atrisk (harmful

gambling) We used 3395 in the analysis for Anyacty and 3315 for PGSI_atrisk The

sample requirement for PROBGAM to be meaningful cannot be achieved within the

limits of the dataset used no matter the number of HSE years included

One final consideration about the sample size for the logistic regression is specific to the

calculation of logs ratios which is the output of step 2 A bias38 of up to 15 is

acknowledged for the log odds ratio when the sample size is around 100 but this

reduces close to zero when around 1000 cases are included So the current analysis

should not be unduly affected by such bias

Table 69 Sample size calculation

Model Proportion of successes (p) Number of predictors (k) Sample size (n)

Anyacty 0473743 12 253

Atrisk 0040908 12 2933

Probgam 0006601 12 18180

Step 2 Findings

The Anyacty model is poor and is not described in detail here

The first output below (Table 73) allows us to reject the null hypothesis Here this is that

the model based on the variables inputted fits equally well as the null model (Block 0 in

full output)

36 Long J (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables SAGE Publications London 37 Peduzzi P Concato J Kemper E Holford T R and A R Feinstein (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis Journal of clinical epidemiology 49(12) 1373-1379 38 Nemes S Jonasson J M Genell A and G Steineck (2009) Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size BMC medical research methodology 9 56-60

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

125

Table 70 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig

Step 32938 25 0000

Block 32938 25 0000

Model 32938 25 000

The second main output is the pseudo-Rsup2 values Itrsquos worth noting that these will be

lower than the Rsup2 of multiple regression lsquoPseudorsquo as Rsup2 in this analysis is not technically

the proportion of variation accounted for by variation in the independents rather it is

only an analogue of correlation The Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be quoted as the preferred

measure over Cox and Snell Rsup2 because the latter has the limitation that it cannot reach

1 as Rsup2 in linear regression can Nagelkerke Rsup2 overcomes this limitation by adjusting

the scale of the statistic So as this analysis aims to be as analogous as possible to the

Rsup2 of least squares regression Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be used

The present model has an Rsup2 of 27 which is good but not great However it is typical

of Nagelkerke and Cox amp Snell to vary and so it is best practice not to over-emphasize

the pseudo-Rsup2 in logistic regression The Hosmer amp Lemeshow uses non-significance as

a measure of goodness of fit of the model Greater than 005 indicates it is a good fitting

model which the PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling) model achieves

Table 71 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Model Summary

-2 Log likelihood Cox amp Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square

1128789a 0097 0267

Note a Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than 0001

Table 72 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Hosmer and Lemeshow Test (step 1)

Chi-square df Sig

9080 8 0336

A drawback of the model is the low classification rate particularly regarding true

classifications A model with a good accuracy rate would demonstrate high proportions

for both those with no PGSI risk and those with any PGSI risk The current model is

good at predicting cases that have no risk (997) but not very good at predicting cases

that do have risk (104)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

126

Table 73 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Classification Tablea

Predicted

(PGSI_atrisk) Percentage Correct

No risk At risk

Observed (PGSI At risk (1plus))

No risk 3023 8 997

At risk 172 20 104

Overall Percentage 944

Note a The cut value is 0500

The most important output for the aim of this study is the variables in the equation table

which details the regression function itself This analysis is not concerned with the raw

scores because natural scales do not make sense when dealing with a dichotomous

dependent variable As the analysis here aims to predict the likelihood of falling into one

of 2 groups (at risk gambling yes or no) meaning the relationship in non-linear then we

quote the log odds (essentially the analysis has made the relationship linear by

converting the raw probability scores into log odds) By taking the natural log of the odds

ratios we get an indirect measure of probability of being in the target group that will then

be linearly related So the final output of the analysis is the predicted change in log odds

for every one unit change in the independents Those that were significant were

tabulated and summarised in the body of the main report These are

bull age

bull sex

bull GHQ-12 (all levels)

bull alcohol consumption (over 14 to 35 units and 50 units or more)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

127

Table 74 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Variables in the Equationa

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational Qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equiv)

8609 2 0014

Educational Qualification 3 groups (Below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational Qualification 3 groups (No qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (least deprived) 11143 4 0025

Quintile of IMD score (2) -0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3) 0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4) 0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (most deprived) 0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1) 15525 4 0004

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2) 0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3) 0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4) 0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5) -0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

128

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Life satisfaction (Low (0-4)) 4262 3 0235

Life satisfaction (Medium (5-6)) -0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (High (7-8)) -0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (Very high (9-10)) 0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ Score ndash grouped (Score 0) 15279 2 0000

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 1-3) 0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 4+) 0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (Nevernot in last 12 months)

36554 4 0000

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14) 0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (Over 14 to 35) 1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (Over 35 to 50) 0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (Over 50) 2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020

Note Empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts a Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

129

Limitations

The main limitations to the analysis are the low classification rate for positive cases and

that while the Rsup2 is less important in binary logistic regression than linear regression and

automatically lower the model overall seems to be good but not great The other main

limitation is that the variables included and so the concepts measured are restricted by

what is included in HSE

Finally it is important to note that while the model goes some way to explaining the

relationship between harmful gambling and the available range of variables and

concepts all conclusions relate to association only not causation

Conclusions

A series of bivariate analyses were conducted to compare a range of variables to 3

increasing levels of gambling participation and harm Of these income region self-

reported general health and BMI were shown not to be significant for harmful gambling

Income and BMI were shown not to be significant for problem gambling

We performed a logistic regression to look at the effects of important socio-demographic

and health factors on the likelihood that respondents are participating in harmful levels of

gambling The logistic regression model was statistically significant (p less-than 005)

The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling and correctly classified

94 of cases but this was skewed towards classifying those at no risk

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be at-risk gamblers Wellbeing

contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on GHQ12

Compared to respondents scoring 0 the odds of those scoring 1 to 3 were 20 times

more likely to participate in harmful gambling Those scoring 4 or more were 24 times

more likely to participate

Regarding physical health and health behaviours smoking and BMI did not contribute

significantly to the model but alcohol did Compared to abstainers or people not drinking

in last 12 months the odds of respondents who drank above the recommended limits

(14 to 35 units) were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This

increased markedly to 78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) Given the

importance of gender mentioned above it should be noted that the group from HSE

consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

The broader conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly

gender appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic

factors such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

130

is a stronger predictor of harmful gambling than poor physical health and negative health

behaviours with the exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and the

method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

131

Appendix C Confidence limits

This appendix presents the confidence intervals39 that correspond to the tables

produced from the Health Survey for England

Note that empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts

Table 1 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6562960 6334907 5738490 5517114

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4317807 4628907 4288585 4135974

Table 2 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5131122 4451484 3932956 3487769

Scratchcards 1779043 2122489 1935338 1701510

Other lotteries 1414683 1397320 1309177 1359294

Machines and games

Football pools 182619 224660 224504 253018

Bingo (not online) 525364 536277 440814 403652

39 A confidence range has been constructed using the Wilson Score method applied to the unweighted survey data

This range (+x and -y) has then been applied to the weighted estimate to produce 95 confidence intervals based

on weighted prevalence levels

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

132

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

565450 651162 564692 517818

Machines in a bookmakers 203497 289984 252415 188015

Casino table games (not online) 217587 308750 280441 225071

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075259 087758 061298 052915

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

247617 327553 271087 262360

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 384863 660760 679692 719161

Betting exchange 057923 078901 096568 088006

Horse races (not online) 966001 1037288 853068 748048

Dog races (not online) 231290 243261 178292 142126

Sports events (not online) 337418 469553 459815 356345

Other events or sports (not online)

070264 114616 105517 123946

Spread-betting 032504 044184 044120 035913

Private betting 414193 460042 365062 337475

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 106871 150925 105517 096928

Summary

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

603368 872696 872386 873509

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

133

Table 3 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1043636 2980783 3995669 4433740 4143208 3366952 2528593 3489166

Scratchcards 1727215 2436717 2122630 1748760 1203935 736928 349895 1702598

Other lotteries 368931 851805 1248142 1510844 1665525 1644453 1488600 1360281

Machines and games

Football pools 500017 505813 125403 043431 092364 052245 125216 253452

Bingo (not online) 368931 434472 414316 218671 306199 263832 366695 404203

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

669475 814954 574877 418627 306199 073441 047549 518443

Machines in a bookmakers

325948 399073 133402 103672 048250 188385

Casino table games (not online)

300370 505813 215674 111586 077250 225478

Poker played in pubs or clubs

097038 079631 042318 053100

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

233091 532732 361625 143797 084765 262801

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

750752 1393731 885118 634445 297618 110693 054080 719896

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

134

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Betting exchange 183742 110705 063786 017054 041341 088251

Horse races (not online)

814337 723214 656254 744063 705698 620226 218526 748796

Dog races (not online) 216520 183867 071194 103672 062513 066258 142445

Sports events (not online)

535416 613960 266506 287132 204688 080724 356862

Other events or sports (not online)

274971 192195 056493 065233 069829 124242

Spread-betting 104643 050020 036061

Private betting 687487 514776 292227 160184 123468 059188 074454 337978

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120051 102830 093988 043431 048250 059188 023266 097187

Summary

Any gambling activity 3591860 5407593 5440884 5765226 5661399 4968794 4065485 5283918

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

3405626 4607524 4144038 3800076 3758191 3064607 2490272 3906545

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

933176 1640157 1107806 762420 392939 157519 081463 874316

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

135

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1467259 3510485 4569168 4988049 4740843 4004582 3216145 3712348

Scratchcards 2237681 2938136 2615102 2189984 1622106 1118809 682241 1880872

Other lotteries 648125 1193740 1655770 1929442 2136972 2162721 2068854 1523567

Machines and games

Football pools 815807 782166 286905 146905 242719 190570 350156 331639

Bingo (not online) 648125 694019 675709 410309 547004 516624 705209 500715

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1024788 1150848 873938 668934 547004 229112 209095 626345

Machines in a bookmakers

591519 649674 298839 246170 167268 078437 076382 256781

Casino table games (not online)

557344 782166 415895 258195 217978 123019 109263 299645

Poker played in pubs or clubs

262730 211548 150729 079335 070360 078437 093306 092229

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

465280 815055 608802 305738 230391 123019 109263 342279

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1122772 1808101 1241414 931637 535657 291423 222447 844666

Betting exchange 395122 260219 189059 093528 154249 123019 124567 137034

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

136

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Horse races (not online)

1198611 1043228 971956 1061279 1044250 976648 495459 875733

Dog races (not online) 442015 366481 201584 246170 192860 216382 124567 202776

Sports events (not online)

860079 913250 484660 501354 409383 241741 153840 448110

Other events or sports (not online)

522990 378089 176420 184919 205472 078437 124567 181001

Spread-betting 275043 161416 067548 064526 085458 043689 076382 069289

Private betting 1046612 793138 518737 329227 291327 203539 261727 427016

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 299471 248158 238589 146905 167268 203539 153840 148088

Summary

Any gambling activity 4217178 5967990 6014213 6308361 6251656 5628584 4820989 5515650

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4024973 5173180 4719791 4345658 4348681 3689635 3174929 4134514

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1338704 2080011 1497113 1082799 659541 364073 274602 1010073

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

137

Table 5 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6632052 6377894 5943259 5575595

Any gambling activity Females

5942819 5731883 4969458 4906675

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6963408 6718136 6293842 5902785

Any gambling activity Females

6254929 6046300 5290274 5233175

Table 6 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3246002 3730976 2826442

Scratchcards 1169964 2047322 1288765

Other lotteries 1169964 1492822 1025881

Machines and games

Football pools 097245 331162 161764

Bingo (not online) 181793 461044 439165

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 260591 677371 289335

Machines in a bookmakers 089066 257882 058685

Casino table games (not online) 269453 248786 023699

Poker played in pubs or clubs 013817 072168 017435

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

181793 321958 089155

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 829815 791242 161764

Betting exchange 097245 072168 044142

Horse races (not online) 680296 876993 315458

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

138

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Dog races (not online) 072929 167769 073727

Sports events (not online) 260591 451712 128970

Other events or sports (not online) 057156 167769 058685

Spread-betting

Private betting 260591 395884 161764

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 072929 106282 058685

Summary

Any gambling activity 4822296 5717294 4381627

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3393706 4396794 2884939

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

942692 991720 254771

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3659871 4051421 3324819

Scratchcards 1464018 2318770 1671830

Other lotteries 1464018 1734501 1376348

Machines and games

Football pools 201170 458796 326066

Bingo (not online) 316244 608611 686798

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 417105 851788 497620

Machines in a bookmakers 189387 372249 169903

Casino table games (not online) 428205 361367 105181

Poker played in pubs or clubs 065016 138416 091504

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316244 448022 219200

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1085531 977657 326066

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

139

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Betting exchange 201170 138416 144563

Horse races (not online) 915656 1071712 531322

Dog races (not online) 165600 262578 194744

Sports events (not online) 417105 597965 279093

Other events or sports (not online) 141449 262578 169903

Spread-betting 018946 010800 029172

Private betting 417105 533922 326066

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 165600 184216 169903

Summary

Any gambling activity 5257552 6040806 4920415

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3811599 4724157 3385971

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1212199 1196726 452417

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

140

Table 7 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5010828 1217707 3855865 3194364 3141982 4261193

Scratchcards 2392446 1504443 771932 1869685 1883219 1942949

Other lotteries 1444337 341029 1743242 944731 869787 1378997

Machines and games

Football pools 293283 350031 113038 153197 065571 251384

Bingo (not online) 485953 296228 532725 426543 524869 503985

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

787354 652538 149092 627816 414928 621294

Machines in a bookmakers

341252 287313 026812 381417 131420 270701

Casino table games (not online)

399008 350031 060262 161672 081619 290043

Poker played in pubs or clubs

113245 139049 011396 071133 088841

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

399008 199203 043262 354482 235334 309408

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

943709 468090 113038 399434 244162 660465

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

141

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Betting exchange 113245 190517 018918 071133 098270

Horse races (not online)

1178937 477241 637685 683310 451433 945210

Dog races (not online)

293283 113840 086397 161672 073550 222461

Sports events (not online)

602327 449816 113038 381417 131420 455212

Other events or sports (not online)

160124 097291 026812 111449 117202

Spread-betting 057978 034490 055608 042284

Private betting 524694 801832 140032 283272 165567 435724

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 150708 164632 068903 095111 042311 136216

Summary

Any gambling activity

6393967 3393970 5102509 4808928 4477874 5701128

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

142

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5169127 1516050 4105461 3632423 3544049 4378999

Scratchcards 2528827 1828181 913477 2242908 2227498 2037902

Other lotteries 1557418 516281 1940866 1232003 1124781 1462015

Machines and games

Football pools 349063 527241 173280 287250 152230 289954

Bingo (not online) 556293 461270 653008 632580 731043 557279

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

874737 883487 217174 870369 601420 679936

Machines in a bookmakers

401069 450223 059636 577920 246091 310631

Casino table games (not online)

463283 527241 106134 298732 176110 331283

Poker played in pubs or clubs

149196 259130 035079 169741 112545

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

463283 338712 083160 544983 381740 351912

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1038302 668690 173280 599818 392876 720754

Betting exchange 149196 327436 047543 169741 123113

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

143

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Horse races (not online)

1282954 679502 767906 934619 644769 1015927

Dog races (not online)

349063 224453 139960 298732 164214 258885

Sports events (not online)

679859 647040 173280 577920 246091 506066

Other events or sports (not online)

202292 201077 059636 229211 144176

Spread-betting 084494 104180 145351 059116

Private betting 597532 1053588 206247 456535 291798 485560

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 191713 293434 117480 205634 115599 165156

Summary

Any gambling activity

6545296 3811322 5357192 5270901 4903252 5818657

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

144

Table 8 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2998785 3313954 3578576 3516211 3324918

Scratchcards 19143 1615445 1719943 1478757 1288589

Other lotteries 921428 1150021 1452543 1440705 1354701

Machines and games

Football pools 185938 31272 225267 17336 170005

Bingo (not online) 518444 401551 338874 285037 229006

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 563566 437439 464056 417836 412342

Machines in a bookmakers 219643 191307 132429 181788 058654

Casino table games (not online) 152757 242814 216674 19874 137049

Poker played in pubs or clubs 058271 05344 038722 024671

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314336 199825 216674 215808 170005

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 518444 573413 701384 773594 692533

Betting exchange 08089 038818 045942 09936 08136

Horse races (not online) 473551 536962 840279 819922 729218

Dog races (not online) 1043 100084 107956 19874 051313

Sports events (not online) 262367 31272 321201 382119 289254

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

145

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 073249 108136 11606 09936 112815

Spread-betting 02347 031777 018411 024671 023682

Private betting 245207 365855 312388 285037 237546

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 088618 108136 084028 031424 073691

Summary

Any gambling activity 4865969 5019271 5419072 5275098 5069299

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3685513 3688054 4042843 3752781 3619792

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

690953 729585 840279 903618 839822

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3511704 379332 4067395 4010237 3843384

Scratchcards 2362902 2000608 2115692 1858612 1672048

Other lotteries 1262067 148849 1824509 1816872 1745527

Machines and games

Football pools 362472 510357 398515 331394 337824

Bingo (not online) 787689 621024 54425 479041 418413

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 842267 664936 69836 645461 653849

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

146

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 408527 352472 27191 342913 169993

Casino table games (not online) 315893 420664 387158 365857 291013

Poker played in pubs or clubs 171099 151192 126224 10107

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

533175 363904 387158 388685 337824

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 787689 828209 979717 1067675 991846

Betting exchange 2083 125915 138953 225862 207111

Horse races (not online) 732881 784861 1140062 1121087 1034927

Dog races (not online) 244709 224247 236535 365857 157392

Sports events (not online) 465504 510357 522024 601386 497756

Other events or sports (not online) 196001 236144 24838 225862 255422

Spread-betting 106199 113005 086687 10107 105257

Private betting 442784 576921 510888 479041 429815

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 220512 236144 200614 114265 194839

Summary

Any gambling activity 5413192 5519375 5917538 5782146 5608713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

422078 4177314 4540749 4252419 4146756

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

147

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

994041 1011184 1140062 1216923 1163622

Table 9 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4506501 2103280 2802777 3104280

Scratchcards 2058401 792842 1234950 1549603

Other lotteries 1474748 606499 660149 735006

Machines and games

Football pools 240450 173397 219725 302101

Bingo (not online) 550883 147693 179245 157085

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 648570 386423 379327 403041

Machines in a bookmakers 269339 173397 227916 220317

Casino table games (not online) 298290 208101 260953 220317

Poker played in pubs or clubs 088076 065122

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

336971 081107 086615 204294

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 717074 156226 260953 420097

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

148

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Betting exchange 097462 041968

Horse races (not online) 1050863 122333 203434 327088

Dog races (not online) 250072

Sports events (not online) 482648 147693 131947 360673

Other events or sports (not online) 125778 057277 134063

Spread-betting 041769 041968

Private betting 463178 216842 101452 411562

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 135258 081107 096828

Summary

Any gambling activity 6017525 2922783 3837359 4033433

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4633639 2466930 3434827 3812932

Scratchcards 2162540 1042510 1718023 2125711

Other lotteries 1566385 829603 1038692 1170192

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

149

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Machines and games

Football pools 281094 304507 463866 608649

Bingo (not online) 610557 270324 404813 395663

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 712837 570581 682495 746376

Machines in a bookmakers 312195 304507 475582 491544

Casino table games (not online) 343234 349653 522173 491544

Poker played in pubs or clubs 113520 153271

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

384540 177211 258560 467789

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 784311 281753 522173 769098

Betting exchange 124130 116537

Horse races (not online) 1130410 235796 440344 643329

Dog races (not online) 291468

Sports events (not online) 538815 270324 332669 689299

Other events or sports (not online) 155805 141153 359019

Spread-betting 059843 116537

Private betting 518291 360874 283536 757744

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 166321 177211 296809

Summary

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

150

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Any gambling activity 6142123 3324273 4510372 4773230

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Table 10 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6209163 5708136 5894410 5910459 5597362 5934614 4647612 5533803 5596221

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6722364 6030005 6262520 6305890 5960529 6282559 4952761 5825022 5961644

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

151

Table 11 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4282244 4298228 3598961

Scratchcards 1995277 1839055 1359311

Other lotteries 1372875 1429754 1064399

Machines and games

Football pools 277508 163664 072657

Bingo (not online) 451567 620892 522183

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 656096 526067 340283

Machines in a bookmakers 287133 199915 147071

Casino table games (not online) 335349 145687 088760

Poker played in pubs or clubs 096607 049834

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316045 254867 224818

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 753849 384907 224818

Betting exchange 105979 049834

Horse races (not online) 1008762 754369 531374

Dog races (not online) 239082 163664 096923

Sports events (not online) 490429 310339 207346

Other events or sports (not online) 124799 075251 080668

Spread-betting 050312 025545

Private betting 490429 291800 113436

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 134242 127829 064737

Summary

Any gambling activity 5732273 5738381 4790347

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

152

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4418000 4582689 4025631

Scratchcards 2105829 2065944 1674158

Other lotteries 1468467 1635933 1350266

Machines and games

Football pools 324254 244202 166214

Bingo (not online) 510128 766172 734720

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 725520 661161 517392

Machines in a bookmakers 334626 287886 271453

Casino table games (not online) 386391 222213 190034

Poker played in pubs or clubs 125227 098246

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

365702 352835 373358

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 827729 502566 373358

Betting exchange 135851 098246

Horse races (not online) 1092719 912465 745491

Dog races (not online) 282695 244202 201833

Sports events (not online) 551251 417265 350907

Other events or sports (not online) 157023 132780 178164

Spread-betting 071540 062584

Private betting 551251 395838 225242

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 167577 200103 154172

Summary

Any gambling activity 5867427 6020177 5229614

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

153

Table 12 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2792229 3230571 3559739 3440260

Scratchcards 1588487 1794312 1677146 1516730

Other lotteries 973585 1332406 1300397 1362961

Machines and games

Football pools 100467 275244 254047 203593

Bingo (not online) 319703 438844 345092 374197

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 420026 421365 530313 429061

Machines in a bookmakers 198705 128019 182413 134065

Casino table games (not online) 086254 216759 254047 168580

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

352860 233340 200193 221251

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 303246 660924 822312 604791

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 462504 518085 774924 754509

Dog races (not online) 100467 046459 121105 151252

Sports events (not online) 198705 317701 391068 292677

Other events or sports (not online) 100467 104797 103936 125531

Spread-betting

Private betting 303246 241672 354266 247898

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 079275 067552 095429 059327

Summary

Any gambling activity 4523069 4909906 5412810 5150385

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3217452 3907588 4005754 3647737

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

591819 814832 955467 716959

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

154

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3531155 3841433 3903469 3824104

Scratchcards 2210949 2309860 1950911 1813910

Other lotteries 1494319 1795766 1548645 1648188

Machines and games

Football pools 320456 522482 377799 331506

Bingo (not online) 657681 737332 486501 540297

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 795842 714974 700775 605242

Machines in a bookmakers 480575 311178 289634 241289

Casino table games (not online) 294922 441540 377799 286647

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

704018 464795 311804 353785

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 634391 1013210 1027993 808906

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 852731 837355 975507 978679

Dog races (not online) 320456 173636 211119 264039

Sports events (not online) 480575 579618 540398 442104

Other events or sports (not online) 320456 274645 188339 229855

Spread-betting

Private betting 634391 476382 497301 387042

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 282027 212298 176871 136314

Summary

Any gambling activity 5317942 5548216 5765700 5548500

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3980370 4538781 4356317 4035958

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1021521 1197914 1174485 936357

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

155

Table 13 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3695674 3916652 3715339 4020550 3665308

Scratchcards 2097067 2031186 2021718 1579579 1425222

Other lotteries 1117472 1154159 1251896 1238946 1302119

Machines and games

Football pools 202809 130988 208740 202579 222107

Bingo (not online) 358227 425267 460826 357911 317347

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 500585 524312 731955 455425 317347

Machines in a bookmakers 331904 206236 268175 160863 121980

Casino table games (not online) 186011 214760 337373 236494 230656

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

340663 189273 259613 202579 171397

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 672818 587908 613590 635899 594967

Betting exchange 065744 106679 042865 058198 113910

Horse races (not online) 755297 864165 925293 745641 649722

Dog races (not online) 112296 180838 183676 136284 113910

Sports events (not online) 446856 345241 604535 393194 291135

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

156

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 080935 067501 118494 088524 044729

Spread-betting

Private betting 279705 371799 443040 279430 239231

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120300 052494 102695 050895 082259

Summary

Any gambling activity 5276613 5592315 5416787 5617329 4945734

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4230545 4427808 4271166 4563725 4180709

Scratchcards 2558958 2463644 2495995 1999811 1813667

Other lotteries 1484713 1505614 1651034 1622613 1677494

Machines and games

Football pools 385415 274857 401597 385844 404082

Bingo (not online) 588920 658751 727642 589428 528229

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 765606 779116 1054581 711252 528229

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

157

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 555423 379126 481711 327861 264877

Casino table games (not online) 362332 390548 571997 431688 415476

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

566604 356196 470337 385844 335126

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 972237 855143 913784 929573 868881

Betting exchange 183496 239328 148824 171309 253003

Horse races (not online) 1069220 1177274 1279891 1059108 933792

Dog races (not online) 256586 344685 366853 292621 253003

Sports events (not online) 699693 559261 902903 633905 494607

Other events or sports (not online) 208186 178774 272551 220742 142685

Spread-betting

Private betting 487981 592542 705558 488452 426846

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 268522 153889 248479 158672 204877

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

158

Summary

Any gambling activity 5820098 6103118 5978704 6157312 5473096

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

159

Table 14 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3614585 3262398 3004568

Scratchcards 1637980 1707333 1654845

Other lotteries 1375741 1363414 1015146

Machines and games

Football pools 270864 193181 166022

Bingo (not online) 381984 431371 275273

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 503795 458465 449980

Machines in a bookmakers 161810 176141 199119

Casino table games (not online) 206914 210338 249667

Poker played in pubs or clubs 048888 046850 022542

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

225102 244956 275273

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 797979 604322 458858

Betting exchange 091223 069632 063876

Horse races (not online) 778883 705673 539231

Dog races (not online) 143947 134151 049405

Sports events (not online) 372668 341796 215860

Other events or sports (not online) 135062 061918 117588

Spread-betting

Private betting 335497 279923 283850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 082604 093322 078806

Summary

Any gambling activity 5379095 5107325 4730935

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1625845 3873510 3533251

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

453456 798417 683864

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

160

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3907685 3724702 3546992

Scratchcards 1867970 2087292 2106069

Other lotteries 1590703 1712903 1390311

Machines and games

Football pools 377703 349108 345783

Bingo (not online) 506364 649649 495664

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 644314 682414 719620

Machines in a bookmakers 246977 326243 392418

Casino table games (not online) 301782 371857 461470

Poker played in pubs or clubs 100137 136286 110532

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

323557 417051 495664

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 969563 855805 730675

Betting exchange 157711 173363 188798

Horse races (not online) 948696 973936 829701

Dog races (not online) 224876 268468 163402

Sports events (not online) 495698 539693 415544

Other events or sports (not online) 213780 161123 274618

Spread-betting

Private betting 452942 461896 507019

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 146348 209531 213734

Summary

Any gambling activity 5679935 5591029 5308932

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1855188 4350675 4094700

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

587617 1080722 1003999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

161

Table 15 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2651783 3729469 4064039

Scratchcards 1459465 1665503 1938147

Other lotteries 954702 1444234 1678079

Machines and games

Football pools 253038 263571 170451

Bingo (not online) 297553 362493 454205

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 433199 453700 554696

Machines in a bookmakers 148439 210476 145004

Casino table games (not online) 156996 290372 179002

Poker played in pubs or clubs 020646 066338 040707

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

182870 236932 274792

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 673162 807051 628360

Betting exchange 065583 074372 103450

Horse races (not online) 682479 854102 656091

Dog races (not online) 097998 141093 136599

Sports events (not online) 270792 508869 230904

Other events or sports (not online) 089781 192957 048153

Spread-betting

Private betting 306505 362493 274792

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 089781 090690 071294

Summary

Any gambling activity 4617434 5483635 5712319

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3516410 3957222 4232697

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

822832 910695 842232

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

162

Upper confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3036056 4134205 4518960

Scratchcards 1772839 1985414 2314018

Other lotteries 1219525 1747473 2035226

Machines and games

Football pools 403947 412462 309698

Bingo (not online) 459251 533162 664592

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 623061 641612 783637

Machines in a bookmakers 268983 345763 275271

Casino table games (not online) 280389 445558 321105

Poker played in pubs or clubs 077356 150485 120117

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314406 379204 444850

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 902154 1046957 869635

Betting exchange 152201 162416 217037

Horse races (not online) 912801 1099733 901776

Dog races (not online) 199641 255421 263719

Sports events (not online) 426121 706237 388949

Other events or sports (not online) 187894 323351 132630

Spread-betting

Private betting 470263 533162 444850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 187894 186030 169362

Summary

Any gambling activity 5043183 5893996 6163711

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3928235 4365662 4689584

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1071903 1162935 1114791

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

163

Table 16 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2484741 4372137 5276755 4915487 5374800

Scratchcards 1108981 2007129 2161887 2068953 2661741

Other lotteries 782168 1405446 1614427 1566777 1799449

Machines and games

Football pools 109794 207619 338138 338922 515747

Bingo (not online) 309779 544387 441083 364588 568919

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 272783 573503 830806 862187 1068509

Machines in a bookmakers 118618 207619 394168 477341 595632

Casino table games (not online) 066450 226639 544874 468590 640326

Poker played in pubs or clubs 033301 058073 110064 164810 256825

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

109794 283929 422295 407680 533432

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 118618 573503 1138851 1137546 1281953

Betting exchange 025408 067178 127774 172804 248473

Horse races (not online) 235999 846311 1517068 1727076 1818423

Dog races (not online) 041390 207619 300976 330401 471722

Sports events (not online) 101014 351108 792492 935181 1161056

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

164

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Other events or sports (not online) 025408 076338 199845 330401 341538

Spread-betting 017786 031240 049802 080286 198927

Private betting 101014 379989 744672 538911 775547

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 041390 113381 190751 221520 174577

Summary

Any gambling activity 3402663 5872721 6816336 6541742 7145430

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2739271 4528134 5562554 5582284 6019270

Scratchcards 1297399 2134314 2402588 2634760 3255627

Other lotteries 944783 1516298 1830969 2081660 2325544

Machines and games

Football pools 178366 254731 449447 621550 841022

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

165

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Bingo (not online) 418012 617791 566320 655617 907342

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 375075 648660 995923 1273026 1503092

Machines in a bookmakers 189525 254731 513318 801704 940375

Casino table games (not online) 121794 275702 682349 790545 995257

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075010 084356 177932 377534 502486

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

178366 338382 545142 712079 863168

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 189525 648660 1327352 1594993 1747699

Betting exchange 062920 095246 200189 389451 490922

Horse races (not online) 331926 935714 1728493 2259846 2346400

Dog races (not online) 086904 254731 406674 610161 785471

Sports events (not online) 167162 411168 954302 1359318 1609698

Other events or sports (not online) 062920 106081 287986 610161 616925

Spread-betting 050558 051203 098309 243038 420977

Private betting 167162 442273 902205 879511 1158765

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 086904 149018 277097 460200 385581

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

166

Summary

Any gambling activity 3679789 6026811 7080456 7161677 7713898

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

167

Table 17 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3494549 3880776

Scratchcards 2800592 1701792

Other lotteries 1034091 1585660

Machines and games

Football pools 405984 207566

Bingo (not online) 557456 444225

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 812186 462738

Machines in a bookmakers 353341 137215

Casino table games (not online) 301251 216477

Poker played in pubs or clubs 101963 037516

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 459092 252321

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 793825 724651

Betting exchange 035595 102887

Horse races (not online) 738878 876023

Dog races (not online) 166154 102887

Sports events (not online) 441342 343059

Other events or sports (not online) 166154 111399

Spread-betting 042443 022554

Private betting 566454 297514

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 117695 102887

Summary

Any gambling activity 5764541 5697910

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 4562254 4188547

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1052700 885515

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

168

Upper confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4053634 4241764

Scratchcards 3332315 1986745

Other lotteries 1411123 1863201

Machines and games

Football pools 663820 325240

Bingo (not online) 851218 607878

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 1154624 629312

Machines in a bookmakers 596862 235807

Casino table games (not online) 529352 336302

Poker played in pubs or clubs 250237 095830

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 730313 380349

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1133119 926642

Betting exchange 137204 190243

Horse races (not online) 1068465 1094838

Dog races (not online) 345513 190243

Sports events (not online) 708196 489341

Other events or sports (not online) 345513 201704

Spread-betting 150289 070846

Private betting 862153 435022

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 274371 190243

Summary

Any gambling activity 6328473 6059713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 5138744 4553155

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1432381 1105318

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

169

Table 18 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9077077 9211674 9517075 9593713 9685299 9812957 9864932 9545183

At risk (score 1-7) 669745 563003 327741 255052 178513 096121 059878 357875

Problem gambler (score 8+) 056035 057940 025265 033521 017067 033153

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9254336 9361084 9635040 9698734 9785404 9895338 9940122 9593521

At risk (score 1-7) 839007 704375 440212 352582 270863 175609 135068 403436

Problem gambler (score 8+) 114097 110366 063274 074520 052682 048254

Table 19 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8519860 8711536 9250440 9393184 9525060 9693782 9734680 9286154

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1032766 892188 499373 354966 259088 132731 108543 560818

Problem gambler (score 8+) 104206 099068 028010 051089 066191

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

170

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8825203 8975334 9454491 9572073 9696566 9842337 9891457 9371335

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1322780 1141419 695870 520040 419484 271299 265320 641733

Problem gambler (score 8+) 215479 197506 089099 125066 096662

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9578099 9644270 9733259 9747049 9798131 9876829 9925357 9785876

At risk (score 1 to 7) 240027 211211 132617 133917 080652 039690 149759

Problem gambler (score 8+) 005940

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9742421 9779976 9850299 9857514 9903095 9960310 9987975 9831453

At risk (score 1 to 7) 399536 344576 243894 241552 178199 123171 192924

Problem gambler (score 8+) 016832

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

171

Table 20 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower

confidence limit

Upper confidence

limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 641488 720646

Scratchcards 1140046 1241836

Other lotteries 758388 843687

Machines and games

Football pools 2839128 2981904

Bingo (not online) 1238228 1343604

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 2501922 2639279

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 3077452 3223462

Poker played in pubs or clubs 4481833 4638384

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 4342093 4498193

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 2561391 2699780

Betting exchange 4322136 4478161

Horse races (not online) 1503817 1617882

Dog races (not online) 2591132 2730024

Sports events (not online) 2978122 3122841

Other events or sports (not online) 4282224 4438092

Spread-betting 5121433 5278468

Private betting 2432562 2568673

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 3306058 3454743

Summary

Any gambling activity 699899 782206

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

172

Table 21 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower confidence limit Lower confidence limit

1 activity 160262 202119

2 to 3 activities 486195 556018

4 to 6 activities 1908236 2033261

7 or more activities 5191468 5348399

Total 699899 782206

Table 22 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9648551 9452875 9563557

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 189323 302060 182973

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 053570 103480 067396

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 012157 039731 042110

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 254548 417354 265579

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9726699 9524733 9669396

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 255518 360428 264318

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 091424 139120 120093

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032887 062907 085425

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 330222 485071 361575

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

173

Table 23 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9464299 9118712 9298723 9837688 9607037

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293250 345425 367963 068855 148376

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 103921 127950 064986 018895 042291

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 039993 095061

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 408612 508276 467966 095173 208930

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9533439 9363096 9504561 9895948 9755893

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 349103 534137 549284 117562 269095

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 138532 252683 153588 047600 115653

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062495 205743

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 473680 730515 668865 151205 348286

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

174

Table 24 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9321411 9480605 9545787 9576877 9640182

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293936 266863 20326 221189 193183

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 147161 076655 077211 051171 050955

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 059097 034342 034692 026447 004394

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 472157 360129 295883 286013 257623

Upper confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9452064 9592895 9647981 9676678 9733111

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 392991 359853 283189 305409 273638

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 220003 13036 129428 095691 096095

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 108216 072746 072015 060457 022741

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 594487 466443 390431 380487 349097

Table 25 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9543316 9616616 9408087 9174175

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

175

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259672 105609 187044 285473

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 097444

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032703 065081

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 365999 147627 235874 352165

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9595191 9765690 9689087 9537114

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 301870 212649 417188 585573

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 124153

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 048918 153365

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 415508 270443 487796 677991

Table 26 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9302879 9445046 9497357 9523320 9521257 9469934 9492898 9516849 9608043

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

272358 267204 197386 202673 189687 244778 215582 253691 180619

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

176

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

081569 080707 076948 058876 069385 086843 073820 074650 045143

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

023985 044753 029872 056980

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

386243 377595 295904 282584 288287 353966 307224 346162 242915

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9551450 9585275 9649557 9681445 9666246 9618459 9618579 9635214 9739105

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

474469 382818 316187 332992 303245 367211 313277 354455 292479

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

206588 149764 157024 137350 143928 165606 135338 133843 108395

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+)

066636 109334 083576 112215

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

619832 512170 437354 432782 424346 497717 421448 461810 369991

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

177

Table 27 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9551629 9486617 9482365

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 267865 218054 172604

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087250 083816 080596

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 023379 058161 049173

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 354644 328786 277601

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9606650 9605883 9659880

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 313905 309759 305887

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 114591 144244 178322

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 038489 109950 129900

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 407092 438830 440425

Table 28 Confidence limits

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9111018 9462725 9515756 9718238

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

312764 243504 241229 116443

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

143552 049671 086588 048311

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

065081 020491 026909

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

498432 314684 343949 178574

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9402415 9640332 9618411 9812436

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

535794 393921 324795 193039

Moderate risk gambler 306251 128609 139653 101327

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

178

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

(PGSI score 3 to 7)

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

185343 077937 059421

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

768820 482444 441935 270771

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

179

Table 29 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9155873 9425755 9528615 9701374 9703227

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 384868 250161 229556 130857 140608

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 148983 098486 063289 038633 031309

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 079863 039886 016379 009625

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 562021 379057 320660 183742 184927

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9334394 9565089 9660959 9807345 9806130

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 525552 359403 341141 220589 230170

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 242033 171423 127839 093075 079760

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 151335 090166 054885 041510

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 727964 510221 449811 287563 285740

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

180

Table 30 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9646180 9415118 9293309

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 204114 293344 311256

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 056303 111028 105447

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 013323 025937 071499

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 270312 433683 440578

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9710684 9538038 9456678

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259082 393775 439328

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087001 176397 185663

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 030014 061641 139703

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 332837 553207 589687

Table 31 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9494512 9524690 9538509

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 285425 237569 214448

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 081349 089900 087185

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 037336 037060 035420

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 380286 341334 326392

Upper confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9581575 9611167 9635965

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 358609 306719 291270

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 122875 134533 138702

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 066930 067427 070539

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 463662 422854 419182

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

181

Table 32 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9755131 9619945 9285949 9010047 8667875

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 083572 207589 375341 347399 604245

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 041367 067162 127709 125476 158387

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 025390 022545 033406 073004 059660

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 127437 293471 525814 512384 820593

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9836785 9677758 9426846 9372379 9079022

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 144664 254767 492212 633031 951836

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 086953 095269 200289 317363 362119

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062963 039910 074774 230460 201952

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 200714 348841 661474 846350 1213446

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

182

Table 33 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9099340 9548599

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 470349 230101

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 155175 091058

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 067013 029234

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 650515 334161

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9254028 9627752

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 596743 293668

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 232455 132830

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 120777 054710

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 796275 409520

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

183

Table 34 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9885967 9878118 9924628 9913695 9934834 9944198 9968002 9930092

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

056067 066401 033140 041679 024529 051489

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9943933 9933599 9966860 9958321 9975471 9983891 9996880 9948511

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

114033 121882 075372 086305 065166 069908

Table 35 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9796495 9790890 9885826 9839198 9881842 9887272 9947056 9892470

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

096118 107416 042843 075125 041388 075306

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

184

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9903882 9892584 9957157 9924875 9958612 9968144 9998118 9924694

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

203505 209110 114174 160802 118158 107530

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9946745 9937883 9924067 9952449 9963538 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9992505 9985535 9978965 9991601 9997263 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

185

Table 36 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9862701 9866674 9912713 9901984 9922588 9931413 9968002 9919365

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

072759 074941 041208 049951 032263 023300 060759

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9927241 9925059 9958792 9950049 9967737 9976700 9996880 9939241

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

137299 133326 087287 098016 077412 068587 080635

Table 37 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9749746 9767784 9873539 9815674 9869402 9874373 9947056 9870806

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129207 124241 050521 091536 048908 038907 093630

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

186

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9870793 9875759 9949479 9908464 9951092 9961093 9998118 9906370

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

250254 232216 126461 184326 130598 125627 129194

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9946745 9924651 9911158 9952449 9948608 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

028092 013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9992505 9978801 9971908 9991601 9992232 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

088842 028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

187

Table 38 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit

Upper confidence limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 085526 116894

Scratchcards 160262 202119

Other lotteries 141440 180951

Machines and games

Football pools 466841 535382

Bingo (not online) 303055 359252

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 457170 525058

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 602596 679557

Poker played in pubs or clubs 1415214 1526530

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 826715 915325

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 341456 400831

Betting exchange 1022381 1119561

Horse races (not online) 274326 327996

Dog races (not online) 670683 751436

Sports events (not online) 524945 597248

Other events or sports (not online) 1297189 1404615

Spread betting 1533366 1648318

Private betting 399228 463030

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 944042 1037939

Summary

Any gambling activity 104050 138360

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

188

Table 39 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit Upper confidence

limit

1 activity 022545 039910

2 to 3 activities 049022 073418

4 to 6 activities 255212 307119

7 or more activities 1130234 1231654

Total 104050 138360

Table 40 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9954942 9915039 9868631

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

019964 057658 076064

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9980036 9942342 9923936

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045058 084961 131369

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

189

Table 41 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9915506 9712750 9908589 9964921 9896912

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057978 153197 027297 011396 034858

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9942022 9846803 9972703 9988604 9965142

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

084494 287250 091411 035079 103088

Table 42 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9970101 9941246 9923436 9908721 9850406

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

008286 025670 037646 046856 089809

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

190

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9991714 9974330 9962354 9953144 9910191

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

029899 058754 076564 091279 149594

Table 43 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9942933 9827380 9744833 9675853

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

039650 069453 076037 069096

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9960350 9930547 9923963 9930904

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057067 172620 255167 324147

Table 44 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9854415 9910787 9857493 9913822 9892022 9920618 9839632 9937886 9942973

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

191

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

070998 040821 072334 028763 046875 032433 091573 026562 016867

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9945585 9969213 9942507 9986178 9967978 9979382 9920368 9982114 9997027

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129002 079179 127666 071237 093125 067567 148427 053438 043133

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

192

Table 45 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9939398 9855435 9809368

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041245 083629 088478

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9958755 9916371 9911522

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

060602 144565 190632

Table 46 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9740976 9908850 9917042 9960283

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

111223 027376 043368 010061

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9888777 9972624 9956632 9989939

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

259024 091150 082958 039717

Table 47 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9791533 9862827 9932436 9957659 9945326

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

122660 072826 023654 009436 016443

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9877340 9927174 9976346 9990564 9983557

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

193

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

208467 137173 067564 042341 054674

Table 48 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9958214 9902923 9814337

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

021531 050437 105447

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9978469 9949563 9894553

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041786 097077 185663

Table 49 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9921761 9909910 9906334

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045993 054365 052282

Upper confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9954007 9945635 9947718

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

078239 090090 093666

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

194

Table 50 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9924761 9926594 9901786 9744784 9760771

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

033199 049030 049850 087770 081586

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9966801 9950970 9950150 9912230 9918414

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

075239 073406 098214 255216 239229

Table 51 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9834167 9922517

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 101829 046444

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9898171 9953556

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 165833 077483

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

195

Table 53 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1271729 2945796 941041 1002800 1228218 1653678

Scratchcards 1093044 2171483 1145690 1143454 1570657 1886444

Other lotteries 1262295 2601960 885593 1426952 983242 1876728

Machines and games

Football pools 1976900 2847439 1033817 1341628 899014 933261

Bingo (not online) 1603655 2415815 931788 872323 1247152 1954492

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1517999 2034979 1352120 872323 1266097 1973946

Machines in a bookmakers 2237019 2171483 1380390 1190513 871014 1152814

Casino table games (not online) 1337847 1772444 1267479 1105867 1351490 2159024

Poker played in pubs or clubs 2731578 2690263 1099009 1171680 685457 668361

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2294993 2327774 1522123 1096479 1020778 743724

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1546529 2239824 1305066 1002800 1152603 1760254

Betting exchange 2488655 2425602 1408685 568786 1002002 1124095

Horse races (not online) 1337847 1957088 848726 669221 936408 3317233

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

196

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Dog races (not online) 2140529 2073956 839523 872323 1067781 2032342

Sports events (not online) 1938477 2611768 1267479 946779 1030171 1229504

Other events or sports (not online)

3200389 3034395 1541067 568786 349482 398246

Spread-betting 3416236 2239824 848726 1209360 611868 734288

Private betting 1366227 1898725 1211196 1134052 1114871 2295682

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 1919276 2327774 830324 1209360 917703 1808759

Summary

Any gambling activity 1027530 2464764 857936 1077713 1237684 2373874

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1648541 3279102 1304925 1338178 1569279 1934955

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

197

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Scratchcards 1448311 2475462 1538808 1496704 1945096 2181543

Other lotteries 1638032 2923845 1240773 1811568 1295516 2171286

Machines and games

Football pools 2419145 3177718 1411481 1717383 1200180 1157388

Bingo (not online) 2014617 2730483 1294245 1189419 1590249 2253307

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1920787 2332329 1770908 1189419 1611206 2273799

Machines in a bookmakers 2697484 2475462 1802439 1549372 1168326 1397217

Casino table games (not online) 1722023 2055564 1676151 1454510 1705377 2468210

Poker played in pubs or clubs 3220013 3015309 1485823 1528315 954852 863041

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2759168 2638757 1959705 1443953 1337786 947463

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1952085 2546940 1718297 1338178 1485282 2048083

Betting exchange 2964364 2740670 1833943 834759 1316659 1366017

Horse races (not online) 1722023 2250428 1197907 953723 1242592 3666828

Dog races (not online) 2594545 2373249 1187178 1189419 1390541 2335242

Sports events (not online) 2377797 2934012 1676151 1274527 1348344 1480312

Other events or sports (not online)

3708461 3370270 1980627 834759 552620 553936

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

198

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Spread-betting 3931358 2546940 1197907 1570416 868828 936926

Private betting 1753472 2188946 1612834 1486161 1443208 2611176

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 2357111 2638757 1176443 1570416 1221394 2099443

Summary

Any gambling activity 1374225 2781404 1208631 1422827 1579765 2692769

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

199

Table 54 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2115834 3842514 4426600

Once a week 2305108 2357524 1278810

Less than once a week more than once a month

1666011 563551 347431

Once a month 1069570 304294 1108443

Every 2 to 3 months 757091 485165

Once or twice a year 420816

Upper confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2839983 5195599 6362470

Once a week 3047889 3598625 2832036

Less than once a week more than once a month

2336575 1348746 1396207

Once a month 1642181 940571 2598245

Every 2 to 3 months 1259596 1230828

Once or twice a year 821370

Table 55 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1082324 4256754

Once a week 2549093 1640856

Less than once a week more than once a month

965178 285899

Once a month 1180106 931875

Every 2 to 3 months 1356433

Once or twice a year 2469937 193456

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

200

Upper confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1200336 5879558

Once a week 2712540 3004014

Less than once a week more than once a month

1077564 1068000

Once a month 1302485 2077246

Every 2 to 3 months 1486034

Once or twice a year 2631751 887818

201

Published September 2021

PHE gateway number GOV-9697

wwwgovukphe

Twitter PHE_uk

wwwfacebookcomPublicHealthEngland

copy Crown copyright 2021

Page 4: Gambling-related harms evidence review

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

3

Executive summary

Background

In the UK there has been increasing concern about the harms associated with

gambling

Public Health England (PHE) was commissioned to review the evidence for the

prevalence determinants and harms associated with gambling and to estimate the

social and economic burden of gambling-related harms in England

To support the objectives of the PHE evidence review this report brings together a

range of quantitative data sources that seek to estimate gambling involvement and

gambling-related harms among the general population

Methods

The first part of the review focuses on a 4 year combined and weighted dataset from the

Health Survey for England (HSE) which presents new analysis undertaken for this

review The second part focuses on previously published sources of gambling data

bringing these together for the first time to address questions not met by the HSE

survey

Results

Gambling participation

In England 245 million people (half of the adult population) gamble each year

Participation in the National Lottery is the most common type of gambling except among

younger people where scratchcards are more common Football pools and playing

electronic gaming machines are much more prevalent gambling activities among people

under 35 years of age compared to older age groups

Overall men are more likely to participate in gambling and this sex difference is marked

for online gambling where 15 of men participate compared to 4 of women Since

2012 overall gambling prevalence has fluctuated Participation in the National Lottery

declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However participation in other gambling

activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015 before falling back to 40 in the

most recent HSE survey Online gambling (excluding the National Lottery) has increased

from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

4

Harmful gambling

The most commonly used screening tools categorise gambling-related harm as either

low-risk moderate-risk or problem gambling The levels of gambling are defined as

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

More specifically problem gambling is typically defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits In 2018 the

HSE estimated that 05 of the population were problem gamblers This is a reduction

from 09 in 2015 (although since the numbers are very small this does not represent a

real decline) However the proportion of gamblers who experience low levels of

gambling-related problems is increasing

It is important to note that a recent YouGov study found a significantly different

prevalence of 13 of the population experiencing some level of gambling harm

compared to 4 from a combined version of the HSE1 An assessment of both sources

concluded that HSE likely underestimated the true prevalence in the population

Profile of gamblers

Overall the highest rates of gambling participation are reported among people who have

higher academic qualifications are employed and among relatively less deprived

groups There are disproportionately more people classified as lsquoat-riskrsquo or lsquolow-riskrsquo

lsquomoderate-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo among men in younger age groups However

the socio-demographic profile of gamblers appears to change as the level of gambling

risk increases from low-risk to problem gambling Harmful gambling is associated with

people who are unemployed and among people living in more deprived areas

Gambling and the risk of gambling-related harm also appear to be associated with

psychological and physical health Overall the highest levels of gambling participation

are reported by people who report better general psychological health (on the short

general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)) and higher life satisfaction In contrast people

1 This version of the HSE combined the health surveys for England Scotland and Wales

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

5

describing poorer psychological health are less likely to report gambling participation

Again this reverses for problem gambling with higher prevalence among people with

poor health low life satisfaction and wellbeing and especially for people where there is

an indication of probable psychological health problems

The health behaviour profile for gambling was inconclusive for BMI (Body Mass Index)

status and cigarette smoking But there is a clear and strong association between

gambling at all levels of harm and increasing alcohol consumption This gradient is

evident for overall gambling participation and becomes steeper for at-risk and problem

gambling There is a particularly high level of gambling risk for people consuming 50

units of alcohol or more per week

Finally harmful gambling has a very different activity profile to general gambling It

includes low National Lottery participation and high participation in online gambling

including

bull slots

bull casino and bingo games

bull electronic gambling machines in bookmakers

bull sports and other event betting

bull betting exchanges

bull dog racing

At-risk gamblers are significantly more likely than general gamblers to participate in

online gambling

Overall demographic factors particularly sex appear to predict at-risk gambling

behaviour more than economic factors such as income employment and relative

deprivation Poor mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling than both poor

physical health and negative health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

Affected others treatment attitudes and influences and children and young people

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were found to be negatively

affected by someone elsersquos gambling Affected others are more likely to be women

reflecting the association between problem gambling and men Among affected others

immediate family members felt the most severe impacts of problem gambling

Just over 9000 people received treatment from the National Gambling Treatment

Service (NGTS) in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This represents only a small

fraction of problem gamblers in England This was the highest number of people treated

since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

6

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged The proportion of children and young people who participate in any

gambling has been reducing Boys are more likely to gamble than girls and the rate

increases with age Fruit and slot (electronic gaming) machines were often identified as

the first experiences of gambling among children and young people Playing the National

Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most common forms

of gambling reported But as the young people got older there was a significant increase

in online gambling among men

The rates of gambling among children and young people are lower than drinking alcohol

but higher than using e-cigarettes smoking tobacco cigarettes or taking illegal drugs

There is a potential relationship between these other harmful activities and gambling

Compared with children who have not gambled those who have spent their own money

on gambling are more likely to have also consumed alcohol taken drugs or smoked

either a tobacco cigarette or an e-cigarette

Discussion and implications

The main findings of this report are that

bull half the population currently gamble with 05 of the population experiencing the

highest level of harm

bull people who are classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo are disproportionately

younger men

bull socioeconomic and health inequalities persist among people classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and

lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo

bull alcohol is very strongly associated with gambling

bull a significant proportion of the population (7) are negatively affected by someone

elsersquos gambling

The previously published sources discussed in the second part of the report vary in the

type and quality of gambling data available Gambling is a relatively new field of

research and inconsistencies in the robustness and standardisation of the publications

and data available are to be expected However all sources included are encouraging

additions to the existing body of work This inconsistency in data quality and the

absence of longitudinal data are a major gap in the evidence base to be addressed in

future research and data collection

No data here takes into account the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on

gambling behaviour Public Health England (PHE) has published a rapid evidence

review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

7

1 Introduction

11 Background and aims

Concern about the harms associated with gambling has been increasing in the UK In

response in March 2018 the PHE remit letter from Health Minister Steve Brine

confirmed PHErsquos priorities for 2018 to 2019 This included the request for PHE to ldquoinform

and support action on gambling-related harm as part of the follow up to the Department

for Digital Culture Media amp Sport-led (DCMS) review of gaming machines and social

responsibilityrdquo (1)

In May 2018 DCMS published their response to the consultation on proposals for

changes to gaming machines and social responsibility measures In it they announced

that ldquoPHE will conduct an evidence review of the health aspects of gambling-related

harm to inform action on prevention and treatmentrdquo (2)

To fulfil this commitment 2 complementary evidence reviews were undertaken

1 The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) carried out a mapping review of

the literature on the effectiveness of national and international polices and

interventions to reduce gambling-related harms (3)

2 PHE has undertaken a broader evidence review on the prevalence of gambling and

associated health harms and social and economic burden

This report presents the findings of the quantitative analysis aspect of the work

conducted by PHE only It is one of 7 technical reports that inform the broader evidence

review The aim is to describe the prevalence characteristics associations and harms

associated with gambling as described in the scope (4) of the high-level protocol

Specifically this report aims to

bull describe the prevalence of gambling and gambling-related harms in England by

socio-demographic characteristics geographical distribution and year

bull identify the determinants of gambling and harmful gambling

12 Methods

To begin the project we undertook a search of common databases websites and other

online resources (for example Office for National Statistics NHS Digital and the

Gambling Commission websites) to see if published reports or datasets for England

were available to fulfil the above objectives We determined that this was not to be the

case So we identified datasets and official statistics that include information on

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

8

gambling by adults or children We used the HSE (for years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018)

as the primary dataset

We ran outputs from HSE to meet the objectives both on the most recent year (2018)

and the whole combined dataset where necessary All outputs have been non-response

weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE analysis since 2003 We commissioned

the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) who manage the HSE on behalf of

NHS Digital to combine the datasets NatCen calculated and appended new combined

weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc18 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb18 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication (5) we used the problem gambling

weight for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening

tools We used the self-completion weight for the rest

You can find all important information related to the data source in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the Health Survey for England series (6) Registered users can access

the separate datasets via the UK Data Archive (7)

We conducted all statistical analysis in SPSS version 25

We supplemented the outputs from HSE with findings from statistical publications and

reports available from other sources to better meet the objectives Sources include

several outputs by

bull the Gambling Commission

bull the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010

bull YouGov

bull the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH)

bull the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

bull hospital episode statistics (NHS Digital)

The HSE asks children certain questions including about smoking and alcohol but this

is not the case for gambling However we found published data to fulfil the aim to

include children in the analytic aspect of the work at least to an extent

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

9

The Gambling Commission publish an analytical report lsquoYoung people and gamblingrsquo

that explores the gambling behaviours of young people aged 11 to 16 years old in

England Scotland and Wales The survey was conducted by Ipsos MORI and includes

adolescent-appropriate application of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders 4th version) to measure at-risk and problem gambling This source

only allows limited analysis of associations linked to gambling in children as it is only

gambling behaviour focused and does not include any health topics

This report has found the lack of health and gambling data for children to be a gap in the

data currently available However gambling behaviours in the cohort is very detailed

and includes aspects such as in-game gambling parental gambling and those following

gambling companies on social media Furthermore trend data is available We have

supplemented the results from this source with recent findings from ALSPAC

13 COVID-19

The Health Survey for England 2018 is the primary data source and the gambling

supplementary questions refer to gambling behaviour in the last 12 months The data

was published in November 2019 and the 12 month period covered by the survey

questions is 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 This was before COVID-19 and so

no data here takes into account the impact of the pandemic on gambling behaviour So

the term lsquothe last 12 monthsrsquo does not refer to the 12 months of 2020 when the

pandemic occurred We have published a rapid evidence review to explore the impact of

COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

10

2 Overall gambling participation

21 Introduction

This section focuses on prevalence and associations with any gambling activity in the

last 12 months (at the time of the survey year referenced most recent refers to 2018)

The HSE involves a set of questions and interviews conducted face to face in the homes

of respondents The gambling questions are completed using a self-completion

questionnaire alongside the core health questionnaire As part of this respondents were

asked whether they have participated in any gambling activity in the last 12 months and

if so what type of activity

22 Overall gambling participation by type of activity

Over half (540) of the England population aged 16 and over have taken part in some

form of gambling in the last 12 months (based on HSE 2018 (5)) This equates to almost

245 million people Gambling activity questions were first included in the HSE in 2012

and again in 2015 2016 and most recently in 2018 Since 2012 participation in any

gambling activity has reduced significantly in the England population by over 10 percent

(from 645 to 540) However the reduction between 2016 and 2018 is not

statistically significant meaning there is unlikely to have been a real change between

the 2 most recent years for which data is available

The National Lottery was the gambling activity with the highest level of participation in

England with 36 of the population taking part in the last 12 months The recent

Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that in the

individual National Lottery draws the most common games of 2019 were

bull Lotto (played by 21 of all survey respondents in the past 4 weeks)

bull EuroMillions (20)

bull Thunderball (3)

bull Hotpicks (1)

However participation in the National Lottery has declined from 525 in 2012 to 457

in 2015 405 in 2016 to 360 in 2018 This is a statistically significant decline and

suggests that the reduction seen in overall gambling participation is largely due to the

reduction in National Lottery participation Figure 1 shows the percentage of overall

gambling participation in England between 2012 and 2018 Once the National Lottery is

excluded gambling participation has stayed at the same level with 402 of the

population having gambled on some other activity in the last 12 months As shown in

Figure 1 by excluding respondents who only play the National Lottery we see a different

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

11

pattern in gambling participation This shows a pattern more resistant to change with the

rate increasing to 451 between 2012 and 2015 before reducing to 402 in 2018

Figure 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Base2 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 Unless otherwise stated the base given in tables is the number of respondents who answered the

relevant question

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity Any gambling activity exc National Lottery

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

12

After lotteries the most common types of gambling activity according to HSE 2018 were

bull horse racing (not online3) (81)

bull online betting with a bookmaker (78)

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines (57)

bull bingo (not online) (45)

These were also the most common activities in 2012 the only difference being that

online betting with a bookmaker was less common in 2012

Table 2 Overall gambling participation by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 525 457 405 360

Scratchcards 187 222 203 179

Other lotteries 150 148 139 144

Machines and games

Football pools 21 26 26 29

Bingo (not online) 58 59 49 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 71 62 57

Machines in a bookmakers 24 33 29 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 35 32 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 11 08 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 28 37 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 43 72 74 78

Betting exchange 08 10 12 11

Horse races (not online) 104 111 92 81

Dog races (not online) 27 28 21 17

Sports events (not online) 38 52 51 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 14 13 15

3 lsquoNot onlinersquo throughout this report means gambling in a bookmakers by telephone or at the venue

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

13

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Spread-betting 05 06 06 05

Private betting 46 51 41 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 18 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 66 94 94 94

Base 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

23 Overall gambling participation by age and sex

Participation in any gambling activity was most common in respondents aged 45 to 64

(604) and least common in those aged 16 to 24 (390) The National Lottery draws

were the activity with greatest participation across all age groups except for those aged

16 to 24 years for whom scratchcards are more common If we exclude National Lottery

gambling was more common in younger age groups for many activities4

Also 94 of people surveyed participated in some form of online gambling (excluding

National Lottery) and this type of gambling is more common with younger people Online

gambling has increased in popularity from 66 in 2012 and since 2015 has remained

consistent at 94

Slot (electronic gaming) machines were the most common type of machine or game

betting Except for bingo most machine or games betting activity types were more

common among younger people particularly

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines

bull football pools

4 Itrsquos worth noting that the HSE gambling measures are derived from a self-completion questionnaire for

people aged 16 years and over However while the legal age limit for playing the National Lottery and

scratchcards is currently 16 years (as well as for some (category D) slot machines) it is 18 years for most

other forms of gambling HSE does not take this legal age discrepancy into account

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

14

bull electronic gaming machines in bookmakers (including fixed odds betting terminals

(FOBT)

bull casino table games

Online betting with a bookmaker sports betting and private betting were also more

common with younger age groups particularly the under 35s

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

15

Table 3 Overall gambling participation by age group England 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 124 324 428 471 444 368 286 360

Scratchcards 197 268 236 196 140 91 49 179

Other lotteries 49 101 144 171 189 189 176 144

Machines and games

Football pools 64 63 19 08 15 10 21 29

Bingo (not online) 49 55 53 30 41 37 51 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 97 71 53 41 13 10 57

Machines in a bookmakers 44 51 20 16 09 - - 22

Casino table games (not online) 41 63 30 17 13 - - 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 13 08 - - - - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

33 66 47 21 14 - - 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 92 159 105 77 40 18 11 78

Betting exchange 27 17 11 04 08 - - 11

Horse races (not online) 99 87 80 89 86 78 33 81

Dog races (not online) 31 26 12 16 11 12 - 17

Sports events (not online) 68 75 36 38 29 14 - 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

16

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Other events or sports (not online) 38 27 10 11 12 - - 15

Spread-betting 17 09 - - - - - 05

Private betting 85 64 39 23 19 11 14 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 19 16 15 08 09 11 06 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 390 569 573 604 596 530 444 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

371 489 443 407 405 337 282 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

112 185 129 91 51 24 15 94

Base 931 1196 1140 1242 1058 875 661 7104

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

17

The Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that on

average online gamblers have 3 accounts with gambling websites and that 21 have

bet lsquoin-playrsquo (while the event is taking place) in the last 4 weeks Furthermore 20 of

online gamblers aged 18 to 24 had more than 5 online accounts Table 4 is taken from

the Gambling Commission report and shows online and in-person participation in the

last 4 weeks for those activities that can be accessed through multiple methods The

table shows that people playing bingo (81) and the National Lottery (73) were most

likely to participate in-person while those participating in football betting (83) sports

betting (81) and casino games (74) were most likely to do so online

Smartphones are now the most popular method of accessing online gambling with 50

of all online gamblers using their device for this purpose This continues the trend seen

in the Gambling Commission annual reports of increasing smartphone use for gambling

in recent years Younger age groups were most likely to gamble with multiple devices

while the likelihood of using more than one device to gamble reduces with age

Table 4 Online and in-person participation in the last 4 weeks (2019)

National Lottery

()

Bingo ()

Football pools

()

Horse racing

()

Sports betting

()

Football betting

()

Betting on other

events ()

Casino games

()

Online 36 24 55 61 81 83 58 74

In-person 73 81 50 49 27 26 53 47

Source The Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Figure 2 shows overall gambling participation for adults by sex in England between 2012

and 2018 Men (574) were more likely than women (507) to have participated in

any gambling activity in the last 12 months It also shows participation reducing at a

similar rate for both men and women since 2012

The difference is marked for online gambling with only 43 of women participating in

online activities compared to 147 of men Participation in online gambling reaches

284 for men aged 25 to 34 This means that of the 565 of 25 to 34 year old men

that gamble (excluding the National Lottery) half do so online

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

18

Figure 2 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 5 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018 2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity men 680 655 612 574

Any gambling activity women 610 589 513 507

Base men 3042 2996 2965 3506

Base women 3749 3759 3726 3599

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Women (178) were as likely to buy scratchcards as men (181) and more likely to

take part in bingo (59 compared to 30 of men) but men had higher participation

rates in all other gambling activities The differences between men and women were

greatest for

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity men Any gambling activity women

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

19

bull online betting with a bookmaker

bull machines in bookmakers (including FOBT)

bull betting on sports events

bull private betting5

24 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification

By highest educational qualifications participation in any gambling activity was most

common in the below degree category (588) followed by respondents with an NVQ4

NVQ5 and degree or equivalent (504) level of qualification Those with no qualification

were least likely to participate in any gambling activity (465)

There were differences by type of activity where those with an NVQ4 NVQ5 and degree

or equivalent were less likely to participate in bingo (24) Also along with people in

the below degree category they were more likely to participate in betting on horse

racing and sports events (not online) Respondents with no qualification were notably

less likely than the rest of the population to participate in online betting with a bookmaker

(23)

Table 6 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification England 2018

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 345 389 307 360

Scratchcards 131 218 147 179

Other lotteries 131 161 119 144

Machines and games

Football pools 14 39 23 29

Bingo (not online) 24 53 55 45

5 This excludes poker played in clubs betting exchanges and spread-betting which are all relatively low

participation activities but are dominated by men

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

20

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 33 76 38 57

Machines in a bookmakers 13 31 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 34 30 05 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 03 10 04 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 38 14 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 88 23 78

Betting exchange 14 10 08 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 41 81

Dog races (not online) 11 21 12 17

Sports events (not online) 33 52 19 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 21 10 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 33 46 23 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 10 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 504 588 465 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

360 456 313 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

107 109 34 94

Base 2024 3553 1313 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

21

25 Overall gambling participation by economic activity

Looking at economic activity participation by group in any gambling activity was most

common in the

bull employed self-employed or training category (647)

bull retired (523)

bull unemployed (504)

However confounding is important here as economic groups like students and those in

retirement comprise people of very different ages and previous tables have shown a

strong association between gambling and age You can find more information about the

issues of confounding later in this report in the section on at-risk and problem gambling

and in more detail in Appendix B

We based Table 7 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller employment groups

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

22

Table 7 Overall gambling participation by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 509 136 398 341 334 432

Scratchcards 246 166 84 205 205 199

Other lotteries 150 42 184 108 99 142

Machines and games

Football pools 32 43 14 21 10 27

Bingo (not online) 52 37 59 52 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 76 18 74 50 65

Machines in a bookmakers 37 36 04 47 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 43 43 08 22 12 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 13 19 02 11 - 1

66 The economically inactive population comprises all persons who were neither employed nor unemployed during the short reference period used to

measure current activity This population is split into 4 groups attendant at educational institutions retired engaged in family duties other

economically inactive

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

23

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

43 26 06 44 30 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 99 56 14 49 31 69

Betting exchange 13 25 03 11 - 11

Horse races (not online) 123 57 70 80 54 98

Dog races (not online) 32 16 11 22 11 24

Sports events (not online) 64 54 14 47 18 48

Other events or sports (not online) 18 14 04 16 - 13

Spread-betting 07 06 - 09 - 05

Private betting 56 92 17 36 22 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 17 22 09 14 07 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 647 360 523 504 469 576

Base 15321 2029 5906 1796 2111 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

24

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

25

27 Overall gambling participation by Index of Multiple Deprivation

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is the official measure of relative deprivation for

small areas in England Quintiles are calculated by ranking the neighbourhoods in

England from most deprived to least deprived and dividing them into 5 equal groups

These range from the most deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally to the least

deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile but there were differences by activity type Several activities were statistically

significantly higher in the most deprived quintile compared to lesser deprived quintiles

We saw the strongest inequality gradients were for bingo and scratchcards

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

26

Table 8 Overall gambling participation by IMD England 2018

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 325 355 382 376 358 360

Scratchcards 213 180 191 166 147 179

Other lotteries 108 131 163 162 154 144

Machines and games

Football pools 26 40 30 24 24 29

Bingo (not online) 64 50 43 37 31 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 54 57 52 52 57

Machines in a bookmakers 30 26 19 25 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 22 32 29 27 20 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 09 07 05 - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

41 27 29 29 24 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 64 69 83 91 83 78

Betting exchange 13 07 08 15 13 11

Horse races (not online) 59 65 98 96 87 81

Dog races (not online) 16 15 16 27 09 17

Sports events (not online) 35 40 41 48 38 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

27

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online) 12 16 17 15 17 15

Spread-betting 05 06 04 05 05 05

Private betting 33 46 40 37 32 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 14 16 13 06 12 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 514 527 567 553 534 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

395 393 429 400 388 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

83 86 98 105 99 94

Base 1278 1528 1515 1474 1310 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

28

28 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity

By broad ethnicity overall participation in any gambling activity was most common in

the White and White British ethnic group (608) and least common in the Asian and

Asian British ethnic group (312)

We base Table 9 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller ethnic groups

Table 9 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 457 228 311 345 432

Scratchcards 211 91 146 182 199

Other lotteries 152 71 83 93 142

Machines and games

Football pools 26 23 32 43 27

Bingo (not online) 58 20 27 25 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

68 47 51 55 65

Machines in a bookmakers

29 23 33 33 29

Casino table games (not online)

32 27 37 33 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs

10 10 - - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

36 12 15 31 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

75 21 37 57 69

Betting exchange 11 07 - - 11

Horse races (not online)

109 17 30 46 98

Dog races (not online) 27 - - - 24

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

29

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Sports events (not online)

51 20 21 50 48

Other events or sports (not online)

14 09 - 22 13

Spread-betting 05 07 - - 05

Private betting 49 28 17 56 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 - 17 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 608 312 417 440 576

Base 23586 2043 821 688 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

29 Overall gambling participation by region

The North East (647) had the highest overall participation in gambling while London

(480) was lower than average

We based Table 10 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for each region

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

30

Table 10 Overall gambling participation by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

647 587 608 611 578 611 480 568 578 576

Base 1329 3592 2699 2332 2838 3013 4115 4442 2803 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 201

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

31

210 Overall gambling participation by local authority

Variation in gambling participation was evident by upper tier local authority (UTLA)

Discounting Rutland which has wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a

rate of gambling participation that was statistically significantly higher than average for

England The top 5 UTLAs in England with the highest levels of gambling participation

were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

For the full list of authorities included in Figure 3 see Appendix A You should note that

due to small sample sizes we have grouped together the authorities of inner and outer

London

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

32

Figure 3 Overall gambling participation by UTLA England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

211 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health

In HSE general health is self-assessed with the question lsquoHow is your health in general

Would you say it was very good good fair bad or very badrsquo There has been very little

change in the general health status of the population over the course of the surveys

with 76 of respondents reporting very good or good health in 1993 compared to 75

in 2018 (in no survey year has this been below 74 or above 76) This is the same for

respondents who gamble with 752 reporting very good or good health in HSE 2018

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health tend to gamble less (501) than

the general population and those reporting good or very good general health (580)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

33

We based Table 11 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for the smaller categories

Table 11 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 435 444 381 432

Scratchcards 205 195 151 199

Other lotteries 142 153 120 142

Machines and games

Football pools 30 20 11 27

Bingo (not online) 48 69 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 59 42 65

Machines in a bookmakers 31 24 20 29

Casino table games (not online) 36 18 13 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 11 07 - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

34 30 29 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 79 44 29 69

Betting exchange 12 07 - 11

Horse races (not online) 105 83 63 98

Dog races (not online) 26 20 14 24

Sports events (not online) 52 36 27 48

Other events or sports (not online) 14 10 12 13

Spread-betting 06 04 - 05

Private betting 52 34 16 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 16 10 15

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

34

Summary

Any gambling activity 580 588 501 576

Base 20488 4684 1987 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

212 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction

In HSE life satisfaction is derived from the question lsquoOverall how satisfied are you with

life nowadaysrsquo This is scored and grouped low (score 0 to 4) medium (score 5 to 6)

high (score 7 to 8) and very high (score 9 to 10)

Gambling participation across life satisfaction groups was inconclusive As with self-

assessed general health the lowest group were again least likely to participate in

gambling (492) This was also true for respondents participating in the National

Lottery where 315 in the lowest satisfaction group take part compared to 363 in the

very high satisfaction group The low satisfaction group were most likely to participate in

online gambling including slots casino and bingo games (50 compared to 28 in the

very high group) but this reverses for online gambling with a bookmaker (44 of the low

group compared to 70 of the very high group)

Table 12 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction England 2018

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 315 353 373 363 360

Scratchcards 188 204 181 166 179

Other lotteries 121 155 142 150 144

Machines and games

Football pools 18 38 31 26 29

Bingo (not online) 46 57 41 45 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 58 55 61 51 57

Machines in a bookmakers 31 2 23 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 16 31 31 22 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - 07

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

35

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

50 33 25 28 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 44 82 92 70 78

Betting exchange - - - - 11

Horse races (not online) 63 66 87 86 81

Dog races (not online) 18 09 16 20 17

Sports events (not online) 31 43 46 36 40

Other events or sports (not online) 18 17 14 17 15

Spread-betting - - - - 05

Private betting 44 34 42 31 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 13 09 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 492 523 559 535 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

359 422 418 384 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

78 99 106 82 94

Base 604 937 3038 2408 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

213 Overall gambling participation by wellbeing

The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a widely used measure

of subjective and psychological functioning It was developed to capture a broad concept

of positive mental wellbeing and incorporates 2 perspectives on wellbeing (9)

1 Eudaimonic wellbeing comes from a sense of purpose personal growth and

involvement in activities

2 Hedonic wellbeing comes from feelings of joy satisfaction and enjoyment

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

36

WEMWBS includes 14 statements that cover psychological functioning cognitive-

evaluative dimensions and affective-emotional aspects of wellbeing For each statement

respondents can answer

bull none of the time

bull rarely

bull some of the time

bull often

bull all of the time

The statements are all expressed positively The responses from 1 to 5 are aggregated

to form an index which can range from 14 (those who answer lsquonone of the timersquo for

every statement) to 70 (those who answer lsquoall of the timersquo to all statements) (10)

As above for life satisfaction findings were inconclusive across WEMWBS quintiles with

the highest participation rates seen in quintiles 2 to 4 and the lowest rate seen in quintile

5 (521)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

37

Table 13 Overall gambling participation by WEMWBS quintile England 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 396 417 399 429 392 405

Scratchcards 232 224 225 178 161 203

Other lotteries 129 132 144 142 148 139

Machines and games

Football pools 28 19 29 28 30 26

Bingo (not online) 46 53 58 46 41 49

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 64 88 57 41 62

Machines in a bookmakers 43 28 36 23 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 26 29 44 32 31 32

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - - 08

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

44 26 35 28 24 31

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 81 71 75 77 72 74

Betting exchange 11 16 08 10 17 12

Horse races (not online) 90 101 109 89 78 92

Dog races (not online) 17 25 26 20 17 21

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

38

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Sports events (not online) 56 44 74 50 38 51

Other events or sports (not online) 13 11 18 14 08 13

Spread-betting - - - - - 06

Private betting 37 47 56 37 32 41

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 09 16 09 13 13

Summary

Any gambling activity 555 585 570 589 521 562

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 417

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 94

Base 1281 1426 1189 1272 1375 6691

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

39

214 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used and validated

measure of psychological health It addresses broader components of psychological

morbidity with 12 items measuring

bull happiness

bull depression

bull anxiety

bull sleep disturbance

bull self-confidence

Each item is rated on a 4-point response scale to show whether symptoms of mental ill

health are lsquonot at all presentrsquo or if present lsquono more than usualrsquo lsquorather more than

usualrsquo or lsquomuch more than usualrsquo For the purpose of the HSE we adopted the standard

GHQ coding method for each of the 4 possible responses to each item as advocated by

the test author Each symptom was scored either 0 if rsquonot at all presentrsquo or present lsquono

more than usualrsquo or 1 for symptoms that were present lsquorather more than usualrsquo or lsquomuch

more than usualrsquo (11) So using this method the maximum score for any individual

study participant is 12 No formal threshold exists for identifying probable mental ill

health with optimal values likely to be specific to the population under study However

in keeping with previous HSE surveys participantsrsquo scores are grouped according to 3

categories which are

bull 0 (indicating no evidence of probable mental ill health)

bull 1 to 3 (indicating less than optimal mental health)

bull 4 or more (indicating probable psychological disturbance or mental ill health) (10)

Continuing the trend seen before for general health life satisfaction and wellbeing

respondents scoring highest on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological disturbance

or mental ill health) were less likely (506) to participate in gambling than those who

score 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) (555)

Table 14 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12 England 2018

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 376 349 327 360

Scratchcards 175 189 187 179

Other lotteries 148 153 119 144

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

40

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Machines and games

Football pools 32 26 24 29

Bingo (not online) 44 53 37 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 57 56 57 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 24 28 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 28 34 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 07 08 05 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 27 32 37 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 88 72 58 78

Betting exchange 12 11 11 11

Horse races (not online) 86 83 67 81

Dog races (not online) 18 19 09 17

Sports events (not online) 43 43 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 17 10 18 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 39 36 38 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 553 535 502 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 404 411 381 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 100 93 83 94

Base 4193 1630 1146 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

41

215 Overall gambling participation by BMI group

BMI (body mass index) is a widely used measure of weight that takes into account the

individualrsquos height and is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the height in metres

squared (kgm2) Adults can be classified as

bull underweight (BMI less than 185)

bull normal (BMI between 185 and 25)

bull overweight (BMI between 25 and 30)

bull obese (BMI 30 or above)

According to HSE 2018 63 of adults in England were overweight or obese and

between 1993 and 2018 there has been a marked increase in the proportion of adults

who are overweight or obese

A greater proportion of respondents classified as obese (594) and overweight (569)

participated in gambling compared to those classified not overweight or obese (486)

This difference was particularly notable for participation in the National Lottery as 429

of the obese group participated compared to 284 of the not overweight or obese

group

Table 15 Overall gambling participation by BMI group England 2018

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 284 393 429 360

Scratchcards 161 182 212 179

Other lotteries 108 159 185 144

Machines and games

Football pools 32 33 23 29

Bingo (not online) 37 44 55 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 52 54 66 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 27 20 22

Casino table games (not online) 21 36 24 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 04 10 07 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 30 35 30

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

42

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 78 92 74 78

Betting exchange 10 11 15 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 77 81

Dog races (not online) 14 19 19 17

Sports events (not online) 34 60 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 13 25 08 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 38 44 35 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 13 11 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 483 569 594 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

372 416 446 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

94 103 97 94

Base 2113 2234 1815 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

216 Overall gambling participation by alcohol consumption

HSE has asked about drinking alcohol since it began in 1993 The proportion of adults

who have drunk alcohol in the last week has steadily reduced over the previous decades

from 67 in 1998 to 57 in 2018 Across all age groups men were more likely than

women to drink at increasing and higher risk levels (12)

Alcohol consumption is reported in units of alcohol One unit of alcohol is 10ml by

volume of pure alcohol In 2016 the UK Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) published new

guidelines on low risk drinking (13) It is now recommended that men and women should

not regularly (defined as most weeks) drink more than 14 units a week Drinking at this

level is considered to be lsquolow riskrsquo and adults who regularly drink up to this amount are

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

43

advised to spread their drinking over 3 or more days Above this level is considered to

be lsquoincreased riskrsquo For men this is now over 14 units and up to 50 units and for women

over 14 units and up to 35 units per week Men who regularly drink more than 50 units a

week and women more than 35 units are described as lsquohigher risk drinkersrsquo and are

considered to be at particular risk of alcohol-related health problems (12)

There was a clear pattern of increased participation in gambling as the number of

alcohol units consumed per week increased being most noticeable at the extremes A

total of 354 of non-drinkers participated in gambling compared to 744 of those

consuming over 50 units This trend persisted for every type of gambling activity

Table 16 Overall gambling participation by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 261 445 542 525 570 432

Scratchcards 120 207 228 234 295 199

Other lotteries 86 146 172 181 205 142

Machines and games

Football pools 14 23 39 46 66 27

Bingo (not online) 36 58 50 49 72 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 32 61 91 105 127 65

Machines in a bookmakers 15 23 45 62 75 29

Casino table games (not online) 09 25 61 61 80 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 05 07 14 25 36 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

14 31 48 54 68 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 15 61 123 135 150 69

Betting exchange 04 08 16 26 35 11

Horse races (not online) 28 89 162 198 207 98

Dog races (not online) 06 23 35 45 61 24

Sports events (not online) 13 38 87 113 137 48

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

44

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online)

04 09 24 45 46 13

Spread-betting 03 04 07 14 29 05

Private betting 13 41 82 69 95 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 06 13 23 32 26 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 354 595 695 686 744 576

Base 4572 15591 4666 858 903 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

217 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking

Since it began HSE has asked questions about cigarette smoking in adults From the

series current cigarette smoking has steadily declined from 27 in 1993 to 17 in

2018 The proportion of respondents that have never regularly smoked cigarettes

increased from 46 to 58 over the same period HSE collects information about the

use of various tobacco products including cigarettes cigars and pipes The focus of this

analysis is on cigarette use meaning we do not consider cigar and pipe use in the below

definition of a current smoker

There was little difference in overall gambling participation between smokers (605)

and non-smokers (588) However current smokers generally have a higher likelihood

of participation for most gambling activity types Most notable were

bull scratchcards (306 compared to 184 of non-smokers)

bull football pools (52 compared to 26 of non-smokers)

bull machines in a bookmakers (46 compared to 18 of non-smokers)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

45

Table 17 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking England 2018

Current smoker ()

Non-smoker ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 377 406 360

Scratchcards 306 184 179

Other lotteries 121 172 144

Machines and games

Football pools 52 26 29

Bingo (not online) 69 52 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 97 54 57

Machines in a bookmakers 46 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 40 27 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 06 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 58 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 82 78

Betting exchange 07 14 11

Horse races (not online) 89 98 81

Dog races (not online) 24 14 17

Sports events (not online) 56 41 40

Other events or sports (not online) 24 15 15

Spread-betting 08 04 05

Private betting 70 36 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 14 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 605 588 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 485 437 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 123 99 94

Base 1151 2840 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

46

3 At-risk and problem gambling

31 Introduction

The most commonly used screening tools for gambling are the Diagnostic and Statistical

Manual of Mental Disorders 4th version (DSM-IV) and the Problem Gambling Severity

Index (PGSI) They define levels of gambling as (14)

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

Anyone scoring low risk or above are showing some signs of problematic behaviour

More specifically problem gambling is defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits There are

several screening tools available to identify problem gambling The HSE uses both the

DSM-IV and the PGSI

The DSM-IV was created as a clinical diagnostic tool and was not intended for use as a

screening instrument among the general population However an adapted version of the

DSM-IV for use in a survey setting was developed for the British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) series and was subject to a rigorous development and testing process

including cognitive testing and piloting The PGSI was designed for use among the

general population rather than within a clinical context It was developed tested and

validated within a general population survey of over 3000 people and the questionnaire

itself has been subject to critical evaluation and was revised in 2003 (12)

We base most tables in this section on the combined HSE dataset to increase sample

sizes wherever possible

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

47

32 Problem and at-risk gambling according to PGSI by age and sex

The PGSI consists of 9 items ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquogambling causing health

problemsrsquo to lsquofeeling guilty about gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale

These are

bull never

bull sometimes

bull most of the time

bull almost always

A score of 1 or more for PGSI indicates at-risk gambling A score of 1 to 2 is considered

low risk a score of 3 to 7 is considered moderate risk and a score of 8 or more

indicates problem gambling (12)

We have combined the low and moderate groups into an lsquoat-riskrsquo group (score 1 to 7) to

give a picture of the total risk of being a problem gambler (score 8 or more) in the

population Non-problem gambling group includes people who have not participated in

any gambling activity

According to the PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of 04 in the general

population (Table 18) The prevalence of people considered lsquoat-riskrsquo was 38 Men in

the younger age groups were most likely to experience both problem and at-risk

gambling For example 117 of men aged 16 to 24 and 101 of men aged 25 to 34

were participating in at-risk levels of gambling compared to 31 and 27 of women

respectively (these differences are statistically significant)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

48

Table 18 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

917 929 958 965 974 986 991 957

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 75 63 38 30 22 13 09 38

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

08 08 04 05 03 - - 04

Mean PGSI score 026 023 015 012 009 005 002 014

Base 3727 4547 4459 4726 3913 3186 2520 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 19 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (inc those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

868 885 936 949 962 978 983 933

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 117 101 59 43 33 19 17 60

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

15 14 05 08 - - - 08

Mean PGSI score 043 039 024 020 014 008 004 024

Base 1889 2249 2219 2336 1928 1534 1092 13246

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

49

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

967 972 980 981 986 993 997 981

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 31 27 18 18 12 07 - 17

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

- - - - - - - 01

Mean PGSI score 009 007 006 005 004 001 000 005

Base 1838 2298 2239 2390 1985 1653 1428 13831

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

According to the PGSI in 2018 there were an estimated 168149 people experiencing

problem gambling in England This is a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 208700

Also the PGSI estimates there to have been 377242 moderate risk gamblers and

1213830 low risk gamblers in England While estimates of problem gamblers and those

at moderate risk have reduced since 2016 those estimated at low risk have increased

since 2016 (from 1094066)

33 At-risk gambling

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by activity

This section shows at-risk gamblers among all respondents who participated in different

gambling activities The base is all respondents who participated in at least one activity

(individual survey participants may be included in multiple rows)

It is worth nothing that in contrast to other gambling activities participation in the

National Lottery was very low among at-risk gamblers compared to the general

population While at-risk gamblers accounted for 74 of all gambling activity they were

significantly overrepresented for

bull spread betting (520)

bull machines in bookmakers (464)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (456)

bull online gambling on slots casino or bingo games (442)

bull betting exchanges (440)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

50

Also in 20187 overall participation in online gambling was more than double (234)

that of the general population (94)

Table 20 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 68

Scratchcards 119

Other lotteries 80

Machines and games

Football pools 291

Bingo (not online) 129

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 257

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 315

Poker played in pubs or clubs 456

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 442

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 263

Betting exchange 440

Horse races (not online) 156

Dog races (not online) 266

Sports events (not online) 305

Other events or sports (not online) 436

Spread-betting 520

Private betting 250

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 338

7 We have used the latest year rather than the combined dataset due to how much online gambling has

increased between 2012 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

51

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Summary

Any gambling activity 74

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base8 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

While at-risk gamblers account for 74 of all gambling activity they account for 527

of those participating in 7 or more different gambling activities over the last 12 months

Table 21 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by number of activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities At-risk gamblers among those who participate ()

1 activity 18

2 to 3 activities 52

4 to 6 activities 197

7 or more activities 527

Total (any gambling activity) 74

Base9 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by highest educational qualification

As we have seen before for overall gambling participation at-risk gambling was most

common in the population for respondents in the below degree category (45) This

category was statistically significantly higher than both the NVQ4 NVQ5 or degree or

equivalent and the no qualification categories

8 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 9 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

52

Table 22 PGSI risk category by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category NVQ4NVQ5 Degree or

equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

969 949 962 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

22 33 22 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 12 09 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 05 06 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

29 45 31 38

Base 7582 14415 5033 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity at-risk gambling was most common in the unemployed category

(61) This was statistically significantly higher than all groups other than those in full-

time education For overall participation in gambling prevalence was the highest for the

employed self-employed or training category This was statistically significant

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

53

Table 23 PGSI risk category by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Employed self-

employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other Inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

950 925 941 987 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 43 45 09 20 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

12 18 10 03 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 14 - - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

44 61 56 12 27 38

Base 15281 1791 2023 5875 2107 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by IMD

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile However for at-risk gambling there was a statistically significant gradient with

prevalence increasing across quintiles from least deprived (30) to most deprived

(53) This aligns with the higher prevalence seen before in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

54

Table 24 PGSI risk category by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

939 954 960 963 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

34 31 24 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

18 10 10 07 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

08 05 05 04 01 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

53 41 34 33 30 38

Base 5165 5362 5667 5516 5369 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by ethnicity

By ethnicity the Asian and Asian British ethnic group had the lowest prevalence of at-

risk gambling (20) This was statistically significantly lower than the White and White

British group (39)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

55

Table 25 PGSI risk category by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category White White

British ()

Asian Asian

British ()

Black Black

British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

957 970 957 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

28 15 28 41 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

11 - - - 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 10 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

39 20 34 49 38

Base 23513 2037 816 687 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

56

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by region

The North East (49) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling while the South West (30) had the lowest

Table 26 PGSI risk category by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the Humber

()

East Midland

s ()

West Midland

s ()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

944 952 958 961 960 955 956 958 968 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

36 32 25 26 24 30 26 30 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

13 11 11 09 10 12 10 10 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 +)

- 04 07 - 05 - 08 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

49 44 36 35 35 42 36 40 30 38

Base 1325 3584 2685 2321 2824 3008 4107 4429 2794 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

57

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by self-assessed general health

There was no significant difference in at-risk gambling by respondents reporting bad and

very bad general health and those reporting very good and good general health

Table 27 PGSI risk category by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Very goodgood

()

Fair ()

Bad very bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

958 955 958 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 29 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 10 11 12 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 03 08 08 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 38 38 35 38

Base 20439 4657 1978 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by life satisfaction

Results for overall gambling participation across life satisfaction groups were

inconclusive This was not the case for at-risk gambling where respondents with low life

satisfaction (62) had a higher prevalence and those with very high life satisfaction had

a notably lower prevalence (22) This difference was statistically significant

Table 28 PGSI risk category by life satisfaction England 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

927 956 957 977 960

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

41 31 28 15 26

10 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

58

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

21 08 11 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 04 04 - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

62 39 39 22 36

Base 1231 2064 6016 3926 13601

Source HSE 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by wellbeing

As above for life satisfaction there was a gradient for at-risk gambling with respondents

in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) having the highest prevalence (64) and those in

quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) having the lowest prevalence (23) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 29 PGSI risk category by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

925 950 960 976 976 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

45 30 28 17 18 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 13 09 06 05 11

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 06 03 - 02 05

11 Totals differ from majority of tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

59

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

64 44 38 23 23 38

Base 3351 3772 3386 3238 3432 20193

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

problems) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling (51) while those scoring 0

(no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (30) This is a reversal of

the pattern seen before for overall gambling participation

Table 30 PGSI risk category by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 968 948 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 23 34 37 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 14 14 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 04 10 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 30 49 51 38

Base 11463 5025 3357 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by BMI group

There were no statistically significant differences for at-risk gambling between

respondents by BMI group

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

60

Table 31 PGSI risk category by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese () Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 954 957 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 27 25 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

10 11 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 05 05 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

42 38 37 38

Base 8910 8471 6378 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by alcohol consumption

As seen for overall gambling participation there was a clear pattern of increased at-risk

gambling as the number of alcohol units consumed per week increased This gradient

was statistically significant with 16 of non-drinkers gambling at-risk compared to

100 of people who consume over 50 units per week

Table 32 PGSI risk category by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Nevernot in last 12

months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to

35 ()

Over 35 to

50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 980 965 936 921 889 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

11 23 43 47 76 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

06 08 16 20 24 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 03 05 13 11 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

16 32 59 66 100 38

Base 4558 13678 4645 894 899 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

61

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by cigarette smoking

We saw a similar pattern for at-risk gambling as we saw for overall gambling

participation when looking at cigarette smoking Current smokers (72) had a higher

prevalence of at-risk gambling compared to non-smokers (37) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 33 PGSI risk category by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Current smoker

() Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 918 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 53 26 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+) 09 04 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 72 37 38

Base 4839 9660 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

34 Problem gambling

Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex

The DSM-IV contains 10 diagnostic criteria ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquocommitting

a crime to fund gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from

lsquoneverrsquo to lsquovery oftenrsquo A score of 3 or more indicates problem gambling

According to the DSM-IV and similar to PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of

05 in the general population Though numbers are small the younger age groups

tend to have a higher prevalence As we would expect given the higher rates of

gambling participation problem gambling according to the DSM-IV was higher in men

(09) than women (02) with the highest prevalence again seen in men in the 25 to

34 age group (15)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

62

Table 34 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

992 991 995 994 996 997 999 994

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

08 09 05 06 04 - - 06

Mean DSM-IV score 009 008 006 005 005 003 002 01

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 35 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

986 985 993 989 993 994 999 991

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

14 15 07 11 07 - - 09

Mean DSM-IV score 015 013 007 008 007 005 003 009

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

998 997 996 998 999 1000 999 998

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

63

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

- - - - - - - 02

Mean DSM-IV score 003 003 004 002 003 002 001 003

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

In 2018 DSM-IV estimated there to be 223975 problem gamblers in England This was

a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 257930

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex

The proportion of problem gamblers in the population according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI included in the HSE was 05 in 2018 (this increases to 07 when we combine

HSE years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018) Prevalence was higher for men (08) than

women (03) Using the combined HSE dataset (see Table 36) prevalence is highest

in the younger age groups

As reported by HSE the proportion of problem gamblers in the population has been

reducing from 09 in 2015 to 07 in 2016 to 05 in 2018 However as numbers

are very small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with

previous years and do not represent a real decline In 2018 there were estimated to be

245634 problem gamblers in England according to either DSM-IV or PGSI This is a

reduction from the 2016 estimate of 303328

Table 36 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 990 990 994 993 995 996 999 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 10 06 07 05 04 - 07

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

64

Table 37 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 982 983 992 987 992 993 999 989

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

18 17 08 13 08 07 - 11

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 998 996 995 998 998 1000 999 998

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

- - 05 - - - - 02

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity

While accounting for just 12 of all gambling activity problem gamblers (according to

either DSM-IV or PGSI) account for a significantly disproportionate level of participation

in

bull machines in a bookmakers (464)

bull spread betting (159)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (147)

bull other events or sports (not online) (135)

The problem gambler group were less likely to participate in activities such as the

National Lottery and scratchcards than the general gambling population

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

65

The problem gambler group were more likely than the general gambling population to

have participated in 7 or more gambling activities in the last 12 months

Table 38 Problem gambling prevalence according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 10

Scratchcards 18

Other lotteries 16

Machines and games

Football pools 50

Bingo (not online) 33

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 49

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 64

Poker played in pubs or clubs 147

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 87

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 37

Betting exchange 107

Horse races (not online) 30

Dog races (not online) 71

Sports events (not online) 56

Other events or sports (not online) 135

Spread betting 159

Private betting 43

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 99

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

66

Summary

Any gambling activity 12

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base12 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 39 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by number of activities participated in over the last 12 months England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

1 activity 03

2 to 3 activities 06

4 to 6 activities 28

7 or more activities 118

Total (any gambling activity) 12

Base13 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification

Based on the data from HSE there is no observable difference for problem gambling by

highest educational qualification

12 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 13 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

67

Table 40 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 990 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 10 07

Base 7599 14457 5061 27164

Source HSE 2012 2105 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity problem gambling was most common in respondents who were

currently unemployed (21)

Table 41 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity England 2012 2105 2016 2018

Employed self-employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler

993 979 995 998 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

07 21 05 02 06 07

Base 15321 1796 2029 5906 2111 2716

4

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD

Unlike overall gambling participation there was an inequality gradient across IMD

quintiles for problem gambling Prevalence was greatest in the most deprived group

(12) and declined for each quintile The difference between the most and least

deprived quintiles was statistically significant We saw a similar pattern before for at-risk

gambling

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

68

Table 42 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 988 993 995 996 998 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

12 07 05 04 02 07

Base 5183 5379 5684 5532 5386 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity

Problem gambling was greater in the Asian and Asian British (11) ethnic group

compared to the White and White British group (05) The difference between the 2

groups is statistically significant Though numbers are small for the remaining groups

(with confidence intervals too wide to draw any meaningful conclusions) the data

suggests a paradox of harm regarding the Asian and Asian British group This ethnic

group is less likely to take part in gambling than the White and White British group (both

overall participation and at-risk gambling) but more likely to experience problematic

gambling than the White and White British group

Table 43 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

Mixed Other

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 986 985 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 14 15 07

Base 23586 2043 821 455 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

69

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region

Even when we combined multiple HSE years numbers were small and confidence intervals overlapped when looking at

problem gambling by region

Table 44 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler (including people not participating in any gambling activity)

990 994 990 995 993 995 988 996 997 93

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 06 10 05 07 05 12 04 03 07

Base 1329 3598 2655 2341 2843 3067 4022 4451 2820 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

70

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed general health

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health had a higher prevalence of

problem gambling (13) than those reporting very good or good general health (05)

As we saw for at-risk gambling the difference between the groups was not statistically

significant but the gradient represents a different pattern to overall gambling

participation

Table 45 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed

general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 987 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 13 07

Base 20586 4581 1954 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life satisfaction

Problem gambling continues the pattern we saw before for at-risk gambling with the

highest prevalence in the low life satisfaction group (17) This was statistically

significant Again it is important to note that this was not the case for overall gambling

participation where there was no clear pattern

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

71

Table 46 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life

satisfaction England 2016 2018

Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()14

Non-problem gambler

983 995 994 998 994

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

17 05 06 02 06

Base 1223 2049 5996 3909 13629

Source HSE 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by wellbeing

As with at-risk gambling there was a clear gradient across WEMWBS quintiles with the

highest prevalence of problem gambling in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) (16) and

lowest in quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) (03) This difference was statistically

significant

Table 47 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()15

Non-problem gambler

984 990 996 998 997 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

16 10 04 02 03 07

Base 3338 3761 3393 3245 3431 20272

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

14 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018 15 Totals differ from most tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

72

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

disturbance or mental ill health) had the highest prevalence of problem gambling (14)

while those scoring 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (03)

This difference was statistically significant This is a similar pattern to at-risk gambling

and differs from overall gambling participation

Table 48 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 14 07

Base 11507 5037 3357 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group

There was little difference for problem gambling across BMI groups There was a similar

picture showing a lack of association between BMI groups for at-risk gambling

Table 49 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not overweight

or obese () Overweight

() Obese () Total ()

Non-problem gambler 994 993 993 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

06 07 07 07

Base 8964 8497 6364 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

73

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by alcohol consumption

There was a clear pattern of increased problem gambling as the number of alcohol units

consumed per week increased

Table 50 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Never or not in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

15 to 35 ()

36 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 994 993 985 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 06 07 15 14 07

Base 4503 15575 4693 863 911 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking

There was little difference by cigarette smoking status for overall gambling participation

This changed for problem gambling with current smokers (13) having higher

prevalence of problem gambling compared to non-smokers (06) This difference is

statistically significant

Table 51 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Current

smoker () Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 987 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

13 06 07

Base 4879 9663 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

74

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling

The previous sections have examined the relationships between gambling and various

other factors separately We carried out binary logistic regression models to further

investigate the different factors associated with gambling The following is a summary of

the pre-registered analysis We present the full outputs in Appendix B

To begin we conducted a series of bivariate analyses to compare a range of variables

to 3 increasing levels of gambling

1 Overall gambling participation

2 Harmful gambling (including low risk moderate risk and problem gambling)

3 Problem gambling taken in isolation

The variables included were

bull age

bull sex

bull ethnicity

bull income

bull educational attainment

bull employment

bull IMD

bull region

bull general health

bull wellbeing

bull life satisfaction

bull GHQ12

bull BMI

bull alcohol

bull smoking

Of these income region self-reported general health and BMI were shown not to be

statistically significantly associated with harmful gambling Income and BMI were shown

not to be statistically significantly associated with problem gambling

After reviewing the bivariate output we applied a multiple logistic regression to estimate

associations of socio-demographic and health factors on the likelihood that respondents

are participating in harmful gambling We excluded factors not significant at the bivariate

level from the model lsquoHarmful gamblingrsquo as discussed here includes problem gambling

and so the model takes account of the full continuum of gambling risk It is important to

note that the terms lsquolow riskrsquo and lsquomoderate riskrsquo (as used in the interpretation of the

PGSI) do not mean that risk is negligible for these respondents but rather that these

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

75

respondents are on a continuum of risk with people who have a definite problem with

their gambling This means the model includes all respondents with problem gambling

behaviours and those at risk of developing problem gambling behaviours

The logistic regression model for harmful gambling was statistically significant (p less-

than 005) The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling (see Appendix

B for more detail) and correctly classified 94 of cases but this was skewed towards

classifying respondents at no risk

Table 52 details the regression function itself and so summarises the effect of each

variable See the key below the table for the meaning of each column However the

main values of concern are the p-value and the adjusted odds ratio The p-value

determines which variables are significant (by convention this is less-than 005) and

these are highlighted in the table The adjusted odds ratio is a measurement of

likelihood that an outcome (harmful gambling) will occur given a particular exposure

compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of that exposure (see

Appendix B for more detail)

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be harmful gamblers Respondents

with below degree attainment were 18 times the odds and those with no qualifications

were 21 times the odds to be harmful gamblers compared to those with a NVQ4 NVQ5

or degree or equivalent level of attainment

Wellbeing contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on

GHQ12 Comparing those scoring 0 the odds of respondents scoring 1 to 3 were 20

times more likely and those scoring 4 or more were 24 times more likely to participate in

harmful gambling

On physical health and health behaviours smoking did not contribute significantly to the

model but alcohol did

Compared to abstainers or those not drinking in the last 12 months the odds of

respondents who drank above the CMOsrsquo low-risk drinking guidelines (14 to 35 units)

were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This increases markedly to

78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) It should be noted that the group

from HSE consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

76

Table 52 Binary multiple logistic regression model of harmful gambling variables

in the equation England 2016

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent)

- - 8609 2 0014 - - -

Educational qualification 3 groups (below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational qualification 3 groups (no qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (Least deprived)

- - 11143 4 0025 - - -

Quintile of IMD score (2)

-0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3)

0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4)

0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (Most deprived)

0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1)

- - 15525 4 0004 - - -

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2)

0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3)

0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4)

0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

77

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5)

-0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Life satisfaction (low (0 to 4))

- - 4262 3 0235 - - -

Life satisfaction (medium (5 to 6))

-0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (high (7 to 8))

-0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (very high (9 to 10))

0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ score ndash grouped (score 0)

- - 15279 2 0000 - - -

GHQ score - grouped (score 1-3)

0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ score - grouped (score 4+)

0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (nevernot in last 12 months)

- - 36554 4 0000 - - -

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14)

0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (over 14 to 35)

1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (over 35 to 50)

0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (over 50)

2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020 - -

Notes Missing data was not available due to small counts Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age 16-75+ in 10 year age bands Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc) Key B the unstandardized coefficients for the model SE the standard errors for the B-coefficients

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

78

Wald the test statistic for the individual predictor variables Linear regression will have a t-test while logistic regression has a chi-square test It is used to determine the p-value df the degrees of freedom for the Wald statistic p-value determines which variables are significant By convention any variable with a p-value below 005 is significant AOR (adjusted odds ratio) the odds ratios associated with changes in predictor scores 95 CI the 95 confidence interval of the odds ratio Source HSE 2016

The broad conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly sex

appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic factors

such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a

stronger predictor of harmful gambling than both poor physical health and negative

health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model being selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and

the method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

79

4 Gambling frequency

41 Introduction

This section considers how often people who do gamble participate in gambling

activities and to what extent Frequency is compared for respondents participating in any

gambling activity at-risk gamblers and problem gamblers This is followed by findings

from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey which combines gambling frequency with

gambling volume in terms of money and time spent

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months

For all gamblers the most common frequency of participation was once a week (262)

followed by once or twice a year (253) This was true for lotteries with 311

participating in the National Lottery once a week 232 buying scratchcards once a

week and 276 participating in other lotteries once a week A similar picture was seen

for machines and games except for machines in a bookmakers poker played in pubs or

clubs and online gambling All these activities were slightly more likely to be played 2 or

more times a week

Most betting activities were also most frequently participated in 2 or more times a week

or once a week except for horse racing and private betting Dog racing was most

frequently participated in either 2 or more times a week (236) or once a week (222)

followed by once or twice a year (218) This differs from horse racing where 349

participated only once or twice a year This reinforces the difference between horse

racing and dog racing seen before for at-risk and problem gambling

Table 53 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 145 311 111 116 139 179

Scratchcards 126 232 133 131 175 203

Other lotteries 144 276 105 161 113 202

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

80

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Machines and games

Football pools 219 301 121 152 104 104

Bingo (not online) 180 257 110 102 141 210

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

171 218 155 102 143 212

Machines in a bookmakers

246 232 158 136 101 127

Casino table games (not online)

152 191 146 127 152 231

Poker played in pubs or clubs

297 285 128 134 81 76

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

252 248 173 126 117 84

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

174 239 150 116 131 190

Betting exchange 272 258 161 69 115 124

Horse races (not online)

152 210 101 80 108 349

Dog races (not online)

236 222 100 102 122 218

Sports events (not online)

215 277 146 110 118 135

Other events or sports (not online)

345 320 175 69 44 47

Spread-betting 367 239 101 138 73 83

Private betting 155 204 140 130 127 245

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling

213 248 99 138 106 195

Summary

Any gambling activity

119 262 102 124 140 253

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

81

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Base16 1342 2961 1147 1403 1581 2853

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers

As we would expect gambling frequency increases as the level of gambling risk

increases Almost a quarter of low risk gamblers gamble 2 or more times a week and

this increases to 451 of moderate risk gamblers and 541 of problem gamblers

Respondents who are considered problem gamblers according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI 507 gamble 2 or more times a week compared to 114 of non-problem

gamblers

Table 54 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for at-risk gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 246 451 541

Once a week 266 294 194

Less than once a week more than once a month

198 88 71

Once a month 133 54 173

16 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities minus those who did

not answer the frequency question

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

82

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

Every 2 to 3 months 98 78 -

Once or twice a year 59 - -

Base 541 204 98

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 55 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for problem gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 114 507

Once a week 263 225

Less than once a week more than once a month

102 56

Once a month 124 141

Every 2 to 3 months 142 -

Once or twice a year 255 42

Base17 11146 142

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume

Although it is not as recent as the HSE 2018 the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) (15) includes more detail than the HSE on certain issues relevant to the

aims of this review In particular the BGPS offers additional data on gambling frequency

(lsquoregularrsquo gambling or days per month) and gambling volume (money time spent) While

a summary is useful for the objectives of this report itrsquos worth noting that the gambling

17 The base for problem gamblers in Table 55 is respondents categorised as a problem gambler according to either

DSM-IV or PGSI This is the conventional approach and that taken throughout the section before focusing on problem

gambling This differs from the base for Table 54 which is respondents categorised as problem gamblers according to

PGSI only This difference is necessary as only PGSI allows the further breakdown into low and moderate risk that

Table 54 requires

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

83

landscape has changed considerably since 2010 particularly issues relating to online

gambling

The BGPS included questions to measure gambling volume among regular gamblers18

based on the amount of time spent gambling in an average month and the amount of

money spent on gambling in an average month This detail is not possible from the HSE

When looking at time spent on gambling the BGPS made a cut-off for analysis purposes

to capture the top 10 of regular gamblers This cut-off was around 7 hours per month

gambling (with a mean for the group of 310 hours per month) The other 90 of regular

gamblers either did not spend any time gambling or generally spent less than 7 hours a

month gambling (with a mean of 30 minutes per month) The BGPS labelled these

groups lsquohigh-timersquo and lsquonon high-timersquo gamblers respectively

When looking at money spent on gambling the BGPS cut-off for the top 10 of regular

gamblers was around pound6150 per month on gambling (with a mean of pound20992 per

month) The remaining 90 of regular gamblers spent less than this amount (with a

mean of pound1482 per month) The BGPS labelled these groups lsquohigh-spendrsquo and lsquonon

high-spendrsquo gamblers respectively As a summary of gambling volume that considers

both time and money spent the BGPS provides 4 possible sub-groups of regular

gamblers These are respondents who were

bull non high-time and non high-spend gamblers (85)

bull high-time but non high-spend gamblers (4)

bull high-spend but non high-time gamblers (4)

bull high-time and high-spend gamblers (6)

Most (85) regular gamblers were both non high-time and non high-spend gamblers Of

the remainder the BGPS found 4 were high-time but not high-spend and another 4

were high-spend but not high-time gamblers It also found 6 were both high-time and

high-spend gamblers

Non high-time and non high-spend gamblers took part in 25 gambling activities in the

past year In comparison high-time only gamblers took part in 40 gambling activities in

the past year and high-spend only gamblers took part in 52 activities High-time and

high-spend gamblers had the highest levels of gambling participation taking part in 66

gambling activities

18 Respondents who gambled once a month or more

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

84

Compared to all regular gamblers the high-time and high-spend group were more likely

to

bull be from semi-routine or routine households19

bull live in areas of greatest deprivation

bull have no educational qualifications

bull be slightly more likely to live in the lowest income households

bull be unemployed (they were much more likely to be unemployed)

Along with the high-time only gamblers this group experiences the greatest

socioeconomic deprivation

19 Based on The National Statistics Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

85

5 Hospital admissions

51 Introduction

This section presents the number of hospital admissions due to gambling from NHS

Digitalrsquos hospital episode statistics (HES) These statistics detail all admissions

outpatient appointments and AampE attendances at NHS hospitals in England We use

figures from finished admission episodes (FAEs) with a primary or secondary diagnosis

as classified by the International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) (ICD-10) of

bull ICD-10 F630 Pathological Gambling

bull ICD-10 Z726 Gambling and Betting

52 HES admissions due to gambling

Across England there were 375 admissions to hospital because of gambling in 2018 to

2019 Over the previous 3 years admissions have increased but compared to other

causes numbers20 remain very small

Table 56 Number of FAEs with a primary or secondary diagnosis relating to gambling by age group England between 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019

Age group 2016 to 2017 2017 to 2018 2018 to 2019

lt20 lt10 lt10 lt10

20 to 29 75 90 115

30 to 39 70 105 120

40 to 49 60 50 60

50 to 59 40 50 55

60+ 20 25 20

Total (will not sum due to rounding) 260 325 375

Source Hospital episode statistics (HES) NHS Digital 2020

20 Numbers are too small relative to all hospital admissions to calculate meaningful rates

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

86

6 Previously published sources of gambling data

This section of the report collates information on gambling previously published

elsewhere The purpose is to meet aspects of the objectives not fulfilled by the primary

data source Topics include

bull affected others

bull treatment

bull attitudes and influences

bull children and young people

The published sources discussed in the rest of the report vary in the type and quality of

gambling data available Gambling is relatively new field of research Inconsistencies in

the robustness and standardisation of the publications and data available are to be

expected However all sources included here are encouraging additions to the existing

body of work and one of the recommendations of the review is to encourage further

research and analysis in this area

We discuss the methods and caveats of each source in the introduction to each topic

61 Affected others

Introduction

A recent report published by YouGov (16) on behalf of GambleAware included a detailed

section on lsquoaffected othersrsquo The report defines lsquoaffected othersrsquo as

ldquohellippeople that know someone who has had a problem with gambling (either

currently or in their past) and feel they have personally experienced negative

effects from this person (or peoples) gambling behaviour This could include

family members friends and work colleagues among others with the negative

effects ranging from financial to emotional or practical impactsrdquo

The BGPS included some analysis of affected others in 2010 but the YouGov report

represents the most recent data available on affected others currently available The

source is not as robust as the HSE (which is designed to be representative of the

population by adopting a multi-stage stratified probability sampling design based on

postcode sectors) but does have a very good sample size of around 12000

respondents of which 7 are affected others

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

87

The main difference between the HSE and the YouGov survey is the sampling method

(probability vs non-probability) The difference in mode is also important (face-to-face

vs online) YouGov describe the survey as nationally representative but this is unclear

These differences may account for the fact that the headline prevalences do differ

somewhat from HSE21 in that YouGov finds 13 of the population experience gambling

harm (PGSI score of 1+) compared to a figure of 4 on the combined HSE This is a

significant difference

An independent report by the London School of Economics (LSE) (17) evaluates the

differences between the sources It concludes that HSE may under-estimate gambling

harm by requiring a residential address and YouGov may over-estimate harm by

excluding offline people The conclusion drawn by LSE is that it is credible that the level

of harm is probably somewhere between the 2 reported figures

The LSE report does offer a level of scrutiny and transparency but it is important to note

when reading the following section that the YouGov report itself has not been peer

reviewed and there is a lack of conclusions drawn and references to other published

work on the subject Furthermore the report does not specify the time frame of the PGSI

questions The HSE is clear that the PGSI is based on the respondentsrsquo activities over

the last 12 months We could assume that YouGov also covered the last 12 months but

this is not clear from the publication If YouGov did not specify the last 12 months then

respondents might have assumed the questions could apply to an earlier time which

would increase the prevalence of harm Particularly relevant to this section it is also

unclear how YouGov arrived at the 7 affected others prevalence figure due to the

complexity of how the report combines phases 1 and 2 of the study as it does not

include this information

However the affected others section of the YouGov report is the most detailed

contribution to the subject currently available and taking into account the above

caveats adds value to the present review

Prevalence of affected others

YouGov finds that 7 of the total adult population of Great Britain were affected others

The findings also reveal that the likelihood of being an affected other increases with

PGSI score Among gamblers 20 of problem gamblers (according to PGSI) were

affected others compared to 13 of moderate risk gamblers and 9 of low risk

21 We do not compare this to HSE exactly but rather the health surveys of England Wales and Scotland combined

Here we refer to it as HSE for simplicity and consistency

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

88

gamblers The report suggests that this shows the complex relationship between a

personrsquos own gambling and the issues relating to other peoplersquos gambling

Affected others were more likely to be women (57) than men (43) which reflects the

fact that problem gambling is much more associated with men There is little variation by

age but affected others were slightly more likely to be social class CD2E22 and less

likely to be White British

Type of affected others

Affected others were most likely to be negatively affected by a gambling problem of

someone in their immediate family (61) This is most commonly a spouse or partner

(25) followed by a parent (21) Women (71) were more likely than men (44) to

be negatively affected by the gambling of someone in their immediate family Women

were also much more likely to be affected by their spouse or partner (35 of women

compared to 9 of men)

Due to their age younger (18 to 24) affected others were most likely to have been

affected by the gambling of a parent Older affected others (55 and over) were most

likely to have been affected by the gambling of a child

Importantly people who were both affected others and problem gamblers were more

likely to have been negatively affected by the gambling problem of a child (15)

implying that gambling has profound impacts on the family as a whole Problem

gamblers were also more likely than average to say they have been negatively affected

by a non-immediate family member or work contact suggesting that gamblers were

more likely to socialise with other gamblers

Severity of impact upon affected others

Among affected others the most severe impacts of gambling were felt most by

immediate family members Figure 4 shows the severity of impact by type of affected

other in Great Britain in 2019 It presents the results from the YouGov report on severity

of impact by percentage into either minor moderate or severe The figure shows that

almost half (48) of affected others that were affected by a spouse or partner report a

severe negative impact This is followed in severity by the gambling of a parent (41)

22 Social class definition

AB higher and intermediate managerial administrative and professional workers C1 supervisory clerical and junior

managerial administrative and professional workers C2 skilled manual workers D semi-skilled and unskilled

manual workers E people on long term state benefits casual and lowest grade workers unemployed with state

benefits (including pension) only

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

89

and a child (38) A lower proportion of affected others reporting a severe negative

impact were due to friends The report suggests that the type and closeness of the

relationship plays an important role in determining the severity of the negative impact

experienced by affected others

Figure 4 Severity of impact by type of affected other Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling treatment and support YouGov 2019

The most significant type of impact reported by affected others was an inability to trust

the problem gambler (62) This was followed by

bull feelings of anger towards them (53)

bull anxiety (40)

bull a breakdown of communication (40)

bull reduced income for household running costs such as food rent and bills (38)

Women were more likely to have experienced all the negative impacts of being an

affected other with 81 reporting depression anxiety and anger towards the problem

gambler compared to 64 of men Women were also more likely to have experienced

financial impacts (67 of women compared to 48 of men)

Advice and support

YouGov found that most (64) affected others have not sought advice or support on

behalf of the problem gambler and an even greater proportion (72) have not sought

help for themselves as an affected other When affected others do seek advice and

0 20 40 60 80 100

Other workcolleague

Friend

Sibling

Other familymember

Child

Parent

Spousepartner

Percent reporting severity of impact ()

Severe Moderate Minor

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

90

support either for themselves or for the problem gambler it is most likely from less formal

sources This included seeking help from

bull a friend or family member (19)

bull a spouse or partner (11)

bull gambling support websites (11)

For more formal sources of advice and support 12 report seeking help from mental

health services and 8 from a GP Also 5 report seeking help from another addiction

service (for example a drugs or alcohol service) again highlighting the complexity of

addiction

Concern for the safety or wellbeing of the problem gambler or family members (65) is

the most common reason affected others seek advice and support Over half (57) of

affected others report not knowing how to deal with gambling and its impacts as the

reason for seeking help A similar proportion (54) sought advice due to a relationship

or family being affected by gambling or due to mental health problems (51) Though a

lower significant proportion (34) report being prompted by a severe negative impact

such as risk of losing employment risk of losing their home or criminal proceedings

YouGov concluded that there is an evident demand for advice and support among

affected others with almost half (48) reporting a need for such help whether for

themselves their spouse or partner a family member friend or colleague

The most reported barrier to seeking advice or support was that the person does not

consider their gambling to be a problem (43) The next most common reason is the

belief that gambling treatment would not be helpful or be effective (40) A further 14

reported feeling embarrassed or ashamed to ask for advice or support or that they would

not want others to find out socially or professionally

62 Treatment

Introduction

This section draws on published reports from Gambleaware The National Gambling

Treatment Service (NGTS) is a network of organisations providing treatment and

support for people experiencing gambling-related harms It is free to access across

England Scotland and Wales GambleAware commissions the NGTS and it is funded

through voluntary contributions from the gambling industry

GambleAware publish annual statistics (18) covering the treatment activity of the NGTS

and this is the source of the following summary The annual statistics cover treatment

provided by GamCare and its partner network Gordon Moody Associates and the

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

91

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) This represents most of the treatment provision for gambling in the UK although

there are other providers emerging in the public sector and third sector as a result of

policy changes in England Scotland and Wales23

Treatment provided (19)

GamCare offers

bull online treatment supported by regular contact with a therapist that people can access

at a time and place convenient for them over the course of 8 weeks

bull one-to-one in person online and telephone therapeutic support and treatment for

people with gambling problems as well as affected others

bull group based gambling recovery courses delivered face-to-face or online for between

6 to 8 weeks

bull the National Gambling Helpline which provides immediate telephone and online live

chat support and referral into the treatment service

bull information and advice via their website moderated forums and online group

chatrooms24

Gordon Moody Association offers

bull two specialist residential treatment centres providing an intensive programme for men

with a gambling addiction over a period of 14 weeks

bull specialist relapse prevention housing for people who have completed the treatment

programmes but need additional recovery support

bull retreat and counselling programmes for women or men-only groups that combine

short residential stays with at-home counselling support

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) offers treatment for gambling problems This treatment is especially for people

bull with more severe addictions

bull with co-morbid mental and physical health conditions

bull with impaired social functioning

bull who may come to treatment with more risk such as risk of suicide

23 The NHS Northern Gambling Service provided by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

has not been open for one full reporting year at time of publication So it is not included in the annual

statistics for 2019 to 2020 Further regional NHS led clinics are being established as part of the NHS Long

Term Plan 24 Data from these services are not included in the annual statistics publication

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

92

GambleAware funded treatment providers are required to submit quarterly datasets in a

standardised format The annual statistics publication presents the analysis of these

submissions As of 2020 there is an additional service as part of the NGTS However

this new service the NHS Northern Gambling Service was not operational in 2019 to

2020 so we have concentrated on the 3 service providers for which there is published

data available

Socio-demographic profile of people in treatment

The NGTS treated just over 9000 people in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This is

the most people treated since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016 (5909) For reference

this review has previously estimated there to be around 245600 problem gamblers in

England (according to PGSI or DSM-IV) Almost a quarter (23) of people treated in

2019 to 2020 had been seen before by the service

Most people treated were gamblers (84) while 13 of referrals related to affected

others This is less than the estimate of affected others among the problem gambling

population (20) suggesting a certain level of unmet need for this group As we can

expect from previous sections of this review affected others were more likely to be

women

Most people treated were men (75) and a greater proportion are from the younger age

groups This corresponds to the prevalence of problem gambling in the population

However there has been an overall small increase in the proportion of women being

treated increasing from 19 in 2015 to 2016 to 25 in 2019 to 2020

Table 57 Age and sex of people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Age group lt20 ()

20-24 ()

25-29 ()

30-34 ()

35-39 ()

40-44 ()

45-49 ()

50-54 ()

55-59 ()

60+ ()

Men 12 112 216 217 157 95 75 52 34 30

Women 05 48 136 159 161 120 85 104 90 91

All people in treatment

10 96 196 202 158 101 78 65 48 45

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Most people in treatment were employed (75) with the next most reported category

being unemployed (9) Given the unemployment rate in the UK was around 4 in

2019 we can expect a higher proportion of people in treatment to be unemployed given

previous findings that problem gambling is highest in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

93

On average people in treatment reported problem gambling starting at the age of 24

years although this was highly variable Three-quarters reported problem gambling

starting by the age of 32 years and one-quarter by the age of 19 years At the point of

coming to treatment services people had typically been problem gambling for an

average of 10 years

Gambling profile of people in treatment

A large proportion of people in treatment (58) participated online for their primary

gambling activity followed by bookmakers (27) No other locations were used by more

than 10 of people in treatment For online activities gambling on casino slots was the

most common activity (38) followed by sporting events (37) and casino table games

(27) For bookmakers gaming machines were the most common form of gambling

(53) followed by sporting events (31) and horse racing (24)

The most notable difference in gambling activity for peopl in treatment between 2015 to

2016 and 2019 to 2020 has been the increase in online gambling (from 57 to 69)

This has happened alongside the reduction in the proportion using bookmakers (from

56 to 38)

About 12 of people in treatment had suffered a job loss as a result of their gambling

and 26 had suffered a relationship loss through their gambling Almost a third (29) of

people in treatment had no debt due to gambling at the time of assessment But a

quarter had debts up to pound5000 and 45 had debts over pound5000 or were bankrupt or in

an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA)

Over half of people in treatment (54) spent up to pound100 per day gambling in the 30 days

before assessment The NGST annual statistics also found

bull 16 spent between pound100 and pound200

bull 18 spent between pound200 and pound500

bull 15 spent over pound500

On average (mean) people in treatment reported spending pound2102 on gambling in the

30 days before assessment

Average (mean) money spent on gambling days was highest among people using

casinos (pound544) and online services (pound435) The mean spend can be affected by outliers

(extreme individual values) but even using the median people using casinos still had the

highest average daily spend (pound200) Average monthly spend was again very high for

people using casinos followed by adult entertainment centres and online services

However monthly spend was also high for bookmakers and bingo halls especially

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

94

compared to daily spend The report suggests that using these services often

contributes to a high monthly spend

Table 58 Average money spent on gambling by people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Average spend per gambling

day (pound) Average spend in past

month (pound)

Mean Median Mean Median

Bookmakers 295 100 1785 1000

Bingo hall 210 100 1007 775

Casino 544 200 2973 1000

Live events 170 45 974 600

Adult entertainment centre

241 100 2807 640

Family entertainment centre

136 100 737 600

Pub 212 100 1519 700

Online 435 100 2145 1000

Miscellaneous 324 100 1467 575

Private members club 160 50 1777 700

Other 265 52 2038 600

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Access and outcomes

The overwhelming majority of people (902) self-referred to the NGTS This was

distantly followed by prisons (29) other service or agency (27) and GPs (15)

For people treated during 2019 to 2020 50 were seen within 3 days and 75 within 8

days Waiting times for residential services were higher with 50 of people seen within

3 and a half months

During 2019 to 2020 there was an average of 7 appointments per person and this was

similar for both problem gamblers and affected others Treatment lasted on average 8

weeks with a quarter of people receiving treatment for 3 weeks or less Half of all people

receiving treatment did so for between 3 and 15 weeks and a quarter received treatment

for over 15 weeks Treatment was slightly shorter for affected others and for those in

residential centres was generally longer (an average of 13 weeks)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

95

Between 2015 to 2016 and 2019 to 2020 the proportion of people completing treatment

increased from 59 to 69 while the proportion dropping out of treatment decreased

from 35 to 24 Affected others were more likely to complete treatment than problem

gamblers (80 compared to 66) Overall women were more likely to complete

treatment than men but when limited to just problem gamblers female problem

gamblers were slightly less likely to complete treatment (64 compared to 67 of male

problem gamblers) Also people who were unemployed were considerably more likely

than the average to drop out of treatment (32) and less likely to complete treatment

(61)

As expected almost all (94) people receiving treatment were defined as a problem

gambler according to PGSI The mean PGSI score for people in treatment was 20

markedly higher than the threshold of 8 required for the problem gambler definition

During 2019 to 2020 this proportion had reduced to 40 while PGSI scores had

improved for most people in treatment (75) Those defined as problem gamblers were

most likely to improve by 10 to 18 points (31) with a further 26 improving by 20 to 27

points

63 Attitudes and influences

Introduction

The Gambling Commission has been tracking public perceptions of gambling since

2010 These attitudes and what influences gambling behaviours are the subject of this

section The primary source is the Gambling Commission annual report series

lsquoGambling participation behaviour awareness and attitudesrsquo (20) The Gambling

Commission collects data via a combination of telephone and online surveys This is

supplemented by tables from the HSE

The telephone survey provides the main measure of past 4 week gambling participation

with waves conducted quarterly in March June September and December to reduce

the effect of seasonal variations in gambling behaviour The Gambling Commission

conducts about 1000 interviews each quarter from a survey sample generated through

Random Digit Dialling (RDD)25 of Great Britain phone numbers The sample is subject to

quotas to ensure it is as nationally representative as possible Respondents are

screened to ensure they are 16 or over and fit in remaining unfilled quotas Quotas are

set based on age sex religion and social grade Data is weighted to be representative

25 Random Digit Dialling (RDD) is a method for sampling of telephone surveys which involves the random generation

of telephone numbers

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

96

of the adult population with weights set based on the National Readership Survey (a

face-to-face random probability sample)

The Gambling Commission uses the online survey to monitor online gambling

behaviour The survey was launched after the government introduced regulation of

overseas gambling companies transacting with customers in Great Britain (in-line with

the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014) The online survey sample is

sourced through a panel and the sample is subject to quotas in-line with those used for

the telephone survey Also data is weighted for analysis in-line with the methods used

for the telephone survey

Public perception of gambling

Considering the public perception of gambling back to 2010 gamblersrsquo attitudes are more positive than non-gamblers but the gap has reduced significantly in recent years (Figure 5) The proportion of gamblers and non-gamblers who think that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted has reduced gradually over the past 10 years

Figure 5 Respondents who agree that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted Great Britain 2010 to 2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

All respondents Gambled in past 12 months

Not gambled in past 12 months

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

97

The views of gamblers were also sought on the most important factors when selecting a

company to gamble with The most important factor was having the best odds (26)

followed by the company having

bull a fair and trustworthy reputation (24)

bull bonus offers (15)

bull a recognisable brand name (14)

The Gambling Commission survey asked respondents about a series of attitudinal

statements taken from the Attitudes Towards Gambling Scale (ATGS-8) (a validated

scale to assess gambling attitudes among the general population originally developed

for the 2007 BGPS) From this 82 of respondents in 2019 agreed that there were

currently too many opportunities for gambling (a 3 increase from 2018) while 73

agreed that gambling is dangerous for family life In 2019 we also saw an increase in

the proportion saying that gambling should be discouraged (up to 62 from 58 in

2018) and a significant reduction in respondents agreeing that ldquogambling livens up liferdquo

(down to 26 from 28 in 2018)

Awareness of gambling

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey asks whether gamblers

follow a gambling company on social media Overall 23 of respondents followed a

gambling company on either Facebook Twitter YouTube Snapchat or Instagram in

2019 Facebook (17) was the most popular social media platform in which gamblers

follow gambling companies and despite a decrease over recent years this has been the

case since 2015 This is followed by

bull Twitter (8)

bull YouTube (6)

bull Instagram (5)

bull Snapchat (2)

These figures are consistent with the Adultrsquos Media Use and Attitudes Report (21) which

identifies Facebook as the most popular social media platform with use decreasing since

2017

Overall 86 of respondents have ever seen or heard any gambling advertisements and

82 have ever seen or heard any gambling sponsorship A higher proportion of men

(89) than women (83) have seen or heard gambling advertisements Also compared

to the 2018 survey we saw a decrease in the visibility of gambling sponsorships among

those aged 25 to 34 years (77 in 2019 compared to 82 in 2018)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

98

Gambling management tools

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey also asks about wider issues

of self-exclusion and gambling management tools

If a gambler considers themselves to be spending too much time or money gambling

either online or in person they can request to be self-excluded from a gambling

company or can self-exclude from multiple operators Figure 6 shows the percentage of

gamblers who have self-excluded from gambling activities through a gambling

management tool and whether they were aware of these tools In 2019 5 of gamblers

have ever self-excluded which is a slight reduction from 6 in the previous 4 years The

proportion The proportion of gamblers who had not self-excluded but were aware of

self-exclusion increased steadily from 29 in 2015 to 42 in 2019 The proportion of

gamblers who were not aware of self-exclusion reduced from 65 in 2015 53 in 2019

Figure 6 Gamblersrsquo awareness and use of self-exclusion Great Britain 2015-2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Among gamblers in 2019 more men (6) have self-excluded than women (4) while

those aged 25 to 34 have the highest self-exclusion rates (9) Other management

tools used were

bull setting financial limits (9)

6 6 6 6 5

2937 35

41 42

6557 58

53 53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Self-excluded Not self-excluded but aware Not self-excluded and not aware

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

99

bull time out (3)

bull reality check (3)

bull exclusion by product (2)

Table 59 Use and awareness of gambling management tools Great Britain 2019

Self-exclusion

() Exclusion by product ()

Time out ()

Financial limits ()

Reality check ()

Used 5 2 3 9 3

Aware but not used

42 24 34 49 27

Not aware 53 74 63 42 70

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Compared to the previous year the Gambling Commission reported an increase in the

proportion of respondents seeing information about where to seek help to control

gambling (40) in 2019 They also reported a decrease in respondents seeing

information on whether a machine is random or compensated26 (6)

Overall 20 of gamblers have ever read the terms and conditions provided by a

gambling operator The proportion of respondents who have not read terms and

conditions but were aware they are available was 62 while 18 were not aware terms

and conditions are available Women (22) and those aged 65 or over (30) were

more likely to be unaware of terms and conditions

64 Children and young people

Introduction

This section focuses on gambling prevalence among children and young people The

legal gambling age in the UK is 18 and this includes both gambling in person and

online Historically the exception was the National Lottery but the government plans to

26 All gambling machines have a return to player rate that dictates how frequently they are likely to pay

out For random machines and online slots this is typically based on a random number generator

meaning it is totally random whether the machine hits this number and pays out In contrast the likelihood

of a compensated machine paying out is based on previous plays The most common example is a fruit

machine which is more likely to pay out the more money it has taken (this is necessary as they can only

physically hold a certain number of coins)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

100

raise this from 16 to 18 no later than October 2021 following the announcement of the

Review of the Gambling Act 2005 (22)

The primary source used is the Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and

Gambling Survey A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo (23) We

supplement this with information from the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) report

lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) as well as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) (25)

The Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey A research

study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo is conducted as part of Ipsos MORIrsquos

annual Young People Omnibus (YPO) and examines gambling behaviours such as

where young people gamble and with whom perceptions of gambling and awareness of

gambling advertising The survey also asks a series of questions relating to potential

issues associated with gambling and uses the DSM-IV-MR-J2 problem gambling screen

to classify gamblers as low risk moderate risk or problem gamblers The survey is

conducted in schools with pupils completing online self-completion surveys in class

Data is weighted by sex age and region

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo used a mixed methods approach comprising of a

series of 6 focus groups with a total of 79 young people across England Scotland and

Wales It also included a survey conducted through Survey Monkey and promoted

through social media which 1025 young people responded to The ethnicity and

geographical region of the respondents was fairly representative of the UK population

However most take-up in the survey was by boys (83) which is not representative of

the general population That said the authors quote studies that have found boys to

have significantly higher participation rates in games most heavily associated with loot

boxes and skin betting such as the FIFA series and Fortnite

ALSPAC is a longitudinal study of young peoplesrsquo gambling between 17 and 24 years

using a contemporary UK cohort the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) When the children were aged 6 in 1997 to 1998 their parents completed the

South Oaks Gambling Screen Then when aged 18 the parents completed the PGSI

Between 2008 and 2018 all young people still registered with the ALSPAC (10155)

were invited to take part and complete a gambling frequency survey which included

PGSI The sample sizes completing the gambling surveys were

bull 3757 at age 17

bull 4340 at age 20

bull 4345 at age 24

Depression anxiety and wellbeing scores and drug and alcohol use were also

collected by self-completion questionnaires The main strength of this report is its use of

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

101

the large ALSPAC cohort which has collected detailed data for over 25 years The main

limitation is the missing data with less than half of the whole ALSPAC cohort completing

the gambling surveys Non-responders to the gambling surveys when compared to

ALSPAC responders overall were more likely to be male and from more deprived social

backgrounds with mothers with lower educational levels There was also a significant

gender bias with the final sample comprising 58 females As males were more likely

to engage in gambling activity this gender bias will have resulted in an under-estimate

of gambling prevalence and associated characteristics (26)

A main limitation of all sources used in this section is a lack of general health data We

acknowledged this in the protocol of this review and represents a gap in the data

available for children young people and gambling

Gambling participation

The proportion of 11 to 16-year-old children who have spent their own money on any gambling activity in the last 7 days has been decreasing since 2011 from 23 to 11 in 2019 (Figure 7) This decrease follows the trend of any gambling in the last 12 months which has reduced from 39 in 2018 to 36 in 201927 We should view this reduction in the context of declining rates of drinking smoking and drug-taking in children and young people Though poor diet remains an issue obesity rates are also falling and levels of activity increasing largely through increased activity at school (27)

Nearly double the number of boys (13) reported participating in any gambling activity

in the past 7 days than girls (7) Participation was higher in older children (12 of 14

to 16 year olds compared to 9 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Table 60 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by age and sex Great Britain 2019

11

year olds

12 year olds

13 year olds

14 year olds

15 year olds

16 year olds

Boys aged 11-16

Girls aged 11-16

Total aged 11-16

Has played a National Lottery game in past 7 days

7 3 4 2 3 9 5 2 4

Has played any gambling game in the past 7 days

14 8 9 11 11 16 13 7 11

27 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 37 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19

pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

102

Source Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain 2019

The most common gambling activities for 11 to 16-year-old children in the past 7 days

were placing a private bet for money (5) and playing fruit or slot (electronic gaming)

machines (4) A consistent finding in the report series is that fruit and slot (electronic

gaming) machines (mentioned by 23 of respondents who have gambled) was the first

experience of gambling The main reason for gambling given was ldquobecause itrsquos funrdquo

(55) while among children who do not gamble the main reason given was that it is

illegal and they are too young to take part (56)

National Lottery participation in the past 7 days among 11 to 15 year olds was at its

lowest reported level in 2019 Figure 7 shows that the proportion of 11 to 15 year olds

who have played National Lottery games in the past week has decreased over time

from 10 in 2011 to 4 in 2019

Figure 7 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by activity Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling Commission lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo 2019

Scratchcards remained the most common National Lottery product among children

under 16 who have ever played (mentioned by 10) compared with

bull Lotto the main National Lottery draw (6)

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Any gambling game Any National Lottery game

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

103

bull National Lottery online instant win games (4)

bull other National Lottery games (5)

Most under 16s who bought a National Lottery product were in the company of a parent

or guardian (67) and report that the parent typically pays at the till (73) The report

concludes that although under 16s play the National Lottery for a range of reasons the

influence of parents and family members was as important as having fun

On average 11 to 16 year olds who had gambled in the past 7 days spent pound17 The

overall amount of money this group was given as pocket money birthday money or

money earnt over the same period was pound34

The rates of gambling reported in the past week (11) were lower than drinking alcohol

(16) but higher than using e-cigarettes (7) smoking tobacco cigarettes (6) or

taking illegal drugs (5) Since 2017 the series has seen a potential relationship

between these other harmful activities and gambling such that those who have spent

their own money on gambling in the past 7 days were also more likely to have drank

alcohol (41) taken drugs (21) or smoked either a tobacco cigarette (25) or an e-

cigarette (27) compared with children who had not gambled

Online gambling and gaming

Participation in online gambling among children in the last 7 days compared with in

person gambling was low (3) particularly in the context of the time young people

spend online (the series shows how chatting online with friends and using social media

are 2 of the most popular spare time activities for this age group) Given the low rate of

participation in online gambling it is difficult to draw conclusions across the report series

Any past participation in online gambling was higher at 12 with differences across age

and sex showing the same pattern seen for overall gambling Boys (16) were more

likely than girls (8) to have ever played an online gambling-style game Participation

was higher in older children compared to younger children (14 of 14 to 16 year olds

compared to 10 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Among children who have ever played online gambling-style games fruit and slot

(electronic gaming) machines were most commonly mentioned (30) followed by casino

games such as

bull roulette or blackjack (26)

bull poker games (24)

bull bingo (21)

This was consistent with previous surveys Almost half (47) of children who play online

gambling-style games do so via apps Of these 26 were apps unrelated to social

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

104

networking sites 18 were via Facebook and 17 were free demo games via

gambling apps

Half (52) of 11 to 16 year olds were aware of in-game items (for example weapons

power-ups and tokens) Awareness of in-game items was more common in boys (66)

than girls (37) Of these children 44 had paid money for loot boxes crates or packs

to get in-game items within the game theyrsquore playing In most cases the money used for

loot boxes crates or packs comes from money they had received as a birthday or

Christmas present or from pocket money

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) explored the relationship between gambling

and video games This report was undertaken to explore concerns that these activities

introduce young people to gambling before they have been able to develop strategies to

avoid gambling-related harms

The RSPH report states that around 93 of young people regularly play video games

and that there is a growing concern around loot boxes and skin betting28 The report

found that in the past 7 days twice as many 11 to 14 year olds had bought loot boxes

than 22 to 24 year olds and almost twice as many had taken part in skin betting Also

children under 18 were significantly less likely than older respondents to classify these

activities as gambling and less likely to associate gambling harms with an increased risk

of health issues such as anxiety and alcohol consumption Finally only 25 of children

aged 11 to 14 years strongly support classifying loot boxes as gambling compared to

73 of those aged 22 to 24 years

You should note with reference to the caveats given at the start of this section that

although this source allows us to include information on this new topic the sampling

design it is not as robust as the lsquoGambling Commission Young People and Gambling

Survey 2019rsquo

Problem gambling

In 2019 17 of 11 to 16 year olds were classified as problem gamblers29 and 27 as

at-risk gamblers (as defined by the youth-adapted problem gambling screen DSM-IV-

28 Loot boxes are purchasable rewards that are uncertain at the time of purchase They include cosmetics such as new lsquoskinsrsquo for a character or they can be functional providing an advantage within the game As they cost money to buy and there is an element of chance involved it has led to concerns that they are a form of gambling On sites external to the game itself players can trade sell or bet on their skins for money ndash this is skin betting The Gambling Commissionrsquos view on loot boxes skin betting and related issues is set on in the position paper published March 2017 29 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 19 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

105

MR-J screen) These figures have remained stable compared to the previous year

However it is important to note that problem gambling prevalence in children and young

people from this source is higher than problem gambling prevalence in adults as

reported in the HSE In reality this is perhaps unlikely to be the case suggesting the

DSM-IV as used here may result in an overestimation

There was a higher proportion of boys at risk (38) and problem gamblers (20) than

girls at risk (16) and problem gamblers (07) This gender difference was consistent

with the higher prevalence seen in boys throughout the survey as well as what we see in

adult problem gambling from the HSE and other sources referenced throughout this

report

Another important aspect of gambling for public health not included in the HSE is the

harmful impact on family members The BGPS asks 2 questions about this issue The

first asked whether the respondentrsquos parents or guardians had ever regularly gambled If

so the respondent was asked to report whether they felt that either of their parents or

guardians had ever had a problem with their gambling Problem gambling prevalence

was significantly higher among respondents whose parents gambled regularly (16)

than for those whose parents did not (07) Also 50 of respondents who reported

having a parent with a gambling problem were themselves problem gamblers compared

with 10 of those who reported that although their parents regularly gambled they did

not have a problem with their gambling

Attitudes and influences

Most young people believe gambling to be dangerous (59) and feel well informed

about the issue (60) Also 7 agree that most people their age gamble 11 agree it

is OK for someone their age to gamble to see what itrsquos like and 7 agree it is OK for

someone their age to gamble once a week Consistent with previous surveys it is

interesting to note that despite the higher gambling prevalence in boys compared to

girls both show a similar level of agreement that gambling is dangerous (60 of boys

and 59 of girls)

Exposure to advertising was high among children and young people with 69 reporting

to have seen or heard some form of gambling advertisements or sponsorship most

commonly via television Boys (39) were more likely than girls (28) to report seeing

or hearing a gambling advert about a sports event or a betting company (34 of boys

compared to 21 of girls) Girls (47) were more likely than boys (34) to remember

the last advert they saw about a National Lottery based game or bingo (33 of girls

compared to 20 of boys) Also just over one in 10 (12) follow gambling companies

on social media while 11 had received direct marketing from gambling companies

Half (50) of young people have been spoken to about the potential problems that

gambling can lead to and 74 say they know who to go to for help if they had problems

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

106

related to gambling Children were most likely to have been spoken to about the

potential problems with gambling by their parents or guardians (34) followed by a

teacher (19)

These findings also highlight how parents or guardians were typically present when a

young person gambles (67 of those who have ever spent money on gambling) but are

also recognised as the first contact for help if they were to have problems with gambling

(53) Most young people (57) say their family would discourage them from gambling

if they started or found out but 23 report that their parents or guardians set rules about

gambling

A recent release from ALSPAC (25) measured young peoplersquos gambling at age 17 20

and 24 (3 points of transition from adolescence to adulthood) and revealed that regular

weekly gamblers had developed habits and patterns of play by 20 years of age Playing

the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most

common forms of gambling reported but as the young people got older there was a

significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to 35 at age 20

and 47 at age 24 There was also an increase seen among women but not as steep

(from 08 at age 17 to 4 at age 20 and 11 at age 24) The study shows how young

people who gamble regularly were more likely to

bull have parents who gambled regularly

bull have high social media usage

bull have been regular players of video games when younger

Also regular gamblers had lower wellbeing scores and were at least twice as likely to

smoke cigarettes daily and consume alcohol weekly Finally a small minority (6 to 7)

of men demonstrated problem gambling behaviours associated with poor mental health

and wellbeing involvement in crime and potentially harmful use of drugs and alcohol

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

107

7 Discussion

Over half of the population take part in gambling (245 million people in England)

Participation in the National Lottery declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However

participation in other gambling activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015

before falling back to 40 in the most recent survey Online gambling (excluding the

National Lottery) has increased from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

The trend in problem gambling between 2012 and 2018 has also reduced accounting

for 05 of the population in 2018 (245600 people in England) As numbers are very

small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with previous years

rather than representative of a real decline However low risk gambling is increasing

and a cause for concern

The prevention paradox states that on a health continuum ndash alcohol being the typical

example ndash the larger volume of harm is associated with people lower on the continuum

because there are more of them It is unclear from the data available whether problem

gambling is actually declining but low risk gambling does appear to be increasing So it

is difficult to say whether gambling risk and the associated harms have increased or

decreased overall The HSE gambling questionnaire is not detailed enough about the

harms themselves and so we cannot draw a clear conclusion based on the quantitative

data presented here This is a limitation of this study and in the data currently available

for this topic area

Problem moderate risk and low risk gambling are all associated with men in the younger

age groups Demographic factors particularly sex appear more significant in predicting

at-risk gambling behaviour than economic factors such as income employment and

relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling

than poor physical health and negative health behaviours with the exception of alcohol

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were affected others Among

children playing the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends

were the most common forms of gambling reported But as the young people got older

there was a significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to

35 at age 20 and 47 at age 24

Figures presented do not cover the period of the COVID-19 pandemic with the most

recent published data from the primary data source covering 2018 We have published a

separate evidence review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling It is important

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

108

to note that some findings particularly for problem gambling may be deemed

inconclusive because of the limited sample size

71 Strengths and limitations

The main strength of the findings of this report comes from the HSE The HSE is a

primary resource used to monitor the nationrsquos health and care It is a robust transparent

detailed widely used and well-respected data source Including the gambling

questionnaire allows us to compare gambling with a range of other health behaviours

and conditions However while sample size is adequate for analysing a range of topics

in England we had to combine several survey years at times in this report In particular

we had to combine data when looking at more detailed breakdowns Though it is the

most robust source available for estimating problem gambling in England the combined

dataset only included around 150 problem gamblers (according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI)

The main limitations of this report come from relying on alternative sources of previously

published data to meet aspects of the objectives not fully met by the HSE The HSE

does not ask questions about

bull time spent on gambling

bull money spent on gambling

bull affected others

bull attitudes towards gambling

bull the gambling behaviours of children and young people

The sources used are the best available for quantitative gambling data on these topics

but in general they lack the data quality of the HSE They also vary considerably in

robustness and how representative they are of the national population Finally except

for ALSPAC referenced in this report there is no longitudinal gambling data source

currently available The addition of longitudinal data would have contributed significantly

to the objectives of this report by allowing us to see important changes in the gambling

behaviours of individuals over time As a relatively new field in public health we hope

that more and better-quality quantitative gambling data will become available as more

research is carried out

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

109

8 References

1 Department of Health and Social Care PHE remit letter 2018 to 2019 Online 2018 2 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Government response to the consultation

on proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures Online 2018

3 Blank L Baxter S Buckley Woods H Goyder E Interventions to reduce public health burden of gambling related harms A mapping review of the international evidence Lancet Public Health 2021 Volume 6

4 Public Health England Gambling-related harms evidence review scope Online 2020 5 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling Online 2019 6 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Online 2018 7 UK Data Service Health Survey for England Online 2020 8 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes

annual report 2020 9 The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) development and UK

validation Health Qual Life Outcomes Tennant R Hiller L Fishwick R Platt S and S Joseph and others 2007 pages 1-13

10 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2016 Well-being and mental health Online 2017 11 David P Goldberg and Paul Williams User Guide to the General Health Questionnaire

Windsor NFER-NELSON 1988 12 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Adult health related behaviours Online

2019 13 Department of Health and Social Care UK Chief Medical Officers Low Risk Drinking

Guidelines Online 2016 14 Gambling Commission Problem gambling vs gambling-related harms Online 2020 15 NatCen British Gambling Prevalence Survey Online 2010 16 NatCen Treatment Needs and Gap Analysis in Great Britain Synthesis of findings from a

programme of studies Online 2020 17 London School of Economics An assessment of the accuracy of survey estimates of the

prevalence of problem gambling in the United Kingdom Online 2020 18 BeGambleAware Annual Statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great

Britain) Online 2020 19 BeGambleAware National Gambling Treatment Service Online 2020 20 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and

attitudes Annual Report Online 2020 21 Ofcom Adults Media Use and Attitudes Report Online 2019 22 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Review of the Gambling Act 2005

Online 2020 23 Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study

among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain Online 2019 24 Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) Skins in the game Online 2019 25 University of Bristol Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Online 2019 26 Emond A Griffiths M and L Hollen A longitudinal study of gambling in late adolescence

and early adulthood Follow-up assessment at 24 years Online 2019 27 The Kings Fund Healthy behaviours Future trends Online 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

110

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority

Introduction

Table 61 shows the prevalence of overall gambling participation in the last 12 months by

upper tier local authority (UTLA) as illustrated in Figure 4 of the main report Due to

sample size the authorities of Inner and Outer London have been grouped together

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

Results

Variation in gambling participation is evident by UTLA Discounting Rutland which has

wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a rate of gambling participation that

is statistically significantly higher than average for England The top 5 UTLAs in England

with the highest levels of gambling participation were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

111

Table 61 Gambling participation in the last 12 months by upper tier local authority England 2012 2015 2016 2018

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000001 Hartlepool 707 596 798

E06000002 Middlesbrough 612 492 720

E06000003 Redcar and Cleveland

667 561 758

E06000004 Stockton-on-Tees 726 637 799

E06000005 Darlington 700 575 801

E06000006 Halton 582 450 703

E06000007 Warrington 525 428 621

E06000008 Blackburn with

Darwen 571 441 692

E06000009 Blackpool 690 562 794

E06000010 Kingston upon Hull 654 567 731

E06000011 East Riding of

Yorkshire 547 464 627

E06000012 North East

Lincolnshire 640 527 739

E06000013 North Lincolnshire 683 587 766

E06000014 York 500 409 591

E06000015 Derby 633 539 718

E06000016 Leicester 476 397 557

E06000017 Rutland 833 436 970

E06000018 Nottingham 527 447 605

E06000019 Herefordshire 600 483 707

E06000020 Telford and Wrekin 711 614 792

E06000021 Stoke-on-Trent 615 535 689

E06000022 Bath and North East

Somerset 589 489 683

E06000023 Bristol 547 476 616

E06000024 North Somerset 606 510 694

E06000025 South

Gloucestershire 566 471 656

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

112

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000026 Plymouth 675 587 752

E06000027 Torbay 550 425 669

E06000030 Swindon 583 483 677

E06000031 Peterborough 617 516 709

E06000032 Luton 646 548 734

E06000033 Southend-on-Sea 598 489 697

E06000034 Thurrock 690 585 779

E06000035 Medway 500 424 576

E06000036 Bracknell Forest 681 566 777

E06000037 West Berkshire 575 466 677

E06000038 Reading 549 441 652

E06000039 Slough 349 257 454

E06000040 Windsor and Maidenhead

469 364 577

E06000041 Wokingham 595 485 696

E06000042 Milton Keynes 654 570 730

E06000043 Brighton and Hove 500 399 601

E06000044 Portsmouth 701 598 787

E06000045 Southampton 710 611 792

E06000046 Isle of Wight 675 568 766

E06000047 County Durham 687 630 738

E06000049 Cheshire East 519 452 586

E06000050 Cheshire West and

Chester 627 561 688

E06000051 Shropshire 653 587 713

E06000052 Cornwall 630 583 673

E06000054 Wiltshire 603 544 659

E06000055 Bedford 569 448 682

E06000056 Central Bedfordshire 620 531 701

E06000057 Northumberland 627 552 697

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

113

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000058 Bournemouth

Christchurch and Poole

614 546 677

E06000059 Dorset 588 520 654

E08000001 Bolton 603 533 669

E08000002 Bury 602 512 685

E08000003 Manchester 453 395 512

E08000004 Oldham 624 544 698

E08000005 Rochdale 614 527 694

E08000006 Salford 551 457 642

E08000007 Stockport 549 480 615

E08000008 Tameside 609 516 695

E08000009 Trafford 558 458 654

E08000010 Wigan 622 538 700

E08000011 Knowsley 786 676 866

E08000012 Liverpool 683 612 746

E08000013 St Helens 596 492 691

E08000014 Sefton 650 567 724

E08000015 Wirral 665 591 731

E08000016 Barnsley 734 644 808

E08000017 Doncaster 703 631 766

E08000018 Rotherham 729 633 808

E08000019 Sheffield 595 544 643

E08000021 Newcastle upon Tyne 558 480 634

E08000022 North Tyneside 759 635 850

E08000023 South Tyneside 692 583 784

E08000024 Sunderland 664 584 736

E08000025 Birmingham 437 393 481

E08000026 Coventry 549 479 618

E08000027 Dudley 682 598 755

E08000028 Sandwell 630 536 715

E08000029 Solihull 505 412 597

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

114

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E08000030 Walsall 558 469 644

E08000031 Wolverhampton 613 500 715

E08000032 Bradford 490 421 559

E08000033 Calderdale 707 601 795

E08000034 Kirklees 563 502 621

E08000035 Leeds 635 586 682

E08000036 Wakefield 702 629 766

E08000037 Gateshead 635 536 725

E10000002 Buckinghamshire 533 474 592

E10000003 Cambridgeshire 587 537 634

E10000006 Cumbria 688 626 743

E10000007 Derbyshire 631 585 675

E10000008 Devon 542 496 587

E10000011 East Sussex 532 470 593

E10000012 Essex 620 583 655

E10000013 Gloucestershire 635 579 688

E10000014 Hampshire 602 565 637

E10000015 Hertfordshire 615 576 652

E10000016 Kent 607 573 641

E10000017 Lancashire 619 581 656

E10000018 Leicestershire 604 553 653

E10000019 Lincolnshire 664 617 707

E10000020 Norfolk 638 595 679

E10000021 Northamptonshire 668 617 715

E10000023 North Yorkshire 651 601 698

E10000024 Nottinghamshire 643 597 687

E10000025 Oxfordshire 636 589 680

E10000027 Somerset 589 530 645

E10000028 Staffordshire 695 655 733

E10000029 Suffolk 658 609 704

E10000030 Surrey 565 528 602

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

115

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E10000031 Warwickshire 528 476 579

E10000032 West Sussex 610 559 658

E10000034 Worcestershire 673 619 724

Inner London 502 473 530

Outer London 500 482 518

Total 593 587 598

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

116

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling

Introduction

This analysis forms one part of a larger piece of work described in the pre-registered

lsquoGambling-related harms evidence review Analysis protocolrsquo The aim is to describe the

prevalence and determinants of gambling the harms associated with gambling and the

social and economic burden of gambling This analysis seeks to address the following

research questions

1 What socio-demographic factors are associated with gambling and harmful gambling

in England

2 Is gambling and harmful gambling associated with health status

The hypotheses tested are

1 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

2 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in

England

3 Problem gambling is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

4 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

5 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

6 Problem gambling is associated with health conditions in England

Data source

The data source is a combined dataset of the HSE for years 2012 2015 2016 and

2018

The HSE is a survey of the general population aged 16 and over Participants are

selected using a random probability sample The survey design ensures that every

address in England has an equal chance of being included in the survey each year and

the results are representative of the population living in private households Gambling

specific questions are included in the 2012 2015 2016 and 2018 surveys only

Outputs have been non-response weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE

analysis since 2003 NatCen were commissioned to combine the datasets They

manage the HSE on behalf of NHS Digital NatCen calculated and appended new

combined weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

117

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc16 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb16 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication30 the problem gambling weights were

used for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening tools

The self-completion weights were used for the remaining analyses

All important information related to the data source is available in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the HSE series31 Registered users can access the un-combined

datasets via the UK Data Archive32

We used SPSS version 25 software for all statistical analysis

Variables

We selected the variables below as they were of the most interest to the research aims

of the study within the limitations of the data available The independent variables are

those measuring the main socio-demographic and health concepts reported in the HSE

series Initially only Anyacty and PROBGAM as dependent variables were within scope

However following feedback from the expert reference group associated with the wider

project we agreed that a measure of any level of risk (lsquoharmful gamblingrsquo) should be

included if feasible A common proxy from HSE and Gambling Commission outputs is to

use a PGSI score of 1 or more to describe any level of gambling risk The analysis

follows this precedent

Table 62 Dependent gambling variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

Anyacty Whether spent any money on gambling in last 12 months Categorical

PGSI_atrisk Respondents with a PGSI score of 1 or more Categorical

PROBGAM Whether a problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

Categorical

30 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling 31 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 32 UK Data Service (2020) Health Survey for England

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

118

Table 63 Independent socio-demographic variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

ag16g10 Age 16 to 75 in 10-year age bands Categorical

Sex Gender Categorical

Origin2 Grouped ethnicity (White Black Asian Mixed Other) Categorical

Eqv3 Equivalised income tertiles (lowest middle highest) Ordinal

TopQual4 Highest educational qualification (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent below degree no qualification)

Ordinal

Employment_r Recoded variable of Activb2activity status of previous week (in education paid employmentself-employed unemployed retired looking after homefamily other)

Categorical

Qimd Quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score (2010 IMD for 2012 and 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018)

Ordinal

Gor1 Government Office Region Categorical

Table 64 Independent health-related variables of interest

Variable name

Variable label Measure

Genhelf2 Self-assessed general health grouped (very goodgood fair badvery bad)

Ordinal

WemwbsQ WEMWBS score quintiles Ordinal

LifeSatG LifeSatG Life satisfaction (low medium high very high) Ordinal

GHQg2 GHQ score group (0 1-3 4+) Ordinal

BMIlvg3 BMI group (not overweight or obese overweight obese) Categorical

Totalwug Alcohol units per week grouped Categorical

Cignow Current smoker Categorical

Missing data

Missing data was coded as such in the source dataset and was excluded as appropriate

from statistical analysis

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

119

Results

Step 1 Bivariate analysis

For step 1 of this pre-registered analysis a series of chi-squared tests were conducted

to refute the null hypothesis This was that the variables of interest are independent of

the 3 dependent gambling variables33

All 3 dependent variables are categorical as are most of the independent variables of

interest Chi-square was also used to test the ordinal variables against the categorical

dependents while acknowledging that the test will treat both as categorical The results

of such tests concerning ordinal variables are valid but there is an acceptable loss of

information in the output (for example the order of the categories) This is a common

approach and the ordinal variables are fully accounted for in step 2 of the analysis using

binary multiple logistic regression To trust the conclusions from a chi-square test the 2

standard assumptions are that

bull observations are independent

bull all expected frequencies are more than 534 for a 2x2 table (for example PROBGAM

x Sex)

These assumptions are true for the HSE combined dataset However the SPSS syntax

used tested the latter assumption as part of the output

Step 1 Findings

Tables 68 69 and 70 show the main output from the bivariate analysis

The most important figure for the hypotheses measured is the significance determined

by the chi-square test Where this is less-than 005 the null hypothesis is rejected and

the conclusion can be made that the association between the dependent and

independent is likely not due to chance variation From the outputs below this cannot be

determined for income region self-reported general health and region

The output also includes measures for Cramerrsquos-VPhi35 to quantify the correlation Chi-

square has determined whether there is a significant relationship between the variables

but is not able to quantify how important this is Cramerrsquos-V is a post-test that provides

this additional information Given the relatively large sample size of the dataset it is

33 Technically a chi-square test is a descriptive test not a modelling technique and as such there are no

dependent variables but for simplicity of language and consistency with the following description of Step 2

of this analysis the main gambling measures are here referred to as dependent 34 For larger tables no more than 20 of all cells may have an expected frequency less than 5 and all

expected frequencies more than 1 35 Phi is used where the table is 2x2

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

120

important to note that even small effects can become significant (as chance reduces

with larger sample sizes) Including this post-test suggests that this may be the case for

our study given that all measures of the correlation are low However results here do

not preclude any variables from step 2 The results of the chi-square test are used to

test whether including a variable reduces the badness-of-fit measure This means that if

chi-square is significant then the variable will be considered a significant predictor in the

equation So only income region and self-reported general health were excluded from

step 2 of the analysis and the conclusion made that the sample size may be amplifying

significance at the bivariate level

Table 65 Bivariate output for gambling participation in the last 12 months

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0121

Sex 0000 0075

Ethnicity 0000 0171

Income 0000 0087

Educational qualification 0000 0076

Employment 0000 0180

IMD 0000 0039

Region 0000 0087

Health factors

General health 0000 0042

Wellbeing 0000 0045

Life satisfaction 0000 0045

GHQ 0000 0032

BMI 0000 0096

Alcohol 0000 0227

Smoking 0000 0031

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

121

Table 66 Bivariate output for harmful gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0123

Sex 0000 0121

Ethnicity 0001 0027

Income 0831 0004

Educational qualification 0000 0044

Employment 0000 0088

IMD 0000 0050

Region 0021 0026

Health factors

General health 0577 0006

Wellbeing 0000 0092

Life satisfaction 0000 0070

GHQ 0000 0061

BMI 0330 0010

Alcohol 0000 0106

Smoking 0000 0085

Table 67 Bivariate output for problem gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0036

Sex 0000 0053

Ethnicity 0000 0042

Income 0017 0019

Educational qualification 0000 0029

Employment 0000 0052

IMD 0000 0047

Region 0000 0037

Health factors

General health 0000 0036

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

122

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Wellbeing 0000 0062

Life satisfaction 0000 0052

GHQ 0000 0053

BMI 0849 0004

Alcohol 0002 0031

Smoking 0000 0040

Step 2 Binary logistic regression

Whereas step 1 describes the significance of the relationship between the independent

variables and gambling behaviour step 2 models the determinants of and predicts the

likelihood of gambling behaviour among the study population Unlike the bivariate

analysis the aim here is to explicitly define a dependent gambling variable and make

predictions so a logistic regression is most appropriate

Because most variables and outcomes were categorical it could be argued that a log

linear analysis would be preferred for step 2 While this is an extension of the chi-square

test used in step 1 it has the disadvantage of being unintuitive and problematic to

interpret and explain So we decided to use logistic regression as it is easier to

understand than log linear analysis simple to explain to the audience of the final report

and is still a reasonable tool for the aims of this study

All standard assumptions of binary logistic regression are met by the present analysis

namely

bull dependent is dichotomous

bull one or more independent variables that can be either categorical (nominal or ordinal)

or continuous

bull independent observations

bull dependent variable is mutually exclusive

bull linear relationship between any continuous independent variables and the logit

transformation of the dependent variable

Before the regression some variables were recoded into more practical or meaningful

groups and others were dummy coded to turn certain categories into binary variables to

give them directionality (such as higher category is 1 lower category is 0) This allows

the regression to look at direction of association by comparing 2 sides

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

123

Table 68 Variables entered into the equation

Variable name Entered into

equation Recodes

ag16g10 Yes No recode

Sex Yes Recoded into dummy variable Sex_r (Male (0) Female (1))

Origin2 Yes Recoded into Ethnicity_r (White (0) Non-White (1))

Eqv3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

TopQual4 Yes No recode

Employment_r Yes Recoded into 2 dummy variables Paid_employ_dum (In paid employmentself-employed (1)) and Unemployed_dum (Unemployed (1))

Qimd Yes No recode

Gor1 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Genhelf2 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

WemwbsQ Yes No recode

LifeSatG Yes No recode

GHQg2 Yes No recode

BMIlvg3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Totalwug Yes Recoded into Alcwug_r (Never drink (0) 1-14 units (1) Over 14 to 35 units (2) Over 35 to 50 units (3) 50+ units (4))

Cignow Yes No recode

Not all questions were asked in every HSE year For example life satisfaction is

included in the 2016 and 2018 surveys while WEMWBS is included in 2012 2015 and

2016 surveys only Given the results of step 1 life satisfaction and WEMWBS are to be

included in the logistic regression This means that the analysis will be run on 2016 as

this is the most recent year that includes all variables of interest This is suitable from a

sample size perspective for Anyacty and PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling)

While there is no consensus regarding sample size for logistic regression a

conventional guideline suggests that maximum likelihood estimation with less than 100

cases is ldquoriskyrdquo 500 cases is ldquoadequaterdquo and there should be at least 10 cases per

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

124

predictor36 Others have refined this saying that 10 times the number of predictors (k)

should consider the proportion (p) of successes (n = 10kp)37 Given the results of step 1

this means we need a sample of 253 for Anyacty and 2933 for PGSI_atrisk (harmful

gambling) We used 3395 in the analysis for Anyacty and 3315 for PGSI_atrisk The

sample requirement for PROBGAM to be meaningful cannot be achieved within the

limits of the dataset used no matter the number of HSE years included

One final consideration about the sample size for the logistic regression is specific to the

calculation of logs ratios which is the output of step 2 A bias38 of up to 15 is

acknowledged for the log odds ratio when the sample size is around 100 but this

reduces close to zero when around 1000 cases are included So the current analysis

should not be unduly affected by such bias

Table 69 Sample size calculation

Model Proportion of successes (p) Number of predictors (k) Sample size (n)

Anyacty 0473743 12 253

Atrisk 0040908 12 2933

Probgam 0006601 12 18180

Step 2 Findings

The Anyacty model is poor and is not described in detail here

The first output below (Table 73) allows us to reject the null hypothesis Here this is that

the model based on the variables inputted fits equally well as the null model (Block 0 in

full output)

36 Long J (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables SAGE Publications London 37 Peduzzi P Concato J Kemper E Holford T R and A R Feinstein (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis Journal of clinical epidemiology 49(12) 1373-1379 38 Nemes S Jonasson J M Genell A and G Steineck (2009) Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size BMC medical research methodology 9 56-60

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

125

Table 70 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig

Step 32938 25 0000

Block 32938 25 0000

Model 32938 25 000

The second main output is the pseudo-Rsup2 values Itrsquos worth noting that these will be

lower than the Rsup2 of multiple regression lsquoPseudorsquo as Rsup2 in this analysis is not technically

the proportion of variation accounted for by variation in the independents rather it is

only an analogue of correlation The Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be quoted as the preferred

measure over Cox and Snell Rsup2 because the latter has the limitation that it cannot reach

1 as Rsup2 in linear regression can Nagelkerke Rsup2 overcomes this limitation by adjusting

the scale of the statistic So as this analysis aims to be as analogous as possible to the

Rsup2 of least squares regression Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be used

The present model has an Rsup2 of 27 which is good but not great However it is typical

of Nagelkerke and Cox amp Snell to vary and so it is best practice not to over-emphasize

the pseudo-Rsup2 in logistic regression The Hosmer amp Lemeshow uses non-significance as

a measure of goodness of fit of the model Greater than 005 indicates it is a good fitting

model which the PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling) model achieves

Table 71 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Model Summary

-2 Log likelihood Cox amp Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square

1128789a 0097 0267

Note a Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than 0001

Table 72 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Hosmer and Lemeshow Test (step 1)

Chi-square df Sig

9080 8 0336

A drawback of the model is the low classification rate particularly regarding true

classifications A model with a good accuracy rate would demonstrate high proportions

for both those with no PGSI risk and those with any PGSI risk The current model is

good at predicting cases that have no risk (997) but not very good at predicting cases

that do have risk (104)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

126

Table 73 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Classification Tablea

Predicted

(PGSI_atrisk) Percentage Correct

No risk At risk

Observed (PGSI At risk (1plus))

No risk 3023 8 997

At risk 172 20 104

Overall Percentage 944

Note a The cut value is 0500

The most important output for the aim of this study is the variables in the equation table

which details the regression function itself This analysis is not concerned with the raw

scores because natural scales do not make sense when dealing with a dichotomous

dependent variable As the analysis here aims to predict the likelihood of falling into one

of 2 groups (at risk gambling yes or no) meaning the relationship in non-linear then we

quote the log odds (essentially the analysis has made the relationship linear by

converting the raw probability scores into log odds) By taking the natural log of the odds

ratios we get an indirect measure of probability of being in the target group that will then

be linearly related So the final output of the analysis is the predicted change in log odds

for every one unit change in the independents Those that were significant were

tabulated and summarised in the body of the main report These are

bull age

bull sex

bull GHQ-12 (all levels)

bull alcohol consumption (over 14 to 35 units and 50 units or more)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

127

Table 74 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Variables in the Equationa

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational Qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equiv)

8609 2 0014

Educational Qualification 3 groups (Below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational Qualification 3 groups (No qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (least deprived) 11143 4 0025

Quintile of IMD score (2) -0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3) 0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4) 0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (most deprived) 0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1) 15525 4 0004

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2) 0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3) 0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4) 0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5) -0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

128

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Life satisfaction (Low (0-4)) 4262 3 0235

Life satisfaction (Medium (5-6)) -0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (High (7-8)) -0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (Very high (9-10)) 0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ Score ndash grouped (Score 0) 15279 2 0000

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 1-3) 0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 4+) 0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (Nevernot in last 12 months)

36554 4 0000

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14) 0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (Over 14 to 35) 1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (Over 35 to 50) 0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (Over 50) 2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020

Note Empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts a Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

129

Limitations

The main limitations to the analysis are the low classification rate for positive cases and

that while the Rsup2 is less important in binary logistic regression than linear regression and

automatically lower the model overall seems to be good but not great The other main

limitation is that the variables included and so the concepts measured are restricted by

what is included in HSE

Finally it is important to note that while the model goes some way to explaining the

relationship between harmful gambling and the available range of variables and

concepts all conclusions relate to association only not causation

Conclusions

A series of bivariate analyses were conducted to compare a range of variables to 3

increasing levels of gambling participation and harm Of these income region self-

reported general health and BMI were shown not to be significant for harmful gambling

Income and BMI were shown not to be significant for problem gambling

We performed a logistic regression to look at the effects of important socio-demographic

and health factors on the likelihood that respondents are participating in harmful levels of

gambling The logistic regression model was statistically significant (p less-than 005)

The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling and correctly classified

94 of cases but this was skewed towards classifying those at no risk

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be at-risk gamblers Wellbeing

contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on GHQ12

Compared to respondents scoring 0 the odds of those scoring 1 to 3 were 20 times

more likely to participate in harmful gambling Those scoring 4 or more were 24 times

more likely to participate

Regarding physical health and health behaviours smoking and BMI did not contribute

significantly to the model but alcohol did Compared to abstainers or people not drinking

in last 12 months the odds of respondents who drank above the recommended limits

(14 to 35 units) were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This

increased markedly to 78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) Given the

importance of gender mentioned above it should be noted that the group from HSE

consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

The broader conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly

gender appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic

factors such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

130

is a stronger predictor of harmful gambling than poor physical health and negative health

behaviours with the exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and the

method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

131

Appendix C Confidence limits

This appendix presents the confidence intervals39 that correspond to the tables

produced from the Health Survey for England

Note that empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts

Table 1 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6562960 6334907 5738490 5517114

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4317807 4628907 4288585 4135974

Table 2 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5131122 4451484 3932956 3487769

Scratchcards 1779043 2122489 1935338 1701510

Other lotteries 1414683 1397320 1309177 1359294

Machines and games

Football pools 182619 224660 224504 253018

Bingo (not online) 525364 536277 440814 403652

39 A confidence range has been constructed using the Wilson Score method applied to the unweighted survey data

This range (+x and -y) has then been applied to the weighted estimate to produce 95 confidence intervals based

on weighted prevalence levels

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

132

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

565450 651162 564692 517818

Machines in a bookmakers 203497 289984 252415 188015

Casino table games (not online) 217587 308750 280441 225071

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075259 087758 061298 052915

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

247617 327553 271087 262360

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 384863 660760 679692 719161

Betting exchange 057923 078901 096568 088006

Horse races (not online) 966001 1037288 853068 748048

Dog races (not online) 231290 243261 178292 142126

Sports events (not online) 337418 469553 459815 356345

Other events or sports (not online)

070264 114616 105517 123946

Spread-betting 032504 044184 044120 035913

Private betting 414193 460042 365062 337475

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 106871 150925 105517 096928

Summary

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

603368 872696 872386 873509

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

133

Table 3 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1043636 2980783 3995669 4433740 4143208 3366952 2528593 3489166

Scratchcards 1727215 2436717 2122630 1748760 1203935 736928 349895 1702598

Other lotteries 368931 851805 1248142 1510844 1665525 1644453 1488600 1360281

Machines and games

Football pools 500017 505813 125403 043431 092364 052245 125216 253452

Bingo (not online) 368931 434472 414316 218671 306199 263832 366695 404203

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

669475 814954 574877 418627 306199 073441 047549 518443

Machines in a bookmakers

325948 399073 133402 103672 048250 188385

Casino table games (not online)

300370 505813 215674 111586 077250 225478

Poker played in pubs or clubs

097038 079631 042318 053100

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

233091 532732 361625 143797 084765 262801

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

750752 1393731 885118 634445 297618 110693 054080 719896

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

134

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Betting exchange 183742 110705 063786 017054 041341 088251

Horse races (not online)

814337 723214 656254 744063 705698 620226 218526 748796

Dog races (not online) 216520 183867 071194 103672 062513 066258 142445

Sports events (not online)

535416 613960 266506 287132 204688 080724 356862

Other events or sports (not online)

274971 192195 056493 065233 069829 124242

Spread-betting 104643 050020 036061

Private betting 687487 514776 292227 160184 123468 059188 074454 337978

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120051 102830 093988 043431 048250 059188 023266 097187

Summary

Any gambling activity 3591860 5407593 5440884 5765226 5661399 4968794 4065485 5283918

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

3405626 4607524 4144038 3800076 3758191 3064607 2490272 3906545

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

933176 1640157 1107806 762420 392939 157519 081463 874316

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

135

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1467259 3510485 4569168 4988049 4740843 4004582 3216145 3712348

Scratchcards 2237681 2938136 2615102 2189984 1622106 1118809 682241 1880872

Other lotteries 648125 1193740 1655770 1929442 2136972 2162721 2068854 1523567

Machines and games

Football pools 815807 782166 286905 146905 242719 190570 350156 331639

Bingo (not online) 648125 694019 675709 410309 547004 516624 705209 500715

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1024788 1150848 873938 668934 547004 229112 209095 626345

Machines in a bookmakers

591519 649674 298839 246170 167268 078437 076382 256781

Casino table games (not online)

557344 782166 415895 258195 217978 123019 109263 299645

Poker played in pubs or clubs

262730 211548 150729 079335 070360 078437 093306 092229

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

465280 815055 608802 305738 230391 123019 109263 342279

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1122772 1808101 1241414 931637 535657 291423 222447 844666

Betting exchange 395122 260219 189059 093528 154249 123019 124567 137034

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

136

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Horse races (not online)

1198611 1043228 971956 1061279 1044250 976648 495459 875733

Dog races (not online) 442015 366481 201584 246170 192860 216382 124567 202776

Sports events (not online)

860079 913250 484660 501354 409383 241741 153840 448110

Other events or sports (not online)

522990 378089 176420 184919 205472 078437 124567 181001

Spread-betting 275043 161416 067548 064526 085458 043689 076382 069289

Private betting 1046612 793138 518737 329227 291327 203539 261727 427016

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 299471 248158 238589 146905 167268 203539 153840 148088

Summary

Any gambling activity 4217178 5967990 6014213 6308361 6251656 5628584 4820989 5515650

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4024973 5173180 4719791 4345658 4348681 3689635 3174929 4134514

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1338704 2080011 1497113 1082799 659541 364073 274602 1010073

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

137

Table 5 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6632052 6377894 5943259 5575595

Any gambling activity Females

5942819 5731883 4969458 4906675

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6963408 6718136 6293842 5902785

Any gambling activity Females

6254929 6046300 5290274 5233175

Table 6 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3246002 3730976 2826442

Scratchcards 1169964 2047322 1288765

Other lotteries 1169964 1492822 1025881

Machines and games

Football pools 097245 331162 161764

Bingo (not online) 181793 461044 439165

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 260591 677371 289335

Machines in a bookmakers 089066 257882 058685

Casino table games (not online) 269453 248786 023699

Poker played in pubs or clubs 013817 072168 017435

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

181793 321958 089155

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 829815 791242 161764

Betting exchange 097245 072168 044142

Horse races (not online) 680296 876993 315458

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

138

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Dog races (not online) 072929 167769 073727

Sports events (not online) 260591 451712 128970

Other events or sports (not online) 057156 167769 058685

Spread-betting

Private betting 260591 395884 161764

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 072929 106282 058685

Summary

Any gambling activity 4822296 5717294 4381627

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3393706 4396794 2884939

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

942692 991720 254771

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3659871 4051421 3324819

Scratchcards 1464018 2318770 1671830

Other lotteries 1464018 1734501 1376348

Machines and games

Football pools 201170 458796 326066

Bingo (not online) 316244 608611 686798

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 417105 851788 497620

Machines in a bookmakers 189387 372249 169903

Casino table games (not online) 428205 361367 105181

Poker played in pubs or clubs 065016 138416 091504

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316244 448022 219200

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1085531 977657 326066

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

139

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Betting exchange 201170 138416 144563

Horse races (not online) 915656 1071712 531322

Dog races (not online) 165600 262578 194744

Sports events (not online) 417105 597965 279093

Other events or sports (not online) 141449 262578 169903

Spread-betting 018946 010800 029172

Private betting 417105 533922 326066

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 165600 184216 169903

Summary

Any gambling activity 5257552 6040806 4920415

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3811599 4724157 3385971

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1212199 1196726 452417

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

140

Table 7 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5010828 1217707 3855865 3194364 3141982 4261193

Scratchcards 2392446 1504443 771932 1869685 1883219 1942949

Other lotteries 1444337 341029 1743242 944731 869787 1378997

Machines and games

Football pools 293283 350031 113038 153197 065571 251384

Bingo (not online) 485953 296228 532725 426543 524869 503985

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

787354 652538 149092 627816 414928 621294

Machines in a bookmakers

341252 287313 026812 381417 131420 270701

Casino table games (not online)

399008 350031 060262 161672 081619 290043

Poker played in pubs or clubs

113245 139049 011396 071133 088841

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

399008 199203 043262 354482 235334 309408

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

943709 468090 113038 399434 244162 660465

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

141

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Betting exchange 113245 190517 018918 071133 098270

Horse races (not online)

1178937 477241 637685 683310 451433 945210

Dog races (not online)

293283 113840 086397 161672 073550 222461

Sports events (not online)

602327 449816 113038 381417 131420 455212

Other events or sports (not online)

160124 097291 026812 111449 117202

Spread-betting 057978 034490 055608 042284

Private betting 524694 801832 140032 283272 165567 435724

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 150708 164632 068903 095111 042311 136216

Summary

Any gambling activity

6393967 3393970 5102509 4808928 4477874 5701128

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

142

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5169127 1516050 4105461 3632423 3544049 4378999

Scratchcards 2528827 1828181 913477 2242908 2227498 2037902

Other lotteries 1557418 516281 1940866 1232003 1124781 1462015

Machines and games

Football pools 349063 527241 173280 287250 152230 289954

Bingo (not online) 556293 461270 653008 632580 731043 557279

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

874737 883487 217174 870369 601420 679936

Machines in a bookmakers

401069 450223 059636 577920 246091 310631

Casino table games (not online)

463283 527241 106134 298732 176110 331283

Poker played in pubs or clubs

149196 259130 035079 169741 112545

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

463283 338712 083160 544983 381740 351912

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1038302 668690 173280 599818 392876 720754

Betting exchange 149196 327436 047543 169741 123113

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

143

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Horse races (not online)

1282954 679502 767906 934619 644769 1015927

Dog races (not online)

349063 224453 139960 298732 164214 258885

Sports events (not online)

679859 647040 173280 577920 246091 506066

Other events or sports (not online)

202292 201077 059636 229211 144176

Spread-betting 084494 104180 145351 059116

Private betting 597532 1053588 206247 456535 291798 485560

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 191713 293434 117480 205634 115599 165156

Summary

Any gambling activity

6545296 3811322 5357192 5270901 4903252 5818657

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

144

Table 8 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2998785 3313954 3578576 3516211 3324918

Scratchcards 19143 1615445 1719943 1478757 1288589

Other lotteries 921428 1150021 1452543 1440705 1354701

Machines and games

Football pools 185938 31272 225267 17336 170005

Bingo (not online) 518444 401551 338874 285037 229006

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 563566 437439 464056 417836 412342

Machines in a bookmakers 219643 191307 132429 181788 058654

Casino table games (not online) 152757 242814 216674 19874 137049

Poker played in pubs or clubs 058271 05344 038722 024671

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314336 199825 216674 215808 170005

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 518444 573413 701384 773594 692533

Betting exchange 08089 038818 045942 09936 08136

Horse races (not online) 473551 536962 840279 819922 729218

Dog races (not online) 1043 100084 107956 19874 051313

Sports events (not online) 262367 31272 321201 382119 289254

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

145

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 073249 108136 11606 09936 112815

Spread-betting 02347 031777 018411 024671 023682

Private betting 245207 365855 312388 285037 237546

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 088618 108136 084028 031424 073691

Summary

Any gambling activity 4865969 5019271 5419072 5275098 5069299

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3685513 3688054 4042843 3752781 3619792

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

690953 729585 840279 903618 839822

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3511704 379332 4067395 4010237 3843384

Scratchcards 2362902 2000608 2115692 1858612 1672048

Other lotteries 1262067 148849 1824509 1816872 1745527

Machines and games

Football pools 362472 510357 398515 331394 337824

Bingo (not online) 787689 621024 54425 479041 418413

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 842267 664936 69836 645461 653849

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

146

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 408527 352472 27191 342913 169993

Casino table games (not online) 315893 420664 387158 365857 291013

Poker played in pubs or clubs 171099 151192 126224 10107

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

533175 363904 387158 388685 337824

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 787689 828209 979717 1067675 991846

Betting exchange 2083 125915 138953 225862 207111

Horse races (not online) 732881 784861 1140062 1121087 1034927

Dog races (not online) 244709 224247 236535 365857 157392

Sports events (not online) 465504 510357 522024 601386 497756

Other events or sports (not online) 196001 236144 24838 225862 255422

Spread-betting 106199 113005 086687 10107 105257

Private betting 442784 576921 510888 479041 429815

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 220512 236144 200614 114265 194839

Summary

Any gambling activity 5413192 5519375 5917538 5782146 5608713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

422078 4177314 4540749 4252419 4146756

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

147

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

994041 1011184 1140062 1216923 1163622

Table 9 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4506501 2103280 2802777 3104280

Scratchcards 2058401 792842 1234950 1549603

Other lotteries 1474748 606499 660149 735006

Machines and games

Football pools 240450 173397 219725 302101

Bingo (not online) 550883 147693 179245 157085

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 648570 386423 379327 403041

Machines in a bookmakers 269339 173397 227916 220317

Casino table games (not online) 298290 208101 260953 220317

Poker played in pubs or clubs 088076 065122

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

336971 081107 086615 204294

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 717074 156226 260953 420097

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

148

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Betting exchange 097462 041968

Horse races (not online) 1050863 122333 203434 327088

Dog races (not online) 250072

Sports events (not online) 482648 147693 131947 360673

Other events or sports (not online) 125778 057277 134063

Spread-betting 041769 041968

Private betting 463178 216842 101452 411562

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 135258 081107 096828

Summary

Any gambling activity 6017525 2922783 3837359 4033433

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4633639 2466930 3434827 3812932

Scratchcards 2162540 1042510 1718023 2125711

Other lotteries 1566385 829603 1038692 1170192

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

149

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Machines and games

Football pools 281094 304507 463866 608649

Bingo (not online) 610557 270324 404813 395663

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 712837 570581 682495 746376

Machines in a bookmakers 312195 304507 475582 491544

Casino table games (not online) 343234 349653 522173 491544

Poker played in pubs or clubs 113520 153271

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

384540 177211 258560 467789

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 784311 281753 522173 769098

Betting exchange 124130 116537

Horse races (not online) 1130410 235796 440344 643329

Dog races (not online) 291468

Sports events (not online) 538815 270324 332669 689299

Other events or sports (not online) 155805 141153 359019

Spread-betting 059843 116537

Private betting 518291 360874 283536 757744

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 166321 177211 296809

Summary

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

150

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Any gambling activity 6142123 3324273 4510372 4773230

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Table 10 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6209163 5708136 5894410 5910459 5597362 5934614 4647612 5533803 5596221

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6722364 6030005 6262520 6305890 5960529 6282559 4952761 5825022 5961644

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

151

Table 11 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4282244 4298228 3598961

Scratchcards 1995277 1839055 1359311

Other lotteries 1372875 1429754 1064399

Machines and games

Football pools 277508 163664 072657

Bingo (not online) 451567 620892 522183

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 656096 526067 340283

Machines in a bookmakers 287133 199915 147071

Casino table games (not online) 335349 145687 088760

Poker played in pubs or clubs 096607 049834

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316045 254867 224818

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 753849 384907 224818

Betting exchange 105979 049834

Horse races (not online) 1008762 754369 531374

Dog races (not online) 239082 163664 096923

Sports events (not online) 490429 310339 207346

Other events or sports (not online) 124799 075251 080668

Spread-betting 050312 025545

Private betting 490429 291800 113436

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 134242 127829 064737

Summary

Any gambling activity 5732273 5738381 4790347

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

152

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4418000 4582689 4025631

Scratchcards 2105829 2065944 1674158

Other lotteries 1468467 1635933 1350266

Machines and games

Football pools 324254 244202 166214

Bingo (not online) 510128 766172 734720

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 725520 661161 517392

Machines in a bookmakers 334626 287886 271453

Casino table games (not online) 386391 222213 190034

Poker played in pubs or clubs 125227 098246

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

365702 352835 373358

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 827729 502566 373358

Betting exchange 135851 098246

Horse races (not online) 1092719 912465 745491

Dog races (not online) 282695 244202 201833

Sports events (not online) 551251 417265 350907

Other events or sports (not online) 157023 132780 178164

Spread-betting 071540 062584

Private betting 551251 395838 225242

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 167577 200103 154172

Summary

Any gambling activity 5867427 6020177 5229614

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

153

Table 12 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2792229 3230571 3559739 3440260

Scratchcards 1588487 1794312 1677146 1516730

Other lotteries 973585 1332406 1300397 1362961

Machines and games

Football pools 100467 275244 254047 203593

Bingo (not online) 319703 438844 345092 374197

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 420026 421365 530313 429061

Machines in a bookmakers 198705 128019 182413 134065

Casino table games (not online) 086254 216759 254047 168580

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

352860 233340 200193 221251

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 303246 660924 822312 604791

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 462504 518085 774924 754509

Dog races (not online) 100467 046459 121105 151252

Sports events (not online) 198705 317701 391068 292677

Other events or sports (not online) 100467 104797 103936 125531

Spread-betting

Private betting 303246 241672 354266 247898

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 079275 067552 095429 059327

Summary

Any gambling activity 4523069 4909906 5412810 5150385

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3217452 3907588 4005754 3647737

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

591819 814832 955467 716959

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

154

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3531155 3841433 3903469 3824104

Scratchcards 2210949 2309860 1950911 1813910

Other lotteries 1494319 1795766 1548645 1648188

Machines and games

Football pools 320456 522482 377799 331506

Bingo (not online) 657681 737332 486501 540297

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 795842 714974 700775 605242

Machines in a bookmakers 480575 311178 289634 241289

Casino table games (not online) 294922 441540 377799 286647

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

704018 464795 311804 353785

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 634391 1013210 1027993 808906

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 852731 837355 975507 978679

Dog races (not online) 320456 173636 211119 264039

Sports events (not online) 480575 579618 540398 442104

Other events or sports (not online) 320456 274645 188339 229855

Spread-betting

Private betting 634391 476382 497301 387042

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 282027 212298 176871 136314

Summary

Any gambling activity 5317942 5548216 5765700 5548500

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3980370 4538781 4356317 4035958

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1021521 1197914 1174485 936357

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

155

Table 13 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3695674 3916652 3715339 4020550 3665308

Scratchcards 2097067 2031186 2021718 1579579 1425222

Other lotteries 1117472 1154159 1251896 1238946 1302119

Machines and games

Football pools 202809 130988 208740 202579 222107

Bingo (not online) 358227 425267 460826 357911 317347

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 500585 524312 731955 455425 317347

Machines in a bookmakers 331904 206236 268175 160863 121980

Casino table games (not online) 186011 214760 337373 236494 230656

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

340663 189273 259613 202579 171397

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 672818 587908 613590 635899 594967

Betting exchange 065744 106679 042865 058198 113910

Horse races (not online) 755297 864165 925293 745641 649722

Dog races (not online) 112296 180838 183676 136284 113910

Sports events (not online) 446856 345241 604535 393194 291135

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

156

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 080935 067501 118494 088524 044729

Spread-betting

Private betting 279705 371799 443040 279430 239231

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120300 052494 102695 050895 082259

Summary

Any gambling activity 5276613 5592315 5416787 5617329 4945734

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4230545 4427808 4271166 4563725 4180709

Scratchcards 2558958 2463644 2495995 1999811 1813667

Other lotteries 1484713 1505614 1651034 1622613 1677494

Machines and games

Football pools 385415 274857 401597 385844 404082

Bingo (not online) 588920 658751 727642 589428 528229

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 765606 779116 1054581 711252 528229

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

157

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 555423 379126 481711 327861 264877

Casino table games (not online) 362332 390548 571997 431688 415476

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

566604 356196 470337 385844 335126

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 972237 855143 913784 929573 868881

Betting exchange 183496 239328 148824 171309 253003

Horse races (not online) 1069220 1177274 1279891 1059108 933792

Dog races (not online) 256586 344685 366853 292621 253003

Sports events (not online) 699693 559261 902903 633905 494607

Other events or sports (not online) 208186 178774 272551 220742 142685

Spread-betting

Private betting 487981 592542 705558 488452 426846

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 268522 153889 248479 158672 204877

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

158

Summary

Any gambling activity 5820098 6103118 5978704 6157312 5473096

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

159

Table 14 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3614585 3262398 3004568

Scratchcards 1637980 1707333 1654845

Other lotteries 1375741 1363414 1015146

Machines and games

Football pools 270864 193181 166022

Bingo (not online) 381984 431371 275273

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 503795 458465 449980

Machines in a bookmakers 161810 176141 199119

Casino table games (not online) 206914 210338 249667

Poker played in pubs or clubs 048888 046850 022542

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

225102 244956 275273

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 797979 604322 458858

Betting exchange 091223 069632 063876

Horse races (not online) 778883 705673 539231

Dog races (not online) 143947 134151 049405

Sports events (not online) 372668 341796 215860

Other events or sports (not online) 135062 061918 117588

Spread-betting

Private betting 335497 279923 283850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 082604 093322 078806

Summary

Any gambling activity 5379095 5107325 4730935

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1625845 3873510 3533251

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

453456 798417 683864

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

160

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3907685 3724702 3546992

Scratchcards 1867970 2087292 2106069

Other lotteries 1590703 1712903 1390311

Machines and games

Football pools 377703 349108 345783

Bingo (not online) 506364 649649 495664

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 644314 682414 719620

Machines in a bookmakers 246977 326243 392418

Casino table games (not online) 301782 371857 461470

Poker played in pubs or clubs 100137 136286 110532

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

323557 417051 495664

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 969563 855805 730675

Betting exchange 157711 173363 188798

Horse races (not online) 948696 973936 829701

Dog races (not online) 224876 268468 163402

Sports events (not online) 495698 539693 415544

Other events or sports (not online) 213780 161123 274618

Spread-betting

Private betting 452942 461896 507019

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 146348 209531 213734

Summary

Any gambling activity 5679935 5591029 5308932

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1855188 4350675 4094700

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

587617 1080722 1003999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

161

Table 15 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2651783 3729469 4064039

Scratchcards 1459465 1665503 1938147

Other lotteries 954702 1444234 1678079

Machines and games

Football pools 253038 263571 170451

Bingo (not online) 297553 362493 454205

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 433199 453700 554696

Machines in a bookmakers 148439 210476 145004

Casino table games (not online) 156996 290372 179002

Poker played in pubs or clubs 020646 066338 040707

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

182870 236932 274792

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 673162 807051 628360

Betting exchange 065583 074372 103450

Horse races (not online) 682479 854102 656091

Dog races (not online) 097998 141093 136599

Sports events (not online) 270792 508869 230904

Other events or sports (not online) 089781 192957 048153

Spread-betting

Private betting 306505 362493 274792

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 089781 090690 071294

Summary

Any gambling activity 4617434 5483635 5712319

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3516410 3957222 4232697

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

822832 910695 842232

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

162

Upper confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3036056 4134205 4518960

Scratchcards 1772839 1985414 2314018

Other lotteries 1219525 1747473 2035226

Machines and games

Football pools 403947 412462 309698

Bingo (not online) 459251 533162 664592

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 623061 641612 783637

Machines in a bookmakers 268983 345763 275271

Casino table games (not online) 280389 445558 321105

Poker played in pubs or clubs 077356 150485 120117

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314406 379204 444850

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 902154 1046957 869635

Betting exchange 152201 162416 217037

Horse races (not online) 912801 1099733 901776

Dog races (not online) 199641 255421 263719

Sports events (not online) 426121 706237 388949

Other events or sports (not online) 187894 323351 132630

Spread-betting

Private betting 470263 533162 444850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 187894 186030 169362

Summary

Any gambling activity 5043183 5893996 6163711

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3928235 4365662 4689584

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1071903 1162935 1114791

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

163

Table 16 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2484741 4372137 5276755 4915487 5374800

Scratchcards 1108981 2007129 2161887 2068953 2661741

Other lotteries 782168 1405446 1614427 1566777 1799449

Machines and games

Football pools 109794 207619 338138 338922 515747

Bingo (not online) 309779 544387 441083 364588 568919

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 272783 573503 830806 862187 1068509

Machines in a bookmakers 118618 207619 394168 477341 595632

Casino table games (not online) 066450 226639 544874 468590 640326

Poker played in pubs or clubs 033301 058073 110064 164810 256825

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

109794 283929 422295 407680 533432

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 118618 573503 1138851 1137546 1281953

Betting exchange 025408 067178 127774 172804 248473

Horse races (not online) 235999 846311 1517068 1727076 1818423

Dog races (not online) 041390 207619 300976 330401 471722

Sports events (not online) 101014 351108 792492 935181 1161056

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

164

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Other events or sports (not online) 025408 076338 199845 330401 341538

Spread-betting 017786 031240 049802 080286 198927

Private betting 101014 379989 744672 538911 775547

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 041390 113381 190751 221520 174577

Summary

Any gambling activity 3402663 5872721 6816336 6541742 7145430

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2739271 4528134 5562554 5582284 6019270

Scratchcards 1297399 2134314 2402588 2634760 3255627

Other lotteries 944783 1516298 1830969 2081660 2325544

Machines and games

Football pools 178366 254731 449447 621550 841022

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

165

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Bingo (not online) 418012 617791 566320 655617 907342

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 375075 648660 995923 1273026 1503092

Machines in a bookmakers 189525 254731 513318 801704 940375

Casino table games (not online) 121794 275702 682349 790545 995257

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075010 084356 177932 377534 502486

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

178366 338382 545142 712079 863168

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 189525 648660 1327352 1594993 1747699

Betting exchange 062920 095246 200189 389451 490922

Horse races (not online) 331926 935714 1728493 2259846 2346400

Dog races (not online) 086904 254731 406674 610161 785471

Sports events (not online) 167162 411168 954302 1359318 1609698

Other events or sports (not online) 062920 106081 287986 610161 616925

Spread-betting 050558 051203 098309 243038 420977

Private betting 167162 442273 902205 879511 1158765

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 086904 149018 277097 460200 385581

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

166

Summary

Any gambling activity 3679789 6026811 7080456 7161677 7713898

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

167

Table 17 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3494549 3880776

Scratchcards 2800592 1701792

Other lotteries 1034091 1585660

Machines and games

Football pools 405984 207566

Bingo (not online) 557456 444225

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 812186 462738

Machines in a bookmakers 353341 137215

Casino table games (not online) 301251 216477

Poker played in pubs or clubs 101963 037516

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 459092 252321

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 793825 724651

Betting exchange 035595 102887

Horse races (not online) 738878 876023

Dog races (not online) 166154 102887

Sports events (not online) 441342 343059

Other events or sports (not online) 166154 111399

Spread-betting 042443 022554

Private betting 566454 297514

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 117695 102887

Summary

Any gambling activity 5764541 5697910

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 4562254 4188547

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1052700 885515

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

168

Upper confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4053634 4241764

Scratchcards 3332315 1986745

Other lotteries 1411123 1863201

Machines and games

Football pools 663820 325240

Bingo (not online) 851218 607878

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 1154624 629312

Machines in a bookmakers 596862 235807

Casino table games (not online) 529352 336302

Poker played in pubs or clubs 250237 095830

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 730313 380349

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1133119 926642

Betting exchange 137204 190243

Horse races (not online) 1068465 1094838

Dog races (not online) 345513 190243

Sports events (not online) 708196 489341

Other events or sports (not online) 345513 201704

Spread-betting 150289 070846

Private betting 862153 435022

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 274371 190243

Summary

Any gambling activity 6328473 6059713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 5138744 4553155

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1432381 1105318

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

169

Table 18 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9077077 9211674 9517075 9593713 9685299 9812957 9864932 9545183

At risk (score 1-7) 669745 563003 327741 255052 178513 096121 059878 357875

Problem gambler (score 8+) 056035 057940 025265 033521 017067 033153

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9254336 9361084 9635040 9698734 9785404 9895338 9940122 9593521

At risk (score 1-7) 839007 704375 440212 352582 270863 175609 135068 403436

Problem gambler (score 8+) 114097 110366 063274 074520 052682 048254

Table 19 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8519860 8711536 9250440 9393184 9525060 9693782 9734680 9286154

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1032766 892188 499373 354966 259088 132731 108543 560818

Problem gambler (score 8+) 104206 099068 028010 051089 066191

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

170

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8825203 8975334 9454491 9572073 9696566 9842337 9891457 9371335

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1322780 1141419 695870 520040 419484 271299 265320 641733

Problem gambler (score 8+) 215479 197506 089099 125066 096662

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9578099 9644270 9733259 9747049 9798131 9876829 9925357 9785876

At risk (score 1 to 7) 240027 211211 132617 133917 080652 039690 149759

Problem gambler (score 8+) 005940

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9742421 9779976 9850299 9857514 9903095 9960310 9987975 9831453

At risk (score 1 to 7) 399536 344576 243894 241552 178199 123171 192924

Problem gambler (score 8+) 016832

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

171

Table 20 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower

confidence limit

Upper confidence

limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 641488 720646

Scratchcards 1140046 1241836

Other lotteries 758388 843687

Machines and games

Football pools 2839128 2981904

Bingo (not online) 1238228 1343604

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 2501922 2639279

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 3077452 3223462

Poker played in pubs or clubs 4481833 4638384

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 4342093 4498193

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 2561391 2699780

Betting exchange 4322136 4478161

Horse races (not online) 1503817 1617882

Dog races (not online) 2591132 2730024

Sports events (not online) 2978122 3122841

Other events or sports (not online) 4282224 4438092

Spread-betting 5121433 5278468

Private betting 2432562 2568673

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 3306058 3454743

Summary

Any gambling activity 699899 782206

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

172

Table 21 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower confidence limit Lower confidence limit

1 activity 160262 202119

2 to 3 activities 486195 556018

4 to 6 activities 1908236 2033261

7 or more activities 5191468 5348399

Total 699899 782206

Table 22 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9648551 9452875 9563557

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 189323 302060 182973

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 053570 103480 067396

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 012157 039731 042110

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 254548 417354 265579

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9726699 9524733 9669396

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 255518 360428 264318

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 091424 139120 120093

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032887 062907 085425

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 330222 485071 361575

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

173

Table 23 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9464299 9118712 9298723 9837688 9607037

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293250 345425 367963 068855 148376

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 103921 127950 064986 018895 042291

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 039993 095061

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 408612 508276 467966 095173 208930

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9533439 9363096 9504561 9895948 9755893

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 349103 534137 549284 117562 269095

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 138532 252683 153588 047600 115653

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062495 205743

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 473680 730515 668865 151205 348286

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

174

Table 24 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9321411 9480605 9545787 9576877 9640182

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293936 266863 20326 221189 193183

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 147161 076655 077211 051171 050955

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 059097 034342 034692 026447 004394

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 472157 360129 295883 286013 257623

Upper confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9452064 9592895 9647981 9676678 9733111

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 392991 359853 283189 305409 273638

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 220003 13036 129428 095691 096095

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 108216 072746 072015 060457 022741

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 594487 466443 390431 380487 349097

Table 25 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9543316 9616616 9408087 9174175

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

175

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259672 105609 187044 285473

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 097444

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032703 065081

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 365999 147627 235874 352165

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9595191 9765690 9689087 9537114

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 301870 212649 417188 585573

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 124153

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 048918 153365

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 415508 270443 487796 677991

Table 26 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9302879 9445046 9497357 9523320 9521257 9469934 9492898 9516849 9608043

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

272358 267204 197386 202673 189687 244778 215582 253691 180619

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

176

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

081569 080707 076948 058876 069385 086843 073820 074650 045143

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

023985 044753 029872 056980

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

386243 377595 295904 282584 288287 353966 307224 346162 242915

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9551450 9585275 9649557 9681445 9666246 9618459 9618579 9635214 9739105

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

474469 382818 316187 332992 303245 367211 313277 354455 292479

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

206588 149764 157024 137350 143928 165606 135338 133843 108395

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+)

066636 109334 083576 112215

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

619832 512170 437354 432782 424346 497717 421448 461810 369991

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

177

Table 27 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9551629 9486617 9482365

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 267865 218054 172604

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087250 083816 080596

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 023379 058161 049173

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 354644 328786 277601

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9606650 9605883 9659880

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 313905 309759 305887

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 114591 144244 178322

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 038489 109950 129900

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 407092 438830 440425

Table 28 Confidence limits

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9111018 9462725 9515756 9718238

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

312764 243504 241229 116443

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

143552 049671 086588 048311

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

065081 020491 026909

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

498432 314684 343949 178574

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9402415 9640332 9618411 9812436

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

535794 393921 324795 193039

Moderate risk gambler 306251 128609 139653 101327

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

178

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

(PGSI score 3 to 7)

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

185343 077937 059421

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

768820 482444 441935 270771

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

179

Table 29 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9155873 9425755 9528615 9701374 9703227

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 384868 250161 229556 130857 140608

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 148983 098486 063289 038633 031309

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 079863 039886 016379 009625

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 562021 379057 320660 183742 184927

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9334394 9565089 9660959 9807345 9806130

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 525552 359403 341141 220589 230170

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 242033 171423 127839 093075 079760

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 151335 090166 054885 041510

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 727964 510221 449811 287563 285740

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

180

Table 30 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9646180 9415118 9293309

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 204114 293344 311256

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 056303 111028 105447

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 013323 025937 071499

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 270312 433683 440578

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9710684 9538038 9456678

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259082 393775 439328

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087001 176397 185663

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 030014 061641 139703

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 332837 553207 589687

Table 31 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9494512 9524690 9538509

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 285425 237569 214448

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 081349 089900 087185

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 037336 037060 035420

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 380286 341334 326392

Upper confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9581575 9611167 9635965

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 358609 306719 291270

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 122875 134533 138702

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 066930 067427 070539

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 463662 422854 419182

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

181

Table 32 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9755131 9619945 9285949 9010047 8667875

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 083572 207589 375341 347399 604245

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 041367 067162 127709 125476 158387

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 025390 022545 033406 073004 059660

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 127437 293471 525814 512384 820593

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9836785 9677758 9426846 9372379 9079022

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 144664 254767 492212 633031 951836

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 086953 095269 200289 317363 362119

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062963 039910 074774 230460 201952

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 200714 348841 661474 846350 1213446

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

182

Table 33 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9099340 9548599

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 470349 230101

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 155175 091058

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 067013 029234

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 650515 334161

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9254028 9627752

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 596743 293668

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 232455 132830

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 120777 054710

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 796275 409520

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

183

Table 34 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9885967 9878118 9924628 9913695 9934834 9944198 9968002 9930092

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

056067 066401 033140 041679 024529 051489

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9943933 9933599 9966860 9958321 9975471 9983891 9996880 9948511

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

114033 121882 075372 086305 065166 069908

Table 35 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9796495 9790890 9885826 9839198 9881842 9887272 9947056 9892470

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

096118 107416 042843 075125 041388 075306

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

184

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9903882 9892584 9957157 9924875 9958612 9968144 9998118 9924694

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

203505 209110 114174 160802 118158 107530

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9946745 9937883 9924067 9952449 9963538 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9992505 9985535 9978965 9991601 9997263 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

185

Table 36 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9862701 9866674 9912713 9901984 9922588 9931413 9968002 9919365

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

072759 074941 041208 049951 032263 023300 060759

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9927241 9925059 9958792 9950049 9967737 9976700 9996880 9939241

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

137299 133326 087287 098016 077412 068587 080635

Table 37 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9749746 9767784 9873539 9815674 9869402 9874373 9947056 9870806

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129207 124241 050521 091536 048908 038907 093630

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

186

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9870793 9875759 9949479 9908464 9951092 9961093 9998118 9906370

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

250254 232216 126461 184326 130598 125627 129194

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9946745 9924651 9911158 9952449 9948608 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

028092 013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9992505 9978801 9971908 9991601 9992232 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

088842 028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

187

Table 38 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit

Upper confidence limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 085526 116894

Scratchcards 160262 202119

Other lotteries 141440 180951

Machines and games

Football pools 466841 535382

Bingo (not online) 303055 359252

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 457170 525058

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 602596 679557

Poker played in pubs or clubs 1415214 1526530

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 826715 915325

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 341456 400831

Betting exchange 1022381 1119561

Horse races (not online) 274326 327996

Dog races (not online) 670683 751436

Sports events (not online) 524945 597248

Other events or sports (not online) 1297189 1404615

Spread betting 1533366 1648318

Private betting 399228 463030

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 944042 1037939

Summary

Any gambling activity 104050 138360

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

188

Table 39 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit Upper confidence

limit

1 activity 022545 039910

2 to 3 activities 049022 073418

4 to 6 activities 255212 307119

7 or more activities 1130234 1231654

Total 104050 138360

Table 40 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9954942 9915039 9868631

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

019964 057658 076064

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9980036 9942342 9923936

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045058 084961 131369

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

189

Table 41 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9915506 9712750 9908589 9964921 9896912

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057978 153197 027297 011396 034858

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9942022 9846803 9972703 9988604 9965142

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

084494 287250 091411 035079 103088

Table 42 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9970101 9941246 9923436 9908721 9850406

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

008286 025670 037646 046856 089809

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

190

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9991714 9974330 9962354 9953144 9910191

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

029899 058754 076564 091279 149594

Table 43 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9942933 9827380 9744833 9675853

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

039650 069453 076037 069096

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9960350 9930547 9923963 9930904

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057067 172620 255167 324147

Table 44 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9854415 9910787 9857493 9913822 9892022 9920618 9839632 9937886 9942973

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

191

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

070998 040821 072334 028763 046875 032433 091573 026562 016867

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9945585 9969213 9942507 9986178 9967978 9979382 9920368 9982114 9997027

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129002 079179 127666 071237 093125 067567 148427 053438 043133

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

192

Table 45 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9939398 9855435 9809368

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041245 083629 088478

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9958755 9916371 9911522

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

060602 144565 190632

Table 46 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9740976 9908850 9917042 9960283

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

111223 027376 043368 010061

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9888777 9972624 9956632 9989939

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

259024 091150 082958 039717

Table 47 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9791533 9862827 9932436 9957659 9945326

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

122660 072826 023654 009436 016443

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9877340 9927174 9976346 9990564 9983557

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

193

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

208467 137173 067564 042341 054674

Table 48 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9958214 9902923 9814337

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

021531 050437 105447

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9978469 9949563 9894553

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041786 097077 185663

Table 49 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9921761 9909910 9906334

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045993 054365 052282

Upper confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9954007 9945635 9947718

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

078239 090090 093666

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

194

Table 50 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9924761 9926594 9901786 9744784 9760771

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

033199 049030 049850 087770 081586

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9966801 9950970 9950150 9912230 9918414

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

075239 073406 098214 255216 239229

Table 51 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9834167 9922517

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 101829 046444

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9898171 9953556

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 165833 077483

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

195

Table 53 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1271729 2945796 941041 1002800 1228218 1653678

Scratchcards 1093044 2171483 1145690 1143454 1570657 1886444

Other lotteries 1262295 2601960 885593 1426952 983242 1876728

Machines and games

Football pools 1976900 2847439 1033817 1341628 899014 933261

Bingo (not online) 1603655 2415815 931788 872323 1247152 1954492

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1517999 2034979 1352120 872323 1266097 1973946

Machines in a bookmakers 2237019 2171483 1380390 1190513 871014 1152814

Casino table games (not online) 1337847 1772444 1267479 1105867 1351490 2159024

Poker played in pubs or clubs 2731578 2690263 1099009 1171680 685457 668361

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2294993 2327774 1522123 1096479 1020778 743724

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1546529 2239824 1305066 1002800 1152603 1760254

Betting exchange 2488655 2425602 1408685 568786 1002002 1124095

Horse races (not online) 1337847 1957088 848726 669221 936408 3317233

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

196

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Dog races (not online) 2140529 2073956 839523 872323 1067781 2032342

Sports events (not online) 1938477 2611768 1267479 946779 1030171 1229504

Other events or sports (not online)

3200389 3034395 1541067 568786 349482 398246

Spread-betting 3416236 2239824 848726 1209360 611868 734288

Private betting 1366227 1898725 1211196 1134052 1114871 2295682

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 1919276 2327774 830324 1209360 917703 1808759

Summary

Any gambling activity 1027530 2464764 857936 1077713 1237684 2373874

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1648541 3279102 1304925 1338178 1569279 1934955

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

197

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Scratchcards 1448311 2475462 1538808 1496704 1945096 2181543

Other lotteries 1638032 2923845 1240773 1811568 1295516 2171286

Machines and games

Football pools 2419145 3177718 1411481 1717383 1200180 1157388

Bingo (not online) 2014617 2730483 1294245 1189419 1590249 2253307

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1920787 2332329 1770908 1189419 1611206 2273799

Machines in a bookmakers 2697484 2475462 1802439 1549372 1168326 1397217

Casino table games (not online) 1722023 2055564 1676151 1454510 1705377 2468210

Poker played in pubs or clubs 3220013 3015309 1485823 1528315 954852 863041

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2759168 2638757 1959705 1443953 1337786 947463

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1952085 2546940 1718297 1338178 1485282 2048083

Betting exchange 2964364 2740670 1833943 834759 1316659 1366017

Horse races (not online) 1722023 2250428 1197907 953723 1242592 3666828

Dog races (not online) 2594545 2373249 1187178 1189419 1390541 2335242

Sports events (not online) 2377797 2934012 1676151 1274527 1348344 1480312

Other events or sports (not online)

3708461 3370270 1980627 834759 552620 553936

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

198

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Spread-betting 3931358 2546940 1197907 1570416 868828 936926

Private betting 1753472 2188946 1612834 1486161 1443208 2611176

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 2357111 2638757 1176443 1570416 1221394 2099443

Summary

Any gambling activity 1374225 2781404 1208631 1422827 1579765 2692769

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

199

Table 54 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2115834 3842514 4426600

Once a week 2305108 2357524 1278810

Less than once a week more than once a month

1666011 563551 347431

Once a month 1069570 304294 1108443

Every 2 to 3 months 757091 485165

Once or twice a year 420816

Upper confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2839983 5195599 6362470

Once a week 3047889 3598625 2832036

Less than once a week more than once a month

2336575 1348746 1396207

Once a month 1642181 940571 2598245

Every 2 to 3 months 1259596 1230828

Once or twice a year 821370

Table 55 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1082324 4256754

Once a week 2549093 1640856

Less than once a week more than once a month

965178 285899

Once a month 1180106 931875

Every 2 to 3 months 1356433

Once or twice a year 2469937 193456

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

200

Upper confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1200336 5879558

Once a week 2712540 3004014

Less than once a week more than once a month

1077564 1068000

Once a month 1302485 2077246

Every 2 to 3 months 1486034

Once or twice a year 2631751 887818

201

Published September 2021

PHE gateway number GOV-9697

wwwgovukphe

Twitter PHE_uk

wwwfacebookcomPublicHealthEngland

copy Crown copyright 2021

Page 5: Gambling-related harms evidence review

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

4

Harmful gambling

The most commonly used screening tools categorise gambling-related harm as either

low-risk moderate-risk or problem gambling The levels of gambling are defined as

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

More specifically problem gambling is typically defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits In 2018 the

HSE estimated that 05 of the population were problem gamblers This is a reduction

from 09 in 2015 (although since the numbers are very small this does not represent a

real decline) However the proportion of gamblers who experience low levels of

gambling-related problems is increasing

It is important to note that a recent YouGov study found a significantly different

prevalence of 13 of the population experiencing some level of gambling harm

compared to 4 from a combined version of the HSE1 An assessment of both sources

concluded that HSE likely underestimated the true prevalence in the population

Profile of gamblers

Overall the highest rates of gambling participation are reported among people who have

higher academic qualifications are employed and among relatively less deprived

groups There are disproportionately more people classified as lsquoat-riskrsquo or lsquolow-riskrsquo

lsquomoderate-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo among men in younger age groups However

the socio-demographic profile of gamblers appears to change as the level of gambling

risk increases from low-risk to problem gambling Harmful gambling is associated with

people who are unemployed and among people living in more deprived areas

Gambling and the risk of gambling-related harm also appear to be associated with

psychological and physical health Overall the highest levels of gambling participation

are reported by people who report better general psychological health (on the short

general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)) and higher life satisfaction In contrast people

1 This version of the HSE combined the health surveys for England Scotland and Wales

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

5

describing poorer psychological health are less likely to report gambling participation

Again this reverses for problem gambling with higher prevalence among people with

poor health low life satisfaction and wellbeing and especially for people where there is

an indication of probable psychological health problems

The health behaviour profile for gambling was inconclusive for BMI (Body Mass Index)

status and cigarette smoking But there is a clear and strong association between

gambling at all levels of harm and increasing alcohol consumption This gradient is

evident for overall gambling participation and becomes steeper for at-risk and problem

gambling There is a particularly high level of gambling risk for people consuming 50

units of alcohol or more per week

Finally harmful gambling has a very different activity profile to general gambling It

includes low National Lottery participation and high participation in online gambling

including

bull slots

bull casino and bingo games

bull electronic gambling machines in bookmakers

bull sports and other event betting

bull betting exchanges

bull dog racing

At-risk gamblers are significantly more likely than general gamblers to participate in

online gambling

Overall demographic factors particularly sex appear to predict at-risk gambling

behaviour more than economic factors such as income employment and relative

deprivation Poor mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling than both poor

physical health and negative health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

Affected others treatment attitudes and influences and children and young people

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were found to be negatively

affected by someone elsersquos gambling Affected others are more likely to be women

reflecting the association between problem gambling and men Among affected others

immediate family members felt the most severe impacts of problem gambling

Just over 9000 people received treatment from the National Gambling Treatment

Service (NGTS) in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This represents only a small

fraction of problem gamblers in England This was the highest number of people treated

since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

6

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged The proportion of children and young people who participate in any

gambling has been reducing Boys are more likely to gamble than girls and the rate

increases with age Fruit and slot (electronic gaming) machines were often identified as

the first experiences of gambling among children and young people Playing the National

Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most common forms

of gambling reported But as the young people got older there was a significant increase

in online gambling among men

The rates of gambling among children and young people are lower than drinking alcohol

but higher than using e-cigarettes smoking tobacco cigarettes or taking illegal drugs

There is a potential relationship between these other harmful activities and gambling

Compared with children who have not gambled those who have spent their own money

on gambling are more likely to have also consumed alcohol taken drugs or smoked

either a tobacco cigarette or an e-cigarette

Discussion and implications

The main findings of this report are that

bull half the population currently gamble with 05 of the population experiencing the

highest level of harm

bull people who are classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo are disproportionately

younger men

bull socioeconomic and health inequalities persist among people classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and

lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo

bull alcohol is very strongly associated with gambling

bull a significant proportion of the population (7) are negatively affected by someone

elsersquos gambling

The previously published sources discussed in the second part of the report vary in the

type and quality of gambling data available Gambling is a relatively new field of

research and inconsistencies in the robustness and standardisation of the publications

and data available are to be expected However all sources included are encouraging

additions to the existing body of work This inconsistency in data quality and the

absence of longitudinal data are a major gap in the evidence base to be addressed in

future research and data collection

No data here takes into account the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on

gambling behaviour Public Health England (PHE) has published a rapid evidence

review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

7

1 Introduction

11 Background and aims

Concern about the harms associated with gambling has been increasing in the UK In

response in March 2018 the PHE remit letter from Health Minister Steve Brine

confirmed PHErsquos priorities for 2018 to 2019 This included the request for PHE to ldquoinform

and support action on gambling-related harm as part of the follow up to the Department

for Digital Culture Media amp Sport-led (DCMS) review of gaming machines and social

responsibilityrdquo (1)

In May 2018 DCMS published their response to the consultation on proposals for

changes to gaming machines and social responsibility measures In it they announced

that ldquoPHE will conduct an evidence review of the health aspects of gambling-related

harm to inform action on prevention and treatmentrdquo (2)

To fulfil this commitment 2 complementary evidence reviews were undertaken

1 The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) carried out a mapping review of

the literature on the effectiveness of national and international polices and

interventions to reduce gambling-related harms (3)

2 PHE has undertaken a broader evidence review on the prevalence of gambling and

associated health harms and social and economic burden

This report presents the findings of the quantitative analysis aspect of the work

conducted by PHE only It is one of 7 technical reports that inform the broader evidence

review The aim is to describe the prevalence characteristics associations and harms

associated with gambling as described in the scope (4) of the high-level protocol

Specifically this report aims to

bull describe the prevalence of gambling and gambling-related harms in England by

socio-demographic characteristics geographical distribution and year

bull identify the determinants of gambling and harmful gambling

12 Methods

To begin the project we undertook a search of common databases websites and other

online resources (for example Office for National Statistics NHS Digital and the

Gambling Commission websites) to see if published reports or datasets for England

were available to fulfil the above objectives We determined that this was not to be the

case So we identified datasets and official statistics that include information on

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

8

gambling by adults or children We used the HSE (for years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018)

as the primary dataset

We ran outputs from HSE to meet the objectives both on the most recent year (2018)

and the whole combined dataset where necessary All outputs have been non-response

weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE analysis since 2003 We commissioned

the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) who manage the HSE on behalf of

NHS Digital to combine the datasets NatCen calculated and appended new combined

weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc18 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb18 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication (5) we used the problem gambling

weight for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening

tools We used the self-completion weight for the rest

You can find all important information related to the data source in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the Health Survey for England series (6) Registered users can access

the separate datasets via the UK Data Archive (7)

We conducted all statistical analysis in SPSS version 25

We supplemented the outputs from HSE with findings from statistical publications and

reports available from other sources to better meet the objectives Sources include

several outputs by

bull the Gambling Commission

bull the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010

bull YouGov

bull the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH)

bull the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

bull hospital episode statistics (NHS Digital)

The HSE asks children certain questions including about smoking and alcohol but this

is not the case for gambling However we found published data to fulfil the aim to

include children in the analytic aspect of the work at least to an extent

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

9

The Gambling Commission publish an analytical report lsquoYoung people and gamblingrsquo

that explores the gambling behaviours of young people aged 11 to 16 years old in

England Scotland and Wales The survey was conducted by Ipsos MORI and includes

adolescent-appropriate application of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders 4th version) to measure at-risk and problem gambling This source

only allows limited analysis of associations linked to gambling in children as it is only

gambling behaviour focused and does not include any health topics

This report has found the lack of health and gambling data for children to be a gap in the

data currently available However gambling behaviours in the cohort is very detailed

and includes aspects such as in-game gambling parental gambling and those following

gambling companies on social media Furthermore trend data is available We have

supplemented the results from this source with recent findings from ALSPAC

13 COVID-19

The Health Survey for England 2018 is the primary data source and the gambling

supplementary questions refer to gambling behaviour in the last 12 months The data

was published in November 2019 and the 12 month period covered by the survey

questions is 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 This was before COVID-19 and so

no data here takes into account the impact of the pandemic on gambling behaviour So

the term lsquothe last 12 monthsrsquo does not refer to the 12 months of 2020 when the

pandemic occurred We have published a rapid evidence review to explore the impact of

COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

10

2 Overall gambling participation

21 Introduction

This section focuses on prevalence and associations with any gambling activity in the

last 12 months (at the time of the survey year referenced most recent refers to 2018)

The HSE involves a set of questions and interviews conducted face to face in the homes

of respondents The gambling questions are completed using a self-completion

questionnaire alongside the core health questionnaire As part of this respondents were

asked whether they have participated in any gambling activity in the last 12 months and

if so what type of activity

22 Overall gambling participation by type of activity

Over half (540) of the England population aged 16 and over have taken part in some

form of gambling in the last 12 months (based on HSE 2018 (5)) This equates to almost

245 million people Gambling activity questions were first included in the HSE in 2012

and again in 2015 2016 and most recently in 2018 Since 2012 participation in any

gambling activity has reduced significantly in the England population by over 10 percent

(from 645 to 540) However the reduction between 2016 and 2018 is not

statistically significant meaning there is unlikely to have been a real change between

the 2 most recent years for which data is available

The National Lottery was the gambling activity with the highest level of participation in

England with 36 of the population taking part in the last 12 months The recent

Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that in the

individual National Lottery draws the most common games of 2019 were

bull Lotto (played by 21 of all survey respondents in the past 4 weeks)

bull EuroMillions (20)

bull Thunderball (3)

bull Hotpicks (1)

However participation in the National Lottery has declined from 525 in 2012 to 457

in 2015 405 in 2016 to 360 in 2018 This is a statistically significant decline and

suggests that the reduction seen in overall gambling participation is largely due to the

reduction in National Lottery participation Figure 1 shows the percentage of overall

gambling participation in England between 2012 and 2018 Once the National Lottery is

excluded gambling participation has stayed at the same level with 402 of the

population having gambled on some other activity in the last 12 months As shown in

Figure 1 by excluding respondents who only play the National Lottery we see a different

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

11

pattern in gambling participation This shows a pattern more resistant to change with the

rate increasing to 451 between 2012 and 2015 before reducing to 402 in 2018

Figure 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Base2 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 Unless otherwise stated the base given in tables is the number of respondents who answered the

relevant question

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity Any gambling activity exc National Lottery

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

12

After lotteries the most common types of gambling activity according to HSE 2018 were

bull horse racing (not online3) (81)

bull online betting with a bookmaker (78)

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines (57)

bull bingo (not online) (45)

These were also the most common activities in 2012 the only difference being that

online betting with a bookmaker was less common in 2012

Table 2 Overall gambling participation by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 525 457 405 360

Scratchcards 187 222 203 179

Other lotteries 150 148 139 144

Machines and games

Football pools 21 26 26 29

Bingo (not online) 58 59 49 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 71 62 57

Machines in a bookmakers 24 33 29 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 35 32 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 11 08 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 28 37 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 43 72 74 78

Betting exchange 08 10 12 11

Horse races (not online) 104 111 92 81

Dog races (not online) 27 28 21 17

Sports events (not online) 38 52 51 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 14 13 15

3 lsquoNot onlinersquo throughout this report means gambling in a bookmakers by telephone or at the venue

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

13

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Spread-betting 05 06 06 05

Private betting 46 51 41 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 18 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 66 94 94 94

Base 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

23 Overall gambling participation by age and sex

Participation in any gambling activity was most common in respondents aged 45 to 64

(604) and least common in those aged 16 to 24 (390) The National Lottery draws

were the activity with greatest participation across all age groups except for those aged

16 to 24 years for whom scratchcards are more common If we exclude National Lottery

gambling was more common in younger age groups for many activities4

Also 94 of people surveyed participated in some form of online gambling (excluding

National Lottery) and this type of gambling is more common with younger people Online

gambling has increased in popularity from 66 in 2012 and since 2015 has remained

consistent at 94

Slot (electronic gaming) machines were the most common type of machine or game

betting Except for bingo most machine or games betting activity types were more

common among younger people particularly

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines

bull football pools

4 Itrsquos worth noting that the HSE gambling measures are derived from a self-completion questionnaire for

people aged 16 years and over However while the legal age limit for playing the National Lottery and

scratchcards is currently 16 years (as well as for some (category D) slot machines) it is 18 years for most

other forms of gambling HSE does not take this legal age discrepancy into account

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

14

bull electronic gaming machines in bookmakers (including fixed odds betting terminals

(FOBT)

bull casino table games

Online betting with a bookmaker sports betting and private betting were also more

common with younger age groups particularly the under 35s

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

15

Table 3 Overall gambling participation by age group England 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 124 324 428 471 444 368 286 360

Scratchcards 197 268 236 196 140 91 49 179

Other lotteries 49 101 144 171 189 189 176 144

Machines and games

Football pools 64 63 19 08 15 10 21 29

Bingo (not online) 49 55 53 30 41 37 51 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 97 71 53 41 13 10 57

Machines in a bookmakers 44 51 20 16 09 - - 22

Casino table games (not online) 41 63 30 17 13 - - 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 13 08 - - - - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

33 66 47 21 14 - - 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 92 159 105 77 40 18 11 78

Betting exchange 27 17 11 04 08 - - 11

Horse races (not online) 99 87 80 89 86 78 33 81

Dog races (not online) 31 26 12 16 11 12 - 17

Sports events (not online) 68 75 36 38 29 14 - 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

16

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Other events or sports (not online) 38 27 10 11 12 - - 15

Spread-betting 17 09 - - - - - 05

Private betting 85 64 39 23 19 11 14 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 19 16 15 08 09 11 06 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 390 569 573 604 596 530 444 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

371 489 443 407 405 337 282 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

112 185 129 91 51 24 15 94

Base 931 1196 1140 1242 1058 875 661 7104

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

17

The Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that on

average online gamblers have 3 accounts with gambling websites and that 21 have

bet lsquoin-playrsquo (while the event is taking place) in the last 4 weeks Furthermore 20 of

online gamblers aged 18 to 24 had more than 5 online accounts Table 4 is taken from

the Gambling Commission report and shows online and in-person participation in the

last 4 weeks for those activities that can be accessed through multiple methods The

table shows that people playing bingo (81) and the National Lottery (73) were most

likely to participate in-person while those participating in football betting (83) sports

betting (81) and casino games (74) were most likely to do so online

Smartphones are now the most popular method of accessing online gambling with 50

of all online gamblers using their device for this purpose This continues the trend seen

in the Gambling Commission annual reports of increasing smartphone use for gambling

in recent years Younger age groups were most likely to gamble with multiple devices

while the likelihood of using more than one device to gamble reduces with age

Table 4 Online and in-person participation in the last 4 weeks (2019)

National Lottery

()

Bingo ()

Football pools

()

Horse racing

()

Sports betting

()

Football betting

()

Betting on other

events ()

Casino games

()

Online 36 24 55 61 81 83 58 74

In-person 73 81 50 49 27 26 53 47

Source The Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Figure 2 shows overall gambling participation for adults by sex in England between 2012

and 2018 Men (574) were more likely than women (507) to have participated in

any gambling activity in the last 12 months It also shows participation reducing at a

similar rate for both men and women since 2012

The difference is marked for online gambling with only 43 of women participating in

online activities compared to 147 of men Participation in online gambling reaches

284 for men aged 25 to 34 This means that of the 565 of 25 to 34 year old men

that gamble (excluding the National Lottery) half do so online

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

18

Figure 2 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 5 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018 2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity men 680 655 612 574

Any gambling activity women 610 589 513 507

Base men 3042 2996 2965 3506

Base women 3749 3759 3726 3599

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Women (178) were as likely to buy scratchcards as men (181) and more likely to

take part in bingo (59 compared to 30 of men) but men had higher participation

rates in all other gambling activities The differences between men and women were

greatest for

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity men Any gambling activity women

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

19

bull online betting with a bookmaker

bull machines in bookmakers (including FOBT)

bull betting on sports events

bull private betting5

24 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification

By highest educational qualifications participation in any gambling activity was most

common in the below degree category (588) followed by respondents with an NVQ4

NVQ5 and degree or equivalent (504) level of qualification Those with no qualification

were least likely to participate in any gambling activity (465)

There were differences by type of activity where those with an NVQ4 NVQ5 and degree

or equivalent were less likely to participate in bingo (24) Also along with people in

the below degree category they were more likely to participate in betting on horse

racing and sports events (not online) Respondents with no qualification were notably

less likely than the rest of the population to participate in online betting with a bookmaker

(23)

Table 6 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification England 2018

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 345 389 307 360

Scratchcards 131 218 147 179

Other lotteries 131 161 119 144

Machines and games

Football pools 14 39 23 29

Bingo (not online) 24 53 55 45

5 This excludes poker played in clubs betting exchanges and spread-betting which are all relatively low

participation activities but are dominated by men

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

20

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 33 76 38 57

Machines in a bookmakers 13 31 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 34 30 05 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 03 10 04 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 38 14 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 88 23 78

Betting exchange 14 10 08 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 41 81

Dog races (not online) 11 21 12 17

Sports events (not online) 33 52 19 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 21 10 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 33 46 23 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 10 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 504 588 465 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

360 456 313 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

107 109 34 94

Base 2024 3553 1313 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

21

25 Overall gambling participation by economic activity

Looking at economic activity participation by group in any gambling activity was most

common in the

bull employed self-employed or training category (647)

bull retired (523)

bull unemployed (504)

However confounding is important here as economic groups like students and those in

retirement comprise people of very different ages and previous tables have shown a

strong association between gambling and age You can find more information about the

issues of confounding later in this report in the section on at-risk and problem gambling

and in more detail in Appendix B

We based Table 7 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller employment groups

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

22

Table 7 Overall gambling participation by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 509 136 398 341 334 432

Scratchcards 246 166 84 205 205 199

Other lotteries 150 42 184 108 99 142

Machines and games

Football pools 32 43 14 21 10 27

Bingo (not online) 52 37 59 52 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 76 18 74 50 65

Machines in a bookmakers 37 36 04 47 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 43 43 08 22 12 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 13 19 02 11 - 1

66 The economically inactive population comprises all persons who were neither employed nor unemployed during the short reference period used to

measure current activity This population is split into 4 groups attendant at educational institutions retired engaged in family duties other

economically inactive

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

23

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

43 26 06 44 30 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 99 56 14 49 31 69

Betting exchange 13 25 03 11 - 11

Horse races (not online) 123 57 70 80 54 98

Dog races (not online) 32 16 11 22 11 24

Sports events (not online) 64 54 14 47 18 48

Other events or sports (not online) 18 14 04 16 - 13

Spread-betting 07 06 - 09 - 05

Private betting 56 92 17 36 22 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 17 22 09 14 07 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 647 360 523 504 469 576

Base 15321 2029 5906 1796 2111 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

24

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

25

27 Overall gambling participation by Index of Multiple Deprivation

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is the official measure of relative deprivation for

small areas in England Quintiles are calculated by ranking the neighbourhoods in

England from most deprived to least deprived and dividing them into 5 equal groups

These range from the most deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally to the least

deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile but there were differences by activity type Several activities were statistically

significantly higher in the most deprived quintile compared to lesser deprived quintiles

We saw the strongest inequality gradients were for bingo and scratchcards

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

26

Table 8 Overall gambling participation by IMD England 2018

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 325 355 382 376 358 360

Scratchcards 213 180 191 166 147 179

Other lotteries 108 131 163 162 154 144

Machines and games

Football pools 26 40 30 24 24 29

Bingo (not online) 64 50 43 37 31 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 54 57 52 52 57

Machines in a bookmakers 30 26 19 25 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 22 32 29 27 20 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 09 07 05 - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

41 27 29 29 24 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 64 69 83 91 83 78

Betting exchange 13 07 08 15 13 11

Horse races (not online) 59 65 98 96 87 81

Dog races (not online) 16 15 16 27 09 17

Sports events (not online) 35 40 41 48 38 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

27

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online) 12 16 17 15 17 15

Spread-betting 05 06 04 05 05 05

Private betting 33 46 40 37 32 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 14 16 13 06 12 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 514 527 567 553 534 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

395 393 429 400 388 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

83 86 98 105 99 94

Base 1278 1528 1515 1474 1310 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

28

28 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity

By broad ethnicity overall participation in any gambling activity was most common in

the White and White British ethnic group (608) and least common in the Asian and

Asian British ethnic group (312)

We base Table 9 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller ethnic groups

Table 9 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 457 228 311 345 432

Scratchcards 211 91 146 182 199

Other lotteries 152 71 83 93 142

Machines and games

Football pools 26 23 32 43 27

Bingo (not online) 58 20 27 25 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

68 47 51 55 65

Machines in a bookmakers

29 23 33 33 29

Casino table games (not online)

32 27 37 33 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs

10 10 - - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

36 12 15 31 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

75 21 37 57 69

Betting exchange 11 07 - - 11

Horse races (not online)

109 17 30 46 98

Dog races (not online) 27 - - - 24

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

29

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Sports events (not online)

51 20 21 50 48

Other events or sports (not online)

14 09 - 22 13

Spread-betting 05 07 - - 05

Private betting 49 28 17 56 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 - 17 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 608 312 417 440 576

Base 23586 2043 821 688 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

29 Overall gambling participation by region

The North East (647) had the highest overall participation in gambling while London

(480) was lower than average

We based Table 10 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for each region

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

30

Table 10 Overall gambling participation by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

647 587 608 611 578 611 480 568 578 576

Base 1329 3592 2699 2332 2838 3013 4115 4442 2803 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 201

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

31

210 Overall gambling participation by local authority

Variation in gambling participation was evident by upper tier local authority (UTLA)

Discounting Rutland which has wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a

rate of gambling participation that was statistically significantly higher than average for

England The top 5 UTLAs in England with the highest levels of gambling participation

were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

For the full list of authorities included in Figure 3 see Appendix A You should note that

due to small sample sizes we have grouped together the authorities of inner and outer

London

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

32

Figure 3 Overall gambling participation by UTLA England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

211 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health

In HSE general health is self-assessed with the question lsquoHow is your health in general

Would you say it was very good good fair bad or very badrsquo There has been very little

change in the general health status of the population over the course of the surveys

with 76 of respondents reporting very good or good health in 1993 compared to 75

in 2018 (in no survey year has this been below 74 or above 76) This is the same for

respondents who gamble with 752 reporting very good or good health in HSE 2018

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health tend to gamble less (501) than

the general population and those reporting good or very good general health (580)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

33

We based Table 11 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for the smaller categories

Table 11 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 435 444 381 432

Scratchcards 205 195 151 199

Other lotteries 142 153 120 142

Machines and games

Football pools 30 20 11 27

Bingo (not online) 48 69 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 59 42 65

Machines in a bookmakers 31 24 20 29

Casino table games (not online) 36 18 13 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 11 07 - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

34 30 29 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 79 44 29 69

Betting exchange 12 07 - 11

Horse races (not online) 105 83 63 98

Dog races (not online) 26 20 14 24

Sports events (not online) 52 36 27 48

Other events or sports (not online) 14 10 12 13

Spread-betting 06 04 - 05

Private betting 52 34 16 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 16 10 15

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

34

Summary

Any gambling activity 580 588 501 576

Base 20488 4684 1987 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

212 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction

In HSE life satisfaction is derived from the question lsquoOverall how satisfied are you with

life nowadaysrsquo This is scored and grouped low (score 0 to 4) medium (score 5 to 6)

high (score 7 to 8) and very high (score 9 to 10)

Gambling participation across life satisfaction groups was inconclusive As with self-

assessed general health the lowest group were again least likely to participate in

gambling (492) This was also true for respondents participating in the National

Lottery where 315 in the lowest satisfaction group take part compared to 363 in the

very high satisfaction group The low satisfaction group were most likely to participate in

online gambling including slots casino and bingo games (50 compared to 28 in the

very high group) but this reverses for online gambling with a bookmaker (44 of the low

group compared to 70 of the very high group)

Table 12 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction England 2018

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 315 353 373 363 360

Scratchcards 188 204 181 166 179

Other lotteries 121 155 142 150 144

Machines and games

Football pools 18 38 31 26 29

Bingo (not online) 46 57 41 45 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 58 55 61 51 57

Machines in a bookmakers 31 2 23 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 16 31 31 22 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - 07

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

35

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

50 33 25 28 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 44 82 92 70 78

Betting exchange - - - - 11

Horse races (not online) 63 66 87 86 81

Dog races (not online) 18 09 16 20 17

Sports events (not online) 31 43 46 36 40

Other events or sports (not online) 18 17 14 17 15

Spread-betting - - - - 05

Private betting 44 34 42 31 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 13 09 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 492 523 559 535 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

359 422 418 384 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

78 99 106 82 94

Base 604 937 3038 2408 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

213 Overall gambling participation by wellbeing

The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a widely used measure

of subjective and psychological functioning It was developed to capture a broad concept

of positive mental wellbeing and incorporates 2 perspectives on wellbeing (9)

1 Eudaimonic wellbeing comes from a sense of purpose personal growth and

involvement in activities

2 Hedonic wellbeing comes from feelings of joy satisfaction and enjoyment

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

36

WEMWBS includes 14 statements that cover psychological functioning cognitive-

evaluative dimensions and affective-emotional aspects of wellbeing For each statement

respondents can answer

bull none of the time

bull rarely

bull some of the time

bull often

bull all of the time

The statements are all expressed positively The responses from 1 to 5 are aggregated

to form an index which can range from 14 (those who answer lsquonone of the timersquo for

every statement) to 70 (those who answer lsquoall of the timersquo to all statements) (10)

As above for life satisfaction findings were inconclusive across WEMWBS quintiles with

the highest participation rates seen in quintiles 2 to 4 and the lowest rate seen in quintile

5 (521)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

37

Table 13 Overall gambling participation by WEMWBS quintile England 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 396 417 399 429 392 405

Scratchcards 232 224 225 178 161 203

Other lotteries 129 132 144 142 148 139

Machines and games

Football pools 28 19 29 28 30 26

Bingo (not online) 46 53 58 46 41 49

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 64 88 57 41 62

Machines in a bookmakers 43 28 36 23 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 26 29 44 32 31 32

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - - 08

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

44 26 35 28 24 31

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 81 71 75 77 72 74

Betting exchange 11 16 08 10 17 12

Horse races (not online) 90 101 109 89 78 92

Dog races (not online) 17 25 26 20 17 21

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

38

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Sports events (not online) 56 44 74 50 38 51

Other events or sports (not online) 13 11 18 14 08 13

Spread-betting - - - - - 06

Private betting 37 47 56 37 32 41

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 09 16 09 13 13

Summary

Any gambling activity 555 585 570 589 521 562

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 417

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 94

Base 1281 1426 1189 1272 1375 6691

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

39

214 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used and validated

measure of psychological health It addresses broader components of psychological

morbidity with 12 items measuring

bull happiness

bull depression

bull anxiety

bull sleep disturbance

bull self-confidence

Each item is rated on a 4-point response scale to show whether symptoms of mental ill

health are lsquonot at all presentrsquo or if present lsquono more than usualrsquo lsquorather more than

usualrsquo or lsquomuch more than usualrsquo For the purpose of the HSE we adopted the standard

GHQ coding method for each of the 4 possible responses to each item as advocated by

the test author Each symptom was scored either 0 if rsquonot at all presentrsquo or present lsquono

more than usualrsquo or 1 for symptoms that were present lsquorather more than usualrsquo or lsquomuch

more than usualrsquo (11) So using this method the maximum score for any individual

study participant is 12 No formal threshold exists for identifying probable mental ill

health with optimal values likely to be specific to the population under study However

in keeping with previous HSE surveys participantsrsquo scores are grouped according to 3

categories which are

bull 0 (indicating no evidence of probable mental ill health)

bull 1 to 3 (indicating less than optimal mental health)

bull 4 or more (indicating probable psychological disturbance or mental ill health) (10)

Continuing the trend seen before for general health life satisfaction and wellbeing

respondents scoring highest on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological disturbance

or mental ill health) were less likely (506) to participate in gambling than those who

score 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) (555)

Table 14 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12 England 2018

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 376 349 327 360

Scratchcards 175 189 187 179

Other lotteries 148 153 119 144

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

40

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Machines and games

Football pools 32 26 24 29

Bingo (not online) 44 53 37 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 57 56 57 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 24 28 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 28 34 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 07 08 05 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 27 32 37 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 88 72 58 78

Betting exchange 12 11 11 11

Horse races (not online) 86 83 67 81

Dog races (not online) 18 19 09 17

Sports events (not online) 43 43 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 17 10 18 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 39 36 38 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 553 535 502 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 404 411 381 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 100 93 83 94

Base 4193 1630 1146 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

41

215 Overall gambling participation by BMI group

BMI (body mass index) is a widely used measure of weight that takes into account the

individualrsquos height and is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the height in metres

squared (kgm2) Adults can be classified as

bull underweight (BMI less than 185)

bull normal (BMI between 185 and 25)

bull overweight (BMI between 25 and 30)

bull obese (BMI 30 or above)

According to HSE 2018 63 of adults in England were overweight or obese and

between 1993 and 2018 there has been a marked increase in the proportion of adults

who are overweight or obese

A greater proportion of respondents classified as obese (594) and overweight (569)

participated in gambling compared to those classified not overweight or obese (486)

This difference was particularly notable for participation in the National Lottery as 429

of the obese group participated compared to 284 of the not overweight or obese

group

Table 15 Overall gambling participation by BMI group England 2018

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 284 393 429 360

Scratchcards 161 182 212 179

Other lotteries 108 159 185 144

Machines and games

Football pools 32 33 23 29

Bingo (not online) 37 44 55 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 52 54 66 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 27 20 22

Casino table games (not online) 21 36 24 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 04 10 07 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 30 35 30

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

42

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 78 92 74 78

Betting exchange 10 11 15 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 77 81

Dog races (not online) 14 19 19 17

Sports events (not online) 34 60 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 13 25 08 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 38 44 35 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 13 11 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 483 569 594 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

372 416 446 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

94 103 97 94

Base 2113 2234 1815 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

216 Overall gambling participation by alcohol consumption

HSE has asked about drinking alcohol since it began in 1993 The proportion of adults

who have drunk alcohol in the last week has steadily reduced over the previous decades

from 67 in 1998 to 57 in 2018 Across all age groups men were more likely than

women to drink at increasing and higher risk levels (12)

Alcohol consumption is reported in units of alcohol One unit of alcohol is 10ml by

volume of pure alcohol In 2016 the UK Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) published new

guidelines on low risk drinking (13) It is now recommended that men and women should

not regularly (defined as most weeks) drink more than 14 units a week Drinking at this

level is considered to be lsquolow riskrsquo and adults who regularly drink up to this amount are

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

43

advised to spread their drinking over 3 or more days Above this level is considered to

be lsquoincreased riskrsquo For men this is now over 14 units and up to 50 units and for women

over 14 units and up to 35 units per week Men who regularly drink more than 50 units a

week and women more than 35 units are described as lsquohigher risk drinkersrsquo and are

considered to be at particular risk of alcohol-related health problems (12)

There was a clear pattern of increased participation in gambling as the number of

alcohol units consumed per week increased being most noticeable at the extremes A

total of 354 of non-drinkers participated in gambling compared to 744 of those

consuming over 50 units This trend persisted for every type of gambling activity

Table 16 Overall gambling participation by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 261 445 542 525 570 432

Scratchcards 120 207 228 234 295 199

Other lotteries 86 146 172 181 205 142

Machines and games

Football pools 14 23 39 46 66 27

Bingo (not online) 36 58 50 49 72 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 32 61 91 105 127 65

Machines in a bookmakers 15 23 45 62 75 29

Casino table games (not online) 09 25 61 61 80 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 05 07 14 25 36 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

14 31 48 54 68 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 15 61 123 135 150 69

Betting exchange 04 08 16 26 35 11

Horse races (not online) 28 89 162 198 207 98

Dog races (not online) 06 23 35 45 61 24

Sports events (not online) 13 38 87 113 137 48

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

44

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online)

04 09 24 45 46 13

Spread-betting 03 04 07 14 29 05

Private betting 13 41 82 69 95 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 06 13 23 32 26 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 354 595 695 686 744 576

Base 4572 15591 4666 858 903 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

217 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking

Since it began HSE has asked questions about cigarette smoking in adults From the

series current cigarette smoking has steadily declined from 27 in 1993 to 17 in

2018 The proportion of respondents that have never regularly smoked cigarettes

increased from 46 to 58 over the same period HSE collects information about the

use of various tobacco products including cigarettes cigars and pipes The focus of this

analysis is on cigarette use meaning we do not consider cigar and pipe use in the below

definition of a current smoker

There was little difference in overall gambling participation between smokers (605)

and non-smokers (588) However current smokers generally have a higher likelihood

of participation for most gambling activity types Most notable were

bull scratchcards (306 compared to 184 of non-smokers)

bull football pools (52 compared to 26 of non-smokers)

bull machines in a bookmakers (46 compared to 18 of non-smokers)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

45

Table 17 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking England 2018

Current smoker ()

Non-smoker ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 377 406 360

Scratchcards 306 184 179

Other lotteries 121 172 144

Machines and games

Football pools 52 26 29

Bingo (not online) 69 52 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 97 54 57

Machines in a bookmakers 46 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 40 27 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 06 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 58 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 82 78

Betting exchange 07 14 11

Horse races (not online) 89 98 81

Dog races (not online) 24 14 17

Sports events (not online) 56 41 40

Other events or sports (not online) 24 15 15

Spread-betting 08 04 05

Private betting 70 36 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 14 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 605 588 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 485 437 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 123 99 94

Base 1151 2840 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

46

3 At-risk and problem gambling

31 Introduction

The most commonly used screening tools for gambling are the Diagnostic and Statistical

Manual of Mental Disorders 4th version (DSM-IV) and the Problem Gambling Severity

Index (PGSI) They define levels of gambling as (14)

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

Anyone scoring low risk or above are showing some signs of problematic behaviour

More specifically problem gambling is defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits There are

several screening tools available to identify problem gambling The HSE uses both the

DSM-IV and the PGSI

The DSM-IV was created as a clinical diagnostic tool and was not intended for use as a

screening instrument among the general population However an adapted version of the

DSM-IV for use in a survey setting was developed for the British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) series and was subject to a rigorous development and testing process

including cognitive testing and piloting The PGSI was designed for use among the

general population rather than within a clinical context It was developed tested and

validated within a general population survey of over 3000 people and the questionnaire

itself has been subject to critical evaluation and was revised in 2003 (12)

We base most tables in this section on the combined HSE dataset to increase sample

sizes wherever possible

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

47

32 Problem and at-risk gambling according to PGSI by age and sex

The PGSI consists of 9 items ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquogambling causing health

problemsrsquo to lsquofeeling guilty about gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale

These are

bull never

bull sometimes

bull most of the time

bull almost always

A score of 1 or more for PGSI indicates at-risk gambling A score of 1 to 2 is considered

low risk a score of 3 to 7 is considered moderate risk and a score of 8 or more

indicates problem gambling (12)

We have combined the low and moderate groups into an lsquoat-riskrsquo group (score 1 to 7) to

give a picture of the total risk of being a problem gambler (score 8 or more) in the

population Non-problem gambling group includes people who have not participated in

any gambling activity

According to the PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of 04 in the general

population (Table 18) The prevalence of people considered lsquoat-riskrsquo was 38 Men in

the younger age groups were most likely to experience both problem and at-risk

gambling For example 117 of men aged 16 to 24 and 101 of men aged 25 to 34

were participating in at-risk levels of gambling compared to 31 and 27 of women

respectively (these differences are statistically significant)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

48

Table 18 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

917 929 958 965 974 986 991 957

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 75 63 38 30 22 13 09 38

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

08 08 04 05 03 - - 04

Mean PGSI score 026 023 015 012 009 005 002 014

Base 3727 4547 4459 4726 3913 3186 2520 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 19 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (inc those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

868 885 936 949 962 978 983 933

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 117 101 59 43 33 19 17 60

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

15 14 05 08 - - - 08

Mean PGSI score 043 039 024 020 014 008 004 024

Base 1889 2249 2219 2336 1928 1534 1092 13246

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

49

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

967 972 980 981 986 993 997 981

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 31 27 18 18 12 07 - 17

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

- - - - - - - 01

Mean PGSI score 009 007 006 005 004 001 000 005

Base 1838 2298 2239 2390 1985 1653 1428 13831

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

According to the PGSI in 2018 there were an estimated 168149 people experiencing

problem gambling in England This is a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 208700

Also the PGSI estimates there to have been 377242 moderate risk gamblers and

1213830 low risk gamblers in England While estimates of problem gamblers and those

at moderate risk have reduced since 2016 those estimated at low risk have increased

since 2016 (from 1094066)

33 At-risk gambling

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by activity

This section shows at-risk gamblers among all respondents who participated in different

gambling activities The base is all respondents who participated in at least one activity

(individual survey participants may be included in multiple rows)

It is worth nothing that in contrast to other gambling activities participation in the

National Lottery was very low among at-risk gamblers compared to the general

population While at-risk gamblers accounted for 74 of all gambling activity they were

significantly overrepresented for

bull spread betting (520)

bull machines in bookmakers (464)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (456)

bull online gambling on slots casino or bingo games (442)

bull betting exchanges (440)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

50

Also in 20187 overall participation in online gambling was more than double (234)

that of the general population (94)

Table 20 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 68

Scratchcards 119

Other lotteries 80

Machines and games

Football pools 291

Bingo (not online) 129

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 257

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 315

Poker played in pubs or clubs 456

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 442

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 263

Betting exchange 440

Horse races (not online) 156

Dog races (not online) 266

Sports events (not online) 305

Other events or sports (not online) 436

Spread-betting 520

Private betting 250

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 338

7 We have used the latest year rather than the combined dataset due to how much online gambling has

increased between 2012 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

51

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Summary

Any gambling activity 74

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base8 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

While at-risk gamblers account for 74 of all gambling activity they account for 527

of those participating in 7 or more different gambling activities over the last 12 months

Table 21 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by number of activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities At-risk gamblers among those who participate ()

1 activity 18

2 to 3 activities 52

4 to 6 activities 197

7 or more activities 527

Total (any gambling activity) 74

Base9 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by highest educational qualification

As we have seen before for overall gambling participation at-risk gambling was most

common in the population for respondents in the below degree category (45) This

category was statistically significantly higher than both the NVQ4 NVQ5 or degree or

equivalent and the no qualification categories

8 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 9 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

52

Table 22 PGSI risk category by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category NVQ4NVQ5 Degree or

equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

969 949 962 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

22 33 22 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 12 09 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 05 06 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

29 45 31 38

Base 7582 14415 5033 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity at-risk gambling was most common in the unemployed category

(61) This was statistically significantly higher than all groups other than those in full-

time education For overall participation in gambling prevalence was the highest for the

employed self-employed or training category This was statistically significant

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

53

Table 23 PGSI risk category by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Employed self-

employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other Inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

950 925 941 987 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 43 45 09 20 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

12 18 10 03 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 14 - - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

44 61 56 12 27 38

Base 15281 1791 2023 5875 2107 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by IMD

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile However for at-risk gambling there was a statistically significant gradient with

prevalence increasing across quintiles from least deprived (30) to most deprived

(53) This aligns with the higher prevalence seen before in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

54

Table 24 PGSI risk category by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

939 954 960 963 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

34 31 24 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

18 10 10 07 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

08 05 05 04 01 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

53 41 34 33 30 38

Base 5165 5362 5667 5516 5369 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by ethnicity

By ethnicity the Asian and Asian British ethnic group had the lowest prevalence of at-

risk gambling (20) This was statistically significantly lower than the White and White

British group (39)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

55

Table 25 PGSI risk category by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category White White

British ()

Asian Asian

British ()

Black Black

British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

957 970 957 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

28 15 28 41 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

11 - - - 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 10 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

39 20 34 49 38

Base 23513 2037 816 687 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

56

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by region

The North East (49) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling while the South West (30) had the lowest

Table 26 PGSI risk category by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the Humber

()

East Midland

s ()

West Midland

s ()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

944 952 958 961 960 955 956 958 968 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

36 32 25 26 24 30 26 30 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

13 11 11 09 10 12 10 10 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 +)

- 04 07 - 05 - 08 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

49 44 36 35 35 42 36 40 30 38

Base 1325 3584 2685 2321 2824 3008 4107 4429 2794 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

57

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by self-assessed general health

There was no significant difference in at-risk gambling by respondents reporting bad and

very bad general health and those reporting very good and good general health

Table 27 PGSI risk category by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Very goodgood

()

Fair ()

Bad very bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

958 955 958 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 29 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 10 11 12 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 03 08 08 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 38 38 35 38

Base 20439 4657 1978 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by life satisfaction

Results for overall gambling participation across life satisfaction groups were

inconclusive This was not the case for at-risk gambling where respondents with low life

satisfaction (62) had a higher prevalence and those with very high life satisfaction had

a notably lower prevalence (22) This difference was statistically significant

Table 28 PGSI risk category by life satisfaction England 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

927 956 957 977 960

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

41 31 28 15 26

10 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

58

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

21 08 11 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 04 04 - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

62 39 39 22 36

Base 1231 2064 6016 3926 13601

Source HSE 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by wellbeing

As above for life satisfaction there was a gradient for at-risk gambling with respondents

in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) having the highest prevalence (64) and those in

quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) having the lowest prevalence (23) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 29 PGSI risk category by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

925 950 960 976 976 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

45 30 28 17 18 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 13 09 06 05 11

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 06 03 - 02 05

11 Totals differ from majority of tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

59

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

64 44 38 23 23 38

Base 3351 3772 3386 3238 3432 20193

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

problems) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling (51) while those scoring 0

(no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (30) This is a reversal of

the pattern seen before for overall gambling participation

Table 30 PGSI risk category by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 968 948 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 23 34 37 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 14 14 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 04 10 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 30 49 51 38

Base 11463 5025 3357 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by BMI group

There were no statistically significant differences for at-risk gambling between

respondents by BMI group

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

60

Table 31 PGSI risk category by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese () Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 954 957 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 27 25 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

10 11 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 05 05 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

42 38 37 38

Base 8910 8471 6378 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by alcohol consumption

As seen for overall gambling participation there was a clear pattern of increased at-risk

gambling as the number of alcohol units consumed per week increased This gradient

was statistically significant with 16 of non-drinkers gambling at-risk compared to

100 of people who consume over 50 units per week

Table 32 PGSI risk category by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Nevernot in last 12

months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to

35 ()

Over 35 to

50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 980 965 936 921 889 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

11 23 43 47 76 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

06 08 16 20 24 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 03 05 13 11 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

16 32 59 66 100 38

Base 4558 13678 4645 894 899 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

61

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by cigarette smoking

We saw a similar pattern for at-risk gambling as we saw for overall gambling

participation when looking at cigarette smoking Current smokers (72) had a higher

prevalence of at-risk gambling compared to non-smokers (37) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 33 PGSI risk category by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Current smoker

() Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 918 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 53 26 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+) 09 04 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 72 37 38

Base 4839 9660 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

34 Problem gambling

Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex

The DSM-IV contains 10 diagnostic criteria ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquocommitting

a crime to fund gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from

lsquoneverrsquo to lsquovery oftenrsquo A score of 3 or more indicates problem gambling

According to the DSM-IV and similar to PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of

05 in the general population Though numbers are small the younger age groups

tend to have a higher prevalence As we would expect given the higher rates of

gambling participation problem gambling according to the DSM-IV was higher in men

(09) than women (02) with the highest prevalence again seen in men in the 25 to

34 age group (15)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

62

Table 34 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

992 991 995 994 996 997 999 994

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

08 09 05 06 04 - - 06

Mean DSM-IV score 009 008 006 005 005 003 002 01

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 35 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

986 985 993 989 993 994 999 991

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

14 15 07 11 07 - - 09

Mean DSM-IV score 015 013 007 008 007 005 003 009

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

998 997 996 998 999 1000 999 998

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

63

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

- - - - - - - 02

Mean DSM-IV score 003 003 004 002 003 002 001 003

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

In 2018 DSM-IV estimated there to be 223975 problem gamblers in England This was

a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 257930

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex

The proportion of problem gamblers in the population according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI included in the HSE was 05 in 2018 (this increases to 07 when we combine

HSE years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018) Prevalence was higher for men (08) than

women (03) Using the combined HSE dataset (see Table 36) prevalence is highest

in the younger age groups

As reported by HSE the proportion of problem gamblers in the population has been

reducing from 09 in 2015 to 07 in 2016 to 05 in 2018 However as numbers

are very small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with

previous years and do not represent a real decline In 2018 there were estimated to be

245634 problem gamblers in England according to either DSM-IV or PGSI This is a

reduction from the 2016 estimate of 303328

Table 36 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 990 990 994 993 995 996 999 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 10 06 07 05 04 - 07

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

64

Table 37 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 982 983 992 987 992 993 999 989

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

18 17 08 13 08 07 - 11

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 998 996 995 998 998 1000 999 998

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

- - 05 - - - - 02

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity

While accounting for just 12 of all gambling activity problem gamblers (according to

either DSM-IV or PGSI) account for a significantly disproportionate level of participation

in

bull machines in a bookmakers (464)

bull spread betting (159)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (147)

bull other events or sports (not online) (135)

The problem gambler group were less likely to participate in activities such as the

National Lottery and scratchcards than the general gambling population

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

65

The problem gambler group were more likely than the general gambling population to

have participated in 7 or more gambling activities in the last 12 months

Table 38 Problem gambling prevalence according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 10

Scratchcards 18

Other lotteries 16

Machines and games

Football pools 50

Bingo (not online) 33

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 49

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 64

Poker played in pubs or clubs 147

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 87

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 37

Betting exchange 107

Horse races (not online) 30

Dog races (not online) 71

Sports events (not online) 56

Other events or sports (not online) 135

Spread betting 159

Private betting 43

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 99

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

66

Summary

Any gambling activity 12

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base12 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 39 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by number of activities participated in over the last 12 months England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

1 activity 03

2 to 3 activities 06

4 to 6 activities 28

7 or more activities 118

Total (any gambling activity) 12

Base13 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification

Based on the data from HSE there is no observable difference for problem gambling by

highest educational qualification

12 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 13 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

67

Table 40 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 990 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 10 07

Base 7599 14457 5061 27164

Source HSE 2012 2105 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity problem gambling was most common in respondents who were

currently unemployed (21)

Table 41 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity England 2012 2105 2016 2018

Employed self-employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler

993 979 995 998 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

07 21 05 02 06 07

Base 15321 1796 2029 5906 2111 2716

4

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD

Unlike overall gambling participation there was an inequality gradient across IMD

quintiles for problem gambling Prevalence was greatest in the most deprived group

(12) and declined for each quintile The difference between the most and least

deprived quintiles was statistically significant We saw a similar pattern before for at-risk

gambling

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

68

Table 42 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 988 993 995 996 998 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

12 07 05 04 02 07

Base 5183 5379 5684 5532 5386 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity

Problem gambling was greater in the Asian and Asian British (11) ethnic group

compared to the White and White British group (05) The difference between the 2

groups is statistically significant Though numbers are small for the remaining groups

(with confidence intervals too wide to draw any meaningful conclusions) the data

suggests a paradox of harm regarding the Asian and Asian British group This ethnic

group is less likely to take part in gambling than the White and White British group (both

overall participation and at-risk gambling) but more likely to experience problematic

gambling than the White and White British group

Table 43 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

Mixed Other

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 986 985 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 14 15 07

Base 23586 2043 821 455 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

69

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region

Even when we combined multiple HSE years numbers were small and confidence intervals overlapped when looking at

problem gambling by region

Table 44 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler (including people not participating in any gambling activity)

990 994 990 995 993 995 988 996 997 93

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 06 10 05 07 05 12 04 03 07

Base 1329 3598 2655 2341 2843 3067 4022 4451 2820 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

70

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed general health

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health had a higher prevalence of

problem gambling (13) than those reporting very good or good general health (05)

As we saw for at-risk gambling the difference between the groups was not statistically

significant but the gradient represents a different pattern to overall gambling

participation

Table 45 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed

general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 987 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 13 07

Base 20586 4581 1954 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life satisfaction

Problem gambling continues the pattern we saw before for at-risk gambling with the

highest prevalence in the low life satisfaction group (17) This was statistically

significant Again it is important to note that this was not the case for overall gambling

participation where there was no clear pattern

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

71

Table 46 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life

satisfaction England 2016 2018

Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()14

Non-problem gambler

983 995 994 998 994

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

17 05 06 02 06

Base 1223 2049 5996 3909 13629

Source HSE 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by wellbeing

As with at-risk gambling there was a clear gradient across WEMWBS quintiles with the

highest prevalence of problem gambling in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) (16) and

lowest in quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) (03) This difference was statistically

significant

Table 47 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()15

Non-problem gambler

984 990 996 998 997 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

16 10 04 02 03 07

Base 3338 3761 3393 3245 3431 20272

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

14 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018 15 Totals differ from most tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

72

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

disturbance or mental ill health) had the highest prevalence of problem gambling (14)

while those scoring 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (03)

This difference was statistically significant This is a similar pattern to at-risk gambling

and differs from overall gambling participation

Table 48 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 14 07

Base 11507 5037 3357 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group

There was little difference for problem gambling across BMI groups There was a similar

picture showing a lack of association between BMI groups for at-risk gambling

Table 49 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not overweight

or obese () Overweight

() Obese () Total ()

Non-problem gambler 994 993 993 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

06 07 07 07

Base 8964 8497 6364 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

73

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by alcohol consumption

There was a clear pattern of increased problem gambling as the number of alcohol units

consumed per week increased

Table 50 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Never or not in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

15 to 35 ()

36 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 994 993 985 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 06 07 15 14 07

Base 4503 15575 4693 863 911 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking

There was little difference by cigarette smoking status for overall gambling participation

This changed for problem gambling with current smokers (13) having higher

prevalence of problem gambling compared to non-smokers (06) This difference is

statistically significant

Table 51 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Current

smoker () Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 987 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

13 06 07

Base 4879 9663 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

74

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling

The previous sections have examined the relationships between gambling and various

other factors separately We carried out binary logistic regression models to further

investigate the different factors associated with gambling The following is a summary of

the pre-registered analysis We present the full outputs in Appendix B

To begin we conducted a series of bivariate analyses to compare a range of variables

to 3 increasing levels of gambling

1 Overall gambling participation

2 Harmful gambling (including low risk moderate risk and problem gambling)

3 Problem gambling taken in isolation

The variables included were

bull age

bull sex

bull ethnicity

bull income

bull educational attainment

bull employment

bull IMD

bull region

bull general health

bull wellbeing

bull life satisfaction

bull GHQ12

bull BMI

bull alcohol

bull smoking

Of these income region self-reported general health and BMI were shown not to be

statistically significantly associated with harmful gambling Income and BMI were shown

not to be statistically significantly associated with problem gambling

After reviewing the bivariate output we applied a multiple logistic regression to estimate

associations of socio-demographic and health factors on the likelihood that respondents

are participating in harmful gambling We excluded factors not significant at the bivariate

level from the model lsquoHarmful gamblingrsquo as discussed here includes problem gambling

and so the model takes account of the full continuum of gambling risk It is important to

note that the terms lsquolow riskrsquo and lsquomoderate riskrsquo (as used in the interpretation of the

PGSI) do not mean that risk is negligible for these respondents but rather that these

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

75

respondents are on a continuum of risk with people who have a definite problem with

their gambling This means the model includes all respondents with problem gambling

behaviours and those at risk of developing problem gambling behaviours

The logistic regression model for harmful gambling was statistically significant (p less-

than 005) The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling (see Appendix

B for more detail) and correctly classified 94 of cases but this was skewed towards

classifying respondents at no risk

Table 52 details the regression function itself and so summarises the effect of each

variable See the key below the table for the meaning of each column However the

main values of concern are the p-value and the adjusted odds ratio The p-value

determines which variables are significant (by convention this is less-than 005) and

these are highlighted in the table The adjusted odds ratio is a measurement of

likelihood that an outcome (harmful gambling) will occur given a particular exposure

compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of that exposure (see

Appendix B for more detail)

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be harmful gamblers Respondents

with below degree attainment were 18 times the odds and those with no qualifications

were 21 times the odds to be harmful gamblers compared to those with a NVQ4 NVQ5

or degree or equivalent level of attainment

Wellbeing contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on

GHQ12 Comparing those scoring 0 the odds of respondents scoring 1 to 3 were 20

times more likely and those scoring 4 or more were 24 times more likely to participate in

harmful gambling

On physical health and health behaviours smoking did not contribute significantly to the

model but alcohol did

Compared to abstainers or those not drinking in the last 12 months the odds of

respondents who drank above the CMOsrsquo low-risk drinking guidelines (14 to 35 units)

were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This increases markedly to

78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) It should be noted that the group

from HSE consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

76

Table 52 Binary multiple logistic regression model of harmful gambling variables

in the equation England 2016

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent)

- - 8609 2 0014 - - -

Educational qualification 3 groups (below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational qualification 3 groups (no qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (Least deprived)

- - 11143 4 0025 - - -

Quintile of IMD score (2)

-0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3)

0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4)

0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (Most deprived)

0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1)

- - 15525 4 0004 - - -

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2)

0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3)

0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4)

0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

77

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5)

-0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Life satisfaction (low (0 to 4))

- - 4262 3 0235 - - -

Life satisfaction (medium (5 to 6))

-0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (high (7 to 8))

-0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (very high (9 to 10))

0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ score ndash grouped (score 0)

- - 15279 2 0000 - - -

GHQ score - grouped (score 1-3)

0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ score - grouped (score 4+)

0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (nevernot in last 12 months)

- - 36554 4 0000 - - -

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14)

0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (over 14 to 35)

1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (over 35 to 50)

0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (over 50)

2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020 - -

Notes Missing data was not available due to small counts Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age 16-75+ in 10 year age bands Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc) Key B the unstandardized coefficients for the model SE the standard errors for the B-coefficients

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

78

Wald the test statistic for the individual predictor variables Linear regression will have a t-test while logistic regression has a chi-square test It is used to determine the p-value df the degrees of freedom for the Wald statistic p-value determines which variables are significant By convention any variable with a p-value below 005 is significant AOR (adjusted odds ratio) the odds ratios associated with changes in predictor scores 95 CI the 95 confidence interval of the odds ratio Source HSE 2016

The broad conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly sex

appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic factors

such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a

stronger predictor of harmful gambling than both poor physical health and negative

health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model being selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and

the method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

79

4 Gambling frequency

41 Introduction

This section considers how often people who do gamble participate in gambling

activities and to what extent Frequency is compared for respondents participating in any

gambling activity at-risk gamblers and problem gamblers This is followed by findings

from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey which combines gambling frequency with

gambling volume in terms of money and time spent

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months

For all gamblers the most common frequency of participation was once a week (262)

followed by once or twice a year (253) This was true for lotteries with 311

participating in the National Lottery once a week 232 buying scratchcards once a

week and 276 participating in other lotteries once a week A similar picture was seen

for machines and games except for machines in a bookmakers poker played in pubs or

clubs and online gambling All these activities were slightly more likely to be played 2 or

more times a week

Most betting activities were also most frequently participated in 2 or more times a week

or once a week except for horse racing and private betting Dog racing was most

frequently participated in either 2 or more times a week (236) or once a week (222)

followed by once or twice a year (218) This differs from horse racing where 349

participated only once or twice a year This reinforces the difference between horse

racing and dog racing seen before for at-risk and problem gambling

Table 53 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 145 311 111 116 139 179

Scratchcards 126 232 133 131 175 203

Other lotteries 144 276 105 161 113 202

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

80

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Machines and games

Football pools 219 301 121 152 104 104

Bingo (not online) 180 257 110 102 141 210

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

171 218 155 102 143 212

Machines in a bookmakers

246 232 158 136 101 127

Casino table games (not online)

152 191 146 127 152 231

Poker played in pubs or clubs

297 285 128 134 81 76

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

252 248 173 126 117 84

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

174 239 150 116 131 190

Betting exchange 272 258 161 69 115 124

Horse races (not online)

152 210 101 80 108 349

Dog races (not online)

236 222 100 102 122 218

Sports events (not online)

215 277 146 110 118 135

Other events or sports (not online)

345 320 175 69 44 47

Spread-betting 367 239 101 138 73 83

Private betting 155 204 140 130 127 245

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling

213 248 99 138 106 195

Summary

Any gambling activity

119 262 102 124 140 253

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

81

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Base16 1342 2961 1147 1403 1581 2853

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers

As we would expect gambling frequency increases as the level of gambling risk

increases Almost a quarter of low risk gamblers gamble 2 or more times a week and

this increases to 451 of moderate risk gamblers and 541 of problem gamblers

Respondents who are considered problem gamblers according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI 507 gamble 2 or more times a week compared to 114 of non-problem

gamblers

Table 54 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for at-risk gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 246 451 541

Once a week 266 294 194

Less than once a week more than once a month

198 88 71

Once a month 133 54 173

16 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities minus those who did

not answer the frequency question

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

82

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

Every 2 to 3 months 98 78 -

Once or twice a year 59 - -

Base 541 204 98

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 55 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for problem gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 114 507

Once a week 263 225

Less than once a week more than once a month

102 56

Once a month 124 141

Every 2 to 3 months 142 -

Once or twice a year 255 42

Base17 11146 142

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume

Although it is not as recent as the HSE 2018 the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) (15) includes more detail than the HSE on certain issues relevant to the

aims of this review In particular the BGPS offers additional data on gambling frequency

(lsquoregularrsquo gambling or days per month) and gambling volume (money time spent) While

a summary is useful for the objectives of this report itrsquos worth noting that the gambling

17 The base for problem gamblers in Table 55 is respondents categorised as a problem gambler according to either

DSM-IV or PGSI This is the conventional approach and that taken throughout the section before focusing on problem

gambling This differs from the base for Table 54 which is respondents categorised as problem gamblers according to

PGSI only This difference is necessary as only PGSI allows the further breakdown into low and moderate risk that

Table 54 requires

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

83

landscape has changed considerably since 2010 particularly issues relating to online

gambling

The BGPS included questions to measure gambling volume among regular gamblers18

based on the amount of time spent gambling in an average month and the amount of

money spent on gambling in an average month This detail is not possible from the HSE

When looking at time spent on gambling the BGPS made a cut-off for analysis purposes

to capture the top 10 of regular gamblers This cut-off was around 7 hours per month

gambling (with a mean for the group of 310 hours per month) The other 90 of regular

gamblers either did not spend any time gambling or generally spent less than 7 hours a

month gambling (with a mean of 30 minutes per month) The BGPS labelled these

groups lsquohigh-timersquo and lsquonon high-timersquo gamblers respectively

When looking at money spent on gambling the BGPS cut-off for the top 10 of regular

gamblers was around pound6150 per month on gambling (with a mean of pound20992 per

month) The remaining 90 of regular gamblers spent less than this amount (with a

mean of pound1482 per month) The BGPS labelled these groups lsquohigh-spendrsquo and lsquonon

high-spendrsquo gamblers respectively As a summary of gambling volume that considers

both time and money spent the BGPS provides 4 possible sub-groups of regular

gamblers These are respondents who were

bull non high-time and non high-spend gamblers (85)

bull high-time but non high-spend gamblers (4)

bull high-spend but non high-time gamblers (4)

bull high-time and high-spend gamblers (6)

Most (85) regular gamblers were both non high-time and non high-spend gamblers Of

the remainder the BGPS found 4 were high-time but not high-spend and another 4

were high-spend but not high-time gamblers It also found 6 were both high-time and

high-spend gamblers

Non high-time and non high-spend gamblers took part in 25 gambling activities in the

past year In comparison high-time only gamblers took part in 40 gambling activities in

the past year and high-spend only gamblers took part in 52 activities High-time and

high-spend gamblers had the highest levels of gambling participation taking part in 66

gambling activities

18 Respondents who gambled once a month or more

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

84

Compared to all regular gamblers the high-time and high-spend group were more likely

to

bull be from semi-routine or routine households19

bull live in areas of greatest deprivation

bull have no educational qualifications

bull be slightly more likely to live in the lowest income households

bull be unemployed (they were much more likely to be unemployed)

Along with the high-time only gamblers this group experiences the greatest

socioeconomic deprivation

19 Based on The National Statistics Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

85

5 Hospital admissions

51 Introduction

This section presents the number of hospital admissions due to gambling from NHS

Digitalrsquos hospital episode statistics (HES) These statistics detail all admissions

outpatient appointments and AampE attendances at NHS hospitals in England We use

figures from finished admission episodes (FAEs) with a primary or secondary diagnosis

as classified by the International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) (ICD-10) of

bull ICD-10 F630 Pathological Gambling

bull ICD-10 Z726 Gambling and Betting

52 HES admissions due to gambling

Across England there were 375 admissions to hospital because of gambling in 2018 to

2019 Over the previous 3 years admissions have increased but compared to other

causes numbers20 remain very small

Table 56 Number of FAEs with a primary or secondary diagnosis relating to gambling by age group England between 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019

Age group 2016 to 2017 2017 to 2018 2018 to 2019

lt20 lt10 lt10 lt10

20 to 29 75 90 115

30 to 39 70 105 120

40 to 49 60 50 60

50 to 59 40 50 55

60+ 20 25 20

Total (will not sum due to rounding) 260 325 375

Source Hospital episode statistics (HES) NHS Digital 2020

20 Numbers are too small relative to all hospital admissions to calculate meaningful rates

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

86

6 Previously published sources of gambling data

This section of the report collates information on gambling previously published

elsewhere The purpose is to meet aspects of the objectives not fulfilled by the primary

data source Topics include

bull affected others

bull treatment

bull attitudes and influences

bull children and young people

The published sources discussed in the rest of the report vary in the type and quality of

gambling data available Gambling is relatively new field of research Inconsistencies in

the robustness and standardisation of the publications and data available are to be

expected However all sources included here are encouraging additions to the existing

body of work and one of the recommendations of the review is to encourage further

research and analysis in this area

We discuss the methods and caveats of each source in the introduction to each topic

61 Affected others

Introduction

A recent report published by YouGov (16) on behalf of GambleAware included a detailed

section on lsquoaffected othersrsquo The report defines lsquoaffected othersrsquo as

ldquohellippeople that know someone who has had a problem with gambling (either

currently or in their past) and feel they have personally experienced negative

effects from this person (or peoples) gambling behaviour This could include

family members friends and work colleagues among others with the negative

effects ranging from financial to emotional or practical impactsrdquo

The BGPS included some analysis of affected others in 2010 but the YouGov report

represents the most recent data available on affected others currently available The

source is not as robust as the HSE (which is designed to be representative of the

population by adopting a multi-stage stratified probability sampling design based on

postcode sectors) but does have a very good sample size of around 12000

respondents of which 7 are affected others

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

87

The main difference between the HSE and the YouGov survey is the sampling method

(probability vs non-probability) The difference in mode is also important (face-to-face

vs online) YouGov describe the survey as nationally representative but this is unclear

These differences may account for the fact that the headline prevalences do differ

somewhat from HSE21 in that YouGov finds 13 of the population experience gambling

harm (PGSI score of 1+) compared to a figure of 4 on the combined HSE This is a

significant difference

An independent report by the London School of Economics (LSE) (17) evaluates the

differences between the sources It concludes that HSE may under-estimate gambling

harm by requiring a residential address and YouGov may over-estimate harm by

excluding offline people The conclusion drawn by LSE is that it is credible that the level

of harm is probably somewhere between the 2 reported figures

The LSE report does offer a level of scrutiny and transparency but it is important to note

when reading the following section that the YouGov report itself has not been peer

reviewed and there is a lack of conclusions drawn and references to other published

work on the subject Furthermore the report does not specify the time frame of the PGSI

questions The HSE is clear that the PGSI is based on the respondentsrsquo activities over

the last 12 months We could assume that YouGov also covered the last 12 months but

this is not clear from the publication If YouGov did not specify the last 12 months then

respondents might have assumed the questions could apply to an earlier time which

would increase the prevalence of harm Particularly relevant to this section it is also

unclear how YouGov arrived at the 7 affected others prevalence figure due to the

complexity of how the report combines phases 1 and 2 of the study as it does not

include this information

However the affected others section of the YouGov report is the most detailed

contribution to the subject currently available and taking into account the above

caveats adds value to the present review

Prevalence of affected others

YouGov finds that 7 of the total adult population of Great Britain were affected others

The findings also reveal that the likelihood of being an affected other increases with

PGSI score Among gamblers 20 of problem gamblers (according to PGSI) were

affected others compared to 13 of moderate risk gamblers and 9 of low risk

21 We do not compare this to HSE exactly but rather the health surveys of England Wales and Scotland combined

Here we refer to it as HSE for simplicity and consistency

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

88

gamblers The report suggests that this shows the complex relationship between a

personrsquos own gambling and the issues relating to other peoplersquos gambling

Affected others were more likely to be women (57) than men (43) which reflects the

fact that problem gambling is much more associated with men There is little variation by

age but affected others were slightly more likely to be social class CD2E22 and less

likely to be White British

Type of affected others

Affected others were most likely to be negatively affected by a gambling problem of

someone in their immediate family (61) This is most commonly a spouse or partner

(25) followed by a parent (21) Women (71) were more likely than men (44) to

be negatively affected by the gambling of someone in their immediate family Women

were also much more likely to be affected by their spouse or partner (35 of women

compared to 9 of men)

Due to their age younger (18 to 24) affected others were most likely to have been

affected by the gambling of a parent Older affected others (55 and over) were most

likely to have been affected by the gambling of a child

Importantly people who were both affected others and problem gamblers were more

likely to have been negatively affected by the gambling problem of a child (15)

implying that gambling has profound impacts on the family as a whole Problem

gamblers were also more likely than average to say they have been negatively affected

by a non-immediate family member or work contact suggesting that gamblers were

more likely to socialise with other gamblers

Severity of impact upon affected others

Among affected others the most severe impacts of gambling were felt most by

immediate family members Figure 4 shows the severity of impact by type of affected

other in Great Britain in 2019 It presents the results from the YouGov report on severity

of impact by percentage into either minor moderate or severe The figure shows that

almost half (48) of affected others that were affected by a spouse or partner report a

severe negative impact This is followed in severity by the gambling of a parent (41)

22 Social class definition

AB higher and intermediate managerial administrative and professional workers C1 supervisory clerical and junior

managerial administrative and professional workers C2 skilled manual workers D semi-skilled and unskilled

manual workers E people on long term state benefits casual and lowest grade workers unemployed with state

benefits (including pension) only

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

89

and a child (38) A lower proportion of affected others reporting a severe negative

impact were due to friends The report suggests that the type and closeness of the

relationship plays an important role in determining the severity of the negative impact

experienced by affected others

Figure 4 Severity of impact by type of affected other Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling treatment and support YouGov 2019

The most significant type of impact reported by affected others was an inability to trust

the problem gambler (62) This was followed by

bull feelings of anger towards them (53)

bull anxiety (40)

bull a breakdown of communication (40)

bull reduced income for household running costs such as food rent and bills (38)

Women were more likely to have experienced all the negative impacts of being an

affected other with 81 reporting depression anxiety and anger towards the problem

gambler compared to 64 of men Women were also more likely to have experienced

financial impacts (67 of women compared to 48 of men)

Advice and support

YouGov found that most (64) affected others have not sought advice or support on

behalf of the problem gambler and an even greater proportion (72) have not sought

help for themselves as an affected other When affected others do seek advice and

0 20 40 60 80 100

Other workcolleague

Friend

Sibling

Other familymember

Child

Parent

Spousepartner

Percent reporting severity of impact ()

Severe Moderate Minor

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

90

support either for themselves or for the problem gambler it is most likely from less formal

sources This included seeking help from

bull a friend or family member (19)

bull a spouse or partner (11)

bull gambling support websites (11)

For more formal sources of advice and support 12 report seeking help from mental

health services and 8 from a GP Also 5 report seeking help from another addiction

service (for example a drugs or alcohol service) again highlighting the complexity of

addiction

Concern for the safety or wellbeing of the problem gambler or family members (65) is

the most common reason affected others seek advice and support Over half (57) of

affected others report not knowing how to deal with gambling and its impacts as the

reason for seeking help A similar proportion (54) sought advice due to a relationship

or family being affected by gambling or due to mental health problems (51) Though a

lower significant proportion (34) report being prompted by a severe negative impact

such as risk of losing employment risk of losing their home or criminal proceedings

YouGov concluded that there is an evident demand for advice and support among

affected others with almost half (48) reporting a need for such help whether for

themselves their spouse or partner a family member friend or colleague

The most reported barrier to seeking advice or support was that the person does not

consider their gambling to be a problem (43) The next most common reason is the

belief that gambling treatment would not be helpful or be effective (40) A further 14

reported feeling embarrassed or ashamed to ask for advice or support or that they would

not want others to find out socially or professionally

62 Treatment

Introduction

This section draws on published reports from Gambleaware The National Gambling

Treatment Service (NGTS) is a network of organisations providing treatment and

support for people experiencing gambling-related harms It is free to access across

England Scotland and Wales GambleAware commissions the NGTS and it is funded

through voluntary contributions from the gambling industry

GambleAware publish annual statistics (18) covering the treatment activity of the NGTS

and this is the source of the following summary The annual statistics cover treatment

provided by GamCare and its partner network Gordon Moody Associates and the

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

91

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) This represents most of the treatment provision for gambling in the UK although

there are other providers emerging in the public sector and third sector as a result of

policy changes in England Scotland and Wales23

Treatment provided (19)

GamCare offers

bull online treatment supported by regular contact with a therapist that people can access

at a time and place convenient for them over the course of 8 weeks

bull one-to-one in person online and telephone therapeutic support and treatment for

people with gambling problems as well as affected others

bull group based gambling recovery courses delivered face-to-face or online for between

6 to 8 weeks

bull the National Gambling Helpline which provides immediate telephone and online live

chat support and referral into the treatment service

bull information and advice via their website moderated forums and online group

chatrooms24

Gordon Moody Association offers

bull two specialist residential treatment centres providing an intensive programme for men

with a gambling addiction over a period of 14 weeks

bull specialist relapse prevention housing for people who have completed the treatment

programmes but need additional recovery support

bull retreat and counselling programmes for women or men-only groups that combine

short residential stays with at-home counselling support

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) offers treatment for gambling problems This treatment is especially for people

bull with more severe addictions

bull with co-morbid mental and physical health conditions

bull with impaired social functioning

bull who may come to treatment with more risk such as risk of suicide

23 The NHS Northern Gambling Service provided by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

has not been open for one full reporting year at time of publication So it is not included in the annual

statistics for 2019 to 2020 Further regional NHS led clinics are being established as part of the NHS Long

Term Plan 24 Data from these services are not included in the annual statistics publication

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

92

GambleAware funded treatment providers are required to submit quarterly datasets in a

standardised format The annual statistics publication presents the analysis of these

submissions As of 2020 there is an additional service as part of the NGTS However

this new service the NHS Northern Gambling Service was not operational in 2019 to

2020 so we have concentrated on the 3 service providers for which there is published

data available

Socio-demographic profile of people in treatment

The NGTS treated just over 9000 people in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This is

the most people treated since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016 (5909) For reference

this review has previously estimated there to be around 245600 problem gamblers in

England (according to PGSI or DSM-IV) Almost a quarter (23) of people treated in

2019 to 2020 had been seen before by the service

Most people treated were gamblers (84) while 13 of referrals related to affected

others This is less than the estimate of affected others among the problem gambling

population (20) suggesting a certain level of unmet need for this group As we can

expect from previous sections of this review affected others were more likely to be

women

Most people treated were men (75) and a greater proportion are from the younger age

groups This corresponds to the prevalence of problem gambling in the population

However there has been an overall small increase in the proportion of women being

treated increasing from 19 in 2015 to 2016 to 25 in 2019 to 2020

Table 57 Age and sex of people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Age group lt20 ()

20-24 ()

25-29 ()

30-34 ()

35-39 ()

40-44 ()

45-49 ()

50-54 ()

55-59 ()

60+ ()

Men 12 112 216 217 157 95 75 52 34 30

Women 05 48 136 159 161 120 85 104 90 91

All people in treatment

10 96 196 202 158 101 78 65 48 45

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Most people in treatment were employed (75) with the next most reported category

being unemployed (9) Given the unemployment rate in the UK was around 4 in

2019 we can expect a higher proportion of people in treatment to be unemployed given

previous findings that problem gambling is highest in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

93

On average people in treatment reported problem gambling starting at the age of 24

years although this was highly variable Three-quarters reported problem gambling

starting by the age of 32 years and one-quarter by the age of 19 years At the point of

coming to treatment services people had typically been problem gambling for an

average of 10 years

Gambling profile of people in treatment

A large proportion of people in treatment (58) participated online for their primary

gambling activity followed by bookmakers (27) No other locations were used by more

than 10 of people in treatment For online activities gambling on casino slots was the

most common activity (38) followed by sporting events (37) and casino table games

(27) For bookmakers gaming machines were the most common form of gambling

(53) followed by sporting events (31) and horse racing (24)

The most notable difference in gambling activity for peopl in treatment between 2015 to

2016 and 2019 to 2020 has been the increase in online gambling (from 57 to 69)

This has happened alongside the reduction in the proportion using bookmakers (from

56 to 38)

About 12 of people in treatment had suffered a job loss as a result of their gambling

and 26 had suffered a relationship loss through their gambling Almost a third (29) of

people in treatment had no debt due to gambling at the time of assessment But a

quarter had debts up to pound5000 and 45 had debts over pound5000 or were bankrupt or in

an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA)

Over half of people in treatment (54) spent up to pound100 per day gambling in the 30 days

before assessment The NGST annual statistics also found

bull 16 spent between pound100 and pound200

bull 18 spent between pound200 and pound500

bull 15 spent over pound500

On average (mean) people in treatment reported spending pound2102 on gambling in the

30 days before assessment

Average (mean) money spent on gambling days was highest among people using

casinos (pound544) and online services (pound435) The mean spend can be affected by outliers

(extreme individual values) but even using the median people using casinos still had the

highest average daily spend (pound200) Average monthly spend was again very high for

people using casinos followed by adult entertainment centres and online services

However monthly spend was also high for bookmakers and bingo halls especially

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

94

compared to daily spend The report suggests that using these services often

contributes to a high monthly spend

Table 58 Average money spent on gambling by people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Average spend per gambling

day (pound) Average spend in past

month (pound)

Mean Median Mean Median

Bookmakers 295 100 1785 1000

Bingo hall 210 100 1007 775

Casino 544 200 2973 1000

Live events 170 45 974 600

Adult entertainment centre

241 100 2807 640

Family entertainment centre

136 100 737 600

Pub 212 100 1519 700

Online 435 100 2145 1000

Miscellaneous 324 100 1467 575

Private members club 160 50 1777 700

Other 265 52 2038 600

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Access and outcomes

The overwhelming majority of people (902) self-referred to the NGTS This was

distantly followed by prisons (29) other service or agency (27) and GPs (15)

For people treated during 2019 to 2020 50 were seen within 3 days and 75 within 8

days Waiting times for residential services were higher with 50 of people seen within

3 and a half months

During 2019 to 2020 there was an average of 7 appointments per person and this was

similar for both problem gamblers and affected others Treatment lasted on average 8

weeks with a quarter of people receiving treatment for 3 weeks or less Half of all people

receiving treatment did so for between 3 and 15 weeks and a quarter received treatment

for over 15 weeks Treatment was slightly shorter for affected others and for those in

residential centres was generally longer (an average of 13 weeks)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

95

Between 2015 to 2016 and 2019 to 2020 the proportion of people completing treatment

increased from 59 to 69 while the proportion dropping out of treatment decreased

from 35 to 24 Affected others were more likely to complete treatment than problem

gamblers (80 compared to 66) Overall women were more likely to complete

treatment than men but when limited to just problem gamblers female problem

gamblers were slightly less likely to complete treatment (64 compared to 67 of male

problem gamblers) Also people who were unemployed were considerably more likely

than the average to drop out of treatment (32) and less likely to complete treatment

(61)

As expected almost all (94) people receiving treatment were defined as a problem

gambler according to PGSI The mean PGSI score for people in treatment was 20

markedly higher than the threshold of 8 required for the problem gambler definition

During 2019 to 2020 this proportion had reduced to 40 while PGSI scores had

improved for most people in treatment (75) Those defined as problem gamblers were

most likely to improve by 10 to 18 points (31) with a further 26 improving by 20 to 27

points

63 Attitudes and influences

Introduction

The Gambling Commission has been tracking public perceptions of gambling since

2010 These attitudes and what influences gambling behaviours are the subject of this

section The primary source is the Gambling Commission annual report series

lsquoGambling participation behaviour awareness and attitudesrsquo (20) The Gambling

Commission collects data via a combination of telephone and online surveys This is

supplemented by tables from the HSE

The telephone survey provides the main measure of past 4 week gambling participation

with waves conducted quarterly in March June September and December to reduce

the effect of seasonal variations in gambling behaviour The Gambling Commission

conducts about 1000 interviews each quarter from a survey sample generated through

Random Digit Dialling (RDD)25 of Great Britain phone numbers The sample is subject to

quotas to ensure it is as nationally representative as possible Respondents are

screened to ensure they are 16 or over and fit in remaining unfilled quotas Quotas are

set based on age sex religion and social grade Data is weighted to be representative

25 Random Digit Dialling (RDD) is a method for sampling of telephone surveys which involves the random generation

of telephone numbers

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

96

of the adult population with weights set based on the National Readership Survey (a

face-to-face random probability sample)

The Gambling Commission uses the online survey to monitor online gambling

behaviour The survey was launched after the government introduced regulation of

overseas gambling companies transacting with customers in Great Britain (in-line with

the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014) The online survey sample is

sourced through a panel and the sample is subject to quotas in-line with those used for

the telephone survey Also data is weighted for analysis in-line with the methods used

for the telephone survey

Public perception of gambling

Considering the public perception of gambling back to 2010 gamblersrsquo attitudes are more positive than non-gamblers but the gap has reduced significantly in recent years (Figure 5) The proportion of gamblers and non-gamblers who think that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted has reduced gradually over the past 10 years

Figure 5 Respondents who agree that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted Great Britain 2010 to 2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

All respondents Gambled in past 12 months

Not gambled in past 12 months

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

97

The views of gamblers were also sought on the most important factors when selecting a

company to gamble with The most important factor was having the best odds (26)

followed by the company having

bull a fair and trustworthy reputation (24)

bull bonus offers (15)

bull a recognisable brand name (14)

The Gambling Commission survey asked respondents about a series of attitudinal

statements taken from the Attitudes Towards Gambling Scale (ATGS-8) (a validated

scale to assess gambling attitudes among the general population originally developed

for the 2007 BGPS) From this 82 of respondents in 2019 agreed that there were

currently too many opportunities for gambling (a 3 increase from 2018) while 73

agreed that gambling is dangerous for family life In 2019 we also saw an increase in

the proportion saying that gambling should be discouraged (up to 62 from 58 in

2018) and a significant reduction in respondents agreeing that ldquogambling livens up liferdquo

(down to 26 from 28 in 2018)

Awareness of gambling

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey asks whether gamblers

follow a gambling company on social media Overall 23 of respondents followed a

gambling company on either Facebook Twitter YouTube Snapchat or Instagram in

2019 Facebook (17) was the most popular social media platform in which gamblers

follow gambling companies and despite a decrease over recent years this has been the

case since 2015 This is followed by

bull Twitter (8)

bull YouTube (6)

bull Instagram (5)

bull Snapchat (2)

These figures are consistent with the Adultrsquos Media Use and Attitudes Report (21) which

identifies Facebook as the most popular social media platform with use decreasing since

2017

Overall 86 of respondents have ever seen or heard any gambling advertisements and

82 have ever seen or heard any gambling sponsorship A higher proportion of men

(89) than women (83) have seen or heard gambling advertisements Also compared

to the 2018 survey we saw a decrease in the visibility of gambling sponsorships among

those aged 25 to 34 years (77 in 2019 compared to 82 in 2018)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

98

Gambling management tools

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey also asks about wider issues

of self-exclusion and gambling management tools

If a gambler considers themselves to be spending too much time or money gambling

either online or in person they can request to be self-excluded from a gambling

company or can self-exclude from multiple operators Figure 6 shows the percentage of

gamblers who have self-excluded from gambling activities through a gambling

management tool and whether they were aware of these tools In 2019 5 of gamblers

have ever self-excluded which is a slight reduction from 6 in the previous 4 years The

proportion The proportion of gamblers who had not self-excluded but were aware of

self-exclusion increased steadily from 29 in 2015 to 42 in 2019 The proportion of

gamblers who were not aware of self-exclusion reduced from 65 in 2015 53 in 2019

Figure 6 Gamblersrsquo awareness and use of self-exclusion Great Britain 2015-2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Among gamblers in 2019 more men (6) have self-excluded than women (4) while

those aged 25 to 34 have the highest self-exclusion rates (9) Other management

tools used were

bull setting financial limits (9)

6 6 6 6 5

2937 35

41 42

6557 58

53 53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Self-excluded Not self-excluded but aware Not self-excluded and not aware

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

99

bull time out (3)

bull reality check (3)

bull exclusion by product (2)

Table 59 Use and awareness of gambling management tools Great Britain 2019

Self-exclusion

() Exclusion by product ()

Time out ()

Financial limits ()

Reality check ()

Used 5 2 3 9 3

Aware but not used

42 24 34 49 27

Not aware 53 74 63 42 70

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Compared to the previous year the Gambling Commission reported an increase in the

proportion of respondents seeing information about where to seek help to control

gambling (40) in 2019 They also reported a decrease in respondents seeing

information on whether a machine is random or compensated26 (6)

Overall 20 of gamblers have ever read the terms and conditions provided by a

gambling operator The proportion of respondents who have not read terms and

conditions but were aware they are available was 62 while 18 were not aware terms

and conditions are available Women (22) and those aged 65 or over (30) were

more likely to be unaware of terms and conditions

64 Children and young people

Introduction

This section focuses on gambling prevalence among children and young people The

legal gambling age in the UK is 18 and this includes both gambling in person and

online Historically the exception was the National Lottery but the government plans to

26 All gambling machines have a return to player rate that dictates how frequently they are likely to pay

out For random machines and online slots this is typically based on a random number generator

meaning it is totally random whether the machine hits this number and pays out In contrast the likelihood

of a compensated machine paying out is based on previous plays The most common example is a fruit

machine which is more likely to pay out the more money it has taken (this is necessary as they can only

physically hold a certain number of coins)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

100

raise this from 16 to 18 no later than October 2021 following the announcement of the

Review of the Gambling Act 2005 (22)

The primary source used is the Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and

Gambling Survey A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo (23) We

supplement this with information from the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) report

lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) as well as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) (25)

The Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey A research

study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo is conducted as part of Ipsos MORIrsquos

annual Young People Omnibus (YPO) and examines gambling behaviours such as

where young people gamble and with whom perceptions of gambling and awareness of

gambling advertising The survey also asks a series of questions relating to potential

issues associated with gambling and uses the DSM-IV-MR-J2 problem gambling screen

to classify gamblers as low risk moderate risk or problem gamblers The survey is

conducted in schools with pupils completing online self-completion surveys in class

Data is weighted by sex age and region

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo used a mixed methods approach comprising of a

series of 6 focus groups with a total of 79 young people across England Scotland and

Wales It also included a survey conducted through Survey Monkey and promoted

through social media which 1025 young people responded to The ethnicity and

geographical region of the respondents was fairly representative of the UK population

However most take-up in the survey was by boys (83) which is not representative of

the general population That said the authors quote studies that have found boys to

have significantly higher participation rates in games most heavily associated with loot

boxes and skin betting such as the FIFA series and Fortnite

ALSPAC is a longitudinal study of young peoplesrsquo gambling between 17 and 24 years

using a contemporary UK cohort the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) When the children were aged 6 in 1997 to 1998 their parents completed the

South Oaks Gambling Screen Then when aged 18 the parents completed the PGSI

Between 2008 and 2018 all young people still registered with the ALSPAC (10155)

were invited to take part and complete a gambling frequency survey which included

PGSI The sample sizes completing the gambling surveys were

bull 3757 at age 17

bull 4340 at age 20

bull 4345 at age 24

Depression anxiety and wellbeing scores and drug and alcohol use were also

collected by self-completion questionnaires The main strength of this report is its use of

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

101

the large ALSPAC cohort which has collected detailed data for over 25 years The main

limitation is the missing data with less than half of the whole ALSPAC cohort completing

the gambling surveys Non-responders to the gambling surveys when compared to

ALSPAC responders overall were more likely to be male and from more deprived social

backgrounds with mothers with lower educational levels There was also a significant

gender bias with the final sample comprising 58 females As males were more likely

to engage in gambling activity this gender bias will have resulted in an under-estimate

of gambling prevalence and associated characteristics (26)

A main limitation of all sources used in this section is a lack of general health data We

acknowledged this in the protocol of this review and represents a gap in the data

available for children young people and gambling

Gambling participation

The proportion of 11 to 16-year-old children who have spent their own money on any gambling activity in the last 7 days has been decreasing since 2011 from 23 to 11 in 2019 (Figure 7) This decrease follows the trend of any gambling in the last 12 months which has reduced from 39 in 2018 to 36 in 201927 We should view this reduction in the context of declining rates of drinking smoking and drug-taking in children and young people Though poor diet remains an issue obesity rates are also falling and levels of activity increasing largely through increased activity at school (27)

Nearly double the number of boys (13) reported participating in any gambling activity

in the past 7 days than girls (7) Participation was higher in older children (12 of 14

to 16 year olds compared to 9 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Table 60 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by age and sex Great Britain 2019

11

year olds

12 year olds

13 year olds

14 year olds

15 year olds

16 year olds

Boys aged 11-16

Girls aged 11-16

Total aged 11-16

Has played a National Lottery game in past 7 days

7 3 4 2 3 9 5 2 4

Has played any gambling game in the past 7 days

14 8 9 11 11 16 13 7 11

27 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 37 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19

pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

102

Source Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain 2019

The most common gambling activities for 11 to 16-year-old children in the past 7 days

were placing a private bet for money (5) and playing fruit or slot (electronic gaming)

machines (4) A consistent finding in the report series is that fruit and slot (electronic

gaming) machines (mentioned by 23 of respondents who have gambled) was the first

experience of gambling The main reason for gambling given was ldquobecause itrsquos funrdquo

(55) while among children who do not gamble the main reason given was that it is

illegal and they are too young to take part (56)

National Lottery participation in the past 7 days among 11 to 15 year olds was at its

lowest reported level in 2019 Figure 7 shows that the proportion of 11 to 15 year olds

who have played National Lottery games in the past week has decreased over time

from 10 in 2011 to 4 in 2019

Figure 7 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by activity Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling Commission lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo 2019

Scratchcards remained the most common National Lottery product among children

under 16 who have ever played (mentioned by 10) compared with

bull Lotto the main National Lottery draw (6)

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Any gambling game Any National Lottery game

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

103

bull National Lottery online instant win games (4)

bull other National Lottery games (5)

Most under 16s who bought a National Lottery product were in the company of a parent

or guardian (67) and report that the parent typically pays at the till (73) The report

concludes that although under 16s play the National Lottery for a range of reasons the

influence of parents and family members was as important as having fun

On average 11 to 16 year olds who had gambled in the past 7 days spent pound17 The

overall amount of money this group was given as pocket money birthday money or

money earnt over the same period was pound34

The rates of gambling reported in the past week (11) were lower than drinking alcohol

(16) but higher than using e-cigarettes (7) smoking tobacco cigarettes (6) or

taking illegal drugs (5) Since 2017 the series has seen a potential relationship

between these other harmful activities and gambling such that those who have spent

their own money on gambling in the past 7 days were also more likely to have drank

alcohol (41) taken drugs (21) or smoked either a tobacco cigarette (25) or an e-

cigarette (27) compared with children who had not gambled

Online gambling and gaming

Participation in online gambling among children in the last 7 days compared with in

person gambling was low (3) particularly in the context of the time young people

spend online (the series shows how chatting online with friends and using social media

are 2 of the most popular spare time activities for this age group) Given the low rate of

participation in online gambling it is difficult to draw conclusions across the report series

Any past participation in online gambling was higher at 12 with differences across age

and sex showing the same pattern seen for overall gambling Boys (16) were more

likely than girls (8) to have ever played an online gambling-style game Participation

was higher in older children compared to younger children (14 of 14 to 16 year olds

compared to 10 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Among children who have ever played online gambling-style games fruit and slot

(electronic gaming) machines were most commonly mentioned (30) followed by casino

games such as

bull roulette or blackjack (26)

bull poker games (24)

bull bingo (21)

This was consistent with previous surveys Almost half (47) of children who play online

gambling-style games do so via apps Of these 26 were apps unrelated to social

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

104

networking sites 18 were via Facebook and 17 were free demo games via

gambling apps

Half (52) of 11 to 16 year olds were aware of in-game items (for example weapons

power-ups and tokens) Awareness of in-game items was more common in boys (66)

than girls (37) Of these children 44 had paid money for loot boxes crates or packs

to get in-game items within the game theyrsquore playing In most cases the money used for

loot boxes crates or packs comes from money they had received as a birthday or

Christmas present or from pocket money

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) explored the relationship between gambling

and video games This report was undertaken to explore concerns that these activities

introduce young people to gambling before they have been able to develop strategies to

avoid gambling-related harms

The RSPH report states that around 93 of young people regularly play video games

and that there is a growing concern around loot boxes and skin betting28 The report

found that in the past 7 days twice as many 11 to 14 year olds had bought loot boxes

than 22 to 24 year olds and almost twice as many had taken part in skin betting Also

children under 18 were significantly less likely than older respondents to classify these

activities as gambling and less likely to associate gambling harms with an increased risk

of health issues such as anxiety and alcohol consumption Finally only 25 of children

aged 11 to 14 years strongly support classifying loot boxes as gambling compared to

73 of those aged 22 to 24 years

You should note with reference to the caveats given at the start of this section that

although this source allows us to include information on this new topic the sampling

design it is not as robust as the lsquoGambling Commission Young People and Gambling

Survey 2019rsquo

Problem gambling

In 2019 17 of 11 to 16 year olds were classified as problem gamblers29 and 27 as

at-risk gamblers (as defined by the youth-adapted problem gambling screen DSM-IV-

28 Loot boxes are purchasable rewards that are uncertain at the time of purchase They include cosmetics such as new lsquoskinsrsquo for a character or they can be functional providing an advantage within the game As they cost money to buy and there is an element of chance involved it has led to concerns that they are a form of gambling On sites external to the game itself players can trade sell or bet on their skins for money ndash this is skin betting The Gambling Commissionrsquos view on loot boxes skin betting and related issues is set on in the position paper published March 2017 29 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 19 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

105

MR-J screen) These figures have remained stable compared to the previous year

However it is important to note that problem gambling prevalence in children and young

people from this source is higher than problem gambling prevalence in adults as

reported in the HSE In reality this is perhaps unlikely to be the case suggesting the

DSM-IV as used here may result in an overestimation

There was a higher proportion of boys at risk (38) and problem gamblers (20) than

girls at risk (16) and problem gamblers (07) This gender difference was consistent

with the higher prevalence seen in boys throughout the survey as well as what we see in

adult problem gambling from the HSE and other sources referenced throughout this

report

Another important aspect of gambling for public health not included in the HSE is the

harmful impact on family members The BGPS asks 2 questions about this issue The

first asked whether the respondentrsquos parents or guardians had ever regularly gambled If

so the respondent was asked to report whether they felt that either of their parents or

guardians had ever had a problem with their gambling Problem gambling prevalence

was significantly higher among respondents whose parents gambled regularly (16)

than for those whose parents did not (07) Also 50 of respondents who reported

having a parent with a gambling problem were themselves problem gamblers compared

with 10 of those who reported that although their parents regularly gambled they did

not have a problem with their gambling

Attitudes and influences

Most young people believe gambling to be dangerous (59) and feel well informed

about the issue (60) Also 7 agree that most people their age gamble 11 agree it

is OK for someone their age to gamble to see what itrsquos like and 7 agree it is OK for

someone their age to gamble once a week Consistent with previous surveys it is

interesting to note that despite the higher gambling prevalence in boys compared to

girls both show a similar level of agreement that gambling is dangerous (60 of boys

and 59 of girls)

Exposure to advertising was high among children and young people with 69 reporting

to have seen or heard some form of gambling advertisements or sponsorship most

commonly via television Boys (39) were more likely than girls (28) to report seeing

or hearing a gambling advert about a sports event or a betting company (34 of boys

compared to 21 of girls) Girls (47) were more likely than boys (34) to remember

the last advert they saw about a National Lottery based game or bingo (33 of girls

compared to 20 of boys) Also just over one in 10 (12) follow gambling companies

on social media while 11 had received direct marketing from gambling companies

Half (50) of young people have been spoken to about the potential problems that

gambling can lead to and 74 say they know who to go to for help if they had problems

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

106

related to gambling Children were most likely to have been spoken to about the

potential problems with gambling by their parents or guardians (34) followed by a

teacher (19)

These findings also highlight how parents or guardians were typically present when a

young person gambles (67 of those who have ever spent money on gambling) but are

also recognised as the first contact for help if they were to have problems with gambling

(53) Most young people (57) say their family would discourage them from gambling

if they started or found out but 23 report that their parents or guardians set rules about

gambling

A recent release from ALSPAC (25) measured young peoplersquos gambling at age 17 20

and 24 (3 points of transition from adolescence to adulthood) and revealed that regular

weekly gamblers had developed habits and patterns of play by 20 years of age Playing

the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most

common forms of gambling reported but as the young people got older there was a

significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to 35 at age 20

and 47 at age 24 There was also an increase seen among women but not as steep

(from 08 at age 17 to 4 at age 20 and 11 at age 24) The study shows how young

people who gamble regularly were more likely to

bull have parents who gambled regularly

bull have high social media usage

bull have been regular players of video games when younger

Also regular gamblers had lower wellbeing scores and were at least twice as likely to

smoke cigarettes daily and consume alcohol weekly Finally a small minority (6 to 7)

of men demonstrated problem gambling behaviours associated with poor mental health

and wellbeing involvement in crime and potentially harmful use of drugs and alcohol

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

107

7 Discussion

Over half of the population take part in gambling (245 million people in England)

Participation in the National Lottery declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However

participation in other gambling activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015

before falling back to 40 in the most recent survey Online gambling (excluding the

National Lottery) has increased from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

The trend in problem gambling between 2012 and 2018 has also reduced accounting

for 05 of the population in 2018 (245600 people in England) As numbers are very

small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with previous years

rather than representative of a real decline However low risk gambling is increasing

and a cause for concern

The prevention paradox states that on a health continuum ndash alcohol being the typical

example ndash the larger volume of harm is associated with people lower on the continuum

because there are more of them It is unclear from the data available whether problem

gambling is actually declining but low risk gambling does appear to be increasing So it

is difficult to say whether gambling risk and the associated harms have increased or

decreased overall The HSE gambling questionnaire is not detailed enough about the

harms themselves and so we cannot draw a clear conclusion based on the quantitative

data presented here This is a limitation of this study and in the data currently available

for this topic area

Problem moderate risk and low risk gambling are all associated with men in the younger

age groups Demographic factors particularly sex appear more significant in predicting

at-risk gambling behaviour than economic factors such as income employment and

relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling

than poor physical health and negative health behaviours with the exception of alcohol

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were affected others Among

children playing the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends

were the most common forms of gambling reported But as the young people got older

there was a significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to

35 at age 20 and 47 at age 24

Figures presented do not cover the period of the COVID-19 pandemic with the most

recent published data from the primary data source covering 2018 We have published a

separate evidence review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling It is important

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

108

to note that some findings particularly for problem gambling may be deemed

inconclusive because of the limited sample size

71 Strengths and limitations

The main strength of the findings of this report comes from the HSE The HSE is a

primary resource used to monitor the nationrsquos health and care It is a robust transparent

detailed widely used and well-respected data source Including the gambling

questionnaire allows us to compare gambling with a range of other health behaviours

and conditions However while sample size is adequate for analysing a range of topics

in England we had to combine several survey years at times in this report In particular

we had to combine data when looking at more detailed breakdowns Though it is the

most robust source available for estimating problem gambling in England the combined

dataset only included around 150 problem gamblers (according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI)

The main limitations of this report come from relying on alternative sources of previously

published data to meet aspects of the objectives not fully met by the HSE The HSE

does not ask questions about

bull time spent on gambling

bull money spent on gambling

bull affected others

bull attitudes towards gambling

bull the gambling behaviours of children and young people

The sources used are the best available for quantitative gambling data on these topics

but in general they lack the data quality of the HSE They also vary considerably in

robustness and how representative they are of the national population Finally except

for ALSPAC referenced in this report there is no longitudinal gambling data source

currently available The addition of longitudinal data would have contributed significantly

to the objectives of this report by allowing us to see important changes in the gambling

behaviours of individuals over time As a relatively new field in public health we hope

that more and better-quality quantitative gambling data will become available as more

research is carried out

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

109

8 References

1 Department of Health and Social Care PHE remit letter 2018 to 2019 Online 2018 2 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Government response to the consultation

on proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures Online 2018

3 Blank L Baxter S Buckley Woods H Goyder E Interventions to reduce public health burden of gambling related harms A mapping review of the international evidence Lancet Public Health 2021 Volume 6

4 Public Health England Gambling-related harms evidence review scope Online 2020 5 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling Online 2019 6 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Online 2018 7 UK Data Service Health Survey for England Online 2020 8 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes

annual report 2020 9 The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) development and UK

validation Health Qual Life Outcomes Tennant R Hiller L Fishwick R Platt S and S Joseph and others 2007 pages 1-13

10 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2016 Well-being and mental health Online 2017 11 David P Goldberg and Paul Williams User Guide to the General Health Questionnaire

Windsor NFER-NELSON 1988 12 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Adult health related behaviours Online

2019 13 Department of Health and Social Care UK Chief Medical Officers Low Risk Drinking

Guidelines Online 2016 14 Gambling Commission Problem gambling vs gambling-related harms Online 2020 15 NatCen British Gambling Prevalence Survey Online 2010 16 NatCen Treatment Needs and Gap Analysis in Great Britain Synthesis of findings from a

programme of studies Online 2020 17 London School of Economics An assessment of the accuracy of survey estimates of the

prevalence of problem gambling in the United Kingdom Online 2020 18 BeGambleAware Annual Statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great

Britain) Online 2020 19 BeGambleAware National Gambling Treatment Service Online 2020 20 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and

attitudes Annual Report Online 2020 21 Ofcom Adults Media Use and Attitudes Report Online 2019 22 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Review of the Gambling Act 2005

Online 2020 23 Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study

among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain Online 2019 24 Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) Skins in the game Online 2019 25 University of Bristol Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Online 2019 26 Emond A Griffiths M and L Hollen A longitudinal study of gambling in late adolescence

and early adulthood Follow-up assessment at 24 years Online 2019 27 The Kings Fund Healthy behaviours Future trends Online 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

110

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority

Introduction

Table 61 shows the prevalence of overall gambling participation in the last 12 months by

upper tier local authority (UTLA) as illustrated in Figure 4 of the main report Due to

sample size the authorities of Inner and Outer London have been grouped together

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

Results

Variation in gambling participation is evident by UTLA Discounting Rutland which has

wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a rate of gambling participation that

is statistically significantly higher than average for England The top 5 UTLAs in England

with the highest levels of gambling participation were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

111

Table 61 Gambling participation in the last 12 months by upper tier local authority England 2012 2015 2016 2018

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000001 Hartlepool 707 596 798

E06000002 Middlesbrough 612 492 720

E06000003 Redcar and Cleveland

667 561 758

E06000004 Stockton-on-Tees 726 637 799

E06000005 Darlington 700 575 801

E06000006 Halton 582 450 703

E06000007 Warrington 525 428 621

E06000008 Blackburn with

Darwen 571 441 692

E06000009 Blackpool 690 562 794

E06000010 Kingston upon Hull 654 567 731

E06000011 East Riding of

Yorkshire 547 464 627

E06000012 North East

Lincolnshire 640 527 739

E06000013 North Lincolnshire 683 587 766

E06000014 York 500 409 591

E06000015 Derby 633 539 718

E06000016 Leicester 476 397 557

E06000017 Rutland 833 436 970

E06000018 Nottingham 527 447 605

E06000019 Herefordshire 600 483 707

E06000020 Telford and Wrekin 711 614 792

E06000021 Stoke-on-Trent 615 535 689

E06000022 Bath and North East

Somerset 589 489 683

E06000023 Bristol 547 476 616

E06000024 North Somerset 606 510 694

E06000025 South

Gloucestershire 566 471 656

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

112

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000026 Plymouth 675 587 752

E06000027 Torbay 550 425 669

E06000030 Swindon 583 483 677

E06000031 Peterborough 617 516 709

E06000032 Luton 646 548 734

E06000033 Southend-on-Sea 598 489 697

E06000034 Thurrock 690 585 779

E06000035 Medway 500 424 576

E06000036 Bracknell Forest 681 566 777

E06000037 West Berkshire 575 466 677

E06000038 Reading 549 441 652

E06000039 Slough 349 257 454

E06000040 Windsor and Maidenhead

469 364 577

E06000041 Wokingham 595 485 696

E06000042 Milton Keynes 654 570 730

E06000043 Brighton and Hove 500 399 601

E06000044 Portsmouth 701 598 787

E06000045 Southampton 710 611 792

E06000046 Isle of Wight 675 568 766

E06000047 County Durham 687 630 738

E06000049 Cheshire East 519 452 586

E06000050 Cheshire West and

Chester 627 561 688

E06000051 Shropshire 653 587 713

E06000052 Cornwall 630 583 673

E06000054 Wiltshire 603 544 659

E06000055 Bedford 569 448 682

E06000056 Central Bedfordshire 620 531 701

E06000057 Northumberland 627 552 697

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

113

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000058 Bournemouth

Christchurch and Poole

614 546 677

E06000059 Dorset 588 520 654

E08000001 Bolton 603 533 669

E08000002 Bury 602 512 685

E08000003 Manchester 453 395 512

E08000004 Oldham 624 544 698

E08000005 Rochdale 614 527 694

E08000006 Salford 551 457 642

E08000007 Stockport 549 480 615

E08000008 Tameside 609 516 695

E08000009 Trafford 558 458 654

E08000010 Wigan 622 538 700

E08000011 Knowsley 786 676 866

E08000012 Liverpool 683 612 746

E08000013 St Helens 596 492 691

E08000014 Sefton 650 567 724

E08000015 Wirral 665 591 731

E08000016 Barnsley 734 644 808

E08000017 Doncaster 703 631 766

E08000018 Rotherham 729 633 808

E08000019 Sheffield 595 544 643

E08000021 Newcastle upon Tyne 558 480 634

E08000022 North Tyneside 759 635 850

E08000023 South Tyneside 692 583 784

E08000024 Sunderland 664 584 736

E08000025 Birmingham 437 393 481

E08000026 Coventry 549 479 618

E08000027 Dudley 682 598 755

E08000028 Sandwell 630 536 715

E08000029 Solihull 505 412 597

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

114

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E08000030 Walsall 558 469 644

E08000031 Wolverhampton 613 500 715

E08000032 Bradford 490 421 559

E08000033 Calderdale 707 601 795

E08000034 Kirklees 563 502 621

E08000035 Leeds 635 586 682

E08000036 Wakefield 702 629 766

E08000037 Gateshead 635 536 725

E10000002 Buckinghamshire 533 474 592

E10000003 Cambridgeshire 587 537 634

E10000006 Cumbria 688 626 743

E10000007 Derbyshire 631 585 675

E10000008 Devon 542 496 587

E10000011 East Sussex 532 470 593

E10000012 Essex 620 583 655

E10000013 Gloucestershire 635 579 688

E10000014 Hampshire 602 565 637

E10000015 Hertfordshire 615 576 652

E10000016 Kent 607 573 641

E10000017 Lancashire 619 581 656

E10000018 Leicestershire 604 553 653

E10000019 Lincolnshire 664 617 707

E10000020 Norfolk 638 595 679

E10000021 Northamptonshire 668 617 715

E10000023 North Yorkshire 651 601 698

E10000024 Nottinghamshire 643 597 687

E10000025 Oxfordshire 636 589 680

E10000027 Somerset 589 530 645

E10000028 Staffordshire 695 655 733

E10000029 Suffolk 658 609 704

E10000030 Surrey 565 528 602

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

115

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E10000031 Warwickshire 528 476 579

E10000032 West Sussex 610 559 658

E10000034 Worcestershire 673 619 724

Inner London 502 473 530

Outer London 500 482 518

Total 593 587 598

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

116

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling

Introduction

This analysis forms one part of a larger piece of work described in the pre-registered

lsquoGambling-related harms evidence review Analysis protocolrsquo The aim is to describe the

prevalence and determinants of gambling the harms associated with gambling and the

social and economic burden of gambling This analysis seeks to address the following

research questions

1 What socio-demographic factors are associated with gambling and harmful gambling

in England

2 Is gambling and harmful gambling associated with health status

The hypotheses tested are

1 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

2 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in

England

3 Problem gambling is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

4 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

5 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

6 Problem gambling is associated with health conditions in England

Data source

The data source is a combined dataset of the HSE for years 2012 2015 2016 and

2018

The HSE is a survey of the general population aged 16 and over Participants are

selected using a random probability sample The survey design ensures that every

address in England has an equal chance of being included in the survey each year and

the results are representative of the population living in private households Gambling

specific questions are included in the 2012 2015 2016 and 2018 surveys only

Outputs have been non-response weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE

analysis since 2003 NatCen were commissioned to combine the datasets They

manage the HSE on behalf of NHS Digital NatCen calculated and appended new

combined weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

117

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc16 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb16 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication30 the problem gambling weights were

used for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening tools

The self-completion weights were used for the remaining analyses

All important information related to the data source is available in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the HSE series31 Registered users can access the un-combined

datasets via the UK Data Archive32

We used SPSS version 25 software for all statistical analysis

Variables

We selected the variables below as they were of the most interest to the research aims

of the study within the limitations of the data available The independent variables are

those measuring the main socio-demographic and health concepts reported in the HSE

series Initially only Anyacty and PROBGAM as dependent variables were within scope

However following feedback from the expert reference group associated with the wider

project we agreed that a measure of any level of risk (lsquoharmful gamblingrsquo) should be

included if feasible A common proxy from HSE and Gambling Commission outputs is to

use a PGSI score of 1 or more to describe any level of gambling risk The analysis

follows this precedent

Table 62 Dependent gambling variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

Anyacty Whether spent any money on gambling in last 12 months Categorical

PGSI_atrisk Respondents with a PGSI score of 1 or more Categorical

PROBGAM Whether a problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

Categorical

30 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling 31 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 32 UK Data Service (2020) Health Survey for England

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

118

Table 63 Independent socio-demographic variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

ag16g10 Age 16 to 75 in 10-year age bands Categorical

Sex Gender Categorical

Origin2 Grouped ethnicity (White Black Asian Mixed Other) Categorical

Eqv3 Equivalised income tertiles (lowest middle highest) Ordinal

TopQual4 Highest educational qualification (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent below degree no qualification)

Ordinal

Employment_r Recoded variable of Activb2activity status of previous week (in education paid employmentself-employed unemployed retired looking after homefamily other)

Categorical

Qimd Quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score (2010 IMD for 2012 and 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018)

Ordinal

Gor1 Government Office Region Categorical

Table 64 Independent health-related variables of interest

Variable name

Variable label Measure

Genhelf2 Self-assessed general health grouped (very goodgood fair badvery bad)

Ordinal

WemwbsQ WEMWBS score quintiles Ordinal

LifeSatG LifeSatG Life satisfaction (low medium high very high) Ordinal

GHQg2 GHQ score group (0 1-3 4+) Ordinal

BMIlvg3 BMI group (not overweight or obese overweight obese) Categorical

Totalwug Alcohol units per week grouped Categorical

Cignow Current smoker Categorical

Missing data

Missing data was coded as such in the source dataset and was excluded as appropriate

from statistical analysis

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

119

Results

Step 1 Bivariate analysis

For step 1 of this pre-registered analysis a series of chi-squared tests were conducted

to refute the null hypothesis This was that the variables of interest are independent of

the 3 dependent gambling variables33

All 3 dependent variables are categorical as are most of the independent variables of

interest Chi-square was also used to test the ordinal variables against the categorical

dependents while acknowledging that the test will treat both as categorical The results

of such tests concerning ordinal variables are valid but there is an acceptable loss of

information in the output (for example the order of the categories) This is a common

approach and the ordinal variables are fully accounted for in step 2 of the analysis using

binary multiple logistic regression To trust the conclusions from a chi-square test the 2

standard assumptions are that

bull observations are independent

bull all expected frequencies are more than 534 for a 2x2 table (for example PROBGAM

x Sex)

These assumptions are true for the HSE combined dataset However the SPSS syntax

used tested the latter assumption as part of the output

Step 1 Findings

Tables 68 69 and 70 show the main output from the bivariate analysis

The most important figure for the hypotheses measured is the significance determined

by the chi-square test Where this is less-than 005 the null hypothesis is rejected and

the conclusion can be made that the association between the dependent and

independent is likely not due to chance variation From the outputs below this cannot be

determined for income region self-reported general health and region

The output also includes measures for Cramerrsquos-VPhi35 to quantify the correlation Chi-

square has determined whether there is a significant relationship between the variables

but is not able to quantify how important this is Cramerrsquos-V is a post-test that provides

this additional information Given the relatively large sample size of the dataset it is

33 Technically a chi-square test is a descriptive test not a modelling technique and as such there are no

dependent variables but for simplicity of language and consistency with the following description of Step 2

of this analysis the main gambling measures are here referred to as dependent 34 For larger tables no more than 20 of all cells may have an expected frequency less than 5 and all

expected frequencies more than 1 35 Phi is used where the table is 2x2

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

120

important to note that even small effects can become significant (as chance reduces

with larger sample sizes) Including this post-test suggests that this may be the case for

our study given that all measures of the correlation are low However results here do

not preclude any variables from step 2 The results of the chi-square test are used to

test whether including a variable reduces the badness-of-fit measure This means that if

chi-square is significant then the variable will be considered a significant predictor in the

equation So only income region and self-reported general health were excluded from

step 2 of the analysis and the conclusion made that the sample size may be amplifying

significance at the bivariate level

Table 65 Bivariate output for gambling participation in the last 12 months

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0121

Sex 0000 0075

Ethnicity 0000 0171

Income 0000 0087

Educational qualification 0000 0076

Employment 0000 0180

IMD 0000 0039

Region 0000 0087

Health factors

General health 0000 0042

Wellbeing 0000 0045

Life satisfaction 0000 0045

GHQ 0000 0032

BMI 0000 0096

Alcohol 0000 0227

Smoking 0000 0031

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

121

Table 66 Bivariate output for harmful gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0123

Sex 0000 0121

Ethnicity 0001 0027

Income 0831 0004

Educational qualification 0000 0044

Employment 0000 0088

IMD 0000 0050

Region 0021 0026

Health factors

General health 0577 0006

Wellbeing 0000 0092

Life satisfaction 0000 0070

GHQ 0000 0061

BMI 0330 0010

Alcohol 0000 0106

Smoking 0000 0085

Table 67 Bivariate output for problem gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0036

Sex 0000 0053

Ethnicity 0000 0042

Income 0017 0019

Educational qualification 0000 0029

Employment 0000 0052

IMD 0000 0047

Region 0000 0037

Health factors

General health 0000 0036

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

122

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Wellbeing 0000 0062

Life satisfaction 0000 0052

GHQ 0000 0053

BMI 0849 0004

Alcohol 0002 0031

Smoking 0000 0040

Step 2 Binary logistic regression

Whereas step 1 describes the significance of the relationship between the independent

variables and gambling behaviour step 2 models the determinants of and predicts the

likelihood of gambling behaviour among the study population Unlike the bivariate

analysis the aim here is to explicitly define a dependent gambling variable and make

predictions so a logistic regression is most appropriate

Because most variables and outcomes were categorical it could be argued that a log

linear analysis would be preferred for step 2 While this is an extension of the chi-square

test used in step 1 it has the disadvantage of being unintuitive and problematic to

interpret and explain So we decided to use logistic regression as it is easier to

understand than log linear analysis simple to explain to the audience of the final report

and is still a reasonable tool for the aims of this study

All standard assumptions of binary logistic regression are met by the present analysis

namely

bull dependent is dichotomous

bull one or more independent variables that can be either categorical (nominal or ordinal)

or continuous

bull independent observations

bull dependent variable is mutually exclusive

bull linear relationship between any continuous independent variables and the logit

transformation of the dependent variable

Before the regression some variables were recoded into more practical or meaningful

groups and others were dummy coded to turn certain categories into binary variables to

give them directionality (such as higher category is 1 lower category is 0) This allows

the regression to look at direction of association by comparing 2 sides

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

123

Table 68 Variables entered into the equation

Variable name Entered into

equation Recodes

ag16g10 Yes No recode

Sex Yes Recoded into dummy variable Sex_r (Male (0) Female (1))

Origin2 Yes Recoded into Ethnicity_r (White (0) Non-White (1))

Eqv3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

TopQual4 Yes No recode

Employment_r Yes Recoded into 2 dummy variables Paid_employ_dum (In paid employmentself-employed (1)) and Unemployed_dum (Unemployed (1))

Qimd Yes No recode

Gor1 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Genhelf2 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

WemwbsQ Yes No recode

LifeSatG Yes No recode

GHQg2 Yes No recode

BMIlvg3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Totalwug Yes Recoded into Alcwug_r (Never drink (0) 1-14 units (1) Over 14 to 35 units (2) Over 35 to 50 units (3) 50+ units (4))

Cignow Yes No recode

Not all questions were asked in every HSE year For example life satisfaction is

included in the 2016 and 2018 surveys while WEMWBS is included in 2012 2015 and

2016 surveys only Given the results of step 1 life satisfaction and WEMWBS are to be

included in the logistic regression This means that the analysis will be run on 2016 as

this is the most recent year that includes all variables of interest This is suitable from a

sample size perspective for Anyacty and PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling)

While there is no consensus regarding sample size for logistic regression a

conventional guideline suggests that maximum likelihood estimation with less than 100

cases is ldquoriskyrdquo 500 cases is ldquoadequaterdquo and there should be at least 10 cases per

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

124

predictor36 Others have refined this saying that 10 times the number of predictors (k)

should consider the proportion (p) of successes (n = 10kp)37 Given the results of step 1

this means we need a sample of 253 for Anyacty and 2933 for PGSI_atrisk (harmful

gambling) We used 3395 in the analysis for Anyacty and 3315 for PGSI_atrisk The

sample requirement for PROBGAM to be meaningful cannot be achieved within the

limits of the dataset used no matter the number of HSE years included

One final consideration about the sample size for the logistic regression is specific to the

calculation of logs ratios which is the output of step 2 A bias38 of up to 15 is

acknowledged for the log odds ratio when the sample size is around 100 but this

reduces close to zero when around 1000 cases are included So the current analysis

should not be unduly affected by such bias

Table 69 Sample size calculation

Model Proportion of successes (p) Number of predictors (k) Sample size (n)

Anyacty 0473743 12 253

Atrisk 0040908 12 2933

Probgam 0006601 12 18180

Step 2 Findings

The Anyacty model is poor and is not described in detail here

The first output below (Table 73) allows us to reject the null hypothesis Here this is that

the model based on the variables inputted fits equally well as the null model (Block 0 in

full output)

36 Long J (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables SAGE Publications London 37 Peduzzi P Concato J Kemper E Holford T R and A R Feinstein (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis Journal of clinical epidemiology 49(12) 1373-1379 38 Nemes S Jonasson J M Genell A and G Steineck (2009) Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size BMC medical research methodology 9 56-60

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

125

Table 70 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig

Step 32938 25 0000

Block 32938 25 0000

Model 32938 25 000

The second main output is the pseudo-Rsup2 values Itrsquos worth noting that these will be

lower than the Rsup2 of multiple regression lsquoPseudorsquo as Rsup2 in this analysis is not technically

the proportion of variation accounted for by variation in the independents rather it is

only an analogue of correlation The Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be quoted as the preferred

measure over Cox and Snell Rsup2 because the latter has the limitation that it cannot reach

1 as Rsup2 in linear regression can Nagelkerke Rsup2 overcomes this limitation by adjusting

the scale of the statistic So as this analysis aims to be as analogous as possible to the

Rsup2 of least squares regression Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be used

The present model has an Rsup2 of 27 which is good but not great However it is typical

of Nagelkerke and Cox amp Snell to vary and so it is best practice not to over-emphasize

the pseudo-Rsup2 in logistic regression The Hosmer amp Lemeshow uses non-significance as

a measure of goodness of fit of the model Greater than 005 indicates it is a good fitting

model which the PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling) model achieves

Table 71 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Model Summary

-2 Log likelihood Cox amp Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square

1128789a 0097 0267

Note a Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than 0001

Table 72 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Hosmer and Lemeshow Test (step 1)

Chi-square df Sig

9080 8 0336

A drawback of the model is the low classification rate particularly regarding true

classifications A model with a good accuracy rate would demonstrate high proportions

for both those with no PGSI risk and those with any PGSI risk The current model is

good at predicting cases that have no risk (997) but not very good at predicting cases

that do have risk (104)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

126

Table 73 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Classification Tablea

Predicted

(PGSI_atrisk) Percentage Correct

No risk At risk

Observed (PGSI At risk (1plus))

No risk 3023 8 997

At risk 172 20 104

Overall Percentage 944

Note a The cut value is 0500

The most important output for the aim of this study is the variables in the equation table

which details the regression function itself This analysis is not concerned with the raw

scores because natural scales do not make sense when dealing with a dichotomous

dependent variable As the analysis here aims to predict the likelihood of falling into one

of 2 groups (at risk gambling yes or no) meaning the relationship in non-linear then we

quote the log odds (essentially the analysis has made the relationship linear by

converting the raw probability scores into log odds) By taking the natural log of the odds

ratios we get an indirect measure of probability of being in the target group that will then

be linearly related So the final output of the analysis is the predicted change in log odds

for every one unit change in the independents Those that were significant were

tabulated and summarised in the body of the main report These are

bull age

bull sex

bull GHQ-12 (all levels)

bull alcohol consumption (over 14 to 35 units and 50 units or more)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

127

Table 74 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Variables in the Equationa

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational Qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equiv)

8609 2 0014

Educational Qualification 3 groups (Below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational Qualification 3 groups (No qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (least deprived) 11143 4 0025

Quintile of IMD score (2) -0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3) 0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4) 0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (most deprived) 0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1) 15525 4 0004

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2) 0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3) 0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4) 0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5) -0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

128

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Life satisfaction (Low (0-4)) 4262 3 0235

Life satisfaction (Medium (5-6)) -0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (High (7-8)) -0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (Very high (9-10)) 0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ Score ndash grouped (Score 0) 15279 2 0000

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 1-3) 0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 4+) 0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (Nevernot in last 12 months)

36554 4 0000

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14) 0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (Over 14 to 35) 1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (Over 35 to 50) 0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (Over 50) 2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020

Note Empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts a Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

129

Limitations

The main limitations to the analysis are the low classification rate for positive cases and

that while the Rsup2 is less important in binary logistic regression than linear regression and

automatically lower the model overall seems to be good but not great The other main

limitation is that the variables included and so the concepts measured are restricted by

what is included in HSE

Finally it is important to note that while the model goes some way to explaining the

relationship between harmful gambling and the available range of variables and

concepts all conclusions relate to association only not causation

Conclusions

A series of bivariate analyses were conducted to compare a range of variables to 3

increasing levels of gambling participation and harm Of these income region self-

reported general health and BMI were shown not to be significant for harmful gambling

Income and BMI were shown not to be significant for problem gambling

We performed a logistic regression to look at the effects of important socio-demographic

and health factors on the likelihood that respondents are participating in harmful levels of

gambling The logistic regression model was statistically significant (p less-than 005)

The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling and correctly classified

94 of cases but this was skewed towards classifying those at no risk

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be at-risk gamblers Wellbeing

contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on GHQ12

Compared to respondents scoring 0 the odds of those scoring 1 to 3 were 20 times

more likely to participate in harmful gambling Those scoring 4 or more were 24 times

more likely to participate

Regarding physical health and health behaviours smoking and BMI did not contribute

significantly to the model but alcohol did Compared to abstainers or people not drinking

in last 12 months the odds of respondents who drank above the recommended limits

(14 to 35 units) were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This

increased markedly to 78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) Given the

importance of gender mentioned above it should be noted that the group from HSE

consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

The broader conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly

gender appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic

factors such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

130

is a stronger predictor of harmful gambling than poor physical health and negative health

behaviours with the exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and the

method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

131

Appendix C Confidence limits

This appendix presents the confidence intervals39 that correspond to the tables

produced from the Health Survey for England

Note that empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts

Table 1 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6562960 6334907 5738490 5517114

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4317807 4628907 4288585 4135974

Table 2 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5131122 4451484 3932956 3487769

Scratchcards 1779043 2122489 1935338 1701510

Other lotteries 1414683 1397320 1309177 1359294

Machines and games

Football pools 182619 224660 224504 253018

Bingo (not online) 525364 536277 440814 403652

39 A confidence range has been constructed using the Wilson Score method applied to the unweighted survey data

This range (+x and -y) has then been applied to the weighted estimate to produce 95 confidence intervals based

on weighted prevalence levels

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

132

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

565450 651162 564692 517818

Machines in a bookmakers 203497 289984 252415 188015

Casino table games (not online) 217587 308750 280441 225071

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075259 087758 061298 052915

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

247617 327553 271087 262360

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 384863 660760 679692 719161

Betting exchange 057923 078901 096568 088006

Horse races (not online) 966001 1037288 853068 748048

Dog races (not online) 231290 243261 178292 142126

Sports events (not online) 337418 469553 459815 356345

Other events or sports (not online)

070264 114616 105517 123946

Spread-betting 032504 044184 044120 035913

Private betting 414193 460042 365062 337475

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 106871 150925 105517 096928

Summary

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

603368 872696 872386 873509

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

133

Table 3 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1043636 2980783 3995669 4433740 4143208 3366952 2528593 3489166

Scratchcards 1727215 2436717 2122630 1748760 1203935 736928 349895 1702598

Other lotteries 368931 851805 1248142 1510844 1665525 1644453 1488600 1360281

Machines and games

Football pools 500017 505813 125403 043431 092364 052245 125216 253452

Bingo (not online) 368931 434472 414316 218671 306199 263832 366695 404203

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

669475 814954 574877 418627 306199 073441 047549 518443

Machines in a bookmakers

325948 399073 133402 103672 048250 188385

Casino table games (not online)

300370 505813 215674 111586 077250 225478

Poker played in pubs or clubs

097038 079631 042318 053100

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

233091 532732 361625 143797 084765 262801

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

750752 1393731 885118 634445 297618 110693 054080 719896

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

134

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Betting exchange 183742 110705 063786 017054 041341 088251

Horse races (not online)

814337 723214 656254 744063 705698 620226 218526 748796

Dog races (not online) 216520 183867 071194 103672 062513 066258 142445

Sports events (not online)

535416 613960 266506 287132 204688 080724 356862

Other events or sports (not online)

274971 192195 056493 065233 069829 124242

Spread-betting 104643 050020 036061

Private betting 687487 514776 292227 160184 123468 059188 074454 337978

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120051 102830 093988 043431 048250 059188 023266 097187

Summary

Any gambling activity 3591860 5407593 5440884 5765226 5661399 4968794 4065485 5283918

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

3405626 4607524 4144038 3800076 3758191 3064607 2490272 3906545

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

933176 1640157 1107806 762420 392939 157519 081463 874316

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

135

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1467259 3510485 4569168 4988049 4740843 4004582 3216145 3712348

Scratchcards 2237681 2938136 2615102 2189984 1622106 1118809 682241 1880872

Other lotteries 648125 1193740 1655770 1929442 2136972 2162721 2068854 1523567

Machines and games

Football pools 815807 782166 286905 146905 242719 190570 350156 331639

Bingo (not online) 648125 694019 675709 410309 547004 516624 705209 500715

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1024788 1150848 873938 668934 547004 229112 209095 626345

Machines in a bookmakers

591519 649674 298839 246170 167268 078437 076382 256781

Casino table games (not online)

557344 782166 415895 258195 217978 123019 109263 299645

Poker played in pubs or clubs

262730 211548 150729 079335 070360 078437 093306 092229

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

465280 815055 608802 305738 230391 123019 109263 342279

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1122772 1808101 1241414 931637 535657 291423 222447 844666

Betting exchange 395122 260219 189059 093528 154249 123019 124567 137034

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

136

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Horse races (not online)

1198611 1043228 971956 1061279 1044250 976648 495459 875733

Dog races (not online) 442015 366481 201584 246170 192860 216382 124567 202776

Sports events (not online)

860079 913250 484660 501354 409383 241741 153840 448110

Other events or sports (not online)

522990 378089 176420 184919 205472 078437 124567 181001

Spread-betting 275043 161416 067548 064526 085458 043689 076382 069289

Private betting 1046612 793138 518737 329227 291327 203539 261727 427016

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 299471 248158 238589 146905 167268 203539 153840 148088

Summary

Any gambling activity 4217178 5967990 6014213 6308361 6251656 5628584 4820989 5515650

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4024973 5173180 4719791 4345658 4348681 3689635 3174929 4134514

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1338704 2080011 1497113 1082799 659541 364073 274602 1010073

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

137

Table 5 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6632052 6377894 5943259 5575595

Any gambling activity Females

5942819 5731883 4969458 4906675

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6963408 6718136 6293842 5902785

Any gambling activity Females

6254929 6046300 5290274 5233175

Table 6 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3246002 3730976 2826442

Scratchcards 1169964 2047322 1288765

Other lotteries 1169964 1492822 1025881

Machines and games

Football pools 097245 331162 161764

Bingo (not online) 181793 461044 439165

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 260591 677371 289335

Machines in a bookmakers 089066 257882 058685

Casino table games (not online) 269453 248786 023699

Poker played in pubs or clubs 013817 072168 017435

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

181793 321958 089155

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 829815 791242 161764

Betting exchange 097245 072168 044142

Horse races (not online) 680296 876993 315458

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

138

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Dog races (not online) 072929 167769 073727

Sports events (not online) 260591 451712 128970

Other events or sports (not online) 057156 167769 058685

Spread-betting

Private betting 260591 395884 161764

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 072929 106282 058685

Summary

Any gambling activity 4822296 5717294 4381627

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3393706 4396794 2884939

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

942692 991720 254771

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3659871 4051421 3324819

Scratchcards 1464018 2318770 1671830

Other lotteries 1464018 1734501 1376348

Machines and games

Football pools 201170 458796 326066

Bingo (not online) 316244 608611 686798

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 417105 851788 497620

Machines in a bookmakers 189387 372249 169903

Casino table games (not online) 428205 361367 105181

Poker played in pubs or clubs 065016 138416 091504

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316244 448022 219200

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1085531 977657 326066

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

139

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Betting exchange 201170 138416 144563

Horse races (not online) 915656 1071712 531322

Dog races (not online) 165600 262578 194744

Sports events (not online) 417105 597965 279093

Other events or sports (not online) 141449 262578 169903

Spread-betting 018946 010800 029172

Private betting 417105 533922 326066

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 165600 184216 169903

Summary

Any gambling activity 5257552 6040806 4920415

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3811599 4724157 3385971

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1212199 1196726 452417

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

140

Table 7 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5010828 1217707 3855865 3194364 3141982 4261193

Scratchcards 2392446 1504443 771932 1869685 1883219 1942949

Other lotteries 1444337 341029 1743242 944731 869787 1378997

Machines and games

Football pools 293283 350031 113038 153197 065571 251384

Bingo (not online) 485953 296228 532725 426543 524869 503985

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

787354 652538 149092 627816 414928 621294

Machines in a bookmakers

341252 287313 026812 381417 131420 270701

Casino table games (not online)

399008 350031 060262 161672 081619 290043

Poker played in pubs or clubs

113245 139049 011396 071133 088841

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

399008 199203 043262 354482 235334 309408

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

943709 468090 113038 399434 244162 660465

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

141

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Betting exchange 113245 190517 018918 071133 098270

Horse races (not online)

1178937 477241 637685 683310 451433 945210

Dog races (not online)

293283 113840 086397 161672 073550 222461

Sports events (not online)

602327 449816 113038 381417 131420 455212

Other events or sports (not online)

160124 097291 026812 111449 117202

Spread-betting 057978 034490 055608 042284

Private betting 524694 801832 140032 283272 165567 435724

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 150708 164632 068903 095111 042311 136216

Summary

Any gambling activity

6393967 3393970 5102509 4808928 4477874 5701128

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

142

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5169127 1516050 4105461 3632423 3544049 4378999

Scratchcards 2528827 1828181 913477 2242908 2227498 2037902

Other lotteries 1557418 516281 1940866 1232003 1124781 1462015

Machines and games

Football pools 349063 527241 173280 287250 152230 289954

Bingo (not online) 556293 461270 653008 632580 731043 557279

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

874737 883487 217174 870369 601420 679936

Machines in a bookmakers

401069 450223 059636 577920 246091 310631

Casino table games (not online)

463283 527241 106134 298732 176110 331283

Poker played in pubs or clubs

149196 259130 035079 169741 112545

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

463283 338712 083160 544983 381740 351912

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1038302 668690 173280 599818 392876 720754

Betting exchange 149196 327436 047543 169741 123113

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

143

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Horse races (not online)

1282954 679502 767906 934619 644769 1015927

Dog races (not online)

349063 224453 139960 298732 164214 258885

Sports events (not online)

679859 647040 173280 577920 246091 506066

Other events or sports (not online)

202292 201077 059636 229211 144176

Spread-betting 084494 104180 145351 059116

Private betting 597532 1053588 206247 456535 291798 485560

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 191713 293434 117480 205634 115599 165156

Summary

Any gambling activity

6545296 3811322 5357192 5270901 4903252 5818657

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

144

Table 8 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2998785 3313954 3578576 3516211 3324918

Scratchcards 19143 1615445 1719943 1478757 1288589

Other lotteries 921428 1150021 1452543 1440705 1354701

Machines and games

Football pools 185938 31272 225267 17336 170005

Bingo (not online) 518444 401551 338874 285037 229006

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 563566 437439 464056 417836 412342

Machines in a bookmakers 219643 191307 132429 181788 058654

Casino table games (not online) 152757 242814 216674 19874 137049

Poker played in pubs or clubs 058271 05344 038722 024671

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314336 199825 216674 215808 170005

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 518444 573413 701384 773594 692533

Betting exchange 08089 038818 045942 09936 08136

Horse races (not online) 473551 536962 840279 819922 729218

Dog races (not online) 1043 100084 107956 19874 051313

Sports events (not online) 262367 31272 321201 382119 289254

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

145

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 073249 108136 11606 09936 112815

Spread-betting 02347 031777 018411 024671 023682

Private betting 245207 365855 312388 285037 237546

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 088618 108136 084028 031424 073691

Summary

Any gambling activity 4865969 5019271 5419072 5275098 5069299

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3685513 3688054 4042843 3752781 3619792

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

690953 729585 840279 903618 839822

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3511704 379332 4067395 4010237 3843384

Scratchcards 2362902 2000608 2115692 1858612 1672048

Other lotteries 1262067 148849 1824509 1816872 1745527

Machines and games

Football pools 362472 510357 398515 331394 337824

Bingo (not online) 787689 621024 54425 479041 418413

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 842267 664936 69836 645461 653849

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

146

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 408527 352472 27191 342913 169993

Casino table games (not online) 315893 420664 387158 365857 291013

Poker played in pubs or clubs 171099 151192 126224 10107

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

533175 363904 387158 388685 337824

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 787689 828209 979717 1067675 991846

Betting exchange 2083 125915 138953 225862 207111

Horse races (not online) 732881 784861 1140062 1121087 1034927

Dog races (not online) 244709 224247 236535 365857 157392

Sports events (not online) 465504 510357 522024 601386 497756

Other events or sports (not online) 196001 236144 24838 225862 255422

Spread-betting 106199 113005 086687 10107 105257

Private betting 442784 576921 510888 479041 429815

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 220512 236144 200614 114265 194839

Summary

Any gambling activity 5413192 5519375 5917538 5782146 5608713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

422078 4177314 4540749 4252419 4146756

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

147

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

994041 1011184 1140062 1216923 1163622

Table 9 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4506501 2103280 2802777 3104280

Scratchcards 2058401 792842 1234950 1549603

Other lotteries 1474748 606499 660149 735006

Machines and games

Football pools 240450 173397 219725 302101

Bingo (not online) 550883 147693 179245 157085

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 648570 386423 379327 403041

Machines in a bookmakers 269339 173397 227916 220317

Casino table games (not online) 298290 208101 260953 220317

Poker played in pubs or clubs 088076 065122

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

336971 081107 086615 204294

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 717074 156226 260953 420097

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

148

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Betting exchange 097462 041968

Horse races (not online) 1050863 122333 203434 327088

Dog races (not online) 250072

Sports events (not online) 482648 147693 131947 360673

Other events or sports (not online) 125778 057277 134063

Spread-betting 041769 041968

Private betting 463178 216842 101452 411562

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 135258 081107 096828

Summary

Any gambling activity 6017525 2922783 3837359 4033433

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4633639 2466930 3434827 3812932

Scratchcards 2162540 1042510 1718023 2125711

Other lotteries 1566385 829603 1038692 1170192

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

149

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Machines and games

Football pools 281094 304507 463866 608649

Bingo (not online) 610557 270324 404813 395663

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 712837 570581 682495 746376

Machines in a bookmakers 312195 304507 475582 491544

Casino table games (not online) 343234 349653 522173 491544

Poker played in pubs or clubs 113520 153271

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

384540 177211 258560 467789

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 784311 281753 522173 769098

Betting exchange 124130 116537

Horse races (not online) 1130410 235796 440344 643329

Dog races (not online) 291468

Sports events (not online) 538815 270324 332669 689299

Other events or sports (not online) 155805 141153 359019

Spread-betting 059843 116537

Private betting 518291 360874 283536 757744

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 166321 177211 296809

Summary

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

150

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Any gambling activity 6142123 3324273 4510372 4773230

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Table 10 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6209163 5708136 5894410 5910459 5597362 5934614 4647612 5533803 5596221

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6722364 6030005 6262520 6305890 5960529 6282559 4952761 5825022 5961644

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

151

Table 11 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4282244 4298228 3598961

Scratchcards 1995277 1839055 1359311

Other lotteries 1372875 1429754 1064399

Machines and games

Football pools 277508 163664 072657

Bingo (not online) 451567 620892 522183

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 656096 526067 340283

Machines in a bookmakers 287133 199915 147071

Casino table games (not online) 335349 145687 088760

Poker played in pubs or clubs 096607 049834

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316045 254867 224818

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 753849 384907 224818

Betting exchange 105979 049834

Horse races (not online) 1008762 754369 531374

Dog races (not online) 239082 163664 096923

Sports events (not online) 490429 310339 207346

Other events or sports (not online) 124799 075251 080668

Spread-betting 050312 025545

Private betting 490429 291800 113436

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 134242 127829 064737

Summary

Any gambling activity 5732273 5738381 4790347

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

152

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4418000 4582689 4025631

Scratchcards 2105829 2065944 1674158

Other lotteries 1468467 1635933 1350266

Machines and games

Football pools 324254 244202 166214

Bingo (not online) 510128 766172 734720

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 725520 661161 517392

Machines in a bookmakers 334626 287886 271453

Casino table games (not online) 386391 222213 190034

Poker played in pubs or clubs 125227 098246

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

365702 352835 373358

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 827729 502566 373358

Betting exchange 135851 098246

Horse races (not online) 1092719 912465 745491

Dog races (not online) 282695 244202 201833

Sports events (not online) 551251 417265 350907

Other events or sports (not online) 157023 132780 178164

Spread-betting 071540 062584

Private betting 551251 395838 225242

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 167577 200103 154172

Summary

Any gambling activity 5867427 6020177 5229614

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

153

Table 12 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2792229 3230571 3559739 3440260

Scratchcards 1588487 1794312 1677146 1516730

Other lotteries 973585 1332406 1300397 1362961

Machines and games

Football pools 100467 275244 254047 203593

Bingo (not online) 319703 438844 345092 374197

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 420026 421365 530313 429061

Machines in a bookmakers 198705 128019 182413 134065

Casino table games (not online) 086254 216759 254047 168580

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

352860 233340 200193 221251

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 303246 660924 822312 604791

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 462504 518085 774924 754509

Dog races (not online) 100467 046459 121105 151252

Sports events (not online) 198705 317701 391068 292677

Other events or sports (not online) 100467 104797 103936 125531

Spread-betting

Private betting 303246 241672 354266 247898

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 079275 067552 095429 059327

Summary

Any gambling activity 4523069 4909906 5412810 5150385

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3217452 3907588 4005754 3647737

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

591819 814832 955467 716959

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

154

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3531155 3841433 3903469 3824104

Scratchcards 2210949 2309860 1950911 1813910

Other lotteries 1494319 1795766 1548645 1648188

Machines and games

Football pools 320456 522482 377799 331506

Bingo (not online) 657681 737332 486501 540297

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 795842 714974 700775 605242

Machines in a bookmakers 480575 311178 289634 241289

Casino table games (not online) 294922 441540 377799 286647

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

704018 464795 311804 353785

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 634391 1013210 1027993 808906

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 852731 837355 975507 978679

Dog races (not online) 320456 173636 211119 264039

Sports events (not online) 480575 579618 540398 442104

Other events or sports (not online) 320456 274645 188339 229855

Spread-betting

Private betting 634391 476382 497301 387042

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 282027 212298 176871 136314

Summary

Any gambling activity 5317942 5548216 5765700 5548500

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3980370 4538781 4356317 4035958

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1021521 1197914 1174485 936357

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

155

Table 13 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3695674 3916652 3715339 4020550 3665308

Scratchcards 2097067 2031186 2021718 1579579 1425222

Other lotteries 1117472 1154159 1251896 1238946 1302119

Machines and games

Football pools 202809 130988 208740 202579 222107

Bingo (not online) 358227 425267 460826 357911 317347

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 500585 524312 731955 455425 317347

Machines in a bookmakers 331904 206236 268175 160863 121980

Casino table games (not online) 186011 214760 337373 236494 230656

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

340663 189273 259613 202579 171397

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 672818 587908 613590 635899 594967

Betting exchange 065744 106679 042865 058198 113910

Horse races (not online) 755297 864165 925293 745641 649722

Dog races (not online) 112296 180838 183676 136284 113910

Sports events (not online) 446856 345241 604535 393194 291135

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

156

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 080935 067501 118494 088524 044729

Spread-betting

Private betting 279705 371799 443040 279430 239231

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120300 052494 102695 050895 082259

Summary

Any gambling activity 5276613 5592315 5416787 5617329 4945734

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4230545 4427808 4271166 4563725 4180709

Scratchcards 2558958 2463644 2495995 1999811 1813667

Other lotteries 1484713 1505614 1651034 1622613 1677494

Machines and games

Football pools 385415 274857 401597 385844 404082

Bingo (not online) 588920 658751 727642 589428 528229

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 765606 779116 1054581 711252 528229

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

157

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 555423 379126 481711 327861 264877

Casino table games (not online) 362332 390548 571997 431688 415476

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

566604 356196 470337 385844 335126

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 972237 855143 913784 929573 868881

Betting exchange 183496 239328 148824 171309 253003

Horse races (not online) 1069220 1177274 1279891 1059108 933792

Dog races (not online) 256586 344685 366853 292621 253003

Sports events (not online) 699693 559261 902903 633905 494607

Other events or sports (not online) 208186 178774 272551 220742 142685

Spread-betting

Private betting 487981 592542 705558 488452 426846

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 268522 153889 248479 158672 204877

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

158

Summary

Any gambling activity 5820098 6103118 5978704 6157312 5473096

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

159

Table 14 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3614585 3262398 3004568

Scratchcards 1637980 1707333 1654845

Other lotteries 1375741 1363414 1015146

Machines and games

Football pools 270864 193181 166022

Bingo (not online) 381984 431371 275273

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 503795 458465 449980

Machines in a bookmakers 161810 176141 199119

Casino table games (not online) 206914 210338 249667

Poker played in pubs or clubs 048888 046850 022542

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

225102 244956 275273

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 797979 604322 458858

Betting exchange 091223 069632 063876

Horse races (not online) 778883 705673 539231

Dog races (not online) 143947 134151 049405

Sports events (not online) 372668 341796 215860

Other events or sports (not online) 135062 061918 117588

Spread-betting

Private betting 335497 279923 283850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 082604 093322 078806

Summary

Any gambling activity 5379095 5107325 4730935

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1625845 3873510 3533251

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

453456 798417 683864

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

160

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3907685 3724702 3546992

Scratchcards 1867970 2087292 2106069

Other lotteries 1590703 1712903 1390311

Machines and games

Football pools 377703 349108 345783

Bingo (not online) 506364 649649 495664

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 644314 682414 719620

Machines in a bookmakers 246977 326243 392418

Casino table games (not online) 301782 371857 461470

Poker played in pubs or clubs 100137 136286 110532

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

323557 417051 495664

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 969563 855805 730675

Betting exchange 157711 173363 188798

Horse races (not online) 948696 973936 829701

Dog races (not online) 224876 268468 163402

Sports events (not online) 495698 539693 415544

Other events or sports (not online) 213780 161123 274618

Spread-betting

Private betting 452942 461896 507019

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 146348 209531 213734

Summary

Any gambling activity 5679935 5591029 5308932

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1855188 4350675 4094700

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

587617 1080722 1003999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

161

Table 15 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2651783 3729469 4064039

Scratchcards 1459465 1665503 1938147

Other lotteries 954702 1444234 1678079

Machines and games

Football pools 253038 263571 170451

Bingo (not online) 297553 362493 454205

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 433199 453700 554696

Machines in a bookmakers 148439 210476 145004

Casino table games (not online) 156996 290372 179002

Poker played in pubs or clubs 020646 066338 040707

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

182870 236932 274792

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 673162 807051 628360

Betting exchange 065583 074372 103450

Horse races (not online) 682479 854102 656091

Dog races (not online) 097998 141093 136599

Sports events (not online) 270792 508869 230904

Other events or sports (not online) 089781 192957 048153

Spread-betting

Private betting 306505 362493 274792

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 089781 090690 071294

Summary

Any gambling activity 4617434 5483635 5712319

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3516410 3957222 4232697

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

822832 910695 842232

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

162

Upper confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3036056 4134205 4518960

Scratchcards 1772839 1985414 2314018

Other lotteries 1219525 1747473 2035226

Machines and games

Football pools 403947 412462 309698

Bingo (not online) 459251 533162 664592

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 623061 641612 783637

Machines in a bookmakers 268983 345763 275271

Casino table games (not online) 280389 445558 321105

Poker played in pubs or clubs 077356 150485 120117

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314406 379204 444850

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 902154 1046957 869635

Betting exchange 152201 162416 217037

Horse races (not online) 912801 1099733 901776

Dog races (not online) 199641 255421 263719

Sports events (not online) 426121 706237 388949

Other events or sports (not online) 187894 323351 132630

Spread-betting

Private betting 470263 533162 444850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 187894 186030 169362

Summary

Any gambling activity 5043183 5893996 6163711

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3928235 4365662 4689584

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1071903 1162935 1114791

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

163

Table 16 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2484741 4372137 5276755 4915487 5374800

Scratchcards 1108981 2007129 2161887 2068953 2661741

Other lotteries 782168 1405446 1614427 1566777 1799449

Machines and games

Football pools 109794 207619 338138 338922 515747

Bingo (not online) 309779 544387 441083 364588 568919

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 272783 573503 830806 862187 1068509

Machines in a bookmakers 118618 207619 394168 477341 595632

Casino table games (not online) 066450 226639 544874 468590 640326

Poker played in pubs or clubs 033301 058073 110064 164810 256825

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

109794 283929 422295 407680 533432

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 118618 573503 1138851 1137546 1281953

Betting exchange 025408 067178 127774 172804 248473

Horse races (not online) 235999 846311 1517068 1727076 1818423

Dog races (not online) 041390 207619 300976 330401 471722

Sports events (not online) 101014 351108 792492 935181 1161056

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

164

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Other events or sports (not online) 025408 076338 199845 330401 341538

Spread-betting 017786 031240 049802 080286 198927

Private betting 101014 379989 744672 538911 775547

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 041390 113381 190751 221520 174577

Summary

Any gambling activity 3402663 5872721 6816336 6541742 7145430

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2739271 4528134 5562554 5582284 6019270

Scratchcards 1297399 2134314 2402588 2634760 3255627

Other lotteries 944783 1516298 1830969 2081660 2325544

Machines and games

Football pools 178366 254731 449447 621550 841022

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

165

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Bingo (not online) 418012 617791 566320 655617 907342

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 375075 648660 995923 1273026 1503092

Machines in a bookmakers 189525 254731 513318 801704 940375

Casino table games (not online) 121794 275702 682349 790545 995257

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075010 084356 177932 377534 502486

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

178366 338382 545142 712079 863168

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 189525 648660 1327352 1594993 1747699

Betting exchange 062920 095246 200189 389451 490922

Horse races (not online) 331926 935714 1728493 2259846 2346400

Dog races (not online) 086904 254731 406674 610161 785471

Sports events (not online) 167162 411168 954302 1359318 1609698

Other events or sports (not online) 062920 106081 287986 610161 616925

Spread-betting 050558 051203 098309 243038 420977

Private betting 167162 442273 902205 879511 1158765

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 086904 149018 277097 460200 385581

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

166

Summary

Any gambling activity 3679789 6026811 7080456 7161677 7713898

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

167

Table 17 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3494549 3880776

Scratchcards 2800592 1701792

Other lotteries 1034091 1585660

Machines and games

Football pools 405984 207566

Bingo (not online) 557456 444225

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 812186 462738

Machines in a bookmakers 353341 137215

Casino table games (not online) 301251 216477

Poker played in pubs or clubs 101963 037516

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 459092 252321

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 793825 724651

Betting exchange 035595 102887

Horse races (not online) 738878 876023

Dog races (not online) 166154 102887

Sports events (not online) 441342 343059

Other events or sports (not online) 166154 111399

Spread-betting 042443 022554

Private betting 566454 297514

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 117695 102887

Summary

Any gambling activity 5764541 5697910

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 4562254 4188547

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1052700 885515

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

168

Upper confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4053634 4241764

Scratchcards 3332315 1986745

Other lotteries 1411123 1863201

Machines and games

Football pools 663820 325240

Bingo (not online) 851218 607878

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 1154624 629312

Machines in a bookmakers 596862 235807

Casino table games (not online) 529352 336302

Poker played in pubs or clubs 250237 095830

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 730313 380349

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1133119 926642

Betting exchange 137204 190243

Horse races (not online) 1068465 1094838

Dog races (not online) 345513 190243

Sports events (not online) 708196 489341

Other events or sports (not online) 345513 201704

Spread-betting 150289 070846

Private betting 862153 435022

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 274371 190243

Summary

Any gambling activity 6328473 6059713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 5138744 4553155

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1432381 1105318

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

169

Table 18 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9077077 9211674 9517075 9593713 9685299 9812957 9864932 9545183

At risk (score 1-7) 669745 563003 327741 255052 178513 096121 059878 357875

Problem gambler (score 8+) 056035 057940 025265 033521 017067 033153

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9254336 9361084 9635040 9698734 9785404 9895338 9940122 9593521

At risk (score 1-7) 839007 704375 440212 352582 270863 175609 135068 403436

Problem gambler (score 8+) 114097 110366 063274 074520 052682 048254

Table 19 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8519860 8711536 9250440 9393184 9525060 9693782 9734680 9286154

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1032766 892188 499373 354966 259088 132731 108543 560818

Problem gambler (score 8+) 104206 099068 028010 051089 066191

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

170

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8825203 8975334 9454491 9572073 9696566 9842337 9891457 9371335

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1322780 1141419 695870 520040 419484 271299 265320 641733

Problem gambler (score 8+) 215479 197506 089099 125066 096662

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9578099 9644270 9733259 9747049 9798131 9876829 9925357 9785876

At risk (score 1 to 7) 240027 211211 132617 133917 080652 039690 149759

Problem gambler (score 8+) 005940

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9742421 9779976 9850299 9857514 9903095 9960310 9987975 9831453

At risk (score 1 to 7) 399536 344576 243894 241552 178199 123171 192924

Problem gambler (score 8+) 016832

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

171

Table 20 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower

confidence limit

Upper confidence

limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 641488 720646

Scratchcards 1140046 1241836

Other lotteries 758388 843687

Machines and games

Football pools 2839128 2981904

Bingo (not online) 1238228 1343604

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 2501922 2639279

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 3077452 3223462

Poker played in pubs or clubs 4481833 4638384

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 4342093 4498193

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 2561391 2699780

Betting exchange 4322136 4478161

Horse races (not online) 1503817 1617882

Dog races (not online) 2591132 2730024

Sports events (not online) 2978122 3122841

Other events or sports (not online) 4282224 4438092

Spread-betting 5121433 5278468

Private betting 2432562 2568673

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 3306058 3454743

Summary

Any gambling activity 699899 782206

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

172

Table 21 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower confidence limit Lower confidence limit

1 activity 160262 202119

2 to 3 activities 486195 556018

4 to 6 activities 1908236 2033261

7 or more activities 5191468 5348399

Total 699899 782206

Table 22 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9648551 9452875 9563557

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 189323 302060 182973

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 053570 103480 067396

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 012157 039731 042110

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 254548 417354 265579

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9726699 9524733 9669396

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 255518 360428 264318

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 091424 139120 120093

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032887 062907 085425

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 330222 485071 361575

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

173

Table 23 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9464299 9118712 9298723 9837688 9607037

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293250 345425 367963 068855 148376

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 103921 127950 064986 018895 042291

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 039993 095061

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 408612 508276 467966 095173 208930

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9533439 9363096 9504561 9895948 9755893

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 349103 534137 549284 117562 269095

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 138532 252683 153588 047600 115653

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062495 205743

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 473680 730515 668865 151205 348286

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

174

Table 24 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9321411 9480605 9545787 9576877 9640182

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293936 266863 20326 221189 193183

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 147161 076655 077211 051171 050955

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 059097 034342 034692 026447 004394

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 472157 360129 295883 286013 257623

Upper confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9452064 9592895 9647981 9676678 9733111

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 392991 359853 283189 305409 273638

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 220003 13036 129428 095691 096095

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 108216 072746 072015 060457 022741

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 594487 466443 390431 380487 349097

Table 25 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9543316 9616616 9408087 9174175

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

175

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259672 105609 187044 285473

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 097444

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032703 065081

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 365999 147627 235874 352165

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9595191 9765690 9689087 9537114

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 301870 212649 417188 585573

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 124153

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 048918 153365

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 415508 270443 487796 677991

Table 26 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9302879 9445046 9497357 9523320 9521257 9469934 9492898 9516849 9608043

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

272358 267204 197386 202673 189687 244778 215582 253691 180619

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

176

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

081569 080707 076948 058876 069385 086843 073820 074650 045143

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

023985 044753 029872 056980

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

386243 377595 295904 282584 288287 353966 307224 346162 242915

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9551450 9585275 9649557 9681445 9666246 9618459 9618579 9635214 9739105

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

474469 382818 316187 332992 303245 367211 313277 354455 292479

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

206588 149764 157024 137350 143928 165606 135338 133843 108395

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+)

066636 109334 083576 112215

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

619832 512170 437354 432782 424346 497717 421448 461810 369991

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

177

Table 27 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9551629 9486617 9482365

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 267865 218054 172604

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087250 083816 080596

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 023379 058161 049173

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 354644 328786 277601

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9606650 9605883 9659880

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 313905 309759 305887

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 114591 144244 178322

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 038489 109950 129900

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 407092 438830 440425

Table 28 Confidence limits

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9111018 9462725 9515756 9718238

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

312764 243504 241229 116443

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

143552 049671 086588 048311

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

065081 020491 026909

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

498432 314684 343949 178574

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9402415 9640332 9618411 9812436

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

535794 393921 324795 193039

Moderate risk gambler 306251 128609 139653 101327

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

178

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

(PGSI score 3 to 7)

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

185343 077937 059421

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

768820 482444 441935 270771

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

179

Table 29 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9155873 9425755 9528615 9701374 9703227

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 384868 250161 229556 130857 140608

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 148983 098486 063289 038633 031309

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 079863 039886 016379 009625

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 562021 379057 320660 183742 184927

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9334394 9565089 9660959 9807345 9806130

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 525552 359403 341141 220589 230170

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 242033 171423 127839 093075 079760

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 151335 090166 054885 041510

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 727964 510221 449811 287563 285740

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

180

Table 30 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9646180 9415118 9293309

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 204114 293344 311256

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 056303 111028 105447

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 013323 025937 071499

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 270312 433683 440578

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9710684 9538038 9456678

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259082 393775 439328

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087001 176397 185663

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 030014 061641 139703

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 332837 553207 589687

Table 31 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9494512 9524690 9538509

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 285425 237569 214448

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 081349 089900 087185

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 037336 037060 035420

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 380286 341334 326392

Upper confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9581575 9611167 9635965

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 358609 306719 291270

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 122875 134533 138702

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 066930 067427 070539

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 463662 422854 419182

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

181

Table 32 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9755131 9619945 9285949 9010047 8667875

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 083572 207589 375341 347399 604245

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 041367 067162 127709 125476 158387

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 025390 022545 033406 073004 059660

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 127437 293471 525814 512384 820593

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9836785 9677758 9426846 9372379 9079022

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 144664 254767 492212 633031 951836

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 086953 095269 200289 317363 362119

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062963 039910 074774 230460 201952

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 200714 348841 661474 846350 1213446

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

182

Table 33 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9099340 9548599

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 470349 230101

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 155175 091058

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 067013 029234

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 650515 334161

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9254028 9627752

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 596743 293668

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 232455 132830

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 120777 054710

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 796275 409520

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

183

Table 34 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9885967 9878118 9924628 9913695 9934834 9944198 9968002 9930092

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

056067 066401 033140 041679 024529 051489

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9943933 9933599 9966860 9958321 9975471 9983891 9996880 9948511

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

114033 121882 075372 086305 065166 069908

Table 35 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9796495 9790890 9885826 9839198 9881842 9887272 9947056 9892470

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

096118 107416 042843 075125 041388 075306

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

184

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9903882 9892584 9957157 9924875 9958612 9968144 9998118 9924694

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

203505 209110 114174 160802 118158 107530

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9946745 9937883 9924067 9952449 9963538 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9992505 9985535 9978965 9991601 9997263 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

185

Table 36 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9862701 9866674 9912713 9901984 9922588 9931413 9968002 9919365

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

072759 074941 041208 049951 032263 023300 060759

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9927241 9925059 9958792 9950049 9967737 9976700 9996880 9939241

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

137299 133326 087287 098016 077412 068587 080635

Table 37 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9749746 9767784 9873539 9815674 9869402 9874373 9947056 9870806

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129207 124241 050521 091536 048908 038907 093630

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

186

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9870793 9875759 9949479 9908464 9951092 9961093 9998118 9906370

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

250254 232216 126461 184326 130598 125627 129194

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9946745 9924651 9911158 9952449 9948608 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

028092 013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9992505 9978801 9971908 9991601 9992232 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

088842 028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

187

Table 38 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit

Upper confidence limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 085526 116894

Scratchcards 160262 202119

Other lotteries 141440 180951

Machines and games

Football pools 466841 535382

Bingo (not online) 303055 359252

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 457170 525058

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 602596 679557

Poker played in pubs or clubs 1415214 1526530

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 826715 915325

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 341456 400831

Betting exchange 1022381 1119561

Horse races (not online) 274326 327996

Dog races (not online) 670683 751436

Sports events (not online) 524945 597248

Other events or sports (not online) 1297189 1404615

Spread betting 1533366 1648318

Private betting 399228 463030

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 944042 1037939

Summary

Any gambling activity 104050 138360

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

188

Table 39 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit Upper confidence

limit

1 activity 022545 039910

2 to 3 activities 049022 073418

4 to 6 activities 255212 307119

7 or more activities 1130234 1231654

Total 104050 138360

Table 40 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9954942 9915039 9868631

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

019964 057658 076064

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9980036 9942342 9923936

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045058 084961 131369

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

189

Table 41 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9915506 9712750 9908589 9964921 9896912

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057978 153197 027297 011396 034858

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9942022 9846803 9972703 9988604 9965142

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

084494 287250 091411 035079 103088

Table 42 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9970101 9941246 9923436 9908721 9850406

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

008286 025670 037646 046856 089809

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

190

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9991714 9974330 9962354 9953144 9910191

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

029899 058754 076564 091279 149594

Table 43 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9942933 9827380 9744833 9675853

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

039650 069453 076037 069096

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9960350 9930547 9923963 9930904

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057067 172620 255167 324147

Table 44 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9854415 9910787 9857493 9913822 9892022 9920618 9839632 9937886 9942973

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

191

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

070998 040821 072334 028763 046875 032433 091573 026562 016867

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9945585 9969213 9942507 9986178 9967978 9979382 9920368 9982114 9997027

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129002 079179 127666 071237 093125 067567 148427 053438 043133

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

192

Table 45 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9939398 9855435 9809368

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041245 083629 088478

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9958755 9916371 9911522

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

060602 144565 190632

Table 46 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9740976 9908850 9917042 9960283

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

111223 027376 043368 010061

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9888777 9972624 9956632 9989939

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

259024 091150 082958 039717

Table 47 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9791533 9862827 9932436 9957659 9945326

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

122660 072826 023654 009436 016443

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9877340 9927174 9976346 9990564 9983557

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

193

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

208467 137173 067564 042341 054674

Table 48 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9958214 9902923 9814337

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

021531 050437 105447

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9978469 9949563 9894553

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041786 097077 185663

Table 49 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9921761 9909910 9906334

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045993 054365 052282

Upper confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9954007 9945635 9947718

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

078239 090090 093666

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

194

Table 50 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9924761 9926594 9901786 9744784 9760771

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

033199 049030 049850 087770 081586

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9966801 9950970 9950150 9912230 9918414

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

075239 073406 098214 255216 239229

Table 51 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9834167 9922517

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 101829 046444

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9898171 9953556

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 165833 077483

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

195

Table 53 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1271729 2945796 941041 1002800 1228218 1653678

Scratchcards 1093044 2171483 1145690 1143454 1570657 1886444

Other lotteries 1262295 2601960 885593 1426952 983242 1876728

Machines and games

Football pools 1976900 2847439 1033817 1341628 899014 933261

Bingo (not online) 1603655 2415815 931788 872323 1247152 1954492

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1517999 2034979 1352120 872323 1266097 1973946

Machines in a bookmakers 2237019 2171483 1380390 1190513 871014 1152814

Casino table games (not online) 1337847 1772444 1267479 1105867 1351490 2159024

Poker played in pubs or clubs 2731578 2690263 1099009 1171680 685457 668361

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2294993 2327774 1522123 1096479 1020778 743724

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1546529 2239824 1305066 1002800 1152603 1760254

Betting exchange 2488655 2425602 1408685 568786 1002002 1124095

Horse races (not online) 1337847 1957088 848726 669221 936408 3317233

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

196

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Dog races (not online) 2140529 2073956 839523 872323 1067781 2032342

Sports events (not online) 1938477 2611768 1267479 946779 1030171 1229504

Other events or sports (not online)

3200389 3034395 1541067 568786 349482 398246

Spread-betting 3416236 2239824 848726 1209360 611868 734288

Private betting 1366227 1898725 1211196 1134052 1114871 2295682

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 1919276 2327774 830324 1209360 917703 1808759

Summary

Any gambling activity 1027530 2464764 857936 1077713 1237684 2373874

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1648541 3279102 1304925 1338178 1569279 1934955

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

197

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Scratchcards 1448311 2475462 1538808 1496704 1945096 2181543

Other lotteries 1638032 2923845 1240773 1811568 1295516 2171286

Machines and games

Football pools 2419145 3177718 1411481 1717383 1200180 1157388

Bingo (not online) 2014617 2730483 1294245 1189419 1590249 2253307

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1920787 2332329 1770908 1189419 1611206 2273799

Machines in a bookmakers 2697484 2475462 1802439 1549372 1168326 1397217

Casino table games (not online) 1722023 2055564 1676151 1454510 1705377 2468210

Poker played in pubs or clubs 3220013 3015309 1485823 1528315 954852 863041

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2759168 2638757 1959705 1443953 1337786 947463

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1952085 2546940 1718297 1338178 1485282 2048083

Betting exchange 2964364 2740670 1833943 834759 1316659 1366017

Horse races (not online) 1722023 2250428 1197907 953723 1242592 3666828

Dog races (not online) 2594545 2373249 1187178 1189419 1390541 2335242

Sports events (not online) 2377797 2934012 1676151 1274527 1348344 1480312

Other events or sports (not online)

3708461 3370270 1980627 834759 552620 553936

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

198

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Spread-betting 3931358 2546940 1197907 1570416 868828 936926

Private betting 1753472 2188946 1612834 1486161 1443208 2611176

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 2357111 2638757 1176443 1570416 1221394 2099443

Summary

Any gambling activity 1374225 2781404 1208631 1422827 1579765 2692769

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

199

Table 54 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2115834 3842514 4426600

Once a week 2305108 2357524 1278810

Less than once a week more than once a month

1666011 563551 347431

Once a month 1069570 304294 1108443

Every 2 to 3 months 757091 485165

Once or twice a year 420816

Upper confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2839983 5195599 6362470

Once a week 3047889 3598625 2832036

Less than once a week more than once a month

2336575 1348746 1396207

Once a month 1642181 940571 2598245

Every 2 to 3 months 1259596 1230828

Once or twice a year 821370

Table 55 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1082324 4256754

Once a week 2549093 1640856

Less than once a week more than once a month

965178 285899

Once a month 1180106 931875

Every 2 to 3 months 1356433

Once or twice a year 2469937 193456

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

200

Upper confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1200336 5879558

Once a week 2712540 3004014

Less than once a week more than once a month

1077564 1068000

Once a month 1302485 2077246

Every 2 to 3 months 1486034

Once or twice a year 2631751 887818

201

Published September 2021

PHE gateway number GOV-9697

wwwgovukphe

Twitter PHE_uk

wwwfacebookcomPublicHealthEngland

copy Crown copyright 2021

Page 6: Gambling-related harms evidence review

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

5

describing poorer psychological health are less likely to report gambling participation

Again this reverses for problem gambling with higher prevalence among people with

poor health low life satisfaction and wellbeing and especially for people where there is

an indication of probable psychological health problems

The health behaviour profile for gambling was inconclusive for BMI (Body Mass Index)

status and cigarette smoking But there is a clear and strong association between

gambling at all levels of harm and increasing alcohol consumption This gradient is

evident for overall gambling participation and becomes steeper for at-risk and problem

gambling There is a particularly high level of gambling risk for people consuming 50

units of alcohol or more per week

Finally harmful gambling has a very different activity profile to general gambling It

includes low National Lottery participation and high participation in online gambling

including

bull slots

bull casino and bingo games

bull electronic gambling machines in bookmakers

bull sports and other event betting

bull betting exchanges

bull dog racing

At-risk gamblers are significantly more likely than general gamblers to participate in

online gambling

Overall demographic factors particularly sex appear to predict at-risk gambling

behaviour more than economic factors such as income employment and relative

deprivation Poor mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling than both poor

physical health and negative health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

Affected others treatment attitudes and influences and children and young people

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were found to be negatively

affected by someone elsersquos gambling Affected others are more likely to be women

reflecting the association between problem gambling and men Among affected others

immediate family members felt the most severe impacts of problem gambling

Just over 9000 people received treatment from the National Gambling Treatment

Service (NGTS) in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This represents only a small

fraction of problem gamblers in England This was the highest number of people treated

since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

6

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged The proportion of children and young people who participate in any

gambling has been reducing Boys are more likely to gamble than girls and the rate

increases with age Fruit and slot (electronic gaming) machines were often identified as

the first experiences of gambling among children and young people Playing the National

Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most common forms

of gambling reported But as the young people got older there was a significant increase

in online gambling among men

The rates of gambling among children and young people are lower than drinking alcohol

but higher than using e-cigarettes smoking tobacco cigarettes or taking illegal drugs

There is a potential relationship between these other harmful activities and gambling

Compared with children who have not gambled those who have spent their own money

on gambling are more likely to have also consumed alcohol taken drugs or smoked

either a tobacco cigarette or an e-cigarette

Discussion and implications

The main findings of this report are that

bull half the population currently gamble with 05 of the population experiencing the

highest level of harm

bull people who are classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo are disproportionately

younger men

bull socioeconomic and health inequalities persist among people classed as lsquoat-riskrsquo and

lsquoproblem gamblersrsquo

bull alcohol is very strongly associated with gambling

bull a significant proportion of the population (7) are negatively affected by someone

elsersquos gambling

The previously published sources discussed in the second part of the report vary in the

type and quality of gambling data available Gambling is a relatively new field of

research and inconsistencies in the robustness and standardisation of the publications

and data available are to be expected However all sources included are encouraging

additions to the existing body of work This inconsistency in data quality and the

absence of longitudinal data are a major gap in the evidence base to be addressed in

future research and data collection

No data here takes into account the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on

gambling behaviour Public Health England (PHE) has published a rapid evidence

review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

7

1 Introduction

11 Background and aims

Concern about the harms associated with gambling has been increasing in the UK In

response in March 2018 the PHE remit letter from Health Minister Steve Brine

confirmed PHErsquos priorities for 2018 to 2019 This included the request for PHE to ldquoinform

and support action on gambling-related harm as part of the follow up to the Department

for Digital Culture Media amp Sport-led (DCMS) review of gaming machines and social

responsibilityrdquo (1)

In May 2018 DCMS published their response to the consultation on proposals for

changes to gaming machines and social responsibility measures In it they announced

that ldquoPHE will conduct an evidence review of the health aspects of gambling-related

harm to inform action on prevention and treatmentrdquo (2)

To fulfil this commitment 2 complementary evidence reviews were undertaken

1 The National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) carried out a mapping review of

the literature on the effectiveness of national and international polices and

interventions to reduce gambling-related harms (3)

2 PHE has undertaken a broader evidence review on the prevalence of gambling and

associated health harms and social and economic burden

This report presents the findings of the quantitative analysis aspect of the work

conducted by PHE only It is one of 7 technical reports that inform the broader evidence

review The aim is to describe the prevalence characteristics associations and harms

associated with gambling as described in the scope (4) of the high-level protocol

Specifically this report aims to

bull describe the prevalence of gambling and gambling-related harms in England by

socio-demographic characteristics geographical distribution and year

bull identify the determinants of gambling and harmful gambling

12 Methods

To begin the project we undertook a search of common databases websites and other

online resources (for example Office for National Statistics NHS Digital and the

Gambling Commission websites) to see if published reports or datasets for England

were available to fulfil the above objectives We determined that this was not to be the

case So we identified datasets and official statistics that include information on

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

8

gambling by adults or children We used the HSE (for years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018)

as the primary dataset

We ran outputs from HSE to meet the objectives both on the most recent year (2018)

and the whole combined dataset where necessary All outputs have been non-response

weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE analysis since 2003 We commissioned

the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) who manage the HSE on behalf of

NHS Digital to combine the datasets NatCen calculated and appended new combined

weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc18 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb18 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication (5) we used the problem gambling

weight for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening

tools We used the self-completion weight for the rest

You can find all important information related to the data source in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the Health Survey for England series (6) Registered users can access

the separate datasets via the UK Data Archive (7)

We conducted all statistical analysis in SPSS version 25

We supplemented the outputs from HSE with findings from statistical publications and

reports available from other sources to better meet the objectives Sources include

several outputs by

bull the Gambling Commission

bull the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010

bull YouGov

bull the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH)

bull the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

bull hospital episode statistics (NHS Digital)

The HSE asks children certain questions including about smoking and alcohol but this

is not the case for gambling However we found published data to fulfil the aim to

include children in the analytic aspect of the work at least to an extent

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

9

The Gambling Commission publish an analytical report lsquoYoung people and gamblingrsquo

that explores the gambling behaviours of young people aged 11 to 16 years old in

England Scotland and Wales The survey was conducted by Ipsos MORI and includes

adolescent-appropriate application of the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of

Mental Disorders 4th version) to measure at-risk and problem gambling This source

only allows limited analysis of associations linked to gambling in children as it is only

gambling behaviour focused and does not include any health topics

This report has found the lack of health and gambling data for children to be a gap in the

data currently available However gambling behaviours in the cohort is very detailed

and includes aspects such as in-game gambling parental gambling and those following

gambling companies on social media Furthermore trend data is available We have

supplemented the results from this source with recent findings from ALSPAC

13 COVID-19

The Health Survey for England 2018 is the primary data source and the gambling

supplementary questions refer to gambling behaviour in the last 12 months The data

was published in November 2019 and the 12 month period covered by the survey

questions is 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2018 This was before COVID-19 and so

no data here takes into account the impact of the pandemic on gambling behaviour So

the term lsquothe last 12 monthsrsquo does not refer to the 12 months of 2020 when the

pandemic occurred We have published a rapid evidence review to explore the impact of

COVID-19 on gambling separately

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

10

2 Overall gambling participation

21 Introduction

This section focuses on prevalence and associations with any gambling activity in the

last 12 months (at the time of the survey year referenced most recent refers to 2018)

The HSE involves a set of questions and interviews conducted face to face in the homes

of respondents The gambling questions are completed using a self-completion

questionnaire alongside the core health questionnaire As part of this respondents were

asked whether they have participated in any gambling activity in the last 12 months and

if so what type of activity

22 Overall gambling participation by type of activity

Over half (540) of the England population aged 16 and over have taken part in some

form of gambling in the last 12 months (based on HSE 2018 (5)) This equates to almost

245 million people Gambling activity questions were first included in the HSE in 2012

and again in 2015 2016 and most recently in 2018 Since 2012 participation in any

gambling activity has reduced significantly in the England population by over 10 percent

(from 645 to 540) However the reduction between 2016 and 2018 is not

statistically significant meaning there is unlikely to have been a real change between

the 2 most recent years for which data is available

The National Lottery was the gambling activity with the highest level of participation in

England with 36 of the population taking part in the last 12 months The recent

Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that in the

individual National Lottery draws the most common games of 2019 were

bull Lotto (played by 21 of all survey respondents in the past 4 weeks)

bull EuroMillions (20)

bull Thunderball (3)

bull Hotpicks (1)

However participation in the National Lottery has declined from 525 in 2012 to 457

in 2015 405 in 2016 to 360 in 2018 This is a statistically significant decline and

suggests that the reduction seen in overall gambling participation is largely due to the

reduction in National Lottery participation Figure 1 shows the percentage of overall

gambling participation in England between 2012 and 2018 Once the National Lottery is

excluded gambling participation has stayed at the same level with 402 of the

population having gambled on some other activity in the last 12 months As shown in

Figure 1 by excluding respondents who only play the National Lottery we see a different

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

11

pattern in gambling participation This shows a pattern more resistant to change with the

rate increasing to 451 between 2012 and 2015 before reducing to 402 in 2018

Figure 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 1 Overall gambling participation England 2012 to 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Base2 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 Unless otherwise stated the base given in tables is the number of respondents who answered the

relevant question

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity Any gambling activity exc National Lottery

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

12

After lotteries the most common types of gambling activity according to HSE 2018 were

bull horse racing (not online3) (81)

bull online betting with a bookmaker (78)

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines (57)

bull bingo (not online) (45)

These were also the most common activities in 2012 the only difference being that

online betting with a bookmaker was less common in 2012

Table 2 Overall gambling participation by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 525 457 405 360

Scratchcards 187 222 203 179

Other lotteries 150 148 139 144

Machines and games

Football pools 21 26 26 29

Bingo (not online) 58 59 49 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 71 62 57

Machines in a bookmakers 24 33 29 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 35 32 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 11 08 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 28 37 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 43 72 74 78

Betting exchange 08 10 12 11

Horse races (not online) 104 111 92 81

Dog races (not online) 27 28 21 17

Sports events (not online) 38 52 51 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 14 13 15

3 lsquoNot onlinersquo throughout this report means gambling in a bookmakers by telephone or at the venue

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

13

2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Spread-betting 05 06 06 05

Private betting 46 51 41 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 18 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 645 622 562 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) 420 451 417 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 66 94 94 94

Base 6791 6755 6691 6927

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

23 Overall gambling participation by age and sex

Participation in any gambling activity was most common in respondents aged 45 to 64

(604) and least common in those aged 16 to 24 (390) The National Lottery draws

were the activity with greatest participation across all age groups except for those aged

16 to 24 years for whom scratchcards are more common If we exclude National Lottery

gambling was more common in younger age groups for many activities4

Also 94 of people surveyed participated in some form of online gambling (excluding

National Lottery) and this type of gambling is more common with younger people Online

gambling has increased in popularity from 66 in 2012 and since 2015 has remained

consistent at 94

Slot (electronic gaming) machines were the most common type of machine or game

betting Except for bingo most machine or games betting activity types were more

common among younger people particularly

bull slot (electronic gaming) machines

bull football pools

4 Itrsquos worth noting that the HSE gambling measures are derived from a self-completion questionnaire for

people aged 16 years and over However while the legal age limit for playing the National Lottery and

scratchcards is currently 16 years (as well as for some (category D) slot machines) it is 18 years for most

other forms of gambling HSE does not take this legal age discrepancy into account

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

14

bull electronic gaming machines in bookmakers (including fixed odds betting terminals

(FOBT)

bull casino table games

Online betting with a bookmaker sports betting and private betting were also more

common with younger age groups particularly the under 35s

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

15

Table 3 Overall gambling participation by age group England 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 124 324 428 471 444 368 286 360

Scratchcards 197 268 236 196 140 91 49 179

Other lotteries 49 101 144 171 189 189 176 144

Machines and games

Football pools 64 63 19 08 15 10 21 29

Bingo (not online) 49 55 53 30 41 37 51 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 97 71 53 41 13 10 57

Machines in a bookmakers 44 51 20 16 09 - - 22

Casino table games (not online) 41 63 30 17 13 - - 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 13 08 - - - - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

33 66 47 21 14 - - 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 92 159 105 77 40 18 11 78

Betting exchange 27 17 11 04 08 - - 11

Horse races (not online) 99 87 80 89 86 78 33 81

Dog races (not online) 31 26 12 16 11 12 - 17

Sports events (not online) 68 75 36 38 29 14 - 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

16

Age group

Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Other events or sports (not online) 38 27 10 11 12 - - 15

Spread-betting 17 09 - - - - - 05

Private betting 85 64 39 23 19 11 14 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 19 16 15 08 09 11 06 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 390 569 573 604 596 530 444 540

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

371 489 443 407 405 337 282 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

112 185 129 91 51 24 15 94

Base 931 1196 1140 1242 1058 875 661 7104

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

17

The Gambling Commission annual report of gambling participation (8) found that on

average online gamblers have 3 accounts with gambling websites and that 21 have

bet lsquoin-playrsquo (while the event is taking place) in the last 4 weeks Furthermore 20 of

online gamblers aged 18 to 24 had more than 5 online accounts Table 4 is taken from

the Gambling Commission report and shows online and in-person participation in the

last 4 weeks for those activities that can be accessed through multiple methods The

table shows that people playing bingo (81) and the National Lottery (73) were most

likely to participate in-person while those participating in football betting (83) sports

betting (81) and casino games (74) were most likely to do so online

Smartphones are now the most popular method of accessing online gambling with 50

of all online gamblers using their device for this purpose This continues the trend seen

in the Gambling Commission annual reports of increasing smartphone use for gambling

in recent years Younger age groups were most likely to gamble with multiple devices

while the likelihood of using more than one device to gamble reduces with age

Table 4 Online and in-person participation in the last 4 weeks (2019)

National Lottery

()

Bingo ()

Football pools

()

Horse racing

()

Sports betting

()

Football betting

()

Betting on other

events ()

Casino games

()

Online 36 24 55 61 81 83 58 74

In-person 73 81 50 49 27 26 53 47

Source The Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Figure 2 shows overall gambling participation for adults by sex in England between 2012

and 2018 Men (574) were more likely than women (507) to have participated in

any gambling activity in the last 12 months It also shows participation reducing at a

similar rate for both men and women since 2012

The difference is marked for online gambling with only 43 of women participating in

online activities compared to 147 of men Participation in online gambling reaches

284 for men aged 25 to 34 This means that of the 565 of 25 to 34 year old men

that gamble (excluding the National Lottery) half do so online

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

18

Figure 2 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 5 Overall gambling participation by sex England 2012 to 2018 2012 () 2015 () 2016 () 2018 ()

Any gambling activity men 680 655 612 574

Any gambling activity women 610 589 513 507

Base men 3042 2996 2965 3506

Base women 3749 3759 3726 3599

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Women (178) were as likely to buy scratchcards as men (181) and more likely to

take part in bingo (59 compared to 30 of men) but men had higher participation

rates in all other gambling activities The differences between men and women were

greatest for

00

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2012 2015 2016 2018

Pa

rtic

ipa

tio

n (

)

HSE year

Any gambling activity men Any gambling activity women

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

19

bull online betting with a bookmaker

bull machines in bookmakers (including FOBT)

bull betting on sports events

bull private betting5

24 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification

By highest educational qualifications participation in any gambling activity was most

common in the below degree category (588) followed by respondents with an NVQ4

NVQ5 and degree or equivalent (504) level of qualification Those with no qualification

were least likely to participate in any gambling activity (465)

There were differences by type of activity where those with an NVQ4 NVQ5 and degree

or equivalent were less likely to participate in bingo (24) Also along with people in

the below degree category they were more likely to participate in betting on horse

racing and sports events (not online) Respondents with no qualification were notably

less likely than the rest of the population to participate in online betting with a bookmaker

(23)

Table 6 Overall gambling participation by highest educational qualification England 2018

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 345 389 307 360

Scratchcards 131 218 147 179

Other lotteries 131 161 119 144

Machines and games

Football pools 14 39 23 29

Bingo (not online) 24 53 55 45

5 This excludes poker played in clubs betting exchanges and spread-betting which are all relatively low

participation activities but are dominated by men

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

20

NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent

()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 33 76 38 57

Machines in a bookmakers 13 31 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 34 30 05 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 03 10 04 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 38 14 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 88 23 78

Betting exchange 14 10 08 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 41 81

Dog races (not online) 11 21 12 17

Sports events (not online) 33 52 19 40

Other events or sports (not online) 09 21 10 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 33 46 23 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 10 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 504 588 465 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

360 456 313 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

107 109 34 94

Base 2024 3553 1313 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

21

25 Overall gambling participation by economic activity

Looking at economic activity participation by group in any gambling activity was most

common in the

bull employed self-employed or training category (647)

bull retired (523)

bull unemployed (504)

However confounding is important here as economic groups like students and those in

retirement comprise people of very different ages and previous tables have shown a

strong association between gambling and age You can find more information about the

issues of confounding later in this report in the section on at-risk and problem gambling

and in more detail in Appendix B

We based Table 7 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller employment groups

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

22

Table 7 Overall gambling participation by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 509 136 398 341 334 432

Scratchcards 246 166 84 205 205 199

Other lotteries 150 42 184 108 99 142

Machines and games

Football pools 32 43 14 21 10 27

Bingo (not online) 52 37 59 52 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 83 76 18 74 50 65

Machines in a bookmakers 37 36 04 47 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 43 43 08 22 12 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 13 19 02 11 - 1

66 The economically inactive population comprises all persons who were neither employed nor unemployed during the short reference period used to

measure current activity This population is split into 4 groups attendant at educational institutions retired engaged in family duties other

economically inactive

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

23

Employed self-

employed or training ()

In full-time

education ()

Retired ()

Unemployed ()

Other inactive6

() Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

43 26 06 44 30 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 99 56 14 49 31 69

Betting exchange 13 25 03 11 - 11

Horse races (not online) 123 57 70 80 54 98

Dog races (not online) 32 16 11 22 11 24

Sports events (not online) 64 54 14 47 18 48

Other events or sports (not online) 18 14 04 16 - 13

Spread-betting 07 06 - 09 - 05

Private betting 56 92 17 36 22 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 17 22 09 14 07 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 647 360 523 504 469 576

Base 15321 2029 5906 1796 2111 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

24

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

25

27 Overall gambling participation by Index of Multiple Deprivation

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is the official measure of relative deprivation for

small areas in England Quintiles are calculated by ranking the neighbourhoods in

England from most deprived to least deprived and dividing them into 5 equal groups

These range from the most deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally to the least

deprived 20 of neighbourhoods nationally

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile but there were differences by activity type Several activities were statistically

significantly higher in the most deprived quintile compared to lesser deprived quintiles

We saw the strongest inequality gradients were for bingo and scratchcards

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

26

Table 8 Overall gambling participation by IMD England 2018

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 325 355 382 376 358 360

Scratchcards 213 180 191 166 147 179

Other lotteries 108 131 163 162 154 144

Machines and games

Football pools 26 40 30 24 24 29

Bingo (not online) 64 50 43 37 31 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 54 57 52 52 57

Machines in a bookmakers 30 26 19 25 10 22

Casino table games (not online) 22 32 29 27 20 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 10 09 07 05 - 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

41 27 29 29 24 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 64 69 83 91 83 78

Betting exchange 13 07 08 15 13 11

Horse races (not online) 59 65 98 96 87 81

Dog races (not online) 16 15 16 27 09 17

Sports events (not online) 35 40 41 48 38 40

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

27

IMD 1 (most deprived) ()

IMD 2 () IMD 3

() IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online) 12 16 17 15 17 15

Spread-betting 05 06 04 05 05 05

Private betting 33 46 40 37 32 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 14 16 13 06 12 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 514 527 567 553 534 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

395 393 429 400 388 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

83 86 98 105 99 94

Base 1278 1528 1515 1474 1310 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

28

28 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity

By broad ethnicity overall participation in any gambling activity was most common in

the White and White British ethnic group (608) and least common in the Asian and

Asian British ethnic group (312)

We base Table 9 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of respondents

for the smaller ethnic groups

Table 9 Overall gambling participation by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 457 228 311 345 432

Scratchcards 211 91 146 182 199

Other lotteries 152 71 83 93 142

Machines and games

Football pools 26 23 32 43 27

Bingo (not online) 58 20 27 25 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

68 47 51 55 65

Machines in a bookmakers

29 23 33 33 29

Casino table games (not online)

32 27 37 33 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs

10 10 - - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

36 12 15 31 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

75 21 37 57 69

Betting exchange 11 07 - - 11

Horse races (not online)

109 17 30 46 98

Dog races (not online) 27 - - - 24

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

29

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Sports events (not online)

51 20 21 50 48

Other events or sports (not online)

14 09 - 22 13

Spread-betting 05 07 - - 05

Private betting 49 28 17 56 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 - 17 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 608 312 417 440 576

Base 23586 2043 821 688 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

29 Overall gambling participation by region

The North East (647) had the highest overall participation in gambling while London

(480) was lower than average

We based Table 10 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for each region

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

30

Table 10 Overall gambling participation by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

647 587 608 611 578 611 480 568 578 576

Base 1329 3592 2699 2332 2838 3013 4115 4442 2803 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 201

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

31

210 Overall gambling participation by local authority

Variation in gambling participation was evident by upper tier local authority (UTLA)

Discounting Rutland which has wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a

rate of gambling participation that was statistically significantly higher than average for

England The top 5 UTLAs in England with the highest levels of gambling participation

were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

For the full list of authorities included in Figure 3 see Appendix A You should note that

due to small sample sizes we have grouped together the authorities of inner and outer

London

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

32

Figure 3 Overall gambling participation by UTLA England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

211 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health

In HSE general health is self-assessed with the question lsquoHow is your health in general

Would you say it was very good good fair bad or very badrsquo There has been very little

change in the general health status of the population over the course of the surveys

with 76 of respondents reporting very good or good health in 1993 compared to 75

in 2018 (in no survey year has this been below 74 or above 76) This is the same for

respondents who gamble with 752 reporting very good or good health in HSE 2018

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health tend to gamble less (501) than

the general population and those reporting good or very good general health (580)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

33

We based Table 11 on the HSE combined dataset to increase the number of

respondents for the smaller categories

Table 11 Overall gambling participation by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 435 444 381 432

Scratchcards 205 195 151 199

Other lotteries 142 153 120 142

Machines and games

Football pools 30 20 11 27

Bingo (not online) 48 69 62 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 69 59 42 65

Machines in a bookmakers 31 24 20 29

Casino table games (not online) 36 18 13 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 11 07 - 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

34 30 29 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 79 44 29 69

Betting exchange 12 07 - 11

Horse races (not online) 105 83 63 98

Dog races (not online) 26 20 14 24

Sports events (not online) 52 36 27 48

Other events or sports (not online) 14 10 12 13

Spread-betting 06 04 - 05

Private betting 52 34 16 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 16 10 15

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

34

Summary

Any gambling activity 580 588 501 576

Base 20488 4684 1987 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

212 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction

In HSE life satisfaction is derived from the question lsquoOverall how satisfied are you with

life nowadaysrsquo This is scored and grouped low (score 0 to 4) medium (score 5 to 6)

high (score 7 to 8) and very high (score 9 to 10)

Gambling participation across life satisfaction groups was inconclusive As with self-

assessed general health the lowest group were again least likely to participate in

gambling (492) This was also true for respondents participating in the National

Lottery where 315 in the lowest satisfaction group take part compared to 363 in the

very high satisfaction group The low satisfaction group were most likely to participate in

online gambling including slots casino and bingo games (50 compared to 28 in the

very high group) but this reverses for online gambling with a bookmaker (44 of the low

group compared to 70 of the very high group)

Table 12 Overall gambling participation by life satisfaction England 2018

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 315 353 373 363 360

Scratchcards 188 204 181 166 179

Other lotteries 121 155 142 150 144

Machines and games

Football pools 18 38 31 26 29

Bingo (not online) 46 57 41 45 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 58 55 61 51 57

Machines in a bookmakers 31 2 23 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 16 31 31 22 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - 07

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

35

Low (0-4) ()

Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

50 33 25 28 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 44 82 92 70 78

Betting exchange - - - - 11

Horse races (not online) 63 66 87 86 81

Dog races (not online) 18 09 16 20 17

Sports events (not online) 31 43 46 36 40

Other events or sports (not online) 18 17 14 17 15

Spread-betting - - - - 05

Private betting 44 34 42 31 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 15 12 13 09 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 492 523 559 535 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

359 422 418 384 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

78 99 106 82 94

Base 604 937 3038 2408 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

213 Overall gambling participation by wellbeing

The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a widely used measure

of subjective and psychological functioning It was developed to capture a broad concept

of positive mental wellbeing and incorporates 2 perspectives on wellbeing (9)

1 Eudaimonic wellbeing comes from a sense of purpose personal growth and

involvement in activities

2 Hedonic wellbeing comes from feelings of joy satisfaction and enjoyment

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

36

WEMWBS includes 14 statements that cover psychological functioning cognitive-

evaluative dimensions and affective-emotional aspects of wellbeing For each statement

respondents can answer

bull none of the time

bull rarely

bull some of the time

bull often

bull all of the time

The statements are all expressed positively The responses from 1 to 5 are aggregated

to form an index which can range from 14 (those who answer lsquonone of the timersquo for

every statement) to 70 (those who answer lsquoall of the timersquo to all statements) (10)

As above for life satisfaction findings were inconclusive across WEMWBS quintiles with

the highest participation rates seen in quintiles 2 to 4 and the lowest rate seen in quintile

5 (521)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

37

Table 13 Overall gambling participation by WEMWBS quintile England 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 396 417 399 429 392 405

Scratchcards 232 224 225 178 161 203

Other lotteries 129 132 144 142 148 139

Machines and games

Football pools 28 19 29 28 30 26

Bingo (not online) 46 53 58 46 41 49

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 62 64 88 57 41 62

Machines in a bookmakers 43 28 36 23 18 29

Casino table games (not online) 26 29 44 32 31 32

Poker played in pubs or clubs - - - - - 08

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

44 26 35 28 24 31

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 81 71 75 77 72 74

Betting exchange 11 16 08 10 17 12

Horse races (not online) 90 101 109 89 78 92

Dog races (not online) 17 25 26 20 17 21

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

38

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()

Sports events (not online) 56 44 74 50 38 51

Other events or sports (not online) 13 11 18 14 08 13

Spread-betting - - - - - 06

Private betting 37 47 56 37 32 41

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 09 16 09 13 13

Summary

Any gambling activity 555 585 570 589 521 562

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 417

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - 94

Base 1281 1426 1189 1272 1375 6691

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

39

214 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12

The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) is a widely used and validated

measure of psychological health It addresses broader components of psychological

morbidity with 12 items measuring

bull happiness

bull depression

bull anxiety

bull sleep disturbance

bull self-confidence

Each item is rated on a 4-point response scale to show whether symptoms of mental ill

health are lsquonot at all presentrsquo or if present lsquono more than usualrsquo lsquorather more than

usualrsquo or lsquomuch more than usualrsquo For the purpose of the HSE we adopted the standard

GHQ coding method for each of the 4 possible responses to each item as advocated by

the test author Each symptom was scored either 0 if rsquonot at all presentrsquo or present lsquono

more than usualrsquo or 1 for symptoms that were present lsquorather more than usualrsquo or lsquomuch

more than usualrsquo (11) So using this method the maximum score for any individual

study participant is 12 No formal threshold exists for identifying probable mental ill

health with optimal values likely to be specific to the population under study However

in keeping with previous HSE surveys participantsrsquo scores are grouped according to 3

categories which are

bull 0 (indicating no evidence of probable mental ill health)

bull 1 to 3 (indicating less than optimal mental health)

bull 4 or more (indicating probable psychological disturbance or mental ill health) (10)

Continuing the trend seen before for general health life satisfaction and wellbeing

respondents scoring highest on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological disturbance

or mental ill health) were less likely (506) to participate in gambling than those who

score 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) (555)

Table 14 Overall gambling participation by GHQ-12 England 2018

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 376 349 327 360

Scratchcards 175 189 187 179

Other lotteries 148 153 119 144

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

40

Score 0 ()

Score 1-3 ()

Score 4+ ()

Total ()

Machines and games

Football pools 32 26 24 29

Bingo (not online) 44 53 37 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 57 56 57 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 24 28 22

Casino table games (not online) 25 28 34 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 07 08 05 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 27 32 37 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 88 72 58 78

Betting exchange 12 11 11 11

Horse races (not online) 86 83 67 81

Dog races (not online) 18 19 09 17

Sports events (not online) 43 43 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 17 10 18 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 39 36 38 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 11 14 13 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 553 535 502 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 404 411 381 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 100 93 83 94

Base 4193 1630 1146 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

41

215 Overall gambling participation by BMI group

BMI (body mass index) is a widely used measure of weight that takes into account the

individualrsquos height and is defined as weight in kilograms divided by the height in metres

squared (kgm2) Adults can be classified as

bull underweight (BMI less than 185)

bull normal (BMI between 185 and 25)

bull overweight (BMI between 25 and 30)

bull obese (BMI 30 or above)

According to HSE 2018 63 of adults in England were overweight or obese and

between 1993 and 2018 there has been a marked increase in the proportion of adults

who are overweight or obese

A greater proportion of respondents classified as obese (594) and overweight (569)

participated in gambling compared to those classified not overweight or obese (486)

This difference was particularly notable for participation in the National Lottery as 429

of the obese group participated compared to 284 of the not overweight or obese

group

Table 15 Overall gambling participation by BMI group England 2018

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 284 393 429 360

Scratchcards 161 182 212 179

Other lotteries 108 159 185 144

Machines and games

Football pools 32 33 23 29

Bingo (not online) 37 44 55 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 52 54 66 57

Machines in a bookmakers 20 27 20 22

Casino table games (not online) 21 36 24 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 04 10 07 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

24 30 35 30

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

42

Not overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Total ()

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 78 92 74 78

Betting exchange 10 11 15 11

Horse races (not online) 79 97 77 81

Dog races (not online) 14 19 19 17

Sports events (not online) 34 60 30 40

Other events or sports (not online) 13 25 08 15

Spread-betting - - - 05

Private betting 38 44 35 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 13 13 11 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 483 569 594 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

372 416 446 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

94 103 97 94

Base 2113 2234 1815 6927

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2018

216 Overall gambling participation by alcohol consumption

HSE has asked about drinking alcohol since it began in 1993 The proportion of adults

who have drunk alcohol in the last week has steadily reduced over the previous decades

from 67 in 1998 to 57 in 2018 Across all age groups men were more likely than

women to drink at increasing and higher risk levels (12)

Alcohol consumption is reported in units of alcohol One unit of alcohol is 10ml by

volume of pure alcohol In 2016 the UK Chief Medical Officers (CMOs) published new

guidelines on low risk drinking (13) It is now recommended that men and women should

not regularly (defined as most weeks) drink more than 14 units a week Drinking at this

level is considered to be lsquolow riskrsquo and adults who regularly drink up to this amount are

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

43

advised to spread their drinking over 3 or more days Above this level is considered to

be lsquoincreased riskrsquo For men this is now over 14 units and up to 50 units and for women

over 14 units and up to 35 units per week Men who regularly drink more than 50 units a

week and women more than 35 units are described as lsquohigher risk drinkersrsquo and are

considered to be at particular risk of alcohol-related health problems (12)

There was a clear pattern of increased participation in gambling as the number of

alcohol units consumed per week increased being most noticeable at the extremes A

total of 354 of non-drinkers participated in gambling compared to 744 of those

consuming over 50 units This trend persisted for every type of gambling activity

Table 16 Overall gambling participation by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 261 445 542 525 570 432

Scratchcards 120 207 228 234 295 199

Other lotteries 86 146 172 181 205 142

Machines and games

Football pools 14 23 39 46 66 27

Bingo (not online) 36 58 50 49 72 53

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 32 61 91 105 127 65

Machines in a bookmakers 15 23 45 62 75 29

Casino table games (not online) 09 25 61 61 80 31

Poker played in pubs or clubs 05 07 14 25 36 10

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

14 31 48 54 68 33

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 15 61 123 135 150 69

Betting exchange 04 08 16 26 35 11

Horse races (not online) 28 89 162 198 207 98

Dog races (not online) 06 23 35 45 61 24

Sports events (not online) 13 38 87 113 137 48

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

44

Nevernot in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50

()

Total ()

Other events or sports (not online)

04 09 24 45 46 13

Spread-betting 03 04 07 14 29 05

Private betting 13 41 82 69 95 46

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 06 13 23 32 26 15

Summary

Any gambling activity 354 595 695 686 744 576

Base 4572 15591 4666 858 903 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

217 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking

Since it began HSE has asked questions about cigarette smoking in adults From the

series current cigarette smoking has steadily declined from 27 in 1993 to 17 in

2018 The proportion of respondents that have never regularly smoked cigarettes

increased from 46 to 58 over the same period HSE collects information about the

use of various tobacco products including cigarettes cigars and pipes The focus of this

analysis is on cigarette use meaning we do not consider cigar and pipe use in the below

definition of a current smoker

There was little difference in overall gambling participation between smokers (605)

and non-smokers (588) However current smokers generally have a higher likelihood

of participation for most gambling activity types Most notable were

bull scratchcards (306 compared to 184 of non-smokers)

bull football pools (52 compared to 26 of non-smokers)

bull machines in a bookmakers (46 compared to 18 of non-smokers)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

45

Table 17 Overall gambling participation by cigarette smoking England 2018

Current smoker ()

Non-smoker ()

Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 377 406 360

Scratchcards 306 184 179

Other lotteries 121 172 144

Machines and games

Football pools 52 26 29

Bingo (not online) 69 52 45

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 97 54 57

Machines in a bookmakers 46 18 22

Casino table games (not online) 40 27 26

Poker played in pubs or clubs 16 06 07

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 58 31 30

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 95 82 78

Betting exchange 07 14 11

Horse races (not online) 89 98 81

Dog races (not online) 24 14 17

Sports events (not online) 56 41 40

Other events or sports (not online) 24 15 15

Spread-betting 08 04 05

Private betting 70 36 38

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 18 14 12

Summary

Any gambling activity 605 588 540

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 485 437 402

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 123 99 94

Base 1151 2840 6927

Source HSE 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

46

3 At-risk and problem gambling

31 Introduction

The most commonly used screening tools for gambling are the Diagnostic and Statistical

Manual of Mental Disorders 4th version (DSM-IV) and the Problem Gambling Severity

Index (PGSI) They define levels of gambling as (14)

1 Non-problem gambler Gamblers who gamble with no negative consequences

2 Low-risk gambler Gamblers who experience a low level of problems with few or no

identified negative consequences

3 Moderate-risk Gamblers who experience a moderate level of problems leading to

some negative consequences

4 Problem gambler Gambling with negative consequences and a possible loss of

control

Anyone scoring low risk or above are showing some signs of problematic behaviour

More specifically problem gambling is defined as gambling to a degree that

compromises disrupts or damages family personal or recreational pursuits There are

several screening tools available to identify problem gambling The HSE uses both the

DSM-IV and the PGSI

The DSM-IV was created as a clinical diagnostic tool and was not intended for use as a

screening instrument among the general population However an adapted version of the

DSM-IV for use in a survey setting was developed for the British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) series and was subject to a rigorous development and testing process

including cognitive testing and piloting The PGSI was designed for use among the

general population rather than within a clinical context It was developed tested and

validated within a general population survey of over 3000 people and the questionnaire

itself has been subject to critical evaluation and was revised in 2003 (12)

We base most tables in this section on the combined HSE dataset to increase sample

sizes wherever possible

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

47

32 Problem and at-risk gambling according to PGSI by age and sex

The PGSI consists of 9 items ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquogambling causing health

problemsrsquo to lsquofeeling guilty about gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale

These are

bull never

bull sometimes

bull most of the time

bull almost always

A score of 1 or more for PGSI indicates at-risk gambling A score of 1 to 2 is considered

low risk a score of 3 to 7 is considered moderate risk and a score of 8 or more

indicates problem gambling (12)

We have combined the low and moderate groups into an lsquoat-riskrsquo group (score 1 to 7) to

give a picture of the total risk of being a problem gambler (score 8 or more) in the

population Non-problem gambling group includes people who have not participated in

any gambling activity

According to the PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of 04 in the general

population (Table 18) The prevalence of people considered lsquoat-riskrsquo was 38 Men in

the younger age groups were most likely to experience both problem and at-risk

gambling For example 117 of men aged 16 to 24 and 101 of men aged 25 to 34

were participating in at-risk levels of gambling compared to 31 and 27 of women

respectively (these differences are statistically significant)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

48

Table 18 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

917 929 958 965 974 986 991 957

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 75 63 38 30 22 13 09 38

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

08 08 04 05 03 - - 04

Mean PGSI score 026 023 015 012 009 005 002 014

Base 3727 4547 4459 4726 3913 3186 2520 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 19 Problem gambling according to PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (inc those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

868 885 936 949 962 978 983 933

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 117 101 59 43 33 19 17 60

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

15 14 05 08 - - - 08

Mean PGSI score 043 039 024 020 014 008 004 024

Base 1889 2249 2219 2336 1928 1534 1092 13246

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

49

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (score less than 1)

967 972 980 981 986 993 997 981

At-risk (score 1 to 7) 31 27 18 18 12 07 - 17

Problem gambler (score 8 or more)

- - - - - - - 01

Mean PGSI score 009 007 006 005 004 001 000 005

Base 1838 2298 2239 2390 1985 1653 1428 13831

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

According to the PGSI in 2018 there were an estimated 168149 people experiencing

problem gambling in England This is a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 208700

Also the PGSI estimates there to have been 377242 moderate risk gamblers and

1213830 low risk gamblers in England While estimates of problem gamblers and those

at moderate risk have reduced since 2016 those estimated at low risk have increased

since 2016 (from 1094066)

33 At-risk gambling

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by activity

This section shows at-risk gamblers among all respondents who participated in different

gambling activities The base is all respondents who participated in at least one activity

(individual survey participants may be included in multiple rows)

It is worth nothing that in contrast to other gambling activities participation in the

National Lottery was very low among at-risk gamblers compared to the general

population While at-risk gamblers accounted for 74 of all gambling activity they were

significantly overrepresented for

bull spread betting (520)

bull machines in bookmakers (464)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (456)

bull online gambling on slots casino or bingo games (442)

bull betting exchanges (440)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

50

Also in 20187 overall participation in online gambling was more than double (234)

that of the general population (94)

Table 20 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 68

Scratchcards 119

Other lotteries 80

Machines and games

Football pools 291

Bingo (not online) 129

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 257

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 315

Poker played in pubs or clubs 456

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 442

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 263

Betting exchange 440

Horse races (not online) 156

Dog races (not online) 266

Sports events (not online) 305

Other events or sports (not online) 436

Spread-betting 520

Private betting 250

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 338

7 We have used the latest year rather than the combined dataset due to how much online gambling has

increased between 2012 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

51

At-risk gamblers among those

who participate in gambling ()

Summary

Any gambling activity 74

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base8 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

While at-risk gamblers account for 74 of all gambling activity they account for 527

of those participating in 7 or more different gambling activities over the last 12 months

Table 21 At-risk gamblers among those who participate in gambling by number of activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities At-risk gamblers among those who participate ()

1 activity 18

2 to 3 activities 52

4 to 6 activities 197

7 or more activities 527

Total (any gambling activity) 74

Base9 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by highest educational qualification

As we have seen before for overall gambling participation at-risk gambling was most

common in the population for respondents in the below degree category (45) This

category was statistically significantly higher than both the NVQ4 NVQ5 or degree or

equivalent and the no qualification categories

8 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 9 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

52

Table 22 PGSI risk category by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category NVQ4NVQ5 Degree or

equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

969 949 962 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

22 33 22 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 12 09 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 05 06 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

29 45 31 38

Base 7582 14415 5033 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity at-risk gambling was most common in the unemployed category

(61) This was statistically significantly higher than all groups other than those in full-

time education For overall participation in gambling prevalence was the highest for the

employed self-employed or training category This was statistically significant

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

53

Table 23 PGSI risk category by economic activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Employed self-

employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other Inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

950 925 941 987 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 43 45 09 20 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

12 18 10 03 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 14 - - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

44 61 56 12 27 38

Base 15281 1791 2023 5875 2107 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by IMD

Overall participation in any gambling activity showed little variation in England by IMD

quintile However for at-risk gambling there was a statistically significant gradient with

prevalence increasing across quintiles from least deprived (30) to most deprived

(53) This aligns with the higher prevalence seen before in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

54

Table 24 PGSI risk category by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

939 954 960 963 969 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

34 31 24 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

18 10 10 07 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

08 05 05 04 01 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

53 41 34 33 30 38

Base 5165 5362 5667 5516 5369 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by ethnicity

By ethnicity the Asian and Asian British ethnic group had the lowest prevalence of at-

risk gambling (20) This was statistically significantly lower than the White and White

British group (39)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

55

Table 25 PGSI risk category by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category White White

British ()

Asian Asian

British ()

Black Black

British ()

MixedOther ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including those not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

957 970 957 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

28 15 28 41 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

11 - - - 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 10 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

39 20 34 49 38

Base 23513 2037 816 687 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

56

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by region

The North East (49) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling while the South West (30) had the lowest

Table 26 PGSI risk category by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire and the Humber

()

East Midland

s ()

West Midland

s ()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

944 952 958 961 960 955 956 958 968 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

36 32 25 26 24 30 26 30 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

13 11 11 09 10 12 10 10 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 +)

- 04 07 - 05 - 08 - - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

49 44 36 35 35 42 36 40 30 38

Base 1325 3584 2685 2321 2824 3008 4107 4429 2794 27078

Note missing data was not available due to small counts

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

57

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by self-assessed general health

There was no significant difference in at-risk gambling by respondents reporting bad and

very bad general health and those reporting very good and good general health

Table 27 PGSI risk category by self-assessed general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Very goodgood

()

Fair ()

Bad very bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem (including people not participating in any gambling activity) (PGSI score 0)

958 955 958 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 29 26 23 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 10 11 12 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 03 08 08 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 38 38 35 38

Base 20439 4657 1978 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by life satisfaction

Results for overall gambling participation across life satisfaction groups were

inconclusive This was not the case for at-risk gambling where respondents with low life

satisfaction (62) had a higher prevalence and those with very high life satisfaction had

a notably lower prevalence (22) This difference was statistically significant

Table 28 PGSI risk category by life satisfaction England 2016 2018

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

927 956 957 977 960

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

41 31 28 15 26

10 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

58

PGSI risk category

Low (0-4) () Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) () Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()10

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

21 08 11 07 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 04 04 - 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

62 39 39 22 36

Base 1231 2064 6016 3926 13601

Source HSE 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by wellbeing

As above for life satisfaction there was a gradient for at-risk gambling with respondents

in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) having the highest prevalence (64) and those in

quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) having the lowest prevalence (23) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 29 PGSI risk category by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

Non-problem (PGSI score 0)

925 950 960 976 976 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

45 30 28 17 18 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 13 09 06 05 11

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

11 06 03 - 02 05

11 Totals differ from majority of tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

59

PGSI risk category

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()11

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

64 44 38 23 23 38

Base 3351 3772 3386 3238 3432 20193

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

problems) had the highest prevalence of at-risk gambling (51) while those scoring 0

(no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (30) This is a reversal of

the pattern seen before for overall gambling participation

Table 30 PGSI risk category by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 968 948 938 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 23 34 37 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

07 14 14 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

02 04 10 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 30 49 51 38

Base 11463 5025 3357 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by BMI group

There were no statistically significant differences for at-risk gambling between

respondents by BMI group

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

60

Table 31 PGSI risk category by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese () Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 954 957 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

32 27 25 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

10 11 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

05 05 05 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

42 38 37 38

Base 8910 8471 6378 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by alcohol consumption

As seen for overall gambling participation there was a clear pattern of increased at-risk

gambling as the number of alcohol units consumed per week increased This gradient

was statistically significant with 16 of non-drinkers gambling at-risk compared to

100 of people who consume over 50 units per week

Table 32 PGSI risk category by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Nevernot in last 12

months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to

35 ()

Over 35 to

50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 980 965 936 921 889 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

11 23 43 47 76 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

06 08 16 20 24 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

04 03 05 13 11 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

16 32 59 66 100 38

Base 4558 13678 4645 894 899 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

61

At-risk gambling according to PGSI by cigarette smoking

We saw a similar pattern for at-risk gambling as we saw for overall gambling

participation when looking at cigarette smoking Current smokers (72) had a higher

prevalence of at-risk gambling compared to non-smokers (37) This difference was

statistically significant

Table 33 PGSI risk category by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

PGSI risk category Current smoker

() Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem (PGSI score 0) 918 959 957

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 53 26 28

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

19 11 10

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+) 09 04 04

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 72 37 38

Base 4839 9660 27078

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

34 Problem gambling

Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex

The DSM-IV contains 10 diagnostic criteria ranging from lsquochasing lossesrsquo to lsquocommitting

a crime to fund gamblingrsquo Each item is assessed on a 4-point scale ranging from

lsquoneverrsquo to lsquovery oftenrsquo A score of 3 or more indicates problem gambling

According to the DSM-IV and similar to PGSI problem gambling has a prevalence of

05 in the general population Though numbers are small the younger age groups

tend to have a higher prevalence As we would expect given the higher rates of

gambling participation problem gambling according to the DSM-IV was higher in men

(09) than women (02) with the highest prevalence again seen in men in the 25 to

34 age group (15)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

62

Table 34 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

992 991 995 994 996 997 999 994

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

08 09 05 06 04 - - 06

Mean DSM-IV score 009 008 006 005 005 003 002 01

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 35 Problem gambling according to DSM-IV by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

986 985 993 989 993 994 999 991

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

14 15 07 11 07 - - 09

Mean DSM-IV score 015 013 007 008 007 005 003 009

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

998 997 996 998 999 1000 999 998

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

63

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

- - - - - - - 02

Mean DSM-IV score 003 003 004 002 003 002 001 003

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

In 2018 DSM-IV estimated there to be 223975 problem gamblers in England This was

a reduction from the 2016 estimate of 257930

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex

The proportion of problem gamblers in the population according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI included in the HSE was 05 in 2018 (this increases to 07 when we combine

HSE years 2012 2015 2016 and 2018) Prevalence was higher for men (08) than

women (03) Using the combined HSE dataset (see Table 36) prevalence is highest

in the younger age groups

As reported by HSE the proportion of problem gamblers in the population has been

reducing from 09 in 2015 to 07 in 2016 to 05 in 2018 However as numbers

are very small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with

previous years and do not represent a real decline In 2018 there were estimated to be

245634 problem gamblers in England according to either DSM-IV or PGSI This is a

reduction from the 2016 estimate of 303328

Table 36 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Age group

Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 990 990 994 993 995 996 999 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 10 06 07 05 04 - 07

Base 3739 4550 4464 4750 3927 3202 2532 27164

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

64

Table 37 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by age and sex England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Men

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 982 983 992 987 992 993 999 989

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

18 17 08 13 08 07 - 11

Base 1899 2251 2222 2355 1934 1540 1097 13297

Women

Age group Total () 16-24

() 25-34 ()

35-44 ()

45-54 ()

55-64 ()

65-74 ()

75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 998 996 995 998 998 1000 999 998

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

- - 05 - - - - 02

Base 1840 2299 2242 2395 1993 1662 1436 13867

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity

While accounting for just 12 of all gambling activity problem gamblers (according to

either DSM-IV or PGSI) account for a significantly disproportionate level of participation

in

bull machines in a bookmakers (464)

bull spread betting (159)

bull poker played in pubs or clubs (147)

bull other events or sports (not online) (135)

The problem gambler group were less likely to participate in activities such as the

National Lottery and scratchcards than the general gambling population

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

65

The problem gambler group were more likely than the general gambling population to

have participated in 7 or more gambling activities in the last 12 months

Table 38 Problem gambling prevalence according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by type of activity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 10

Scratchcards 18

Other lotteries 16

Machines and games

Football pools 50

Bingo (not online) 33

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 49

Machines in a bookmakers 464

Casino table games (not online) 64

Poker played in pubs or clubs 147

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 87

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 37

Betting exchange 107

Horse races (not online) 30

Dog races (not online) 71

Sports events (not online) 56

Other events or sports (not online) 135

Spread betting 159

Private betting 43

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 99

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

66

Summary

Any gambling activity 12

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) -

Base12 15549

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 39 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by number of activities participated in over the last 12 months England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Number of gambling activities

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

1 activity 03

2 to 3 activities 06

4 to 6 activities 28

7 or more activities 118

Total (any gambling activity) 12

Base13 15549

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification

Based on the data from HSE there is no observable difference for problem gambling by

highest educational qualification

12 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities 13 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

67

Table 40 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by highest educational qualification England 2012 2015 2016 2018

NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 990 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 10 07

Base 7599 14457 5061 27164

Source HSE 2012 2105 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity

By economic activity problem gambling was most common in respondents who were

currently unemployed (21)

Table 41 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by economic activity England 2012 2105 2016 2018

Employed self-employed or in

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education

()

Retired ()

Other inactive

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler

993 979 995 998 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

07 21 05 02 06 07

Base 15321 1796 2029 5906 2111 2716

4

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD

Unlike overall gambling participation there was an inequality gradient across IMD

quintiles for problem gambling Prevalence was greatest in the most deprived group

(12) and declined for each quintile The difference between the most and least

deprived quintiles was statistically significant We saw a similar pattern before for at-risk

gambling

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

68

Table 42 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by IMD England 2012 2015 2016 2018

IMD 1 (most

deprived) ()

IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least

deprived) ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 988 993 995 996 998 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

12 07 05 04 02 07

Base 5183 5379 5684 5532 5386 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity

Problem gambling was greater in the Asian and Asian British (11) ethnic group

compared to the White and White British group (05) The difference between the 2

groups is statistically significant Though numbers are small for the remaining groups

(with confidence intervals too wide to draw any meaningful conclusions) the data

suggests a paradox of harm regarding the Asian and Asian British group This ethnic

group is less likely to take part in gambling than the White and White British group (both

overall participation and at-risk gambling) but more likely to experience problematic

gambling than the White and White British group

Table 43 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by ethnicity England 2012 2015 2016 2018

WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

Mixed Other

()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 986 985 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 14 15 07

Base 23586 2043 821 455 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

69

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region

Even when we combined multiple HSE years numbers were small and confidence intervals overlapped when looking at

problem gambling by region

Table 44 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by region England 2012 2015 2016 2018

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler (including people not participating in any gambling activity)

990 994 990 995 993 995 988 996 997 93

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

10 06 10 05 07 05 12 04 03 07

Base 1329 3598 2655 2341 2843 3067 4022 4451 2820 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

70

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed general health

Respondents reporting bad or very bad general health had a higher prevalence of

problem gambling (13) than those reporting very good or good general health (05)

As we saw for at-risk gambling the difference between the groups was not statistically

significant but the gradient represents a different pattern to overall gambling

participation

Table 45 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by self-assessed

general health England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Very

goodgood ()

Fair () Badvery bad ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 989 987 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 11 13 07

Base 20586 4581 1954 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life satisfaction

Problem gambling continues the pattern we saw before for at-risk gambling with the

highest prevalence in the low life satisfaction group (17) This was statistically

significant Again it is important to note that this was not the case for overall gambling

participation where there was no clear pattern

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

71

Table 46 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by life

satisfaction England 2016 2018

Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Total ()14

Non-problem gambler

983 995 994 998 994

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

17 05 06 02 06

Base 1223 2049 5996 3909 13629

Source HSE 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by wellbeing

As with at-risk gambling there was a clear gradient across WEMWBS quintiles with the

highest prevalence of problem gambling in quintile 1 (lowest wellbeing) (16) and

lowest in quintile 5 (highest wellbeing) (03) This difference was statistically

significant

Table 47 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by WEMWBS quintile England 2012 2015 2016

Low wellbeing (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

High wellbeing (57 to 70)

()

Total ()15

Non-problem gambler

984 990 996 998 997 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

16 10 04 02 03 07

Base 3338 3761 3393 3245 3431 20272

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016

14 Totals differ from most tables in this section as life satisfaction question was only included in HSE 2016 and 2018 15 Totals differ from most tables in this section WEMWBS was only included in HSE 2012 2015 and 2016

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

72

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12

Respondents scoring 4 or more on GHQ-12 (indicating probable psychological

disturbance or mental ill health) had the highest prevalence of problem gambling (14)

while those scoring 0 (no evidence of probable mental ill health) had the lowest (03)

This difference was statistically significant This is a similar pattern to at-risk gambling

and differs from overall gambling participation

Table 48 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by GHQ-12 England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Score 0

() Score 1-3

() Score 4+

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 997 993 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

03 07 14 07

Base 11507 5037 3357 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group

There was little difference for problem gambling across BMI groups There was a similar

picture showing a lack of association between BMI groups for at-risk gambling

Table 49 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by BMI group England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not overweight

or obese () Overweight

() Obese () Total ()

Non-problem gambler 994 993 993 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

06 07 07 07

Base 8964 8497 6364 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

73

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by alcohol consumption

There was a clear pattern of increased problem gambling as the number of alcohol units

consumed per week increased

Table 50 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by average weekly units of alcohol consumed England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Never or not in last 12 months

()

1 to 14 ()

15 to 35 ()

36 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Total ()

Non-problem gambler 995 994 993 985 986 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

05 06 07 15 14 07

Base 4503 15575 4693 863 911 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking

There was little difference by cigarette smoking status for overall gambling participation

This changed for problem gambling with current smokers (13) having higher

prevalence of problem gambling compared to non-smokers (06) This difference is

statistically significant

Table 51 Problem gambling according to either DSM-IV or PGSI by cigarette smoking England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Current

smoker () Non-smoker

() Total ()

Non-problem gambler 987 994 993

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

13 06 07

Base 4879 9663 27164

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

74

35 Factors associated with harmful gambling

The previous sections have examined the relationships between gambling and various

other factors separately We carried out binary logistic regression models to further

investigate the different factors associated with gambling The following is a summary of

the pre-registered analysis We present the full outputs in Appendix B

To begin we conducted a series of bivariate analyses to compare a range of variables

to 3 increasing levels of gambling

1 Overall gambling participation

2 Harmful gambling (including low risk moderate risk and problem gambling)

3 Problem gambling taken in isolation

The variables included were

bull age

bull sex

bull ethnicity

bull income

bull educational attainment

bull employment

bull IMD

bull region

bull general health

bull wellbeing

bull life satisfaction

bull GHQ12

bull BMI

bull alcohol

bull smoking

Of these income region self-reported general health and BMI were shown not to be

statistically significantly associated with harmful gambling Income and BMI were shown

not to be statistically significantly associated with problem gambling

After reviewing the bivariate output we applied a multiple logistic regression to estimate

associations of socio-demographic and health factors on the likelihood that respondents

are participating in harmful gambling We excluded factors not significant at the bivariate

level from the model lsquoHarmful gamblingrsquo as discussed here includes problem gambling

and so the model takes account of the full continuum of gambling risk It is important to

note that the terms lsquolow riskrsquo and lsquomoderate riskrsquo (as used in the interpretation of the

PGSI) do not mean that risk is negligible for these respondents but rather that these

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

75

respondents are on a continuum of risk with people who have a definite problem with

their gambling This means the model includes all respondents with problem gambling

behaviours and those at risk of developing problem gambling behaviours

The logistic regression model for harmful gambling was statistically significant (p less-

than 005) The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling (see Appendix

B for more detail) and correctly classified 94 of cases but this was skewed towards

classifying respondents at no risk

Table 52 details the regression function itself and so summarises the effect of each

variable See the key below the table for the meaning of each column However the

main values of concern are the p-value and the adjusted odds ratio The p-value

determines which variables are significant (by convention this is less-than 005) and

these are highlighted in the table The adjusted odds ratio is a measurement of

likelihood that an outcome (harmful gambling) will occur given a particular exposure

compared to the odds of the outcome occurring in the absence of that exposure (see

Appendix B for more detail)

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be harmful gamblers Respondents

with below degree attainment were 18 times the odds and those with no qualifications

were 21 times the odds to be harmful gamblers compared to those with a NVQ4 NVQ5

or degree or equivalent level of attainment

Wellbeing contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on

GHQ12 Comparing those scoring 0 the odds of respondents scoring 1 to 3 were 20

times more likely and those scoring 4 or more were 24 times more likely to participate in

harmful gambling

On physical health and health behaviours smoking did not contribute significantly to the

model but alcohol did

Compared to abstainers or those not drinking in the last 12 months the odds of

respondents who drank above the CMOsrsquo low-risk drinking guidelines (14 to 35 units)

were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This increases markedly to

78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) It should be noted that the group

from HSE consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

76

Table 52 Binary multiple logistic regression model of harmful gambling variables

in the equation England 2016

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent)

- - 8609 2 0014 - - -

Educational qualification 3 groups (below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational qualification 3 groups (no qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (Least deprived)

- - 11143 4 0025 - - -

Quintile of IMD score (2)

-0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3)

0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4)

0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (Most deprived)

0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1)

- - 15525 4 0004 - - -

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2)

0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3)

0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4)

0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

77

Covariable B SE Wald df p-

value AOR

95 CI

Lower Upper

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5)

-0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Life satisfaction (low (0 to 4))

- - 4262 3 0235 - - -

Life satisfaction (medium (5 to 6))

-0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (high (7 to 8))

-0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (very high (9 to 10))

0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ score ndash grouped (score 0)

- - 15279 2 0000 - - -

GHQ score - grouped (score 1-3)

0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ score - grouped (score 4+)

0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (nevernot in last 12 months)

- - 36554 4 0000 - - -

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14)

0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (over 14 to 35)

1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (over 35 to 50)

0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (over 50)

2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020 - -

Notes Missing data was not available due to small counts Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age 16-75+ in 10 year age bands Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc) Key B the unstandardized coefficients for the model SE the standard errors for the B-coefficients

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

78

Wald the test statistic for the individual predictor variables Linear regression will have a t-test while logistic regression has a chi-square test It is used to determine the p-value df the degrees of freedom for the Wald statistic p-value determines which variables are significant By convention any variable with a p-value below 005 is significant AOR (adjusted odds ratio) the odds ratios associated with changes in predictor scores 95 CI the 95 confidence interval of the odds ratio Source HSE 2016

The broad conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly sex

appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic factors

such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a

stronger predictor of harmful gambling than both poor physical health and negative

health behaviours with the notable exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model being selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and

the method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

79

4 Gambling frequency

41 Introduction

This section considers how often people who do gamble participate in gambling

activities and to what extent Frequency is compared for respondents participating in any

gambling activity at-risk gamblers and problem gamblers This is followed by findings

from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey which combines gambling frequency with

gambling volume in terms of money and time spent

42 Gambling frequency of those who have gambled in the last 12 months

For all gamblers the most common frequency of participation was once a week (262)

followed by once or twice a year (253) This was true for lotteries with 311

participating in the National Lottery once a week 232 buying scratchcards once a

week and 276 participating in other lotteries once a week A similar picture was seen

for machines and games except for machines in a bookmakers poker played in pubs or

clubs and online gambling All these activities were slightly more likely to be played 2 or

more times a week

Most betting activities were also most frequently participated in 2 or more times a week

or once a week except for horse racing and private betting Dog racing was most

frequently participated in either 2 or more times a week (236) or once a week (222)

followed by once or twice a year (218) This differs from horse racing where 349

participated only once or twice a year This reinforces the difference between horse

racing and dog racing seen before for at-risk and problem gambling

Table 53 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities England 2012 2015 2016 2018

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 145 311 111 116 139 179

Scratchcards 126 232 133 131 175 203

Other lotteries 144 276 105 161 113 202

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

80

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Machines and games

Football pools 219 301 121 152 104 104

Bingo (not online) 180 257 110 102 141 210

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

171 218 155 102 143 212

Machines in a bookmakers

246 232 158 136 101 127

Casino table games (not online)

152 191 146 127 152 231

Poker played in pubs or clubs

297 285 128 134 81 76

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

252 248 173 126 117 84

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

174 239 150 116 131 190

Betting exchange 272 258 161 69 115 124

Horse races (not online)

152 210 101 80 108 349

Dog races (not online)

236 222 100 102 122 218

Sports events (not online)

215 277 146 110 118 135

Other events or sports (not online)

345 320 175 69 44 47

Spread-betting 367 239 101 138 73 83

Private betting 155 204 140 130 127 245

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling

213 248 99 138 106 195

Summary

Any gambling activity

119 262 102 124 140 253

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

81

2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a

week more than once a month ()

Once a month

()

Every 2 to 3 months

()

Once or twice a year ()

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

- - - - - -

Base16 1342 2961 1147 1403 1581 2853

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

43 Gambling frequency of at-risk and problem gamblers

As we would expect gambling frequency increases as the level of gambling risk

increases Almost a quarter of low risk gamblers gamble 2 or more times a week and

this increases to 451 of moderate risk gamblers and 541 of problem gamblers

Respondents who are considered problem gamblers according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI 507 gamble 2 or more times a week compared to 114 of non-problem

gamblers

Table 54 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for at-risk gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 246 451 541

Once a week 266 294 194

Less than once a week more than once a month

198 88 71

Once a month 133 54 173

16 Base here is the number of respondents who spent money on 1 or more gambling activities minus those who did

not answer the frequency question

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

82

Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

Every 2 to 3 months 98 78 -

Once or twice a year 59 - -

Base 541 204 98

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Table 55 Frequency of spending money on gambling activities for problem gamblers England 2012 2015 2016 2018

Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 114 507

Once a week 263 225

Less than once a week more than once a month

102 56

Once a month 124 141

Every 2 to 3 months 142 -

Once or twice a year 255 42

Base17 11146 142

Note missing data was not available due to small counts Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

44 Regular gambling and gambling volume

Although it is not as recent as the HSE 2018 the 2010 British Gambling Prevalence

Survey (BGPS) (15) includes more detail than the HSE on certain issues relevant to the

aims of this review In particular the BGPS offers additional data on gambling frequency

(lsquoregularrsquo gambling or days per month) and gambling volume (money time spent) While

a summary is useful for the objectives of this report itrsquos worth noting that the gambling

17 The base for problem gamblers in Table 55 is respondents categorised as a problem gambler according to either

DSM-IV or PGSI This is the conventional approach and that taken throughout the section before focusing on problem

gambling This differs from the base for Table 54 which is respondents categorised as problem gamblers according to

PGSI only This difference is necessary as only PGSI allows the further breakdown into low and moderate risk that

Table 54 requires

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

83

landscape has changed considerably since 2010 particularly issues relating to online

gambling

The BGPS included questions to measure gambling volume among regular gamblers18

based on the amount of time spent gambling in an average month and the amount of

money spent on gambling in an average month This detail is not possible from the HSE

When looking at time spent on gambling the BGPS made a cut-off for analysis purposes

to capture the top 10 of regular gamblers This cut-off was around 7 hours per month

gambling (with a mean for the group of 310 hours per month) The other 90 of regular

gamblers either did not spend any time gambling or generally spent less than 7 hours a

month gambling (with a mean of 30 minutes per month) The BGPS labelled these

groups lsquohigh-timersquo and lsquonon high-timersquo gamblers respectively

When looking at money spent on gambling the BGPS cut-off for the top 10 of regular

gamblers was around pound6150 per month on gambling (with a mean of pound20992 per

month) The remaining 90 of regular gamblers spent less than this amount (with a

mean of pound1482 per month) The BGPS labelled these groups lsquohigh-spendrsquo and lsquonon

high-spendrsquo gamblers respectively As a summary of gambling volume that considers

both time and money spent the BGPS provides 4 possible sub-groups of regular

gamblers These are respondents who were

bull non high-time and non high-spend gamblers (85)

bull high-time but non high-spend gamblers (4)

bull high-spend but non high-time gamblers (4)

bull high-time and high-spend gamblers (6)

Most (85) regular gamblers were both non high-time and non high-spend gamblers Of

the remainder the BGPS found 4 were high-time but not high-spend and another 4

were high-spend but not high-time gamblers It also found 6 were both high-time and

high-spend gamblers

Non high-time and non high-spend gamblers took part in 25 gambling activities in the

past year In comparison high-time only gamblers took part in 40 gambling activities in

the past year and high-spend only gamblers took part in 52 activities High-time and

high-spend gamblers had the highest levels of gambling participation taking part in 66

gambling activities

18 Respondents who gambled once a month or more

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

84

Compared to all regular gamblers the high-time and high-spend group were more likely

to

bull be from semi-routine or routine households19

bull live in areas of greatest deprivation

bull have no educational qualifications

bull be slightly more likely to live in the lowest income households

bull be unemployed (they were much more likely to be unemployed)

Along with the high-time only gamblers this group experiences the greatest

socioeconomic deprivation

19 Based on The National Statistics Socio-economic classification (NS-SEC)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

85

5 Hospital admissions

51 Introduction

This section presents the number of hospital admissions due to gambling from NHS

Digitalrsquos hospital episode statistics (HES) These statistics detail all admissions

outpatient appointments and AampE attendances at NHS hospitals in England We use

figures from finished admission episodes (FAEs) with a primary or secondary diagnosis

as classified by the International Classification of Diseases (10th revision) (ICD-10) of

bull ICD-10 F630 Pathological Gambling

bull ICD-10 Z726 Gambling and Betting

52 HES admissions due to gambling

Across England there were 375 admissions to hospital because of gambling in 2018 to

2019 Over the previous 3 years admissions have increased but compared to other

causes numbers20 remain very small

Table 56 Number of FAEs with a primary or secondary diagnosis relating to gambling by age group England between 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019

Age group 2016 to 2017 2017 to 2018 2018 to 2019

lt20 lt10 lt10 lt10

20 to 29 75 90 115

30 to 39 70 105 120

40 to 49 60 50 60

50 to 59 40 50 55

60+ 20 25 20

Total (will not sum due to rounding) 260 325 375

Source Hospital episode statistics (HES) NHS Digital 2020

20 Numbers are too small relative to all hospital admissions to calculate meaningful rates

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

86

6 Previously published sources of gambling data

This section of the report collates information on gambling previously published

elsewhere The purpose is to meet aspects of the objectives not fulfilled by the primary

data source Topics include

bull affected others

bull treatment

bull attitudes and influences

bull children and young people

The published sources discussed in the rest of the report vary in the type and quality of

gambling data available Gambling is relatively new field of research Inconsistencies in

the robustness and standardisation of the publications and data available are to be

expected However all sources included here are encouraging additions to the existing

body of work and one of the recommendations of the review is to encourage further

research and analysis in this area

We discuss the methods and caveats of each source in the introduction to each topic

61 Affected others

Introduction

A recent report published by YouGov (16) on behalf of GambleAware included a detailed

section on lsquoaffected othersrsquo The report defines lsquoaffected othersrsquo as

ldquohellippeople that know someone who has had a problem with gambling (either

currently or in their past) and feel they have personally experienced negative

effects from this person (or peoples) gambling behaviour This could include

family members friends and work colleagues among others with the negative

effects ranging from financial to emotional or practical impactsrdquo

The BGPS included some analysis of affected others in 2010 but the YouGov report

represents the most recent data available on affected others currently available The

source is not as robust as the HSE (which is designed to be representative of the

population by adopting a multi-stage stratified probability sampling design based on

postcode sectors) but does have a very good sample size of around 12000

respondents of which 7 are affected others

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

87

The main difference between the HSE and the YouGov survey is the sampling method

(probability vs non-probability) The difference in mode is also important (face-to-face

vs online) YouGov describe the survey as nationally representative but this is unclear

These differences may account for the fact that the headline prevalences do differ

somewhat from HSE21 in that YouGov finds 13 of the population experience gambling

harm (PGSI score of 1+) compared to a figure of 4 on the combined HSE This is a

significant difference

An independent report by the London School of Economics (LSE) (17) evaluates the

differences between the sources It concludes that HSE may under-estimate gambling

harm by requiring a residential address and YouGov may over-estimate harm by

excluding offline people The conclusion drawn by LSE is that it is credible that the level

of harm is probably somewhere between the 2 reported figures

The LSE report does offer a level of scrutiny and transparency but it is important to note

when reading the following section that the YouGov report itself has not been peer

reviewed and there is a lack of conclusions drawn and references to other published

work on the subject Furthermore the report does not specify the time frame of the PGSI

questions The HSE is clear that the PGSI is based on the respondentsrsquo activities over

the last 12 months We could assume that YouGov also covered the last 12 months but

this is not clear from the publication If YouGov did not specify the last 12 months then

respondents might have assumed the questions could apply to an earlier time which

would increase the prevalence of harm Particularly relevant to this section it is also

unclear how YouGov arrived at the 7 affected others prevalence figure due to the

complexity of how the report combines phases 1 and 2 of the study as it does not

include this information

However the affected others section of the YouGov report is the most detailed

contribution to the subject currently available and taking into account the above

caveats adds value to the present review

Prevalence of affected others

YouGov finds that 7 of the total adult population of Great Britain were affected others

The findings also reveal that the likelihood of being an affected other increases with

PGSI score Among gamblers 20 of problem gamblers (according to PGSI) were

affected others compared to 13 of moderate risk gamblers and 9 of low risk

21 We do not compare this to HSE exactly but rather the health surveys of England Wales and Scotland combined

Here we refer to it as HSE for simplicity and consistency

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

88

gamblers The report suggests that this shows the complex relationship between a

personrsquos own gambling and the issues relating to other peoplersquos gambling

Affected others were more likely to be women (57) than men (43) which reflects the

fact that problem gambling is much more associated with men There is little variation by

age but affected others were slightly more likely to be social class CD2E22 and less

likely to be White British

Type of affected others

Affected others were most likely to be negatively affected by a gambling problem of

someone in their immediate family (61) This is most commonly a spouse or partner

(25) followed by a parent (21) Women (71) were more likely than men (44) to

be negatively affected by the gambling of someone in their immediate family Women

were also much more likely to be affected by their spouse or partner (35 of women

compared to 9 of men)

Due to their age younger (18 to 24) affected others were most likely to have been

affected by the gambling of a parent Older affected others (55 and over) were most

likely to have been affected by the gambling of a child

Importantly people who were both affected others and problem gamblers were more

likely to have been negatively affected by the gambling problem of a child (15)

implying that gambling has profound impacts on the family as a whole Problem

gamblers were also more likely than average to say they have been negatively affected

by a non-immediate family member or work contact suggesting that gamblers were

more likely to socialise with other gamblers

Severity of impact upon affected others

Among affected others the most severe impacts of gambling were felt most by

immediate family members Figure 4 shows the severity of impact by type of affected

other in Great Britain in 2019 It presents the results from the YouGov report on severity

of impact by percentage into either minor moderate or severe The figure shows that

almost half (48) of affected others that were affected by a spouse or partner report a

severe negative impact This is followed in severity by the gambling of a parent (41)

22 Social class definition

AB higher and intermediate managerial administrative and professional workers C1 supervisory clerical and junior

managerial administrative and professional workers C2 skilled manual workers D semi-skilled and unskilled

manual workers E people on long term state benefits casual and lowest grade workers unemployed with state

benefits (including pension) only

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

89

and a child (38) A lower proportion of affected others reporting a severe negative

impact were due to friends The report suggests that the type and closeness of the

relationship plays an important role in determining the severity of the negative impact

experienced by affected others

Figure 4 Severity of impact by type of affected other Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling treatment and support YouGov 2019

The most significant type of impact reported by affected others was an inability to trust

the problem gambler (62) This was followed by

bull feelings of anger towards them (53)

bull anxiety (40)

bull a breakdown of communication (40)

bull reduced income for household running costs such as food rent and bills (38)

Women were more likely to have experienced all the negative impacts of being an

affected other with 81 reporting depression anxiety and anger towards the problem

gambler compared to 64 of men Women were also more likely to have experienced

financial impacts (67 of women compared to 48 of men)

Advice and support

YouGov found that most (64) affected others have not sought advice or support on

behalf of the problem gambler and an even greater proportion (72) have not sought

help for themselves as an affected other When affected others do seek advice and

0 20 40 60 80 100

Other workcolleague

Friend

Sibling

Other familymember

Child

Parent

Spousepartner

Percent reporting severity of impact ()

Severe Moderate Minor

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

90

support either for themselves or for the problem gambler it is most likely from less formal

sources This included seeking help from

bull a friend or family member (19)

bull a spouse or partner (11)

bull gambling support websites (11)

For more formal sources of advice and support 12 report seeking help from mental

health services and 8 from a GP Also 5 report seeking help from another addiction

service (for example a drugs or alcohol service) again highlighting the complexity of

addiction

Concern for the safety or wellbeing of the problem gambler or family members (65) is

the most common reason affected others seek advice and support Over half (57) of

affected others report not knowing how to deal with gambling and its impacts as the

reason for seeking help A similar proportion (54) sought advice due to a relationship

or family being affected by gambling or due to mental health problems (51) Though a

lower significant proportion (34) report being prompted by a severe negative impact

such as risk of losing employment risk of losing their home or criminal proceedings

YouGov concluded that there is an evident demand for advice and support among

affected others with almost half (48) reporting a need for such help whether for

themselves their spouse or partner a family member friend or colleague

The most reported barrier to seeking advice or support was that the person does not

consider their gambling to be a problem (43) The next most common reason is the

belief that gambling treatment would not be helpful or be effective (40) A further 14

reported feeling embarrassed or ashamed to ask for advice or support or that they would

not want others to find out socially or professionally

62 Treatment

Introduction

This section draws on published reports from Gambleaware The National Gambling

Treatment Service (NGTS) is a network of organisations providing treatment and

support for people experiencing gambling-related harms It is free to access across

England Scotland and Wales GambleAware commissions the NGTS and it is funded

through voluntary contributions from the gambling industry

GambleAware publish annual statistics (18) covering the treatment activity of the NGTS

and this is the source of the following summary The annual statistics cover treatment

provided by GamCare and its partner network Gordon Moody Associates and the

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

91

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) This represents most of the treatment provision for gambling in the UK although

there are other providers emerging in the public sector and third sector as a result of

policy changes in England Scotland and Wales23

Treatment provided (19)

GamCare offers

bull online treatment supported by regular contact with a therapist that people can access

at a time and place convenient for them over the course of 8 weeks

bull one-to-one in person online and telephone therapeutic support and treatment for

people with gambling problems as well as affected others

bull group based gambling recovery courses delivered face-to-face or online for between

6 to 8 weeks

bull the National Gambling Helpline which provides immediate telephone and online live

chat support and referral into the treatment service

bull information and advice via their website moderated forums and online group

chatrooms24

Gordon Moody Association offers

bull two specialist residential treatment centres providing an intensive programme for men

with a gambling addiction over a period of 14 weeks

bull specialist relapse prevention housing for people who have completed the treatment

programmes but need additional recovery support

bull retreat and counselling programmes for women or men-only groups that combine

short residential stays with at-home counselling support

Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (London Problem Gambling

Clinic) offers treatment for gambling problems This treatment is especially for people

bull with more severe addictions

bull with co-morbid mental and physical health conditions

bull with impaired social functioning

bull who may come to treatment with more risk such as risk of suicide

23 The NHS Northern Gambling Service provided by Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

has not been open for one full reporting year at time of publication So it is not included in the annual

statistics for 2019 to 2020 Further regional NHS led clinics are being established as part of the NHS Long

Term Plan 24 Data from these services are not included in the annual statistics publication

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

92

GambleAware funded treatment providers are required to submit quarterly datasets in a

standardised format The annual statistics publication presents the analysis of these

submissions As of 2020 there is an additional service as part of the NGTS However

this new service the NHS Northern Gambling Service was not operational in 2019 to

2020 so we have concentrated on the 3 service providers for which there is published

data available

Socio-demographic profile of people in treatment

The NGTS treated just over 9000 people in Great Britain during 2019 to 2020 This is

the most people treated since the NGTS began in 2015 to 2016 (5909) For reference

this review has previously estimated there to be around 245600 problem gamblers in

England (according to PGSI or DSM-IV) Almost a quarter (23) of people treated in

2019 to 2020 had been seen before by the service

Most people treated were gamblers (84) while 13 of referrals related to affected

others This is less than the estimate of affected others among the problem gambling

population (20) suggesting a certain level of unmet need for this group As we can

expect from previous sections of this review affected others were more likely to be

women

Most people treated were men (75) and a greater proportion are from the younger age

groups This corresponds to the prevalence of problem gambling in the population

However there has been an overall small increase in the proportion of women being

treated increasing from 19 in 2015 to 2016 to 25 in 2019 to 2020

Table 57 Age and sex of people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Age group lt20 ()

20-24 ()

25-29 ()

30-34 ()

35-39 ()

40-44 ()

45-49 ()

50-54 ()

55-59 ()

60+ ()

Men 12 112 216 217 157 95 75 52 34 30

Women 05 48 136 159 161 120 85 104 90 91

All people in treatment

10 96 196 202 158 101 78 65 48 45

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Most people in treatment were employed (75) with the next most reported category

being unemployed (9) Given the unemployment rate in the UK was around 4 in

2019 we can expect a higher proportion of people in treatment to be unemployed given

previous findings that problem gambling is highest in the unemployed category

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

93

On average people in treatment reported problem gambling starting at the age of 24

years although this was highly variable Three-quarters reported problem gambling

starting by the age of 32 years and one-quarter by the age of 19 years At the point of

coming to treatment services people had typically been problem gambling for an

average of 10 years

Gambling profile of people in treatment

A large proportion of people in treatment (58) participated online for their primary

gambling activity followed by bookmakers (27) No other locations were used by more

than 10 of people in treatment For online activities gambling on casino slots was the

most common activity (38) followed by sporting events (37) and casino table games

(27) For bookmakers gaming machines were the most common form of gambling

(53) followed by sporting events (31) and horse racing (24)

The most notable difference in gambling activity for peopl in treatment between 2015 to

2016 and 2019 to 2020 has been the increase in online gambling (from 57 to 69)

This has happened alongside the reduction in the proportion using bookmakers (from

56 to 38)

About 12 of people in treatment had suffered a job loss as a result of their gambling

and 26 had suffered a relationship loss through their gambling Almost a third (29) of

people in treatment had no debt due to gambling at the time of assessment But a

quarter had debts up to pound5000 and 45 had debts over pound5000 or were bankrupt or in

an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA)

Over half of people in treatment (54) spent up to pound100 per day gambling in the 30 days

before assessment The NGST annual statistics also found

bull 16 spent between pound100 and pound200

bull 18 spent between pound200 and pound500

bull 15 spent over pound500

On average (mean) people in treatment reported spending pound2102 on gambling in the

30 days before assessment

Average (mean) money spent on gambling days was highest among people using

casinos (pound544) and online services (pound435) The mean spend can be affected by outliers

(extreme individual values) but even using the median people using casinos still had the

highest average daily spend (pound200) Average monthly spend was again very high for

people using casinos followed by adult entertainment centres and online services

However monthly spend was also high for bookmakers and bingo halls especially

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

94

compared to daily spend The report suggests that using these services often

contributes to a high monthly spend

Table 58 Average money spent on gambling by people treated in the National Gambling Treatment Service (NGTS) Great Britain 2019 to 2020

Average spend per gambling

day (pound) Average spend in past

month (pound)

Mean Median Mean Median

Bookmakers 295 100 1785 1000

Bingo hall 210 100 1007 775

Casino 544 200 2973 1000

Live events 170 45 974 600

Adult entertainment centre

241 100 2807 640

Family entertainment centre

136 100 737 600

Pub 212 100 1519 700

Online 435 100 2145 1000

Miscellaneous 324 100 1467 575

Private members club 160 50 1777 700

Other 265 52 2038 600

Source Annual statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great Britain) 2020

Access and outcomes

The overwhelming majority of people (902) self-referred to the NGTS This was

distantly followed by prisons (29) other service or agency (27) and GPs (15)

For people treated during 2019 to 2020 50 were seen within 3 days and 75 within 8

days Waiting times for residential services were higher with 50 of people seen within

3 and a half months

During 2019 to 2020 there was an average of 7 appointments per person and this was

similar for both problem gamblers and affected others Treatment lasted on average 8

weeks with a quarter of people receiving treatment for 3 weeks or less Half of all people

receiving treatment did so for between 3 and 15 weeks and a quarter received treatment

for over 15 weeks Treatment was slightly shorter for affected others and for those in

residential centres was generally longer (an average of 13 weeks)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

95

Between 2015 to 2016 and 2019 to 2020 the proportion of people completing treatment

increased from 59 to 69 while the proportion dropping out of treatment decreased

from 35 to 24 Affected others were more likely to complete treatment than problem

gamblers (80 compared to 66) Overall women were more likely to complete

treatment than men but when limited to just problem gamblers female problem

gamblers were slightly less likely to complete treatment (64 compared to 67 of male

problem gamblers) Also people who were unemployed were considerably more likely

than the average to drop out of treatment (32) and less likely to complete treatment

(61)

As expected almost all (94) people receiving treatment were defined as a problem

gambler according to PGSI The mean PGSI score for people in treatment was 20

markedly higher than the threshold of 8 required for the problem gambler definition

During 2019 to 2020 this proportion had reduced to 40 while PGSI scores had

improved for most people in treatment (75) Those defined as problem gamblers were

most likely to improve by 10 to 18 points (31) with a further 26 improving by 20 to 27

points

63 Attitudes and influences

Introduction

The Gambling Commission has been tracking public perceptions of gambling since

2010 These attitudes and what influences gambling behaviours are the subject of this

section The primary source is the Gambling Commission annual report series

lsquoGambling participation behaviour awareness and attitudesrsquo (20) The Gambling

Commission collects data via a combination of telephone and online surveys This is

supplemented by tables from the HSE

The telephone survey provides the main measure of past 4 week gambling participation

with waves conducted quarterly in March June September and December to reduce

the effect of seasonal variations in gambling behaviour The Gambling Commission

conducts about 1000 interviews each quarter from a survey sample generated through

Random Digit Dialling (RDD)25 of Great Britain phone numbers The sample is subject to

quotas to ensure it is as nationally representative as possible Respondents are

screened to ensure they are 16 or over and fit in remaining unfilled quotas Quotas are

set based on age sex religion and social grade Data is weighted to be representative

25 Random Digit Dialling (RDD) is a method for sampling of telephone surveys which involves the random generation

of telephone numbers

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

96

of the adult population with weights set based on the National Readership Survey (a

face-to-face random probability sample)

The Gambling Commission uses the online survey to monitor online gambling

behaviour The survey was launched after the government introduced regulation of

overseas gambling companies transacting with customers in Great Britain (in-line with

the Gambling (Licensing and Advertising) Act 2014) The online survey sample is

sourced through a panel and the sample is subject to quotas in-line with those used for

the telephone survey Also data is weighted for analysis in-line with the methods used

for the telephone survey

Public perception of gambling

Considering the public perception of gambling back to 2010 gamblersrsquo attitudes are more positive than non-gamblers but the gap has reduced significantly in recent years (Figure 5) The proportion of gamblers and non-gamblers who think that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted has reduced gradually over the past 10 years

Figure 5 Respondents who agree that gambling is conducted fairly and can be trusted Great Britain 2010 to 2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

All respondents Gambled in past 12 months

Not gambled in past 12 months

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

97

The views of gamblers were also sought on the most important factors when selecting a

company to gamble with The most important factor was having the best odds (26)

followed by the company having

bull a fair and trustworthy reputation (24)

bull bonus offers (15)

bull a recognisable brand name (14)

The Gambling Commission survey asked respondents about a series of attitudinal

statements taken from the Attitudes Towards Gambling Scale (ATGS-8) (a validated

scale to assess gambling attitudes among the general population originally developed

for the 2007 BGPS) From this 82 of respondents in 2019 agreed that there were

currently too many opportunities for gambling (a 3 increase from 2018) while 73

agreed that gambling is dangerous for family life In 2019 we also saw an increase in

the proportion saying that gambling should be discouraged (up to 62 from 58 in

2018) and a significant reduction in respondents agreeing that ldquogambling livens up liferdquo

(down to 26 from 28 in 2018)

Awareness of gambling

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey asks whether gamblers

follow a gambling company on social media Overall 23 of respondents followed a

gambling company on either Facebook Twitter YouTube Snapchat or Instagram in

2019 Facebook (17) was the most popular social media platform in which gamblers

follow gambling companies and despite a decrease over recent years this has been the

case since 2015 This is followed by

bull Twitter (8)

bull YouTube (6)

bull Instagram (5)

bull Snapchat (2)

These figures are consistent with the Adultrsquos Media Use and Attitudes Report (21) which

identifies Facebook as the most popular social media platform with use decreasing since

2017

Overall 86 of respondents have ever seen or heard any gambling advertisements and

82 have ever seen or heard any gambling sponsorship A higher proportion of men

(89) than women (83) have seen or heard gambling advertisements Also compared

to the 2018 survey we saw a decrease in the visibility of gambling sponsorships among

those aged 25 to 34 years (77 in 2019 compared to 82 in 2018)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

98

Gambling management tools

The Gambling Commissionrsquos gambling participation survey also asks about wider issues

of self-exclusion and gambling management tools

If a gambler considers themselves to be spending too much time or money gambling

either online or in person they can request to be self-excluded from a gambling

company or can self-exclude from multiple operators Figure 6 shows the percentage of

gamblers who have self-excluded from gambling activities through a gambling

management tool and whether they were aware of these tools In 2019 5 of gamblers

have ever self-excluded which is a slight reduction from 6 in the previous 4 years The

proportion The proportion of gamblers who had not self-excluded but were aware of

self-exclusion increased steadily from 29 in 2015 to 42 in 2019 The proportion of

gamblers who were not aware of self-exclusion reduced from 65 in 2015 53 in 2019

Figure 6 Gamblersrsquo awareness and use of self-exclusion Great Britain 2015-2019

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Among gamblers in 2019 more men (6) have self-excluded than women (4) while

those aged 25 to 34 have the highest self-exclusion rates (9) Other management

tools used were

bull setting financial limits (9)

6 6 6 6 5

2937 35

41 42

6557 58

53 53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Self-excluded Not self-excluded but aware Not self-excluded and not aware

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

99

bull time out (3)

bull reality check (3)

bull exclusion by product (2)

Table 59 Use and awareness of gambling management tools Great Britain 2019

Self-exclusion

() Exclusion by product ()

Time out ()

Financial limits ()

Reality check ()

Used 5 2 3 9 3

Aware but not used

42 24 34 49 27

Not aware 53 74 63 42 70

Source Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes annual report 2020

Compared to the previous year the Gambling Commission reported an increase in the

proportion of respondents seeing information about where to seek help to control

gambling (40) in 2019 They also reported a decrease in respondents seeing

information on whether a machine is random or compensated26 (6)

Overall 20 of gamblers have ever read the terms and conditions provided by a

gambling operator The proportion of respondents who have not read terms and

conditions but were aware they are available was 62 while 18 were not aware terms

and conditions are available Women (22) and those aged 65 or over (30) were

more likely to be unaware of terms and conditions

64 Children and young people

Introduction

This section focuses on gambling prevalence among children and young people The

legal gambling age in the UK is 18 and this includes both gambling in person and

online Historically the exception was the National Lottery but the government plans to

26 All gambling machines have a return to player rate that dictates how frequently they are likely to pay

out For random machines and online slots this is typically based on a random number generator

meaning it is totally random whether the machine hits this number and pays out In contrast the likelihood

of a compensated machine paying out is based on previous plays The most common example is a fruit

machine which is more likely to pay out the more money it has taken (this is necessary as they can only

physically hold a certain number of coins)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

100

raise this from 16 to 18 no later than October 2021 following the announcement of the

Review of the Gambling Act 2005 (22)

The primary source used is the Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and

Gambling Survey A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo (23) We

supplement this with information from the Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) report

lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) as well as the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) (25)

The Gambling Commission series lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey A research

study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo is conducted as part of Ipsos MORIrsquos

annual Young People Omnibus (YPO) and examines gambling behaviours such as

where young people gamble and with whom perceptions of gambling and awareness of

gambling advertising The survey also asks a series of questions relating to potential

issues associated with gambling and uses the DSM-IV-MR-J2 problem gambling screen

to classify gamblers as low risk moderate risk or problem gamblers The survey is

conducted in schools with pupils completing online self-completion surveys in class

Data is weighted by sex age and region

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo used a mixed methods approach comprising of a

series of 6 focus groups with a total of 79 young people across England Scotland and

Wales It also included a survey conducted through Survey Monkey and promoted

through social media which 1025 young people responded to The ethnicity and

geographical region of the respondents was fairly representative of the UK population

However most take-up in the survey was by boys (83) which is not representative of

the general population That said the authors quote studies that have found boys to

have significantly higher participation rates in games most heavily associated with loot

boxes and skin betting such as the FIFA series and Fortnite

ALSPAC is a longitudinal study of young peoplesrsquo gambling between 17 and 24 years

using a contemporary UK cohort the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children

(ALSPAC) When the children were aged 6 in 1997 to 1998 their parents completed the

South Oaks Gambling Screen Then when aged 18 the parents completed the PGSI

Between 2008 and 2018 all young people still registered with the ALSPAC (10155)

were invited to take part and complete a gambling frequency survey which included

PGSI The sample sizes completing the gambling surveys were

bull 3757 at age 17

bull 4340 at age 20

bull 4345 at age 24

Depression anxiety and wellbeing scores and drug and alcohol use were also

collected by self-completion questionnaires The main strength of this report is its use of

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

101

the large ALSPAC cohort which has collected detailed data for over 25 years The main

limitation is the missing data with less than half of the whole ALSPAC cohort completing

the gambling surveys Non-responders to the gambling surveys when compared to

ALSPAC responders overall were more likely to be male and from more deprived social

backgrounds with mothers with lower educational levels There was also a significant

gender bias with the final sample comprising 58 females As males were more likely

to engage in gambling activity this gender bias will have resulted in an under-estimate

of gambling prevalence and associated characteristics (26)

A main limitation of all sources used in this section is a lack of general health data We

acknowledged this in the protocol of this review and represents a gap in the data

available for children young people and gambling

Gambling participation

The proportion of 11 to 16-year-old children who have spent their own money on any gambling activity in the last 7 days has been decreasing since 2011 from 23 to 11 in 2019 (Figure 7) This decrease follows the trend of any gambling in the last 12 months which has reduced from 39 in 2018 to 36 in 201927 We should view this reduction in the context of declining rates of drinking smoking and drug-taking in children and young people Though poor diet remains an issue obesity rates are also falling and levels of activity increasing largely through increased activity at school (27)

Nearly double the number of boys (13) reported participating in any gambling activity

in the past 7 days than girls (7) Participation was higher in older children (12 of 14

to 16 year olds compared to 9 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Table 60 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by age and sex Great Britain 2019

11

year olds

12 year olds

13 year olds

14 year olds

15 year olds

16 year olds

Boys aged 11-16

Girls aged 11-16

Total aged 11-16

Has played a National Lottery game in past 7 days

7 3 4 2 3 9 5 2 4

Has played any gambling game in the past 7 days

14 8 9 11 11 16 13 7 11

27 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 37 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19

pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

102

Source Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain 2019

The most common gambling activities for 11 to 16-year-old children in the past 7 days

were placing a private bet for money (5) and playing fruit or slot (electronic gaming)

machines (4) A consistent finding in the report series is that fruit and slot (electronic

gaming) machines (mentioned by 23 of respondents who have gambled) was the first

experience of gambling The main reason for gambling given was ldquobecause itrsquos funrdquo

(55) while among children who do not gamble the main reason given was that it is

illegal and they are too young to take part (56)

National Lottery participation in the past 7 days among 11 to 15 year olds was at its

lowest reported level in 2019 Figure 7 shows that the proportion of 11 to 15 year olds

who have played National Lottery games in the past week has decreased over time

from 10 in 2011 to 4 in 2019

Figure 7 Gambling participation in the last 7 days by activity Great Britain 2019

Source Gambling Commission lsquoYoung People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study among 11-16 year olds in Great Britainrsquo 2019

Scratchcards remained the most common National Lottery product among children

under 16 who have ever played (mentioned by 10) compared with

bull Lotto the main National Lottery draw (6)

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Pe

rcen

t (

)

Any gambling game Any National Lottery game

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

103

bull National Lottery online instant win games (4)

bull other National Lottery games (5)

Most under 16s who bought a National Lottery product were in the company of a parent

or guardian (67) and report that the parent typically pays at the till (73) The report

concludes that although under 16s play the National Lottery for a range of reasons the

influence of parents and family members was as important as having fun

On average 11 to 16 year olds who had gambled in the past 7 days spent pound17 The

overall amount of money this group was given as pocket money birthday money or

money earnt over the same period was pound34

The rates of gambling reported in the past week (11) were lower than drinking alcohol

(16) but higher than using e-cigarettes (7) smoking tobacco cigarettes (6) or

taking illegal drugs (5) Since 2017 the series has seen a potential relationship

between these other harmful activities and gambling such that those who have spent

their own money on gambling in the past 7 days were also more likely to have drank

alcohol (41) taken drugs (21) or smoked either a tobacco cigarette (25) or an e-

cigarette (27) compared with children who had not gambled

Online gambling and gaming

Participation in online gambling among children in the last 7 days compared with in

person gambling was low (3) particularly in the context of the time young people

spend online (the series shows how chatting online with friends and using social media

are 2 of the most popular spare time activities for this age group) Given the low rate of

participation in online gambling it is difficult to draw conclusions across the report series

Any past participation in online gambling was higher at 12 with differences across age

and sex showing the same pattern seen for overall gambling Boys (16) were more

likely than girls (8) to have ever played an online gambling-style game Participation

was higher in older children compared to younger children (14 of 14 to 16 year olds

compared to 10 of 11 to 13 year olds)

Among children who have ever played online gambling-style games fruit and slot

(electronic gaming) machines were most commonly mentioned (30) followed by casino

games such as

bull roulette or blackjack (26)

bull poker games (24)

bull bingo (21)

This was consistent with previous surveys Almost half (47) of children who play online

gambling-style games do so via apps Of these 26 were apps unrelated to social

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

104

networking sites 18 were via Facebook and 17 were free demo games via

gambling apps

Half (52) of 11 to 16 year olds were aware of in-game items (for example weapons

power-ups and tokens) Awareness of in-game items was more common in boys (66)

than girls (37) Of these children 44 had paid money for loot boxes crates or packs

to get in-game items within the game theyrsquore playing In most cases the money used for

loot boxes crates or packs comes from money they had received as a birthday or

Christmas present or from pocket money

The RSPH report lsquoSkins in the gamersquo (24) explored the relationship between gambling

and video games This report was undertaken to explore concerns that these activities

introduce young people to gambling before they have been able to develop strategies to

avoid gambling-related harms

The RSPH report states that around 93 of young people regularly play video games

and that there is a growing concern around loot boxes and skin betting28 The report

found that in the past 7 days twice as many 11 to 14 year olds had bought loot boxes

than 22 to 24 year olds and almost twice as many had taken part in skin betting Also

children under 18 were significantly less likely than older respondents to classify these

activities as gambling and less likely to associate gambling harms with an increased risk

of health issues such as anxiety and alcohol consumption Finally only 25 of children

aged 11 to 14 years strongly support classifying loot boxes as gambling compared to

73 of those aged 22 to 24 years

You should note with reference to the caveats given at the start of this section that

although this source allows us to include information on this new topic the sampling

design it is not as robust as the lsquoGambling Commission Young People and Gambling

Survey 2019rsquo

Problem gambling

In 2019 17 of 11 to 16 year olds were classified as problem gamblers29 and 27 as

at-risk gamblers (as defined by the youth-adapted problem gambling screen DSM-IV-

28 Loot boxes are purchasable rewards that are uncertain at the time of purchase They include cosmetics such as new lsquoskinsrsquo for a character or they can be functional providing an advantage within the game As they cost money to buy and there is an element of chance involved it has led to concerns that they are a form of gambling On sites external to the game itself players can trade sell or bet on their skins for money ndash this is skin betting The Gambling Commissionrsquos view on loot boxes skin betting and related issues is set on in the position paper published March 2017 29 Reported prevalence in 2020 was 19 but the 2020 study was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and the closure of schools in Great Britain on 20 March 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

105

MR-J screen) These figures have remained stable compared to the previous year

However it is important to note that problem gambling prevalence in children and young

people from this source is higher than problem gambling prevalence in adults as

reported in the HSE In reality this is perhaps unlikely to be the case suggesting the

DSM-IV as used here may result in an overestimation

There was a higher proportion of boys at risk (38) and problem gamblers (20) than

girls at risk (16) and problem gamblers (07) This gender difference was consistent

with the higher prevalence seen in boys throughout the survey as well as what we see in

adult problem gambling from the HSE and other sources referenced throughout this

report

Another important aspect of gambling for public health not included in the HSE is the

harmful impact on family members The BGPS asks 2 questions about this issue The

first asked whether the respondentrsquos parents or guardians had ever regularly gambled If

so the respondent was asked to report whether they felt that either of their parents or

guardians had ever had a problem with their gambling Problem gambling prevalence

was significantly higher among respondents whose parents gambled regularly (16)

than for those whose parents did not (07) Also 50 of respondents who reported

having a parent with a gambling problem were themselves problem gamblers compared

with 10 of those who reported that although their parents regularly gambled they did

not have a problem with their gambling

Attitudes and influences

Most young people believe gambling to be dangerous (59) and feel well informed

about the issue (60) Also 7 agree that most people their age gamble 11 agree it

is OK for someone their age to gamble to see what itrsquos like and 7 agree it is OK for

someone their age to gamble once a week Consistent with previous surveys it is

interesting to note that despite the higher gambling prevalence in boys compared to

girls both show a similar level of agreement that gambling is dangerous (60 of boys

and 59 of girls)

Exposure to advertising was high among children and young people with 69 reporting

to have seen or heard some form of gambling advertisements or sponsorship most

commonly via television Boys (39) were more likely than girls (28) to report seeing

or hearing a gambling advert about a sports event or a betting company (34 of boys

compared to 21 of girls) Girls (47) were more likely than boys (34) to remember

the last advert they saw about a National Lottery based game or bingo (33 of girls

compared to 20 of boys) Also just over one in 10 (12) follow gambling companies

on social media while 11 had received direct marketing from gambling companies

Half (50) of young people have been spoken to about the potential problems that

gambling can lead to and 74 say they know who to go to for help if they had problems

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

106

related to gambling Children were most likely to have been spoken to about the

potential problems with gambling by their parents or guardians (34) followed by a

teacher (19)

These findings also highlight how parents or guardians were typically present when a

young person gambles (67 of those who have ever spent money on gambling) but are

also recognised as the first contact for help if they were to have problems with gambling

(53) Most young people (57) say their family would discourage them from gambling

if they started or found out but 23 report that their parents or guardians set rules about

gambling

A recent release from ALSPAC (25) measured young peoplersquos gambling at age 17 20

and 24 (3 points of transition from adolescence to adulthood) and revealed that regular

weekly gamblers had developed habits and patterns of play by 20 years of age Playing

the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends were the most

common forms of gambling reported but as the young people got older there was a

significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to 35 at age 20

and 47 at age 24 There was also an increase seen among women but not as steep

(from 08 at age 17 to 4 at age 20 and 11 at age 24) The study shows how young

people who gamble regularly were more likely to

bull have parents who gambled regularly

bull have high social media usage

bull have been regular players of video games when younger

Also regular gamblers had lower wellbeing scores and were at least twice as likely to

smoke cigarettes daily and consume alcohol weekly Finally a small minority (6 to 7)

of men demonstrated problem gambling behaviours associated with poor mental health

and wellbeing involvement in crime and potentially harmful use of drugs and alcohol

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

107

7 Discussion

Over half of the population take part in gambling (245 million people in England)

Participation in the National Lottery declined by 10 between 2012 and 2018 However

participation in other gambling activities increased from 40 in 2012 to 45 in 2015

before falling back to 40 in the most recent survey Online gambling (excluding the

National Lottery) has increased from 6 in 2012 to 9 in 2018

The trend in problem gambling between 2012 and 2018 has also reduced accounting

for 05 of the population in 2018 (245600 people in England) As numbers are very

small the proportion of problem gamblers in 2018 is likely consistent with previous years

rather than representative of a real decline However low risk gambling is increasing

and a cause for concern

The prevention paradox states that on a health continuum ndash alcohol being the typical

example ndash the larger volume of harm is associated with people lower on the continuum

because there are more of them It is unclear from the data available whether problem

gambling is actually declining but low risk gambling does appear to be increasing So it

is difficult to say whether gambling risk and the associated harms have increased or

decreased overall The HSE gambling questionnaire is not detailed enough about the

harms themselves and so we cannot draw a clear conclusion based on the quantitative

data presented here This is a limitation of this study and in the data currently available

for this topic area

Problem moderate risk and low risk gambling are all associated with men in the younger

age groups Demographic factors particularly sex appear more significant in predicting

at-risk gambling behaviour than economic factors such as income employment and

relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health is a stronger predictor of at-risk gambling

than poor physical health and negative health behaviours with the exception of alcohol

There is a negative and worsening public perception of how gambling is provided Most

people see gambling as dangerous too readily available and think it should be

discouraged

Including adults and children around 7 of the population were affected others Among

children playing the National Lottery scratchcards and placing private bets with friends

were the most common forms of gambling reported But as the young people got older

there was a significant increase in online gambling among men from 9 at age 17 to

35 at age 20 and 47 at age 24

Figures presented do not cover the period of the COVID-19 pandemic with the most

recent published data from the primary data source covering 2018 We have published a

separate evidence review to explore the impact of COVID-19 on gambling It is important

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

108

to note that some findings particularly for problem gambling may be deemed

inconclusive because of the limited sample size

71 Strengths and limitations

The main strength of the findings of this report comes from the HSE The HSE is a

primary resource used to monitor the nationrsquos health and care It is a robust transparent

detailed widely used and well-respected data source Including the gambling

questionnaire allows us to compare gambling with a range of other health behaviours

and conditions However while sample size is adequate for analysing a range of topics

in England we had to combine several survey years at times in this report In particular

we had to combine data when looking at more detailed breakdowns Though it is the

most robust source available for estimating problem gambling in England the combined

dataset only included around 150 problem gamblers (according to either DSM-IV or

PGSI)

The main limitations of this report come from relying on alternative sources of previously

published data to meet aspects of the objectives not fully met by the HSE The HSE

does not ask questions about

bull time spent on gambling

bull money spent on gambling

bull affected others

bull attitudes towards gambling

bull the gambling behaviours of children and young people

The sources used are the best available for quantitative gambling data on these topics

but in general they lack the data quality of the HSE They also vary considerably in

robustness and how representative they are of the national population Finally except

for ALSPAC referenced in this report there is no longitudinal gambling data source

currently available The addition of longitudinal data would have contributed significantly

to the objectives of this report by allowing us to see important changes in the gambling

behaviours of individuals over time As a relatively new field in public health we hope

that more and better-quality quantitative gambling data will become available as more

research is carried out

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

109

8 References

1 Department of Health and Social Care PHE remit letter 2018 to 2019 Online 2018 2 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Government response to the consultation

on proposals for changes to Gaming Machines and Social Responsibility Measures Online 2018

3 Blank L Baxter S Buckley Woods H Goyder E Interventions to reduce public health burden of gambling related harms A mapping review of the international evidence Lancet Public Health 2021 Volume 6

4 Public Health England Gambling-related harms evidence review scope Online 2020 5 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling Online 2019 6 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Online 2018 7 UK Data Service Health Survey for England Online 2020 8 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and attitudes

annual report 2020 9 The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) development and UK

validation Health Qual Life Outcomes Tennant R Hiller L Fishwick R Platt S and S Joseph and others 2007 pages 1-13

10 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2016 Well-being and mental health Online 2017 11 David P Goldberg and Paul Williams User Guide to the General Health Questionnaire

Windsor NFER-NELSON 1988 12 NHS Digital Health Survey for England 2018 Adult health related behaviours Online

2019 13 Department of Health and Social Care UK Chief Medical Officers Low Risk Drinking

Guidelines Online 2016 14 Gambling Commission Problem gambling vs gambling-related harms Online 2020 15 NatCen British Gambling Prevalence Survey Online 2010 16 NatCen Treatment Needs and Gap Analysis in Great Britain Synthesis of findings from a

programme of studies Online 2020 17 London School of Economics An assessment of the accuracy of survey estimates of the

prevalence of problem gambling in the United Kingdom Online 2020 18 BeGambleAware Annual Statistics from the National Gambling Treatment Service (Great

Britain) Online 2020 19 BeGambleAware National Gambling Treatment Service Online 2020 20 Gambling Commission Gambling participation in 2019 behaviour awareness and

attitudes Annual Report Online 2020 21 Ofcom Adults Media Use and Attitudes Report Online 2019 22 Department for Digital Culture Media and Sport Review of the Gambling Act 2005

Online 2020 23 Gambling Commission Young People and Gambling Survey 2019 A research study

among 11-16 year olds in Great Britain Online 2019 24 Royal Society for Public Health (RSPH) Skins in the game Online 2019 25 University of Bristol Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children Online 2019 26 Emond A Griffiths M and L Hollen A longitudinal study of gambling in late adolescence

and early adulthood Follow-up assessment at 24 years Online 2019 27 The Kings Fund Healthy behaviours Future trends Online 2020

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

110

Appendix A Overall gambling participation by local authority

Introduction

Table 61 shows the prevalence of overall gambling participation in the last 12 months by

upper tier local authority (UTLA) as illustrated in Figure 4 of the main report Due to

sample size the authorities of Inner and Outer London have been grouped together

It was not possible to produce meaningful local authority analysis for at-risk gambling or

problem gambling due to the small number of counts for these questions at local

authority level The confidence intervals were too wide to show any useful evidence of

variability

Results

Variation in gambling participation is evident by UTLA Discounting Rutland which has

wide confidence intervals there were 19 UTLAs with a rate of gambling participation that

is statistically significantly higher than average for England The top 5 UTLAs in England

with the highest levels of gambling participation were

bull Knowsley (786)

bull North Tyneside (759)

bull Barnsley (734)

bull Rotherham (729)

bull Stockton-on-Tees (726)

The 5 UTLAs with the lowest levels of gambling participation (all statistically significantly

lower) were

bull Slough (349)

bull Birmingham (437)

bull Manchester (453)

bull Windsor and Maidenhead (469)

bull Leicester (476)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

111

Table 61 Gambling participation in the last 12 months by upper tier local authority England 2012 2015 2016 2018

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000001 Hartlepool 707 596 798

E06000002 Middlesbrough 612 492 720

E06000003 Redcar and Cleveland

667 561 758

E06000004 Stockton-on-Tees 726 637 799

E06000005 Darlington 700 575 801

E06000006 Halton 582 450 703

E06000007 Warrington 525 428 621

E06000008 Blackburn with

Darwen 571 441 692

E06000009 Blackpool 690 562 794

E06000010 Kingston upon Hull 654 567 731

E06000011 East Riding of

Yorkshire 547 464 627

E06000012 North East

Lincolnshire 640 527 739

E06000013 North Lincolnshire 683 587 766

E06000014 York 500 409 591

E06000015 Derby 633 539 718

E06000016 Leicester 476 397 557

E06000017 Rutland 833 436 970

E06000018 Nottingham 527 447 605

E06000019 Herefordshire 600 483 707

E06000020 Telford and Wrekin 711 614 792

E06000021 Stoke-on-Trent 615 535 689

E06000022 Bath and North East

Somerset 589 489 683

E06000023 Bristol 547 476 616

E06000024 North Somerset 606 510 694

E06000025 South

Gloucestershire 566 471 656

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

112

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000026 Plymouth 675 587 752

E06000027 Torbay 550 425 669

E06000030 Swindon 583 483 677

E06000031 Peterborough 617 516 709

E06000032 Luton 646 548 734

E06000033 Southend-on-Sea 598 489 697

E06000034 Thurrock 690 585 779

E06000035 Medway 500 424 576

E06000036 Bracknell Forest 681 566 777

E06000037 West Berkshire 575 466 677

E06000038 Reading 549 441 652

E06000039 Slough 349 257 454

E06000040 Windsor and Maidenhead

469 364 577

E06000041 Wokingham 595 485 696

E06000042 Milton Keynes 654 570 730

E06000043 Brighton and Hove 500 399 601

E06000044 Portsmouth 701 598 787

E06000045 Southampton 710 611 792

E06000046 Isle of Wight 675 568 766

E06000047 County Durham 687 630 738

E06000049 Cheshire East 519 452 586

E06000050 Cheshire West and

Chester 627 561 688

E06000051 Shropshire 653 587 713

E06000052 Cornwall 630 583 673

E06000054 Wiltshire 603 544 659

E06000055 Bedford 569 448 682

E06000056 Central Bedfordshire 620 531 701

E06000057 Northumberland 627 552 697

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

113

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E06000058 Bournemouth

Christchurch and Poole

614 546 677

E06000059 Dorset 588 520 654

E08000001 Bolton 603 533 669

E08000002 Bury 602 512 685

E08000003 Manchester 453 395 512

E08000004 Oldham 624 544 698

E08000005 Rochdale 614 527 694

E08000006 Salford 551 457 642

E08000007 Stockport 549 480 615

E08000008 Tameside 609 516 695

E08000009 Trafford 558 458 654

E08000010 Wigan 622 538 700

E08000011 Knowsley 786 676 866

E08000012 Liverpool 683 612 746

E08000013 St Helens 596 492 691

E08000014 Sefton 650 567 724

E08000015 Wirral 665 591 731

E08000016 Barnsley 734 644 808

E08000017 Doncaster 703 631 766

E08000018 Rotherham 729 633 808

E08000019 Sheffield 595 544 643

E08000021 Newcastle upon Tyne 558 480 634

E08000022 North Tyneside 759 635 850

E08000023 South Tyneside 692 583 784

E08000024 Sunderland 664 584 736

E08000025 Birmingham 437 393 481

E08000026 Coventry 549 479 618

E08000027 Dudley 682 598 755

E08000028 Sandwell 630 536 715

E08000029 Solihull 505 412 597

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

114

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E08000030 Walsall 558 469 644

E08000031 Wolverhampton 613 500 715

E08000032 Bradford 490 421 559

E08000033 Calderdale 707 601 795

E08000034 Kirklees 563 502 621

E08000035 Leeds 635 586 682

E08000036 Wakefield 702 629 766

E08000037 Gateshead 635 536 725

E10000002 Buckinghamshire 533 474 592

E10000003 Cambridgeshire 587 537 634

E10000006 Cumbria 688 626 743

E10000007 Derbyshire 631 585 675

E10000008 Devon 542 496 587

E10000011 East Sussex 532 470 593

E10000012 Essex 620 583 655

E10000013 Gloucestershire 635 579 688

E10000014 Hampshire 602 565 637

E10000015 Hertfordshire 615 576 652

E10000016 Kent 607 573 641

E10000017 Lancashire 619 581 656

E10000018 Leicestershire 604 553 653

E10000019 Lincolnshire 664 617 707

E10000020 Norfolk 638 595 679

E10000021 Northamptonshire 668 617 715

E10000023 North Yorkshire 651 601 698

E10000024 Nottinghamshire 643 597 687

E10000025 Oxfordshire 636 589 680

E10000027 Somerset 589 530 645

E10000028 Staffordshire 695 655 733

E10000029 Suffolk 658 609 704

E10000030 Surrey 565 528 602

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

115

UTLA Code UTLA Name Gambling participation in last 12 months ()

Lower confidence

limit ()

Upper confidence

limit ()

E10000031 Warwickshire 528 476 579

E10000032 West Sussex 610 559 658

E10000034 Worcestershire 673 619 724

Inner London 502 473 530

Outer London 500 482 518

Total 593 587 598

Source HSE 2012 2015 2016 2018

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

116

Appendix B Factors associated with harmful gambling

Introduction

This analysis forms one part of a larger piece of work described in the pre-registered

lsquoGambling-related harms evidence review Analysis protocolrsquo The aim is to describe the

prevalence and determinants of gambling the harms associated with gambling and the

social and economic burden of gambling This analysis seeks to address the following

research questions

1 What socio-demographic factors are associated with gambling and harmful gambling

in England

2 Is gambling and harmful gambling associated with health status

The hypotheses tested are

1 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

2 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with socio-demographic factors in

England

3 Problem gambling is associated with socio-demographic factors in England

4 lsquoAny gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

5 lsquoAny at-risk gambling activityrsquo is associated with health conditions in England

6 Problem gambling is associated with health conditions in England

Data source

The data source is a combined dataset of the HSE for years 2012 2015 2016 and

2018

The HSE is a survey of the general population aged 16 and over Participants are

selected using a random probability sample The survey design ensures that every

address in England has an equal chance of being included in the survey each year and

the results are representative of the population living in private households Gambling

specific questions are included in the 2012 2015 2016 and 2018 surveys only

Outputs have been non-response weighted in line with standard procedure of HSE

analysis since 2003 NatCen were commissioned to combine the datasets They

manage the HSE on behalf of NHS Digital NatCen calculated and appended new

combined weighting variables to the file received by the project team These were

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

117

bull wt_sc12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb12151618 combined 2012 2015 2016 2018 problem gambling weight

bull wt_sc16 etc specific year self-completion weight

bull wt_gamb16 etc specific year problem gambling weight

This weighting ensures the outputs are representative of the population Following

standard HSE analysis practice as used in the lsquoHealth Survey for England 2018

Supplementary analysis on gamblingrsquo publication30 the problem gambling weights were

used for all analyses involving variables based on the problem gambling screening tools

The self-completion weights were used for the remaining analyses

All important information related to the data source is available in the comprehensive

user guide data dictionary and methods tables published as part of the standard

dissemination of the HSE series31 Registered users can access the un-combined

datasets via the UK Data Archive32

We used SPSS version 25 software for all statistical analysis

Variables

We selected the variables below as they were of the most interest to the research aims

of the study within the limitations of the data available The independent variables are

those measuring the main socio-demographic and health concepts reported in the HSE

series Initially only Anyacty and PROBGAM as dependent variables were within scope

However following feedback from the expert reference group associated with the wider

project we agreed that a measure of any level of risk (lsquoharmful gamblingrsquo) should be

included if feasible A common proxy from HSE and Gambling Commission outputs is to

use a PGSI score of 1 or more to describe any level of gambling risk The analysis

follows this precedent

Table 62 Dependent gambling variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

Anyacty Whether spent any money on gambling in last 12 months Categorical

PGSI_atrisk Respondents with a PGSI score of 1 or more Categorical

PROBGAM Whether a problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

Categorical

30 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 Supplementary analysis on gambling 31 NHS Digital (2019) Health Survey for England 2018 32 UK Data Service (2020) Health Survey for England

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

118

Table 63 Independent socio-demographic variables of interest

Variable name Variable label Measure

ag16g10 Age 16 to 75 in 10-year age bands Categorical

Sex Gender Categorical

Origin2 Grouped ethnicity (White Black Asian Mixed Other) Categorical

Eqv3 Equivalised income tertiles (lowest middle highest) Ordinal

TopQual4 Highest educational qualification (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equivalent below degree no qualification)

Ordinal

Employment_r Recoded variable of Activb2activity status of previous week (in education paid employmentself-employed unemployed retired looking after homefamily other)

Categorical

Qimd Quintile of Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score (2010 IMD for 2012 and 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018)

Ordinal

Gor1 Government Office Region Categorical

Table 64 Independent health-related variables of interest

Variable name

Variable label Measure

Genhelf2 Self-assessed general health grouped (very goodgood fair badvery bad)

Ordinal

WemwbsQ WEMWBS score quintiles Ordinal

LifeSatG LifeSatG Life satisfaction (low medium high very high) Ordinal

GHQg2 GHQ score group (0 1-3 4+) Ordinal

BMIlvg3 BMI group (not overweight or obese overweight obese) Categorical

Totalwug Alcohol units per week grouped Categorical

Cignow Current smoker Categorical

Missing data

Missing data was coded as such in the source dataset and was excluded as appropriate

from statistical analysis

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

119

Results

Step 1 Bivariate analysis

For step 1 of this pre-registered analysis a series of chi-squared tests were conducted

to refute the null hypothesis This was that the variables of interest are independent of

the 3 dependent gambling variables33

All 3 dependent variables are categorical as are most of the independent variables of

interest Chi-square was also used to test the ordinal variables against the categorical

dependents while acknowledging that the test will treat both as categorical The results

of such tests concerning ordinal variables are valid but there is an acceptable loss of

information in the output (for example the order of the categories) This is a common

approach and the ordinal variables are fully accounted for in step 2 of the analysis using

binary multiple logistic regression To trust the conclusions from a chi-square test the 2

standard assumptions are that

bull observations are independent

bull all expected frequencies are more than 534 for a 2x2 table (for example PROBGAM

x Sex)

These assumptions are true for the HSE combined dataset However the SPSS syntax

used tested the latter assumption as part of the output

Step 1 Findings

Tables 68 69 and 70 show the main output from the bivariate analysis

The most important figure for the hypotheses measured is the significance determined

by the chi-square test Where this is less-than 005 the null hypothesis is rejected and

the conclusion can be made that the association between the dependent and

independent is likely not due to chance variation From the outputs below this cannot be

determined for income region self-reported general health and region

The output also includes measures for Cramerrsquos-VPhi35 to quantify the correlation Chi-

square has determined whether there is a significant relationship between the variables

but is not able to quantify how important this is Cramerrsquos-V is a post-test that provides

this additional information Given the relatively large sample size of the dataset it is

33 Technically a chi-square test is a descriptive test not a modelling technique and as such there are no

dependent variables but for simplicity of language and consistency with the following description of Step 2

of this analysis the main gambling measures are here referred to as dependent 34 For larger tables no more than 20 of all cells may have an expected frequency less than 5 and all

expected frequencies more than 1 35 Phi is used where the table is 2x2

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

120

important to note that even small effects can become significant (as chance reduces

with larger sample sizes) Including this post-test suggests that this may be the case for

our study given that all measures of the correlation are low However results here do

not preclude any variables from step 2 The results of the chi-square test are used to

test whether including a variable reduces the badness-of-fit measure This means that if

chi-square is significant then the variable will be considered a significant predictor in the

equation So only income region and self-reported general health were excluded from

step 2 of the analysis and the conclusion made that the sample size may be amplifying

significance at the bivariate level

Table 65 Bivariate output for gambling participation in the last 12 months

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0121

Sex 0000 0075

Ethnicity 0000 0171

Income 0000 0087

Educational qualification 0000 0076

Employment 0000 0180

IMD 0000 0039

Region 0000 0087

Health factors

General health 0000 0042

Wellbeing 0000 0045

Life satisfaction 0000 0045

GHQ 0000 0032

BMI 0000 0096

Alcohol 0000 0227

Smoking 0000 0031

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

121

Table 66 Bivariate output for harmful gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0123

Sex 0000 0121

Ethnicity 0001 0027

Income 0831 0004

Educational qualification 0000 0044

Employment 0000 0088

IMD 0000 0050

Region 0021 0026

Health factors

General health 0577 0006

Wellbeing 0000 0092

Life satisfaction 0000 0070

GHQ 0000 0061

BMI 0330 0010

Alcohol 0000 0106

Smoking 0000 0085

Table 67 Bivariate output for problem gambling

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Socio-demographic factors

Age 0000 0036

Sex 0000 0053

Ethnicity 0000 0042

Income 0017 0019

Educational qualification 0000 0029

Employment 0000 0052

IMD 0000 0047

Region 0000 0037

Health factors

General health 0000 0036

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

122

Pearson Chi-square Cramerrsquos-VPhi

Wellbeing 0000 0062

Life satisfaction 0000 0052

GHQ 0000 0053

BMI 0849 0004

Alcohol 0002 0031

Smoking 0000 0040

Step 2 Binary logistic regression

Whereas step 1 describes the significance of the relationship between the independent

variables and gambling behaviour step 2 models the determinants of and predicts the

likelihood of gambling behaviour among the study population Unlike the bivariate

analysis the aim here is to explicitly define a dependent gambling variable and make

predictions so a logistic regression is most appropriate

Because most variables and outcomes were categorical it could be argued that a log

linear analysis would be preferred for step 2 While this is an extension of the chi-square

test used in step 1 it has the disadvantage of being unintuitive and problematic to

interpret and explain So we decided to use logistic regression as it is easier to

understand than log linear analysis simple to explain to the audience of the final report

and is still a reasonable tool for the aims of this study

All standard assumptions of binary logistic regression are met by the present analysis

namely

bull dependent is dichotomous

bull one or more independent variables that can be either categorical (nominal or ordinal)

or continuous

bull independent observations

bull dependent variable is mutually exclusive

bull linear relationship between any continuous independent variables and the logit

transformation of the dependent variable

Before the regression some variables were recoded into more practical or meaningful

groups and others were dummy coded to turn certain categories into binary variables to

give them directionality (such as higher category is 1 lower category is 0) This allows

the regression to look at direction of association by comparing 2 sides

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

123

Table 68 Variables entered into the equation

Variable name Entered into

equation Recodes

ag16g10 Yes No recode

Sex Yes Recoded into dummy variable Sex_r (Male (0) Female (1))

Origin2 Yes Recoded into Ethnicity_r (White (0) Non-White (1))

Eqv3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

TopQual4 Yes No recode

Employment_r Yes Recoded into 2 dummy variables Paid_employ_dum (In paid employmentself-employed (1)) and Unemployed_dum (Unemployed (1))

Qimd Yes No recode

Gor1 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Genhelf2 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

WemwbsQ Yes No recode

LifeSatG Yes No recode

GHQg2 Yes No recode

BMIlvg3 No Excluded in Step 1 (gt005)

Totalwug Yes Recoded into Alcwug_r (Never drink (0) 1-14 units (1) Over 14 to 35 units (2) Over 35 to 50 units (3) 50+ units (4))

Cignow Yes No recode

Not all questions were asked in every HSE year For example life satisfaction is

included in the 2016 and 2018 surveys while WEMWBS is included in 2012 2015 and

2016 surveys only Given the results of step 1 life satisfaction and WEMWBS are to be

included in the logistic regression This means that the analysis will be run on 2016 as

this is the most recent year that includes all variables of interest This is suitable from a

sample size perspective for Anyacty and PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling)

While there is no consensus regarding sample size for logistic regression a

conventional guideline suggests that maximum likelihood estimation with less than 100

cases is ldquoriskyrdquo 500 cases is ldquoadequaterdquo and there should be at least 10 cases per

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

124

predictor36 Others have refined this saying that 10 times the number of predictors (k)

should consider the proportion (p) of successes (n = 10kp)37 Given the results of step 1

this means we need a sample of 253 for Anyacty and 2933 for PGSI_atrisk (harmful

gambling) We used 3395 in the analysis for Anyacty and 3315 for PGSI_atrisk The

sample requirement for PROBGAM to be meaningful cannot be achieved within the

limits of the dataset used no matter the number of HSE years included

One final consideration about the sample size for the logistic regression is specific to the

calculation of logs ratios which is the output of step 2 A bias38 of up to 15 is

acknowledged for the log odds ratio when the sample size is around 100 but this

reduces close to zero when around 1000 cases are included So the current analysis

should not be unduly affected by such bias

Table 69 Sample size calculation

Model Proportion of successes (p) Number of predictors (k) Sample size (n)

Anyacty 0473743 12 253

Atrisk 0040908 12 2933

Probgam 0006601 12 18180

Step 2 Findings

The Anyacty model is poor and is not described in detail here

The first output below (Table 73) allows us to reject the null hypothesis Here this is that

the model based on the variables inputted fits equally well as the null model (Block 0 in

full output)

36 Long J (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables SAGE Publications London 37 Peduzzi P Concato J Kemper E Holford T R and A R Feinstein (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis Journal of clinical epidemiology 49(12) 1373-1379 38 Nemes S Jonasson J M Genell A and G Steineck (2009) Bias in odds ratios by logistic regression modelling and sample size BMC medical research methodology 9 56-60

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

125

Table 70 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig

Step 32938 25 0000

Block 32938 25 0000

Model 32938 25 000

The second main output is the pseudo-Rsup2 values Itrsquos worth noting that these will be

lower than the Rsup2 of multiple regression lsquoPseudorsquo as Rsup2 in this analysis is not technically

the proportion of variation accounted for by variation in the independents rather it is

only an analogue of correlation The Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be quoted as the preferred

measure over Cox and Snell Rsup2 because the latter has the limitation that it cannot reach

1 as Rsup2 in linear regression can Nagelkerke Rsup2 overcomes this limitation by adjusting

the scale of the statistic So as this analysis aims to be as analogous as possible to the

Rsup2 of least squares regression Nagelkerke Rsup2 will be used

The present model has an Rsup2 of 27 which is good but not great However it is typical

of Nagelkerke and Cox amp Snell to vary and so it is best practice not to over-emphasize

the pseudo-Rsup2 in logistic regression The Hosmer amp Lemeshow uses non-significance as

a measure of goodness of fit of the model Greater than 005 indicates it is a good fitting

model which the PGSI_atrisk (harmful gambling) model achieves

Table 71 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Model Summary

-2 Log likelihood Cox amp Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square

1128789a 0097 0267

Note a Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than 0001

Table 72 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Hosmer and Lemeshow Test (step 1)

Chi-square df Sig

9080 8 0336

A drawback of the model is the low classification rate particularly regarding true

classifications A model with a good accuracy rate would demonstrate high proportions

for both those with no PGSI risk and those with any PGSI risk The current model is

good at predicting cases that have no risk (997) but not very good at predicting cases

that do have risk (104)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

126

Table 73 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Classification Tablea

Predicted

(PGSI_atrisk) Percentage Correct

No risk At risk

Observed (PGSI At risk (1plus))

No risk 3023 8 997

At risk 172 20 104

Overall Percentage 944

Note a The cut value is 0500

The most important output for the aim of this study is the variables in the equation table

which details the regression function itself This analysis is not concerned with the raw

scores because natural scales do not make sense when dealing with a dichotomous

dependent variable As the analysis here aims to predict the likelihood of falling into one

of 2 groups (at risk gambling yes or no) meaning the relationship in non-linear then we

quote the log odds (essentially the analysis has made the relationship linear by

converting the raw probability scores into log odds) By taking the natural log of the odds

ratios we get an indirect measure of probability of being in the target group that will then

be linearly related So the final output of the analysis is the predicted change in log odds

for every one unit change in the independents Those that were significant were

tabulated and summarised in the body of the main report These are

bull age

bull sex

bull GHQ-12 (all levels)

bull alcohol consumption (over 14 to 35 units and 50 units or more)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

127

Table 74 Binary logistic regression (PGSI_atrisk) Variables in the Equationa

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Age -0539 0060 79635 1 0000 0583 0518 0656

Sex 1423 0206 47936 1 0000 4151 2774 6211

Ethnicity -0446 0266 2815 1 0093 0640 0380 1078

Educational Qualification 3 groups (NVQ4NVQ5degree or equiv)

8609 2 0014

Educational Qualification 3 groups (Below degree)

0584 0216 7317 1 0007 1794 1175 2740

Educational Qualification 3 groups (No qualification)

0754 0296 6493 1 0011 2124 1190 3793

In paid employment -0197 0214 0845 1 0358 0821 0540 1250

Unemployed -0195 0296 0433 1 0510 0823 0461 1470

Quintile of IMD score (least deprived) 11143 4 0025

Quintile of IMD score (2) -0270 0354 0583 1 0445 0763 0381 1527

Quintile of IMD score (3) 0018 0307 0003 1 0953 1018 0558 1859

Quintile of IMD score (4) 0573 0287 3982 1 0046 1773 1010 3111

Quintile of IMD score (most deprived) 0366 0294 1550 1 0213 1442 0810 2566

WEMWBS score ndash quintiles (1) 15525 4 0004

WEMWBS score - quintiles (2) 0714 0344 4303 1 0038 2041 1040 4006

WEMWBS score - quintiles (3) 0003 0331 0000 1 0993 1003 0525 1918

WEMWBS score - quintiles (4) 0482 0314 2352 1 0125 1619 0875 2999

WEMWBS score - quintiles (5) -0288 0357 0649 1 0421 0750 0373 1510

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

128

Covariable B SE Wald df p-value Adjusted

odds ratio

95 CI

Lower Upper

Life satisfaction (Low (0-4)) 4262 3 0235

Life satisfaction (Medium (5-6)) -0114 0386 0088 1 0767 0892 0418 1902

Life satisfaction (High (7-8)) -0006 0331 0000 1 0987 0994 0520 1903

Life satisfaction (Very high (9-10)) 0348 0273 1616 1 0204 1416 0828 2420

GHQ Score ndash grouped (Score 0) 15279 2 0000

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 1-3) 0680 0204 11079 1 0001 1973 1322 2944

GHQ Score - grouped (Score 4+) 0886 0254 12140 1 0000 2425 1473 3992

Alcohol weekly units (Nevernot in last 12 months)

36554 4 0000

Alcohol weekly units (1 to 14) 0743 0333 4961 1 0026 2101 1093 4039

Alcohol weekly units (Over 14 to 35) 1188 0360 10900 1 0001 3280 1620 6640

Alcohol weekly units (Over 35 to 50) 0428 0599 0512 1 0474 1535 0475 4963

Alcohol weekly units (Over 50) 2060 0395 27226 1 0000 7848 3620 17015

Current smoker 0160 0174 0851 1 0356 1174 0835 1650

Constant -3915 0684 32792 1 0000 0020

Note Empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts a Variable(s) entered on step 1 (D) Age Sex_r Ethnicity_r (D) Highest Educational Qualification 3 groups Paid_employ_dum Unemployed_dum (D) Quintile of IMD SCORE (2010 IMD for 2012 2015 IMD for 2015 2016 2018) - least deprived to most deprived (D) Wemwbs score - quintiles - all HSE years (D) Overall how satisfied with life nowadays - grouped (D) GHQ Score - grouped (01-34+) Alcwug_r Whether smoke cigarettes nowadays (c+sc)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

129

Limitations

The main limitations to the analysis are the low classification rate for positive cases and

that while the Rsup2 is less important in binary logistic regression than linear regression and

automatically lower the model overall seems to be good but not great The other main

limitation is that the variables included and so the concepts measured are restricted by

what is included in HSE

Finally it is important to note that while the model goes some way to explaining the

relationship between harmful gambling and the available range of variables and

concepts all conclusions relate to association only not causation

Conclusions

A series of bivariate analyses were conducted to compare a range of variables to 3

increasing levels of gambling participation and harm Of these income region self-

reported general health and BMI were shown not to be significant for harmful gambling

Income and BMI were shown not to be significant for problem gambling

We performed a logistic regression to look at the effects of important socio-demographic

and health factors on the likelihood that respondents are participating in harmful levels of

gambling The logistic regression model was statistically significant (p less-than 005)

The model explained 27 of the variance in harmful gambling and correctly classified

94 of cases but this was skewed towards classifying those at no risk

The likelihood of respondents experiencing harmful gambling is shown to reduce with

age Men were 42 times more likely than women to be at-risk gamblers Wellbeing

contributed significantly to the model but more important was scoring on GHQ12

Compared to respondents scoring 0 the odds of those scoring 1 to 3 were 20 times

more likely to participate in harmful gambling Those scoring 4 or more were 24 times

more likely to participate

Regarding physical health and health behaviours smoking and BMI did not contribute

significantly to the model but alcohol did Compared to abstainers or people not drinking

in last 12 months the odds of respondents who drank above the recommended limits

(14 to 35 units) were 33 times more likely to engage in harmful gambling This

increased markedly to 78 times for the heaviest drinkers (50 units or more) Given the

importance of gender mentioned above it should be noted that the group from HSE

consuming 50 units or more is predominantly male (758)

The broader conclusion from this analysis is that demographic factors particularly

gender appear more significant in predicting harmful gambling behaviour than economic

factors such as income employment and relative deprivation Meanwhile mental health

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

130

is a stronger predictor of harmful gambling than poor physical health and negative health

behaviours with the exception of alcohol

This conclusion is made with the caveat that regression analyses are sensitive to the

model selected the variables included in the model (limited by those in HSE) and the

method by which variables are entered into the model

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

131

Appendix C Confidence limits

This appendix presents the confidence intervals39 that correspond to the tables

produced from the Health Survey for England

Note that empty cells indicate missing data that was not available due to small counts

Table 1 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity 6562960 6334907 5738490 5517114

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

4317807 4628907 4288585 4135974

Table 2 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5131122 4451484 3932956 3487769

Scratchcards 1779043 2122489 1935338 1701510

Other lotteries 1414683 1397320 1309177 1359294

Machines and games

Football pools 182619 224660 224504 253018

Bingo (not online) 525364 536277 440814 403652

39 A confidence range has been constructed using the Wilson Score method applied to the unweighted survey data

This range (+x and -y) has then been applied to the weighted estimate to produce 95 confidence intervals based

on weighted prevalence levels

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

132

Lower confidence limits 2012 2015 2016 2018

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

565450 651162 564692 517818

Machines in a bookmakers 203497 289984 252415 188015

Casino table games (not online) 217587 308750 280441 225071

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075259 087758 061298 052915

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

247617 327553 271087 262360

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 384863 660760 679692 719161

Betting exchange 057923 078901 096568 088006

Horse races (not online) 966001 1037288 853068 748048

Dog races (not online) 231290 243261 178292 142126

Sports events (not online) 337418 469553 459815 356345

Other events or sports (not online)

070264 114616 105517 123946

Spread-betting 032504 044184 044120 035913

Private betting 414193 460042 365062 337475

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 106871 150925 105517 096928

Summary

Any gambling activity 6335401 6103706 5500798 5282442

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4083098 4391650 4052367 3905112

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

603368 872696 872386 873509

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

133

Table 3 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1043636 2980783 3995669 4433740 4143208 3366952 2528593 3489166

Scratchcards 1727215 2436717 2122630 1748760 1203935 736928 349895 1702598

Other lotteries 368931 851805 1248142 1510844 1665525 1644453 1488600 1360281

Machines and games

Football pools 500017 505813 125403 043431 092364 052245 125216 253452

Bingo (not online) 368931 434472 414316 218671 306199 263832 366695 404203

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

669475 814954 574877 418627 306199 073441 047549 518443

Machines in a bookmakers

325948 399073 133402 103672 048250 188385

Casino table games (not online)

300370 505813 215674 111586 077250 225478

Poker played in pubs or clubs

097038 079631 042318 053100

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

233091 532732 361625 143797 084765 262801

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

750752 1393731 885118 634445 297618 110693 054080 719896

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

134

Lower confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Betting exchange 183742 110705 063786 017054 041341 088251

Horse races (not online)

814337 723214 656254 744063 705698 620226 218526 748796

Dog races (not online) 216520 183867 071194 103672 062513 066258 142445

Sports events (not online)

535416 613960 266506 287132 204688 080724 356862

Other events or sports (not online)

274971 192195 056493 065233 069829 124242

Spread-betting 104643 050020 036061

Private betting 687487 514776 292227 160184 123468 059188 074454 337978

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120051 102830 093988 043431 048250 059188 023266 097187

Summary

Any gambling activity 3591860 5407593 5440884 5765226 5661399 4968794 4065485 5283918

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

3405626 4607524 4144038 3800076 3758191 3064607 2490272 3906545

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

933176 1640157 1107806 762420 392939 157519 081463 874316

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

135

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1467259 3510485 4569168 4988049 4740843 4004582 3216145 3712348

Scratchcards 2237681 2938136 2615102 2189984 1622106 1118809 682241 1880872

Other lotteries 648125 1193740 1655770 1929442 2136972 2162721 2068854 1523567

Machines and games

Football pools 815807 782166 286905 146905 242719 190570 350156 331639

Bingo (not online) 648125 694019 675709 410309 547004 516624 705209 500715

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1024788 1150848 873938 668934 547004 229112 209095 626345

Machines in a bookmakers

591519 649674 298839 246170 167268 078437 076382 256781

Casino table games (not online)

557344 782166 415895 258195 217978 123019 109263 299645

Poker played in pubs or clubs

262730 211548 150729 079335 070360 078437 093306 092229

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

465280 815055 608802 305738 230391 123019 109263 342279

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1122772 1808101 1241414 931637 535657 291423 222447 844666

Betting exchange 395122 260219 189059 093528 154249 123019 124567 137034

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

136

Upper confidence limit

Age group Total () 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Horse races (not online)

1198611 1043228 971956 1061279 1044250 976648 495459 875733

Dog races (not online) 442015 366481 201584 246170 192860 216382 124567 202776

Sports events (not online)

860079 913250 484660 501354 409383 241741 153840 448110

Other events or sports (not online)

522990 378089 176420 184919 205472 078437 124567 181001

Spread-betting 275043 161416 067548 064526 085458 043689 076382 069289

Private betting 1046612 793138 518737 329227 291327 203539 261727 427016

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 299471 248158 238589 146905 167268 203539 153840 148088

Summary

Any gambling activity 4217178 5967990 6014213 6308361 6251656 5628584 4820989 5515650

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

4024973 5173180 4719791 4345658 4348681 3689635 3174929 4134514

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1338704 2080011 1497113 1082799 659541 364073 274602 1010073

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

137

Table 5 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6632052 6377894 5943259 5575595

Any gambling activity Females

5942819 5731883 4969458 4906675

Upper confidence limit

2012 () 2013 ()

2014 ()

2015 () 2016 () 2017 ()

2018 ()

Any gambling activity Males

6963408 6718136 6293842 5902785

Any gambling activity Females

6254929 6046300 5290274 5233175

Table 6 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3246002 3730976 2826442

Scratchcards 1169964 2047322 1288765

Other lotteries 1169964 1492822 1025881

Machines and games

Football pools 097245 331162 161764

Bingo (not online) 181793 461044 439165

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 260591 677371 289335

Machines in a bookmakers 089066 257882 058685

Casino table games (not online) 269453 248786 023699

Poker played in pubs or clubs 013817 072168 017435

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

181793 321958 089155

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 829815 791242 161764

Betting exchange 097245 072168 044142

Horse races (not online) 680296 876993 315458

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

138

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Dog races (not online) 072929 167769 073727

Sports events (not online) 260591 451712 128970

Other events or sports (not online) 057156 167769 058685

Spread-betting

Private betting 260591 395884 161764

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 072929 106282 058685

Summary

Any gambling activity 4822296 5717294 4381627

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3393706 4396794 2884939

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

942692 991720 254771

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3659871 4051421 3324819

Scratchcards 1464018 2318770 1671830

Other lotteries 1464018 1734501 1376348

Machines and games

Football pools 201170 458796 326066

Bingo (not online) 316244 608611 686798

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 417105 851788 497620

Machines in a bookmakers 189387 372249 169903

Casino table games (not online) 428205 361367 105181

Poker played in pubs or clubs 065016 138416 091504

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316244 448022 219200

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1085531 977657 326066

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

139

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification

()

Betting exchange 201170 138416 144563

Horse races (not online) 915656 1071712 531322

Dog races (not online) 165600 262578 194744

Sports events (not online) 417105 597965 279093

Other events or sports (not online) 141449 262578 169903

Spread-betting 018946 010800 029172

Private betting 417105 533922 326066

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 165600 184216 169903

Summary

Any gambling activity 5257552 6040806 4920415

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3811599 4724157 3385971

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1212199 1196726 452417

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

140

Table 7 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5010828 1217707 3855865 3194364 3141982 4261193

Scratchcards 2392446 1504443 771932 1869685 1883219 1942949

Other lotteries 1444337 341029 1743242 944731 869787 1378997

Machines and games

Football pools 293283 350031 113038 153197 065571 251384

Bingo (not online) 485953 296228 532725 426543 524869 503985

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

787354 652538 149092 627816 414928 621294

Machines in a bookmakers

341252 287313 026812 381417 131420 270701

Casino table games (not online)

399008 350031 060262 161672 081619 290043

Poker played in pubs or clubs

113245 139049 011396 071133 088841

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

399008 199203 043262 354482 235334 309408

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

943709 468090 113038 399434 244162 660465

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

141

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Betting exchange 113245 190517 018918 071133 098270

Horse races (not online)

1178937 477241 637685 683310 451433 945210

Dog races (not online)

293283 113840 086397 161672 073550 222461

Sports events (not online)

602327 449816 113038 381417 131420 455212

Other events or sports (not online)

160124 097291 026812 111449 117202

Spread-betting 057978 034490 055608 042284

Private betting 524694 801832 140032 283272 165567 435724

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 150708 164632 068903 095111 042311 136216

Summary

Any gambling activity

6393967 3393970 5102509 4808928 4477874 5701128

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

142

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 5169127 1516050 4105461 3632423 3544049 4378999

Scratchcards 2528827 1828181 913477 2242908 2227498 2037902

Other lotteries 1557418 516281 1940866 1232003 1124781 1462015

Machines and games

Football pools 349063 527241 173280 287250 152230 289954

Bingo (not online) 556293 461270 653008 632580 731043 557279

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

874737 883487 217174 870369 601420 679936

Machines in a bookmakers

401069 450223 059636 577920 246091 310631

Casino table games (not online)

463283 527241 106134 298732 176110 331283

Poker played in pubs or clubs

149196 259130 035079 169741 112545

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

463283 338712 083160 544983 381740 351912

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker

1038302 668690 173280 599818 392876 720754

Betting exchange 149196 327436 047543 169741 123113

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

143

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employed or training ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Unemployed

() Other inactive

() Total ()

Horse races (not online)

1282954 679502 767906 934619 644769 1015927

Dog races (not online)

349063 224453 139960 298732 164214 258885

Sports events (not online)

679859 647040 173280 577920 246091 506066

Other events or sports (not online)

202292 201077 059636 229211 144176

Spread-betting 084494 104180 145351 059116

Private betting 597532 1053588 206247 456535 291798 485560

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 191713 293434 117480 205634 115599 165156

Summary

Any gambling activity

6545296 3811322 5357192 5270901 4903252 5818657

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

144

Table 8 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2998785 3313954 3578576 3516211 3324918

Scratchcards 19143 1615445 1719943 1478757 1288589

Other lotteries 921428 1150021 1452543 1440705 1354701

Machines and games

Football pools 185938 31272 225267 17336 170005

Bingo (not online) 518444 401551 338874 285037 229006

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 563566 437439 464056 417836 412342

Machines in a bookmakers 219643 191307 132429 181788 058654

Casino table games (not online) 152757 242814 216674 19874 137049

Poker played in pubs or clubs 058271 05344 038722 024671

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314336 199825 216674 215808 170005

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 518444 573413 701384 773594 692533

Betting exchange 08089 038818 045942 09936 08136

Horse races (not online) 473551 536962 840279 819922 729218

Dog races (not online) 1043 100084 107956 19874 051313

Sports events (not online) 262367 31272 321201 382119 289254

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

145

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 073249 108136 11606 09936 112815

Spread-betting 02347 031777 018411 024671 023682

Private betting 245207 365855 312388 285037 237546

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 088618 108136 084028 031424 073691

Summary

Any gambling activity 4865969 5019271 5419072 5275098 5069299

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3685513 3688054 4042843 3752781 3619792

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

690953 729585 840279 903618 839822

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3511704 379332 4067395 4010237 3843384

Scratchcards 2362902 2000608 2115692 1858612 1672048

Other lotteries 1262067 148849 1824509 1816872 1745527

Machines and games

Football pools 362472 510357 398515 331394 337824

Bingo (not online) 787689 621024 54425 479041 418413

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 842267 664936 69836 645461 653849

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

146

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 408527 352472 27191 342913 169993

Casino table games (not online) 315893 420664 387158 365857 291013

Poker played in pubs or clubs 171099 151192 126224 10107

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

533175 363904 387158 388685 337824

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 787689 828209 979717 1067675 991846

Betting exchange 2083 125915 138953 225862 207111

Horse races (not online) 732881 784861 1140062 1121087 1034927

Dog races (not online) 244709 224247 236535 365857 157392

Sports events (not online) 465504 510357 522024 601386 497756

Other events or sports (not online) 196001 236144 24838 225862 255422

Spread-betting 106199 113005 086687 10107 105257

Private betting 442784 576921 510888 479041 429815

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 220512 236144 200614 114265 194839

Summary

Any gambling activity 5413192 5519375 5917538 5782146 5608713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

422078 4177314 4540749 4252419 4146756

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

147

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 ()

IMD 3 ()

IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

994041 1011184 1140062 1216923 1163622

Table 9 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4506501 2103280 2802777 3104280

Scratchcards 2058401 792842 1234950 1549603

Other lotteries 1474748 606499 660149 735006

Machines and games

Football pools 240450 173397 219725 302101

Bingo (not online) 550883 147693 179245 157085

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 648570 386423 379327 403041

Machines in a bookmakers 269339 173397 227916 220317

Casino table games (not online) 298290 208101 260953 220317

Poker played in pubs or clubs 088076 065122

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

336971 081107 086615 204294

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 717074 156226 260953 420097

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

148

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Betting exchange 097462 041968

Horse races (not online) 1050863 122333 203434 327088

Dog races (not online) 250072

Sports events (not online) 482648 147693 131947 360673

Other events or sports (not online) 125778 057277 134063

Spread-betting 041769 041968

Private betting 463178 216842 101452 411562

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 135258 081107 096828

Summary

Any gambling activity 6017525 2922783 3837359 4033433

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4633639 2466930 3434827 3812932

Scratchcards 2162540 1042510 1718023 2125711

Other lotteries 1566385 829603 1038692 1170192

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

149

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Machines and games

Football pools 281094 304507 463866 608649

Bingo (not online) 610557 270324 404813 395663

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 712837 570581 682495 746376

Machines in a bookmakers 312195 304507 475582 491544

Casino table games (not online) 343234 349653 522173 491544

Poker played in pubs or clubs 113520 153271

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

384540 177211 258560 467789

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 784311 281753 522173 769098

Betting exchange 124130 116537

Horse races (not online) 1130410 235796 440344 643329

Dog races (not online) 291468

Sports events (not online) 538815 270324 332669 689299

Other events or sports (not online) 155805 141153 359019

Spread-betting 059843 116537

Private betting 518291 360874 283536 757744

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 166321 177211 296809

Summary

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

150

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Any gambling activity 6142123 3324273 4510372 4773230

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Table 10 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6209163 5708136 5894410 5910459 5597362 5934614 4647612 5533803 5596221

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the Humber

()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England ()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Spent money on at least one gambling activity

6722364 6030005 6262520 6305890 5960529 6282559 4952761 5825022 5961644

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

151

Table 11 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4282244 4298228 3598961

Scratchcards 1995277 1839055 1359311

Other lotteries 1372875 1429754 1064399

Machines and games

Football pools 277508 163664 072657

Bingo (not online) 451567 620892 522183

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 656096 526067 340283

Machines in a bookmakers 287133 199915 147071

Casino table games (not online) 335349 145687 088760

Poker played in pubs or clubs 096607 049834

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

316045 254867 224818

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 753849 384907 224818

Betting exchange 105979 049834

Horse races (not online) 1008762 754369 531374

Dog races (not online) 239082 163664 096923

Sports events (not online) 490429 310339 207346

Other events or sports (not online) 124799 075251 080668

Spread-betting 050312 025545

Private betting 490429 291800 113436

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 134242 127829 064737

Summary

Any gambling activity 5732273 5738381 4790347

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

152

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4418000 4582689 4025631

Scratchcards 2105829 2065944 1674158

Other lotteries 1468467 1635933 1350266

Machines and games

Football pools 324254 244202 166214

Bingo (not online) 510128 766172 734720

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 725520 661161 517392

Machines in a bookmakers 334626 287886 271453

Casino table games (not online) 386391 222213 190034

Poker played in pubs or clubs 125227 098246

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

365702 352835 373358

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 827729 502566 373358

Betting exchange 135851 098246

Horse races (not online) 1092719 912465 745491

Dog races (not online) 282695 244202 201833

Sports events (not online) 551251 417265 350907

Other events or sports (not online) 157023 132780 178164

Spread-betting 071540 062584

Private betting 551251 395838 225242

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 167577 200103 154172

Summary

Any gambling activity 5867427 6020177 5229614

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

153

Table 12 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2792229 3230571 3559739 3440260

Scratchcards 1588487 1794312 1677146 1516730

Other lotteries 973585 1332406 1300397 1362961

Machines and games

Football pools 100467 275244 254047 203593

Bingo (not online) 319703 438844 345092 374197

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 420026 421365 530313 429061

Machines in a bookmakers 198705 128019 182413 134065

Casino table games (not online) 086254 216759 254047 168580

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

352860 233340 200193 221251

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 303246 660924 822312 604791

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 462504 518085 774924 754509

Dog races (not online) 100467 046459 121105 151252

Sports events (not online) 198705 317701 391068 292677

Other events or sports (not online) 100467 104797 103936 125531

Spread-betting

Private betting 303246 241672 354266 247898

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 079275 067552 095429 059327

Summary

Any gambling activity 4523069 4909906 5412810 5150385

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3217452 3907588 4005754 3647737

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

591819 814832 955467 716959

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

154

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3531155 3841433 3903469 3824104

Scratchcards 2210949 2309860 1950911 1813910

Other lotteries 1494319 1795766 1548645 1648188

Machines and games

Football pools 320456 522482 377799 331506

Bingo (not online) 657681 737332 486501 540297

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 795842 714974 700775 605242

Machines in a bookmakers 480575 311178 289634 241289

Casino table games (not online) 294922 441540 377799 286647

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

704018 464795 311804 353785

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 634391 1013210 1027993 808906

Betting exchange

Horse races (not online) 852731 837355 975507 978679

Dog races (not online) 320456 173636 211119 264039

Sports events (not online) 480575 579618 540398 442104

Other events or sports (not online) 320456 274645 188339 229855

Spread-betting

Private betting 634391 476382 497301 387042

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 282027 212298 176871 136314

Summary

Any gambling activity 5317942 5548216 5765700 5548500

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3980370 4538781 4356317 4035958

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1021521 1197914 1174485 936357

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

155

Table 13 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3695674 3916652 3715339 4020550 3665308

Scratchcards 2097067 2031186 2021718 1579579 1425222

Other lotteries 1117472 1154159 1251896 1238946 1302119

Machines and games

Football pools 202809 130988 208740 202579 222107

Bingo (not online) 358227 425267 460826 357911 317347

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 500585 524312 731955 455425 317347

Machines in a bookmakers 331904 206236 268175 160863 121980

Casino table games (not online) 186011 214760 337373 236494 230656

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

340663 189273 259613 202579 171397

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 672818 587908 613590 635899 594967

Betting exchange 065744 106679 042865 058198 113910

Horse races (not online) 755297 864165 925293 745641 649722

Dog races (not online) 112296 180838 183676 136284 113910

Sports events (not online) 446856 345241 604535 393194 291135

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

156

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Other events or sports (not online) 080935 067501 118494 088524 044729

Spread-betting

Private betting 279705 371799 443040 279430 239231

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 120300 052494 102695 050895 082259

Summary

Any gambling activity 5276613 5592315 5416787 5617329 4945734

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4230545 4427808 4271166 4563725 4180709

Scratchcards 2558958 2463644 2495995 1999811 1813667

Other lotteries 1484713 1505614 1651034 1622613 1677494

Machines and games

Football pools 385415 274857 401597 385844 404082

Bingo (not online) 588920 658751 727642 589428 528229

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 765606 779116 1054581 711252 528229

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

157

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Machines in a bookmakers 555423 379126 481711 327861 264877

Casino table games (not online) 362332 390548 571997 431688 415476

Poker played in pubs or clubs

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

566604 356196 470337 385844 335126

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 972237 855143 913784 929573 868881

Betting exchange 183496 239328 148824 171309 253003

Horse races (not online) 1069220 1177274 1279891 1059108 933792

Dog races (not online) 256586 344685 366853 292621 253003

Sports events (not online) 699693 559261 902903 633905 494607

Other events or sports (not online) 208186 178774 272551 220742 142685

Spread-betting

Private betting 487981 592542 705558 488452 426846

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 268522 153889 248479 158672 204877

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

158

Summary

Any gambling activity 5820098 6103118 5978704 6157312 5473096

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

159

Table 14 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3614585 3262398 3004568

Scratchcards 1637980 1707333 1654845

Other lotteries 1375741 1363414 1015146

Machines and games

Football pools 270864 193181 166022

Bingo (not online) 381984 431371 275273

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 503795 458465 449980

Machines in a bookmakers 161810 176141 199119

Casino table games (not online) 206914 210338 249667

Poker played in pubs or clubs 048888 046850 022542

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

225102 244956 275273

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 797979 604322 458858

Betting exchange 091223 069632 063876

Horse races (not online) 778883 705673 539231

Dog races (not online) 143947 134151 049405

Sports events (not online) 372668 341796 215860

Other events or sports (not online) 135062 061918 117588

Spread-betting

Private betting 335497 279923 283850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 082604 093322 078806

Summary

Any gambling activity 5379095 5107325 4730935

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1625845 3873510 3533251

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

453456 798417 683864

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

160

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3907685 3724702 3546992

Scratchcards 1867970 2087292 2106069

Other lotteries 1590703 1712903 1390311

Machines and games

Football pools 377703 349108 345783

Bingo (not online) 506364 649649 495664

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 644314 682414 719620

Machines in a bookmakers 246977 326243 392418

Casino table games (not online) 301782 371857 461470

Poker played in pubs or clubs 100137 136286 110532

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

323557 417051 495664

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 969563 855805 730675

Betting exchange 157711 173363 188798

Horse races (not online) 948696 973936 829701

Dog races (not online) 224876 268468 163402

Sports events (not online) 495698 539693 415544

Other events or sports (not online) 213780 161123 274618

Spread-betting

Private betting 452942 461896 507019

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 146348 209531 213734

Summary

Any gambling activity 5679935 5591029 5308932

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

1855188 4350675 4094700

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

587617 1080722 1003999

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

161

Table 15 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2651783 3729469 4064039

Scratchcards 1459465 1665503 1938147

Other lotteries 954702 1444234 1678079

Machines and games

Football pools 253038 263571 170451

Bingo (not online) 297553 362493 454205

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 433199 453700 554696

Machines in a bookmakers 148439 210476 145004

Casino table games (not online) 156996 290372 179002

Poker played in pubs or clubs 020646 066338 040707

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

182870 236932 274792

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 673162 807051 628360

Betting exchange 065583 074372 103450

Horse races (not online) 682479 854102 656091

Dog races (not online) 097998 141093 136599

Sports events (not online) 270792 508869 230904

Other events or sports (not online) 089781 192957 048153

Spread-betting

Private betting 306505 362493 274792

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 089781 090690 071294

Summary

Any gambling activity 4617434 5483635 5712319

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3516410 3957222 4232697

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

822832 910695 842232

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

162

Upper confidence limit Not overweight

or obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3036056 4134205 4518960

Scratchcards 1772839 1985414 2314018

Other lotteries 1219525 1747473 2035226

Machines and games

Football pools 403947 412462 309698

Bingo (not online) 459251 533162 664592

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 623061 641612 783637

Machines in a bookmakers 268983 345763 275271

Casino table games (not online) 280389 445558 321105

Poker played in pubs or clubs 077356 150485 120117

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

314406 379204 444850

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 902154 1046957 869635

Betting exchange 152201 162416 217037

Horse races (not online) 912801 1099733 901776

Dog races (not online) 199641 255421 263719

Sports events (not online) 426121 706237 388949

Other events or sports (not online) 187894 323351 132630

Spread-betting

Private betting 470263 533162 444850

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 187894 186030 169362

Summary

Any gambling activity 5043183 5893996 6163711

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

3928235 4365662 4689584

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

1071903 1162935 1114791

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

163

Table 16 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2484741 4372137 5276755 4915487 5374800

Scratchcards 1108981 2007129 2161887 2068953 2661741

Other lotteries 782168 1405446 1614427 1566777 1799449

Machines and games

Football pools 109794 207619 338138 338922 515747

Bingo (not online) 309779 544387 441083 364588 568919

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 272783 573503 830806 862187 1068509

Machines in a bookmakers 118618 207619 394168 477341 595632

Casino table games (not online) 066450 226639 544874 468590 640326

Poker played in pubs or clubs 033301 058073 110064 164810 256825

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

109794 283929 422295 407680 533432

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 118618 573503 1138851 1137546 1281953

Betting exchange 025408 067178 127774 172804 248473

Horse races (not online) 235999 846311 1517068 1727076 1818423

Dog races (not online) 041390 207619 300976 330401 471722

Sports events (not online) 101014 351108 792492 935181 1161056

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

164

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () 15 to 35 () 36 to 50 () Over 50 ()

Other events or sports (not online) 025408 076338 199845 330401 341538

Spread-betting 017786 031240 049802 080286 198927

Private betting 101014 379989 744672 538911 775547

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 041390 113381 190751 221520 174577

Summary

Any gambling activity 3402663 5872721 6816336 6541742 7145430

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 2739271 4528134 5562554 5582284 6019270

Scratchcards 1297399 2134314 2402588 2634760 3255627

Other lotteries 944783 1516298 1830969 2081660 2325544

Machines and games

Football pools 178366 254731 449447 621550 841022

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

165

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Bingo (not online) 418012 617791 566320 655617 907342

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 375075 648660 995923 1273026 1503092

Machines in a bookmakers 189525 254731 513318 801704 940375

Casino table games (not online) 121794 275702 682349 790545 995257

Poker played in pubs or clubs 075010 084356 177932 377534 502486

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

178366 338382 545142 712079 863168

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 189525 648660 1327352 1594993 1747699

Betting exchange 062920 095246 200189 389451 490922

Horse races (not online) 331926 935714 1728493 2259846 2346400

Dog races (not online) 086904 254731 406674 610161 785471

Sports events (not online) 167162 411168 954302 1359318 1609698

Other events or sports (not online) 062920 106081 287986 610161 616925

Spread-betting 050558 051203 098309 243038 420977

Private betting 167162 442273 902205 879511 1158765

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 086904 149018 277097 460200 385581

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

166

Summary

Any gambling activity 3679789 6026811 7080456 7161677 7713898

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

167

Table 17 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 3494549 3880776

Scratchcards 2800592 1701792

Other lotteries 1034091 1585660

Machines and games

Football pools 405984 207566

Bingo (not online) 557456 444225

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 812186 462738

Machines in a bookmakers 353341 137215

Casino table games (not online) 301251 216477

Poker played in pubs or clubs 101963 037516

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 459092 252321

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 793825 724651

Betting exchange 035595 102887

Horse races (not online) 738878 876023

Dog races (not online) 166154 102887

Sports events (not online) 441342 343059

Other events or sports (not online) 166154 111399

Spread-betting 042443 022554

Private betting 566454 297514

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 117695 102887

Summary

Any gambling activity 5764541 5697910

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 4562254 4188547

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1052700 885515

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

168

Upper confidence limit Current

smoker () Non-smoker

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 4053634 4241764

Scratchcards 3332315 1986745

Other lotteries 1411123 1863201

Machines and games

Football pools 663820 325240

Bingo (not online) 851218 607878

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 1154624 629312

Machines in a bookmakers 596862 235807

Casino table games (not online) 529352 336302

Poker played in pubs or clubs 250237 095830

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 730313 380349

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1133119 926642

Betting exchange 137204 190243

Horse races (not online) 1068465 1094838

Dog races (not online) 345513 190243

Sports events (not online) 708196 489341

Other events or sports (not online) 345513 201704

Spread-betting 150289 070846

Private betting 862153 435022

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 274371 190243

Summary

Any gambling activity 6328473 6059713

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery) 5138744 4553155

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery) 1432381 1105318

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

169

Table 18 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9077077 9211674 9517075 9593713 9685299 9812957 9864932 9545183

At risk (score 1-7) 669745 563003 327741 255052 178513 096121 059878 357875

Problem gambler (score 8+) 056035 057940 025265 033521 017067 033153

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9254336 9361084 9635040 9698734 9785404 9895338 9940122 9593521

At risk (score 1-7) 839007 704375 440212 352582 270863 175609 135068 403436

Problem gambler (score 8+) 114097 110366 063274 074520 052682 048254

Table 19 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8519860 8711536 9250440 9393184 9525060 9693782 9734680 9286154

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1032766 892188 499373 354966 259088 132731 108543 560818

Problem gambler (score 8+) 104206 099068 028010 051089 066191

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

170

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 8825203 8975334 9454491 9572073 9696566 9842337 9891457 9371335

At risk (score 1 to 7) 1322780 1141419 695870 520040 419484 271299 265320 641733

Problem gambler (score 8+) 215479 197506 089099 125066 096662

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9578099 9644270 9733259 9747049 9798131 9876829 9925357 9785876

At risk (score 1 to 7) 240027 211211 132617 133917 080652 039690 149759

Problem gambler (score 8+) 005940

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non problem (score less than 1) 9742421 9779976 9850299 9857514 9903095 9960310 9987975 9831453

At risk (score 1 to 7) 399536 344576 243894 241552 178199 123171 192924

Problem gambler (score 8+) 016832

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

171

Table 20 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower

confidence limit

Upper confidence

limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 641488 720646

Scratchcards 1140046 1241836

Other lotteries 758388 843687

Machines and games

Football pools 2839128 2981904

Bingo (not online) 1238228 1343604

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 2501922 2639279

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 3077452 3223462

Poker played in pubs or clubs 4481833 4638384

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 4342093 4498193

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 2561391 2699780

Betting exchange 4322136 4478161

Horse races (not online) 1503817 1617882

Dog races (not online) 2591132 2730024

Sports events (not online) 2978122 3122841

Other events or sports (not online) 4282224 4438092

Spread-betting 5121433 5278468

Private betting 2432562 2568673

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 3306058 3454743

Summary

Any gambling activity 699899 782206

Any gambling activity (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

172

Table 21 Confidence limits

All PGSI at-risk gamblers () Lower confidence limit Lower confidence limit

1 activity 160262 202119

2 to 3 activities 486195 556018

4 to 6 activities 1908236 2033261

7 or more activities 5191468 5348399

Total 699899 782206

Table 22 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9648551 9452875 9563557

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 189323 302060 182973

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 053570 103480 067396

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 012157 039731 042110

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 254548 417354 265579

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5degree

or equivalent ()

Below degree

()

No qualification

()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9726699 9524733 9669396

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 255518 360428 264318

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 091424 139120 120093

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032887 062907 085425

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 330222 485071 361575

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

173

Table 23 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9464299 9118712 9298723 9837688 9607037

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293250 345425 367963 068855 148376

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 103921 127950 064986 018895 042291

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 039993 095061

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 408612 508276 467966 095173 208930

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or government

training ()

Unemployed () In full-time

education () Retired ()

Other Inactive ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9533439 9363096 9504561 9895948 9755893

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 349103 534137 549284 117562 269095

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 138532 252683 153588 047600 115653

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062495 205743

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 473680 730515 668865 151205 348286

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

174

Table 24 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9321411 9480605 9545787 9576877 9640182

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 293936 266863 20326 221189 193183

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 147161 076655 077211 051171 050955

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 059097 034342 034692 026447 004394

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 472157 360129 295883 286013 257623

Upper confidence limit Most deprived

() 2nd () 3rd () 4th ()

Least deprived ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9452064 9592895 9647981 9676678 9733111

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 392991 359853 283189 305409 273638

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 220003 13036 129428 095691 096095

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 108216 072746 072015 060457 022741

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 594487 466443 390431 380487 349097

Table 25 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9543316 9616616 9408087 9174175

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

175

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259672 105609 187044 285473

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 097444

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 032703 065081

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 365999 147627 235874 352165

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British ()

AsianAsian British ()

BlackBlack British ()

MixedOther ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9595191 9765690 9689087 9537114

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 301870 212649 417188 585573

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 124153

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 048918 153365

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 415508 270443 487796 677991

Table 26 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9302879 9445046 9497357 9523320 9521257 9469934 9492898 9516849 9608043

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

272358 267204 197386 202673 189687 244778 215582 253691 180619

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

176

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

081569 080707 076948 058876 069385 086843 073820 074650 045143

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

023985 044753 029872 056980

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

386243 377595 295904 282584 288287 353966 307224 346162 242915

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0)

9551450 9585275 9649557 9681445 9666246 9618459 9618579 9635214 9739105

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

474469 382818 316187 332992 303245 367211 313277 354455 292479

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

206588 149764 157024 137350 143928 165606 135338 133843 108395

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8+)

066636 109334 083576 112215

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

619832 512170 437354 432782 424346 497717 421448 461810 369991

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

177

Table 27 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9551629 9486617 9482365

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 267865 218054 172604

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087250 083816 080596

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 023379 058161 049173

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 354644 328786 277601

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair ()

Badvery bad ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9606650 9605883 9659880

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 313905 309759 305887

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 114591 144244 178322

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 038489 109950 129900

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 407092 438830 440425

Table 28 Confidence limits

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9111018 9462725 9515756 9718238

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

312764 243504 241229 116443

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7)

143552 049671 086588 048311

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

065081 020491 026909

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

498432 314684 343949 178574

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9402415 9640332 9618411 9812436

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2)

535794 393921 324795 193039

Moderate risk gambler 306251 128609 139653 101327

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

178

PGSI Risk Category Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6) ()

High (7-8) ()

Very high (9-10) ()

(PGSI score 3 to 7)

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more)

185343 077937 059421

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7)

768820 482444 441935 270771

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

179

Table 29 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9155873 9425755 9528615 9701374 9703227

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 384868 250161 229556 130857 140608

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 148983 098486 063289 038633 031309

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 079863 039886 016379 009625

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 562021 379057 320660 183742 184927

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1

(14 to 42) () Quintile 2

(43 to 48) () Quintile 3

(49 to 52) () Quintile 4

(53 to 56) () Quintile 5

(57 to 70) ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9334394 9565089 9660959 9807345 9806130

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 525552 359403 341141 220589 230170

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 242033 171423 127839 093075 079760

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 151335 090166 054885 041510

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 727964 510221 449811 287563 285740

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

180

Table 30 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9646180 9415118 9293309

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 204114 293344 311256

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 056303 111028 105447

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 013323 025937 071499

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 270312 433683 440578

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1-3 () Score 4+ ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9710684 9538038 9456678

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 259082 393775 439328

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 087001 176397 185663

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 030014 061641 139703

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 332837 553207 589687

Table 31 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9494512 9524690 9538509

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 285425 237569 214448

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 081349 089900 087185

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 037336 037060 035420

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 380286 341334 326392

Upper confidence limit Not

overweight or obese ()

Overweight ()

Obese ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9581575 9611167 9635965

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 358609 306719 291270

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 122875 134533 138702

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 066930 067427 070539

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 463662 422854 419182

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

181

Table 32 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9755131 9619945 9285949 9010047 8667875

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 083572 207589 375341 347399 604245

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 041367 067162 127709 125476 158387

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 025390 022545 033406 073004 059660

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 127437 293471 525814 512384 820593

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 () Over 14 to 35

() Over 35 to 50

() Over 50 ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9836785 9677758 9426846 9372379 9079022

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 144664 254767 492212 633031 951836

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 086953 095269 200289 317363 362119

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 062963 039910 074774 230460 201952

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 200714 348841 661474 846350 1213446

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

182

Table 33 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9099340 9548599

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 470349 230101

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 155175 091058

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 067013 029234

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 650515 334161

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker ()

Non problem (PGSI score 0) 9254028 9627752

Low risk gambler (PGSI score 1 to 2) 596743 293668

Moderate risk gambler (PGSI score 3 to 7) 232455 132830

Problem gambler (PGSI score 8 or more) 120777 054710

All at-risk gamblers (PGSI score 1 to 7) 796275 409520

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

183

Table 34 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9885967 9878118 9924628 9913695 9934834 9944198 9968002 9930092

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

056067 066401 033140 041679 024529 051489

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9943933 9933599 9966860 9958321 9975471 9983891 9996880 9948511

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

114033 121882 075372 086305 065166 069908

Table 35 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9796495 9790890 9885826 9839198 9881842 9887272 9947056 9892470

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

096118 107416 042843 075125 041388 075306

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

184

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9903882 9892584 9957157 9924875 9958612 9968144 9998118 9924694

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

203505 209110 114174 160802 118158 107530

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9946745 9937883 9924067 9952449 9963538 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler (DSM-IV score less than 3)

9992505 9985535 9978965 9991601 9997263 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler (DSM-IV score 3 or more)

028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

185

Table 36 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9862701 9866674 9912713 9901984 9922588 9931413 9968002 9919365

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

072759 074941 041208 049951 032263 023300 060759

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9927241 9925059 9958792 9950049 9967737 9976700 9996880 9939241

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

137299 133326 087287 098016 077412 068587 080635

Table 37 Confidence limits

Men

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9749746 9767784 9873539 9815674 9869402 9874373 9947056 9870806

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129207 124241 050521 091536 048908 038907 093630

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

186

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9870793 9875759 9949479 9908464 9951092 9961093 9998118 9906370

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

250254 232216 126461 184326 130598 125627 129194

Women

Lower confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9946745 9924651 9911158 9952449 9948608 9976940 9955621 9971059

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

028092 013817

Upper confidence limit Age group Total

() 16-24 () 25-34 () 35-44 () 45-54 () 55-64 () 65-74 () 75+ ()

Non-problem gambler 9992505 9978801 9971908 9991601 9992232 1000000

0 9997753 9986183

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

088842 028941

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

187

Table 38 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit

Upper confidence limit

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 085526 116894

Scratchcards 160262 202119

Other lotteries 141440 180951

Machines and games

Football pools 466841 535382

Bingo (not online) 303055 359252

Slot (electronic gaming) machines 457170 525058

Machines in a bookmakers 4561713 4718465

Casino table games (not online) 602596 679557

Poker played in pubs or clubs 1415214 1526530

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games 826715 915325

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 341456 400831

Betting exchange 1022381 1119561

Horse races (not online) 274326 327996

Dog races (not online) 670683 751436

Sports events (not online) 524945 597248

Other events or sports (not online) 1297189 1404615

Spread betting 1533366 1648318

Private betting 399228 463030

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 944042 1037939

Summary

Any gambling activity 104050 138360

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

188

Table 39 Confidence limits

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI ()

Lower confidence limit Upper confidence

limit

1 activity 022545 039910

2 to 3 activities 049022 073418

4 to 6 activities 255212 307119

7 or more activities 1130234 1231654

Total 104050 138360

Table 40 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9954942 9915039 9868631

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

019964 057658 076064

Upper confidence limit NVQ4NVQ5

degree or equivalent ()

Below degree ()

No qualification ()

Non-problem gambler 9980036 9942342 9923936

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045058 084961 131369

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

189

Table 41 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9915506 9712750 9908589 9964921 9896912

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057978 153197 027297 011396 034858

Upper confidence limit

In employment self-employment or

government training ()

Unemployed ()

In full-time education ()

Retired () Other inactive

()

Non-problem gambler 9942022 9846803 9972703 9988604 9965142

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

084494 287250 091411 035079 103088

Table 42 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9970101 9941246 9923436 9908721 9850406

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

008286 025670 037646 046856 089809

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

190

Upper confidence limit IMD 1 (most

deprived) () IMD 2 () IMD 3 () IMD 4 ()

IMD 5 (least deprived) ()

Non-problem gambler 9991714 9974330 9962354 9953144 9910191

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

029899 058754 076564 091279 149594

Table 43 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9942933 9827380 9744833 9675853

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

039650 069453 076037 069096

Upper confidence limit WhiteWhite British

() AsianAsian British

() BlackBlack British

() MixedOther ()

Non-problem gambler 9960350 9930547 9923963 9930904

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

057067 172620 255167 324147

Table 44 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9854415 9910787 9857493 9913822 9892022 9920618 9839632 9937886 9942973

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

191

Lower confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

070998 040821 072334 028763 046875 032433 091573 026562 016867

Upper confidence limit

North East ()

North West ()

Yorkshire amp the

Humber ()

East Midlands

()

West Midlands

()

East of England

()

London ()

South East ()

South West ()

Non-problem gambler 9945585 9969213 9942507 9986178 9967978 9979382 9920368 9982114 9997027

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

129002 079179 127666 071237 093125 067567 148427 053438 043133

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

192

Table 45 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9939398 9855435 9809368

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041245 083629 088478

Upper confidence limit Very goodgood

() Fair () Badvery bad ()

Non-problem gambler 9958755 9916371 9911522

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

060602 144565 190632

Table 46 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9740976 9908850 9917042 9960283

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

111223 027376 043368 010061

Upper confidence limit Low (0-4)

() Medium (5-6)

() High (7-8)

() Very high (9-10) ()

Non-problem gambler 9888777 9972624 9956632 9989939

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

259024 091150 082958 039717

Table 47 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9791533 9862827 9932436 9957659 9945326

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

122660 072826 023654 009436 016443

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Non-problem gambler 9877340 9927174 9976346 9990564 9983557

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

193

Upper confidence limit Quintile 1 (14 to 42)

()

Quintile 2 (43 to 48)

()

Quintile 3 (49 to 52)

()

Quintile 4 (53 to 56)

()

Quintile 5 (57 to 70)

()

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

208467 137173 067564 042341 054674

Table 48 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9958214 9902923 9814337

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

021531 050437 105447

Upper confidence limit Score 0 () Score 1 to 3 () Score 4 or more

()

Non-problem gambler 9978469 9949563 9894553

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

041786 097077 185663

Table 49 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9921761 9909910 9906334

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

045993 054365 052282

Upper confidence limit Not overweight or

obese () Overweight () Obese ()

Non-problem gambler 9954007 9945635 9947718

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

078239 090090 093666

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

194

Table 50 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9924761 9926594 9901786 9744784 9760771

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

033199 049030 049850 087770 081586

Upper confidence limit Nevernot in

last 12 months ()

1 to 14 ()

Over 14 to 35 ()

Over 35 to 50 ()

Over 50 ()

Non-problem gambler 9966801 9950970 9950150 9912230 9918414

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI

075239 073406 098214 255216 239229

Table 51 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9834167 9922517

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 101829 046444

Upper confidence limit Current smoker

() Non-smoker

()

Non-problem gambler 9898171 9953556

Problem gambler according to either DSM-IV or PGSI 165833 077483

Gambling-related harms evidence review quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

195

Table 53 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1271729 2945796 941041 1002800 1228218 1653678

Scratchcards 1093044 2171483 1145690 1143454 1570657 1886444

Other lotteries 1262295 2601960 885593 1426952 983242 1876728

Machines and games

Football pools 1976900 2847439 1033817 1341628 899014 933261

Bingo (not online) 1603655 2415815 931788 872323 1247152 1954492

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1517999 2034979 1352120 872323 1266097 1973946

Machines in a bookmakers 2237019 2171483 1380390 1190513 871014 1152814

Casino table games (not online) 1337847 1772444 1267479 1105867 1351490 2159024

Poker played in pubs or clubs 2731578 2690263 1099009 1171680 685457 668361

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2294993 2327774 1522123 1096479 1020778 743724

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1546529 2239824 1305066 1002800 1152603 1760254

Betting exchange 2488655 2425602 1408685 568786 1002002 1124095

Horse races (not online) 1337847 1957088 848726 669221 936408 3317233

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

196

Lower confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Dog races (not online) 2140529 2073956 839523 872323 1067781 2032342

Sports events (not online) 1938477 2611768 1267479 946779 1030171 1229504

Other events or sports (not online)

3200389 3034395 1541067 568786 349482 398246

Spread-betting 3416236 2239824 848726 1209360 611868 734288

Private betting 1366227 1898725 1211196 1134052 1114871 2295682

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 1919276 2327774 830324 1209360 917703 1808759

Summary

Any gambling activity 1027530 2464764 857936 1077713 1237684 2373874

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Lotteries and related products

National Lottery 1648541 3279102 1304925 1338178 1569279 1934955

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

197

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Scratchcards 1448311 2475462 1538808 1496704 1945096 2181543

Other lotteries 1638032 2923845 1240773 1811568 1295516 2171286

Machines and games

Football pools 2419145 3177718 1411481 1717383 1200180 1157388

Bingo (not online) 2014617 2730483 1294245 1189419 1590249 2253307

Slot (electronic gaming) machines

1920787 2332329 1770908 1189419 1611206 2273799

Machines in a bookmakers 2697484 2475462 1802439 1549372 1168326 1397217

Casino table games (not online) 1722023 2055564 1676151 1454510 1705377 2468210

Poker played in pubs or clubs 3220013 3015309 1485823 1528315 954852 863041

Online gambling on slots casino or bingo games

2759168 2638757 1959705 1443953 1337786 947463

Betting activities

Online betting with a bookmaker 1952085 2546940 1718297 1338178 1485282 2048083

Betting exchange 2964364 2740670 1833943 834759 1316659 1366017

Horse races (not online) 1722023 2250428 1197907 953723 1242592 3666828

Dog races (not online) 2594545 2373249 1187178 1189419 1390541 2335242

Sports events (not online) 2377797 2934012 1676151 1274527 1348344 1480312

Other events or sports (not online)

3708461 3370270 1980627 834759 552620 553936

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

198

Upper confidence limit 2 or more

times a week ()

Once a week ()

Less than once a week more than once a month ()

Once a month ()

Every 2-3 months ()

Once or twice a year

()

Spread-betting 3931358 2546940 1197907 1570416 868828 936926

Private betting 1753472 2188946 1612834 1486161 1443208 2611176

Other gambling activity

Any other gambling 2357111 2638757 1176443 1570416 1221394 2099443

Summary

Any gambling activity 1374225 2781404 1208631 1422827 1579765 2692769

Any gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Any online gambling (excluding National Lottery)

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

199

Table 54 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2115834 3842514 4426600

Once a week 2305108 2357524 1278810

Less than once a week more than once a month

1666011 563551 347431

Once a month 1069570 304294 1108443

Every 2 to 3 months 757091 485165

Once or twice a year 420816

Upper confidence limit Low risk

gambler () Moderate risk gambler ()

Problem gambler ()

2 or more times a week 2839983 5195599 6362470

Once a week 3047889 3598625 2832036

Less than once a week more than once a month

2336575 1348746 1396207

Once a month 1642181 940571 2598245

Every 2 to 3 months 1259596 1230828

Once or twice a year 821370

Table 55 Confidence limits

Lower confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1082324 4256754

Once a week 2549093 1640856

Less than once a week more than once a month

965178 285899

Once a month 1180106 931875

Every 2 to 3 months 1356433

Once or twice a year 2469937 193456

Gambling-related harms evidence review Quantitative analysis of gambling involvement and gambling-related harms among the general population in England

200

Upper confidence limit Not a problem gambler

according to either DSM or PGSI ()

Problem gambler according to either DSM or PGSI ()

2 or more times a week 1200336 5879558

Once a week 2712540 3004014

Less than once a week more than once a month

1077564 1068000

Once a month 1302485 2077246

Every 2 to 3 months 1486034

Once or twice a year 2631751 887818

201

Published September 2021

PHE gateway number GOV-9697

wwwgovukphe

Twitter PHE_uk

wwwfacebookcomPublicHealthEngland

copy Crown copyright 2021

Page 7: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 8: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 9: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 10: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 11: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 12: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 13: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 14: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 15: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 16: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 17: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 18: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 19: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 20: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 21: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 22: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 23: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 24: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 25: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 26: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 27: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 28: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 29: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 30: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 31: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 32: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 33: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 34: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 35: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 36: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 37: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 38: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 39: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 40: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 41: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 42: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 43: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 44: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 45: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 46: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 47: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 48: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 49: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 50: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 51: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 52: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 53: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 54: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 55: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 56: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 57: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 58: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 59: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 60: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 61: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 62: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 63: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 64: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 65: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 66: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 67: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 68: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 69: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 70: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 71: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 72: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 73: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 74: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 75: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 76: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 77: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 78: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 79: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 80: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 81: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 82: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 83: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 84: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 85: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 86: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 87: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 88: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 89: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 90: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 91: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 92: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 93: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 94: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 95: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 96: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 97: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 98: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 99: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 100: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 101: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 102: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 103: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 104: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 105: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 106: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 107: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 108: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 109: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 110: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 111: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 112: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 113: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 114: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 115: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 116: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 117: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 118: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 119: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 120: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 121: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 122: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 123: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 124: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 125: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 126: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 127: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 128: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 129: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 130: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 131: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 132: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 133: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 134: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 135: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 136: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 137: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 138: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 139: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 140: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 141: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 142: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 143: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 144: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 145: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 146: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 147: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 148: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 149: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 150: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 151: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 152: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 153: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 154: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 155: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 156: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 157: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 158: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 159: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 160: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 161: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 162: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 163: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 164: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 165: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 166: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 167: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 168: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 169: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 170: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 171: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 172: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 173: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 174: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 175: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 176: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 177: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 178: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 179: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 180: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 181: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 182: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 183: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 184: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 185: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 186: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 187: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 188: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 189: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 190: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 191: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 192: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 193: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 194: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 195: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 196: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 197: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 198: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 199: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 200: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 201: Gambling-related harms evidence review
Page 202: Gambling-related harms evidence review