module 8a: faceted classification imt530: organization of information resources winter 2008 michael...

35
Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

Upload: stella-mcbride

Post on 19-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

Module 8a: Faceted Classification

IMT530: Organization of Information ResourcesWinter 2008Michael Crandall

Page 2: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

2

Overview• Enumerated vs. analytico-synthetic

techniques • History of faceted classification –

Ranganathan & CRG• Facets• Examples• Facet analysis • Spiteri’s simplified model• Process • Use of facets in information systems

Page 3: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

3

Enumerated Classification vs. Faceted Classification

• Enumerated classification – One-dimensional

• Dewey Decimal Classification System• Library of Congress Classification System

– Rigid hierarchical approach– Gives a single schedule that enumerates

fully the classes and their ready-made class numbers

Page 4: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

4

Enumerated Classification vs. Faceted Classification

• Analytico-Synthetic (Faceted Classification)– Multi-dimensional– Clearly defined, mutually exclusive, and

collectively exhaustive aspects, properties, or characteristics of a class or specific subject

Page 5: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

5

Faceted Classification

• FA (Facet Analysis) - (analytical technique)• Listing of characteristics of the entities in a

universe (exhaustive, mutually exclusive)

• FC (Facet Classification) - (synthetic structure)• Structure – division of entities in a universe (by

one characteristic at a time) • Synthesis – combination of relevant facets:

– Schedule of terms for description – Assignment of notation

Page 6: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

6

Origin of Faceted Classification

– A Hindu mathematician – Worked as a librarian– Started from the limits of

traditional enumerative classification systems

– Attempted to describe the entire universe of ideas

– 1930s– Colon Classification –

Analytico-synthetic classification system (1933)Ranganathan (1892 - 1972)

Page 7: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

7

Basic Ranganathan

• Analyze each document • Group isolates (simple-concept subjects) into

the facets• Order the isolates within the facets• Establish a citation order for facets

(Ranganathan’s is P-M-E-S-T)• Establish a schedule order for the facets• Apply the notational system• Compile schedules & generate an index

Page 8: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

8

Ranganathan’s 5 Facets

• Personality : Who • Matter: What• Energy: How• Space: Where• Time: When

Page 9: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

9

Ranganathan’s Rule

• 46 Canons : Must follow

• 13 Postulates : Strongly recommended

• 22 Principles : Strongly recommended

Page 10: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

10

Examples

• Ranganathan's Colon Classification– research in the cure of tuberculosis of lungs

by x-ray conducted in India in 1950– L,45;421:6;253:f.44'N5– Medicine,Lungs;Tuberculosis:Treatment;X-

ray:Research.India'1950

Page 11: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

11

Classification Research Group (CRG)

• UK (1952)

• Produced classification systems for narrower, specialized areas

• Designed several subject-specific faceted classification systems

Page 12: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

12

Ranganathan & the CRG

• Agree about the essential qualities of a facet – Mutually exclusive; each facet represents a

characteristic not found in any other facet– Relationships between facets are non-

hierarchical

Page 13: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

13

Facets

• The broad categories into which the subject area is divided. A facet consists “... of a group of terms that represents one, and only one, characteristic of division of a subject field....no two facets may contain terms that could represent the same concepts.” Spiteri, L. (1998) A Simplified Model for Facet Analysis. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science v23, 1-30 (April-July 1998). http://iainstitute.org/pg/a_simplified_model_for_facet_analysis.php

• “Clearly defined, mutually exclusive, and collectively exhaustive aspects, properties or characteristics of a class or specific subject" Maple, A. (1995) Faceted Access: A Review of the Literature http://www.musiclibraryassoc.org/BCC/BCC-Historical/BCC95/95WGFAM2.html

Page 14: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

14

Examples of Facets

• Petersen (1994) – the Art & Architecture Thesaurus – Associated Concepts/ Physical Attributes/

Styles and Periods/ Agents / Activities/ Materials/ Objects

• Business – Products/ Applications/ Organizations/

People/ Domain objects/ Events/ Publications

Page 15: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

15

Epicurious.com

• Recipe collection on the web– Cuisine– Special considerations– Meal/Course– Dish– Main Ingredients– Preparation methods– Season/Occasion

Page 16: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

16

Examples

• Faceted Classification – Epicurious http://www.epicurious.com/recipes/find/advanced/ – Wine.com http://www.wine.com/wineshop/– Flamenco http://flamenco.berkeley.edu/demos.html – Images of England http://www.imagesofengland.org.uk– lawforwa.org http://www.lawforwa.org/search/advsearch.html – FAT-HUM Project http://www.ucl.ac.uk/fatks/php/browse.php

• Tools– FacetMap’s Wine demonstration

http://facetmap.com/download/starterKit.jsp– Siderean software http://www.siderean.com/– Endeca software http://endeca.com/

Page 17: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

17

Characteristics of a Faceted Classification System

• Based on the important, essential or persistent characteristics of content objects

• More than hierarchies• Easy to extend by adding a new facet • Flexibility• Easier to construct• Easy to formulate composite subjects• Easy to accommodate new concepts• Provides multiple access points to content

Page 18: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

18

Facet Analysis

•“Facet analysis is a mental process involving analysis of a subject into its facets based on a set of postulates, canons and principles. It provides a framework to accommodate various types of terms, along with rules for their combination.”—K. Kumar •Facet analysis is the sorting of terms in a given field of knowledge into “homogenous, mutually exclusive facets, each derived from the parent universe by a single characteristic of division ... every distinctive logical category should be isolated, every new characteristic of division should be clearly indicated.” —B. C. Vickery

Page 19: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

19

Planes of Work

• The Idea Plane – the process of analyzing a subject field into its component parts

• The Verbal Plane – the process of choosing appropriate terminology

• The Notational Plane – the process of expressing these component parts by means of a notational device

Page 20: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

20

Idea Plane: Principles for the Choice of Facets

• Differentiation– Divide by a clearly defined characteristic of division – E.g., Humans by Gender

• Relevance – Reflect the purpose and scope of the classification system – E.g., Children by Grade, but not for Dogs

• Ascertainability– Definite and ascertainable facts– E.g., Date of birth for Humans, Breed for Dogs

• Permanence– Permanent qualities of the entity – E.g., Color wouldn’t work for chameleons

Page 21: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

21

Idea Plane: Principles for the Choice of Facets

• Homogeneity

– Facets must not overlap

– E.g., geography and product names

• Mutual Exclusivity – Facets represent only one characteristic

• Fundamental Categories – Categories should be derived from the domain– Disagrees with Ranganathan’s universal PMEST

Page 22: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

22

Idea Plane: Principles for the Citation Order of Facets and Foci

• Relevant Succession – Chronological Order– Alphabetical Order– Spatial/Geometric Order– Simple to Complex Order (or Complex to Simple)– Canonical Order– Increasing Quantity (or Decreasing Quantity)

• Consistent Succession

Page 23: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

23

Principles for the Verbal Plane

• Context – Meaning is determined by position in the

system Grain dishes

Rice dishesWhite rice dishes With raisinsBrown rice dishes

• Currency – Should use terminology appropriate for the

language in use at time of indexing

Page 24: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

24

Guidelines for Faceted Classification

• Study the domain – (Context) Examine the domain – (Content) Study information objects– (Users) Who? Information Needs?

• Entity listing• Facet creation • Facet arrangement• Citation order• Classification• Revision, testing, and maintenance

Page 25: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

25

Use of the Facet Approach

• Traditional Use– Classification– Thesaurus– Indexing

• Information Systems– Information Architecture & User-Centered Design

• Navigation and browse

– Information Retrieval • Individual facets can be accessed and retrieved either

alone or in any desired combination

Page 26: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

26

Faceted Approach in IS

• Simple in structure• Flexible in application• Amenable to software applications• Amenable to computer assisted indexing

and validation• Interoperable with the majority of

modern indexing vocabularies• Easier and more economical to maintain

than enumerated vocabularies

Page 27: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

27

Faceted Navigation

Page 28: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

28

Facet-based Advanced Search

Page 29: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

29

Combined

Page 30: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

30

Usability Testing of Faceted Approaches

• Flamenco developed by Marty Hearst and others to test facets for images

• Built an interface to support both direct search and browsing

• Supports search usability guidelines • Nine facets• Opening – Middle Game – Endgame• http://bailando.sims.berkeley.edu/

flamenco.html

Page 31: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

31

Usability Studies – Flamenco (Hearst et al., 2003)

• Usability Study for Search• 32 art history students • Search by Faceted Metadata vs Baseline• More Successful• More usage time• 90% - Preferred the metadata approach overall• 97% - Helped users learn more about the collection• 75% - More flexible• 72% - Easier to use

Page 32: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

32

Problems of Faceted Approach

• Mismatched labeling

• Inconsistent category metadata

• Difficulty in deciding on the correct or appropriate facet

• Challenges in defining a useful and usable collection of facets

Page 33: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

33

Recap

• Enumerated classification (Hierarchical)– One-dimensional

• Dewey Decimal Classification System• Library of Congress Classification System

– Rigid Hierarchy– Gives a single schedule that enumerates fully the

classes and their ready-made class numbers.

• Analytico-Synthetic (Faceted Classification)– Multi-dimensional– Clearly defined, mutually exclusive and collectively

exhaustive aspects, properties, or characteristics of a class or specific subject

Page 34: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

34

Recap

• Hierarchical and faceted approaches are not mutually exclusive– You can use hierarchies under facets to help with

entry vocabulary and cross references

• You may not always be able to apply mutual exclusion and exhaustivity to facets, but you should use these principles to help clarify – Spiteri’s Idea Plane is where you do this work– Try to apply terms from all facets to each object

(webpage) you’re tagging to see what happens– If it doesn’t make sense, you probably need to

rethink your facets

Page 35: Module 8a: Faceted Classification IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter 2008 Michael Crandall

IMT530 Organization of Information Resources

35