meeting agenda of the transportation advisory...

Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Transportation Planning Region (TPR)

Urban Transportation Planning Division www.PACOG.net

211 East D Street Pueblo, CO 81003-4132 Phone: (719) 553-2259 FAX: (719) 553-2359 E-mail: [email protected]

Meeting Agenda of the TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE

October 2, 2014 8:30 a.m.

City Council Chambers, 1 City Hall Place Agenda items marked with * indicate additional materials are included in the packet.

1. Call Meeting to Order

2. Introductions and Public Comments (non-agenda items only).

3. Approval of Minutes* September 4, 2014 Action Requested: Approve/Disapprove/Modify

4. CDOT Region II TIP/STIP Regular & Administrative Agenda Item(s)* CDOT Region II has notification of one (1) administrative amendment of Roll Forward Project Funding or TIP/STIP Policy amendments to the PACOG Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) in the MPO/TPR area. Additional information is available in the attached letter and spreadsheet.

Project Name: Arkansas River Trail Phase 4

STIP Number: SR25079.058

Project Location and Description: Arkansas River Trail Federal Earmark Program Funds: $616,494

State Matching Funds: Local Matching Funds: $154,124

Other Local Overmatch Project Funds:

TOTAL PROJECT FUND AMENDMENT: $770,618

No Action Required

5. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) PACOG 2040 LRTP Priority Corridors* Regional Priorities & TIP Update 2040 Program Distribution Planning Estimates*

6. MPO Staff Report & Updates

Multimodal Map Workshop October 9, 2014 1:00 – 3:00 pm City Municipal Building I.T. Media Room

Effects of Alternative Routes from US50* Rural TPR Meetings (Colorado City/Rye, Boone/Avondale, St. Charles Mesa, Beulah) MPO Staff Training Sessions* HDR, Inc. 2040 Long Range Plan Update*

7. Items from TAC members or scheduling of future agenda items.

8. Adjourn at or before 10:30 am.

Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Transportation Planning Region (TPR)

Urban Transportation Planning Division www.PACOG.net

211 East D Street Pueblo, CO 81003-4132 Phone: (719) 553-2259 FAX: (719) 553-2359 E-mail: [email protected]

Minutes of the TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE

August 13, 2014 8:30 a.m.

City Council Chambers, 1 City Hall Place

1. Call Meeting to Order Chairman: Scott Hobson Time of Call: 8:41 am TAC Members Present: Pepper Whittlef, Dan Centa, Alf Randall, Wendy Pettit, and Michael Snow CAC Members Present: Kristen Castor, Megan Murillo, Eppie Griego, Don Bruestle, David Webb, and Michael Cuppy MPO Staff Present: Scott Hobson, Beritt Odom, Sarah Snowberger Others: Maureen Paz de Araujo and Katherine Haire – HDR, Inc., Mary Lupa – Parsons Brinckerhoff, and Bill Haas - FHWA

2. Introductions and Public Comments (non-agenda items only). Introductions were completed by those in attendance.

3. Approval of Minutes of the regular meeting held on August 13, 2014 Motion to Approve: Kristen Castor Second: Eppie Griego Unanimous

4. CDOT Region II TIP/STIP Regular & Administrative Agenda Item(s) Mr. Scott Hobson reported CDOT did not have any regular or administrative items for September.

5. PACOG Travel Model Structure and Base Year Model Validation Results Presentation – Maureen Paz de Araujo – HDR, Inc. Ms. Maureen Paz de Araujo reported that the new Travel Demand Model (TDM) has been fully updated based on 2010 U.S. Census data from the prior model that was using survey information from 1993. The new model is a traditional 4-step model which includes Trip Generation; Trip Distribution; Mode Choice; and Assignment. The next steps in this phase of the model are to apply the model to support the needs of the 2040 Transportation Plan, develop model enhancements, and complete modeling documentation and training.

6. 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Est. Revenue Projections Update and Preferred Plan & Corridor Vision Discussion Mr. Hobson reported MPO Staff is working on reconciling projects from the 2030 and 2035 LRTP’s to see what was included, not included or has been completed and working on a list to incorporate for the 2040 LRTP. Some areas of Pueblo County were originally, in prior plans, over designated and planned therefore it was suggested a workshop take place to narrow down corridor projects for the 2040 LRTP in the next week.

223 North Santa Fe Ave. Pueblo, CO 81003-4132 Phone: (719) 553-2951 FAX: (719) 553-2950 E-mail: [email protected]

7. Adjusted Urbanized Zone Area (UZA) Boundaries Mr. Hobson Reviewed the UZA Boundaries map with the TAC explaining the adjustment to the boundaries was based on the identified 2010 Census urban areas. Motion was made for recommendation to the PACOG Board as presented. Motion to Recommend: Michael Cuppy Second: Kristen Castor Unanimous

8. MPO Staff Report & Updates CAC Appointment Notice – Mr. Hobson reported two CAC seats are up for appointment

and will be voted on at the October 23, 2014 by PACOG Board. The two existing seats are currently held by Ms. Laurie Clark and Ms. Kristen Castor. The application for the CAC is available on the PACOG.net website as well as the City of Pueblo Planning & Community Development Office. The Application deadline is October 13, 2014 by 5 pm.

9. Items from TAC members or scheduling of future agenda items.

There were no items for future meetings.

10. Adjournment Chairman Scott Hobson adjourned the meeting at 10:21 am

905 N Erie Ave, Pueblo CO 81001-2915 P 719.546.5452 F 719.546.5456 www.coloradodot.info

Region 2 Planning

905 N Erie Ave

Pueblo CO 81001-2915

September 25,2014

To: PACOG 211 E. D Street. Pueblo, Colorado 81003 (719) 553-2244 FAX (719) 549-2359

CDOT Region II request(s) for PACOG MPO/TPR TIP amendment(s)

FY 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program Administrative notification of Roll Forward Project Funding or TIP/STIP Policy amendment(s) in the MPO and TPR

area(s) –no TAC or Board action required.

Administrative Action:

Project Name: Arkansas River Trail Phase 4 STIP Number: SR25079.058 Project Location and Description: Arkansas River Trail Federal Program Funds: $ 616,494 State Matching Funds: $ Local Matching Funds: $ 154,124 Other Project Funds: $ TOTAL PROJECT FUND AMENDMENT: $770,618 This project is now ready to have the funding budgeted to move forward to getting an IGA in place for construction.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions about the proposed Administrative Notifications. Sincerely, Wendy Pettit CDOT Region 2 Planning Cc: Jamie Collins (OFMB) Andy Wheeler (OFMB) Karen Rowe ( R2 RTD) Jason Ahrens (R2 BO) Michael Snow (DTD) Ajin Hu (R2 SPE)

TIP Amendment Information Form

Must be submitted by close of business Monday (Tuesday noon if Monday is a Holiday) to be included in that week’s TIP Approval Letter

CDOT Region

MPO TIP

Amendment ID

TIP ID STIP ID (include

WBS) Project Description

Changed Amount/FY

Reason for Amendment Date

Approved by MPO

e.g., NFR Admin Amendment #45 or DRCOG Policy TIP memo dtd 8/13/12

e.g., NF1095 or 2008-135

e.g., SDR6050 or SDR5220.025

2 PACOG Administrative SR25079.058 SR25079.058 Arkansas River Trail Project Phase 4 $616,494/Fed 154124/Loc

Roll forward from2014 to 2015 for budgeting

Placeholder for

PACOG 2040 LRTP Priority Corridors

Information regarding this item will be provided as soon as possible.

STP-M Metro-PL CMAQ TAP RPP FSA Cong. ReliefFSA Transit (Local)

FSA Transit (SW) HSIP BE Maintenance Surf. Treat. Structures

DRCOG 74.2% 67.3% 81.8% 44.9% 39.1% 36.6% 100.0% 0.0% 60.0% 56.4% 42.8% 32.7% 32.7% 42.8% Suballocation 74.2% 67.3% 81.8% 23.6% MPO Estimate 0.0% 60.0% 56.4% 42.8% 32.7% 32.7% 42.8% Region 1 Share (est.) 15.7% 34.0% 31.1% 100.0% Region 4 Share (est.) 5.6% 5.1% 5.5%GVMPO 0.0% 4.3% 0.0% 1.9% 3.6% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 2.3% 1.2% 1.2% 2.3% Suballocation 0.0% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% MPO Estimate 0.0% 2.5% 2.3% 1.2% 1.2% 2.3% Region 3 Share (est.) 1.9% 3.6% 3.5%NFRMPO 8.3% 9.7% 10.1% 6.5% 6.0% 4.6% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 7.0% 3.7% 4.3% 4.3% 3.7% Suballocation 8.3% 9.7% 10.1% 2.6% MPO Estimate 4.0% 7.0% 3.7% 4.3% 4.3% 3.7% Region 4 Share (est.) 3.9% 6.0% 4.6%PPACG 17.5% 14.2% 2.5% 8.8% 8.0% 7.2% 0.0% 14.0% 0.0% 9.4% 6.7% 5.0% 5.0% 6.7% Suballocation 17.5% 14.2% 2.5% 5.6% MPO Estimate 14.0% 9.4% 6.7% 5.0% 5.0% 6.7% Region 2 Share (est.) 3.2% 8.0% 7.2%PACOG 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% 2.1% 1.9% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 3.5% 1.2% 1.2% 3.5% Suballocation 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% MPO Estimate 0.0% 3.3% 3.5% 1.2% 1.2% 3.5% Region 2 Share (est.) 2.1% 1.9% 2.9%

CMAQ TAP RPP FSA Hot Spots Traffic Signals Cong. ReliefRegion 1 0.0% 17.2% 35.5% 33.0% 20.0% 33.3% 100.0%Region 2 0.5% 13.2% 19.9% 21.3% 20.0% 16.7% 0.0%Region 3 1.0% 13.0% 14.3% 14.1% 20.0% 16.7% 0.0%Region 4 1.7% 18.9% 23.2% 23.6% 20.0% 16.7% 0.0%Region 5 1.0% 5.9% 7.1% 8.0% 20.0% 16.7% 0.0%

Region Allocation Percentages

2040 Program DistributionPlanning Estimates Summary

September 2014

MPO Estimate Percentages

Line1 Asset Management Statewide Region MPO Notes2 Maintenance 50% on-system lane miles/50% on-system VMT3 Surface Treatment 50% on-system lane miles/50% on-system VMT4 Structures On-System % of on-system bridge deck area5 Rockfall Mitigation All Statewide6 Cap.Expenditure (Road Eq./Prop./Cap. Op. Eq.) All Statewide7 TSM&O: ITS Maintenance All Statewide9 Other TC Directed Programs (Flexible)

10 Hot Spots 20% to each Region11 Traffic Signals 2/6 to Region 1, 1/6 to all other Regions12 TSM&O: Performance Programs and Services All Statewide13 TSM&O: Congestion Relief 100% to Region 1 100% to DRCOG14 Regional Priority Program Adopted Formula From Region Allocation using adopted formula15 Capital Expenditure (ITS Investments) All Statewide 16 Contingency All Statewide17 Restricted Programs18 Highway Safety Investment Program All Statewide with MPO estimate Adopted Formula19 Railway-Highway Crossings Program All Statewide20 FASTER - Safety Projects Adopted Formula From Region Allocation using adopted formula21 Safety Education All Statewide22 Strategic Projects All Statewide23 Deliver - Program Delivery/Administration All Statewide24 Aeronautics All Statewide25 Transportation Alternatives Adopted Formula Adopted Formula26 STP-Metro Adopted Formula

27 Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality$7M Federal in FY 16, $7 M Federal in FY 17, $6 M Federal in FY 18 Adopted Formula Adopted Formula

28 Metropolitan Planning Adopted Formula29 Bridge Off-System All Statewide30 Federal Transit All Statewide 31 Strategic Projects -Transit All Statewide 32 Transit and Rail Local Grants All Statewide with MPO estimate Target allocation for MMT, and Transfort33 Transit and Rail Statewide Grants All Statewide with MPO estimate Target allocation for RTD34 Infrastructure Bank All Statewide35 Debt Service All Statewide36 Bridge Enterprise All Statewide with MPO estimate % of on-system bridge deck area37 HPTE All Statewide

2040 Program DistributionPlanning Estimates Allocation Methodologies

September 2014

Allocation Methodology

What effect do the local improvements have on US 50?

In Table 1-2, the 2035 daily traffic forecasts show that (taken as a whole) local improvement projects have the potential to remove about 25 to 30 percent of the volume from US 50, depending on location. However, the effectiveness of the local improvements varies depending on location and design standards, including lane widths and speed limits.

Table 1-2. 2035 Two-Way Daily US 50 Volumes with and without Local Improvements

Location Without Local Improvements

With Local Improvements

Traffic Diverted to Local

Improvements Percentage Diversion

Purcell Blvd. to Pueblo Blvd. 86,000 65,000 21,000 24%

Pueblo Blvd. to Wills Blvd. 80,000 55,000 25,000 31%

Source: JFSA, 2010.

The most effective local improvement is the Pueblo Blvd. Extension, which by itself, is expected to draw about 22,000 trips from US 50 east of Pueblo Blvd. and about 4,000 trips from US 50 between

Purcell Blvd. and Pueblo Blvd. (This diversion is calculated by comparing Table B-8 and

Table B-11 of Appendix B.)

The least effective improvement is the two-lane Tuxedo Blvd. Extension, which serves only a few hundred vehicles to and from eastbound US 50 each peak hour.

The Joe Martinez Blvd. Extension, part of the West Pueblo Connector, is forecast to carry about

10,300 daily trips in either direction. (See Table B-7 of Appendix B for more details.) However, about 7,000 of these trips would come from Juniper Rd. through Lake Pueblo State Park, so the Joe Martinez Blvd. Extension would remove only about 3,000 trips from US 50 between Purcell Blvd. and Pueblo Blvd. East of Pueblo Blvd., 24th St. carries 20,000 daily vehicles, or about 6,000 more than it would without the new sections of the West Pueblo Connector.

The Pueblo Blvd. Extension is expected to handle about 68,000 daily vehicles in either direction just north of US 50, and 55,000 daily vehicles between the Eagleridge Blvd. Extension and Platteville Blvd. The improvements to Platteville Blvd. would more than double the volume it currently carries between Purcell Blvd. and the BNSF railroad (near the Pueblo Blvd. Extension alignment)—from 12,000 to 26,000 vehicles per day. The Eagleridge Blvd. Extension is expected to carry 17,000 vehicles per day. The Industrial Blvd. Extension is forecast to handle 7,000 daily trips, while the Spaulding Ave. Extension—which passes through a residential area east of Purcell Blvd.—is expected to draw only about 5,000 vehicles per day.

Traffic patterns were examined to determine the effect of the Pueblo Blvd. Extension to Platteville Blvd. and the West Pueblo Connector on LOS at Wills Blvd. and Baltimore Ave. This approach is

consistent with these two roadways being included in the PACOG 2035 Long Range

Transportation Plan. Without these local improvements, the Wills Blvd. and Baltimore Ave. intersections with US 50 cannot meet the Purpose and Need criteria.

How do we know when we need the Pueblo Blvd. Extension and the West Pueblo Connector?

The LOS at US 50 and Baltimore Ave. drives the need for the Pueblo Blvd. Extension and West

Pueblo Connector. (These two local improvements are described briefly in Chapter 1, Section 1.7,

of the PEL Study. The Pueblo Blvd. Extension is described in more detail in the Preferred

Alternative, Eden Interchange/Pueblo Boulevard Feasibility Study prepared for CDOT in 1999 by Kimley-Horn and Associates.) The Preferred Alternative acknowledges the benefits of the Pueblo Blvd. Extension and West Pueblo Connector in allowing continued use of signalized intersections at Wills Blvd. and Baltimore Ave., and, therefore, avoiding the need for more expansive intersection options involving grade separation where ROW is limited. The Baltimore Ave. intersection has

higher turning volumes than Wills Blvd., as can be seen by comparing Table IP-15 against Table

IP-13 and Table IP-16 against Table IP-14. Therefore, LOS at Baltimore Ave. would fail the Purpose and Need criteria before it does so at Wills Blvd., indicating the benefit that would occur from congestion relief from the local improvement projects.

Class Name & Duration Number of MPO Staff Attending Other Agencies Interested

FHWA-NHI-152054 Introduction to Travel Demand Forecasting 3 Days

1 Mesa, PPACG, and CDOT

FTA-NTI Introduction to Metropolitan Transportation Planning 3 Days

2 NFR, Mesa, PPACG, and CDOT

FTA-NTI Introduction to Transportation Conformity 3 Days


FTA-NTI State & Metropolitan Transportation Programming 3 Days


FTA-NTI Transportation and Land Use 3 Days


Agreement – Project Number 14-009 1 Schedule 1- Scope of Services

Schedule 1 – Description of Scope of Services

PACOG Travel Demand Model Evaluation (Phase 1) and Upgrade (Phase 2); Project Number: 14-009 Contract MOD 2: Phase 3 Additional Services

General The Consultant will facilitate an ongoing blended team collaboration approach for the completion of the PACOG 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan including collaboration among the consultant team, PACOG staff and CDOT, monthly project management activities supplemented with bi-weekly blended project team progress meetings. These blended team collaboration meetings will stress documenting progress and issues identification and resolution. HDR will schedule and prepare meeting discussion materials and will draft and promptly distibute meeting notes, including documentation of “action items” and responsibilities. Additional Tasks Data Collection, Analysis and Mapping Existing Conditions: The Consultant will provide an existing conditions traffic analysis for the MPA. This analysis will utilize CDOT, MPO, and City of Pueblo traffic counts for roadways, show existing high traffic and congestion areas, and produce an overall roadway capacity analysis. Existing Conditions: 1. Traffic analysis – provided by Consultant

a. Traffic counts – provided by Pueblo MPO and City of Pueblo, Consultant coded in model b. Congestion areas – provided by Consultant c. Traffic flow – provided by Consultant d. Overall road capacity analysis – provided by Consultant

Mobility Data, Demand and Alternatives Analysis The Consultant will provide roadway projections for the year 2040 under the “no-build” scenario in which 2040 forecast traffic is assigned to the Existing + Committed (E+C) network. This will include projected traffic counts, traffic congestion levels, and a capacity analysis for major roadways and intersections for the year 2040. Projections for the Pueblo airport, rail, and truck traffic within the MPO will be provided by the staff from the Pueblo Airport and CDOT Transit and Rail staff. 2040 Socioeconomic and Existing + Committed Roadway Projections: 1. Population projections for 2040 by gender and age – provided by Pueblo MPO 2. Employment projections for 2040 by industry – provided by Pueblo MPO 3. 2040 E+C Roadway projections for:

a. Traffic flow – provided by Consultant b. Congestion levels and areas – provided by Consultant c. Overall capacity analysis – provided by Consultant

4. 2040 No Build Traffic Analysis Preferred Plan and Corridor Vision with Project Priorities The Consultant shall provide technical analysis for potential major transportation projects in each transportation category of roadways, transit, rail, and pedestrian/bicycles. The Consultant will used modeling that is included in the Phase 2/MOD1 scope of work to support this analysis. The Consultant


will coordinate with current TIP projects and MPO projects to provide a full analysis for at least one project in each transportation category (including multiple roadway projects). The MPO will guide, at a later time, specifically which projects to provide extended analysis for. Regional Priorities and Transportation Improvement Plan 1. Potential/Planned Roadway projects (assume 6 projects)

a. Project description – provided by CDOT, City and County staff b. Congestion impact – provided by Consultant c. Project cost – provided by Pueblo MPO and CDOT staff d. Available funding sources – provided by Pueblo MPO and CDOT staff e. Financial feasibility/benefit-cost scoring – provided by Consultant

2. Potential/Planned Transit projects (assume 1 project) a. Project description – provided by CDOT, City and County staff b. Congestion impact – provided by Consultant c. Project cost - provided by Pueblo MPO and Pueblo Transit staff d. Available funding sources – provided by Pueblo MPO and CDOT staff e. Financial feasibility/benefit-cost scoring – provided by Consultant

3. Potential/Planned Rail/Roadway projects (assume 1 project)

a. Project description – provided by CDOT, City and County staff b. Congestion impact – provided by Consultant c. Project cost – provided by Pueblo MPO and CDOT staff d. Available funding sources – provided by Pueblo MPO and CDOT staff e. Financial feasibility/benefit-cost scoring – provided by Consultant

4. Potential/Planned Pedestrian/Bicycle projects (assume 2 projects)

a. Project description – provided by City, County, Pueblo West and CDOT b. Congestion impact c. Project cost d. Available funding sources e. Financial feasibility/benefit-cost scoring – provided by Consultant

Integration with Statewide Transportation Plan The PACOG Long Range Transportation Plan shall address the development, integrated management, and operation of transportation systems and facilities (including accessible pedestrian walkways and bicycle transportation facilities) that function as part of an intermodal transportation system serving the State of Colorado, and is an integral part of an intermodal transportation system for the United States. Final Plan Compilation and Formatting The final product will include two reports encompassing the detailed points discussed above. The project will be two parts and be completed in two phases. Phase 1 includes the existing conditions data and 2040 projection data. Phase 2 includes analysis of specific projects within each of the transportation categories. As mentioned above, these projects will be specified by DATS. This report will list potential projects and outline them according to impact, cost, available funding sources, and financial feasibility. Final reports will be completed no later than May 29, 2015. Final Products 1. One (1) copy of the Draft 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.

2. One (1) copy of the Final 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan.


3. One (1) copy of all electronic data in (MS Excel files, MS Word files, GIS files, etc.) including an electronic reproducible and editable copy of the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan in electronic (Adobe PDF and MS Word) formats. Project Schedule The entire project must be completed by February 28, 2014, with the target PACOG adoption date of March 2015. All products and deliverables for the long range transportation plan shall be compliant with federal, state, and local regulations with specific attention to: 23 Code of Federal Regulations Part 450 Subpart C-Metropolitan Planning and Programming. The consultant will NOT be completing the LRTP process independently. As mentioned above, consulting is needed for a number of technical analyses, 2040 projections, and financial analyses. The consultant will provide the requested technical data to CDOT staff. Blended Team Collaboration HDR’s approach took basic project management required by PACOG to the next level to support the partnered collaboration needed to meet PACOG deliverable schedule requirements. HDR’s project management approach supports blended team collaboration and PACOG staff capability-building through continuous communication and collaboration framework. Outreach to and coordination with the PACOG Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) is also being used as a means of extended capability building within the region.

To facilitate ongoing blended team collaboration, including collaboration among the consultant team, PACOG staff and CDOT, monthly project management activities be supplemented with bi-weekly blended project team progress meetings. Meeting frequency may be increased if warranted by scheduling weekly meetings/conference calls. These blended team collaboration meetings will stress documenting progress and issues identification and resolution. HDR will schedule and prepare meeting discussion materials and will draft and promptly distibute meeting notes, including documentation of “action items” and responsibilities.

To facilitate project management on yet a third level, the Consultant will participate in up to 3 briefings to the PACOG Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). The Consultant will practice continuous communication and technical transparency with PACOG and CDOT staff throughout the PACOG Long Range Transportation Plan process. Briefings to the TAC will be used to leverage existing MPO planning process structure and extend technical transparency to include City and County technical personnel. We recommend up to 3 TAC project briefings.

ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors

1 Project Management - Coordination and Meetings 148 days Tue 4/15/14 Fri 11/7/142 0.0 Kickoff Meeting 0 days Tue 4/15/14 Tue 4/15/143 0.1 Phase 1 & 2 Monthly Schedule Control 105 days Wed 5/14/14 Wed 10/8/14

10 0.2 Phase 1 & 2 Monthly Budget Control, Tracking and Invoicing 135 days Fri 5/2/14 Fri 11/7/1418 0.3 Progress/Management Team Meetings 120 days Wed 4/23/14 Wed 10/8/1432 0.4 Phase 2 PACOG TAC Meetings (up to 3) 110 days Thu 6/5/14 Thu 11/6/1436 Phase 1: Model Evaluation/Data Collection (Phase 1 SOW) 25 days Tue 4/15/14 Mon 5/19/1437 Task 1.1 Data Collection 15 days Tue 4/15/14 Mon 5/5/1445 Task 1.2 Model Evaluation 4 wks Tue 4/15/14 Mon 5/12/1446 Task 1.3 Phase 1 Documentation QC 1 wk Tue 5/13/14 Mon 5/19/14 4547 Phase 2: Travel Demand Modeling (Optional Phase 2 SOW) 170 days Wed 6/11/14 Tue 2/3/1548 Task 2.1 Formats/Timelines Scoping Meeting 0 days Wed 6/11/14 Wed 6/11/1449 Task 2.2: Base Year Model (Development/Validation) 60 days Wed 6/11/14 Tue 9/2/1450 2.2.1 Network Coding Support/QC 6 wks Wed 6/11/14 Tue 7/22/14 4851 2.2.2 Land Use Allocation (2010 Base Year) 6 wks Wed 6/11/14 Tue 7/22/14 4852 2.2.3 Trip Generation 4 wks Wed 6/11/14 Tue 7/8/14 4853 2.2.4 Special Generators 1 wk Wed 7/9/14 Tue 7/15/14 5254 2.2.5 Distribution 1 wk Wed 7/16/14 Tue 7/22/14 52,5355 2.2.6 Model Choice Model 1 wk Wed 7/16/14 Tue 7/22/14 52,5356 2.2.7 Truck Model 2 wks Wed 7/23/14 Tue 8/5/14 5057 2.2.7 Base Year Model Validation 3 wks Wed 8/6/14 Tue 8/26/14 5658 2.2.9 Prepare/QC Base Year Model Validation Technical Memorandum 6 wks Wed 7/23/14 Tue 9/2/14 5059 Task 2.3 Future Year Housing and Employment 5 wks Wed 7/23/14 Tue 8/26/14 5160 Task 2.4: Modeling Alternatives 6 wks Wed 9/3/14 Tue 10/14/14 5861 Task 2.5: Long and Short Range TDM Goals/Objectives 2 wks Wed 10/15/14 Tue 10/28/1464 Task 2.6: Develop Application Procedures/Programs 80 days Wed 8/6/14 Tue 11/25/1465 2.6.1 Reporting/Performance Measures 6 wks Wed 10/15/14 Tue 11/25/146066 2.6.2 Subarea Model Extraction 6 wks Wed 10/15/14 Tue 11/25/146067 2.6.3 General User Interface 4 wks Wed 8/6/14 Tue 9/2/14 5668 Task 2.7: User Training/Development of Documentation 140 days Wed 7/23/14 Tue 2/3/1569 2.7.1 Prepare/QC Model Development Methodology Report 6 wks Wed 7/23/14 Tue 9/2/14 5070 2.7.2 Prepare/QC Model User Guide/Standards 2 wks Wed 11/26/14 Tue 12/9/14 65,6671 2.7.3 Conduct Model User Training 2 wks Wed 12/10/14 Tue 12/23/14 7072 Phase 3: LRTP Support 100 days Wed 9/17/14 Tue 2/3/1573 Task 3.1: Data Collection, Analysis and Mapping 11 days Wed 9/17/14 Wed 10/1/1474 Task 3.1.1 Traffic Counts Model Coding - Existing Conditions 2 days Wed 9/17/14 Thu 9/18/14 59FS+3 wks75 Task 3.1.2 Traffic Flows - Existing Conditions 2 days Fri 9/19/14 Mon 9/22/14 7476 Task 3.1.3 Congestion Levels and Areas - Existing Conditions 2 days Tue 9/23/14 Wed 9/24/14 7577 Task 3.1.4 Overall Roadway Capacity Analysis - Existing Conditions 1 wk Thu 9/25/14 Wed 10/1/14 7678 Task 3.1.5 Existing Conditions Traffic Analysis Tech Memo 1 wk Thu 9/25/14 Wed 10/1/14 7679 Task 3.2: Mobility Data, Demand and Alternatives Analysis 14 days Thu 10/2/14 Tue 10/21/14 7380 Task 3.2.1 E+C TDM Network Coding 1 wk Thu 10/2/14 Wed 10/8/14 7481 Task 3.2.2 Traffic Flows - 2040 E+C Conditions 2 days Thu 10/9/14 Fri 10/10/14 8082 Task 3.2.3 Congestion Levels and Areas - 2040 E+C Conditions 2 days Mon 10/13/14 Tue 10/14/14 8183 Task 3.2.4 Overall Roadway Capacity Analysis - 2040 E+C Conditions 1 wk Wed 10/15/14 Tue 10/21/14 8284 Task 3.2.5 2040 No Build Traffic Analysis Tech Memo 1 wk Wed 10/15/14 Tue 10/21/14 8285 Task 3.3: Preferred Plan and Corridor Vision with Project Priorities 40 days Wed 10/22/14 Tue 12/16/1486 Task 3.3.1 Project Priorities Analysis 6 wks Wed 10/22/14 Tue 12/2/14 7987 Task 3.3.2 Project Priorities Tech Memo 2 wks Wed 12/3/14 Tue 12/16/14 8688 Task 3.4: Regional Priorities and Transportation Improvement Plan 35 days Wed 12/17/14 Tue 2/3/1589 Task 3.4.1 Roadway Projects Evaluation 2 wks Wed 12/17/14 Tue 12/30/14 8590 Task 3.4.2 Transit Projects Evaluation 1 wk Wed 12/31/14 Tue 1/6/15 8991 Task 3.4.3 Rail/Roadway Projects Evaluation 1 wk Wed 1/7/15 Tue 1/13/15 9092 Task 3.4.4 Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects Evaluation 1 wk Wed 1/14/15 Tue 1/20/15 9193 Task 3.4.5 Project Analysis/Prioritization Summary Tech Memo 2 wks Wed 1/21/15 Tue 2/3/15 92

9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 12/7 12/14 12/21 12/28 1/4 1/11 1/18 1/25 2/1 2/8September October November December January Febru

Task

Split

Milestone

Summary

Project Summary

External Tasks

External Milestone

Inactive Task

Inactive Milestone

Inactive Summary

Manual Task

Duration-only

Manual Summary Rollup

Manual Summary

Start-only

Finish-only

Progress

Deadline

SCHEDULE 3: PROJECT SCHEDULE - PACOG Travel Demand Model Evaluation, Upgrade and LRTP Support

Project: PACOG Travel Demand Model Evaluation_Upgrade_Revised September 2 2014Date: 5/19/2014

Senior (HDR) Senior (HDR) Senior (HDR) Admin (HDR) Senior (PB) Intermediate (PB) Senior (PB)

QA/QC LeadPM & Technical

LeadLRTP Support &

ModelingSupport/Project

ControlTechnical Lead Travel Modeler Travel Modeler

Frazier Paz de Araujo Haire Moreno Lupa Stratton Clymer

Billable Hourly Rate $169.59 $195.22 $161.17 $112.17 $166.59 $109.49 $95.08Phase 3: Project Management ‐ Coordination and MeetingsTask 1.1 Schedule Control 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4Task 1.2 Budget Control, Tracking and Invoicing 0 4 0 8 0 0 0 12Task 1.3 Progress/Management Team Meetings ( 4 meetings in addition to Phase 2/MOD1) 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 8Task 1.4 Participate PACOG TAC Meetings (up to 3) 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 12Task 1.5 Prepare Meeting Materials 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 16

Total Task 1 Project Management 0 26 18 8 0 0 0 52

Phase 3: LRTP Support Task 2.1: Data Collection, Analysis and Mapping ‐ Existing Conditions2.1.1 Traffic Counts Model Coding ‐ Existing Conditions (expand & verify Phase 2 coding) 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 122.1.2 Congestion Levels and Areas ‐ Existing Conditions 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 82.1.3 Traffic Flows ‐ Existing Conditions 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 82.1.4 Overall Road Capacity Analysis ‐ Existing Conditions 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 82.1.5 Existing Conditions Traffic Analysis Tech Memo 2 6 16 0 0 0 0 24

Total Task 2.1 2 6 16 0 0 0 36 60

Task 2.2: Mobility Data, Demand and Alternatives Analysis ‐ 2040 E+C Conditions2.2.1 E+C TDM Network Coding ‐ 2040 No Build Volume Forecasts 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 122.2.2 Traffic Flows ‐ Model Extent Network 2040 E+C Conditions 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 82.2.3 Congestion Levels and Areas ‐ 2040 E+C Conditions 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 82.2.4 Overall Road Capacity Analysis ‐ Model Extent 2040 E+C Conditions 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 82.2.5 2040 No Build Traffic Analysis Tech Memo 2 6 16 0 0 0 0 24

Total Task 2.2 2 6 16 0 0 12 24 60

Task 2.3: Preferred Plan and Corridor Vision with Project Priorities2.3.1 Project Priorities Analysis 0 8 24 0 0 0 0 322.3.2 Project Priorities Tech Memo 2 24 8 0 4 0 0 38

Total Task 2.3 2 32 32 0 4 0 0 70

Task 2.4: Regional Priorities and Transportation Improvement Plan2.4.1 Roadway Projects Evaluation (assume 6 projects) 0 16 32 0 0 6 6 602.4.2 Transit Projects (assume 1 project) 0 8 0 0 0 2 2 122.4.3 Rail/Roadway Projects (assume 1 project) 0 0 8 0 0 2 2 122.4.4 Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects (assume 2 projects) 0 0 16 0 0 4 4 242.4.5 Project Analysis/Prioritization Summary Tech Memo 2 8 24 0 8 0 0 42

Total Task 2.4 2 32 80 0 8 14 14 150

Total Task 2 LRTP Support 8 76 144 0 12 26 74 340

Total Phase 3/MOD2 ‐ Labor Hours 8 102 162 8 12 26 74 392

Total Phase 3/MOD2 ‐ Direct Labor Costs (Billable Hourly Rate x Total Hours) 1,357$ 19,912$ 26,110$ 897$ 1,999$ 2,847$ 7,036$ 60,158$ Phase 3/MOD2 ‐ Direct Expenses

# of Trips Direct Costs

Travel to Meetings: Hotel (PB) 0 ‐$ Travel to Meetings: Per Diem (PB) 0 ‐$ Travel to Meetings: Autos or Air Costs (PB) 0 ‐$ Printing, Plotting (HDR) $400 400$ Local Travel (personal vehicle @ $0.56/mile) ‐$

Total Phase 3/MOD2 ‐ Direct Expenses ‐$ ‐$ 400$

Phase 3/MOD2 ‐ Budget SummaryLabor Expenses 60,158$ Direct Expenses 400$

Phase 3/MOD2 ‐ Total Cost 60,558$

Project HoursBudget Labor Tasks & Hours

SCHEDULE 2 ‐ COST PROPOSAL Project No. 14‐009: Travel Demand Model Evaluation (Phase 1), Upgrade (Phase 2) and LRTP Support (Phase 3)

Contract MOD 2 ‐ Additional 2040 RTP Support Scope of Services (Phase 3)HDR PB

meeting agenda of the transportation advisory...

Documents