michael calabrese's presentation at emerging communication conference & awards 2009 europe
TRANSCRIPT
The Myth of Spectrum Scarcity:
Hybrid Networks and Opportunistic Access to the Airwaves
eCommEmerging Communications Conference
October 30, 2009
Michael CalabreseDirector, Wireless Future ProgramNew America [email protected]
Wireless Future Program
Mission: Pervasive Connectivity• Universal• Ubiquitous• Affordable
Means: Openness• Open Spectrum• Open Networks• Open Technologies
Exploding Demand for Mobile Data- iPhone: Canary in the Spectrum Coal Mine
- Total US mobile data demand: 16 to 366 terabytes by 2013 (Cisco)
Estimated Growth in Monthly Data Consumption from Smartphones
0.00
10000.00
20000.00
30000.00
40000.00
50000.00
60000.00
70000.00
80000.00
90000.00
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Year
Ter
abyt
es Data
Text
Voice
“The spectrum is completely, unbelievably underutilized. It’s terribly inefficient and grossly unfair
to rural America”– Tri-County Telephone Co-Op, Wyoming
More Conventional Wisdom:Meet Mobile Data Demand
with Spectrum Auctions
US Wireless Industry (CTIA): Petitions FCC for 800 Additional MHz of exclusively-licensed spectrum
This is based on ITU Projections that advanced market economies require total allocations of roughly 1,300 MHz by 2015 and 1,720 by 2020 (vs. 500 MHz today in U.S.)
ITU Spectrum Requirements for Competitive Markets is Higher Still
Source: ITU, Estimated total spectrum requirements for future development of IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced (2006).
More Spectrum is Just One Part of the Solution to Exploding
Mobile Data Demand
Increase spectrum access Shrink cell sizes (spectrum re-use) More effective use of wired backhaul
(offload data traffic) More efficient/cooperative wireless
architectures and technologies
Exclusively-Licensed, Hub-Spoke, Tower-Based Model is
Not Sustainable . . . Clearing incumbents off 800+ MHz not feasible
Physical limits on cell capacity- ITU estimate assumes 4G at 75% of theoretical limit (Shannon’s Law)
Limits on how close carrier-owned transmitters and backhaul can be brought to individual users
- Total U.S. cell sites increased only 14% over past two years
. . . Nor Desirable . . . Most mobile data should flow short
distances over shared spectrum to consumer-owned or shared backhaul
Consumers should not pay for data transport over expensive carrier spectrum/infrastructure
Carriers evolve into ‘quality of service’ component of hybrid networks
- Consumers pay only for needed mobility, remote access and latency-sensitive aps
Carriers are Increasingly Offloading Data Traffic to WiFi
Signs of the Times: AT&T: 25.6 million WiFi connections
through June > double all of 2008. T-Mobile offering office and home service
that default to WiFi, potentially replacing wired lines (but charging for ‘free’!)
Devicescape survey: 81% of smartphone users prefer using WiFi for mobile browsing/email
Far More Spectrum Can be Freed Via Opportunistic Access by
Cognitive Radios Tragedy of the Anti-Commons:
Spectrum is infinitely renewable – bandwidth not used at any place/time is wasted.
A band can be ‘white’ (underutilized) and shared on a number of dimensions:• Geographically (not in use everywhere)• Time (not continually in use)• Spatially (in the air, not on the ground)• Angle of Reception (directional or ‘smart
antennas’)
Underlay: Sharing Underutilized Frequency Band
Example: WiFi Backhaul Shares Upper 5 GHz with Military Radar – Listen Before Talk Sensing
TV WS: Opportunistic Access to ‘Swiss Cheese’ Spectrum
Majority of interleaved (TV WS) channels become useable on opportunistic, license-exempt basis if:-- Cognitive Radio: Occupied channel detection and frequency hopping via . . .
- Geolocate database: Lists permitted channels, or- Listen-Before-Talk Sensing
-- Low Power: - FCC (40 mW for mobile on channels adjacent to
DTV)- OfCom (variable power when rely on geo-database)
Some Benefits:- Spectrum efficiency: frequency re-use at low power- National availability (even in large Metro markets)- No permanent assignment channels: bands and access
conditions changeable with CR
FCC’s TV White Space Order Adopted Nov. 4, 2008: 5-0 Vote Unlicensed access to all unassigned
channels- Mobile: 40mW (or 50mW non-adjacent)- Fixed Access: 4 W (non-adjacent only)
Devices must have GPS & Check Location Against Online Database of Licensed transmitters
- Reliance on sensing/DFS unresolved
UK and EU ‘Digital Dividend’ OfCom (July ‘09): Adopts license-exempt
access to ‘interleaved’ channels by CRs relying on geo-permission database
ECC/CEPT Working Group (Oct. ‘09): Draft Report on technical and operational requirements for CR systems in the ‘white spaces’ (WG-SE43)
“[T]he digital dividend presents an opportunity to introduce a more flexible spectrum approach, giving Europe a competitive edge over other regions.” --EC Consultation Document, July ‘09
Future: Opportunistic Access
Let ‘Smart Radios’ Operate Around the Dinosaurs
• Clarify License Rights: Protect only incumbent services, not unused spectrum capacity
• Open unused spectrum for non-interfering use, millisecond to millisecond
Rules of the Road: Like Public Highways and Ocean Shipping Lanes, Exclusive Licenses are Inefficient for
Low-Power Use of the Airwaves
Next Steps to Open Spectrum
Inventory the Airwaves• In U.S., legislation pending to survey assigned
and actual uses, frequency-by-frequency, to identify ‘white spaces’ and where sharing is possible
• Actual use measurement & monitoring is key – and increasingly affordable
Add Available Frequencies to TV
White Space Database• Devices with GPS and/or sensing can identify open
frequencies locality by locality.• Software defined radio allows devices to
dynamically hop across a very wide range of frequencies: opportunistic access.
Market-Based Sticks & Carrots:
• Levy annual lease fees on all government and private license holders that do not open unused capacity for opportunistic sharing.
• At a minimum, require license holders to take micro-payments for unused bandwidth.