midwestern state university, wichita falls tx 1 computerized trip classification of gps data: a...

27
Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 1 Computerized Trip Classification of GPS Data: A Proposed Framework Terry Griffin - Yan Huang – Ranette Halverson Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls University of North Texas, Denton

Upload: imogen-wiggins

Post on 27-Dec-2015

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 1

Computerized Trip Classificationof GPS Data:

A Proposed Framework

Terry Griffin - Yan Huang – Ranette HalversonMidwestern State University, Wichita Falls

University of North Texas, Denton

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 2

Introduction and Motivation

• Why Derive Trip Purpose??

• Many Transportation Departments are doing studies that require Travel Diaries (TD) or Origin Destination (OD) matrices.

• TD’s and OD matrices require user interaction (lots of it).

• In this paper we propose a framework to possibly eliminate the human factor from the creation of TD’s and OD matrices.

• This is done by passively collecting GPS data.

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 3

•Conclusions

•Results

•Generating Random Data

•Trip Purpose Classification•Data Collection•Data Preparation•Data Aggregation•Clustering

•Some Background

Overview of the Presentation

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 4

Background

To create a trip classification model, we first need to know:

•What is a trip?

•GPS streams

•How do we classify that trip?

•Clustering

•Decision Trees

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 5

GPS StreamsBackground

What is a GPS stream?

•The logged GPS data can be described as a collection of points

•Each point is defined by a Latitude (Lat) and Longitude (Lon) pair, accompanied by the Time of Day (ToD).

•The entire set becomes:

(P1, P2...Pn)

(P[Lat,Lon,ToD]1,P[Lat,Lon,ToD]2,...,P[Lat,Lon,ToD]n)

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 6

GPS StreamsBackground

What is a GPS stream?

Each stream is typically recorded:

• continuously with a user defined interval

• or by movement only

Each stream creates Points Of Interest (POI)

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 7

ClusteringBackground

Dbscan – Density Based Clustering

•Eps

•MinPts

•Density Reachability

•Density Connectivity

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 8

ClusteringBackground

Dbscan – Density Based Clustering

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 9

Decision Trees

• What is a decision tree?

1. Used as a tool for classification and prediction

2. Tree like structure that represents rules

3. leaf node - indicates the value of the target attribute (class) of examples, or

4. decision node - specifies some test to be carried out on a single attribute-value, with one branch and sub-tree for each possible outcome of the test.

Background

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 10

Example Decision Tree

ATTRIBUTE | POSSIBLE VALUES============+=======================outlook | sunny, overcast, raintemperature | continuoushumidity | continuouswindy | true, false

OUTLOOK | TEMPERATURE | HUMIDITY | WINDY | PLAY=====================================================sunny | 85 | 85 | false | Don't Playsunny | 80 | 90 | true | Don't Playovercast| 83 | 78 | false | Playrain | 70 | 96 | false | Playrain | 68 | 80 | false | Playrain | 65 | 70 | true | Don't Playovercast| 64 | 65 | true | Play….

Given and

You get

Decision TreesBackground

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 11

Decision Trees

Example Decision Tree (Golf)

Background

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 12

Decision Trees

1.Entropy – measures the purity of an arbitrary collection of examples (the homogeneity )

2.Information gain - measures how well a given attribute separates the training examples according to their target classification

Background

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 13

Trip Purpose Classification

•To find and classify trip purposes for a given GPS stream, we follow a series of steps

•Data Collection

•Data Preparation

•Data Aggregation

•Actual Classification

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 14

Data Collection

•Tools

•Used a Palm m515 (hardware)

•Magellan GPS companion (hardware)

•Cetus GPS 1.1 (software)

•Method

•Continuous

•Movement Only (caused problems)

•Collected

•6 weeks of continuous data for 1 individual

•Randomly generated a data set

Trip Purpose Detection

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 15

Data Preparation

• Data cleansing

• Compute trip stop lengths from given raw GPS data.

• Continuous

• Movement only

Trip Purpose Detection

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 16

Data AggregationTrip Purpose Detection

•Single points are not meaningful

•Only after many points are “clustered” together can we really gain information.

•Each balloon is a “POI” (cluster)

•Each balloon gives us:

•Average time of day

•Average length of stay

•Longest length of stay

•Earliest arrival time

•Etc…

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 17

Data AggregationTrip Purpose Detection

•It’s from these aggregate values that we can build / train our decision tree.

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 18

Classifying Points of Interest

Trip Purpose Detection

Identified Clusters:

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 19

Classifying Points of Interest

Trip Purpose Detection

•Example Tree

created by c4.5:

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 20

Classifying Points of Interest

Trip Purpose Detection

Identified Clusters:

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 21

Random Data

d = (d1,d2)|d {(0,1),(-1,0),(-1,1)}

x - current time of day

µ - specified time for location in which the probability of going there should be high

σ - time window (standard deviation) around µ

d – control parameter

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 22

Results

Random Data

•50 generations

•For each generation we modified Eps and MinPts

•15x15 feet - 200x200 feet (5 distinct sizes)

•MinPts of 2 – 10 were used

•As each cluster was found, it was classified using a classification tree based on the data generated for that test.

•Each cluster was assigned a level of correctness (all points in the cluster correctly identified = 1)

• We used 20 % of the generated data to train the tree.

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 23

Results

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 24

Results

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 25

Future Work

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 26

Future Plans

• Create a GPS database– $5000 grant for GPS devices (fall 2006)– Additional University funds

• Fill a needed gap in GPS research

Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls TX 27

Conclusions

•This classification tool has potential, but needs real validation

•Be nice to obtain a large data set

•Future…

•possibly predict the next trip stop based on Markhov chains

•Questions??