mv 1 july 2011 merged - university of johannesburg...gender and politics. leila ahmed’s work fits...

1
Muslim Views . 29 July 2011 73 A Quiet Revolution – The Veil’s Resurgence from the Middle East to America. Author: Leila Ahmed. Publisher: Yale University Press 2011. ISBN: 9780300170955 T HE Muslim veil has remained a contentious garment accessory since Islam’s encounter with colonialism. Vigorously debated, the veil has been defended as a religious requirement that safeguards female modesty, and a symbol of Islamic identity. It has been criticised as an instrument of female subjugation, gender inequality and a symbol of radical Islam. However, the typecasting of such a polarised and stereotypical discourse fails to capture the fluid attitudes towards the veil in Mus- lim societies and offers little analysis on the nature of the reli- gious revival among Muslims wherein the centrality of the veil is unmistakable for reasons not usually connected to radical reli- giosity. Some Muslim feminists and scholars have recently questioned the old secular-liberal assump- tions which hold to account Islamist groups and the intricate matrix it forms with notions of gender and politics. Leila Ahmed’s work fits into this mould of questioning the long established secular-liberal notions of the veil and investigat- ing the meaning of its resurgence among Muslim women. The impetus for Ahmed’s enquiry was the sight of a group of veiled Muslim women at the Cambridge Common during the late 1990s, shortly after arriving in Cambridge and the discussion it ignited with her visiting friend from Egypt. The sight of the veil ignited vis- ceral disturbing emotions for Ahmed and her friend due to its connections with the early Mus- lim Brotherhood in Egypt. Ahmed traces the history of the veil from the 1940s, where it was a disappearing phenomenon in Egypt and much of the Arab world to its steady resurgence during the 1970s. The veil took on new mean- ings, at times different from the traditional outlook on veiling. The veil was a marker of religios- ity and an explicit sign of annoy- ance with secular dominance. Islamist organisations, such as the Muslim Brotherhood, were ‘implanting in women the will and desire to wear hijab’. Ahmed traces the foundations of America’s Muslim institutions, notably the Muslim Students Association (MSA) and the Islam- ic Society of North America (ISNA), to Islamist organisations in the Arab world. While women were involved in the founding of these organisa- tions, the face of these organisa- tions has changed dramatically in respect of gender. Muslim women head both these organisations today. The veil, in this instance, is both a sign of Muslim identity and a symbol of leadership and activism within Muslim society. Ahmed also, interestingly, gives voice to the criticism from postcolonial theorists such as Hamid Dabashi and Sabah Mah- mood on the imperial nature of the common rationale utilised by the West, notably the United States of America, that its moral- ly dubious wars, particularly in Afghanistan, were influenced by liberating women from the veil. While Ahmed continues to believe ‘that the rights and condi- tions of women in Muslim-major- ity societies often are acutely in need of improvement’, she won- ders ‘if the subject of “the oppres- sion of women in Islam” – com- ing to us charged and loaded with the legacies…that are capable evi- dently of taking on renewed life and force in the West in fraught political times in relation to Islam – is any longer a useful or even valid topic.’ Ahmed’s conclusions are sur- prising. She posits that it is indeed the legacy of Islamism – and the children of this legacy – who are at the forefront of ‘those who were most fully and rapidly assimilating into the distinctively American tradition of activism in pursuit of justice’ and are also at the forefront of women’s rights in Islam. While this conclusion certainly is an optimistic one for Ahmed, the prevalence of believers in a God-given gender hierarchy is still present. The investigative argument which Ahmed puts forth is certainly interesting and is an alternate view to the dominant discourse on the veil. The importance of relooking and also rethinking the issue of the veil within the wider context of Islamism, Muslim identity, ethics and gender is integral to understanding the current nature, motivation and purpose of the veil among many Muslim women and the resurgent religiosity with- in Muslim societies. Review by NADEEM MAHOMED Nadeem Mahomed is a Masters student in the Department of Religion Studies at the University of Johannesburg. Book-Review Book-Review The Study of Islam @ UJ Book Review

Upload: others

Post on 14-May-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MV 1 July 2011 MERGED - University of Johannesburg...gender and politics. Leila Ahmed’s work fits into this mould of questioning the long established secular-liberal notions of the

Muslim Views

Muslim Views . 29 July 2011 73

A Quiet Revolution – The Veil’sResurgence from the MiddleEast to America. Author: LeilaAhmed. Publisher: Yale University Press 2011.ISBN: 9780300170955

THE Muslim veil hasremained a contentiousgarment accessory since

Islam’s encounter with colonialism.

Vigorously debated, the veilhas been defended as a religiousrequirement that safeguardsfemale modesty, and a symbol ofIslamic identity.

It has been criticised as aninstrument of female subjugation,gender inequality and a symbol ofradical Islam.

However, the typecasting ofsuch a polarised and stereotypicaldiscourse fails to capture the fluidattitudes towards the veil in Mus-lim societies and offers littleanalysis on the nature of the reli-gious revival among Muslimswherein the centrality of the veilis unmistakable for reasons notusually connected to radical reli-giosity.

Some Muslim feminists andscholars have recently questionedthe old secular-liberal assump-tions which hold to accountIslamist groups and the intricatematrix it forms with notions ofgender and politics.

Leila Ahmed’s work fits intothis mould of questioning the

long established secular-liberalnotions of the veil and investigat-ing the meaning of its resurgenceamong Muslim women.

The impetus for Ahmed’senquiry was the sight of a groupof veiled Muslim women at theCambridge Common during thelate 1990s, shortly after arrivingin Cambridge and the discussionit ignited with her visiting friendfrom Egypt.

The sight of the veil ignited vis-ceral disturbing emotions forAhmed and her friend due to itsconnections with the early Mus-lim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Ahmed traces the history of theveil from the 1940s, where it wasa disappearing phenomenon inEgypt and much of the Arabworld to its steady resurgenceduring the 1970s.

The veil took on new mean-ings, at times different from thetraditional outlook on veiling.The veil was a marker of religios-ity and an explicit sign of annoy-ance with secular dominance.

Islamist organisations, such asthe Muslim Brotherhood, were‘implanting in women the willand desire to wear hijab’.

Ahmed traces the foundationsof America’s Muslim institutions,notably the Muslim StudentsAssociation (MSA) and the Islam-ic Society of North America(ISNA), to Islamist organisationsin the Arab world.

While women were involved in

the founding of these organisa-tions, the face of these organisa-tions has changed dramatically inrespect of gender.

Muslim women head boththese organisations today. Theveil, in this instance, is both a signof Muslim identity and a symbolof leadership and activism withinMuslim society.

Ahmed also, interestingly,gives voice to the criticism frompostcolonial theorists such asHamid Dabashi and Sabah Mah-mood on the imperial nature ofthe common rationale utilised bythe West, notably the UnitedStates of America, that its moral-ly dubious wars, particularly inAfghanistan, were influenced byliberating women from the veil.

While Ahmed continues tobelieve ‘that the rights and condi-tions of women in Muslim-major-ity societies often are acutely inneed of improvement’, she won-ders ‘if the subject of “the oppres-sion of women in Islam” – com-ing to us charged and loaded withthe legacies…that are capable evi-dently of taking on renewed lifeand force in the West in fraughtpolitical times in relation to Islam– is any longer a useful or evenvalid topic.’

Ahmed’s conclusions are sur-prising. She posits that it is indeedthe legacy of Islamism – and thechildren of this legacy – who areat the forefront of ‘those whowere most fully and rapidly

assimilating into the distinctivelyAmerican tradition of activism inpursuit of justice’ and are also atthe forefront of women’s rights inIslam.

While this conclusion certainlyis an optimistic one for Ahmed,the prevalence of believers in aGod-given gender hierarchy isstill present. The investigativeargument which Ahmed putsforth is certainly interesting and isan alternate view to the dominantdiscourse on the veil.

The importance of relooking

and also rethinking the issue ofthe veil within the wider contextof Islamism, Muslim identity,ethics and gender is integral tounderstanding the current nature,motivation and purpose of theveil among many Muslim womenand the resurgent religiosity with-in Muslim societies.Review byNADEEM MAHOMEDNadeem Mahomed is a Mastersstudent in the Department ofReligion Studies at the Universityof Johannesburg.

Book-ReviewBook-Review

The Study of Islam @ UJ Book Review

MV 29 July 2011 MERGED_MV 29 July 2011 MERGED 2011/07/25 3:33 PM Page 73