medical handover. taps – training and action for patients safety. c. ruprai, m. kotlinska, c....
TRANSCRIPT
MEDICAL HANDOVER.
TAPS – TRAINING AND ACTION FOR PATIENTS SAFETY.
C. Ruprai, M. Kotlinska, C. Brewer, A. Wilson, Mrs. Jha
What is TAPS?
New training programme
↓
Helping multi-professional clinical teams
↓
Develop innovative solutions
↓
Address common patient safety problems
TAPS programme
• Designed by Bradford Institute for Health Research and panel of active clinicians
• Running across Yorkshire (inc. Bradford, Leeds, Sheffield, Doncaster, York)
• 10 teams in Hull (inc. Acute Medicine, Orthopaedics, Pharmacy)
• O&G team: C. Ruprai, M. Kotlinska, C. Brewer, A. Wilson, Mrs. Jha
Medical handover
Poor handover has repeatedly been implicated as a causative factor in adverse incidents
&
improvement in handover has been advocated by a number of agencies
Challenges
• EWTD• Increase patient load• Frequent movement of patients• Involvement of multiple specialist team• Corridor or inconvenient meeting room• Type, formality & information varies• Interruptions
TAPS
20 week programme
November 2011 – March 2012
4 workshops
↓
1st staff survey (Nov. 2011)
Results presented at Joined Obs.&Anaest. Meeting
↓
Handover audit (presented in PNM Dec. 2011)
↓
TAPS
↓ Introduction of unified handover sheet (Jan. 2012)
↓
Weekly audits for 10 weeks
↓
2nd staff survey
Your perception of handover
• 2 staff surveys (November 2011 and March 2012)• The questionnaire was randomly given to different levels of staff
• 46 participants in first one and 33 in the second one
• Obstetric, midwifery and anaesthetic members of staff
Results
• Perception of O&G consultant presence at the handover 74%
• Evident absence of the anaesthetic staff• 70% - appropriate setting of the handover • Average score for quality of the handover across all staff was 3.6 (scale 1-5)
Weekly audit
Weekly audit
Who is consistently present at handover
2nd survey
1st survey
On time start of handover
Who leads handover
Have you been pulled out of handover for non-urgent tasks
Setting (quiet and private)
Overall quality of handover
Overall 3.6
Overall 3.8
Is there consistent handover between O&G SpR and consultant
between 5-7pm
Conclusion
• Excellent morning handover involving whole MDT
• Clear improvement in many areas of the handover in TAPS process
• Audit once a year is not good enough tool in monitoring change and hence should be undertaken more frequently
Recommendations
• Evening face-face communication between obs. SpR and consultant needs to be improved, already has been communicated to senior staff
• Repeat staff survey in next several months• Share the experience with others (our ‘journey’ may be used to help improve medical handover in other clinical areas)
Thank you