metro economies report_011812

91
U.S. Metro Economies 2012 Employment Forecast and the Impact of Exports Including Household Median Income January 2012 The United States Conference of Mayors Prepared for: The United States Conference of Mayors and The Council for the New American City Prepared by:

Upload: patricia-dillon

Post on 19-Apr-2017

216 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Metro Economies Report_011812

U.S. Metro Economies2012 Employment Forecast and the Impact of Exports

Including Household Median IncomeJanuary 2012

The United States Conference of Mayors

Prepared for:

The United States Conference of Mayors and The Council for the New American City

Prepared by:

Page 2: Metro Economies Report_011812

January 2012

No one has been hit harder by the Great Recession than the 8.8 million Americans who have lost their jobs during the most significant economic downturn in generations.

Our nation’s mayors are focused on doing everything we can to help the jobless, the underemployed, and those worried about losing their jobs.

This report, prepared by IHS Global Insight as part of the US Conference of Mayors’ U.S. Metro Economy series, highlights where we are and the challenges that lie ahead.

At the close of 2011, 125 cities and their metro areas had not seen any net job growth. By the end of last year, the economy as a whole had regained only 30 percent of jobs lost from the Great Recession.

The outlook for 2012 is better. By the end of this year, the report forecasts that almost every one of our 363 metro economies will see job gains and the nation will have gained back 48 percent of its lost jobs. But de-spite this progress, one thing remains clear: the recovery is slow and it’s uneven. For almost 80 of our metro areas, it will take more than five years to get back to pre-recession levels of employment.

The report notes that consumer confidence is an important part of our recovery. When Congress fails to reach necessary agreements on long-term debt reduction, short-term tax cuts and infrastructure spending, the public grows cynical and disillusioned. This is not good for our economy, our cities, or our local busi-nesses. Obstruction might be good short-term politics, but it’s bad long-term economics.

Next year cities and their metro areas will generate 90.4 percent of our Gross Domestic Product and 85.6 percent of the nation’s jobs. We are the engines of the U.S. economy, and investment in our future is an investment in the future prosperity of our country.

If Congress will give us the tools, we will put them to use. We will get our constituents back to work and get America’s economy humming again.

As mayors, we call on Congress to work with the President to advance initiatives that speed our nation’s recovery and new jobs that come with it. The time for stopgaps and last minute extensions is over. It is time for leadership.

Sincerely,

Antonio R. Villaraigosa Mayor of Los Angeles President The United States Conference of Mayors

Page 3: Metro Economies Report_011812

1

INTRODUCTION – NATIONAL ECONOMIC OUTLOOK

The recovery from the Great Recession continued in 2011, though its pace almost stalled in the summer months, as uncertainty reigned and confidence plummeted due to sovereign debt crises in the US and Europe. Nevertheless, the US economic outlook has improved, with real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) expected to increase by 3.4% in the fourth quarter and 1.8% for the year once final figures are tallied. This growth is a result of improvements in business confidence, consumer spending, and housing starts.

However, contractionary domestic fiscal policy, slower global growth, and the Eurozone financial crisis will still mean at least some tightening of credit conditions in the United States. The housing sector, whose health is key to a robust recovery, remains sluggish. Demand among young adults for new housing is tied to their employment prospects; mortgage credit remains tight, though it has loosened a bit in 2011; and home prices continue to fall under the pressure of foreclosures and excess supply. Appendix Tables 8 and 9 detail the decline in home prices experienced by most metro areas in 2011. For the US, house prices are estimated to have fallen by 4% over the course of the year. This decline in home values further reduced household wealth by over $500 billion, adding to pressures on consumer spending. It also further stresses the property tax base of local governments going forward.

Even with a stronger domestic performance, the recession risk for the U.S. thus remains uncomfortably high, at 30%. IHS Global Insight predicts a mild recession in the Eurozone in 2011 - 2012. However, the Eurozone recession is not expected to be severe enough to tip the United States into recession. It will primarily impact export demand and corporate earnings of US firms.

While employment growth over the last few months of the year was not as weak as first feared, it was still sluggish, at just 137,000 jobs per month on average in the last quarter. The unemployment rate has finally started to edge down, to 8.5% in December 2011. While encouraging, we should note that some of the reduction came from a decline in the labor force in November and December. Consumer spending, meanwhile, has been doing far better than sentiment readings would suggest. IHS Global Insight expects consumer spending growth of 2.2% for 2011. Suppressed demand, as consumers have recently delayed replacement purchases, is now helping spending to improve in areas such as vehicles, while holiday sales should also increase substantially (up around 5% year on year in nominal dollars, very similar to 2010). However, consumers face too many headwinds to allow a robust spending recovery after the holiday season. A weak labor market, high debt burdens, housing prices that have not yet hit bottom, price increases that have outpaced wage growth, and a lack of confidence in the government’s effectiveness and accountability will keep spending growth moderate in the coming year. Inflation concerns, though, are easing. A combination of higher gasoline prices and food prices has raised CPI

Page 4: Metro Economies Report_011812

2

inflation to 3.1% this year. In addition, in the face of weak demand growth and some pullback in commodity prices, core inflation is beginning to slow.

Real GDP is predicted to increase a soft 2.0% in 2012. As a result, IHS Global Insight expects job growth to stay weak and the unemployment rate to remain above 8% over the course of the year. IHS expects a modest improvement in housing starts during 2012 (730,000 units, compared with 610,000 in 2011), concentrated in the multifamily segment, since pent-up demand is already helping the rental market. With less upward pressure from oil and food, we expect CPI inflation to fall back to 1.5% in 2012.

LONGER TERM RISKS

Over the longer term, IHS Global Insight expects the recovery to pick up steam, but there are serious risks on the horizon. One concern is government budget policy. The congressional super committee tasked with cutting $1.2 trillion off the budget deficit over the next 10 years has failed, making budget sequester possible. Budget sequester would mean that in 2013, mandatory and automatic spending cuts of $1.2 trillion would begin to take effect. This would come in the form of $110 billion of budget authority per year. In the first year, $55 billion in spending cuts would be eliminated from discretionary defense spending. Government spending has already been declining recently, and IHS expects this to continue through 2016 at the federal, state, and local levels. Such spending reductions put a drag on GDP; in 2012 federal, state, and local spending will decline by 2.5%, which will decrease GDP growth by 0.5 percentage points. IHS expects the cuts to include wages and salaries, which will in turn dampen job growth and spending.

In addition, the current sequester debate highlights how far apart Democrats and Republicans are in their vision for government, and how drastic current levels of gridlock remain in the U.S. federal government. Gridlock prevents government action to adapt to the current economic situation. It has also resulted in a crisis of confidence by the American people in their leadership. Negative perceptions of Congress dampen consumer confidence and sentiments, which have already been declining in recent years. IHS expects that decline to continue in the near term. The result will be less spending and longer delays in purchasing, putting more drag on economic growth and contributing to the sluggishness of the recovery.

Further stressing local communities in this environment is the threat to the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, which provides federal funding for housing, economic development, neighborhood revitalization, and other community development activities. In a 2011 report, IHS Global Insight "demonstrated the unique economic contributions of the CDBG grant program in communities across the US. Our results suggest that in the last year the $3.95 billion in grant funds generated 137,000 jobs and contributed $12.1 billion in Gross Domestic Product, following up on the economic successes of the last decade, as well as providing numerous valuable social benefits." Over the past two fiscal years, CDBG funding has been reduced by $1 billion, suggesting the potential loss of 35,000 new jobs.

Page 5: Metro Economies Report_011812

3

The median real income for US households in 2010 was $49,455. This is 7.1% lower than median real household income in 1999, which was $53,252 (in 2010 dollars). This decline has been even steeper for those in lower income groups, leading to increased income inequality and deteriorating financial stability for many Americans. From 1999 to 2010, income values for the bottom 10% of American earners declined by 12.1%.

Figure 1 demonstrates the sharp deterioration in median income in the past decade. At the same time the share of income earned by the top 20% of households continued to increase. Since 1970 the share of the top quintile has increased from 43.3% to over half, 50.2% in 2010.

Figure 1: Median Income Through the Years

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

55,000

40%

43%

46%

49%

52%

1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Median real incomeShare of income in highest quintile

The trend of the past decade of declining median income and increasing income inequality has continued during the recovery from the Great Recession. Median income declined 2.3% from 2009 to 2010. Those in the bottom two-fifths of the income distribution also had a smaller share of aggregate income in 2010 than 2009. In 2010, the bottom 20% of households received 3.3% of the income, down from 3.4% in 2009, 3.6% in 2000, and 4.1% in 1970. These income trends are worrisome for the health and growth of the economy. As lower-income households spend a greater portion of their incomes as consumption, the constraint in their spending power retards consumer demand, adding to the sluggish performance of the national economy.

Income decline and increasing inequality is an important issue for metro areas, as the trend in median income decline has not been experienced evenly. From 2009 to 2010, metro area households experienced a 2.2% decline in median household income while households in rural areas did not experience a statistically significant decline. Those living in cities saw a 3.4% decline in income while those outside cities saw income decline by 2.4%. Appendix table 1 details metro median incomes from 2007 to 2010. In 2010 median household income ranged from $31,700 in Brownsville, TX, to $84,500 in Washington, DC. In that year median income declined in 216 metros.

Page 6: Metro Economies Report_011812

4

An additional stress on household finances going forward is the rapid accumulation of student loan indebtedness. With persistently high unemployment and diminished job and career prospects for recent college graduates, these loan balances further erode welfare and spending. The Federal Reserve estimates that student loan balances in the second quarter of 2011 amounted to $845 billion.

METRO EMPLOYMENT IN 2012

In 2011, the US added more than 1.6 million jobs to its payrolls, growing 1.3% over 2010. This is a welcome turnaround, as the United States previously suffered three consecutive years of net job losses as a result of the Great Recession of 2007-2009. Throughout that period, total nonfarm payrolls contracted by 6.2% and shed over 8.6 million jobs. The detrimental and costly effects of the Great Recession have been felt in all 363 metropolitan statistical areas that we measure. Consider Los Angeles, which saw over 500,000 jobs disappear in just three years. A brighter day is dawning in the US, however - by the end of 2012, US total nonfarm payrolls will have grown by another 1.3%, and the nation will have regained 48% of the jobs lost in the recession, putting itself on solid footing to maintain strong positive growth in 2013 and beyond. Figure 2 illustrates the year in which each metro will regain the jobs lost since its pre-recessionary peak employment. At this time only 26 metro areas have completely recovered jobs lost in the recession. By the end of 2012, another 26 will have, and an additional 99 will have recouped over one-half of their losses. But for almost 80 metros, full recovery is over five years away. The recovery is very uneven across US regions, with the southeastern and southwestern metros, who were most affected by the housing bubble, looking ahead to years of recovery.

Figure 2: Return to Peak Employment for Metro Areas

PEAK2010 to 20112012 to 20132014 to 20152016 to 2017Past 2017

Page 7: Metro Economies Report_011812

5

This is the most protracted period of underemployment in US economic history since the Great Depression and World War II. All subsequent recessions in the 20th century saw payroll jobs quickly regain previous peak levels with a strong first year of economic recovery. In 2001, however, a shallow recession was followed by a 'jobless' recovery. Job losses did continue after the economy began to grow, but all losses were recouped within two years of employment growth, four years after the downturn began. The recovery from the most recent recession is now passing both of those benchmarks, with two years of job gains, and four years since the start of the downturn, yet less than 30% of lost jobs have been recovered by the end of 2011.

In 2011, US metros saw a wide range of employment growth. For example Victoria, TX and Hot Springs, AZ expanded by greater than 6.0%, while Missoula, MT and Dalton, GA both contracted by more than 4.5%. Thirty-five metros registered job growth higher than 3.0%, and 122 (33%) metros posted growth above the national average of 1.3% in 2011. Meanwhile, 241 (67%) US metros fell below the 1.3% growth mark, including 125 metros that did not see positive gains at all.

Figure 3: Employment Growth Across Metro Areas, End of 2012

In contrast to the 125 metro areas that shrunk in 2011, all but three of the nation’s metros will experience positive employment growth during 2012 (see appendix table 2). Led by Myrtle Beach, SC with a 3.0% payroll expansion, 181 (50%) of the metro areas will at least match average of 1.3% growth in 2012. The remaining 179 metros will all show positive growth between 0.1% and 1.3% (see figure 3).

Page 8: Metro Economies Report_011812

6

Job growth in 2012 will come predominantly through several important sectors: education and health services, trade, transportation, and utilities, and professional and business services (see figure 4). The trade, transportation, and utilities sector contracted during the recession, but will maintain the positive growth of 2011 and post 563,000 new jobs, growing a respectable 2.3% over the next year. Education and health services, which was relatively unaffected by the mass layoffs seen in other industries during the recession, will grow at a rate of 2.4% over 2012 and add 478,000 jobs. Another important sector, which will make up for much of the losses seen in sectors such as government and construction, is the high-paying professional and business services sector. This sector will add almost 400,000 jobs and grow at a rate of 2.3% over the year. Metro areas that have a high concentration in these industries will benefit the most from this employment growth. While these sectors will show the most significant growth, virtually all areas are projected to add jobs in 2012. In fact, the government sector, due to practical fiscal belt-tightening, and construction, natural resources, and mining, due to a continued housing slump, will be the only industries to shrink.

Figure 4: US Employment By Sector (Thous.), End of 2012 2011Q4 2012Q4 Diff Total Nonfarm 131,553 133,315 1,762 Trade, Transportation, and Utilities 24,990 25,553 563 Educational and Health Services 20,166 20,644 478 Professional and Business Services 17,304 17,708 404 Leisure and Hospitality 13,379 13,678 300 Manufacturing 11,723 11,911 187 Financial Activities 7,557 7,644 87 Construction, Natural Resources, Mining 6,259 6,123 -135 Government 22,146 21,950 -196

Of the nation’s 363 metro areas, 11 of the top 50 largest are located within the South Atlantic Region. Many of these metros, especially in Florida and South Carolina, will see a boost in their services industries in 2012, particularly the tourism-related segments. The upswing in tourism, along with the amelioration of major losses in the local housing market, will help give the Miami-Fort Lauderdale metro’s professonal and business services sector, for example, 3.2% job growth and 13,800 new jobs in 2012.

Another boost for South Atlantic metros will come from the Columbia and Panama free-trade pacts recently signed, which will spur growth in South Florida with increased levels of trade from Latin America. Indeed, both the Miami and Tampa-St. Petersburg areas of Florida will both expand payrolls by 1.7% (see Appendix Table 2), thanks in large part to the trade and transportation sector picking up steam in 2012 (2.9% and 2,5%, respectively). Nearby Atlanta, Georgia will also benefit; it has among the highest concentrations of workers in wholesale trade and transportation services in the country. That sector will grow 2.8% in Atlanta over the next year, and will produce nearly half of all the jobs in what is the seventh largest metro in the US. An efficient and well-designed transportation infrastructure has also created a

Page 9: Metro Economies Report_011812

7

growing and stable trade sector in the Charlotte and other North and South Carolina metros.

Sharp contractions in government payrolls, however, will have both direct and indirect negative impacts in Maryland, Virginia, and DC--areas that during the Great Recession benefited by an expansion of federal jobs. Despite these losses, Baltimore and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria metros will experience overall positive employment growth in 2012 of 1.1% each due to major additions to the education, health, professional and business services sectors.

In the Middle Atlantic and New England regions, education and health services and professional business services will be the main drivers in employment growth for New York, Philadelphia, and Boston as they grow total employment by 1.7%, 1.5%, and 1.1% respectively. The healthcare sector continues to be a bright spot in the region; New York and Pennsylvania have the third and fourth highest concentrations of healthcare jobs, respectively, in the nation. Equally important to New England is the educational services sector, as the greater Boston metro is home to several prominent universities that act as major employers for the area. Not only do these universities provide jobs, they also create a highly educated workforce to meet the demand for rapidly expanding professional and business services in New England.

In the Pittsburgh metro and surrounding area, the natural resources and mining sector grew 5.8% in 2011 as a result of Marcellus Shale prospects. Drilling and extraction from this shale has the potential to bring significant new and sustainable growth in natural resource and mining employment for not only Pittsburgh, but smaller regional metros such as Youngstown, Ohio; Binghamton, New York; and Wheeling, West Virginia.

From the automotive assembly lines in Michigan, to metal mining and fabrication in Ohio, manufacturing is the dominant industry in the East North Central region. Although this sector has been on the decline for over a decade in the nation’s Rust Belt, durable manufacturing employment payrolls grew 4.1% in 2011 and will expand by another 3.2% in 2012. The momentum provided by this uptick in manufacturing has spread to other sectors. For example, often overlooked in the Detroit-Warren-Livonia metro are its large services sectors. Following 2011’s addition of almost 7,000 net new jobs and 2.2% growth in professional and business services, the overall services sectors, including education, health, and hospitality will add 8,000 jobs in 2012. Education and health services will play a major role in sustaining employment growth in the Minneapolis-St. Paul and Cleveland metros. In 2011, this sector experienced growth of 1.7% in Cleveland, and in 2012 the sector will see more robust growth of 2.4%, which will translate into over 4,000 jobs. Minneapolis-St. Paul will build on 2.7% growth in 2011, expanding healthcare services payrolls by 2.8% in 2012 and adding 7,500 jobs.

Other East North Central states, such as Illinois and Wisconsin, are more economically diverse. The Chicago-Naperville-Joliet metro will add the most jobs (58,500) of any metro in the region. Not only does Chicago have a large and diverse

Page 10: Metro Economies Report_011812

8

financial sector, where over 30 Fortune 500 companies are headquartered, but it also continues to be home to a main transportation hub and a strong services industry. It is this diversity that has insulated the area from the economic woes of a traditionally manufacturing dependent region.

From the Marcellus Shale in the Northeast to the Barnett Shale in northern Texas, natural resources and mining is projected to grow strongly. But energy-rich states such as Texas and Oklahoma in the West South Central region will also expand in other areas. For example the Dallas-Fort Worth metro has become the Southwest’s largest wholesale trade center, and one of the region’s major retail hubs. The trade and transportation sectors will contribute over 17,000 new jobs in 2012, helping total payrolls rise at a rate of 1.9%. In Houston, trade and transportation will grow 2.9% and add 15,000 jobs as the Port of Houston gains a larger share of trade from fast-growing emerging markets--a benefit in part from the expansion of the Panama Canal.

The West South Central region will also see robust growth in the services industries. In 2012, professional business services will add 12,800 jobs in the Dallas-Fort Worth metro growing at 2.8%, 10,500 jobs in the Houston metro growing 2.8%, and 1,900 jobs in Oklahoma City metro at 2.4% growth. These three metro economies will also be augmented by 23,400 new education and health services workers.

Throughout the Mountain and West North Central regions, prosperity due to the recent boom in on-shore oil and gas production will have both positive direct and indirect effects for the regions and the metros contained within. The Denver metro, for instance, is slated to post 1.6% total employment growth in 2012. Thanks to its central location, Denver is a major transportation and distribution hub, and the metro’s improved economic growth is a result of its largest sector: trade, transportation, and utilities. This sector will add 6,300 jobs and grow at a rate of 2.7%. The Phoenix metro, supported by a growing retiree population and a subdued local housing market will also expand the trade and transportation sector by 13,600 jobs, growing 3.8% in 2012.

The Pacific region continues to be an attractive hot spot for skilled labor such as scientists, engineers, and software programmers, which drives employment growth in the professional and business services sector that supports them. In 2012, Los Angeles will see growth in most of its major employment sectors adding 57,500 jobs and growing 1.1%. Leading the way will be services: education health, professional and business and leisure and hospitality – all of which will post payroll increases of over 13,000 new jobs on the year. Similarly in the Seattle metro, the professional and business services will round out 2011 by adding 16,000 on the year–an impressive 7.2% rate of growth from the third largest sector in the area. This expansion will continue in 2012 with 7,000 new jobs and 3.0% growth. Seattle will also boast significant growth from transportation and trade in which 7,400 new jobs in 2012 (2.4%) will be added on top of the 5,800 in 2011 (1.9%).

Page 11: Metro Economies Report_011812

9

On the heels of 1.3% growth and 1.6 million new jobs added to US payrolls in 2011, the US is poised to make significant strides in 2012, beginning the climb out of the hole dug during the Great Recession. Although important sectors such as manufacturing may never return to previous levels of employment, and construction and government continue to be weak, other sectors will pick up the slack. From New York to Los Angeles, the 1.3% growth and 1.7 million additional jobs forecast for 2012 will largely come in the resilient education and health services sector, and the trade, transportation, and burgeoning professional and business sectors.

METROPOLITAN AREA EXPORTS

Over the past two decades, the merchandise value of manufactured exports in the US has tripled, reaching $1.28 trillion in 2010, or 8.8% of GDP — up from 6.9% in 1990. International trade is a key economic support for metropolitan areas, and has been one of the few fiscal bright spots as the nation slowly emerges from the recession. International trade connects metros with fast-growing and developing countries and adds diversity from purely domestic demand. It supports local manufacturers and creates jobs in the warehousing, logistics, and transportation industries. Foreign trade increases competition, requiring firms to be more efficient and innovative. It also encourages specialization and economies of scale, improving quality and prices of goods sold. Overall, trade helps markets allocate resources in the most efficient way. It is no surprise then that metro economies, already centers for innovation and efficiency, dominate the US export industry and stand to gain the most from global trade.

Figure 5: Nation's Largest Metros are the Top Exporters 2010 Level Rank GMP Exports New York-Nrthrn New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 1 1 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 2 3 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 3 7 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 4 22 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 5 2 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 6 10 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 7 9 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 8 13 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 9 11 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 10 17 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 11 5 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 12 6 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 13 12 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 14 4 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 15 28 Source: Census Bureau, Bureau of Economic Analysis

Note: export values through the first half of 2010

Page 12: Metro Economies Report_011812

10

Metro areas are the US export leaders. Similar to their share of employment and output, they account for 88% of the nation's exports. The largest metros are also our top exporters (see figure 5), with the 20 biggest metro economies comprising 50% of the total US share. Comprehensive historical export data for metros is limited, but just over the last few years foreign trade has grown tremendously in metros. From 2005-2008, export merchandise value increased in 300 metros, expanded by over 50% in 168 metros, and doubled in 70.

Outside of the size of the export market, the relationship of export merchandise value to gross metro product (GMP) provides further perspective on the relative importance of international trade (appendix table 6)1. For many small metros, the impact on their local economy is enormous. Out of the top 15 metro export/GMP ratios, only three are among the 100 largest metro areas (see figure 6). International trade encourages specialization and economies of scale, which is more pronounced in smaller metros, which tend to focus on one or two types of export products. For example, Peoria, Illinois and Davenport, Iowa, the headquarters of Caterpillar and John Deere, respectively, rely on machinery for the bulk of their exports. A number of other metros specialize in the shipment of a single type of export product, including Detroit and Kokomo, Indiana, both in transportation equipment; Victoria, Texas and Kingsport, Tennessee, in chemicals; Burlington, Vermont in computers/electronics; Sioux City, Iowa in food; and Racine, Wisconsin in machinery.

While much has been made about the jobs lost from overseas competition, strong foreign markets also serve as a key consumer of US-made goods. It is true that many of the low-skill labor-intensive manufacturing jobs have been offshored, but there are many metros that produce capital-intensive durable goods for largely foreign markets. In the 15 metros in figure 6, there are 12 where the concentration of manufacturing jobs tops 10%, and 8 have manufacturing employment concentrations ranking in the top 100. These manufacturing sectors would suffer if their export markets were not as large.

Canada, Mexico, and China are the largest US export destinations and contribute 19.5%, 12.8%, and 7.2% of total merchandise value, respectively. Clearly, location matters — the two US border countries account for a third of our total exports. The size of the market is also important, which is why China overtook Japan in 2007 to become the third largest export destination. 1 It is important to put the export data in context with GMP, which is a value-added figure and estimated with more precision than export merchandise value. The export data series excludes service exports and is collected through origin-of-movement, zip code-based data. The origin-of-movement calculation is not a perfect representation of the local benefits created by trade activity because only final sales value is counted (omitting intermediate goods that could come outside the export area), and in cases where goods are consolidated, the merchandise value is assigned to the location of the consolidation point. This means that export values in metro areas that serve as primary warehousing points can be overstated, which is apparent in a few metros that specialize in warehousing/distribution. While this series is thus prone to some statistical noise, it offers a glimpse into the importance of international trade (see appendix table 6).

Page 13: Metro Economies Report_011812

11

Figure 6: Top Export-to-GMP Ratios 2010Q2, %

Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 59.9 Peoria, IL 51.6 Longview, WA 35.5 El Paso, TX 35.0 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 33.5 Kokomo, IN 33.5 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 31.1 Victoria, TX 30.5 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 29.0 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 27.9 Janesville, WI 27.4 Savannah, GA 26.9 Racine, WI 26.2 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 25.7 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 22.2

With the exception of Seattle, all of the top exporters located in the northern portion of the US send the largest share of their goods to Canada (see figure 7). The top exporters in the south are not as homogenized. Mexico is the leading destination for Houston and Los Angeles, but Canada is Dallas' top destination, while Miami ships most of its exports to Latin America. About half of these top exporters have a diverse set of trade destinations, such as Miami, Boston, and New York, while others like Detroit rely on their top few trading partners for most of their exports.

Figure 7: Top Metropolitan Exporter Destinations, % Top Share of

Country Total Top 3 New York-Northern NJ-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA Canada 12.3 25.3 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX Mexico 13.4 29.2 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA Mexico 21.8 45.3 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Canada 37.0 76.7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL Venezuela 9.8 22.9 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA China 13.8 32.3 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI Canada 32.7 50.8 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA South Korea 12.3 30.2 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Canada 25.4 50.2 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Canada 15.4 35.6 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Canada 11.0 28.7 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI Canada 22.1 44.8

Page 14: Metro Economies Report_011812

12

Metropolitan Ports: Exports and Imports

It is important to take a broad view of foreign trade by also looking at imports. The US runs a trade deficit, meaning that the value of goods entering the country exceeds the value of those leaving. In an increasingly globalized economy, American consumers rely on more and more imported goods each year. In 2010, the dollar value of imports totaled $1.91 trillion, or about 13.1% of US GDP. Meanwhile, American companies exported $1.28 trillion, or about 8.8% of GDP. To handle the total $3.19 trillion of shipments entering and leaving the country, massive infrastructure is required to ensure that goods move quickly and efficiently. US ports are at the center of these operations, and the largest ports reside in the nation's key metro areas.

To focus on port activity we looked at the US customs districts, which are clusters of air, vessel, and freight facilities that work as foreign trade zones and ports of entry. In terms of the merchandise value of imports and exports, New York City leads the nation, just ahead of Los Angeles. The Houston custom district is the leader in the south and third largest in the nation, while Detroit ranks fourth. The top 15 customs districts handle 75% of the total merchandise value entering and leaving the nation.

Figure 8: Top US Custom Districts Merchandise Value, Mil $, YTD 2011Q3

Export Value Import Value Total Value

New York City, NY  121,460 169,067 290,526 

Los Angeles, CA  90,533 196,557 287,090 

Houston‐Galveston, TX  87,136 111,235 198,371 

Detroit, MI  92,329 89,448 181,778 

New Orleans, LA  60,997 113,326 174,323 

Laredo, TX  70,650 89,791 160,441 

Chicago, IL  27,123 102,692 129,814 

Savannah, GA  36,739 56,996 93,735 

Seattle, WA  50,271 42,943 93,214 

San Francisco, CA  37,074 52,226 89,300 

Miami, FL  50,822 31,931 82,753 

Cleveland, OH  21,946 58,087 80,033 

Buffalo, NY  35,180 31,475 66,655 

Philadelphia, PA  12,871 51,120 63,991 

El Paso, TX  25,837 35,054 60,891 

Most customs districts import more than they export. Out of the 15 biggest, only 4 are net exporters. Even in custom districts primarily involved in importing, however, jobs are created. The movement of goods into the country requires labor involved in logistics, transportation, and warehousing. Businesses also cluster near ports,

Page 15: Metro Economies Report_011812

13

offering them convenient access to shipping routes. Many of the nation's largest cities sprung up around ports, and they will continue to be vital economic drivers in the nation's metropolitan areas.

Looking ahead, export growth will continue to dominate import growth, supported by robust emerging economies and a competitive dollar. Export values will increase 13.5% in 2011 while imports grow by 12.9%, this on the heels of double-digit growth last year. Indeed, in the two years following the 2009 collapse, foreign trade has grown vigorously. IHS Global Insight expects trade to soften in 2012, with export values increasing only 4.2% while import values rise 3.2% as softening growth abroad, including the economic turbulence in the Eurozone, curb trade activity. Over the longer-term, export growth will be strong, averaging 7.9% annually over the next five years, outpacing imports, which will advance by 5.2%. This will chip away at the US trade deficit and open up more opportunities for local firms to sell goods globally.

CONCLUSION

The US economy is recovering slowly, but surely, from the Great Recession. This growth is being led by metro areas, once again the engines of US economic growth. In 2011, metros led US growth, gaining 2.2% to boost national growth to 1.8%. Metros now contribute 90.4% of the nation's Gross Domestic Product. Metros now account for 85.6% of jobs in the nation.

This report has documented the crucial role metro areas play in enabling the nation reap the benefits of international trade. Demand for US exports will be a vital driver of economic growth in the coming decades. Exports will be more important than ever in this decade of retrenching consumers and governments, both burdened by massive debt. Policy makers need to be aware that the maintenance and development of metro economies' continued ability to generate the economic activity derived from exports is essential for the nation to prosper.

Page 16: Metro Economies Report_011812

IHS Global Insight

Appendix Tables

Page 17: Metro Economies Report_011812

IHS Global Insight

Table of Contents Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thousand $ 1 Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas 10 Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012 19 Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012 31 Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Million $ 40 Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product 48 Table 7: Largest Ports by US Customs District 56 Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area (Dollars $) 57 Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area (Ranked by Population, Dollars, $) 66

Page 18: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

1 Abilene, TX 39.4 42.0 42.9 40.6

2 Akron, OH 47.9 50.0 47.5 46.5

3 Albuquerque, NM 45.3 47.2 46.8 47.4

4 Alexandria, LA 37.2 42.6 39.5 40.0

5 Albany, GA 36.4 39.0 36.2 34.0

6 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 55.0 58.8 56.8 55.6

7 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 55.1 58.8 57.7 55.8

8 Altoona, PA 42.5 40.3 38.4 43.0

9 Amarillo, TX 42.1 47.8 43.4 46.4

10 Ames, IA 47.8 48.1 45.5 48.1

11 Anchorage, AK 68.0 75.0 72.7 71.5

12 Anderson, IN 42.8 44.1 41.7 38.8

13 Ann Arbor, MI 61.0 57.8 54.6 55.9

14 Anniston-Oxford, AL 37.1 40.1 36.5 36.7

15 Anderson, SC 40.8 45.2 41.3 36.8

16 Appleton, WI 56.8 54.8 55.7 55.9

17 Asheville, NC 43.8 43.2 41.1 42.2

18 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 55.8 52.7 52.9 52.6

19 Athens-Clarke County, GA 40.8 41.4 39.0 40.4

20 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 57.2 60.7 55.5 53.2

21 Auburn-Opelika, AL 39.4 41.8 36.9 39.4

22 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 43.8 44.3 42.1 44.5

23 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 56.7 59.2 56.2 55.7

24 Bakersfield-Delano, CA 47.1 44.7 47.4 45.5

25 Baltimore-Towson, MD 63.7 66.1 65.4 64.8

26 Bangor, ME 41.3 42.9 39.9 43.0

27 Barnstable Town, MA 60.0 57.3 58.0 55.3

28 Baton Rouge, LA 44.7 48.5 47.8 48.3

29 Battle Creek, MI 41.1 41.2 38.5 43.0

30 Bay City, MI 42.4 45.9 44.0 45.5

31 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 43.6 47.8 43.9 41.3

32 Bellingham, WA 46.5 47.1 46.5 50.0

33 Bend, OR 55.9 51.5 52.3 44.6

34 Billings, MT 48.3 50.1 46.4 48.0

35 Binghamton, NY 45.2 45.2 44.3 46.0

36 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 47.2 49.3 44.9 44.2

37 Bismarck, ND 50.6 53.6 55.8 53.4

38 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 39.5 41.4 40.6 40.1

39 Bloomington-Normal, IL 54.1 58.1 56.0 59.6

40 Bloomington, IN 39.6 39.7 37.4 38.2

41 Boise City-Nampa, ID 49.9 52.0 48.3 47.3

42 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 68.1 71.4 69.3 68.0

43 Boulder, CO 63.3 66.5 63.4 61.9

44 Bowling Green, KY 41.2 42.2 41.1 39.1

45 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 57.5 59.3 60.9 56.3

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

IHS Global Insight 1

Page 19: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

46 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 80.3 84.5 79.1 74.8

47 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 29.3 30.6 30.9 31.7

48 Brunswick, GA 45.5 47.3 42.2 39.1

49 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 44.8 47.9 45.8 46.4

50 Burlington, NC 41.5 42.8 42.7 41.1

51 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 56.9 60.5 58.2 54.7

52 Canton-Massillon, OH 44.9 44.5 44.0 42.4

53 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 50.7 50.8 45.4 43.9

54 Carson City, NV 50.9 51.5 57.8 52.4

55 Casper, WY 43.8 50.8 56.3 51.7

56 Cedar Rapids, IA 52.0 53.7 53.3 53.8

57 Champaign-Urbana, IL 44.9 46.6 41.8 45.9

58 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 53.2 55.0 51.3 50.4

59 Chattanooga, TN-GA 43.2 45.3 40.7 42.3

60 Cheyenne, WY 52.5 56.8 49.8 48.8

61 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 59.3 61.3 58.7 57.1

62 Chico, CA 39.5 40.1 41.8 41.7

63 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 49.8 52.3 48.2 48.1

64 Charlottesville, VA 53.4 56.8 55.8 56.8

65 Charleston, WV 39.8 42.9 42.1 43.9

66 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 52.0 54.1 51.8 51.6

67 Clarksville, TN-KY 45.2 44.2 41.7 42.3

68 Cleveland, TN 38.0 39.0 38.4 37.2

69 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 48.2 49.2 45.4 46.2

70 Coeur d`Alene, ID 46.7 50.0 47.5 42.3

71 Columbus, IN 54.4 50.9 49.4 47.2

72 College Station-Bryan, TX 38.2 37.7 34.1 36.0

73 Colorado Springs, CO 55.3 58.9 55.2 51.7

74 Columbus, GA-AL 41.9 38.5 40.4 36.5

75 Columbia, MO 44.8 46.8 46.4 40.8

76 Columbus, OH 51.7 54.4 50.8 51.0

77 Corpus Christi, TX 40.6 45.9 42.3 42.0

78 Corvallis, OR 45.6 53.5 44.6 46.0

79 Columbia, SC 47.6 48.8 47.6 45.9

80 Cumberland, MD-WV 35.6 41.7 36.3 34.8

81 Danville, IL 37.2 41.5 35.0 38.2

82 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 54.7 56.4 54.5 54.4

83 Dalton, GA 36.4 42.9 38.0 39.5

84 Danville, VA 33.2 34.8 34.5 36.0

85 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 45.9 49.0 50.5 46.3

86 Dayton, OH 46.5 48.2 45.2 43.8

87 Decatur, AL 42.6 47.0 37.7 42.2

88 Decatur, IL 44.8 45.6 44.1 40.9

89 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 42.3 46.1 41.5 41.6

90 Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO 58.9 60.3 59.0 58.7

IHS Global Insight 2

Page 20: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

91 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 55.8 57.9 56.6 54.7

92 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 52.5 52.5 48.5 48.2

93 Dothan, AL 36.6 40.7 35.9 38.6

94 Dover, DE 46.8 56.0 51.5 54.7

95 Dubuque, IA 46.3 49.0 46.6 49.8

96 Duluth, MN-WI 42.6 44.7 44.6 42.1

97 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 48.4 52.4 49.9 48.0

98 Eau Claire, WI 45.4 49.4 44.6 44.1

99 El Centro, CA 31.9 37.9 38.6 41.8

100 Elizabethtown, KY 48.1 47.4 45.2 42.4

101 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 48.0 49.5 42.8 41.8

102 Elmira, NY 39.8 41.6 43.7 47.7

103 El Paso, TX 35.0 36.5 36.2 36.0

104 Erie, PA 42.4 44.2 42.9 42.5

105 Eugene-Springfield, OR 43.1 43.3 39.9 40.3

106 Evansville, IN-KY 46.2 43.3 46.5 44.3

107 Fairbanks, AK 65.3 69.1 70.6 60.8

108 Fayetteville, NC 42.8 44.1 40.5 43.5

109 Fargo, ND-MN 44.5 46.5 45.5 50.1

110 Farmington, NM 43.7 47.1 47.1 45.1

111 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 44.5 44.0 44.2 45.1

112 Flagstaff, AZ 49.6 47.4 50.8 42.1

113 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 37.0 39.4 37.7 37.6

114 Flint, MI 43.1 44.6 41.4 38.8

115 Florence, SC 40.9 40.3 38.3 37.6

116 Fond du Lac, WI 50.0 52.9 50.2 49.7

117 Fresno, CA 47.3 43.7 45.7 45.2

118 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 52.1 56.3 55.7 54.2

119 Fort Smith, AR-OK 36.7 38.7 36.6 38.0

120 Fort Wayne, IN 48.3 48.6 47.1 47.0

121 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 55.5 56.1 49.2 51.5

122 Gadsden, AL 34.6 37.6 39.1 35.9

123 Gainesville, FL 38.0 42.4 37.6 40.3

124 Gainesville, GA 51.8 52.8 49.0 47.0

125 Glens Falls, NY 45.4 48.3 51.1 50.9

126 Goldsboro, NC 40.1 39.4 40.9 40.8

127 Green Bay, WI 51.4 52.5 50.3 49.0

128 Greeley, CO 52.1 56.1 54.7 52.0

129 Greensboro-High Point, NC 42.5 45.2 41.3 41.1

130 Great Falls, MT 42.9 42.7 40.5 41.9

131 Grand Forks, ND-MN 43.9 46.6 42.3 46.1

132 Grand Junction, CO 51.0 55.7 52.9 46.2

133 Greenville, NC 36.3 40.0 36.1 39.7

134 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 49.0 49.9 47.1 47.0

135 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 45.2 45.1 43.3 42.6

IHS Global Insight 3

Page 21: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

136 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 41.5 44.9 43.0 41.9

137 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 51.6 50.5 48.6 50.5

138 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 46.8 51.0 44.5 44.6

139 Harrisonburg, VA 44.2 48.8 42.7 45.2

140 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 53.2 57.1 53.0 54.0

141 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 64.4 67.2 65.7 63.1

142 Hattiesburg, MS 37.5 36.8 40.5 38.5

143 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 39.4 41.4 37.3 39.4

144 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 41.6 40.3 44.2 37.5

145 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 53.9 55.5 51.0 53.1

146 Honolulu, HI 65.4 71.0 67.7 68.5

147 Hot Springs, AR 34.9 36.9 37.7 36.5

148 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 42.0 51.1 47.7 48.2

149 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 53.0 56.2 54.2 53.9

150 Huntsville, AL 50.6 53.4 54.6 52.4

151 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 34.9 35.5 36.1 36.0

152 Idaho Falls, ID 50.5 52.2 49.0 50.2

153 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 53.1 53.7 50.4 48.9

154 Iowa City, IA 51.3 53.8 48.8 48.4

155 Ithaca, NY 43.4 48.6 45.0 52.1

156 Jackson, MI 43.3 46.9 46.7 42.8

157 Jackson, MS 44.4 46.1 44.1 42.5

158 Janesville, WI 48.7 51.4 49.0 46.8

159 Jackson, TN 37.3 42.6 39.0 40.5

160 Jefferson City, MO 44.7 55.2 50.6 51.7

161 Johnson City, TN 35.9 40.8 34.5 36.8

162 Johnstown, PA 37.5 38.1 38.9 41.2

163 Jonesboro, AR 37.1 36.9 36.8 35.5

164 Joplin, MO 38.6 39.6 38.5 38.5

165 Jacksonville, FL 51.9 54.5 50.0 50.3

166 Jacksonville, NC 42.2 48.0 41.2 41.8

167 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 44.0 45.8 41.1 43.7

168 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 46.4 50.5 50.9 44.8

169 Kansas City, MO-KS 53.5 56.5 54.5 53.9

170 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA 50.7 51.5 54.0 56.4

171 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 47.3 49.8 44.9 49.8

172 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 57.1 54.8 56.5 51.3

173 Kingston, NY 36.5 39.1 36.3 34.7

174 Knoxville, TN 44.3 45.4 45.2 43.1

175 Kokomo, IN 45.0 48.1 47.6 41.2

176 Lake Charles, LA 42.2 45.7 44.3 40.2

177 La Crosse, WI-MN 48.2 48.8 50.1 47.7

178 Lafayette, LA 43.3 46.3 47.4 46.7

179 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 40.0 38.3 41.0 36.4

180 Lafayette, IN 41.8 45.4 41.6 40.6

IHS Global Insight 4

Page 22: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

181 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 44.3 44.4 41.9 41.2

182 Lancaster, PA 52.8 55.9 55.7 51.7

183 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 58.0 60.3 58.5 56.7

184 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 48.0 49.6 47.7 47.7

185 Laredo, TX 33.9 36.7 38.3 35.8

186 Las Cruces, NM 35.3 36.0 35.7 35.2

187 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 56.0 56.7 53.5 51.4

188 Lawrence, KS 42.8 46.4 43.4 47.3

189 Lawton, OK 43.7 39.2 47.9 43.8

190 Lebanon, PA 46.7 52.6 50.7 51.4

191 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 46.4 45.2 43.1 41.2

192 Lewiston, ID-WA 41.4 44.8 40.0 40.0

193 Lexington-Fayette, KY 47.1 50.7 46.7 46.3

194 Lima, OH 44.0 44.2 37.8 41.1

195 Lincoln, NE 49.2 52.6 47.9 50.1

196 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 45.8 45.3 46.0 46.0

197 Logan, UT-ID 45.4 49.1 45.3 46.2

198 Longview, TX 41.3 45.0 43.7 41.8

199 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 45.7 48.7 46.8 44.7

200 Longview, WA 44.1 47.4 45.5 41.0

201 Lubbock, TX 41.5 44.8 39.1 42.1

202 Lynchburg, VA 42.1 44.4 44.8 41.2

203 Macon, GA 39.9 42.6 39.4 37.5

204 Madera-Chowchilla, CA 45.0 47.4 44.1 48.3

205 Madison, WI 59.7 60.9 56.7 57.6

206 Manchester-Nashua, NH 67.7 69.2 64.7 68.3

207 Mansfield, OH 43.4 42.6 39.3 41.6

208 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 30.3 30.2 30.4 33.7

209 Medford, OR 44.5 40.6 46.0 40.2

210 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 45.7 46.2 43.6 45.4

211 Merced, CA 44.4 42.3 39.5 42.5

212 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 49.2 49.3 46.0 45.4

213 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 43.5 45.6 46.2 43.8

214 Midland, TX 51.2 57.6 55.0 53.2

215 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 52.0 54.4 52.0 49.8

216 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 63.9 65.9 63.1 62.4

217 Missoula, MT 42.8 42.3 39.0 45.6

218 Mobile, AL 37.4 41.1 40.0 40.0

219 Modesto, CA 50.6 50.4 48.7 48.1

220 Monroe, LA 36.5 38.1 37.8 37.8

221 Monroe, MI 53.8 57.2 52.8 50.0

222 Montgomery, AL 43.0 46.4 44.3 45.5

223 Morgantown, WV 39.3 43.0 34.5 43.5

224 Morristown, TN 37.0 37.2 35.1 37.1

225 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 51.6 53.4 54.9 55.5

IHS Global Insight 5

Page 23: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

226 Muncie, IN 37.7 38.9 34.8 35.9

227 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 39.1 40.8 38.3 38.6

228 Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC 43.2 42.3 41.3 41.6

229 Napa, CA 62.1 65.2 68.6 64.4

230 Naples-Marco Island, FL 57.7 61.2 53.0 52.7

231 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 50.8 51.8 51.1 48.0

232 New Haven-Milford, CT 59.9 61.6 60.6 57.1

233 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 48.1 47.6 46.2 46.1

234 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 42.1 42.5 39.5 40.3

235 Norwich-New London, CT 61.1 68.6 64.1 62.4

236 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 61.6 64.7 62.9 61.9

237 Ocala, FL 39.3 40.2 39.0 37.0

238 Ocean City, NJ 52.0 60.2 50.2 53.4

239 Odessa, TX 46.6 50.2 44.1 42.3

240 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 59.0 59.2 60.2 59.2

241 Oklahoma City, OK 45.2 47.7 45.1 46.2

242 Olympia, WA 57.8 62.5 58.5 61.0

243 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 52.9 55.0 52.3 54.1

244 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 50.9 50.4 46.9 46.5

245 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 50.4 53.2 46.5 48.2

246 Owensboro, KY 41.7 41.6 42.3 41.0

247 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 73.3 76.9 71.7 71.9

248 Palm Coast, FL 41.8 46.6 50.2 44.0

249 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 50.4 49.4 45.4 46.3

250 Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, FL 49.0 45.7 44.4 44.9

251 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 39.7 42.3 39.4 40.4

252 Pascagoula, MS 43.7 51.5 48.0 44.9

253 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 44.5 46.2 45.5 44.0

254 Peoria, IL 50.6 52.5 49.9 51.0

255 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 58.3 60.9 60.1 58.1

256 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 54.3 55.9 52.8 50.4

257 Pine Bluff, AR 34.2 37.5 33.2 33.4

258 Pittsfield, MA 47.3 44.8 42.3 44.2

259 Pittsburgh, PA 45.6 47.8 46.3 46.7

260 Pocatello, ID 43.9 49.3 45.4 39.1

261 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 54.0 54.4 53.8 56.5

262 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 55.4 58.8 55.5 53.1

263 Port St. Lucie, FL 49.7 46.9 46.2 41.3

264 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 66.0 70.7 69.1 67.3

265 Prescott, AZ 44.4 41.8 40.4 40.3

266 Provo-Orem, UT 57.3 59.5 57.5 54.2

267 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 54.0 55.9 54.2 51.9

268 Pueblo, CO 41.6 42.6 38.8 38.3

269 Punta Gorda, FL 46.7 46.4 40.4 42.0

270 Racine, WI 51.4 54.5 51.7 51.4

IHS Global Insight 6

Page 24: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

271 Raleigh-Cary, NC 58.1 61.9 59.3 57.8

272 Rapid City, SD 44.4 44.8 46.2 47.1

273 Reading, PA 52.8 54.6 53.5 51.8

274 Redding, CA 41.9 42.1 42.9 41.0

275 Reno-Sparks, NV 54.3 57.7 52.7 50.7

276 Richmond, VA 56.7 58.7 55.6 55.3

277 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 57.3 56.5 53.8 53.6

278 Roanoke, VA 46.9 46.4 46.3 45.6

279 Rockford, IL 49.7 49.8 45.7 45.5

280 Rome, GA 43.0 41.6 39.0 36.9

281 Rochester, MN 58.7 63.8 62.5 59.7

282 Rocky Mount, NC 41.0 39.2 36.4 38.1

283 Rochester, NY 50.5 52.4 50.3 50.2

284 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 58.4 61.5 59.1 56.8

285 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 59.7 61.0 57.4 56.2

286 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 63.8 67.5 61.5 61.1

287 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 61.8 63.0 60.2 59.9

288 Santa Fe, NM 51.4 55.5 52.7 47.1

289 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 43.0 41.4 39.2 42.0

290 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 83.8 88.1 84.5 84.0

291 Salem, OR 43.7 48.4 44.9 45.6

292 Salinas, CA 57.1 59.4 58.5 54.5

293 Salisbury, MD 49.2 48.9 45.8 47.1

294 Salt Lake City, UT 57.3 60.0 57.1 57.4

295 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 57.0 60.5 56.7 54.0

296 Sandusky, OH 48.6 46.4 43.1 42.2

297 San Angelo, TX 41.0 43.6 40.8 38.2

298 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 46.3 47.8 47.9 50.2

299 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 49.3 47.4 45.4 45.3

300 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 62.4 62.2 62.4 59.1

301 Savannah, GA 47.9 48.1 45.0 46.8

302 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 41.9 42.0 41.8 42.4

303 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 63.9 66.5 64.0 63.1

304 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 73.6 76.8 73.8 73.0

305 Sheboygan, WI 52.1 51.9 52.2 49.4

306 Sherman-Denison, TX 44.8 45.9 43.3 45.6

307 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 39.0 39.5 40.9 40.8

308 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 45.1 44.2 45.4 44.0

309 Sioux Falls, SD 50.3 56.9 50.5 52.0

310 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 43.5 43.7 43.6 42.0

311 Spartanburg, SC 40.9 45.2 39.7 41.9

312 Springfield, IL 48.0 53.5 52.7 50.4

313 Springfield, MA 49.0 51.6 49.2 49.2

314 Springfield, MO 41.5 45.3 39.7 40.1

315 Springfield, OH 42.7 45.5 42.4 39.6

IHS Global Insight 7

Page 25: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

316 Spokane, WA 46.4 48.4 44.7 47.1

317 State College, PA 44.6 47.5 49.0 44.7

318 St. Cloud, MN 50.6 51.7 48.0 50.1

319 St. George, UT 46.8 50.3 46.5 49.1

320 St. Joseph, MO-KS 41.2 44.4 42.2 43.2

321 St. Louis, MO-IL 52.5 53.2 51.7 50.9

322 Stockton, CA 52.5 54.9 52.8 50.0

323 Sumter, SC 39.0 37.6 37.7 36.5

324 Syracuse, NY 48.6 49.0 49.6 49.7

325 Tallahassee, FL 46.9 44.1 40.0 41.5

326 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 46.6 46.3 44.1 43.5

327 Terre Haute, IN 39.3 41.1 38.3 41.2

328 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 40.5 38.5 40.7 40.5

329 Toledo, OH 46.4 44.5 43.3 41.6

330 Topeka, KS 46.4 49.3 48.2 45.3

331 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 70.3 73.8 71.6 71.0

332 Tucson, AZ 43.5 46.6 43.1 44.3

333 Tulsa, OK 45.7 47.1 46.4 44.5

334 Tuscaloosa, AL 39.0 40.4 40.0 41.0

335 Tyler, TX 44.6 47.2 46.5 43.2

336 Utica-Rome, NY 42.9 44.4 45.3 46.6

337 Valdosta, GA 39.5 42.1 38.6 36.0

338 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 66.9 70.6 65.8 63.4

339 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 46.1 46.4 42.7 47.4

340 Victoria, TX 45.5 45.8 47.8 45.8

341 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 47.9 50.8 48.9 51.6

342 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 54.8 57.1 55.2 57.3

343 Visalia-Porterville, CA 40.6 45.1 40.0 43.4

344 Waco, TX 40.5 39.7 38.8 39.1

345 Warner Robins, GA 53.3 58.6 49.9 58.5

346 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 83.2 85.8 85.2 84.5

347 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 43.1 48.3 44.5 45.8

348 Wausau, WI 53.4 54.7 49.7 49.4

349 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 38.7 38.1 37.9 35.7

350 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA 43.5 46.8 49.8 47.8

351 Wheeling, WV-OH 35.4 38.7 39.0 38.4

352 Wichita, KS 47.4 49.8 48.2 46.1

353 Wichita Falls, TX 41.4 45.4 43.7 39.6

354 Williamsport, PA 41.7 42.1 40.0 41.0

355 Wilmington, NC 44.8 48.1 44.0 44.8

356 Winchester, VA-WV 55.8 51.0 48.5 46.6

357 Winston-Salem, NC 45.0 46.0 45.7 42.6

358 Worcester, MA 62.0 66.9 63.4 61.2

359 Yakima, WA 42.7 45.2 41.3 40.7

360 York-Hanover, PA 55.1 56.9 57.0 56.4

IHS Global Insight 8

Page 26: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2007 2008 2009 2010

Table 1: Annual Median Household Income by Metropolitan Area, Thous. $

361 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 40.3 40.5 40.9 39.2

362 Yuba City, CA 47.8 50.7 47.3 46.3

363 Yuma, AZ 40.7 38.9 38.7 42.3

IHS Global Insight 9

Page 27: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

1 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8,333.5 8,470.6 1.7 137.2

2 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 4,273.8 4,332.2 1.4 58.5

3 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 5,162.5 5,220.0 1.1 57.5

4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,940.3 2,996.5 1.9 56.1

5 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 2,614.6 2,657.6 1.7 43.0

6 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 2,701.3 2,740.6 1.5 39.3

7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 2,212.6 2,250.6 1.7 38.0

8 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 1,713.8 1,750.9 2.2 37.0

9 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 2,246.5 2,282.5 1.6 36.0

10 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 2,983.1 3,016.9 1.1 33.8

11 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 1,896.3 1,922.2 1.4 25.9

12 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 2,442.8 2,468.6 1.1 25.8

13 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 1,672.6 1,698.2 1.5 25.6

14 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 1,720.8 1,746.4 1.5 25.6

15 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 1,120.1 1,143.0 2.0 22.8

16 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 1,015.3 1,037.5 2.2 22.2

17 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 1,142.3 1,161.6 1.7 19.3

18 Denver-Aurora, CO 1,202.0 1,221.1 1.6 19.1

19 Columbus, OH 909.6 928.4 2.1 18.8

20 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 866.0 884.6 2.2 18.6

21 Austin-Round Rock, TX 784.2 802.7 2.4 18.5

22 Kansas City, MO-KS 965.5 983.0 1.8 17.5

23 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 1,756.1 1,773.0 1.0 16.9

24 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 1,243.0 1,259.8 1.4 16.9

25 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 979.2 995.9 1.7 16.7

26 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 1,001.1 1,017.7 1.7 16.6

27 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 808.1 824.4 2.0 16.3

28 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 749.8 764.0 1.9 14.2

29 San Antonio, TX 849.1 863.3 1.7 14.2

30 Baltimore-Towson, MD 1,279.6 1,293.1 1.1 13.6

31 Pittsburgh, PA 1,148.1 1,161.4 1.2 13.3

32 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 807.7 820.5 1.6 12.8

33 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 880.6 893.0 1.4 12.4

34 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 995.1 1,007.0 1.2 11.9

35 Salt Lake City, UT 621.9 633.8 1.9 11.8

36 Raleigh-Cary, NC 505.6 517.4 2.3 11.8

37 Jacksonville, FL 586.4 598.0 2.0 11.7

38 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 803.6 814.6 1.4 11.0

39 St. Louis, MO-IL 1,302.0 1,312.7 0.8 10.7

40 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 590.9 600.3 1.6 9.4

41 Rochester, NY 515.5 523.4 1.5 7.9

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

IHS Global Insight 10

Page 28: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

42 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 607.5 615.1 1.3 7.6

43 Oklahoma City, OK 572.7 579.8 1.2 7.1

44 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 829.1 835.8 0.8 6.7

45 Columbia, SC 347.1 353.4 1.8 6.3

46 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 543.9 550.2 1.2 6.3

47 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 530.1 536.4 1.2 6.2

48 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 462.8 469.0 1.3 6.2

49 Tulsa, OK 417.2 423.3 1.5 6.1

50 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 672.2 678.1 0.9 5.9

51 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 226.3 232.1 2.6 5.8

52 Greensboro-High Point, NC 342.4 348.1 1.7 5.7

53 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 333.1 338.7 1.7 5.6

54 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 435.3 440.9 1.3 5.6

55 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 319.0 324.6 1.8 5.6

56 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 287.8 293.2 1.9 5.4

57 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 202.7 208.1 2.7 5.4

58 El Paso, TX 282.9 288.2 1.9 5.3

59 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 488.1 493.4 1.1 5.3

60 Toledo, OH 301.4 306.5 1.7 5.2

61 Bradenton-Sarasota-Venice, FL 239.7 244.8 2.2 5.2

62 Knoxville, TN 328.1 333.3 1.6 5.1

63 Madison, WI 349.0 354.2 1.5 5.1

64 Durham, NC 281.1 286.2 1.8 5.1

65 Albuquerque, NM 369.5 374.5 1.4 5.1

66 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 318.2 323.1 1.6 5.0

67 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 337.2 341.9 1.4 4.7

68 Richmond, VA 595.5 600.2 0.8 4.6

69 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 416.5 421.0 1.1 4.5

70 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 726.5 731.0 0.6 4.5

71 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 299.3 303.6 1.5 4.4

72 Provo-Orem, UT 184.1 188.4 2.4 4.4

73 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 198.2 202.4 2.1 4.2

74 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 199.9 204.0 2.1 4.2

75 Wichita, KS 285.1 289.3 1.5 4.2

76 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 275.4 279.5 1.5 4.1

77 Syracuse, NY 316.8 320.8 1.3 4.1

78 Huntsville, AL 207.1 211.1 2.0 4.1

79 Tucson, AZ 355.5 359.6 1.1 4.0

80 Lancaster, PA 226.3 230.2 1.8 4.0

81 Fresno, CA 278.3 282.2 1.4 3.9

82 Boise City-Nampa, ID 256.7 260.6 1.5 3.8

83 Colorado Springs, CO 245.8 249.5 1.5 3.7

IHS Global Insight 11

Page 29: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

84 Winston-Salem, NC 208.9 212.6 1.8 3.7

85 Dayton, OH 371.3 375.0 1.0 3.7

86 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 373.1 376.8 1.0 3.7

87 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 248.5 252.1 1.5 3.7

88 Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC 119.0 122.5 3.0 3.6

89 Chattanooga, TN-GA 232.5 236.1 1.5 3.5

90 Lexington-Fayette, KY 250.1 253.6 1.4 3.4

91 Green Bay, WI 164.3 167.6 2.0 3.3

92 Springfield, MO 193.7 196.9 1.7 3.2

93 Jackson, MS 251.4 254.7 1.3 3.2

94 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 188.3 191.4 1.7 3.1

95 Worcester, MA 323.9 326.9 1.0 3.1

96 Honolulu, HI 443.8 446.8 0.7 3.1

97 Wilmington, NC 134.2 137.1 2.2 2.9

98 Bakersfield, CA 228.1 231.0 1.3 2.9

99 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 253.2 256.1 1.1 2.9

100 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 259.4 262.3 1.1 2.9

101 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 157.9 160.7 1.8 2.9

102 Spokane, WA 203.3 206.1 1.4 2.8

103 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 234.8 237.6 1.2 2.8

104 Naples-Marco Island, FL 108.9 111.7 2.6 2.8

105 Akron, OH 327.4 330.2 0.9 2.8

106 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 617.2 620.0 0.5 2.8

107 Anchorage, AK 172.6 175.4 1.6 2.8

108 Stockton, CA 188.9 191.7 1.5 2.8

109 Lakeland, FL 192.3 195.0 1.4 2.7

110 Mobile, AL 175.0 177.7 1.6 2.7

111 Port St. Lucie, FL 119.4 122.0 2.2 2.7

112 Evansville, IN-KY 175.5 178.1 1.5 2.6

113 Fort Wayne, IN 209.6 212.2 1.3 2.6

114 Reading, PA 169.7 172.2 1.5 2.5

115 Manchester-Nashua, NH 197.0 199.5 1.3 2.5

116 Lincoln, NE 175.8 178.2 1.4 2.4

117 Baton Rouge, LA 360.7 363.1 0.7 2.4

118 Fargo, ND-MN 124.0 126.4 2.0 2.4

119 Ann Arbor, MI 197.5 199.9 1.2 2.4

120 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 127.3 129.6 1.9 2.4

121 New Haven-Milford, CT 362.5 364.9 0.7 2.4

122 Asheville, NC 167.3 169.6 1.4 2.3

123 York-Hanover, PA 177.9 180.1 1.3 2.3

124 Sioux Falls, SD 134.1 136.3 1.7 2.3

125 Modesto, CA 146.7 148.9 1.5 2.2

IHS Global Insight 12

Page 30: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

126 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 227.0 229.2 1.0 2.2

127 Appleton, WI 115.3 117.4 1.8 2.1

128 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 107.7 109.6 1.8 2.0

129 Laredo, TX 91.5 93.5 2.1 2.0

130 Montgomery, AL 164.8 166.7 1.2 1.9

131 Springfield, MA 286.9 288.8 0.7 1.9

132 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 136.2 138.1 1.4 1.9

133 Rockford, IL 144.6 146.4 1.3 1.9

134 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 103.6 105.4 1.8 1.8

135 Fort Smith, AR-OK 115.9 117.7 1.6 1.8

136 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 138.6 140.4 1.3 1.8

137 Ocala, FL 90.8 92.6 2.0 1.8

138 Spartanburg, SC 118.5 120.3 1.5 1.8

139 Savannah, GA 148.3 150.1 1.2 1.8

140 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 93.7 95.4 1.9 1.7

141 Salem, OR 140.4 142.1 1.2 1.7

142 Peoria, IL 185.8 187.4 0.9 1.7

143 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 133.7 135.3 1.3 1.7

144 Rochester, MN 104.3 105.9 1.6 1.7

145 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 140.9 142.6 1.2 1.7

146 Eugene-Springfield, OR 139.9 141.5 1.2 1.6

147 Erie, PA 128.5 130.1 1.3 1.6

148 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 209.0 210.6 0.8 1.6

149 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 157.5 159.1 1.0 1.6

150 Cedar Rapids, IA 138.3 139.8 1.1 1.5

151 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 133.9 135.4 1.2 1.5

152 Clarksville, TN-KY 83.6 85.1 1.8 1.5

153 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 114.3 115.8 1.3 1.5

154 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 128.6 130.1 1.2 1.5

155 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 118.1 119.5 1.3 1.5

156 Columbus, GA-AL 118.3 119.7 1.2 1.4

157 Eau Claire, WI 80.9 82.3 1.7 1.4

158 Tyler, TX 95.0 96.3 1.4 1.3

159 Lafayette, IN 93.9 95.2 1.4 1.3

160 Olympia, WA 97.6 98.9 1.4 1.3

161 St. George, UT 46.5 47.7 2.8 1.3

162 Canton-Massillon, OH 161.4 162.7 0.8 1.3

163 Boulder, CO 162.9 164.2 0.8 1.3

164 Medford, OR 76.1 77.4 1.7 1.3

165 Bellingham, WA 77.8 79.1 1.6 1.3

166 Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 97.2 98.5 1.3 1.3

167 Dover, DE 62.9 64.2 2.0 1.3

IHS Global Insight 13

Page 31: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

168 St. Cloud, MN 98.1 99.3 1.3 1.3

169 Billings, MT 79.6 80.8 1.6 1.2

170 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 107.2 108.4 1.2 1.2

171 Joplin, MO 78.9 80.1 1.6 1.2

172 Bloomington-Normal, IL 90.0 91.2 1.4 1.2

173 Wausau, WI 66.9 68.1 1.8 1.2

174 La Crosse, WI-MN 74.4 75.5 1.6 1.2

175 Utica-Rome, NY 131.4 132.6 0.9 1.2

176 Bismarck, ND 64.2 65.3 1.8 1.2

177 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 89.9 91.0 1.3 1.2

178 Tuscaloosa, AL 92.9 94.0 1.3 1.2

179 Racine, WI 73.8 75.0 1.6 1.2

180 Amarillo, TX 112.3 113.5 1.0 1.2

181 Gainesville, GA 71.3 72.4 1.6 1.1

182 Iowa City, IA 88.5 89.6 1.3 1.1

183 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 119.5 120.6 0.9 1.1

184 Las Cruces, NM 68.8 69.9 1.6 1.1

185 Greeley, CO 78.3 79.4 1.4 1.1

186 Waco, TX 107.6 108.6 1.0 1.1

187 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 182.8 183.9 0.6 1.1

188 Charleston, WV 151.3 152.4 0.7 1.1

189 Coeur d'Alene, ID 52.5 53.6 2.0 1.1

190 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 95.2 96.3 1.1 1.1

191 Dalton, GA 63.6 64.7 1.7 1.1

192 Greenville, NC 75.0 76.0 1.4 1.1

193 Roanoke, VA 155.8 156.8 0.7 1.0

194 Logan, UT-ID 55.3 56.3 1.9 1.0

195 Columbia, MO 93.3 94.3 1.1 1.0

196 Gainesville, FL 125.8 126.8 0.8 1.0

197 Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL 80.0 81.0 1.3 1.0

198 Missoula, MT 51.4 52.4 2.0 1.0

199 Bend, OR 60.9 61.9 1.7 1.0

200 Bloomington, IN 80.5 81.5 1.2 1.0

201 Florence, SC 82.6 83.5 1.2 1.0

202 Idaho Falls, ID 48.4 49.3 2.0 1.0

203 Janesville, WI 60.8 61.7 1.6 1.0

204 Ithaca, NY 64.4 65.3 1.5 1.0

205 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 117.5 118.5 0.8 1.0

206 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 169.7 170.6 0.6 0.9

207 Lynchburg, VA 106.0 106.9 0.9 0.9

208 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 96.6 97.5 1.0 0.9

209 Corpus Christi, TX 185.2 186.1 0.5 0.9

IHS Global Insight 14

Page 32: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

210 Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 72.0 72.9 1.3 0.9

211 Visalia-Porterville, CA 107.3 108.2 0.9 0.9

212 Jackson, TN 57.4 58.3 1.6 0.9

213 Rapid City, SD 60.8 61.7 1.5 0.9

214 Decatur, AL 53.5 54.4 1.7 0.9

215 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 45.7 46.6 2.0 0.9

216 Prescott, AZ 52.5 53.4 1.7 0.9

217 Tallahassee, FL 168.0 168.9 0.5 0.9

218 Punta Gorda, FL 41.0 41.8 2.2 0.9

219 Auburn-Opelika, AL 54.2 55.0 1.7 0.9

220 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 220.7 221.6 0.4 0.9

221 Bowling Green, KY 59.0 59.8 1.5 0.9

222 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 58.4 59.2 1.5 0.9

223 Jonesboro, AR 48.2 49.1 1.8 0.9

224 Charlottesville, VA 101.4 102.2 0.9 0.9

225 Athens-Clarke County, GA 80.5 81.4 1.1 0.9

226 Dothan, AL 56.2 57.0 1.5 0.8

227 Topeka, KS 106.8 107.6 0.8 0.8

228 Burlington, NC 55.6 56.4 1.5 0.8

229 Yakima, WA 74.0 74.8 1.1 0.8

230 Hattiesburg, MS 59.4 60.2 1.4 0.8

231 Anderson, SC 60.7 61.5 1.3 0.8

232 Flagstaff, AZ 62.3 63.1 1.3 0.8

233 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 43.1 43.8 1.9 0.8

234 Fayetteville, NC 130.1 130.9 0.6 0.8

235 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 85.8 86.5 0.9 0.8

236 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 80.5 81.2 1.0 0.8

237 Morristown, TN 44.6 45.4 1.7 0.8

238 Morgantown, WV 65.8 66.5 1.1 0.7

239 Sheboygan, WI 58.9 59.6 1.3 0.7

240 Battle Creek, MI 55.2 55.9 1.4 0.7

241 State College, PA 74.8 75.5 1.0 0.7

242 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 60.7 61.4 1.2 0.7

243 Santa Fe, NM 61.0 61.7 1.2 0.7

244 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 69.9 70.6 1.0 0.7

245 Binghamton, NY 109.6 110.3 0.7 0.7

246 Fond du Lac, WI 45.2 45.9 1.6 0.7

247 Lubbock, TX 132.8 133.4 0.5 0.7

248 Cleveland, TN 38.6 39.2 1.8 0.7

249 Jackson, MI 54.0 54.6 1.3 0.7

250 Lafayette, LA 153.1 153.7 0.5 0.7

251 Altoona, PA 60.4 61.0 1.1 0.7

IHS Global Insight 15

Page 33: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

252 Grand Junction, CO 58.6 59.3 1.2 0.7

253 Hot Springs, AR 39.7 40.4 1.7 0.7

254 Dubuque, IA 56.8 57.4 1.2 0.7

255 Owensboro, KY 50.5 51.2 1.3 0.7

256 Grand Forks, ND-MN 55.4 56.1 1.2 0.7

257 Johnson City, TN 77.2 77.8 0.8 0.6

258 Columbus, IN 43.6 44.2 1.5 0.6

259 Lebanon, PA 50.9 51.5 1.3 0.6

260 Barnstable Town, MA 89.1 89.7 0.7 0.6

261 Kingston, NY 60.2 60.8 1.1 0.6

262 Winchester, VA-WV 56.6 57.2 1.1 0.6

263 College Station-Bryan, TX 97.3 97.9 0.6 0.6

264 Pocatello, ID 35.7 36.3 1.7 0.6

265 Napa, CA 59.8 60.4 1.0 0.6

266 Yuma, AZ 48.4 49.0 1.3 0.6

267 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 55.9 56.5 1.1 0.6

268 Lawrence, KS 51.7 52.2 1.2 0.6

269 Bangor, ME 72.5 73.1 0.8 0.6

270 Glens Falls, NY 54.3 54.8 1.1 0.6

271 St. Joseph, MO-KS 55.3 55.8 1.0 0.6

272 Longview, TX 97.9 98.4 0.6 0.6

273 Flint, MI 131.1 131.7 0.4 0.6

274 Monroe, MI 37.4 37.9 1.5 0.5

275 Terre Haute, IN 70.2 70.7 0.8 0.5

276 Reno-Sparks, NV 187.1 187.6 0.3 0.5

277 Johnstown, PA 61.1 61.6 0.9 0.5

278 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 41.7 42.2 1.3 0.5

279 Lima, OH 52.9 53.4 1.0 0.5

280 Wheeling, WV-OH 68.4 68.9 0.8 0.5

281 Fairbanks, AK 39.5 40.0 1.3 0.5

282 Gadsden, AL 34.9 35.4 1.5 0.5

283 Salisbury, MD 52.3 52.8 1.0 0.5

284 Merced, CA 56.9 57.4 0.9 0.5

285 Williamsport, PA 52.2 52.7 1.0 0.5

286 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 96.4 96.9 0.5 0.5

287 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 50.3 50.8 1.0 0.5

288 Jefferson City, MO 78.0 78.4 0.6 0.5

289 Anderson, IN 39.1 39.5 1.3 0.5

290 Monroe, LA 75.9 76.4 0.7 0.5

291 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 44.6 45.1 1.1 0.5

292 Rocky Mount, NC 59.3 59.7 0.8 0.5

293 Pueblo, CO 59.4 59.8 0.8 0.5

IHS Global Insight 16

Page 34: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

294 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 45.3 45.7 1.1 0.5

295 Palm Coast, FL 18.2 18.7 2.5 0.5

296 Springfield, OH 49.7 50.1 0.9 0.5

297 Ocean City, NJ 41.3 41.7 1.1 0.4

298 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 74.4 74.8 0.6 0.4

299 Bay City, MI 37.7 38.1 1.2 0.4

300 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 45.2 45.6 1.0 0.4

301 Elizabethtown, KY 46.6 47.0 0.9 0.4

302 Macon, GA 96.3 96.7 0.5 0.4

303 Sherman-Denison, TX 42.8 43.2 1.0 0.4

304 Salinas, CA 121.6 122.0 0.4 0.4

305 Cheyenne, WY 44.2 44.6 1.0 0.4

306 Anniston-Oxford, AL 48.4 48.8 0.9 0.4

307 Kokomo, IN 41.1 41.5 1.0 0.4

308 Norwich-New London, CT 127.2 127.6 0.3 0.4

309 Sandusky, OH 39.2 39.6 1.1 0.4

310 Wenatchee, WA 39.6 40.0 1.0 0.4

311 Chico, CA 70.5 70.9 0.6 0.4

312 Lake Charles, LA 91.6 91.9 0.4 0.4

313 Texarkana-Texarkana, TX-AR 56.9 57.3 0.7 0.4

314 Lewiston, ID-WA 25.1 25.5 1.5 0.4

315 Sumter, SC 36.8 37.1 1.0 0.4

316 Harrisonburg, VA 62.9 63.2 0.6 0.4

317 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 89.9 90.3 0.4 0.4

318 Redding, CA 59.9 60.3 0.6 0.4

319 Springfield, IL 111.9 112.3 0.3 0.4

320 Elmira, NY 39.8 40.2 0.9 0.4

321 Warner Robins, GA 59.3 59.7 0.6 0.4

322 Valdosta, GA 51.3 51.6 0.7 0.4

323 Corvallis, OR 38.3 38.6 0.9 0.3

324 Mansfield, OH 52.0 52.3 0.6 0.3

325 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 181.3 181.6 0.2 0.3

326 Farmington, NM 49.3 49.6 0.7 0.3

327 Rome, GA 37.7 38.0 0.8 0.3

328 Casper, WY 40.4 40.7 0.8 0.3

329 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 160.7 161.0 0.2 0.3

330 Duluth, MN-WI 129.0 129.3 0.2 0.3

331 Great Falls, MT 35.5 35.8 0.9 0.3

332 Muncie, IN 48.7 49.0 0.6 0.3

333 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 57.8 58.1 0.5 0.3

334 Longview, WA 35.0 35.2 0.8 0.3

335 Cumberland, MD-WV 41.1 41.4 0.7 0.3

IHS Global Insight 17

Page 35: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2011Q4 2012Q4 % Difference

Table 2: Total Nonfarm Employment Across US Metro Areas

(Thousands)

336 Pascagoula, MS 57.5 57.7 0.4 0.2

337 Pittsfield, MA 64.9 65.1 0.4 0.2

338 Goldsboro, NC 41.8 42.0 0.6 0.2

339 Brunswick, GA 40.2 40.4 0.6 0.2

340 Alexandria, LA 65.0 65.2 0.4 0.2

341 Decatur, IL 52.8 53.0 0.4 0.2

342 Ames, IA 46.5 46.7 0.5 0.2

343 El Centro, CA 44.7 44.9 0.5 0.2

344 Yuba City, CA 37.2 37.4 0.5 0.2

345 Danville, VA 39.8 40.0 0.5 0.2

346 Abilene, TX 61.8 61.9 0.3 0.2

347 Jacksonville, NC 47.2 47.4 0.4 0.2

348 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 68.8 68.9 0.2 0.2

349 Danville, IL 28.6 28.7 0.6 0.2

350 Albany, GA 61.4 61.6 0.3 0.2

351 Victoria, TX 51.5 51.6 0.3 0.1

352 Madera, CA 31.9 32.0 0.4 0.1

353 San Angelo, TX 45.5 45.6 0.3 0.1

354 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria, CA 160.4 160.5 0.1 0.1

355 Champaign-Urbana, IL 105.3 105.4 0.1 0.1

356 Lawton, OK 43.1 43.2 0.3 0.1

357 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 36.5 36.6 0.3 0.1

358 Wichita Falls, TX 57.4 57.5 0.1 0.1

359 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 19.3 19.4 0.4 0.1

360 Pine Bluff, AR 36.4 36.4 0.1 0.0

361 Odessa, TX 63.8 63.7 -0.1 0.0

362 Midland, TX 71.0 70.8 -0.2 -0.1

363 Carson City, NV 28.5 28.2 -1.1 -0.3

IHS Global Insight 18

Page 36: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

AlaskaAnchorage, AK 174.2 52.2Fairbanks, AK 39.8 11.9 Sum of Metro Areas 214.0 64.1

AlabamaAnniston-Oxford, AL 48.6 2.6Auburn-Opelika, AL 54.7 2.9Birmingham-Hoover, AL 491.2 25.9Columbus, GA-AL 13.0 0.7Decatur, AL 54.0 2.8Dothan, AL 56.7 3.0Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 56.2 3.0Gadsden, AL 35.2 1.9Huntsville, AL 209.5 11.1Mobile, AL 176.7 9.3Montgomery, AL 166.0 8.8Tuscaloosa, AL 93.5 4.9 Sum of Metro Areas 1,455.3 76.8

ArkansasFayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR 199.0 16.8Fort Smith, AR-OK 94.8 8.0Hot Springs, AR 40.1 3.4Jonesboro, AR 48.7 4.1Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR 340.0 28.7Memphis, TN-MS-AR 16.4 1.4Pine Bluff, AR 36.4 3.1Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 13.7 1.2 Sum of Metro Areas 789.1 66.7

ArizonaFlagstaff, AZ 62.7 2.6Lake Havasu, AZ 46.2 1.9Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 1,734.7 71.2Prescott, AZ 53.0 2.2Tucson, AZ 357.6 14.7Yuma, AZ 48.7 2.0 Sum of Metro Areas 2,302.8 94.5

CaliforniaBakersfield, CA 229.6 1.6Chico, CA 70.7 0.5El Centro, CA 44.7 0.3Fresno, CA 280.5 2.0Hanford-Corcoran, CA 36.5 0.3Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 5,194.9 36.6Madera, CA 32.0 0.2Merced, CA 57.1 0.4Modesto, CA 148.0 1.0

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

IHS Global Insight 19

Page 37: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Napa, CA 60.1 0.4Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 277.8 2.0Redding, CA 60.1 0.4Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 1,133.3 8.0Santa Barbara-Santa Maria, CA 160.4 1.1Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 809.6 5.7Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 90.1 0.6San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 1,252.6 8.8San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 888.1 6.2Salinas, CA 121.8 0.9San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 97.1 0.7Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 170.1 1.2San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 1,911.5 13.5Stockton, CA 190.5 1.3Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 118.0 0.8Visalia-Porterville, CA 107.7 0.8Yuba City, CA 37.3 0.3 Sum of Metro Areas 13,580.0 95.6

ColoradoBoulder, CO 163.7 7.2Colorado Springs, CO 248.1 10.9Denver-Aurora, CO 1,213.6 53.3Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 137.3 6.0Greeley, CO 79.0 3.5Grand Junction, CO 59.0 2.6Pueblo, CO 59.6 2.6 Sum of Metro Areas 1,960.2 86.0

ConnecticutBridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 419.2 25.7Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 618.5 37.9New Haven-Milford, CT 363.8 22.3Norwich-New London, CT 127.4 7.8 Sum of Metro Areas 1,528.9 93.7

District of ColumbiaWashington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 715.9 100.0 Sum of Metro Areas

DelawareDover, DE 63.7 15.3Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (MSA) 275.3 66.1 Sum of Metro Areas 339.0 81.4

FloridaCape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 200.6 2.7Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 159.5 2.2Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL 80.6 1.1Gainesville, FL 126.3 1.7Jacksonville, FL 593.3 8.1

IHS Global Insight 20

Page 38: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Lakeland, FL 193.8 2.6Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL 2,235.5 30.4Naples-Marco Island, FL 110.6 1.5Ocala, FL 91.8 1.2Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 1,028.8 14.0Palm Coast, FL 18.5 0.3Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 190.0 2.6Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 72.5 1.0Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 158.4 2.2Port St. Lucie-Fort Pierce, FL 120.9 1.6Punta Gorda, FL 41.5 0.6Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL 242.8 3.3Tallahassee, FL 168.4 2.3Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 1,153.8 15.7Vero Beach, FL 43.6 0.6 Sum of Metro Areas 7,031.0 95.6

GeorgiaAlbany, GA 61.4 1.6Athens-Clarke County, GA 80.9 2.1Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 2,267.0 59.1Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 144.8 3.8Brunswick, GA 40.3 1.1Chattanooga, TN-GA 30.7 0.8Columbus, GA-AL 106.0 2.8Dalton, GA 64.3 1.7Gainesville, GA 72.0 1.9Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 19.3 0.5Macon, GA 96.4 2.5Rome, GA 37.8 1.0Savannah, GA 149.2 3.9Valdosta, GA 51.4 1.3Warner Robins, GA 59.5 1.5 Sum of Metro Areas 3,280.9 85.5

HawaiiHonolulu, HI 445.5 74.5 Sum of Metro Areas

IowaAmes, IA 46.6 3.1Cedar Rapids, IA 139.2 9.3Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 89.9 6.0Des Moines, IA 322.5 21.5Dubuque, IA 57.2 3.8Iowa City, IA 89.1 5.9Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 49.2 3.3Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 51.9 3.5Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 90.6 6.0

IHS Global Insight 21

Page 39: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Sum of Metro Areas 936.1 62.4Idaho

Boise City-Nampa, ID 258.9 42.1Coeur d'Alene, ID 53.1 8.6Idaho Falls, ID 48.9 8.0Lewiston, ID-WA 19.8 3.2Logan, UT-ID 3.3 0.5Pocatello, ID 36.0 5.9 Sum of Metro Areas 420.0 68.3

IllinoisBloomington-Normal, IL 90.7 1.6Champaign-Urbana, IL 105.2 1.8Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI (MSA) 4,044.0 70.9Danville, IL 28.6 0.5Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 93.5 1.6Decatur, IL 52.9 0.9Kankakee-Bradley, IL 45.4 0.8Peoria, IL 186.7 3.3Rockford, IL 145.7 2.6Springfield, IL 112.0 2.0St. Louis, MO-IL 241.9 4.2 Sum of Metro Areas 5,146.7 90.2

IndianaAnderson, IN 39.3 1.4Bloomington, IN 81.0 2.9Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI (MSA) 262.7 9.3Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 21.0 0.7Columbus, IN 44.0 1.6Elkhart-Goshen, IN 104.7 3.7Evansville, IN-KY 153.8 5.5Fort Wayne, IN 211.2 7.5Indianapolis, IN 877.1 31.1Kokomo, IN 41.3 1.5Lafayette, IN 94.7 3.4Louisville, KY-IN 96.9 3.4Michigan City-La Porte, IN 42.0 1.5Muncie, IN 48.8 1.7South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 125.7 4.5Terre Haute, IN 70.5 2.5 Sum of Metro Areas 2,314.5 82.1

KansasKansas City, MO-KS 435.5 32.5Lawrence, KS 52.0 3.9St. Joseph, MO-KS 2.4 0.2Topeka, KS 107.3 8.0Wichita, KS 287.6 21.4

IHS Global Insight 22

Page 40: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Sum of Metro Areas 884.8 66.0Kentucky

Bowling Green, KY 59.5 3.3Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 184.3 10.2Clarksville, TN-KY 35.4 2.0Elizabethtown, KY 46.8 2.6Evansville, IN-KY 23.2 1.3Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 37.3 2.1Lexington-Fayette, KY 252.2 13.9Louisville, KY-IN 515.3 28.4Owensboro, KY 50.8 2.8 Sum of Metro Areas 1,204.8 66.5

LouisianaAlexandria, LA 65.0 3.4Baton Rouge, LA 361.8 18.8Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 96.6 5.0Lake Charles, LA 91.7 4.8Lafayette, LA 153.3 8.0Monroe, LA 76.2 4.0New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 533.6 27.7Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 181.3 9.4 Sum of Metro Areas 1,559.5 80.9

MassachusettsBarnstable Town, MA 89.4 2.7Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH (MSA) 2,263.6 69.5Pittsfield, MA 65.0 2.0Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 211.7 6.5Springfield, MA 287.8 8.8Worcester, MA 325.6 10.0 Sum of Metro Areas 3,243.1 99.6

MarylandBaltimore-Towson, MD 1,287.4 50.6Cumberland, MD-WV 32.6 1.3Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 64.3 2.5Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (MSA) 28.9 1.1Salisbury, MD 52.5 2.1Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 941.7 37.1 Sum of Metro Areas 2,407.5 94.7

MaineBangor, ME 72.8 12.1Lewiston-Auburn, ME 50.6 8.4Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 261.1 43.5 Sum of Metro Areas 384.5 64.1

MichiganAnn Arbor, MI 198.7 5.0Battle Creek, MI 55.6 1.4

IHS Global Insight 23

Page 41: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Bay City, MI 37.9 1.0Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 1,765.4 44.5Flint, MI 131.3 3.3Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 375.3 9.5Holland-Grand Haven, MI 108.9 2.7Jackson, MI 54.3 1.4Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 139.5 3.5Lansing-East Lansing, MI 221.0 5.6Monroe, MI 37.7 1.0Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 58.9 1.5Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 61.1 1.5Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 86.2 2.2South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 8.9 0.2 Sum of Metro Areas 3,340.8 84.3

MinnesotaDuluth, MN-WI 112.6 4.1Fargo, ND-MN 18.7 0.7Grand Forks, ND-MN 13.0 0.5La Crosse, WI-MN 5.3 0.2Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 1,696.4 62.5Rochester, MN 105.2 3.9St. Cloud, MN 98.8 3.6 Sum of Metro Areas 2,050.0 75.6

MissouriColumbia, MO 93.8 3.5Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 7.0 0.3Jefferson City, MO 78.2 2.9Joplin, MO 79.6 3.0Kansas City, MO-KS 540.9 20.2Springfield, MO 195.6 7.3St. Joseph, MO-KS 53.2 2.0St. Louis, MO-IL 1,066.2 39.9 Sum of Metro Areas 2,114.5 79.1

MississippiGulfport-Biloxi, MS 107.9 9.8Hattiesburg, MS 59.9 5.4Jackson, MS 253.3 22.9Memphis, TN-MS-AR 71.4 6.5Pascagoula, MS 57.7 5.2 Sum of Metro Areas 550.0 49.8

MontanaBillings, MT 80.3 18.3Great Falls, MT 35.7 8.1Missoula, MT 52.0 11.8 Sum of Metro Areas 167.9 38.3

North Carolina

IHS Global Insight 24

Page 42: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Asheville, NC 168.6 4.3Burlington, NC 56.0 1.4Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 742.2 18.9Durham, NC 284.1 7.2Fayetteville, NC 130.5 3.3Goldsboro, NC 41.9 1.1Greensboro-High Point, NC 345.7 8.8Greenville, NC 75.6 1.9Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 141.9 3.6Jacksonville, NC 47.3 1.2Raleigh-Cary, NC 512.7 13.1Rocky Mount, NC 59.5 1.5Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 5.8 0.1Wilmington, NC 136.0 3.5Winston-Salem, NC 211.1 5.4 Sum of Metro Areas 2,958.9 75.5

North DakotaBismarck, ND 64.9 16.1Fargo, ND-MN 106.8 26.6Grand Forks, ND-MN 42.8 10.6 Sum of Metro Areas 214.4 53.3

NebraskaLincoln, NE 177.0 18.3Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 417.5 43.2Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 14.0 1.5Sum of Metro Areas 608.6 62.9

New HampshireBoston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH (MSA) 193.9 30.5Manchester-Nashua, NH 198.5 31.2 Sum of Metro Areas 392.3 61.8

New JerseyAllentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 35.8 0.9Atlantic City, NJ 134.8 3.4New York-Nrthrn NewJersey-Lng Islnd, NY-NJ-PA (MSA) 2,815.1 72.0Ocean City, NJ 41.5 1.1Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (MSA) 535.0 13.7Trenton-Ewing, NJ 236.4 6.0Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 58.0 1.5 Sum of Metro Areas 3,856.6 98.7

New MexicoAlbuquerque, NM 372.3 45.9Farmington, NM 49.4 6.1Las Cruces, NM 69.4 8.6Santa Fe, NM 61.4 7.6Sum of Metro Areas 552.5 68.1

Nevada

IHS Global Insight 25

Page 43: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Carson City, NV 28.3 2.5Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 815.3 72.2Reno-Sparks, NV 187.3 16.6 Sum of Metro Areas 1,030.8 91.3

New YorkAlbany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 438.2 5.0Binghamton, NY 109.9 1.3Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 547.1 6.3Elmira, NY 40.0 0.5Glens Falls, NY 54.6 0.6Ithaca, NY 64.9 0.7Kingston, NY 60.5 0.7New York-Nrthrn New Jersey-Lng Islnd, NY-NJ-PA (MSA) 5,584.7 63.9Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 250.5 2.9Rochester, NY 519.9 5.9Syracuse, NY 318.9 3.6Utica-Rome, NY 132.0 1.5 Sum of Metro Areas 8,121.2 92.9

OhioAkron, OH 329.2 6.4Canton-Massillon, OH 162.2 3.1Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 806.4 15.6Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 1,002.5 19.4Columbus, OH 921.1 17.8Dayton, OH 373.7 7.2Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 13.4 0.3Lima, OH 53.2 1.0Mansfield, OH 52.2 1.0Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 25.5 0.5Sandusky, OH 39.4 0.8Springfield, OH 49.9 1.0Toledo, OH 304.4 5.9Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 24.7 0.5Wheeling, WV-OH 24.7 0.5Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 177.9 3.4 Sum of Metro Areas 4,360.6 84.5

OklahomaFort Smith, AR-OK 22.3 1.4Lawton, OK 43.1 2.7Oklahoma City, OK 576.9 36.5Tulsa, OK 420.9 26.6 Sum of Metro Areas 1,063.3 67.3

OregonBend, OR 61.5 3.7Corvallis, OR 38.4 2.3Eugene-Springfield, OR 140.8 8.6

IHS Global Insight 26

Page 44: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Medford, OR 76.9 4.7Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 859.1 52.3Salem, OR 141.3 8.6 Sum of Metro Areas 1,317.9 80.3

PennsylvaniaAllentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 300.8 5.2Altoona, PA 60.8 1.1Erie, PA 129.6 2.3Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 321.2 5.6Johnstown, PA 61.5 1.1Lancaster, PA 228.8 4.0Lebanon, PA 51.3 0.9NewYork-Nrthrn New Jersey-Lng Islnd, NY-NJ-PA (MSA) 11.0 0.2Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD (MSA) 1,886.1 32.8Pittsburgh, PA 1,156.4 20.1Reading, PA 171.4 3.0Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 255.0 4.4State College, PA 75.2 1.3Williamsport, PA 52.5 0.9York-Hanover, PA 179.3 3.1Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 50.5 0.9 Sum of Metro Areas 4,991.2 86.9

Rhode IslandProvidence-New Bedford-FallRiver, RI-MA 463.7 100.0 Sum of Metro Areas

South CarolinaAnderson, SC 61.1 3.3Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 64.9 3.5Charleston-North Charleston, SC 291.0 15.8Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 75.4 4.1Columbia, SC 350.7 19.0Florence, SC 83.1 4.5Greenville, SC 301.8 16.4Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 121.1 6.6Spartanburg, SC 119.6 6.5Sumter, SC 37.0 2.0 Sum of Metro Areas 1,505.6 81.6

South DakotaRapid City, SD 61.4 14.9Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 8.6 2.1Sioux Falls, SD 135.4 33.0 Sum of Metro Areas 205.4 50.0

TennesseeChattanooga, TN-GA 203.8 7.6Clarksville, TN-KY 49.2 1.8Cleveland, TN 39.0 1.5

IHS Global Insight 27

Page 45: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Jackson, TN 57.9 2.2Johnson City, TN 77.5 2.9Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 80.9 3.0Knoxville, TN 331.1 12.4Memphis, TN-MS-AR 508.5 19.0Morristown, TN 45.0 1.7Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro, TN 758.5 28.3 Sum of Metro Areas 2,151.5 80.4

TexasAbilene, TX 61.8 0.6Amarillo, TX 112.9 1.1Austin-Round Rock, TX 795.0 7.4Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 160.7 1.5Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 128.6 1.2College Station-Bryan, TX 97.6 0.9Corpus Christi, TX 185.5 1.7Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,972.6 27.7El Paso, TX 285.9 2.7Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 2,638.2 24.6Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 129.4 1.2Laredo, TX 92.6 0.9Longview, TX 98.1 0.9Lubbock, TX 133.0 1.2McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 229.6 2.1Midland, TX 70.8 0.7Odessa, TX 63.6 0.6San Angelo, TX 45.5 0.4San Antonio, TX 857.2 8.0Sherman-Denison, TX 43.0 0.4Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 43.4 0.4Tyler, TX 95.7 0.9Victoria, TX 51.5 0.5Waco, TX 108.1 1.0Wichita Falls, TX 57.4 0.5 Sum of Metro Areas 9,557.7 89.2

UtahLogan, UT-ID 52.6 4.3Ogden-Clearfield, UT 202.3 16.3Provo-Orem, UT 186.6 15.1Salt Lake City, UT 629.0 50.8St. George, UT 47.2 3.8 Sum of Metro Areas 1,117.8 90.3

VirginiaBlacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 68.8 1.9Charlottesville, VA 101.8 2.8Danville, VA 39.9 1.1

IHS Global Insight 28

Page 46: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Harrisonburg, VA 63.0 1.7Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 38.0 1.0Lynchburg, VA 106.4 2.9Richmond, VA 598.0 16.3Roanoke, VA 156.2 4.3Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 723.2 19.7Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 1,330.2 36.2Winchester, VA-WV 52.8 1.4 Sum of Metro Areas 3,278.1 89.3

VermontBurlington-South Burlington, VT 120.1 39.4 Sum of Metro Areas

WashingtonBellingham, WA 78.5 2.8Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 80.9 2.8Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 97.9 3.4Lewiston, ID-WA 5.5 0.2Longview, WA 35.1 1.2Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 44.9 1.6Olympia, WA 98.4 3.5Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 130.4 4.6Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 1,687.7 59.3Spokane, WA 204.9 7.2Wenatchee, WA 39.8 1.4Yakima, WA 74.5 2.6 Sum of Metro Areas 2,578.4 90.6

WisconsinAppleton, WI 116.6 4.2Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI (MSA) 56.8 2.0Duluth, MN-WI 112.6 4.1Eau Claire, WI 81.7 2.9Fond du Lac, WI 45.6 1.6Green Bay, WI 166.2 6.0Janesville, WI 61.3 2.2La Crosse, WI-MN 69.8 2.5Madison, WI 352.0 12.6Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 832.8 29.8Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 40.3 1.4Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 94.8 3.4Racine, WI 74.5 2.7Sheboygan, WI 59.4 2.1Wausau, WI 67.6 2.4 Sum of Metro Areas 2,232.0 80.0

West VirginiaCharleston, WV 151.9 20.0Cumberland, MD-WV 8.6 1.1

IHS Global Insight 29

Page 47: Metro Economies Report_011812

Employment % of State

Table 3: Metro Employment as a Share of State Employment in 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 31.5 4.1Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 64.3 8.5Morgantown, WV 66.2 8.7Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 44.8 5.9Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV (MSA) 14.8 2.0Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 20.9 2.7Wheeling, WV-OH 43.9 5.8Winchester, VA-WV 4.1 0.5 Sum of Metro Areas 451.1 59.5

WyomingCasper, WY 40.5 13.8Cheyenne, WY 44.4 15.2 Sum of Metro Areas 85.0 29.0

IHS Global Insight 30

Page 48: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

McAllen-Edinburg-Pharr, TX 219.7 217.1 232.1 100+%

Bismarck, ND 61.8 61.1 65.3 100+%

Anchorage, AK 171.6 170.3 175.4 100+%

Fargo, ND-MN 122.1 120.4 126.4 100+%

Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 126.9 125.2 130.1 100+%

Fairbanks, AK 38.6 37.8 40.0 100+%

Cumberland, MD-WV 40.0 39.1 41.4 100+%

Morgantown, WV 64.4 63.0 66.5 100+%

Grand Forks, ND-MN 54.1 52.7 56.1 100+%

Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 126.5 124.1 129.6 100+%

El Paso, TX 279.5 272.8 288.2 100+%

Austin-Round Rock, TX 777.3 755.7 802.7 100+%

Ithaca, NY 64.5 63.9 65.3 100+%

Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 96.4 94.4 98.5 100+%

Burlington-South Burlington, VT 117.1 113.7 120.6 100+%

New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 526.9 517.2 536.4 100+%

College Station-Bryan, TX 96.9 95.7 97.9 100+%

Lincoln, NE 174.8 170.4 178.2 100+%

Lebanon, PA 50.3 48.8 51.5 100+%

Dubuque, IA 56.0 54.0 57.4 100+%

Lubbock, TX 131.3 128.3 133.4 100+%

Columbia, MO 92.9 90.6 94.3 100+%

Laredo, TX 90.9 86.3 93.5 100+%

Waco, TX 107.3 104.9 108.6 100+%

Hot Springs, AR 39.3 37.1 40.4 100+%

Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 2,606.6 2,499.9 2,657.6 100+%

Corpus Christi, TX 183.0 176.3 186.1 100+%

Pueblo, CO 59.0 57.1 59.8 100+%

Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 94.2 91.1 95.4 100+%

San Antonio, TX 854.4 832.4 863.3 100+%

Madison, WI 350.1 339.8 354.2 100+%

Kankakee-Bradley, IL 44.9 42.5 45.6 100+%

Rochester, NY 517.9 499.7 523.4 100+%

Pittsburgh, PA 1,151.1 1,113.6 1,161.4 100+%

Warner Robins, GA 59.4 58.4 59.7 100+%

Sandusky, OH 38.8 35.5 39.6 100+%

Wheeling, WV-OH 68.5 66.6 68.9 100+%

Pittsfield, MA 64.5 61.2 65.1 100+%

Lafayette, LA 152.6 145.5 153.7 100+%

Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 90.6 87.5 91.0 100+%

Oklahoma City, OK 576.7 552.0 579.8 100+%

State College, PA 75.3 73.4 75.5 100+%

Fayetteville, NC 130.5 127.5 130.9 100+%

San Angelo, TX 45.4 43.7 45.6 100+%

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

IHS Global Insight 31

Page 49: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 3,009.4 2,933.2 3,016.9 100+%

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,983.9 2,835.0 2,996.5 100+%

Las Cruces, NM 69.8 68.3 69.9 100+%

Tyler, TX 96.1 91.5 96.3 100+%

Ogden-Clearfield, UT 203.4 191.1 204.0 100+%

Amarillo, TX 113.3 109.1 113.5 100+%

Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 181.4 175.0 181.6 100+%

Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 138.0 132.4 138.1 100+%

Sioux Falls, SD 136.4 132.4 136.3 97.6%

Lawrence, KS 52.3 49.4 52.2 97.1%

Charlottesville, VA 102.4 98.2 102.2 95.5%

Victoria, TX 51.8 48.4 51.6 95.5%

Evansville, IN-KY 178.6 169.0 178.1 95.4%

Longview, TX 98.8 92.6 98.4 94.2%

Logan, UT-ID 56.6 51.8 56.3 94.2%

Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 208.7 198.1 208.1 93.9%

Great Falls, MT 35.8 35.4 35.8 93.1%

Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro, TN 767.7 718.9 764.0 92.4%

Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 2,476.7 2,373.7 2,468.6 92.1%

Auburn-Opelika, AL 55.3 52.0 55.0 91.4%

Clarksville, TN-KY 85.5 81.1 85.1 91.1%

La Crosse, WI-MN 75.8 73.0 75.5 90.4%

Midland, TX 71.4 65.4 70.8 90.3%

Corvallis, OR 38.8 36.9 38.6 90.2%

Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 470.6 454.8 469.0 90.2%

Odessa, TX 64.5 58.1 63.7 87.8%

Bay City, MI 38.4 36.0 38.1 87.0%

Peoria, IL 189.9 174.0 187.4 84.8%

Owensboro, KY 51.6 48.9 51.2 84.6%

Springfield, IL 112.7 110.1 112.3 83.7%

Des Moines, IA 326.8 314.1 324.6 82.6%

Charleston, WV 153.5 147.3 152.4 82.2%

Lafayette, IN 96.5 90.0 95.2 80.9%

Joplin, MO 80.6 77.9 80.1 79.6%

Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 98.3 91.4 96.9 79.5%

Raleigh-Cary, NC 523.9 492.7 517.4 79.3%

Worcester, MA 330.3 314.0 326.9 79.2%

Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 554.1 535.2 550.2 79.2%

Rapid City, SD 62.1 60.1 61.7 78.9%

Rochester, MN 107.0 101.8 105.9 78.6%

Provo-Orem, UT 191.7 176.3 188.4 78.6%

Johnstown, PA 62.2 59.5 61.6 78.5%

Billings, MT 81.6 78.0 80.8 78.0%

Knoxville, TN 337.7 318.0 333.3 77.6%

IHS Global Insight 32

Page 50: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Jonesboro, AR 49.3 48.1 49.1 77.6%

Lewiston, ID-WA 51.5 48.7 50.8 77.4%

Harrisonburg, VA 63.9 61.0 63.2 77.2%

Wenatchee, WA 40.6 38.0 40.0 76.0%

Cedar Rapids, IA 140.8 136.6 139.8 75.3%

Casper, WY 41.6 37.8 40.7 74.7%

Salt Lake City, UT 644.0 603.8 633.8 74.5%

Utica-Rome, NY 133.8 129.0 132.6 74.4%

Winchester, VA-WV 58.5 53.4 57.2 74.3%

Reading, PA 174.9 164.8 172.2 73.2%

Ann Arbor, MI 203.1 191.5 199.9 72.5%

Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 57.4 54.2 56.5 70.2%

Louisville, KY-IN 626.6 589.1 615.1 69.4%

York-Hanover, PA 183.8 171.8 180.1 69.3%

Cheyenne, WY 45.2 43.3 44.6 68.8%

Syracuse, NY 325.1 311.8 320.8 68.1%

Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 126.8 113.6 122.5 67.7%

Holland-Grand Haven, MI 113.8 100.9 109.6 67.6%

Eau Claire, WI 83.9 78.9 82.3 66.8%

Palm Coast, FL 19.1 17.9 18.7 66.0%

Fort Wayne, IN 219.5 198.0 212.2 65.9%

Columbus, OH 945.2 896.3 928.4 65.7%

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 920.3 841.7 893.0 65.3%

Lexington-Fayette, KY 258.9 243.6 253.6 65.0%

Bangor, ME 74.6 70.5 73.1 64.6%

Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 255.9 245.5 252.1 64.2%

Tulsa, OK 434.2 404.1 423.3 63.9%

Lynchburg, VA 109.6 102.1 106.9 63.5%

Springfield, MA 293.0 281.5 288.8 63.4%

Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 389.8 354.2 376.8 63.3%

Springfield, MO 201.3 189.9 196.9 61.8%

Sherman-Denison, TX 43.8 42.3 43.2 61.1%

Charleston-North Charleston, SC 301.7 280.1 293.2 60.6%

Merced, CA 59.0 54.9 57.4 60.2%

Columbus, IN 46.3 41.2 44.2 59.7%

Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 858.8 802.0 835.8 59.4%

Lansing-East Lansing, MI 227.8 212.6 221.6 59.0%

Durham, NC 292.0 277.9 286.2 58.8%

Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 58.2 56.0 57.3 57.9%

Hattiesburg, MS 61.6 58.3 60.2 57.6%

Green Bay, WI 170.5 163.6 167.6 57.6%

Honolulu, HI 457.4 432.6 446.8 57.4%

Columbus, GA-AL 122.1 116.7 119.7 55.8%

Erie, PA 134.0 125.3 130.1 55.8%

IHS Global Insight 33

Page 51: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Akron, OH 343.0 314.3 330.2 55.3%

Boulder, CO 169.2 158.0 164.2 55.2%

Winston-Salem, NC 220.4 203.2 212.6 55.0%

Hanford-Corcoran, CA 37.7 35.3 36.6 54.3%

Elizabethtown, KY 48.7 45.1 47.0 54.2%

New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 8,647.2 8,261.9 8,470.6 54.2%

Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 1,798.7 1,684.6 1,746.4 54.2%

Jacksonville, NC 47.9 46.8 47.4 54.1%

Bakersfield, CA 239.1 221.6 231.0 53.9%

Appleton, WI 119.8 114.6 117.4 53.6%

Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 1,051.5 979.2 1,017.7 53.3%

Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 76.8 72.5 74.8 53.3%

Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 111.5 105.0 108.4 52.5%

Bloomington-Normal, IL 92.6 89.6 91.2 52.0%

Danville, VA 41.4 38.5 40.0 51.6%

Anderson, SC 64.8 58.0 61.5 50.5%

Huntsville, AL 215.1 207.1 211.1 50.4%

Williamsport, PA 54.1 51.4 52.7 50.1%

Lake Charles, LA 95.3 88.6 91.9 50.1%

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 1,766.7 1,631.4 1,698.2 49.3%

Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 190.4 177.5 183.9 49.3%

Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 96.3 84.4 90.3 49.3%

Fort Walton Beach-Crestview-Destin, FL 85.3 76.9 81.0 49.2%

Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR 349.3 334.7 341.9 49.0%

Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 241.1 218.0 229.2 48.4%

Denver-Aurora, CO 1,258.5 1,186.2 1,221.1 48.3%

Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 346.0 332.1 338.7 48.0%

Baltimore-Towson, MD 1,323.6 1,265.2 1,293.1 47.8%

Kingston, NY 123.6 115.8 119.5 47.6%

Chattanooga, TN-GA 248.2 225.1 236.1 47.4%

Kokomo, IN 46.8 36.8 41.5 47.0%

San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 1,312.7 1,214.0 1,259.8 46.4%

Dover, DE 66.5 62.2 64.2 46.2%

Jefferson City, MO 80.2 77.0 78.4 45.7%

Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 146.3 135.5 140.4 45.4%

Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 166.2 156.7 161.0 45.1%

Columbia, SC 368.0 341.6 353.4 44.7%

Orlando, FL 1,094.2 992.7 1,037.5 44.1%

Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 91.2 82.9 86.5 43.8%

Altoona, PA 62.8 59.7 61.0 43.2%

Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 1,042.9 960.4 995.9 43.1%

Glens Falls, NY 56.8 53.4 54.8 43.0%

Elmira, NY 41.5 39.2 40.2 42.8%

Parkersburg-Marietta, WV-OH 73.4 68.5 70.6 42.8%

IHS Global Insight 34

Page 52: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 269.5 256.9 262.3 42.8%

Alexandria, LA 67.7 63.3 65.2 42.6%

Flagstaff, AZ 66.1 60.9 63.1 42.0%

Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 452.1 432.9 440.9 41.6%

Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 440.2 407.7 421.0 41.0%

Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 2,820.8 2,685.4 2,740.6 40.8%

St. Cloud, MN 103.1 96.7 99.3 40.3%

Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 644.7 603.6 620.0 39.9%

Springfield, OH 53.0 48.2 50.1 39.7%

Greenville, SC 321.2 292.1 303.6 39.5%

Lima, OH 56.0 51.7 53.4 39.2%

Greenville, NC 78.8 74.2 76.0 39.1%

Kansas City, MO-KS 1,020.0 959.2 983.0 39.1%

Iowa City, IA 91.4 88.5 89.6 38.5%

Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 868.6 796.7 824.4 38.5%

Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 263.3 251.7 256.1 38.5%

Bloomington, IN 84.5 79.7 81.5 38.1%

Mobile, AL 185.9 172.7 177.7 37.7%

Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 65.7 58.9 61.4 37.5%

Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH 49.3 43.6 45.7 37.5%

Bowling Green, KY 62.6 58.2 59.8 36.8%

St. Louis, MO-IL 1,364.3 1,282.6 1,312.7 36.8%

Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 173.0 153.6 160.7 36.6%

Decatur, IL 55.3 51.6 53.0 36.6%

Redding, CA 65.5 57.3 60.3 36.5%

Visalia-Porterville, CA 114.5 104.6 108.2 36.3%

Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 48.0 43.4 45.1 36.3%

Boise City-Nampa, ID 278.6 250.4 260.6 36.2%

Manchester-Nashua, NH 207.6 194.9 199.5 36.2%

South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 144.2 130.3 135.3 36.1%

Jackson, MS 263.0 250.0 254.7 36.1%

Indianapolis, IN 921.1 864.0 884.6 36.0%

Toledo, OH 328.4 294.8 306.5 34.8%

Greeley, CO 83.2 77.4 79.4 34.8%

Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 1,251.3 1,113.9 1,161.6 34.7%

Fond du Lac, WI 48.9 44.3 45.9 34.4%

Roanoke, VA 163.4 153.3 156.8 34.2%

Medford, OR 84.2 73.8 77.4 34.1%

Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 333.0 318.0 323.1 34.1%

Lancaster, PA 239.8 225.3 230.2 34.0%

Colorado Springs, CO 261.9 243.2 249.5 33.8%

Battle Creek, MI 59.2 54.2 55.9 33.7%

Farmington, NM 53.1 47.8 49.6 33.7%

Jacksonville, FL 636.0 578.8 598.0 33.7%

IHS Global Insight 35

Page 53: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Punta Gorda, FL 45.2 40.1 41.8 33.6%

Ames, IA 48.1 46.0 46.7 32.5%

Trenton-Ewing, NJ 244.3 234.4 237.6 32.5%

Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 19.8 19.2 19.4 32.1%

New Haven-Milford, CT 383.3 356.2 364.9 32.0%

Memphis, TN-MS-AR 641.2 581.8 600.3 31.1%

Greensboro-High Point, NC 373.1 336.9 348.1 30.8%

Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Miami Beach, FL 2,419.0 2,176.2 2,250.6 30.7%

Olympia, WA 103.9 96.7 98.9 30.6%

Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 120.9 113.5 115.8 30.2%

Topeka, KS 111.7 105.8 107.6 30.0%

Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 297.5 271.8 279.5 30.0%

Elkhart-Goshen, IN 130.1 95.0 105.4 29.8%

Ocean City, NJ 43.7 40.9 41.7 29.8%

Napa, CA 65.6 58.1 60.4 29.8%

Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 4,563.3 4,234.5 4,332.2 29.7%

Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 63.9 59.6 60.8 29.4%

Tuscaloosa, AL 98.9 92.0 94.0 29.2%

Asheville, NC 178.2 166.0 169.6 29.2%

Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 1,923.9 1,679.9 1,750.9 29.1%

Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 217.2 207.8 210.6 29.1%

Canton-Massillon, OH 173.8 158.2 162.7 28.7%

Athens-Clarke County, GA 86.0 79.5 81.4 28.1%

Duluth, MN-WI 134.0 127.4 129.3 28.0%

Spartanburg, SC 130.1 116.5 120.3 27.9%

Jackson, MI 59.4 52.8 54.6 27.9%

Coeur d'Alene, ID 58.2 51.8 53.6 27.8%

Santa Fe, NM 65.5 60.3 61.7 27.5%

Idaho Falls, ID 52.2 48.3 49.3 27.4%

Modesto, CA 161.0 144.4 148.9 27.4%

Macon, GA 102.6 94.6 96.7 26.9%

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 2,044.1 1,878.0 1,922.2 26.7%

Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 72.3 67.7 68.9 26.2%

San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 104.5 95.2 97.5 25.4%

Sumter, SC 40.3 36.1 37.1 25.2%

El Centro, CA 47.2 44.1 44.9 25.1%

Tucson, AZ 385.6 350.9 359.6 24.9%

Florence, SC 89.0 81.7 83.5 24.7%

Yuba City, CA 42.1 35.9 37.4 24.6%

Wichita, KS 308.7 282.9 289.3 24.6%

Monroe, LA 79.4 75.4 76.4 24.3%

Albany, GA 64.8 60.5 61.6 24.3%

Binghamton, NY 115.3 108.8 110.3 24.0%

Decatur, AL 59.5 52.7 54.4 24.0%

IHS Global Insight 36

Page 54: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Grand Junction, CO 66.5 57.1 59.3 23.5%

St. George, UT 55.0 45.5 47.7 23.5%

Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 1,075.4 986.7 1,007.0 22.9%

Sheboygan, WI 64.8 58.1 59.6 22.8%

Pocatello, ID 39.4 35.4 36.3 22.2%

Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 1,274.1 1,105.7 1,143.0 22.1%

Salinas, CA 129.5 119.9 122.0 22.0%

Salem, OR 153.4 138.9 142.1 21.7%

Chico, CA 76.8 69.3 70.9 21.6%

Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 234.3 193.7 202.4 21.5%

Rockford, IL 162.0 142.2 146.4 21.4%

Bellingham, WA 85.6 77.3 79.1 20.9%

Stockton, CA 211.6 186.5 191.7 20.7%

Wilmington, NC 148.6 134.2 137.1 20.7%

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 5,645.6 5,109.0 5,220.0 20.7%

Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 76.8 71.8 72.9 20.6%

Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 1,973.7 1,721.6 1,773.0 20.4%

Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 127.7 116.1 118.5 20.3%

Burlington, NC 61.6 55.0 56.4 20.3%

Cleveland, TN 42.0 38.6 39.2 20.1%

Longview, WA 38.5 34.4 35.2 19.6%

Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 2,458.6 2,239.9 2,282.5 19.5%

Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 721.4 667.7 678.1 19.4%

Barnstable Town, MA 95.6 88.3 89.7 19.4%

Gainesville, GA 79.1 70.9 72.4 19.1%

Salisbury, MD 56.0 52.0 52.8 19.1%

Albuquerque, NM 396.6 369.3 374.5 19.0%

Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 103.2 94.6 96.3 18.9%

Jackson, TN 62.6 57.2 58.3 18.9%

Wausau, WI 73.8 66.8 68.1 18.8%

Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 930.1 796.2 820.5 18.2%

Spokane, WA 220.1 203.1 206.1 17.9%

Dayton, OH 404.4 368.6 375.0 17.9%

Lewiston-Auburn, ME 27.7 25.0 25.5 17.8%

Richmond, VA 634.1 592.8 600.2 17.8%

Fort Smith, AR-OK 126.4 115.9 117.7 17.4%

Anderson, IN 41.9 39.1 39.5 17.3%

Port St. Lucie-Fort Pierce, FL 135.1 119.3 122.0 17.1%

Naples-Marco Island, FL 132.0 107.5 111.7 17.0%

Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 62.4 57.2 58.1 17.0%

Racine, WI 80.8 73.8 75.0 16.8%

Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 904.5 796.5 814.6 16.7%

Ocala, FL 107.5 89.6 92.6 16.6%

Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 173.8 156.2 159.1 16.6%

IHS Global Insight 37

Page 55: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Missoula, MT 57.5 51.4 52.4 16.5%

Monroe, MI 43.8 36.7 37.9 16.4%

Bend, OR 71.7 59.9 61.9 16.4%

Fresno, CA 308.1 277.4 282.2 15.7%

Morristown, TN 50.8 44.4 45.4 15.6%

Dothan, AL 63.5 55.8 57.0 15.6%

Yakima, WA 79.2 74.0 74.8 15.6%

Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice, FL 279.5 238.5 244.8 15.5%

Mansfield, OH 58.1 51.3 52.3 15.3%

Lake Havasu, AZ 55.0 45.1 46.6 14.9%

Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 65.4 58.1 59.2 14.9%

Baton Rouge, LA 377.2 360.7 363.1 14.8%

Gadsden, AL 38.5 34.9 35.4 14.6%

Vero Beach, FL 50.2 42.8 43.8 14.2%

Johnson City, TN 82.1 77.1 77.8 14.2%

Atlantic City, NJ 150.8 133.0 135.4 13.9%

Lakeland, FL 212.5 192.3 195.0 13.5%

Savannah, GA 161.7 148.3 150.1 13.1%

Terre Haute, IN 74.6 70.2 70.7 12.6%

Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 191.0 167.7 170.6 12.5%

Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 86.8 80.5 81.2 12.2%

Montgomery, AL 181.0 164.8 166.7 12.0%

St. Joseph, MO-KS 60.0 55.3 55.8 11.9%

Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 214.6 188.3 191.4 11.9%

Birmingham-Hoover, AL 533.2 488.1 493.4 11.7%

Gainesville, FL 134.5 125.8 126.8 11.6%

Eugene-Springfield, OR 157.6 139.4 141.5 11.6%

Pascagoula, MS 61.0 57.3 57.7 11.3%

Lawton, OK 44.2 43.1 43.2 10.6%

Janesville, WI 69.8 60.8 61.7 10.5%

Yuma, AZ 54.4 48.4 49.0 10.1%

Michigan City-La Porte, IN 47.1 41.7 42.2 10.0%

Rocky Mount, NC 66.2 59.0 59.7 9.8%

Muncie, IN 53.3 48.5 49.0 9.7%

Pine Bluff, AR 39.2 36.2 36.4 9.0%

Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 779.2 726.5 731.0 8.6%

Tallahassee, FL 178.6 168.0 168.9 8.5%

Anniston-Oxford, AL 53.7 48.4 48.8 7.8%

Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 163.7 140.9 142.6 7.4%

Valdosta, GA 57.0 51.2 51.6 7.4%

Prescott, AZ 64.9 52.5 53.4 7.2%

Rome, GA 42.1 37.7 38.0 7.0%

Dalton, GA 78.9 63.6 64.7 6.9%

Madera, CA 35.5 31.8 32.0 6.2%

IHS Global Insight 38

Page 56: Metro Economies Report_011812

Pre-Recession Recession Employment Share of JobsPeak Trough 2012Q4 Recovered

Table 4: Metro Area Jobs Regained Since the Great Recession, End of 2012(Number of Jobs, Thousands)

Goldsboro, NC 45.7 41.8 42.0 6.2%

Danville, IL 31.6 28.5 28.7 6.1%

Norwich-New London, CT 137.1 127.2 127.6 4.3%

Brunswick, GA 46.1 40.2 40.4 4.1%

Abilene, TX 68.0 61.7 61.9 4.1%

Wichita Falls, TX 62.2 57.3 57.5 3.0%

Flint, MI 151.3 131.1 131.7 2.8%

Champaign-Urbana, IL 114.2 105.1 105.4 2.7%

Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 174.3 160.3 160.5 1.9%

Reno-Sparks, NV 225.2 187.0 187.6 1.6%

Carson City, NV 33.3 28.2 28.2 0.0%

IHS Global Insight 39

Page 57: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

1 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 55,565 66,229 80,852 95,244 69,990 39,855

2 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 41,748 53,281 62,815 80,015 65,821 37,455

3 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 43,814 48,718 54,433 59,986 51,528 29,733

4 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 40,360 43,273 49,165 44,515 28,405 21,741

5 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 20,383 23,491 26,197 33,412 31,175 16,880

6 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 30,676 46,309 53,893 46,911 36,942 16,697

7 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 26,172 29,219 30,635 35,555 28,197 15,973

8 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 25,843 28,171 28,210 27,049 21,406 12,129

9 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 12,720 16,147 18,882 21,683 19,067 11,600

10 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 20,541 22,462 22,079 22,504 19,882 10,741

11 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 18,090 20,267 21,031 22,955 18,973 10,592

12 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 15,938 17,602 21,628 25,212 20,097 10,428

13 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 14,707 18,358 20,081 20,470 16,040 10,370

14 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 11,202 14,581 15,784 19,477 15,482 9,177

15 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 11,192 12,708 15,359 17,534 15,489 8,364

16 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 13,193 13,618 14,342 15,856 13,419 7,943

17 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 11,063 11,394 12,551 14,433 13,406 7,243

18 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 4,858 6,717 8,449 12,665 10,145 6,392

19 Pittsburgh, PA 6,899 8,277 9,750 11,309 8,343 6,006

20 St. Louis, MO-IL 7,217 9,612 10,481 11,601 9,027 5,559

21 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 7,087 8,263 8,751 9,726 8,013 5,173

22 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 6,058 7,511 9,205 9,879 9,226 5,161

23 Salt Lake City, UT 3,913 5,048 5,563 7,799 7,783 5,066

24 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 6,281 7,084 8,138 9,109 8,443 4,804

25 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 7,301 7,340 7,979 8,590 8,031 4,743

26 El Paso, TX 9,655 10,106 9,608 9,391 7,748 4,686

27 Peoria, IL 8,070 9,625 11,222 14,230 7,846 4,638

28 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 8,473 10,955 12,818 12,624 7,948 4,506

29 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 2,378 5,448 9,115 9,654 7,912 4,327

30 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 8,097 6,647 7,481 10,077 8,451 4,325

31 Austin-Round Rock, TX 7,687 8,205 8,429 7,406 5,964 3,985

32 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 6,088 6,992 7,075 7,885 7,542 3,912

33 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 6,019 6,849 7,303 7,544 6,505 3,562

34 Kansas City, MO-KS 4,915 5,682 6,706 7,800 5,889 3,521

35 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 4,424 4,739 5,711 7,154 6,464 3,291

36 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 3,724 4,745 5,512 5,662 5,316 3,137

37 San Antonio, TX 2,347 3,094 3,568 5,049 4,390 3,102

38 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 3,774 4,192 4,971 6,241 5,356 3,070

39 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 2,668 3,285 3,738 5,382 5,392 2,963

40 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 5,021 5,389 5,106 5,260 4,407 2,828

41 Laredo, TX 3,597 4,443 4,704 5,088 4,375 2,716

42 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 4,121 4,183 4,269 5,036 4,133 2,568

43 Rochester, NY 4,374 4,603 5,070 5,353 4,874 2,551

44 Denver-Aurora, CO 2,918 3,844 4,196 4,634 4,310 2,528

45 Baltimore-Towson, MD 4,975 4,822 5,170 5,595 4,809 2,509

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

IHS Global Insight 40

Page 58: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

46 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 3,144 3,408 4,143 5,255 3,543 2,499

47 Richmond, VA 3,733 4,531 4,952 5,162 4,097 2,439

48 Wichita, KS 3,915 5,263 5,712 6,846 4,955 2,396

49 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 3,168 3,631 4,042 4,578 3,736 2,100

50 Greensboro-High Point, NC 3,108 3,684 3,844 3,688 3,169 2,057

51 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 1,956 2,137 2,901 4,160 3,443 1,934

52 Baton Rouge, LA 2,234 2,933 3,333 4,121 3,312 1,916

53 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 2,924 3,398 3,319 3,608 3,502 1,916

54 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 3,850 3,375 3,308 4,556 3,205 1,915

55 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 3,455 4,232 4,984 5,194 3,562 1,904

56 Boise City-Nampa, ID 2,670 3,040 3,853 3,851 2,850 1,828

57 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 2,183 2,474 3,045 3,388 2,947 1,801

58 Savannah, GA 1,648 1,951 2,520 3,599 2,725 1,732

59 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 1,440 1,571 1,921 2,692 2,346 1,695

60 Columbus, OH 3,936 3,260 3,489 3,882 2,873 1,679

61 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 3,832 3,265 2,858 2,951 2,662 1,646

62 Akron, OH 2,982 3,499 3,956 4,049 2,958 1,560

63 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 1,858 2,197 2,409 2,631 2,195 1,414

64 Durham, NC 2,969 2,266 2,430 2,688 2,656 1,391

65 Tulsa, OK 2,061 2,238 2,440 2,878 2,441 1,389

66 Evansville, IN-KY 1,252 1,157 1,408 1,442 2,014 1,360

67 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 2,073 2,375 2,425 2,579 2,484 1,296

68 Dayton, OH 3,020 4,215 4,348 4,525 3,771 1,261

69 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 2,195 2,767 2,829 2,994 2,409 1,238

70 Lexington-Fayette, KY 2,096 2,509 2,671 2,491 2,260 1,237

71 Worcester, MA 2,912 2,707 2,475 2,864 2,036 1,233

72 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 1,662 1,724 1,881 2,279 2,004 1,228

73 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 1,433 2,014 2,366 2,659 2,595 1,206

74 Manchester-Nashua, NH 692 1,251 1,450 2,006 1,743 1,170

75 El Centro, CA 1,917 2,184 2,304 2,512 1,993 1,144

76 Lake Charles, LA 508 938 1,314 2,350 1,305 1,136

77 Knoxville, TN 1,372 2,011 2,094 2,313 1,887 1,109

78 Corpus Christi, TX 1,072 1,231 1,551 2,426 1,705 1,096

79 Tucson, AZ 3,015 3,257 2,728 2,878 1,978 1,077

80 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 1,414 1,615 1,843 2,006 1,456 1,052

81 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 824 1,441 1,537 2,024 1,805 1,046

82 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 1,502 1,413 1,879 2,317 1,924 1,028

83 Provo-Orem, UT 1,015 787 1,205 2,218 1,773 980

84 Raleigh-Cary, NC 975 1,759 2,130 2,077 1,799 967

85 Jacksonville, FL 1,201 1,446 1,709 1,973 1,634 952

86 Bakersfield, CA 1,179 1,395 1,594 1,805 1,778 949

87 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 493 542 735 1,190 1,211 935

88 Toledo, OH 1,768 1,998 2,159 2,642 1,411 931

89 Madison, WI 1,159 1,310 1,574 1,596 1,572 923

90 Charleston, WV 1,103 962 1,225 1,716 1,365 902

IHS Global Insight 41

Page 59: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

91 York-Hanover, PA 1,288 1,662 1,984 2,210 1,723 890

92 New Haven-Milford, CT 1,823 1,548 1,821 2,081 1,595 881

93 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 916 927 1,147 1,353 1,487 876

94 Racine, WI 1,365 1,484 1,651 2,128 1,539 875

95 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 642 912 1,090 1,209 926 869

96 Fresno, CA 1,538 1,600 1,862 1,999 1,660 867

97 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 1,611 1,996 1,921 2,218 2,235 863

98 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 890 1,316 1,611 1,609 1,038 841

99 Winston-Salem, NC 1,221 1,507 1,785 1,855 1,742 837

100 Syracuse, NY 1,847 1,992 1,987 2,008 1,315 828

101 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 1,205 1,408 1,522 1,555 1,185 815

102 Columbia, SC 1,456 1,143 1,048 1,483 1,363 787

103 Montgomery, AL 818 834 1,236 1,286 1,143 773

104 Reno-Sparks, NV 877 1,304 1,147 1,317 1,234 765

105 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 796 754 674 1,422 1,450 765

106 Victoria, TX 920 1,168 1,323 1,131 834 729

107 Mobile, AL 1,032 1,373 1,458 1,847 1,492 717

108 Canton-Massillon, OH 601 1,353 1,543 1,850 1,212 715

109 Colorado Springs, CO 1,968 2,227 1,826 1,932 1,281 679

110 Spartanburg, SC 808 950 1,424 1,325 1,118 669

111 Janesville, WI 195 803 1,034 1,452 1,243 659

112 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 717 1,052 1,182 1,168 1,023 655

113 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 1,288 1,120 1,169 1,251 1,187 641

114 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 516 887 1,373 1,384 940 630

115 Reading, PA 606 974 1,022 1,218 943 630

116 Rockford, IL 992 1,186 1,400 1,512 1,253 622

117 Kokomo, IN 1,445 1,458 1,413 1,260 759 605

118 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 838 988 1,213 1,122 965 605

119 Bellingham, WA 632 886 869 1,305 918 579

120 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 1,074 1,107 1,313 1,162 857 568

121 Ann Arbor, MI 1,010 1,171 1,238 1,085 903 560

122 Wilmington, NC 572 597 1,127 1,139 1,079 560

123 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 1,208 1,338 1,364 1,561 788 554

124 Modesto, CA 633 874 916 1,080 999 541

125 Oklahoma City, OK 1,004 869 828 1,234 988 536

126 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 706 793 880 851 855 530

127 Longview, WA 650 551 595 898 1,155 527

128 Appleton, WI 262 975 1,000 1,095 930 521

129 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 947 921 975 1,012 705 518

130 Lubbock, TX 365 843 860 1,017 530 512

131 Fort Wayne, IN 1,311 728 1,010 1,143 917 510

132 Chattanooga, TN-GA 540 710 809 1,053 661 504

133 Yakima, WA 404 478 695 829 801 495

134 Lancaster, PA 606 818 939 1,008 786 482

135 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 322 447 731 1,125 715 463

IHS Global Insight 42

Page 60: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

136 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 928 987 973 1,118 880 462

137 Springfield, MA 773 873 965 1,009 813 461

138 Visalia-Porterville, CA 321 481 580 735 572 458

139 Erie, PA 936 1,178 1,135 1,862 1,408 456

140 Greeley, CO 529 736 792 1,005 713 456

141 Rochester, MN 1,044 847 1,007 938 780 453

142 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 877 1,027 1,057 1,077 785 447

143 Decatur, AL 722 703 773 549 531 442

144 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 469 550 422 622 737 441

145 Boulder, CO 703 937 899 892 727 437

146 Huntsville, AL 1,105 1,252 1,053 1,079 1,137 437

147 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 787 828 789 875 667 428

148 Stockton, CA 629 707 757 812 789 427

149 Salinas, CA 498 573 696 778 718 419

150 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 1,189 1,250 1,323 1,411 1,694 418

151 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 545 693 753 795 740 414

152 Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 588 611 743 815 704 410

153 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 521 602 772 849 747 404

154 Champaign-Urbana, IL 470 497 601 642 661 403

155 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 576 669 665 720 626 402

156 Asheville, NC 592 665 713 792 682 393

157 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 729 826 957 1,007 811 393

158 Bloomington, IN 315 426 454 481 629 386

159 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 256 467 536 568 372 386

160 Spokane, WA 579 691 879 895 662 378

161 Lakeland, FL 375 393 572 695 649 374

162 Lincoln, NE 448 586 666 733 683 371

163 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 657 721 765 783 556 367

164 Lima, OH 254 295 818 685 487 366

165 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 624 687 786 1,035 782 364

166 Rocky Mount, NC 422 535 569 603 510 362

167 Salisbury, MD 159 229 336 459 452 357

168 Cedar Rapids, IA 587 654 817 910 735 354

169 Battle Creek, MI 511 534 538 552 529 350

170 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 383 459 631 740 658 348

171 Columbus, IN 303 911 1,016 1,072 549 346

172 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 453 573 615 679 623 343

173 Florence, SC 669 653 871 681 478 340

174 Roanoke, VA 524 545 575 669 582 338

175 St. Joseph, MO-KS 285 325 386 393 460 323

176 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 589 698 557 631 584 322

177 Anderson, SC 417 527 565 545 464 307

178 Las Cruces, NM 425 427 495 527 521 306

179 Utica-Rome, NY 484 545 579 652 495 302

180 Green Bay, WI 384 432 564 622 496 299

IHS Global Insight 43

Page 61: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

181 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 117 209 273 408 505 295

182 Brunswick, GA 398 448 458 512 498 292

183 La Crosse, WI-MN 436 512 606 692 600 286

184 Sheboygan, WI 426 442 501 590 478 282

185 Gainesville, GA 200 391 473 535 442 281

186 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 436 516 508 651 496 278

187 Albuquerque, NM 1,977 2,229 979 475 358 273

188 Jackson, MS 904 940 601 677 432 268

189 Binghamton, NY 427 488 498 432 340 264

190 Greenville, NC 261 437 380 410 398 261

191 Fargo, ND-MN 310 336 488 677 466 256

192 Lafayette, IN 632 539 564 676 469 253

193 Honolulu, HI 210 266 360 546 358 252

194 Longview, TX 334 268 299 427 357 247

195 Topeka, KS 284 366 400 446 442 243

196 Fond du Lac, WI 473 522 530 497 390 242

197 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 229 324 385 449 323 236

198 Lafayette, LA 376 519 587 763 657 234

199 Harrisonburg, VA 316 362 452 625 682 233

200 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 321 456 508 586 661 232

201 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 317 515 553 445 250 229

202 Duluth, MN-WI 373 393 620 819 318 227

203 Merced, CA 248 325 450 488 397 227

204 Salem, OR 211 263 285 332 325 225

205 Flint, MI 1,203 1,129 1,083 801 354 217

206 Dalton, GA 504 501 480 552 392 214

207 Yuba City, CA 258 271 298 401 314 207

208 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 151 225 266 408 348 202

209 Pittsfield, MA 498 462 464 389 257 199

210 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 193 268 273 288 272 198

211 Columbus, GA-AL 385 485 630 572 384 196

212 Fort Smith, AR-OK 268 339 358 388 318 195

213 Eau Claire, WI 445 427 340 417 379 195

214 Eugene-Springfield, OR 774 828 909 781 314 193

215 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 217 256 314 468 408 191

216 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 178 170 198 283 237 178

217 Sherman-Denison, TX 196 261 459 421 408 177

218 Wenatchee, WA 286 276 312 377 381 175

219 Olympia, WA 106 129 154 175 154 175

220 Naples-Marco Island, FL 164 182 257 324 313 174

221 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 10 131 202 246 230 173

222 Auburn-Opelika, AL 47 105 184 193 193 171

223 Lynchburg, VA 319 385 366 384 357 171

224 Macon, GA 437 163 168 246 254 170

225 Springfield, MO 306 279 331 372 293 168

IHS Global Insight 44

Page 62: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

226 Terre Haute, IN 366 368 373 371 297 165

227 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 274 447 500 502 245 163

228 Iowa City, IA 253 209 202 234 263 154

229 Monroe, MI 264 286 273 326 229 152

230 Corvallis, OR 602 342 352 357 241 151

231 Sioux Falls, SD 112 115 183 234 203 149

232 Port St. Lucie, FL 189 228 259 272 240 144

233 Springfield, OH 226 380 286 258 215 144

234 Waco, TX 135 193 191 266 230 143

235 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 109 127 195 227 204 143

236 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 97 267 307 341 218 140

237 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 59 208 243 320 272 139

238 Jackson, TN 379 254 255 258 202 138

239 Morristown, TN 254 288 338 381 252 135

240 Winchester, VA-WV 228 232 255 198 169 135

241 Charlottesville, VA 182 238 269 276 244 134

242 Fayetteville, NC 497 295 322 300 218 134

243 Jackson, MI 230 254 293 351 195 133

244 Logan, UT-ID 149 162 174 396 218 132

245 Lebanon, PA 85 184 184 215 195 131

246 Mansfield, OH 360 345 343 357 236 129

247 Coeur d'Alene, ID 46 60 72 172 215 129

248 Norwich-New London, CT 219 259 505 532 265 129

249 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 217 172 205 223 225 127

250 Hattiesburg, MS 74 80 111 159 183 126

251 Bowling Green, KY 340 294 556 340 239 124

252 Williamsport, PA 231 236 251 272 205 122

253 Burlington, NC 102 296 262 267 205 121

254 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 146 167 197 247 221 120

255 Wausau, WI 215 211 291 239 203 120

256 Columbia, MO 127 182 206 235 211 119

257 Idaho Falls, ID 127 168 165 218 214 117

258 Clarksville, TN-KY 303 324 310 311 158 116

259 Ithaca, NY 123 141 177 187 172 116

260 Gainesville, FL 187 192 227 285 233 115

261 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 95 128 175 256 161 109

262 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 155 216 187 405 328 109

263 Odessa, TX 57 171 183 156 188 109

264 Danville, IL 189 201 281 244 200 109

265 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 191 184 223 305 186 108

266 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 195 238 217 224 155 108

267 Bloomington-Normal, IL 122 187 345 330 143 107

268 Altoona, PA 165 157 150 198 158 107

269 Athens-Clarke County, GA 228 152 182 171 215 105

270 Kingston, NY 115 160 173 187 166 104

IHS Global Insight 45

Page 63: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

271 St. Cloud, MN 105 195 303 286 196 103

272 Amarillo, TX 154 165 221 281 144 103

273 Madera, CA 127 159 120 153 202 100

274 Ames, IA 123 150 187 285 160 100

275 Sandusky, OH 404 253 289 270 200 98

276 Glens Falls, NY 67 127 157 170 166 97

277 Anniston-Oxford, AL 161 171 147 214 174 94

278 Yuma, AZ 216 302 274 258 197 92

279 Napa, CA 117 181 194 219 161 91

280 State College, PA 134 187 259 271 159 89

281 Pine Bluff, AR 251 92 100 124 144 87

282 Joplin, MO 155 200 180 191 167 86

283 Cleveland, TN 167 191 173 143 141 86

284 Chico, CA 128 136 152 170 180 86

285 Ocala, FL 133 131 155 178 144 86

286 Albany, GA 158 278 167 88 93 86

287 Tyler, TX 175 206 181 147 130 83

288 Jefferson City, MO 144 165 175 221 182 81

289 Bay City, MI 192 113 96 125 137 81

290 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ n/a 32 38 43 138 76

291 Dothan, AL 125 115 81 122 179 75

292 San Angelo, TX 10 11 117 145 173 74

293 Carson City, NV 235 167 141 162 141 74

294 Wichita Falls, TX 185 212 225 190 163 71

295 Grand Forks, ND-MN 152 221 233 255 178 71

296 Muncie, IN 131 117 145 126 90 70

297 Flagstaff, AZ 70 71 81 107 134 68

298 Springfield, IL 62 53 66 87 87 68

299 Elmira, NY 551 137 141 155 127 68

300 Elizabethtown, KY 236 231 226 173 106 67

301 Valdosta, GA 81 95 92 73 101 67

302 Monroe, LA 121 112 95 89 82 65

303 Danville, VA 183 116 100 115 102 61

304 Tallahassee, FL 57 62 87 119 108 60

305 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 81 90 98 118 90 60

306 Barnstable Town, MA 80 92 102 138 117 57

307 Johnstown, PA 60 77 57 97 89 56

308 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 145 153 139 189 110 56

309 Dubuque, IA 108 125 138 157 128 55

310 Pueblo, CO 175 172 193 133 118 55

311 Johnson City, TN 79 126 131 120 82 55

312 Pocatello, ID 156 165 151 166 111 54

313 Medford, OR 115 173 149 97 108 53

314 Bend, OR 59 73 72 82 67 51

315 Goldsboro, NC 83 130 158 145 136 51

IHS Global Insight 46

Page 64: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

Table 5: Export Merchandise Value by Metropolitan Area, Mil $

316 Bangor, ME 123 212 161 115 113 51

317 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 151 139 169 135 97 49

318 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 65 90 93 99 102 46

319 Lawrence, KS 55 62 85 89 73 44

320 Great Falls, MT 27 37 47 89 69 43

321 Billings, MT 66 75 62 89 71 43

322 Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 117 108 183 391 139 43

323 Owensboro, KY 166 174 119 130 101 42

324 Anchorage, AK 152 370 417 246 214 40

325 Grand Junction, CO 81 70 66 76 68 40

326 St. George, UT 27 21 24 36 26 39

327 Jonesboro, AR 95 48 56 85 79 38

328 Sumter, SC 91 92 104 91 66 36

329 Casper, WY 36 52 51 70 79 35

330 Midland, TX 71 74 80 93 76 34

331 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 52 58 92 248 100 34

332 Redding, CA 58 49 61 72 55 33

333 Atlantic City, NJ 51 49 65 61 44 33

334 Alexandria, LA 62 65 59 76 79 32

335 Lewiston, ID-WA 42 38 45 66 52 31

336 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 61 161 148 195 106 31

337 Prescott, AZ 11 30 39 42 37 29

338 Rome, GA 205 127 134 148 79 28

339 College Station-Bryan, TX 67 36 49 55 45 28

340 Warner Robins, GA 67 42 32 161 86 27

341 Morgantown, WV 62 44 53 52 17 27

342 Dover, DE 80 63 74 85 57 24

343 Wheeling, WV-OH 13 208 60 59 62 22

344 Abilene, TX 28 46 53 54 39 21

345 Hot Springs, AR 22 58 47 38 42 20

346 Anderson, IN 81 103 44 56 38 18

347 Bismarck, ND 51 40 46 52 38 17

348 Palm Coast, FL n/a 26 47 48 40 16

349 Ocean City, NJ 44 41 30 38 42 16

350 Missoula, MT 19 20 30 50 25 15

351 Punta Gorda, FL 28 28 33 28 27 14

352 Cumberland, MD-WV 36 35 33 17 21 13

353 Rapid City, SD 100 149 131 101 31 13

354 Cheyenne, WY 13 13 16 27 22 12

355 Gadsden, AL 9 11 14 18 16 10

356 Santa Fe, NM 21 20 20 23 14 9

357 Farmington, NM 20 7 6 10 14 7

*Export data through the first half of 2010

IHS Global Insight 47

Page 65: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

%

1 Laredo, TX 71.1 83.4 83.9 86.0 77.7 92.7

2 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 45.7 49.5 52.8 57.3 47.5 59.9

3 Peoria, IL 55.3 60.4 66.2 80.5 45.0 51.6

4 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 31.8 32.6 41.1 56.0 45.8 50.3

5 El Centro, CA 51.2 54.5 54.2 54.4 43.6 48.5

6 Longview, WA 24.2 19.3 19.9 30.6 40.3 35.5

7 El Paso, TX 44.2 42.4 39.0 36.9 29.9 35.0

8 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 10.6 23.6 36.7 38.3 31.7 33.5

9 Kokomo, IN 36.0 35.7 32.2 34.4 22.3 33.5

10 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 41.4 33.8 29.4 29.2 26.1 31.1

11 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 28.6 30.7 31.6 34.5 27.9 30.5

12 Victoria, TX 21.6 24.7 26.8 22.3 18.2 30.5

13 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 21.2 22.0 25.4 31.4 21.2 29.0

14 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 9.5 10.0 12.5 18.5 18.8 27.9

15 Janesville, WI 4.1 15.7 20.2 29.5 26.4 27.4

16 Savannah, GA 14.5 15.7 19.4 27.8 21.4 26.9

17 Racine, WI 21.8 22.5 24.6 32.7 23.7 26.2

18 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 13.8 13.8 17.2 21.5 22.7 25.7

19 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 20.1 21.8 24.0 22.6 14.9 22.2

20 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 10.5 10.6 11.6 17.1 14.9 20.9

21 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 13.8 16.0 16.8 20.3 18.1 19.7

22 Lake Charles, LA 3.1 6.1 10.0 18.3 11.6 19.4

23 Brunswick, GA 13.3 13.9 14.0 15.4 15.4 18.4

24 Decatur, AL 17.0 15.5 16.2 11.4 11.3 18.4

25 Wichita, KS 17.5 20.6 20.5 24.7 19.1 18.4

26 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 13.1 15.6 16.8 17.6 14.0 18.3

27 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 7.1 10.1 12.5 18.1 15.2 18.2

28 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 9.2 13.3 15.5 17.6 12.4 18.0

29 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 19.7 17.7 18.3 18.4 12.4 17.8

30 Salisbury, MD 4.4 5.9 8.3 11.1 11.0 17.3

31 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 10.2 11.4 8.2 12.2 14.3 16.8

32 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 12.3 13.6 15.8 17.8 15.9 16.8

33 Columbus, IN 8.8 24.3 25.3 25.3 13.8 16.2

34 Lima, OH 6.0 6.8 19.0 16.4 11.2 16.2

35 Evansville, IN-KY 8.5 7.5 8.9 8.9 12.3 15.8

36 Salt Lake City, UT 7.5 8.8 8.9 12.0 12.1 15.3

37 Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA 11.5 13.1 13.5 15.7 13.0 14.9

38 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 19.9 20.2 18.9 17.9 14.4 14.8

39 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 10.8 11.6 12.8 14.2 13.3 14.8

40 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 11.7 15.7 17.0 19.0 21.2 14.7

41 St. Joseph, MO-KS 8.1 8.5 9.3 9.3 10.5 14.6

42 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 16.4 22.9 24.4 20.6 16.4 14.6

43 Boise City-Nampa, ID 11.3 12.6 15.0 15.2 11.5 14.4

44 Bellingham, WA 8.2 12.0 10.9 16.4 11.6 14.2

45 Battle Creek, MI 11.1 11.8 11.6 11.7 10.8 13.8

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

IHS Global Insight 48

Page 66: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

%

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

46 Yakima, WA 6.4 7.3 9.8 11.2 11.1 13.7

47 Rocky Mount, NC 8.2 10.1 10.9 11.5 9.6 13.5

48 Corpus Christi, TX 7.7 8.2 9.3 14.3 10.7 13.4

49 Provo-Orem, UT 8.8 6.1 8.4 15.2 12.3 13.3

50 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 8.6 9.3 9.9 12.8 12.3 13.2

51 Fond du Lac, WI 14.2 15.1 14.8 13.7 11.1 13.1

52 Anderson, SC 9.8 11.9 12.4 12.0 10.3 13.0

53 Spartanburg, SC 8.7 9.8 13.9 12.8 11.0 12.7

54 Greeley, CO 8.5 11.2 11.1 13.6 10.1 12.5

55 Greensboro-High Point, NC 10.5 11.9 11.7 11.1 9.6 12.0

56 Bloomington, IN 6.1 7.7 7.9 8.0 9.9 11.9

57 Charleston, WV 9.0 7.4 9.0 12.2 9.4 11.9

58 York-Hanover, PA 9.7 12.1 13.8 15.0 11.8 11.8

59 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 9.5 11.1 10.8 13.9 10.8 11.8

60 Akron, OH 11.7 13.4 14.5 14.8 11.1 11.4

61 Rochester, NY 10.6 10.7 11.8 12.4 11.1 11.3

62 Canton-Massillon, OH 4.8 10.8 12.1 14.1 9.7 11.2

63 Manchester-Nashua, NH 3.6 6.4 7.2 9.5 8.3 11.2

64 Sheboygan, WI 8.9 8.9 9.8 11.8 9.7 11.1

65 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 2.1 4.2 5.3 7.8 9.6 10.9

66 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 7.4 8.9 9.9 10.1 9.5 10.8

67 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 11.4 11.5 10.7 11.9 9.0 10.8

68 Lexington-Fayette, KY 10.4 11.8 12.1 11.2 10.2 10.7

69 Las Cruces, NM 9.7 9.2 9.9 10.2 9.4 10.7

70 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 7.6 8.5 10.4 9.9 8.8 10.7

71 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 12.0 10.1 10.0 10.6 9.9 10.6

72 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 9.0 9.7 11.4 13.0 10.5 10.6

73 Pittsburgh, PA 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.2 7.6 10.5

74 Appleton, WI 3.0 10.7 10.5 11.7 9.7 10.5

75 Montgomery, AL 6.2 6.0 8.6 8.8 7.8 10.4

76 Lubbock, TX 4.4 9.6 9.5 10.6 5.5 10.4

77 Sherman-Denison, TX 6.8 8.4 14.5 12.9 12.4 10.3

78 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 11.0 8.5 9.1 12.1 10.4 10.3

79 La Crosse, WI-MN 9.3 10.5 12.0 13.2 11.1 10.1

80 Rockford, IL 8.8 10.0 11.3 12.4 10.5 10.0

81 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 7.2 8.2 8.4 9.3 7.8 9.9

82 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 0.4 4.9 7.0 7.6 7.1 9.9

83 Erie, PA 11.1 13.5 12.4 19.8 15.5 9.8

84 Baton Rouge, LA 6.0 7.6 8.7 10.6 8.6 9.8

85 Rochester, MN 13.0 10.3 12.0 10.9 8.9 9.8

86 Wenatchee, WA 9.2 8.3 9.0 10.4 10.6 9.6

87 Florence, SC 10.4 9.7 12.2 9.7 6.8 9.6

88 Auburn-Opelika, AL 1.6 3.2 5.3 5.5 5.4 9.5

89 Austin-Round Rock, TX 11.6 11.2 11.0 9.2 7.5 9.4

90 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 11.2 9.3 8.9 11.9 8.1 9.4

IHS Global Insight 49

Page 67: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

%

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

91 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 8.7 8.5 8.6 9.3 7.9 9.3

92 Danville, IL 8.7 8.9 12.5 10.6 8.6 9.2

93 Mobile, AL 8.1 9.7 9.9 12.1 9.8 9.2

94 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 8.2 7.9 8.2 8.7 8.0 9.1

95 Champaign-Urbana, IL 6.6 6.6 7.5 7.5 7.6 9.1

96 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 9.0 9.6 9.0 9.9 9.0 9.0

97 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 4.5 5.2 5.9 8.3 8.4 9.0

98 Yuba City, CA 6.5 6.4 6.7 8.6 6.8 8.9

99 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 3.7 5.1 5.9 6.5 4.9 8.9

100 Gainesville, GA 3.4 6.6 7.6 8.3 7.0 8.8

101 St. Louis, MO-IL 6.2 8.1 8.4 9.0 7.1 8.6

102 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 5.8 7.1 7.6 8.1 7.7 8.6

103 Worcester, MA 11.3 10.1 9.0 10.1 7.3 8.5

104 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 9.0 10.4 12.0 12.3 8.2 8.5

105 Reading, PA 4.7 7.0 7.1 8.4 6.6 8.5

106 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 8.1 8.7 9.0 9.1 7.9 8.5

107 Monroe, MI 6.9 7.3 6.9 8.8 6.4 8.3

108 Visalia-Porterville, CA 3.2 4.7 5.0 6.4 5.2 8.1

109 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 6.6 6.9 7.4 8.0 7.2 8.1

110 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 5.6 7.4 8.4 9.3 9.0 8.1

111 Morristown, TN 7.8 8.6 10.1 11.6 7.9 8.1

112 Springfield, OH 6.6 10.8 8.1 7.3 6.0 8.1

113 Wilmington, NC 5.0 5.0 8.6 8.5 7.9 8.1

114 Greenville, NC 5.3 8.3 6.5 6.8 6.4 8.1

115 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 3.0 8.1 8.9 9.7 6.5 8.0

116 Dalton, GA 8.7 8.8 8.0 9.5 7.5 8.0

117 Kennewick-Richland-Pasco, WA 7.6 7.8 8.5 8.9 7.3 8.0

118 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 5.9 6.8 7.7 8.3 7.4 7.9

119 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 8.3 10.0 9.4 10.6 10.4 7.8

120 Logan, UT-ID 5.6 5.8 5.7 12.2 6.6 7.8

121 Richmond, VA 6.6 7.8 8.2 8.3 6.5 7.6

122 San Antonio, TX 3.6 4.4 4.7 6.4 5.6 7.6

123 Dayton, OH 9.3 12.7 13.0 13.6 11.7 7.6

124 Charleston-North Charleston, SC 6.2 6.7 7.0 7.5 5.4 7.6

125 Pittsfield, MA 9.6 8.9 9.0 7.4 4.9 7.6

126 Reno-Sparks, NV 4.9 6.7 5.3 6.2 6.2 7.6

127 Harrisonburg, VA 6.5 7.1 8.3 11.3 11.5 7.6

128 Knoxville, TN 5.2 7.3 7.4 7.9 6.6 7.5

129 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 7.0 8.5 8.6 9.4 7.5 7.5

130 Winston-Salem, NC 5.9 7.2 8.3 8.6 8.0 7.5

131 Merced, CA 4.6 5.8 7.0 7.9 6.8 7.5

132 Durham, NC 11.4 7.3 7.2 7.9 7.5 7.5

133 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 7.9 8.9 8.8 8.9 6.7 7.5

134 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 3.4 5.6 5.7 7.4 6.5 7.3

135 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 6.3 6.9 6.7 7.5 7.2 7.3

IHS Global Insight 50

Page 68: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

%

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

136 Mansfield, OH 9.1 8.7 8.9 9.3 6.6 7.2

137 Modesto, CA 4.5 5.9 6.0 7.1 6.6 7.1

138 Lebanon, PA 2.8 5.8 5.4 6.2 5.6 7.1

139 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 7.4 7.4 6.7 6.8 5.7 7.1

140 Toledo, OH 6.9 7.7 8.1 10.2 5.5 7.1

141 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 3.0 3.4 4.5 5.2 5.1 7.0

142 Corvallis, OR 16.0 7.8 7.9 8.0 5.7 6.9

143 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 6.9 7.3 7.2 7.6 6.4 6.8

144 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 7.1 7.7 7.8 9.2 5.0 6.8

145 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 4.3 5.2 5.8 6.5 5.7 6.7

146 Kansas City, MO-KS 5.3 5.9 6.6 7.5 5.7 6.7

147 Utica-Rome, NY 6.2 6.6 6.8 7.6 5.6 6.7

148 Tucson, AZ 10.7 10.6 8.3 8.7 6.2 6.7

149 Bakersfield, CA 5.0 5.3 5.5 6.0 6.4 6.5

150 Binghamton, NY 6.2 6.8 6.5 5.5 4.3 6.4

151 Williamsport, PA 7.0 6.9 7.2 7.8 5.8 6.4

152 Sandusky, OH 13.2 8.2 9.8 9.2 6.9 6.4

153 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 5.1 6.0 6.2 6.1 5.0 6.4

154 Lafayette, IN 9.2 7.6 7.5 8.8 6.1 6.4

155 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 5.2 5.7 6.7 7.7 5.8 6.3

156 Tulsa, OK 5.5 5.4 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.2

157 Eau Claire, WI 8.0 7.4 5.7 7.1 6.3 6.2

158 Ann Arbor, MI 5.9 6.7 6.8 6.1 5.0 6.1

159 Jackson, TN 8.9 5.8 5.8 5.7 4.6 6.1

160 Syracuse, NY 7.9 8.1 7.8 7.7 4.9 6.1

161 Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IL-IN-WI 5.5 5.9 5.9 6.8 5.5 6.0

162 Coeur d'Alene, ID 1.3 1.5 1.7 3.9 5.0 6.0

163 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 6.4 6.5 7.4 6.4 4.7 6.0

164 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 4.8 5.0 5.3 6.2 4.7 6.0

165 Idaho Falls, ID 4.1 4.9 4.4 5.6 5.6 5.9

166 Fresno, CA 5.9 5.7 6.4 6.7 5.7 5.9

167 Ithaca, NY 3.7 4.1 4.9 4.9 4.4 5.8

168 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 4.3 4.3 5.0 6.4 5.8 5.8

169 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 6.6 6.7 6.2 6.0 5.5 5.8

170 Terre Haute, IN 7.4 7.1 6.8 6.7 5.4 5.7

171 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 5.7 8.7 9.1 9.2 4.4 5.7

172 Asheville, NC 5.0 5.3 5.4 6.0 5.1 5.7

173 Fort Wayne, IN 8.2 4.3 5.7 6.6 5.3 5.6

174 Bay City, MI 7.3 4.2 3.5 4.5 4.9 5.6

175 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 6.0 6.8 5.1 5.7 5.2 5.6

176 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 3.6 3.7 4.3 5.5 4.9 5.6

177 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 1.3 4.5 5.2 6.6 5.5 5.6

178 Burlington, NC 2.5 6.8 5.8 6.0 4.8 5.6

179 Madera, CA 4.0 4.7 3.3 4.2 5.6 5.5

180 Pine Bluff, AR 8.9 3.1 3.3 4.0 4.7 5.5

IHS Global Insight 51

Page 69: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

%

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

181 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 2.1 3.5 3.9 4.2 2.7 5.5

182 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 3.9 4.3 4.6 4.3 4.4 5.4

183 Bowling Green, KY 8.8 7.1 12.8 7.5 5.4 5.4

184 Winchester, VA-WV 5.2 5.0 5.4 4.3 3.5 5.4

185 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 4.5 5.9 4.9 10.4 8.4 5.4

186 Jackson, MI 5.0 5.5 6.0 7.4 4.1 5.4

187 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 4.5 4.4 4.6 5.3 5.0 5.3

188 Carson City, NV 9.0 6.0 4.8 5.7 5.0 5.3

189 Longview, TX 4.7 3.4 3.4 4.5 4.1 5.3

190 Hattiesburg, MS 1.9 1.9 2.4 3.4 3.9 5.3

191 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 2.4 3.0 3.9 5.7 3.8 5.2

192 Madison, WI 3.9 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.6 5.2

193 Ames, IA 3.9 4.4 5.3 7.6 4.2 5.2

194 Colorado Springs, CO 9.0 9.7 7.6 7.8 5.1 5.2

195 Topeka, KS 3.6 4.5 4.6 5.0 4.8 5.2

196 Lincoln, NE 3.7 4.5 4.9 5.4 4.8 5.2

197 Anniston-Oxford, AL 4.9 5.0 4.0 5.6 4.7 5.1

198 Altoona, PA 4.5 4.1 3.7 4.9 3.8 5.1

199 Roanoke, VA 4.6 4.5 4.5 5.1 4.4 5.1

200 Lancaster, PA 3.5 4.6 5.1 5.4 4.2 5.0

201 Cedar Rapids, IA 5.0 5.6 6.2 7.1 5.4 5.0

202 Glens Falls, NY 2.0 3.5 4.3 4.5 4.4 5.0

203 Columbia, SC 5.4 4.0 3.4 4.8 4.4 4.9

204 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 2.3 3.8 5.7 5.6 3.8 4.9

205 Cleveland, TN 5.3 5.8 5.3 4.2 4.1 4.9

206 Boulder, CO 4.5 5.8 5.2 5.0 4.2 4.8

207 Chattanooga, TN-GA 2.9 3.6 3.9 5.1 3.3 4.8

208 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 1.9 2.5 3.9 6.2 3.9 4.8

209 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 4.1 4.3 4.1 4.3 3.8 4.7

210 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ 5.0 5.9 6.5 6.4 4.2 4.7

211 Elmira, NY 22.6 5.5 5.5 5.7 4.7 4.7

212 Salinas, CA 3.0 3.3 3.9 4.3 4.1 4.7

213 Duluth, MN-WI 4.3 4.5 6.8 8.8 3.4 4.7

214 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 4.8 5.0 4.8 5.5 4.5 4.7

215 Fargo, ND-MN 3.6 3.7 5.0 6.5 4.4 4.7

216 Charlotte-Gastonia-Concord, NC-SC 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.5 3.8 4.6

217 Macon, GA 5.9 2.2 2.3 3.2 3.4 4.5

218 Lakeland, FL 2.5 2.4 3.4 4.2 3.9 4.5

219 Stockton, CA 3.5 3.7 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.4

220 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 2.7 3.6 4.1 4.4 3.2 4.4

221 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 4.7 5.0 5.7 5.8 4.7 4.4

222 New Haven-Milford, CT 5.2 4.2 4.7 5.3 4.0 4.4

223 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 3.8 3.3 4.2 5.1 4.1 4.3

224 Wausau, WI 4.1 3.9 5.2 4.4 3.7 4.3

225 Huntsville, AL 6.7 7.1 5.7 5.6 5.7 4.2

IHS Global Insight 52

Page 70: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

%

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

226 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ n/a 0.8 0.9 1.1 3.9 4.2

227 Spokane, WA 3.8 4.2 5.0 5.1 3.7 4.2

228 Muncie, IN 4.1 3.6 4.4 3.8 2.7 4.2

229 Danville, VA 6.4 4.1 3.5 4.1 3.5 4.2

230 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 3.3 3.6 3.5 3.8 3.8 4.1

231 Iowa City, IA 4.2 3.2 3.0 3.3 3.6 4.1

232 Springfield, MA 3.8 4.2 4.5 4.5 3.7 4.1

233 Pocatello, ID 6.2 6.7 5.8 6.1 4.2 4.0

234 Lynchburg, VA 4.3 4.9 4.6 4.6 4.2 3.9

235 Olympia, WA 1.5 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.7 3.9

236 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 2.2 2.7 2.8 4.1 3.5 3.9

237 Green Bay, WI 2.9 3.1 3.9 4.3 3.3 3.9

238 San Angelo, TX 0.3 0.3 3.4 3.8 4.7 3.9

239 Fort Smith, AR-OK 3.0 3.6 3.7 3.9 3.3 3.9

240 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 3.9 4.1 4.1 4.2 3.0 3.8

241 Odessa, TX 1.5 3.7 3.3 2.6 3.5 3.8

242 Flint, MI 9.9 9.4 9.0 7.1 3.2 3.8

243 Yuma, AZ 4.9 6.4 5.4 5.2 4.0 3.7

244 Columbus, OH 4.7 3.8 3.9 4.3 3.2 3.6

245 Grand Forks, ND-MN 4.8 6.4 6.4 6.6 4.6 3.6

246 Salem, OR 2.0 2.3 2.4 2.7 2.6 3.6

247 Columbia, MO 2.3 3.1 3.3 3.7 3.3 3.5

248 Baltimore-Towson, MD 4.1 3.8 3.9 4.1 3.5 3.5

249 Orlando-Kissimmee, FL 2.4 2.5 2.9 3.3 2.9 3.5

250 Albany, GA 3.4 5.9 3.4 1.8 1.9 3.5

251 Raleigh-Cary, NC 2.3 3.8 4.1 3.9 3.3 3.4

252 Eugene-Springfield, OR 7.5 7.4 7.8 6.5 2.8 3.4

253 Waco, TX 2.0 2.7 2.5 3.4 2.8 3.4

254 Athens-Clarke County, GA 4.1 2.7 3.0 2.7 3.5 3.4

255 Columbus, GA-AL 3.9 4.7 5.8 5.1 3.4 3.3

256 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 3.1 2.3 2.7 2.9 3.0 3.3

257 Dothan, AL 2.9 2.6 1.8 2.7 4.0 3.3

258 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 1.7 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.3 3.2

259 Denver-Aurora, CO 2.2 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.2

260 Valdosta, GA 2.3 2.5 2.3 1.8 2.4 3.2

261 Jacksonville, FL 2.3 2.5 2.8 3.3 2.8 3.2

262 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 4.2 4.5 3.9 4.9 3.1 3.1

263 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.5 3.1

264 Joplin, MO 3.1 3.9 3.4 3.4 3.0 3.0

265 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 1.6 1.8 2.5 3.1 2.8 3.0

266 State College, PA 2.8 3.7 4.9 4.9 2.8 3.0

267 Flagstaff, AZ 1.8 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.9 2.9

268 Great Falls, MT 1.1 1.4 1.7 3.1 2.4 2.9

269 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 1.6 1.5 1.3 2.6 2.8 2.9

270 Charlottesville, VA 2.3 2.8 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.8

IHS Global Insight 53

Page 71: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

%

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

271 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 2.9 2.7 3.1 4.1 2.5 2.8

272 St. Cloud, MN 1.5 2.7 4.2 3.9 2.6 2.8

273 Johnstown, PA 1.7 2.1 1.5 2.5 2.3 2.8

274 Jefferson City, MO 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.9 3.1 2.7

275 Chico, CA 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.8 2.9 2.7

276 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 1.7 1.9 2.3 3.2 2.9 2.7

277 Elizabethtown, KY 6.0 5.5 5.4 4.0 2.3 2.7

278 Lafayette, LA 3.2 3.6 3.7 4.5 4.1 2.7

279 Naples-Marco Island, FL 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.4 2.7

280 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 2.1 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.5 2.6

281 Pueblo, CO 5.1 4.8 5.0 3.2 2.9 2.6

282 Goldsboro, NC 2.5 3.6 4.2 3.9 3.5 2.6

283 Napa, CA 1.8 2.7 2.8 3.1 2.3 2.6

284 Port St. Lucie, FL 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.2 2.6

285 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.5 5.2 2.5

286 Dubuque, IA 2.8 3.2 3.4 3.8 3.1 2.5

287 Wichita Falls, TX 3.8 4.0 4.0 3.1 2.9 2.5

288 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.5

289 Palm Coast, FL n/a 1.8 3.4 3.7 3.1 2.4

290 Ocala, FL 2.0 1.7 2.0 2.4 2.0 2.4

291 Springfield, MO 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.1 2.3

292 Lawrence, KS 1.8 1.9 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.3

293 St. George, UT 0.9 0.6 0.7 1.0 0.8 2.3

294 Sumter, SC 3.2 3.1 3.4 3.0 2.2 2.3

295 Bloomington-Normal, IL 1.6 2.3 4.1 4.0 1.6 2.3

296 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC 2.3 2.6 2.2 2.3 1.6 2.3

297 Clarksville, TN-KY 3.8 3.7 3.4 3.2 1.6 2.3

298 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.3 2.1 2.3

299 Jackson, MS 4.4 4.4 2.6 2.8 1.8 2.2

300 Gainesville, FL 2.2 2.1 2.3 2.9 2.3 2.2

301 Kingston, NY 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.8 2.1

302 Amarillo, TX 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.9 1.5 2.1

303 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 1.9 2.7 3.0 2.2 1.3 2.1

304 Monroe, LA 2.1 1.9 1.6 1.4 1.3 2.1

305 Tyler, TX 2.5 2.7 2.3 1.7 1.6 2.0

306 Owensboro, KY 4.5 4.3 3.0 3.1 2.4 2.0

307 Johnson City, TN 1.5 2.3 2.4 2.1 1.4 1.9

308 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.9 2.1 1.9

309 Oklahoma City, OK 2.1 1.7 1.5 2.1 1.8 1.9

310 Bangor, ME 2.5 4.1 3.0 2.2 2.1 1.9

311 Sioux Falls, SD 0.8 0.8 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.8

312 Jonesboro, AR 2.7 1.3 1.5 2.2 2.0 1.8

313 Norwich-New London, CT 1.8 1.9 3.6 3.7 1.9 1.8

314 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 0.9 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.2 1.8

315 Rome, GA 7.0 4.2 4.4 4.7 2.5 1.7

IHS Global Insight 54

Page 72: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010*

%

Table 6: Merchandise Exports as a Percentage of Gross Metropolitan Product

316 Medford, OR 1.9 2.7 2.3 1.5 1.8 1.7

317 Bend, OR 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.7

318 Grand Junction, CO 2.1 1.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7

319 Lewiston, ID-WA 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.8 1.4 1.6

320 Hot Springs, AR 0.9 2.3 1.9 1.5 1.7 1.6

321 Fayetteville, NC 3.9 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.3 1.5

322 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.5

323 Albuquerque, NM 5.9 6.5 2.8 1.4 1.0 1.4

324 Springfield, IL 0.8 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.9 1.4

325 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 1.6 4.1 3.6 4.6 2.5 1.4

326 Barnstable Town, MA 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.7 1.4 1.3

327 Panama City-Lynn Haven, FL 2.0 1.8 2.9 6.0 2.1 1.3

328 Redding, CA 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.1 1.3

329 Prescott, AZ 0.3 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 1.3

330 Alexandria, LA 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.5 1.6 1.3

331 Billings, MT 1.1 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.0 1.2

332 Anderson, IN 2.6 3.2 1.4 1.8 1.2 1.1

333 Casper, WY 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.2 1.0

334 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 1.7 1.5 1.8 1.4 1.0 1.0

335 Warner Robins, GA 1.5 0.9 0.6 3.2 1.6 1.0

336 Cumberland, MD-WV 1.6 1.5 1.4 0.7 0.8 1.0

337 Honolulu, HI 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.0

338 Tallahassee, FL 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.9

339 Morgantown, WV 1.5 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.3 0.9

340 Punta Gorda, FL 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9

341 College Station-Bryan, TX 1.3 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.8

342 Dover, DE 1.5 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.0 0.8

343 Wheeling, WV-OH 0.3 4.6 1.3 1.2 1.2 0.8

344 Ocean City, NJ 1.1 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.8

345 Abilene, TX 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.7 0.8

346 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 0.7 0.7 1.1 2.8 1.1 0.8

347 Gadsden, AL 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.7

348 Midland, TX 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.7

349 Bismarck, ND 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.8 0.7

350 Missoula, MT 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.6

351 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6

352 Atlantic City, NJ 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.5

353 Rapid City, SD 2.4 3.4 2.8 2.0 0.6 0.5

354 Cheyenne, WY 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.4

355 Anchorage, AK 0.7 1.6 1.7 0.9 0.8 0.3

356 Santa Fe, NM 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3

357 Farmington, NM 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3

*Export data through the first half of 2010

IHS Global Insight 55

Page 73: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank Imports Exports Total

1 New York City, NY 121,460 169,067 290,526

2 Los Angeles, CA 90,533 196,557 287,090

3 Houston-Galveston, TX 87,136 111,235 198,371

4 Detroit, MI 92,329 89,448 181,778

5 New Orleans, LA 60,997 113,326 174,323

6 Laredo, TX 70,650 89,791 160,441

7 Chicago, IL 27,123 102,692 129,814

8 Savannah, GA 36,739 56,996 93,735

9 Seattle, WA 50,271 42,943 93,214

10 San Francisco, CA 37,074 52,226 89,300

11 Miami, FL 50,822 31,931 82,753

12 Cleveland, OH 21,946 58,087 80,033

13 Buffalo, NY 35,180 31,475 66,655

14 Philadelphia, PA 12,871 51,120 63,991

15 El Paso, TX 25,837 35,054 60,891

16 Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 13,484 33,541 47,025

17 Charleston, SC 16,841 27,206 44,048

18 Baltimore, MD 15,051 23,662 38,713

19 San Diego, CA 13,698 24,853 38,551

20 Great Falls, MT 16,185 21,974 38,159

21 Ogdensburg, NY 14,143 22,882 37,025

22 Norfolk, VA 17,929 18,660 36,589

23 Port Arthur, TX 7,449 25,063 32,512

24 Pembina, ND 18,865 11,817 30,682

25 Mobile, AL 8,518 19,847 28,365

26 Tampa, FL 12,618 14,010 26,628

27 Anchorage, AK 11,531 11,431 22,962

28 Boston, MA 6,152 16,012 22,164

29 Nogales, AZ 7,871 13,730 21,601

30 Columbia-Snake, OR 10,880 9,181 20,061

31 Wilmington, NC 4,148 11,170 15,318

32 Minneapolis, MN 1,920 12,373 14,293

33 St. Louis, MO 496 13,387 13,883

34 Washington, DC 3,953 6,824 10,778

35 Honolulu, HI 5,561 4,196 9,757

Table 7: Largest Ports by US Customs DistrictYear-to-Date 2011Q3, Mil, $

IHS Global Insight 56

Page 74: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

1 Danville, VA 86,259 94,056 9.0 7,797

2 Elmira, NY 98,715 105,589 7.0 6,874

3 Joplin, MO 83,516 88,797 6.3 5,281

4 Bismarck, ND 143,011 150,332 5.1 7,321

5 Casper, WY 148,160 155,123 4.7 6,963

6 Gadsden, AL 85,028 88,886 4.5 3,858

7 Lewiston, ID-WA 149,344 155,459 4.1 6,115

8 Jefferson City, MO 107,598 111,941 4.0 4,343

9 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 78,544 81,712 4.0 3,168

10 Midland, TX 128,875 134,066 4.0 5,191

11 Cheyenne, WY 150,224 155,734 3.7 5,510

12 Dubuque, IA 121,821 126,114 3.5 4,293

13 Grand Forks, ND-MN 126,111 130,451 3.4 4,339

14 Pittsburgh, PA 115,776 119,751 3.4 3,975

15 Columbia, MO 119,258 123,320 3.4 4,061

16 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 79,838 82,453 3.3 2,615

17 Morristown, TN 98,443 101,614 3.2 3,171

18 Sherman-Denison, TX 84,906 87,617 3.2 2,712

19 Idaho Falls, ID 114,287 117,852 3.1 3,565

20 Lincoln, NE 118,846 122,414 3.0 3,568

21 Tyler, TX 106,023 109,129 2.9 3,106

22 St. Joseph, MO-KS 89,301 91,800 2.8 2,500

23 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 59,612 61,252 2.8 1,641

24 Hot Springs, AR 108,586 111,382 2.6 2,796

25 Utica-Rome, NY 120,032 122,887 2.4 2,855

26 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 102,590 104,943 2.3 2,354

27 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 115,619 118,213 2.2 2,594

28 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 211,028 215,723 2.2 4,696

29 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 104,448 106,761 2.2 2,313

30 Wichita Falls, TX 79,682 81,369 2.1 1,687

31 Cleveland, TN 106,377 108,497 2.0 2,120

32 Williamsport, PA 131,513 134,098 2.0 2,585

33 College Station-Bryan, TX 114,522 116,748 1.9 2,226

34 Billings, MT 156,697 159,726 1.9 3,028

35 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 126,706 129,053 1.9 2,347

36 Springfield, IL 106,581 108,460 1.8 1,880

37 Erie, PA 109,780 111,690 1.7 1,911

38 Missoula, MT 215,132 218,657 1.6 3,525

39 Rochester, NY 123,443 125,416 1.6 1,972

40 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 105,458 107,097 1.6 1,639

41 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 93,631 95,068 1.5 1,436

42 Sioux Falls, SD 122,997 124,840 1.5 1,843

43 Jonesboro, AR 76,588 77,733 1.5 1,145

44 Rapid City, SD 122,084 123,821 1.4 1,737

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

IHS Global Insight 57

Page 75: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

45 Owensboro, KY 89,955 91,204 1.4 1,249

46 Tuscaloosa, AL 111,228 112,733 1.4 1,505

47 Odessa, TX 76,447 77,464 1.3 1,017

48 Great Falls, MT 132,254 133,995 1.3 1,741

49 Fargo, ND-MN 142,167 144,033 1.3 1,866

50 Amarillo, TX 95,076 96,221 1.2 1,145

51 Wheeling, WV-OH 89,579 90,630 1.2 1,051

52 Ithaca, NY 165,363 167,252 1.1 1,889

53 Anchorage, AK 236,237 238,898 1.1 2,661

54 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 94,691 95,756 1.1 1,064

55 Abilene, TX 81,109 82,017 1.1 908

56 Syracuse, NY 122,603 123,935 1.1 1,332

57 Clarksville, TN-KY 104,700 105,827 1.1 1,127

58 Fairbanks, AK 195,342 197,356 1.0 2,014

59 Iowa City, IA 146,375 147,834 1.0 1,459

60 Cedar Rapids, IA 111,951 113,032 1.0 1,081

61 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 214,609 216,604 0.9 1,995

62 Fort Smith, AR-OK 81,205 81,944 0.9 739

63 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 92,703 93,504 0.9 801

64 Jackson, MS 98,096 98,865 0.8 769

65 Sandusky, OH 111,593 112,402 0.7 809

66 Warner Robins, GA 87,794 88,403 0.7 609

67 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 109,220 109,977 0.7 757

68 Charleston, WV 92,759 93,381 0.7 622

69 Glens Falls, NY 169,297 170,330 0.6 1,033

70 Boulder, CO 306,608 308,427 0.6 1,820

71 Victoria, TX 91,240 91,765 0.6 526

72 State College, PA 172,417 173,364 0.5 947

73 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 197,229 198,299 0.5 1,070

74 Harrisonburg, VA 166,495 167,332 0.5 837

75 Columbus, IN 116,652 117,216 0.5 564

76 Bloomington-Normal, IL 129,695 130,270 0.4 574

77 Elizabethtown, KY 118,326 118,828 0.4 502

78 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 91,259 91,641 0.4 381

79 Longview, TX 98,349 98,705 0.4 356

80 Lake Charles, LA 99,163 99,515 0.4 352

81 Evansville, IN-KY 94,163 94,487 0.3 324

82 San Angelo, TX 95,580 95,890 0.3 310

83 Springfield, MO 104,157 104,414 0.2 257

84 Waco, TX 94,930 95,145 0.2 215

85 Champaign-Urbana, IL 118,188 118,358 0.1 170

86 Ames, IA 133,704 133,855 0.1 151

87 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 109,198 109,320 0.1 121

88 Bloomington, IN 123,940 124,077 0.1 136

IHS Global Insight 58

Page 76: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

89 Baton Rouge, LA 127,010 127,149 0.1 139

90 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 122,660 122,770 0.1 110

91 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 107,404 107,457 0.0 53

92 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 172,246 172,298 0.0 52

93 Roanoke, VA 147,047 147,018 0.0 -29

94 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA 153,390 153,341 0.0 -49

95 Corpus Christi, TX 94,220 94,083 -0.1 -137

96 Mansfield, OH 88,556 88,425 -0.1 -131

97 Huntsville, AL 124,028 123,814 -0.2 -214

98 Lubbock, TX 87,349 87,175 -0.2 -174

99 Kansas City, MO-KS 119,752 119,496 -0.2 -257

100 Pocatello, ID 110,533 110,288 -0.2 -246

101 Lima, OH 94,065 93,814 -0.3 -251

102 Lynchburg, VA 139,589 139,157 -0.3 -432

103 Peoria, IL 112,412 112,059 -0.3 -353

104 Altoona, PA 104,526 104,194 -0.3 -332

105 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 97,930 97,604 -0.3 -326

106 Jackson, TN 86,365 86,060 -0.4 -305

107 Morgantown, WV 124,179 123,636 -0.4 -542

108 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 110,361 109,825 -0.5 -536

109 Palm Coast, FL 132,527 131,870 -0.5 -658

110 Decatur, IL 84,249 83,829 -0.5 -420

111 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 104,614 104,068 -0.5 -546

112 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 87,150 86,694 -0.5 -456

113 Bowling Green, KY 111,414 110,805 -0.5 -609

114 St. Louis, MO-IL 122,977 122,275 -0.6 -702

115 Laredo, TX 89,688 89,155 -0.6 -532

116 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 123,422 122,616 -0.7 -806

117 Rochester, MN 131,047 130,145 -0.7 -902

118 Knoxville, TN 126,545 125,582 -0.8 -962

119 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 157,317 156,058 -0.8 -1,259

120 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 134,592 133,512 -0.8 -1,080

121 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 110,433 109,534 -0.8 -899

122 Alexandria, LA 92,254 91,495 -0.8 -759

123 Ann Arbor, MI 152,083 150,806 -0.8 -1,277

124 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 161,372 159,912 -0.9 -1,460

125 Tallahassee, FL 123,311 122,153 -0.9 -1,158

126 Fayetteville, NC 112,097 110,902 -1.1 -1,195

127 Duluth, MN-WI 115,962 114,710 -1.1 -1,252

128 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 115,281 114,011 -1.1 -1,270

129 Columbus, OH 131,667 130,190 -1.1 -1,477

130 Danville, IL 67,973 67,204 -1.1 -769

131 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 82,520 81,581 -1.1 -939

132 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 96,584 95,450 -1.2 -1,134

IHS Global Insight 59

Page 77: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

133 Decatur, AL 93,820 92,703 -1.2 -1,117

134 Lebanon, PA 146,511 144,764 -1.2 -1,747

135 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 102,038 100,812 -1.2 -1,226

136 Lafayette, IN 111,034 109,618 -1.3 -1,416

137 Hattiesburg, MS 88,778 87,639 -1.3 -1,139

138 Anniston-Oxford, AL 80,954 79,902 -1.3 -1,052

139 Binghamton, NY 123,826 122,214 -1.3 -1,612

140 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 122,897 121,270 -1.3 -1,627

141 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 95,929 94,599 -1.4 -1,330

142 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 124,834 123,094 -1.4 -1,740

143 Honolulu, HI 597,884 589,279 -1.4 -8,605

144 Corvallis, OR 240,928 237,342 -1.5 -3,586

145 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 220,356 217,060 -1.5 -3,297

146 Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO 226,820 223,372 -1.5 -3,448

147 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 63,487 62,492 -1.6 -995

148 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 125,437 123,434 -1.6 -2,003

149 Fort Wayne, IN 94,580 92,994 -1.7 -1,586

150 Chattanooga, TN-GA 113,020 111,108 -1.7 -1,913

151 Colorado Springs, CO 189,635 186,360 -1.7 -3,275

152 Monroe, LA 96,672 94,944 -1.8 -1,728

153 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 330,556 324,585 -1.8 -5,971

154 Springfield, OH 95,065 93,345 -1.8 -1,719

155 Bay City, MI 80,796 79,327 -1.8 -1,469

156 Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, FL 120,286 118,048 -1.9 -2,237

157 Pine Bluff, AR 68,702 67,348 -2.0 -1,354

158 Battle Creek, MI 81,308 79,683 -2.0 -1,625

159 Toledo, OH 95,826 93,860 -2.1 -1,966

160 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 109,908 107,651 -2.1 -2,258

161 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 124,076 121,504 -2.1 -2,572

162 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 103,209 101,062 -2.1 -2,148

163 Macon, GA 82,523 80,793 -2.1 -1,730

164 Auburn-Opelika, AL 109,023 106,691 -2.1 -2,332

165 Johnstown, PA 95,846 93,794 -2.1 -2,052

166 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 107,275 104,933 -2.2 -2,342

167 Canton-Massillon, OH 100,695 98,479 -2.2 -2,216

168 La Crosse, WI-MN 130,180 127,250 -2.3 -2,930

169 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 103,548 101,165 -2.3 -2,382

170 Johnson City, TN 112,667 110,065 -2.3 -2,602

171 Akron, OH 113,147 110,509 -2.3 -2,639

172 Yakima, WA 150,044 146,517 -2.4 -3,527

173 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 205,856 200,980 -2.4 -4,876

174 Dayton, OH 105,438 102,939 -2.4 -2,499

175 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 127,867 124,810 -2.4 -3,057

176 Rocky Mount, NC 86,471 84,389 -2.4 -2,082

IHS Global Insight 60

Page 78: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

177 Lexington-Fayette, KY 139,387 136,011 -2.4 -3,376

178 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 141,675 138,234 -2.4 -3,441

179 Charlottesville, VA 225,275 219,770 -2.4 -5,506

180 Montgomery, AL 97,086 94,687 -2.5 -2,398

181 Logan, UT-ID 163,519 159,345 -2.6 -4,175

182 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 138,961 135,392 -2.6 -3,569

183 New Haven-Milford, CT 226,182 220,371 -2.6 -5,811

184 Lafayette, LA 125,788 122,546 -2.6 -3,242

185 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 121,023 117,886 -2.6 -3,137

186 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 393,194 382,276 -2.8 -10,918

187 Albany, GA 77,190 75,033 -2.8 -2,157

188 Winchester, VA-WV 145,447 141,372 -2.8 -4,076

189 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 126,521 122,968 -2.8 -3,553

190 Lancaster, PA 183,204 177,825 -2.9 -5,379

191 Terre Haute, IN 79,952 77,517 -3.0 -2,434

192 Topeka, KS 103,889 100,707 -3.1 -3,182

193 Greeley, CO 154,784 150,033 -3.1 -4,750

194 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 314,219 304,316 -3.2 -9,903

195 Springfield, MA 199,200 192,883 -3.2 -6,317

196 Eau Claire, WI 120,881 117,013 -3.2 -3,869

197 Fond du Lac, WI 130,149 125,952 -3.2 -4,197

198 Goldsboro, NC 101,900 98,590 -3.2 -3,310

199 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 168,755 163,183 -3.3 -5,573

200 El Paso, TX 103,123 99,709 -3.3 -3,414

201 Bend, OR 171,685 165,942 -3.3 -5,743

202 Madison, WI 190,817 184,396 -3.4 -6,421

203 Athens-Clarke County, GA 112,162 108,379 -3.4 -3,782

204 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 494,595 477,890 -3.4 -16,705

205 Pittsfield, MA 199,656 192,893 -3.4 -6,763

206 Norwich-New London, CT 216,900 209,484 -3.4 -7,416

207 Winston-Salem, NC 123,908 119,580 -3.5 -4,329

208 Savannah, GA 114,032 110,041 -3.5 -3,992

209 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 77,472 74,717 -3.6 -2,755

210 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 126,129 121,627 -3.6 -4,503

211 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 96,244 92,808 -3.6 -3,436

212 Greenville, NC 97,049 93,503 -3.7 -3,546

213 Oklahoma City, OK 104,742 100,901 -3.7 -3,841

214 Wichita, KS 102,016 98,253 -3.7 -3,763

215 St. Cloud, MN 134,009 129,050 -3.7 -4,959

216 Eugene-Springfield, OR 192,655 185,455 -3.7 -7,201

217 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 128,819 123,920 -3.8 -4,899

218 Burlington, NC 109,283 105,120 -3.8 -4,163

219 Baltimore-Towson, MD 235,192 226,176 -3.8 -9,016

220 Raleigh-Cary, NC 178,252 171,357 -3.9 -6,896

IHS Global Insight 61

Page 79: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

221 Anderson, IN 84,252 80,992 -3.9 -3,261

222 Mobile, AL 97,874 94,063 -3.9 -3,811

223 Richmond, VA 168,392 161,795 -3.9 -6,598

224 Cumberland, MD-WV 115,998 111,443 -3.9 -4,554

225 Pueblo, CO 118,048 113,391 -3.9 -4,657

226 Columbus, GA-AL 96,740 92,912 -4.0 -3,829

227 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 100,013 96,018 -4.0 -3,995

228 Dothan, AL 87,117 83,566 -4.1 -3,551

229 Barnstable Town, MA 302,966 290,426 -4.1 -12,541

230 Tulsa, OK 104,195 99,867 -4.2 -4,328

231 Wausau, WI 125,156 119,951 -4.2 -5,205

232 Reading, PA 165,048 158,158 -4.2 -6,890

233 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 236,820 226,847 -4.2 -9,973

234 Kokomo, IN 81,920 78,432 -4.3 -3,488

235 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 120,075 114,926 -4.3 -5,149

236 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 134,472 128,693 -4.3 -5,779

237 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 120,148 114,903 -4.4 -5,245

238 Green Bay, WI 129,862 124,191 -4.4 -5,671

239 Sumter, SC 90,372 86,425 -4.4 -3,947

240 Brunswick, GA 98,134 93,842 -4.4 -4,292

241 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 197,859 189,143 -4.4 -8,716

242 Appleton, WI 130,474 124,707 -4.4 -5,767

243 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 167,315 159,861 -4.5 -7,454

244 Pascagoula, MS 95,353 91,097 -4.5 -4,256

245 Jacksonville, FL 126,509 120,761 -4.5 -5,748

246 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 176,543 168,400 -4.6 -8,143

247 Santa Fe, NM 252,144 240,474 -4.6 -11,670

248 Monroe, MI 107,180 102,219 -4.6 -4,961

249 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 84,277 80,360 -4.6 -3,917

250 York-Hanover, PA 166,371 158,473 -4.7 -7,898

251 Rockford, IL 114,417 108,955 -4.8 -5,462

252 Flint, MI 68,702 65,413 -4.8 -3,289

253 Lawton, OK 105,576 100,512 -4.8 -5,064

254 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 112,689 107,235 -4.8 -5,454

255 Sheboygan, WI 130,759 124,426 -4.8 -6,332

256 Valdosta, GA 88,045 83,720 -4.9 -4,326

257 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 401,293 381,391 -5.0 -19,902

258 Farmington, NM 125,312 119,097 -5.0 -6,215

259 Jackson, MI 86,714 82,370 -5.0 -4,344

260 Las Cruces, NM 110,822 105,180 -5.1 -5,642

261 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 380,632 361,243 -5.1 -19,389

262 Worcester, MA 209,789 199,075 -5.1 -10,713

263 Florence, SC 83,084 78,815 -5.1 -4,269

264 Albuquerque, NM 170,095 161,157 -5.3 -8,938

IHS Global Insight 62

Page 80: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

265 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 111,601 105,737 -5.3 -5,864

266 Kingston, NY 208,533 197,551 -5.3 -10,982

267 Dalton, GA 81,261 76,981 -5.3 -4,280

268 Columbia, SC 112,652 106,682 -5.3 -5,971

269 Coeur d`Alene, ID 154,052 145,745 -5.4 -8,307

270 Greensboro-High Point, NC 119,196 112,738 -5.4 -6,457

271 Manchester-Nashua, NH 198,860 188,063 -5.4 -10,797

272 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 113,478 107,136 -5.6 -6,343

273 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 248,946 234,859 -5.7 -14,087

274 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 428,865 404,392 -5.7 -24,474

275 Rome, GA 86,103 81,176 -5.7 -4,927

276 Bangor, ME 129,281 121,840 -5.8 -7,440

277 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 107,666 101,464 -5.8 -6,203

278 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 216,955 204,411 -5.8 -12,544

279 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 253,990 239,294 -5.8 -14,696

280 Bellingham, WA 263,029 247,655 -5.8 -15,374

281 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 86,775 81,597 -6.0 -5,177

282 St. George, UT 155,919 146,604 -6.0 -9,316

283 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 157,517 147,980 -6.1 -9,537

284 Gainesville, FL 126,431 118,711 -6.1 -7,720

285 Flagstaff, AZ 176,986 166,168 -6.1 -10,818

286 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 172,524 161,975 -6.1 -10,548

287 Salt Lake City, UT 210,185 197,253 -6.2 -12,932

288 Janesville, WI 116,563 109,316 -6.2 -7,247

289 Lawrence, KS 151,041 141,521 -6.3 -9,520

290 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 189,109 177,149 -6.3 -11,960

291 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA 224,209 209,800 -6.4 -14,409

292 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 105,282 98,483 -6.5 -6,799

293 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 230,769 215,844 -6.5 -14,925

294 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 148,036 138,398 -6.5 -9,639

295 Provo-Orem, UT 185,640 173,297 -6.6 -12,342

296 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 98,134 91,547 -6.7 -6,587

297 Muncie, IN 77,174 71,968 -6.7 -5,206

298 Racine, WI 139,714 130,207 -6.8 -9,507

299 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 77,455 72,122 -6.9 -5,333

300 Spartanburg, SC 94,394 87,713 -7.1 -6,681

301 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 122,272 113,532 -7.1 -8,739

302 Prescott, AZ 134,982 125,284 -7.2 -9,698

303 Spokane, WA 174,261 161,606 -7.3 -12,656

304 Salem, OR 175,286 162,515 -7.3 -12,771

305 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 345,739 320,449 -7.3 -25,290

306 Asheville, NC 159,001 147,230 -7.4 -11,770

307 Jacksonville, NC 123,490 114,261 -7.5 -9,229

308 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 294,099 272,050 -7.5 -22,048

IHS Global Insight 63

Page 81: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

309 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 225,855 208,782 -7.6 -17,072

310 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 425,927 393,415 -7.6 -32,512

311 Punta Gorda, FL 106,713 98,566 -7.6 -8,147

312 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 107,269 99,017 -7.7 -8,252

313 Port St. Lucie, FL 111,084 102,355 -7.9 -8,729

314 Naples-Marco Island, FL 188,781 173,883 -7.9 -14,898

315 Longview, WA 169,529 155,935 -8.0 -13,594

316 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 232,457 213,805 -8.0 -18,652

317 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 123,523 113,600 -8.0 -9,923

318 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 109,252 100,459 -8.0 -8,792

319 Olympia, WA 217,589 200,023 -8.1 -17,566

320 Gainesville, GA 109,676 100,540 -8.3 -9,136

321 Yuma, AZ 89,278 81,759 -8.4 -7,520

322 Anderson, SC 99,079 90,732 -8.4 -8,346

323 Tucson, AZ 127,449 116,569 -8.5 -10,881

324 Ocean City, NJ 287,157 262,474 -8.6 -24,683

325 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 113,259 103,485 -8.6 -9,773

326 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 193,325 176,255 -8.8 -17,070

327 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 306,630 277,660 -9.4 -28,971

328 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 146,082 132,025 -9.6 -14,058

329 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 155,633 140,653 -9.6 -14,979

330 El Centro, CA 96,355 86,952 -9.8 -9,402

331 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 155,417 140,191 -9.8 -15,227

332 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 337,094 304,045 -9.8 -33,049

333 Grand Junction, CO 183,400 165,295 -9.9 -18,105

334 Wilmington, NC 164,130 147,650 -10.0 -16,480

335 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 305,966 274,233 -10.4 -31,733

336 Medford, OR 177,949 159,372 -10.4 -18,577

337 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 358,900 320,328 -10.7 -38,572

338 Chico, CA 169,737 151,473 -10.8 -18,264

339 Napa, CA 303,756 271,059 -10.8 -32,697

340 Boise City-Nampa, ID 125,439 111,559 -11.1 -13,880

341 Redding, CA 153,911 136,754 -11.1 -17,157

342 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 176,486 156,398 -11.4 -20,088

343 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 104,548 92,442 -11.6 -12,106

344 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 131,652 116,367 -11.6 -15,285

345 Ocala, FL 87,588 77,276 -11.8 -10,312

346 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 240,903 212,259 -11.9 -28,644

347 Visalia-Porterville, CA 117,412 103,301 -12.0 -14,111

348 Salisbury, MD 146,435 128,289 -12.4 -18,146

349 Reno-Sparks, NV 152,746 133,709 -12.5 -19,037

350 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 196,029 170,886 -12.8 -25,142

351 Salinas, CA 284,886 248,043 -12.9 -36,843

352 Fresno, CA 135,990 117,941 -13.3 -18,049

IHS Global Insight 64

Page 82: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 8: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Dollars, $)

353 Bakersfield-Delano, CA 112,279 97,230 -13.4 -15,050

354 Carson City, NV 155,798 134,502 -13.7 -21,297

355 Dover, DE 158,443 136,598 -13.8 -21,845

356 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 181,513 154,914 -14.7 -26,600

357 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 118,239 100,770 -14.8 -17,468

358 Stockton, CA 137,904 116,602 -15.4 -21,302

359 Modesto, CA 125,609 106,197 -15.5 -19,412

360 Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC 124,688 104,920 -15.9 -19,768

361 Madera-Chowchilla, CA 145,562 120,876 -17.0 -24,686

362 Yuba City, CA 129,906 104,614 -19.5 -25,292

363 Merced, CA 101,076 81,379 -19.5 -19,696

IHS Global Insight 65

Page 83: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

1 New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA 401,293 381,391 -5.0 -19,902

2 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA 380,632 361,243 -5.1 -19,389

3 Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 193,325 176,255 -8.8 -17,070

4 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 123,422 122,616 -0.7 -806

5 Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX 126,129 121,627 -3.6 -4,503

6 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 216,955 204,411 -5.8 -12,544

7 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 330,556 324,585 -1.8 -5,971

8 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL 157,517 147,980 -6.1 -9,537

9 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA 128,819 123,920 -3.8 -4,899

10 Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH 314,219 304,316 -3.2 -9,903

11 San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 428,865 404,392 -5.7 -24,474

12 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 176,486 156,398 -11.4 -20,088

13 Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI 94,691 95,756 1.1 1,064

14 Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ 123,523 113,600 -8.0 -9,923

15 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 294,099 272,050 -7.5 -22,048

16 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 167,315 159,861 -4.5 -7,454

17 San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA 345,739 320,449 -7.3 -25,290

18 St. Louis, MO-IL 122,977 122,275 -0.6 -702

19 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 111,601 105,737 -5.3 -5,864

20 Baltimore-Towson, MD 235,192 226,176 -3.8 -9,016

21 Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO 226,820 223,372 -1.5 -3,448

22 Pittsburgh, PA 115,776 119,751 3.4 3,975

23 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 236,820 226,847 -4.2 -9,973

24 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX 110,361 109,825 -0.5 -536

25 Sacramento--Arden-Arcade--Roseville, CA 196,029 170,886 -12.8 -25,142

26 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL 122,272 113,532 -7.1 -8,739

27 Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN 124,834 123,094 -1.4 -1,740

28 Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH 120,148 114,903 -4.4 -5,245

29 Kansas City, MO-KS 119,752 119,496 -0.2 -257

30 Las Vegas-Paradise, NV 118,239 100,770 -14.8 -17,468

31 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 494,595 477,890 -3.4 -16,705

32 Columbus, OH 131,667 130,190 -1.1 -1,477

33 Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 148,036 138,398 -6.5 -9,639

34 Indianapolis-Carmel, IN 127,867 124,810 -2.4 -3,057

35 Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 172,246 172,298 0.0 52

36 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC 197,859 189,143 -4.4 -8,716

37 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 157,317 156,058 -0.8 -1,259

38 Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA 232,457 213,805 -8.0 -18,652

39 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI 172,524 161,975 -6.1 -10,548

40 Jacksonville, FL 126,509 120,761 -4.5 -5,748

41 Memphis, TN-MS-AR 96,584 95,450 -1.2 -1,134

42 Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN 126,521 122,968 -2.8 -3,553

43 Oklahoma City, OK 104,742 100,901 -3.7 -3,841

44 Richmond, VA 168,392 161,795 -3.9 -6,598

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

IHS Global Insight 66

Page 84: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

45 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 220,356 217,060 -1.5 -3,297

46 New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA 141,675 138,234 -2.4 -3,441

47 Raleigh-Cary, NC 178,252 171,357 -3.9 -6,896

48 Salt Lake City, UT 210,185 197,253 -6.2 -12,932

49 Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY 126,706 129,053 1.9 2,347

50 Birmingham-Hoover, AL 109,908 107,651 -2.1 -2,258

51 Rochester, NY 123,443 125,416 1.6 1,972

52 Tucson, AZ 127,449 116,569 -8.5 -10,881

53 Honolulu, HI 597,884 589,279 -1.4 -8,605

54 Tulsa, OK 104,195 99,867 -4.2 -4,328

55 Fresno, CA 135,990 117,941 -13.3 -18,049

56 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT 393,194 382,276 -2.8 -10,918

57 Albuquerque, NM 170,095 161,157 -5.3 -8,938

58 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA 115,619 118,213 2.2 2,594

59 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY 197,229 198,299 0.5 1,070

60 New Haven-Milford, CT 226,182 220,371 -2.6 -5,811

61 Bakersfield-Delano, CA 112,279 97,230 -13.4 -15,050

62 Dayton, OH 105,438 102,939 -2.4 -2,499

63 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA 337,094 304,045 -9.8 -33,049

64 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ 189,109 177,149 -6.3 -11,960

65 El Paso, TX 103,123 99,709 -3.3 -3,414

66 Baton Rouge, LA 127,010 127,149 0.1 139

67 Worcester, MA 209,789 199,075 -5.1 -10,713

68 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX 59,612 61,252 2.8 1,641

69 Columbia, SC 112,652 106,682 -5.3 -5,971

70 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI 102,038 100,812 -1.2 -1,226

71 Greensboro-High Point, NC 119,196 112,738 -5.4 -6,457

72 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR 102,590 104,943 2.3 2,354

73 North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL 124,076 121,504 -2.1 -2,572

74 Akron, OH 113,147 110,509 -2.3 -2,639

75 Knoxville, TN 126,545 125,582 -0.8 -962

76 Springfield, MA 199,200 192,883 -3.2 -6,317

77 Stockton, CA 137,904 116,602 -15.4 -21,302

78 Charleston-North Charleston-Summerville, SC 146,082 132,025 -9.6 -14,058

79 Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY 248,946 234,859 -5.7 -14,087

80 Syracuse, NY 122,603 123,935 1.1 1,332

81 Colorado Springs, CO 189,635 186,360 -1.7 -3,275

82 Toledo, OH 95,826 93,860 -2.1 -1,966

83 Greenville-Mauldin-Easley, SC 113,478 107,136 -5.6 -6,343

84 Wichita, KS 102,016 98,253 -3.7 -3,763

85 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL 113,259 103,485 -8.6 -9,773

86 Boise City-Nampa, ID 125,439 111,559 -11.1 -13,880

87 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL 84,277 80,360 -4.6 -3,917

88 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA 122,660 122,770 0.1 110

IHS Global Insight 67

Page 85: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

89 Madison, WI 190,817 184,396 -3.4 -6,421

90 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre, PA 134,592 133,512 -0.8 -1,080

91 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 97,930 97,604 -0.3 -326

92 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA 87,150 86,694 -0.5 -456

93 Ogden-Clearfield, UT 176,543 168,400 -4.6 -8,143

94 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA 161,372 159,912 -0.9 -1,460

95 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL 107,269 99,017 -7.7 -8,252

96 Jackson, MS 98,096 98,865 0.8 769

97 Provo-Orem, UT 185,640 173,297 -6.6 -12,342

98 Chattanooga, TN-GA 113,020 111,108 -1.7 -1,913

99 Lancaster, PA 183,204 177,825 -2.9 -5,379

100 Modesto, CA 125,609 106,197 -15.5 -19,412

101 Portland-South Portland-Biddeford, ME 205,856 200,980 -2.4 -4,876

102 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC 168,755 163,183 -3.3 -5,573

103 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL 104,548 92,442 -11.6 -12,106

104 Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA 305,966 274,233 -10.4 -31,733

105 Winston-Salem, NC 123,908 119,580 -3.5 -4,329

106 Lexington-Fayette, KY 139,387 136,011 -2.4 -3,376

107 Spokane, WA 174,261 161,606 -7.3 -12,656

108 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO 107,275 104,933 -2.2 -2,342

109 Lansing-East Lansing, MI 96,244 92,808 -3.6 -3,436

110 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL 110,433 109,534 -0.8 -899

111 Visalia-Porterville, CA 117,412 103,301 -12.0 -14,111

112 Springfield, MO 104,157 104,414 0.2 257

113 York-Hanover, PA 166,371 158,473 -4.7 -7,898

114 Reno-Sparks, NV 152,746 133,709 -12.5 -19,037

115 Corpus Christi, TX 94,220 94,083 -0.1 -137

116 Port St. Lucie, FL 111,084 102,355 -7.9 -8,729

117 Asheville, NC 159,001 147,230 -7.4 -11,770

118 Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA 358,900 320,328 -10.7 -38,572

119 Flint, MI 68,702 65,413 -4.8 -3,289

120 Huntsville, AL 124,028 123,814 -0.2 -214

121 Salinas, CA 284,886 248,043 -12.9 -36,843

122 Fort Wayne, IN 94,580 92,994 -1.7 -1,586

123 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA 181,513 154,914 -14.7 -26,600

124 Killeen-Temple-Fort Hood, TX 103,209 101,062 -2.1 -2,148

125 Mobile, AL 97,874 94,063 -3.9 -3,811

126 Reading, PA 165,048 158,158 -4.2 -6,890

127 Brownsville-Harlingen, TX 63,487 62,492 -1.6 -995

128 Canton-Massillon, OH 100,695 98,479 -2.2 -2,216

129 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA 104,448 106,761 2.2 2,313

130 Manchester-Nashua, NH 198,860 188,063 -5.4 -10,797

131 Salem, OR 175,286 162,515 -7.3 -12,771

132 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX 82,520 81,581 -1.1 -939

IHS Global Insight 68

Page 86: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

133 Anchorage, AK 236,237 238,898 1.1 2,661

134 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL 105,458 107,097 1.6 1,639

135 Peoria, IL 112,412 112,059 -0.3 -353

136 Montgomery, AL 97,086 94,687 -2.5 -2,398

137 Fayetteville, NC 112,097 110,902 -1.1 -1,195

138 Tallahassee, FL 123,311 122,153 -0.9 -1,158

139 Trenton-Ewing, NJ 253,990 239,294 -5.8 -14,696

140 Wilmington, NC 164,130 147,650 -10.0 -16,480

141 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC 107,666 101,464 -5.8 -6,203

142 Evansville, IN-KY 94,163 94,487 0.3 324

143 Eugene-Springfield, OR 192,655 185,455 -3.7 -7,201

144 Savannah, GA 114,032 110,041 -3.5 -3,992

145 Rockford, IL 114,417 108,955 -4.8 -5,462

146 Ann Arbor, MI 152,083 150,806 -0.8 -1,277

147 Ocala, FL 87,588 77,276 -11.8 -10,312

148 Kalamazoo-Portage, MI 104,614 104,068 -0.5 -546

149 Naples-Marco Island, FL 188,781 173,883 -7.9 -14,898

150 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI 100,013 96,018 -4.0 -3,995

151 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA 109,220 109,977 0.7 757

152 Roanoke, VA 147,047 147,018 0.0 -29

153 Green Bay, WI 129,862 124,191 -4.4 -5,671

154 Charleston, WV 92,759 93,381 0.7 622

155 Lincoln, NE 118,846 122,414 3.0 3,568

156 Fort Collins-Loveland, CO 211,028 215,723 2.2 4,696

157 Fort Smith, AR-OK 81,205 81,944 0.9 739

158 Utica-Rome, NY 120,032 122,887 2.4 2,855

159 Columbus, GA-AL 96,740 92,912 -4.0 -3,829

160 Boulder, CO 306,608 308,427 0.6 1,820

161 Lubbock, TX 87,349 87,175 -0.2 -174

162 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH 92,703 93,504 0.9 801

163 Spartanburg, SC 94,394 87,713 -7.1 -6,681

164 Erie, PA 109,780 111,690 1.7 1,911

165 Duluth, MN-WI 115,962 114,710 -1.1 -1,252

166 Clarksville, TN-KY 104,700 105,827 1.1 1,127

167 Lafayette, LA 125,788 122,546 -2.6 -3,242

168 Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 225,855 208,782 -7.6 -17,072

169 Norwich-New London, CT 216,900 209,484 -3.4 -7,416

170 Myrtle Beach-North Myrtle Beach-Conway, SC 124,688 104,920 -15.9 -19,768

171 Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV 155,633 140,653 -9.6 -14,979

172 San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA 306,630 277,660 -9.4 -28,971

173 Holland-Grand Haven, MI 122,897 121,270 -1.3 -1,627

174 Gainesville, FL 126,431 118,711 -6.1 -7,720

175 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 425,927 393,415 -7.6 -32,512

176 Kennewick-Pasco-Richland, WA 153,390 153,341 0.0 -49

IHS Global Insight 69

Page 87: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

177 Cedar Rapids, IA 111,951 113,032 1.0 1,081

178 Merced, CA 101,076 81,379 -19.5 -19,696

179 Greeley, CO 154,784 150,033 -3.1 -4,750

180 Laredo, TX 89,688 89,155 -0.6 -532

181 Olympia, WA 217,589 200,023 -8.1 -17,566

182 Lynchburg, VA 139,589 139,157 -0.3 -432

183 Bremerton-Silverdale, WA 230,769 215,844 -6.5 -14,925

184 Amarillo, TX 95,076 96,221 1.2 1,145

185 Gulfport-Biloxi, MS 103,548 101,165 -2.3 -2,382

186 Binghamton, NY 123,826 122,214 -1.3 -1,612

187 Yakima, WA 150,044 146,517 -2.4 -3,527

188 Waco, TX 94,930 95,145 0.2 215

189 Topeka, KS 103,889 100,707 -3.1 -3,182

190 Champaign-Urbana, IL 118,188 118,358 0.1 170

191 Macon, GA 82,523 80,793 -2.1 -1,730

192 College Station-Bryan, TX 114,522 116,748 1.9 2,226

193 Sioux Falls, SD 122,997 124,840 1.5 1,843

194 Appleton, WI 130,474 124,707 -4.4 -5,767

195 Tuscaloosa, AL 111,228 112,733 1.4 1,505

196 Chico, CA 169,737 151,473 -10.8 -18,264

197 Barnstable Town, MA 302,966 290,426 -4.1 -12,541

198 Longview, TX 98,349 98,705 0.4 356

199 Las Cruces, NM 110,822 105,180 -5.1 -5,642

200 Burlington-South Burlington, VT 214,609 216,604 0.9 1,995

201 Tyler, TX 106,023 109,129 2.9 3,106

202 Springfield, IL 106,581 108,460 1.8 1,880

203 Fargo, ND-MN 142,167 144,033 1.3 1,866

204 Prescott, AZ 134,982 125,284 -7.2 -9,698

205 Houma-Bayou Cane-Thibodaux, LA 115,281 114,011 -1.1 -1,270

206 Florence, SC 83,084 78,815 -5.1 -4,269

207 Medford, OR 177,949 159,372 -10.4 -18,577

208 Charlottesville, VA 225,275 219,770 -2.4 -5,506

209 Lafayette, IN 111,034 109,618 -1.3 -1,416

210 Bellingham, WA 263,029 247,655 -5.8 -15,374

211 Lake Charles, LA 99,163 99,515 0.4 352

212 Lake Havasu City-Kingman, AZ 98,134 91,547 -6.7 -6,587

213 Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI 77,472 74,717 -3.6 -2,755

214 Johnson City, TN 112,667 110,065 -2.3 -2,602

215 Yuma, AZ 89,278 81,759 -8.4 -7,520

216 Elkhart-Goshen, IN 105,282 98,483 -6.5 -6,799

217 Racine, WI 139,714 130,207 -6.8 -9,507

218 Bloomington, IN 123,940 124,077 0.1 136

219 Athens-Clarke County, GA 112,162 108,379 -3.4 -3,782

220 Greenville, NC 97,049 93,503 -3.7 -3,546

IHS Global Insight 70

Page 88: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

221 St. Cloud, MN 134,009 129,050 -3.7 -4,959

222 Anderson, SC 99,079 90,732 -8.4 -8,346

223 Rochester, MN 131,047 130,145 -0.7 -902

224 Jacksonville, NC 123,490 114,261 -7.5 -9,229

225 Kingston, NY 208,533 197,551 -5.3 -10,982

226 Gainesville, GA 109,676 100,540 -8.3 -9,136

227 Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL 138,961 135,392 -2.6 -3,569

228 Monroe, LA 96,672 94,944 -1.8 -1,728

229 Redding, CA 153,911 136,754 -11.1 -17,157

230 El Centro, CA 96,355 86,952 -9.8 -9,402

231 Joplin, MO 83,516 88,797 6.3 5,281

232 Columbia, MO 119,258 123,320 3.4 4,061

233 Terre Haute, IN 79,952 77,517 -3.0 -2,434

234 Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI 77,455 72,122 -6.9 -5,333

235 Bloomington-Normal, IL 129,695 130,270 0.4 574

236 Panama City-Lynn Haven-Panama City Beach, FL 120,286 118,048 -1.9 -2,237

237 Waterloo-Cedar Falls, IA 107,404 107,457 0.0 53

238 Oshkosh-Neenah, WI 120,075 114,926 -4.3 -5,149

239 Yuba City, CA 129,906 104,614 -19.5 -25,292

240 Abilene, TX 81,109 82,017 1.1 908

241 Dover, DE 158,443 136,598 -13.8 -21,845

242 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA 125,437 123,434 -1.6 -2,003

243 Pascagoula, MS 95,353 91,097 -4.5 -4,256

244 Eau Claire, WI 120,881 117,013 -3.2 -3,869

245 Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH 95,929 94,599 -1.4 -1,330

246 Jackson, MI 86,714 82,370 -5.0 -4,344

247 Pueblo, CO 118,048 113,391 -3.9 -4,657

248 Janesville, WI 116,563 109,316 -6.2 -7,247

249 Punta Gorda, FL 106,713 98,566 -7.6 -8,147

250 Billings, MT 156,697 159,726 1.9 3,028

251 Bend, OR 171,685 165,942 -3.3 -5,743

252 Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, NJ 155,417 140,191 -9.8 -15,227

253 Albany, GA 77,190 75,033 -2.8 -2,157

254 Niles-Benton Harbor, MI 109,198 109,320 0.1 121

255 State College, PA 172,417 173,364 0.5 947

256 Alexandria, LA 92,254 91,495 -0.8 -759

257 Decatur, AL 93,820 92,703 -1.2 -1,117

258 Bangor, ME 129,281 121,840 -5.8 -7,440

259 Iowa City, IA 146,375 147,834 1.0 1,459

260 Hanford-Corcoran, CA 131,652 116,367 -11.6 -15,285

261 Rocky Mount, NC 86,471 84,389 -2.4 -2,082

262 Madera-Chowchilla, CA 145,562 120,876 -17.0 -24,686

263 Burlington, NC 109,283 105,120 -3.8 -4,163

264 Monroe, MI 107,180 102,219 -4.6 -4,961

IHS Global Insight 71

Page 89: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

265 Wichita Falls, TX 79,682 81,369 2.1 1,687

266 Jefferson City, MO 107,598 111,941 4.0 4,343

267 Wheeling, WV-OH 89,579 90,630 1.2 1,051

268 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL 93,631 95,068 1.5 1,436

269 Dothan, AL 87,117 83,566 -4.1 -3,551

270 Grand Junction, CO 183,400 165,295 -9.9 -18,105

271 Santa Fe, NM 252,144 240,474 -4.6 -11,670

272 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD 91,259 91,641 0.4 381

273 Hattiesburg, MS 88,778 87,639 -1.3 -1,139

274 Dalton, GA 81,261 76,981 -5.3 -4,280

275 Johnstown, PA 95,846 93,794 -2.1 -2,052

276 Warner Robins, GA 87,794 88,403 0.7 609

277 Auburn-Opelika, AL 109,023 106,691 -2.1 -2,332

278 Valdosta, GA 88,045 83,720 -4.9 -4,326

279 Coeur d`Alene, ID 154,052 145,745 -5.4 -8,307

280 St. George, UT 155,919 146,604 -6.0 -9,316

281 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL 109,252 100,459 -8.0 -8,792

282 Springfield, OH 95,065 93,345 -1.8 -1,719

283 Napa, CA 303,756 271,059 -10.8 -32,697

284 Midland, TX 128,875 134,066 4.0 5,191

285 Morristown, TN 98,443 101,614 3.2 3,171

286 Odessa, TX 76,447 77,464 1.3 1,017

287 Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR 79,838 82,453 3.3 2,615

288 Battle Creek, MI 81,308 79,683 -2.0 -1,625

289 Flagstaff, AZ 176,986 166,168 -6.1 -10,818

290 Wausau, WI 125,156 119,951 -4.2 -5,205

291 La Crosse, WI-MN 130,180 127,250 -2.3 -2,930

292 Lebanon, PA 146,511 144,764 -1.2 -1,747

293 Morgantown, WV 124,179 123,636 -0.4 -542

294 Idaho Falls, ID 114,287 117,852 3.1 3,565

295 Anderson, IN 84,252 80,992 -3.9 -3,261

296 Pittsfield, MA 199,656 192,893 -3.4 -6,763

297 Farmington, NM 125,312 119,097 -5.0 -6,215

298 Winchester, VA-WV 145,447 141,372 -2.8 -4,076

299 Glens Falls, NY 169,297 170,330 0.6 1,033

300 Lawton, OK 105,576 100,512 -4.8 -5,064

301 Rapid City, SD 122,084 123,821 1.4 1,737

302 Logan, UT-ID 163,519 159,345 -2.6 -4,175

303 St. Joseph, MO-KS 89,301 91,800 2.8 2,500

304 Bowling Green, KY 111,414 110,805 -0.5 -609

305 Altoona, PA 104,526 104,194 -0.3 -332

306 Harrisonburg, VA 166,495 167,332 0.5 837

307 Salisbury, MD 146,435 128,289 -12.4 -18,146

308 Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV 78,544 81,712 4.0 3,168

IHS Global Insight 72

Page 90: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

309 Elizabethtown, KY 118,326 118,828 0.4 502

310 Goldsboro, NC 101,900 98,590 -3.2 -3,310

311 Mansfield, OH 88,556 88,425 -0.1 -131

312 Jonesboro, AR 76,588 77,733 1.5 1,145

313 Sherman-Denison, TX 84,906 87,617 3.2 2,712

314 Anniston-Oxford, AL 80,954 79,902 -1.3 -1,052

315 Muncie, IN 77,174 71,968 -6.7 -5,206

316 Mount Vernon-Anacortes, WA 240,903 212,259 -11.9 -28,644

317 Cleveland, TN 106,377 108,497 2.0 2,120

318 Williamsport, PA 131,513 134,098 2.0 2,585

319 Jackson, TN 86,365 86,060 -0.4 -305

320 Sheboygan, WI 130,759 124,426 -4.8 -6,332

321 Victoria, TX 91,240 91,765 0.6 526

322 Owensboro, KY 89,955 91,204 1.4 1,249

323 Kankakee-Bradley, IL 121,023 117,886 -2.6 -3,137

324 Brunswick, GA 98,134 93,842 -4.4 -4,292

325 San Angelo, TX 95,580 95,890 0.3 310

326 Wenatchee-East Wenatchee, WA 224,209 209,800 -6.4 -14,409

327 Michigan City-La Porte, IN 112,689 107,235 -4.8 -5,454

328 Lawrence, KS 151,041 141,521 -6.3 -9,520

329 Decatur, IL 84,249 83,829 -0.5 -420

330 Bismarck, ND 143,011 150,332 5.1 7,321

331 Missoula, MT 215,132 218,657 1.6 3,525

332 Sumter, SC 90,372 86,425 -4.4 -3,947

333 Bay City, MI 80,796 79,327 -1.8 -1,469

334 Lewiston-Auburn, ME 134,472 128,693 -4.3 -5,779

335 Danville, VA 86,259 94,056 9.0 7,797

336 Lima, OH 94,065 93,814 -0.3 -251

337 Gadsden, AL 85,028 88,886 4.5 3,858

338 Cumberland, MD-WV 115,998 111,443 -3.9 -4,554

339 Longview, WA 169,529 155,935 -8.0 -13,594

340 Fond du Lac, WI 130,149 125,952 -3.2 -4,197

341 Ithaca, NY 165,363 167,252 1.1 1,889

342 Pine Bluff, AR 68,702 67,348 -2.0 -1,354

343 Fairbanks, AK 195,342 197,356 1.0 2,014

344 Grand Forks, ND-MN 126,111 130,451 3.4 4,339

345 Kokomo, IN 81,920 78,432 -4.3 -3,488

346 Ocean City, NJ 287,157 262,474 -8.6 -24,683

347 Palm Coast, FL 132,527 131,870 -0.5 -658

348 Rome, GA 86,103 81,176 -5.7 -4,927

349 Hot Springs, AR 108,586 111,382 2.6 2,796

350 Dubuque, IA 121,821 126,114 3.5 4,293

351 Cheyenne, WY 150,224 155,734 3.7 5,510

352 Pocatello, ID 110,533 110,288 -0.2 -246

IHS Global Insight 73

Page 91: Metro Economies Report_011812

Rank 2010Q4 2011Q4 % Difference

Table 9: Median Existing Home Prices by Metro Area

(Ranked by Population, Dollars, $)

353 Ames, IA 133,704 133,855 0.1 151

354 Elmira, NY 98,715 105,589 7.0 6,874

355 Corvallis, OR 240,928 237,342 -1.5 -3,586

356 Great Falls, MT 132,254 133,995 1.3 1,741

357 Danville, IL 67,973 67,204 -1.1 -769

358 Sandusky, OH 111,593 112,402 0.7 809

359 Columbus, IN 116,652 117,216 0.5 564

360 Casper, WY 148,160 155,123 4.7 6,963

361 Hinesville-Fort Stewart, GA 86,775 81,597 -6.0 -5,177

362 Lewiston, ID-WA 149,344 155,459 4.1 6,115

363 Carson City, NV 155,798 134,502 -13.7 -21,297

IHS Global Insight 74