memorial descritivo e projeto de atuação...

57
Dra Tatiana M. Tilli System biology Lab [email protected] HSP90AB1 VIM CSNK2B TK1 YWHAB Next...

Upload: trinhtuong

Post on 22-Jan-2019

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Dra Tatiana M. Tilli

System biology Lab

[email protected]

HSP90AB1

VIM

CSNK2B

TK1

YWHABNext...

Technologies

2001

Explosion of the “Omics”

• Proteomics• Allergenomics• Bibliomics• Biomics• Cardiogenomics• Cellomics• Chemogenomics• Chemoproteomics• Chromatinomics• Chromonomics• Chromosomics• Combinatorial Peptidomics• Computational RNomics• Cryobionomics

Crystallomics

Cytochromics

Cytomics

Degradomics

Ecotoxicogenomics

Eicosanomics

Embryogenomics

Enviromics

Epigenomics

Epitomics

Expressomics

Fluxomics

Fragmentomics

Fragonomics

Etc…

http://www.genomicglossaries.com

Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Clegg L, Mariotto A, Feuer EJ, Edwards BK (eds). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2002, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2002/, based on Nov 2004 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site 2005.

Leukemias and Lymphomas

80

Years Ago

Leukemia or Lymphoma60

Years Ago

Chronic Leukemia

Acute Leukemia

Preleukemia

Indolent Lymphoma

Aggressive Lymphoma

100

Years Ago

“Disease of the Blood”

Today

38 Leukemia types identified:

Acute myeloid leukemia (12 types)

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (2 types)

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (2 types)

Acute monocytic leukemia (2 types)

Acute erythroid leukemia (2 types)

Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia

Acute myelomonocytic leukemia (2 types)

Chronic myeloid leukemia

Chronic myeloproliferative disorders (5 types)

Myelodysplastic syndromes (6 types)

Mixed myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic syndromes (3 types)

51 Lymphomas identified:

Mature B-cell lymphomas (14 types)

Mature T-cell lymphomas (15 types)

Plasma cell neoplasm (3 types)

Immature (precursor) lymphomas (2 types)

Hodgkin’s lymphoma (5 types)

Immunodeficiency associated lymphomas (5 types)

Other hematolymphoid neoplasms (7 types)

5-YearSurvival

~ 0%

70%

Personalized medicine - concept

The right treatment, for the right

patient, at the right time

From European Union

Personalized Medicine Reduces Ineffective Treatment in Colon Cancer

Langreth, R. (2008), ‘Imclone’s Gene Test Battle’, Forbes.com, 16May

kras Testing

Do Not Treat

Treat with Erbitux

Treat with Erbitux

TreatmentSuccess

Burrell et al., 2013 - Nature

Tumor Heterogeneity

Red – chromosome 2Green – chromosome 18

Heterogeneity of MAP-Tau expression in a whole tissue section of breast carcinoma. (a) H&E stain. (b) Immunofluorescence. Nuclei are labeled with DAPI. Cytokeratin is labeled with Cy3. MAP-Tau is labeled with Cy5.

Tolles et al. Breast Cancer Research 2011 13:R51

Therapy?

Tumor Heterogeneity

Heterogeinity: Primary tumor X metastasis

Primary renal-cell carcinoma

AdaptationHeterogeinity

ResistancePlasticity

Microenvironment

Therapy failure

Major challenge to precision medicine and biomarker development

Case: Breast Cancer

Breast Cancer

PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov (September, 2016)

Problems about Breast Cancer

1. New cases: 1.7 million wordwide

2. Second most common cause of cancer mortality in developed countries

drugs + timeline + side effects (70%)

3. Therapy costs: $1 billion a year (US)

AdaptationHeterogeinity

ResistancePlasticity

Microenvironment

Therapy failure

Major challenge to precision medicine and biomarker development

1. Delineate a strategy to identify targets to breastcancer treatment

2. Avoid side effetcs

Goals

(intact-micluster)

~10,000 genes

~600 genes

Carels et al., 2015_PlosOnePatent: BR1020150308191

Study design

Up-regulated genes

Down-regulated genes

P < 0.001

MDA-MB-231 vs. MCF-10A

HSP90AB1

VIM

CSNK2B

TK1

YWHAB

Carels et al., 2015_PlosOnePatente: BR1020150308191

Are they actionable? Combination -> 5 genes

Bench validation: Top-5 inhibition

Downregulation using siRNAs

MCF-10AMDA-MB-231 MCF-7

HSP90AB1GRB2EEF1GMCM7KPNA2

HSP90AB1TK1

CSNK2BVIM

YWHAB

HSP90AB1VIMCSNK2BYWHABTK1

Functional assays

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

100nM – 48h

(A)

(B)

MDA-MB-231 MCF-10A MCF-7

Bench validation: Top-5 inhibition

Cell Proliferation and Survival

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

Scrambled All siRNA

All siRNA

All siRNA

Scrambled

Scrambled

Control

Control

Control

MD

A-M

B-2

31

MC

F-1

0A

MC

F-7

(A)

(B)MDA-MB-231

MCF-10A

MCF-7

Bench validation: Top-5 inhibition

Cell proliferation

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

MCF-10A Scrambled

MCF-10A All siRNA

MDA-MB-231 Scrambled

MDA-MB-231 All siRNA

MCF-10A MDA-MB-231

(A) (B)

(C) (D)

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

(A)

Control Scrambled All siRNA

MD

A-M

B-2

31

MC

F-1

0A

MC

F-7

Bench validation: Top-5 inhibition

Migration

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

Control Scrambled All siRNAM

DA

-MB

-231

MC

F-1

0A

MC

F-7

Bench validation: Top-5 inhibition

Invasion

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

(A)

(B)

Control Scrambled All siRNA

MD

A-M

B-2

31

MC

F-1

0A

MC

F-7

Bench validation: Top-5 inhibition

Metastatic Potential – Colony formation soft agarMDA-MB-231

MCF-7

MCF-10A

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

(A) (B)

Bench validation: Individual transfections

Cell Proliferation and Survival

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

(C)

(E)

(G)

(D)

(F)

(H)

Bench validation: Individual transfections

Cell death

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

Scrambled

HSP90AB1

YWHAB

VIM

CSNK2B

TK1

(A)

(B)

(C) (D) (E)

Bench validation: Individual transfections

Tilli et al., 2016 Oncotarget

HSP90AB1TK1

CSNK2BVIM

YWHAB

MDA-MB-231 MCF-7

HSP90AB1GRB2EEF1GMCM7KPNA2

MCF-10A

Strategy

Drugs combination

Summary

Interactome + Transcriptome

Selection of targets

Drug development

Network pharmacology

Summary

HSP90AB1CSNK2B

MDA-MB-468

BT-20

MAGOHEEF1G

VIMYWHAB

TK1

CHD3HDGF

MDA-MB-231

EGFR

Individualized treatment

Personalized medicine - concept

The right treatment, for the right

patient, at the right time

TCGA database: unveil protein target for therapy.

• 85 patients -> breast tumor versus normal, including molecular subtypes (~75 genes). (Alessandra Conforte Thesis)

• ~50% of the targets are FDA-approved.

• In silico pharmacology targets -> pharma industry. (Dr Carlyle Ribeiro, Pos Doc)

Targeted Therapy: A Giant Step Forward

Startup : Development of a molecular diagnostic approach to assist breast cancer treatment

Project contemplated -> FAPERJ

Amplify for other tumors and diseases.

Rational approach to select drugs1. Efficacy

2. Avoid side effects

Tumor and normal tissue

Transcritome and Interactome

6 days

Solution: Molecular approach

Proposed value

Breast cancer panelP

ate

nt

pe

nd

ing

Breast cancer panelRecurrence

Patent pending

mR

NA

exp

ress

ion

(RN

Ase

qV

2) Gene A Gene B Gene C

Breast cancer panelPatient Vital Status

Patent pending

mR

NA

exp

ress

ion

(RN

Ase

qV

2) Gene A Gene B Gene C

Breast cancer panelOverall Survival

Patent pending

Breast cancer panelNetwork

Patent pending

Breast cancer panelNext steps.......

Patent pending

Clinical trial

Nanomedicine – New Era of Personalized Medicine

Drugdelivery Therapy

ImagingDiagnosis

Prognosis

Gene delivery

Labelling

Labelling Monitoring

TCGA: unveil membrane proteins specifically expressed in breastcancer tissues.

95 patients -> tumor versus normal, including molecular subtypes

siRNA

Specific protein

Specific receptor

Manuscript in preparationPatent pending

Membrane proteins: breast cancer

Não-tumoral Tumor

Nanoparticle -> therapy and imaging

Monoclonal antibodies -> therapy

Biomarker -> Diagnosis

free margin surgery -> prognosis, therapy

Pharma industry

Alunas: Júlia Badaró, Luiza Gomes, Alice Gomes

Clinicalapplications

BioinformaticsCell Biology

Molecular BiologySystem Biology

Modelling

Dia

gno

sis

The

rap

y

Summary

Acknowledgements

• UofA, Alberta, Canada– Jack Tuszynski

• Fiocruz/CDTS– Nicolas Carels

– Alessandra Conforte

– Julia Badaró

– Milena Magalhães

– Carlyle Lima

– Luiza Gomes

• PROCC– Fabrício Alves

Obrigada pela atenção

[email protected]

Hallmarks: estudo da medicina personalizada

1. Desenvolvimento de novos fármacos2. Sistema de delivery específicos

Projeto 3: Validação in vivo

Objetivo 1. Avaliar a formação de tumor -> ortotópico e subcutâneoMetástase -> veia da cauda – pulmão

intra-cardíaca - óssea

RNAi

Objetivo 2. Avaliar a formação de tumor -> ortotópico e subcutâneo

CRISPR-Cas9

Objetivo 3. Avaliação terapêutica -> tumor subcutâneo + injeção intra-tumoralRNAi

Projeto 10: Células tronco tumorais, glioma

1. Melhor compreensão desse tipo celular2. Identificar alvos para aumentar a eficiência terapêutica

Dr Kiran Velpula

Sem soro+EGF / +bFGF

Nanog / Oct3-4 / Sox2

ZR-741XMCF-10A

Actin

GRB2

PDIA3

NPM1

GAPDH

Up-regulated genes

Down-regulated genes

HSP90AB1

BT-474XMCF10A

HSP90AB1

Actin

ERBB3

YWHAB

ERBB2

IKBA

GRP78

GAPDH

PA2G4

A strategy to unveil housekeeping genes suitable for analyses in breast cancer diseases

Manuscript in preparation

Oncotype DX Test – 21 genesNational Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN) and the American Society of Clinical

Oncology (ASCO) treatment guidelines

Aim: identify HKGs for breast cancer

Tumor Heterogeinity

Breast cell lines

(A)

(B)

novel HKGs X traditional HKGs

ER

STAT5

STAT3

HIF

SP1

TP53

MYC

AP1

NFKB

NOTCH

FOXA1

GATA3

ELK1

RPL13AGAPDH

PGK1

ACTB

TUBA1A

DIMT1

PUM1

GUSB

B2M

DHX9

LARP1

MZT2B

TAF2

STX5

UBXN4

CCSER2

ANKRD17

SYMPK

TMEM11

Transcription factorsnHKGstHKGs

(A) (B)

Bench validation: Real Time PCR

Luminal A -> MCF-7 and T47D Triple Negative -> MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 Non-tumoral -> MCF-10A

International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC): 394 patients

CCSER2, SYMPK and ANKRD17