mcdonald s b - city of orlando 10 cup2014-00019 —mcdonald’s bogcoossee page 10 cup2014-00019...

Property Location: 14902 Narcoossee Rd.

(northwest corner of Boggy Creek Rd. and Nar-

coossee Rd. intersection) (Parcel ID #32-24-31-

0000-00-005) (±1.88 acres, District 1)

Applicant’s Request:

The applicant is requesting Conditional Use Per-

mit (CUP) approval to allow a McDonald’s

drive-through. The request also includes Specific

Parcel Master Plan Review (SPMP) review for

the eating and drinking use.

S U M M A RY

Location Map Subject Site

Staff Report to the

Municipal Planning Board

October 28 , 2014

M C D O N A L D ’ S B O G C O O S S E E

C U P 2 0 1 4 - 0 0 0 1 9

I T E M # 3

Staff’s Recommendation:

Approval of the request, subject to the conditions

in this report.

Public Comment

Courtesy notices were mailed to property owners

within 300 ft. of the subject property during the

week of October 6, 2014. As of the published

date of this report, staff has not received any com-

ments from the public concerning this request.

Updated: October 13, 2014

Owner

Erika Stillwell, VP

Boggy Creek Narcoossee

LLC

Applicant

Ryan McCullough,

CPH, Inc.

Project Planner

Michaëlle Petion

Orange County

CUP2014-00019 —M cDonald’s Bogcoossee

FU TU RE LAN D US E MA P

ZO N IN G MA P

Subject Site

Subject Site


PR O JE CT AN A LYS IS Project Description

The 1.88 acre subject site is located near the northwest corner of Narcoossee Rd. and Boggy Creek Rd., within the Narcoossee South

neighborhood. The site is part of the larger 10.2 acre Boggy Creek Narcoossee Commercial Center, which received overall master

plan approval in 2012. The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow a McDonald’s drive-through lane as

well as Specific Parcel Master Plan approval for the development of the 4,388 sq. ft. eating and drinking use. The site has a Future

Land Use designation of Neigh-AC (Neighborhood Activity Center) and a zoning designation of AC-N/AN. The proposal is consis-

tent with both the Zoning and Future Land Use designations.

Previous Actions:

2006– Annexation, GMP amendment to apply the Neighborhood Activity Center future land use designation, and rezoning to

Neighborhood Activity Center. (ANX2005-00042, GMP2006-00015, ZON2006-00011)

2010– Current owners purchased the subject property.

2012– MPB recommended approval of a framework Master Plan to allow for a six lot phased commercial development.

(February; MPL2011-00025)

2012– Zoning Official issued a Letter of Determination clarifying ISR requirements for the development and reducing the buffer-

yard requirements along the southern and eastern site boundaries. (September; LDC2012-00306)

2014– Technical Review Committee approval of a major subdivision request for a 4-lot development. Plat has not yet been re-

corded. (August; SUB2014-00044)

Project Context The subject site is currently undeveloped and undergoing the platting process. Consolidated from a 6 lot development into 4 parcels,

the subject site is proposed Lot 4, located on the northeastern portion of the site. Surrounding uses, zoning, and future land uses are

shown in Table 1 below. The Southeastern Oaks Planned Development to the east is approved for retail and civic uses along Nar-

coossee Rd.

Conformance with the GMP

As indicated in Figure LU-1 of the Future Land Use Element, commercial use is allowed under and consistent with the Neighbor-

hood Activity Center future land use designation. There are no GMP future land use subarea policies affecting the subject property.

The proposal is consistent with the GMP.

Conformance with the LDC

The proposed development site has a zoning designation of AC-N/AN (Neighborhood Activity Center with the Aircraft Noise over-

lay). The AC-N district is intended to provide for concentrated areas of neighborhood-serving commercial, office, residential, rec-

reational and cultural facilities, at intensities compatible with surrounding neighborhoods.. The “AN” is intended to protect the

health, safety, and welfare of persons and property in the vicinity of the OIA and OEA. It’s also intended to reduce noise and safety

hazards associated with aircraft operations, to preserve the operational stability of the airports, and assist in the implementation of

policies and recommendations found in the City's Growth Management Plan and in appropriate FAA sponsored Part 150 studies.

No minimum FAR requirements exist for the AC-N zoning district and the subject site is well under the maximum FAR of 0.30. See

Table 2– Development Standards. The one-story building will comply with the maximum height restrictions of 35ft. The applicant

proposes an Impervious Surface Ratio (ISR) calculation of 0.73, which is below the maximum allowance of 0.75.

Table 1—Project Context

Future Land Use Zoning Surrounding Use

North Neighborhood Activity Center AC-N/AN Vacant land

East Urban Village & Rural/Agriculture

(unincorporated)

PD/AN & Unincorporated Orange

County

Vacant land

South Low Density Residential Unincorporated Osceola County Single family residence & a con-

venience store/gas station

West Residential Low R-1/AN Single-family residences


PR O JE CT AN A LYS IS

Drive-through facilities in the AC-N zoning district require a Conditional Use Permit. Drive-throughs are required to provide a by-

pass aisle, which the applicant has provided adjacent to the drive-through lane. City code also requires queuing for a minimum of

six cars, which the applicant has provided. The AC-N zoning district has a minimum rear setback of 20 ft. All other minimum set-

backs are 0 ft. The proposed McDonald’s is consistent with setback regulations. Bufferyard standards were provided with the frame-

work Master Plan.

Transportation

The site is currently accessed directly from Narcoossee Rd. as well as via the internal spine road of the development that runs along

the site’s northern and western boundaries. Eating and drinking uses require between 5 and 20 parking spaces for every 1,000 sq. ft.

of GFA. The proposed developed restaurant is 4,388 sq. ft., thereby requiring a minimum of 23 spaces and a maximum of 88 spaces;

44 parking spaces are proposed.

Urban Design

The subject site is unique in that it is immediately outside of the Southeast Sector, whose purpose is to “create a sustainable and bal-

anced community in the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan area with the characteristics of traditional "Orlando": where streets are con-

venient and comfortable for walking, where parks are a focus for public activity, and where the life and vitality of a mid-sized town

can be enjoyed by its residents and visitors.” The site is also a gateway into Orlando from Osceola County to the south as well as

Orange County to the east. Its design and layout should be mindful of those considerations.

The previously approved framework master plan included façade requirements based on the orientation of the building to the right-of

-way (R-O-W). Lots adjacent to the public R-O-W are required to designate two primary facades or have the principal facade of the

building , which will be the façade facing Narcoossee or Boggy Creek Roads, parallel to the R-O-W. This addresses visibility of the

buildings from Narcoossee, which has an angled nature in this road segment, in addition to allowing for a better streetscape. The

applicant proposes a building parallel to Narcoossee Rd. and therefore has only one primary façade.

Table 2—Development Standards

Phase Acreage Use Site Sq. Ft. Density (dwelling units per acre)

FAR (floor area ratio)

Building Height ISR (impervious surface

ratio)

Minimum /

Maximum Proposed Minimum /

Maximum Proposed Maximum* Proposed Maximum Proposed

1 1.88 Commer-

cial

4,388 sq. ft. N/A N/A 0/0.3 0.05 35ft. 25 ft. 0.75 0.73


OV E RA LL DE V EL OPME NT

Lot 4, subject site

Lot 1

Lot 2 Lot 3


SU RVE Y

Subject Site Lot 4


PR OP OS ED S I TE PLA N

Proposed drive-

through lane

Landscape island shall be a

minimum of 10 ft. in width.

Primary facade


PR OP OS ED ELE VAT IO NS


S I TE

PH O TO S

Subject site as viewed from Narcoossee Rd.

Overall development as viewed from the intersection of Boggy creek Rd. and

Narcoossee Rd.

CUP2014-00019 —McDonald’s Bogcoossee

Page 10 CUP2014-00019 —M cDonald’s Bogcoossee

F I N DI N GS Subject to the conditions contained herein, the proposal is consistent with the requirements for approval of Conditional Use Permit

applications contained in Chapter 65 of the Land Development Code (LDC):

1. The proposed use is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan.

2. The proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the LDC.

3. The proposed use will be compatible with surrounding land uses and the general character of the area.

4. The necessary public facilities will be adequate to serve the proposed use, or will be provided by the applicant as a condition of

this approval.

Subject to the conditions contained herein, the proposal is consistent with the requirements for approval of Master Plan applications

contained in Section 65.335 of the Land Development Code (LDC):

1. The proposed use is consistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan.

2. The proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the AC-3/SP and AC-3/RP/SP zoning district and all other require-

ments of the LDC.

3. The proposed use will be compatible with surrounding land uses and the general character of the area.

4. The necessary public facilities will be adequate to serve the proposed use, or will be provided by the applicant as a condition of

this approval.

Staff recommends approval of the proposed CUP and SPMP for, subject to the following conditions:

AE R IA L

Subject Property


Page 11

CO N D IT IO NS OF APP RO VAL


Growth Management 1.The Comprehensive Planning Studio has no objections to the proposed conditional use permit.

Land Development

1. Scope of Conditional Use. This use shall operate only as described within this report. All of the improvements shown in the at-

tached site plan (and as amended by any conditions found herein) are required as a condition of approval. Any changes in the use of

the site, the operation of the project, or the site plan as described herein may require a new or amended Conditional Use Permit/MPL

(see "Minor Modifications" condition). This approval is not transferable to another property.

2. Minor Modifications. Minor modifications and design changes including but not limited to fences, signs, landscaping, interior

alterations, and other minor changes, that are required beyond those previously reviewed by the Municipal Planning Board, may be

approved by the Planning Official without further review by the Municipal Planning Board. Major changes shall require additional

review by the Municipal Planning Board.

3. Permit Compliance. All plans submitted with the applicant's building permit application(s) must comply with the conditions of

approval provided in the Municipal Planning Board staff report and any amendments to those conditions approved by the Municipal

Planning Board or City Council. No building permit will be issued for this project until all conditions of approval are complied with

and reflected in the plans submitted with the building permit application.

4. Regulations Subject to Code. Except as provided herein, the proposed project is subject to the conditions of this report and all

codes and ordinances of the State of Florida, City of Orlando and all other applicable regulatory agencies.

5. CUP Expiration. Approval of the Conditional Use by City Council shall grant the applicant authority to submit an application for

site plan/master plan review for a building permit. The permit application must be submitted and a permit issued within two (2)

years of approval of City Council or the Conditional Use Permit shall expire. However, upon written application filed 30 days prior

to the expiration date, the Planning Official may renew the Conditional Use Permit for a one period of up to 12 months providing

good cause is shown.

6. Master Plan Approval. Approval of the Master Plan by City Council shall grant the applicant authority to submit an application for

preliminary plat and/or final site plan approval for a building permit. Such application must be submitted within 24 months of ap-

proval or the Master Plan shall expire. However, the Planning Official may extend this time limit for one period of up to twelve

months for good cause shown upon written application filed 30 days prior to the expiration date.

7. Conformance with Master Plan Required. Conformance with all applicable conditions of the framework Master Plan (MPL2011-

00025) approval shall be required.

8. Landscape Island. All landscape islands, specifically along the west, adjacent to the drive-through lane, shall be a minimum of 10

ft. in wide.

Urban Design 1. Appearance Review

a. An Appearance Review shall be required prior to building permits being issued. All Urban Design conditions of approval shall be

address in revised drawings prior to Appearance Review meeting.

2. Architecture

a. Architectural elevations shall be generally consistent with those provided in the application. Significant deviation from those ele-

vations shall require a master plan amendment. Minor changes may be approved by staff.

b. Minimum 30% transparency required on primary façades (i.e., oriented toward the public right-of-way or internal streets or drive-

ways) for each floor below the roofline. Exterior glazing shall be clear on all facades (minimum of 80% light transmittance).

3. Lighting

a. Site lighting must be consistent with City of Orlando Ordinance #2013-73. Light-emitting diode (LED) lamps are encouraged.


Page 12

CO N D IT IO NS OF APP RO VAL (CO NT . )


Dumpsters

a. All dumpsters and trash compactors shall be screened with solid walls to match the principal structure. Decorative gates shall be

installed to coordinate with principal structure. Landscape screen including low hedge and groundcover required to soften the view

from the public ROW.

4. Site Improvements

a. Fencing - Any fencing shall be open, CPTED-approved fence, such as aluminum or wrought-iron picket fencing.

b. Sidewalk Connections - A minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian pathway shall connect from the principal building entrances and exits

to the street sidewalk and to adjacent parcel sidewalk networks.

c. Provide stamped concrete, pavers, or an alternative material treatment with a smooth surface for all pedestrian crosswalks.

5. Landscaping

a. All landscaping shall meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the landscape code.

b. Chapter 61 of City Code requires landscape areas at least 10' in width at the end of each parking row. The row of 4 parking spaces

adjacent to the drive-through lane must have 10' at each end.

c. A tree survey has not been provided. Prior to submission of permitting plans, the applicant shall submit a tree survey, with a sec-

ond plan showing all existing trees superimposed onto the site plan for review. If no trees are existing on the site, a signed and sealed

letter to that effect is required. These documents shall be submitted to City Planning Division and to City Parks Division.

d. Existing trees (not including those classified as invasive, exotic species) shall be preserved to the extent practical. The placement

of underground utilities, including irrigation, within the driplines of existing trees to be preserved shall be done by means of tunnel-

ing rather than trenching. Any melaleuca, chinaberry, Chinese tallow, Brazilian pepper, camphor, or Australian pines existing on the

site shall be removed.

e. Tree clearing (excluding the clearing of invasive exotic species) shall not commence until full site and building development plans

have been approved.

f. City Code requires street trees. Because of the design speed and narrow parkway strip along Narcoossee Road, the required street

trees shall be placed on the site, in addition to (not in lieu of) required on-site trees. Because the priority for all street tree plantings is

canopy trees, these "shifted" street trees shall be canopy trees, except in the case of overriding site-specific conditions. In the case

that canopy trees cannot be placed between the parking and the right-of-way, the equivalent payment of money shall be made into

the street tree trust fund.

Transportation Planning The Transportation Planning Division supports the applicant's request provided that the owner/applicant complies with the following:

1. Work within Road ROW. All costs associated with the creation of the median opening and turn lane on Narcoossee Road shall be

the responsibility of the applicant and or the developer of the Narcoossee Commerce Center. This work shall be completed prior to

issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. All work within the Right-of-Way for Narcoossee Road, including median

and sidewalk work shall be permitted through Orange County. Contact David Pearce at 407-836-7785 or [email protected]

to initiate this process.

2. Pedestrian Access- Specific. The submitted plans shall be modified to include a clear delineated pedestrian path between the south

side of the building and the adjacent property. Path shall include MUTCD compliant striping and accessibility ramps.

Transportation Engineering

1. Driveway– Design. The proposed driveway shall meet Orlando Land Development Code (LDC), Chapter 61 (Sections 61.240 ¿

61.242), and Engineering Standards Manual (ESM), Section 8.11, design requirements including, but not limited to the following:

1. Driveway width;

2. Spacing (driveway spacing from other driveways);

3. Number and location of driveways;

4. Angle;

5. Radii; and

6. Grade

2. Driveways: Sight Distance. At all project entrances, clear sight distances for drivers and pedestrians shall not be blocked by signs,

buildings, building columns, landscaping, or other visual impediments. No structure, fence, wall, or other visual impediment shall


Page 13



obstruct vision between 3 feet and 8 feet in height above street level. The street corner / driveway visibility area shall be shown and

noted on construction plans and any future site plan submittals. The applicant shall design the site plan as necessary to comply with

the Florida Greenbook and the FDOT Design Standards Index. Sight lines shall be provided on both the site and landscape/

hardscape plans.

3. Parking Lot Design. The proposed parking lot must comply with Orlando Land Development Code (LDC) and Engineering Stan-

dards Manual (ESM) requirements. Refer to LDC, Chapter 61, Part 3, for parking and loading standards.

4. FDOT/OC Approval. The proposed improvements, located within the Narcoossee Road right-of-way, require Florida Department

of Transportation (FDOT) and approvals. The Owner/Applicant shall provide a copy of the permits and approval (or letter of intent

of approval) from the approving agency to the City of Orlando prior to final permit/construction plans approval.

Engineering/Zoning

1. ESM. The City Council Adopted the Engineering Standards Manual Fourth Edition (ESM) on March 9, 2009. All plans must con-

form to the ESM and all construction must be accomplished in accordance to the ESM.

2. Sewer– Orange County. Per the Orlando-Orange County Wastewater Territorial Agreement the subject property is located within

Orange County's territorial service area. This site will be serviced by Orange County Public Utilities, prior to issuance of permits an

invoice or receipt will be required by the Office of Permitting Services.

3. Erosion– Building Site. All building site plans submitted for review should include a detailed erosion and sedimentation control

plan.

4.. Orange County. Any construction within Narcoossee Road right of-way of will require Orange County approval/permit prior to

construction.

5. Storm– Misc. A letter of Modification from South Florida Water Management District is required prior to issuance of building

permit.

6. Sidewalk. As per Section 61.225 of the Land Development Code, a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk is required along all dedicated

rights-of-way. Any existing sidewalk damaged or broken is to be repaired.

7. Eng/Zoning Misc. In accordance with City Code Section 28.6 (f) 1-3, the Office of Permitting Services is authorized to make a

determination of approval/disapproval of refuse container sites.

The dumpster must have a minimum opening of 12' wide and a clear depth of 10' forward of any bollards within the enclosure

(Double dumpster shall have a minimum 24' opening and depth of 10' clear).

Approval/disapproval of the use of commercial hand pick-up of refuse from any non-residential entity shall be determined solely by

the Refuse Collection Bureau Staff

8. Concurrency– Chapter 59. All new construction, change in use, additions, or redevelopments are required to submit a Concurrency

Management application as a part of the building plan review process.

Police 1. CPTED Review. The Orlando Police Department has reviewed the plans for the McDonalds with drive-thru located at 14902 Nar-

coossee Rd., utilizing CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) principles. CPTED emphasizes the proper design

and effective use of a created environment to reduce crime and enhance the quality of life. There are four overlapping strategies in

CPTED that apply to any development: Natural Surveillance, Natural Access Control, Territorial Reinforcement and Target Harden-

ing.

2. Natural Surveillance. Design the sites to keep intruders easily observable. This is promoted by features that maximize visibility of

people, parking areas and building entrances; doors and windows that look out onto streets and parking areas; pedestrian-friendly

sidewalks and street; and adequate nighttime lighting. • All lighting for this project shall meet or exceed the guidelines in Orlando City Code, Title II, Chapter 63, Part 2M.

o Lighting is universally considered to be the most important security feature. Illumination, uniformity, and glare


Page 14



should all be taken into consideration.

o Good lighting provides visual guidance and orientation to employees and visitors and improves the perception of their

safety especially in areas not easily observed from main walkways.

o Appropriate lighting should be included in any areas anticipated to be utilized after dark. This includes parking areas,

building entrances, trash and recycle enclosures, and service or delivery areas.

o Exterior lighting should not be screened out by landscaping (especially pedestrian scale lighting) or building struc-

tures such as overhangs or awnings.

o Uniformity of light is crucial to avoid 'dark' spots, especially in parking areas.

o Any illumination shall not cause a glare or excessive brightness that adversely affects the vision of pedestrians or

motor vehicle operators on public or private property.

o Pedestrian walkways, back lanes and access routes open to public spaces should be lit so that a person with normal

vision is able to identify a face from a distance of 30 feet during nighttime hours.

o Lighting fixtures should be reliable, easy to maintain, withstand the elements, and be vandal-resistant. • Landscaping: Low-growing shrubs are an excellent means for defining an area that requires visual surveillance.

o All shrubs should be kept trimmed to no higher than 2 ½ feet and should not block windows.

o Tree branches should be kept trimmed to a minimum of 6 feet from the ground; branches should be kept away from

roof; trees should not prevent building occupants from viewing entrances or sidewalks; tree canopies should not inter-

fere with lighting or mechanical surveillance.

o A maintenance plan is essential in landscaping. • Exterior (non public) doors should be made of a solid material, metal frames, interior hinges (or hinges with security pins),

a minimum 3" screws in the strike plates and have 180° viewers/peep holes or small windows. • Since there is typically no natural surveillance between buildings and dumpsters, be sure this area is well-lit and that light-

ing is well maintained. • The proposed bicycle parking pad should be observable from the building entrances, securely fastened and not hidden be-

hind landscaping. • Ensure that any awnings or overhangs do not interfere with lighting if these locations are to be used during nighttime hours.

• Window signs should cover no more than 15% of the windows.

• Decals which display height measures should be posted inside each entrance.

• Public restrooms should be visible from the main customer areas and away from outside exits.

3. Natural Access Control. Design the sites to decrease crime opportunity by denying access to crime targets and creating in offend-

ers, a perception of risk. This can be accomplished by designing street, sidewalks, building and parking lot entrances to clearly indi-

cate public routes and discourage access to private areas with structural and landscape elements. • Public entrances should be clearly defined by walkways, signs, and landscaping. Landscaping used around the property

should create clear way-finding, be well lit and not block entrances or create ambush points. • There should be no easy access to the roof of the building.

• If awnings are installed over exterior doors, ensure they do not block lighting of the doors.

• Signs located in the parking lot should remind employees and customers to lock their vehicles and keep valuables out of

sight. • Way-finding located throughout the property should help guide users to authorized areas while discouraging potential of-

fenders. • Signage with hours of operation should be clearly visible at any public entrance.

• Traffic calming techniques as well as surface and gateway treatments should be used to encourage safe vehicle speeds, re-

duce collision frequency and increase the safety and the perception of safety for non-motorized users. • Walkways should be a minimum 6' in width to enhance pedestrian flow.

• Cashier or reception area should have unobstructed views of approaching customers and employees.

4. Territorial Reinforcement. Design can create or extend a sphere of influence, where users develop a sense of territorial control,

while potential offenders are discouraged. This is promoted by features that define property lines and distinguish private spaces from

public spaces using landscape plantings, pavement designs, gateway treatments and CPTED open design (see-through) fences. • The property should be designed to encourage interaction between users.

• The restaurant should have an address that is clearly visible from the parking lot and street with numbers a minimum of five

-inches high made of non-reflective material. • Fencing can add security, delineate property lines, allow transparency for surveillance, be unobtrusive, and create a sense of

community. CPTED style fencing, up to 6-foot in height, made of commercial grade steel is a good option to consider. An-

other option is landscape buffers that include hostile vegetation, to delineate public from private spaces. The fencing and


Page 15



landscape buffer may be used together to further define and control spaces. • Maintenance is an important aspect of territorial reinforcement. A well-maintained area sends the message that people no-

tice and care about what happens in an area. This in turn discourages vandalism and other crimes. • We support the use of bollards around the building to protect life-safety elements and critical utilities.

• Air conditioner units should be caged and the cages should be locked at all times.

5. Target Hardening. This is accomplished by incorporating features that prohibit entry or access such as window locks, single-

cylinder dead bolts for doors and interior door hinges. • Door locks should be located a minimum of 40 inches from adjacent windows.

• An access control system should be utilized to keep private areas private such as employee break areas, storage rooms and

employee only entrances. • A security camera system capable of recording and retrieving an image to assist in offender identification and apprehension

should be installed. Security cameras should be mounted at an optimal height to capture offender identification ("aiming"

down from the ceiling often results in images of the offender's hat). CCTVs should also be placed in several locations

throughout the parking areas, especially areas with limited or no natural surveillance. • The restaurant should have a commercial alarm system that is regularly maintained. During working hours, the alarm sys-

tem should be programmed so that a short beep is sounded if a door opens. • OPD's Crime Prevention Unit encourages the use of tempered or impact resistant glass for all large glass doors and win-

dows or a security film (such as Lexan™) to reduce the opportunity for burglaries, i.e. "smash and grabs". If security film is

utilized, ensure that the light transmittance of the security film is greater than or equal to the light transmittance of the win-

dow's glass. • Non-public doors should be kept locked from the outside at all times. Internal restaurant policy should prohibit the

"propping open" of exterior doors. • The restaurant should contain a drop safe or cash management device.

• A conspicuous sign should be placed at the entrance which states that the cash register contains $50 or less.

Additional precautions, such as silent alarms and retail theft training (what to do during a robbery), should be discussed with

OPD's Crime Prevention Unit Officer Edgar Malave, 407.246.2513.

6. Construction Site Crime Prevention. Due to the continued trend of theft of building materials and equipment from construction

sites, Orlando Police Department's Crime Prevention Unit strongly recommends that the developer institute the following crime pre-

vention/security measures at this project site:

1) Post signs at the site that theft from the site or trespassing on a construction site is a felony under Florida Law and that the

developer will prosecute.

2) To improve visibility of potential offenders by OPD patrol officers, perimeter lighting should be installed at a minimum of

150 foot intervals and at a height not less than fifteen (15') from the ground. The light source used should have a minimum light

output of 2,000 lumens, shall be protected by a vandal resistant cover, and shall be lighted during the hours of darkness.

3) In addition to lighting, one of the following physical security measures should be installed:

a. Fencing, not less than six (6') feet in height, which is designed to preclude human intrusion, should be installed along the

perimeter boundaries of the site and should be secured with chain and fire department padlocks for emergency vehicle ac-

cess; post in a clear area, an emergency contact person and phones numbers for after hours, in case of an emergency; or

b. A uniformed security guard should be hired to continually patrol the construction site during the hours when construction

work has ceased.

4) Valuable construction materials and tools should be protected in a secondary fenced, locked cage.

5) Post in a clean, open area, the name and numbers of an emergency contact person for OPD in case of a night-time emer-

gency.

If you have any questions, please call the Crime Prevention Unit Edgar Malave, 407.246.2513.

7. Innovative Response to Improve Safety (I.R.I.S.) Camera System. OPD recommends that the developer contact OPD in an effort

to coordinate camera system technology. OPD has the ability to monitor specified external camera systems from private facilities at

the will of the developer or building owner. OPD monitoring will be in addition to self- monitoring and will not replace building

camera monitoring. OPD will not have the ability to interfere with or manipulate building camera systems, only view. The additional

monitoring is beneficial to both the developer/owner and OPD as a crime prevention and overall public safety solution.

IRIS questions should be directed to the Orlando Police Department, Sgt. Andy Brennan, at [email protected].


Page 16 CUP2014-00019 —M cDonald’s Bogcoossee

CO N TAC T IN F ORM AT IO N Growth Management

For questions regarding Growth Management plan review, please contact Mary-Stewart Droege at 407.246.3276 or mary-

[email protected].

Land Development

For questions regarding Land Development review, please contact Michaëlle Petion at (407) 246-3837 or

[email protected].

Urban Design

For questions regarding Urban Design plan review, please contact Ken Pelham, at 407.246.3235 or ken-

[email protected]

Transportation Planning

For questions regarding Transportation Planning plan review, please contact John Rhoades at 407-246-2293 or

[email protected]

Transportation Engineering

For questions regarding Transportation Planning plan review, please contact Lauren Torres at 407-246-3220 or

[email protected]

Engineering/Zoning

For questions regarding Engineering or Zoning contact Keith Grayson at (407) 246-3234 or

[email protected]. To obtain plan review status, schedule/cancel an inspection and obtain inspection

results, please call PROMPT, our Interactive Voice Response System at 407.246.4444.

Police

For questions regarding Orlando Police Department plan review, please contact Audra Nordaby at 407.246.2454 or

[email protected].

Building/Fire

For questions regarding Building Plan Review issues contact Don Fields at (407) 246-2654 or [email protected].

Parks-Trees

For questions regarding Tree removal issues contact Justin Garber at (407) 246-4047 or [email protected]

RE V I E W /AP P R O VA L PRO C ESS—NE X T ST E P S 1. MPB meeting minutes scheduled for review and approval by City Council.

2. Apply for building permits.

mcdonald s b - city of orlando 10 cup2014-00019 —mcdonald’s bogcoossee page 10 cup2014-00019...

Documents