moffett rab site 26 and 28 update

30
Abiotic / Biotic Treatability Study Restoration Advisory Board Meeting May 13, 2010 Installation Restoration Sites 26 and 28

Upload: steve-williams

Post on 09-Jun-2015

570 views

Category:

Education


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Presentation to the Moffett Field Restoration Advisory Board May 13, 2010: Update on Sites 26 and 28, Dan Leigh, Shaw Environmental and Infrastructure

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Abiotic / Biotic Treatability Study

Restoration Advisory Board Meeting

May 13, 2010

Installation Restoration Sites 26 and 28

Page 2: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

2

IR Site 26 Treatability Study

Purpose of Treatability Test

Determine if combined abiotic/biotic treatment is a viable remedial alternative for mitigating the remaining chlorinated ethenes (CEs) present in the upper portion of the A-aquifer at IR Site 26.

Conduct Pilot Test in area of highest CE concentration in upper A-Aquifer at Site 26

Treatability Study Method:

Pilot Test Method:

Install wells in Pilot Test area

Determine baseline conditions in pilot test area

Inject EHC® into Aquifer

Measure Distribution of EHC®

Measure changes in pilot test area geochemistry

Measure changes in pilot test area CE concentrations

Page 3: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 4: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 5: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 6: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Biologically Mediated Oxidation - Reduction

Electron Donor Electron AcceptorResistor

Battery Ground

GrowthProtein Synthesis

Reproduction

CnHn

Fe(II)

H2S

H2

O2

NO3

As(V)

Mn(IV)

SO4

CO2

WorkLight bulb

Motors

Fe(0)

CO2 + H2O

Fe(III)

H2O +SO4

H2O

FeS2Fe (III)

Fe(II)

Fe(III)+SO4

H2O + CO2

HNO2

As(III)

Mn(II)

Fe (II)

S- + H2O

CH4

Reduced Oxidized Reduced Oxidized

Page 7: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Biological Reductive Dechlorination of Chlorinated Ethenes

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Cl

H H H HH H

PCETCE

cis 1,2 -DCE

HH

H H HHHH HH H H

VC

H H

H H H H

Ethene

0

- 50

- 200

- 150

- 250

ORP

HHHHHH

C C C C C C

Ethane-300

PCETCE

cis 1,2 -DCEVC

EtheneEthane

PCETCE

cis 1,2 -DCEVC

EtheneEthane

Page 8: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

HH

C CCl

Cl

Cl

Cl

Fe2+

TetrachloroetheneDichloroacetylene

Ethene

Ethane

Fe0Fe2+

Fe2+

Fe0

Abiotic Pathway

Fe2+

Fe2+

Fe0Fe0

Fe0

Fe0

O

O HH

O HH

O HH

O HH

O HH

O HH

O HH

Chloroacetylene

Acetylene

Page 9: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Some Hypothesized Reaction Pathways

Biotic Abiotic

PCE

TCE

cis 1,2-DCE trans 1,2-DCE

VC

Ethene

Ethane

PCE

TCE

VC

Ethene

Ethane

Chloroacetylene

Acetylene

1,1-DCE, trans 1,2-DCE, cis1,2-DCE

Dichloroacetylene

Hydrogenolysis

β-elimination

α-elimination

Hydrogenation

Page 10: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

10

Indicators of Degradation Pathway

• Chloroacetylene

• Dichloroacetylene

Abiotic Pathway

• Acetylene

• 1,1-DCE

Biotic Pathway

• Primarily cis 1,2-DCE

• Low TCE, DCE, VC / ethene ratio• Stoichiometric Conversion

Page 11: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 12: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

EHC Injection Process

GW FlowDirection

Page 13: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Groundwater Flow

Page 14: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Radius of EHC Distribution Evaluation

Page 15: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Groundwater Flow Direction

Page 16: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 17: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 18: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 19: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 20: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 21: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 22: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 23: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update
Page 24: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Relative Molar Fraction of Ethenes and Ethane

Upgradient Well

Treatment Area Wells

Page 25: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

Relative Molar Fraction of Ethenes and Ethane

Page 26: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

26

Preliminary Conclusions Site 26 TS

• pH, ORP, SC, T, in the treatment area are within the range considered appropriate for biotic and abiotic degradation of the CEs

• DO, nitrate, arsenic, manganese, iron, sulfate and methane reducing conditions have been established in the treatment area.

• Degradation of CEs is occurring.

• Cis 1,2-DCE stall is not occurring.

• Dechlorinating microbial culture (DHC) is present in the treatment area.

• Complete conversion of CEs to non-toxic degradation products is occurring.

Page 27: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

27

26 Treatability Study Schedule

June 28, 2010 – 4th Quarter GW Sampling Event

August 25, 2010 -Draft Treatability Study Results Technical Memorandum

October 27, 2010 -Final Treatability Study Results Technical Memorandum

Page 28: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

28

Conduct Concurrent Pilot Tests in Three High Concentration Areas:

Evaluate Three Technologies:

In Situ Anaerobic Biotic/Abiotic Degradation (ISABA)

In Situ Anaerobic Biostimulation with Bioaugmentation (ISABB) Process

Building 88 Area

Traffic Island Area

Well W9-18 Area

Sodium Lactate & SDC-9

Emulsified Oil & SDC-9

Expanded Pilot Test (Site 28) Methodology

EHC

Page 29: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

ISABA - EHC

ISABB - Emulsfied Oil & SDC-9

ISABB - Lactate & SDC-9

Task 1 Conduct MIPs Investigation

Task 2 Install Monitoring Wells

Task 3 Inject Substrates

Expanded Pilot Test Site 28

Page 30: Moffett RAB Site 26 and 28 Update

30

Site 28 Pilot Test Schedule

February 2010 - Work Plans Finalized

March 2010 - MIPs Investigation

May 2010 -Treatability Study Progress Report

July, 2010 - Substrate Injection

August 2010 to July 2011 - Performance Monitoring

October 2011 – Treatability Study Final Report

June, 2010 – Monitoring Well Installation