HOW DOES RISING RURAL POPULATION DENSITYAFFECT SMALLHOLDER AGRICULTURE?

EVIDENCE FROM ETHIOPIA, KENYA & MALAWI

Milu Muyanga, J. Ricker-Gilbert , D. Headey, A. L. Josephson, T.S. Jayne

Photo: Christiaensen and Demery (2007)Photo: Christiaensen and Demery (2007)

Presentation at the Food Seminar at IFPRI, September 4, 2014, IFPRI Headquarters , Washington DC, USA

10

Motivation• Population densities in many sub-Saharan Africa are

much higher than they were two decades ago

• The rising rural population densities are profoundly affecting farming systems• Diminishing land sizes and limited scope of accessing land

• Limited off-farm opportunities

• Are increasing population densities inducing innovations aimed at intensifying the use of land?• Consistent with the induced innovation theories of Boserup (1965)

and Ruttan and Hayami (1971)

9

Total rural population projections

Source: UN Pop Council, 2013

8

Local analysts point to historical land

injustices as the main cause of the 2007

post-election violence and the 2014

killings in the coastal region of Kenya

Increasing land conflicts-Newspaper Headlines

7

Effects of population density on smallholder-intensification– analytical framework

6

Data sources• Ethiopia: 6 waves of household-level data from the Ethiopian Rural

Household Surveys covering 1293 households

• Kenya: 5 waves of panel survey data on 1,146 farm households

• Malawi: 3 waves of rural farm households; only 1375 households

were re-interviewed in the last wave

• Geographic Information Systems: Population and land estimates data

came from two GIS databases:

• Global Rural–Urban Mapping Project (GRUMP)

• GlobCover 2009

5

RESULTS: ETHIOPIA

4

Household landholding /adult equivalent by population density

Kilogram of fertilizer used/ha, by population density

RESULTS: KENYA 3

Figure 1: Fertilizer quantities applied per hectare cultivated 50

100

150

200

250

kgs/

ha

25% 50% 75% 95%0 250 500 750 1000

persons/sq km

actual simulated

 

Figure 2: Total value of cash expenditures per ha cultivated

810

1214

1618

'000

KSh/

ha

25% 50% 75% 95%0 250 500 750 1000

persons/sq km

actual simulated

 Figure 4: Net crop income per hectare cultivated

2040

6080

'000

KSh

25% 50% 75% 95%0 250 500 750 1000

persons/sq km

actual simulated

 

Figure 5: Net crop income per family labor (resident adults)

1520

2530

35

'000

KS

h

25% 50% 75% 95%0 250 500 750 1000

persons/sq km

actual simulated

 

RESULTS: MALAWI 2

Fertilizer kg/ha, by pop. den. Gross value of crop output/ha, by pop. den.

25th percentile

50th percentile

75th percentile

99th percentile010

0020

0030

0040

00fa

rm in

com

e pe

r adu

lt eq

uiva

lent

s

0 200 400 600population / square km of land

Farm Income per Adult Equivalent, by pop. den. Value of assets/adult equivalent, by pop. den.

Summary of findings• Rural population density is projected to increase by 48% in sub-

Saharan Africa in the next 35 years

• Population density is endogenous- what are the drivers of population density in sub-Saharan Africa?

• Rising population densities are influencing household behavior and farming systems in sub-Saharan Africa• Intensification is not possible beyond some population density thresholds

• 13% of the rural population in Kenya live in areas beyond the thresholds

• Our results do not explain the reasons for the decline in agricultural intensification• Signs of unsustainable agricultural intensification– reduced fallows; soil

mining, etc.

1

Acknowledgements

0