morphological characterization of peek

14
Macromolecular and Morphological Characterization of Medical Grade PEEK Polymers Anuj Bellare 1 , Kim-Phuong Le 2 , Shi-Shen Yau 2 & Stephen Spiegelberg 3 1 Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA 2 Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ 3 Cambridge Polymer Group, Inc, Boston, MA April 25, 2013

Upload: rebornwilly

Post on 18-Nov-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

PEEK

TRANSCRIPT

  • Macromolecular and Morphological Characterization of Medical Grade PEEK Polymers

    Anuj Bellare1, Kim-Phuong Le2, Shi-Shen Yau2 & Stephen Spiegelberg3

    1 Brigham & Womens Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

    2 Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ

    3 Cambridge Polymer Group, Inc, Boston, MA

    April 25, 2013

  • 2

    Financial Disclosure

    Anuj Bellare - None

    K-P Le & S-S Yau Stryker Orthopaedics

    S. Spiegelberg Royalties from Zimmer, Corin, Renovis,Iconacy, Conformis, Mako

  • 3

    Poly (ether ether ketone) - PEEK

    Tg ~ 143C

    Tm ~ 335-345C

    Micrometer level structure - spherulitic

    Nanometer level structure - lamellae

    High ultimate tensile stress, high modulus

    Carbon-Fiber reinforced PEEK ~ modulus of cortical bone

    Application in trauma, orthopedic and spinal implants

  • 4

    Micro- and Nano-structure

    IMPINGED SPHERULITES

    L

    Stack of Lamellae

  • 5

    Objective

    To measure molecular weight distribution and characterize

    semi-crystalline morphology of various grades of PEEK

  • 6

    Materials and Methods

    Four medical grade PEEK polymers

    PEEK-1, PEEK-2, PEEK-3, PEEK-4

    Gel Permeation Chromatography Mn, Mw, Mz

    Density Measurements (ASTM D792)

    Differential Scanning Calorimeter (ASTM F2026)

    Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ASTM D2778-09)

    Small Angle X-ray Scattering L, D

  • 7

    Molecular Characterization

    ID Mn [g/mol] Mw[g/mol] Mz g/mol] PIPEEK1 35,726181 114,026121 209,294808 3.19PEEK2 34,314194 108,352470 227,540958 3.16PEEK3 42,0741448 115,91386 210,3171654 2.75PEEK4 30,278683 74,426432 124,2971617 2.46

    PEEK-3 had highest Mn

    PEEK-4 had lowest Mn and lowest PI

    Mn = NiMi/Ni

    Mw = NiMi2/ NiMi

    Mz = NiMi3/ NiMi2

    PI = Mw/Mn

  • 8

    Small Angle X-Ray Scattering

    1

    10

    100

    0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9

    PEEK-1 PEEK-2 PEEK-3 PEEK-4

    Inte

    nsity

    [cou

    nts]

    q [1/nm]

    Long Period L = 2/d ~ Inter-lamellar spacing almost same for all PEEKs

    L

  • One Dimensional Correlation Function

    p(r) (1 / 22A) q2I(q)cos(qr)dq0

    -0.02

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0 5 10 15 20

    PEEK-1 PEEK-2

    PEEK-3 PEEK-4

    r [nm]One

    dim

    ensi

    onal

    corr

    elat

    ion

    func

    tion

    -2.0E-02

    0.0E+00

    2.0E-02

    4.0E-02

    6.0E-02

    8.0E-02

    1.0E-01

    0.0E+00 2.0E+01 4.0E+01 6.0E+01

    p(r)

    r [nm]

    origin base linebase line

    dPdr

    slope=

    Qfit

    L

    O. Glatter, 1977

    L

  • 10

    Crystalline Morphology

    ID L[nm] XDSC [%] D[nm]PEEK1 12.2 41.81.7 5.10.2PEEK2 12.3 47.81.3 5.90.2PEEK3 12.4 42.50.8 5.30.1PEEK4 12.3 52.20.9 6.40.1

    L

  • 11

    Crystallinity and Lamellar Thickness

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000

    Mn [g/mol]

    % C

    ryst

    allin

    ity

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    Lam

    ella

    r th

    ickn

    ess [

    nm]

    XIR

    Xdensity

    Xdsc

    Lamellarthickness

  • 12

    Summary

    All medical grade PEEK resins showed relatively small differences in molecular weights and morphology

    PEEK-4 had the lowest Mn and highest crystallinity

    Differences in crystallinity associated with differences in lamellar thickness

    Consistent trend in crystallinity obtained from DSC, FTIR and density

  • 13

    Future Work

    Micrometer scale morphology Low voltage SEM

    Alter crystallization conditions (nucleation/crystal growth)

    Correlate crystalline morphology on the nano- and micro-scale with macroscopic mechanical properties

  • 14

    THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION