meta-analysis. overview definition a meta-analysis statistically combines the results of several...
TRANSCRIPT
Meta-analysis
Overview
Definition A meta-analysis statistically combines the results of
several studies that address a shared research hypotheses.
A study collects data from individual subjects (such as 100 subjects = 100 “data points”)
A meta-analysis collects data from individual studies
(such as 100 studies = 100 “data points”)
Step1
Defines your hypothesis
e.g., Does “authoritarianism” predict verdict choice?
relationship between X (authoritarianism) and Y (verdict)
Step 2
Locate studies
e.g., Sannito & Arnolds (1982)
McGowen & King (1982)
Boehm (1968)
etc.
Step 3
Find “effect size” for each study
e.g., convert data (means, p-value, etc) to “r”
Step 4
Average the “effect sizes” together
e.g., weight by sample size, then take mean
Step 5
If you want, you can analyze “moderators”
e.g., does the “average effect size” get smaller or bigger based upon factors like if the studies have actual jurors versus college students, or if the studies employ written summaries versus actual trials, etc.
Why do a meta-analysis?
Easy Steps are simple, there is software to calculate everything
Cost-effective Since you have already read a bunch of articles to write a
paper, not much more work to synthesize them together
Best type of article Most highly cited type of article. Advantages of both qualitative and quantitative research Truly answers research questions within the literature
(compared to single studies which can’t truly generalize)
Step1 (again)
Defines your hypothesis Typically the hypothesis is relationship between X and Y Best to find studies with diversity (e.g., findings that vary
in size, involve multiple IVs or DVs or stimuli, etc) Best to find studies where controversies or
inconsistencies exist (which the meta-analysis can resolve)
From practical point of view, ideally choose a topic with enough primary studies (20-40) but not too many studies (100+) because hardest part is finding the studies (step 2)
Step 2 (again)
Locate studies A meta-analysis is only informative if it adequately
summarizes the existing literature Techniques - database searches, ancestry
approach, descendancy approach, hand searching, invisible college
Doesn’t have to be comprehensive (fail-safe n) but needs to be close to comprehensive
Step 3 (again)
Find “effect size” for each study For every test that we have covered in this class,
you can convert all of them to “r” or “d” Download “es_calculator.zip” from
http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html In an excel file, have a separate row for each study
in which you input information such as sample size, effect size, codings from moderators, etc.
Example - http://www.lyonsmorris.com/lyons/metaAnalysis/index.cfm
“r” and “d”
The r family Correlation Coefficient - The "r" family includes all types of
correlation coefficients (e.g., r, phi, rho, etc) and Johnson & Eagly, 2000 suggest using r when the studies composing the meta analysis primarily report the correlation between variables.
The d family Standardized Difference - The "d" family includes Cohen's d (unweighted) and Hedges g (weighted), and Johnson & Eagly, 2000 suggest using d when the studies composing the meta-analysis primarily report ANOVAs and t-tests comparisons between groups.
Step 4 (again)
Average the “effect sizes” together First, weight them by sample size Second, sum them together Third, divide by sum of total sample size.
Macros for SPSS can be downloaded from: http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html
Step 5 (again)
If you want, you can analyze “moderators” First, need to ascertain “homogeneity” which tells
you if variance exists in average effect size Can test categorical moderators (categories like
college student versus actual juror) similar to ANOVA
Can test continuous moderators (such as length of stimulus) similar to regression
Use macros downloaded from http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html
For more information…
PsychWiki - http://www.psychwiki.com/wiki/Meta-analysis
Some cool things about meta-analyses…