monitoring of amr in russia - bsac · monitoring of amr in russia ... (one per patient / case of...
TRANSCRIPT
Monitoring of AMR in Russia Surveillance studies conducted by
Institute of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (IAC) Centre for Monitoring of Antimicrobial Resistance (CMAR)
Prospective surveillance studies on AMR in Russia Ø Collection of microbial isolates and patient’s data (in CRFs) matching the
defined study criteria and patients’ population
Ø Repeated cross-sectional studies conducted at intervals of 1-3 years or continuous studies
Ø Main focuses:
§ Nosocomial infections
§ Community-acquired UTIs
§ Community-acquired LRTI
Ø Consecutive non-duplicate isolates (one per patient / case of infection)
Ø Various types of specimens (representative for infection type)
Ø AST in central laboratory of IAC
Ø Storage of all isolates (regardless of AMR profile)
Moscow
Participants of IAC / IACMAC surveillance studies on AMR 1994-95: 4 hospitals in 2 cities; 400 isolates
Smolensk
2013-15: 62 hospitals in 50 cities of Russia; ~4000 isolates/year
Krasnodar
Kazan
Novosibirsk
Omsk
Тomsk
Krasnoyarsk
Irkutsk
Voronezh
Stavropol
Tyumen
Yakutsk
Volgograd
Vladivostok
Kaluga
Kemerovo
Lipetsk
Rostov-on-Don
Nizh.Novgorod Orel
Novokuznetsk
Seversk
Nizhnevartovsk
Perm
Chelyabinsk
St.-Petersburg
Tolyatti Ufa
Ryazan
Samara
Yaroslavl
Anadyr
Noyabrsk
Ulan-Ude Barnaul
Khanty-Mansiysk
Surgut Nizhni Tagil
Yekaterinburg
Nab. Chelny Izhevsk
Penza
Rostov
Archangelsk
Petrozavodsk
Murmansk
Vologda Cherepovets
Kislovodsk
+ collaborating sites in 9 cities of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Moldova
Khabarovsk
1994-95 Nosocomial Gram-negative Pathogens Prevalence and Resistance Survey in ICUs (NPRS I) 4 hospitals in 2 cities
1998-99 NPRS II 30 hospitals in 14 cities
2002-04 Antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial bacterial pathogens in Russian ISUs (RESORT) 33 hospitals in 20 cities
2006-08 Antimicrobial resistance in nosocomial bacterial pathogens in wards with intensive use of antibiotics (REVANSH) 36 hospitals in 26 cities
2011-12 Monitoring of prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of nosocomial pathogens and use of antimicrobial agents in tertiary hospitals (MARATHON) 23 hospitals in 19 cities
…
National surveys of AMR in nosocomial pathogens in Russia
New design of AMR surveillance studies in hospitals in Russia
MARATHON-2013: 23 hospitals in 19 cities
MARATHON-2014: 33 hospitals in 22 cities
MARATHON-2015: 23 hospitals in 16 cities (isolates and data submitted by Dec. 2015)
+
APEx (since 2013): carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae
Ø Transition from repeated cross-sectional to continuous study design
Ø Any infections in hospitalised patients: nosocomial or community-acquired (distinguished based on formal ‘48-hour’ criterion and recorded in CRF)
Gram(-) ….............. 72,1% % Escherichia coli 7,8 Klebsiella pneumoniae 17,0
Klebsiella oxytoca 0,4 Enterobacter cloacae 2,6 Enterobacter aerogenes 0,7 Enterobacter asburiae 0,2 Serratia marcescens 1,9 Serratia ureilytica 0,1 Proteus mirabilis 1,7 Proteus vulgaris 0,5 Proteus penneri 0,1 Citrobacter freundii 0,4 Morganella morganii 0,4 Raoultella ornithinolytica 0,1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 19,9 Pseudomonas mendocina 0,1 Pseudomonas mosselii 0,1 Pseudomonas stutzeri 0,1
Acinetobacter baumannii 14,0 Acinetobacter pittii 0,4 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus 0,2 Acinetobacter genomosp. 13 0,1 Acinetobacter haemolyticus 0,1
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia 2,8 Alcaligenes faecalis 0,5 Alcaligenes xylosoxidans 0,1 Achromobacter xylosoxidans 0,1 Myroides odoratimimus 0,1
Species distribution of bacterial nosocomial pathogens in Russia
Gram(+) …............. 27,9% % Staphylococcus aureus 16,9
Staphylococcus epidermidis 2,0 Staphylococcus haemolyticus 1,4 Staphylococcus hominis 0,5 Staphylococcus albus 0,1 Staphylococcus saprophyticus 0,1 Staphylococcus simulans 0,1 Staphylococcus warneri 0,1
Enterococcus faecalis 4,2 Enterococcus faecium 2,1
Enterococcus gallinarum 0,1 Enterococcus avium 0,1 Enterococcus raffinosus 0,1
Streptococcus agalactiae 0,1 Streptococcus pneumoniae 0,1 Streptococcus pyogenes 0,1
MARATHON Study
Krasnodar
Moscow
Kazan
Novosibirsk
Omsk Тomsk
Krasnoyarsk
Irkutsk
Voronezh
Stavropol
Tyumen
Yakutsk
Volgograd
Vladivostok
Carbapenem resistance (%I+R) and production of carbapenemases in nosocomial Enterobacteriaceae in Russia 2006-07: CPE 1 isolate (0.1%)
Kaluga
Kemerovo
Lipetsk
Rostov-on-Don
Nizh.Novgorod Orel
Novokuznetsk
Seversk
Nizhnevartovsk Yekaterinburg
Smolensk
Perm
Chelyabinsk
St.-Petersburg
Tolyatti Ufa
Ryazan
2011-12: CPE 19 isolates (3.4%), 3 cities
Samara
Yaroslavl
Khabarovsk
Noyabrsk
• OXA-48 (dominant) • VIM-4 (single)
• NDM-1 (sporadic)
• KPC-2 (local)
Barnaul
2012-15 (all studies): CPE >100 isolates, 11 cities
0.1 0.3
2.8 3.2 3.6 2.1
8.4 6.7
9.8
14.0
0.0 0.0 0.1
3.3
1997-99 (n=1598)
2002-04 (n=1374)
2006-07 (n=1039)
2011-12 (n=572)
MER IPM ETP Ca-se.-pos.
Н Н
Krasnodar
Moscow
Kazan
Novosibirsk
Omsk Тomsk
Krasnoyarsk
Irkutsk
Voronezh
Stavropol
Tyumen
Yakutsk
Volgograd
Vladivostok
2002-04: MBL(+) 47 isolates (4.5%), 3 cities
Kaluga
Kemerovo
Lipetsk
Rostov-on-Don
Nizh.Novgorod Orel
Novokuznetsk
Seversk
Nizhnevartovsk Yekaterinburg
Smolensk
Perm
Chelyabinsk
St.-Petersburg
Tolyatti Ufa
Ryazan
• VIM-2 (dominant) • IMP-30 (local)
2006-07: MBL(+) 160 isolates (20.1%), 12 cities 2011-12: MBL(+) 97 изолятов (28.0%), 13 cities
Samara
Yaroslavl
Khabarovsk
Noyabrsk
19.0
39.0
55.9 58.5 55.4
79.3
66.8
0.0 4.5
20.1 28.3
1997-99 (n=821) 2002-04 (n=1053)
2006-07 (n=787) 2011-12 (n=347)
IPM MER MBL-pos.
Н
Carbapenem resistance (%I+R) and production of MBLs in nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Russia
2006-15 (all studies): MBL(+) >800 isolates, 24 cities
Epidemic spread of P. aeruginosa ST235 VIM-2 in Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia
Ø Rise of MBL prevalence in nosocomial P. aeruginosa in Russia from 4.5% to 28.7% between 2002 and 2010
Ø 96.5% of MBL producers belong to the epidemic clone ST235 VIM-2
251 MBL-pos. isolates, 2003-2012
ST111 (VIM, IMP): 29.9% ST235 (VIM, IMP): 20.7% ST357 (VIM): 12.0% ST233 (VIM): 10.4% ST654 (VIM, IMP, NDM): 7.6% ST773 (VIM): 5.2% Other (VIM, IMP, NDM): 14.3%
Krasnodar
Moscow
Kazan
Novosibirsk
Omsk ТOmsk
Krasnoyarsk
Irkutsk
Voronezh
Stavropol
Tyumen
Yakutsk
Volgograd
Vladivostok
2002-04: Ca-se.(+) 11 isolates (2.4%), 3 cities
Kaluga
Kemerovo
Lipetsk Rostov-on-Don
Nizh.Novgorod Orel
Novokuznetsk
Seversk
Noyabrsk
Yekaterinburg
Smolensk
Perm
Chelyabinsk
St.-Petersburg
Tolyatti Ufa
Ryazan
• OXA-23-like
2006-07: Ca-se.(+) 9 isolates (2.7%), 3 cities
2011-12: Ca-se.(+) 111 isolates (44.0%), 13 cities
Samara
Yaroslavl
Khabarovsk
1997-99: Ca-se.(+) 1 isolate (0.5%)
Murmansk
• OXA-24/40-like (dominant)
• OXA-58-like
NDM-1
Ижевск
Сургут
2011-15 (all studies): Ca-se.(+) >700 isolates, 20 cities
3.0 6.0 5.1
48.0
11.8
38.6
67.5
0.5 2.4 2.7
44.0
1997-99 (n=202)
2002-04 (n=466)
2006-07 (n=332)
2011-12 (n=252)
IPM MER Ca-se.-pos.
Н
Carbapenem resistance (%I+R) and production of carbapenemases in nosocomial Acinetobacter spp. in Russia
Dominance of international high-risk clones among Russian nosocomial A. baumannii and ‘allodemic’ pattern of carbapenemase-producing strains
SNP typing and MLST of 103 isolates from 54 hospitals, 32 cities
Nosocomial infections due to carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative pathogens in Russia MARATHON Study (2011-12), 26 hospitals, 19 cities
~13% Ca-se.-positive, (most XDR)
~1% PDR K. pneumoniae17,0%
OXA-48, NDM-1: 1,1%
P. aeruginosa19,9%
A. baumannii14.0%
E. coli7,8%
S. aureus16,9%
Другиебактерии
24,4%
VIM-2: 5,6%
OXA-40/-23/-58: 6,2%
Prospective surveillance studies: Pros and Cons
+ Standardised AST in central lab (MIC data)
+ Storage of collected isolates
but…
– Low coverage of hospitals and patient population
– Long time to results!
Future development of AMR surveillance in Russia
Ø Establishing a network of laboratories to collect reliable AST data as part of the CAESAR (Central Asian and Eastern European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance) project
Ø Collecting AST data in “real time”
Ø Development of a web-based resource “Map of Antimicrobial Resistance” (supported by the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation”
§ Distributed access system for coordinating centre, participating centres, and “general users”
§ Interactive trends, charts, geographic maps
§ Basic and advanced statistics and BI tools
§ Comparison of local and national AMR data: “my hospital” vs. city / region / country”