melaleuca communities of the northern territory4. · melaleuca survey of the northern territory 5...
TRANSCRIPT
TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 25/2009D Melaleuca Survey of the Top End, Northern Territory.
DRAFT Document
Peter Brocklehurst and D. Lynch Land and Vegetation Branch, Land and Water Division Department of Natural Resources, Environment, The Arts and Sport PO Box 496 Palmerston NT 0831
© Northern Territory of Australia, 2001
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Bart Edmeades, Paul Munns, Robyn Maurer,
Mark Rampant and John Scott with fieldwork, mapping and data editing. A sincere
thankyou to Station managers and owners for allowing us to access to their land and for
their hospitality.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 3
SUMMARY
Summary is to be approximately one page.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 4
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................... 2
1. MELALEUCA SURVEY OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY ......................................................... 7
1.1 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................................... 7
Funding ................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.2 PROJECT OUTLINE................................................................................................................................... 7
2. METHODS................................................................................................................................................. 8
2.1 DISTRIBUTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE MELALEUCA FORESTS........................................................ 8
2.1.1 Mapping distribution................................................................................................................. 8
2.1.2 Classification of Mapping boundaries ...................................................................................... 9
2.1.3 Digital ARC/INFO coverage..................................................................................................... 9
2.1.4 Reliability of mapping. ............................................................................................................ 10
2.2 FIELD SURVEY ...................................................................................................................................... 10
2.2.1 Floristic Survey .......................................................................................................................... 10
2.2.2 Forestry Survey - Wood transects .............................................................................................. 11
2.3 WOD VOLUME DATA............................................................................................................................. 12
3. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................................. 14
3.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................................ 14
3.2 COMMUNITY DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................................................. 15
MAP UNIT 1 MELALEUCA VIRIDFLORA, M. LEUCADENDRA OPEN FOREST. ................................................. 17
MAP UNIT 2 MELALEUCA CAJUPUTI, M.VIRIDIFLORA OPEN FOREST. ........................................................ 19
MAP UNIT 3 MELALEUCA CAJUPUTI OPEN FOREST................................................................................... 22
MAP UNIT 4 MELALEUCA CAJUPUTI, M. ACACIODES OPEN FOREST.......................................................... 25
MAP UNIT 5 MELALEUCA LEUCADENDRA, M. ARGENTEA OPEN FOREST. ................................................... 27
MAP UNIT 6 MELALEUCA LEUCADENDRA, M. CAJUPUTI OPEN- FOREST. .................................................. 29
MAP UNIT 7 MELALEUCA ACACIODES, M. DEALBATA LOW OPEN FOREST. ................................................ 31
MAP UNIT 8 MELALEUCA VIRIDIFLORA, M. LEUCADENDRA FOREST. ...................................................... 33
MAP UNIT 9 MELALEUCA VIRIDIFLORA, M. STENOSTACHYA WOODLAND. ................................................... 35
MAP UNIT 10 MELALEUCA LEUCADENDRA, M.VIRIDIFLORA WOODLAND.................................................. 37
MAP UNIT 11 MELALEUCA LEUCADENDRA, M. VIRIDIFLORA OPEN-FOREST. .............................................. 40
MAP UNIT 12 MELALEUCA VIRIDIFLORA, M. CAJUPUTI LOW OPEN-WOODLAND........................................ 42
MAP UNIT 13 MELALEUCA NERVOSA, M. VIRIDIFLORA LOW WOODLAND.................................................... 45
MAP UNIT 14 MELALEUCA CAJUPUTI, M. LEUCADENDRA WOODLAND. ...................................................... 47
MAP UNIT 15 MELALEUCA CITROLENS, M. VIRIDIFLORA LOW WOODLAND. ................................................ 49
MAP UNIT 16 MELALEUCA CITROLENS, M. MINUTIFOLIA LOW WOODLAND. ............................................ 51
MAP UNIT 17 MELALEUCA STENOSTACHYA AND TERMINALIA PLATYPTERA LOW OPEN WOODLAND. ........... 54
MAP UNIT 18 MELALEUCA MINUTIFOLIA, M. SERICEA LOW OPEN-WOODLAND. ......................................... 56
MAP UNIT 19 MELALEUCA MINUTIFOLIA, M. VIRIDIFLORA LOW OPEN-WOODLAND. .................................. 58
MAP UNIT 20 MELALEUCA VIRIDIFLORA, M. ACACIOIDES LOW OPEN WOODLAND. .................................... 60
REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................................. 62
APPENDIX 1 FLORISTIC SITE ATTRIBUTES ................................................................................. 63
FLORISTIC PROFORMA ................................................................................................................................ 63
LIFEFORM SUMMARY TABLES AS PER PROFORMA FIELD SHEET. ................................................................. 67
APPENDIX 3 WOODY ATTRIBUTES ................................................................................................. 70
APPENDIX 5 SPECIES LIST ................................................................................................................. 77
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 5
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Site Mary River Flp.407 Melaleuca viridiflora, M.leucadendra forest located in a swamp
nearby floodplain. .................................................................................................................... 18
Figure 2: Site Field317. Melaleuca cajuputi open forest with mixed grassland (Oryza rufipogon) / sedgeland (Eleocharis dulcis) understorey. ............................................................................ 20
Figure 3: Outside site Field317. Definition between the Melaleuca community and adjacent communities is clear................................................................................................................ 21
Figure 4: Site Millingimbi 149. Melaleuca viridiflora, M. cajuputi open forest with Eleocharis sphaeceolata sedgeland / Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland. ........................................... 21
Figure 5: Site Cahill 295 Melaleuca cajuputi / M.viridiflora open .................................................. 21
forest with Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland / Eleocharis sundaica sedgeland understorey. ... 21
Figure 6 : Site Point Stuart 400, Melaleuca cajuputi open forest with Brachiaria mutica (para grass) grassland understorey................................................................................................. 23
Figure 7 : Site Point Stuart 345. Melaleuca cajuputi forest killed by wildfire (October 1993) one month prior to visit. .................................................................................................................. 24
Figure 8 : Site Mataranka 60 Melaleuca cajuputi forest with a variable understorey dominated by Acacia ampliceps. ................................................................................................................... 26
Figure 9 : Site Limmen Bight river 85. Melaleuca leucadendra open forest with mixed species mid and lower storey. .............................................................................................................. 28
Figure 10: Site Kapalga 315. Melaleuca leucadendra, M. cajuputi open forestwith Pseudaoraphis spinescens grassland.............................................................................................................. 30
Figure 11 : Site Legune 32 Melaleuca acaciodes low forest Xerochloa imrberbis mixed grassland understorey. ............................................................................................................................ 32
Figure 12: Site Numbulwah 210 Melaleuca acaciodes, M. dealbata open forest with Xerochloa imberbis mixed grassland located on tidal flat. ....................................................................... 32
Figure 13: Site Urarunga 74 Wallamunga lagoon. Melaleuca leucadendra forest with Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland understorey. ................................................................. 34
Figure 14: Site Phelp 221. Melaleuca stenostachya woodland with Chrysopogon fallax grassland understorey............................................................................................................. 36
Figure 15: Site Towns 79, Little Towns river. Melaleuca argenta woodland with Chrysopogon fallax mixed grassland............................................................................................................. 39
Figure 16: site Reynold’s River 356 Melaleuca leucadendra open forest with Hymenachne acutigluma, Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland. .................................................................. 41
Figure 17: site Mary River 416 Melaleuca viridiflora low open forest with Hymenachne acutigluma, Eleocharis brassii understorey. ........................................................................... 43
Figure 18: Site BlueMud 203. Melaleuca viridiflora low woodland. Ground layer dominated by Eriachne species, Schizachrium fragile and Scleria species. ................................................. 46
Figure 19: site East Alligator 311 Melaleuca leucadendra woodland with Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland.............................................................................................................. 48
Figure 20: site South Alligator 329 Melaleuca cajuputi woodland with Leersia hexandra and mixed grasses and sedges in the ground layer. ..................................................................... 48
Figure 21: site Urapunga 69 Melaleuca citrolens low woodland with Chrysopogon fallax grassland................................................................................................................................. 50
Figure 22 : site Urapunga 75 Melaleuca citrolens low woodland with Xerochloa imbersis grassland................................................................................................................................. 50
Figure 23: Coangula 121 Melaleuca citrloens low open woodland with mixed grassland understorey. ............................................................................................................................ 52
Figure 24: site Roper Valley Melaleuca stenostachya low woodland........................................... 53
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 6
Figure 25: Site Phelp217. Melaleuca stenostachya low woodland. Melaleuca occur in patches that open out to patches of open grassland dominated by Xerochloa imberbis. ........................... 55
Figure 26: Site Phelp 219. Melaleuca stenostachya woodland. Community interspersed with low trees and shrubs. .................................................................................................................... 55
Figure 27: site Newry station Melaleuca minutifolia low open woodland with Sorghum timorense grassland................................................................................................................................. 57
Figure 28: site Tomkinson River Flp.144 Melaleuca acaciodes low open woodland with Sporobolus virginicus grassland. ............................................................................................ 61
Figure 29: Tomkinson River Flp. 145 Melaleuca viridiflora low open woodland.......................... 61
LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Percentage of each defect class occuring in communities with wood volume data. ........ 14
Table 2. Community structure summary. ..................................................................................... 15
Table 3. Summarised stand structure data. ................................................................................. 15
Table 4. Wood volume data.......................................................................................................... 15
Table 5. Percentage of each log class within the community and percentage of each species in each log class.......................................................................................................................... 16
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 7
1. MELALEUCA SURVEY OF THE NORTHERN TERRITORY
1.1 Introduction
Funding
Funding was obtained from the National Forestry Inventory (N.F.I.) to undertake a survey
of the Melaleuca forests in the Northern Territory. The N.F.I. definition of forest is 'woody
vegetation, usually with a single stem, having a mature or potentially mature stand height
exceeding five metres with existing or potential projective cover of overstorey strata about
equal to or greater than 30%'. This definition has since been extended to include woodlands
with a projective cover of 10-30%.
The Melaleuca forests in the N.T. are classed as old growth forests because of the
relatively unexploited state.
1.2 Project Outline
There were three main components to the project
1. Distribution and Classification of the Melaleuca Forests. (Stand density
classes and/or floristics).
2. Field survey. Measurement of floristic and stand correlates.
3. Analysis, map production and Report.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 8
2. METHODS
2.1 Distribution and Classification of the Melaleuca Forests.
Objective:
2.1.1 To produce 1:250 000 topographic maps with mapped boundaries of significant
Melaleuca communities.
2.1.2 A classification of the communities for both floristics and stand characteristics.
2.1.3 Digital output (ARC/INFO) of map boundaries with related attribute files.
2.1.4 A file containing information as to reliability of the mapping to be stored on
ARC/INFO.
2.1.1 Mapping distribution
Mapping the distribution of the communities entailed a search of information already
available as well as interpretation of landsat and aerial photographs to determine mapping
boundaries in areas not adequately covered. The smallest mapping area at the 1:250 000
scale was estimated to be a square 2*2 millimetres (ie on the ground 50 * 50 metres or
0.25 hectares.
Landsat or Photo-interpretation of boundaries
Melaleuca community boundaries were interpreted predominantly from aerial
photography and information transferred directly onto 1:100 000 topographic maps.
Compilation scale was 1:100 000. Production scale of mapping is at 1:250 000. The
quality of the aerial photography varied. Black & white and colour photography was used
at various scales from 1:25 000 to 1:80 000 depending on availability. Landsat TM scenes
at 1:100 000 and 1:250 000 were used where photography was unavailable. Age of the
photography varied. Areas of forestry potential, mostly occurring in or near the major
floodplains of the N.T were interpretated from the most recent photography or imagery
available (ie Kakadu NP was interpreted from 1991 colour 1:25 000, Arnhemland 1:50
000, 1984 colour photography). However some of the inland areas were interpreted from
high level 1:80 000 b/w photography which was the only available material.
Streamline forests or narrow fringing forests (ie with very large lineal extents and
relatively small widths) were draw as single lines on the topographic maps. All areas with
large enough discrete areas were recorded as polygons. Not all communities mapped were
of forestry significance. Also, because of the narrow nature of the streamline forests
particularly towards their sources and scale of interpretative photography and mapping,
some areas of creeklines containing Melaleuca communities will not have been mapped.
(Most coastal and sub-coastal creeklines contain M.viridflora open-forest to woodland).
Conversely because of the high level of the photography in some regions areas of forest
discernable on the photographs may not prove to be pure Melaleuca forests. These forests
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 9
however are of interest as communities and floristically but are not utilisable in the
forestry sense.
Incorporation of existing information.
Existing information was used to check feasibility of; and add to linework interpreted
from, remotely sensed data. This information was also used to assist in defininig a
Melaleuca community from other forest communities such as monsoon-vine or riparian.
Topographic Maps
Major rivers and streamlines represented by lines on topgraphic maps were
transferred directly where they were interpreted to be associated with a Melelaueca
community from remotely sensed data.
Land unit and Land system reports.
A number of landunit and landsystem maps with relevant units containing
Melaleuca species are used to check interpretation to determine if the initial boundaries
are correct and to remove and/or add linework where necessary. This was especially
useful to check mapping over large areas wherethe remotlely sensed data and /or
possibility of fieldwork was limited. The main problem encountered is the inability to
determine what percentage of a LU or LS that is occupied by a particular vegetation
community and lack of detailed community descriptions.
Monsoon vine-forest
Similarly to the land unit and land system information the survey of
monsoon forests in the N.T. by J. Russell-Smith ( ), was used to assist interpretation and
check mapping.
Wetland Survey
This is a grid survey carried out in … of the vegetation across the Mary
River floodplain proper. This information was used to check mapping and assist in the
definition of the community map units.
2.1.2 Classification of Mapping boundaries
Once the mapping boundaries were decided upon they were classified into preliminary
groups based on topographic position, density, height and local experience. Also the
incorporation of existing information helped define Melaleuca community groups and to
reduce the number of field sites. This classification was re-interpreted following field-
work and final community definition. To help deliniate floristic communities from the
field data two ecological computer software packages were used, TWINSPAN (Hill 1979)
and PATN (Belbin 1987). Vegetation abundance data and other attribute data except
wood transect variables were stored in the computer database DECODA (Minchin 1986)
and used to average values for each community type.
2.1.3 Digital ARC/INFO coverage.
Once the final mapping boundaries was determined, for each 1: 250 000 topographic map
the information was transferred (manually digitised) into the ARC/INFO system. The final
information was a polygon coverage and attribute data referenced to it.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 10
The preliminary classification was incorporated on the arcs as arc-ids. The streamline
forests (ie arcs only) were buffered to form polygons and arc-ids transferred to the
polygons. A buffer width was determined for each community type based on average
widths of the streamlines. For example minor streams (community 3,4,6,9,11) a buffer
width of 10 metres, intermediate stream and rivers (community 1,2,7,8,17) a buffer width
of 20 metres, and major rivers (community 16) a buffer width of 30 metres.
Polygons were digitised in and arc-ids transferred to the poygons. The final coverage is in
Lambert Conformal Conic projection and each polygon attributed with a community code.
2.1.4 Reliability of mapping.
For each mapped area a file containing information on the reliability and accuracy of the
mapping is provided. This includes the following information:
Map name Map sheet name
Map no Map sheet number
Accuracy The accuracy of any point on the map in metres.
Source Indicates the source mapping material (ie landsat, aerial photo etc).
Scale The scale of map compilation.
Compiler The person who compiled the map.
2.2 Field Survey
The field season began in July and extended to November 1993. Sites were located
according to the initial interpretation and distribution map and reassessed in light of
subsequent field survey. Sites were sampled from across the Top End of the Northern
Territory (N.T.); down to 18 degrees south. Site location was designed to cover the
community variation and geographic range of the perceived Melaleuca communities.
Where possible access was by vehicle although in some instances this was not possible, such
as remote areas in Arnhem land, which were accessed by helicopter. Final map checking
over the main Melaleuca areas was carried out using fixed wing small aircraft flying at
500 feet.
The field survey has two main components; the floristic component and the forestry
component. The reasons for this are
1. The need to define all melaleuca communities for distribution
and ecological information and to help classify them for the
forestry component.
2. Only a few of the Melaleuca communities will have any forestry
potential.
The floristic sites and wood (forestry) transects were assessed at the same time and in the
same place. The information collected complies with the NFI requirements. There are three
main core data requirements, site specific attributes, vegetation attributes and wood attribute
data. Site specific attributes were collected as part of the floristic survey.
2.2.1 Floristic Survey
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 11
Objectives: To adequately assess the resource for floristic and structural characteristics and
determine discrete communities.
To adequately assess the the geographic range and types of the Melaleuca
forests.
To assess the present status, threats and conservation of the Melaleuca forests.
(condition & dynamics).
Site specific attributes
The floristic sites were assessed in a 20 metre by 20metre quadrat. Each site has a discrete
number and reference by Australian Map Grid (AMG) co-ordinates. Other attributes
included locational and environmental information such as; landform element and pattern
slope, aspect, geology, percentage rock outcrop, nearest water, soil texture type and
microrelief. All attributes and their difintions are listed in Appendix 1.
Vegetation attributes
These were collected at each site and on completion of the survey used in the classification
of map units. The map units were related to the digital coverage via the map unit number.
The vegetation attributes included the following information; growth form, height and cover
of each strata, evidence of disturbance and a list of species and their abundance (basal area/
percentage foliage cover). Where possible full floristic lists were compiled. However
towards the end of the field survey, near the end of the dry season, some species, mostly
annuals were not able to identified.
Other attributes included stems per hectare, basal area, crown type and cover, gross stocking
rate and age type. All attributes and their difintions are listed in Appendix 2.
2.2.2 Forestry Survey - Wood transects
Objectives: To estimate possible gross bole volume of Melaleuca forests by community
type.
To determine merchantable volumes for Melaleuca forests with utilisable
potential.
Wood volume and stand attribute information was collected from transects adjacent to the
floristic sites when appropriate. Not all forest types were regarded as of forestry potential.
Minimum sitesize was generally 0.2 hectares. Two transects 100 metres long by 10 metres
wide or one transect 200 metres long by 10 metres wide was assessed. The variables
recorded for each tree measured along the transect included species name, tree height,
diameter breast height over bark above ground level (DBHOB), merchantability, length
and defects. This data was used to calculate tree volumes and is used to get some estimate
of total stand volumes as a biomass/productivity measure. All attributes and their
defintions are listed in Appendix 3.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 12
2.3 Analysis, Map production and Report. Wood volume data
Volumes were determined using a volume equation as described below (Archer 1977).
Areas initially discernable and able to be mapped from the aerial photography were used
for volume calculations. (ie many of the streamline communities were too narrow to be of
forestry potential). The main polygon cover contains a polygon attribute called “utilvol”
which if ‘Yes’ means that the polygon was used to determine areas on which total volumes
were determined. Of the buffered linework only community 16 (major rivers-bank forest
and springs) were used in volume calculations. To determine merchantable volume, log
measurements for trees with dbhob of 30 centimetres or greater were determined using the
following criteria.
Sawlogs Minimum small (top) end diameter=20cm
Minimum log length= 2.4 metres
Minimum big (DBH) end diameter = 30cm
Pole logs Minimum small end diameter= 10cm DBHOB
Minimum length = 3 metres
Minimum big (DBH) end diameter = 30cm
Small pole logs Minimum diameters between 5-10 cm dbhob.
Small pole volumes were determined for trees with a dbhob less than 30 centimetres.
Gross bole volumes were also determined to get an estimate of stand volumes.
Volume equation
The equation and constants were taken from Archers Thesis 'Tree Volume Models for
Tropical Broadleaved Forests,1977' (Archer 1977). These volume models were
determined using the field inventory and log assessment information collected during the
forest inventories undertaken between 1960 and 1974 in Top End open-forests. There were
three sets of constants determined for Melaleuca sps., pertaining to different regions of the
Territory. The constants for Murgenella were used due to the proximity of the region to
the larger Melaleuca forest stands (ie coastal and sub-coastal regions). Most data was
collected for M. leucadendra, M. viridiflora, M. cajuputi and M. argentea which are the
main species of forestry significance.
The volume equation is of the form:
V = b0 + b1Db2
Hb3
where V = Volume in cubic metres
D = Diameter under bark **
b0 = -0.00366
b1 = 0.000084725
b2 = 2.0364
b3 = 0.61603
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 13
** In the thesis it is not explained whether the diameter category is dbhob or dub. To be
cautious we have used 'D' as diameter under bark which may result in an approximate
15% under estimate of volume. ( Average bark thickness of M.leuca, M. caju and M.viri
for dbhob >30 cm is 3.2 cm. If this is applied to the mean diameter of 41.5 and mean log
length of 9 metres the under estimate of log volume is in the order off 15%).
** Bark thickness varied considerable for trees of the same species and diameters.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 14
3. RESULTS
3.1 General Description
The final classification resulted in 20 communities ranging from forests to open
woodlands. The major forest communities are located around the coastal regions such as
those located on the floodplain proper (mapunit 1,2,3,6,11,14) and riparian springs and
swamps (5, 8, 10). The average crown type was between 50 and 70% and the mean top
heights lie between 14.5 and 21 metres. These communities may be inundated for periods
of several months with floodmarks on tree trunks recorded as reaching almost 2 metres.
Woodland and open-woodland communities (map unit 4, 9, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20)
occur on drainage flats, mostly away from the coast. These communiities generally have
little (barely up to 0.5 metres) or no floodmark recorded. The crown type is generally
between 40 and 55% and the mean top heights mostly lie between 7 and 14.5 metres.
These communities are inundated for shorter periods of time than the coastal floodplain
areas. Community 7, also a low open forest, is located in the coastal regions but associated
with saline drainage flats.
From the 412 sites surveyed , 317 plant genera and 640 plant species were identified, of
which 13 were Melaleuca species. There were eleven exotic species recorded; most being
naturalised such as Passiflora foetida. Since the time of the survey there have been name
changes for some species especially within the Eucalypts. The synonyms have been noted
in the species list in Appendix 4. Five species now occur in the series Confertiflorae under
the genus Corymbia. Three of these species now replace what was Eucalyptus
confertiflora. Where confident the species’ names are changed in this report to C.
disjuncta and C. pauciseta otherwise species remain as C. confertiflora.
The original raw data files have not been upgraded
Community 1, M.leucadendra forest on floodplain fringe and community 5,
M.leucadendra forest on riparian fringeshad the highest merchantable wood volumes of
nearly 300 cubic meters pe hectare. All other communites with wood volume data had
only a merchantable volume of around 50 cubic meters per hectare or less. Most of the
wood volume comprised of pulp logs and in some instances the unmerchantable volume
was higher, such as in communities 8, 11 and 12 it was greater than 50%. The percentage
of wood volume that rated as either pole or saw log was never more than 10% in any
community. Of those defects that caused the wood to be unmerchantable the most
common were twisted / spiral grain (class 6), bowed or bent (class 7), or multistemmed
(class 8) and occasionally termite infestation (class 3) (Table 1).
Table 1 Percentage of each defect class occuring in communities with wood volume data.
Community Defects (% of community) 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 11 13
1 8.2 1.6 19.5 2.0 20.9 20.5 15.3 0.9 7.8 3.3
2 5.0 1.8 14.9 2.7 25.2 15.3 23.9 0.9 9.9 0.5
3 4.3 1.6 21.4 0.4 16.3 24.5 21.0 1.2 6.6 2.7
5 14.8 2.0 10.8 4.8 28.3 23.1 6.5 1.5 2.8 5.5
6 4.2 1.8 8.4 0.6 28.1 29.9 17.4 4.2 5.4
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 15
8 1.8 0.9 22.9 1.8 12.8 21.1 24.8 0.9 11.0 1.8
10 16.0 16.0 24.0 12.0 32.0
11 7.0 0.9 5.3 2.6 12.3 38.6 25.4 6.1 1.8
12 10.0 10.0 30.0 20.0 30.0
13 100.0
14 6.1 10.6 19.7 4.5 21.2 30.3 6.1 1.5
3.2 Community Descriptions
Community descriptions include structural data that is summarised using the format of
Table 2. Species recorded at the sites are listed in order of decreasing mean frequency of
occurrence (percentage figure). The minor species of those communuties with extremely
long lists are omitted. The stand basal area (SBA) is listed for the dominant trees species
in each community. Fourteen of the 20 communities have stand structure and wood
volume data (map units 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14). All the wood volume data
relates to trees with a diameter breast height over bark (DBHOB) greater than 30
centimetres. Stand structure is listed in a format such as Table 3 and wood volume is
summarised as in Table 4. The percentage of each species in each log class and
percentage of each logclass that makes of the wood volume in each community is listed as
in Table 5.
Table 2. Community structure summary. MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION
Strata Dominant Median % cover Median PFC % Median
Life form Average % cover Average PFC % canopy
Height (m)
Upper Tree
Mid Small
Tree
Lower Forbs
Table 3. Summarised stand structure data.
Average Range
Top height (m) SBA (m
2 ha
-1)
Stock (stems ha-1)
Trees > 10cm DBH
Table 4. Wood volume data.
sum
Saw log
Pole log
Wood volume (m
3 ha
-1)
Pulp log
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha Cubic metres per Ha.
Statistics relates to trees of DBHOB >= 30CM.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 16
Table 5. Percentage of each log class within the community and percentage of each
species in each log class. % of trees in each log class within this community
Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 1 Species % in each log class across all communities
Melaleuca
Saw
log
Pole
log
Saw
+
pole
Pulp
log
Saw
+
pulp
Pole
+
pulp
Un
merc
h
Nil/
lost
Statistics relates to trees of DBHOB >= 30CM.
The NVIS classification criteria was used.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 17
Map Unit 1 Melaleuca viridflora, M. leucadendra open forest. No. of sites surveyed: 62
M. viridiflora (58%), M. leucadendra (44%) and M. cajuputi (34%) are co-dominant
species, with occasional M. dealbata (15%) and Pandanus spiralis (19%). The mid-layer
is absent or sparse comprising of Acacia auriculiformis (16%), Barringtonia acutangula
(21%), and regenerating upper stratum species. The lower-layer is an open cover of the
low grass Pseudoraphis spinescens (37%), and a mix of herbs, sedges, vines such as
Gymnanthera oblonga (24%), Passiflora foetida (21%) and ferns. Mimosa pigra has been
recorded to occur in this community.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 214 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed )
Upper stratum: 12% Livistona benthamii, Lophostemon lactifluus, <10% Nauclea
orientalis, Melaleuca acaciodes, M.nervosa, Corymbia bella, Syzygium armstrongii.
Mid stratum: Melaleuca leucadendra, Pandanus sprialis, Acacia auriculiformis, 11%
Phyllanthus reticulatus, <10% Melastoma polyanthum, Acacia torulosa, Breynia cernua,
Cathormium unbellatum, Dillenia alata.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: Melaleuca cajupti.
Graminoids: 11% Paspalum scrobiculatum, <10% Eriachne triseta, Hymenachne
acutigluma, Oryza rufipogon, Vetivera pauciflora, Panicum mindanaense.
Ferns: <10% Blechnum indicum Lygodium microphyllum.
Forbs:13% Glinus oppositifolius 11% Aniseia martinicensis, Basilicum polystachyon
<10% Euphorbia vachellii, Germainia grandiflora, Heliotropium inidicum, Hygrophila
angustifolia, Hyptis suaveolens, Ipomea species, Ludwigia hyssopifolia, Urena lobata.
Sedges: 11% Cyperus polystachyos, Fimbristylis species, <10% Fimbristylis pauciflora,
Cyperus conicus.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca viridflora 4.9
Melaleuca leucadendra 4.7
Melaleuca cajuputi 4.5
Melaleuca dealbata 1.8
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median % cover Median PFC % Median
Life form Average % cover Average PFC % Canopy
Height (m)
Upper tree 60 (15 - 90) 38 (8 - 64) 16 (5 – 27)
61 37
Mid small 8 (1 - 40) - 3 (1 - 15)
tree 8 if present If present
Lower forbs 40 (2 - 95) - 0.3 (0.1 - 1.4)
40
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 18
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 767 km2
This community is found predominantly fringing floodplains or drainage depressions and
swamps. It occurs on landform patterns of very low relief (mean elevation 13 (2-90)m )
including plains or rises in coastal to subcoastal areas. The soils are mostly alluvial with
either sandy/sandy loam texture or light clay/clay loam texture.
Average Range
Top height (m) 19.65 7-32
SBA (m2 ha-1) 17.1 1.5 – 52
Stock (stems ha-1) 574 59 – 1470
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 26
Pole log 24
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 230
Av/Merchantable vol /Ha 280
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 1 0.6 1.9 0.1 49 3.9 5.5 38.5 0.4
Species % in each log class across all communities M. cajuputi 4 30 33 39 26
M. dealbata 67 100 83
M. leucadendra 44 50 11 41 27 33 38
M. viridiflora 10 39 33 25 31
Figure 1: Site Mary River Flp.407 Melaleuca viridiflora, M.leucadendra forest located in a swamp
nearby floodplain.
Evidence of feral pigs is common in these areas.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 19
Map Unit 2 Melaleuca cajuputi, M.viridiflora open forest. No. of sites surveyed: 27
This community is dominated by M. cajuputi (70%) with M. viridiflora (44%) codominate
in some instances.. M.leucadendra (26%) also occurs. The mid-layer is sparse. Lower-
layer is a sedglenad/grassland dominated by Eleocharis dulcis (33%), and grasses
including Pseudoraphis spinescens (26%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 93 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed )
Upper stratum: 3.7% Lophostemon lactifluus, 3.7% Acacia auriculiformis, Corymbia
bella, Syzygium armstrongii.
Mid- stratum: 11% Acacia auriculiformis, 7.4% Pandanus spiralis, Barringtonia
acutangula, 3.7% Cathormiom umbellatum.
Lower stratum
Graminoides: 15% Vetiveria species, 11% Leersia hexandra, Oryza rufipogon, Eragrostis
species <10% Hymenachne acutigluma, Panicum mindanense,.
Forbs: 18% Passiflora foetida, Hygrophila angustifolia, 11% Ipomea aquatica <10%
Germainia truncatiglumis.
Sedges15: % Eleoacharis dulcis.
Dominant tree species mean SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca cajuputi 8.7
Melaleuca viridiflora 5.1
Melaleuca leucadendra 2.4
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION
Strata Dominant Median % cover Median PFC % Median Life form Average % cover Average PFC canopy Height (m) Upper Tree 55 (30 – 95) 35 (18 - 61) 14 (6 - 22) 59 37 Mid Small 5 (2 – 15) - 4 (1.5 - 12) Tree 4 where present where present Lower Forbs 50 (1 – 98) - 0.5 (0.1 - 1.2) 49
Distribution and habitat notes:
Mapped area: 904 km2
This community occurs on coastal / subcoastal plains with low elevation (2-15m).
Primarily found in drainage depressions and swamps associated with floodplains. The
soils are alluvial and range in texture from sands, loams to heavier clay soils.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 20
Stand structure
Canopy height varies from 6 to 22 metre with emergents to 30 metre.
Average Range
Top height (m) 17.93 10-30
SBA (m2 ha-1) 16.44 3.5 – 36
Stock (stems ha-1) 642 149 – 2000
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 3.3
Pole log 2.8
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 43.6
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 49.6
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 2 1.4 3.6 49.1 0.5 0.5 39.6 5.4
Species % in each log class across all communities M. cajuputi 14 14 8
M. leucadendra 2 1
M. viridiflora 75 50 29 13 30
Figure 2: Site Field317. Melaleuca cajuputi open forest with mixed grassland (Oryza rufipogon) /
sedgeland (Eleocharis dulcis) understorey.
Cover may vary across the community between 20 to 70%.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 21
Figure 3: Outside site Field317. Definition between the Melaleuca community and adjacent communities is clear.
Figure 4: Site Millingimbi 149. Melaleuca viridiflora, M. cajuputi open forest with Eleocharis sphaeceolata sedgeland / Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland.
Figure 5: Site Cahill 295 Melaleuca cajuputi / M.viridiflora open forest with Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland / Eleocharis sundaica sedgeland understorey.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 22
Map Unit 3 Melaleuca cajuputi open forest. No. of sites surveyed: 24
The upper layer is dominated by Melaleuca cajuputi (92%) with the occasional presence
of Barringtonia acutangula (25%). The midlayer is mostly a sparse cover of low trees and
shrubs. Hymenachne acutigluma (21%), Pseudoraphis spinescens (33%) and Eleocharis
dulcis (21%) dominate the open grassland/sedgeland understorey. Passiflora foetida is
often present. Mimosa pigra has been recorded in this unit.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 68 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed )
Upper stratum: 16% Melaleuca viridiflora, <10% Nauclea orientalis, Acacia
auriculiformis, Melaleuca lecucadendra.
Mid stratum: 8% Mimosa pigra, Phyllanthus reticulatus, Alphintonia excelsa.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: Cathormium umbellatum, Pandanus aquaticus, Phyllanthus reticulatus.
Graminoids: 24% Oryza rufipogon <10% Brachiaria mutica..
Forbs: 16% Persicaria attenuata, Heliotropium indicum, 12% Glinus oppositifolius,
Cardiospermum halicacabum, Persicaria barbata. <10% Pistia stratiodes, Ipomea
aquatica, Eclipta prostrata..
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca cajuputi 14
Barringtonia acutangula 0.17
Melaleuca viridflora 1.2
Melaleuca leucadendra 1.6
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median %cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % cover Average PFC canopy
Height (m)
Upper Tree 58 (20 - 80) 37 (14 – 56) 14 (7 - 21)
57 35
Mid small 4 (1 - 60) - 4 (1 - 7)
tree 6.5 where present where present
Lower Hummock grass 50 (1 – 95) - 0.4 (0.1 - 1.5)
50 where present where present
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 839 km2
This community occurs mostly on coastal floodplains (elevation range 1-10m). It also
occurs on subcoastal plains in drainage depressions or swamps. The alluvial soils are
generally light clay loam or sandy soils.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 23
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies between 7-21m
Average Range
Top height (m) 16.63 17-24
SBA (m2 ha-1) 17.97 3-41
Stock (stems ha-1) 776 160 - 2780
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 2.3
Pole log 4.5
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 33.9
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 40.7
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 3 1.2 2.7 37.7 1.2 3.5 49.4 4.3
Species % in each log class across all communities M. cajuputi 50 33 31 17 27 41
M. viridiflora 1 33 4
Figure 6 : Site Point Stuart 400, Melaleuca cajuputi open forest with Brachiaria mutica (para
grass) grassland understorey.
Pig rooting through community.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 24
Figure 7 : Site Point Stuart 345. Melaleuca cajuputi forest killed by wildfire (October 1993) one
month prior to visit.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 25
Map Unit 4 Melaleuca cajuputi, M. acaciodes open forest. No. of sites surveyed: 2
The upper layer is dominated by Melaleuca cajuputi (50%) and M.acaciodes (50%), in
association with Timonius timon. Acacia ampliceps (100%) forms an open shrubland mid-
stratum. The understorey is a sparse cover of mixed low forbs, grasses and sedges.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 16 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed )
Upper stratum: 50% Livistonia rigida.
Mid stratum: 50% Breynia cernua.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: M.cajuputi, Timonius timon, Acacia ampliceps.Ficus scobina.
Graminoids: 50% Brachyachne convergens, Dactyloctenium radulans, Ectrosia.leporina.
Forbs: 100% Flagellaria indica, Gymnanthera oblonga. 50% Ampelocissus acetosa,
Cynanchum carnosum, parsonia velutina.
Sedges: 50% Fimbristylis littoralis.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca cajuputi 11.5
Melaleuca viridflora 11.5
Melaleuca acaciodes 6.75
Timonius timon 3
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median % cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % cover Average PFC Canopy
Height (m)
Upper tree 60 (60 - 60) 34.5 (33 - 36) 15 (10 - 19)
60 34.5
Mid shrubs 22.5 (10 – 35) - 4 (4 - 4)
22.5
Lower forbs 3.5 (2 - 5) - 0.15 (0.1 – 0.2)
3.5
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 65 km2
This community occurs on inland plains in drainage depressions with sandy loam soils.
Woody data.
Average Range
Top height (m) 16 10 - 22
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 22.25 17.5 - 27
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 900 850 - 950
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 26
Figure 8 : Site Mataranka 60 Melaleuca cajuputi forest with a variable understorey dominated by
Acacia ampliceps.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 27
Map Unit 5 Melaleuca leucadendra, M. argentea open forest. No. of sites surveyed: 74
The upper layer is dominated by Melaleuca leucadendra and with M. argentea
codominant in some instances. Species occurring in the sparse mid layer include
Barringtonia acutangula (45%) and Pandanus species (~70%). The ground layer is an
open cover of low forbs and grasses including Flagellaria indica (40%), Gymnanthera
oblonga (30%), Passiflora foetida (25%) and Pseudoraphis spinescens (20%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 375 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed )
Upper stratum: 20% Melalueca leucadendra, <15% M.cajuputi, Casurina cunninghamii,
Timonius timon,Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Acacia auriculiformis, Nauclea orientalis,
Lophostemon grandiflorus, <10% Terminalia platyphylla, Lophostemon arnhemicus,
Corymbia bella, Corymbia polycarpa, Smilax australis, Ficus coronulata.
Mid stratum: 40% Pandanus spiralis, 30% P. aquaticus, 14% Acacia holosericea,
Phyllanthsu reticulatus, <10% Astromyrtus symphocarpa, Melastoma affine, Canthium
schultzii, Acacia leptoclada. Many of the mid and upper stratum species occur across the
stratum.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: many of the above species as regeneration.
Graminoids: 19% Vetiveria pauciflora, 14% Cynodon dactylon,11% Eragrostis tenella,
<10% Heteropogon contortus, Ectrosia leporina, Eragrostis cummingii.
Forbs: 16% Nelsonia campetris, <10% Fuirena ciliaris, Heliotropium ovalifolium,
Basilicum polystachyon, Philydrum lanuginosum.
Sedges: 13% Fimbristylis pauciflora <10% Cyperus haspan.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca leucadendra 5.83
Melaleuca argentea 2.42
Melaleuca cajuputi 1.37
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median % cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % cover Average PFC canopy
(%cc) Height (m)
Upper tree 50 (5 - 85) 30 (3 - 56) 16 (9 - 26)
Mid trees/shrubs 13 (1 - 90) - 4.5 (1.2 - 18)
where present where present
Lower forbs 35 (2 - 90) - 0.5 (0.1 – 2.0)
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 1050 km2
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 28
This riparian community occurs along the major rivers in the Top End of the N.T. It is
found on the river levees, in stream channels and near springs and freshwater swamps.
The soils are mostly sandy and some grade into loam and light clay soils.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies between 9 and 26m.
Average Range
Top height (m) 20.1 11 - 30
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 14.04 2 - 42
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 490.2 75 – 1225
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 71.4
Pole log 34.74
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 187.1
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 293.3
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 5 1 3.8 2.5 46.4 13.5 11 20.6 1.25
Species % in each log class across all communities M. argentea 100 100 100 100
M. cajuputi 17 19 100 6 25 18 8
M. leucadendra 22 39 89 30 65 47 13
M. viridiflora 25 30 8 50 8
Figure 9 : Site Limmen Bight river 85. Melaleuca leucadendra open forest with mixed species
mid and lower storey.
Scattered Melaleuca argentea along the river banks.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 29
Map Unit 6 Melaleuca leucadendra, M. cajuputi open- forest. No. of sites surveyed: 7
The upper layer is codominated by Melaleuca leucadendra (71%) and M. cajuputi, (86%).
The middle stratum is sparse, although when present includes species such as Barringtonia
acutangula (43%). The ground layer is a low grassland dominated by Pseudoraphis
spinescens (43%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 36 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 57% Melaleuca viridiflora.
Mid stratum: Melaleuca species, 14% Cathormium umbellatum, Nauclea orientalis,
Lophostemon lactifluus.
Lower stratum
Graminoids: 29% Oryza rufipogon, Panicum paludosa, 14% Urochloa mosambicensis,
Paspalum scrobiculatum.
Forbs: 29% Anisomeles martinicesis, Glinus oppositus, 14% Sesbania cannabina,
Basilicum polystachyon, Polymeria ambigua.
Sedges: 29% Scleria poaeformis, Eleocharis dulcis,
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca leucadendra 8.3
Melaleuca cajuputi 7.2
Melaleuca viridflora 1.9
Strata Dominant Median %cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % Cover Average PFC canopy
Height (m)
Upper tree 60 (25 - 85) 36 (8 - 64) 17 (15 - 21)
56 37
Mid small 5 (2 - 8) - 3.5 (1.5 - 8)
tree 4.5 where present Where present
Lower forbs 75 (25 - 95) - 0.3 (0.1 - 1.0)
68
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 181 km2
This community occurs in drainage depressions and swamps on coastal floodplains and
sub-coastal plains. The soils are alluvial with a texture range between sandy to loam with
little clay content.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 30
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 15 to 21 metres.
Average Range
Top height (m) 21 15 – 26
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 17.43 9 – 31
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 509.6 235 - 930
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 4.7
Pole log 4.4
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 45.2
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 54.2
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 6 1.8 1.2 48.5 1.8 4.7 40.8 1.2
Species % in each log class across all communities M. cajuputi 33 10 11 17 3 8
M. leucadendra 11 12 1 10 18
M. viridiflora 1
Figure 10: Site Kapalga 315. Melaleuca leucadendra, M. cajuputi open forestwith Pseudaoraphis
spinescens grassland.
Pig rooting evident through site.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 31
Map Unit 7 Melaleuca acaciodes, M. dealbata low open forest. No. of sites surveyed: 7
Melaleuca acaciodes (86%), which is associated with saline habitats, dominates the upper
layer with occasionally M.dealbata (43%). The midlayer is often absent but is comprised
of sparse low trees when present. The open ground layer is dominated by species
associated with tidal flats such as Xerochloa imbesis (57%) and Haloscaria species (29%)
as well as a mixture of other grasses and forbs.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 34 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 14% Melaleuca nervosa, M.viridiflora.
Mid stratum: 29% Thespesia populneoides, 14% Atalaya hemiglauca.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: Cathormium species.
Graminoids: 14% Digitaria species, Chloris species, Vetiveria pauciflora, Panicum
mindanense, Yakirra australis.
Forbs: 29% Achyranthes aspera, 14% Lepidosperma elatius, Sida species,
Sedges: 14% Eleocharis species.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca acaciodes 5.9
Melaleuca dealbata 3.9
Melaleuca nervosa 1.14
Melaleuca viridiflora 0.5
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median % cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % cover Average PFC canopy
Height (m)
Upper tree 60 (10 - 80) 38 (7 - 48) 6 (2 – 8.5)
52 32
Mid shrub 9 (3 - 15) - 1.4 (1 – 1.8)
3 where present where present
Lower forbs 20 (5 - 60) - 0.2 (0.1 – 0.8)
28
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 7 km2
This community occurs on coastal plains on saline flat fringes with sandy or light clay
soils.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 32
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 2 – 8.5.
Average Range
Top height (m) 8 3 - 12
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 11 1.25 – 26
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 417.9 75 - 925
Figure 11 : Site Legune 32 Melaleuca acaciodes low forest Xerochloa imrberbis mixed grassland
understorey.
Patchy open areas through community.
Figure 12: Site Numbulwah 210 Melaleuca acaciodes, M. dealbata open forest with Xerochloa
imberbis mixed grassland located on tidal flat.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 33
Map Unit 8 Melaleuca viridiflora, M. leucadendra forest. No. of sites surveyed: 19
The upper layer is dominated by tall Melaleuca viridiflora (68%) and is sometimes
codominate with M. leucadendra (37%). When the midstrata is present there is a sparse
cover of either Melaleuca species or Acacia auriculiformis (21%). The lower stratum
grassland is dominated with Pseudoraphis spinescens (74%) and on some sites the sedge
Eleocharis dulcis (11%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 48 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 10% Melaleuca dealbata, Corymbia polycarpa, Astromyrtus symphocarpa,
5% Melaleuca nervosa, Eucalyptus camaldulensis.
Mid stratum: 10% Acacia holosericea, 5% Cupanopsis anacardioides, Astonia
actinophylla, Barringtonia acutangula, Excocaria parviflora.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: Melaleuca and Acacia species as listed above.
Graminoids: 10% Panicum trichoides, Paspalum scrobiculatum, Vetiveria pauciflora.
Forbs: 10% Leptochloa neesii, Xyris complanata.
Sedges: 21% Fimbristylis species.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca viridiflora 10
Melaleuca leucadendra 5
Melaleuca dealbata 1
Corymbia polycarpa 0.2
Melaleuca nervosa 0.1
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median %cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % cover Average PFC canopy
(%cc) Height (m)
Upper Tree 50 (30 - 80) 27 (12 - 49) 13 (7 - 16)
50 29
Mid Small 6.5 (1 - 10) - 2 (1.5 - 5)
Tree 3 where present where present
Lower Forbs 55 (8 - 85) - 0.3 (0.1 - 1.5)
48
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 218 km2
This community fringes drainage depressions (billabongs) and swamps on plains and
occasionally rises. The alluvial soils range in texture from sandy through to clay.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 34
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 2 – 8.5m
Average Range
Top height (m) 8 3 – 12
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 11.3 1.25 - 26
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 423 69 – 1000
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 0.39
Pole log 0.8
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 16.5
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 17.7
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 8 0.92 38.5 0.92 0.92 58.7
Species % in each log class across all communities M. leucadendra 1 6
M. viridiflora 10 18 33 13 19
Figure 13: Site Urapunga 74 Wallamunga lagoon. Melaleuca leucadendra forest with
Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland understorey.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 35
Map Unit 9 Melaleuca viridiflora, M. stenostachya woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 2
The woodland is dominated by Melaleuca viridiflora with M. stenostachya occurring as a
subdominate. The midlayer is open cover of low trees and the ground stratum is a mid
high tussock grassland.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 15 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 50% Petalostigma pubescens.
Mid stratum: 50% Pandanus spiralis, Hakea arborescens, Grevillea striata.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: Melaleuca stenostachya, Carissa lanceolata, Dodonea physocarpa.
Graminoids: 50% Chrysopogon fallax, Arundinella nepalensis, Eragrostis species,
Ectrosia leporina, Imperata cylinderica.
Forbs: 50% Rhynchosia species.
Sedges: 50% Fimbristylis species.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca viridflora 6.4
Melaleuca stenostachya 1.1
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median % cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % Cover Average PFC canopy
Height (m)
Upper tree 28 (25 – 30) 15.5 (15 - 16) 11 (7 - 15)
27.5 15.5
Mid shrub 8.5 (5 – 12) - 3 (2 - 4)
8.5
Lower forbs 42.5 (35 – 50) - 0.55 (0.3 – 0.8)
42.5
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 180 km2
This community occurs on sandy drainage flats in coastal regions.
Average Range
Top height (m) 8 3 – 12
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 11.3 1.25 - 26
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 137.5 25 – 250
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 36
Figure 14: Site Phelp 221. Melaleuca stenostachya woodland with Chrysopogon fallax
grassland understorey.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 37
Map Unit 10 Melaleuca leucadendra, M.viridiflora woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 64
The woodland is dominated by M. leucadendra and M.viridiflora (38%). The upper
stratum also includes a variety of other tree species such as Eucalyptus camaldulensis
(38%), Barringtonia acutangula (30%), Lophostemon grandiflorus (22%) Melaleuca
argentea (20%) and Pandanus spriralis (20%). The mid stratum when present is
comprised of a number of low trees and shrubs such as Acacia holosericea (20%). The
ground layer is dominated by Pseudoraphis spinescens (27%) and a number of forbs
including Nelsonia campestris (22%), Passiflora foetida (19%), Gymnanthera oblonga
(17%) and the tussock grass, Heteropogon contortus (17%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 311 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 18% Melaleuca cajuputi, M argentea, Terminalia platyphylla, Pandanus
aquaticus, 16% Excocaria parviflora, 14% Corymbia bella, 12% Melaleuca dealbata,
11% Ficus coronulata, Corymbia polycarpa, Grevillea pteridifolia, <10% Casuarina
cunninghamii, Astromyrtus symphocarpa, Acacia auriculiformis, Cathormium
umbelllatum, Melaleuca acaciodes, Lophostemon lactifluus, Livistona rigida, Nauclea
orientalis.
Mid stratum: <10% Timonius timon, Acacia ampliceps, Flueggia virosa, Atalaya
hemiglauca, Phyllanthus reticulatus, Acacia hemignosta, Antidesma ghesaembilla, Acacia
leptoclada.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: <10% Grewia retusifolia, many of the above listed species regenerating.
Graminoids: 16% Ectrosia leporina, 14% Pandanus mindanense, 11% Eragrostis
cumingii, E.tenellula, Vetiveria elongata, <10% Cynodon dactylon, Eriachne triseta,
Eulalia aurea, Ophiurus exaltatus, Chrysopogon fallax, Mnesithea rottboellioides,
Vetiveria pauciflora.
Forbs: <10% Flageraria indica, Euphorbia hirtus, Fuirena cilliaris, Heliotropium
ovalifolium.
Sedges: 11% Fimbristylis species, Cyperus haspan, C. javanicus.
Vines: <10% Cassytha filliformis.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca leucadendra 2.1
Melaleuca viridiflora 1.6
Melaleuca argentea 0.7
Eucalyptus camaldulensis 0.4
Melaleuca cajuputi 0.6
Melaleuca dealbata 0.7
Casuarina cunninghamii 0.34
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 38
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form cover PFC canopy
(%cc) height
(m)
Upper Tree 36 (5 - 90) 19.5 (2 - 63) 12 (5 - 25)
Mid Small 10 (1 - 40) - 4 (1 - 12)
Tree Where present where present
Lower Forbs 37.5 (2 - 95) - 0.45 (0.1 – 2.0)
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 1,321 km2
This community occurs along river and creek levees and in streambeds across the Top End
of the Northern Territory. The associated alluvial soils are mostly sandy.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 5 to 25m.
Average Range
Top height (m) 15.86 7 – 32
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 8.3 2.5 – 24
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 336.35 75 – 1200
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 0
Pole log 1.36
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 8.26
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 9.62
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 10 8 56 16 20
Species % in each log class across all communities M. cajuputi 10 2 6
M. leucadendra 3
M. viridiflora 3 2
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 39
Figure 15: Site Towns 79, Little Towns river. Melaleuca argenta woodland with Chrysopogon
fallax mixed grassland.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 40
Map Unit 11 Melaleuca leucadendra, M. viridiflora open-forest. No. of sites surveyed: 5
The tall open forest is dominated by Melaleuca leucadendra (100%) and occasionally M.
viridiflora (40%) also occurs. There is no midlayer and the lower stratum grassland is
dominated by Hymenachne acutigluma (60%) and Pseudoraphis spinescens (60%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 31 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Lower stratum
Shrubs: 20% Barringtonia acutangula, Pandanus aquaticus.
Graminoids: 40% Oryza rufipogon,
Ferns: 20% Stenochlaena palustris, Blechnum indicum.
Forbs: 40% Ludwigia adscendens, Aniseia martinicensis, Persicaria attenuata, Tridax
procumbens, 20% Salvinia molesta, Azolla species, Sesbania cannabina, Ipomea
aquatica, Coldenia procumbens.
Sedges: 40% Cyperus digitatus, C. platystylis 20% Eleocharis species, Scleria polycarpa,
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca leucadendra 12.4
Melaleuca viridiflora 0.8
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form cover PFC canopy
(%cc) height
(m)
Upper tree 50 (25 - 80) 35.5 (16 - 56) 16 (5 - 27)
Mid absent absent - absent
Lower forbs 66 (15 - 95) - 0.2 (0.1 – 0.5)
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 36 km2
This community occurs on fllodplains and alluvial plains associated with drainage
depressions on loamy soils.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from
Average Range
Top height (m) 17.5 4 – 25
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 12.33 8 – 17
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 239 130 - 345
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 41
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 3.92
Pole log 3.07
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 36.5
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 43.48
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 11 1.8 1.8 36.8 3.5 3.5 51.8 0.88
Species % in each log class across all communities M. cajuputi 1
M. leucadendra 22 11 9 4 6 21
M. viridiflora 2 3
Figure 16: site Reynold’s River 356 Melaleuca leucadendra open forest with Hymenachne
acutigluma, Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 42
Map Unit 12 Melaleuca viridiflora, M. cajuputi low open-woodland No. of sites surveyed: 14
The upper layer is generally dominated by Melaleuca viridiflora (64%) with M. cajuputi
(43%) dominant in some areas. The midlayer is often absent but occasionally may contain
shrubs. The ground layer has an open cover of grasses and sedges including Eriachne
obtusa, (29%) Hymenachne acutigluma (14%) and Eleocharis brassii (14%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 123 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 21% Pandanus spiralis, Grevillea pteridifolia, 14% Melaleuca dealbata,
Corymbia bella, <10% Lophostemon lactifluus, Melaleuca sericea, Barringtonia
acutangula.
Mid stratum: Melaleuca viridiflora, Pandanus spiralis, 14% Verticordia cunninghamii,
Acacia difficilis, <10% Acacia latescens, Grevillea refracta, Antidesma ghesaembilla,
Calotropis procera, dolichandrone filiformis, Syzygium angophoroides.
Lower stratum
Shrubs – regeneration of above species.
Graminoids: 21% Schizachrium fragile, 14% Aristida inaequiglumis, Chrysopogon fallax,
Eriachne armittii, Triodia bitextura, Sorghum species, Themeda triandra.
Forbs: 29% Borreria species, 21% Rhynchosia species 14% Buchnera species, Cyanotis
axillaris, Eriocaulon species, Gomphrena flaccida, Ludwigia perensis, Waltheria indica.
Sedges: 14% Fimbristylis densa.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca viridflora 2.25
Melaleuca cajuputi 2.2
Corymbia bella 0.29
Melaleuca dealbata 0.43
Lophostemon lactifluus 0.14
Melaleuca sericea 0.14
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form Cover PFC canopy
(%cc) height
(m)
Upper tree 33 (12 – 65) 16 (6 - 35) 7 (5 - 16)
Mid small 10 (2 – 40) - 1.5 (1 - 4)
tree where present where present
Lower forbs 60 (12 – 90) - 0.45 (0.1 - 1.0)
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 43
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 542 km2
This community occurs on plains and rises associated with drainage depressions and
swales.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 5 – 16m.
Average Range
Top height (m) 12.5 8 – 18
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 6.45 2 – 13
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 229.2 50 – 480
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 0
Pole log 0.43
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 1.36
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 1.78
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 12 20 20 60
Species % in each log class across all communities M. cajuputi 1 6
M. viridiflora 2
Figure 17: site Mary River 416 Melaleuca viridiflora low open forest with Hymenachne
acutigluma, Eleocharis brassii understorey.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 44
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 45
Map Unit 13 Melaleuca nervosa, M. viridiflora low woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 61
Melaleuca nervosa (44%), M.dealbata (33%) and M. viridiflora (51%) may dominate or
codominate the overstorey. The midlayer when present is an open cover of young
Melaleuca species and a mixture of shrubs. Dominant species in the ground layer varies
between low grasses such as Pseudoraphis spinescens (20%), Triodia bitextura and
Vetiveria pauciflora (10%) or sedge species.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 243 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 34% Asteromyrtus symphomyrtus, 23% Grevillea pteridifolia, 11% Hakea
arborescens, <10% Melaleuca cajuputi, Excocaria parviflora, Pandanus spiralis,
Lophostemon lactifluus, Corymbia polycarpa, Petalostigma pubescens, Melaleuca
acaciodes.
Mid stratum: 15% Verticordia cunninghamii <10% Terminalia canescens, Banksia
dentata, Dolichandrone heterophylla, Calytrix estipulata, Acacia difficilis, A. hemignosta,
Bossiaea bossiaeoides, Phyllanthus reticulatus, Excocarpus latifolius, Antidesma
ghesmaephila.
Lower stratum
Graminoids: 13% Schizachrium fragile 11% Eragrostis cumingii, Eriachne obtusa,
E.triseta <10% Aristida species, Panicum minandensem, Schizachrium species, Eragrostis
pubescens, Eriachne burkittii.
Forbs: 13% Rhynchosia species 11% Xyris complanata, <10% Borreria species,
Hygrophila angustifolia, Buchnera species, Gomphrena canescens, Hyptis sauveolens.
Sedges: 11% Leptocarpus spathaceus, <10% Cyperus species, Fimbristylis species.
Vines: 21% Cassytha filiformis
Dominant tree species SBA - m
2 /ha
Melaleuca nervosa 2.55
Melaleuca dealbata 1.9
Melaleuca viridiflora 1.48
Melaleuca cajuputi 0.18
Asteromyrtus symphyocarpus 0.54
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median % Cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % Cover Average PFC canopy
height
(m)
Upper tree 35 (5 – 70) 40 (2 - 42) 7 (4 - 18)
34 16.5
Mid trees/shrubs 10 (3 – 40) - 1.5 (1.2 - 8)
where present where present
6
Lower forbs 40 (2 – 98) - 0.3 (0.1 - 1.3)
43
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 46
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 967 km2
This community occurs on drainage flats and depressions associated with plains and rises.
The soils are either alluvial or colluvial, mostly with a sandy texture, but may also include
loams and light clay soils.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 4 - 18 m.
Average Range
Top height (m) 10.38 4 – 22
SBA (m2 ha-1) 7.39 0.2 – 30
Stock (stems ha-1) >30cm 330.5 41 – 2025
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 0
Pole log 0
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 0.21
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 0.21
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 13 100 Species % in each log class across all communities
M. dealbata 17
Figure 18: Site BlueMud 203. Melaleuca viridiflora low woodland. Ground layer dominated by
Eriachne species, Schizachrium fragile and Scleria species.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 47
Map Unit 14 Melaleuca cajuputi, M. leucadendra woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 10
The upper stratum is dominated by Melaleuca cajuputi (60%) with M. leucadendra (30%)
sometimes dominant. The mid stratum is mostly absent. The ground layer has a sparse
cover of species such as Pseudoraphis spinescens (60%) and Hymenachne acutigluma
(50%). Mimosa pigra has been recorded in this community.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 30% Melaleuca viridiflora 10% Nauclea orientalis, Barringtonia
acutangula.
Mid stratum:10% Mimosa pigra.
Lower stratum
Shrubs- Mimosa pigra.
Graminoids: 30% Oryza rufipogon, 20% Leersia hexandra.
Forbs: 40% Ludwigia acutigluma, 30% Heliotropium indicum, 20% Coldenia
procumbens, Persicaria attenuata, 10% Ipomea aquatica, Ludwigia perensis, Eclipta
prostrata.
Sedges: 40% Cyperus platystylis, 30% Eleocharis dulcis 10% Eleocharis brassii, Cyperus
digitatus.
Vines: 10% Passiflora foetida.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca viridflora 0.93
Melaleuca cajuputi 4.38
Melaleuca leucadendra 3.6
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form cover PFC canopy
(%cc) Height (m)
Upper tree 28 (8 - 40) 15 (4 - 30) 12 (7 - 16)
Mid absent absent - absent
Lower forbs 60 (30 - 98) - 0.35 (0.3 – 0.8)
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 364 km2
This community occurs on floodplains and drainage depressions associated with sub-
coastal plains. The associated alluvial soils have a clay texture.
Wood data
Dominant Canopy height varies from 2 – 8.5.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 48
Average Range
Top height (m) 8 3 – 12
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 11.3 1.25 – 26
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 220.2 47 – 550
Wood volume Sum
Saw log 0.43
Pole log 0.14
(m3 ha-1)
Pulp log 12.3
Av/ Merchantable vol /Ha 12.9
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 14 47 1.5 1.5 47 3
Species % in each log class across all communities M. cajuputi 6 8
M. leucadendra 3 1 1 3 100
M. viridiflora 1
Figure 19: site East
Alligator 311 Melaleuca leucadendra woodland with Pseudoraphis spinescens grassland.
Figure 20: site
South Alligator 329 Melaleuca cajuputi woodland with Leersia hexandra and mixed grasses and sedges in the ground layer.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 49
Map Unit 15 Melaleuca citrolens, M. viridiflora low woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 6
The upper layer is generally dominated by Melaleuca citrolens (83%), although
occasionally M. viridiflora (50%) may dominate. The mid layer when present is comprised
of the sparse presence of shrubs such as Carissa lanceolata (50%) and Dodonea
physocarpa (50%). The ground layer is mostly dominated by Chrysopogon fallax (50%) or
other species such as Pseudoraphis spinescens (17%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 58 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 33% Eucalyptus pruinosa, 17% Atalya hemignosta, Dolichandrone
heterophylla, Eucalyptus tectifica, Terminalia canescens.
Mid stratum: 33% Maytenus cunninghamii, 17% Calytris exstipulata, Acacia hemsleyi,
Acacia holosericea, Capparis lasiandra, Dichrostachys spicata, Hakea arborescens,
Petalostigma pubescens, Wrightia saligna.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: Melaleuca species, Terminalia canescens, 17% Acacia nuperima, Grewia
retusifolia.
Graminoids: 50% Rhynchosia species, Eulalia aurea, 17% Eriachne ciliata, Xerochloa
imberbis, Sehima nervosa, Sporobolus australis, Aristida species, Eragrostis tenelulla,
Setaria species.
Forbs: 17% Polycarpaea breviflora, Centipida minima, Ectrosia leporina .
Sedges: 33% Bulbostylis barabata.17 % Cyperus carinatus.
Vines: 17% Cassytha filiformis.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca viridflora 1.54
Melaleuca citrolens 2.29
Eucalyptus pruinosa 0.17
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form cover PFC canopy
(%cc) height
(m)
Upper Tree 23 (12 - 35) 12 (4 - 16) 6 (4.5 - 7)
Mid Small 10 (8 - 15) - 2 (1 - 2)
Tree where present where present
Lower Forbs 52.5 (25 - 75) - 0.35 (0.2 - 1.5)
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 321 km2
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 50
This community is found mostly in the Gulf region. It occurs inland on drainage
depressions and swales associated with plains and rises. The soils are either alluvial or
colluvial mostly with a clay-loam texture.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 4.5 – 7m.
Average Range
Top height (m) 7.5 6 – 9
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 4.21 3.25 – 6
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 79.2 25 - 150
Figure 21: site Urapunga 69 Melaleuca citrolens low woodland with Chrysopogon fallax
grassland.
Figure 22 : site Urapunga 75 Melaleuca citrolens low woodland with Xerochloa imbersis
grassland.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 51
Map Unit 16 Melaleuca citrolens, M. minutifolia low woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 5
Melaleuca citrolens (60%) dominates the upper layer with M. minutifolia (20%) co
dominant or dominant in some instances. Eucalyptus pruinosa (60%) is also found
dispersed through the upper layer may occasionally be subdominant. The midlayer when
present is an open shrubland dominated by Carissa lanceolata (80%). The grassland
understorey is dominated by Eulalia aurea (80%), Chrysopogon fallax (40%) and
Eriachne obtusa (60%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 53 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum; 40% Melaleuca viridiflora, 20% Melaleuca stenostachya, Eucalyptus
microtheca, Terminalia platyphylla, Eucalyptus leucophloia, Excocaria parviflora,
Macropteranthes kekwickii, Acacia cowleana.
Mid stratum: Melaleuca citrolens 40% Atalaya hemiglauca, 20% Dodonea physocarpa,
Lysiphyllum cunninghamii, Dolichandrone heterophylla, Grevillea striata, Terminalia
volucris.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: Melaleuca citrolens
Graminoids: 40% Eragrostis tenellula, Sporobolus australis, Themeda triandra, 20%
Triodia microstachya, Digitaria ammophila, Eriachne armittii, Elytrophorus spicatus,
Aristida species, Triodia bitexteura, Pseudoraphis spinescens, Sorghum species.
Forbs: 20% Rotala diandra, Hydrolea zeylanica.
Sedges: 40% Bulbostylis barbata, Fimbristylis species.
Dominant tree species SBA - m
2 /ha
Melaleuca citrolens 1.1
Melaleuca minutifolia 1
Eucalyptus pruinosa 0.6
Melaleuca stenostachya 0.35
Melaleuca viridifolia 0.05
Terminalia platyphylla 0.15
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form cover PFC canopy
(%cc) height
(m)
Upper tree 30 (8 - 55) 10 (4 - 33) 6 (5 - 9)
Mid shrub 12.5 (5 - 25) - 1 (1 - 3)
where present where present
Lower forbs 35 (15 - 55) - 0.4 (0.2 – 0.8)
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 52
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 2700 km2
This community is found on plains associated with drainage flats and floodouts with
colluvial soils. It occurs inland across the TopEnd, predominantly in the Gulf region.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 5 – 9.
Average Range
Top height (m) 8.6 8 – 11
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 3.67 1.25 – 5.1
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 175 50 - 400
Figure 23: Coanjula 121 Melaleuca citrloens low open woodland with mixed grassland
understorey.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 53
Figure 24: site Roper Valley Melaleuca stenostachya low woodland.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 54
Map Unit 17 Melaleuca stenostachya and Terminalia platyptera low open woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 2
The upper layer is generally dominated by Melaleuca stenostachya (100%). The mid layer
is occasionally present as a mixture of low trees and shrubs. Low grasses such as
Xerochloa imberbis (50%) and Triodia bitextura (50%) dominate the ground layer.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 50% Petalostigma pubescens, Eucalyptus latifolia.
Mid stratum: 50% Petalostigma pubescens, Hakea species, Cathormium umbellatum,
Terminalia grandifolia, Santalum lanceolata.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: 50% Calytrix exstipulata, Maytenus cunninghamii, Terminalia canescens.
Graminoids: 50% Brachiaria pubigera, Chrysopogon fallax, Sorghum species, Panicum
mindinanense, Schizachrium fragile.
Forbs: 50% Evolvulus alsinoides.
Sedges: 50% Bulbostylis barbata, Rhynchosia species.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca stenostachya 4.6
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median % cover Median PFC Median
Life form Average % cover Average PFC canopy
Height (m)
Upper Tree 45 (35 – 65) 7 (5 - 16)
50 26.5
Mid Shrub 10 (0 – 10) - 1.5 (1 - 4)
5 where present
Lower grass 26 (20 – 33) - 0.45 (0.1 - 1.0)
26.5
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: ……km2
This community occurs on plains in relic drainage lines on light clay soils. Both sites in
this small community are located near the Phelp river flood plains.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from
Average Range
Top height (m) 8 6 – 10 SBA (m
2 ha
-1) 4.63 3.75 – 5.5
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 150 100 – 200
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 55
% of trees in each log class within this community Log class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Map unit 17
Species % in each log class across all communities M. dealbata 17 100 17
Figure 25: Site Phelp217. Melaleuca stenostachya low woodland. Melaleuca occur in patches that
open out to patches of open grassland dominated by Xerochloa imberbis.
Figure 26: Site Phelp 219. Melaleuca stenostachya woodland. Community interspersed with low
trees and shrubs.
Ground layer dominated with Triodia bitextura open grassland.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 56
Map Unit 18 Melaleuca minutifolia, M. sericea low open-woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 11
The upper layer is generally dominated by Melaleuca minutifolia (73%) with Melaleuca
sericea (46%) occurring as dominant in some areas. Melaleuca viridiflora (55%) and
Terminalia platyphylla (46%) are also commonly found in the upper layer. When present
the mid layer forms a sparse shrub layer of mixed species. The ground layer is generally a
grassland including species such as Eriachne obtusa (64%) and Chrysopogon fallax
(46%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 85 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 27% Eucalyptus pruinosa, 18% Termianlia canescens, Corymbia
polycarpa, Petalostigma pubvescens, Terminalia volucris, <10% Melaleuca argentea,
Eucalyptus bigalerita, Adansonia gregorii, Eucalyptus brevifolia, E. microtheca, E.
tectifica.
Mid stratum: 36% Ehretia saligna, 28% Dolichandrone filiformis, 18% Calytrix
exsipulata, <10% Grevillea wickhamii, Acacia lysiphloia, A. stipuligera, Acacia
aulacocarpa, A. holosericea, A. laccata, Cathormiom umbellatum, Cochlospermum
fraserii.
Lower stratum
Shrubs; Melaleuca species, Terminalia canescens, Calytrix exstipulata, Acacia species.
Graminoids: 36% Eriachne ciliata, 36% Sorghum species 27% Triodia bitextura,
Themeda triandra, 18% Aristida hyrometrica, Eulalia aurea, Sehima nervosa, Sporobolus
australis.
Forbs: 55% Rhynchosia species, 27% Borreria species, Buchnera linearis, 18% Ptilotus
shwartzii, Streptoglossa odora <10% Bothrochloa bladhii.
Sedges: 36% Bulbostylis barbata, 27% Fimbristylis pterygosperma, <10% Fimbristylis
complanata.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca sericea 0.89
Melaleuca minutifolia 0.75
Melaleuca viridflora 0.43
Terminalia platyphylla 0.18
Melaleuca argentea 0.11
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form cover PFC canopy
(%cc) height
(m)
Upper tree 20 (5 - 40) 10 (1 - 16) 5 (3.5 – 6.5)
Mid small 3 (1 - 23) - 1.4 (1.2 - 3)
tree where present where present
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 57
Lower forbs 60 (35 - 90) - 0.4 (0.2 - 1.0)
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 259 km2
This community is found inland, typically in the Victoria River region. It occurs on plains
or rises associated with either lower hillslopes or drainage flats. The soils are mostly
colluvial with a variable loamy texture.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 3.5 – 6.5m.
Average Range
Top height (m) 7 5 – 10
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 2.75 0.75 – 5.75
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 100 25 - 225
Figure 27: site Newry station Melaleuca minutifolia low open woodland with Sorghum timorense
grassland.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 58
Map Unit 19 Melaleuca minutifolia, M. viridiflora low open-woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 3
Melaleuca minutifolia dominates the low open-woodland with M. viridiflora occurring as
a sub-dominant. The mid-layer is absent. Tussock grasses dominate the grassland ground
layer. The most commonly occuring grasses include Aristida latifolia (67%), A.
hygrometrica (67%), Eriachne obtusa (67%), Chrysopogon fallax (67%) and Themeda
triandra (67%).
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 30 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 33% Corymbia grandifolia, Erythrophleum chlorostachys, Corymbia
dichromophloia, Eucalyptus pruinosa.
Lower stratum: Shrubs – 67% Carissa lanceolata, Grewia retusifolia 33% Acacia
difficilis, Terminalia canescens.
Graminoids: 33% Eulalia aurea, Iseilema vaginalis, Schizachrium fragile, Dichanthium
sericeum.
Forbs: 33% Borreria species, Buchnera species, Ptilotus fusiformis.
Sedges: 33% Scleria brownii.
Vines: 33% Ampelocissus frutescens.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca minutifolia 1.17
Melaleuca viridflora 0.58
Corymbia grandiflolia 0.17
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form cover PFC canopy
(%cc) height
(m)
Upper tree 9 (9 - 22) 6 (2 - 8) 5 (5 - 9)
Mid absent absent - absent
Lower forbs 65 (60 - 90) - 0.35 (0.2 – 0.5)
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 257 km2
This community occurs on inland drainage depressions associated with alluvial plains.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 5 – 9m.
Average Range
Top height (m) 9.33 7 – 11
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 2.17 1.75 – 2.75
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 59
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 116.7 75 - 200
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 60
Map Unit 20 Melaleuca viridiflora, M. acacioides low open woodland. No. of sites surveyed: 3
Melaleuca viridiflora (67%) and M. acacioides (33%) dominate the open woodland. The
midlayer is generally absent or oassionally a few shrubs are present. The ground layer is
an open cover of low tussock grasses and a mix of forbs and sedges.
Other species in order of decreasing % frequency:
(total of 22 species recorded, only the most frequent species listed)
Upper stratum: 33% Acacia leptocarpa.
Mid stratum: 67% Grevillea pteridifolia, 33% Acacia plectocarpa.
Lower stratum
Shrubs: 33% Asteromyrtus symphyomytus, Pandanus spiralis.
Graminoids: 33% Sporobolus virginicus, Ectrosia leporina, Eriachne obtusa,
Elytrophorus spicatus, Alloteropsis semialata.
Forbs: 33% Leptocarpus spathaceus, Oldenlandia galiodes, Polycarpaea brevifolia.
Dominant tree species SBA - m2
/ha
Melaleuca viridflora 1.91
Melaleuca acacioides 2
MEAN STRUCTURAL FORMATION Strata Dominant Median Median Median
Life form cover PFC canopy
(%cc) height
(m)
Upper tree 12 (8 - 25) 7 (3 - 13) 16 (5 - 27)
Mid absent absent - absent
Lower forbs 20 (15 - 40) - 0.2 (0.2 – 0.2)
Distribution and habitat:
Mapped Area: 78 km2
This community occurs on sandy drainage flats of sub-coastal plains. May occur on the
periphery of saltflats.
Stand structure
Dominant Canopy height varies from 5 – 9m.
Average Range
Top height (m) 9 7 – 11
SBA (m2
ha-1
) 4 1.75 – 6
Stock (stems ha-1)
>30cm 50 242 - 400
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 61
Figure 28: site Tomkinson River Flp.144 Melaleuca acaciodes low open woodland with
Sporobolus virginicus grassland.
Figure 29: Tomkinson River Flp. 145 Melaleuca viridiflora low open woodland.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 62
REFERENCES
Archer,G.R. 1977. Tree Volume Models for Tropical broad-leaved forests: with particular
reference to the forests of the Northern Territory. M.Sc Thesis. Australian National
University, Canberra.
Belbin,L. 1987. PATN. Pattern Ananlysis Package Reference Manual. Vols. 1 & 2.
CSIRO, Canberra
Hill,M.O. 1979. Program For Arranging Multivariate Data in an ordered Two-way Table
by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Cornell Univ., Ithaca N.Y.
McDonald,R.C.,Isbell,R.F.,Speight,J.G.,Walker,J.,Hopkins,M.S. 1990. Australian Soil
and Land Survey:Field Handbook. 2nd Edition. Inkata Press.
Minchin,P.R. 1986. How to use ECOPAK:An Ecological Data Base System. Tech memo.
86/6.Water and Land Resources,CSIRO, Canberra.
National Land and Water Resources Audit, (2000). Australian Vegetation Attributes:
National Vegetation Information. System Version 5.0. Audit Canberra.
Russell-Smith J. (1991). Classification, species richness, and environmental relations of
monsoon rain forest in northern Australia. Journal Of Vegetation Science 2:259-278.
Specht,R,L. [ed.](in prep) Structural Formation in Major Plant Communities in a
Australia-An Objective Assesment. Aust.J.Bot.Supp.Ser.
Walker J. & Hopkins M.J. 1990. Vegetation. In R.C. McDonald, R.F. Isbell,
J.G.Speight, J. Walker, & N. J. Hopkins (eds) Australian Soil and Land Survey Field
Handbook. Walker,J.,Hopkins,M.S. 1990. Australian Soil and Land Survey:Field
Handbook. 2nd Edition, Inkata Press, Melbourne.
Wilson, BA, Brocklehurst, PS and Whitehead, PJ. (1990). Classification, Distribution and
Environmental Relationships of Coastal Floodplain Vegetation, Northern Territory,
Australia. Technical memorandum 91/2. Land Conservation Unit, Conservation
Commission of the Northern Territory, PO Box 496 Palmerston NT 0813. 114pp.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 63
APPENDIX 1 FLORISTIC SITE ATTRIBUTES
The following site specific variables were recorded Floristic Proforma
Site specific attributes.
Record attributes
Custodian Conservation Commision of the Northern Territory (CCNT)
now Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Environment
(DIPE).
Site number Discrete site number and cover-id number.
Woody_record Wood transect completed at the site.
Date Date when sampled (day,month,year).
Sample_size In hectares. Should always be 20*20 metres for vegetation sites.
Sample_shape Square.
Project NT-Melaleuca
Location attributes
State N.T.
Map_sheet The 1:250 000 topographic map sheet on which the plot is located.
Geocode Plot location in decimal degrees. Converted from the AMG co-
ordinates (Grid Zone, Easting, Northing) from GPS.
Elevation Determine from topographic map. Measured in metres.
Abiotic attributes
Element Landform element.( triplet code as per McDonald et al 1990)
Pattern Landform pattern.(triplet code as per McDonald et al 1990)
Aspect Direction slope is facing.(8 cardinal points)
1. North
2. North East
3. East
4. South East
5. South
6. South West
7. West
8. North West
Slope Degrees slope. Will generally be small.
Drainage Drainage of water. 1. Very well drained
2. Well drained
3. Undecided
4. Impeded
5. Waterlogged
6. Water
Surface feature & substrate
Parent_material Level of confidence N-Not parent material
D-Dubious
P-Probable
A-Certain
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 64
Type 1. Alluvium
2. Laterite
3. Sandstone
4. Ironstone
5. Other
Geology Coding as per legend 1:25000 geological map sheet.
Water-present Present Y=Yes N=No
Water cover %cover of plot by water
Water Depth Depth of water in metres and centimetres
Type 1. Swamp
2. Spring
3. Permanent creek
4. Ephemeral creek
5. Drainage line
6. Permanent pool
7. Ephemeral pool
8. Tidal
Floodmark Present Y=Yes N=No floodmark on trees
Floodmark-gr Height from Ground to floodmark
Floodmark-wt Height from water surface to floodmark
Nearest Free water If water not actually at site
Type As above
Distance of nearest water body
0. At site
1. < 100 metres
2. 100-500 metres
3. 500m-1km
4. >1km
Water_cond of nearest water body
1. Fresh,fast flowing
2. Fresh and moving
3. Fresh and still
4. Stagnant
5. Brackish
6. Salty
Water-period Water periodicity of nearest water body.
1. Permanent
2. Intermittent
Water-bed General composition of water body bed of nearest water body
1. Sand
2. Mud
3. Algae
4. Grass
5. Sedge
6. Rock
7. Gravel
8. Aquatic vegetation
Run-off Run-off category
1. No run-off
2. Very slow
3. Slow
4. Moderately rapid
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 65
5. Rapid
6. Very rapid
Surface_text Soil surface texture based on field texture grade as described in
McDonald et al (1990).
1. Sands
2. Sandy loams
3. Loams
4. Clay loams
5. Light clays
6. Medium,heavy clays
Organic Organic layer if present Y=Yes N=No
1. Root mat
2. Peat
3. Other
% cover of site.
Depth of organic layer(in centimetres).
Micro-relief Micro-relief refers to relief up to a few metres about the plane of the
land surface, as per McDonald et al (1990).
0. None
1. Gilgai
2. Hummocky
3. Biotic
4. Other
Comment
Rock_outcrop %cover of plot
Coarse_frag % cover of coarse fragments.
Type Dominant type of coarse fragments
0. Not present
1. Fine gravelly
2. Medium gravelly
3. Coarse gravelly
4. Cobbly
5. Stony
6. Bouldery
7. Large boulders
Bare-ground %area of bare ground in plot.
Wood-shelter
Litter layer Y=yes, N= no
Litter-depth Depth of Litter(average depth cm)
Litter cover percentage cover of litter across the site.
Stumps Number of stumps in the plot converted to Number/hectare. Coded
into classes.
0. Absent
1. 1-10
2. 11-50
3. 50-100
4. >100
Logs Number of logs on the ground in the site.
Term/Ha Number of termite mounds per hectare.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 66
Vegetation Attributes
Species abundance attributes
Upper stratum : species name - basal count
- % cover
Mid statum : species name - % cover.
Lower stratum : species name - % cover.
Lifeform Code Trees >8 metres 1
Trees 2-8 metres 2
Trees <2metres 3
Mallee 4
Palms 5
Shrubs >2 metres 6
Shrubs <2 metres 7
Chenopod shrubs 8
Cycads 9
Tussock grasses 10
Hummock grasses 11
Sedges 12
Forbs 13
Ferns 14
Vines 15
Life form Dominant stratum life form (as per list above).
Dom-height Height of dominant stratum (metres)
Dom-cover Crown cover percentage of dominant stratum
Crown type Crown density as per Walker & Hopkins (1990).
PFC Percentage foliage cover = Dom-cover * Crown type
Dom-sps Four letter code for dominant genus and species. In some instances
there maybe two or more species codes, therefore need to check
listing.
Class Structural formation classes for a site which is a summary of the
above mentioned Vegetation attributes. (see Walker & Hopkins
1990) Lifeform / Cover class / Height.
Life-form T = Tree S = Shrub etc
Cover class Crown cover(%) Code Closed or dense >70 D
Mid-dense 30-70 M
Sparse 10-30 S
Very sparse <10 V
Height class Code 20.01-35 9
12.01-20 8
6.01-12 7
3.01-6 6
1.01-3 5
Stratum-num Number of strata. Should not be greater than 3.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 67
Strata-mid-ht Upper height in metres of middle stratum.
Strata-mid-cv %canopy cover of middle stratum
Strata-mid-lf Dominant lifeform of middle stratum
Strata-mid-struc Dominant structure of middle stratum as per class above.
Strata-mid-sp Dominant species in the middle layer. Four letter code for Genus
and Species.
Strata-low-ht Upper height in metres of ground stratum.
Strata-low-cv %canopy cover of ground stratum
Strata-low-lf Dominant lifeform of ground stratum
Strata-low-struc Dominant structure of ground stratum as per Class.
Strata-low-sp Dominant species in the ground layer. Four letter code for Genus
and Species.
Lifeform Summary Tables as per proforma field sheet.
Stratum Dom.
Lifeform
%
cover
Av
Height
Upper
Mid
Lower
Lifeform % cover AV height (m)
Trees >8m
Trees 2 – 8m
Tree regen (<2m)
Mallee
Palms
Shrubs >2m
Shrubs <2m
Chenopod shrubs
Cycads
Tussock grass
Hummock grass
Sedge
Forbs
Ferns
Vines
Map-unit/Veg community number: The number relating to the digital map coverage to
which the site records belong.
Stand
Top-height Mean total height in metres of the three tallest trees in each plot or
recorded in the basal sweep. ( **Trees measured to total heights
rather than canopy height).
SBA Stand basal area (sq.metres/ha) measured in the field with a basal
wedge not from measured diameters. This generally gives an under-
estimate in stands with trees greater than 40-50cm dbhob. SBA is
Table refers to above stratum variables
that summarise the dominant lifeforms
in each stratum.
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 68
generally used to give the dominant species in flora community
assessment.
(Total basal area-live = is the total basal area per hectare of live trees greater than 2cm dboh
per hectare. This total is based on the sum of basal areas per hectare by diameter class.
Each diameter class (2>5cm to 25<30cm, >30cm). Basal area is determined from the
number of trees per hectare.)
Stock Tree stems per hectare (trees defined as >10cm dbh). Determine
from wood transects or stand table.
Temporal Disturbance Attributes
Logging Y = yes, N = no
Logging-int Time of logging event.
0=unknown
1=within 1 year
2=2-5 years
3=>5years
Fire present / absent
Fire-intensity Fire damage.
0=not evident
1=minor impact,fire scars on some trees
2=minor impact,fire scars on most trees
3=some trees killed
4=most trees killed
Fire-frequency 0=no fire.
1=evidence of fire in last dry season.
2=fire greater than 1 year.
Disturbance Y = yes, N = no.
Disturb-type Type of disturbance (may be more than one disturbance at a site.)
0=no disturbance
1=Wildfire
2=logging
3=Grazing
4=Cyclone/wind-storm
5=Prescribed fire
6=Timber stand improvement
7=Insect damage
8=Dieback
9=Mining
10=Feral animals
11=Exotic weeds
4=Salinity
Biotic disturbance. Biological agents causing disturbance.
1=Animal (pig,bovine)
2=Man
3=Bird
4=Termite
5=Ant
6=Vegetation
7=Other
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 69
Disturbance freq Frequency of disturbance
1=little evidence of disturbance over the past 30 years.
2=Single major disturbance in period 10-30 years.
3=A few disturbances, all > 10 years ago.
4=Single recent disturbance 1-10 years.
5=Frequent recent disturbance,1-10 years.
6=Current disturbance
Mimosa Presence of mimosa Y=Yes N=No
Mimosa-juv. %cover seedlings
Mimosa-mat %cover mature
Stand-table All trees in floristic plot to be included in height and diameter
classess. 10cm diameter classes, 5 metre height classes. Those
floristic sites where no woody transect was done due to lack of
forestry potential a stand-table was completed to determine
volumes.
Height class m
0-5 5-10 10-15 …etc. 25-30 30-35 TOTAL
0<10
10<20
20<30
…etc
…
90<100
100<110
<110
Dia
met
er
cm
TOTAL
Melaleuca survey of the Northern Territory 70
APPENDIX 3 WOODY ATTRIBUTES
The following attributes collected along the wood transect were stored in the final data
table after collection in the field.
Florasite-No Vegetation site site number as per field sheets.
Woodsite-No Transect number (quadrat number)
Floristic Site If done adjacent to a floristic site. Y=Yes N=No
Location Map 1:100 000 topographic map on which the site occurs.
Easting Site location:easting coordinate from GPS.
Northing Site location:northing coordinate from GPS
GZ Grid zone
Site Size In hectares.
Regeneration Table of frequencies by height classes of seedlings and
regeneration. Counts made 1 metre either side of the centreline
of the transect. Site size 0.04 hectare. Regeneration was
classed as all melaleuca saplings with a dbhob of 2cm or
less.
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 71
Small Trees Trees with a diameter 2-29.99cm DBHOB arranged in 5 cm diameter
classes (2<5cm, 5<10cm etc.) and measured for heights. Dead trees within
these diameter classes were also measured. Trees other than Melaleucas
were not measured. Possible small pole lengths (not bole heights) were
determined as trees were measured.
Wood volumes All trees with a dbhob of 30 cm or greater were measured for wood volumes. An average bole volume
was determined for trees less than 30cm dbhob. The final wood transect data was averaged per hectare
per map unit category.
Species Melaleuca species
For each species the following was recorded:
DBHOB Diameter breast height over bark measured at 1.3 metres above ground
level.
Bark Thickness Average thickness from four measurements around the trunk.
Total Bole Ht Height in metres to tip of bole (first major crown break). These heights
were used to determine gross bole volume irrespective of log class.
Merchantable height Merchantable height of the tree in metres. These heights used to determine
merchantable heights within each log class. In the case of pulp logs the
merchantable height in most instances was equivalent to bole height.
Stump height Stump height in metres.
Sawlog length Length of sawlog in metres.
Pulplog length Length of pulplog in metres.
Pole length Length of pole log.
(See below for criteria for log measurements.)
Logclass Classification of the tree. Trees were classified in the field into utilisation
classes. These classes were then used to determine the volumes.
1=sawlog only
2=pole log only
3=sawlog and pole log
4=pulp log
5=sawlog and pulp log
6=pole and pulp log
7=unmerchantable
8=missing/lost
Criteria:Log measurement (For trees with DBHOB > 30cm)
Trees were assessed in the field using the following criteria.
Sawlog Minimum small (top) end diameter=20cm
Minimum log length= 2.4 metres
Minimum big (DBH) end diameter = 30cm
Pole log Minimum small end diameter= 10cm DBHOB
Minimum length = 3 metres
Minimum big (DBH) end diameter = 30cm
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 72
Small pole log Minimum diameters between 5-10 cm dbhob.
Defect Defect categories. These were appraised visually in the field with defect
codes the same as those used for a major inventory of the NT forests
undertaken by the Forestry section of the NT from 1960-1974. The visual
assessment of these former surveys was tested and evaluated from log
measurement data taken from felled trees. In some instances a particular
tree may have had more than one defect. However the major defect
affecting its utilisation was the one recorded.
.
The following categories were used.
1=nil defect
2=Blown top
3=Ant infected
4=Fire damaged
5=Buffalo/cattle damage (ie exposed roots, bark removal
etc)
6=Twisted (spiral grain)
7=Bowed or bent
8=Multi-stemmed
9=Dying
10=Recently dead
11=Long dead
12=Salt intrusion
13=Missing
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 73
APPENDIX 4 SITES BY COMMUNITY LIST
COMMUNITY FLORASITE_NO SITE_LABEL
0 217 PHELP217
0 219 PHELP219
1 33 LEGU33
1 34 LEGU34
1 37 VRD37
1 141 TOMK141
1 154 BLYTH154
1 167 GOVE167
1 168 GOVE168
1 169 GOVE169
1 179 KOOL179
1 187 GOVE187
1 188 GOVE188
1 189 GOVE189
1 190 ARNH190
1 192 CALED192
1 236 EALLI231
1 238 OENPE238
1 243 CBURG243
1 244 CBURG244
1 247 CBURG247
1 248 CBURG248
1 249 CBURG249
1 250 CBURG250
1 251 CBURG251
1 253 MURGA253
1 254 MURGA254
1 256 MURGA256
1 257 MURGA257
1 258 MURGE258
1 262 MURGE262
1 267 CROKE266
1 269 MURGE269
1 273 MURGA273
1 278 EALLI278
1 280 CAHIL280
1 283 EALLI283
1 292 CAHIL292
1 299 KAPAL299
1 300 KAPAL300
1 301 CAHIL301
1 302 CAHIL302
1 304 CAHIL304
1 316 KAPAL316
1 330 KAPAL330
1 339 PTSTU339
1 344 PTSTU344
1 346
1 354 BYNOE354
1 355 BYNOE355
1 357 ANSON357
1 358 ANSON358
1 359 ANSON359
1 361 ANSON361
1 369 MOYLE369
1 383 ANSON383
1 384 ANSON384
1 385 ANSON385
1 402 PTSRU402
1 405 PTSTU405
1 407 PTSTU407
1 408 PTSTU408
1 410 PTSTU410
1 413 MARY413
1 418 NOONA418
1 419 NOONA419
2 139 TOMK139
2 140 TOMK140
2 149 MILLI149
2 150 TOMK150
2 151 BLYT151
2 182 KOOL182
2 183 KOOL183
2 191 ARNH191
2 200 BLMUD200
2 201 BLMUD201
2 260 MURGE260
2 261 MURGE256
2 276 EALLI276
2 279 EALLI279
2 282 CAHIL282
2 285 CAHIL285
2 295 CAHIL295
2 296 KAPAL296
2 310 KAPAL310
2 312 KAPAL312
2 317 FIELD317
2 318 FIELD318
2 319 FIELD319
2 337 KOOLP337
2 353 FOGBA353
2 406 PTSTU406
2 409 PTSTU409
3 176 KOOL176
3 180 KOOL180
3 181 KOOL181
3 313 KAPAL313
3 323 KAPAL323
3 324 KAPAL324
3 338 PTSTU338
3 341 PTSTU341
3 345 PTSTU345
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 74
3 360 ANSON360
3 363 REYNO363
3 377 DALY377
3 378 DALY378
3 379 DALY379
3 380 DALY380
3 386 ANSON386
3 387 ANSON387
3 388 ANSON388
3 389 ANSON389
3 391 ANSON391
3 392 ANSON392
3 395 ANSON395
3 398 PTSTU398
3 400 MARY400
3 401 PTSTU401
4 60 MATAR60
4 61 MATAR61
5 2 BOWMAN02
5 18 BULL18
5 19 BAIN19
5 23 AUVE23
5 24 PINK24
5 27 LEGU27
5 35 VRD35
5 42 WA42
5 43 NEGI43
5 46 WAVE46
5 47 VRD47
5 54 ELSEY54
5 57 GORRIE57
5 58 GORRIE58
5 66 KATH66
5 67 FERG67
5 70 URAPU70
5 85 TOWNS85
5 86 NATHAN86
5 90 BAUH90
5 91 BAUHDOW
5 92 BAUHIN92
5 94 BAUHIN94
5 104 WEARY104
5 106 ROBIN106
5 109 PUNGA109
5 113 WOLLO113
5 128 OENP128
5 131 GOMAD131
5 132 GOMAD132
5 135 GOMAD135
5 137 TOMK137
5 142 TOMK142
5 143 TOMK143
5 146 TOMK146
5 147 MILLI147
5 148 MILLI148
5 158 BLYTH158
5 159 ANNI159
5 160 MIRRI160
5 161 MIRRI161
5 162 MIRRI162
5 163 MITCH163
5 170 GOVE170
5 171 DURAB171
5 173 KOOL173
5 184 KOOL184
5 185 BLANE185
5 186 BLANE186
5 194 KOOL194
5 198 BLMUD198
5 202 BLMUD202
5 218 PHELP218
5 220 PHELP220
5 223 URAPU223
5 224 PHELP224
5 229 MROAK229
5 235 EALLI235
5 240 OENPE240
5 246 CBURG246
5 252 CBURG252
5 284 CAHIL284
5 286 CAHIL286
5 287 CAHIL287
5 308 KAPAL308
5 336 KAPAL336
5 342 MARY342
5 362 REYNO362
5 366 PEPPI356
5 371 MOYLE371
5 382 DALY382
5 393 ANSON393
5 403 PTSTU403
5 417 MARY417
6 315 KAPAL315
6 350 FOGBA350
6 352 FOGBA352
6 364 REYNO364
6 370 BARTL370
6 394 ANSON394
6 404 FIELD404
7 31 LEGU31
7 32 LEG32
7 38 VRD38
7 98 BINGBO98
7 177 KOOL177
7 178 KOOL178
7 210 ROSE210
8 72 URAPU72
8 74 URAPU74
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 75
8 83 TOWNS83
8 134 GOMAD134
8 193 DURAB193
8 208 ROSE208
8 270 MURGE270
8 277 EALLI277
8 290 CAHIL290
8 297 KAPAL297
8 309 KAPAL309
8 314 KAPAL314
8 321 FIELD321
8 322 FIELD322
8 331 KAPAL331
8 332 KAPAL332
8 333 KAPAL333
8 343 MARY343
8 415 MARY415
9 138 TOMK138
9 221 PHELP221
10 1 MANB01
10 4 WILL04
10 8 GREG08
10 9 IKY09
10 11 IKY11
10 13 IKY13
10 16 IKY16
10 17 STOK17
10 26 NEW26
10 36 VRD36
10 41 LEGU41
10 44 NEGI44
10 48 WAVE48
10 56 MATAR56
10 62 MATAR62
10 63 MATAR63
10 64 LITROPER
10 65 MARANB65
10 73 URAPU73
10 79 TOWNS79
10 84 TOWNS84
10 89 BATTEN89
10 93 BAUHIN93
10 95 BATTEN95
10 96 BINGBO96
10 102 WEARY102
10 107 PUNGA107
10 108 PUNGA108
10 110 WOLLO110
10 111 WOLLO111
10 114 WOLLO114
10 115 CALV115
10 118 NICH118
10 122 MALA122
10 124 OTDOW124
10 126 OENP126
10 127 OENP127
10 129 OENP129
10 153 BLYTH153
10 164 MITCH164
10 166 DURAB166
10 172 DURAB172
10 195 BLMUD195
10 196 BLMUD196
10 197 BLMUD197
10 212 ROSE212
10 213 ROSE213
10 216 PHELP216
10 222 URAPU222
10 225 CHAPM225
10 227 CHAPM227
10 237 OENP237
10 241 WELLI241
10 264 MURGE264
10 266 CROAK266
10 268 CROKE268
10 306 CAHI306A
10 307 KAPA307
10 328 KAPAL328
10 334 KAPAL334
10 374 MOYLE374
10 376 DALY376
10 396 REYNO396
10 411 MARY411
11 293 CAHIL293
11 303 CAHIL303
11 305 CAHIL305
11 356 REYNO356
11 399 PTSTU399
11 412 MARY412
12 15 IKY15
12 22 PINK22
12 28 LEGU28
12 29 LEGU29
12 30 LEGU30
12 40 LEGU40
12 55 ELSEY55
12 88 MANTU88
12 152 BLYTH152
12 239 OENPE239
12 245 CBURG245
12 294 CAHIL294
12 306 CAHI306B
12 416 MARY416
13 49 DALY49
13 50 DALY50
13 59 GORRIE59
13 77 ROPER77
13 78 TOWNS78
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 76
13 80 TOWNS80
13 81 TOWNS81
13 82 TOWNS82
13 97 BINGB97
13 99 BINGBO99
13 100 BORRO100
13 101 BORRO101
13 103 WEARY103
13 105 WEARY105
13 112 WOLLO112
13 116 NICH116
13 117 COANJ117
13 120 COANJ120
13 123 OTDOW123
13 130 GOMAD130
13 133 GOMAD133
13 155 BLYTH155
13 156 BLYTH157
13 157 EMUSPR
13 165 MITCH165
13 174 KOOL174
13 175 KOOL175
13 199 BLMUD199
13 203 BLMUD203
13 204 BLMUD204
13 205 BLMUD205
13 206 BLMUD206
13 207 ROSE207
13 209 ROSE209
13 211 ROSE211
13 214 PHELP214
13 215 PHELP215
13 226 CHAPM226
13 242 MURGE242
13 259 MURGE259
13 265 MURGE265
13 271 MURGE271
13 272 WELL272
13 281 EALLI281
13 288 CAHIL288
13 289 CAHIL289
13 291 CAHIL291
13 320 FIELD320
13 326 KAPAL326
13 327 KAPAL327
13 335 KAPAL335
13 340 PTSTU340
13 365 GREEN365
13 367 MOYLE367
13 368 MOYLE368
13 372 MOYLE372
13 373 MOYLE373
13 375 MOYLE375
13 381 DALY381
13 397 REYNO397
13 414 MARY414
14 255 MURGA255
14 275 EALLI275
14 298 KAPAL298
14 311 KAPAL311
14 325 KAPAL325
14 329 KAPAL329
14 348 PTSTU348
14 349 PTSTU349
14 351 FOGBA351
14 390 ANSON390
15 68 URAP68
15 69 URAPU69
15 71 STVIDG
15 75 URAPU75
15 76 ROPER76
15 87 NATHAN87
16 51 WESTCK51
16 119 COANJ119
16 121 COANJ121
16 125 OCTO125
16 228 CHAPM228
18 3 WILL03
18 10 IKY10
18 12 IKY12
18 14 IKY14
18 20 AUVE20
18 21 AUVE21
18 25 PINK25
18 39 VRD39
18 45 WAVEHI45
18 52 ELSEY52
18 53 ELSEY53
19 5 DELA05
19 6 DELA06
19 7 DELA07
20 136 TOMK136
20 144 TOMK144
20 145 TOMK145
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 77
APPENDIX 5 SPECIES LIST
Species list Synonym
Exotic species (may be naturalised ) ***
Abrus precatorius L.
Abutilon leucopetalum (F. Muell.) F. Muell. ex Benth.
Abutilon sp. nil
Acacia ampliceps Maslin
Acacia aulacocarpa Cunn. ex Benth.
Acacia auriculiformis Cunn. ex Benth.
Acacia cowleana Tate
Acacia difficilis Maiden
Acacia dimidiata Benth.
Acacia dunnii (Maiden) Turrill
Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd.
Acacia galioides Benth.
Acacia hammondii Maiden
Acacia hemignosta F. Muell.
Acacia hemsleyi Maiden
Acacia holosericea Cunn. ex G. Don
Acacia laccata Pedley
Acacia latescens Benth.
Acacia latifolia Benth.
Acacia leptocarpa Cunn. ex Benth.
Acacia lysiphloia F. Muell.
Acacia mimula Pedley
Acacia nuperrima E.G. Baker
Acacia plectocarpa Cunn. ex Benth.
Acacia simsii Cunn. ex Benth.
Acacia sp. nil
Acacia stipuligera
Acacia torulosa Benth. ex F. Muell.
Acacia umbellata Cunn. ex Benth.
Achyranthes aspera L.
Acrostichum speciosum Willd.
Adansonia gregorii F. Muell.
Adenostemma lavenia (L.) Kuntze
Aerva javanica (Burman f.) A.L. Juss. ex Schultes
Alloteropsis semialata (R. Br.) A. Hitchc.
Alphitonia excelsa (Fenzl) Benth.
Alstonia actinophylla (Cunn.) Schumann
Alternanthera denticulata R. Br.
Alternanthera nana R. Br.
Alternanthera nodiflora R. Br.
Alternanthera sp.
Alysicarpus glumaceus (Vahl) DC.
Alyxia spicata R. Br.
Ammannia multiflora Roxb.
Ampelocissus acetosa (F. Muell.) Planchon
Ampelocissus frutescens Jackes
Andropogon gayanus Kunth
Aniseia martinicensis (Jacq.) Choisy
Antidesma ghaesembilla Gaertner
Aristida holathera Domin
Aristida hygrometrica R. Br.
Aristida inaequiglumis Domin
Aristida jerichoensis (Domin) Henrard
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 78
Aristida latifolia Domin
Aristida macroclada Henrard
Aristida sp. nil
Arundinella nepalensis Trin.
Aster sp. nil
Asteromyrtus symphyocarpa (F. Muell.) Craven
Atalaya hemiglauca (F. Muell.) F. Muell. ex Benth.
Atalaya variifolia (F. Muell.) F. Muell. ex Benth.
Avicennia marina (Forsskal) Vierh.
Azolla pinnata R. Br.
Azolla sp. nil
Bacopa floribunda (R. Br.) Wettst.
Bambusa arnhemica F. Muell.
Banksia dentata L. f.
Barringtonia acutangula (L.) Gaertner
Basilicum polystachyon (L.) Moench
Bauhinia cunninghamii Lysiphyllum cunninghamii (Benth.) De Wit
Baumea rubiginosa (Sprengel) Boeckeler
Bergia pedicellaris (F. Muell.) Benth.
Bidens bipinnata L.
Blechnum indicum Burman f.
Blechnum orientale L.
Blumea axillaris (Lam.) DC.
Blumea diffusa R. Br. ex Benth.
Blumea integrifolia DC.
Blumea saxatilis Zoll. Moritzi
Blumea tenella DC.
Bonamia media (R. Br.) Hallier f.
Borreria exserta (Benth.) Schumann
Borreria sp. nil
Bossiaea bossiaeoides (Cunn. ex Benth.) Court
Bothriochloa bladhii (Retz.) S.T. Blake
Bothriochloa ewartiana (Domin) C. Hubb.
Brachyachne convergens (F. Muell.) Stapf
Brachychiton diversifolius R. Br.
Brachychiton multicaulis Guymer
Brachychiton paradoxus Schott
Breynia cernua (Poiret) Muell. Arg.
Buchanania arborescens (Blume) Blume
Buchanania obovata Engl.
Buchnera linearis R. Br.
Buchnera ramosissima R. Br.
Buchnera sp. nil
Bulbostylis barbata (Rottb.) C.B. Clarke
Cajanus cinereus (F. Muell.) F. Muell.
Calandrinia sp. nil
Callitris intratropica R. Baker H.G. Smith
Calophyllum inophyllum L.
Calopogonium mucunoides Desv.
Calotropis procera (Willd.) R. Br. ex Aiton f.
Calytrix brownii (Schauer) Craven
Calytrix exstipulata DC.
Canarium australianum F. Muell.
Canscora diffusa (Vahl) Roemer Schultes
Canthium lucidum Hook. Arn.
Canthium schultzii (O. Schwarz) Chippendale
Capparis lasiantha R. Br. ex DC.
Capparis umbonata Lindley
Carallia brachiata (Lour.) Merrill
Cardiospermum halicacabum L.
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 79
Carissa lanceolata R. Br.
Carpentaria acuminata (H.H. Wendl. Drude) Becc.
Cartonema parviflorum Hassk.
Cartonema sp. nil
Cartonema spicatum R. Br.
Cartonema tenue Careul
Cassytha filiformis L.
Casuarina cunninghamiana Miq.
Cathormion sp. nil
Cathormion umbellatum (Vahl) Kosterm.
Cayratia trifolia (L.) Domin
Cenchrus ciliaris L.
Cenchrus echinatus L.
Cenchrus sp. nil
Centaurium spicatum (L.) Fritschen
Centipeda minima (L.) A. Braun Asch.
Ceratopteris thalictroides (L.) Brongn.
Cheilanthes sp. nil
Chionachne cyathopoda (F. Muell.) F. Muell. ex Benth.
Chloris inflata Link
Chloris sp. nil
Choriceras tricorne (Benth.) Airy Shaw
Chrysopogon fallax S.T. Blake
Chrysopogon latifolius S.T. Blake
Chrysopogon setifolius Stapf.
Chrysopogon sp. nil
Cissus reniformis Domin
Cleome viscosa L.
Clitoria ternatea L.
Cochlospermum fraseri Planchon
Coldenia procumbens L.
Commelina ensifolia R. Br.
Commelina lanceolata R. Br.
Commelina sp. nil
Corchorus capsularis L.
Corchorus sidoides F. Muell.
Cordyline cannifolia R. Br.
Corymbia bella K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson Corymbia bella
Corymbia confertiflora (F. Muell) K.D. Hill& L.A.S. Johnson. Eucalyptus confertiflora
Corymbia dichromophloia (F. Muell.) K.D. Hill& L.A.S. Johnson. Eucalyptus dichromophloia
Corymbia disjuncta K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson. Eucalyptus confertiflora
Corymbia ferruginea (Schauer) K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson. Eucalyptus ferruginea
Corymbia foelscheana (F. Muell.) K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson. Eucalyptus foelscheana
Corymbia grandifolia (R. Br. ex Benth.) Hill & L.A.S. Johnson. Corymbia grandifolia
Corymbia latifolia (F. Muell.) K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson. Eucalyptus latifolia
Corymbia pauciseta K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson Eucalyptus confertiflora
Corymbia polycarpa (F. Muell.) K.D. Hill & L.A.S. Johnson. Eucalyptus polycarpa
Corymbia terminalis (F. Muell.) K.D.Hill& L.A.S. Johnson. Eucalyptus terminalis
Crinum sp.
Crosslandia setifolia W. Fitzg.
Crotalaria brevis Domin
Crotalaria crispata (F. Muell.) Benth.
Crotalaria medicaginea Lam.
Crotalaria montana Roth
Croton habrophyllus Airy Shaw
Cupaniopsis anacardioides (A. Rich.) Radlk.
Cyanotis axillaris (L.) D. Don
Cyclosorus interruptus (Willd.) Ching
Cynanchum carnosum (R. Br.) Schltr.
Cynanchum sp. nil
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 80
Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.
Cynodon sp. nil
Cyperus aquatilis R. Br.
Cyperus carinatus R. Br.
Cyperus conicus (R. Br.) Boeckeler.
Cyperus decompositus (R. Br.) F. Muell.
Cyperus digitatus Roxb.
Cyperus haspan L.
Cyperus holoschoenus R. Br.
Cyperus iria L.
Cyperus javanicus Houtt.
Cyperus platystylis R. Br.
Cyperus polystachyos Rottb.
Cyperus sp. nil
Cyperus vaginatus R. Br.
Dactyloctenium radulans (R. Br.) Beauv.
Datura inoxia Miller ***
Decaisnina brittenii (Blakely) Barlow
Decaisnina signata (F. Muell. ex Benth.) Tieghem
Dendrobium affine Steudel
Dendrobium canaliculatum R. Br.
Dendrobium sp. nil
Denhamia obscura (A. Rich.) Meissner ex Walp.
Dentella repens Forster
Desmodium biarticulatum (L.) F. Muell.
Desmodium sp. nil
Desmodium trichostachyum Benth.
Dianella longifolia R. Br.
Dianella odorata Blume
Dianella sp. nil
Dichanthium fecundum S.T. Blake
Dichanthium sericeum (R. Br.) A. Camus
Dichanthium sp. nil
Dichrostachys spicata (F. Muell.) Domin
Dicliptera armata F. Muell.
Dicranopteris linearis (Burman f.) L. Underw.
Digitaria ammophila Hughes
Digitaria bicornis (Lam.) Roemer Schultes
Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koeler
Digitaria sps
Dillenia alata (R. Br. ex DC.) Martelli
Dimeria ornithopoda Trin.
Diospyros calycantha O. Schwarz
Diospyros compacta (R. Br.) Kostermans
Diospyros humilis (R. Br.) F. Muell.
Distichostemon hispidulus (Endl.) Baillon
Dodonaea lanceolata F. Muell.
Dodonaea physocarpa F. Muell.
Dodonaea platyptera F. Muell.
Dolichandrone filiformis (Fenzl) F. Muell.
Dolichandrone heterophylla (R. Br.) F. Muell.
Drosera indica L.
Drosera lanata Kondo
Drosera petiolaris R. Br. ex DC.
Drosera sp. nil
Dysophylla stellata (Lour.) Benth.
Echinochloa colona (L.) Link
Eclipta prostrata (L.) L.
Ecliptera platyglossa
Ectrosia agrostoides Benth.
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 81
Ectrosia leporina R. Br.
Ectrosia schultzii Benth.
Ectrosia sp. nil
Ehretia saligna R. Br.
Eleocharis atropurpurea (Retz.) C. Presl
Eleocharis brassii S.T. Blake
Eleocharis dulcis (Burman f.) Henschel
Eleocharis geniculata (L.) Roemer Schultes
Eleocharis sp. nil
Eleocharis sphacelata R. Br.
Eleocharis sundaica Kern
Elytrophorus spicatus (Willd.) A. Camus
Emilia sonchifolia (L.) DC.
Enneapogon polyphyllus (Domin) N. Burb.
Enneapogon purpurascens (R. Br.) Beauv.
Enneapogon sp. nil
Epaltes australis Less.
Eragrostis confertiflora J. Black
Eragrostis cumingii Steudel
Eragrostis ecarinata
Eragrostis pubescens (R. Br.) Steudel
Eragrostis schultzii Benth.
Eragrostis sp. nil
Eragrostis spartinoides Steudel
Eragrostis speciosa (Roemer Schultes) Steudel
Eragrostis tenax Jedwabr.
Eriachne aristidea F. Muell.
Eriachne armittii F. Muell. ex Benth.
Eriachne avenacea R. Br.
Eriachne burkittii Jansen
Eriachne ciliata R. Br.
Eriachne festucacea F. Muell.
Eriachne filiformis Hartley
Eriachne glauca R. Br.
Eriachne melicacea F. Muell.
Eriachne mucronata R. Br.
Eriachne obtusa R. Br.
Eriachne sp. nil
Eriachne squarrosa R. Br.
Eriachne triseta Nees
Eriocaulon cinereum
Eriocaulon heterogynum F. Muell.
Eriocaulon sp. nil
Eriocaulon spectabile F. Muell.
Erythrophleum chlorostachys (F. Muell.) Baillon
Eucalyptus alba Reinw. ex Blume
Eucalyptus apodophylla Blakely Jacobs
Eucalyptus bigalerita F. Muell.
Eucalyptus brevifolia F. Muell.
Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh.
Eucalyptus leucophloia Brooker
Eucalyptus microtheca F. Muell.
Eucalyptus phoenicea F. Muell.
Eucalyptus porrecta S.T. Blake
Eucalyptus pruinosa Schauer
Eucalyptus sp. nil
Eucalyptus tectifica F. Muell.
Eulalia aurea (Bory) Kunth
Euphorbia coghlanii Bailey
Euphorbia hirta L.
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 82
Euphorbia tannensis Sprengel
Euphorbia vachellii Hook. Arn.
Evolvulus alsinoides L.
Evolvulus nummularis (L.) L.
Evolvulus sp. nil
Excoecaria agallocha L.
Excoecaria parvifolia Muell. Arg.
Exocarpos latifolius R. Br.
Fagraea racemosa Jack ex. Wall.
Ficus adenosperma Miq.
Ficus coronulata Miq.
Ficus opposita Miq.
Ficus racemosa L.
Ficus scobina Benth.
Ficus sp. nil
Ficus virens Aiton
Fimbristylis acicularis R. Br.
Fimbristylis aestivalis (Retz.) Vahl
Fimbristylis clavata S.T. Blake
Fimbristylis complanata (Retz.) Link
Fimbristylis cymosa R. Br.
Fimbristylis dealbata
Fimbristylis densa S.T. Blake
Fimbristylis dichotoma (L.) Vahl
Fimbristylis dolera S.T. Blake
Fimbristylis littoralis Gaudich.
Fimbristylis macrantha Boeckeler
Fimbristylis microcarya F. Muell.
Fimbristylis nuda Boeckeler.
Fimbristylis nutans (Retz.) Vahl
Fimbristylis oxystachya F. Muell.
Fimbristylis pauciflora R. Br.
Fimbristylis polytrichoides (Retz.) R. Br.
Fimbristylis pterygosperma R. Br.
Fimbristylis recta Bailey
Fimbristylis sieberana Kunth
Fimbristylis simplex S.T. Blake
Fimbristylis simulans Latz
Fimbristylis sp. nil
Fimbristylis squarrulosa F. Muell.
Fimbristylis tetragona R. Br.
Fimbristylis trigastrocarya F. Muell.
Fimbristylis velata R. Br.
Flacourtia territorialis Airy Shaw
Flagellaria indica L.
Flemingia lineata (L.) Roxb. ex Aiton f.
Flueggea virosa (Roxb. ex Willd.) Voigt
Fuirena ciliaris (L.) Roxb.
Fuirena umbellata Rottb.
Galactia tenuiflora (Willd.) Wight Arn.
Gardenia megasperma F. Muell.
Germainia grandiflora (S.T. Blake) Chaianan
Germainia truncatiglumis (F. Muell. ex Benth.) Chaianan
Glinus lotoides L.
Glinus oppositifolius (L.) C. DC.
Glochidion disparipes Airy Shaw
Glochidion perakense Hook. f.
Glochidion xerocarpum (O. Schwarz) Airy Shaw
Glycine tomentella Hayata
Gmelina schlechteri H.J. Lam
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 83
Gomphrena canescens R. Br.
Gomphrena flaccida R. Br.
Gonocarpus chinensis (Lour.) Orchard
Goodenia bicolor
Goodenia lamprosperma F. Muell.
Goodenia purpurea (F. Muell.) Carolin
Goodenia sp.
Gossypium sp. nil
Grevillea pteridifolia Knight
Grevillea pungens R. Br.
Grevillea refracta R. Br.
Grevillea striata R. Br.
Grevillea wickhamii Meissner
Grewia breviflora Benth.
Grewia retusifolia Kurz
Grewia sp. nil
Gronophyllum ramsayi (Becc.) H. Moore
Gymnanthera oblonga (Burm. f.) P. Green
Haemodorum coccineum R. Br.
Haemodorum ensifolium F. Muell.
Hakea arborescens R. Br.
Hakea sp. nil
Halosarcia sp. nil
Hanguana malayana (Jack) Merrill
Hedyotis sp.
Helicia australasica F. Muell.
Helicteres dentata F. Muell. ex Benth.
Heliotropium indicum L.
Heliotropium ovalifolium Forsskal
Heliotropium sp. nil
Heliotropium tenuifolium R. Br.
Heterachne abortiva (R. Br.) Druce
Heteropogon contortus (L.) Beauv. ex Roemer Schultes
Heteropogon triticeus (R. Br.) Stapf
Hibbertia dealbata(R. Br. ex DC.) Benth.
Hibbertia sp. nil
Hibiscus leptocladus Benth.
Hibiscus meraukensis Hochr.
Hibiscus panduriformis Burman f.
Hibiscus tiliaceus L.
Homalanthus novo-guineensis (Warb.) Laterb. & Schumann
Horsfieldia australiana S.T. Blake
Hybanthus enneaspermus (L.) F. Muell.
Hydriastele wendlandiana H.H. Wendl. Drude
Hydrocotyle grammatocarpa F. Muell.
Hydrolea zeylanica Vahl
Hygrochloa aquatica Lazarides
Hygrophila angustifolia R. Br.
Hymenachne acutigluma (Steudel) Gilliland
Hypericum gramineum Forster f.
Hyptis suaveolens (L.) Poit. ***
Ilex arnhemensis (F. Muell.) Loes.
Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch.
Indigofera colutea (Burman f.) Merrill
Indigofera linifolia (L. f.) Retz.
Ipomoea aquatica Forsskal
Ipomoea coptica (L.) Roth ex Roemer Schultes
Ipomoea sp. nil
Ipomoea velutina R. Br.
Isachne confusa Ohwi
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 84
Ischaemum australe R. Br.
Ischaemum sp. nil
Iseilema sp. nil
Iseilema vaginiflorum Domin
Ixora klanderana F. Muell.
Jacksonia dilatata Benth.
Jacksonia odontoclada F. Muell. ex Benth.
Jacksonia sp. nil
Jacksonia thesioides (Cunn.) Benth.
Jasmine molle R. Br.
Jasminum didymum Forster f.
Jatropha gossypifolia L.
Leea indica (Burman. f.) Merrill
Leea rubra Blume ex Sprengel
Leersia hexandra Sw.
Lepironia articulata (Retz.) Domin
Leptocarpus elatior R. Br.
Leptocarpus schultzii Benth.
Leptocarpus sp. nil
Leptocarpus spathaceus R. Br.
Leptochloa neesii (Thwaites) Benth.
Leptospermum parviflora
Limnophila brownii Wannan
Limnophila chinensis (Osbeck) Merrill
Limnophila fragrans (Forster f.) Seemann
Limnophila sp. nil
Lindernia aplectra W.R. Barker
Lindernia scapigera R. Br.
Lindsaea ensifolia Sw.
Lindsaea sp. nil
Lindsaea walkerae Hook.
Livistona benthamii Bailey
Livistona humilis R. Br.
Livistona rigida Becc.
Lobelia dioica R. Br.
Lobelia quadrangularis R. Br.
Lophopetalum arnhemicum Byrnes
Lophostemon grandiflorus (Benth.) Peter Wilson Waterhouse
Lophostemon lactifluus (F. Muell.) Peter Wilson Waterhouse
Ludwigia adscendens (L.) Hara
Ludwigia hyssopifolia (G. Don) Exell
Ludwigia octovalvis (Jacq.) Raven
Ludwigia perennis L.
Luffa cylindrica (L.) M. Roemer
Luffa graveolens Roxb.
Lycopodiella cernua (L.) Pichi_Serm.
Lygodium microphyllum (Cav.) R. Br.
Macaranga tanarius (L.) Muell. Arg.
Macropteranthes kekwickii F. Muell.
Malachra fasciata Jacq. ***
Mallotus nesophilus Muell. Arg.
Malvastrum americanum (L.) Torrey
Marsdenia viridiflora R. Br.
Marsilea exarata A. Braun
Marsilea hirsuta R. Br.
Marsilea mutica Mett.
Marsilea sp. nil
Maytenus cunninghamii (Hook.) Loes.
Melaleuca acacioides F. Muell.
Melaleuca argentea W. Fitzg.
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 85
Melaleuca bracteata F. Muell.
Melaleuca cajuputi Powell
Melaleuca citrolens Barlow
Melaleuca dealbata S.T. Blake
Melaleuca lasiandra F. Muell.
Melaleuca leucadendra (L.) L.
Melaleuca minutifolia F. Muell.
Melaleuca nervosa (Lindley) Cheel
Melaleuca sericea Byrnes
Melaleuca sp. nil
Melaleuca stenostachya S.T. Blake
Melaleuca viridiflora Sol. ex Gaertner
Melastoma polyanthum
Melhania oblongifolia F. Muell.
Melhania sp. nil
Melicope elleryana (F. Muell.) T. Hartley
Melochia pyramidata L.
Merremia dissecta (Jacq.) Hallier f.
Merremia gemella (Burman f.) Hallier f.
Merremia hederacea (Burman f.) Hallier f.
Merremia sp. nil
Mimosa pigra L. ***
Mitrasacme aggregata
Mitrasacme connata R. Br.
Mitrasacme elata R. Br.
Mitrasacme laevis Benth.
Mitrasacme nudicaulis Reinw. ex Blume
Mitrasacme sp. nil
Mnesithea formosa (R. Br.) Koning Sosef
Mnesithea rottboellioides (R. Br.) Koning Sosef
Mnesithea sp. nil
Mollugo molluginis (F. Muell.) Druce
Mollugo sp. nil
Morinda citrifolia L.
Mucuna gigantea (Willd.) DC.
Murdannia graminea (R. Br.) A. Brueckner
Murdannia sp. nil
Nauclea orientalis (L.) L.
Nelsonia campestris R. Br.
Nephrolepis biserrata (Sw.) Schott
Neptunia dimorphantha Domin
Nymphaea violacea Lehm.
Nymphoides aurantiaca (Dalz.) Kuntze
Nymphoides quadriloba Aston
Oldenlandia galioides (F. Muell.) F. Muell.
Omegandra kanisii
Operculina sp. nil
Ophiuros exaltatus (L.) Kuntze
Ophiuros sp. nil
Oryza australiensis Domin
Oryza rufipogon Griffith
Oryza sp. nil
Owenia vernicosa F. Muell.
Pandanus aquaticus F. Muell.
Pandanus spiralis R. Br.
Panicum decompositum R. Br.
Panicum effusum R. Br.
Panicum luzonense Presl
Panicum mindanaense Merrill
Panicum paludosum Roxb.
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 86
Panicum seminudum Domin
Panicum simile Domin
Panicum sp. nil
Panicum trachyrhachis Benth.
Panicum trichoides Sw.
Paraneurachne muelleri (Hack.) S.T. Blake
Parkinsonia aculeata L.
Parsonsia velutina R. Br.
Parvetta sp.
Paspalidium distans (Trin.) Hughes
Paspalum scrobiculatum L. ***
Paspalum sps. nil
Passiflora foetida L. ***
Pennisetum pedicellatum Trin.
Perotis rara R. Br.
Persicaria attenuata (R. Br.) Sojak
Persicaria barbata (L.) H. Hara
Persicaria sp.
Persicaria strigosa (R. Br.) Gross
Petalostigma banksii Britten S. Moore
Petalostigma pubescens Domin
Petalostigma quadriloculare F. Muell.
Petalostigma sp. nil
Petalostigma suborbicular
Pheidochloa gracilis S.T. Blake
Philydrum lanuginosum Banks Sol. ex Gaertner
Phragmites karka (Retz.) Trin. ex Steudel
Phyla nodiflora (L.) E. Greene
Phyllanthus grandisepalus
Phyllanthus maderaspatensis L.
Phyllanthus minutiflorus F. Muell. ex Muell. Arg.
Phyllanthus reticulatus Poiret
Phyllanthus sp. nil
Phyllanthus urinaria L.
Physalis minima L.
Pistia stratiotes L.
Planchonia careya (F. Muell.) Kunth
Pleurocarpaea fasciculata Dunlop
Plumbago zeylanica L.
Pogonolobus reticulatus F. Muell.
Polycarpaea breviflora F. Muell.
Polycarpaea corymbosa (L.) Lam.
Polycarpaea sp. nil
Polycarpaea violacea (Mart.) Benth.
Polymeria ambigua R. Br.
Polymeria longifolia Lindley
Pongamia pinnata (L.) Pierre
Portulaca sp. nil
Pouteria sericea (Aiton) Baehni
Protasparagus racemosus (Willd.) Oberm.
Pseuderanthemum variabile (R. Br.) Radlk.
Pseudopogonatherum contortum (Brongn.) A. Camus
Pseudoraphis minuta
Pseudoraphis spinescens (R. Br.) Vickery
Pteridium revolutum (Blume) Nakai
Ptilotus distans (R. Br.) Poiret
Ptilotus fusiformis (R. Br.) Poiret
Ptilotus schwartzii F. Muell. ex Tate
Ptilotus sp. nil
Rapanea pedicellaris
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 87
Rhus taitensis Guill.
Rhynchosia minima (L.) DC.
Rhynchospora pterochaeta F. Muell.
Rhynchospora sp. nil
Rotala diandra (F. Muell.) Koehne
Sacciolepis myosuroides
Salvinia molesta D. Mitch. ***
Santalum lanceolatum R. Br.
Schizachyrium fragile (R. Br.) A. Camus
Schizachyrium sp. nil
Schoenoplectus litoralis (Schrader) Palla
Schoenus calostachyus (R. Br.) Poiret
Schoenus falcatus R. Br.
Schoenus sparteus R. Br.
Scleria brownii Kunth.
Scleria ciliaris Nees
Scleria lingulata C.B. Clarke
Scleria novae-hollandiae Boeckeler
Scleria poaeformis Retz.
Scleria polycarpa Boeckeler
Scleria psilorrhiza C.B. Clarke
Scleria rugosa R. Br.
Scleria sp. nil
Sehima nervosum (Rottler.) Stapf
Sehima sp. nil
Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin
Senna occidentalis (L.) Link
Sesbania cannabina (Retz.) Poiret
Sesbania formosa (F. Muell.) N. Burb.
Sesbania sp. nil
Setaria apiculata (Scribner Merrill) Schumann
Setaria sp. nil
Sida acuta Burman f. ***
Sida cordifolia L. ***
Sida sp.
Smilax australis R. Br.
Solanum echinatum R. Br.
Solenostemon scutellarioides (L.) Codd
Sorghum (annual)
Sorghum (Perennial)
Sorghum intrans F. Muell. ex Benth.
Sorghum sp. nil
Sorghum timorense (Kunth) Buse in de Vriese
Sphaeranthus indicus L.
Sporobolus australasicus Domin
Sporobolus pulchellus R. Br.
Sporobolus sp. nil
Sporobolus virginicus (L.) Kunth
Stackhousia intermedia Bailey
Staurogyne leptocaulis Bremek.
Stemodia viscosa Roxb.
Stenochlaena palustris (Burman f.) Beddome
Stenochlaena sp. nil
Streptoglossa odora (F. Muell.) Dunlop
Strychnos lucida R. Br.
Stylidium floodii F. Muell.
Stylidium multiscapum O. Schwarz
Stylidium schizanthum F. Muell.
Stylosanthes hamata (L.) Taub.
Syzygium angophoroides (F. Muell.) B. Hyland
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 88
Syzygium armstrongii (Benth.) B. Hyland
Syzygium eucalyptoides (F. Muell.) B. Hyland
Syzygium forte (F. Muell.) B. Hyland
Syzygium sp.
Syzygium suborbiculare (Benth.) Hartley Perry
Tarenna sp.
Tephrosia juncacea
Terminalia bursarina F. Muell.
Terminalia canescens (DC.) Radlk.
Terminalia carpentariae C. White
Terminalia erythrocarpa F. Muell.
Terminalia grandiflora Benth.
Terminalia microcarpa Decne.
Terminalia platyphylla F. Muell.
Terminalia platyptera F. Muell.
Terminalia pterocarya F. Muell.
Terminalia sp. nil
Terminalia volucris R. Br. ex Benth.
Thaumastochloa major S.T. Blake
Thaumastochloa pubescens (Benth.) C. Hubb.
Thecanthes punicea R. Br. (Wikstrom)
Thecanthes sanguinea (F. Muell.) Rye
Themeda sp. nil
Themeda triandra Forsskal
Thespesia populneoides (Roxb.) Kostel.
Thespesia thespesioides (R. Br. ex Benth.) Fryxell
Thysanotus chinensis Benth.
Timonius timon (Sprengel) Merrill
Tinospora smilacina Benth.
Trema tomentosa (Roxb.) Hara
Trianthema portulacastrum L.
Trichodesma zeylanicum (Burman f.) R. Br.
Tricostularia undulata (Thwaites) Kern
Tridax procumbens L.
Triodia bitextura Lazarides Plectrachne pungens (R. Br.) C. Hubb.
Triodia microstachya R. Br.
Triodia procera R. Br.
Triodia sp. nil
Triumfetta rhomboidea Jacq.
Tylophora flexuosa R. Br.
Uraria lagopodoides (L.) Desv. ex DC.
Urena australiensis
Urena lobata L.
Urochloa pubigera (Roemer & Schultes) R. Webster Brachiaria pubigera (Roemer Schultes) S.T. Blake
Urochloa sp. n il Brachiaria sp. nil
Urochloa praetervisa Brachiaria windersii C. Hubb.
Urochloa mosambicensis (Hackel) Dandy ***
Urochloa mutica (Forsskal)T.Q.Nguyen. ** Brachiaria mutica (Forsskal) Stapf
Utricularia odorata Pellegrin
Utricularia sp. nil
Vallisneria sp. nil
Vernonia cinerea (L.) Less.
Verticordia cunninghamii Schauer
Vetiveria elongata (R. Br.) Stapf ex C. Hubb.
Vetiveria pauciflora S.T. Blake
Vetiveria sp. nil
Vigna lanceolata Benth.
Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek
Vigna sp. nil
Vitex glabrata R. Br.
Melaleuca Survey of the Northern Territory. 89
Wahlenbergia sp.
Waltheria indica L.
Whiteochloa capillipes (Benth.) Lazarides
Wrightia saligna (R. Br.) F. Muell. ex Benth.
Xanthium occidentale
Xanthium strumarium L.
Xanthostemon eucalyptoides F. Muell.
Xanthostemon paradoxus F. Muell.
Xenostegia tridentata (L.) Austin Staples
Xerochloa imberbis R. Br.
Xerochloa laniflora Benth.
Xerochloa sp. nil
Xyris complanata R. Br.
Xyris indica L.
Xyris pauciflora Willd.
Xyris perennis
Xyris sp. nil
Yakirra australiensis (Domin) Lazarides R. Webster