metabolism, neural activation and plasticity after tbi · giza, santa maria & hovda, j....
TRANSCRIPT
Metabolism, Neural Activation and Plasticity after TBI:A Developmental Perspective
Christopher C. Giza, M.D.UCLA Brain Injury Research Center
Pediatric Neurology and NeurosurgeryMattel Children’s Hospital – UCLADavid Geffen School of Medicine
Traumatic Brain Injury in Youth
Basic ScientistsDavid Hovda, Ph.D.MeFernando Gomez-Pinilla, Ph.D.Grace Griesbach, Ph.D.Neil Harris, Ph.D.Andrey Mazarati, M.D., Ph.D.Mayumi Prins, Ph.D.Raman Sankar, M.D., Ph.D.
UCLA Brain Injury Research Center
Undergrads/PostbacFarbod Fazlollahi Phoebe HuaAditya Ponnaluri
Graduate StudentsDaya AlexanderGretchen MillerMaxine RegerNaomi Santa Maria
Lab Assistants Yan Cai, M.S.Sima GhavimDon Shin
Clinical Investigators Robert Asarnow, Ph.D.Talin Babikian, Ph.D.Fabienne Cazalis, Ph.D.Sarah DeBoard Marion, Ph.D.John DiFiori, M.D.Jason Lerner, M.D.Michelle Leung, ProgrammerAndy Madikians, M.D.Joyce Matsumoto, M.D.
EEG Techs Andrea DuranConrad Szeliga
Naomi Santa MariaHannah Valino
Residents/FellowsGarni Barkoudarian, M.D.Meeryo Choe, M.D.Ivet Hartonian, M.D.Daniel Shrey, M.D.
NursesMaria EtchepareSue Yudovin
Joyce Matsumoto, M.D.David McArthur, Ph.D., M.P.H.
Medical Students Julia BreaultFloyd Buen
Post-docTiffany Greco
Summary
1. Introduction to Pediatric TBI
2. Metabolism and Metabolic Therapy
3. Neural Activation and Pro-plasticity Therapy
4. Effects of Repeated Injury in Development
5. Conclusions5. Conclusions
1000
1200
1400
Rat
e p
er 1
00,0
00Traumatic Brain Injury:
Epidemiology#1 cause of death and acquired disability in children and adolescents!!
0
200
400
600
800
0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75 +
Age Group (years)
Rat
e p
er 1
00,0
00
Male Female
CDC 2004 Report: TBI in the United States
Age of Injury and Mechanism
20
25
30
35
Nu
mb
er
of
Pa
tie
nts
Mechanism of Injury varies by Age
MVA
GSW
*ANOVA, p < 0.0001
0
5
10
15
20
0-1 y 1-4 y 4-8 y 8-12 y 12-16 y >16 y
Nu
mb
er
of
Pa
tie
nts
Age of Injury
GSW
Fall
Blunt
AHT
Valino H, Breault J, et.al. in preparation, 2012
Summary
1. Introduction to Pediatric TBI
2. Metabolism and Metabolic Therapy
a) Neurometabolic Cascade
b) Alternative Fuel Metabolic Therapy
3. Neural Activation and Pro-plasticity Therapy3. Neural Activation and Pro-plasticity Therapy
4. Effects of Repeated Injury in Development
5. Conclusions
Neurometabolic Cascade of mTBI:Basic Pathophysiology
Altered neurotrans-mission
Glu
tam
ate
K+
Cell DeathProtease activation
Ca2+Ionic flux
EnergyCrisis
Axonal injuryPump
Mito
K+
ADPATP
Glu
tam
ate
K+K+
K+
Ionic flux
activation
Treating for Neuroprotection: Ketones as Fuel
30
35
40
45
Standard DietKG Diet
Con
tusi
on V
olum
e (m
m3)
†
Standard Diet Ketogenic Diet
PND17
PND17 PND30 PND45 PND900
5
10
15
20
25
Age Groups
Con
tusi
on V
olum
e (m
m3)
**
†PND35
PND45
PND65
PND65
Prins, et al., J Neurosci Res, 2005
Post-TBI ketogenic diet reduces lesion volume in immature rats
Post-TBI transporter upregulation
Sham TBI
P35
Adu
lt
0.1mm
Prins & Giza, Dev Nsci 2006
TBI induces vascular endothelial expression of monocarboxylatetransporter 2 (MCT2)
Summary
1. Introduction to Pediatric TBI
2. Metabolism and Metabolic Therapy
3. Neural Activation and Pro-plasticity Therapy
1. Impaired glutamatergic neurotransmission and experience-dependent plasticity
2. Restoration of plasticity using glutamate agonist
4. Effects of Repeated Injury in Development
5. Conclusions
Traumatic Brain Injury:Fluid Percussion
Fluid percussion injury effects
• Diffuse concussive injury
• Dura intact
• Followed by apnea
Transducer
Saline filled cylinder
Piston
InjuryCap
• Followed by apnea and unresponsive-ness to toe pinch
• Normal open-field behavior as early as 1 day post-injury
• Little, if any overt cell death in developing animals
Developmental TBI: NMDARs
PID1Sham FPI FPI
PID2Sham FPI
PID4Sham FPI
PID7Sham
Hippocampus: Ipsilateral NR2A
20
40
% o
f Sha
m
*
20
30
40
50
60
eEP
SC
(pA
)
Sham
FPI*
*
Hippocampus: Ipsilateral CA1
ANOVA, Overall effect of injury, p<0.05
*
-60
-40
-20
0
20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7Post-injury day
% o
f Sha
m
Giza, Santa Maria & Hovda, J. Neurotrauma 2006
Protein levels of the NR2A subunit are selectively reduced after developmental TBI. NR1 & NR2B show little change.
0
10
20
Total NMDAR EPSC NR2A EPSC
eEP
SC
(pA
)
Li, et. al., National Neurotrauma Society abstract 2005
NR2A mediated postsynaptic currents are selectively reducedafter developmental TBI.
* p<0.05
**
Post-TBI Impaired Activation: Functional MRI
Condition 1 vs 3
Controls TBI
During a spatial working memory task, children post-acutely following moderate-severe TBI show much less network activation
Cazalis F, et al., Society for Neuroscience, abstract, 2007
Imaging Post-TBI NMDAR Activation with phMRI: RatControl PID3-4
20
40
60
80
DC
S-in
duce
d %
rCB
V
Control (n=5)LFP PID3-4 (n=5)
*
100%
75
50
25
0
LFP PID3-4
Santa Maria N.S., et al., J Neurotrauma abstr 2009
DCS administration selectively increases hippocampal rCBV. This activation is abolished 3-4 days after developmental TBI.
-20
0
Hipp Thal Cortex
DC
S-in
duce
d %
rCB
V
Experimental Design:
Enriched environment rearing for 17 days
SHAMSURGERY
STANDARD ENVIRONMENT
SHAMSURGERY
days
STANDARD ENVIRONMENT
Enriched environment rearing for 17 days
TBI Early in Life Results in a Loss of Developmental Potential
Control/STD
Sham/EEFP/EE
FP/STD
# tr
ials
to
cri
teri
on
30
40
50
*
Morris water maze Average after trauma
Average after trauma and EE
Average
Giza, Griesbach and Hovda, Behav Brain Res 2005
Morris water maze performance improves after enrichment, but does NOT improve with enrichment after developmental TBI.
Group
# tr
ials
to
cri
teri
on
0
10
20and EE
Smarter after EE
Measure P19 FPIMolecular NR2A (PID4)
Phos/total CAMKII(PID4)
Electro-physiological
Evoked EPSC (PID4)
What we have: FPI and NMDARSummary
Behavioral (subacute)
NOR (PID4)
Behavioral (chronic)
MWM Trials to Criterion (PID40)
phMRI(subcute)
∆∆∆∆rCBV (evoked)(PID3-5)
The concept of excitotoxicity led to the general idea that
Ikonomidou & Turski, Lancet Neurol, 2002
However, it is increasingly apparent that GLUTAMATE
CAN ALSO BE GOOD.
led to the general idea that GLUTAMATE WAS BAD post-injury and should be blocked.
D-Cycloserine (DCS) Treatment Reverses TBI Dysfunction
30
S-SalS-highDCS FP-Sal
FP-lowDCS
FP-highDCS
ANOVA,
Hippocampal NR2A
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
%ch
ange
fro
m S
-Sal
ANOVA, Overall injury effect (p<.01)Overall drug effect (p<.05)
Santa Maria N.S., et al, J Neurotrauma abst 2007
Treatment with DCS restores normal NR2A levels in rats
D-cycloserine
• NMDAR co-agonist• Binds at glycine site• FDA approved agent (for TB)• Good bioavailability• Penetrates BBB
Experimental Design:
Enriched environment rearing for 17 days
SHAMSURGERY
STANDARD ENVIRONMENT
SHAMSURGERY
days
STANDARD ENVIRONMENT
Enriched environment rearing for 17 days
D-Cycloserine (DCS) Treatment Restores post-TBI Plasticity
EE34 DCS effect on Sham groups
40
50
60
70
80
TT
5sC
SStdSal
SStdDCS
NS
NS
EE34 DCS effect on LFP groups
40
50
60
70
80
TT
5sC
FStdSal
FStdDCS
*#
One-way ANOVA* p<0.05# p=0.19
Treatment with DCS has no effect in sham rats, but given after developmental TBI, DCS improves spatial memory in adulthood preferentially in EE reared animals
0
10
20
30
40
Group
TT
5sC SStdDCS
SEESal
SEEDCS
NS
0
10
20
30
40
GroupT
T5s
C FStdDCS
FEESal
FEEDCS
Santa Maria N.S., et al., J Neurotrauma abst 2008
Measure P19 FPI DCS Molecular NR2A (PID4)
Phos/total CAMKII(PID4)
Restored NR2A (PID4)Restored phos/total CAMKII (PID4)
Electro-physiological
Evoked EPSC (PID4) -
What we have: FPI and NMDARSummary
Behavioral (subacute)
NOR (PID4) Restored NOR (PID4)
Behavioral (chronic)
MWM Trials to Criterion (PID40)
Restored MWM Trials to CriterionRestored MWM Probe Trial (PID40-50)
phMRI(subcute)
∆∆∆∆rCBV (evoked)(PID3-5)
-
Future Clinical Directions
Can we use this..
…to turn this……into this… and will it then lead to…
….this?
Summary
1. Introduction to Pediatric TBI
2. Metabolism and Metabolic Therapy
3. Neural Activation and Pro-plasticity Therapy
4. Effects of Repeated Injury in Development
5. Conclusions5. Conclusions
Concussion in juvenile rat
Post-injury day 21 hr test interval
RTBISingle TBI
APP staining at Post-injury day 1
Prins ML, et al., Dev Nsci 2010
24 hr test interval
Axonal injury and working memory impairment after repeat TBI can be modeled in rats.
Conclusions1. The developing brain has both resiliencies and
vulnerabilities to TBI.
2. The neurometabolic cascade of TBI is distinct in the young brain, and metabolic therapy with alternative substrates may be an age-specific treatment.
3. The young brain is resilient to TBI but shows altered / 3. The young brain is resilient to TBI but shows altered / impaired neural activation and plasticity.
4. Judicious use of glutamate agonists coupled with behavioral interventions can restore experience-dependent plasticity after TBI.
5. Repeated injury in the young brain can result in worse sequelae, depending upon the timing of the injuries.
Protected BrainsUnprotected
Brain
PROTECT ALL THE BRAINS!!!