me2101 1 design process 2016

Upload: shumukong

Post on 07-Jul-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    1/63

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    2/63

    16

    Application of Design Process

    Case Study

    Design of a DIYConcrete Mixer

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    3/63

    17

    First step is to identify specific need (ormarket) that is to be satisfied by a solutionbased upon technology.

    Engineering design is a purposeful activitydirected toward the goal of fulfilling human

    needs.

    Driving forces behind design projects maycome from….

    Recognition of need

    Recognition of Need

    Impetus from designer sponsor:Customers, government agencies, etc

    Impetus from a changing market

    Impetus from a changing customeror stakeholder needs

    Impetus from technological breakthrough

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    4/63

    18

    Sony Walkman: Portable and individual music

    Examples of design needs:

    Aircraft-safe bullets: Counteract hijackersbut save the plane

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    5/63

    19

    Harvesting of water

    Need:

    50% (2.5 billion) of world’s populationhas no access to clean, drinkable water.

    How to design an innovative,inexpensive, simple but functionalproduct to create potable water?

    African Sahara Desert beetle

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    6/63

    20

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    7/63

    21

    Moisture in air condenseson surface. Droplets roll

    down and collected at rim.

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    8/63

    22

    Need: To fulfill the craze of buyers for rockets and jet engines in the Post WWII period.

    1959 Cadillac Cyclone

    1956 Oldsmobile Rocket 1959 Cadillac Biarritz

    Need: To fulfill desire of those who missed owning

    a classical car; to arouse nostalgic emotion of olderdrivers and attract Y-generation car buyers.

    Mazda Miata VW Beetle

    Mini Cooper Fiat 500

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    9/63

    23

    Existing product may need to beredesigned to:

    • eliminate shortcomings by incorporatingnew technology and manufacturingmethods

    • better serve changing needs of users

    • to meet competition in the marketplace

    • reduce cost of the product

    Good design is good business……

    All products can be improved through design……

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    10/63

    24

    Run-away alarm clock

    Fly-away alarmclock thatmakesmosquito noise

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    11/63

    25

    aXbo Sleep Phase Alarm Clock

    During sleep, each person goes through varioussleeping cycles each of 90 to 110 minutes.

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    12/63

    26

    Lance Armstrong’s Tour de France Bicycle

    MICHELIN® TWEEL™

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    13/63

    27

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    14/63

    28

    Waterlessurinal

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    15/63

    29

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Client may impose constraints to fit budget,company manufacturing capabilities or marketniche.

    Additional constraints may be: Convention or code (such as building codes)

    Compatibility with existing equipment (eg. Standard tire

    sizes) Compatibility with mating parts of an assembly

    Available power requirement (eg. 220V, 15amps, etc)

    Regulatory requirements (eg. Auto emission rules)

    Industry standards (eg. Thread on a light bulb base)

    Product environment (eg. Temperature, pressure,humidity)

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    16/63

    30

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Ferrari Lamborghini

    6 Speed Manual Standard Transmission 6 Speed Manual3.6L V8 Standard Engine 6.2L V123586 Displacement (cc) 6192

    40 Valves 48400 at 8500 rpm Horsepower 571 at 7500 rpm276 at 4750 rpm Torque (lb/ft) 479 at 5400 rpm35.4/35.4 Steer Diameter (Curb) 41.2/41.2MID/RWD Engine Location/Drive MID/4WD-FTDisc/Disc Brakes (Fr/Rr) Disc/Disc215/45R18 Tires 245/35R183197/NA Curb Weight 3638/NA102.3 Wheelbase(Fr/Rr) 104.965.7/63.6 Track 64.4/66.7176.3 Length 180.375.7 Width 80.548.6 Height 44.7

    Lamborghini - Murcielago 6.2Ferrari - 360 Modena Spider

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    17/63

    31

    Key Features :

    • 1.8in. LCD display• Resolution: 640 x 480 pixels, 320 x 240 mode• No. of pictures: 15 at 640 x 480, 50 at 320 x 240

    Additional Features :

    • Automatic focus• Self-timer• Automatic power-saving mode• Video cable included for TV view• 3 Flash modes: Autoflash, Force Flash, and No Flash• JPEG compression

    Specifications :

    • Internal memory: 2MB• Flash Range: 3 to 6 feet (1 to 1.8 m)• Focus Range: 3 feet (1 m) to infinity• Batteries: 4 AA (included) or AC adapter (included)• Packaged with PhotoMAX SE Software

    • Dimensions 2.63 in.H x 5.38 in. L x 1.88 in. D• Weight 10 oz. (with batteries)

    System Requirements :• Windows 95 or 98 only, CD-ROM drive, 32MB RAMmemory, 85MB hard drive space, VGA monitor with 16-bitdisplay card, 24-bit recommended, Sound card(recommended), Available RS-232C serial port

    PhotoMAX Fun Flash640 digital camerafrom Polaroid

    Example of DesignSpecification:

    Portable Winch

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    18/63

    32

    Design Brief

    From internal market research, it has been decided that IWC needs to design ageneral purpose winch to sell to the cable and pipe laying market sector. The winchshould be portable but have mounting points for the end user. It is important that thewinch sits within our current range of 'Excel General Purpose winches'.

    1.0 Performance 1.1 Lift / lower a load of 2.5 tonnes (+/- 10%). 1.2 Draw in cable in at a rate of 0.2 m/s. 1.3 Winch drive should cut out when the load exceeds 10% of the specified load. 1.4 Drive to stop lowering load when only 1.5 metres of cable remains on drum. 1.5 Winch should operate with forward, reverse, stop and inch facility. 1.6 Any braking system employed, should produce a braking torque of 150% the

    full load torque. 1.7 Winch should have a manual device to control the brake release and load

    descent in the event of a power failure. 1.8 In the event of the winch 'overrunning', a manual safety relay/braking device

    should operate within 1 second or before the load exceeds a speed of 3m/s. 1.9 The product should be portable but with the option for permanent mounting. 1.10 The product must use a portable power source, preferably a diesel engine. 1.11 The weight of the product must be sufficient to aid the stability of the product. 1.12 Efficiency of the unit should be high, preferably in the area of 20 - 30%. 1.13 The drum should hold 50m of cable.

    2.0 Environment 2.1 The winch drive and power unit should be power unit. 2.2 The unit will be mainly used in European weather conditions. But we

    could expect sales of about 2% unit volume to the Far East. 2.3 Temperature ranges:

    -28 degree C - European12 - 44 degree C - Far East

    2.4 The product may experience humid conditions. 2.5 Corrosion resistance may be considered by the use of special materials

    or surface protection methods. 2.6 Any noise from the equipment should not exceed 95 dB at a distance of

    1.0m. 2.7 The winch will be stored in suppliers warehouses before sales.

    3.0 Product Life Span 3.1 Product will be on the market for 10 years. 3.2 Spare parts will be available for a further 5 years after that.

    4.0 Life in Service 4.1 Should withstand an operating period of 1 hr uninterrupted use per day

    for 5 years. 4.2 Life in service should be assessed against the criteria outlined in the

    Performance and Environment categories.

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    19/63

    33

    5.0 Shelf Life 5.1 The product will be stored on-site for up to 1 month before dispatched. 5.2 Our Far East distributor may store the product for several months.

    6.0 Target Costs 6.1 The product should have an end-user cost of £5500 within Britain. 6.2 The cost of manufacture should be less than £2750. 6.3 The cost of packaging and shipping should be no more than 15% of the

    manufacturing cost.

    7.0 Quantity 7.1 150 units in the first year, increasing to 800 within four years.

    8.0 Maintenance 8.1 To be maintenance free except for light lubrication once a month and a

    recommended service every two years. 8.2 Parts requiring lubrication should be accessible within 15 minutes

    without the use of special tools or equipment. 8.3 All fasteners used should comply with BS6105. 8.4 Spares should be available for 5 years after the product is replaced with

    a new model. 8.5 No special tools should be required for maintenance.

    9.0 Marketing 9.1 Initially to be manufactured for European market but Far Eastern

    distributors in Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia will find a market. 9.2 The winch should be operating against equivalent models which

    include the following companies: Swansom - England Oholom - Sweden Winderhock - Germany

    9.3 Applicable markets: Telecom - Cable laying Gas and Electricity operators

    Pipe laying services Civil Engineering Operations

    9.4 Summary of market requirements: Portable winch which can be attached to vans and low loaders Use portable power source To be used in all weather To allow one man operation To have at least 40m of cable To pull 2000kg

    10.0 Packaging 10.1 Packaging / transport cost should be kept to a minimum and

    preferably below 5% of the unit cost.

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    20/63

    34

    11.0 Size and Weight Restrictions 11.1 Weight should not exceed 500 kg. 11.2 Length not to exceed 2500 mm.

    11.3 Width not to exceed 2000mm. 11.4 Height not to exceed 2000mm.

    12.0 Shipping 12.1 Product will be shipped by road within Europe. 12.2 Product will be shipped by sea to Far Eastern markets.

    13.0 Manufacturing Processes 13.1 Capacity is available for current market demand within scope to increase production to

    200 per year without investment / expansion. 13.2 Motors, transmissions, bearing and ropes are bought in from the following suppliers: Drives:

    Electric Motors - Brook Compton Diesel Engines - Gardener Hydraulic Motors - Hydrostatic Transmission Ltd

    Bearings: RHP Bearings

    Transmissions: Couplings - Wellman Bibby Worm Gears - Reynold Planetary Gears - David Brown (PPG Divisions) In-Line Gears - David Brown Radicon Ltd V-belts - Fenner

    Ropes: Bridon

    13.3 Castings and injection moulds produced by external suppliers.

    14.0 Aesthetics 14.1 The form can follow function. 14.2 If cost dictates, the winch should look attractive to improve our perception

    within the market.

    15.0 Ergonomics 15.1 Controls to be mounted in an accessible position, relative to the operator i.e.

    waist height - around 1m, to accommodate 95% of the working population. 15.2 All controls should be hand operated, requiring one-hand operation with a

    maximum force of 1.5 N/m2 15.3 One man should be able to operate the product.

    16.0 Customer Requirements

    See Marketing 

    17.0 Competition 17.1 The winch will be operating against equivalent models which include the

    following companies: Swansom - England Oholom - Sweden Winderhock - Germany

    18.0 Quality and Reliability 18.1 Quality should be such that winches should not generally fail within a period

    of three years and only 1 in 50 should fail within the first year. 18.2 No winch should fail in the area of the safety overload device.

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    21/63

    35

    19.0 Standards and Specifications 19.1 Standards to be adhered to:

    BS 5000 part 99 Motor Performance BS 6105 and BSEN 20898(1) Bolts BS 6322(2) & BS 4320 Nuts and washers BS 7676 and BS 4517 Gears BS 3019 Welding BS 5989 Bearings BS 2754 Electrical Insulation BS 5646 pt4 Bearing Housing BS 4235 Keys and Keyways BS 7664 Painting BS 1399 Seals

    20.0 Company Constraints 20.1 None - except those outlines in Manufacturing and Processes.

    21.0 Processes 21.1 All components to be of metric form and comply with ISO 4900 for

    limits and fits.

    22.0 Safety 22.1 No winch should fail in the area of the safety overload device. 22.2 Winch should not operate when maintenance is being carried out.

    23.0 Testing 23.1 Testing is to be carried out on 5% of units. 23.2 All cables should be tested to BS3621.

    24.0 Legal 24.0 Possible litigation lies in the user injuring themselves by having

    access to moving parts during winch operation.

    25.0 Installation N/A

    26.0 Documentation 26.1 Product should be supplied with a user manual covering winch

    operation and maintenance. 26.2 Suppliers require maintenance and repair manual.

    27.0 Disposal 27.1 Plastic parts should be separable and marked to aid disposal.

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    22/63

    36

    Design specs may be of several types:

    Physical Space allocation; dimensional requirement;

    weight limits; energy/power requirements…

    Environmental Moisture limits; dust levels; intensity of light;

    temperature range; noise limits……

    Functional or operational Acceptable vibrational ranges; operating

    times…

    Economic

    Limits on production costs; operating costs;service/maintenance requirements; existenceof competitors; equipment depreciation…

    Legal

    Government safety requirements;environmental/pollution control codes;production standards…

    Human factors/ergonomics

    Strength; intelligence; anatomical dimensionsof users…

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    23/63

    37

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Feasibility study

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Aim: to verify possible success or failure of adesign proposal from technical and economicstandpoint.

    Some factors to consider:

    Any natural law defied?Any specs beyond technically available

    currently?

    Any dependency on scarce materials?

    Product cost being too high?

    Any public objection to use of product?

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    24/63

    38

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Feasibility study

    Idea generation and development

    Identification of constraints imposed

    This is most challenging part of design whereinnovative ideas are generated (throughbrainstorming)

    All possible ideas are examined carefully andunbiasedly

    Best solution is chosen for preliminary design

    Overall configuration is made to establishfunctional relations between various parts andsystems to validate the functional and overall sizerequirements of design specifications

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    25/63

    39

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Feasibility study

    Idea generation and development

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Prototyping/Evaluation

    Built and test prototype to evaluateperformance and to decide uponmodifications required.

    At least three construction techniquesavailable:

    1. Mock-up :–

    Generally constructed to scale fromplastics, wood, cardboard, etc to givedesigner a feel of the design

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    26/63

    40

    Purpose – to check clearance, assembly

    techniques, manufacturing considerations,and appearance

    Least expensive

    May be replaced by solid model in CADsystem

    Often referred to as Proof of Conceptprototype

    Mock-up

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    27/63

    41

    Mock-up

    2. Model :-

    This is a detailed visual, mathematical, 2-D or 3-D representation of the design,often used to test ideas and/or makechanges to a design

    Purpose – test some of the functions orfeatures of the final design

    Often referred to as Proof of Productprototype

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    28/63

    42

    Computer Models

    3. Prototype :-

    This is a full-scale working model of adesign intended to have complete form, fitand function of the intended design

    Purpose – test a design concept bymaking actual observations and makingnecessary adjustments

    Most expensive technique but producesthe greatest amount useful information

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    29/63

    43

    Prototypes

    Prototype of J-20 Stealth fighter, China - 2011

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    30/63

    44

    Other departments involved at this stage of

    design include:

    Manufacturing

    Maintenance

    Materials, etc

    Some questions to ask:

    Can material be changed to improve product?Can parts be fabricated?

    What is the best process to fabricate them?

    Fabricate in-house or sub-contract out?

    Example: Airbus A380has been designed with

    25% of plane’s overallstructure made from

    lightweight carbon-fiberreinforced plastic to

    reduce weight.

    Materials used in Boeing 787 - Dreamliner

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    31/63

    45

    Use of Composites in Aircraft

       L  a  r  g  e  r  w   i  n   d  o  w  s  a  v  a   i   l  a   b   l  e

      o  n  c  o  m  m  e  r  c   i  a   l   a   i  r  c  r  a   f   t

    Single sectionfuselage and

    nose cone

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    32/63

    46

    More questions to ask:

    Can amount of material required bereduced?

    Can assembly time be reduced? Or madeeasier?

    Can number of drawings be reduced?

    Is there a simpler way to design it?

    Can it be made from standard parts?

    Is it more economical to buy part thandesigning and manufacturing it?

    How do others do it? Copy it? Modify it?Improve it? Buy it for your own use?

    NUMBER OF PARTS REDUCED Swatch used novelmaterials, manufacturing techniques and visual design tobeat foreign competition. The number of componentsinside is reduced drastically. The plastic casing quartzanalog watch requires only 51 parts compared to typical90 to 150 parts found in conventional watches. Flexiblemanufacturing system is used to allow easy changes ofdesign. More than 30 million such watches have beensold, saving the Swiss watch industry in the nick of time.

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    33/63

    47

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Feasibility study

    Idea generation and development

    Detailed design

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Prototyping/Evaluation

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    34/63

    48

    Finalise and fully design all componentsand systems with dimensions/tolerances,materials selection, quantity, andassembly details

    Prepare all working drawings

    Verification/Approval of drawings

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Feasibility study

    Idea generation and development

    Detailed design

    Production of design

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Prototyping/Evaluation

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    35/63

    49

    Approve detailed design and produceproduct

    Consider capital investment to pay forfor materials, labour, subcontractors,fabrication, and loan etc.

    Time schedule for production and

    delivery dates

    Network analysis chart: indicates a prototype design time of 12.5

    weeks is required (critical path along tasks 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20, 21, 22, 23 and 24)

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    36/63

    50

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Feasibility study

    Idea generation and development

    Detailed design

    Production of design

    Sale/Usage

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Prototyping/Evaluation

    Ensure supply of raw materials/services

    Distribution of

    Advertising and marketing

    Pricing to ensure optimum sales andprofits

    Feedback of public opinion

    Availability of spare parts and services

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    37/63

    51

    Morphologyof DesignProcess

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Feasibility study

    Idea generation and development

    Detailed design

    Production of design

    Sale/Usage

    Obsolescence

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Prototyping/Evaluation

    At end of useful life, product should notbe capable of prolonged operation

    Product to be succeeded by new

    improved version or scrap?

    Disposed? What about environment?Recycleable?

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    38/63

    52

    Example: Sony Walkman Before the Walkman is obsolete, new

    technologies and features have been introducedto prop up the sale of the product.

    History of innovation of Walkman 1979-1988:

    Feature Company Date Imitated

    Walkman Sony 1979 yes

    Mini headphones Sony 1979 Yes

    AM/FM stereo radio Sony 1980 yes

    Stereo recording Sony/Aiwa 1980/1 yes

    Feature Company Date Imitated

    FM tuner cassette Toshiba 1980/1 no

    Auto-reverse KLH SOLO 1981/2 yes

    FM headphone radio Sony 1981/2 yes

    Downsized unit Sony 1982 yes

    Dolby Sony/Aiwa 1982 yes

    Direct drive Sony 1982 no

    Cassette-sized unit Sony 1983 yes

    Short-wave tuner Sony 1983 no

    Remote control Aiwa 1983 yes

    Detachable speakers Aiwa 1983 yes

    Water resistance Sony 1983/4 no

    Graphic equalizer Sony 1985 yes

    Rechargeable Sony 1985 yes

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    39/63

    53

    Feature Company Date Imitated

    Solar-powered Sony 1986 noRadio presets Panasonic 1986 yes

    Dual cassette Sony 1986 no

    TV audio band Sony 1986/7 no

    Digital tuning Panasonic 1986/7 yes

    Child’s model Sony 1987 yes

    Enhanced bass Sony 1987/8 yes

    Voice activated Toshiba 1988 no

    As worldwide sales grew rapidly, competitionbecame intense. To maintain market share andleading position, Sony had to continually developand launch improved products, even beforeexisting ones became obsolete.

    Recognition of need

    Specifications and requirements

    Feasibility study

    Idea generation and development

    Detailed design

    Production of design

    Sale/Usage

    Obsolescence

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Prototyping/Evaluation

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    40/63

    54

    Application ofDesign Process

    Case Study

    Design of a DIY

    Concrete Mixer

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    41/63

    55

    KonKret-miKs Ltd, also known as 3KCompany, designs and produces a widerange of building construction equipment.

    Market Research Department of 3K

    Company has identified a gap in themarket for low-cost low-capacity concretemixers suitable for practical do-it-yourselfenthusiasts.

    Recognition of need

    Board Meeting decisions:

    Present: Managing DirectorSales DirectorTechnical ManagerWorks Director

    Market Research Manager

    Decisions:

    a) Draw-up specifications, etc

    b) Design mixer

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    42/63

    56

    Further market research data:

    Suggested price: approximately S$750

    Sale forecast: approximately 5,000 units peryear (export to neighbouring countries)

    Configuration: Compact, light weight, easilydismantled for transport in a small station-wagon or estate car

    Identification of constraints imposed

    Capacity 60 liters mixed batch (equivalent to anaverage wheel barrow load)

    Dimensions 420 mm diameter drum opening

    1050 mm total height

    610 mm maximum between wheelsDrum speed Approximately 30 rpm.

    Assembly All items easily assembled anddismantled by average DIY personusing basic tools

    Drive(suitable for domesticsupply)

    0.25 kW (1/3 hp), single phase, 50 Hzelectric motor, speed 1450 rpm.

    Specifications and requirements

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    43/63

    57

    Final specifications cannot bedetermined until:

    A prototype model has been designed,fabricated and tested.

    Cost analysis is completed; customer

    feedback obtained after a trial batch ofat least two units has been sold andused.

    (1) Conditions of use:

    Mixer must be able to mix quantities of cement,water, sand aggregates or plaster in varyingproportions under its own power, without

    spillage

    It should be light, portable, manoeuvrablearound garden or work area; transportable insmall station wagon or estate car

    Performance and reliability of mixer not affectedby climate condition

    Requirements to be considered:

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    44/63

    58

    (2) Characteristics of components:

    Mixing drum: plastic injectionmolded or welded steel cone;

    supported by bearings; 2 heavy-duty mixing blades;

    Drive: speedreductionfrom motorby gears orbelt drive

    Guard:

    welded steelplates

    Wheels: two wheels, diameter200 mm, plastic injectionmolded or welded steel plates

    Tilt-handle:detachable from

    main frame fortransport, circular

    steel tubes, longenough for easy

    tipping, ergonomicas per 5th %tile man

    Frame: welded steel angles orplates or tubes; ensurestiffness but minimum

    materials to reduce weight

    Mouth: easily loaded withshovel, and enable fastemptying

    (3) Ergonomic considerations:

    Size and height of drum (and whole mixer) forfilling and tipping

    Ease of manoeuvrability

    Ease of tipping Comfortable grip of tilt-handle

    Ease of assembly, dismantling and maintenance

    Weight of dismantled parts

    Availability of tools (for assembling anddismantling)

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    45/63

    59

    (4) Aesthetics (appearance) considerations:

    Should look symmetrical and stable; giveimpression of precision and efficiency offunction; quality of manufacturing; pleasingcontinuity of profile; refreshing up-dated senseof styling suitable for display in catalogue

    Flat surfaces and smooth lines to enable easycleaning

    Steel surfaces be given double coats of paint(prime and finishing) against rust, weather andrough treatment; pleasing colour choice on drumand guard, contrast with black frame and wheels

    (5) Performance:

    Prototype to be tested for performance undersimilar conditions as in actual service

    Should allow some overloading; to cope withsevere cases, motor to be fitted with thermaloverload and reset button

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    46/63

    60

    (6) Life and reliability:

    Useful life = 7 years under full loading capacityfor stated number of hours per day and days peryear operation

    Prototype to be tested under stated conditionswith intermittent stop/start

    Periods between lubrication and change of partsduring prototype testing should be quoted infinal specification

    (7) Packaging:

    Mixer to be supplied in totally dismantled formpacked in cardboard carton with assemblyinstruction booklet and warranty card (for motoronly)

    Instruction manual to consist of mixer inexploded view with parts numbered; parts to belisted with corresponding numbers

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    47/63

    61

    (8) After-sales service:

    Servicing to be done by owner with aid of instructionbooklet and standard workshop tools.

    General spare parts available are: Pulleys and belts Shafts (for gears and drum) Motor Bearings

    Special parts (in small quantity) available are: Drum Wheels Guard Tilt-handle

    (9) Obsolescence:

    Mixer be scraped at end of useful life

    Metal parts to be reused or recycled

    Plastic (if used) parts be made of recyclable orbio-degradable materials

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    48/63

    62

    Feasibility evaluation:

    Mixer is technologically and economicallyfeasible to be designed, fabricated and marketed

    Motor/Gearbox: to be

    purchased asstandardparts;available

    Guard: formedand welded in-house

    Wheels and rims: purchasedas standard parts; available

    Mixing drum,internal parts and

    structures:formed and

    welded in-house;

    if plastic drum, besub-contractedout; quality to be

    ensured

    Frame and tilt-handle:formed and welded in-house

    Feasibility study

    1 Order of drive motor 0.5 week

    2 Delivery of motor 4 weeks

    3 Synthesis and evaluation of drive system 0.5 week

    4 Order of pulleys and belts (if chosen in design) 0.5 week

    5 Delivery of pulleys and belts 2 weeks

    6 Cost analysis of drum 0.5 week

    7 Order of Drum 0.5 week

    8 Delivery of drum 6 weeks

    9 Cost analysis of wheel and rim 0.5 week

    10 Order of wheels and rims 0.5 week

    11 Delivery of wheels and rims 5 weeks

    12 Selection and order of bearings 0.5 week

    13 Delivery of bearings 3 weeks

    14 Analysis of frame and tilt-handle 0.5 week

    15 Comparison and evaluation of frame 1 week

    16 Design calculations 1 week

    17 Design drawings/sketching 1 week

    18 Overall cost analysis of product 1 week

    19 Re-design for cost (if necessary) 0.5 week

    20 Detail drawings and instruction manual 1 week

    21 Fabrication of frame, handle, gears, shafts, guards, etc 2 weeks

    22 Assembly of whole mixer 0.5 week

    23 Testing of mixer 3 weeks

    24 Re-design for function (if necessary) 1 week

    Planningschedule -

    Networkanalysis

    chart:

    to determine

    design timeto produce a

    fully-testedprototype

    mixer. Tableshows

    allottedtasks

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    49/63

    63

    Network analysis chart: indicates a prototype design time of 12.5weeks is required (critical path along tasks 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20, 21, 22, 23 and 24)

    Some possiblesolutions

    Idea generation and development

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    50/63

    64

    Somepossible

    solutions

    1.25m

    1.0m

    After some brainstorming sessions and evaluation:design below is deemed best for simplicity and cost

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    51/63

    65

    Idea generation/development of tilt-handle

    Idea (a) Idea (c)Idea (b)

    Idea generation/development of supporting frame

    Idea (a) Idea (b) Idea (c)

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    52/63

    66

    Idea generation/development of drive(reduce motor speed = 1450rpm to drum speed = 30 rpm; speed reduction = 48.3 : 1)

    Idea (a) Idea (b) Idea (c)

    Worm gear boxexpensive; and

    unnecessary

    Worm gear boxbulky, heavy, and

    expensive

    Simple, neat andlow cost; no gearbox needed

    Humanfactors:

    To estimate framedimensions,estimated full

    weight of concretemixer, comfortablelifting force of a 5th

    percentile adultman (fromanthropometricdata charts) at315mm handleheight, areconsidered

    Prototyping/Evaluation

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    53/63

    67

    Details of support structure: Size of rectangular hollow steelsections as supporting frame calculated for bending and torsionwith critical area at base of upright pedestal to support drumshaft assembly and handle

    Details ofwheel axle:Circular steeltube used andsize calculatedfor bending

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    54/63

    68

    Handle tube sized to be33.7mm outside diameterwith 2.6mm thickness usingmax bending moment

    Drum shaft

    does nottransmittorque; sizedusingmaximumbending stress

    Examples of detail

    calculations:

    Details of drumsupport assembly.

    Note fabricationmethod and belt

    tension adjustingmethod

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    55/63

    69

    Pinion-shaftcalculated forcombinedbending andtorsion underfatigue loading.Stressconcentrationfactor at weakestpoint considered

    Selection of standard components:

    Bought-out components like belt drive,pulleys and rolling bearings selected

    from manufacturers’ catalogues

    Sizes of bolts and screws determinedfor tensile and shear loading

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    56/63

    70

    Cost Analysis:

    Unit cost of mixer = $500

    Fixed cost per batch (5,000 units) =$350,000

    For 5,000 units, total cost = $350,000 +($500 x 5,000) = $2,850,000

    For $750 selling price, total income =5,000 x $750 = $3,750,000

    Profit expected = $900,000.

    Re-design for cost:

    Unit cost of mixer of $750 appears reasonable

    To be competitive, comparison is made withcompetitors’ products:

    List price Remarks

    Competitor A $1104 30% discount for multiple orders

    Competitor B $1092 Selling at 15% below list price

    Competitor C $950 25% discount for multiple orders

    Competitor D $1560 Selling at 15% below list price

    Competitor E $840 Selling at 10 % below list price

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    57/63

    71

    Actual cost comparison:

    List price Actual costCompetitor A $1104 $773

    Competitor B $1092 $928

    Competitor C $950 $713

    Competitor D $1560 $1326

    Competitor E $840 $756

    To be competitive with competitor C, propose

    initial price be discounted by at least 5%.

    Better to re-design to reduce cost: Use lessrobust drum; reduce quality of electric motor,use thinner steel structures, etc

    Re-design for function:

    Prototype mixer fabricated, tested andanalyzed

    Torsional deflection of motor-mountingplate caused excessive vibration underdynamic loading

    Motor-mounting re-designed with flangerather than stiffening plate

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    58/63

    72

    Rigidity of motor-mounting plate improved with flanges

    Workingdrawings are

    drawn

    Detailed design

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    59/63

    73

    Final product:

    Mixer stand(optional extra):

    Stand may beneeded for tippingconcrete directlyinto wheel barrow

    Designed usingsteel tubes weldedtogether; feet withrubber stoppers toensure stability

    Rubberstopper

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    60/63

    74

    Optional stand for

    tipping concrete directlyinto wheel barrow

    Instruction booklet:

    Information in instruction bookletinclude:

    Part list of mixer

    Assembly instruction of mixer

    Maintenance and care

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    61/63

    75

    1

    1A

    2

    34

    56

    78

    8A9

    1011

    1213

    1415

    16

    17

    18

    1919A20

    2122

    2324

    2526

    2728

    Explodedview ofmixer

    showingassembly

    procedure

    Dismantled parts of mixer

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    62/63

    76

    Opening of

    cardboard carton inwhich completemixer is packaged

    for assembly

       O  p  e  r  a   t   i  n  g   i  n  s   t  r  u  c   t   i  o  n  s

  • 8/18/2019 ME2101 1 Design Process 2016

    63/63

    Dismantled for transport in a small

    station wagon at end of use