modelling and data analysis
DESCRIPTION
MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS. TRANSPORT TEACHING MATERIAL. Transparencies 2003. EU-funded Urban Transport Research Project Results. www.eu-portal.net. THE COMPONENTS OF MODELLING. MODELLING. Data collection and sharing. Develop-ment of model and modelling technique. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSISMODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS
Transparencies 2003
EU-funded Urban Transport Research Project Results
www.eu-portal.net
TRANSPORT TEACHING MATERIAL
MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS
THE COMPONENTS OF MODELLING
MODELLING
Data collection and sharing
Develop-ment of model and modelling technique
Evaluating and validation of the model
The use and evaluation of the modelling results
MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS
SCREENSHOT FROM STREAMS PRESENTATION TOOL (STREAMS: Final Report for Publication)
Year Mode Flow Legend Comparison TREE TIFF-File
1994 Rail Road Business Container 1h 4h Years Flows No comp. Draw Other city
2002 Air Leisure Bulk 2h 8h Modes 2 cases Remove Exit
Travel times to Bologna1994, rail Business trips
MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS
STREAMS MODEL RESULTS (STREAMS: Final Report for Publication)
Number of passenger trips (‘000 per day) by flow type, 1994 and 2020
Flow Group 1994 2020 % change
Short trips
Commuting and business trips, no car available 21230 7730,4 -63,6
Commuting and business trips, part car available 76777,8 50136,6 -34,7
Commuting and business trips, full car available 110683 165050,5 49.1
Children, all trips all car availability levels 104460,9 98552,5 -5,7
Shopping, personal business, education, VFR16, day trip – no car available
142215,5 71061,1 -50,0
Shopping, personal business, education, VFR, day trip – part car available
427094,3 525188,1 23,0
Shopping, personal business, education, VFR, day trip – part car available
132146,7 214369,5 62,2
MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS
STREAMS MODEL RESULTS (STREAMS: Final Report for Publication)
Flow Group 1994 2020 % change
Long trips
20803,9VFR, day trip, no car available 5030,9 2476,1 -50,8
VFR, day trip, Part & full car available 20803,9 27624,4 32,8
Charter holiday 86,7 91,1 5,1
Business and commuting- all car availability levels
15259,1 16298,4 6,8
International independent holiday no car available
74,4 70,9 -4,8
International independent holiday-part & full car available
656,7 1708,0 160,1
Domestic holiday - no car available 359,1 339,8 -5,4
Domestic holiday - part & full car available 2532,3 6167,6 143,6
TOTAL 1059411,3 1186865,0 12,0
MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS
ARCHITECTURE CHOICE ACCORDING TO THE OBJECTIVES OF THE DIRECT PROJECT(DIRECT, Final Summary Report)
Application field Chosen architecture
Local database
Distributed objects architecture
Intranet/internet architecture
Transport Planning Best choice Bad choice Good choice if a light product is selected (ex Oracle WebDB)
Traffic Manage-
ment
Traffic information1
(aggregated demand)
Bad choice Best choice Good choice, but implies a very powerful configuration
Traveller infomation2
Trip planning3 (individual demand)
Difficult to publish the data, low scalability
Good choice, but implies high development costs, and a web interface
Best choice
MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS
ESTEEM VALIDATION CHAINS (ESTEEM, Final Report)
Scenarios:A ReferenceB1 New transport
supplyB2 Gates of Rome
Scenarios:• Traffic management • Air Quality 2005• traffic reduction Act 1998
• mixed urban dev.• Chelsea Hackney lime
ROME BRUSSELS LYON LONDON
ProjectO/D matrixes
Transport modelEMME2
Emission model TEE
Dispersion modelADMS Urban
Emission modelLANES
Dispersion modelCAL 3qhc
ADMS Urban
Started Preference Surveys•Modal choice•Residencial choice
Started Preference Surveys•Residencial choice
RER Scenarios:• Excluding land market
• Including land market
Scenarios:• Reference • Transport policy• Transport and land use policy
Transport modelSATURN
Transport & land
use modelTRANUS