measuring journal and research prestige · 2014. 10. 1. · 0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5....
TRANSCRIPT
Measuring Journal and Research Prestige
Presented by: Jaap van Harten, PhD, Executive Publisher Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Location: Laval University, Québec City, Canada Date: September 22, 2014
2
Open(ing) Questions
• What is the best scientific journal you know? • Why is that one the best? • Why couldn’t another journal be just as good?
3
Objectives
• Why is there a need to discern quality among different journals?
• What metrics are used to compare journals? • Which journal is most appropriate “for me”
to submit my manuscript to?
Why is there a need to discern quality among different journals?
5
Growth of peer-reviewed journals
“This is truly the decade of the journal, and one should seek to limit their number rather
than to increase them, since there can be too many periodicals.”
6
Growth of peer-reviewed journals
“This is truly the decade of the journal, and one should seek to limit their number rather
than to increase them, since there can be too many periodicals.”
1789 Neues medizinisches Wochenblatt für Aerzte, Wundärzte, Apotheker und Freunde der Naturwissenschaft
7
Growth of peer-reviewed journals
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25.000
<1900 1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s >2000 Decade
Num
ber of Active Journals
Source:
8
Journal Competition
• Journals for the best papers and the best authors • The concept of journal prestige originates from this competition
For example, in the category of “Analytical Chemistry”
Analytical Chemistry
Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytical Biochemistry
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Analyst
Electroanalysis
Analytical Sciences
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Current Analytical Chemistry
Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
And >50 others!
How can you tell which of these are high quality journals?
What metrics are used to compare journals?
10
Overview of Journal Metrics
• Impact Factor et al. • Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) • SCImago Journal Rank • H-index • Article usage
• Journal citation data and bibliometrics can be used to measure the impact or influence of articles, authors, and journals
11
Impact Factor
• Citation index of Science, Social Science, Arts & Humanities journals
• Impact Factors of Science and Social Science journals
Impact Factor is the most well-known citation metric
Impact Factor and related parameters
13
Impact Factor - Definition & Calculation
IF is published 6 months after the end of the year it relates to (i.e. The “IF 2011” is published mid 2012)
Definition The ratio between citations and recent citable items published in a journal
(i.e. the average number of citations received per published article)
14
Impact Factor – The Anomaly
Citations to many non-source items (editorials, letters, book reviews, abstracts, etc.) inflate the IF
All types of communications (e.g. editorials, letters, reviews)
All source items (articles, notes, reviews)
15
Influences on the IF: Article Types
Citations
Articles
Reviews
Years since publication
Notes
4 8 12 16 0 2 6 10 14 18 20
Impact Factor Window
16
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 3,5
Mathematics & Computer Sciences
Social Sciences
Materials Science & Engineering
Biological Sciences
Environmental Sciences
Earth Sciences
Chemistry & Chemical Engineering
Physics
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Clinical Medicine
Neuroscience
Fundamental Life Sciences
Mean Impact Factor (1998)
Influences on the IF: Subject Area
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Pharmac[olog]y Journals Ranked by Impact Factor 2005
Impact Factor 2005
% of Journals with a higher IF 2005
Pharmacology
Pharmacy
18
Typical Ranges of IFs
For example: In the category of “Analytical Chemistry”
Analytical Chemistry
Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytical Biochemistry
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry
Analyst
Electroanalysis
Analytical Sciences
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Current Analytical Chemistry
Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
And >50 others!
5.646
3.198
2.948
2.894
2.591 2.444
2.339
1.589
1.500
0.444
0.429
0.133 – 5.646
Other journals: Science 30.028
Naval Architect 0.001 Power Engineering 0.007 Engineering & Mining Journal 0.008
Nature 26.681 Cell 29.194
19
Impact Factor Use and Abuse
• Used for library collection development
• Open to manipulation by authors, reviewers, editors and publishers
• Used to compare journals of different types • Used to compare journals in different fields • Used to derive a ‘personal IF’ ?
• Used as a lone proxy for journal ‘quality’
Author versus Journal Impact Factors Author N.N.: ≈100 original research articles (Reviews excluded) ≈ 50% published in ISI category “Pharmacology & Pharmacy”
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Personal IFJournal IF
Impact Factor Year
Impact Factor
Avg. = 3.086
Avg. = 2.637
21
Other IF-related metrics
• Cited Half-life – The cited half-life for the journal is the median
age of its articles cited in the current IF year • Immediacy Index
– The immediacy index is the average number of times an article is cited in the year that it is published
22
Source-Normalized Impact per Paper
• Developed by Henk F. Moed (CWTS, Leiden) • “Raw impact per paper” divided by the “Relative
database citation potential” – The impact of a single citation is given higher value in
subject areas where citations are less likely, and vice versa.
• Data sourced from Scopus • Tool to compare journals in different fields
– Definition of “field” is not static (e.g. ISI category) but dynamic (i.e. journal-dependent)
23
SCImago Journal Rank
• Produced by bibliometricians in Spain • Data sourced from Scopus • A ratio of citations in current year to articles
published in the previous 3 years • Citations are weighted by the SJR of the citing journal -- like Google weights links to web pages)
24
SCImago Journal Rank
Note European decimal notation!
25
Journal metrics on homepages
26
h-Index
• Proposed by physicist Jorge Hirsch in 2005
• Rates individuals or journals based on career publications
• Incorporates both quantity (no. of publications) and quality (no. of citations)
Calculation of the h-index
If you list a scientist’s papers in descending order of the number of citations received to date, his/ her h-index is 8 when 8 papers
have been cited 8 times or more since publication
29
h-index for journals
Note European decimal notation!
30
Usage • Usage is a new concept for measuring journal
value and impact • Full-text article downloads • COUNTER is attempting to standardize usage
reporting and develop a “Usage Factor” metric • Libraries already use usage statistics to evaluate
their collections and spend • Authors (and administrators) are also interested
to see how much the works are used • “Industry” reads a lot, but publishes
and cites much less
Which journal is appropriate for me to submit my research to?
32
Journal Selection
How would you pick an “Analytical Chemistry” journal?
Analytical Chemistry Analytica Chimica Acta
Analytical Biochemistry Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry Analyst
Electroanalysis
Analytical Sciences
Journal of Analytical Chemistry
Current Analytical Chemistry Reviews in Analytical Chemistry
And >50 others!
33
Journal Selection Selection of a journal depends on many factors
in addition to journal metrics – The aims and scope of the journal – The type of manuscript you have written
• review, letter, research article – The specific subject area – The significance of your work – The prestige/quality of the journal – The reputation of the editors in the field – The editorial and production speed of the journal – The community and audience around the journal – The coverage and distribution
• regional, international
34
Summary • Why is there a need to discern quality among
different journals? – Increasing number of journals and disciplines
• What metrics are used compare journals? – Impact Factor – Source-normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) – SCImago Journal Rank – H-index – Usage
• Which journal is appropriate for me to submit my research to? – Consider the significance and scope of your work. Ask your
supervisor which journal would be suitable for the area and quality of research you have conducted
– Consider the aims, scope, subject area, prestige, editors, editorial and production speed, community/audience, and coverage of a journal
Thank you! Questions welcome