meeting 5 december 5, 2016

37
Meeting 5 December 5, 2016

Upload: others

Post on 26-Mar-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Meeting 5December 5, 2016

TONIGHT'S AGENDADinnerWelcome / Agenda for tonightResults from Meeting 4Cost Estimating 101Project Solutions and Probable CostsSequencing ScenariosCommittee Discussion of Project Solutions and Sequencing ScenariosSelection of Project Solutions and Sequencing ScenarioDiscussion of Community SurveyPotential Next Meeting (December 14)

6:00-6:306:30-6:356:35-6:406:40-6:456:45-7:007:00-7:107:10-7:407:40-7:557:55-8:00

MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - OVERALL

Outdoor Education at all campuses – 54Large areas for multiple classrooms – 50

State of the Art Early Childhood Center – 110Consolidate FDECC & Jefferson into new site – 64

Specialized lab space at all levels – 49Offer Pre-K to all – 61

Spaces for Teachers – 39Exceed space requirements / larger learning environments – 83

State of the Art Fine Arts Facilities – 99Full time staff child care center – 112

MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - OVERALL

State of the art spaces for teacher collaboration – 97Addressing overcrowded high school – 62

Ninth Grade Center – 37Spaces for specialized / personal learning – 49

Grade Configuration K-5, 6-8, 9-12 – 92Environments for special populations (ADHD etc) – 35

New high school, move MS to SHS, 3 new elementary schools – 77Bigger cafeteria / multi use – 54

Equity across district – 99

MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - CTE

CTE Education spaces – 66Purpose Built learning spaces for CTE – 22

Guided by workforce needs – 34Community partners – 58

Higher Education partners – 25Real life education – 33

Experiences that lead to jobs - 67

MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - TECHNOLOGY

More network bandwidth across district / and community – 92Technology Infrastructure – 84

Equity – 51

MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - ATHLETIC

Athletic programs – 56Fitness – 33

Sports Center for all Sports / Community Complex – 120High School swimming pool – 45

State of the art facilities – 64Practice facilities – 89

MEETING 4 COMMITTEE ACTIVITY RESULTSCONCEPTS - PRESENTED DURING VOTING

Security – 27Traffic flow on campuses – 12

Storm Shelters - 12

MEETING 4 OPTIONS PRESENTED

NEW HIGH SCHOOL FOR 2,100 STUDENTS

PHASED REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING HS

NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL FOR 1,000 STUDENTS

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE WAKEFIELD

WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS

CONVERT INTERMEDIATE INTO ELEMENTARY

SORY ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS

PHASED REPLACEMENT ON SITE

NEBLETT ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS

CONVERT EXISTING SHS TO MIDDLE SCHOOL

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE FAIRVIEW

CONVERT DOUGLASS TO NEW PDC

BEARCAT STADIUM RENOVATION ON SITE

CONVERT INTERMEDIATE TO MIDDLE SCHOOL

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE CRUTCHFIELD

CONVERT DOUGLASS TO ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION

NEW FACILITY AT NEW HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION

LEARNING CENTER DOUGLASS ECC

MOVE DAEP AND EARLY HEAD START TO DILLINGHAM

MOVE LEARNING CENTER TO OLD HIGH SCHOOL

MEETING 4 NON-VIABLE OPTIONS RESULTS

NEW HIGH SCHOOL FOR 2,100 STUDENTS

OPTIONS DELETED ONLY

THROUGH UNANIMOUS

SUPPORT

12

12

5 2

PHASED REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING HS

NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL FOR 1,000 STUDENTS

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE WAKEFIELD

WASHINGTON ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS

LEARNING CENTER DOUGLASS ECC

CONVERT INTERMEDIATE INTO ELEMENTARY

SORY ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS

MOVE DAEP AND EARLY HEAD START TO DILLINGHAM

PHASED REPLACEMENT ON SITE

NEBLETT ELEMENTARY RENOVATIONS

MOVE LEARNING CENTER TO OLD HIGH SCHOOL

CONVERT EXISTING SHS TO MIDDLE SCHOOL

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE FAIRVIEW

CONVERT DOUGLASS TO NEW PDC

BEARCAT STADIUM RENOVATION ON SITE

CONVERT INTERMEDIATE TO MIDDLE SCHOOL

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE CRUTCHFIELD

CONVERT DOUGLASS TO ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION

NEW FACILITY AT NEW HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION

5 1 1

18

6

IDENTIFIED NEEDSTechnologyProviding better access (infrastructure) and learning opportunities (classroom devices)

CTE spaces, and overall capacityHigh School

Minimize transitions and follow best practices and state recommendations: capacity and quality issues at elementary schools, reuse of intermediate campus

Grade configuration

Planning for capacity for all students, state of the art spaces Pre-K

Quality issues at the middle school and capacity issues at the intermediateMiddle / Intermediate School

Lack of proper game facilities at the stadium, lack of proper practice and game facilities at the high school

Athletics

PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101

Construction Cost

Soft Costs

Inflation and Total Cost

PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101Sherman Independent School District

OPINION OF PROBABLE COST

Construction CostBuilding Construction 100,000 SF 238$ 23,800,000$

Additions 10,000 SF 268$ 2,680,000$

Storm Shelter 5,500 SF 75$ 412,500$

Major Renovations 10,000 175$ 1,750,000$

Minor Renovations 10,000 75$ 750,000$

Repairs & Remediation 10,000 68$ 680,000$

Demolition 10,000 8$ 80,000$

Abatement 10,000 4$ 40,000$

Program Contingency 5% 1,190,000$

On-Site Contingency 2.5% 595,000$ Off-Site Construction Cost 5% 1,190,000$

Subtotal 33,167,500$

Contingency/AllowanceOwner's Betterment 1.5% 497,513$ Contractor's Contingency 2.0% 663,350$

Subtotal 1,160,863$

Jurisdictional & Professional Fees(Includes costs, fees, tests and studies required to satisfy all governing authorities and codes)

Site Survey

Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)

Due Diligence / Property Evaluation

Geotechnical Engineering

Geothermal Test Well

Architectural/ Engineering - Building TDLR / Architectural Barriers / TAS / ADA

Food Service Consultant

On-site Civil Engineering

Material Testing

HVAC Test and BalanceBuilding Permit

Subtotal 12% 4,119,404$

Fixtures, Furniture & Equipment (FF&E) 10% 3,432,836$

Technology 3.5% 1,160,863$ 43,041,465$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2016 43,041,465$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2017 45,924,649$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 61,963,964$

DECEMBER

DECEMBER

NOVEMBER

Description 2016 Unit Cost BASELINE

Generic Campus

December 5, 2016

PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101Sherman Independent School District

OPINION OF PROBABLE COST

Construction CostBuilding Construction 100,000 SF 238$ 23,800,000$

Additions 10,000 SF 268$ 2,680,000$

Storm Shelter 5,500 SF 75$ 412,500$

Major Renovations 10,000 175$ 1,750,000$

Minor Renovations 10,000 75$ 750,000$

Repairs & Remediation 10,000 68$ 680,000$

Demolition 10,000 8$ 80,000$

Abatement 10,000 4$ 40,000$

Program Contingency 5% 1,190,000$

On-Site Contingency 2.5% 595,000$ Off-Site Construction Cost 5% 1,190,000$

Subtotal 33,167,500$

Contingency/AllowanceOwner's Betterment 1.5% 497,513$ Contractor's Contingency 2.0% 663,350$

Subtotal 1,160,863$

Jurisdictional & Professional Fees(Includes costs, fees, tests and studies required to satisfy all governing authorities and codes)

Site Survey

Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)

Due Diligence / Property Evaluation

Geotechnical Engineering

Geothermal Test Well

Architectural/ Engineering - Building TDLR / Architectural Barriers / TAS / ADA

Food Service Consultant

On-site Civil Engineering

Material Testing

HVAC Test and BalanceBuilding Permit

Subtotal 12% 4,119,404$

Fixtures, Furniture & Equipment (FF&E) 10% 3,432,836$

Technology 3.5% 1,160,863$ 43,041,465$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2016 43,041,465$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2017 45,924,649$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 61,963,964$

DECEMBER

DECEMBER

NOVEMBER

Description 2016 Unit Cost BASELINE

Generic Campus

December 5, 2016

PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101

Sherman Independent School District

OPINION OF PROBABLE COST

Construction CostBuilding Construction 100,000 SF 238$ 23,800,000$

Additions 10,000 SF 268$ 2,680,000$

Storm Shelter 5,500 SF 75$ 412,500$

Major Renovations 10,000 175$ 1,750,000$

Minor Renovations 10,000 75$ 750,000$

Repairs & Remediation 10,000 68$ 680,000$

Demolition 10,000 8$ 80,000$

Abatement 10,000 4$ 40,000$

Program Contingency 5% 1,190,000$

On-Site Contingency 2.5% 595,000$ Off-Site Construction Cost 5% 1,190,000$

Subtotal 33,167,500$

Contingency/AllowanceOwner's Betterment 1.5% 497,513$ Contractor's Contingency 2.0% 663,350$

Subtotal 1,160,863$

Jurisdictional & Professional Fees(Includes costs, fees, tests and studies required to satisfy all governing authorities and codes)

Site Survey

Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)

Due Diligence / Property Evaluation

Geotechnical Engineering

Geothermal Test Well

Architectural/ Engineering - Building TDLR / Architectural Barriers / TAS / ADA

Food Service Consultant

On-site Civil Engineering

Material Testing

HVAC Test and BalanceBuilding Permit

Subtotal 12% 4,119,404$

Fixtures, Furniture & Equipment (FF&E) 10% 3,432,836$

Technology 3.5% 1,160,863$ 43,041,465$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2016 43,041,465$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2017 45,924,649$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 61,963,964$

DECEMBER

DECEMBER

NOVEMBER

Description 2016 Unit Cost BASELINE

Generic Campus

December 5, 2016

PROJECT COST ESTIMATING 101

Sherman Independent School District

OPINION OF PROBABLE COST

Construction CostBuilding Construction 100,000 SF 238$ 23,800,000$

Additions 10,000 SF 268$ 2,680,000$

Storm Shelter 5,500 SF 75$ 412,500$

Major Renovations 10,000 175$ 1,750,000$

Minor Renovations 10,000 75$ 750,000$

Repairs & Remediation 10,000 68$ 680,000$

Demolition 10,000 8$ 80,000$

Abatement 10,000 4$ 40,000$

Program Contingency 5% 1,190,000$

On-Site Contingency 2.5% 595,000$ Off-Site Construction Cost 5% 1,190,000$

Subtotal 33,167,500$

Contingency/AllowanceOwner's Betterment 1.5% 497,513$ Contractor's Contingency 2.0% 663,350$

Subtotal 1,160,863$

Jurisdictional & Professional Fees(Includes costs, fees, tests and studies required to satisfy all governing authorities and codes)

Site Survey

Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE)

Due Diligence / Property Evaluation

Geotechnical Engineering

Geothermal Test Well

Architectural/ Engineering - Building TDLR / Architectural Barriers / TAS / ADA

Food Service Consultant

On-site Civil Engineering

Material Testing

HVAC Test and BalanceBuilding Permit

Subtotal 12% 4,119,404$

Fixtures, Furniture & Equipment (FF&E) 10% 3,432,836$

Technology 3.5% 1,160,863$ 43,041,465$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2016 43,041,465$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2017 45,924,649$

TOTAL PROJECT COST 2026 61,963,964$

DECEMBER

DECEMBER

NOVEMBER

Description 2016 Unit Cost BASELINE

Generic Campus

December 5, 2016

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

NEW HIGH SCHOOL AT NEW LOCATION

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $133,337,877

• 2,100 Student Capacity Facility

• State of the art Science and CTE Spaces

• UIL Fine Arts Spaces

• New Competition & Practice Athletic Facilities

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

CTE AND CAPACITY ADDITIONS AT SHERMAN HS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $35,032,388

• New state of the art CTE Spaces

• New state of the art Science Labs

• New academic classrooms

• Added capacity of 600 students

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL FOR 1,000 STUDENTS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $51,020,509

• 1,000 Student Capacity Facility

• State of the art Science and CTE Spaces

• UIL Fine Arts Spaces

• New Practice Athletic Facilities

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

CONVERT EXISTING SHS TO MIDDLE SCHOOL

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $14,072,487

• Renovated spaces for 1,000 Student Capacity

• State of the art Science and CTE Spaces

• UIL Fine Arts Spaces

• New Practice Athletic Facilities

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $23,640,415

• Renovated spaces for 1,000 Student Capacity

• State of the art Science and CTE Spaces

• UIL Fine Arts Spaces

• New Competition & Practice Athletic Facilities

CONVERT INTERMEDIATE TO MIDDLE SCHOOL

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $11,515,511

• Renovated spaces for 600 Student Capacity Facility

• Remaining portions of existing facility could be used for other district purposes

CONVERT INTERMEDIATE INTO ELEMENTARY

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $26,902,225

• 600 Student Capacity Facility

• Improved site circulation

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE WAKEFIELD

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $27,103,284

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE FAIRVIEW• 600 Student Capacity Facility

• Improved site circulation

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $27,060,386

NEW ELEMENTARY TO REPLACE CRUTCHFIELD• 600 Student Capacity Facility

• Improved site circulation

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $17,641,338

• New Stand-Alone Facility

• Improved site circulation

NEW EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE:$187,999 PER CAMPUS

• Renovated spaces for new toilets

• Facilitates the transition to Pre-K – 5th Grade Configuration

RENOVATIONS AT ELEMENTARIES FOR PRE-K

ELEMENTARY 02

ELEMENTARY 03ELEMENTARY 01

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $27,385,620

• Renovation of Home Side with New Press Box and addition of more seating capacity

• New Visitor Side Seating

• New Field House

• Added Parking Capacity

BEARCAT STADIUM RENOVATION ON SITE

OPINIONS OF PROBABLE COST FOR VIABLE PROJECT OPTIONS

DECEMBER 2016 PRICE: $28,043,969

• New UIL Competition Facility

• Shared parking with New High School Location

• New Field House part of the New High School

NEW STADIUM AT NEW HIGH SCHOOL LOCATION

SEQUENCING SCENARIOSSCENARIO 1

SEQUENCING SCENARIOSSCENARIO 2

SEQUENCING SCENARIOSSCENARIO 3

SEQUENCING SCENARIOSSCENARIO 4

CONSENSUS BUILDINGCOMMITTEE DISCUSSION

Project Solutions and Sequencing Scenarios

CONSENSUS BUILDINGCOMMITTEE ACTIVITY

Selecting the Sequencing Scenario

COMMUNITY SURVEY DISCUSSION

NEXT MEETING

NEXT MEETINGWednesday , December 14 Potential follow up meeting