microscopic interpretation of the excited k = 0 + , 2 + bands of deformed nuclei

31
NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa Microscopic interpretation of the excited K = 0 + , 2 + bands of deformed nuclei Gabriela Popa Rochester Institute of Technology Collaborators: J. P. Draayer Louisiana State University J. G. Hirsch UNAM, Mexico A. Georgieva Bulgarian Academy of Science

Upload: mura

Post on 12-Jan-2016

22 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Microscopic interpretation of the excited K  = 0 + , 2 + bands of deformed nuclei. Gabriela Popa Rochester Institute of Technology Collaborators: J. P. Draayer Louisiana State University J. G. Hirsch UNAM, Mexico Georgieva Bulgarian Academy of Science. Outline.  Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Microscopic interpretation of the excited K = 0+, 2+ bands

of deformed nuclei

Gabriela PopaRochester Institute of Technology

Collaborators:J. P. Draayer

Louisiana State University

J. G. HirschUNAM, Mexico

A. GeorgievaBulgarian Academy of Science

Page 2: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Outline

IntroductionIntroductionWhat we know about the nucleusWhat we know about the nucleusCharacteristic energy spectraCharacteristic energy spectraTheoretical Model Theoretical Model Configuration spaceConfiguration spaceSystem HamiltonianSystem HamiltonianResults Results Conclusion and future workConclusion and future work

Page 3: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

Nuclear Physics Summer School June 15-27, 2003 Gabriela Popa

Chart of the nuclei

N (number of neutrons)

Z (protons)

Page 4: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Nuclear vibrations

-vibration

3

1

2

3

-vibration1

2

Page 5: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

0, 2, 4

00246

8

6

8

20246

23456

spherical deformed

E = n E = I(I+1)/(2)

Schematic level schemes of spherical and deformed nuclei

Page 6: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Experimental energy levels

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

152Nd156Sm160Gd164Dy 168Er172Yb176Hf

2

21

02

0g.s.

Number of Pairs of Particles

Page 7: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

Nuclear Physics Summer School June 15-27, 2003 Gabriela Popa

ExperimentalExperimental energy spectra of 162Dy

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

162Dy

g.s.

K = 2

K = 0K = 0

2+4+

6+

8+

0+

2+4+6+

0+

4+

7+

2+

4+

6+

8+

3+

5+

7+

6+

5+1+

1+

1+

2+4+6+8+

0+

K = 4Ene

rgy

[MeV

]

Page 8: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Single particle energy levels

1s

1p

2s

1g

N = 3

N = 2

N = 1

N = 0

N = 4

1d

l·l l·s

d5/2

d3/2s1/2

1f2p

3s2d

1hN = 5

s1/2

p1/2p3/2

f7/2f5/2

p5/2

f9/2p1/2

d3/2d5/2

h11/2s1/2

g7/2

Page 9: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Valence space: U() U()

total normal unique

=32 n =20 u

=12 =44 n

=30 u=14

Particle distributions: protons: neutrons: total 152Nd 10 6 4 10 6 4 (12,0) (18,0) (30, 0)156Sm 12 6 6 12 6 6 (12,0) (18,0) (30, 0) 160Gd 14 8 6 14 8 6 (10,4) (18,4) (28, 4) 164Dy 16 10 6 16 10 6 (10,4) (20,4) (30, 4) 168Er 18 10 8 18 10 8 (10,4) (20,4) (30, 4) 172Yb 20 12 8 20 12 8 (36,0) (12,0) (24, 0) 176Hf 22 14 8 22 14 8 (8,30) (0,12) (8, 18)

Particle distribution

Page 10: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Wave Function

| = Ci | i

|i = |{; } (,)KL S; JM

( = , ) = n [f ] ( , ), S

( , ) ( , ) = (, )

Page 11: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Coupling proton and neutron irreps to total (coupled) SU(3):

+++- ++++-+-+-

m,l +-2m+l++m-2l)k

with the multiplicity denoted by k = k(m,l)

Direct Product Coupling

Page 12: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

(10,4) (18,4) (28,8) (29,6) (30,4) (31,2) (32,0) (26,9) (27,7)(10,4) (20,0) (30,4)(10,4) (16,5) (26,9) (27,7)(10,4) (17,3) (27,7)(12,0) (18,4) (30,4)(12,0) (20,0) (32,0)(8,5) (18,4) (26,9) (27,7)(9,3) (18,4) (27,7)(7,7) (18,4) (25,11) (26,9) (27,7)(7,7) (20,0) (27,7)(4,10) (18,4) (22,14)

(,)(,) (,)

21st SU(3) irreps corresponding to the highest

C2 values were used in 160Gd

Page 13: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Tricks

Invariants InvariantsRot(3) SU(3)Tr(Q2) C2

Tr(Q3) C3 ~+ + + + =tan+

Page 14: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

SU(3) conserving Hamiltonian:

H = Q•Q + a L2 + b KJ2 + asym C2 + a3 C3

this Hamiltonian becomes ...

+ one-body and two-body terms

+ Hs.p.Hs.p.

G HPG HP

Rewriting

H = Hsp

+Hsp+G HP

+G HP+Q•Q

+ a L2 + b KJ2 + asym C2 + a3 C3

.

System Hamiltonian

Page 15: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Parameters of the Pseudo-SU(3) Hamiltonian

Fit to experiment(fine tuning): a, b, asym and a3

= 0.0637 = 0.60

= 0.0637 = 0.60

From systematics: = 35/A 5/3 MeVG= 21/A MeVG= 19/A MeVh = 41/A 1/3 MeV

Page 16: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

K0+

K+

K0

2

+

160Gd

0+

6+

0+

2+

2+

2+

4+

4+

8+

6+

3+

8+

7+

6+

4+

5+

8+

Exp. Th. Exp. Th. Exp. Th.

Energy spectrum for 160Gd

Page 17: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Coupling proton and neutron irreps to total (coupled) SU(3):

+++- ++++-+-+-

m,l +-2m+l++m-2l)k

Twist

Scissors

Scissors + Twist

… Orientation of the - system is quantized with the multiplicity denoted by k = k(m,l)

Protons

Neutrons

Direct Product Coupling

Page 18: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Nucleus B(M1) mode

160 ,162Dy (10,4) (18,4) (28,8) ( 29, 6) 0.56 t( 26, 9) 1.77 s(27; 7)1 1.82 s+t(27; 7)2 0.083 t+s

164 Dy (10,4) (20,4) (30,8) (31,6) 0.56 t(28,9) 1.83 s(29,7) 1.88 s+t(29,7) 0.09 t+s

() () () ()1+

M1 Transition Strengths [ 2N]

in the Pure Symmetry Limit of the

Pseudo SU(3) Model

Page 19: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

2.2 3.0 3.7 4.5

Th.Exp.

164Dy

B(M

1,

0+ -

> 1+)

[n2 ]

Energy [MeV]

f)

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

164 Dy

e)K = 2

K = 0 K = 0

2+4+

6+

0+2+4+

6+

0+

2+4+6+

0+

2+4+

0+

2+4+

0+

2+4+6+

0+

2+

4+6+

3+5+

2+4+6+

3+5+

g.s.

c)

Ene

rgy

[MeV

]Exp. Th. Exp. Th. Exp. Th. Exp. Th.

Energy levels of 164Dy

… and M1 Strengths

Page 20: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5

Th.168Er

B(M

1,

0+ -

> 1+)

[n2 ]

Energy [MeV]

b)

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

168 Er

K = 0

K = 0K = 2

0 +2 +

8 +

6 +

4 +

0 +2 +

8 +

6 +

4 +

0 +2 +

8 +

6 +

4 +

0 +2 +4 +

2 +

8 +

6 +

4 +

7 +

3 +5 +

2 +

8 +

6 +

4 +

7 +

3 +5 +

0 +2 +6 +

6 +

4 +0 +2 +

6+

4 +

g.s.

Ene

rgy

[MeV

]

Exp. Th. Exp. Th.Exp. Th. Exp. Th.

a)

Energy Levels of 168Er

… and M1 Strengths

Page 21: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Nucleus

ExperimentCalculated

Pure S U (3) Theory

160 Dy 2.48 4.24 2.32162 Dy 3.29 4.24 2.29164 Dy 5.63 4.36 3.05

B(M1)[N2]

Total B(M1) strength (N2)

Page 22: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

First excited K=0+ and K=2+ states

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

10 12 14 16 18 20 22

152Nd 156Sm 160Gd 164Dy 168Er 172Yb 176Hf

2

21

02

0g.s.

Number of pairs of particles

Page 23: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0gs

2 02

0gs

2 02

156Sm

(30,0)(12,0)x(18,0)(26,6)(12,0)x(14,2)(26,2)(8,2)x(18,0)(24,6)(12,0)x(12,6)

SU

(3)

con

tent

[%

]

Page 24: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0gs

2 02

0gs

2 02

160Gd

a = (28,8)(10,4)x(18,4)b = (30,4)(10,4)x(18,4)c = (30,4)(10,4)x(20,4)d = (30,4)(12,0)x(18,4)e = (32,0)(10,4)x(18,4)f = (32,0)(12,0)x(20,0)

Page 25: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0gs

2 02

0gs

2 02

164Dy

a = (30,8)(10,4)x(20,4)b = (32,4)(10,4)x(20,4)c = (32,4)(12,0)x(20,4) d = (32,4)(10,4)x(20,4)e = (34,0)(10,4)x(20,4)f = (34,0)(12,0)x(22,0)g = (24,14)(10,4)x(14,10)

Page 26: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0gs

2 02

0gs

2 02

168Er

a = (30,8)(10,4)x(20,4)b = (32,4)(10,4)x(20,4)c = (32,4)(12,0)x(20,4)d = (32,4)(10,4)x(22,0)e = (34,0)(10,4)x(20,4)f = (24,14)(10,4)x(14,10)

Page 27: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

0

20

40

60

80

100

0

20

40

60

80

100

0gs

2 02

0gs

2 02

a = (36,0)(12,0)x(24,0)b = (28,10)(12,0)x(16,10)c = (20,20)(4,10)x(16,10)

SU(3) content in 172Yb

Page 28: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Conclusions

•B(E2) transitions within the g.s. band wellreproduced

ground state, , first and second excited K = 0+ bands well described by a few representations

•calculated results in good agreement with the low-energy spectra

•1+ energies fall in the correct energy range

•fragmentation in the B(M1) transition probabilities correctly predicted

Page 29: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Conclusions

A proper description of collective properties of the first excited K = 0+ and K=2+ states must take into account the mixing of different SU(3)-irreps, which is driven by the Hamiltonian.

A microscopic interpretation of the relative position of the collective band, as well as that of the levels within the band, follows from an evaluation of the primary SU(3) content of the collective states. The latter are closely linked to nuclear deformation.

If the leading configuration is triaxial (nonzero ), the ground and bands belong to the same SU(3) irrep; if the leading SU(3) configuration is axial (=0), the K =0 and bands come from the same SU(3) irrep.

Page 30: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa

Future work

• In some nuclei total strength of the M1 distributionis larger than the experimental value

•Investigate the energy spectra in super-heavy nuclei•Investigate the M1 transitions in light nuclei

• There are new experiments that determine the inter-band B(E2) transitions• Improve the model to calculate these transitions

• Consider the abnormal parity levels• Consider the states with J = 1 in the configuration space

Page 31: Microscopic interpretation of the excited K   = 0 + , 2 +  bands  of deformed nuclei

NPSC-2003 Gabriela Popa