mason burley senior research associate washington state institute for public policy
DESCRIPTION
Educational Attainment of Foster Youth: What Do We Know, and Where Do We Go (from here)? Washington Education Research Association December 5, 2008. Mason Burley Senior Research Associate Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) 528-1645 E-mail: [email protected] - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Mason BurleySenior Research Associate
Washington State Institute for Public PolicyPhone: (360) 528-1645
E-mail: [email protected] Publications: www.wsipp.wa.gov
Educational Attainment of Foster Youth:
What Do We Know, andWhere Do We Go (from here)?
Washington Education Research AssociationDecember 5, 2008
Background
Policy Shift
Results
1 of 20
Current Project
…review and summarize existing research that identifies problems and barriers to improved educational attainment of children in long-term foster care and suggest ways to improve the availability of information about the educational experiences of these children
The 2000 Legislature asked the Washington State Institute for Public Policy (Institute) to:
Safety & Permanency Well-being & Education
Background
Prior Research (pre-2001)
Results
2 of 20
Current Project
1. Focused on older adolescents2. Small populations3. No comparison groups4. Primary outcome – gpa and graduation
1. Matched foster care records to grade 3, 6, 9, and 112. Statewide sample (~1,500 foster)3. All non-foster youth (~70,000 per grade) with self
assessment4. Norm referenced test and longitudinal completion5. Any history of foster care
Background
Results
Results
3 of 20
Current Project
2000 Iowa Standardized Tests
Background
Results
Results
4 of 20
Current Project
On-Time Graduation of 11th Grade Students
11th Grade Students On-Time Graduation Percentage
Non-Foster 86 percent
Foster 59 percent
11th Grade Students On-Time Graduation Percentage
Non-Foster 86 percent
Foster 59 percent
Background Results
5 of 20
Current Project
Achievement
Completion
Family Factorsparent's educationhours per week watching TVEnglish spoken in the hometime spent on homeworkadult helps with homework
School Factorschanged school during yearfirst enrolled in school / districteducational aspirationsfeel safe at schoolopinion of school problems
Individual Factors gender / ethnicityspecial assistanceextra-curricular activitiesaptitude/course workfoster care background
Background
Results
Results
6 of 20
Current Project
Change Schools During Year Repeated
Grade Level
Special Ed.
Foster 16%
School 7%
Foster 29%
School 10%
6%School
Foster 13%
Background Results
7 of 20
Current Project
Domain Student Characteristics
Increase (Decrease) in Percentile Ranking
Grade 3 Grade 6 Grade 9Individual Male (0.7) n/s 1.3
Race: African-American (11.1) (12.3) (14.9)Race: Asian 1.7 1.2 (4.5)Race: Hispanic (14.6) (12.4) (10.3)Race: Native American (8.8) (9.3) (8.3)Current or previous foster care placement (7.7) (7.0) (6.8)
Personal appraisal of future educational prospects (6-point scale: will not graduate high school – advanced degree) 4.0 3.4Grade point average (8-point scale) 4.9Plan to attend four-year college/university 2.8
SchoolEnrolled in special education program (26.9) (27.1) (25.2)Enrolled in highly capable program 26.4 26.3 15.8Receives extra help in reading or math (Title I) (14.4) (11.6) (12.3)Attended another school this year (8.5) (6.4) (3.7)Stayed in same grade more than one year (8.6) (9.5) (5.5)Never feels safe at school (6.4) (5.0)Number of school activities participated in during last year (1 to 5) 0.2
Family Has computer at home and uses for school work 4.2 8.8 7.0Language other than English spoken most frequently in household (10.9) (8.5) (9.3)Receives periodic homework assistance 8.4 7.2 (0.8)Watches TV five or more hours per day (6.9) (6.2) (3.2)
Number of Children in Analysis 44,147 60,083 62,483
Adjusted Results (Iowa Tests)
Background Results
8 of 20
Current Project
Total Time in Foster Care Average Number of Placements/Year
Number of Placements Average Number of Caseworkers/Year
Age First Entered Foster Care Special Services Provided
Do Any of These Measures of the Foster Care System Relate to Test Scores?
Currently in Foster Care Recently Entered Foster Care
Background Results
9 of 20
Current Project
Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 (Chaffee Act) – doubled amount of federal funding for independent living programs
Education and Training Vouchers (2003) – $5,000 per year for tuition assistance for emancipating foster youth
Child and Family Services Review (2003) – “children receive appropriate services to meet educational needs”
Legislative Changes and InitiativesFederal
Foster Care Education Workgroup (2002)
Educational Advocacy Program (2006) – 1-2 per DSHS region work with students, parents, teacher, administrators to help with educational progress
Foster Care to College (FCTCP) and Foster Care Passport to College Promise Program (2007)
Braam Monitoring Panel
State
Background ResultsCurrent Project
10 of 20
Study DifferencesTopic 2001 WSIPP Report
Study Sample Students in Grades 3, 6, and 9
Assessment Outcomes
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS)—grades 3 and 6
Iowa Tests of Educational Development (ITED)—grade 9
( tests eliminated in 2006)
Assessment Type
Norm-referencedRanks each student to the achievement of othersTest items help discriminate between high and low achieversIndividual assessment scores are compared and assigned a percentile or grade-equivalent score
Assessment Covariates
Student information questionnaire (self-reported information on demographics, school history, and family background).
Outcome Analysis
Increase/decrease in National Percentile Ranking (continuous 1–100); Ordinary Least Squares Regression
2008 WSIPP Report
Students in Grades 4, 7, and 10
Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL)—grades 4, 7, and 10
Criterion-referencedDetermines whether each student has achieved specific skillsTest items are designed to assess competence in key conceptsIndividuals are compared with preset standards for acceptable achievement
Administrative records on demographics, program participation, school mobility, and retention
Likelihood of meeting WASL standard (yes/no);Logistical Regression
Background ResultsCurrent Project
11 of 20
“The CA will replicate the 2001 WSIPP study Educational Attainment of Foster Youth: Achievement of Graduation Outcomes for Children in State Care for school-age children in foster care three months or longer in FY2005, with inclusion of WASL performance for 4th, 7th and 10th grades and all other variables in the study.”
Current Study Direction
[Revised Implementation Plan Adolescent Services Action Step 1] [Goal 2, Outcome 3, Action step 1 of February 2006 Braam Implementation Plan]
Background ResultsCurrent Project
12 of 20
Record Linkage (FERPA)
Student self-assessment (independent variables)
Test completers / alternate versions
Study Challenges
Grade 4 Grade 7 Grade 10
Non-Foster Foster Non-Foster FosterNon-
Foster FosterUnmodified WASL
70,899 (96.5%)
1,022 (88.9%)
75,055 (96.0%)
1,158 (86.0%)
76,875 (95.8%)
1,084 (85.0%)
Alternative Assessments for Special Populations
2,543 (3.5%)
128 (11.1%)
3,116 (4.0%)
189 (14.0%)
3,402 (4.2%)
192 (15.0%)
Total 73,442 1,150 78,171 1,347 80,277 1,276
Completed WASL Grade 4 Grade 7 Grade 10
Non-Foster Students 70,504 (96%) 74,631 (95%) 67,202 (84%)
Foster Students 1,042 (91%) 1,192 (88%) 773 (61%)
Background Current Project Results
13 of 20
81,553 Grade 10 students
2,299 Grade 10 students with any current or previous foster care placement (2.8%)
1,276 Grade 10 students with a placement lasting 3 months or more (1.6%)
382 Grade 10 students with a placement lasting 3 months or more and in active placement at time of WASL
Who is a ‘Foster Student’?In the 2005-06 school year, there were…
Of the 1,276 Grade 10 youth with 3-month placement, 61% (778) completed WASL
Background Current Project Results
14 of 20
Percentage of Students Meeting Standard in All Content Areas of the 2005–06 WASL
Background Current Project Results
15 of 20
Percentage of Students Meeting Standard by Subject Area on the 2005–06 WASL
Background Current Project Results
16 of 20
Characteristics of 10th Graders Completing the 2005–06 WASL
Percentage of 10th Graders
Met Standard inAll Three Areas
Category of Student Non-Foster Foster Non-Foster Foster
All Students 99% 1% 53.8% 27.2%
Race/Ethnicity
American Indian/Alaskan Native 2.1% 10.0% 35.4% 20.3%
Asian American 8.5% 2.5% 60.8% 50.0%
African American 4.2% 14.8% 26.4% 17.0%
Hispanic/Latino 9.6% 8.3% 27.6% 28.3%
Caucasian 75.5% 64.4% 58.6% 30.5%
Background Current Project Results
17 of 20
Characteristics of 10th Graders Completing the 2005–06 WASL
Percentage of 10th Graders
Met Standard inAll Three Areas
Category of Student Non-Foster Foster Non-Foster Foster
All Students 99% 1% 53.8% 27.2%
School Status
Behind Grade Level 10.7% 17.4% 37.1% 15.7%
Time in Same District
One Year or Less 12.5% 22.5% 44.4% 20.4%
One to Two Years 17.6% 19.9% 52.6% 22.3%
Longer Than Two Years 70.0% 57.6% 55.8% 31.4%
Background Current Project Results
18 of 20
Characteristics of 10th Graders Completing the 2005–06 WASL
Percentage of 10th Graders
Met Standard inAll Three Areas
Category of Student Non-Foster Foster Non-Foster FosterAll Students (with Alternative) 98.9% 1.1% 52.3% 24.1%
Disability Status
No Disability 91.6% 72.6% 55.9% 31.6%
Health Disability 1.9% 7.4% 13.7% 3.5%
Specific Learning Disability 4.7% 11.5% 9.2% 2.2%
Special Education Status
Special Education Services 7.8% 26.3% 10.9% 3.0%
Background Current Project Results
19 of 20
After accounting for other differences, foster students are…
35 percent less likely to meet WASL standards in Grade 4
46 percent less likely to meet WASL standards in Grade 7
38 percent less likely to meet WASL standards in Grade 10
(non-foster students are 2-3 times more likely to meet WASL standards in all three content areas)
Background Current Project Results
20 of 20
Next Steps/Future Analyses
1. Prior WASL scores: Match a student’s 10th grade scores to their previous score (in 7th grade).
2. Expanded definition of high school graduation: NGA standard four-year, adjusted cohort graduation rate
3. Analysis of Educational Advocacy Program
IDEAS??