nanotechnologies - micola dzubinsky.pdf

7/27/2019 Nanotechnologies - Micola Dzubinsky.pdf

1/22

Nanosciences, Nanotechnologies,Materials and New Production

Technologies theme in FP731 May 2010, BrusselsMykola Dubinsk

Added Value Materials unit, Directorate G Industrial technologies

Directorate-General Research, European Commission

DISCLAIMER: These slides do not represent any official position of the European Commission

or engage it in any manner. Please refer to official documents.


2/22


3/22

FP7 budget(in billion , total 50.521)

Ideas

7.510

Cooperation

32.413

Capacities4.097

JRC (n.n.)

1.751

People

4.750


4/22

FP7 SP Cooperation

10 Themes( million)

* Not including non-nuclear activities of the Joint Research Centre: 1 751 million

1. Health 6 100

2. Food, agriculture and fisheries, andbiotechnology

1 935

3. Information and communication technologies 9 050

4. Nanosciences, Nanotechnologies, Materials

and New Production Technologies

3 475

5. Energy 2 350

6. Environment 1 890

7. Transport 4 160

8. Socioeconomic research 623

9. Space 1 43010. Security 1 400

Total 32 413


5/22


6/22

Important definitions

Public body means any legal entity established as such bynational public law, and international organisations.

Research organisation means a legal entity established asa non pro

fit organisation which carries out research ortechnological development as one of its main objectives.

Higher and secondary education establishments = Termuse

d by Financial Regulation / Implementing Rules,includes universities, schools for applied sciences andsimilar.

SMEs mean micro, small and medium-sized enterpriseswithin the meaning of Recommendation 2003/361/EC inthe version of 6 May 2003 (OJ L 124, 20.5.2003, p. 36).

International cooperation partner countries three categoriesaccor

ding to income per capita (low-income, lower-middle-income, or upper-middle-income); will be identified as suchin the work programmes. NOTdeveloped countries (e.g.Japan, USA, Canada, etc.)


7/22

Collaborative Projects

Networks of Excellence

Coordination and Support Actions

Support for Frontier Research (ERC) Research for the Benefit of Specific Groups

Support for Training and Career Development ofResearchers (Marie Curie)

Combinations e.g. CP and CSA

FP7 FundingSchemes


8/22


9/22

FP7 FundingSchemes

Coordination and Support Actions:

Coordination (or networking) actions

Support actions

ERA-NET Plus

Eligibility criteria for Coordination and Support Actions

Support: At least 1 legal entity

Coordination: At least 3 independent MS/AS legal entities.


10/22

Community financialcontribution

Eligibility for Funding:

Legal entities from MS and AS or created underCommunity law (and JRC)

International European interest organisations Legal entities established in international cooperation

partner countries (ICPC)

and

International organisations, third countries other thanICPC, if provided for in SP or WP; or essential for carryingout action; or provision for funding is provided for in abilateral agreement between Community and the thirdcountry.


11/22

Research and technological development activities:up to 50% ofeligible costs except for:

Public bodies: up to 75%

Secondary and higher education establishments: up to

75% Research organisations (non-profit): up to 75%

SMEs: up to 75%

Security related research for highly reliable capabilitieswith impact on security of European citizens and

targeted to a limited number of public users: up to75%.

Demonstration activities: up to 50%

Maximumfunding rates (1)


12/22

Maximumfunding rates (2)

Frontier research actions: up to 100%

Coordination and support actions: up to100%

Training and career development ofresearchers actions: up to 100%

Other activities: up to 100% including e.g.Management


13/22


14/22

By highly qualified in respective field independent

external experts, which are registered in the FP7

database of expertshttps://cordis.europa.eu/emmfp7/

Expert ofany nationality is eligible

For first year 4 NMP calls: 480 experts in Main List

184 experts in Reserve List

Proposal evaluation


15/22

Evaluation criteria

Criteria adapted to each funding scheme

specified in the work programme (annex 2)

Given in Guide for applicants

Divided into three main criteria:

S&T Quality (relevant to the topic of the call) Concept, objective, work-plan

Implementation Individual participants and consortium as a whole

Allocation of resources

Impact Contribution to expected impacts listed in work programme

Plans for dissemination/exploitation


16/22

Lead markets

MaterialsMaterials -- ourour core businesscore business

15 years

to market

5 years

to market

Blue-skyrese

arch

Not forNMP

Industrialinnovation

Understanding key

mechanisms to fill

specific

knowledge gaps

Research and

Development

on MATERIALS

into new systems

or products

into new specific

production

(synthesis or

processing)

Not forNMPEquipment, characterisation, standardisation, simulation

LARGE/SME including validation

ESF, ERC,

COST

Strategic use of the type of grant

SMALL projects

RSFF

NanoScienceERANET+ JTI FCH, MATERA+ EUREKA

sectoral calls e.g. CEFIC

Other FP7 Themes


17/22

EC funded materialsresearch portfolio

Projects managed by the unit Value-added materials, RTD.G3 -- Data for FP7 based on results for the Calls in 2007 ONLY!!

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

FP5

FP6

FP7Catalysis and Chemical Technologies

Biomaterials and Medical Implants

Materials for Energy Applications

Surface Engineering and Coatings

Materials for Information Technologies

Materials with High Mechanical

Performances

Polymers and their Composites

approx 350 Mio Euro

approx 450 Mio Euro


18/22

NMP Work Programme : featuresNMP Work Programme : features

In the first three (2007, 2008 and 2009) calls: Strategic use of funding schemes

Calls by funding scheme (Large CP, Small CP, SME, CSAs) Budget

allocation by call (!)

One evaluation panel per topic. Overall average success rate: 15%for SME, 10% for LCP and 7% for SMP.

Two stage submission for all projects except CSA and PPP-topics

Stage 1 10 pages project outline. Stage 2, full project success

rate 30%-50%.

Coordination and cooperation (ERANET; INCO; horizontal activities;

joint calls)


19/22

2010 2011 2012 2013TOTAL* 325.7 450 514.5 628.2

NMP Calls 198 +/- 303** +/- 310** +/- 314**

PPP FoF 60 80 100 160

PPP EeB 30 40 70 110

PPP Green cars 10 10 15 25

JTI FCH 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.5

Metrology 9.9 7.0 9.3 9.3

Other NMP activities 4.1 ? ? ?

FP7 activities 4.1 ? ? ?

NMP 2011NMP 2011--20132013Indicative budget (MillionIndicative budget (Million ))

* Third countries + EFTA contribution NOT included

** Including Other NMP and FP7 activities


20/22

IndicativeIndicative calendarcalendar ofof majormajor20112011 callscalls

Late July 2010 call published

Early November 2010 call closed

Late November early December 2010 stage 1 evaluation

End of 2010 - results of stage 1

Mid April 2011 - deadline of stage 2

2nd half of May 2011 stage 2 evaluation

Mid June 2011: results of stage 2

It takes another 7-9 months before projectstarts


21/22

FP7 InformationFP7 Information

EU research:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/research

Research programmes and projects:

http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/home_en.html


22/22

Thank you for your attention!

Contacts:

phone: +32 2 299 42 25

fax: +32 2 296 05 50

e-mail: [email protected]

nanotechnologies - micola dzubinsky.pdf

Documents